Interhospital Transfer Delays Appropriate Treatment for Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Retrospective Cohort Study

A Description of Medications and Intravenous Fluids Used During Neonatal Transport by a Regional Pediatric Critical Care Team

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the type and frequency of enteral and parenteral fluids and medications used during the transport of neonates by a regional pediatric critical care transport team.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of neonates transported by a regional neonatal transport team affiliated with a level IV neonatal intensive care unit within a large care network between 2020 and 2021. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the electronic medical record. Standard frequency tabulation and summary statistics were used to report demographics, transport characteristics, and fluid and medication use; results were then stratified by preterm (37 weeks) and term births.

RESULTS

In the 628 included transports, more term than preterm infants received at least 1 fluid or medication (53% vs. 43%, respectively). The most commonly administered medications were antibiotics (ampicillin and gentamicin), prostaglandin, and opiates (morphine sulfate and fentanyl). In addition, term infants received more analgesic medications, antimicrobials, and prostaglandin, whereas preterm infants received total parenteral nutrition more often. There were over 38 different medications provided on the transports studied.

CONCLUSION

This study of a single transport team revealed that a wide variety of medications and fluids were used in the transport of neonates, with term infants receiving more medications than preterm infants. These data could be used by transport teams in making or updating their standardized medication lists or in creating simulations.

Use of Fixed Wing Modified Scene Air Ambulance Responses for Injured Patients in Northern Ontario: A Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE

Timely access to a lead trauma hospital (LTH) saves lives; however, the vast geography of Northern Ontario creates a barrier to equitable access to an LTH. Paramedics in Ontario follow the field trauma triage standard (FTTS) to identify which patients should be directly brought to an LTH. A pilot project was launched using a fixed wing modified scene response (MSR) to transport patients from Northern Ontario who met the FTTS directly to an LTH. This study aimed to 1) explore the impact of the fixed wing MSR pilot program on the time to LTH arrival for injured patients in Northern Ontario compared with the traditional interfacility transfer (IFT) process and 2) determine the frequency and specific FTTS criteria that were fulfilled.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of injured patients in Northern Ontario who were emergently transported to an LTH by the provincial air ambulance service between January 2016 and October 2021. Electronic patient care records were manually reviewed, and patient cases were grouped by their sending and receiving facilities to evaluate time differences between MSR and IFT.

RESULTS

For same-distance transports, the average time from injury to trauma center arrival was reduced with MSR (292.8 minutes) compared with IFT (507.8 minutes), with a mean difference of 130.3 minutes. All MSR cases and 90% of IFT cases met at least 1 FTTS criterion.

CONCLUSION

Fixed wing MSR improves access to timely definitive care for injured patients in Northern Ontario, and all patients transported in this pilot project met the trauma bypass criteria.

Association between hospital spending and in-hospital mortality of patients with sepsis based on a Japanese nationwide medical claims database study

Background

The effect of hospital spending on the mortality rate of patients with sepsis has not yet been fully elucidated. We hypothesized that hospitals that consume more medical resources would have lower mortality rates among patients with sepsis.

Methods

This retrospective study used administrative data from 2010 to 2017. The enrolled hospitals were divided into quartiles based on average daily medical cost per sepsis case. The primary and secondary outcomes were the average in-hospital mortality rate of patients with sepsis and the effective cost per survivor among the enrolled hospitals, respectively. A multiple regression model was used to determine the significance of the differences among hospital categories to adjust for baseline imbalances.

Results

Among 997 hospitals enrolled in this study, the crude in-hospital mortality rates were 15.7% and 13.2% in the lowest and highest quartiles of hospital spending, respectively. After adjusting for confounding factors, the highest hospital spending group demonstrated a significantly lower in-hospital mortality rate than the lowest hospital spending group (coefficient = -0.025, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.034 to -0.015; p < 0.0001). Similarly, the highest hospital spending group was associated with a significantly higher effective cost per survivor than the lowest hospital spending group (coefficient = 77.7, 95% CI 73.1 to 82.3; p < 0.0001). In subgroup analyses, hospitals with a small or medium number of beds demonstrated a consistent pattern with the primary test, whereas those with a large number of beds or academic affiliations displayed no association.

Conclusions

Using a nationwide Japanese medical claims database, this study indicated that hospitals with greater expenditures were associated with a superior survival rate and a higher effective cost per survivor in patients with sepsis than those with lower expenditures. In contrast, no correlations between hospital spending and mortality were observed in hospitals with a large number of beds or academic affiliations.

Impact of a Repatriation Program Between Quaternary and Community Hospitals

BACKGROUND

Capacity challenges at quaternary hospitals cause delays or denials in patient transfers from community hospitals that can compromise quality and safety. Repatriation is an innovative approach to increase capacity at the quaternary hospital by transferring a patient back to their originating community hospital after the quaternary portion of their care is completed.

METHODS

A repatriation program was implemented at a large quaternary care teaching hospital over a one-year period (2020 to 2021). The authors characterized the rate of successful repatriation and associated patient characteristics, determined the impact on quaternary hospital capacity in terms of bed days saved, and estimated the resultant number of backfilled admissions that could be accommodated. The research team also monitored the rate of readmissions for repatriations back to the quaternary hospital.

RESULTS

Overall, 215 repatriations were attempted, and 103 (47.5%) were successful. The most common diagnoses were sepsis (13, 12.6%), stroke (12, 11.7%), intracranial bleed (10, 9.7%), gastrointestinal perforation/obstruction (9, 8.7%), and trauma (9, 8.7%). The median length of stay at the quaternary hospital was 13 days (interquartile range [IQR] 7-20) and 12 days (IQR 4-26) at the community hospital. There were 2,842 bed days saved at the quaternary hospital, with a backfill opportunity of 431 admissions. The readmission rate to the quaternary hospital was 1.9%.

CONCLUSION

By dynamically matching patient need with hospital capability at different phases of the patient's care, Repatriation can save bed days at the quaternary hospital, creating capacity to improve access for patients needing timely transfer. The low observed readmission rate suggests that repatriation is safe.

Overcoming distance: an exploration of current practices of government and charity-funded critical care transport and retrieval organizations

BACKGROUND

For critically ill and injured patients, timely access to definitive care is associated with a reduction in avoidable mortality. Access to definitive care is significantly affected by geographic remoteness. To overcome this disparity, a robust critical care transport (CCT) or retrieval system is essential to support the equity of care and overcome the tyranny of distance. While critical care transport or retrieval systems have evolved over the years, there is no universally accepted system or standard, which has led to considerable variation in practices. The objective of this mixed-methods study was to identify and explore the current clinical, operational, and educational practices of government and charity-funded critical care transport and retrieval organizations operating across access- and weather- challenged geography.

METHODS

This study utilized a mixed-methods approach comprising a rapid review of the literature and semi-structured interviews with identified subject matter experts (SME).

RESULTS

A total of 44 articles and 14 interviews with SMEs from six different countries, 12 different services/systems, and seven operational roles, including clinicians (physician, paramedic, and nurse), educator, quality improvement, clinical governance, clinical informatics and research, operations manager, and medical director were included in the narrative analysis. The study identified several themes including deployment, crew composition, selection and education, clinical governance, quality assurance and quality improvement and research.

CONCLUSION

This mixed-methods study underscores the paucity of literature describing current clinical, operational, and educational practices of government or charity-funded CCT or retrieval programs operating across access- and weather- challenged geography. While many common themes were identified including clearly defined mission profiles, use of dedicated or specialized transport teams, central coordination, rigorous selection processes, service-sponsored graduate education, and strong clinical governance, there is little consensus and considerable variation in current practices. Further research is needed to identify and harmonize best practices within the CCT and retrieval environments.

Neighborhood Poverty and Distance to Pediatric Hospital Care

OBJECTIVE

To describe the relationship between neighborhood poverty and geographic access to pediatric inpatient care.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study using 2017-18 hospital and demographic data, as well as geographic data from the 2010 census. Acute care hospitals in 17 states were included, comprising approximately one-third of the national population. The main outcome was distance to capable pediatric hospital care by neighborhood Area Deprivation Index (ADI), both overall and by urbanicity.

RESULTS

Median distance to pediatric hospital care increased linearly with poverty across ADI national deciles (Pearson coefficient of 0.986; P < .001). The most advantaged neighborhoods were a median of 2.5 miles from the nearest pediatric capable hospital (interquartile range [IQR] 1.2-5.6) while those in the most disadvantaged were a median of 13.8 miles away (IQR 3.3-35.9; P < .001). The nearest hospital admitted children in 51.17% (7927) of advantaged neighborhoods (lowest national ADI quintile) and only 26.02% (3729) of disadvantaged neighborhoods (highest national ADI quintile). The association between poverty and median distance to care was observed in rural, suburban, and urban census block groups (P < .001 for all trends). In suburban neighborhoods, children from the most disadvantaged neighborhoods were 3 times as likely as children from the most advantaged neighborhoods to live more than 20 miles from pediatric inpatient care (27.85%, 456,533 of children from bottom quintile neighborhoods vs 9.24%, 259,787 of children from top quintile neighborhoods, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Distances to capable pediatric hospital care are greater from poor than affluent neighborhoods. This carries potential implications for disparities in pediatric health outcomes.

Urban-rural disparities in interfacility transfers for children during COVID-19

PURPOSE

We aimed to identify temporal trends and differences in urban and rural pediatric interfacility transfers (IFTs) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of IFT among children <18 years from January 2019 to June 2022 using the Pediatric Health Information System. The primary outcome was IFTs from general hospitals to referral children's hospitals. The primary exposure was patient rurality, defined by Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes. We categorized IFTs into medical, surgical, and mental health diagnoses and analyzed trends by month. We calculated observed-to-expected (O-E) ratios of pre-pandemic (March 2019-Feb 2020) transfers compared to pandemic year 1 (March 2020-Feb 2021) and year 2 (March 2021-February 2022) using Poisson modeling.

FINDINGS

Of 419,250 IFTs, 18.8% (n = 78,751) were experienced by rural-residing children. The O-E ratio of IFT in year 1 for urban children was 14.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 13.8, 14.2) and 14.8% (95% CI 14.4, 15.3) for rural children compared to pre-pandemic (P = .0001). In year 2, transfers rebounded with IFTs for rural-residing children increasing more than urban-residing children (101.7% [95% CI 100.1, 103.4] compared to 90.7% [95% CI 89.0, 90.4], P < .0001). For mental-health indications in year 2, rural transfer ratios were higher than urban, 126.8% (95% CI, 116.7, 137.6) compared to 113.7% (95% CI 109.9, 117.6), P = .0168.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric IFTs decreased dramatically during pandemic year 1. In year 2, while medical and surgical transfers continued to lag pre-pandemic volumes, transfers for mental health indications significantly exceeded pre-pandemic levels, particularly among rural-residing children.

The impact of telehealth in sepsis care: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Sepsis is associated with significant mortality. Telehealth may improve the quality of early sepsis care, but the use and impact of telehealth applications for sepsis remain unclear. We aim to describe the telehealth interventions that have been used to facilitate sepsis care, and to summarize the reported effect of telehealth on sepsis outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

We identified articles reporting telehealth use for sepsis using an English-language search of PubMed, CINAHL Plus (EBSCO), Academic Search Ultimate (EBSCO), APA PsycINFO (EBSCO), Public Health (ProQuest), and Web of Science databases with no restrictions on publication date.

STUDY SELECTION

Included studies described the use of telehealth as an intervention for treating sepsis. Only comparative effectiveness analyses were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, two investigators independently selected articles for inclusion and abstracted data. A random-effects subgroup analysis was conducted on patient survival treated with and without telehealth.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies were included, involving 188,418 patients with sepsis. Thirteen studies used observational study designs, and the most common telehealth applications were provider-to-provider telehealth consultation and intensive care unit telehealth. Clinical and methodological heterogeneity was significantly high. Telehealth use was associated with higher survival, especially in settings with low control group survival. The effect of telehealth on other care processes and outcomes were more varied and likely dependent on hospital-level factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Telehealth has been used in diverse applications for sepsis care, and it may improve patient outcomes in certain contexts. Additional interventional trials and cost-based analyses would clarify the causal role of telehealth in improving sepsis outcomes.

Inter-hospital transfer and clinical outcomes for people with COVID-19 admitted to intensive care units in Australia: an observational cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To examine the association between inter-hospital transfer and in-hospital mortality among people with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study; analysis of data collected for the Short Period Incidence Study of Severe Acute Respiratory Illness (SPRINT-SARI) Australia study.

SETTING, PARTICIPANTS

People with COVID-19 admitted to 63 ICUs, 1 January 2020 - 1 April 2022.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome: in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes: ICU and hospital lengths of stay and frequency of selected complications.

RESULTS

Of 5207 people with records in the SPRINT-SARI Australia database at 1 April 2022, 328 (6.3%) had been transferred between hospitals, 305 (93%) during the third pandemic wave. Compared with patients not transferred, their median age was lower (53 years; interquartile range [IQR], 45-61 years v 60 years; IQR, 46-70 years), their median body mass index higher (32.5 [IQR, 27.2-39.0] kg/m² v 30.1 [IQR, 25.7-35.7] kg/m² ), and fewer had received a COVID-19 vaccine (22% v 44.9%); their median APACHE II scores were similar (14.0; IQR, 12.0-18.0 v 14.0; IQR, 10.0-19.0). Bacterial pneumonia (64.7% v 29.0%) and bacteraemia (27% v 8%) were more frequent in transferred patients, as was the need for more intensive ICU interventions, including invasive mechanical ventilation (71.2% v 38.1%) and extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (26% v 1.7%). Crude ICU (19% v 14.9%) and in-hospital mortality (19% v 18.4%) were similar for patients who were or were not transferred; median lengths of ICU (20.0 [IQR, 11.2-40.3] days v 4.6 [IQR, 2.1-10.1] days) and hospital stay (29.7 [IQR, 18.1-49.6] days v 12.3 [IQR, 7.3-21.0] days) were longer for transferred patients. In the multivariable regression analysis, in-hospital mortality risk was lower for transferred patients (risk difference [RD], -5.0 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI] -10 to -0.03 percentage points), but not in the propensity score-adjusted analysis (RD, -3.4 [95% CI, -8.9 to 2.1] percentage points).

CONCLUSIONS

Among people with COVID-19 admitted to ICUs, patients transferred from another hospital required more intense interventions and remained in hospital longer, but were not at greater risk of dying in hospital than the patients who were not transferred.

A system in crisis: exploring how recent emergency department closures influence potential access to emergency care in Ontario

OBJECTIVES

Access to emergency medical care in Ontario has been under stress, mainly due to a lack of human resources (staffing of nurses and doctors). Over the past year, several emergency departments in Ontario have closed. Some of these closures are nightly, while others have closed for weeks at a time, leaving Ontario residents without access to emergency medical care which can lead to poor or more severe outcomes. The purpose of this paper was to examine how closures of ED's in Ontario have influenced potential access to emergency medical care.

METHODS

We performed population-level geographic information systems (GIS)-based analysis of potential access to ED hospitals in Ontario. The number of people with access to an ED was calculated when all ED's in Ontario were open, then recalculated with the 14 ED closures. Access was defined by ground travel with 30 min, 45 min, and 60 min travel times used for analysis. Differences in the number of people at the census block level who potentially lost access were compiled and examined by census subdivision.

RESULTS

If all 14 ED's had closed at the same time, there would be 35,808 people at 30 min, 15,018 at 45 min, and 12,131 at 60 min travel times in Ontario who lost access to ED care. Certain areas of the province saw more significant decreases in ED access. At 45 min travel times, nearly 2000 people in Central Frontenac lost access (44% of population), while 7298 people in Cochrane (North Part) lost access (20% of population).

CONCLUSIONS

ED closures have led to decreases in potential access to emergency care for predominantly rural populations. Health human resource recovery strategies must focus on areas where lack of overlap exists.

Outcomes Associated With Rural Emergency Department Provider-to-Provider Telehealth for Sepsis Care: A Multicenter Cohort Study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that provider-to-provider tele-emergency department care is associated with more 28-day hospital-free days and improved Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guideline adherence in rural emergency departments (EDs).

METHODS

Multicenter (n=23), propensity-matched, cohort study using medical records of patients with sepsis from rural hospitals in an established, on-demand, rural video tele-ED network in the upper Midwest between August 2016 and June 2019. The primary outcome was 28-day hospital-free days, with secondary outcomes of 28-day inhospital mortality and SSC guideline adherence.

RESULTS

A total of 1,191 patients were included in the analysis, with tele-ED used for 326 (27%). Tele-ED cases were more likely to be transferred to another hospital (88% versus 8%, difference 79%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 75% to 83%). After matching and regression adjustment, tele-ED cases did not have more 28-day hospital-free days (difference 0.07 days more for tele-ED, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.17) or 28-day inhospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.51, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.60). Adherence with both the SSC 3-hour bundle (aOR 0.59, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.22) and complete bundle (aOR 0.45, 95% CI 0.02 to 11.60) were similar. An a priori-defined subgroup of patients treated by advanced practice providers suggested that the mortality was lower in the cohort with tele-ED use (aOR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.73) despite no significant difference in complete SSC bundle adherence (aOR 2.88, 95% CI 0.52 to 15.86).

CONCLUSION

Rural emergency department patients treated with provider-to-provider tele-ED care in a mature network appear to have similar clinical outcomes to those treated without.

Factors affecting the length of stay in the emergency department for critically Ill patients transferred to regional emergency medical center

AIM

To identify the factors affecting Emergency Department Length of Stay for transferred critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND

The Length of Stay of the transferred patients is an important indicator of Emergency Department service quality; thus, understanding the factors affecting the Emergency Department Length of Stay of transferred critically ill patients is essential.

METHODS

Using the electronic medical records of 968 transferred critically ill Emergency Department patients of a tertiary hospital in Korea, prediction models for Emergency Department Length of Stay were built using various machine learning algorithms.

RESULTS

The logistic regression (AUROC 0.85) models showed the best performance, followed by random forest (AUROC 0.83) and Naive Bayes (AUROC 0.83). The logistic regression model indicated that fewer consultations, the highest acuity level, need for an emergency operation or angiography, need for ICU admission, severe emergency disease and fewer diagnoses were the statistically significant predictors for Emergency Department Length of Stay of 6 h or less.

CONCLUSIONS

The transferred critically ill patients analysed in this study who required immediate or specialized care tended to receive needed care on time at the study site.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT

Understanding the factors affecting the Emergency Department Length of Stay of transferred critically ill patients is crucial for developing strategies to manage the nursing resource of Emergency Department successfully.

Characteristics of Patients Who Visited Emergency Department: A Nationwide Population-Based Study in South Korea (2016-2018)

The utilization of the emergency department (ED) has been continuously increasing and has become a burden for ED resources. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics, outcomes, common diagnoses, and disease classifications of patients who were referred to the ED. This nationwide epidemiologic study examined the data from adult patients (>18 years) who visited EDs from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018. Most EDs in Korea provide data from ED patients to the National Emergency Medical Center (NEMC). The disposition of ED patients was classified as discharge, admission, death, and re-transfer. From 2016 to 2018, the proportion of referred patients out of the total ED visits increased from 7.3% to 7.8%. The referred patients were older (61.1 vs. 50.5 years), had worse vital signs, longer ED lengths of stay (409.1 vs. 153.3 min), and higher admission (62.3 vs. 16.9%) and re-transfer rates (4.4 vs. 1.9%) than the direct-visit patients. Among the referred patients in the 3 years, 62.3% were hospitalized, and the most common disease classification was “disease of the digestive system” (19.8%). The most common diagnosis was pneumonia (6.0%), followed by urinary tract infection, gastrointestinal bleeding, and hepatobiliary infection. The number of patients referred to EDs is increasing, and more than 60% of referred patients are hospitalized. Detailed characteristics of these patients will be helpful for improving ED management and the distribution of medical resources.

Early fluid bolus in adults with sepsis in the emergency department: a systematic review, meta-analysis and narrative synthesis

Background

Early intravenous fluids for patients with sepsis presenting with hypoperfusion or shock in the emergency department remains one of the key recommendations of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines to reduce mortality. However, compliance with the recommendation remains poor. While several interventions have been implemented to improve early fluid administration as part of sepsis protocols, the extent to which they have improved compliance with fluid resuscitation is unknown. The factors associated with the lack of compliance are also poorly understood.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis and narrative review to investigate the effectiveness of interventions in emergency departments in improving compliance with early fluid administration and examine the non-interventional facilitators and barriers that may influence appropriate fluid administration in adults with sepsis. We searched MEDLINE Ovid/PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, CINAHL, and SCOPUS databases for studies of any design to April 2021. We synthesised results from the studies reporting effectiveness of interventions in a meta-analysis and conducted a narrative synthesis of studies reporting non-interventional factors.

Results

We included 31 studies out of the 825 unique articles identified in the systematic review of which 21 were included in the meta-analysis and 11 in the narrative synthesis. In meta-analysis, interventions were associated with a 47% improvement in the rate of compliance [(Random Effects (RE) Relative Risk (RR) = 1.47, 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 1.25–1.74, p-value < 0.01)]; an average 24 min reduction in the time to fluids [RE mean difference = − 24.11(95% CI − 14.09 to − 34.14 min, p value < 0.01)], and patients receiving an additional 575 mL fluids [RE mean difference = 575.40 (95% CI 202.28–1353.08, p value < 0.01)]. The compliance rate of early fluid administration reported in the studies included in the narrative synthesis is 48% [RR = 0.48 (95% CI 0.24–0.72)].

Conclusion

Performance improvement interventions improve compliance and time and volume of fluids administered to patients with sepsis in the emergency department. While patient-related factors such as advanced age, co-morbidities, cryptic shock were associated with poor compliance, important organisational factors such as inexperience of clinicians, overcrowding and inter-hospital transfers were also identified. A comprehensive understanding of the facilitators and barriers to early fluid administration is essential to design quality improvement projects.

PROSPERO Registration ID

CRD42021225417.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-021-00558-5.

Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Distance to Pediatric Critical Care

OBJECTIVES

To describe the geography of pediatric critical care services and the relationship between poverty and distance to these services across the United States.

DESIGN

Retrospective, cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Contiguous United States.

PATIENTS

Children less than 18 years as represented in the 2016 American Community Survey.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Pediatric critical care services were geographically concentrated within urban areas, with half of all PICUs located within 9.5 miles of another (interquartile range, 3.4-51.5 miles). Median distances from neighborhoods to the nearest unit increased linearly with Area Deprivation Index (p < 0.001), such that the median distance from the least privileged neighborhoods was nearly three times that of the most privileged neighborhoods (first decile = 7.8 miles [interquartile range, 3.4-15.8 miles] vs tenth decile = 22.6 miles [interquartile range, 4.2-52.5 miles]; p < 0.001). A relationship between neighborhood poverty and distance to a PICU was present across all U.S. regions and within urban/suburban and rural areas.

CONCLUSIONS

In the United States, the distance to pediatric critical care services increases with poverty. This carries implications for access to care and health outcome disparities.

Delays to Initiate Interfacility Transfer for Patients Transported by a Critical Care Transport Organization

OBJECTIVE

The time to initiate an interfacility transfer is an important and understudied cause of delay to definitive management. This study identifies characteristics associated with delays to initiate interfacility transfer of critically ill patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent interfacility transfer by a provincial critical care transport organization over a 3-year period. The primary outcome was the time to initiate interfacility transfer. Quantile regression explored the impact of patient, environmental, and institutional characteristics.

RESULTS

In total 11,231 patients were included. Cardiac (+1.45 hours), gastrointestinal (+3.28 hours), respiratory (+4.90 hours), or sepsis (+3.03 hours) reasons for transfer; vasopressor requirements (+2.31 hours); and evening time (+3.67 hours) were associated with longer times to initiate interfacility transfer at the 90th quantile. Neurologic (-1.45 hours), obstetric (-1.56 hours), or trauma (-3.14 hours) reasons for transfer; Glasgow Coma Scale < 8 (-0.98 hours); blood transfusion requirement (-1.47 hours); and smaller sending sites were associated with shorter times to initiate transfer.

CONCLUSION

The time to initiate interfacility transfer represents a modifiable delay in a patient's transport journey. This study highlights important patient, environmental, and institutional characteristics associated with increased time to initiate transfer. Collaboration between transport organizations and hospitals in developing regional bypass criteria and prearranged transfer agreements may help facilitate timely patient transfer.

Interhospital Transfer Outcomes for Critically Ill Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Requiring Mechanical Ventilation

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Studying interhospital transfer of critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in the spring 2020 surge may help inform future pandemic management.

Are we overlooking the rural patient journey when it comes to sepsis diagnosis and management?

Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines have progressively moved towards faster time-based treatment targets over recent years despite international data consistently showing low protocol adherence. A key stakeholder in Australian healthcare remains overlooked in sepsis research: the under-resourced rural ED. The journey of the rural patient markedly differs to that of the metropolitan patient, involving greater reliance upon patient transfers, reduced staffing and resource inaccessibility, directly impacting on sepsis protocol adherence and patient outcomes. Greater representation of rural patients and EDs in Australian sepsis research is paramount in guiding future sepsis treatment protocols. This perspective piece explores current international sepsis literature, recognising significant barriers to sepsis protocol adherence specific to rural Australian EDs.

Regionalization of Critical Care in the United States: Current State and Proposed Framework From the Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine Task Force of the Society of the Critical Care Medicine

OBJECTIVES

The Society of Critical Care Medicine convened its Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine taskforce on February 22, 2016, during the 45th Critical Care Congress to develop a series of consensus papers with toolkits for advancing critical care organizations in North America. The goal of this article is to propose a framework based on the expert opinions of critical care organization leaders and their responses to a survey, for current and future critical care organizations, and their leadership in the health system to design and implement successful regionalization for critical care in their regions.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION

Members of the workgroup convened monthly via teleconference with the following objectives: to 1) develop and analyze a regionalization survey tool for 23 identified critical care organizations in the United States, 2) assemble relevant medical literature accessed using Medline search, 3) use a consensus of expert opinions to propose the framework, and 4) create groups to write the subsections and assemble the final product.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

The most prevalent challenges for regionalization in critical care organizations remain a lack of a strong central authority to regulate and manage the system as well as a lack of necessary infrastructure, as described more than a decade ago. We provide a framework and outline a nontechnical approach that the health system and their critical care medicine leadership can adopt after considering their own structure, complexity, business operations, culture, and the relationships among their individual hospitals. Transforming the current state of regionalization into a coordinated, accountable system requires a critical assessment of administrative and clinical challenges and barriers. Systems thinking, business planning and control, and essential infrastructure development are critical for assisting critical care organizations.

CONCLUSIONS

Under the value-based paradigm, the goals are operational efficiency and patient outcomes. Health systems that can align strategy and operations to assist the referral hospitals with implementing regionalization will be better positioned to regionalize critical care effectively.

Critical Care Utilization and Outcomes of Interhospital Medical Transfers at Lower Risk of Death

PURPOSE

To evaluate utilization and mortality outcomes of interhospital transferred critically-ill medical patients with lower predicted risk of hospital mortality.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Multisite retrospective cohort analysis of patients with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV-a predicted mortality of ≤20% from 335 ICUs in 208 hospitals in the Philips eICU database between 2014-2015. Differences in length-of-stay (LOS) and mortality between transferred and local patients were evaluated using negative binomial logistic regression and logistic regression, respectively. Stratified analyses were conducted for subgroups of predicted mortality: 0%-5%, 6%-10%, 11%-15%, and 16%-20%.

RESULTS

Transfers had a higher risk of longer ICU and hospital LOS across all risk strata (IRR 1.12; 95% CI 1.09-1.16, P < 0.001 and IRR 1.11; 95% CI 1.07-1.14, P < 0.001 respectively). Mortality was higher among transfers, largely driven by the 6%-10% mortality risk strata (OR 1.30; 95% CI 1.09-1.54, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Interhospital transfer of critically-ill medical patients with lower illness severity is associated with higher ICU and hospital utilization and increased mortality. Better understanding of factors driving patient selection for and characteristics of interhospital transfer for this population will have an impact on ICU resource utilization, care efficiency, and hospital quality.

Location of residence and mortality for patients diagnosed with Fournier's gangrene

INTRODUCTION

Fournier's gangrene (FG) is a necrotizing infection of the genitalia. Time from to surgical intervention is a critical determinant of prognosis. We sought to investigate whether patients from rural locations have worse clinical outcomes given distance from a tertiary center.

METHODS

The Manitoba Intensive Care Unit (ICU) registry includes patients who have been admitted into ICUs across Manitoba. We identified patients admitted with FG from February 1999 to October 2019. Age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), presence of colostomy and scrotal debridement, length of stay (LOS), and mortality outcomes were obtained. Patients were categorized as being rural or urban.

RESULTS

From 1999-2019, a total of 79 patients were admitted with FG. The median age was 60 years [interquartile range [IQR] 48-67). The mortality rate during hospitalization was 16.5%. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of deaths for patients from urban vs. rural dwellings (9/47 [19.1%] vs. 4/32 [12.5%], p=0.434]. A comparison of the 66 (83.5%) patients that survived and the 13 (16.5%) that died during ICU hospitalization demonstrated no difference in age, gender, CCI, presence of colostomy, and rates of scrotal re-debridement (p>0.05). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that living in a rural area was not associated with increased mortality (odds ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 00.16-2.57, p=0.527).

CONCLUSIONS

Location of residence was not predictive of death from FG. In addition, baseline characteristics such as age, gender, CCI, surgical interventions, or LOS were not found to be associated with mortality.

A Level 1 Trauma Center's response to the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City: a qualitative and quantitative story

Background

The purpose of this study is to describe a Level 1 Trauma Center’s orthopedic response to the COVID-19 pandemic, and to compare outcomes of acute fracture patients pre-COVID versus during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

All inpatient fracture cases performed over a 5-month period were identified and retrospective chart review performed. Patients were divided into pre- and COVID-era groups based on when surgery was performed relative to March 16, 2020 (the date elective operations were ceased), and groups were statistically compared. Patients with a COVID test result were further sub-divided into COVID negative and positive groups, and statistically compared. Statistical analysis was performed using independent t-test for continuous variables and chi-square analysis for categorical variables.

Results

One hundred and nineteen patients were identified, 38% females with average age of 58 years. Average length of stay was 7 days with average time from injury to surgery of 3 days and average time from admission to surgery of 1.3 days. Overall in-hospital complication rate was 29.4%, and 30-day mortality and readmission rates were 2.5% and 5%, respectively. Sixty-nine patients comprised the pre-COVID group, and 50 in the COVID-era group. There was no significant difference with respect to length of stay, time from injury to surgery, time from admission to surgery, need for post-operative ICU stay, in-hospital complication rate, 30-day mortality rate and 30-day readmission rate. Thirty-four patients had COVID testing, with 24 negative and 10 positive. COVID-positive patients had longer time from injury to surgery (8.5 days vs. 2 days, p = 0.003) and longer time from admission to surgery (2.7 days vs. 1.2 days, p = 0.034). While more COVID-positive patients required ICU admission post-operatively (60% vs. 21%, p = 0.036), there was no difference in overall complication rate.

Conclusions

Orthopedic care of acute fracture patients was not affected by a global pandemic. The response of our Level 1 Trauma Center’s orthopedic department can guide other hospitals if and when new surges in COVID cases arise, in order to prevent compromising appropriate orthopedic care.

Level of evidence

Prognostic III.

TELEmedicine as an intervention for sepsis in emergency departments: a multicenter, comparative effectiveness study (TELEvISED Study)

Sepsis is a life-threatening infection that affects over 1.7 million Americans annually. Low-volume rural hospitals have worse sepsis outcomes, and emergency department (ED)-based telemedicine (tele-ED) has been one promising strategy for improving rural sepsis care. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of tele-ED consultation on sepsis care and outcomes in rural ED patients. The TELEvISED study is a multicenter (n = 25) retrospective propensity-matched comparative effectiveness study of tele-ED care for rural sepsis patients in a mature tele-ED network. Telemedicine-exposed patients will be matched with non telemedicine patients using a propensity score to predict tele-ED use. The primary outcome is 28-day hospital free days, and secondary outcomes include adherence with guidelines, mortality and organ failure. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04441944.

Impact of Prepatching on Paramedic In-Hospital Times for Emergent Interfacility Transfers

Background: The care required for patients at times necessitates they be transferred to another hospital capable of providing specialized care, a process known as an interfacility transfer. Delays to appropriate care for critically ill patients are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Improving efficiencies in interfacility transport process can thus expedite the time to critical treatment. Traditionally paramedics would patch to a transport medicine physician (TMP) after initial patient contact to discuss the case and expected management during transport. The concept of prepatch shifts this discussion between the TMP and paramedics prior to initial patient contact. The objective of this study was to assess if prepatching with paramedics prior to arrival at the patient reduced the in-hospital time for emergent interfacility transfers transported by a provincial critical care transport organization. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of all emergent, adult interfacility transports for patients transported by a provincial critical care transport organization in Ontario, Canada from January 2016 to December 2019. Quantile regression was used to evaluate the impact of prepatching as well as patient and paramedic characteristics on paramedic in-hospital time. Results: A total of 10,088 patients were included in the study, with 3,606 patients having a prepatch conducted and 6,482 without. Ventilated patients and vasopressor use were associated with higher prepatch rates; with the use of prepatch in these patients increasing over subsequent years of the study. Additionally, patients requiring higher levels of care, including being mechanically ventilated or dependent on vasopressors, were associated with longer in-hospital times. Prepatching reduced in-hospital time by 4 minutes at the 90^th quantile across all patients. Conclusion: Prepatching reduced paramedic in-hospital time for emergent interfacility transports. Although the clinical impact of this reduction in time is uncertain, prepatching may serve in facilitating shared mental modeling between paramedics and TMPs which may be beneficial to patient safety and team performance.

Delayed interhospital transfer of critically ill patients with surgical sepsis

BACKGROUND

Suboptimal triage of critically ill patients with surgical sepsis may contribute to adverse outcomes. Patients transferred to a tertiary care center after spending 24 hours or longer at an outside facility were compared with patients who had early triage to a tertiary care center with the null hypothesis that management parameters and outcomes would be similar between groups.

METHODS

This prospective observational cohort study included 308 patients treated for surgical sepsis in a surgical intensive care unit at a tertiary care center. Patients transferred after spending more than 24 hours at an outside facility (n = 69) were compared with patients who were directly admitted or transferred within 24 hours (n = 239). Patient characteristics, management parameters, and outcomes were compared between groups. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02276066).

RESULTS

Average outside facility length of stay in the delayed transfer group was 43 hours. Delayed transfer patients had higher sequential organ failure assessment (7 vs. 5, p = 0.003) and APACHE II scores (19 vs. 16, p = 0.007) on admission. The interval between admission and source control was significantly longer in the delayed transfer group (12.1 hours vs. 1.0 hours, p = 0.009). The incidence of nosocomial infection was significantly higher in the delayed transfer group (41% vs. 23%, p = 0.005). Delayed transfer was independently associated with a 10-day increase in hospital length of stay. Delayed transfer patients were less likely to be discharged home (22% vs. 59%, p < 0.001) and suffered twofold higher in-hospital mortality (14.5% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.056).

CONCLUSION

Patients with surgical sepsis who spent more than 24 hours at an outside facility prior to transfer had greater initial illness severity, longer intervals between admission and source control, and more nosocomial infections compared with patients who had early triage to a tertiary care center.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Care management/therapeutic, Level IV; Epidemiologic/prognostic, Level III.

Trends in Regionalization of Emergency Care for Common Pediatric Conditions

BACKGROUND

For children who cannot be discharged from the emergency department, definitive care has become less frequent at most hospitals. It is uncertain whether this is true for common conditions that do not require specialty care. We sought to determine how the likelihood of definitive care has changed for 3 common pediatric conditions: asthma, croup, and gastroenteritis.

METHODS

We used the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample database to study children <18 years old presenting to emergency departments in the United States from 2008 to 2016 with a primary diagnosis of asthma, croup, or gastroenteritis, excluding critically ill patients. The primary outcome was referral rate: the number of patients transferred among all patients who could not be discharged. Analyses were stratified by quartile of annual pediatric volume. We used logistic regression to determine if changes over time in demographics or comorbidities could account for referral rate changes.

RESULTS

Referral rates increased for each condition in all volume quartiles. Referral rates were greatest in the lowest pediatric volume quartile. Referral rates in the lowest pediatric volume quartile increased for asthma (13.6% per year; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.6%-22.2%), croup (14.8% per year; 95% CI 2.6%-28.3%), and gastroenteritis (16.4% per year; 95% CI 3.5%-31.0%). Changes over time in patient age, sex, comorbidities, weekend presentation, payer mix, urban-rural location of presentation, or area income did not account for these findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing referral rates over time suggest decreasing provision of definitive care and regionalization of inpatient care for 3 common, generally straightforward conditions.

Potentially avoidable issues in urology mortality cases in Australia: identification and improvements

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to identify the most common potentially avoidable factors in urology deaths, focusing on the lessons that can be learnt.

METHODS

This study analysed data from a well-established and comprehensive peer review audit of surgical deaths in Australian hospitals (excluding New South Wales) from 2009 to 2015, focusing on urology cases with identified areas for improvement in patient management. Of all audited deaths, 11% (79/719) had serious clinical management issues with a total of 109 individual clinical management issues identified. These were categorized based on perioperative stage (preoperative, intraoperative or post-operative), followed by thematic analysis within each stage.

RESULTS

The study found preoperative issues to be the most common (n = 48), followed by post-operative issues (n = 32) with intraoperative issues less common (n = 13). Communication issues were seen at all three stages (n = 16). Overall, the most common theme was at the preoperative stage; inadequate preoperative assessment (n = 27). More specifically, the most common preoperative assessment issues involved a failure to order necessary preoperative investigations, or to administer necessary preoperative treatment (e.g. prophylactic antibiotics). The most common communication issue was between teams and at handover, often involving failure by junior medical staff to communicate issues to the responsible surgical consultant.

CONCLUSION

Urological surgical cases with potentially avoidable mortality constitute a small, but important subset of deaths. The analysis of these cases can inform various stakeholders to improve the quality and safety of urological surgical care.

Central Venous Access Capability and Critical Care Telemedicine Decreases Inter-Hospital Transfer Among Severe Sepsis Patients: A Mixed Methods Design

OBJECTIVES

Severe sepsis is a complex, resource intensive, and potentially lethal condition and rural patients have worse outcomes than urban patients. Early identification and treatment are important to improving outcomes. The objective of this study was to identify hospital-specific factors associated with inter-hospital transfer.

DESIGN

Mixed method study integrating data from a telephone survey and retrospective cohort study of state administrative claims.

SETTING AND SUBJECTS

Survey of Iowa emergency department administrators between May 2017 and June 2017 and cohort of adults seen in Iowa emergency departments for severe sepsis and septic shock between January 2005 and December 2013.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of inter-hospital transfer. We included 114 institutions that provided data (response rate = 99%), and responses were linked to a total of 150,845 visits for severe sepsis/septic shock. In our adjusted model, having the capability to place central venous catheters or having a subscription to a tele-ICU service was independently associated with lower odds of inter-hospital transfer (adjusted odds ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54-0.86 and adjusted odds ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54-0.88, respectively). A facility's participation in a sepsis-specific quality improvement initiative was associated with 62% higher odds of transfer (adjusted odds ratio, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.10-2.39).

CONCLUSIONS

The insertion of central venous catheters and access to a critical care physician during sepsis treatment are important capabilities in hospitals that transfer fewer sepsis patients. In the future, hospital-specific capabilities may be used to identify institutions as regional sepsis centers.

Provider-to-provider telemedicine improves adherence to sepsis bundle care in community emergency departments

INTRODUCTION

Sepsis is a life-threatening emergency. Together, early recognition and intervention decreases mortality. Protocol-based resuscitation in the emergency department (ED) has improved survival in sepsis patients, but guideline-adherent care is less common in low-volume EDs. This study examined the association between provider-to-provider telemedicine and adherence with sepsis bundle components in rural community hospitals.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study of adults presenting with sepsis or septic shock in community EDs participating in rural telemedicine networks. The primary outcome was adherence to four sepsis bundle requirements: lactate measurement within 3 hours, blood culture before antibiotics, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and adequate fluid resuscitation. Multivariable generalized estimating equations estimated the association between telemedicine and adherence.

RESULTS

In this cohort (n = 655), 5.6% of subjects received ED telemedicine consults. The telemedicine group was more likely to be male and have a higher severity of illness. After adjusting for severity and chief complaint, total sepsis bundle adherence was higher in the telemedicine group compared with the non-telemedicine group (aOR 17.27 [95%CI 6.64-44.90], p < 0.001). Telemedicine consultation was associated with higher adherence with three of the individual bundle components: lactate, antibiotics, and fluid resuscitation.

DISCUSSION

Telemedicine patients were more likely to receive initial blood lactate measurement, timely broad-spectrum antibiotics, and adequate fluid resuscitation. In rural, community EDs, telemedicine may improve sepsis care and potentially reduce disparities in sepsis outcomes at low-volume facilities. Future work should identify specific components of telemedicine-augmented care that improve performance with sepsis quality indicators.

Double inter-hospital transfer in Sepsis patients presenting to the ED does not worsen mortality compared to single inter-hospital transfer

PURPOSE

Sepsis is a leading cause of hospital deaths. Inter-hospital transfer is frequent in sepsis and is associated with increased mortality. Some sepsis patients undergo two inter-hospital transfers (double transfer). This study assessed the (1) prevalence, (2) associated risk factors, (3) associated mortality, and (4) hospital length-of-stay and costs of double-transfer of sepsis patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study using 2005-2014 administrative claims data in Iowa. Multivariable generalized estimating equations adjusted for potential confounding variables, with a primary outcome of mortality. Secondary outcomes included hospital length-of-stay and costs. Hospital-specific cost-to-charge ratios estimated hospital costs. Hospitals were categorized into quintiles based on sepsis-volume.

RESULTS

Of 15,182 sepsis subjects, there were 45.2% non-transfers and 2.1% double-transfers. Double-transfers had worse mortality than non-transfers but not single-transfers. Of the non-transfers, 44.9% presented to a top sepsis-volume hospital compared to 22.8% of double-transfers and 25.1% of single-transfers. After transfer from first to second hospital, 93.4% of the single-transfers and 92.2% of the double-transfers were at a top sepsis-volume hospital. Double-transfers had longer length-of-stay and more in total hospital costs than single-transfers.

CONCLUSIONS

Double-transfer occurs in 2.1% of Iowa sepsis patients. Double-transfers had similar mortality and increased length of stay and costs compared to single-transfers.

Implementation of earlier antibiotic administration in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in Japan: a descriptive analysis of a prospective observational study

Background

Time to antibiotic administration is a key element in sepsis care; however, it is difficult to implement sepsis care bundles. Additionally, sepsis is different from other emergent conditions including acute coronary syndrome, stroke, or trauma. We aimed to describe the association between time to antibiotic administration and outcomes in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in Japan.

Methods

This prospective observational study enrolled 1184 adult patients diagnosed with severe sepsis based on the Sepsis-2 criteria and admitted to 59 intensive care units (ICUs) in Japan between January 1, 2016, and March 31, 2017, as the sepsis cohort of the Focused Outcomes Research in Emergency Care in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Sepsis and Trauma (FORECAST) study. We compared the characteristics and in-hospital mortality of patients administered with antibiotics at varying durations after sepsis recognition, i.e., 0–60, 61–120, 121–180, 181–240, 241–360, and 361–1440 min, and estimated the impact of antibiotic timing on risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality using the generalized estimating equation model (GEE) with an exchangeable, within-group correlation matrix, with “hospital” as the grouping variable.

Results

Data from 1124 patients in 54 hospitals were used for analyses. Of these, 30.5% and 73.9% received antibiotics within 1 h and 3 h, respectively. Overall, the median time to antibiotic administration was 102 min [interquartile range (IQR), 55–189]. Compared with patients diagnosed in the emergency department [90 min (IQR, 48–164 min)], time to antibiotic administration was shortest in patients diagnosed in ICUs [60 min (39–180 min)] and longest in patients transferred from wards [120 min (62–226)]. Overall crude mortality was 23.4%, where patients in the 0–60 min group had the highest mortality (28.0%) and a risk-adjusted mortality rate [28.7% (95% CI 23.3–34.1%)], whereas those in the 61–120 min group had the lowest mortality (20.2%) and risk-adjusted mortality rates [21.6% (95% CI 16.5–26.6%)]. Differences in mortality were noted only between the 0–60 min and 61–120 min groups.

Conclusions

We could not find any association between earlier antibiotic administration and reduction in in-hospital mortality in patients with severe sepsis.

Defining the Three Delays in Referral of Surgical Emergencies from District Hospitals to University Teaching Hospital of Kigali, Rwanda

BACKGROUND

Surgical conditions represent up to 30% of the global burden of diseases. The aim of this study was to assess the delays in patients transferred to a tertiary referral hospital from district hospitals (DHs) in Rwanda with emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions.

METHODS

We performed a prospective review of all EGS patients referred from DH over a 3-month period to assess delays in transfer and accessing care. We then surveyed general practitioners to define their perspective on delays in surgical care.

RESULTS

Over a 3-month period, there were 86 patients transferred from DH with EGS conditions. The most common diagnoses were bowel obstruction (n = 22, 26%) and trauma (n = 19, 22%). The most common performed operations were laparotomy (n = 21, 24%) and bowel resection (n = 20, 23%). The mortality rate was 12%, and the intensive care unit admission rate was 4%. In transfer to the referral hospital, 5% patients were delayed for financial reasons and 2% due to lack of insurance. After reaching CHUK, 5% patients were delayed due to laboratory and radiology issues. Other delays included no operating theater available (4%) and no surgeon available (1%). Providers' perceptions for not performing surgeries at DH were predominantly the lack of a competent surgical provider or anesthesia staff.

CONCLUSION

EGS patients represent a broad range of diagnoses. Delays were noted at each step in the referral process with multiple areas for potential improvement. Expanding surgical access at the DH has the potential to decrease delays and thereby improves patient outcomes.

Opportunities for achieving resuscitation goals during the inter-emergency department transfer of severe sepsis patients by emergency medical services: A case series

PURPOSE

This study aimed to describe the care provide by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to severe sepsis patients being transferred between acute care hospitals and identify how that care contributes to sepsis care goals.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study conducted at a 60,000-visit Midwestern academic emergency department, using run reports from 13 ambulance services transferring from 9 hospitals.

RESULTS

39 patients were included in the final cohort, transferred by 13 ambulance services from 9 hospitals. Included patients were adults with severe sepsis transferred by ambulance between 2009 and 2014. Thirty-nine patients were included in this cohort. 41% (n = 12) of patients received an adequate fluid bolus of 30 mL/kg (median 42.9 mL/kg crystalloid fluid, IQR 8.0 mL/kg) prior to tertiary care arrival. Seventeen percent (n = 2) of patients completed the adequate bolus during transfer time. Broad-spectrum antibiotics were initiated during transfer in 2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

EMS sepsis care during transfer was limited. EMS crews primarily continued treatments previously initiated and did not take additional steps toward resuscitation targets. Data suggests the inter-emergency department transfer period may provide an opportunity to continue working toward treatment targets, though the time is currently underutilized.

Additional Telemedicine Rounds as a Successful Performance-Improvement Strategy for Sepsis Management: Observational Multicenter Study

Background

Sepsis is a major health care problem with high morbidity and mortality rates and affects millions of patients. Telemedicine, defined as the exchange of medical information via electronic communication, improves the outcome of patients with sepsis and decreases the mortality rate and length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Additional telemedicine rounds could be an effective component of performance-improvement programs for sepsis, especially in underserved rural areas and hospitals without ready access to critical care physicians.

Objective

Our aim was to evaluate the impact of additional daily telemedicine rounds on adherence to sepsis bundles. We hypothesized that additional telemedicine support may increase adherence to sepsis guidelines and improve the detection rates of sepsis and septic shock.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, observational, multicenter study between January 2014 and July 2015 with one tele-ICU center and three ICUs in Germany. We implemented telemedicine as part of standard care and collected data continuously during the study. During the daily telemedicine rounds, routine screening for sepsis was conducted and adherence to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign’s 3-hour and 6-hour sepsis bundles were evaluated.

Results

In total, 1168 patients were included in this study, of which 196 were positive for severe sepsis and septic shock. We found that additional telemedicine rounds improved adherence to the 3-hour (Quarter 1, 35% vs Quarter 6, 76.2%; P=.01) and 6-hour (Quarter 1, 50% vs Quarter 6, 95.2%; P=.001) sepsis bundles. In addition, we noted an increase in adherence to the item “Administration of fluids when hypotension” (Quarter 1, 80% vs Quarter 6, 100%; P=.049) of the 3-hour bundle and the item “Remeasurement of lactate” (Quarter 1, 65% vs Quarter 6, 100%, P=.003) of the 6-hour bundle. The ICU length of stay after diagnosis of severe sepsis and septic shock remained unchanged over the observation period. Due to a higher number of patients with sepsis in Quarter 5 (N=60) than in other quarters, we observed stronger effects of the additional rounds on mortality in this quarter (Quarter 1, 50% vs Quarter 5, 23.33%, P=.046).

Conclusions

Additional telemedicine rounds are an effective component of and should be included in performance-improvement programs for sepsis management.

Urban and Rural Emergency Department Performance on National Quality Metrics for Sepsis Care in the United States

PURPOSE

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) developed national quality measures for emergency department (ED) sepsis care. Like care for many conditions, meeting sepsis quality metrics can vary between settings. We sought to examine and compare sepsis care quality in rural vs urban hospital-based EDs.

METHODS

We analyzed data from EDs participating in the national Emergency Quality Network (E-QUAL). We collected preliminary performance data on both the CMS measure (SEP-1) and the ACEP measures via manual chart review. We analyzed SEP-1 data at the hospital level based on existing CMS definitions and analyzed ACEP measure data at the patient level. We report descriptive statistics of performance variation in rural and urban EDs.

FINDINGS

Rural EDs comprised 58 of the EDs reporting SEP-1 results and 405 rural patient charts in the manual review. Of sites reporting SEP-1 results, 44% were rural and demonstrated better aggregate SEP-1 bundle adherence than urban EDs (79% vs 71%; P = .049). Both urban and rural hospitals reported high levels of compliance with the ACEP recommended initial actions of obtaining lactate and blood cultures, with urban EDs outperforming rural EDs on metrics of IV fluid administration and antibiotics (74% urban vs 60% rural; P ≤  .001; 91% urban vs 84% rural; P ≤  .001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Sepsis care at both rural and urban EDs often achieves success with national metrics. However, performance on individual components of ED sepsis care demonstrates opportunities for improved processes of care at rural EDs.

Outcomes of Hospital Transfers for Pediatric Abdominal Pain and Appendicitis

IMPORTANCE

Hospital care for children is becoming more concentrated, with interhospital transfer occurring more frequently even for common conditions. Condition-specific analysis is required to determine the value, costs, and consequences of this trend.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the capabilities of transferring and receiving hospitals and to determine how often children transferred after an initial diagnosis of abdominal pain or appendicitis require higher levels of care.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Retrospective cohort analysis using the 2 most recent available inpatient and emergency department administrative data sets from all acute care hospitals in California from 2010 to 2011 and Florida, Massachusetts, and New York from 2013 to 2014. Data were analyzed between February and June 2018. All patients younger than 18 years with a primary diagnosis of abdominal pain or appendicitis who underwent an interhospital transfer and whose care could be matched through unique identifiers were included.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Outcomes after hospital transfers, classified into encounters with major surgical procedures, imaging diagnostics, and no major procedures. Pediatric Hospital Capability Index of transferring and receiving hospitals.

RESULTS

There were 465 143 pediatric hospital encounters for abdominal pain and appendicitis, including 53 517 inpatient admissions and 15 275 transfers. Among them, 4469 could be matched to encounters in receiving hospitals. The median (interquartile range) age of this cohort was 10 (7-14) years, with 54.8% female (2449 patients), 40.9% male (1830 patients), and 4.3% unreported sex (190 patients). The increase in capability at the receiving hospital compared with the transferring hospital was large (median [interquartile range] change in Pediatric Hospital Capability Index score, 0.70 [0.54-0.82]), with 9.2% of hospitals (57) with very high capability (Pediatric Hospital Capability Index score >0.77) receiving 80.8% of the total transfers (3610). Diagnostic imaging was undertaken in the care of 710 transferred patients (15.9%) and invasive procedures were performed in 2421 patients (54.2%), including 2153 appendectomies. No imaging or surgery was required in the care of 1338 transfers (29.9%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, interfacility transfers of patients with appendicitis and abdominal pain were concentrated toward high-capability hospitals, and about 30% of patients were released without apparent intervention. These findings suggest an opportunity for improving care and decreasing cost through better interfacility coordination, such as standardized management protocols and telemedicine with high-capability hospitals. Further research is needed to identify similar opportunities among other common conditions.

Clinical epidemiology and outcomes of community acquired infection and sepsis among hospitalized patients in a resource limited setting in Northeast Thailand: A prospective observational study (Ubon-sepsis)

Infection and sepsis are leading causes of death worldwide but the epidemiology and outcomes are not well understood in resource-limited settings. We conducted a four-year prospective observational study from March 2013 to February 2017 to examine the clinical epidemiology and outcomes of adults admitted with community-acquired infection in a resource-limited tertiary-care hospital in Ubon Ratchathani province, Northeast Thailand. Hospitalized patients with infection and accompanying systemic manifestations of infection within 24 hours of admission were enrolled. Subjects were classified as having sepsis if they had a modified sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score ≥2 at enrollment. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02217592. A total of 4,989 patients were analyzed. Of the cohort, 2,659 (53%) were male and the median age was 57 years (range 18-101). Of these, 1,173 (24%) patients presented primarily to the study hospital, 3,524 (71%) were transferred from 25 district hospitals or 8 smaller hospitals in the province, and 292 (6%) were transferred from one of 30 hospitals in other provinces. Three thousand seven hundred and sixteen (74%) patients were classified as having sepsis. Patients with sepsis had an older age distribution and a greater prevalence of comorbidities compared to patients without sepsis. Twenty eight-day mortality was 21% (765/3,716) in sepsis and 4% (54/1,273) in non-sepsis patients (p<0.001). After adjusting for gender, age, and comorbidities, sepsis on admission (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 3.30; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.48-4.41, p<0.001), blood culture positive for pathogenic organisms (adjusted HR 2.21; 95% CI 1.89-2.58, p<0.001) and transfer from other hospitals (adjusted HR 2.18; 95% CI 1.69-2.81, p<0.001) were independently associated with mortality. In conclusion, mortality of community-acquired sepsis in Northeast Thailand is considerable and transferred patients with infection are at increased risk of death. To reduce mortality of sepsis in this and other resource-limited setting, facilitating rapid detection of sepsis in all levels of healthcare facilities, establishing guidelines for transfer of sepsis patients, and initiating sepsis care prior to and during transfer may be beneficial.

[Factors affecting in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis: Development of a risk-adjusted model based on administrative data from German hospitals]

BACKGROUND

Inpatient administrative data from hospitals is already used nationally and internationally in many areas of internal and public quality assurance in healthcare. For sepsis as the principal condition, only a few published approaches are available for Germany. The aim of this investigation is to identify factors influencing hospital mortality by employing appropriate analytical methods in order to improve the internal quality management of sepsis.

METHODS

The analysis was based on data from 754,727 DRG cases of the CLINOTEL hospital network charged in 2015. The association then included 45 hospitals of all supply levels with the exception of university hospitals (range of beds: 100 to 1,172 per hospital). Cases of sepsis were identified via the ICD codes of their principal diagnosis. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors influencing in-hospital lethality for this population. The model was developed using sociodemographic and other potential variables that could be derived from the DRG data set, and taking into account current literature data. The model obtained was validated with inpatient administrative data of 2016 (51 hospitals, 850,776 DRG cases).

RESULTS

Following the definition of the inclusion criteria, 5,608 cases of sepsis (2016: 6,384 cases) were identified in 2015. A total of 12 significant and, over both years, stable factors were identified, including age, severity of sepsis, reason for hospital admission and various comorbidities. The AUC value of the model, as a measure of predictability, is above 0.8 (H-L test p>0.05, R² value=0.27), which is an excellent result.

CONCLUSION

The CLINOTEL model of risk adjustment for in-hospital lethality can be used to determine the mortality probability of patients with sepsis as principal diagnosis with a very high degree of accuracy, taking into account the case mix. Further studies are needed to confirm whether the model presented here will prove its value in the internal quality assurance of hospitals.

Predictors of 24-h mortality after inter-hospital transfer to a tertiary medical intensive care unit

Purpose

To identify variables associated with 24-h mortality after inter-hospital transfer.

Materials and methods

Single center retrospective study of adult patients transferred to a tertiary care medical ICU between 1 January 2010 and 15 April 2014. Demographic, clinical, physiologic, and laboratory data were collected. The Lasso method was used for logistic regression to identify predictors of 24-h mortality after inter-hospital ICU transfer.

Results

We identified 773 patients. Median age was 58 years (IQR 45-69), 49% were female, 83% Caucasian, and 48% had Medicare. The median length of stay at the transferring facility was 1.0 day (IQR 0-2). Median SOFA score on the day of ICU transfer was 5 (IQR 2-8). Twenty-two (3%) died within 24 h after inter-hospital transfer. SOFA score of 12-16 the day of inter-hospital transfer (odds ratio (OR) 7.77, 95% CI 1.21-66.26, p = 0.037), FiO₂ 0.8-1.0 on ICU arrival, and cardiac arrest prior to transfer (OR 4.94, 95% CI 1.43-15.96, p = 0.009) were associated with an increased risk for 24-h mortality after inter-hospital transfer.

Conclusions

Our study identified biologically plausible and potentially modifiable factors associated with 24-h mortality after inter-hospital medical ICU transfer, which may serve to inform patients and families of readiness and risk for mortality after inter-hospital transfer.

Outcomes of Ventilated Patients With Sepsis Who Undergo Interhospital Transfer: A Nationwide Linked Analysis

OBJECTIVES

The outcomes of critically ill patients who undergo interhospital transfer are not well understood. Physicians assume that patients who undergo interhospital transfer will receive more advanced care that may translate into decreased morbidity or mortality relative to a similar patient who is not transferred. However, there is little empirical evidence to support this assumption. We examined country-level U.S. data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database to examine whether, in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis, interhospital transfer is associated with a mortality benefit.

DESIGN

Retrospective data analysis using complex survey design regression methods with propensity score matching.

SETTING

The Nationwide Readmissions Database contains information about hospital admissions from 22 States, accounting for roughly half of U.S. hospitalizations; the database contains linkage numbers so that admissions and transfers for the same patient can be linked across 1 year of follow-up.

PATIENTS

From the 2013 Nationwide Readmission Database Sample, 14,325,172 hospital admissions were analyzed. There were 61,493 patients with sepsis and on mechanical ventilation. Of these, 1,630 patients (2.7%) were transferred during their hospitalization. A propensity-matched cohort of 1,630 patients who did not undergo interhospital transfer was identified.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The exposure of interest was interhospital transfer to an acute care facility. The primary outcome was hospital mortality; the secondary outcome was hospital length of stay. The propensity score included age, gender, insurance coverage, do not resuscitate status, use of renal replacement therapy, presence of shock, and Elixhauser comorbidities index. After propensity matching, interhospital transfer was not associated with a difference in in-hospital mortality (12.3% interhospital transfer vs 12.7% non-interhospital transfer; p = 0.74). However, interhospital transfer was associated with a longer total hospital length of stay (12.8 d interquartile range, 7.7-21.6 for interhospital transfer vs 9.1 d interquartile range, 5.1-17.0 for non-interhospital transfer; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with sepsis requiring mechanical ventilation who underwent interhospital transfer did not have improved outcomes compared with a cohort with matched characteristics who were not transferred. The study raises questions about the risk-benefit profile of interhospital transfer as an intervention.

Availability of Definitive Hospital Care for Children

IMPORTANCE

Timely and efficient access to hospital care is essential for the health and well-being of children. As insurance networks, accountable care organizations, and alternative payment methods evolve, these new systems of care must continue to serve the needs of children.

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that the availability of definitive pediatric hospital care is significantly more limited than adult care and is decreasing disproportionately.

DESIGN

This study used case mix data during fiscal years 2004 through 2014 to measure transfer frequency and identify the site of care completion for all patients seen in acute care hospitals throughout Massachusetts. Patterns of care among children were then compared with patterns of care among adults. Participants were all patients seen in an emergency department or admitted to a hospital from 2004 through 2014, including more than 34 million encounters.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Hospital Capability Index and Regionalization Index for all acute care hospitals and all conditions within the Clinical Classifications Software of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project.

RESULTS

Over the study period, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts hospital system was composed of 66 acute care hospitals. After excluding newborns and mental health conditions, there were 34 511 312 encounters, with 25 226 014 emergency department visits and 9 285 298 observation or full admissions. From 2004 through 2014, care for adults and children concentrated among hospitals but much more so for pediatric care. The number of children requiring care in more than one hospital increased 36.2% (from 7190 to 9793). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) Hospital Capability Index, reflecting the likelihood of a hospital completing a patient's care without transfer, decreased 10.8% (from 0.74 [IQR, 0.65-0.81] to 0.66 [IQR, 0.53-0.76]) for adult care and 65.0% (0.20 [IQR, 0.05-0.34] to 0.07 [IQR, 0.01-0.23]) for pediatric care. Almost all of the shift was from nonacademic to academic hospitals. The median Regionalization Index, reflecting the degree to which care for specific conditions is regionalized, was very high for pediatric conditions and further increased from 0.79 (IQR, 0.67-0.91) to 0.87 (IQR, 0.80-0.91). Over the same decade, the mean Regionalization Index for adult conditions was low and increased modestly from 0.25 (IQR, 0.14-0.39) to 0.32 (IQR, 0.19-0.46). Among pediatric conditions, more than 75% were highly regionalized in 2014 compared with fewer than 50% in 2004.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Pediatric hospital care has become increasingly concentrated, and many children with common conditions are now less frequently treated in the community. This finding has significant implications for systemwide capacity management and should be specifically accounted for in public health activities, disaster planning, and determinations of network adequacy.

Effect of Interhospital ICU Relocation on Patient Physiology and Clinical Outcomes

Relocation of large numbers of critically ill patients between hospitals is sometimes necessary and the risks associated with relocation may be high. In the setting of adherence to an interhospital intensive care unit (ICU) relocation protocol, we aimed to determine whether the interhospital relocation of all ICU patients in a single day is associated with changes in vital signs, device removal, and worse clinical outcomes. We conducted a prospective, observational, cohort study of all critically ill adults admitted to a tertiary medical center's ICUs on the day of a planned hospital relocation and exposed to interhospital ICU relocation compared with unexposed critically ill adults. Changes in vital signs were evaluated by the before-and-after interhospital relocation measurement of vital signs, and clinical outcomes were collected for all patients. A total of 699 patients were admitted to the ICU during the observation period, 24 of whom were exposed to interhospital ICU relocation on a single day. The median interhospital transport duration was 28 minutes (interquartile range: 24-35) and 29% of patients were receiving invasive mechanical ventilation. Patients exposed to interhospital ICU relocation had no significant change in any vital sign measurement and no devices were unintentionally removed. Inhospital mortality was similar (8.3%) to patients not exposed to interhospital ICU relocation (9.2%, P > .99). In the setting of adherence to an ICU relocation protocol, the interhospital ICU relocation of all critically ill adults during a single day is not associated with changes in vital signs, device removal, or worse clinical outcomes.

Case Volume-Outcomes Associations Among Patients With Severe Sepsis Who Underwent Interhospital Transfer

OBJECTIVES

Case volume-outcome associations bolster arguments to regionalize severe sepsis care, an approach that may necessitate interhospital patient transfers. Although transferred patients may most closely reflect care processes involved with regionalization, associations between sepsis case volume and outcomes among transferred patients are unclear. We investigated case volume-outcome associations among patients with severe sepsis transferred from another hospital.

DESIGN

Serial cross-sectional study using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

SETTING

United States nonfederal hospitals, years 2003-2011.

PATIENTS

One hundred forty-one thousand seven hundred seven patients (weighted national estimate of 717,732) with severe sepsis transferred from another acute care hospital.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We examined associations between quintiles of annual hospital severe sepsis case volume for the receiving hospital and in-hospital mortality among transferred patients with severe sepsis. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay and total charges. Transferred patients accounted for 13.2% of hospitalized severe sepsis cases. In-hospital mortality was 33.2%, with median length of stay 11 days (interquartile range, 5-22), and median total charge $70,722 (interquartile range, $30,591-$159,013). Patients transferred to highest volume hospitals had higher predicted mortality risk, greater number of acutely dysfunctional organs, and lower adjusted in-hospital mortality when compared with the lowest-volume hospitals (odds ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67-0.90). In stratified analysis (p < 0.001 for interaction of case volume by organ failure), mortality benefit associated with case volume was limited to patients with single organ dysfunction (n = 48,607, 34.3% of transfers) (odds ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.55-0.80). Treatment at highest volume hospitals was significantly associated with shorter adjusted length of stay (incidence rate ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.98) but not costs (% charge difference, 95% CI: [-]18.8, [-]37.9 to [+]0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital mortality was lowest among patients with severe sepsis who were transferred to high-volume hospitals; however, case volume benefits for transferred patients may be limited to patients with lower illness severity.

Rural Patients With Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock Who Bypass Rural Hospitals Have Increased Mortality: An Instrumental Variables Approach

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors associated with rural sepsis patients' bypassing rural emergency departments to seek emergency care in larger hospitals, and to measure the association between rural hospital bypass and sepsis survival.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

SETTING

Emergency departments of a rural Midwestern state.

PATIENTS

All adults treated with severe sepsis or septic shock between 2005 and 2014, using administrative claims data.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients bypassing local rural hospitals to seek care in larger hospitals.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 13,461 patients were included, and only 5.4% (n = 731) bypassed a rural hospital for their emergency department care. Patients who initially chose a top-decile sepsis volume hospital were younger (64.7 vs 72.7 yr; p < 0.001) and were more likely to have commercial insurance (19.6% vs 10.6%; p < 0.001) than those who were seen initially at a local rural hospital. They were also more likely to have significant medical comorbidities, such as liver failure (9.9% vs 4.2%; p < 0.001), metastatic cancer (5.9% vs 3.2%; p < 0.001), and diabetes with complications (25.2% vs 21.6%; p = 0.024). Using an instrumental variables approach, rural hospital bypass was associated with a 5.6% increase (95% CI, 2.2-8.9%) in mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Most rural patients with sepsis seek care in local emergency departments, but demographic and disease-oriented factors are associated with rural hospital bypass. Rural hospital bypass is independently associated with increased mortality.