Severe dermographism after topical therapy with diphenylcyclopropenone for alopecia universalis

We describe here a 19-year-old Japanese man with an 11-year history of alopecia universalis, who, after the 1st application of a 0.003% diphenylcyclopropenone (DPCP) solution to the whole scalp, developed acute contact dermatitis at the test site, together with widespread severe dermographism. Every 3 weeks, persistence of the severe urticarial reaction and efficacy of treatment were monitored by constant pressure stimuli in a series of pressure tests, and subsequently evaluated by laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF). Although, on pressure tests, the urticarial response was found to significantly improve after starting treatment, erythematous responses continued to appear for nearly 3 months. The persistent course of these side-effects in our patient strongly suggests that precautions must currently be taken in the therapeutic use of potent sensitizers such as DPCP.

Antianginal and anti-ischaemic efficacy of tedisamil, a potassium channel blocker

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy and safety of the potassium channel blocker tedisamil versus placebo in the treatment of patients with stable angina.

DESIGN

Prospective, double blind, placebo controlled study. 203 patients first completed a seven day placebo run in. They were then randomised to receive 50 mg, 100 mg or 150 mg tedisamil twice daily, or placebo. Treadmill exercise testing was carried out at baseline and after 14 days of double blind treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary efficacy parameters were an increase in total exercise duration and a reduction of the sum of ST segment depression using six ECG leads at maximum workload at trough (12 hours after last medication). Secondary aims included increase in exercise time to onset of 0.1 mV ST segment depression, increase in exercise time to onset of any anginal pain, and reduction in ST segment depression in any of the six specified leads at maximum workload. These were all at trough. The same parameters were also assessed at peak concentrations (two hours after administration). Overall attacks of angina and the use of short acting nitrates were assessed from patient diaries.

RESULTS

Tedisamil led to a dose dependent prolongation of exercise duration (significant at all concentrations), an effect that was greater at peak than at trough. Treatment also led to a significant dose dependent reduction in the sum of ST segment depression at both trough and peak concentrations. Tedisamil also decreased (in a dose dependent way) the frequency of anginal attacks and the consumption of short acting nitrates, an improvement that became significant for all doses in the second treatment week. Adverse events with tedisamil were few. There was a pronounced rise in the incidence of diarrhoea with the 150 mg twice daily regimen. Bradycardic effects and increases in QT interval were dose dependent, but were no more evident at exercise than at rest.

CONCLUSIONS

Tedisamil, at doses of 50-100 mg twice daily, was found to be an effective antianginal and anti-ischaemic agent. At doses above 100 mg twice daily its main side effect, diarrhoea, becomes pronounced; therefore the 50-100 mg twice daily regimen appears to be appropriate.

[Effects of the K(+) channel blocker tedisamil on hemodynamics, myocardial ischemia and neurohumoral systems in patients with stable angina pectoris. A comparison with the beta blocker atenolol]

BACKGROUND

Clinical drawbacks of beta-blocker treatment in stable angina have motivated researchers to provide alternative heart rat lowering agents, such as tedisamil which additionally exerts anti-ischemic and antiarrhythmic effects by blockade of cellular repolarizing K(+) currents.

METHODS AND RESULTS

48 patients with stable angina pectoris were investigated (double-blind, randomized, parallel grouped) comparing the hemodynamic, anti-ischemic, metabolic and neurohumoral effects of tedisamil 100 mg b.i.d and atenolol 50 mg b.i.d. after a single dose and over 6 days of treatment. Tedisamil and atenolol produced a decrease in heart rate both at rest (day 1: -13.6 vs -15.4 bpm; p > 0.05; day 6: -14.8 vs -22.2 bpm; resp.; p > 0.05) and exercise (day 1: -9.1 vs -18.3 bpm; p = 0. 001; day 6: -12.0 vs -24.8 bpm, resp.; p = 0.001), while anginal threshold increased. Cardiac output decreased with tedisamil and atenolol at rest (day 1: -1.01 vs -1.19 l/min; p > 0.05; day 6: -0. 86 vs -1.10 l/min, resp.; p > 0.05) and exercise (day 1: -0.82 vs -1. 28 l/min; p > 0.05; day 6: -0.65 vs -2.68 l/min, resp.; p = 0.03), while stroke volume remained unchanged. Right atrial pressure changed during exercise only: It decreased with tedisamil (-1.7 mm Hg) and increased with atenolol (+3.7 mm Hg). Mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressures decreased at rest (-0.5 mm Hg) and exercise (-6.9 mm Hg) in the tedisamil group, but tended to increase with atenolol on day 6 (rest: +1.7; exercise: +3.7 mm Hg) (p = 0.03). Arterial pressure decreased under atenolol treatment only. Exercise-induced plasma norepinephrine levels were reduced by tedisamil (-93 pg/ml) but elevated by atenolol (+172 pg/ml) (p = 0. 001). As compared to atenolol, tedisamil produced a significant prolongation of QT (c) interval (+31 vs -8 ms) (p = 0.002) at initial values of 0.408 +/- 0.018 s with PQ and QRS remaining unaltered.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, tedisamil (100 mg b.i.d. ) generated favorable hemodynamic, neurohumoral and anti-ischemic effects in patients with stable angina pectoris. The anti-ischemic efficacy of tedisamil, as measured by ST segment depression and angina threshold, is comparable to that of atenolol (50 mg b.i.d.).

[Clinical tolerance of a new antidepressant -- milnacipran]

Milnacipran is a new antidepressant which has been developed for its selective inhibition of both serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake with a good safety and tolerability profile. The efficacy and tolerance profile of this antidepressant have been compared with those of tricyclic and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants (SSRIs) in open-label and placebo-controlled trials. But no data in clinical practice are available. The authors studied the tolerability of milnacipran (100 to 200 mg/d) in 28 depressed inpatients receiving usual comedications during a mean period of 33 days (3 to 107 days). The incidence of adverse events was determined with the help of the Pharmacovigilance Center of the Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire (Besançon, France). Among the 28 patients, milnacipran was well tolerated by 18 of them. Side-effects were noted in 10 patients, but they led to withdrawal of the antidepressant in only 2 cases, where dyspnea, palpitations, pollakiuria in a case and headache, nausea, dysuria in the other case occurred. The most frequent adverse event observed was hypotension (n = 6), but in each case it occurred just after the addition of sedative phenothiazines (n = 5) or of a comedication with phenothiazines and valpromide (n = 1). So this side-effect could not be attributed to milnacipran alone. Treatments with heptaminol or theodrenaline and cafedrine were useful. An increase of the cardiac frequency seemed to occur with milnacipran (p < 0.06). It was observed in the 5 inpatients for whom this cardiovascular parameter was recorded before and during the milnacipran treatment. In 5 other patients, the cardiac frequency seemed to decrease when milnacipran was stopped for lack of good efficacy or adverse events. Gastrointestinal disturbances were scarce isolated (nausea n = 1), but necessitated a treatment with metopimazine. The milnacipran prescription (100 mg/d) after an other antidepressant treatment had been done without a withdrawal period and without problem, even when the previous antidepressant was a SSRIs with a long half-life and CYP450 inhibitory properties. The authors concluded to the good tolerability of milnacipran in usual clinical practice.

Efficacy of topical sensitizers in the treatment of alopecia areata

It has been more than 2 decades since the first report of the use of dinitrochlorobenzene to induce hair growth in 2 patients with alopecia areata. Other topical sensitizers, namely squaric acid dibutylester and diphenylcyclopropenone, have been used with variable success. This article reviews the efficacy and safety of the use of topical sensitizers in the treatment of alopecia areata.

Milnacipran. A review of its use in depression

Milnacipran is a cyclopropane derivative which acts by inhibiting noradrenaline (norepinephrine) and serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) reuptake at presynaptic sites; no postsynaptic receptor activity has been demonstrated. It is most commonly administered at a dosage of 50 mg twice daily for the treatment of major depressive disorder. Improvement usually occurs within 2 weeks of treatment initiation, but some patients do respond sooner. Most studies which evaluated milnacipran were of short (4 to 8 weeks) duration and results were not published in full with rigorous peer review. Nonetheless, the drug is significantly more effective than placebo for the treatment of in- or outpatients with moderate to severe major depressive disorder. Limited data suggest that it may prevent relapse and be effective for long term use, although this requires confirmation. Milnacipran 200 mg/day is generally not significantly different from amitriptyline 150 mg/day in terms of onset and efficacy. However, when doses are titrated (not a requirement for milnacipran), milnacipran 50 or 100 mg/day has a slower onset than the tricyclic antidepressant. At a dosage of 100 mg/day for 4 to 12 weeks, milnacipran generally has similar efficacy to imipramine and clomipramine 150 mg/day, although milnacipran 50 to 150 mg/day had a faster onset of activity than imipramine 50 to 150 mg/day in Japanese patients. In a 6-month trial, milnacipran was less effective than clomipramine. Milnacipran 50 or 100 mg twice daily was as effective as fluoxetine 20 mg once daily or fluvoxamine 100 mg twice daily in 4- to 12-week studies. At a dosage of 50 then 100 mg daily it was also as effective as mianserin 30 then 60 mg daily in a 4-week study. However, when administered once daily (in the evening), milnacipran 100 mg/day was not as effective as fluoxetine 20 mg/day after 6 weeks. The drug is generally well tolerated, producing no more adverse events (including anticholinergic events) than placebo, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or mianserin and fewer adverse events than tricyclic antidepressants in clinical trials. However, dysuria has been reported in 7% of male patients receiving milnacipran.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from predominantly short term trials suggest that milnacipran generally has similar efficacy to tricyclic antidepressants and SSRIs. Although further published data are required to confirm its efficacy, good tolerability profile and pharmacokinetic profile which suggests a low potential for drug interactions, milnacipran should be considered a promising agent for the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder.

A double-blind comparison of the efficacy and safety of milnacipran and fluoxetine in depressed inpatients

This double-blind, randomised, multicentre study compared the antidepressant efficacy and safety of two doses of milnacipran (100 mg/day and 200 mg/day) and fluoxetine (20 mg/day) in 289 inpatients with endogenous depression. After a placebo washout period of 4-7 days, assessments were performed weekly during the first 4 weeks, and then after 6, 8 and 12 weeks, using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI). HDRS total score was reduced by a mean of 14.8 in the milnacipran 100 mg/day group, 12.9 in the milnacipran 200 mg/day group and 12.1 in the fluoxetine 20 mg/day group. MADRS total score decreased by 17.4, 15.8 and 14.6, respectively. No significant difference could be shown between the three treatment groups for either the HDRS or MADRS total scores. However, the time-by-time change showed a trend in favour of milnacipran 100 mg/day, which was found significantly superior to fluoxetine at day 28 for several converging parameters (MADRS, CGI-3). Overall, efficacy ratings for all parameters were highest for milnacipran 100 mg/day, followed by milnacipran 200 mg/day and fluoxetine 20 mg/day. Side-effect profiles were not significantly different between groups except for a significantly greater frequency of dose-related increase in heart rate > or = 100 bpm in milnacipran recipients and a significantly greater weight loss in fluoxetine recipients.

Pharmacokinetics of milnacipran in renal impairment

The pharmacokinetics of a single 50 mg dose of milnacipran, a new non tricyclic antidepressant drug, were compared in 8 chronic renal failure subjects (Clc(reat) between 9 to 84.5 ml.min(-1)) and in 6 healthy volunteers. Concentrations of unchanged (F2207 racemate and F2695 and F2696, enantiomers) and glucuroconjugated drug (main metabolite) were measured using HPLC and GC-MS. As for drugs mainly eliminated via renal route, the pharmacokinetics of milnacipran were markedly affected by impaired renal function with the elimination half-life of severely impaired subject being approximately three times that of the control group. Milnacipran apparent total clearance and renal clearance were positively correlated with glomerular filtration rate, while non-renal clearance and apparent volume of distribution were unaffected by renal impairment. Plasma concentrations of the glucuroconjugate were gradually increased in plasma, while its total urine excretion remained unchanged. As for the racemate, pharmacokinetics of each enantiomer were modified by renal failure, although, as predictable from its higher renal clearance value, it was more marked for F2696 than for F2695. Considering that modifications were shown to be proportional to the degree of renal impairment and that milnacipran presents low variability, the necessary dose adjustment is therefore easy to predict.

Double-blind study of the efficacy and safety of milnacipran and imipramine in elderly patients with major depressive episode

The novel antidepressant agent milnacipran is a dual and equipotent serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor. The aim of this double-blind study was to compare the efficacy and safety of milnacipran (50 mg twice daily) with that of imipramine (50 mg twice daily) in elderly patients with major depressive episode. A total of 219 patients were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of double-blind treatment with either milnacipran or imipramine; 72 patients withdrew from the study. At the end of treatment no significant differences were found between milnacipran and imipramine in antidepressant efficacy. A significantly greater number of side-effects, particularly anticholinergic effects, was observed in the imipramine group. Milnacipran may be preferable to imipramine in elderly depressed patients, as it provides the same antidepressant activity as imipramine with a lower incidence of side-effects, and does not impair cognitive ability.

Antifibrillatory efficacy of long-term tedisamil administration in a postinfarcted canine model of ischemic ventricular fibrillation

The electrophysiologic and antifibrillatory properties of tedisamil (KC-8857) were studied in vivo in a conscious canine model of sudden cardiac death. Male mongrel dogs were anesthetized, and surgical anterior myocardial infarction was induced by a 2-h occlusion, with reperfusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Three to five days after infarction, dogs were subjected to programmed electrical stimulation (PES) to identify those at risk for ischemia-induced ventricular fibrillation. Previous studies documented that dogs with a significant anterior-wall infarction develop ventricular tachycardia in response to PES and are at an increased risk for sudden cardiac death on imposition of a transient ischemic event in a region remote from the infarct-related artery. PES-inducible animals were randomized to either oral placebo or oral tedisamil treatment (3 mg/kg, b.i.d for 4 days, Group 1, n = 8). Control animals received empty gelatin capsules (Group 2, n = 8). The effective refractory period and QTc interval were unchanged after 3 days of oral placebo or tedisamil dosing. Arrhythmic activity after drug administration was not observed in dogs treated with tedisamil. PES induction of ventricular tachycardia was reduced significantly in the tedisamil-treated group (100% inducible before drug vs. 9% inducible after drug; p < 0.05). In the sudden-cardiac-death protocol, tedisamil reduced the incidence of lethal ischemic arrhythmias developing in response to acute posterolateral myocardial ischemia. Tedisamil-treated animals exhibited a 100% compared with a 25% survival rate in the control group (p < 0.05). Anterior-wall infarct size, expressed as a percentage of the left ventricle, did not differ between groups: Group 1 = 20 +/- 1%; Group 2 = 22 +/- 1%. Our findings suggest that tedisamil might be useful in the prevention of malignant ventricular arrhythmias in myocardial ischemic injury.

Long-term efficacy and safety of milnacipran compared to clomipramine in patients with major depression

Milnacipran is a new antidepressive drug, a combined noradrenaline/serotonin (NA/5-HT) reuptake inhibitor, which has been suggested to be as effective as and better tolerated than tricyclic antidepressants. Since long-term studies are lacking, we compared the efficacy, safety and tolerability of milnacipran and clomipramine in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study setting during 26 weeks of treatment in patients with major depression. A total of 107 patients were treated with either milnacipran (n=52) or clomipramine (n=55). Due to active treatment of duration less than 12 days in four patients and protocol deviation in one patient, in total 47 milnacipran-treated patients were eligible for efficacy analysis. Nine patients in the clomipramine group continued on active treatment for less than 12 days. Thus 46 clomipramine-treated patients were finally included in the efficacy analysis. After 1 week of dose escalation, there was a fixed dosage regimen of either milnacipran (200 mg daily) or clomipramine (150 mg daily) during weeks 2 to 10, followed by flexible dosing of milnacipran (100, 150 or 200 mg daily) or clomipramine (75, 100 or 150 mg daily) during weeks 11 to 26. A total of 53 patients (49%) completed the 26-week study period; 21% (11/52) of the patients in the milnacipran group and 38% (21/55) of the patients in the clomipramine group discontinued their medication prematurely due to adverse events, whereas 19% (10/52) of those on milnacipran and 7% (4/55) of those on clomipramine treatment withdrew due to either lack of efficacy or clinical deterioration. The mean change (+/-SD) in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) score between the baseline and the last rating ranged from 23.7+/-3.1 to 12.0+/-9.5 in the milnacipran-treated patients and from 23.1+/-3.5 to 8.0+/-8.5 in the clomipramine-treated patients, revealing a significant difference in favour of clomipramine. In total 58% of the milnacipran-treated patients vs. 72% of the clomipramine-treated patients showed a > or = 50% reduction in their baseline HAMD scores and 45% vs. 63% had an HAMD score of < or = 7 at the last rating, respectively. Moreover, the time to the onset of the antidepressant action (defined as > or = 50% reduction of the baseline HAMD score) showed a significant difference in favour of clomipramine. In addition, clomipramine was significantly more efficacious in patients with a baseline HAMD score of > or = 24 as evidenced by the analysis of the HAMD score at week 6 and at the last rating. The Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale did not show significant differences between the treatment groups. The safety analysis did not reveal any differences of clinical significance in cardiovascular variables between the study drugs. Dry mouth was significantly less frequently reported by the milnacipran-treated patients during the early and later phases (weeks 6 to 26) of the study, while insomnia was more common in the milnacipran group during weeks 1 to 6. In conclusion, milnacipran appeared to be less effective than clomipramine in the long-term treatment of depression. The side-effects of the drugs differed to a certain extent, and milnacipran tended to be somewhat better tolerated than clomipramine.

Effects of tedisamil, atenolol and their combination on heart and rate-dependent QT interval in healthy volunteers

AIMS

Tedisamil is a new blocker of K+ currents in cardiac tissues, exerts bradycardic effects and has shown clinical efficacy in angina pectoris. Theoretically, when coadministered with a beta-adrenoceptor blocker the tedisamil combination could induce dangerous bradycardia and QT interval prolongation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of tedisamil and atenolol alone and in combination, on heart rate and QT interval duration at rest and during exercise tests.

METHODS

The effects of tedisamil (100 mg twice daily) and atenolol (50 mg twice daily) on heart rate and QT interval duration were analysed in a three-period crossover study in healthy male volunteers.

RESULTS

This study showed that tedisamil exerted a significant (P<0.05) bradycardic action at rest (-10 beats min(-1); 95% CI: -6 to -15 beats min(-1)) similar to atenolol (-14 beats min(-1); -11 to -17) and drug combination (-9 beats min(-1); -6 to -12). During exercise, at the highest comparable workload, heart rate did not decrease significantly with tedisamil but decreased significantly with atenolol (-42 beats min(-1); -37 to -47) and combination (-47 beats min(-1); -41 to 52). Atenolol did not modify QT interval duration. Tedisamil alone and in combination with atenolol increased QT interval duration by 12% (95% CI: 7 to 17%) and 12% (8 to 16) respectively at RR=1000 ms, but not at RR<700 ms (combination). Tedisamil alone and in combination induced a reverse rate-dependent QT interval prolongation.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the combination of tedisamil and atenolol is not associated with excessive bradycardia or excessive QT interval prolongation in healthy subjects.

A double-blind six months comparative study of milnacipran and clomipramine in major depressive disorder

Milnacipran is a new antidepressant with similar effects on the reuptake of noradrenaline and serotonin in vivo and in vitro. The present study was designed to study the efficacy and tolerability of long-term treatment of depressed patients with milnacipran in comparison with clomipramine. The study was designed as a double-blind, randomized parallel group comparison at 10 different hospitals in The Netherlands. The duration of treatment was 6 weeks, with an extension period of 20 weeks. The entire study period of 26 weeks was done under double-blind conditions. There was 1 week of dose escalation after which the patients received either treatment with milnacipran 200 mg/day or clomipramine 150 mg/day in fixed doses during weeks 2 to 10. This was followed by flexible dosing with 200, 150, or 100 mg/day milnacipran or 150, 100 or 75 mg/day clomipramine during weeks 11 to 26. Both milnacipran and clomipramine showed poor antidepressant activity in this patient sample. There were no significant differences between the two treatment groups with respect to antidepressant efficacy. Several methodological reasons might explain the lack of antidepressant efficacy in the present study. In 45% of the patients in the present study, the duration of the current episode of depression was longer than 6 months, whereas 48% of the patients used antidepressants before the study and 73% of these appeared to be non-responders. This raises the possibility that the present sample consisted of treatment-resistant depressive patients.

Dyschromatosis

The dyschromatoses are a group of disorders characterized by the presence of both hyperpigmented and hypopigmented macules, many of which are small in size and irregular in shape. There are two major forms-dyschromatosis symmetrica hereditaria (DSH) and dyschromatosis universalis hereditaria (DUH), both of which are seen most commonly in Japan. DSH was first described by Toyama in 1929 and is characterized by a symmetrical distribution of hyperpigmented and hypopigmented macules on the extremities, especially over the dorsa of the hands and feet. In 1933, Ichikawa and Hiraga were the first to describe DUH as well-demarcated brown macules admixed with various-sized hypopigmented macules in a generalized as opposed to acral distribution. DUH was noted to appear within the first month of life. Some clinicians have suggested that DSH might be a subtype of DUH; however, we have to wait for the cloning of the causal genes of these diseases before coming to any definite conclusions. The differential diagnosis of dyschromatosis includes xeroderma pigmentosum, dyschromic amyloidosis, and exposure to chemicals such as diphenylcyclopropenone and monobenzyl ether of hydroquinone.

Milnacipran, a new serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor: an overview of its antidepressant activity and clinical tolerability

Milnacipran (Ixel) is a new antidepressant with essentially equal potency for inhibiting the reuptake of both serotonin and noradrenaline, with no affinity for any neurotransmitter receptor studied. A review of the studies comparing milnacipran, placebo and active comparator antidepressants provides clear-cut evidence of its efficacy in both severe and moderate depression in hospitalized and community settings. Meta-analyses of the original data of controlled trials involving 1032 patients, comparing milnacipran with imipramine or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), show that milnacipran provides antidepressant efficacy similar to that of imipramine and significantly superior to that of the SSRIs. An analysis of a database of over 3300 patients shows that both the general and cardiovascular tolerability of milnacipran are superior to those of the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) with fewer cholinergic side-effects. The tolerability of milnacipran was comparable to that of the SSRIs, with a higher incidence of dysuria with milnacipran, and a higher frequency of nausea and anxiety with the SSRIs. Milnacipran is a new therapeutic option in depression, which offers a clinical efficacy in the range of the TCAs combined with a tolerability equivalent to that of the SSRIs.