V. NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): measuring working memory

This chapter focuses on the NIH Toolbox List Sorting Working Memory Test, which was developed to assess processing speed within the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB). This test is a sequencing task requiring children and adults to process stimuli (presented both visually and auditorily) and sequence the stimuli according to size. We describe the development of the NIH Toolbox List Sorting Working Memory Test, highlighting its utility in children. We examine descriptive data, test-retest reliability, and convergent and discriminant validity. Results indicated that List Sorting performance was positively correlated with age indicating that performance on the task improved throughout childhood and early adolescence. Further, test-retest reliability coefficients were high and there was support for both convergent and discriminant validity. These data suggest that the NIH Toolbox List Sorting Working Memory Test is reliable and shows evidence of construct validity.

III. NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): measuring episodic memory

One of the most significant domains of cognition is episodic memory, which allows for rapid acquisition and long-term storage of new information. For purposes of the NIH Toolbox, we devised a new test of episodic memory. The nonverbal NIH Toolbox Picture Sequence Memory Test (TPSMT) requires participants to reproduce the order of an arbitrarily ordered sequence of pictures presented on a computer. To adjust for ability, sequence length varies from 6 to 15 pictures. Multiple trials are administered to increase reliability. Pediatric data from the validation study revealed the TPSMT to be sensitive to age-related changes. The task also has high test-retest reliability and promising construct validity. Steps to further increase the sensitivity of the instrument to individual and age-related variability are described.

VI. NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): measuring processing speed

This chapter focuses on the Toolbox Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test, which was developed to assess processing speed within the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB). We describe the development of the test, highlighting its utility in children. In addition, we examine descriptive data, test-retest reliability, validity, and preliminary work creating a composite index of processing speed. Results indicated that most children were able to understand the basic concepts of the Toolbox Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test. Further, test-retest reliability was excellent. Analyses examining convergent and discriminant validity provided support for the utility of the test as a measure of processing speed. Finally, analyses comparing and combining scores on the Toolbox Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test with other measures of simple reaction time from the NIH Toolbox CB indicated that a Processing Speed Composite score performed better than any test examined in isolation. Taken together, the Toolbox Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test appears to exhibit a number of strengths: it is child-friendly and engaging, short and easy to administer, and has good construct validity, especially when used as part of a composite score.

Prospective longitudinal evaluation of a symptom cluster in breast cancer

CONTEXT

Symptom cluster research expands cancer investigations beyond a focus on individual symptoms in isolation.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a prospective longitudinal study of sleep, fatigue, depression, anxiety, and perceived cognitive impairment in patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patient-reported outcome measures were administered prior to chemotherapy, at Cycle 4 Day 1, and six months after initiating chemotherapy. Participants were divided into four groups and assigned a symptom cluster index (SCI) score based on the number/severity of symptoms reported at enrollment.

RESULTS

Participants (N = 80) were mostly women (97.5%) with Stage II (69.0%) breast cancer, 29-71 years of age. Scores on all measures were moderately-highly correlated across all time points. There were time effects for all symptoms, except sleep quality (nonsignificant trend), with most symptoms worsening during chemotherapy, although anxiety improved. There were no significant group × time interactions; all four SCI groups showed a similar trajectory of symptoms over time. Worse performance status and quality of life were associated with higher SCI score over time.

CONCLUSION

With the exception of anxiety, the coherence of the symptom cluster was supported by similar patterns of severity and change over time in these symptoms (trend for sleep quality). Participants with higher SCI scores prior to chemotherapy continued to experience greater symptom burden during and after chemotherapy. Early assessment and intervention addressing this symptom cluster (vs. individual symptoms) may have a greater impact on patient performance status and quality of life for patients with higher SCIs.

Abstract W P226: Delirium After Intracerebral Hemorrhage Is Common and Independently Predicts Reduced Domain-Specific Quality Of Life

Background: Delirium sypmptoms are common after ischemic stroke and in the medical and surgical ICU, and predictive of increased length of stay and worse outcomes. There are few data in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We tested the hypothesis that delirium symptoms were associated with increased length of stay, worse functional outcomes, and worse domain-specific quality of life (QOL) at follow-up.

Methods: We prospectively identified 114 patients with ICH. Delirium symptoms were assessed by trained nursing staff twice daily with the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU), a validated method. Arousal was measured with the Richmond Agitation Sedation Score. Functional outcomes were measured with the modified Rankin Scale at 1 and 3 months, with poor outcome defined at <=3 (moderately severe disability or worse). QOL was assessed at 1, 3 and 12 months with Neuro-QOL, instruments developed by NIH for neurologic disease and validated for proxy report.

Results: Of 114 patients, 31(27%) patients had delirium symptoms, 67 (59%) were never delirious, and the remainder (14%) had persistent coma. Only 2 (2%) were ever very agitated (both of whom were delirious), so most delirium symptoms were hypoactive. Any benzodiazepine (BZD) use, age, pneumonia, seizure, hematoma volume and NIH Stroke Scale were not associated with delirium symptoms in patients who could be assessed. Delirium symptoms were detected mean 5.9 days after ICH symptom onset and were associated with longer ICU length of stay (mean 3.5 days longer in ever delirious patients, 95%CI 1.5 - 8.3, P=0.004) after correction for age, admit NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and any BZD exposure. Delirium symptoms were associated with increased odds of poor outcome at 28 days (OR 8.7, 95%CI 1.4 - 52.5, P=0.018) after correction for admission NIHSS and age. After correction for NIHSS, age, any BZD use and time of follow-up, delirium symptoms were associated with worse QOL in the domains of applied cognition - executive function (0.6 SD, 95%CI 0.2 - 1.1 SD, P=0.045) and fatigue (0.7 SD, 95%CI 0.17-1.3 SD, P=0.01).

Conclusions: Delirium symptoms (encephalopathy) were not predictable on admission, common after ICH, and independently predictive of longer length of stay, worse functional outcomes and reduced QOL.

Development of a symptom index for patients with primary brain tumors

OBJECTIVES

This study's primary goals included identifying the highest priority symptoms of patients with advanced brain tumors on treatment, comparing patient priority ratings with those of oncology experts, and constructing a brief symptom index using combined input to assess these symptoms and concerns.

METHODS

Fifty patients with advanced primary brain tumors and 10 physician experts were recruited from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network institutions and community support agencies. By using a 40-item symptom checklist, patients first selected up to 10 of the most important symptoms/concerns to monitor when assessing the value of drug treatment for brain tumors, then nominated up to 5 of the very most important concerns, and finally generated additional symptoms/concerns. By using the same checklist as patients, physicians rated each symptom/concern as disease- or treatment-related.

RESULTS

By using the combined input, a 24-item National Comprehensive Cancer Network/Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain Symptom Index (NFBrSI-24) was developed. The NFBrSI-24 showed good internal consistency (α = 0.84), significantly differentiated patients with different levels of functional status (F2,47 = 8.21; P < .001), and demonstrated good convergent validity with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General functional, physical, social, emotional, and brain tumor-specific concerns (ρ = 0.59, 0.57, 0.40, 0.35, and 0.50, respectively; Ps < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The NFBrSI-24, an index of the symptoms in advanced brain tumors perceived as most important by both patients and clinicians, improves upon existing measures of brain tumor symptoms through better satisfaction of regulatory requirements for measure development. The findings suggest good reliability and validity, indicating that the NFBrSI-24 is a promising brief assessment of high-priority advanced brain tumor symptoms for research and clinical settings.

Intracerebral hemorrhage and delirium symptoms. Length of stay, function, and quality of life in a 114-patient cohort

RATIONALE

The prognostic significance of delirium symptoms in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with focal neurologic injury is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relationship between delirium symptoms and subsequent functional outcomes and quality of life (QOL) after intracerebral hemorrhage.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 114 patients. Delirium symptoms were routinely assessed twice daily using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU by trained nurses. Functional outcomes were recorded with modified Rankin Scale (scored from 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [dead]), and QOL outcomes with Neuro-QOL at 28 days, 3 months, and 12 months.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-one (27%) patients had delirium symptoms ("ever delirious"), 67 (59%) were never delirious, and the remainder (14%) had persistent coma. Delirium symptoms were nearly always hypoactive, were detected mean 6 days after intracerebral hemorrhage presentation, and were associated with longer ICU length of stay (mean 3.5 d longer in ever vs. never delirious patients; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-8.3; P = 0.004) after correction for age, admit National Institutes of Health (NIH) Stroke Scale, and any benzodiazepine exposure. Delirium symptoms were associated with increased odds of poor outcome at 28 days (odds ratio, 8.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-52.5; P = 0.018) after correction for admission NIH Stroke Scale and age, and with worse QOL in the domains of applied cognition-executive function and fatigue after correcting for the NIH Stroke Scale, age, benzodiazepine exposure, and time of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

After focal neurologic injury, delirium symptoms were common despite low rates of infection and sedation exposure, and were predictive of subsequent worse functional outcomes and lower QOL.

Measuring priority symptoms in advanced bladder cancer: development and initial validation of a brief symptom index

BACKGROUND

Improved measurement of clinically meaningful symptoms is needed in advanced bladder cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This study developed and examined the initial reliability and validity of a new measure of advanced bladder cancer-specific symptoms, the NCCN-FACT Bladder Symptom Index-18 (NFBISI-18), which assesses the symptoms perceived as most important by patients and oncology clinical experts.

METHODS

A total of 31 individuals with advanced bladder cancer rated the importance of 28 symptoms. In addition, 10 oncology clinical experts rated symptoms as treatment- or disease-related. Patient-rated symptoms were reconciled with published clinicians' symptom priorities, producing the NFBISI-18. Participants completed measures of quality of life (QOL) and performance status to examine initial validity.

RESULTS

An 18-item symptom index for advanced bladder cancer included 3 subscales: disease-related symptoms, treatment side effects, and general function/well-being. Lower scores indicate greater symptom burden. Preliminary reliability reveals good internal consistency for the full NFBISI-18 (alpha = 0.83). The NFBISI-18 was significantly associated with QOL criteria and performance status, in the expected direction.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations include the cross-sectional design and the relatively low reliability of the disease-related symptoms subscale.

CONCLUSION

The NFBISI-18 demonstrates preliminary evidence as a valid brief measure of the most important symptoms of advanced bladder cancer, as rated by both patients and oncology clinical experts. The NFBISI-18 should have greater acceptability to regulatory authorities than previously developed questionnaires.

Effects of de-escalated bisphosphonate therapy on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Pain, Brief Pain Inventory and bone biomarkers

Background

The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Pain (FACT-BP) are commonly used measures of patient reported pain outcomes. We report on the performance of the FACT-BP in comparison to the BPI within a small, randomized trial.

Methods

Patients with biochemically defined low risk bone metastases were randomized to 4 weekly (control arm) or 12 weekly (de-escalating arm) pamidronate for 1 year. FACT-BP, BPI and serum markers of bone turnover were recorded at baseline and weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48. Mixed effects models were used to compare scores over time between arms. Correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate the association between FACT-BP and BPI scores, as well as with markers of bone turnover.

Results

Nineteen patients were randomized to each study arm. Pain scores determined by the two instruments were moderately to highly correlated with each other. Baseline C-telopeptide (CTx) level was correlated with baseline FACT-BP and BPI scores. Baseline bone-specific alkaline phosphatase showed a non-significant association with pain scores. There were no correlations between the markers of bone turnover and pain scores at week 12.

Conclusions

In the current study the FACT-BP and BPI correlated well with each other, and with baseline CTx. The possibility of linking subjective pain scores with objective biomarkers of response requires more investigation.

I. NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): introduction and pediatric data

This monograph presents the pediatric portion of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB) of the NIH Toolbox for the Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function. The NIH Toolbox is an initiative of the Neuroscience Blueprint, a collaborative framework through which 16 NIH Institutes, Centers, and Offices jointly support neuroscience-related research, to accelerate discoveries and reduce the burden of nervous system disorders. The CB is one of four modules that measure cognitive, emotional, sensory, and motor health across the lifespan. The CB is unique in its continuity across childhood, adolescence, early adulthood, and old age, and in order to help create a common currency among disparate studies, it is also available at low cost to researchers for use in large-scale longitudinal and epidemiologic studies. This chapter describes the evolution of the CB; methods for selecting cognitive subdomains and instruments; the rationale for test design; and a validation study in children and adolescents, ages 3-15 years. Subsequent chapters feature detailed discussions of each test measure and its psychometric properties (Chapters 2-6), the factor structure of the test battery (Chapter 7), the effects of age and education on composite test scores (Chapter 8), and a final summary and discussion (Chapter 9). As the chapters in this monograph demonstrate, the CB has excellent psychometric properties, and the validation study provided evidence for the increasing differentiation of cognitive abilities with age.

Evaluation of treatment- and disease-related symptoms in advanced head and neck cancer: validation of the national comprehensive cancer network-functional assessment of cancer therapy-head and neck cancer symptom index-22 (NFHNSI-22)

CONTEXT

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck is a well-validated assessment of quality of life used with patients diagnosed with head and neck cancers (HCNs). The present study is an attempt to evaluate and modify this instrument as necessary in light of the recent regulatory guidelines from the Food and Drug Administration on the use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES

Overall, the goal was to identify patients' highest priority cancer symptoms, compare these symptoms with those suggested by oncology experts, and construct a brief symptom index to assess these symptoms and categorize them as treatment-related, disease-related, or related to general function and well-being.

METHODS

Patients (N=49) with advanced (Stages III and IV) HCNs were recruited from participating National Comprehensive Cancer Network institutions and community cancer support organizations in the Chicago area. Patients completed open-ended interviews and symptom checklists. Participating oncology physician experts also rated symptoms. Content validity was obtained by evaluating results alongside items in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy system. Eleven oncologists categorized symptoms in terms of importance and also whether the symptoms were primarily related to disease, treatment, or functional well-being.

RESULTS

HCN-related symptoms endorsed as high priority by both patients and oncology experts were selected for the new National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck Cancer Symptom Index-22. The final version includes 22 items, which are broken down into disease-related symptoms, treatment side effects, or general function and well-being. The new scale has acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's coefficient alpha=0.86), content validity for use in chemotherapy trials of patients with advanced disease, and concurrent validity as demonstrated by moderate-to-strong correlations with the existing Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy measure.

CONCLUSION

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck Cancer Symptom Index-22 adequately reflects symptom and side effect concerns of advanced HCN patients as well as oncology physicians. This instrument can be used to evaluate the most important disease-related symptoms, treatment side effects, and function/well-being in patients with advanced HCNs in clinical practice and research.

Development and initial validation of the NCCN/FACT symptom index for advanced kidney cancer

OBJECTIVES

There is a need for a brief symptom index for advanced kidney cancer that includes perspectives of both patients and clinicians and is consistent with the Food and Drug Administration's guidance for patient-reported outcome measures. This study developed and examined the preliminary reliability and validity of the new National Comprehensive Cancer Network/Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Kidney Symptom Index 19.

METHODS

Fifty patients with advanced kidney cancer provided open-ended and survey responses ranking their most important symptoms. Responses were reconciled with published clinician reports of the most important symptoms. Ten experienced oncologists rated symptoms as disease- or treatment-related. Patients completed quality-of-life and performance status measures.

RESULTS

A 19-item index was produced from symptoms that were rated as most important by patients or clinicians. It includes three subscales: disease-related symptoms (DRS), treatment side effects (TSE), and general function and well-being (FWB). Internal consistency was good for the full instrument (α = 0.83), the DRS subscale (α = 0.76), and the FWB subscale (α = 0.78) but lower for the TSE subscale (α = 0.59). Convergent validity was demonstrated through correlations with the FACT-General. Patients with differing performance status were distinguished by the total score (F2,47 = 17.37; P < .0001), the DRS subscale (F2,47 = 14.22; P < .0001), and the FWB subscale (F2,47 = 13.40; P < .0001) but not the TSE subscale (F2,47 =1.48; P = 0.2380).

CONCLUSIONS

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network/FACT-Kidney Symptom Index 19 combines symptoms deemed most important by patients and clinicians. Preliminary evidence suggests that the total score and DRS and FWB subscales are reliable and valid as summary indexes. The TSE subscale may be least relevant given the advent of newer therapies.

Validation of the supplementary quality of life questionnaire for mouth/throat and hand/foot soreness

9574

Background: PISCES is a randomized crossover trial evaluating patient preference of pazopanib versus sunitinib in advanced/ metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The Supplementary Quality of Life Questionnaire (SQLQ) was developed for this trial to assess hand/foot soreness and mouth/throat soreness (MTS). The objective of this project is to validate the SQLQ. Methods: SQLQ was administered at baseline and every two weeks thereafter. EQ-5D was administered at baseline, during the washout period, and end of second treatment period. Treatment arms were collapsed for validation. SQLQ assesses severity of MTS (1 item), limitations due to MTS (5 items), severity of hand soreness (1 item), severity of foot soreness (1 item), limitations due to foot soreness (5 items) and ability to work (1 item). Cronbach’s coefficient alpha was used to evaluate the internal consistency reliability of the multi-item subscales.T-tests compared scores between groups defined by performance status (0 versus 1) and number of metastatic sites (0/1 versus 2+) at baseline. Effect sizes (ES = mean difference / pooled standard deviation) were calculated. Results: Of 169 patients randomized, data was available on 168. Over 80% of on-study patients completed the SQLQ at each assessment. Cronbach’s coefficient alpha was ≥ 0.80 for both limitations subscales at all assessments except baseline (limitations due to MTS). Both scores differentiated between performance status groups at baseline with ES > 0.40 (p<0.05). Scores significantly differed by severity of soreness with large ES of 0.9-2.1. Moderate correlations with EQ-5D were observed for limitations scores; correlations were smaller for soreness ratings. MTS and limitations due to MTS worsened after baseline with moderate – large ES; moderate ES was observed for changes in other scores. Limitation change scores were minimal in groups with no change in soreness rating; patients with worsened soreness reported similarly worsened limitations due to soreness with moderate – large ES. Conclusions: SQLQ is a valid and responsive measure of MTS, hand/foot soreness, and limitations due to soreness. Use of the SQLQ in future clinical trials will provide further external validation.

Development and validation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy: Antiangiogenesis (FACT-AntiA)

e20527

Background: Anti-angiogenesis therapies represent a significant and promising advancement in cancer treatment. Side effects from angiogenesis inhibitors, although generally milder than chemotherapy side effects, have the potential to impact Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and may lead to dose reduction or discontinuation. Currently, there are no patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures that specifically assess HRQOL related to anti-angiogenesis therapy. This study describes the development and validation of a PRO questionnaire for anti-angiogenesis therapy, the FACT-AntiA. Methods: Scale development included identification of 59 anti-angiogenesis side effects from the literature and clinician and patient input. Patient and clinician ratings of the importance of these side effects led to the development of a 24-item scale. Cognitive interviews with 10 patients confirmed item wording and meaning. To assess psychometric properties of the scale, 132 kidney cancer patients completed the FACT-AntiA and other PRO measures including the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), the FACT-Kidney Cancer Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19), and PROMIS Global Health at 3 time points. Patient responses to the FACT-AntiA were analyzed for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, and responsiveness to change in clinical status. Results: FACT-AntiA side-effect subscales scores and total score were found to have good internal consistency reliability (most Cronbach’s alpha > 0.70). Test-retest reliability was greater than 0.70 for most subscales and individual items. All single items (except nosebleeds), subscales, and the total score significantly differentiated between groups defined by level of side effect bother. Conclusions: The number of patients who reported a change in their side effect bother was small so evaluation of FACT-AntiA responsiveness to change requires further study. The FACT-AntiA was developed and validated as a tool to enhance treatment decision-making and side effect management for patients receiving anti-angiogenesis therapies and is a reliable and valid index for evaluation of therapy side effects.

Norming plans for the NIH Toolbox

OBJECTIVE

The NIH Toolbox for Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function (NIH Toolbox) is a comprehensive battery of brief assessment tools. The purpose of this article is to describe plans to establish normative reference values for the NIH Toolbox measures.

METHODS

A large sample will be obtained from the US population for the purpose of calculating normative values. The sample will be stratified by age (ages 3-85 years), sex, and language preference (English or Spanish) and have a total sample size of at least 4,205. The sample will include a minimum of 25-100 individuals in each targeted demographic and language subgroup.

RESULTS

Norming methods will include poststratification adjustment calculated using iterative proportional fitting, also known as raking, so that the weighted sample will have the same distribution on key demographic variables as the US population described in the 2010 Census.

CONCLUSIONS

As with any set of norms, users should be mindful of the reference population and make conclusions consistent with the limitations of normative sampling, since it is not a probability-based sample. However, the NIH Toolbox norming study has been designed to minimize bias and maximize representativeness and precision of estimates. The availability of a "toolbox" of normed measures will be an important foundation for addressing critical research questions in neurologic and behavioral health.

Cognition assessment using the NIH Toolbox

Cognition is 1 of 4 domains measured by the NIH Toolbox for the Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function (NIH-TB), and complements modules testing motor function, sensation, and emotion. On the basis of expert panels, the cognition subdomains identified as most important for health, success in school and work, and independence in daily functioning were Executive Function, Episodic Memory, Language, Processing Speed, Working Memory, and Attention. Seven measures were designed to tap constructs within these subdomains. The instruments were validated in English, in a sample of 476 participants ranging in age from 3 to 85 years, with representation from both sexes, 3 racial/ethnic categories, and 3 levels of education. This report describes the development of the Cognition Battery and presents results on test-retest reliability, age effects on performance, and convergent and discriminant construct validity. The NIH-TB Cognition Battery is intended to serve as a brief, convenient set of measures to supplement other outcome measures in epidemiologic and longitudinal research and clinical trials. With a computerized format and national standardization, this battery will provide a "common currency" among researchers for comparisons across a wide range of studies and populations.

Quality of Life in Patients with Advanced Cancer Using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Assessment Tool: A Literature Review

Quality of life (QOL) has become an increasingly meaningful endpoint in advanced cancer research. Clinicians assess QOL to help them select appropriate treatment options and regimens. The present review aims to compare QOL scores of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Assessment Tool (FACT-G) in relation to clinical and socio-demographic features in patients with advanced cancer. A literature search in MEDLINE and EMBASE was conducted; a total of 33 studies encompassing 39 study arms were identified that reported FACT-G scores. Four statistically significant parameters were identified with respect to FACT-G scores: education, national per capita healthcare expenditures, admittance status and previous radiation therapy. A greater percentage of patients completing higher education programs were correlated to significantly better emotional well-being and global QOL. Cohorts from countries with higher national per capita healthcare expenditures had better physical well-being, social/family well-being and improved relationships with their doctors. Patient samples comprised of purely outpatients had better levels of emotional well-being and global QOL when compared to samples with a mix of outpatients and inpatients. A greater percentage of patients previously receiving radiation therapy were correlated to a better relationship with doctor score. Although limitations of the present review exist, differences in QOL scores based on socio-demographic and clinical factors are observed; certain correlations described in the present work have been described previously in the literature while others have not. Future work aimed at either determining confounding parameters or cause and effect relationships is recommended.

Development and validation of a symptom index for advanced hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancers: the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (NCCN-FACT) Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Symptom Index (NFHSI)

BACKGROUND

The 45-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) questionnaire assesses health-related quality of life in patients with liver, bile duct, and pancreatic cancers. Although the FACT-Hep was initially derived from patient input, this study's researchers sought to verify adequate coverage of items by soliciting open-ended input from patients with advanced disease.

METHODS

As part of a larger study in collaboration with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), 50 people (60% male, 80% caucasian, average age 60.4 years) with stage 3 or 4 hepatobiliary or pancreatic cancer were recruited. Participants generated and ranked up to 10 important symptoms and concerns that physicians should monitor when assessing the value of chemotherapy. Patients were also able to provide open-ended, qualitative information that was evaluated systematically. Ten expert physicians also provided input on priority symptoms.

RESULTS

The resulting 18-item NCCN-FACT Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Symptom Index (NFHSI-18) demonstrated high internal consistency (α = .89) and moderate to strong correlations with measures of physical well-being (ρ = .76), emotional well-being (ρ = 0.52), and functional well-being (ρ = 0.57). Scores on the NFHSI-18 were also highly correlated with the original hepatobiliary scale of the FACT-Hep (ρ = .82; all P < .001). Compared with patients with better performance status, patients with poor performance status had worse NFHSI-18 symptom scores, F(3,47) = 9.74; P = .0003.

CONCLUSIONS

The NFHSI-18 assesses symptoms of importance to patients with hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancers and demonstrates promising measurement properties. The scale is a good candidate for brief symptom assessment in clinical trials.

Patients' and Health Care Providers' Evaluation of Quality of Life Issues in Advanced Cancer Using Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Palliative Care Module (FACIT-Pal) Scale

Background

To examine the agreement of Health Care Providers (HCPs) and patients’ evaluation of quality of life on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness therapy - Palliative care module (FACIT-Pal) scale.

Methods

Sixty advanced cancer patients and fifty-six health care providers involved in their care at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre completed a modified version of the FACIT- Pal. In the survey, patients and HCPs indicated the 10 top issues affecting the quality of life of patients with advanced cancer most profoundly. The percentage of participants selecting each item as one of their 10 most relevant items was calculated in HCPs and patients.

Results

There were differences in relative rankings of QOL issues among patients and HCPs. Among the top 10 items which were identified from both patients and HCPs, there were differences in the rankings. Patients ranked emotional support from family (40.9%) as most important followed by pain (38.6%), lack of energy (31.8%) and able to enjoy life (29.6%). HCPs ranked in the following order: pain (73.2%), lack of energy (63.4%), nausea (51.2%) and dyspnea (51.2%) whereas patients rated nausea at 18.2 % and dyspnea at 9.09%.

Conclusion

There is a discrepancy between scores of patients and HCPs as they may prioritize differently. HCPs tended to put more emphasis on physical symptoms, whereas patients had emotional and global issues as priorities.

Characterizing fatigue associated with sunitinib (SU) in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)

6092

Background: Fatigue is common in cancer pts and associated with use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as SU. Limited data exist on the time pattern of fatigue with TKI therapy. Methods: Data from treatment-naïve mRCC pts in SU arms of two clinical trials were analyzed retrospectively. Study 1; 375 pts were randomized to SU 50 mg/d on a 4 weeks-on-2-weeks-off schedule (Schedule 4/2), for up to 30 cycles. Study 2; pts were randomized to SU 50 mg/d Schedule 4/2 (Group 1; n=146) or 37.5 mg/d continuous daily dosing (CDD; Group 2; n=146). In both trials, fatigue was measured with the question to pts: “I feel fatigued” over the past week (5-point rating scale, not at all-very much), and with the provider-rated Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). In addition to descriptive profiles, Study 1 used two modeling approaches; repeated measures model (M1), with time as a categorical predictor; and random intercept-slope model (M2), with time as a continuous predictor. Study 2 calculated mean absolute values of within-cycle rate of change (from one assessment to the next) through the first 6 treatment cycles. Results: In Study 1, representing fatigue across cycles, M1 showed that the initial increase in patient-reported fatigue was worst during Cycle 1; mean values at all subsequent cycles were numerically better. For CTCAE fatigue, M1 showed that all but one of the pair-wise comparisons of the cycle means were not significantly different. M2 showed that the overall trend for patient-reported fatigue and CTCAE fatigue was not statistically different from zero. In Study 2, the mean absolute rate of change for fatigue during 6 treatment cycles was greater for Group 1 (4/2) compared to Group 2 (CDD): 0.042 vs. 0.032, respectively; P=0.003, t-test. Conclusions: In Study 1, pts reported notable fatigue in Cycle 1, which improved or stabilized, thereafter. In Study 2, Schedule 4/2 was associated with more within-cycle fluctuation in fatigue. These findings illustrate how SU-associated fatigue occurs early in therapy and continues with more within-cycle fluctuation associated with 4/2 dosing. This may help patient-clinician communications and interventions that support maintaining effective therapy.

Measuring the severity of infantile hemangiomas: instrument development and reliability

OBJECTIVES

To develop instruments that measure the severity of infantile hemangiomas (Hemangioma Severity Scale [HSS]) and the complications of infantile hemangiomas for longitudinal use (Hemangioma Dynamic Complication Scale [HDCS]).

DESIGN

Instrument development and reliability study.

SETTING

Academic research.

PARTICIPANTS

The HSS and the HDCS were developed through the collaborative effort of members of the Hemangioma Investigator Group Research Core, an expert multi-institutional research group. After development of the scales, 13 pediatric dermatologists used the HSS to score 20 different hemangiomas. In addition, 12 pediatric dermatologists used the HDCS to score hemangioma-related complications for 24 clinical scenarios. Interrater and intrarater reliability was measured for both scales.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Interrater and intrarater reliability.

RESULTS

For the HSS, interrater reliability and intrarater reliability exceeded 99%. Similarly, the HDCS had a high rate of interrater agreement; for individual items, agreement among raters was 67% to 100%, with most clinical scenarios demonstrating greater than 90% agreement. Intrarater reliability was excellent for all individual items of the HDCS.

CONCLUSION

The HSS and the HDCS are reliable scales that can be used to measure the severity of infantile hemangiomas, including the severity of complications for longitudinal use.