1
|
Schipper RJ, de Bruijn A, van der Sangen MJC, Bloemen JG, van den Hoven I, Schepers EEM, Vriens BEP, Boerman T, Rijkaart DC, van de Winkel LMH, Brouwer C, van Warmerdam LJC, Gielens MPM, van Bommel RMG, van Riet YE, Voogd AC, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP. Oncologic outcomes of de-escalating axillary treatment in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy - A two center cohort study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108472. [PMID: 38870876 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2024] [Revised: 05/18/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the present study was to report the 5-year axillary recurrence-free interval (aRFI) in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients treated according to a de-escalating axillary treatment protocol after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). METHODS All patients diagnosed in two hospitals between October 2014 and March 2021 were identified retrospectively. Data on diagnostic workup, treatment and follow-up was collected. Adjuvant axillary treatment was considered based on the initial staging using 18F-FDG PET/CT and the results of axillary lymph node marking with a radioactive-iodine seed protocol or a targeted axillary dissection procedure. Follow-up was updated until 27th April 2024. Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated to report the 5-year aRFI with corresponding 95 % confident intervals (95%-CI). RESULTS A total of 199 patients were included. Axillary pathological complete response was reported in 66 (33.2 %). Based on the treatment protocol and initial clinical staging, no adjuvant axillary treatment was indicated in 30 patients (15 %), while 139 (70 %) received axillary radiotherapy without performance of an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The remaining 30 patients (15 %) underwent an ALND with additional locoregional radiotherapy. A median follow-up of 62 months (30-106) showed that 4 (2 %) patients experienced an axillary recurrence after 7, 8, 36 and 36 months, respectively. In all 4 patients, synchronous distant metastases were diagnosed. The estimated 5-year aRFI was 97.8 % (95%-CI 95.6-99.9 %) CONCLUSION: Although longer follow-up should be awaited before final conclusions can be drawn regarding the oncological safety of this approach, the implementation of a de-escalating axillary treatment protocol appears to be safe since the estimated 5-year aRFI is 97.8 %.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert-Jan Schipper
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Anna Hospital, Geldrop, the Netherlands.
| | - Anne de Bruijn
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Johanne G Bloemen
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Birgit E P Vriens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Thom Boerman
- Department of Pathology, Eurofins PAMM, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Dorien C Rijkaart
- Department of Radiotherapy, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Christel Brouwer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Yvonne E van Riet
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Adri C Voogd
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Amstel FJG, de Mooij CM, Simons JM, Mitea C, van Diest PJ, Nelemans PJ, van der Pol CC, Luiten EJT, Koppert LB, Smidt ML, van Nijnatten TJA. Disease extent according to baseline [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and molecular subtype: prediction of axillary treatment response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znae203. [PMID: 39302345 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Revised: 06/19/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Axillary disease extent according to baseline [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT combined with pathological axillary treatment response has been proposed to guide de-escalation of axillary treatment for clinically node-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy. The aim of this study was to assess whether axillary disease extent according to baseline [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and breast cancer molecular subtype are predictors of axillary pCR. METHODS This study included clinically node-positive patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy in the prospective Radioactive Iodine Seed placement in the Axilla with Sentinel lymph node biopsy ('RISAS') trial (NCT02800317) with baseline [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT imaging available. The predictive value of axillary disease extent according to baseline [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and breast cancer molecular subtype to estimate axillary pCR was evaluated using logistic regression analysis. Discriminative ability is expressed using ORs with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS Overall, 185 patients were included, with an axillary pCR rate of 29.7%. The axillary pCR rate for patients with limited versus advanced baseline axillary disease according to [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT was 31.9% versus 26.1% respectively. Axillary disease extent was not a significant predictor of axillary pCR (OR 0.75 (95% c.i. 0.38 to 1.46) (P = 0.404)). There were significant differences in axillary pCR rates between breast cancer molecular subtypes. The lowest probability (7%) was found for hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- tumours. Using this category as a reference group, significantly increased ORs of 14.82 for hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ tumours, 40 for hormone receptor-/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ tumours, and 6.91 for triple-negative tumours were found (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Molecular subtype is a significant predictor of axillary pCR after neoadjuvant systemic therapy, whereas axillary disease extent according to baseline [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT is not.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florien J G van Amstel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW - Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis M de Mooij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW - Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Janine M Simons
- GROW - Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cristina Mitea
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW - Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Patty J Nelemans
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ernest J T Luiten
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital Breda, Breda, The Netherlands
- Tawam Breast Care Center, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Linetta B Koppert
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein L Smidt
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW - Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Thiemo J A van Nijnatten
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW - Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Boland MR. Modern management of the axilla. J Surg Oncol 2024; 130:23-28. [PMID: 38643485 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
Surgical management of the axilla has evolved considerably in recent years, with a strong focus on de-escalation to minimise morbidity whilst maintaining oncological outcomes. Current trials will focus on the omission of Sentinel node biopsy in select groups of patients, while axillary lymph node dissection will be reserved for those with more aggressive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R Boland
- Department of Breast Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nijveldt JJ, Rajan KK, Boersma K, Noorda EM, van der Starre-Gaal J, Kate MV'VT, Roeloffzen EMA, Vendel BN, Beek MA, Francken AB. Implementation of the Targeted Axillary Dissection Procedure in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:4477-4486. [PMID: 38523225 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15182-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The targeted axillary dissection (TAD) procedure is used in clinically positive lymph node (cN+) breast cancer to assess whether pathological complete response (pCR) is achieved after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) to decide on de-escalation of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). In this study, we review the implementation of the TAD procedure in a large regional breast cancer center. METHODS All TAD procedures between 2016 and 2022 were reviewed. The TAD procedure consists of marking pre-NST the largest suspected metastatic lymph node(s) using a radioactive I-125 seed. During surgery, the marked node was excised together with a sentinel node procedure. Axillary therapy (ALND, axillary radiotherapy, or nothing) recommendations were based on the amount of suspected positive axillary lymph nodes (ALNs < 4 or ≥ 4) pre-NST and if pCR was achieved after NST. RESULTS A total of 312 TAD procedures were successfully performed in 309 patients. In 134 (43%) cases, pCR of the TAD lymph nodes were achieved. Per treatment protocol, 43 cases (14%) did not receive any axillary treatment, 218 cases (70%) received adjuvant axillary radiotherapy, and 51 cases (16%) underwent an ALND. During a median follow-up of 2.8 years, 46 patients (14%) developed recurrence, of which 11 patients (3.5%) had axillary recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Introduction of the TAD procedure has resulted in a reduction of 84% of previously indicated ALNDs. Moreover, 18% of cases did not receive adjuvant axillary radiotherapy. These data show that implementation of de-escalation axillary treatment with the TAD procedure appeared to be successful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joni J Nijveldt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Isala Zwolle, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Kiran K Rajan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Isala Zwolle, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
| | - Karina Boersma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Isala Zwolle, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Eva M Noorda
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Isala Zwolle, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Brian N Vendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Isala Zwolle, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten A Beek
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Isala Zwolle, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
de Wild SR, Koppert LB, de Munck L, Vrancken Peeters MJTFD, Siesling S, Smidt ML, Simons JM. Prognostic effect of nodal status before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a Dutch population-based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 204:277-288. [PMID: 38133707 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07178-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can downstage the nodal status, and can even result in a pathological complete response, which is associated with improved prognosis. This study aimed to determine the prognostic effect of nodal status before and after NAC. METHODS Women with breast cancer treated with NAC were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry if diagnosed between 2005 and 2019, and classified based on nodal status before NAC: node-negative (cN0), or node-positive based on fine needle aspiration cytology or core needle biopsy (cN+). Subgroups were based on nodal status after NAC: absence (ypN0) or presence (ypN+) of nodal disease. Five-year overall survival (OS) was assessed with Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, also per breast cancer molecular subtype. To adjust for potential confounders, multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS A total of 6,580 patients were included in the cN0 group, and 11,878 in the cN+ group. The 5-year OS of the cN0ypN0-subgroup was statistically significant better than that of the cN+ypN0-subgroup (94.4% versus 90.1%, p < 0.0001). In cN0 as well as cN+ disease, ypN+ had a statistically significant worse 5-year OS compared to ypN0. For hormone receptor (HR)+ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-, HR+ HER2+, HR-HER2+, and triple negative disease, respectively, 5-year OS in the cN0ypN+-subgroup was 89.7%, 90.4%, 73.7%, and 53.6%, and in the cN+ypN+-subgroup 84.7%, 83.2%, 61.4%, and 48.8%. In multivariable analyses, cN+ and ypN+ disease were both associated with worse OS. CONCLUSION This study suggests that both cN-status and ypN-status, and molecular subtype should be considered to further improve prognostication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine R de Wild
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Linetta B Koppert
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Linda de Munck
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Center, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein L Smidt
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Janine M Simons
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vrancken Peeters NJMC, Kaplan ZLR, Clarijs ME, Mureau MAM, Verhoef C, van Dalen T, Husson O, Koppert LB. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after different axillary treatments in women with breast cancer: a 1-year longitudinal cohort study. Qual Life Res 2024; 33:467-479. [PMID: 37889384 PMCID: PMC10850260 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03538-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE As life expectancy continues to rise, post-treatment health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of breast cancer patients becomes increasingly important. This study examined the one-year longitudinal relation between axillary treatments and physical, psychosocial, and sexual wellbeing and arm symptoms. METHODS Women diagnosed with breast cancer who received different axillary treatments being axilla preserving surgery (APS) with or without axillary radiotherapy or full axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) with or without axillary radiotherapy were included. HRQoL was assessed at baseline, 6- and 12-months postoperatively using the BREAST-Q and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire Breast Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-BR23). Mixed regression models were constructed to assess the impact of axillary treatment on HRQoL. HRQoL at baseline was compared to HRQoL at 6- and at 12-months postoperatively. RESULTS In total, 552 patients were included in the mixed regressions models. Except for ALND with axillary radiotherapy, no significant differences in physical and psychosocial wellbeing were found. Physical wellbeing decreased significantly between baseline and 6- and 12-months postoperatively (p < 0.001, p = 0.035) and psychosocial wellbeing decreased significantly between baseline and 12 months postoperatively (p = 0.028) for ALND with axillary radiotherapy compared to APS alone. Arm symptoms increased significantly between baseline and 6 months and between baseline and 12 months postoperatively for APS with radiotherapy (12.71, 13.73) and for ALND with radiotherapy (13.93, 16.14), with the lowest increase in arm symptoms for ALND without radiotherapy (6.85, 7.66), compared to APS alone (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Physical and psychosocial wellbeing decreased significantly for ALND with radiotherapy compared to APS alone. Shared decision making and expectation management pre-treatment could be strengthened by discussing arm symptoms per axillary treatment with the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N J M C Vrancken Peeters
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Z L R Kaplan
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M E Clarijs
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M A M Mureau
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T van Dalen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - O Husson
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L B Koppert
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vidal-Sicart S, Goñi E, Cebrecos I, Rioja ME, Perissinotti A, Sampol C, Vidal O, Saavedra-Pérez D, Ferrer A, Martí C, Ferrer Rebolleda J, García Velloso MJ, Orozco-Cortés J, Díaz-Feijóo B, Niñerola-Baizán A, Valdés Olmos RA. Continuous innovation in precision radio-guided surgery. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2024; 43:39-54. [PMID: 37963516 DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2023.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
Since its origins, nuclear medicine has faced technological changes that led to modifying operating modes and adapting protocols. In the field of radioguided surgery, the incorporation of preoperative scintigraphic imaging and intraoperative detection with the gamma probe provided a definitive boost to sentinel lymph node biopsy to become a standard procedure for melanoma and breast cancer. The various technological innovations and consequent adaptation of protocols come together in the coexistence of the disruptive and the gradual. As obvious examples we have the introduction of SPECT/CT in the preoperative field and Drop-in probes in the intraoperative field. Other innovative aspects with possible application in radio-guided surgery are based on the application of artificial intelligence, navigation and telecare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergi Vidal-Sicart
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Elena Goñi
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Isaac Cebrecos
- Instituto Clínic de Ginecología, Obstetricia y Neonatología (ICGON), Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Andrés Perissinotti
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
| | - Catalina Sampol
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Oscar Vidal
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Cirugía General y Digestiva, ICMDiM, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Departamento de Cirugía, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Saavedra-Pérez
- Cirugía General y Digestiva, ICMDiM, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ada Ferrer
- Servicio de Cirugía Maxilofacial, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carles Martí
- Servicio de Cirugía Maxilofacial, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José Ferrer Rebolleda
- Servicio Medicina Nuclear Ascires, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Jhon Orozco-Cortés
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Berta Díaz-Feijóo
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Instituto Clínic de Ginecología, Obstetricia y Neonatología (ICGON), Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Departamento de Cirugía, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Aida Niñerola-Baizán
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), ISCIII, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Biomedicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Renato Alfredo Valdés Olmos
- Department of Radiology, Section of Nuclear Medicine & Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Weber WP, Heidinger M, Hayoz S, Matrai Z, Tausch C, Henke G, Zwahlen DR, Gruber G, Zimmermann F, Montagna G, Andreozzi M, Goldschmidt M, Schulz A, Mueller A, Ackerknecht M, Tampaki EC, Bjelic-Radisic V, Kurzeder C, Sávolt Á, Smanykó V, Hagen D, Müller DJ, Gnant M, Loibl S, Fitzal F, Markellou P, Bekes I, Egle D, Heil J, Knauer M. Impact of Imaging-Guided Localization on Performance of Tailored Axillary Surgery in Patients with Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Prospective Cohort Study Within TAXIS (OPBC-03, SAKK 23/16, IBCSG 57-18, ABCSG-53, GBG 101). Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:344-355. [PMID: 37903951 PMCID: PMC10695869 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14404-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tailored axillary surgery (TAS) is a novel surgical concept for clinical node-positive breast cancer. It consists of the removal of the sentinel lymph nodes (LNs), as well as palpably suspicious nodes. The TAS technique can be utilized in both the upfront and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) setting. This study assessed whether/how imaging-guided localization (IGL) influenced TAS. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a prospective observational cohort study preplanned in the randomized phase-III OPBC-03/TAXIS trial. IGL was performed at the surgeon's discretion for targeted removal of LNs during TAS. Immediate back-up axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) followed TAS according to TAXIS randomization. RESULTS Five-hundred patients were included from 44 breast centers in six countries, 151 (30.2%) of whom underwent NACT. IGL was performed in 84.4% of all patients, with significant variation by country (77.6-100%, p < 0.001). No difference in the median number of removed (5 vs. 4, p = 0.3) and positive (2 vs. 2, p = 0.6) LNs by use of IGL was noted. The number of LNs removed during TAS with IGL remained stable over time (p = 0.8), but decreased significantly without IGL, from six (IQR 4-6) in 2019 to four (IQR 3-4) in 2022 (p = 0.015). An ALND was performed in 249 patients, removing another 12 (IQR 9-17) LNs, in which a median number of 1 (IQR 0-4) was positive. There was no significant difference in residual nodal disease after TAS with or without IGL (68.0% vs. 57.6%, p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS IGL did not significantly change either the performance of TAS or the volume of residual nodal tumor burden. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03513614.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walter P Weber
- Breast Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Martin Heidinger
- Breast Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Zoltan Matrai
- Department of Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Christoph Tausch
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Breast Center Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Guido Henke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Breast Center, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Daniel R Zwahlen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Günther Gruber
- Institute of Radiotherapy, Klinik Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Frank Zimmermann
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Clinic of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Giacomo Montagna
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mariacarla Andreozzi
- Breast Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Maite Goldschmidt
- Breast Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Alexandra Schulz
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Mueller
- SAKK Competence Center, Bern, Switzerland
- Breast Center, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Markus Ackerknecht
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ekaterini Christina Tampaki
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive Surgery and Burn Unit, KAT Athens Hospital and Trauma Center, Athens, Greece
| | - Vesna Bjelic-Radisic
- Breast Unit, Helios University Clinic, University Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany
| | - Christian Kurzeder
- Breast Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ákos Sávolt
- National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Viktor Smanykó
- National Tumor Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Daniela Hagen
- Breast Center, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | | | - Michael Gnant
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- ABCSG, Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group, GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Florian Fitzal
- ABCSG, Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria
- Atomos Klinik Waehring, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pagona Markellou
- Breast Center, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Inga Bekes
- Breast Center, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Egle
- ABCSG, Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria
- Breast Cancer Center Tirol, Department of Gynecology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Jörg Heil
- Breast Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Knauer
- Tumor and Breast Center Eastern Switzerland, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
van Hemert AKE, van Duijnhoven FH, Vrancken Peeters MJTFD. This house believes that: MARI/TAD is better than sentinel node biopsy after PST for cN+ patients. Breast 2023; 71:89-95. [PMID: 37562108 PMCID: PMC10432821 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The increasing use and effectiveness of primary systemic treatment (PST) enables tailored locoregional treatment. About one third of clinically node positive (cN+) breast cancer patients achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) of the axilla, with higher rates observed in Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor (HER)2-positive or triple negative (TN) breast cancer subtypes. Tailoring axillary treatment for patients with axillary pCR is necessary, as they are unlikely to benefit from axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), but may suffer complications and long-term morbidity such as lymphedema and impaired shoulder motion. By combining pre-PST and post-PST axillary staging techniques, ALND can be omitted in most cN + patients with pCR. Different post-PST staging techniques (MARI/TAD/SN) show low or ultra-low false negative rates for detection of residual disease. More importantly, trials using the MARI (Marking Axillary lymph nodes with Radioactive Iodine seeds) procedure or sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as axillary staging technique post-PST have already shown the safety of tailoring axillary treatment in patients with an excellent response. Tailored axillary treatment using the MARI procedure in stage I-III breast cancer resulted in 80% reduction of ALND and excellent five-year axillary recurrence free interval (aRFI) of 97%. Similar oncologic outcomes were seen for post-SLNB in stage I-II patients. The MARI technique requires only one invasive procedure pre-NST and a median of one node is removed post-PST, whereas for the SLNB and TAD techniques two to four nodes are removed. A disadvantage of the MARI technique is its use of radioactive iodine, which is subject to extensive regulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annemiek K E van Hemert
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frederieke H van Duijnhoven
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ferrarazzo G, Nieri A, Firpo E, Rattaro A, Mignone A, Guasone F, Manzara A, Perniciaro G, Spinaci S. The Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Patients Who Become Clinically Node-Negative Following Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Literature Review. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:8703-8719. [PMID: 37887530 PMCID: PMC10605278 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30100630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Revised: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer (BC) patients who become clinically node-negative (cN0) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after lymphatic mapping with lymphoscintigraphy is not widely accepted; therefore, it has become a topic of international debate. OBJECTIVE Our literature review aims to evaluate the current use of this surgical practice in a clinical setting and focuses on several studies published in the last six years which have contributed to the assessment of the feasibility and accuracy of this practice, highlighting its importance and oncological safety. We have considered the advantages and disadvantages of this technique compared to other suggested methods and strategies. We also evaluated the role of local irradiation therapy after SLNB and state-of-the-art SLN mapping in patients subjected to NACT. METHODS A comprehensive search of PubMed and Cochrane was conducted. All studies published in English from 2018 to August 2023 were evaluated. RESULTS Breast units are moving towards a de-escalation of axillary surgery, even in the NACT setting. The effects of these procedures on local irradiation are not very clear. Several studies have evaluated the oncological outcome of SLNB procedures. However, none of the alternative techniques proposed to lower the false negative rate (FNR) of SLNB are significant in terms of prognosis. CONCLUSIONS Based on these results, we can state that lymphatic mapping with SLNB in cN+ BC patients who become clinically node-negative (ycN0) following NACT is a safe procedure, with a good prognosis and low axillary failure rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Ferrarazzo
- Nuclear Medicine, Ospedale Villa Scassi ASL3, 16149 Genova, Italy; (A.M.); (A.M.)
| | - Alberto Nieri
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialist Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Cona, Italy;
| | - Emma Firpo
- Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ospedale Villa Scassi ASL3, 16149 Genova, Italy; (E.F.); (A.R.); (F.G.)
| | - Andrea Rattaro
- Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ospedale Villa Scassi ASL3, 16149 Genova, Italy; (E.F.); (A.R.); (F.G.)
| | - Alessandro Mignone
- Nuclear Medicine, Ospedale Villa Scassi ASL3, 16149 Genova, Italy; (A.M.); (A.M.)
| | - Flavio Guasone
- Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ospedale Villa Scassi ASL3, 16149 Genova, Italy; (E.F.); (A.R.); (F.G.)
| | - Augusto Manzara
- Nuclear Medicine, Ospedale Villa Scassi ASL3, 16149 Genova, Italy; (A.M.); (A.M.)
| | - Giuseppe Perniciaro
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Unit, Ospedale Villa Scassi ASL3, 16149 Genova, Italy;
| | - Stefano Spinaci
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgery, Ospedale Villa Scassi ASL3, 16149 Genova, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kaidar-Person O, Pfob A, Gentilini OD, Borisch B, Bosch A, Cardoso MJ, Curigliano G, De Boniface J, Denkert C, Hauser N, Heil J, Knauer M, Kühn T, Lee HB, Loibl S, Mannhart M, Meattini I, Montagna G, Pinker K, Poulakaki F, Rubio IT, Sager P, Steyerova P, Tausch C, Tramm T, Vrancken Peeters MJ, Wyld L, Yu JH, Weber WP, Poortmans P, Dubsky P. The Lucerne Toolbox 2 to optimise axillary management for early breast cancer: a multidisciplinary expert consensus. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 61:102085. [PMID: 37528842 PMCID: PMC10388578 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Clinical axillary lymph node management in early breast cancer has evolved from being merely an aspect of surgical management and now includes the entire multidisciplinary team. The second edition of the "Lucerne Toolbox", a multidisciplinary consortium of European cancer societies and patient representatives, addresses the challenges of clinical axillary lymph node management, from diagnosis to local therapy of the axilla. Five working packages were developed, following the patients' journey and addressing specific clinical scenarios. Panellists voted on 72 statements, reaching consensus (agreement of 75% or more) in 52.8%, majority (51%-74% agreement) in 43.1%, and no decision in 4.2%. Based on the votes, targeted imaging and standardized pathology of lymph nodes should be a prerequisite to planning local and systemic therapy, axillary lymph node dissection can be replaced by sentinel lymph node biopsy ( ± targeted approaches) in a majority of scenarios; and positive patient outcomes should be driven by both low recurrence risks and low rates of lymphoedema.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orit Kaidar-Person
- Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - André Pfob
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Bettina Borisch
- Department of Histopathology, University of Geneva, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ana Bosch
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lasarettsgatan 23A, 22241, Lund, Sweden
| | - Maria João Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Foundation and University of Lisbon Faculty of Medicine, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti, 435, 20141 Milano MI, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Jana De Boniface
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Breast Centre, Capio St Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Nik Hauser
- Breast Center, Hirslanden Clinic Aarau, Frauenarztzentrum Aargau AG, Baden, Switzerland
| | - Jörg Heil
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
- Breast Center Heidelberg, Klinik St. Elisabeth, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Knauer
- Breast Center Eastern Switzerland, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm, Germany
| | - Han-Byoel Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group (GBG), C/o GBG Forschungs GmbH 63263 - Neu-Isenberg/, Germany
- Centre for Haematology and Oncology Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Icro Meattini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Giacomo Montagna
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katja Pinker
- Breast Imaging Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Isabel T. Rubio
- Breast Surgical Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Patrizia Sager
- Breast Center Bern-Biel, Hirslanden Clinic Salem, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Petra Steyerova
- Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnostic Center, Clinic of Radiology, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Trine Tramm
- Department of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Marie-Jeanne Vrancken Peeters
- Department of Surgical Oncology Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek & Amsterdam University Medical Center, Netherlands
| | - Lynda Wyld
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, The University of Sheffield, The Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jong Han Yu
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Walter Paul Weber
- Breast Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp 2610, Belgium
- University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Peter Dubsky
- Breast Center, Hirslanden Clinic St Anna, 6006, Lucerne, Switzerland
- University of Lucerne, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Lucerne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Heeling E, van de Kamer JB, Methorst M, Bruining A, van de Meent M, Vrancken Peeters MJTFD, Lok CAR, van der Ploeg IMC. The Safe Use of 125I-Seeds as a Localization Technique in Breast Cancer during Pregnancy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3229. [PMID: 37370839 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15123229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Some aspects of the treatment protocol for breast cancer during pregnancy (PrBC) have not been thoroughly studied. This study provides clarity regarding the safety of the use of 125I-seeds as a localization technique for breast-conserving surgery in patients with PrBC. METHODS To calculate the exposure to the fetus of one 125I-seed implanted in a breast tumor, we developed a model accounting for the decaying 125I-source, time to surgery, and the declining distance between the 125I-seed and the fetus. The primary outcome was the maximum cumulative fetal dose of radiation at consecutive gestational ages (GA). RESULTS The cumulative fetal dose remains below 1 mSv if a single 125I-seed is implanted at a GA of 26 weeks. After a GA of 26 weeks, the fetal dose can be at a maximum of 11.6 mSv. If surgery takes place within two weeks of implantation from a GA of 26 weeks, and one week above a GA of 32 weeks, the dose remains below 1 mSv. CONCLUSION The use of 125I-seeds is safe in PrBC. The maximum fetal exposure remains well below the threshold of 100 mSv, and therefore, does not lead to an increased risk of fetal tissue damage. Still, we propose keeping the fetal dose as low as possible, preferably below 1 mSv.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Heeling
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen B van de Kamer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michelle Methorst
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie Bruining
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mette van de Meent
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Christianne A R Lok
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris M C van der Ploeg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Banys-Paluchowski M, de Boniface J. Axillary staging in node-positive breast cancer converting to node negativity through neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Current evidence and perspectives. Scand J Surg 2023; 112:117-125. [PMID: 36642957 DOI: 10.1177/14574969221145892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Over the recent years, axillary staging of initially node-positive breast cancer patients converting to clinical node negativity after neoadjuvant chemotherapy has seen rapid changes. This narrative review aims to give a contemporary overview over published evidence and clinical practice, and thus provide some guidance to the surgical community in the process of re-evaluating and re-shaping surgical practice. METHODS The search strategy aimed at finding relevant studies. Only articles in English were considered. RESULTS The introduction of modern techniques offer more precise staging surgery and thus hopefully reduced arm morbidity. Clinical practice has however diverged both within countries and internationally. While some countries have adapted de-escalated axillary staging techniques such as targeted axillary dissection, targeted lymph node biopsy or sentinel lymph node biopsy, others continue to recommend a full axillary lymph node dissection. With the implementation of new techniques, many questions arise, regarding aspects of oncological safety, technical performance, budget and practicality, patient selection and indications for different levels of axillary staging procedures. CONCLUSIONS There is a growing body of evidence on de-escalation of axillary surgery in the setting of cN+ → ycN0 breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, standards differ between countries and future studies are necessary to fully assess the optimal strategy for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Jana de Boniface
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Heidinger M, Knauer M, Tausch C, Weber WP. Tailored axillary surgery - A novel concept for clinically node positive breast cancer. Breast 2023; 69:281-289. [PMID: 36922305 PMCID: PMC10034500 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Axillary surgery in patients with breast cancer has been a history of de-escalation; however, surgery for clinically node-positive breast cancer remained at the dogmatic level of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). In these patients, currently the only way to avoid ALND is neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST) with nodal pathologic complete response (pCR) as diagnosed by selective lymph node removal. However, pCR rates are highly dependent on tumor biology, with luminal tumors being most present yet showing the lowest pCR rates. Therefore, the TAXIS trial is investigating whether in clinically node-positive patients, either with residual disease after NST or in the upfront surgical setting, ALND can be safely omitted. All patients undergo tailored axillary surgery (TAS), which includes removal of the biopsied and clipped node, the sentinel lymph nodes as well as all palpably suspicious nodes, turning a clinically positive axilla into a clinically negative. Feasibility of TAS was recently confirmed in the first pre-specified TAXIS substudy. TAS is followed by axillary radiotherapy to treat any remaining nodal disease. Disease-free survival is the primary endpoint of this non-inferiority trial, and morbidity as well as quality of life are the main secondary endpoints, with ALND being known for having a relevant negative impact on both. Currently, 663 of 1500 patients were randomized; accrual completion is projected for 2025. The TAXIS trial stands out in including clinically node-positive patients in both the neoadjuvant and upfront surgery setting, thereby investigating surgical de-escalation at the far-end of the risk spectrum of patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Heidinger
- Breast Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michael Knauer
- Breast Center Eastern Switzerland, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | | | - Walter P Weber
- Breast Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ooi WL, Becker B, Phillips M, Saunders C, Taylor D. Iodine-125 seed versus hook-wire guided breast conserving surgery: do post operative complication rates differ? ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:876-880. [PMID: 36797222 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Revised: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radio-guided occult lesion localisation using iodine 125 seeds (ROLLIS) is used to localize impalpable breast cancers for breast conserving surgery (BCS). Previous studies have suggested improved efficiency and patient outcomes with ROLLIS compared with hook-wire localisation (HWL). The aim of this report is to compare the post-operative complication rates and safety profiles of ROLLIS versus hook-wire guided surgery. METHODS Between September 2013 and March 2018, 690 women with non-palpable breast cancer eligible for breast-conserving surgery were randomly assigned to either pre-operative localisation with 125 I seed or hook-wire as part of the ROLLIS clinical trial. Medical record review of 170 women (30% of the total participants) from three tertiary hospitals in Western Australia was performed. Post-operative complications were classified using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events(CTCAE) grade I to V. RESULTS Total of 170 surgeries were performed: 82 by ROLLIS and 88 by hook-wire. The overall complication rate in the ROLLIS group was 19.5%, with 15.9% being grade II and 3.66% grade III. In the HWL group, the complication rate was 22.7% with 20.5% being grade II and 2.27% grade III. There was no statistically significant difference in complication grades between the 2 groups. No grade IV or grade V complications were reported. Complications observed included drainable seroma, drainable haematoma and surgical site infection. CONCLUSION ROLLIS is a safe method of localisation for surgical resection with similar complication rates as hookwires. We encourage its use as an alternative localisation technique as it has demonstrable superiority and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Ling Ooi
- Breast Surgery, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Brenno Becker
- General Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Michael Phillips
- Harry Perkins Institute for Medical Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Christobel Saunders
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Donna Taylor
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,School of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Laws A, Kantor O, King TA. Surgical Management of the Axilla for Breast Cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2023; 37:51-77. [PMID: 36435614 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2022.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
This review discusses the contemporary surgical management of the axilla in patients with breast cancer. Surgical paradigms are highlighted by clinical nodal status at presentation and treatment approach, including upfront surgery and neoadjuvant systemic therapy settings. This review focuses on the increasing opportunities for de-escalating the extent of axillary surgery in the era of sentinel lymph node biopsy, while also reviewing the remaining indications for axillary clearance with axillary lymph node dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Laws
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Olga Kantor
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tari A King
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Luo Y, Jiang H, Liu C, Zhang C. Axillary Downstaging and the Impact of Clinical Axillary Status on Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Therapy for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2023; 22:15330338221150325. [PMID: 36660776 PMCID: PMC9893393 DOI: 10.1177/15330338221150325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Lymph node downstaging and the achievement of total-pCR (ypT0/is ypN0) after neoadjuvant therapy are of great importance in HER-2 positive breast cancer. We aim to provide an overall review of neoadjuvant regimens for lymph node downstaging and to indirectly compare the total-pCR by various neoadjuvant regimens with network meta-analysis in HER2-positive patients according to their clinical lymph node status. Methods: Five English databases were searched comprehensively and systematically for relevant RCTs and case-control studies. The data extracted from the included studies were analyzed with the use of Review Manager 5.3 or STATA 15.0 software. Results: A total of 1508 published manuscripts were identified, and 17 studies including 4747 patients were finally included in our analysis. The network meta-analysis of total-pCR showed that dual-target therapy is significantly better than single-target therapy in clinically node-positive patients, and carboplatin performed significantly better than anthracycline in single-target condition. Lapatinib performed poorly in clinically node-positive patients. However, lapatinib in combination with trastuzumab was ranked at the top in the clinically node-negative group, and pertuzumab showed dissatisfied performance in contrast to the primacy of pertuzumab in clinically node-positive groups. Conclusion: In summary, different lymph node statuses led to the diverse first choice of neoadjuvant regimen. We highly recommended TCbHP as the first choice for the neoadjuvant treatment in clinically node-positive HER-2 positive breast cancer. Since lapatinib with trastuzumab ranked top in the clinically node-negative group, we looked forward to discovering the potential value of TKI in clinically node-negative patients, which needs further analysis in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunzhao Luo
- Beijing Chaoyang Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hongchuan Jiang
- Beijing Chaoyang Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | | | - Chao Zhang
- Beijing Chaoyang Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Munoz P, Corral S, Martínez-Regueira F, Paz A, Muñoz-Madero V, Mena A, Cabañas J, Rivas S. Axillary staging and management of cN + breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results of a survey among breast cancer surgeons in Spain. CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE FEDERATION OF SPANISH ONCOLOGY SOCIETIES AND OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE OF MEXICO 2022; 25:1463-1471. [PMID: 36586064 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-03049-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Given the high rate of complete nodal response, the role of axillary lymph node dissection on staging the axilla has been questioned. This survey, addressed to breast cancer surgeons in Spain, has the objective of assessing current clinical trends on axillary staging of cN + patients treated with NAC. METHODS An online survey was conducted among breast surgeons from the Spanish Society of Surgery (AEC), Spanish Surgical Oncology Society (SEOQ), Spanish Breast Cancer Surgeons Society (AECIMA) and Spanish Gynecology and Obstetrics Society (SEGO). It was structured in 5 sections: general information and clinical practice, knowledge of clinical trials, diagnosis work-up and nodal marking, axillary staging, and axillary treatment. RESULTS 150 breast cancer surgeons completed the full survey (96.7%). 81.8% of respondents performed SLNB or targeted axillary dissection in cN1 patients treated with NAC. Radiological axillary response was the preferred parameter guiding the surgical strategy. The excision of the clipped node (92.0%), use of dual tracer (73.2%), and axillary US (65.9%) after treatment were the most important variables considered by respondents, to increase the accuracy of SLNB in cN + patients. CONCLUSION This survey confirms a trend toward a less invasive approach for axillary staging in cN + patients treated with NAC among breast cancer surgeons in Spain. While there is widespread agreement in less invasive approaches to axillary staging, there is, however, a lack of consensus around treatment strategy. Further, it shows a wide heterogeneity in their clinical practice. This study highlights the need for clear evidence concerning less invasive staging procedures and their oncological safety, to ensure consistent recommendations in surgical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula Munoz
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Quironsalud Torrevieja, Torrevieja, Alicante, Spain.
| | - Sara Corral
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Alejandro Paz
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Quironsalud Torrevieja, Torrevieja, Alicante, Spain
| | - Vicente Muñoz-Madero
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Quironsalud Torrevieja, Torrevieja, Alicante, Spain
| | - Antonio Mena
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jacobo Cabañas
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sonia Rivas
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Simons JM, van Nijnatten TJA, van der Pol CC, van Diest PJ, Jager A, van Klaveren D, Kam BLR, Lobbes MBI, de Boer M, Verhoef C, Sars PRA, Heijmans HJ, van Haaren ERM, Vles WJ, Contant CME, Menke-Pluijmers MBE, Smit LHM, Kelder W, Boskamp M, Koppert LB, Luiten EJT, Smidt ML. Diagnostic Accuracy of Radioactive Iodine Seed Placement in the Axilla With Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Node-Positive Breast Cancer. JAMA Surg 2022; 157:991-999. [PMID: 36069889 PMCID: PMC9453629 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.3907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Several less-invasive staging procedures have been proposed to replace axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with initially clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer, but these procedures may fail to detect residual disease. Owing to the lack of high-level evidence, it is not yet clear which procedure is most optimal to replace ALND. Objective To determine the diagnostic accuracy of radioactive iodine seed placement in the axilla with sentinel lymph node biopsy (RISAS), a targeted axillary dissection procedure. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a prospective, multicenter, noninferiority, diagnostic accuracy trial conducted from March 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. Patients were included within 14 institutions (general, teaching, and academic) throughout the Netherlands. Patients with breast cancer clinical tumor categories 1 through 4 (cT1-4; tumor diameter <2 cm and up to >5 cm or extension to the chest wall or skin) and pathologically proven positive axillary lymph nodes (ie, clinical node categories cN1, metastases to movable ipsilateral level I and/or level II axillary nodes; cN2, metastases to fixed or matted ipsilateral level I and/or level II axillary nodes; cN3b, metastases to ipsilateral level I and/or level II axillary nodes with metastases to internal mammary nodes) who were treated with NAC were eligible for inclusion. Data were analyzed from July 2020 to December 2021. Intervention Pre-NAC, the marking of a pathologically confirmed positive axillary lymph node with radioactive iodine seed (MARI) procedure, was performed and after NAC, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) combined with excision of the marked lymph node (ie, RISAS procedure) was performed, followed by ALND. Main Outcomes and Measures The identification rate, false-negative rate (FNR), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for all 3 procedures: RISAS, SLNB, and MARI. The noninferiority margin of the observed FNR was 6.25% for the RISAS procedure. Results A total of 212 patients (median [range] age, 52 [22-77] years) who had cN+ breast cancer underwent the RISAS procedure and ALND. The identification rate of the RISAS procedure was 98.2% (223 of 227). The identification rates of SLNB and MARI were 86.4% (197 of 228) and 94.1% (224 of 238), respectively. FNR of the RISAS procedure was 3.5% (5 of 144; 90% CI, 1.38-7.16), and NPV was 92.8% (64 of 69; 90% CI, 85.37-97.10), compared with an FNR of 17.9% (22 of 123; 90% CI, 12.4%-24.5%) and NPV of 72.8% (59 of 81; 90% CI, 63.5%-80.8%) for SLNB and an FNR of 7.0% (10 of 143; 90% CI, 3.8%-11.6%) and NPV of 86.3% (63 of 73; 90% CI, 77.9%-92.4%) for the MARI procedure. In a subgroup of 174 patients in whom SLNB and the MARI procedure were successful and ALND was performed, FNR of the RISAS procedure was 2.5% (3 of 118; 90% CI, 0.7%-6.4%), compared with 18.6% (22 of 118; 90% CI, 13.0%-25.5%) for SLNB (P < .001) and 6.8% (8 of 118; 90% CI, 3.4%-11.9%) for the MARI procedure (P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance Results of this diagnostic study suggest that the RISAS procedure was the most feasible and accurate less-invasive procedure for axillary staging after NAC in patients with cN+ breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine M. Simons
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- GROW—School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Thiemo J. A. van Nijnatten
- GROW—School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, the Netherlands
| | - Carmen C. van der Pol
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, the Netherlands
| | - Paul J. van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Agnes Jager
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - David van Klaveren
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Boen L. R. Kam
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marc B. I. Lobbes
- GROW—School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike de Boer
- GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Cees Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Paul R. A. Sars
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, the Netherlands
| | - Harald J. Heijmans
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital Group Twente, Breast Clinic Oost-Nederland, Hengelo, the Netherlands
| | - Els R. M. van Haaren
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter J. Vles
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Léonie H. M. Smit
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Treant Zorggroep Hospital, Hoogeveen, the Netherlands
| | - Wendy Kelder
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marike Boskamp
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Wilhelmina Hospital, Assen, the Netherlands
| | - Linetta B. Koppert
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ernest J. T. Luiten
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
- Tawam Breast Care Center, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates
- Department of Surgery College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates
| | - Marjolein L. Smidt
- GROW—School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Deparment of Surgical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Encuesta del Grupo de Trabajo de Cirugía Radioguiada (GTCRG) de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular (SEMNIM): localización radioguiada de lesiones no palpables de mama con o sin indicación de biopsia selectiva de ganglio centinela: ROLL, SNOLL y semillas de 125I. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2021.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
21
|
de la Riva Pérez PA, Carrera Salazar D, Paredes Barranco P, Goñi Gironés E. Survey of the Radioguided Surgery Working Group (GTCRG-RGSWG) of the Spanish Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SEMNIM): Radioguided localization of non-palpable breast lesions with or without indication for selective sentinel node biopsy: ROLL, SNOLL and 125I seeds. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2022; 41:223-230. [PMID: 35668015 DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2022.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To know the current status of the technique of radioguided localisation of non-palpable breast lesions with or without indication for selective sentinel node biopsy -ROLL, SNOLL and 125I seeds- by conducting a national survey developed by the Working Group on Radioguided Surgery (GTCRG) of the Spanish Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SEMNIM). MATERIAL AND METHODS In October 2020, the form was sent in digital format to the different nuclear medicine services in Spain. A response time of 2 months with an overtime of 15 days was given. The number of ROLL/SNOLL procedures in each centre and the methodology used were obtained, including important technical details. In addition, a specific section on 125I seeds was included. The results were automatically downloaded into an Excel 2007 spreadsheet for subsequent analysis with the same program. RESULTS The survey was answered by 55 centres; 21 use wire-guided localisation while the remaining 34 use different radioguided surgery techniques (RGS) for the localisation of non-palpable breast lesions, with the results itemized into thirteen sections. The commonly used tracer dose is 111 MBq for the ROLL technique and 222 MBq for the SNOLL technique, with a volume of 0.2 ml. The most common protocol is the two-day protocol. 26% of centres performing CRG use 125I seeds for both breast lesion and suspicious/pathological node detection, with the time between implantation and removal being about 3 days, with subsequent radiological control in most cases. CONCLUSION The survey shows the relevance of radioguided surgery in the management of breast cancer patients at different stages of the disease, with disparity in the implementation of new techniques and tools, which responds to the multiple healthcare realities of Nuclear Medicine services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P A de la Riva Pérez
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain; Grupo de Trabajo de Cirugía Radioguiada (GTCRG) de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular (SEMNIM), Spain.
| | - D Carrera Salazar
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario Joan XXIII de Tarragona, Tarragona, Spain; Grupo de Trabajo de Cirugía Radioguiada (GTCRG) de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular (SEMNIM), Spain
| | - P Paredes Barranco
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Grupo de Trabajo de Cirugía Radioguiada (GTCRG) de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular (SEMNIM), Spain
| | - E Goñi Gironés
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain; Grupo de Trabajo de Cirugía Radioguiada (GTCRG) de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular (SEMNIM), Spain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
de Boniface J, Frisell J, Kühn T, Wiklander-Bråkenhielm I, Dembrower K, Nyman P, Zouzos A, Gerber B, Reimer T, Hartmann S. False-negative rate in the extended prospective TATTOO trial evaluating targeted axillary dissection by carbon tattooing in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 193:589-595. [PMID: 35451733 PMCID: PMC9114094 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06588-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In clinically node-positive breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST), nodal metastases can be initially marked and then removed during surgical axillary staging. Marking methods vary significantly in terms of feasibility and cost. The purpose of the extended TATTOO trial was to report on the false-negative rate (FNR) of the low-cost method carbon tattooing. METHODS The international prospective single-arm TATTOO trial included clinically node-positive breast cancer patients planned for NST from November 2017 to January 2021. For the present analysis, patients who received both the targeted procedure with or without an additional sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy and a completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) were selected. Primary endpoint was the FNR. RESULTS Out of 172 included patients, 149 had undergone a completion ALND. The detection rate for the tattooed node was 94.6% (141 out of 149). SLN biopsy was attempted in 132 out of 149 patients with a detection rate of 91.7% (121 out of 132). SLN and tattooed node were identical in 58 out of 121 individuals (47.9%). The combined procedure, i.e. targeted axillary dissection (TAD) was successful in 147 of 149 cases (98.7%). Four out of 65 patients with a clinically node-negative status after NST had a negative TAD but metastases on ALND, corresponding to a FNR of 6.2%. All false-negative TAD procedures were performed in the first 2 years of the trial (2018-2019, p = 0.022). CONCLUSION Carbon tattooing is a feasible marking method for TAD with a high detection rate and an acceptably low FNR. The TATTOO trial was preregistered as prospective trial before initiation at the University of Rostock, Germany (DRKS00013169).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana de Boniface
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Department of Surgery, Breast Centre, Capio St. Göran's Hospital, Mariebergsporten 2, 11219, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Jan Frisell
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Breast, Endocrine and Sarcoma Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | | | - Karin Dembrower
- Department of Radiology, Capio St. Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Nyman
- Department of Surgery, Skaraborg Hospital, Lidköping, Sweden
| | - Athanasios Zouzos
- Department of Mammography, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Steffi Hartmann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Song YX, Xu Z, Liang MX, Liu Z, Hou JC, Chen X, Xu D, Fei YJ, Tang JH. Diagnostic accuracy of de-escalated surgical procedure in axilla for node-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Med 2022; 11:4085-4103. [PMID: 35502768 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND More initial clinical node-positive breast cancer patients achieve axillary pathological complete response (ax-pCR) after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). Restaging axillary status and performing de-escalated surgical procedures to replace routine axillary lymph nodes dissection (ALND) is urgently needed. Targeted axillary lymph node biopsy (TLNB) is a novel de-escalated surgical strategy marking metastatic axillary nodes before NST and targeted dissection and biopsy intraoperatively to tailor individual axillary management. METHODS This study provided a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the feasibility and diagnosis accuracy of TLNB. Prospective and retrospective clinical trials on TLNB were searched from Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane. Identification rate (IFR), false-negative rate (FNR), negative predictive value (NPV), and rate of ax-pCR were the outcomes of this meta-analysis. RESULTS One thousand nine hundred and twenty patients attempted TLNB, with an overall IFR of 93.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 90.1%-96.2%). IFR of three nodal marking methods, namely iodine seeds, clips, and carbon dye, was 95.6% (95% CI 91.2%-98.7%), 91.7% (95% CI 87.3%-95.4%), and 97.1% (95% CI 89.1%-100.0%), respectively. Of them, 847 patients received ALND, with an overall FNR of 5.5% (95% CI 3.3%-8.0%), and NPV ranged from 90.1% to 96.1%. Regression analysis showed that the overlap of targeted and sentinel biopsied nodes might associate with IFRs and FNRs. CONCLUSION TLNB is a novel, less invasive surgical approach to distinguish initial node-positive breast cancer that achieves negative axillary conversion after NST. It yields an excellent IFR with a low FNR and a high NPV. A combination of preoperative imaging, intraoperative TLNB with SLNB, and postoperative nodal radiotherapy might affect the future treatment paradigm of primary breast cancer with nodal metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Xin Song
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zheng Xu
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Ming-Xing Liang
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhen Liu
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jun-Chen Hou
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiu Chen
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Di Xu
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yin-Jiao Fei
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jin-Hai Tang
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
van Loevezijn AA, van der Noordaa MEM, Stokkel MPM, van Werkhoven ED, Groen EJ, Loo CE, Elkhuizen PHM, Sonke GS, Russell NS, van Duijnhoven FH, Vrancken Peeters MJTFD. Three-year follow-up of de-escalated axillary treatment after neoadjuvant systemic therapy in clinically node-positive breast cancer: the MARI-protocol. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 193:37-48. [PMID: 35239072 PMCID: PMC8993719 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06545-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Purpose In clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer patients, evidence supporting response-guided treatment after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) instead of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is increasing, but follow-up results are lacking. We assessed three-year axillary recurrence-free interval (aRFI) in cN+ patients with response-adjusted axillary treatment according to the ‘Marking Axillary lymph nodes with Radioactive Iodine seeds’ (MARI)-protocol. Methods We retrospectively assessed all stage II–III cytologically proven cN+ breast cancer patients who underwent the MARI-protocol between July 2014 and November 2018. Pre-NST axillary staging with FDG-PET/CT (less- or more than four suspicious axillary nodes; cALN < 4 or cALN ≥ 4) and post-NST pathological axillary response measured in the pre-NST largest tumor-positive axillary lymph node marked with an iodine seed (MARI-node; ypMARI-neg or ypMARI-pos) determined axillary treatment: no further treatment (cALN < 4, ypMARI-neg), axillary radiotherapy (ART) (cALN < 4, ypMARI-pos and cALN ≥ 4, ypMARI-neg) or ALND plus ART (cALN ≥ 4, ypMARI-pos). Results Of 272 women included, the MARI-node was tumor-negative in 56 (32%) of 174 cALN < 4 patients and 43 (44%) of 98 cALN ≥ 4 patients. According to protocol, 56 (21%) patients received no further axillary treatment, 161 (59%) received ART and 55 (20%) received ALND plus ART. Median follow-up was 3.0 years (IQR 1.9–4.1). Five patients (one no further treatment, four ART) had axillary metastases. Three-year aRFI was 98% (95% CI 96–100). The overall recurrence risk remained highest for patients with ALND (HR 4.36; 95% CI 0.95–20.04, p = 0.059). Conclusions De-escalation of axillary treatment according to the MARI-protocol prevented ALND in 80% of cN+ patients with an excellent three-year aRFI of 98%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariane A van Loevezijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke E M van der Noordaa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel P M Stokkel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik D van Werkhoven
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma J Groen
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Claudette E Loo
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paula H M Elkhuizen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gabe S Sonke
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicola S Russell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederieke H van Duijnhoven
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rebollo Aguirre A, Fernández Fernández J, Sánchez Sánchez R, Mendoza Arnau I, Rivas Navas D, Martínez Meca S. Radioguided surgery with iodine-125 seeds in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2022; 41:71-77. [DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2021.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
26
|
de Wild SR, Simons JM, Vrancken Peeters MJTFD, Smidt ML, Koppert LB. De-Escalating Axillary Surgery in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy. Breast Care (Basel) 2022; 16:584-589. [PMID: 35087361 DOI: 10.1159/000518376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is a trend towards de-escalating axillary staging and treatment in breast cancer patients. On account of neoadjuvant systemic therapy, node-positive breast cancer patients can achieve a pathological complete response of the axilla. It is hypothesized that these patients do not benefit from an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), and thus may be spared the risk of severe post-surgical morbidity. In an effort to omit standard ALND, less invasive axillary staging procedures are being implemented to establish response-guided treatment. However, it is unclear which less invasive staging procedure is most accurate, and long-term data are missing with regard to their oncologic safety. Summary This article provides an overview of the literature on currently used less invasive axillary staging procedures, the accuracy and feasibility of these procedures in clinical practice, important issues concerning axillary treatment, and issues to be addressed in ongoing or future studies. Key messages More evidence is needed regarding the safety of replacing standard ALND by less invasive axillary staging procedures in terms of long-term prognosis. These less invasive staging procedures not only serve to select patients who may benefit from treatment de-escalation, but also to select patients who may benefit from treatment escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine R de Wild
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Janine M Simons
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein L Smidt
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Linetta B Koppert
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hersh EH, King TA. De-escalating axillary surgery in early-stage breast cancer. Breast 2021; 62 Suppl 1:S43-S49. [PMID: 34949533 PMCID: PMC9097808 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The role of axillary surgery has evolved over the last three decades from routine axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) to sentinel lymph node biopsy to omission of axillary surgery altogether in select patients. This evolution has been achieved through the design and conduct of multiple clinical trials demonstrating that ALND does not impact survival and is not necessary for local control in patients with early-stage breast cancer and limited nodal involvement. Importantly, this practice-changing shift mirrored the trend towards earlier stage at diagnosis and the recognition of the interplay between local and systemic therapies in maintaining local control. There are numerous clinical scenarios today in which axillary staging can be safely avoided, including (1) DCIS treated with lumpectomy, (2) at the time of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, and (3) in elderly patients with early-stage, HR+/HER2-clinically node-negative (cN0) disease. Ongoing clinical trials seek to expand the cohorts in which surgical nodal staging can be omitted. These populations include a broader range of early-stage, cN0 patients undergoing upfront surgery, as seen in the SOUND, INSEMA, BOOG 2013-08, SOAPET and NAUTILUS trials. Omission of axillary surgery in cN0 patients with HER2+ or triple-negative disease treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is also being tested in the ASICS and EUBREAST-01 trials. Continued advances in imaging and the growing role of genomic assays in selecting patients for systemic therapy are likely to further minimize the need for axillary surgery; thereby further reducing the morbidity of local therapy for women with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliza H Hersh
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tari A King
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Corsi F, Albasini S, Sorrentino L, Armatura G, Carolla C, Chiappa C, Combi F, Curcio A, Della Valle A, Ferrari G, Gasparri ML, Gentilini O, Ghilli M, Listorti C, Mancini S, Marinello P, Meani F, Mele S, Pertusati A, Roncella M, Rovera F, Sgarella A, Tazzioli G, Tognali D, Folli S. Development of a novel nomogram-based online tool to predict axillary status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cN+ breast cancer: A multicentre study on 1,950 patients. Breast 2021; 60:131-137. [PMID: 34624755 PMCID: PMC8503563 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Type of axillary surgery in breast cancer (BC) patients who convert from cN + to ycN0 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is still debated. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a preoperative predictive nomogram to select those patients with a low risk of residual axillary disease after NAC, in whom axillary surgery could be minimized. PATIENTS AND METHODS 1950 clinically node-positive BC patients from 11 Breast Units, treated by NAC and subsequent surgery, were included from 2005 to 2020. Patients were divided in two groups: those who achieved nodal pCR vs. those with residual nodal disease after NAC. The cohort was divided into training and validation set with a geographic separation criterion. The outcome was to identify independent predictors of axillary pathologic complete response (pCR). RESULTS Independent predictive factors associated to nodal pCR were axillary clinical complete response (cCR) after NAC (OR 3.11, p < 0.0001), ER-/HER2+ (OR 3.26, p < 0.0001) or ER+/HER2+ (OR 2.26, p = 0.0002) or ER-/HER2- (OR 1.89, p = 0.009) BC, breast cCR (OR 2.48, p < 0.0001), Ki67 > 14% (OR 0.52, p = 0.0005), and tumor grading G2 (OR 0.35, p = 0.002) or G3 (OR 0.29, p = 0.0003). The nomogram showed a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 73% (AUC 0.77, 95%CI 0.75-0.80). After external validation the accuracy of the nomogram was confirmed. CONCLUSION The accuracy makes this freely-available, nomogram-based online tool useful to predict nodal pCR after NAC, translating the concept of tailored axillary surgery also in this setting of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Corsi
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgery, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "Luigi Sacco", Università di Milano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Sara Albasini
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgery, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
| | - Luca Sorrentino
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "Luigi Sacco", Università di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Armatura
- Chirurgia Generale, Ospedale Centrale di Bolzano, Azienda Sanitaria dell'Alto Adige, Italy
| | - Claudia Carolla
- Breast Unit, Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Francesca Combi
- Breast Unit Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Modena, Italy
| | - Annalisa Curcio
- Chirurgia Senologica, Ospedale Morgagni Pierantoni, Ausl Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Angelica Della Valle
- Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Ferrari
- Breast Surgery Unit, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola 2, 42122, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Maria Luisa Gasparri
- Service of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano EOC, Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Oreste Gentilini
- Breast Surgery, San Raffaele University and Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Matteo Ghilli
- Breast Cancer Centre, University Hospital of Pisa, Italy
| | - Chiara Listorti
- Breast Unit, Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Mancini
- Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milano, Italy
| | - Peter Marinello
- Chirurgia Generale, Ospedale Centrale di Bolzano, Azienda Sanitaria dell'Alto Adige, Italy
| | - Francesco Meani
- Service of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano EOC, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Simone Mele
- Breast Surgery Unit, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola 2, 42122, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Anna Pertusati
- General Surgery I, Department of Surgery, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milano, Italy
| | | | | | - Adele Sgarella
- Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy; Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giovanni Tazzioli
- Breast Unit Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Modena, Italy
| | - Daniela Tognali
- Chirurgia Senologica, Ospedale Morgagni Pierantoni, Ausl Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Secondo Folli
- Breast Unit, Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
de Mooij CM, Mitea C, Mottaghy FM, Smidt ML, van Nijnatten TJA. Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for predicting axillary pathologic complete response following neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer patients: emphasis on breast cancer subtype. EJNMMI Res 2021; 11:116. [PMID: 34807395 PMCID: PMC8609064 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-021-00861-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) is a widely accepted initial treatment modality that can lead to pathologic downstaging of the axillary disease burden in breast cancer patients. Axillary response as well as baseline 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) uptake on positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) differ between breast cancer subtypes. The value of baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT in predicting axillary response to NST is not yet established, possibly since breast cancer subtype was not taken into account. The purpose of this study was to investigate the value of baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT in predicting axillary response to NST with a specific emphasis on subtype. Methods PET-parameters derived from the primary tumor as well as the most FDG-avid axillary lymph node were measured on baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT. Overall imaging findings were compared with the gold standard of histopathology of the axillary surgery specimen. Analyses for ER-positive/HER2-negative were performed separately from HER2-positive and TN patients. In addition, separate analyses for clinically node-positive patients were performed. Results Sixty-six patients with 69 primary tumors were included in this study. Thirty-three axillae contained ER-positive/HER2-negative, 16 HER2-positive, and 20 TN breast cancer. No significant difference in PET-parameters between patients with axillary residual disease and axillary pathologic complete response were found for ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. In the combined HER2-positive/TN subgroup, the SUVmax was significantly lower in patients without residual axillary disease in both the entire cohort and in patients with clinically node-positive disease. In this combined subgroup, a cut-off of 4.89 SUVmax measured on the most FDG-avid axillary lymph node could predict residual axillary disease with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 90%, 69%, 53%, and 95%, respectively. Conclusions Predicting axillary response following NST with baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT can be performed when focusing on breast cancer subtypes. The easily computed PET-parameter SUVmax can predict axillary response in HER2-positive and TN breast cancer. This study adds to the accumulating evidence that studies investigating the value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer should always take subtypes into account. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13550-021-00861-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelis M de Mooij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands. .,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. .,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Cristina Mitea
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Felix M Mottaghy
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Marjolein L Smidt
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Thiemo J A van Nijnatten
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Dialani V, Dogan B, Dodelzon K, Dontchos BN, Modi N, Grimm L. Axillary Imaging Following a New Invasive Breast Cancer Diagnosis-A Radiologist's Dilemma. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2021; 3:645-658. [PMID: 38424939 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbab082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Traditionally, patients with newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer underwent axillary US to assess for suspicious axillary lymph nodes (LNs), which were then targeted for image-guided needle biopsy to determine the presence of metastasis. Over the past decade, there has been a shift towards axillary preservation. For patients with palpable lymphadenopathy, the decision to perform axillary imaging with documentation of the number and location of abnormal LNs in preparation for image-guided LN sampling is straightforward. Since LN involvement correlates with cancer size, it is reasonable to image the axilla in patients with tumors larger than 5 cm; however, for tumors smaller than 5 cm, axillary imaging is often deferred until after the tumor molecular subtype and treatment plan are established. Over the last decade, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is increasingly used for smaller cancers with more aggressive molecular subtypes. In most cases, detecting axillary metastasis is critical when deciding whether the patient would benefit from NACT. There is increasing evidence that abnormal axillary US findings correlates with LN metastases and reliably establishes a baseline to monitor response to NACT. Depending on hormone receptor status, practices may choose to image the axilla in the setting of clinical stage T1 and T2 cancers to evaluate nodal status and help determine further steps in care. Radiologists should understand the nuances of axillary management and the scope and challenges of LN marking techniques that significantly increase the precision of limited axillary surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vandana Dialani
- Beth Israel Lahey Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Basak Dogan
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Katerina Dodelzon
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Department of Radiology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brian N Dontchos
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Neha Modi
- Saint Vincent Hospital at Worcester Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Lars Grimm
- Duke University Hospital, Department of Radiology, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rauch GM, Kuerer HM, Jochelson MS. To Look or Not to Look? Yes to Nodal Ultrasound! JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2021; 3:659-665. [PMID: 38424935 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbab079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Knowledge of axillary nodal status is highly important for correct staging and treatment planning in patients with breast cancer. Axillary US is a recognized highly specific and cost-effective tool for assessing nodal status and guiding appropriate treatment. Axillary US imaging with US-guided biopsy is routinely performed throughout the world. However, because of recent developments in the surgical management of the axilla in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer (American College of Surgeons Oncology Group [ACOSOG] Z0011 trial) and in patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy (ACOSOG Z1071, SENTinel NeoAdjuvant [SENTINA] and Sentinel Node biopsy aFter NeoAdjuvant Chemotherapy [SN FNAC] trials), some have questioned the utility of axillary US for nodal staging. Here, we review the evidence to date supporting the additional value of axillary US for patients with breast cancer. Nodal US in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer is useful for staging; in a significant proportion of patients, nodal US identifies additional axillary level II or level III nodal disease, which allows for appropriate treatment of disease. Furthermore, ongoing clinical trials may show that axillary surgery can be omitted in patients with negative findings on axillary US. In patients with lymph node-positive disease undergoing neoadjuvant systemic therapy, nodal US can guide the approach to axillary surgery. A more personalized patient approach, taking into the account tumor biology, among other factors, may help to mitigate the controversy surrounding the role of axillary US in breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaiane M Rauch
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Departments of Abdominal and Breast Imaging, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Henry M Kuerer
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maxine S Jochelson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, New York City, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Friedrich M, Kühn T, Janni W, Müller V, Banys-Pachulowski M, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Jackisch C, Krug D, Albert US, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer J, Budach W, Dall P, Fallenberg EM, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Gerber B, Gluz O, Hanf V, Harbeck N, Heil J, Huober J, Kreipe HH, Kümmel S, Loibl S, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Möbus V, Mundhenke C, Nitz U, Park-Simon TW, Reimer T, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Witzel I, Wöckel A, Thill M, Ditsch N. AGO Recommendations for the Surgical Therapy of the Axilla After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: 2021 Update. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2021; 81:1112-1120. [PMID: 34629490 PMCID: PMC8494519 DOI: 10.1055/a-1499-8431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
For many decades, the standard procedure to treat breast cancer included complete dissection of the axillary lymph nodes. The aim was to determine histological node status, which was then used as the basis for adjuvant therapy, and to ensure locoregional tumour control. In addition to the debate on how to optimise the therapeutic strategies of systemic treatment and radiotherapy, the current discussion focuses on improving surgical procedures to treat breast cancer. As neoadjuvant chemotherapy is becoming increasingly important, the surgical procedures used to treat breast cancer, whether they are breast surgery or axillary dissection, are changing. Based on the currently available data, carrying out SLNE prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not recommended. In contrast, surgical axillary management after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is considered the procedure of choice for axillary staging and can range from SLNE to TAD and ALND. To reduce the rate of false negatives
during surgical staging of the axilla in pN+
CNB
stage before NACT and ycN0 after NACT, targeted axillary dissection (TAD), the removal of > 2 SLNs (SLNE, no untargeted axillary sampling), immunohistochemistry to detect isolated tumour cells and micro-metastases, and marking positive lymph nodes before NACT should be the standard approach. This most recent update on surgical axillary management describes the significance of isolated tumour cells and micro-metastasis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the clinical consequences of low volume residual disease diagnosed using SLNE and TAD and provides an overview of this yearʼs AGO recommendations for surgical management of the axilla during primary surgery and in relation to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, HELIOS Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang Janni
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Pachulowski
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, UK-SH, Lübeck, Germany.,Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut gemeinnützige GmbH, Landshut, Germany
| | - Jens Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum des Universitätsklinikums der Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Strahlentherapie, Radiologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Frauenklinik, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Eva M Fallenberg
- Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Großhadern, Institut für Klinische Radiologie, München, Germany
| | | | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda, Brustzentrum, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Volker Hanf
- Frauenklinik, Nathanstift Klinikum Fürth, Fürth, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Universitäts-Klinikum Heidelberg, Brustzentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Patrick Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik, St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz Krankenhaus GmbH, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Volker Möbus
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda, Brustzentrum, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Tjoung-Won Park-Simon
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Florian Schütz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Sektion Gynäkopathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Universitätsfrauenklinik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
van Loevezijn AA, Stokkel MPM, Donswijk ML, van Werkhoven ED, van der Noordaa MEM, van Duijnhoven FH, Vrancken Peeters MJTFD. [ 18F]FDG-PET/CT in prone compared to supine position for optimal axillary staging and treatment in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients with neoadjuvant systemic therapy. EJNMMI Res 2021; 11:78. [PMID: 34417932 PMCID: PMC8380204 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-021-00824-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Axillary staging before neoadjuvant systemic therapy in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients with tailored axillary treatment according to the Marking Axillary lymph nodes with radioactive iodine seeds (MARI)-protocol, a protocol developed at the Netherlands Cancer Institute, is performed with [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT). We aimed to assess the value of FDG-PET/CT in prone compared to standard supine position for axillary staging. METHODS We selected patients with FDG-PET/CT in supine and prone position who underwent the MARI-protocol. One hour after administration of 3.5 MBq/kg, [18F]FDG-PET was performed with a low-dose prone position CT-thorax followed by a supine whole-body scan. Scans were separately reviewed by two nuclear medicine physicians and categorized by number of FDG-positive axillary lymph nodes (ALNs; cALN<4 or cALN≥4). Main outcome was axillary up- or downstaging. RESULTS Of 153 patients included, 24 (16%) patients were up- or downstaged at evaluation of prone images: One observer upstaged 14 patients, downstaged 3 patients and reported a higher number of ALNs (3.6 vs. 3.2, p < 0.001), while staging (4 up- and 5 downstaged) and number of ALNs (2.8 vs. 2.8) did not differ for the other. Observers agreed on up- or downstaging in only 1 (1%) patient. Irrespective of supine or prone position scanning, observers agreed on axillary staging in 124 (81%) patients and disagreed in 5 (3%). Interobserver agreement was lower with prone assessments (86%, K = 0.67) than supine (92%, K = 0.80). CONCLUSIONS Axillary staging with FDG-PET/CT in prone compared to supine position did not result in concordant up- or downstaging. Therefore, FDG-PET/CT in supine position only can be considered sufficient for axillary staging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariane A van Loevezijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel P M Stokkel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten L Donswijk
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik D van Werkhoven
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke E M van der Noordaa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederieke H van Duijnhoven
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Options to Determine Pathological Response of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13164167. [PMID: 34439321 PMCID: PMC8394061 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13164167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Neoadjuvant therapy instituted prior to definitive surgery helps to reduce the tumor burden in the breast and axilla. De-escalation of surgery in the axilla may allow removal of just the involved nodes and sentinel nodes for determination of pathological response of previously biopsy proven positive axillary nodes. In order to attain the optimal surgical results with minimum risk of complications, it is important to choose the accurate method of identification of these positive nodes. In this review, we examine the different options to assure identification of the nodes deemed positive before neoadjuvant therapy, at the time of definitive surgery. Abstract Increasing use of neoadjuvant therapy in large tumors or node positive disease in breast cancer patients or hormone negative and HER 2 overexpressing cancers often gives rise to complete clinical response, with resolution of disease in the breast and axilla. These results have raised important questions to deescalate loco-regional surgical treatment options with minimum recurrence risk and treatment related morbidity. Although there is excellent prognosis following clinical response, the primary goal of surgery still remains to confirm complete pathological response in the biopsied node that was previously positive and now clinically/radiologically negative (ycN0). Biopsied lymph nodes are often marked with a clip to allow future identification at the time of definitive surgery. The goal of lymph node surgery in oncology is that it should be accurate, hence the significance of localizing the biopsied node. This article aims to review the different options to localize the deemed positive node at the time of definitive surgery, in order to help determine pathological response after neoadjuvant therapy.
Collapse
|
35
|
de Wild SR, Simons JM, Vrancken Peeters MJTFD, Smidt ML, Koppert LB. MINImal vs. MAXimal Invasive Axillary Staging and Treatment After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Node Positive Breast Cancer: Protocol of a Dutch Multicenter Registry Study (MINIMAX). Clin Breast Cancer 2021; 22:e59-e64. [PMID: 34446364 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Node positive breast cancer (cN+) patients with an axillary pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) are not expected to benefit from axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Therefore, less invasive axillary staging procedures have been introduced to establish response-guided treatment. However, evidence is lacking with regard to their oncologic safety and impact on quality of life (QoL). We hypothesize that if response-guided treatment is given, less invasive staging procedures are non-inferior to standard ALND in terms of oncologic safety, and superior to standard ALND in terms of QoL. PATIENTS AND METHODS MINIMAX is a Dutch multicenter registry study that includes patients with cN1-3M0 unilateral invasive breast cancer, who receive NST, followed by axillary staging and treatment according to local protocols. In a retrospective registry of ±4000 patients, the primary endpoint is oncologic safety at 5 and 10 years (disease-free, breast-cancer-specific and overall survival, and axillary recurrence rate). In a prospective multicenter registry, the primary endpoints are QoL at 1 and 5 years, and we aim to verify the 5-year oncologic safety. With an estimated 5-year disease-free survival of 72.5% and anticipated loss to follow-up of 10%, a sample size of 549 is needed to have 80% power to detect non-inferiority (with a 10% margin) of less invasive staging procedures. CONCLUSION In cN+ patients treated with NST, less invasive axillary staging procedures are already implemented globally. Evidence is needed to support the assumed oncologic safety and superior QoL of such procedures. This study will contribute to evidence-based guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine R de Wild
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Janine M Simons
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marjolein L Smidt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Linetta B Koppert
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Balija TM, Braz D, Hyman S, Montgomery LL. Early reflector localization improves the accuracy of localization and excision of a previously positive axillary lymph node following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 189:121-130. [PMID: 34159474 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06281-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Clipped axillary lymph node (CALN) localization after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for axillary node positive breast cancer can be difficult due to significant shrinkage or disappearance of the CALN after NAC. This study compares wire localization to a radar-based localization system utilizing a reflector that can be placed before or during NAC, in the months before definitive surgery, to facilitate accurate localization and excision of the CALN. METHODS Between 2016 and 2019, women with T0-4 N1-3 M0 breast cancer who underwent NAC followed by axillary surgery with planned excision of a biopsy positive or clinically suspicious axillary node via wire or reflector localization were identified. A retrospective chart review was performed comparing successful localization and CALN retrieval by each localization technique. RESULTS Ninety-nine patients met inclusion criteria. Forty-two patients underwent wire localization while 57 patients underwent reflector localization of the CALN. Successful identification of the CALN by wire or reflector was equivalent (83.3% vs 84.2%, respectively). Twenty-two reflectors placed before or during early/mid NAC (early placement) had 100% successful CALN localization and retrieval in the OR. Placement of wire or reflector localization devices within 8 weeks of surgery (late placement) only resulted in 79.2% localization success (p = .02). CONCLUSION This study suggests a benefit of axillary lymph node reflector placement in the early NAC setting. Early reflector placement allows for more accurate excision of the CALN during axillary surgery after NAC as compared to placement of localization wires or reflectors in the few weeks prior to surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara M Balija
- Department of Surgery, Division of Breast Surgery, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, 20 Prospect Avenue, Suite 402, Hackensack, NJ, 07601, USA.
| | - Devin Braz
- Department of Surgery, Division of Breast Surgery, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, 20 Prospect Avenue, Suite 402, Hackensack, NJ, 07601, USA
| | - Sara Hyman
- Department of Surgery, Division of Breast Surgery, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, 20 Prospect Avenue, Suite 402, Hackensack, NJ, 07601, USA
| | - Leslie L Montgomery
- Department of Surgery, Division of Breast Surgery, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, 20 Prospect Avenue, Suite 402, Hackensack, NJ, 07601, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
van der Noordaa MEM, van Duijnhoven FH, Cuijpers FNE, van Werkhoven E, Wiersma TG, Elkhuizen PHM, Winter-Warnars G, Dezentje V, Sonke GS, Groen EJ, Stokkel M, Vrancken Peeters MTFD. Toward omitting sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer. Br J Surg 2021; 108:667-674. [PMID: 34157085 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.12026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Revised: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The nodal positivity rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ypN+) in patients with clinically node-negative (cN0) breast cancer is low, especially in those with a pathological complete response of the breast. The aim of this study was to identify characteristics known before surgery that are associated with achieving ypN0 in patients with cN0 disease. These characteristics could be used to select patients in whom sentinel lymph node biopsy may be omitted after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS This cohort study included patients with cT1-3 cN0 breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by breast surgery and sentinel node biopsy between 2013 and 2018. cN0 was defined by the absence of suspicious nodes on ultrasound imaging and PET/CT, or absence of tumour cells at fine-needle aspiration. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of ypN0. RESULTS Overall, 259 of 303 patients (85.5 per cent) achieved ypN0, with high rates among those with a radiological complete response (rCR) on breast MRI (95·5 per cent). Some 82 per cent of patients with hormone receptor-positive disease, 98 per cent of those with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and all patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive disease who had a rCR achieved ypN0. Multivariable regression analysis showed that HER2-positive (odds ratio (OR) 5·77, 95 per cent c.i. 1·91 to 23·13) and TNBC subtype (OR 11·65, 2·86 to 106·89) were associated with ypN0 status. In addition, there was a trend toward ypN0 in patients with a breast rCR (OR 2·39, 0·95 to 6·77). CONCLUSION The probability of nodal positivity after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was less than 3 per cent in patients with TNBC or HER2-positive disease who achieved a breast rCR on MRI. These patients could be included in trials investigating the omission of sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M E M van der Noordaa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - F H van Duijnhoven
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - F N E Cuijpers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E van Werkhoven
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - T G Wiersma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P H M Elkhuizen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G Winter-Warnars
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - V Dezentje
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G S Sonke
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E J Groen
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Stokkel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M T F D Vrancken Peeters
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Dickhoff LR, Vrancken Peeters MJ, Bosman PA, Alderliesten T. Therapeutic applications of radioactive sources: from image-guided brachytherapy to radio-guided surgical resection. THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ITALIAN ASSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (AIMN) [AND] THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RADIOPHARMACOLOGY (IAR), [AND] SECTION OF THE SOCIETY OF... 2021; 65:190-201. [PMID: 34105339 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.21.03370-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
It is well known nowadays that radioactivity can destroy the living cells it interacts with. It is therefore unsurprising that radioactive sources, such as iodine-125, were historically developed for treatment purposes within radiation oncology with the goal of damaging malignant cells. However, since then, new techniques have been invented that make creative use of the same radioactivity properties of these sources for medical applications. Here, we review two distinct kinds of therapeutic uses of radioactive sources with applications to prostate, cervical, and breast cancer: brachytherapy and radioactive seed localization. In brachytherapy (BT), the radioactive sources are used for internal radiation treatment. Current approaches make use of real-time image guidance, for instance by means of magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, computed tomography, and sometimes positron emission tomography, depending on clinical availability and cancer type. Such image-guided BT for prostate and cervical cancer presents a promising alternative and/or addition to external beam radiation treatments or surgical resections. Radioactive sources can also be used for radio-guided tumor localization during surgery, for which the example of iodine-125 seed use in breast cancer is given. Radioactive seed localization (RSL) is increasingly popular as an alternative tumor localization technique during breast cancer surgery. Advantages of applying RSL include added flexibility in the clinical scheduling logistics, an increase in tumor localization accuracy, and higher patient satisfaction; safety measures do however have to be employed. We exemplify the implementation of RSL in a clinic through experiences at the Netherlands Cancer Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah R Dickhoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands -
| | - Marie-Jeanne Vrancken Peeters
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter A Bosman
- Life Sciences and Health group, Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tanja Alderliesten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Breast and axillary surgery in malignant breast disease: a review focused on literature of 2018 and 2019. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2021; 32:91-99. [PMID: 31833973 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW There have been fundamental changes in the surgical approach to breast cancer management over the last decades. The primary objective of achieving locoregional control, however, remains unchanged. RECENT FINDINGS In addition to strategies optimizing systemic treatment and radiotherapy, current discussions focus on improving the surgical approach to breast cancer. Especially in view of the increasingly pivotal role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy NAT/NAC (NACT), gauging the extent of tissue removal in the breast and the width of resection margins in breast-conserving surgery is highly important, as is the extent of axillary surgery. Although sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive patients always underwent axillary lymph node dissection in the past, this paradigm has been challenged in recent years. Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) has emerged as a new staging option in biopsy-proven node-positive patients who convert to clinical node negativity (cN0) after NACT. TAD combines the removal of the SLN and of the target lymph node marked prior to NACT. The accuracy of axillary staging both before and after NACT plays an important role for prognostication and multidisciplinary treatment plans, while its extent has significant effects on patients' arm morbidity and quality of life. SUMMARY The current review focuses on recent evidence regarding surgical management of the breast and axilla in patients with primary breast cancer based on a PubMed and EMBASE literature search for publication years 2018 and 2019.
Collapse
|
40
|
Samiei S, Simons JM, Engelen SME, Beets-Tan RGH, Classe JM, Smidt ML. Axillary Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy by Breast Cancer Subtype in Patients With Initially Clinically Node-Positive Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Surg 2021; 156:e210891. [PMID: 33881478 PMCID: PMC8060891 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Importance An overview of rates of axillary pathologic complete response (pCR) for all breast cancer subtypes, both for patients with and without pathologically proven clinically node-positive disease, is lacking. Objective To provide pooled data of all studies in the neoadjuvant setting on axillary pCR rates for different breast cancer subtypes in patients with initially clinically node-positive disease. Data Sources The electronic databases Embase and PubMed were used to conduct a systematic literature search on July 16, 2020. The references of the included studies were manually checked to identify other eligible studies. Study Selection Studies in the neoadjuvant therapy setting were identified regarding axillary pCR for different breast cancer subtypes in patients with initially clinically node-positive disease (ie, defined as node-positive before the initiation of neoadjuvant systemic therapy). Data Extraction and Synthesis Two reviewers independently selected eligible studies according to the inclusion criteria and extracted all data. All discrepant results were resolved during a consensus meeting. To identify the different subtypes, the subtype definitions as reported by the included articles were used. The random-effects model was used to calculate the overall pooled estimate of axillary pCR for each breast cancer subtype. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome of this study was the rate of axillary pCR and residual axillary lymph node disease after neoadjuvant systemic therapy for different breast cancer subtypes, differentiating studies with and without patients with pathologically proven clinically node-positive disease. Results This pooled analysis included 33 unique studies with 57 531 unique patients and showed the following axillary pCR rates for each of the 7 reported subtypes in decreasing order: 60% for hormone receptor (HR)-negative/ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-positive, 59% for ERBB2-positive (HR-negative or HR-positive), 48% for triple-negative, 45% for HR-positive/ERBB2-positive, 35% for luminal B, 18% for HR-positive/ERBB2-negative, and 13% for luminal A breast cancer. No major differences were found in the axillary pCR rates per subtype by analyzing separately the studies of patients with and without pathologically proven clinically node-positive disease before neoadjuvant systemic therapy. Conclusions and Relevance The HR-negative/ERBB2-positive subtype was associated with the highest axillary pCR rate. These data may help estimate axillary treatment response in the neoadjuvant setting and thus select patients for more or less invasive axillary procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanaz Samiei
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- GROW–School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Janine M. Simons
- GROW–School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Sanne M. E. Engelen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Regina G. H. Beets-Tan
- GROW–School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam
| | - Jean-Marc Classe
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, Saint-Herblain, Loire Atlantique, France
| | - Marjolein L. Smidt
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- GROW–School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Assessment of axillary node status by ultrasound after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer according to breast cancer subtype. Sci Rep 2021; 11:10858. [PMID: 34035335 PMCID: PMC8149690 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89738-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for patients with cN1 breast cancer is controversial. Improvements of negative predictive value (NPV) by axillary ultrasound (AUS), which corresponds to the accurate prediction rate of node-negative status after NAC, would lead to decreased FNR of SNB following NAC. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the accurate prediction rate of NPV by AUS after NAC in patients with cytologically node-positive breast cancer treated between January 2012 and December 2016. Of 279 eligible patients, the NPV was 49.2% in all patients, but varied significantly by tumor subtype (p < 0.001) and tumor response determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (p = 0.0003). Of the 23 patients with clinically node negative (ycN0) by AUS and clinical complete response in primary lesion by MRI, the NPV was 100% in patients with HR±/HER2+ or HR-/HER2- breast cancer. In conclusion, regarding FNR reduction post-NAC, it will be of clinical value to take tumor subtype and primary tumor response using MRI into account to identify patients for SNB after NAC.
Collapse
|
42
|
Schipper RJ, de Bruijn A, Voogd AC, Bloemen JG, Van Riet YE, Vriens BEP, Smidt ML, Siesling S, van der Sangen MJC, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP. Rate and predictors of nodal pathological complete response following neoadjuvant endocrine treatment in clinically biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer patients. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2021; 47:1928-1933. [PMID: 34030918 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.04.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 04/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on effectiveness and optimal use of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) in clinically biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer is lacking. This study examined the incidence of axillary pathological complete response (pCR) on NET in clinically biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer patients. Secondary, patient and tumour characteristics, as well as the optimal duration of NET in relation to the occurrence of axillary pCR were investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients diagnosed with primary hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer between 2014 and 2019, with at least one positive axillary lymph node (pathologically proven), treated with NET were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The incidence of axillary pCR in combination with patient, tumour and treatment characteristics was analysed. RESULTS In a population of 561 patients, an axillary pCR of 7.3% on NET was observed. Median length of treatment was 8.1 months in the patients without vs. 8.8 months in those with axillary pCR, with no statistically significant difference. A p-value <0.30 was found for age, histologic type, clinical tumour status, hormone receptor status and the type of NET in univariable analysis. After multivariable logistic regression analyses, none of these variables were independently associated with the likelihood of an axillary pCR. CONCLUSION The rate of axillary pCR after NET in HR + HER2-clinically biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer patients is low. Factors independently associated with the likelihood of an axillary pCR could not be identified. More research is warranted regarding optimizing the duration of NET and the prognostic value of residual disease in the axilla after NET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anne de Bruijn
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Adri C Voogd
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands; GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Johanne G Bloemen
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Yvonne E Van Riet
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Birgit E P Vriens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolein L Smidt
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center +, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Rebollo Aguirre AC, Fernández Fernández J, Sánchez Sánchez R, Mendoza Arnau I, Rivas Navas DJ, Martínez Meca S. Radioguided surgery with iodine-125 seeds in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2021; 41:S2253-654X(21)00067-6. [PMID: 33863696 DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2021.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the use of radioactive iodine-125 seed (RIS) in breast and/or axillary surgery, in patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). MATERIAL AND METHODS Prospective study between January 2016 and June 2020. 80 women T1-3,N0-2,M0: 30 RIS marking the breast tumor, 36 both the tumor and the biopsied positive axillary node, and 14 only the axilla. Age: 54.7±11.4 years. Tumor size: 34.1±14.6mm. Histological type: invasive ductal carcinoma 90.0%. Molecular subtypes: luminal-A 23.8%, luminal-B/HER2- 33.7%, luminal-B/HER2+ 18.8%, HER2+ 7.5%, basal-like 16,2%. RESULTS Of the 66 patients with RIS marking of the tumor (51 pre-NAC, 15 post-NAC), 92.1% had tumor-free surgical margins, with a specimen volume of 126.7±111.2 cm3. Of the 5 second local excisions, in 3 the resection margin was involved (1 mastectomy). Of the 50 patients N1 with RIS marking (MLN), 44 pre-NAC and 6 post-NAC, MLN was identified in 97.2%: negative 23, positive 26. In 45/50 patients, sentinel node biopsy (SNB) was performed and it was identified in 93.3%: negative 26, positive 16. In 1 case RIS was not placed correctly and SNB was not identified due to non-migration. In 61.9% of the patients, MLN was among the SNB identified in the surgery. In 5 patients with mismatched SNB and MLN, the pathological result of the SNB was negative and the MLN was positive. Axillary lymph node dissection was performed in 53.8% of the patients. CONCLUSION RIS allow to perform breast-conserving surgery and improve detection of residual axillary disease in patients treated with NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A C Rebollo Aguirre
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, España.
| | - J Fernández Fernández
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, España
| | - R Sánchez Sánchez
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, España
| | - I Mendoza Arnau
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico. Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, España
| | - D J Rivas Navas
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, España
| | - S Martínez Meca
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico. Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, España
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Diagnostic Performance of Noninvasive Imaging for Assessment of Axillary Response After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Clinically Node-positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2021; 273:694-700. [PMID: 33201095 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic performance of current noninvasive imaging modalities for assessment of axillary response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA NST can lead to downstaging of axillary lymph node disease. Imaging can potentially provide information about the axillary response to NST and, consequently, tailor the surgical management. METHODS PubMed and Embase were searched for studies that compared noninvasive imaging after NST with axillary surgery outcome to identify axillary response in patients with initial pathologically proven axillary lymph node metastasis. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and extracted the data. A meta-analysis was performed by computing the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS Thirteen studies describing 2380 patients were included for final analysis. Of these patients, 1322 had undergone axillary ultrasound, 849 breast MRI, and 209 whole-body 18F-FDG PET-CT. The overall axillary pathologic complete response rate was 39.5% (941/2380). For axillary ultrasound, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 65%, 69%, 77%, 50%, respectively. For breast MRI, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 60%, 76%, 78%, 58%, respectively. For whole-body 18F-FDG PET-CT, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 38%, 86%, 78%, 49%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The diagnostic performance of current noninvasive imaging modalities is limited to accurately assess axillary response after NST in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients.
Collapse
|
45
|
Banys-Paluchowski M, Gasparri ML, de Boniface J, Gentilini O, Stickeler E, Hartmann S, Thill M, Rubio IT, Di Micco R, Bonci EA, Niinikoski L, Kontos M, Karadeniz Cakmak G, Hauptmann M, Peintinger F, Pinto D, Matrai Z, Murawa D, Kadayaprath G, Dostalek L, Nina H, Krivorotko P, Classe JM, Schlichting E, Appelgren M, Paluchowski P, Solbach C, Blohmer JU, Kühn T. Surgical Management of the Axilla in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Converting to Clinical Node Negativity through Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Current Status, Knowledge Gaps, and Rationale for the EUBREAST-03 AXSANA Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:1565. [PMID: 33805367 PMCID: PMC8037995 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last two decades, surgical methods for axillary staging in breast cancer patients have become less extensive, and full axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is confined to selected patients. In initially node-positive patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, however, the optimal management remains unclear. Current guidelines vary widely, endorsing different strategies. We performed a literature review on axillary staging strategies and their place in international recommendations. This overview defines knowledge gaps associated with specific procedures, summarizes currently ongoing clinical trials that address these unsolved issues, and provides the rationale for further research. While some guidelines have already implemented surgical de-escalation, replacing ALND with, e.g., sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or targeted axillary dissection (TAD) in cN+ patients converting to clinical node negativity, others recommend ALND. Numerous techniques are in use for tagging lymph node metastasis, but many questions regarding the marking technique, i.e., the optimal time for marker placement and the number of marked nodes, remain unanswered. The optimal number of SLNs to be excised also remains a matter of debate. Data on oncological safety and quality of life following different staging procedures are lacking. These results provide the rationale for the multinational prospective cohort study AXSANA initiated by EUBREAST, which started enrollment in June 2020 and aims at recruiting 3000 patients in 20 countries (NCT04373655; Funded by AGO-B, Claudia von Schilling Foundation for Breast Cancer Research, AWOgyn, EndoMag, Mammotome, and MeritMedical).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Campus Lübeck, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, 23538 Lübeck, Germany
- Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Maria Luisa Gasparri
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland;
- Faculty of Biomedicine, University of the Italian Switzerland (USI), 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Jana de Boniface
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; (J.d.B.); (M.A.)
- Department of Surgery, Capio St. Göran’s Hospital, 112 19 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Oreste Gentilini
- Breast Surgery Unit, San Raffaele Hospital Milan, 20132 Milano MI, Italy; (O.G.); (R.D.M.)
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany;
| | - Steffi Hartmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany;
| | - Marc Thill
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, AGAPLESION Markus Krankenhaus, 60431 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
| | - Isabel T. Rubio
- Breast Surgical Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 28027 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Rosa Di Micco
- Breast Surgery Unit, San Raffaele Hospital Milan, 20132 Milano MI, Italy; (O.G.); (R.D.M.)
| | - Eduard-Alexandru Bonci
- Department of Surgical Oncology, “Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuță” Institute of Oncology, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
- 11th Department of Oncological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Laura Niinikoski
- Breast Surgery Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, 00280 Helsinki, Finland;
| | - Michalis Kontos
- 1st Department of Surgery, Laiko Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 27 Athens, Greece;
| | - Guldeniz Karadeniz Cakmak
- Breast and Endocrine Unit, General Surgery Department, Zonguldak BEUN The School of Medicine, Kozlu/Zonguldak 67600, Turkey;
| | - Michael Hauptmann
- Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, 16816 Neuruppin, Germany;
| | | | - David Pinto
- Champalimaud Clinical Center, Breast Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, 1400-038 Lisboa, Portugal;
| | - Zoltan Matrai
- Department of Breast and Sarcoma Surgery, National Institute of Oncology, 1122 Budapest, Hungary;
| | - Dawid Murawa
- Collegium Medicum, University of Zielona Góra, 65-046 Zielona Góra, Poland;
| | - Geeta Kadayaprath
- Breast Surgical Oncology and Oncoplastic Surgery, Max Institute of Cancer Care, Max Healthcare Delhi, Delhi 110092, India;
| | - Lukas Dostalek
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic;
| | - Helidon Nina
- Oncology Hospital, University Hospital Center “Nene Tereza”, 1000 Tirana, Albania;
| | - Petr Krivorotko
- Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, 197758 Saint-Petersburg, Russia;
| | - Jean-Marc Classe
- Department of surgical oncology, Institut de cancerologie de l’Ouest Nantes, 44800 Saint Herblain, France;
| | - Ellen Schlichting
- Department for Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, 0188 Oslo, Norway;
| | - Matilda Appelgren
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; (J.d.B.); (M.A.)
| | - Peter Paluchowski
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Regio Klinikum Pinneberg, 25421 Pinneberg, Germany;
| | - Christine Solbach
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Department of Gynecology and Breast Cancer Center, Charite Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Esslingen, 73730 Esslingen, Germany;
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
The Evolving Role of Marked Lymph Node Biopsy (MLNB) and Targeted Axillary Dissection (TAD) after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT) for Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13071539. [PMID: 33810544 PMCID: PMC8037051 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The 5-year survival rate for patients with breast cancer, in whom disease has spread to local lymph nodes, is 85%. However, many live with the complications of surgery to remove the lymph nodes in the armpit thus impacting their quality of life. In recent years, new approaches have been developed to minimise surgery and reduce complications. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the feasibility and accuracy of two minimally invasive surgical procedures, Marked Lymph Node Biopsy and Targeted Axillary Dissection as an alternative to complete removal of the axillary lymph nodes after upfront chemotherapy in patients in whom cancer spread to the regional lymph nodes. Our findings confirm that these procedures can safely replace more radical surgery in women who have responded well to upfront drug treatment. Therefore, although further research to determine long-term outcomes is required, this review concludes that it is reasonable to offer such patients the option of less invasive surgery thus avoiding over treatment and enhancing quality of life. Abstract Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) is a new axillary staging technique that consists of the surgical removal of biopsy-proven positive axillary nodes, which are marked (marked lymph node biopsy (MLNB)) prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in addition to the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). In a meta-analysis of more than 3000 patients, we previously reported a false-negative rate (FNR) of 13% using the SLNB alone in this setting. The aim of this systematic review and pooled analysis is to determine the FNR of MLNB alone and TAD (MLNB plus SLNB) compared with the gold standard of complete axillary lymph node dissection (cALND). The PubMed, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases were searched using MeSH-relevant terms and free words. A total of 9 studies of 366 patients that met the inclusion criteria evaluating the FNR of MLNB alone were included in the pooled analysis, yielding a pooled FNR of 6.28% (95% CI: 3.98–9.43). In 13 studies spanning 521 patients, the addition of SLNB to MLNB (TAD) was associated with a FNR of 5.18% (95% CI: 3.41–7.54), which was not significantly different from that of MLNB alone (p = 0.48). Data regarding the oncological safety of this approach were lacking. In a separate analysis of all published studies reporting successful identification and surgical retrieval of the MLN, we calculated a pooled success rate of 90.0% (95% CI: 85.1–95.1). The present pooled analysis demonstrates that the FNR associated with MLNB alone or combined with SLNB is acceptably low and both approaches are highly accurate in staging the axilla in patients with node-positive breast cancer after NACT. The SLNB adds minimal new information and therefore can be safely omitted from TAD. Further research to confirm the oncological safety of this de-escalation approach of axillary surgery is required. MLNB alone and TAD are associated with acceptably low FNRs and represent valid alternatives to cALND in patients with node-positive breast cancer after excellent response to NACT.
Collapse
|
47
|
Different strategies in marking axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant medical treatment: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 186:607-615. [PMID: 33611665 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06118-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Marking of cytology-proven metastatic axillary lymph node in breast cancer patients before neoadjuvant treatment and its subsequent surgical retrieval have been shown to reduce the false-negative rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy. A systematic review was performed to evaluate different strategies in nodal marking and localization. METHODS PubMed, Embase, EBSCOhost, and the Cochrane library literature databases were searched systematically to address the identification rate and retrieval rate of marked axillary lymph nodes. Studies were eligible if they performed nodal marking before neoadjuvant treatment, followed by selective extirpation of these marked axillary lymph nodes in definitive surgery RESULTS: Fifteen studies with a total of 703 patients were included. Index axillary lymph nodes were marked by clips or tattooed prior to the commencement of neoadjuvant treatment. In our pooled analysis, eighty-eight percent of the clipped nodes and ninety-seven percent of the tattooed nodes were successfully retrieved. Among these patients, seventy-seven percent of these marked axillary lymph nodes were also sentinel lymph nodes. CONCLUSION Marking and selectively removing cytology-proven metastatic axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant treatment is feasible. An acceptably high nodal retrieval rate could be achieved using various methods of nodal marking and localization techniques.
Collapse
|
48
|
Malter W, Eichler C, Hanstein B, Mallmann P, Holtschmidt J. First Reported Use of Radiofrequency Identification (RFID) Technique for Targeted Excision of Suspicious Axillary Lymph Nodes in Early Stage Breast Cancer - Evaluation of Feasibility and Review of Current Recommendations. In Vivo 2021; 34:1207-1213. [PMID: 32354911 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Revised: 03/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM The purpose of this study was to evaluate, whether radio frequency identification (RFID) labeling of axillary lymph nodes (LNs) for the use of targeted resection is feasible in primary breast cancer patients with suspicious LNs. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed 10 consecutive patients where RFID technique was used for intraoperative detection of suspicious LNs without preceding neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). We compared the specifics of these procedures to 10 consecutive sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNB) in the cN0 situation. RESULTS Intraoperative detection rate (DR) for the RFID-labeled target lymph node (TLN) was 100%. Perioperative complications were infrequent and comparable to SLNB. Average time for location of the RFID labeled TLN was quicker than for the SLN. In 71.4% the chip bearing TLN equaled a SLN. CONCLUSION The use of the RFID technique for intraoperative localization of axillary LNs for targeted excision seems feasible. RFID technique for targeted axillary dissection (TAD) following NACT should be investigated in a prospective manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfram Malter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christian Eichler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Bettina Hanstein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Mallmann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Johannes Holtschmidt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Simons JM, Scoggins ME, Kuerer HM, Krishnamurthy S, Yang WT, Sahin AA, Shen Y, Lin H, Bedrosian I, Mittendorf EA, Thompson A, Lane DL, Hunt KK, Caudle AS. Prospective Registry Trial Assessing the Use of Magnetic Seeds to Locate Clipped Nodes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:4277-4283. [PMID: 33417121 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09542-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) involves locating and removing both clipped nodes and sentinel nodes for assessment of the axillary response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) by clinically node-positive breast cancer patients. Initial reports described radioactive seeds used for localization, which makes the technique difficult to implement in some settings. This trial was performed to determine whether magnetic seeds can be used to locate clipped axillary lymph nodes for removal. METHODS This prospective registry trial enrolled patients who had biopsy-proven node-positive disease with a clip placed in the node and treatment with NAC. A magnetic seed was placed under ultrasound guidance in the clipped node after NAC. All the patients underwent TAD. RESULTS Magnetic seeds were placed in 50 patients by 17 breast radiologists. All the patients had successful seed placement at the first attempt (mean time for localization was 6.1 min; range 1-30 min). The final position of the magnetic seed was within the node (n = 44, 88%), in the cortex (n = 3, 6%), less than 3 mm from the node (n = 2, 4%), or by the clip when the node could not be adequately visualized (n = 1, 2%). The magnetic seed was retrieved at surgery from all the patients. In 49 (98%) of the 50 cases, the clip and magnetic seed were retrieved from the same node. Surgeons rated the transcutaneous and intraoperative localization as easy for 43 (86%) of the 50 cases. No device-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS Localization and selective removal of clipped nodes can be accomplished safely and effectively using magnetic seeds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine M Simons
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marion E Scoggins
- Department of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Henry M Kuerer
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Savitri Krishnamurthy
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wei T Yang
- Department of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aysegul A Sahin
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yu Shen
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Heather Lin
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Isabelle Bedrosian
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Mittendorf
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alastair Thompson
- Department of Surgery, Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Deanna L Lane
- Department of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Abigail S Caudle
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Mariscal Martínez A, Vives Roselló I, Salazar Gómez A, Catanese A, Pérez Molina M, Solà Suarez M, Pascual Miguel I, Blay Aulina L, Ríos Gozálvez C, Julián Ibáñez JF, Rodríguez Martínez P, Martínez Román S, Margelí Vila M, Luna Tomás MA. Advantages of preoperative localization and surgical resection of metastatic axillary lymph nodes using magnetic seeds after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Surg Oncol 2020; 36:28-33. [PMID: 33285433 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2020] [Revised: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the safety and effectiveness of magnetic seeds in preoperative localization and surgical dissection of metastatic axillary lymph nodes (LN+) in breast cancer patients with axillary involvement, after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). In addition, to assess the impact of targeted axillary dissection (TAD) in reducing the rate of false negatives (FN) in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). MATERIALS AND METHODS A cross-sectional prospective cohort study was conducted from April 2017 to September 2019, including breast cancer patients with axillary lymph node involvement treated with NAC. Prior to NAC, the LN+ were marked by ultrasound-guided clip insertion. After NAC, a magnetic seed (Magseed®) was inserted in the clip-marked lymph node (MLN). During surgery, the MLN was located and removed with the aid of a magnetic detection probe (Sentimag®) and the sentinel lymph node was removed. Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was used to determine the rate of FN for SLNB alone and the combination of SLNB and MLN dissection, called TAD. RESULTS The study included 29 patients (mean age, 55; range, 30-78 years). Selective preoperative localization and surgical dissection were successful for all 30 MLNs (100%). The MLN corresponded to the SLN in 50% of cases. After ALND, there were 21.4% (3/14) FN with SLNB alone and 5.9% (1/17) with TAD. CONCLUSIONS Following NAC, selective surgical removal of MLN by preoperative localization using magnetic seeds is a safe and effective procedure with a success rate of 100%. Adding TAD reduces the rate of FN associated with SLNB alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Mariscal Martínez
- Breast Diagnostic Imaging Unit (BDIU) Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol (HUGTiP), Badalona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | - Angela Salazar Gómez
- Breast Diagnostic Imaging Unit (BDIU) Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol (HUGTiP), Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alessandro Catanese
- Breast Diagnostic Imaging Unit (BDIU) Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol (HUGTiP), Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mariola Pérez Molina
- Breast Diagnostic Imaging Unit (BDIU) Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol (HUGTiP), Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|