Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with prostate cancer

The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of prostate cancer was published in 2020. It was therefore decided, by both the ESMO and the Singapore Society of Oncology (SSO), to convene a special, virtual guidelines meeting in November 2021 to adapt the ESMO 2020 guidelines to take into account the differences associated with the treatment of prostate cancer in Asia. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by experts in the treatment of patients with prostate cancer representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), India (ISMPO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), Singapore (SSO) and Taiwan (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices and drug access restrictions in the different Asian countries. The latter were discussed when appropriate. The aim is to provide guidance for the optimisation and harmonisation of the management of patients with prostate cancer across the different regions of Asia.

Effects of different exercise intensity on bone mineral density in adults: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The primary objective of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effect of differing exercise intensity on (areal) bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine and hip in adults by a comparative meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature according to the PRISMA statement included: (a) exercise trials, (b) with ≥two study arms that compared different exercise intensities, (c) intervention ≥6 months, (d) BMD assessments at lumbar spine (LS) or hip. Five electronic databases were scanned without language restrictions up to July 2021. The present analysis of exercise intensity was conducted as a mixed-effect meta-analysis and applied "type of exercise" and "study duration" as moderator in subgroup analyses. Outcome measures were standardized mean differences (SMD) for BMD changes at the LS, and hip.

RESULTS

Eleven exercise studies with 26 study arms were included. Although the effect of high-intensity exercise was more pronounced on LS-BMD (SMD: 0.19, 95%-CI: 0.61 to -0.23) and hip-ROI (0.17, 0.38 to -0.04), we did not observe significant differences between the groups (LS-BMD: p=0.373 and hip-BMD: p=0.109). We observed a substantial level of heterogeneity between the trials for LS- but not for hip-BMD. Applying "type of exercise" and "study duration" as moderators did not significantly modify the differences between low and high exercise intensity on BMD at LS or hip.

CONCLUSION

There is insufficient evidence for a superior effect of high-intensity exercise on areal BMD at lumbar spine and hip in people aged 50 years and older. Varying exercise intensity with periods of lower exercise intensity intermitted by higher intensity might be a promising option to address the issue of exercise intensities in intervention studies.

Immunotherapy in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: state of the art and novel therapeutic approaches

The standard of care for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by 1 year of adjuvant durvalumab. Despite the survival benefit granted by immunotherapy in this setting, only 1/3 of patients are alive and disease free at 5 years. Novel treatment strategies are under development to improve patient outcomes in this setting: different anti-programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 [anti-PD-(L)1] antibodies after CCRT, consolidation immunotherapy after sequential chemoradiotherapy, induction immunotherapy before CCRT and immunotherapy concurrent with CCRT and/or sequential chemoradiotherapy. Cross-trial comparison is particularly challenging in this setting due to the different timing of immunotherapy delivery and different patients' inclusion and exclusion criteria. In this review, we present the results of clinical trials investigating immune therapy in unresectable stage III NSCLC and discuss in-depth their biological rationale, their pitfalls and potential benefits. Particular emphasis is placed on the potential mechanisms of synergism between chemotherapy, radiation therapy and different monoclonal antibodies, and how this affects the tumor immune microenvironment. The designs and questions tackled by ongoing clinical trials are also discussed. Last, we address open questions and unmet clinical needs, such as the necessity for predictive biomarkers (e.g. radiomics and circulating tumor DNA). Identifying distinct subsets of patients to tailor anticancer treatment is a priority, especially in a heterogeneous disease such as stage III NSCLC.

Impact of smoking status on the relative efficacy of the EGFR TKI/angiogenesis inhibitor combination therapy in advanced NSCLC-a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The ETOP 10-16 BOOSTER trial failed to demonstrate a progression-free survival (PFS) benefit for adding bevacizumab to osimertinib in second line. An exploratory subgroup analysis, however, suggested a PFS benefit of the combination in patients with a smoking history and prompted us to do this study.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the differential effect of smoking status on the benefit of adding an angiogenesis inhibitor to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy was carried out. All relevant randomized controlled trials appearing in main oncology congresses or in PubMed as of 1 November 2021 were used according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses statement. Primarily PFS according to smoking status, and secondarily overall survival (OS) were of interest. Pooled and interaction hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated by fixed or random effects models, depending on the detected degree of heterogeneity. Bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane tool for randomized controlled trials (RoB 2).

Results

Information by smoking was available for 1291 patients for PFS (seven studies) and 678 patients for OS (four studies). The risk of bias was low for all studies. Combination treatment significantly prolonged PFS for smokers [n = 502, HR = 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44-0.69] but not for nonsmokers (n = 789, HR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.66-1.27; treatment-by-smoking interaction P = 0.02). Similarly, a significant OS benefit was found for smokers (n = 271, HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.47-0.93) but not for nonsmokers (n = 407, HR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.82-1.42; treatment-by-smoking interaction P = 0.03).

Conclusion

In advanced EGFR-non-small-cell lung cancer patients, the addition of an angiogenesis inhibitor to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy provides a statistically significant PFS and OS benefit in smokers, but not in non-smokers. The biological basis for this observation should be pursued and could determine whether this might be due to a specific co-mutational pattern produced by tobacco exposure.

•

Target population consists of EGFR-non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

•

The relative effect of adding an angiogenesis inhibitor to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor by smoking status was explored.

•

In patients with smoking history, the addition of an angiogenesis inhibitor provides significant PFS and OS benefit.

•

This is not the case in patients with a negative smoking history.

•

The biological basis for this observation should be pursued.

POS1560-HPR “MY GUT FEELING IS…”: IDENTIFYING HOW HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS COMMUNICATE ABOUT PAIN IN PAEDIATRIC RHEUMATOLOGY MULTI-DISCIPLINARY TEAM MEETINGS

Background

Multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs) are common in paediatric rheumatology where UK standards of care state that all children/young people should have access to a paediatric rheumatologist, nurse, physiotherapist, occupational therapist and a psychologist. MDTs in paediatric rheumatology regularly meet for the broader purpose of discussing the assessment of and future management plans for children/young people with a range of complex conditions in which chronic pain may feature. The content of these discussions has not been previously researched. Little is known about healthcare professional to healthcare professional communication and how this may influence the care of children/young people with chronic pain.

Objectives

The objective of the current study was to investigate healthcare professionals communication about children and young people with chronic musculoskeletal pain during MDT meetings in paediatric rheumatology.

Methods

This study was a non-participant ethnographic observation of virtual and face-to-face MDT meetings in three paediatric rheumatology centres in the UK. A structured observation checklist was used to capture and organise field notes which were analysed using an inductive thematic approach amongst research team members. Interpretation of field notes was guided by discussions with healthcare professionals from each of the teams involved.

Results

Forty-two healthcare professionals from across the three teams participated. Ten meetings from each team (n=30) were observed, with meetings ranging from 1-2 hours. Analysis was organised into three themes;

1)Describing the child/young person with pain: Healthcare professionals’ perceptions about personality characteristics (e.g. “He is mature”, “She is sensitive”) were frequently used to introduce a child/young person to the team. A child/young person description was always accompanied by a description of parents and perceptions about their behaviour (e.g. “Dad is very disengaged”, “Mum can shout”).

2)Interpreting the pain of the child/young person: A core component of interpretations was professional’s familiarity with the child/young person and parents (e.g., “I haven’t got a handle on them yet”). Professionals also discussed how their interpretations of pain were influenced by “gut feelings” or “vibes that something else is going on at home”.

3)

Managing the child/young person with pain: Healthcare professionals discussed the need for acceptance of pain and treatment from children/young people (e.g., “She wasn’t buying into that”; “He needs to get used to it”). Setting boundaries for children/young people and parents for accessing the team also featured in discussions (e.g., “We need to re-assure them but not always be available”).

Conclusion

This study highlights a range of healthcare professional approaches and processes to communicating about and discussing children/young people with pain at paediatric rheumatology MDT meetings. Findings suggest that healthcare professionals in paediatric rheumatology describe, interpret and manage the child/young person presenting with pain alongside the broader psychosocial (and less frequently the biological) context. These findings will inform the content and methods of a behaviour change intervention to improve pain communication in consultations with children/young people, parents and amongst the paediatric rheumatology team of healthcare professionals in the UK.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the healthcare professionals for kindly taking the time to take part in this study. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the National Institute for Health Research, or the UK Department of Health. This work was supported by a Foundation Fellowship award from Versus Arthritis (Grant 22433). Aspects of this work were also supported by funding from the Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis (Grant 20380) and the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

COVID-19 in patients with cancer: first report of the ESMO international, registry-based, cohort study (ESMO-CoCARE)

BACKGROUND

ESMO COVID-19 and CAncer REgistry (ESMO-CoCARE) is an international collaborative registry-based, cohort study gathering real-world data from Europe, Asia/Oceania and Africa on the natural history, management and outcomes of patients with cancer infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

ESMO-CoCARE captures information on patients with solid/haematological malignancies, diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Data collected since June 2020 include demographics, comorbidities, laboratory measurements, cancer characteristics, COVID-19 clinical features, management and outcome. Parameters influencing COVID-19 severity/recovery were investigated as well as factors associated with overall survival (OS) upon SARS-CoV-2 infection.

RESULTS

This analysis includes 1626 patients from 20 countries (87% from 24 European, 7% from 5 North African, 6% from 8 Asian/Oceanian centres), with COVID-19 diagnosis from January 2020 to May 2021. Median age was 64 years, with 52% of female, 57% of cancer stage III/IV and 65% receiving active cancer treatment. Nearly 64% patients required hospitalization due to COVID-19 diagnosis, with 11% receiving intensive care. In multivariable analysis, male sex, older age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥2, body mass index (BMI) <25 kg/m2, presence of comorbidities, symptomatic disease, as well as haematological malignancies, active/progressive cancer, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥6 and OnCovid Inflammatory Score ≤40 were associated with COVID-19 severity (i.e. severe/moderate disease requiring hospitalization). About 98% of patients with mild COVID-19 recovered, as opposed to 71% with severe/moderate disease. Advanced cancer stage was an additional adverse prognostic factor for recovery. At data cut-off, and with median follow-up of 3 months, the COVID-19-related death rate was 24.5% (297/1212), with 380 deaths recorded in total. Almost all factors associated with COVID-19 severity, except for BMI and NLR, were also predictive of inferior OS, along with smoking and non-Asian ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Selected patient and cancer characteristics related to sex, ethnicity, poor fitness, comorbidities, inflammation and active malignancy predict for severe/moderate disease and adverse outcomes from COVID-19 in patients with cancer.

OP0056 “BECAUSE THAT’S THEIR JOB, ISN’T IT?”: EXPLORING CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLES’ EXPERIENCES OF AND PERSPECTIVES ABOUT PAIN COMMUNICATION IN PAEDIATRIC RHEUMATOLOGY IN THE UK

Background

Pain communication should be an integral part of every clinical consultation, particularly in paediatric rheumatology where children/young people often present complex long-term conditions in which chronic pain is a feature. Researchers investigating pain communication in paediatric healthcare encounters have been focused on healthcare professionals, yielding inconsistent findings about the occurrence and nature of pain discussions with children/young people. There has been limited research examining children/young peoples’ own experiences and perspectives on this in the literature to date.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to investigate children/young peoples’ experiences and perceptions of communicating about pain with paediatric rheumatology healthcare professionals in the UK.

Methods

Twenty-six children/young people were recruited from three UK paediatric rheumatology centres. Data were collected using semi-structured telephone interviews between April-October, 2021. A framework analysis approach was used to explore similarities and divergences in participants’ narrative accounts.

Results

The mean age of children/young people was 14.0 years (SD=3.6 years, Range= 6-18 years, 58% female). Diagnoses included; Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis, Chronic Regional Pain Syndrome, diffuse idiopathic chronic pain, localised idiopathic pain, hypermobility (including Ehlers Danlos Syndrome) and Raynaud’s disease.

Findings are organised into four themes.

Conclusion

These study findings highlight a range of effective and ineffective pain communication approaches from the experiences and perspectives of children/young people. These will be used to create recommendations for improving the communication of chronic pain in paediatric rheumatology in the future, in a way that is acceptable and valuable to children/young people.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the children/young people for kindly taking the time to share their experiences and perceptions about their interactions with healthcare professionals in paediatric rheumatology. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the National Institute for Health Research, or the UK Department of Health. This work was supported by a Foundation Fellowship award from Versus Arthritis (Grant 22433). Aspects of this work were also supported by funding from the Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis (Grant 20380) and the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared.

ESMO expert consensus statements on the management of EGFR mutant non-small-cell lung cancer

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a virtual consensus-building process on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer in 2021. The consensus included a multidisciplinary panel of 34 leading experts in the management of lung cancer. The aim of the consensus was to develop recommendations on topics that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline and where the available evidence is either limited or conflicting. The main topics identified for discussion were: (i) tissue and biomarkers analyses; (ii) early and locally advanced disease; (iii) metastatic disease and (iv) clinical trial design, patient's perspective and miscellaneous. The expert panel was divided into four working groups to address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This manuscript presents the recommendations developed, including findings from the expert panel discussions, consensus recommendations and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.

Long-term outcomes of operable stage III NSCLC in the pre-immunotherapy era: results from a pooled analysis of the SAKK 16/96, SAKK 16/00, SAKK 16/01, and SAKK 16/08 trials

Background

Chemoradiotherapy with durvalumab consolidation has yielded excellent results in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, it is essential to identify patients who might benefit from a surgical approach.

Material and methods

Data from 437 patients with operable stage III NSCLC enrolled in four consecutive Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) trials (16/96, 16/00, 16/01, 16/08) were pooled and outcomes were analyzed in 431 eligible patients. All patients were treated with three cycles of induction chemotherapy (cisplatin/docetaxel), followed in some patients by neoadjuvant radiotherapy (44 Gy, 22 fractions) (16/00, 16/01, 16/08) and cetuximab (16/08).

Results

With a median follow-up time of 9.3 years (range 8.5-10.3 years), 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were 37% and 25%, respectively. Overall, 342 patients (79%) underwent tumor resection, with a complete resection (R0) rate of 80%. Patients (n = 272, 63%) with R0 had significantly longer OS compared to patients who had surgery but incomplete resection (64.8 versus 19.2 months, P < 0.001). OS for patients who achieved pathological complete remission (pCR) (n = 66, 15%) was significantly better compared to resected patients without pCR (86.5 versus 37.0 months, P = 0.003). For patients with pCR, the 5- and 10-year event-free survival and OS rates were 45.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 32.8% to 57.7%] and 28.1% (95% CI 15.2% to 42.6%), and 58.2% (95% CI 45.2% to 69.2%) and 45.0% (95% CI 31.5% to 57.6%), respectively.

Conclusion

We report favorable long-term outcomes in patients with operable stage III NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and docetaxel ± neoadjuvant sequential radiotherapy from four prospective SAKK trials. Almost two-third of the patients underwent complete resection after neoadjuvant therapy. We confirm R0 resection and pCR as important predictors of outcome.

•

Combined modality treatment in operable stage III NSCLC results in 5- and 10-year survival rates of 37% and 25%.

•

Long-term survival for patients with incomplete resection is poor.

•

Complete resection and pCR are important predictors for outcome.

Effectiveness of PD-(L)1 Inhibitors Alone or in Combination With Platinum-Doublet Chemotherapy in First-Line (1L) Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (nsq-NSCLC) With PD-L1-High Expression Using Real-World Data

BACKGROUND

Anti-PD-(L)1 therapy alone (cancer immunotherapy [CIT]-mono) or combined with platinum-based chemotherapy (CIT-chemo) is used as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our study compared clinical outcomes with CIT-mono vs CIT-chemo in the specific clinical scenario of non-squamous (Nsq)-NSCLC with a high PD-L1 expression of ≥50% (tumor proportion score (TPS) or tumor cells (TC)).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using a real-world de-identified database. Patients with metastatic Nsq-NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression initiating first-line CIT-mono or CIT-chemo between 24 October 2016 and 28 February 2019 were followed up to 28 February 2020. We compared overall survival (OS) and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Hazard ratios (HR) were adjusted (aHR) for differences in baseline key prognostic characteristics using inverse probability of treatment weighting methodology.

RESULTS

Patients with PD-L1-high Nsq-NSCLC treated with CIT-mono (n=351), were older and less often presented with de novo stage IV disease than patients treated with CIT-chemo (n=169). With a median follow-up of 19.9 months for CIT-chemo vs 23.5 months for CIT-mono, median OS and rwPFS did not differ between the two groups (median OS: CIT-chemo, 21.0 months vs CIT-mono, 22.1 months, aHR=1.03, 95% CI 0.77-1.39, P=0.83; median rwPFS: CIT-chemo, 10.8 months vs CIT-mono, 11.5 months, aHR=1.04, 95% CI 0.78-1.37, P=0.81). CIT-chemo showed significant and meaningful improvement in OS and rwPFS vs CIT-mono only in the never-smoker subgroup, albeit among a small sample of patients (n=50; OS HR=0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.83, interaction P=0.02; rwPFS HR=0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.95, interaction P=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Except in the subgroup of never-smoker patients, sparing the chemotherapy in first-line CIT treatment does not appear to impact survival outcomes in Nsq-NSCLC patients with high PD-L1 expression.

First-line immunotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with ECOG performance status 2: results of an International Expert Panel Meeting by the Italian Association of Thoracic Oncology

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy represents the standard of care in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), either as monotherapy in high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive tumors (≥50%) or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 status. However, most pivotal clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) did not include patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 2. Hence, a consensus is lacking on the safety and efficacy of ICIs in this specific subgroup of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A virtual International Expert Panel took place in July 2021 with the aim of reviewing the available evidence on the use of ICIs in NSCLC patients with ECOG PS 2, both in clinical practice and in a research setting.

RESULTS

All panelists expressed concern about the applicability of currently available PS scales to evaluate patients for ICI treatment. The panelists agreed that, though limited, the available data support the safety of single-agent immunotherapy in PS 2 NSCLC patients, whereas concern was raised on the safety of ICI combinations, mainly related to chemotherapy and/or anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 toxicity. On the basis of reviewed data, ICI efficacy may be speculated in PS 2 NSCLC patients; however, PS 2 remains a negative prognostic category as compared to PS 0-1 in patients treated with ICI, as it is for chemotherapy. The panelists defined high, medium and low priorities in clinical research. High priority was attributed to the inclusion of PS 2 patients in prospective clinical trials and the specific evaluation of combined ICI treatments with attenuated chemotherapy doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the current evidence, the panelists outlined the major limitations affecting PS 2 patients with NSCLC and reached common considerations on the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of ICI monotherapy and ICI combinations in the first-line setting.

Arrhythmic Phenotypes Are a Defining Feature of Dilated Cardiomyopathy-Associated SCN5A Variants: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Variants in the SCN5A gene, that encodes the cardiac sodium channel, Nav1.5, are associated with a highly arrhythmogenic form of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Our aim was to review the phenotypes, natural history, functional effects, and treatment outcomes of DCM-associated rare SCN5A variants.

METHODS

A systematic review of reported DCM-associated rare SCN5A variants was undertaken using PubMed and Embase.

RESULTS

Eighteen SCN5A rare variants in 29 families with DCM (173 affected individuals) were identified. Eleven variants had undergone experimental evaluation, with 7 of these resulting in increased sustained current flow during the action potential (eg, increased window current) and at resting membrane potentials (eg, creation of a new gating pore current). These variants were located in transmembrane voltage-sensing domains and had a consistent phenotype characterized by frequent multifocal narrow and broad complex ventricular premature beats (VPB; 72% of affected relatives), ventricular arrhythmias (33%), atrial arrhythmias (32%), sudden cardiac death (13%), and DCM (56%). This VPB-predominant phenotype was not seen with 1 variant that increased late sodium current, or with variants that reduced peak current density or had mixed effects. In the latter groups, affected individuals mainly showed sinus node dysfunction, conduction defects, and atrial arrhythmias, with infrequent VPB and ventricular arrhythmias. DCM did not occur in the absence of arrhythmias for any variant. Twelve studies (23 total patients) reported treatment success in the VPB-predominant cardiomyopathy using sodium channel-blocking drug therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

SCN5A variants can present with a diverse spectrum of primary arrhythmic features. A majority of DCM-associated variants cause a multifocal VPB-predominant cardiomyopathy that is reversible with sodium channel blocking drug therapy. Early recognition of the distinctive phenotype and prompt genetic testing to identify variant carriers are needed. Our findings have implications for interpretation and management of SCN5A variants found in DCM patients with and without arrhythmias.

Evaluation of dose, volume and outcome in children with localized, intracranial ependymoma treated with proton therapy within the prospective KiProReg Study

Background

Radiotherapy (RT) of ependymoma in children is an important part of the interdisciplinary treatment concept. However, feasibility and dose concepts are still under investigation, particularly in very young children. The aim of this study was to evaluate the standard dose and volume of proton therapy (PT) in children with ependymoma.

Methods

In this analysis, 105 patients with localized, intracranial ependymoma under the age of 18 years treated with PT between 2013 and 2018 were included. Patient characteristics, treatment, outcome, and follow-up data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analysis.

Results

The median age of patients at PT was 2.8 years (0.9-17.0 years). The molecular subgroup analysis was performed in a subset of 50 patients (37 EP-PFA, 2 EP-PFB, 7 EP-RELA, 2 EP-YAP, 2 NEC [not elsewhere classified]). The median total dose was 59.4 Gy (54.0-62.0 Gy). The median follow-up time was 1.9 years. The estimated 3-year overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 93.7%, 74.1%, and 55.6%, respectively. Within univariable analysis, female gender and lower dose had a positive impact on OS, whereas age ≥4 years had a negative impact on OS and PT given after progression had a negative impact on PFS. In the multivariable analysis, multiple tumor surgeries were associated with lower PFS. New ≥3° late toxicities occurred in 11 patients.

Conclusion

For children with localized ependymoma, PT was effective and well tolerable. Multiple surgeries showed a negative impact on PFS.

Clinical definition of acquired resistance to immunotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

Acquired resistance (AR) to programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-(L)1] blockade is frequent in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), occurring in a majority of initial responders. Patients with AR may have unique properties of persistent antitumor immunity that could be re-harnessed by investigational immunotherapies. The absence of a consistent clinical definition of AR to PD-(L)1 blockade and lack of uniform criteria for ensuing enrollment in clinical trials remains a major barrier to progress; such clinical definitions have advanced biologic and therapeutic discovery. We examine the considerations and potential controversies in developing a patient-level definition of AR in NSCLC treated with PD-(L)1 blockade. Taking into account the specifics of NSCLC biology and corresponding treatment strategies, we propose a practical, clinical definition of AR to PD-(L)1 blockade for use in clinical reports and prospective clinical trials. Patients should meet the following criteria: received treatment that includes PD-(L)1 blockade; experienced objective response on PD-(L)1 blockade (inclusion of a subset of stable disease will require future investigation); have progressive disease occurring within 6 months of last anti-PD-(L)1 antibody treatment or rechallenge with anti-PD-(L)1 antibody in patients not exposed to anti-PD-(L)1 in 6 months.