Regorafenib dose-optimisation in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (ReDOS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study

INTEGRATE IIa Phase III Study: Regorafenib for Refractory Advanced Gastric Cancer

PURPOSE

Treatment options for refractory advanced gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer (AGOC) are limited. Regorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in the INTEGRATE I phase II trial. INTEGRATE IIa was designed to examine whether regorafenib improved overall survival (OS).

METHODS

A double-blind placebo-controlled phase III trial compared regorafenib and best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo and BSC for participants with confirmed evaluable metastatic/advanced AGOC who failed ≥two prior therapies on a 2:1 random assignment, stratified by tumor location, geographic region (Asia v rest of world), and prior vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors. The primary end point was OS. Treatment efficacy on OS was first tested in the pooled INTEGRATE I + INTEGRATE IIa cohort and, if significant, then in the INTEGRATE IIa cohort. Secondary end points were PFS, objective response rate, safety, and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

INTEGRATE IIa enrolled 251 participants: 157 from Asia and 94 from rest of world and 169 received regorafenib and 82 received placebo. No significant heterogeneity was observed between INTEGRATE I and INTEGRATE IIa studies on OS. Pooled OS analysis hazard ratio (HR) was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.87; P = .001; 361 events). INTEGRATE IIa alone OS HR was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.90; P = .006; 238 events), the median OS was 4.5 months versus 4.0 months, and 12-month survival rates were 19% and 6%, for regorafenib versus placebo, respectively. After a preplanned adjustment for multiplicity, there were no statistically significant differences across regions or other prespecified subgroups. Regorafenib improved PFS (HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.40 to 0.70]; P < .0001) and delayed deterioration in global QoL (HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.89]; P = .0043). The toxicity profile was consistent with that of previous reports.

CONCLUSION

Regorafenib improves survival compared with placebo in refractory AGOC.

Clinical Trial Data Review of the Combination FTD/TPI + Bevacizumab in the Treatment Landscape of Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Recommended first and second line treatments for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) include fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-based therapy, and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapies. In third line, the SUNLIGHT trial showed that trifluridine/tipiracil + bevacizumab (FTD/TPI + BEV) provided significant survival benefits and as such is now a recommended third line regimen in patients with refractory mCRC, irrespective of RAS mutational status and previous anti-VEGF treatment. Some patients are not candidates for intensive combination chemotherapy as first-line therapy due to age, low tumor burden, performance status and/or comorbidities. Capecitabine (CAP) + BEV is recommended in these patients. In the SOLSTICE trial, FTD/TPI + BEV as a first line regimen in patients not eligible for intensive therapy was not superior to CAP + BEV in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). However, in SOLSTICE, FTD/TPI + BEV resulted in similar PFS, overall survival, and maintenance of quality of life as CAP + BEV, with a different safety profile. FTD/TPI + BEV offers a possible first line alternative in patients for whom CAP + BEV is an unsuitable treatment. This narrative review explores and summarizes the clinical trial data on FTD/TPI + BEV.

Comparative efficacy of later-line therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer: a network meta-analysis of survival curves

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated the comparative efficacy of six later-line (≥3) therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) over placebo. We applied a novel statistical method of reconstructing pseudo-patient-level data (pseudo-IPD) to inform a network meta-analysis of survival curves that considers shape in addition to scale parameters.

METHODS

A literature search yielded 10 phase II/III trials. We digitized all survival curves and applied a novel method incorporating curve coordinates, patients-at-risk, and events reported to generate pseudo-IPD. Using fitted random effects lognormal distributions, we estimated the survival proportions and HRs (95CrI) of progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) over 12 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

Compared to placebo, in ascending order, 12-month OS HRs were 0.50 (95% CrI = 0.35, 0.69; PFS = 0.11 (95% CrI = 0.06, 0.14)) for TAS+bevacizumab; 0.71 (95% CrI = 0.51, 0.97; PFS = 0.26 (95% CrI = 0.16, 0.41)) for regorafenib; 0.75 (95% CrI = 0.61, 0.91; (PFS = 0.24 (95% CrI = 0.17, 0.31)) for TAS-102; 0.80 (95% CrI = 0.79, 0.90; PFS = 0.18 (95% CrI = 0.13, 0.24)) for fruquintinib; 0.83 (95% CrI = 0.50, 0.99; PFS = 0.42 (95% CrI = 0.20, 0.75)) for atezolizumab+cobimetinib; and 1.03 (95% CrI = 0.55, 1.65; PFS = 0.67 (95% CrI = 0.29, 1.01)) for atezolizumab.

CONCLUSION

In this independent NMA of survival data, all later-line mCRC therapies but atezolizumab monotherapy exhibited superiority in 12-month PFS and OS over placebo. TAS+bevacizumab emerged as the most dominant option and may be the preferred choice, with fruquintinib, regorafenib, and TAS-102 monotherapy showing statistically significant but lower PFS and OS benefits.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42022371953.

Association between sidedness and survival among chemotherapy refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib

BACKGROUND

The impact of sidedness on survival of later-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is undetermined. This study aimed to investigate the association between sidedness and survival among chemotherapy refractory patients with mCRC treated with trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) or regorafenib or both.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with mCRC treated with TAS-102 or regorafenib between 2015 and 2020 was retrospectively collected. Patients were stratified into TAS-102 first and regorafenib first, then subdivided into TAS-102 followed by regorafenib (T-R) and regorafenib followed by TAS-102 (R-T) groups. The oncologic outcomes were presented with time-to-treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

After matching, 376 TAS-102 patients and 376 regorafenib patients were included for outcomes comparison. TTF had insignificant differences while OS was significantly different between TAS-102 and regorafenib groups. Median TTF and OS were 1.9 months versus 2.0 months (P = .701) and 9.1 months versus 7.0 months (P = .008) in TAS-102 and regorafenib, respectively. The OS benefits were consistent regardless primary tumor location. Subgroup analysis with 174 T-R patients and 174 R-T patients was investigated for treatment sequences. TTF and OS had significant differences in both groups. Median TTF and OS were 8.5 months versus 6.3 months (P = .001) and 14.4 months versus 12.6 months (P = .035) in T-R and R-T groups, respectively. The TTF and OS benefits were persisted regardless primary tumor location.

CONCLUSION

TAS-102 first provided a better survival benefit in chemotherapy refractory patients with mCRC across all sidedness. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate our conclusions.

Underlying mechanisms and management strategies for regorafenib-induced toxicity in hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 85% of liver cancer cases and is the third leading cause of cancer death. Regorafenib is a multi-target inhibitor that dramatically prolongs progression-free survival in HCC patients who have failed sorafenib therapy. However, one of the primary factors limiting regorafenib's clinical utilization is toxicity. Using Clinical Trials.gov and PubMed, we gathered clinical data on regorafenib and conducted a extensive analysis of the medication's adverse reactions and mechanisms. Next, we suggested suitable management techniques to improve regorafenib's effectiveness.

AREAS COVERED

We have reviewed the mechanisms by which regorafenib-induced toxicity occurs and general management strategies through clinical trials of regorafenib. Furthermore, by examining the literature on regorafenib and other tyrosine kinase inhibition, we summarized the mechanics of the onset of regorafenib toxicity and mechanism-based intervention strategies by reviewing the literature related to regorafenib and other tyrosine kinase inhibition.

EXPERT OPINION

One of the primary factors restricting regorafenib's clinical utilization and combination therapy is its toxicity reactions. To optimize regorafenib treatment regimens, it is especially important to further understand the specific toxicity mechanisms of regorafenib as a multi-kinase inhibitor.

Real-world dosing patterns of regorafenib for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Spain: the RE-SEARCH study

PURPOSE

To describe the dosing patterns of regorafenib in a real-world population of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a routine clinical practice setting in Spain, focusing on the starting dose of regorafenib.

METHODS

An observational, retrospective, multicenter study that included patients ≥ 18 years old who had histologically documented mCRC and who had initiated treatment with regorafenib since January 2017. Post hoc categorization of dosing patterns revealed the following: initial dose < 160 mg and dose escalation, initial dose < 160 mg and maintenance, initial dose equal to 160 mg and maintenance, and initial dose equal to 160 mg and dose reduction.

RESULTS

Most patients (152/241, 63.8%) initiated treatment with regorafenib at doses < 160 mg. There was large variation in the starting dose of regorafenib over time: in 2017, most patients (59%) initiated regorafenib at a dose of 160 mg, this proportion decreased to 6% in 2021. There were no significant differences in the median progression-free survival according to the regorafenib dose patterns during the first two cycles. The proportion of patients who reported at least one adverse event (AE), had a grade 3-4 AE or had an AE leading to dose reduction was greater in the group of patients who received an initial dose equal to 160 and reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that physicians in Spain have gradually adopted a dose-escalation approach during cycle 1, which is a common practice for starting treatment with a reduced dose (< 160 mg/day), a strategy that seems to improve tolerability while maintaining efficacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

Integrative Analysis of Multi-Omics Data to Identify Deregulated Molecular Pathways and Druggable Targets in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is the most common B-cell malignancy in the Western world, characterized by frequent relapses despite temporary remissions. Our study integrated publicly available proteomic, transcriptomic, and patient survival datasets to identify key differences between healthy and CLL samples. We exposed approximately 1000 proteins that differentiate healthy from cancerous cells, with 608 upregulated and 415 downregulated in CLL cases. Notable upregulated proteins include YEATS2 (an epigenetic regulator), PIGR (Polymeric immunoglobulin receptor), and SNRPA (a splicing factor), which may serve as prognostic biomarkers for this disease. Key pathways implicated in CLL progression involve RNA processing, stress resistance, and immune response deficits. Furthermore, we identified three existing drugs-Bosutinib, Vorinostat, and Panobinostat-for potential further investigation in drug repurposing in CLL. We also found limited correlation between transcriptomic and proteomic data, emphasizing the importance of proteomics in understanding gene expression regulation mechanisms. This generally known disparity highlights once again that mRNA levels do not accurately predict protein abundance due to many regulatory factors, such as protein degradation, post-transcriptional modifications, and differing rates of translation. These results demonstrate the value of integrating omics data to uncover deregulated proteins and pathways in cancer and suggest new therapeutic avenues for CLL.

Real-world dosing of regorafenib and outcomes among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis using US claims data

BACKGROUND

The randomized, dose-optimization, open-label ReDOS study in US patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) showed that, compared with a standard dosing approach, initiating regorafenib at 80 mg/day and escalating to 160 mg/day depending on tolerability increased the proportion of patients reaching their third treatment cycle and reduced the incidence of adverse events without compromising efficacy. Subsequently, the ReDOS dose-escalation strategy was included as an alternative regorafenib dosing option in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines. A retrospective analysis was conducted using a US claims database to assess whether inclusion of this dose-escalation strategy in NCCN Guidelines has influenced the use of flexible dosing in routine US clinical practice, and to describe clinical outcomes pre- and post-inclusion in NCCN Guidelines.

METHODS

Patients with CRC in the Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart database initiating regorafenib for the first time between January 2016 and June 2020 were stratified based on whether they initiated regorafenib pre- or post-inclusion of ReDOS in NCCN Guidelines, and in two groups: flexible dosing (< 160 mg/day; < 84 tablets in the first treatment cycle) and standard dosing (160 mg/day; ≥ 84 tablets in the first treatment cycle). The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients who initiated their third treatment cycle and the mean number of treatment cycles per group.

RESULTS

703 patients initiated regorafenib during the study period, of whom 310 (44%) initiated before and 393 (56%) initiated after inclusion of ReDOS in NCCN Guidelines. After inclusion in the guidelines, the proportion of patients who received flexible dosing increased from 21% (n = 66/310) to 45% (n = 178/393), the proportion who received standard dosing decreased from 79% (n = 244/310) to 55% (n = 215/393), the proportion who initiated their third treatment cycle increased from 36% (n = 113/310) to 46% (n = 179/393), and the mean (standard deviation) number of treatment cycles increased from 2.6 (2.9) to 3.2 (3.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Following inclusion of ReDOS in NCCN Guidelines, real-world data suggest that US clinicians have markedly increased use of flexible dosing in clinical practice, potentially maximizing clinical benefits and safety outcomes for patients with metastatic CRC receiving regorafenib.

Association of VEGFA and CCL4L2 polymorphisms with hand-foot skin reaction and survival of regorafenib in Japanese patients with colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Treatment with regorafenib, which inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor, frequently results in hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), requiring treatment discontinuation or dose reduction. In our prospective study of regorafenib on patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, 17% of patients developed grade 3 HFSR. Herein, we retrospectively examined genetic polymorphisms associated with regorafenib-induced severe HFSR.

METHODS

To identify associated polymorphisms, exploratory whole-exome sequencing focusing on factors related to VEGF-mediated signaling pathways was first performed in seven patients each, with grade 3 HFSR and without HFSR. The identified HFSR-associated polymorphisms were analyzed in all the 40 patients.

RESULTS

The genotype frequency of rs3025009 G/A or A/A in the gene encoding VEGF-A (VEGFA) in patients with ≥ grade 2 HFSR was significantly higher than in other patients (P = 0.0257, Pc = 0.0771 [Bonferroni correction]). The frequency of C-C motif of chemokine ligand 4-like 2 (CCL4L2) rs3744596 A/T or T/T in patients with grade 3 HFSR was significantly lower than in others (P = 0.00894, Pc = 0.0268). The combination of the risk genotypes VEGFA rs3025009 G/A or A/A and CCL4L2 rs3744596 A/A was significantly associated with a higher incidence of grade 3 (P = 0.000614, Pc = 0.00246) and a longer median progression-free survival (P = 0.0234) than others.

CONCLUSIONS

These VEGF-related polymorphisms were found to be associated with HFSR and the survival benefits of regorafenib treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE

UMIN000013939, registered on May 12, 2014, when 6 months after the approval by the Institutional Review Board of Showa University.

How to Balance Prognostic Factors in Controlled Phase II Trials: Stratified Permuted Block Randomization or Minimization? An Analysis of Clinical Trials in Digestive Oncology

In controlled phase II trials, major prognostic factors need to be well balanced between arms. The main procedures used are SPBR (Stratified Permuted Block Randomization) and minimization. First, we provide a systematic review of the treatment allocation procedure used in gastrointestinal oncology controlled phase II trials published in 2019. Second, we performed simulations using data from six phase II studies to measure the impacts of imbalances and bias on the efficacy estimations. From the 40 articles analyzed, all mentioned randomization in both the title and abstract, the median number of patients included was 109, and 77.5% were multicenter. Of the 27 studies that reported at least one stratification variable, 10 included the center as a stratification variable, 10 used minimization, 9 used SBR, and 8 were unspecified. In real data studies, the imbalance increased with the number of centers. The total and marginal imbalances were higher with SBR than with minimization, and the difference increased with the number of centers. The efficiency estimates per arm were close to the original trial estimate in both procedures. Minimization is often used in cases of numerous centers and guarantees better similarity between arms for stratification variables for total and marginal imbalances in phase II trials.

Navigating through novelties concerning mCRC treatment-the role of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy in mCRC

Over the course of nearly six decades since the inception of initial trials involving 5-FU in the treatment of mCRC (metastatic colorectal cancer), our progressive comprehension of the pathophysiology, genetics, and surgical techniques related to mCRC has paved the way for the introduction of novel therapeutic modalities. These advancements not only have augmented the overall survival but have also positively impacted the quality of life (QoL) for affected individuals. Despite the remarkable progress made in the last two decades in the development of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and target therapies, mCRC remains an incurable disease, with a 5-year survival rate of 14%. In this comprehensive review, our primary goal is to present an overview of mCRC treatment methods following the latest guidelines provided by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS). Emphasis has been placed on outlining treatment approaches encompassing chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and surgery's role in managing mCRC. Furthermore, our review delves into prospective avenues for developing new therapies, offering a glimpse into the future of alternative pathways that hold potential for advancing the field.

Chemotherapy Rechallenge or Reintroduction Compared to Regorafenib or Trifluridine/Tipiracil for Pretreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Propensity Score Analysis of Treatment Beyond Second Line (Proserpyna Study)

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) beyond second line is still questioned. Besides the standard of care agents (regorafenib, REG, or trifluridine/tipiracil, FTD/TPI), chemotherapy rechallenge or reintroduction (CTr/r) are commonly considered in clinical practice, despite weak supporting evidence. The prognostic performance of CTr/r, REG and FTD/TPI in this setting are herein evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PROSERpYNa is a multicenter, observational, retrospective study, in which patients with refractory mCRC, progressing after at least 2 lines of CT, treated with CTr/r, REG or FTD/TPI, are considered eligible and were enrolled in 2 independent data sets (exploratory and validation). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (RR) and safety. A propensity score adjustment was accomplished for survival analyses.

RESULTS

Data referring to patients treated between Jan-10 and Jan-19 from 3 Italian institutions were gathered (341 and 181 treatments for exploratory and validation data sets respectively). In the exploratory cohort, median OS (18.5 vs. 6.5 months), PFS (6.1 vs. 3.5 months) and RR (28.6% vs. 1.4%) were significantly longer for CTr/r compared to REG/FTD/TPI. Survival benefits were retained at the propensity score analysis, adjusted for independent prognostic factors identified at multivariate analysis. Moreover, these results were confirmed within the validation cohort analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the retrospective fashion, CTr/r proved to be a valuable option in this setting in a real-world context, providing superior outcomes compared to standard of care agents at the price of a moderate toxicity.

Regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Spain: from clinical trials to real-world evidence

Aim: To describe the evolution of regorafenib use, since its approval, in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in routine clinical practice in Spain.Methods: We extracted patient characteristics, dosing, safety and efficacy data for the Spanish cohorts of the CORRECT and CONSIGN trials, and the real-world CORRELATE study.Results: The Spanish cohorts represented 10.7-13.8% of the global cohorts. Efficacy and safety in the Spanish cohorts reflected findings from the global cohorts, with evidence of a flexible dosing approach being adopted in routine clinical practice.Conclusion: Regorafenib use in patients with mCRC has evolved in the real-world setting, emphasizing the need for further research evaluating dosing patterns that can optimize clinical outcomes in these patients.Clinical trial registration: The CORRECT trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01103323; the CONSIGN trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01538680; the CORRELATE study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02042144.

Dose Optimization of Targeted Therapies for Oncologic Indications

Therapeutic advances in oncology in the 21st century have contributed to significant declines in cancer mortality. Notably, targeted therapies comprised the largest proportion of oncology drugs approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) over the past 25 years and have become the standard of care for the treatment of many cancers. However, despite the metamorphosis of the therapeutic landscape, some aspects of cancer drug development have remained essentially unchanged. In particular, the dose-finding methodology originally developed for cytotoxic chemotherapy drugs continues to be implemented, even though this approach no longer represents the most appropriate strategy for modern cancer therapies. In recognition of the need to reconsider assumptions, adapt the dose selection process for newer drugs, and design alternative strategies, the FDA has undertaken several initiatives in recent years to address these concerns. These actions include the launch of Project Optimus in 2021 and the issuance of draft guidance for industry on dose optimization of oncology drugs in 2023. Amid this evolving regulatory environment, the present manuscript reviews case studies for six different targeted cancer therapies, highlighting how dose-finding challenges have been managed to date by oncologists, sponsors, and regulators.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Regorafenib versus Other Third-Line Treatments for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Background

Regorafenib, a novel multikinase inhibitor, has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as a standard treatment choice for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Nonetheless, its substantial cost places a significant burden on social health resources and patients. However, the cost-effectiveness (CE) of regorafenib compared to other third-line therapies is still undetermined.

Objective

This study aims to assess the CE of regorafenib compared to other third-line therapies for the treatment of mCRC.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, as well as nine other databases to identify relevant studies published up to October 2023, focusing on patients with mCRC and examining the cost-effectiveness of regorafenib. Following the screening and extraction of pertinent data, the study quality was assessed using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) checklist.

Results

The literature search yielded 751 records, and after applying the inclusion criteria, 13 studies from 7 different countries were included. Of these, 7 studies evaluated the cost-effectiveness of regorafenib compared to trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102), 3 studies compared regorafenib with best supportive care (BSC), and 3 studies compared regorafenib with fruquintinib, serplulimab, and regorafenib dose optimization (ReDo).The quality of the included studies was high with an average QHES scores of 85.62. Regorafenib standard dose proves to be less cost-effective than alternative third-line therapies. Implementing a dose optimization strategy could potentially rectify this disparity and enhance the cost-effectiveness of regorafenib.

Conclusion

The use of the standard dose of regorafenib is generally regarded as not cost-effective when compared to other third-line therapies for patients with mCRC. However, implementing a dose-escalation strategy may enhance regorafenib's cost-effectiveness. Consequently, significant price reductions or optimizing the dose of regorafenib are required to achieve cost-effectiveness.

Updates on the Management of Colorectal Cancer in Older Adults

Colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a significant global health challenge. Notably, the risk of CRC escalates with age, with the majority of cases occurring in those over the age of 65. Despite recent progress in tailoring treatments for early and advanced CRC, there is a lack of prospective data to guide the management of older patients, who are frequently underrepresented in clinical trials. This article reviews the contemporary landscape of managing older individuals with CRC, highlighting recent advancements and persisting challenges. The role of comprehensive geriatric assessment is explored. Opportunities for treatment escalation/de-escalation, with consideration of the older adult's fitness level. are reviewed in the neoadjuvant, surgical, adjuvant, and metastatic settings of colon and rectal cancers. Immunotherapy is shown to be an effective treatment option in older adults who have CRC with microsatellite instability. Promising new technologies such as circulating tumor DNA and recent phase III trials adding later-line systemic therapy options are discussed. Clinical recommendations based on the data available are summarized. We conclude that deliberate efforts to include older individuals in future colorectal cancer trials are essential to better guide the management of these patients in this rapidly evolving field.

Efficacy of Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil According to Extended RAS Evaluation in Advanced Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

There are few molecular markers driving treatment selection in later lines of treatment for advanced colorectal cancer patients. The vast majority of patients who progress after first- and second-line therapy undergo chemotherapy regardless of molecular data.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the prognostic and predictive effects of specific RAS mutations on overall survival of patients receiving regorafenib (rego), trifluridine/tipiracil (TFD/TPI), or both.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study based on data from a previous study of our research network, involving nine Italian institutions over a 10-year timeframe (2012-2022). Extended RAS analysis, involving KRAS exon 2-4 and NRAS exon 2-4, and BRAF were the main criteria for inclusion in this retrospective evaluation. Patients with BRAF mutation were excluded. Patients were classified according to treatment (rego- or TFD/TPI-treated) and RAS mutational status (wild-type [WT], KRAS codon 12 mutations, KRAS codon 13 mutations, KRAS rare mutations and NRAS mutations, KRAS G12C mutation and KRAS G12D mutation).

RESULTS

Overall, 582 patients were included in the present analysis. Overall survival did not significantly differ in rego-treated patients according to RAS extended analysis, although a trend toward a better median survival in patients carrying G12D mutation (12.0 months), Codon 13 mutation (8.0 months), and Codon 12 mutation (7.0 months) has been observed, when compared with WT patients (6.0 months). Overall survival did not significantly differ in TFD/TPI-treated patients according to RAS extended analysis, although a trend toward a better median survival in WT patients had been observed (9.0 months) in comparison with the entire population (7.0 months). Patients receiving both drugs displayed a longer survival when compared with the population of patients receiving rego alone (p = 0.005) as well as the population receiving TFD/TPI alone (p < 0.001), suggesting a group enriched for favorable prognostic factors. However, when each group was analyzed separately, the addition of TFD/TPI therapy to the rego-treated group improved survival only in all-RAS WT patients (p = 0.003). Differently, the addition of rego therapy to TFD/TPI-treated patients significantly improved OS in the Codon 12 group (p = 0.0004), G12D group (p = 0.003), and the rare mutations group (p = 0.02), in addition to all-RAS WT patients (p = 0.002). The rego-TFD/TPI sequence, compared with the reverse sequence, significantly improved OS only in the KRAS codon 12 group (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate that RAS mutations do not affect outcome in rego-treated patients as well as TFD/TPI-treated patients. Nevertheless, a trend toward a higher efficacy of rego in RAS-mutated (in particular codon 12, rare RAS mutations, and G12D) patients has been recorded. The rego-TFD/TPI sequence seems to be superior to the reverse sequence in patients carrying an RAS codon 12 mutation, although the impact of other factors as disease burden or performance status cannot be excluded.

Impact of preexisting proteinuria on the development of regorafenib-induced problematic proteinuria in real-world metastatic colorectal cancer treatment

Regorafenib is the first multikinase inhibitor for treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Proteinuria is a frequently encountered adverse effect, regardless of prior administration of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors. Herein, we aimed to assess the impact of baseline preexisting proteinuria on regorafenib-induced problematic proteinuria during real-world mCRC therapy. Patients with mCRC receiving regorafenib (n = 100) were retrospectively assessed and divided into control and preexisting proteinuria (baseline grade of 1-2) groups. The primary endpoint was the development of grade ≥ 2 (grade ≥ 3 in case of baseline grade 2 patients) proteinuria. Propensity score-matching was performed to confirm the robustness of primary analyses. Defined proteinuria occurred in 30.7 and 57.9% of patients in the control and preexisting proteinuria groups, respectively, with significant differences in the all-patient population (P = 0.01). The preexisting proteinuria group exhibited significant defined proteinuria development within 7 days of regorafenib initiation, grade ≥ 3 symptoms, and treatment suspension owing to proteinuria. Similar results were obtained in the propensity score-matched population. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, baseline proteinuria was a singular risk factor for defined proteinuria development (adjusted odds ratio; 3.76, 95% confidence interval; 1.45-9.75, P = 0.007). Collectively, our study revealed that patients with preexisting proteinuria develop regorafenib-induced proteinuria degradation.

Translational research on drug development and biomarker discovery for hepatocellular carcinoma

Translational research plays a key role in drug development and biomarker discovery for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, unique challenges exist in this field because of the limited availability of human tumor samples from surgery, the lack of homogenous oncogenic driver mutations, and the paucity of adequate experimental models. In this review, we provide insights into these challenges and review recent advancements, with a particular focus on the two main agents currently used as mainstream therapies for HCC: anti-angiogenic agents and immunotherapy. First, we examine the pre-clinical and clinical studies to highlight the challenges of determining the optimal therapeutic combinations with biologically effective dosage for HCC. Second, we discuss biomarker studies focusing on anti-PD1/anti-PD-L1-based combination therapy. Finally, we discuss the progress made in our collective understanding of tumor immunology and in multi-omics analysis technology, which enhance our understanding of the mechanisms underlying immunotherapy, characterize different patient subgroups, and facilitate the development of novel combination approaches to improve treatment efficacy. In summary, this review provides a comprehensive overview of efforts in translational research aiming at advancing our understanding of and improving the treatment of HCC.

Regorafenib monotherapy or combined with an immune-checkpoint inhibitor as later-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter, real-world retrospective study in China

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib monotherapy or in combination with immune-checkpoint inhibitor while treating Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a real-world study.

METHODS

The data of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who received regorafenib-containing regimen as the third or later line treatment at ten Chinese hospitals from Aug 2017 to Jun 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, including dosing details, survival data as well as adverse events. Survival analysis was further performed for patients administrated with regorafenib monotherapy and combined with an immune-checkpoint inhibitor based on Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. The primary endpoint was overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 537 patients were included with a median age of 61, among whom 376 received regorafenib monotherapy and 245 received regorafenib combined with immune-checkpoint inhibitors. The clinicopathological characteristics of the two groups at baseline were mainly balanced. No significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) was observed in patients receiving regorafenib monotherapy or combination therapy (3.8 vs. 5.5 months, p = 0.170). In contrast, patients receiving combination therapy had a more prolonged overall survival (OS) than those receiving regorafenib monotherapy (13.5 vs. 10.0 months, p = 0.001). The treatment regimen and regorafenib dosage were significant prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis. Significant benefits in PFS and OS were achieved in KRAS mutant and anti-angiogenesis treatment-naïve subgroups receiving combination therapy compared to monotherapy. No apparent increase was recorded in treatment-related adverse events in patients receiving combination therapy.

CONCLUSION

Regorafenib plus an immune-checkpoint inhibitor has already been a widely adopted strategy in the later-line treatment for mCRC in the real world. The combination therapy yielded a significantly prolonged overall survival than regorafenib alone, with a manageable safety profile in Chinese patients, and warrants further investigation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04835324. Registered 6th April 2021.

Efficacy, safety, and predictors of fruquintinib plus anti-programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) antibody in refractory microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer in a real-world setting: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) have few alternatives for salvage therapy and a large unmet clinical need. Preclinical studies demonstrate that fruquintinib combined with anti-programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) has a synergistic anti-tumor effect. But a few phase 2 clinical studies show inconsistent efficacy of this combination therapy in CRC. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy, safety, and predictors of fruquintinib plus PD-1 antibodies in refractory MSS metastatic CRC (mCRC) in a real-world setting.

Methods

We performed a retrospective single-center analysis to assess the outcomes of patients with MSS mCRC who were treated with fruquintinib plus anti-PD-1 antibodies subsequent to the failure of standard therapies at the Hunan Cancer Hospital. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and toxicity were reviewed and evaluated. The primary endpoint was OS. The impact on OS and PFS was examined using the Cox regression model.

Results

Between 1 January 2019 and 30 June 2022, we enrolled 70 eligible patients. The median follow-up was 17.2 months (range, 5.3-32.9 months). The median OS (mOS) and median PFS (mPFS) were 19.48 and 5.5 months respectively. The ORR was 11.43% and the DCR was 84.29%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis reveals liver metastasis (LM) without local treatment was a risk factor for OS [hazard ratio (HR) =5.31, P=0.0184], whereas that with local treatment (HR =2.19, P=0.263) was not. The most common adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (37.14%), hypertension (34.29%), mucositis oral (32.86%). No serious adverse effects or adverse effect-related deaths were reported. There were no instances of severe adverse effects or deaths related to adverse effects reported.

Conclusions

Our study indicates that the combination of fruquintinib and anti-PD-1 antibodies can improve the OS and PFS with a tolerable toxicity profile for Chinese patients with refractory MSS mCRC. LM without local therapy is a negative prognostic factor for OS, but those with local treatment can significantly prolong survival. We require additional well-structured, prospective, and extensive studies to confirm and validate these findings.

Significant response from fruquintinib plus anti-PD-1 immunotherapy for microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer with liver and lung metastasis in the third line: case report

Background

There are limited treatment options available for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). About 95% of CRC patients have mismatch repair proficient/microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) tumors are virtually unresponsive to programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody treatment. This report shows that a patient with pMMR/MSS mCRC achieved significant response and the longest progression-free survival (PFS) of 28 months currently reported from tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) family (VEGFR-1,2,3) (fruquintinib) plus anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in the third line, providing a new and promising treatment option for some MSS mCRC patients.

Case Description

This case details a 65-year-old male with CRC who was diagnosed with pT4aN2bM0, IIIC, and pMMR/MSS after curative surgery in August 2018. Subsequently, he received adjuvant chemotherapy [FOLFOX (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) for 5 cycles], first-line treatment (pelvic radiation plus capecitabine), and second-line treatment [TOMIRI (raltitrexed and irinotecan) plus cetuximab for 2 cycles]. Lung, liver, and pelvic cavity metastases worsened in October 2019. He began receiving the fruquintinib plus PD-1 inhibitor (FP) regimen as third-line treatment and after 3 cycles, the size of the lung lesions was significantly reduced and evaluated as partial response (PR), whereas the liver and pelvic cavity lesions remained stable. As of December 2021, he had received a total of 33 courses of FP regimen. In February 2022, liver metastases progressed. In brief, he achieved a long PFS of 28 months and an overall survival (OS) of 40 months from the third-line treatment. Additionally, the patient only experienced mild proteinuria after the combined treatment and tolerated well.

Conclusions

Fruquintinib combined with immunotherapy could exert good therapeutic effects with safety in MSS mCRC patients. And patients with lung metastasis may be the principal beneficiaries.

Treatment Options in Late-Line Colorectal Cancer: Lessons Learned from Recent Randomized Studies

Systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has improved considerably over the past 20 years. First- and second-line combinations of 5FU, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, with or without anti-angiogenic and/or anti-EGFR antibodies, were approved shortly after the turn of the millennium. Further triumphs were not seen for almost 10 years, until the approval of initially regorafenib and shortly after trifluridine/tipiracil. A growing understanding of tumor biology through molecular profiling has led to further treatment options. Here, we review the most recent clinical data for late-line treatment options in mCRC, focusing on randomized trials if available. We include recommendations for options in unselected patients and therapies that should only be offered in patients with distinct tumor profiles (e.g., BRAF mutations, KRAS G12C mutations, HER2 amplification, deficient MMR, or NTRK gene fusions).

Appropriate dose of regorafenib based on body weight of colorectal cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Previous randomized studies have shown a survival benefit of using regorafenib but a high rate of adverse events in unresectable colorectal cancer patients. To reduce these adverse events and improve the tolerability, we examined the appropriate dose of regorafenib based on body weight.

METHODS

We used a nationwide claims database in Japan and examined the efficacy and safety of regorafenib for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer between groups divided by body weight (60 kg) and median average dose (120 mg) between 2013 and 2018. We also assessed overall survival (OS) and adverse events between these groups.

RESULTS

We identified 2530 Japanese patients (heavy weight/high dose: 513, light weight/low dose: 921, heavy weight/low dose: 452, and light weight/high dose: 644). There was no significant difference in the adverse events and OS after inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) adjustment between heavy weight/high dose group and light weight/low dose group (hazard ratio, HR=0.97). Among the light-weight patients, higher average dose was associated with shorter OS (IPTW adjusted HR=1.21, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.39, Table 3) while among the heavy-weight patients, there was no significant difference in OS between high and low dose groups (IPTW adjusted HR=1.14, 95% CI 0.95 - 1.37).

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that a low dose of regorafenib for light-weight patients may be as safe and effective as high doses for heavy-weight patients. Further studies should be conducted to identify an appropriate dose based on each patient's physique and condition.

Retrospective Correlation between First Drug Treatment Duration and Survival Outcomes in Sequential Treatment with Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Subgroup Analysis

Background: Patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) rarely receive third-line or further treatment. In this context, regorafenib (R) and trifluridine/tipiracil (T) are two important novel therapeutic choices with statistically significant increases in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control, with different toxicity profiles. This study is a subgroup analysis of our larger retrospective study, already published, whose objective was to assess the outcomes of patients when R and T were given sequentially. Patients and Methods: The study involved thirteen Italian cancer centers on a 10-year retrospective observation (2012-2022). In this subgroup analysis, we focused our attention on the correlation between the first drug treatment duration (<3 months, 3 to <6 months and ≥6 months) and survival outcomes in patients who had received the sequence regorafenib-to-trifluridine/tipiracil, or vice versa. Results: The initial study included 866 patients with mCRC who received sequential T/R, or R/T, or T or R alone. This analysis is focused on evaluating the impact of the duration of the first treatment in the sequence on clinical outcomes (OS, PFS) and includes 146 and 116 patients of the T/R and R/T sequences, respectively. Based on the duration of the first drug treatment, subgroups for the T/R sequence included 27 patients (18.4%) who received T for <3 months, 86 (58.9%) treated for 3 to <6 months, and 33 (22.6%) treated for ≥6 months; in the reverse sequence (R as the first drug), subgroups included 18 patients (15.5%) who received their first treatment for <3 months, 62 (53.4%) treated for 3 to <6 months, and 35 (31.0%) treated for ≥6 months. In patients who received their first drug treatment for a period of 3 to <6 months, the R/T sequence had a significantly longer median OS (13.7 vs. 10.8 months, p = 0.0069) and a longer median PFS (10.8 vs. 8.5 months, p = 0.0003) than the T/R group. There were no statistically significant differences between groups with first drug treatment durations of <3 months and ≥6 months. Conclusions: Our analysis seems to suggest that the administration of R for a period of 3 to <6 months before that of T can prolong both OS and PFS, as compared to the opposite sequence.

Efficacy and safety of fruquintinib dose-escalation strategy for elderly patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: A single-arm, multicenter, phase II study

BACKGROUND

Fruquintinib has demonstrated significant improvement in overall survival (OS) among previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. However, the utilization of fruquintinib has been constrained by various toxicities, such as hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) and hypertension, particularly in elderly patients with reduced tolerance to the standard dosage. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib dose-escalation strategy for elderly refractory mCRC patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This open-label, single-arm, phase II trial included patients aged 65 years or over with mCRC who had progressed after two or more lines of chemotherapy. Fruquintinib was administered for 21 consecutive days of a 28-day treatment cycle. The starting dose of fruquintinib was 3 mg/day and escalated to 4 mg/day in Week 2 and 5 mg/day in Week 3 if no significant drug-related toxicity was observed. The highest tolerated dose from Cycle 1 would be administered in Cycle 2 and all subsequent cycles. Before commencing treatment, all enrolled patients underwent a G8 questionnaire and comprehensive geriatric assessments. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

A total of 29 patients were enrolled and all started fruquintinib at 3 mg/day. Fifteen patients (51.7%) were subsequently escalated to 4 mg/day and 4 (13.8%) to 5 mg/day. Only four (13.8%) patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events (AEs). The median PFS was 3.8 months (95% CI, 2.7-4.9), and the median OS was 7.6 months (95% CI, 6.5-8.7). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed in all 29 patients (100%). The most frequently occurring (>10%) TRAEs greater than Grade 3 were HFSR (20.7%), hypertension (20.7%), and diarrhea (10.3%).

CONCLUSION

Our study indicated that a dose of 4 mg/day was well tolerated by most elderly patients, suggesting that fruquintinib dose-escalation strategy during the first cycle could serve as a viable alternative to the standard 5 mg/day dosing.

Effect of Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy with Regorafenib on IL-6 and TNF-α Levels and Peritoneal Cytology: Experimental Study in Rats with Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS), combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, has significantly improved survival outcomes in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer (CRC). Regorafenib is an oral agent administered in patients with refractory metastatic CRC. Our aim was to investigate the outcomes of intraperitoneal administration of regorafenib for intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPEC) or/and CRS in a rat model of colorectal peritoneal metastases regarding immunology and peritoneal cytology. A total of 24 rats were included. Twenty-eight days after carcinogenesis induction, rats were randomized into following groups: group A: control group; group B: CRS only; group C: IPEC only; and group D: CRS + IPEC. On day 56 after carcinogenesis, euthanasia and laparotomy were performed. Serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) as well as peritoneal cytology were investigated. Groups B and D had statistically significant lower mean levels of IL-6 and TNF-α compared to groups A and C, but there was no significant difference between them. Both B and D groups presented a statistically significant difference regarding the rate of negative peritoneal cytology, when compared to the control group, but not to group C. In conclusion, regorafenib-based IPEC, combined with CRS, may constitute a promising tool against peritoneal carcinomatosis by altering the tumor microenvironment.

Prognostic factors for regorafenib treatment in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: A real-life retrospective multi-center study

Regorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, has improved survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who have progressed on standard therapies. Our study aimed to evaluate prognostic factors influencing regorafenib treatment and assess the optimal dosing regimen in a real-life setting. We retrospectively analysed 263 patients with mCRC from multiple medical oncology clinics in Turkey. Treatment responses and prognostic factors for survival were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analysis. Of the patients, 120 were male, and 143 were female; 28.9% of tumors were located in the rectum. RAS mutations were present in 3.0% of tumors, while BRAF, K-RAS, and N-RAS mutations were found in 3.0%, 29.7%, and 25.9% of tumor tissues, respectively. Dose escalation was preferred in 105 (39.9%) patients. The median treatment duration was 3.0 months, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 4.9%. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related toxicity occurred in 133 patients, leading to discontinuation, interruption, and modification rates of 50.6%, 43.7%, and 79.0%, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.0 and 8.1 months, respectively. RAS/RAF mutation (hazard ratio [HR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.3; P = 0.01), pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.3; P = 0.008), and toxicity-related treatment interruption or dose adjustment (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.4; P = 0.01) were identified as independent prognostic factors for PFS. Dose escalation had no significant effect on PFS but was associated with improved OS (P < 0.001). Independent prognostic factors for OS were the initial TNM stage (HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.9; P = 0.04) and dose interruption/adjustment (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.9; P = 0.03). Our findings demonstrate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib. Treatment line influences the response, with dose escalation being more favorable than adjustment or interruption, thus impacting survival.

Recombinant Methioninase Lowers the Effective Dose of Regorafenib Against Colon-Cancer Cells: A Strategy for Widespread Clinical Use of a Toxic Drug

Background/Aim

Regorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor, targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 and other oncogenic kinases. Regorafenib has efficacy in metastatic colon cancer, but has severe dose-limiting toxicities which cause patients to stop taking the drug. The aim of the present study was to determine if recombinant methioninase (rMETase) could lower the effective concentration of regorafenib in vitro against a colorectal-cancer cell line.

Materials and Methods

Firstly, we examined the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of regorafenib alone and rMETase alone for the HCT-116 human colorectal-cancer cell line. After that, using the IC50 concentration of each drug, we investigated the efficacy of the combination of regorafenib and rMETase.

Results

While both methioninase alone (IC50=0.61 U/ml) and regorafenib alone (IC50=2.26 U/ml) inhibited the viability of HCT-116 cells, the combination of the two agents was more than twice as effective as either alone. Addition of rMETase at 0.61 U/ml lowered the IC50 of regorafenib from 2.26 μM to 1.46 μM.

Conclusion

rMETase and regorafenib are synergistic, giving rise to the possibility of lowering the effective dose of regorafenib in patients, thereby reducing its severe toxicity, allowing more cancer patients to be treated with regorafenib.

Associations of HLA-C*01:02 and HLA-B*46:01 with regorafenib-induced erythema multiforme in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Regorafenib improves the survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); however, it is also characterized by detrimental dermal side effects that may require treatment cessation or modified dosing. In our previous prospective pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacogenetic studies, 17.5% (7/40) of the patients with mCRC had grade 3 erythema multiforme (EM) that caused treatment discontinuation. Haplotypes in genes encoding human leukocyte antigen (HLA) are associated with EM following the administration of drugs, such as allopurinol. This study examined the association between HLA haplotypes and regorafenib-induced EM. Regorafenib was administered orally at 160 mg/body once daily for weeks 1-3 of each 4-week cycle. To determine the HLA haplotypes, we used the WAKFlow HLA Typing Kit HLA-A, -B, or -C. The carrier frequency of HLA-C*01:02 in patients with EM (6/7) was higher than that in tolerant controls (8/33; odds ratio [OR] = 18.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.95-180, p = 0.00437). HLA-B*46:01 was also associated with EM (OR = 11.6, 95% CI = 1.47-92.1, p = 0.0299). These associations were no longer significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. Therefore, regorafenib-induced EM in Japanese patients appears to be associated with specific HLA haplotypes but further validation is needed.

Real-world effectiveness of regorafenib in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A retrospective, observational study

AIM

To evaluate the real-world usage pattern and factors associated with the effectiveness of regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed data for 209 patients with mCRC treated with regorafenib as third or later line of therapy. TheKaplan-Meier method was used to draw the survival curves. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to analyze the prognostic value for overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of 209 patients, 156 (75%) were treated with regorafenib, and 53 (25%) were given regorafenib combined with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors. About 182 (87%) patients had a dose record of regorafenib. The initial daily doses of regorafenib were 160, 120, 80, and 40 mg, accounting for 29%, 17%, 48%, and 6% of patients, respectively. The median follow-up time was 11.3 months, and the median OS was 12.0 months (95% CI: 9.7-14.3). Patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors plus regorafenib had a longer OS than the non-PD-1 group (13.5 vs. 10.1 months, hazard ratio [HR] = .534, 95% CI: .325-.879; p = .014). A total of 49 patients with microsatellite stable or mismatch repair-proficient genotype treated with PD-1 inhibitors plus regorafenib had a longer OS than the non-PD-1 group (13.5 vs. 9.7 months; HR = .563, p = .027). The median OS of patients continuing treatment with regorafenib after progression (n = 19, with five patients receiving additional immunotherapy) was marginally longer than patients discontinuing regorafenib after progression (12.7 vs. 11.9 months, p = .425) observed in a smaller cohort.

CONCLUSION

In real-world practice, patients with mCRC in whom standard regimens had failed have a good survival benefit with regorafenib. Combination with PD-1 inhibitor may further prolong survival of the patients.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of third-line treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different third-line treatment regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) through a comprehensive analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA). Additionally, the study aims to provide guidance on selecting appropriate third-line systemic treatment regimens for patients with mCRC.

Methods

We conducted a search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from January 1, 2005, to May 20, 2023, to include phase II/III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of third-line treatments for mCRC. The primary outcome assessed in the NMA was median overall survival (mOS), and other outcomes included median progression-free survival (mPFS), disease control rate (DCR), and grade 3 or higher adverse events (≥3AEs).

Results

Ultimately, nine phase II/III RCTs involving five treatment regimens were included in this study. Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus bevacizumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0.41, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.32-0.52) was found to be the most effective treatment for mOS compared to best supportive care (BSC). TAS-102 plus bevacizumab also significantly improved mPFS compared to BSC (HR 0.20, 95% CrI 0.16-0.25). In terms of adverse events (AEs), TAS-102 (RR 0.52, 95% CrI 0.35-0.74) had a lower incidence of ≥3AEs compared to fruquintinib, but fruquintinib (RR 1.79, 95% CrI 1.10-3.11) showed better improvement in DCR than TAS-102. Subgroup analysis using the Bayesian surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) ranked the regimens based on the OS benefit. The results indicated that TAS-102 plus bevacizumab ranked first across age, gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), and time from initial diagnosis of metastatic disease to randomization.

Conclusion

TAS-102, fruquintinib, TAS-102 plus bevacizumab, the regorafenib standard dose regimen (regorafenib), and the regorafenib dose-escalation regimen (regorafenib 80+) all demonstrated improved OS and PFS compared to BSC in mCRC patients. However, TAS-102 plus bevacizumab may be the optimal choice for third-line treatment in mCRC patients.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php, CRD42023434929.

Severe hypertension development significantly improves progression-free survival in regorafenib treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Regorafenib is the first multikinase inhibitor used for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment. Reports regarding other multikinase inhibitors have suggested that the development of hypertension is associated with improved clinical benefits. We aimed to reveal the relationship between the development of severe hypertension and regorafenib efficacy in an mCRC real-world setting.

METHODS

Patients with mCRC (n = 100) who received regorafenib were assessed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was a comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with and without ≥ grade 3 hypertension. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse effects.

RESULTS

Patients developing ≥ grade 3 hypertension accounted for 30%, and obtained significantly longer PFS than control patients (median PFS of 53 and 56 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] of 46-144 and 49-63 days, respectively; P = 0.04). In contrast, OS and DCR were not statistically different between the groups (P = 0.13 and P = 0.46, respectively). The incidence and severity of adverse effects were not significantly different, except for hypertension. Treatment interruption was significantly more frequent in patients with hypertension (P = 0.04). Multivariate Cox hazard analysis suggested that the development of ≥ grade 3 severe hypertension was an independent factor for improved PFS (adjusted hazard ratio 0.57, 95% CI 0.35-0.93; P = 0.02). In contrast, baseline hypoalbuminemia was associated with a worse PFS (1.85, 1.14-3.01; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

We have revealed that patients who develop severe hypertension after regorafenib treatment for mCRC have improved PFS. Management of hypertension is important for effective treatment with less burden; therefore, further evaluation is needed.

SEOM-GEMCAD-TTD clinical guidelines for the systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (2022)

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in Spain. Metastatic disease is present in 15-30% of patients at diagnosis and up to 20-50% of those with initially localized disease eventually develop metastases. Recent scientific knowledge acknowledges that this is a clinically and biologically heterogeneous disease. As treatment options increase, prognosis for individuals with metastatic disease has steadily improved over recent decades. Disease management should be discussed among experienced, multidisciplinary teams to select the most appropriate systemic treatment (chemotherapy and targeted agents) and to integrate surgical or ablative procedures, when indicated. Clinical presentation, tumor sidedness, molecular profile, disease extension, comorbidities, and patient preferences are key factors when designing a customized treatment plan. These guidelines seek to provide succinct recommendations for managing metastatic CRC.

Real-world experience of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in children, adolescents and adults with relapsed or refractory bone tumours: A Canadian Sarcoma Research and Clinical Collaboration (CanSaRCC) study

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a retrospective multi-centre study to assess the real-world outcome of regorafenib (REGO) and cabozantinib (CABO) in recurrent/refractory bone tumours (BTs) including osteosarcoma (OST), Ewing sarcoma (EWS) and chondrosarcoma (CS)/extra-skeletal mesenchymal CS (ESMC).

METHODS

After regulatory approval, data from patients with recurrent BT (11 institutions) were extracted from CanSaRCC (Canadian Sarcoma Research and Clinical Collaboration) database. Patient characteristics, treatment and outcomes were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

From July 2018 to May 2022, 66 patients received REGO or CABO; 39 OST, 18 EWS, 4 CS and 5 ESMC. Median age was 27.8 years (range 12-76); median starting dose was 60 mg for CABO (n = 37, range 40-60) and 120 mg for REGO (n = 29, range 40-160). Twenty-eight (42.4%) patients required dose reduction: hand-foot syndrome 7 (10.6%), nausea/vomiting 1 (1.5%), diarrhoea 1 (1.5%), 2 elevated LFTs (3%), elevated bilirubin 1 (1.5%) and mucositis 1 (1.5%). The median OS for patients with OST, EWS, CS and ESMC was 8.5 months (n = 39, 95% CI 7-13.1); 13.4 months (n = 18, 95% CI 3.4-27.2), 8.1 (n = 4, 95% CI 4.1-9.3) and 18.2 (n = 5, 95% CI (10.4-na), respectively. Median PFS for OST, EWS, CS and ECMS was 3.5 (n = 39, 95% CI 2.8-5), 3.9 (n = 18, 95% CI 2.1-5.9), 5.53 (n = 4. 95% CI 2.13-NA) and 11.4 (n = 5, 95% CI 1.83-14.7), respectively. Age, line of therapy, REGO versus CABO, or time from diagnosis to initiation of TKI were not associated with PFS on univariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our real-world data show that TKIs have meaningful activity in recurrent BT with acceptable toxicities when started at modified dosing. Inclusion of TKIs in earlier lines of treatment and/or maintenance therapy could be questions for future research.

Key Prognostic Factors Create a Composite Risk Score to Stratify Patients into High- and Low-Treatment Benefit Groups: A Multicenter, Retrospective Data Analysis of 84 Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Regorafenib as Part of the CORRECT and CONSIGN Trials

INTRODUCTION

In further-line mCRC treatment, median progression-free survival (PFS) is rather short, and many patients do not benefit from any antitumor treatment and should therefore be treated according to best-supportive care. A risk score based on standard laboratory values using markers of tumor inflammation aims to define a patient cohort with high treatment benefit and might offer insights into tumor biology. As regorafenib has been dropped off the German market due to an unfavorable risk-benefit ratio, patient selection is key for any further-line treatment option.

METHODS

We used Cox regression analysis to determine laboratory markers that are independent prognostic factors of OS and PFS outcome. The influence of these variables was weighted using an estimator, which was calculated using Cox regression analysis. The estimators were implemented as multiplication factors, resulting in a risk score. A cut-off value for the resulting risk values was then determined via Cox regression analysis resulting in a low- and high-risk subgroup.

RESULTS

Using data of 82 patients, a risk score identifying long-term survival in patients with last-line mCRC treatment could be calculated. The following parameters were associated with significantly longer survival in multivariate analysis: NLR ≤5 (p = <0.001), AP ≤200 U/L (p = 0.001), CRP ≤3.2 mg/dL (p = <0.001). The following estimator values were used to calculate a risk score: NLR: 0.132 (p = 0.046), AP: 0.004 (p = 0.014), and CRP: 0.032 (p = 0.039). Implementing the estimators as multiplication factors yielded the following risk score: 0.132*NLR + 0.004*AP + 0.032*CRP = Risk value. Cox regression resulted in low- and high-risk subgroups with risk values below and above 1.4, respectively. In the group with a low-risk score (<1.4), patients had a median OS of 10.5 months after initiating regorafenib. Patients with a high-risk score (>1.4) survived only 3.3 months after starting therapy with regorafenib (n = 43, p < 0.001, HR = 3.76).

CONCLUSIONS

The presented composite risk score stratifies patients into two prognostic subgroups characterized by standard laboratory values. Patients with signs of systemic inflammation characterized by elevated NLR, AP, and CRP have a high composite risk score and a significant shorter overall survival. Although this score needs to be prospectively validated in larger cohorts, it may be used to stratify patients suitable for further-line treatment studies.

Evaluation of Systemic Treatment Options for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. Surgical treatment is recommended for the majority of localised GIST, while systemic treatment is the cornerstone of management for metastatic or unresectable disease. While a three-year regimen of imatinib is the standard of care in the adjuvant setting, there is no precise recommendation for the duration of neoadjuvant treatment, where imatinib is usually given between 4 and 12 months. Continuous treatment with imatinib at a dose of 400 mg once per day is recommended for most patients with unresectable or metastatic GIST in the first line. An exception is represented by patients with tumours harbouring the imatinib-insensitive PDGFRA D842V mutation who would be better treated with avapritinib. Targeted therapies are also recommended in the presence of NTRK rearrangements and BRAF mutations, although limited data are available. While an increase in the dose of imatinib to 800 mg is an option for the second line, sunitinib is usually considered the standard of care. Similar outcomes were reported for ripretinib in patients with tumours harbouring KIT exon 11 mutation, with significantly fewer side effects. Regorafenib and ripretinib are the standards of care in the third and fourth lines, respectively. The recent development of various systemic treatment options allows for a more personalised approach based on the molecular profile of the GIST, patient characteristics, and the profile of medications' adverse events. A multidisciplinary approach is paramount since combining systemic treatment with locoregional treatment options and supportive care is vital for long-term survival.

Molecular and genetic targets within metastatic colorectal cancer and associated novel treatment advancements

Colorectal cancer results in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of patients worldwide each year, with incidence expected to rise over the next two decades. In the metastatic setting, cytotoxic therapy options remain limited, which is reflected in the meager improvement of patient survival rates. Therefore, focus has turned to the identification of the mutational composition inherent to colorectal cancers and development of therapeutic targeted agents. Herein, we review the most up to date systemic treatment strategies for metastatic colorectal cancer based on the actionable molecular alterations and genetic profiles of colorectal malignancies.

Treatment Settings and Outcomes with Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil at Third-Line Treatment and beyond in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Patients with refractory mCRC rarely undergo third-line or subsequent treatment. This strategy could negatively impact their survival. In this setting, regorafenib (R) and trifluridine/tipiracil (T) are two key new treatment options with statistically significant improvements in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control with different tolerance profiles. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of these agents in real-world practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 2012-2022, 866 patients diagnosed with mCRC who received sequential R and T (T/R, n = 146; R/T, n = 116]) or T (n = 325]) or R (n = 279) only were retrospectively recruited from 13 Italian cancer institutes.

RESULTS

The median OS is significantly longer in the R/T group (15.9 months) than in the T/R group (13.9 months) (p = 0.0194). The R/T sequence had a statistically significant advantage in the mPFS, which was 8.8 months with T/R vs. 11.2 months with R/T (p = 0.0005). We did not find significant differences in outcomes between groups receiving T or R only. A total of 582 grade 3/4 toxicities were recorded. The frequency of grade 3/4 hand-foot skin reactions was higher in the R/T sequence compared to the reverse sequence (37.3% vs. 7.4%) (p = 0.01), while grade 3/4 neutropenia was slightly lower in the R/T group than in the T/R group (66.2% vs. 78.2%) (p = 0.13). Toxicities in the non-sequential groups were similar and in line with previous studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The R/T sequence resulted in a significantly longer OS and PFS and improved disease control compared with the reverse sequence. R and T given not sequentially have similar impacts on survival. More data are needed to define the best sequence and to explore the efficacy of sequential (T/R or R/T) treatment combined with molecular-targeted drugs.

Assessing the reporting quality of early phase dose-finding trial protocols: a methodological review

Background

The paradigm of early phase dose-finding trials has evolved in recent years. Innovative dose-finding designs and protocols which combine phases I and II are becoming more popular in health research. However, the quality of these trial protocols is unknown due to a lack of specific reporting guidelines. Here, we evaluated the reporting quality of dose-finding trial protocols.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study of oncology and non-oncology early phase dose-finding trial protocols posted on ClinicalTrials.gov in 2017-2023. A checklist of items comprising: 1) the original 33-items from the SPIRIT 2013 Statement and 2) additional items unique to dose-finding trials were used to assess reporting quality. The primary endpoint was the overall proportion of adequately reported items. This study was registered with PROSPERO (no: CRD42022314572).

Finding

A total of 106 trial protocols were included in the study with the rule-based 3 + 3 being the most used trial design (39.6%). Eleven model-based and model-assisted designs were identified in oncology trials only (11/58, 19.0%). The overall proportion of adequately reported items was 65.1% (95%CI: 63.9-66.3%). However, the reporting quality of each individual item varied substantially (range 9.4%-100%). Oncology study protocols showed lower reporting quality than non-oncology. In the multivariable analysis, trials with larger sample sizes and industry funding were associated with higher proportions of adequately reported items (all p-values <0.05).

Interpretation

The overall reporting quality of early phase dose-finding trial protocols is suboptimal (65.1%). There is a need for improved completeness and transparency in early phase dose-finding trial protocols to facilitate rigorous trial conduct, reproducibility and external review.

Funding

None.

Interaction of Some Amino-Nitrile Derivatives with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 1 (VEGFR1) Using a Theoretical Model

BACKGROUND

Some studies indicate that the angiogenesis process is related to vascular endothelial growth factor, which can interact with endothelial cell surface receptors (VEGF-R1, VEGF-R2, and VEGF-R3); this biochemical process and other factors result in the promotion and growth of new blood vessels under normal conditions. However, some studies indicate that this phenomenon could also occur in cancer cells. It is important to mention that some amino derivatives have been prepared as VEGF-R1 inhibitors; however, their interaction with VEGF-R1 is not clear, perhaps due to different experimental approaches or differences in their chemical structure.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the theoretical interaction of several amino-nitrile derivatives (Compounds 1 to 38) with VEGF-R1.

METHODS

The theoretical interaction of amino-nitrile derivatives with VEGF-R1 was carried out using the 3hng protein as the theoretical model. In addition, cabozantinib, pazopanib, regorafenib, and sorafenib were used as controls in the DockingServer program.

RESULTS

The results showed different amino acid residues involved in the interaction of amino-nitrile derivatives with the 3hng protein surface compared with the controls. In addition, the inhibition constant (Ki) was lower for Compounds 10 and 34 than for cabozantinib. Other results show that Ki for Compounds 9, 10, 14, 27-29 and 34-36 was lower in comparison with pazopanib, regorafenib, and sorafenib.

CONCLUSIONS

All theoretical data suggest that amino-nitrile derivatives could produce changes in the growth of some cancer cell lines through VEGFR-1 inhibition. Therefore, these amino-nitrile derivatives could be a therapeutic alternative to treat some types of cancer.

Update on Emerging Therapies for Advanced Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy worldwide. It is projected to increase by 3.2 million new cases and account for 1.6 million deaths by 2040. Mortality is largely due to limited treatment options for patients who present with advanced disease. Thus, the development of effective and tolerable therapies is crucial. Chemotherapy has been the backbone of systemic treatment of advanced CRC, but utility has been limited because of invariable resistance to therapy, narrow mechanisms of action, and unfavorable toxicity profile. Tumors that are mismatch repair-deficient have demonstrated remarkable response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. However, most CRC tumors are mismatch repair-proficient and represent an unmet medical need. Although ERBB2 amplification occurs only in a few cases, it is associated with left-sided tumors and a higher incidence of brain metastasis. Numerous combinations of HER2 inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy, and antibody-drug conjugates against HER2 represent innovative strategies in this area. The KRAS protein has been classically considered undruggable. Fortunately, new agents targeting KRAS G12C mutation represent a paradigm shift in the management of affected patients and could lead the advancement in drug development for the more common KRAS mutations. Furthermore, aberrant DNA damage response is present in 15%-20% of CRCs, and emerging innovative combinations with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors could improve the current therapeutic landscape. Multiple novel biomarker-driven approaches in the management of patients with advanced CRC tumors are reviewed in this article.

Is Financial Toxicity Captured in Assessments of Quality of Life In Oncology Randomized Clinical Trials?

BACKGROUND

Financial difficulties in relation with diagnosis and treatment of patients with cancer affects their quality-of-life (QoL). We aim to characterize how financial toxicity was captured in oncology randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and to estimate how often the study-drug or other expenses were covered by sponsors.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional analysis of articles published in six high impact journals (The New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, JAMA, The Lancet Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, and JAMA Oncology). Selected articles needed to report on a RCT published between January 2018 and December 2019, study an anti-cancer drug, and have reported QoL results. We abstracted the QoL questionnaires used; whether the survey was directly assessing financial difficulties; whether a difference in financial toxicity was reported between arms; and whether the sponsor supplied the study-drug or covered other expenses.

RESULTS

For all 73 studies that met inclusion criteria, 34 studies (47%) utilized QoL questionnaires without direct assessment of financial difficulties. The study drug was provided by the sponsor in at least 51 trials (70%), provided according to local rules in 3 trials (4%), and undeterminated in the remaining 19 trials (26%). We found 2 trials (3%) with payments or compensation to enrolled patients.

CONCLUSION

This cross-sectional study found 47% of articles reporting on QoL in oncology RCTs did not use QoL questionnaires directly assessing financial toxicity. Additionnaly, the study drug was supplied by the sponsor in most trials. Financial toxicity occurs in real-life settings when patients have to pay for the drugs and other medical expenses. QoL assessments from oncology RCTs lack generalizability to real-world settings, due to limited querying of financial toxicity.

POLICY SUMMARY

Real-world evidence could be demanded by regulators as post-requirement studies to ensure QoL results observed in trials will replicate in patients treated outside investigational trials.

Guidance for Treating the Older Adults with Colorectal Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

The need for evidence-based data in the rapidly growing group of older patients is vast and more elderly-specific studies are desperately needed, for which there is clear demand from both patients and providers. Notably, many of the studies discussed in this review included unplanned subset analyses based on age and/or were not originally stratified by age; therefore, these data, particularly overall survival data, need to be interpreted with some caution as they may not be statistically valid based on the initial trial design and statistical plan. As we await data from ongoing elderly-specific trials, our recommendation for managing older patients with CRC should include geriatric screening tools (e.g., CSGA, VES-13, G8, CARG, CRASH) to help guide treatment adjustments for improved tolerability without sacrificing efficacy. For patients with a positive screen for significant geriatric concerns, a full geriatric assessment is recommended to guide treatment approach and supportive care. Prior data support the use of all approved medications for CRC in older adults who are fit; however, treatment breaks and dose attenuation with potential escalation are reasonable options for these patients. Ultimately, management decisions in the care of older adults with mCRC must be made through shared decision-making with the patient with consideration for the patient's functional status, comorbidities, goals of care, social support, as well as potential toxicities and possible effect on QoL.

Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) and regorafenib in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is a disease of older patients, but few guidelines directly address age in their recommendations. Older patients may present comorbidities that affect the choice of chemotherapy, and care must be taken when choosing the best approach. This narrative review aimed to describe the literature regarding approved oral agents for third-line treatment in older patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, regorafenib, and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI).

Long-term response of more than 9 years to regorafenib in a heavily pretreated patient with metastatic colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide, with approximately 1.9 million new diagnoses and 935 000 deaths annually. Overall, there is accumulating evidence that receiving all available treatments leads to a survival advantage and, although tailored treatments might be appropriate for selected patients, the one-size-fits-all approach is still widely used in chemo-refractory patients. Currently, different antiangiogenics and multitarget agents are indicated in treatment of metastatic CRC (mCRC) whereas the identification of useful predictive factors for the treatment response is lacking. Analysis of potential predictive biomarkers of efficacy of regorafenib is still ongoing but may prove to be difficult because of its nonspecific activity across a wide range of angiogenic, oncogenic, stromal, and intracellular signaling kinases. We present a case of a 57-year-old Caucasian woman diagnosed with recurrence after curative surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma stage III (ypT3N2). Despite undergoing multiple lines of standard chemotherapy, disease control could not be maintained. Consequently, regorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic proprieties, was started as a late-line treatment and a dose reduction strategy allowed a long-term response of more than 9 years with good tolerability.

Regorafenib is suitable for advanced colorectal cancer patients who have previously received trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab

Regorafenib is a standard salvage line therapy used for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Recently, trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) plus bevacizumab also showed promising efficacy as a salvage line therapy for advanced CRC. However, the efficacy and safety of regorafenib for patients with advanced CRC who have previously received TFTD plus bevacizumab is unclear. We retrospectively collected clinicopathologic data from patients with advanced CRC who received regorafenib after TFTD plus bevacizumab in multiple institutions between April 2017 and June 2020.Thirty-four advanced CRC patients who received regorafenib were analyzed. The median age was 66.5 (range 43-81 years), 11 patients were male, and all had an ECOG performance status(PS) of 0 or 1. Twenty-two patients had left-sided tumors, 18 patients had RAS mutants, and 1 patient had a BRAF V600E mutation. The response rate was 0%, and the disease control rate was 31%. The median progression-free survival was 70 days (95% CI: 56-91), and the overall survival was 233 days (95% CI: 188-324). Treatment was discontinued in 32 patients, and 28 (82%) discontinued treatment due to progressive disease. The major grade 3 and4 toxicities were proteinurea (29%), hypertension (26%), hand-foot syndrome(15%), and platelet decrease (6%). Regorafenib after TFTD plus bevacizumab showed efficacy similar to that of the previous study, and no new adverse events were observed.

Phase II dose titration study of regorafenib in progressive unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer

Regorafenib has shown significant survival benefit as a salvage therapy for colorectal cancer; however, its starting dose has been controversial in recent studies. Therefore, we conducted a prospective study on the efficacy and safety of the dose reduction of regorafenib to 120 mg. Patients received 120 mg regorafenib once per day for 3 weeks, followed by a 1-week off-treatment period. The primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed disease control rate (DCR). Sixty patients were registered, and the DCR was 38.3% with a median progression-free survival of 2.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-3.7) and median overall survival of 10.0 months (95% CI 6.9-15.2). Common grade 3-4 adverse events were hand-foot skin reaction and hypertension (20.0% each). The results of administration of 120 mg regorafenib as the starting dose are consistent with reports from prior phase III trials, which used starting doses of 160 mg. This lower initiating dose of regorafenib may be beneficial to certain patient populations. This clinical trial was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR number UMIN000018968, registration date: 10/09/2015).

Baseline Cytokine Profile Identifies a Favorable Outcome in a Subgroup of Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Regorafenib

Metastatic colorectal cancer is frequently associated with poor clinical conditions that may limit therapeutic options. Regorafenib is a small molecule approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, but it is hampered by significative toxicities. Moreover, only a relatively limited number of patients benefit from the treatment. Therefore, the identification of reliable markers for response is an unmet need. Eighteen cytokines, selected based on their prevalent Th1 or Th2 effects, were collected. Peripheral blood samples were gathered at baseline in 25 metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with regorafenib. Data extracted have been linked to progression-free survival. ROC identified the best cytokines associated with outcome. The relative value of the selected cytokines was determined by PCA. Data analysis identified 8 cytokines (TGF-β, TNF-α, CCL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-13 and IL-21), used to create a signature (TGF-β, TNF-α high; CCL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-13 and IL-21 low) corresponding to patients with a significantly longer progression-free survival. This report suggests that the analysis of multiple cytokines might identify a cytokine signature related to a patient's outcome that is able to recognize patients who will benefit from treatment. If confirmed, future studies, also based on different drugs, using this approach and including larger patient populations, might identify a signature allowing the a priori identification of patients to be treated.