Multicenter, phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010;65:1101-1107. [PMID: 19707761 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-009-1115-5]

The Recent Trends of Systemic Treatments and Locoregional Therapies for Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a hepatic malignancy that has a rapidly increasing incidence. CCA is anatomically classified into intrahepatic (iCCA) and extrahepatic (eCCA), which is further divided into perihilar (pCCA) and distal (dCCA) subtypes, with higher incidence rates in Asia. Despite its rarity, CCA has a low 5-year survival rate and remains the leading cause of primary liver tumor-related death over the past 10-20 years. The systemic therapy section discusses gemcitabine-based regimens as primary treatments, along with oxaliplatin-based options. Second-line therapy is limited but may include short-term infusional fluorouracil (FU) plus leucovorin (LV) and oxaliplatin. The adjuvant therapy section discusses approaches to improve overall survival (OS) post-surgery. However, only a minority of CCA patients qualify for surgical resection. In comparison to adjuvant therapies, neoadjuvant therapy for unresectable cases shows promise. Gemcitabine and cisplatin indicate potential benefits for patients awaiting liver transplantation. The addition of immunotherapies to chemotherapy in combination is discussed. Nivolumab and innovative approaches like CAR-T cells, TRBAs, and oncolytic viruses are explored. We aim in this review to provide a comprehensive report on the systemic and locoregional therapies for CCA.

Real-world treatment outcomes of metastatic biliary tract cancer patients in Japan: the Tokushukai REAl-world data project 04 (TREAD 04)

OBJECTIVES

To investigate temporal trends in treatment patterns and prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer.

METHODS

From the Tokushukai REAl-world Data project, we identified 945 patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer treated with gemcitabine, tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil, gemcitabine plus cisplatin, gemcitabine plus tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil or gemcitabine plus cisplatin and tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil between April 2010 and March 2022. Stratified/conventional Cox regression analyses were conducted to examine the association between overall survival and patient- and tumour-related factors, study period, hospital volume, hospital type and first-line chemotherapy regimen. Using inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores, overall survival was also compared between monotherapy and combination therapy groups.

RESULTS

We enrolled 366 patients (199 men; median age, 72 years). Over a median follow-up of 5.2 months, the median overall survival was 7.0 months (95% confidence interval 6.2-9.0), and the median time to treatment failure was 3.5 months (95% confidence interval 3.1-4.5). Median overall survival and time to treatment failure for gemcitabine/tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil/gemcitabine plus cisplatin/gemcitabine plus tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil/gemcitabine plus cisplatin and tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil regimen were 6.2/6.6/7.9/16.2/15.1 and 2.8/3.4/4.1/15.3/7.4 months, respectively. Primary disease site, previous surgery, previous endoscopic procedures and hospital type were identified as significant prognostic factors. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis demonstrated that combination therapy had a significantly better prognosis than monotherapy (hazard ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.43-0.88, P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Our real-world data analysis showed that standard care for metastatic biliary tract cancer is widely used in hospitals throughout Japan and verified the survival benefits of combination therapy over monotherapy observed in prior clinical trials.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

UMIN000050590 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm).

Cisplatin-based combination therapy for cancer

Cisplatin, that is, cis-diamminedichloroplatinum is a coordinate compound that is mainly preferred as prior treatment against several solid tumors and malignancies like ovaries, head and neck, testicular, and lung cancers because of its anticancer activity. Cisplatin binds at the N7 position of purine and forms adducts, leading to altered activity of DNA that triggers apoptosis. DNA damage is followed by several signaling pathways like induced oxidative stress, upregulated p53, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and Jun N-terminal kinases (JNK) or Akt pathways along with induced apoptosis. Additionally, cisplatin treatment comes with few disadvantages such as toxic effects, that is, hepatotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, neurotoxicity, etc., and drug resistance. Furthermore, to overcome cisplatin resistance and toxicological effects, combination drug therapy has been considered. The aim of the review is to focus on the molecular mechanism of action of cisplatin and combination drug therapy to reduce the side effects in cancer therapy.

Impact of Gemcitabine Plus S1 Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Borderline Resectable Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection is the only curative strategy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC), but recurrence rates are high even after purported curative resection. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine/S-1 (GS) combination chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.

METHODS

In an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with GS, repeated every 21 days, was administered for three cycles to patients with histologic or cytologically confirmed borderline resectable (BR) PHC who were eligible for inclusion in the study. In this study, BR PHC was defined as positive for lymph node metastasis and for cancerous vascular invasion or Bismuth type 4 on preoperative imaging. The primary end point consisted of the 3- and 5-year survival rates. The secondary end points were feasibility, resection rate, and pathologic effect.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 60 patients between January 2011 and December 2016. With respect to toxicity, the major adverse effect was neutropenia, which reached grade 3 or 4 in 53.3% of cases. The overall disease control rate was 91.3%. The median survival time for the entire cohort was 30.3 months. For all the patients, the estimated 3-year survival rate was 44.1%, and the 5-year survival rate was 30.0%. Resection with curative intent was performed for 43 (71%) of the 60 patients. For 81% of the resected patients, R0 resection was performed, and Clavien-Dindo grade 3 complications or a higher morbidity rate was seen in 41% of the patients. The median survival time was 50.1 months for the resected and 14.8 months for the unresected patients. For the resected patients, the estimated 3-year survival rate was 55.8%, and the estimated 5-year survival rate was 36.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine/S-1 combination NAC has promising efficacy and good tolerability for patients with BR PHC.

Signal enhancement ratio of CE-MRI: a potential biomarker of survival after hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in biliary tract cancers

Background

The association of contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) and the overall survival (OS) of biliary tract cancers (BTC) is ambiguous. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate the value of signal enhancement ratio (SER) and its early change in CE-MRI as biomarkers of survival after hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in BTC.

Results

One hundred and two BTC patients treated via HAIC with 3cir-OFF regimen between January 2011 and June 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were 9.8 months [range 1.5–83.3 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.789–11.811] and 14.2 months (range 1.8–83.3 months, 95% CI: 11.106–17.294), respectively. The cutoff value of SER before HAIC (SER0) was 1.04, and both median PFS and OS in the SER0 ≥ 1.04 group were longer than in the SER0 < 1.04 group (median PFS: 10.5 vs. 8.5 months, p = 0.027; median OS: 23.9 vs. 12.3 months, p < 0.001). The median OS in the ΔSER > 0 group was longer than in the ΔSER < 0 group (17.3 versus 12.8 months, p = 0.029 (ΔSER means the change of SER after two cycles of HAIC). Multivariate analysis showed SER0 (p = 0.029) and HAIC treatment cycle (p = 0.002) were independent predictors of longer survival.

Conclusions

SER in CE-MRI before HAIC (SER0) is a potential biomarker for the prediction of survival after HAIC in advanced BTC.

Survival Outcomes of Gemcitabine Plus S-1 Adjuvant Chemotherapy after Surgical Resection for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer

INTRODUCTION

The usefulness of adjuvant chemotherapy in biliary tract cancer (BTC) is poorly reported. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) chemotherapy after curative surgical resection for BTC.

METHODS

225 BTC patients who underwent surgical resection between January 2006 and May 2019 were enrolled in this study. Twenty-seven patients received adjuvant chemotherapy with GS (GS group), whereas 67 patients underwent surgery alone (S group). Twenty-three matching pairs were derived through propensity score (PS) matching analysis. Patients received 12 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (70 mg/m2 oral S-1 for 7 consecutive days plus intravenous gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on day 7). The primary end point was recurrence-free survival (RFS). The secondary end points were the 1-, 2-, and 3-year RFS and overall survival (OS) rates, tolerability, and frequency of grade 3/4 toxicity.

RESULTS

The completion rate was 81.5%; no treatment-related deaths were observed. Grade 3/4 adverse events were seen in 40.7% of the patients. RFS (3-year RFS rate: 59.3% vs. 39.1%, p = 0.049) and OS (3-year OS rate: 71.7% vs. 53.4%, p = 0.008) were significantly better in the GS group than in the S group among PS-matched pairs.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

GS chemotherapy after curative surgery was well tolerated, showed better clinical benefit in the adjuvant setting, and can effectively reduce BTC recurrence.

Chemotherapy for Biliary Tract Cancer in 2021

Biliary tract cancer refers to a group of malignancies including cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, and ampullary cancer. While surgical resection is considered the only curative treatment, postoperative recurrence can sometimes occur. Adjuvant chemotherapy is used to prolong prognosis in some cases. Many unresectable cases are also treated with chemotherapy. Therefore, systemic chemotherapy is widely introduced for the treatment of biliary tract cancer. Evidence on chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer is recently on the increase. Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin is currently the standard of care for first-line chemotherapy in advanced cases. Recently, FOLFOX also demonstrated efficacy as a second-line treatment. In addition, efficacies of isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors and fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors have been shown. In the adjuvant setting, capecitabine monotherapy has become the standard of care in Western countries. In addition to conventional cytotoxic agents, molecular-targeted agents and immunotherapy have been evaluated in multiple clinical trials. Genetic testing is used to check for genetic alterations and molecular-targeted agents and immunotherapy are introduced based on tumor characteristics. In this article, we review the latest evidence of chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer.

The impact of age and comorbidity in advanced or recurrent biliary tract cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Limited data are available on age and comorbidity assessment in patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC). This study aimed to evaluate the association of age and comorbidity burden with clinical outcomes of chemotherapy for BTC.

METHODS

Consecutive 197 BTC patients undergoing first-line chemotherapy between 2007 and 2017 were retrospectively studied. Patients were classified to three groups according to the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI) excluding the score about BTC and progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), and safety were compared.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients (26%) were elderly (≥ 75 years), and ACCI was 0-2 in 73 patients (37%), 3-4 in 98 (50%), and ≥ 5 in 26 (13%). ACCI was associated with the administration of first-line combination chemotherapy (89% in 0-2, 80% in 3-4, and 64% in ≥ 5, P < 0.01) and second-line chemotherapy (67% in 0-2, 51% in 3-4, and 35% in ≥ 5, P = 0.01). ACCI was prognostic for OS in addition to performance status, disease status, and CA19-9: The hazard ratios in ACCI of 3-4 and ≥ 5 were 1.39 and 1.79, compared with ACCI of 0-2 (P = 0.04). While overall safety profile did not differ by ACCI, higher ACCI score group developed Grade 3-4 neutropenia more frequently (26% in 0-2, 42% in 3-4, and 46% in ≥ 5, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Age and comorbidity burden did affect OS and safety profile in BTC patients undergoing first-line palliative chemotherapy. ACCI can be a simple and useful tool to evaluate the age and comorbidity burden in these patients.

New and Emerging Systemic Therapeutic Options for Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) represents a disease entity that comprises a heterogeneous group of biliary malignant neoplasms, with variable clinical presentation and severity. It may be classified according to its anatomical location and distinguished in intrahepatic (iCCA), perihilar (pCCA), or distal (dCCA), each subtype implying distinct epidemiology, biology, prognosis, and strategy for clinical management. Its incidence has increased globally over the past few decades, and its mortality rate remains high due to both its biological aggressiveness and resistance to medical therapy. Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment and is the standard approach for resectable CCA; however, more than half of the patients have locally advanced or metastatic disease at presentation. For patients with unresectable CCA, the available systemic therapies are of limited effectiveness. However, the advances of the comprehension of the complex molecular landscape of CCA and its tumor microenvironment could provide new keys to better understand the pathogenesis, the mechanisms of resistance and ultimately to identify promising new therapeutic targets. Recently, clinical trials targeting isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-1 mutations and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-2 fusions, as well as immunotherapy showed promising results. All these new and emerging therapeutic options are herein discussed.

High Response Rate and Prolonged Survival of Unresectable Biliary Tract Cancer Treated With a New Combination Therapy Consisting of Intraarterial Chemotherapy Plus Radiotherapy

SYNOPSIS

A new combination therapy consisting of intraarterial chemotherapy plus radiotherapy was demonstrated to have the potential to improve the response rate and survival time in patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer.

PURPOSE

We retrospectively investigated the effectiveness and safety of a new combination therapy consisting of intraarterial chemotherapy plus radiation therapy (AI+RT), which may have the potential to improve unresectable biliary tract cancer (BTC).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 52 BTC cases treated with AI+RT and analyzed the anti-tumor effect, survival time and adverse events. The AI+RT regimen consisted of one-shot intraarterial chemotherapy (AI) at the first angiography session, almost 6 months of reservoir AI (5-FU and cisplatin, q/week) and external radiation with a maximum dose of 50.6 Gy.

RESULTS

The response rate and disease control rate were high, at 40.4% and 96.2%, respectively, and the median overall and progression-free survival time were 463 and 431 days; thus, long-term survival was achieved. A univariate analysis identified 12 prognostic factors, and a performance status of 2 (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.82, p=0.02), jaundice (HR: 3.22, p<0.01), peritoneal dissemination (HR: 22.5, p<0.01), number of AI (HR: 0.35, p=0.01) and response to AI+RT (HR: 0.23, p<0.01) were extracted as significant prognostic factors in a multivariate analysis. The following: grade ≥3 adverse events occurred: leucopenia (11.5%), neutropenia (1.9%), anemia (15.4%), thrombocytopenia (11.5%), anorexia (3.8%), gastroduodenal ulcer (25.0%), and cholangitis (23.1%). There were no cases of treatment-related death.

CONCLUSIONS

AI+RT was shown to contribute to a high response rate and prolonged survival in patients with unresectable BTC. A sufficient number of AI and the response to this therapy were thought to be significant prognostic factors in patients receiving AI+RT. Advances in multidisciplinary therapies, such as AI+RT, which was described in the present study, are also considered to be important for the future.

Clinical outcomes of previously untreated patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma following proton beam therapy

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of proton beam therapy (PBT) as initial treatment for patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is unclear, particularly as related to ICC histological subtypes. We performed this study to address this gap in knowledge.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with unresectable ICC who underwent PBT as their initial treatment were evaluated. Twenty-seven patients had Child-Pugh class A liver function, 11 exhibited jaundice, and 10 had multiple tumors. Nineteen, 7, and 11 tumors were classified as mass forming (MF), periductal infiltrating (PI), and intraductal growth (IG) types, respectively, based on gross appearance in imaging studies. Patients were classified into the curative group (n = 25) and palliative group (n = 12) depending on whether the planning target volume covered all the macroscopic tumors.

RESULTS

The 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 60.3, and 41.4%, respectively; the median survival time (MST) was 15 months for all patients. The MSTs for curative and palliative groups were 25 and 7 months, respectively. Curative treatment and adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival, while the presence of periductal infiltrating type tumors was a negative prognostic factor. In the curative group, the 1- and 2-year local control rates were 100 and 71.5%, respectively, while the 1-, and 2-year progression-free survival rates were 58.5, and 37.6%, respectively. No severe acute toxicities were observed. Three patients experienced grade 3 biliary tract infection, although it was unclear whether this was radiotherapy-related.

CONCLUSION

PBT may yield to improve survival and local tumor control among patients with unresectable ICC.

Combination gemcitabine plus S-1 versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin for advanced/recurrent biliary tract cancer: the FUGA-BT (JCOG1113) randomized phase III clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) is the standard treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC); however, it causes nausea, vomiting, and anorexia, and requires hydration. Gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) reportedly has equal to, or better, efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile. We aimed to confirm the non-inferiority of GS to GC for patients with advanced/recurrent BTC in terms of overall survival (OS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We undertook a phase III randomized trial in 33 institutions in Japan. Eligibility criteria included chemotherapy-naïve patients with recurrent or unresectable BTC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 - 1, and adequate organ function. The calculated sample size was 350 with a one-sided α of 5%, a power of 80%, and non-inferiority margin hazard ratio (HR) of 1.155. The primary end point was OS, while the secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), adverse events (AEs), and clinically significant AEs defined as grade ≥2 fatigue, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, oral mucositis, or diarrhea.

RESULTS

Between May 2013 and March 2016, 354 patients were enrolled. GS was found to be non-inferior to GC [median OS: 13.4 months with GC and 15.1 months with GS, HR, 0.945; 90% confidence interval (CI), 0.78-1.15; P = 0.046 for non-inferiority]. The median PFS was 5.8 months with GC and 6.8 months with GS (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.70-1.07). The RR was 32.4% with GC and 29.8% with GS. Both treatments were generally well-tolerated. Clinically significant AEs were observed in 35.1% of patients in the GC arm and 29.9% in the GS arm.

CONCLUSIONS

GS, which does not require hydration, should be considered a new, convenient standard of care option for patients with advanced/recurrent BTC.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

This trial has been registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm), number UMIN000010667.

A feasibility study of gemcitabine, S-1 and leucovorin combination therapy (GSL) for advanced biliary tract cancer

Objective: Gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) combination chemotherapy is the current standard of care for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). Recently, a randomized controlled trial showed the non-inferiority in overall survival of gemcitabine and S-1 (GS) compared to GC. Because leucovorin is known to enhance the activity of S-1, we conducted this study to evaluate the feasibility of combination therapy of gemcitabine, S-1 and leucovorin (GSL). Methods: Advanced BTC patients without prior treatment other than surgery or adjuvant chemotherapy were eligible to this study. Gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 1000 mg/m² on day 1, and oral S-1 at a dose of 40 mg/m² and oral leucovorin at a dose of 25 mg twice daily on days 1-7, every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was PFS and the secondary endpoints included OS, objective tumour response and the safety. Results: Between June 2013 and December 2015, 20 patients with advanced BTC (12 gallbladder, 4 extrahepatic, 2 intrahepatic, 2 ampulla) including 16 unresectable disease and 4 recurrent disease were enroled. The median PFS and OS were 5.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8 - not reached) and 16.0 (95% CI, 6.4-20.8) months, respectively. A partial response was achieved in 3 (15%) and stable disease in 8 (40%), giving a disease control rate of 55%. Major grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (30%), anaemia (5%), stomatitis (15%), diarrhoea (15%) and anorexia (10%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: This study showed the feasibility and potential efficacy of GSL as a first-line treatment in patients with advanced BTC.

The Efficacy of Different Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Background: Although gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) is considered as standard chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), the optimal regimen remains unknown.

Methods: Using Network meta-analysis (NMA), a systematic review was conducted to find the most effective chemotherapy regimen for advanced BTC. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library for articles published before October 6, 2018. Articles about chemotherapeutic comparisons were included. Hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were estimated while odd ratios (ORs) was assessed for objective response rate (ORR).

Results: The NMA included 25 studies and 3,312 individuals. Among all the regimens, Folfox-4 regimen obtained a superior difference in OS (BSC vs. Folfox-4, HR 3.4, 95% CI 1.7-6.7). XP was slightly better than GP in OS and GS approximately obtained the same efficacy to GP (HR for XP vs. GP 0.74, 95% CI 0.51-1.1; HR for GS vs. GP 1.1, 95% CI 0.71-1.5). Most of the targeted therapies included in this study tend to achieve better results in PFS and ORR but failed to improve OS, in which E-GEMOX achieved the best ORR when compared to BSC (OR 0.03, 95% CI 0.00-0.94).

Conclusions: Folfox-4 regimen is likely to be the optimal chemotherapy for patients with advanced BTC and the predominant targeted therapy hasn't achieved significant success currently. XP and GS can be considered as alternatives for advanced BTC.

The Efficacy and Safety of First-line Chemotherapies for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Network Meta-analysis

Major chemotherapeutic drugs for advanced biliary tract cancer (ABTC) include gemcitabine, fluoropyrimidines and platinum compounds, but the optimum combination of them remains inconclusive. The main objective of this network meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of first-line chemotherapies for ABTC.

Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane library and Science Direct for relevant controlled trials until May 2017. We estimated the Hazard ratios (HRs) for survival time and odds ratios (ORs) for response rate and toxic effects among different therapies. All data were calculated by Aggregate Data Drug Information System (ADDIS) v2.0 online and STATA software.

Results: 16 trials involving 2245 patients and 10 regimens were included in this study. In terms of the objective response rate, Cap plus CIS (CapC) exhibited better performance than FU (OR 5.46, 95% CI 1.07-56.63). Gem plus S-1 (GS) was superior to Gem (OR 4.72, 95% CI 1.31-17.02) and FU (OR 9.08, 95% CI 1.56-89.20). Also, GS had an overall survival benefit compared to FU and Gem, with a HR of 0.51 (95% CI 0.28-0.96) and 0.43 (95% CI 0.20-0.93), respectively. Compared with FU, Gem plus OXA (Gemox) prolonged the OS (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.32-0.96). And FU was also inferior to FP (HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.07-3.16). The PFS did not differ between all regiments. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 hematological toxic effects appeared to be higher in the Gem-based chemotherapies. In regard to nonhematological adverse events, grade 3 or 4 diarrhea and stomotitis occurred more frequently in S-1-based groups. In addition, the Cap plus CIS combination (CapC) were more likely to cause vomiting, stomotitis and hand-foot syndrome. As for peripheral neuropathy, Gem plus OXA (Gemox), CapC and GC were associated with higher risk. There was no difference among different treatments with respect to anorexia, fatigue, nausea, pigmentation, renal dysfunction and asthenia.

Conclusion: Physicians should discuss with the patients the different options outlining potential benefit and toxicity since no clear evidence of an approach of choice can be produced.

Second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent biliary tract cancer: a single center, retrospective analysis of 294 cases

Purpose The survival benefit of first-line chemotherapy (CT1) for biliary tract cancer (BTC) is now established but the role of second-line chemotherapy (CT2) has not been fully elucidated yet. Methods Consecutive advanced BTC patients receiving CT1 between 2000 and 2016 were retrospectively studied. We investigated the safety and efficacy of CT2, prognostic factors for residual survival after CT1, and explored subgroups who would benefit from CT2. Results Among 294 patients receiving CT1 for advanced BTC, CT2 was given in 139 patients (47%). CT2 provided a response rate of 4%, a disease control rate of 52%, a median progression-free survival of 2.8 and overall survival of 7.7 months, respectively. CT2 was associated with longer residual survival after CT1 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61, p < 0.01), as well as PS of 0-1 (HR 0.53, p < 0.01), best response to CT1 of PD (HR 1.46, p = 0.01), and CEA ≥5.0 ng/mL (HR 1.69, p < 0.01). The effects of CT2 were homogeneous across almost all subgroups but were more prominent in patients with age ≥ 70 years (HR 0.32, p for interaction =0.02), CA19-9 ≥ 200 IU/mL (HR 0.41, p for interaction = 0.08) and CEA ≥5.0 ng/mL (HR 0.41, p for interaction = 0.06). Conclusions The introduction rate of CT2 was 47%. Although the efficacy of CT2 was modest in terms of tumor response, it was associated with better survival. Further investigations are necessary both to develop more effective regimens and to select patients who will benefit from CT2.

Pathologic complete response after gemcitabine and S-1 chemotherapy for far advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

We report the case of a 72-year-old man who was initially diagnosed with far advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, associated with bulky lymph node metastasis involving the common hepatic artery and moderate amount of ascites around the liver. After 10 cycles of systemic chemotherapy combining gemcitabine and S-1 with well-tolerated toxicities, a CT scan showed a marked shrinkage of the liver mass and lymph nodes (clinical partial response) with disappearance of ascites, which could permit a radical resection of the tumor. He underwent left lobectomy of the liver with lymph node dissection, and histopathological examination revealed pathologic complete response. Seven years after surgery, he is in a good overall condition.

Combined gemcitabine and S-1 chemotherapy for treating unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized open-label clinical trial

Although the combination of cisplatin and gemcitabine (GEM) is considered the standard first-line chemotherapy against unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC), its efficacy is discouraging. The present randomized open-label clinical trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the GEM plus S-1 (GEM-S-1) combination against unresectable HC. Twenty-five patients per group were randomly assigned to receive GEM, S-1 or GEM-S-1. Neutropenia (56%) and leukopenia (40%) were the most common chemotherapy-related toxicities in the GEM-S-1 group. Median overall survival (OS) in the GEM-S-1, GEM and S-1 groups was 11, 10 and 6 months, respectively. GEM plus S-1 significantly improved OS compared to S-1 monotherapy (OR=0.68; 95%CI, 0.50–0.90; P=0.008). Median progression-free survival (PFS) times in the GEM-S-1, GEM and S-1 groups were 4.90, 3.70 and 1.60 months, respectively. GEM plus S-1 significantly improved PFS compared to S-1 monotherapy (OR=0.50; 95%CI, 0.27–0.91; P=0.024). Response rates were 36%, 24% and 8% in the GEM-S-1, GEM and S-1 groups, respectively. A statistically significant difference was found in response rates between the gemcitabine-S-1 and S-1 groups (36% vs 8%, P=0.017). Patients with CA19-9<466 U/ml were more responsive to chemotherapeutic agents than those with CA19-9≥571 U/ml (88.9% vs 0%, P<0.001). We conclude that the combination of GEM plus S-1 provides a better OS, PFS and response rate than S-1 monotherapy, but it did not significantly differ from GEM monotherapy. (ChiCTR-TRC-14004733).

CA19-9 kinetics during systemic chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent biliary tract cancer

PURPOSE

The role of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) kinetics in patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) receiving chemotherapy remains to be elucidated.

METHODS

A total of 185 advanced or recurrent BTC patients receiving a first line chemotherapy between January 2006 and March 2016, were retrospectively studied. Serum CA19-9 was measured at baseline and after two cycles of chemotherapy, and patients were categorized based on CA19-9 response: CA19-9 decrease group (≥ 30% decrease), stable group (< 30% decrease and < 20% increase) and increase group (≥ 20% increase). The associations of CA19-9 response with radiological tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were investigated.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant association between CA19-9 response and radiological tumor responses (p < 0.001). The median PFS and OS were significantly different among three groups according to CA19-9 response: PFS of 8.0, 5.7 and 3.5 months in CA19-9 decrease, stable and increase groups (p < 0.001) and OS of 18.8, 16.0 and 7.5 months in CA19-9 decrease, stable and increase groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses showed that CA19-9 response was prognostic both of OS and PFS in addition, to CA19-9 at baseline, and performance status.

CONCLUSION

CA19-9 kinetics after the first two cycles of a first line chemotherapy was a prognostic factor for OS and PFS in patients with advanced and recurrent BTC.

[Chemotherapy for Biliary Tract Cancer]

The term of biliary tract cancer (BTC) refers to all tumors that arise from the biliary tract or the biliary drainage system, including the intra- and extra-hepatic bile ducts as well as the gallbladder. BTCs are aggressive tumors with limited treatment options and poor overall survival. Currently, surgery remains to be the only potentially curative treatment, and most patients develop recurrence. For advanced tumors, only limited effective treatment modalities exist today. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin is considered as a standard option for advanced biliary cancer. A randomized phase III trial (ABC-02 trial) showed superiority of gemcitabine plus cisplatin over gemcitabine alone. In that study, they showed that after a median follow-up of 8.2 months, the median overall survival was 8.1 months in the gemcitabine-only group and 11.7 months in the gemcitabine plus cisplatin group (p<0.001). However, while this is a definite advancement, a 3-month survival extension among patients with BTC is modest at best. Moreover, this regimen has not been compared head-to-head with other gemcitabine based combinations. Gemcitabine monotherapy, 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin, and single-agent capecitabine are all reasonable options for patients with a borderline performance status. Recent advancements have provided new insight into the genomic landscape of BTCs, and thus, it remains unclear whether combined treatment with molecular targeted agents or other cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents may also be effective against advanced BTC.

Gemcitabine and S-1 versus gemcitabine and cisplatin treatment in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: a multicenter retrospective study

Objective This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of the combination therapy of gemcitabine and S-1 (GS) versus gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). Methods In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, a total of 212 patients with advanced BTC receiving GS (n = 125) or GC (n = 87) between July 2006 and August 2015 were analyzed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective tumor response, and safety. Results Patient characteristics were well balanced between the two groups, except for tumor size (the baseline sum of the largest diameter of the tumor: 6.3 cm in the GS group vs. 8.6 cm in the GC group, p = 0.01). Although the response rate was higher in the GS group than in the GC group (28.8% vs. 10.3%, p = 0.01), the median PFS and OS were comparable between the two groups (PFS of 5.6 vs. 7.6 months, p = 0.74; OS of 12.4 vs. 9.2 months, p = 0.20, respectively). Stomatitis and skin rash were more frequently observed in the GS group, whereas anemia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, and renal toxicity were more commonly observed in the GC group. Conclusion This study demonstrates that GS and GC are similar with regard to their safety and efficacy in patients with advanced BTC. GS could serve as an alternative treatment for advanced BTC as a first-line chemotherapy.

Histological complete response in a patient with advanced biliary tract cancer treated by gemcitabine/cisplatin/S-1 combination chemotherapy: A case report

A 68-year-old woman was referred to our hospital with increased levels of biliary enzymes. On imaging, the patient was diagnosed with unresectable intrahepatic biliary tract cancer (BTC) with invasion of the portal vein and para-aortic lymph node metastasis (cT3N1M1, cStage IVb) and underwent endoscopic biliary drainage for the biliary stricture prior to therapy. The patient was subsequently enrolled in a phase III randomized trial (UMIN000014371/NCT02182778) and randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine/cisplatin/S-1 (GCS) combination therapy intravenously at doses of 1,000 or 25 mg/m² on day 1 and orally twice daily at a dose of 80 mg/m² on days 1–7 every 2 weeks. After 12 cycles of scheduled therapy without uncontrollable adverse effects, the patient achieved a good partial response with chemotherapy. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a marked reduction of the primary and metastatic lesions. In addition,¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/CT revealed diminishing abnormal uptake and no macroscopic evidence of factors adversely affecting tumor resectability. Therefore, the patient underwent extended right hepatic lobectomy, lymph node dissection and left hepaticojejunostomy. Finally, histological examination of the resected tissues revealed no residual cancer cells, suggesting a pathologically complete response. We herein present the case of a patient with intrahepatic BTC who achieved a pathologically complete response following combination chemotherapy with GCS.

Intrahepatic chemotherapy for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: review of literature and personal experience

Most patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IH-CCA) are unresectable and treatment options are limited. This study evaluates the efficacy of hepatic artery infusion (HAI) chemotherapy in patients whose disease is not initially treatable with resection. We selected patients with unresectable IH-CCA treated only with HAI chemotherapy at our centre between January 2008 and December 2012. We compared our outcome, using mRECIST, with published results of patients treated with systemic chemotherapy during the same period. Eleven patients underwent HAI chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin after placement of an HAI pump. A CT scan performed after the sixth cycle of therapy revealed that 5 of them had partial hepatic response (more than 45 %), 2 stable disease and 4 showed clear signs of disease progression. The average survival of the entire group was 17.6 months. Three of the patients with partial hepatic response underwent resection and 2 had more than 70 % tumour necrosis, both of whom are still alive and disease free. The median survival of patients with liver-only disease treated with systemic chemotherapy, who were not submitted for resection, was 15.3 months. HAI chemotherapy enables this small group of patients to have their unresectable IH-CCA disease converted into a resectable one, thus confirming its role in treatment of this disease.

A potent therapeutics for gallbladder cancer by combinatorial inhibition of the MAPK and mTOR signaling networks

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common type of cancer with the worst prognosis among the bile duct cancers. There still remains a clear need for effective mechanism-based novel therapeutic approaches. A crosstalk between mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and the mammalian target of Rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathways has been reported in several cancers. We hypothesized that targeting both pathways in combination will be a potent therapeutic for GBC.

METHODS

Expression of phospho-ERK and phospho-S6rp protein were evaluated by immunostaining in surgically resected GBC specimens (n = 30). GBC cell lines and a xenograft model were treated with CI-1040, an inhibitor of MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase) and RAD001, an inhibitor of mTOR, alone or in combination, and then, we examined the cell proliferation and tumor growth, cell cycle status, and apoptosis.

RESULTS

Analysis of human GBC tissues demonstrated that MAPK and mTOR signaling pathways were frequently coordinately dysregulated in one third of them. The combination therapy inhibited both signaling pathways and subsequently inhibited human GBC cell proliferation in vitro and xenograft tumor growth in vivo. Compared to the single treatment, the combination therapy significantly induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis with decreased cyclin D1 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

The double blockade of MAPK and mTOR signaling pathways inhibits the signal crosstalk and shows anti-tumor activity, which can be a potent therapeutic for GBC, especially for the patients with hyperactivated signaling of both pathways.

Randomized Phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1 versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG1113, FUGA-BT)

A Phase II selection design trial was conducted to identify the most promising regimen for comparison with standard therapy in chemo-naive patients with unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer (JCOG0805). Gemcitabine plus S-1 therapy showed better efficacy than S-1 monotherapy with acceptable safety in JCOG0805 study. Based on this result, a randomized Phase III trial was started in May 2013 to confirm the non-inferiority of gemcitabine plus S-1 therapy relative to gemcitabine plus cisplatin therapy, which is the current standard treatment for chemo-naive patients with unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer. A total of 350 patients will be accrued from 32 Japanese institutions within 4 years. The primary endpoint is overall survival, while the secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, adverse events, serious adverse events, clinically significant adverse events, response rate and %planned dose. This trial has been registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm) and the registration number is UMIN000010667.

A phase II study of capecitabine and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with inoperable adenocarcinoma of the gall bladder or biliary tract

BACKGROUND

Advanced biliary tract carcinomas are associated with a poor prognosis, and palliative chemotherapy has only modest benefit. This multi-centre phase II study was conducted to determine the efficacy of capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin in patients with inoperable gall bladder or biliary tract cancer.

METHODS

This was a Phase II, non-randomised, two-stage Simon design, multi-centre study. Ethics approval was sought and obtained by the North West MREC, and then locally by the West Glasgow Hospitals Research Ethics Committee. Eligible patients with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the gall bladder or biliary tract and with adequate performance status, haematologic, renal, and hepatic function were treated with capecitabine (1000 mg/m(2) po, twice daily, days 1-14) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m(2) i.v., day 1) every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. The primary objective of the study was to determine the objective tumour response rates (complete and partial). The secondary objectives included assessment of toxicity, progression-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients were recruited between July 2003 and December 2005. The regimen was well tolerated with no grade 3/4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Grade 3/4 sensory neuropathy was observed in six patients. Two-thirds of patients received their chemotherapy without any dose delays. Overall response rate was 23.8% (95% CI 12.05-39.5%). Stable disease was observed in a further 13 patients (31%) and progressive disease observed in 12 (28.6%) of patients. The median progression-free survival was 4.6 months (95% CI 2.8-6.4 months; Fig. 1) and the median overall survival 7.9 months (95% CI 5.3-10.4 months; Fig. 2). Fig. 1 Progression-free survival Fig. 2 Overall survival

CONCLUSION

Capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin has a lower disease control and shorter overall survival than the combination of cisplatin with gemcitabine which has subsequently become the standard of care in this disease. However, capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin does have modest activity in this disease, and can be considered as an alternative treatment option for patients in whom cisplatin and/or gemcitabine are contra-indicated.

Phase I clinical trial of oral administration of S-1 in combination with intravenous gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended dose of combining S-1 with gemcitabine and cisplatin for advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma first-line therapy.

METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients with histologically or cytologically proven unresectable or metastatic biliary tract adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Patients with advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma received gemcitabine and cisplatin intravenously on Days 1 and 8 and S-1 orally twice daily from Days 1 to 14. Cycles were repeated every 21 days until disease progression. Patients were scheduled to receive gemcitabine (mg/m(2)/week), cisplatin (mg/m(2)/week) and S-1 (mg/m(2)/day) at four dose levels: 800/25/40 (level 0), 1000/25/40 (level 1), 1000/25/60 (level 2) and 1000/25/80 (level 3). Level 1 was chosen as the starting dose. For cases where recommended dose could not be determined within the triweekly schedule, we prepared a biweekly schedule to find recommended dose.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients with advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma were treated across three dose levels. Maximum tolerated dose and recommended dose were defined as level 0. Dose-limiting toxicities included a Grade 3 maculopapular rash, Grade 4 thrombocytopenia and consecutive administration skips of gemcitabine and cisplatin on Day 8. Five partial responses were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This triweekly triplet regimen was well tolerated and showed promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma. We recommend level 0, gemcitabine at 800 mg/m(2)/week, cisplatin at 25 mg/m(2)/week and S-1 at 40 mg/m(2)/day during a 21-day cycle, in further studies with this schedule.

Proton beam therapy for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Treatment for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has not been established. The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcome of proton beam therapy (PBT) for patients with unresectable ICC.

METHODS

Up to 2010, 20 patients (11 males, 9 females, median age 63 years old) with unresectable ICC (two, seven, seven, and four in stages II, IIIA, IIIC, and IV, respectively) were treated with PBT. The largest dimensions of the tumors ranged from 15 to 140 mm (median: 50 mm). The intrahepatic region and lymph nodes received median total proton doses of 72.6 GyE in 22 fractions and 56.1 GyE in 17 fractions, respectively. Four patients received concurrent chemotherapy (tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil; TS-1) during PBT. Twelve patients were treated curatively, and eight were treated palliatively because tumors were present outside the irradiation field.

RESULTS

In the curative group, nine tumors within the irradiated field were controlled in follow-up of 8.6-62.6 months (median: 20.8 months). Median survival rates in the curative and palliative groups were 27.5 and 9.6 months, respectively, and overall 1- and 3-year survival rates were 82% and 38%, and 50% and 0%, respectively. Eight patients survived for > 2 years, and there was no distant metastasis in five of these patients after 2 years. No severe side-effects occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that long-term survival can be achieved using PBT for patients with unresectable ICC without distant metastasis. Further studies are required to determine the optimal treatment schedule and best combination of PBT and chemotherapy.

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of biliary tract cancers 2015: the 2nd English edition

BACKGROUND

The Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery launched the clinical practice guidelines for the management of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas in 2008. Novel treatment modalities and handling of clinical issues have been proposed after the publication. New approaches for editing clinical guidelines, such as the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system, also have been introduced for better and clearer grading of recommendations.

METHODS

Clinical questions (CQs) were proposed in seven topics. Recommendation, grade of recommendation and statement for each CQ were discussed and finalized by evidence-based approach. Recommendation was graded to grade 1 (strong) and 2 (weak) according to the concept of GRADE system.

RESULTS

The 29 CQs covered seven topics: (1) prophylactic treatment, (2) diagnosis, (3) biliary drainage, (4) surgical treatment, (5) chemotherapy, (6) radiation therapy, and (7) pathology. In 27 CQs, 19 recommendations were rated strong and 11 recommendations weak. Each CQ included the statement of how the recommendation was graded.

CONCLUSIONS

This guideline provides recommendation for important clinical aspects based on evidence. Future collaboration with cancer registry will be a key for assessment of the guidelines and establishment of new evidence. Free full-text articles and a mobile application of this guideline are available via http://www.jshbps.jp/en/guideline/biliary-tract2.html.

Phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy in patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer

PURPOSE

A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy in patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer (BTC).

METHODS

Patients with pathologically confirmed, unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic adenocarcinoma that originated from the intrahepatic or extrahepatic biliary ducts or gallbladder were assessed for eligibility. The primary end point was the overall response rate (ORR). The treatment consisted of 1,000 mg/m(2) intravenous gemcitabine administered over 30 min on days 1 and 8, and 80 mg/m(2) oral S-1 on days 1-14 of each cycle. The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were enrolled between November 2005 and 2010. All patients had metastatic disease, and the primary sites of cancer were as follows: gallbladder in 12 (31.6%), intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts in 23 (60.5%), and the ampulla of Vater in 3 (7.9%) patients. One patient achieved a complete response, and six experienced a partial response. The ORR was 20.6% (95% CI 8.5-36.7] in the per-protocol (PP) population, and 18.4% (95%CI 6.1-30.7) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population; the median response duration was 10.8 months. Nineteen patients had stable disease, and the disease control rate was 76.5% (95%CI 60.6-87.6) in the PP population. The median progression-free survival was 4.4 months (95%CI 1.8-6.9), and the median overall survival was 9.0 months (95%CI 4.0-13.9) with a 1-year survival rate of 44.7% (95%CI 29.0-61.5) in the ITT population. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were observed in 13 (37.1%), 9 (25.7%), 2 (5.7%), and 2 (5.7%) patients, respectively. One patient experienced a grade 3 febrile neutropenia without any documented infection. The grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities were hepatic toxicity (11.4%), anorexia (2.9%), and renal toxicity (2.9%).

CONCLUSION

Gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy showed acceptable efficacy and favorable toxicity profiles. Therefore, it might offer an alternative therapeutic strategy in patients with BTC.

Treatment outcomes of chemotherapy between unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer

AIM: To evaluate the differences in the treatment outcomes between the unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer patients who received chemotherapy.

METHODS: Patients who were treated with gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy in the previous prospective studies were divided into groups of unresectable and recurrent cases. The tumor response, time-to-progression, overall survival, toxicity, and dose intensity were compared between these two groups.

RESULTS: Response rate of the recurrent group was higher than that of the unresectable group (40.0% vs 25.5%; P = 0.34). Median time-to-progression of the recurrent and unresectable groups were 8.7 mo (95%CI), 1.2 mo, not reached) and 5.7 mo (95%CI: 4.0-7.0 mo), respectively (P = 0.14). Median overall survival of the recurrent and the unresectable groups were 16.1 mo (95%CI: 2.0 mo-not reached) and 9.6 mo (95%CI: 7.1-11.7 mo), respectively (P = 0.10). Dose intensities were significantly lower in the recurrent groups (gemcitabine: recurrent group 83.5% vs unresectable group 96.8%; P < 0.01, S-1: Recurrent group 75.9% vs unresectable group 91.8%; P < 0.01). Neutropenia occurred more frequently in recurrent group (recurrent group 90% vs unresectable group 55%; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION: Not only the efficacy but also the toxicity and dose intensity were significantly different between unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer.

Curative resection of gallbladder cancer with liver invasion and hepatic metastasis after chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus S-1: report of a case

A 62-year-old woman diagnosed with gallbladder cancer exhibiting broad liver invasion and metastasis to Couinaud’s hepatic segments 4 and 8 (S4 and S8) consulted her regular doctor. Owing to the presence of liver metastases, she received treatment with gemcitabine plus S-1. After four cycles of chemotherapy, the size of the main lesion dramatically decreased and the two liver metastases disappeared. After six cycles of chemotherapy, the patient was referred to our hospital for surgical treatment. Upon admission, there was no evidence of any distant metastasis, based on a detailed radiological examination. Therefore, we performed cholecystectomy and central bisegmentectomy of the liver after obtaining the patient’s informed consent. Pathological examination demonstrated viable cancer cells with granuloma formation and calcification in the gallbladder, as well as regenerative changes without viable cancer cells in S4 and S8 of the liver. Gemcitabine plus S-1 was again administered as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. One and a half years after the surgery, there were no signs of recurrence. In patients selected according to their response to chemotherapy, surgical treatment might therefore be effective against gallbladder cancer with metastasis.

Cholangiocarcinoma: Biology, Clinical Management, and Pharmacological Perspectives

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), or tumor of the biliary tree, is a rare and heterogeneous group of malignancies associated with a very poor prognosis. Depending on their localization along the biliary tree, CCAs are classified as intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal, and these subtypes are now considered different entities that differ in tumor biology, the staging system, management, and prognosis. When diagnosed, an evaluation by a multidisciplinary team is essential; the team must decide on the best therapeutic option. Surgical resection of tumors with negative margins is the best option for all subtypes of CCA, although this is only achieved in less than 50% of cases. Five-year survival rates have increased in the recent past owing to improvements in imaging techniques, which permits resectability to be predicted more accurately, and in surgery. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy are relatively ineffective in treating nonoperable tumors and the resistance of CCA to these therapies is a major problem. Although the combination of gemcitabine plus platinum derivatives is the pharmacological treatment most widely used, to date there is no standard chemotherapy, and new combinations with targeted drugs are currently being tested in ongoing clinical trials. This review summarizes the biology, clinical management, and pharmacological perspectives of these complex tumors.

Surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Despite surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) becoming more widely available, the prognosis after hepatic resection for ICC remains poor. Because ICC is relatively rare, the TNM staging system for ICC was finally established in the 2000s. Resection margin status and lymph node metastases are important prognostic factors after surgery for ICC; however, the true impact of wide resection margins or lymph node dissection on postoperative survival is unclear. Although adjuvant chemotherapy can improve the postoperative prognosis of patients with various types of cancer, no standard regimen has been developed for ICC. Over 50 % of patients suffer postoperative recurrence, even after curative resection, and no effective treatment for recurrent ICC has been established. Therefore, despite advances in imaging studies and hepatobiliary surgery, significant challenges remain in improving the prognosis of patients with ICC.

Comparative outcomes of elderly and non-elderly patients receiving first-line palliative chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Few studies have reported the efficacy and safety of palliative chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. We aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of palliative chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer in elderly patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 403 consecutive patients who received palliative chemotherapy between April 2006 and March 2009 for pathologically confirmed unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer. Clinical outcomes of the elderly group (≥ 75 years old; n = 94) were compared with those of the non-elderly group (< 75 years old; n = 309).

RESULTS

Except for the extent of disease, patient baseline characteristics were well balanced between both groups. The median overall survival was 10.4 months in the elderly group and 11.5 months in the non-elderly group (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-1.45; P = 0.31). Although the frequency of adverse events between both groups was similar, interstitial pneumonitis was significantly more frequent in the elderly group than in the non-elderly group (4.3% vs 0%, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In advanced biliary tract cancer, overall survival of elderly patients receiving palliative chemotherapy is comparable with that of non-elderly patients. To our knowledge, this is one of the largest studies that have reported the clinical outcomes of elderly patients following palliative chemotherapy.

Prediction of the postoperative prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC): importance of preoperatively- determined anatomic invasion level and number of tumors

BACKGROUND

Preoperative prediction of the prognosis of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) following surgical treatment remains quite difficult and controversial. We attempted to identify the preoperative and postoperative predictors of the overall survival rates inpatients with ICC in order to clarify the appropriate indications for surgical resection of ICC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively investigated the clinicopathological features of ICC and outcome of surgical resection in 111 consecutive patients who underwent surgical treatment at our hospital between 1980 and March 2012. Both preoperative factors and operatively confirmed factors were evaluated as potential risk factors for determination of the post-surgical prognosis.

RESULTS

Curative resection (R0) was performed in 72 patients (64.9 %). The 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were 85.0 and 59.7 % in the R0 group. Two preoperative factors [hilar invasion as recognized by computed tomography(HR 3.16, P = 0.020) and multiple intrahepatic tumors (HR 7.09, P = 0.0002)] and two operatively confirmed factors [multiple intrahepatic tumors (HR 9.17,P = 0.0009) and lymph node metastasis as confirmed by final histology (HR 6.41, P = 0.003)] were identified as significant risk factors adversely influencing the overall survival rate after surgery. Furthermore, solitary, small(\5 cm) and peripheral ICCs were associated with a very low probability of lymph node metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperatively diagnosed hilar invasion,multiple intrahepatic tumors and histologically confirmed lymph node metastasis were the main determinants of an adverse postoperative prognosis in patients with ICC.Lymph node dissection could be omitted for patients with solitary, small and peripheral ICCs.

A retrospective study of gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy as second-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the treatment outcome of gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy as second-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced biliary tract cancer who were refractory to gemcitabine-based first-line chemotherapy were treated with gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy. Gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)) were administered intravenously on days 1 and 8, repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included. The tumor response and disease control rates were 1.7 and 58.3%, respectively. The median overall survival and time to progression were 6.7 months (95% CI 4.9-8.1) and 3.5 months (95% CI 2.5-5.0), respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities included leucopenia (20%), neutropenia (25%), anemia (23%), thrombocytopenia (17%), nausea (2%), anorexia (2%), and liver dysfunction (2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy showed moderate efficacy and safety as second-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer that is refractory to gemcitabine-based first-line chemotherapy.

Current status of chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer

Chemotherapy is indispensable for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer. Recently, reports regarding first-line chemotherapy have increased, and first-line chemotherapy treatment has become gradually more sophisticated. Gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy (or gemcitabine and oxaliplatin combination therapy) have become the standard of care for advanced biliary tract cancer. Oral fluoropyrimidines have also been shown to have good antitumor effects. Gemcitabine, platinum compounds, and oral fluoropyrimidines are now considered key drugs for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer. Several clinical trials using molecular targeted agents are also ongoing. Combination therapy using cytotoxic agents and molecular-targeted agents has been evaluated widely. However, reports regarding second-line chemotherapy remain limited, and it has not yet been clarified whether second-line chemotherapy can improve the prognosis of advanced biliary tract cancer. Thus, there is an urgent need to establish second-line standard chemotherapy treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer. Several problems exist when assessing the results of previous reports concerning advanced biliary tract cancer. In the present review, the current status of the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer is summarized, and several associated problems are indicated. These problems should be solved to achieve more sophisticated treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer.

Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine plus S-1 versus S-1 in advanced biliary tract cancer: a Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG 0805)

The oral fluoropyrimidine, S-1, combined with or without gemcitabine is considered to be a promising agent for treating advanced biliary tract cancer; gemcitabine plus cisplatin is the current standard regimen. This randomized phase II trial was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two regimens: gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) (gemcitabine: 1000 mg/m(2) , day 1 and day 8; S-1: 60 mg/m(2) , twice daily on days 1-14, repeated every 3 weeks); and S-1 (80 mg/m(2) , days 1-28, given orally twice daily for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest, repeated every 6 weeks). The regimen with a higher 1-year survival would be selected for a subsequent phase III trial. Between February 2009 and April 2010, 101 patients were randomized. For the GS (n = 51) and S-1 (n = 50) arms, the 1-year survival was 52.9% (95% confidence interval, 38.5-65.5) and 40.0% (95% confidence interval, 26.5-53.1), and the median survival times were 12.5 and 9.0 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were more frequent in the GS arm (leucocytes 29.4%, neutrophils 60.8%, hemoglobin 11.8%, platelets 11.8%) than in the S-1 arm (leucocytes 2.0%, neutrophils 4.0%, hemoglobin 4.0%, platelets 4.0%). Although two treatment-related deaths occurred in the GS arm, all other grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicities were reversible. In conclusion, GS was considered to be more promising and was selected as the test regimen for a subsequent phase III trial comparing GS with gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination therapy. This study was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN 000001685 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm).

Outcomes of endoscopic pyloric stenting in malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a retrospective study

Background

Up to 30% of patients with pancreatic cancer and more than 50% of patients with gastric cancer already have incurable disease, with distressing symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction at the time of presentation which require effective palliation. We decided to test the clinical outcomes of endoscopic stent placement in malignant gastric outlet obstruction.

Methods

In a retrospective single institution-based study, the charts of patients who had self-expandable metal stents placed to alleviate malignant gastric outlet obstruction were reviewed. Charts were reviewed to assess improvement in oral intake according to the Gastric Outlet Obstruction Scoring System (GOOSS), and in order to also evaluate technical success and complications of the procedure.

Results

69 patients with successful stent placement were retrospectively evaluated. Within 7 and 28 days after stent placement respectively, 85.5% and 80% benefited from stent insertion, with an increase in the GOOSS score of > 1. Resumption of soft or low residue diet (GOOSS 2-3) was achieved in 53.6% at day 7 and in 62% of patients at day 28, respectively. Of the patients achieving a GOOSS score of 2-3, 17.3% remained on a soft or low residue diet at 24 weeks or at last follow up, while 46% died. Stent related adverse events occurred in 10 patients (14%), including stent blockade in 7 and stent migration in 3 patients.

Conclusion

Endoscopic enteral stenting promptly increases oral intake in the majority of patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction and is a safe procedure with a low rate of serious complications.

A Case of Common Bile Duct Cancer That Completely Responded to Combination Chemotherapy of Gemcitabine and TS-1

Common bile duct (CBD) cancer is a relatively rare malignancy that arises from the biliary epithelium and is associated with a poor prognosis. Here, we report a case of advanced metastatic CBD cancer successfully treated by chemotherapy with gemcitabine combined with S-1 (tegafur+gimeracil+oteracil). A 65-year-old male presented with pyogenic liver abscess. After antibiotic therapy and percutaneous drainage, follow-up computed tomography (CT) showed an enhanced nodule in the CBD. Biopsy was performed at the CBD via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, which showed adenocarcinoma. Additional CT and magnetic resonance imaging showed multiple small nodules in the right hepatic lobe, which were confirmed as metastatic adenocarcinoma by sono-guided liver biopsy. The patient underwent combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1. After nine courses of chemotherapy, the hepatic lesion disappeared radiologically. Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed, and no residual tumor was found in the resected specimen. Three weeks after the operation, the patient was discharged with no complications. Through 3 months of follow-up, no sign of recurrence was observed on CT scan. Gemcitabine combined with S-1 may be a highly effective treatment for advanced cholangiocarcinoma.

Chemotherapy for the biliary tract cancers: moving toward improved survival time

BACKGROUND

The biliary tract carcinomas rank fifth in incidence among all gastrointestinal tumours. This group of tumours includes both cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma. Although surgery represents the main therapeutic option for these patients, both radiotherapy and chemotherapy could be used in a multidisciplinary approach. Several studies are currently available on the use of chemotherapy, including 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin C, methotrexate, doxorubicin and cisplatin or newer anticancer molecules, such as gemcitabine, capecitabine, oxaliplatin and irinotecan. However, the small sample size of most of these studies prevents generalization.

DISCUSSION

We reviewed the available data on both chemotherapy and targeted therapies for biliary carcinoma. By using conventional chemotherapy, a response rate ranging from 10% to 40% has been reported. Although encouraging data emerged with the use of targeted therapies, further efforts are needed to improve treatment options for patients with biliary tract cancer.

A randomized phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine monotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer

PURPOSE

In order to confirm the impact of adding S-1 to gemcitabine, we conducted a randomized phase II study to compare the combination therapy of gemcitabine plus S-1 to gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma or gallbladder cancer were randomized to either the combination therapy of gemcitabine and S-1 (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15 and S-1 40 mg/m(2) b.i.d. on days 1-14, repeated every 4 weeks) or gemcitabine monotherapy (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15, repeated every 4 weeks). The primary endpoint of this study was response rate, and the regimen which showed the better response rate was selected as a candidate of phase III study. Tumor response was assessed every two cycles using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria version 1.0.

RESULTS

The response rates of the combination therapy and the monotherapy were 20.0 and 9.4 %, respectively. The median time-to-progressions and overall survivals of these two treatments were nearly the same (5.6 vs. 4.3 months; 8.9 vs. 9.2 months). Adverse events occurred more frequently in the combination arm.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination therapy of gemcitabine and S-1 showed the better response rate, but the superiority of this combination therapy was not clear in total. Because the standard of care changed to the combination therapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin during this study, it is difficult to select this combination therapy with a 4-week regimen as a candidate of phase III study.