Long-term ACE Inhibitor/ARB Use Is Associated With Severe Renal Dysfunction and Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Severe COVID-19: Results From a Referral Center Cohort in the Northeast of France

Background

In patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), data are scarce and conflicting regarding whether chronic use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) influences disease outcomes. In patients with severe COVID-19, we assessed the association between chronic ACEI/ARB use and the occurrence of kidney, lung, heart, and liver dysfunctions and the severity of the inflammatory reaction as evaluated by biomarkers kinetics, and their association with disease outcomes.

Methods

We performed a retrospective longitudinal cohort study on consecutive patients with newly diagnosed severe COVID-19. Independent predictors were assessed through receiver operating characteristic analysis, time-series analysis, logistic regression analysis, and multilevel modeling for repeated measures.

Results

On the 149 patients included in the study 30% (44/149) were treated with ACEI/ARB. ACEI/ARB use was independently associated with the following biochemical variations: phosphorus >40 mg/L (odds ratio [OR], 3.35, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.83–6.14), creatinine >10.1 mg/L (OR, 3.22, 2.28–4.54), and urea nitrogen (UN) >0.52 g/L (OR, 2.65, 95% CI, 1.89–3.73). ACEI/ARB use was independently associated with acute kidney injury stage ≥1 (OR, 3.28, 95% CI, 2.17–4.94). The daily dose of ACEI/ARB was independently associated with altered kidney markers with an increased risk of +25 to +31% per each 10 mg increment of lisinopril-dose equivalent. In multivariable multilevel modeling, UN >0.52 g/L was independently associated with the risk of acute respiratory failure (OR, 3.54, 95% CI, 1.05–11.96).

Conclusions

Patients chronically treated with ACEI/ARB who have severe COVID-19 are at increased risk of acute kidney injury. In these patients, the increase in UN associated with ACEI/ARB use could predict the development of acute respiratory failure.

Safety of Enalapril in Infants: Data from the Pediatric Heart Network Infant Single Ventricle Trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety profile of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in infants with single ventricle.

STUDY DESIGN

The Pediatric Heart Network conducted a double-blind trial involving infants with single ventricle physiology randomized to receive enalapril or placebo and followed to 14 months of age. Data including demographics, drug administration, hemodynamic monitoring, laboratory measurements, adverse events, and survival were extracted from the public use data set and compared between the placebo and enalapril-treated groups.

RESULTS

The Infant Single Ventricle trial randomized 230 patients, with 115 patients in each group. Initial enalapril dose was 0.10 mg/kg/d and median maximal dose was 0.38 mg/kg/d. There was no significant difference in change in blood pressure at study drug initiation or when resuming study drug after Glenn surgery. The incidence of hyperkalemia and neutropenia did not differ between groups. Renal dysfunction occurred in 3% of the enalapril group and none of the placebo patients, which was not statistically significant. There was a high frequency of serious adverse events in both groups. There was no difference in the frequency of heart transplant or death between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Enalapril did not have sustained hemodynamic effects at initiation or up-titration of drug. Creatinine and potassium were not different between groups, although renal dysfunction occurred more often in the patients on enalapril. Although efficacy of enalapril in neonates with single ventricle has not been demonstrated, the safety profile of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors appears to be low risk in infants and children with significant heart disease.

Impact of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers on in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients: ​a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

There are concerns that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) may worsen outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This systemic review and meta-analysis aimed to study in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients who were on ACEI/ARB as compared to those not on ACEI/ARB.

METHODS

We search PubMed, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov and Google Scholar between 1 January 2020 and 30 May 2020 to identify all studies that evaluated the use of ACEI/ARB and reported the in-hospital mortality outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Nine non-randomised studies were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. The primary outcome studied was in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients who were on ACEI/ARB compared with those not on ACEI/ARB.

RESULTS

Of the 8,313 patients in the nine studies, 7,622 (91.7%) were from studies with all-comers, while 691 (8.3%) were from studies with only hypertensive patients. 577 (14.6%) in-hospital deaths were observed out of a total of 3,949 patients with an outcome in the nine studies. Overall, there was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between patients on ACEI/ARB and those not on ACEI/ARB (odds radio [OR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-1.50; p = 0.73). Further sensitivity analysis in the hypertensive group and all-comers group showed similar results (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.58-1.32; p = 0.53 and OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.00-3.43; p = 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This study found that ACEI/ARB has no significant impact on in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients and can be used safely in patients with indications.

Association of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Blockers With Severity of COVID-19: A Multicenter, Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Speculations whether treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) predisposes to severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) or worsens its outcomes. This study assessed the association of ACE-I/ARB therapy with the development of severe COVID-19.

METHODS

This multi-center, prospective study enrolled patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and receiving one or more antihypertensive agents to manage either hypertension or cardiovascular disease. ACE-I/ARB therapy associations with severe COVID-19 on the day of hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation and in-hospital death on follow-up were tested using a multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for age, obesity, and chronic illnesses. The composite outcome of mechanical ventilation and death was examined using the adjusted Cox multivariate regression model.

RESULTS

Of 338 enrolled patients, 245 (72.4%) were using ACE-I/ARB on the day of hospital admission, and 197 continued ACE-I/ARB therapy during hospitalization. Ninety-eight (29%) patients had a severe COVID-19, which was not significantly associated with the use of ACE-I/ARB (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.66-2.09; P = .57). Prehospitalization ACE-I/ARB therapy was not associated with ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, or in-hospital death. Continuing ACE-I/ARB therapy during hospitalization was associated with decreased mortality (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.073-0.67; P = .008). ACE-I/ARB use was not associated with developing the composite outcome of mechanical ventilation and in-hospital death (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.51-1.78; P = .87) versus not using ACE-I/ARB.

CONCLUSION

Patients with hypertension or cardiovascular diseases receiving ACE-I/ARB therapy are not at increased risk for severe COVID-19 on admission to the hospital. ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and mortality are not associated with ACE-I/ARB therapy. Maintaining ACE-I/ARB therapy during hospitalization for COVID-19 lowers the likelihood of death.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT4357535.

Efficacy of telmisartan for the treatment of persistent renal proteinuria in dogs: A double-masked, randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Information regarding efficacy of the angiotensin II receptor blocker, telmisartan, for treatment of proteinuria in dogs is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the antiproteinuric efficacy of telmisartan, as compared to enalapril, in dogs with chronic kidney disease and persistent, renal proteinuria.

ANIMALS

Thirty-nine client-owned dogs with chronic kidney disease and urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPC) > 0.5 (if azotemic) or ≥ 1.0 (if nonazotemic).

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, double-masked clinical trial, dogs were block randomized, according to presence or absence of azotemia and systemic arterial hypertension, to receive telmisartan (1.0 mg/kg PO q24h), or enalapril (0.5 mg/kg PO q12h), and followed for 120 days. Up-titration of study drug dosage on days 30 and 60, and addition of the other study drug at day 90, were performed if UPC > 0.5 was noted at these visits. Percentage change in UPC relative to baseline was calculated for all time points. Data are presented as median (range).

RESULTS

Thirty-nine (20 telmisartan-treated, 19 enalapril-treated) dogs were included. At day 30, percentage change in UPC was greater for telmisartan-treated (-65% [-95% to 104%]) vs enalapril-treated (-35% [-74% to 87%]) dogs (P = .002). Among dogs persistently proteinuric at earlier visits, telmisartan remained superior to enalapril at days 60 (P = .02) and 90 (P = .02). No difference in percentage change in UPC between study groups was observed at day 120, when combination therapy was allowed. Combination therapy resulted in relevant azotemia in 4/13 (31%) dogs.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Telmisartan might be a suitable first-line therapy for dogs with renal proteinuria.

Renin-angiotensin system blockers and 1-year mortality in patients with post-operative acute kidney injury

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) and angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) users may be associated with increased mortality in patients with post-operative acute kidney injury (AKI), but data are limited. We studied whether users of ACE-I/ARBs with AKI after colorectal cancer surgery (CRC) were associated with increased 1-year mortality after AKI.

METHODS

This population-based cohort study in Northern Denmark included patients with AKI within 7 days after CRC surgery during 2005-2014. From reimbursed prescriptions, patients were classified as ACE-I/ARB current, former, or non-users. We computed the cumulative 30-day and 1-year mortality after AKI with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using the Kaplan-Meier method (1-survival function). Hazard ratios (HRs) comparing mortality in current and former users with non-users were computed by Cox proportional hazards regression analyses, controlling for potential confounders.

RESULTS

We identified 10 713 CRC surgery patients. A total of 2000 patients had AKI and were included. Thirty-day mortality was 16.5% (95% CI 13.7-19.8), 16.2% (95% CI 11.3-22.8), and 13.4% (95% CI 11.6-15.4) for current, former, and non-users. Adjusted HR was 1.26 (95% CI 0.96-1.65) and 1.19 (95% CI 0.78-1.82) for current and former users compared with non-users. One-year mortality rates were 26.4% (95% CI 22.9-30.4), 29.8% (95% CI 23.2-37.8), and 24.7% (95% CI 22.4-27.2) in current, former, and non-users. Compared with non-users, the adjusted 1-year HR for death in current and former users were 1.29 (95% CI 0.96-1.73) and 1.11 (95% CI 0.91-1.35).

CONCLUSION

Based on our findings, current users of ACE-I/ARB may possibly have a small increase in mortality rate in the year after post-operative AKI, although the degree of certainty is low.

Adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with first-trimester exposure to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to determine the effects of prenatal exposure to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), particularly when exposure is limited to the first trimester of pregnancy, on adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. A systematic search was performed on four databases, that is, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, to identify relevant articles published up to December 31, 2019. Included studies were limited to original investigations assessing the association between prenatal exposure to ACEIs/ARBs and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Odds ratios were used as a summary effect measure. Pooled-effect estimates of each outcome were calculated by the random-effects meta-analysis. The main outcomes included overall and specific congenital malformations, low birth weight, miscarriage, elective termination of pregnancy, stillbirth, and preterm delivery. Of 19 included articles involving a total of 4 163 753 pregnant women, 13 studies reported an increased risk of, at least, one adverse pregnancy outcome in pregnant women who were exposed to ACEIs/ARBs. Meta-analysis revealed a significant association between overall congenital malformations and first trimester-only exposure to ACEIs/ARBs (OR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.71-2.21, P < .0001). Cardiovascular malformations, miscarriage, and stillbirth also provided a significant relation with ACEI/ARB exposure. In conclusion, prenatal exposure to ACEIs/ARBs in the first trimester of pregnancy was found to be associated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Women of reproductive age should be aware of the potential teratogenic risks of these drugs if they become pregnant.

Use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in patients receiving therapeutic plasma exchange with a centrifuge-based apheresis system

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) are frequently used antihypertensive medications with additional advantages such as reducing proteinuria and cardiovascular events. ACEi are commonly held at least 24 hours before a therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) to reduce possibility of adverse events (AEs) including adverse drug reactions (ADR). The objective of this study was to determine if ACEi use increases the risk of ADR in patients receiving TPE with a conventional centrifuge-based apheresis system. This is a retrospective chart review study (n = 252; 52% male). Binary logistic regression was used to analyze the association of ACEi use and AEs. Of 171 patients who had AE during TPE, only 38 patients were taking ACEi. There was no significant association between ACEi use and AEs after adjustments (odds ratio = 0.885, 95% confidence interval: 0.468, 1.674). Our results suggest that risk of AEs is not higher in patients taking ACEi receiving TPE using a centrifuge-based machine. Randomized controlled prospective trials may be needed to further investigate this matter.

Randomized elimination and prolongation of ACE inhibitors and ARBs in coronavirus 2019 (REPLACE COVID) Trial Protocol

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is associated with high incidence of multiorgan dysfunction and death. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which facilitates SARS-CoV-2 host cell entry, may be impacted by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), two commonly used antihypertensive classes. In a multicenter, international randomized controlled trial that began enrollment on March 31, 2020, participants are randomized to continuation vs withdrawal of their long-term outpatient ACEI or ARB upon hospitalization with COVID-19. The primary outcome is a hierarchical global rank score incorporating time to death, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of renal replacement or vasopressor therapy, and multiorgan dysfunction severity. Approval for the study has been obtained from the Institutional Review Board of each participating institution, and all participants will provide informed consent. A data safety monitoring board has been assembled to provide independent oversight of the project.

Centrally Acting Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Suppresses Type I Interferon Responses and Decreases Inflammation in the Periphery and the CNS in Lupus-Prone Mice

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by multi-organ damage. Neuropsychiatric lupus (NPSLE) is one of the most common manifestations of human SLE, often causing depression. Interferon-α (IFNα) is a central mediator in disease pathogenesis. Administration of IFNα to patients with chronic viral infections or cancers causes depressive symptoms. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) is part of the kallikrein-kinin/renin-angiotensin (KKS/RAS) system that regulates many physiological processes, including inflammation, and brain functions. It is known that ACE degrades bradykinin (BK) into inactive peptides. We have previously shown in an in vitro model of mouse bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDC) and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells that captopril (a centrally acting ACE inhibitor-ACEi) suppressed Type I IFN responsive gene (IRG) expression. In this report, we used the MRL/lpr lupus-prone mouse model, an established model to study NPSLE, to determine the in vivo effects of captopril on Type I IFN and associated immune responses in the periphery and brain and effects on behavior. Administering captopril to MRL/lpr mice decreased expression of IRGs in brain, spleen and kidney, decreased circulating and tissue IFNα levels, decreased microglial activation (IBA-1 expression) and reduced depressive-like behavior. Serotonin levels that are decreased in depression were increased by captopril treatment. Captopril also reduced autoantibody levels in plasma and immune complex deposition in kidney and brain. Thus, ACEi's may have potential for therapeutic use for systemic and NPSLE.

Inhibition of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Impairs Anti-staphylococcal Immune Function in a Preclinical Model of Implant Infection

Background: Evidence suggests the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays key immunomodulatory roles. In particular, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) has been shown to play a role in antimicrobial host defense. ACE inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are some of the most commonly prescribed medications, especially in patients undergoing invasive surgery. Thus, the current study assessed the immunomodulatory effect of RAS-modulation in a preclinical model of implant infection.

Methods:In vitro antimicrobial effects of ACEi and ARBs were first assessed. C57BL/6J mice subsequently received either an ACEi (lisinopril; 16 mg/kg/day), an ARB (losartan; 30 mg/kg/day), or no treatment. Conditioned mice blood was then utilized to quantify respiratory burst function as well as Staphylococcus aureus Xen36 burden ex vivo in each treatment group. S. aureus infectious burden for each treatment group was then assessed in vivo using a validated mouse model of implant infection. Real-time quantitation of infectious burden via bioluminescent imaging over the course of 28 days post-procedure was assessed. Host response via monocyte and neutrophil infiltration within paraspinal and spleen tissue was quantified by immunohistochemistry for F4/80 and myeloperoxidase, respectively.

Results: Blood from mice treated with an ACEi demonstrated a decreased ability to eradicate bacteria when mixed with Xen36 as significantly higher levels of colony forming units (CFU) and biofilm formation was appreciated ex vivo (p < 0.05). Mice treated with an ACEi showed a higher infection burden in vivo at all times (p < 0.05) and significantly higher CFUs of bacteria on both implant and paraspinal tissue at the time of sacrifice (p < 0.05 for each comparison). There was also significantly decreased infiltration and respiratory burst function of immune effector cells in the ACEi group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: ACEi, but not ARB, treatment resulted in increased S. aureus burden and impaired immune response in a preclinical model of implant infection. These results suggest that perioperative ACEi use may represent a previously unappreciated risk factor for surgical site infection. Given the relative interchangeability of ACEi and ARB from a cardiovascular standpoint, this risk factor may be modifiable.

COVID-19 In-Hospital Mortality and Use of Renin-Angiotensin System Blockers in Geriatrics Patients

Objective

The role of treatment with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers at the onset of COVID-19 infection is not known in the geriatric population. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) use and in-hospital mortality in geriatric patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

Design

This observational retrospective study was conducted in a French geriatric department. Patients were included between March 17 and April 18, 2020.

Setting and Participants

All consecutive 201 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 (confirmed by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction methods) were included. All nondeceased patients had 30 days of follow-up and no patient was lost to follow-up.

Methods

Demographic, clinical, and biological data and medications were collected. In-hospital mortality of patients treated or not by ACEI/ARB was analyzed using multivariate Cox models.

Results

Mean age of the population was 86.3 (8.0) years, 62.7% of patients were institutionalized, 88.6% had dementia, and 53.5% had severe disability (activities of daily living [ADL] score <2). Sixty-three patients were treated with ACEI/ARB and 138 were not. Mean follow-up was 23.4 (10.0) days, 66 (33.8%) patients died after an average of 10.0 days (6.0). Lower mortality rate was observed in patients treated with ACEI/ARB compared with patients not treated with ARB or ACEI (22.2% [14] vs 37.7% [52], hazard ratio [HR] 0.54; 95% confidence interval 0.30–0.97; P = .03). In a multivariate Cox regression model including age, sex, ADL score, Charlson index, renal function, dyspnea, C-reactive protein, and white blood cell count, use of ACEI/ARB was significantly associated with lower in-hospital mortality (HR 0.52 (0.27−0.99), P = .048).

Conclusion and Implications

In very old subjects hospitalized in geriatric settings for COVID-19, mortality was significantly lower in subjects treated with ARB or ACEI before the onset of infection. The continuation of ACEI/ARB therapy should be encouraged during periods of coronavirus outbreak in older subjects.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors Versus Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers in Acute Coronary Syndrome and Preserved Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) showed comparable survival results in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, there is lack of evidence of the comparative effectiveness in preserved LVEF patients after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the selection between ACEi and ARB in preserved LVEF after an ACS confers a prognostic benefit, based on real life results. We analyzed a cohort of 3006 contemporary patients with LVEF ≥40% after an ACS. A propensity score matching and Cox regression analysis were performed to assess the association between treatment and events (death, acute myocardial infarction [AMI], HF, and combined event) for a mean follow-up of 3.6 ± 2.1 years. We found no significant differences between ACEi/ARB for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] for ARB: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.70-1.29), AMI (HR for ARB: 1.34, 95% CI: 0.95-1.89), HF (HR for ARB: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.85-1.45), or combined end point (death, AMI and HF: HR for ARB: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.92-1.40). In conclusion, there are no prognostic differences between the use of ACEi and ARB in patients with LVEF ≥40% after ACS. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm our results.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker: Potential agents to reduce post-surgical scar formation in humans

Studies on the effectiveness and mechanisms of reducing scar formation by interfering with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAAS) have been demonstrated in animals, but not in humans due to the lack of clinical support. Our aim was to investigate whether angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) could inhibit scar formation in humans. Thus, an observational and hypothesis-generating study using a designed questionnaire was carried out. A total of 347 patients with postoperative scars secondary to thyroid tumours were enrolled. They were divided into four groups: ACEI group, ARB group, other antihypertensive drugs control group and blank control group according to the administration of antihypertensive drugs. The width of scar was measured, and the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale was filled out. Results showed that patients of ACEI group (mean scar width 1.60 mm) and ARB group (mean scar width 1.57 mm) formed smaller scars than those of other antihypertensive drugs control group (mean scar width 2.09 mm) and blank control group (mean scar width 2.0 mm). Oral administration of ACEI and ARB may be associated with better post-surgical scar formation in humans. These two kinds of antihypertensive drugs may be active components of anti-scar medicine.

Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers in context of COVID-19 outbreak: a retrospective analysis

The possible effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) on COVID-19 disease severity have generated considerable debate. We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of hospitalized adult COVID-19 patients in Wuhan, China, who had definite clinical outcome (dead or discharged) by February 15, 2020. Patients on anti-hypertensive treatment with or without ACEI/ARB were compared on their clinical characteristics and outcomes. The medical records from 702 patients were screened. Among the 101 patients with a history of hypertension and taking at least one anti-hypertensive medication, 40 patients were receiving ACEI/ARB as part of their regimen, and 61 patients were on antihypertensive medication other than ACEI/ARB. We observed no statistically significant differences in percentages of in-hospital mortality (28% vs. 34%, P = 0.46), ICU admission (20% vs. 28%, P = 0.37) or invasive mechanical ventilation (18% vs. 26%, P = 0.31) between patients with or without ACEI/ARB treatment. Further multivariable adjustment of age and gender did not provide evidence for a significant association between ACEI/ARB treatment and severe COVID-19 outcomes. Our findings confirm the lack of an association between chronic receipt of renin-angiotensin system antagonists and severe outcomes of COVID-19. Patients should continue previous anti-hypertensive therapy until further evidence is available.

COVID-19 and Heart: From Clinical Features to Pharmacological Implications

A highly pathogenic human coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has been recently recognized in Wuhan, China, as the cause of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak which has spread rapidly from China to other countries in the world, causing a pandemic with alarming morbidity and mortality. The emerging epidemiological data about COVID-19 patients suggest an association between cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and SARS-CoV-2 infection, in term of clinical features at hospital admission and prognosis for disease severity. The aim of our review is to describe the cardiological features of COVID-19 patients at admission, the acute cardiac presentation, the clinical outcome for patients with underlying CVD and the pharmacological implications for disease management.

Discharge treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker after a heart failure hospitalisation is associated with a better prognosis irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

Medical therapy could improve the prognosis of real-life patients discharged after a heart failure (HF) hospitalisation.

AIM

To determine the impact of discharge HF treatment on mortality and readmissions in different left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) groups.

METHODS

Multicentre prospective registry in 20 Spanish hospitals. Patients were enrolled after a HF hospitalisation.

RESULTS

A total of 1831 patients was included (583 (31.8%) HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); 227 (12.4%) HF with midrange ejection fraction (HFmrEF); 610 (33.3%) HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and 411 (22.4%) with unknown LVEF). Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) at discharge were independently associated with a reduction in: (i) all-cause mortality: hazard ratio (HR) 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.74, P < 0.001, with a similar effect in the four groups; (ii) mortality due to refractory HF HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.29-0.64, P < 0.001, with a similar effect in the three groups with known LVEF; (iii) mortality/HF admissions (HR 0.61; 95% CI: 0.50-0.74), more evident in HFrEF (HR 0.54; 95% CI: 0.38-0.78) compared with HRmEF (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.40-1.02), or HFpEF (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.53-0.92). In patients with HFrEF triple therapy (ACE inhibitor/ARB + beta blocker + mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist) was associated with the lowest mortality risk (HR 0.21; 95% CI: 0.08-0.57, P = 0.002) compared with patients that received none of these drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Discharge treatment with ACE inhibitor/ARB after a HF hospitalisation is associated with a reduction in all-cause and refractory HF mortality, irrespective of LVEF.

Association of Inpatient Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers With Mortality Among Patients With Hypertension Hospitalized With COVID-19

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Use of ACEIs (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors) and ARBs (angiotensin II receptor blockers) is a major concern for clinicians treating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with hypertension.

ACE inhibitor angioedema: characterization and treatment versus non-ACE angioedema in acute hospitalized patients

Background

ACE angioedema has not been characterized in comparison with angioedema from other causes in acute hospitalized patients.

Methods

We retrospectively compared ACE-angioedema and non-ACE angioedema patients from January 2013 to May 2017.

Results

Of 855 cases screened, 575 met the inclusion criteria of angioedema diagnosis and an electronic medical record. Of these, 297 (51.7%) had ACE angioedema and 278 had angioedema from other causes, of these 31 who were taking an ACE inhibitor that was not considered to be the cause of angioedema (ACE other cause). At least 80% of cases in all groups were African American. Epinephrine was prescribed in 21% of ACE angioedema cases. One-third of patients in all groups were admitted to the ICU, and about 25% required intubation. Previous history of ACE inhibitor-induced angioedema was found in 63 of 278 non-ACE cause angioedema patients (23%) and in 23 (8%) in the ACE cause group.

Conclusion

ACE angioedema was the cause of half of angioedema admissions over a 4.5-year period. Mortality, morbidity, and treatment did not differ between the groups. Patients on ACE inhibitors were often treated with medications known not to be effective for ACE angioedema. Over one-fourth of patients not taking an ACE inhibitor had a previous history of ACE angioedema, and 31 patients taking ACE inhibitors were diagnosed with non-ACE angioedema. Regardless of the etiology of angioedema, 25% of patients required airway protection in the form of intubation.

Effectiveness by gender and age of renin-angiotensin system blockade in heart failure-A national register-based cohort study

Purpose

Investigate effectiveness by gender and age and equity implications of treatment with renin‐angiotensin system blockade (RASb) in heart failure (HF) patients.

Methods

In this population‐based register study, we used inpatient data from 2006 to 2010 for patients age 20 years or older with no HF hospitalisation for minimum of 1 year before an index hospitalisation. A wash‐out period for RASb of 6 months preceding admission was used.

Hospital data were linked with drug dispensation data and cause of death data. The associations between time‐dependent RASb exposure and all‐cause death and HF death, respectively, were examined by Cox regression models. Interactions by gender and age were also investigated on the multiplicative and additive scales.

Results

Thirty thousand seven hundred twenty‐one patients were analysed. Fifty‐one percent were women. Median age was 83. Fifty‐three percent of women and 64% of men received RASb after the index hospitalisation. Younger patients were more likely to receive RASb than older ones. One‐year mortality was 28%. RASb was associated with an overall hazard ratio (HR) for all‐cause death of 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.69‐0.75), and an HR of 0.85 (0.77‐0.93) for HF death. Interaction analyses showed HRs for all‐cause death associated with RASb between 0.12 (0.10‐0.13) in the youngest, and 0.80 (0.76‐0.84) in the oldest patients.

Conclusions

RASb appeared effective for women and men and for patients of all ages in this hospitalised HF cohort. No gender difference in effectiveness was found. RASb exposure was low overall, indicating a need for improved adherence to treatment guidelines. Treatment with RASb may be inequitable for women and older patients.

Hyperlipidemia inhibits the protective effect of lisinopril after myocardial infarction via activation of dendritic cells

To investigate the prevention of cardiac remodelling and inflammatory immune response after myocardial infarction (MI) via ACEI regulating dendritic cells (DCs), we explored whether the protective effect of ACEI was repressed under hyperlipidemic environment. In vivo, the survival rate and left ventricular function of the mice were recorded on day 7 after MI. Tissue samples of the myocardium, spleen, bone marrow and peripheral blood were assessed for Ang II concentration, inflammatory cytokines and DCs expression. In vitro, DCs were treated with ox‐LDL + Ang II, simulating the internal environment of MI in ApoE^−/− mice to explore the mechanism involved in the DCs maturation and inflammation. Under hyperlipidemic circumstances, we found that the cardioprotective effect of ACEI was attenuated through regulating DCs maturation and inflammation after MI, affecting survival rate and left ventricular function. Effects of lisinopril on the release of spleen‐derived DCs and myocardial infiltration were also reduced under hyperlipidemic conditions. In vitro, immune maturation and inflammation of DCs were further induced by ox‐LDL on the basis of Ang II treatment, as indicated by the upregulation of CD83, CD86, and the expressions of cytokines and chemokines. Furthermore, ox‐LDL could activate TLR4‐MyD88 signalling pathway, promoting IRAK‐4 and NF‐κB. The present study demonstrated that ACEI reduced the recruitment of DCs to the infarct site, leading to a higher survival rate and improved function. However, this effect was inhibited under hyperlipidemic environment. TLR4‐MyD88 signalling pathway may be responsible for the molecular mechanism involved in the immune maturation and inflammation of DCs induced by ox‐LDL.

Effects of combined statin and ACE inhibitor therapy on endothelial function and blood pressure in essential hypertension - a randomised double-blind, placebo controlled crossover study

Background:

The aim of this study was to compare the influence of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors on endothelial function and blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension on long-term angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy.

Method:

The study was designed as a prospective, double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover clinical trial. Twenty patients with essential hypertension were treated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; the control group included 10 healthy subjects. Hypertensive patients received in random order 80 mg of fluvastatin daily or placebo for 6 weeks. The following parameters were assessed at baseline and after each treatment period: serum lipids, flow-mediated vasodilation, activity of von Willebrand factor, concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor, C-reactive protein and 24-hour blood pressure profile.

Results:

Hypertensive patients did not differ from healthy subjects with respect to age, body mass and biochemical parameters, with the exception of C-reactive protein, which was higher in hypertensive patients (P=0.02). After statin therapy, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P<0.0001), C-reactive protein (P=0.03), von Willebrand factor (P=0.03) and vascular endothelial growth factor (P<0.01) decreased and flow-mediated vasodilation improved (P<0.001). Statins had no significant effect on blood pressure.

Conclusions:

Statins added to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors may improve endothelial function and ameliorate inflammation independently of blood pressure.

Effect of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors on Short-Term Mortality After Sepsis: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Antagonists of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), including ACEIs (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors) and ARBs (angiotensin II receptor blockers), may prevent organ failure. We, therefore, investigated whether specific RAAS inhibitors are associated with reduced mortality in patients with sepsis.We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using multivariable propensity score-based regression to control for differences among patients using different RAAS inhibitors. A multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional-hazards regression model was used to determine the association between RAAS inhibitors and sepsis outcomes. To directly compare ACEI users, ARB users, and nonusers, a 3-way propensity score matching approach was performed. Results were pooled with previous evidence via a random-effects meta-analysis. A total of 52 727 patients were hospitalized with sepsis, of whom 7642 were prescribed an ACEI and 4237 were prescribed an ARB. Using propensity score-matched analyses, prior ACEI use was associated with decreased 30-day mortality (hazard ratio, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.75-0.94]) and 90-day mortality (hazard ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.75-0.92]) compared with nonuse. Prior ARB use was associated with an improved 90-day survival (hazard ratio, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.83-0.94]). These results persisted in sensitivity analyses focusing on patients without cancer and patients with hypertension. By contrast, no beneficial effect was found for antecedent β-blockers exposure (hazard ratio, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.94-1.05]). The pooled estimates obtained from the meta-analysis was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.58-0.87) for prior use of ACEI/ARB.The short-term mortality after sepsis was substantially lower among those who were already established on RAAS inhibitor treatment when sepsis occurred.