1
|
Li J, Song Y, Peng Y, Lin J, Du Y, Qin C, Xu T. The role of histological subtype and chemotherapy on prognosis of ureteral cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2024; 150:192. [PMID: 38613698 PMCID: PMC11015994 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-024-05684-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To date, there have been few studies examining the prognostic implications of histological subtypes in ureteral cancer. And chemotherapy plays a crucial role in the treatment of ureteral cancer, while many factors influence the efficacy of chemotherapy. This study aimed to utilize the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database to assess the impact of histological type on ureteral cancer prognostic outcomes and discovered how histological type and T-stage influence the efficacy of chemotherapy. METHODS Based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, we reviewed 8915 records of patients with primary ureteral cancer from 18 centers between 2000 and 2018. We focused on the overall survival and cancer-specific survival of the records and used Kaplan‒Meier method to calculate survival curves. RESULTS In the comparison of prognostic outcomes, atypical subtypes exhibited a less favorable prognosis compared to typical ureteral carcinoma. Notably, patients diagnosed with papillary urothelial carcinoma demonstrated the most favorable overall survival (p = 0.005). Statistically significant benefits were observed in the prognosis of patients with non-papillary urothelial carcinoma who received chemotherapy (HR = 0.860, 95% CI 0.764-0.966, p = 0.011), while chemotherapy did not yield a statistically significant effect on the prognosis of patients with papillary urothelial carcinoma (HR = 1.055, 95% CI 0.906-1.228, p = 0.493). Chemotherapy had an adverse impact on the prognosis of patients with T1 ureteral cancer (HR = 1.235, 95% CI 1.016-1.502, p = 0.034), whereas it exhibited a positive prognostic effect for T3/T4 cases (HR = 0.739, 95% CI 0.654-0.835, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Histological type affects the prognosis of ureteral cancer. And evaluation of cancer histological type and T stage in ureteral cancer patients prior to chemotherapy is mandatory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jincong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Yuxuan Song
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Yun Peng
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Jiaxing Lin
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Yiqing Du
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Caipeng Qin
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
| | - Tao Xu
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yu CC, Chang CH, Fang JK, Huang SK, Tseng WH, Lee HY, Yeh HC, Chen IHA, Lin JT, Chen PC, Cheong IS, Hsueh TY, Jiang YH, Lee YK, Chen WC, Lo SH, Lin PH, Wang SS, Huang CY, Wu CC, Tseng JS, Wu SY, Tsai YC. Impact of pathological response on oncological outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial cancer receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. J Formos Med Assoc 2023; 122:1274-1281. [PMID: 37400294 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2023.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to evaluate the rates of pathological complete response (ypT0N0/X) and pathological response (ypT1N0/X or less) in patients with upper tract urothelial cancer who were treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and to examine their impact on oncological outcomes. METHODS This study is a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of patients with high-risk upper tract urothelial cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical nephroureterectomy between 2002 and 2021. Logistic regression analyses were used to investigate all clinical parameters for response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cox proportional hazard models were performed to assess the effect of the response on the oncological outcomes. RESULTS A total of 84 patients with UTUC who received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy were identified. Among them, 44 (52.4%) patients received cisplatin-based chemotherapy, and 22 (26.2%) patients had a carboplatin-based regimen. The pathological complete response rate was 11.6% (n = 10), and the pathological response rate was 42.9% (n = 36). Multifocal tumors or tumors larger than 3 cm significantly reduced the odds of pathological response. In the multivariable Cox proportional hazard model, pathological response was independently associated with better overall survival (HR 0.38, p = 0.024), cancer-specific survival (HR 0.24, p = 0.033), and recurrence-free survival (HR 0.17, p = 0.001), but it was not associated with bladder recurrence-free survival (HR 0.84, p = 0.69). CONCLUSION Pathological response after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and radical nephroureterectomy is strongly associated with patient survival and recurrence, and it might be a good surrogate for evaluating the efficacy of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Chin Yu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Hsiang Chang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Kai Fang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Steven K Huang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Taiwan; Department of Medical Science Industries, College of Health Sciences, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan City, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Hsin Tseng
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Ying Lee
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan; Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Chih Yeh
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan; Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - I-Hsuan Alan Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Tai Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Pi-Che Chen
- Department of Urology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Ian-Seng Cheong
- Department of Urology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Thomas Y Hsueh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital Renai Branch, Taiwan; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Hong Jiang
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Khun Lee
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chieh Chen
- Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Hsiu Lo
- Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Po-Hung Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Shian-Shiang Wang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Applied Chemistry, National Chi Nan University, Nantou, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Yuan Huang
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chang Wu
- Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Urology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Shu Tseng
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Yu Wu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Chou Tsai
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pinar U, Calleris G, Grobet-Jeandin E, Grande P, Benamran D, Thibault C, Gontero P, Rouprêt M, Seisen T. The role of perioperative chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy. World J Urol 2023; 41:3205-3230. [PMID: 36905443 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04330-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To summarize evidence regarding the use of neoadjuvant (NAC) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) among patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS A comprehensive literature search of PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE and the Cochrane library was performed to identify any original or review article on the role of perioperative chemotherapy for UTUC patients treated with RNU. RESULTS With regards to NAC, retrospective studies consistently suggested that it may be associated with better pathological downstaging (pDS) ranging from 10.8 to 80% and complete response (pCR) ranging from 4.3 to 15%, while decreasing the risk of recurrence and death as compared to RNU alone. Even higher pDS ranging from 58 to 75% and pCR ranging from 14 to 38% were observed in single-arm phase II trials. With regards to AC, retrospective studies provided conflicting results although the largest report from the National Cancer Database suggested an overall survival benefit in pT3-T4 and/or pN + patients. In addition, a phase III randomized controlled trial showed that the use of AC was associated with a disease-free survival benefit (HR = 0.45; 95% CI = [0.30-0.68]; p = 0.0001) in pT2-T4 and/or pN + patients with acceptable toxicity profile. This benefit was consistent in all subgroups analyzed. CONCLUSIONS Perioperative chemotherapy improves oncological outcomes associated with RNU. Given the impact of RNU on renal function, the rational is stronger for the use of NAC which impacts final pathology and potentially prolongs survival. However, the level of evidence is stronger for the use of AC that has been proven to decrease the risk of recurrence after RNU with a potential survival benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ugo Pinar
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Giorgio Calleris
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città Della Salute E Della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Pietro Grande
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Daniel Benamran
- Division of Urology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Constance Thibault
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, AP-HP Centre, Paris, France
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città Della Salute E Della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Seisen
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ricci AD, Rizzo A, Mollica V, Schiavina R, Fiorentino M, Brunocilla E, Ardizzoni A, Massari F. Platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a change of paradigm? A meta-analysis of aggregate data. Anticancer Drugs 2022; 33:e61-e68. [PMID: 34387596 DOI: 10.1097/cad.0000000000001200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eligible studies were identified using Pubmed/Medline, Cochrane library, Embase and meeting abstracts. Outcomes of interest included: overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Platinum-based AC was associated with improved DFS, while the benefit in OS and CSS was not statistically significant compared to observation. Conversely, platinum-based AC showed a modest OS benefit in an analysis combing multivariable HRs with estimated HRs from Kaplan-Meier curves. Our results suggest that platinum-based AC is associated with improved DFS and a modest OS benefit in patients with locally advanced urothelial carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alessandro Rizzo
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
| | - Veronica Mollica
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
| | | | | | | | - Andrea Ardizzoni
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
| | - Francesco Massari
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Luo Y, Feng B, Wei D, Han Y, Li M, Zhao J, Lin Y, Hou Z, Jiang Y. Adjuvant chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy improves the survival outcome of high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients with cardiovascular comorbidity. Sci Rep 2020; 10:17674. [PMID: 33077839 PMCID: PMC7572393 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74940-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
This prospective randomized comparative trial study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) used in combination in high risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients with cardiovascular comorbidity. Based on the inclusion criteria of high-risk UTUC in EAU guidelines (updated in 2014), all eligible patients treated in our hospital from January 2014 to March 2018 were included, and cases with late disease, renal dysfunction, severe cardiopulmonary disease or other malignant tumors were excluded. The cases were randomized into two groups based on treatment regimen. Multivariate analyses were performed to analyze the influencing factors of survival outcome in the enrolled patients. The Cox proportional-hazards model and the Kaplan–Meier method were employed to assess progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS). In addition, the potential adverse effects of chemotherapy were actively monitored. A total of 176 high-risk UTUC individuals with cardiovascular comorbidity were enrolled and evaluated in this study. Median follow-up durations were 30 months (range 6–54) in the RNU (n = 82) group and 36 months (range 6–54) in the RNU + ACT (n = 94) group. Multivariable analysis indicated that peri-operative cardiovascular events risk grade was independent prognostic factor for OS. Tumor size was independent prognostic factor for PFS and CSS. BMI and lymphovacular invasion were significant predictors of PFS. Clinical stage, lymph node involvement, and tumor grade were significant predictors of PFS, OS and CSS in these patients. Especially, chemotherapy was helpful in improving PFS [P < 0.001, HR = 6.327 (5.115–7.793)], OS [P = 0.013, HR = 2.336 (1.956–2.883)] and CSS [P = 0.008, HR = 3.073 (2.533–3.738)]. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated that the oncologic outcomes of RNU treated high-risk UTUC patients were improved much significantly by ACT, including PFS [P = 0.0033, HR = 3.78 (3.13–4.55)], OS [P = 0.0397, HR = 1.39 (1.01–1.75)] and CSS [P = 0.0255, HR = 1.26 (1.07–1.45)]. Further analysis of the lymph node positive subgroup showed that the median time of oncologic events was enhanced in RNU + ACT treated individuals in comparison with the RNU group, including PFS (11.4 months vs. 31.9 months, P = 0.0018), OS (26.8 months vs. 36.3 months, P = 0.0255) and CSS (28.2 months vs. 39.3 months, P = 0.0197). In the T3/4 cohort, significantly increased median PFS (13.9 months vs. 36.3 months, P = 0.0217), OS (20.6 months vs. 32.2 months, P = 0.0183) and CSS (21.9 months vs. 38.4 months, P = 0.0226) were obtained in the combination group. Additionally, no severe adverse events (over grade 4) associated with chemotherapy were detected in the RNU + ACT group. In conclusion, ACT after radical surgery has statistically significant therapeutic effects on PFS, OS and CSS in high-risk UTUC patients with cardiovascular comorbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Luo
- Department of Urology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Anzhenli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China.
| | - Bingfu Feng
- Department of Urology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Anzhenli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Dechao Wei
- Department of Urology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Anzhenli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Yili Han
- Department of Urology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Anzhenli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Mingchuan Li
- Department of Urology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Anzhenli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiahui Zhao
- Department of Urology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Anzhenli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Yunhua Lin
- Department of Urology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Anzhenli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhu Hou
- Department of Urology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Anzhenli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Yongguang Jiang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Anzhenli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Leow JJ, Chong YL, Chang SL, Valderrama BP, Powles T, Bellmunt J. Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A 2020 Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, and Future Perspectives on Systemic Therapy. Eur Urol 2020; 79:635-654. [PMID: 32798146 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT To improve the prognosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), clinicians have used neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) before or after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Despite some new data, the evidence remains mixed on their efficacy. OBJECTIVE To update the current evidence on the role of NAC and AC for UTUC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched for all studies investigating NAC or AC for UTUC in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings up to February 2020. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS For NAC, the pooled pathologic complete response rate (≤ypT0N0M0) was 11% (n = 811) and pathologic partial response rate (≤ypT1N0M0) was 43% (n = 869), both across 14 studies. Across six studies, the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32-0.59, p < 0.001) for overall survival (OS) and 0.38 (95% CI: 0.24-0.61, p < 0.001) for cancer-specific survival (CSS) in favor of NAC. The evidence for NAC is at best level 2. As for AC, there was a benefit in OS (pooled HR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64-0.92, p = 0.004 across 14 studies and 7983 patients), CSS (pooled HR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.69-0.91, p = 0.001 across 18 studies and 5659 patients), and disease-free survival (DFS; pooled HR 0.52; 95% CI: 0.38-0.70 across four studies and 602 patients). While most studies were retrospective (level 2 evidence), there were two prospective randomized trials providing level 1 evidence. There are currently four phase 2 trials on neoadjuvant immunotherapy and three phase 2 trials on adjuvant immunotherapy for UTUC. CONCLUSIONS NAC for UTUC confers a favorable pathologic response and tumor downstaging rate, and an OS and CSS benefit compared with RNU alone. AC confers an OS, CSS, and DFS benefit compared with RNU alone. Currently, the evidence for AC appears stronger (with positive level 1 evidence) than that for NAC (at best level 2 evidence). Limited data are available for chemoimmunotherapy approaches, but preliminary data support an active research investment. PATIENT SUMMARY After a comprehensive search of the latest studies examining the role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial cancer, the pooled evidence shows that perioperative chemotherapy was beneficial for prolonging survival; however, the evidence for adjuvant chemotherapy was stronger than that for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey J Leow
- Department of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore; Division of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yew Lam Chong
- Department of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Steven L Chang
- Division of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Begoña P Valderrama
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Barts Health and the Royal Free NHS Trusts, London, UK
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and PSMAR-IMIM Research Lab, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hwang EC, Sathianathen NJ, Jung JH, Kim MH, Narayan V, Hwang JE, Spiess PE, Dahm P. Perioperative systemic chemo-immunotherapy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Hippokratia 2020. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eu Chang Hwang
- Chonnam National University Medical School, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital; Department of Urology; Hwasun Korea, South
| | | | - Jae Hung Jung
- Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine; Department of Urology; 20 Ilsan-ro Wonju Gangwon Korea, South 26426
| | - Myung Ha Kim
- Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine; Yonsei Wonju Medical Library; Wonju Korea, South
| | - Vikram Narayan
- University of Minnesota; Department of Urology; Minneapolis Minnesota USA
| | - Jun Eul Hwang
- Chonnam National University Medical School, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital; Department of Hematology-Oncology; Hwasun Korea, South
| | | | - Philipp Dahm
- Minneapolis VA Health Care System; Urology Section; One Veterans Drive Mail Code 112D Minneapolis Minnesota USA 55417
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Quhal F, Mori K, Sari Motlagh R, Laukhtina E, Pradere B, Rouprêt M, Necchi A, Moschini M, Shariat SF. Efficacy of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for localized and locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Oncol 2020; 25:1037-1054. [PMID: 32206939 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-020-01650-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The objectives of this study are to evaluate the available literature regarding the oncologic effect of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with clinically non-metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and locally advanced UTUC. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases in November 2019, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We included studies that compared patients with non-metastatic UTUC who received either neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy with patients who underwent surgery alone. Subgroup meta-analyses were also performed for studies that investigated only locally advanced UTUC. Overall, 36 studies were included in the review of which 22 studies and 15,378 patients were eligible for the meta-analysis. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was associated with higher rates of pathological downstaging (pDS) (RR 6.48, 95% CI 2.05-20.44, p = 0.001) and pathological complete response (RR 18.46, 95% CI 3.34-99.24, p = 0.001); and this was also proven in a subgroup analysis of studies that evaluated pDS in locally advanced UTUC (RR 3.18, 95% CI 2.0-5.07, p < 0.001). The association of NAC with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was also statistically significant in all patients and in patients with locally advanced UTUC. Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) was associated with improved metastasis-free survival (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.55-0.76, p < 0.001) and CSS (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.57-0.77, p < 0.001), which continued to be true for the patients with locally advanced UTUC. The association of AC with OS was only significant in patients with locally advanced UTUC. Perioperative chemotherapy might provide better survival outcomes in patients with clinically non-metastatic UTUC treated with radical nephroureterectomy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy seems to have promising results, although high level of evidence is still lacking. Despite the low level, the body of evidence suggests a need for multimodal therapy of invasive UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Urology Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
- European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jiang Y, Yao Z, Zhu X, Wu B, Bai S. Risk factors and oncological outcome for intravesical recurrence in organ-confined upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients after radical nephroureterectomy: A propensity score-matched case control study. Int J Surg 2020; 76:28-34. [PMID: 32081714 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2019] [Revised: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the primary treatment strategy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); however, the prognosis is poor and recurrences are common. The risk factors for intravesical recurrence (IVR) remain inconsistent and unclear. Thus, we have identified the risk factors for IVR in patients with organ-confined UTUC. METHODS We retrospectively studied 229 patients with UTUC who underwent RNU combined with bladder cuff resection at our center between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2015. After propensity score-matching, 204 patients were included in our study. Patient demographics, co-morbidities, and peri-operative data were recorded. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression were used to estimate the hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals. Overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were measured using the Kaplan-Meier curve with a log-rank test. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS Of the 229 patients, 42 (18.3%) had IVR after 40 months (range, 24-56 months) follow-up. In the matched group, the independent risk factors for IVR were tumor diameter (HR = 2.690, p = 0.038) and tumor stage (T3 vs. T1, HR = 3.363, p = 0.019; T2 vs. T1, HR = 2.835, p = 0.022). OS and CSS were poor in patients with IVR than patients without IVR (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS In this propensity score-matched case-control study, tumor diameter and tumor stage were shown to be independent risk factors for IVR in patients with organ-confined UTUC. Moreover, patients with IVR had poor prognosis than patients without IVR. Thus, more active postoperative surveillance and treatment strategies should be adopted for these patients, which may help improve treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunzhong Jiang
- Department of Urology, ShengJing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China.
| | - Zichuan Yao
- Department of Urology, ShengJing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China.
| | - Xianqing Zhu
- Department of Urology, ShengJing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China.
| | - Bin Wu
- Department of Urology, ShengJing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China.
| | - Song Bai
- Department of Urology, ShengJing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Song W, Jeong JY, Jeon HG, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Choi HY, Lee HM, Sung HH. Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for patients with pT3NanyM0 upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2019; 66:12-17. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2018] [Revised: 04/16/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
11
|
Survival Effect of Chemotherapy in Metastatic Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2019; 17:e97-e103. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Revised: 09/08/2018] [Accepted: 09/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
12
|
Chang YH, Hsiao PJ, Chen GH, Lin CC, Chang CH, Wu HC, Huang CP, Yang CR, Yeh SP. Outcomes of stage II-IV upper-tract urothelial carcinoma and adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cancer. Oncol Lett 2019; 17:1341-1348. [PMID: 30655904 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.9672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2016] [Accepted: 10/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The present retrospective study aimed to examine the outcomes of stage II-IV upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy is a beneficial treatment for patients with locally advanced UTUC (specifically, stage III-IV). The analysis included 126 patients with muscle-invasive UTUC who were treated between June 2003 and June 2012. All patients underwent laparoscopic or open nephroureterectomy and bladder cuff excision. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) were assessed. Outcomes were compared between groups of patients with stage II (high-stage localized) disease, stage III-IV (high-stage locally advanced) disease treated with chemotherapy, and stage III-IV disease not treated with chemotherapy. Among patients with high-stage locally advanced UTUC (stage III-IV), those who received adjuvant chemotherapy had significantly better rates of OS (67.1 vs. 33.7%; P=0.004), DFS (70.2 vs. 46.0%; P=0.030) and DMFS (86.3 vs. 65.2%; P=0.048) at 5-years compared with those who did not undergo adjuvant chemotherapy. However, there was no significant difference between the 5-year LRFS rates in these two groups (78.2 vs. 62.5%; P=0.525). Importantly, the survival curve of patients with high-stage UTUC who received adjuvant chemotherapy was similar to that of patients with low-stage UTUC who underwent surgery only. Multivariate analysis revealed that adjuvant chemotherapy was an independent risk factor for OS [without adjuvant chemotherapy vs. with adjuvant chemotherapy: Hazard ratio (HR), 0.29; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.129-0.654; P=0.003] and DFS (without adjuvant chemotherapy vs. with adjuvant chemotherapy: HR, 0.381; 95% CI, 0.168-0.865; P=0.021). In conclusion, adjuvant chemotherapy may improve the outcome for patients with high-stage locally advanced UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Huei Chang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 40447, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Po-Jen Hsiao
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 40447, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Guang-Heng Chen
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 40447, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Ching-Chan Lin
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 40447, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Chao-Hsiang Chang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 40447, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Hsi-Chin Wu
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 40447, Taiwan, R.O.C.,Department of Urology, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, Beigang 651, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Chi-Ping Huang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 40447, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Chi-Rei Yang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 40447, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Su-Peng Yeh
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 40447, Taiwan, R.O.C
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nazzani S, Preisser F, Mazzone E, Tian Z, Mistretta FA, Shariat SF, Soulières D, Saad F, Montanari E, Luzzago S, Briganti A, Carmignani L, Karakiewicz PI. Survival effect of perioperative systemic chemotherapy on overall mortality in locally advanced and/or positive regional lymph node non-metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. World J Urol 2018; 37:1329-1337. [PMID: 30298285 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2516-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2018] [Accepted: 10/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To analyze the potential survival benefit of perioperative chemotherapy (CHT) in patients treated with nephroureterectomy (NU) for non-metastatic locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma. METHODS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2014), we identified 1286 patients with T3 or T4, N 0-3 M0 UTUC. Kaplan-Meier plots, as well as multivariable Cox regression models (MCRMs) relying on inverse probability after treatment weighting (IPTW) and landmark analyses, were used to test the effect of CHT vs no CHT on overall mortality (OM) in the overall population (n =1286), as well as after stratification according to lymph node invasion (LNI). RESULTS Overall, 37.4% patients received CHT. The CHT rate was higher with LNI (62.2% vs 35.2%, p < 0.001). In MCRMs, testing for OM in the overall population, CHT was associated with lower rates of OM (HR 0.71, CI 0.58-0.87; p = 0.001). Similarly, in MCRMs testing for OM in patients with LNI, CHT achieved independent predictor status for lower OM (HR 0.61, CI 0.48-0.78; p < 0.001). Conversely, in MCRMs testing for OM in patients without LNI, no CHT effect was recorded (HR 0.72, CI 0.52-1.01; p = 0.05). All results were confirmed after IPTW adjustment and in landmark analyses. CONCLUSIONS Our results represent a contemporary North American report indicating lower OM after CHT for patients with locally advanced non-metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma, specifically in patients with T3-T4, N1-N3, M0 disease. Validation of the current and of the previous study is required within a randomized prospective design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiano Nazzani
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada. .,Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada. .,Academic Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Corso San Gottardo 12, Milano MI, Italy.
| | - Felix Preisser
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.,Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.,Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | - Denis Soulières
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Emanuele Montanari
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Academic Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Corso San Gottardo 12, Milano MI, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ikeda M, Matsumoto K, Hirayama T, Koguchi D, Murakami Y, Matsuda D, Okuno N, Utsunomiya T, Taoka Y, Irie A, Iwamura M. Selected High-Risk Patients With Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With Radical Nephroureterectomy for Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2018; 16:e669-e675. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2017] [Revised: 10/21/2017] [Accepted: 10/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
15
|
Gregg RW, Vera-Badillo FE, Booth CM, Mahmud A, Brundage M, Leveridge MJ, Hanna TP. Perioperative chemotherapy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2018; 128:58-64. [PMID: 29958631 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2017] [Revised: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 05/09/2018] [Indexed: 10/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Upper tract urothelial carcinomas are rare malignancies with differences in anatomy and biology requiring therapeutic strategies that differ from bladder cancer. The role of perioperative systemic therapy in this disease remains uncertain with limited data to support its use. A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis was therefore undertaken to provide more information and guide clinical practice. METHODS A literature search was performed using Embase and Medline databases with additional searches performed manually using terms associated with upper tract urothelial malignancies. Data was extracted from studies of patients that underwent nephrouretectomy for the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma and received either neoadjuvant or adjuvant systemic therapy. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were summated and analyzed using Cochrane Revman software Version 5.3. RESULTS There were 13 comparative studies and no randomized studies identified for data extraction; 11 adjuvant and 2 neoadjuvant with 1170 patients receiving perioperative systemic therapy and 3472 controls that did not. Perioperative chemotherapy was associated with improved OS (HR 0.75, 95%CI 0.57-0.99), DFS (HR 0.54, 95%CI 0.32-0.92), and CSS (HR 0.69, 95%CI 0.42-1.15). CONCLUSIONS The available data suggests that perioperative systemic therapy is associated with improved survival in patients with upper tract urothelial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard W Gregg
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Canada; Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Canada.
| | - Francisco E Vera-Badillo
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Canada; Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Canada; Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Canada
| | - Christopher M Booth
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Canada; Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Canada; Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Canada
| | - Aamer Mahmud
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Canada; Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Brundage
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Canada; Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Canada; Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Canada
| | - Michael J Leveridge
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Canada; Department of Urology, Queen's University, Canada
| | - Timothy P Hanna
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Canada; Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Canada; Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yang X, Li P, Deng X, Dong H, Cheng Y, Zhang X, Yang C, Tang J, Yuan W, Xu X, Tao J, Li P, Yang H, Lu Q, Gu M, Wang Z. Perioperative treatments for resected upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a network meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2018; 8:3568-3580. [PMID: 27683040 PMCID: PMC5356904 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2015] [Accepted: 09/20/2016] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative treatments have been used to improve prognosis in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). However, optimal management remains unestablished. METHODS We searched the Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane databases for studies published before June 20, 2015. All included studies were categorised into three groups on the basis of the outcome reported (overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS)). Relative hazard ratios (HRs) for death were calculated using random-effects Bayesian network meta-analysis methods. We also ranked the three different treatments in terms of three outcomes. RESULTS A total of 31 trials with 8100 patients were included. Compared with the control, adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) could improve OS, DSS and RFS by 32% (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51-0.89), 29% (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.54-0.89) and 51% (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.23-0.85), respectively. We noted a marked prolongation of RFS in both intravesical chemotherapy (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.09-0.69) as well as concurrent radiotherapy and intravesical chemotherapy (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.03-0.97) than in the control. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) showed a significant improvement in DSS relative to the control (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.06-0.61) and a distinct advantage over AC (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.08-0.90) or AR (HR 6.89, 95% CI 1.25-18.66). CONCLUSIONS Our results showed that AC; intravesical chemotherapy; and concurrent radiotherapy and intravesical chemotherapy could improve the prognosis of UTUC patients. NAC was found to be more favourable for UTUC than AC in terms of DSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Yang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Peng Li
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaheng Deng
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Hongquan Dong
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yidong Cheng
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaolei Zhang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Chengdi Yang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jingyuan Tang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Wenbo Yuan
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaoting Xu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jun Tao
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Pengchao Li
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Haiwei Yang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Qiang Lu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Min Gu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zengjun Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kim HS, Jeong CW, Kwak C, Kim HH, Ku JH. Association between demographic factors and prognosis in urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2018; 8:7464-7476. [PMID: 27448978 PMCID: PMC5352335 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.10708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2016] [Accepted: 06/06/2016] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
We aimed to assess the prognostic significance of demographic factors, including age, sex, performance status, smoking status, obesity, and race in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy through a systematic review and meta-analysis. We conducted PubMed search for all articles published until December 2014 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Survival outcomes of interest were intravesical recurrence (IVR) free survival, progression free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Seventy-nine studies, including numbers of subjects ranging from 24 to 9899, met the inclusion criteria. Advanced age was significantly associated with worse PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.01] and OS (HR 1.05). The significant predictors of CSS were age (HR 1.02) and performance status (HR 1.35). Female gender (HR 0.81) and smoking (HR 1.38) were the significant predictors only for IVR free survival. No significant associations with survival outcomes were observed in obesity and race. Our study reveals that age is one of the most important demographic predictor of survival in UTUC. Also, male gender, poor performance status, and smoking are also significantly related to worse survival outcomes. However, large well-designed prospective studies are required to investigate the precise prognostic significance of demographics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyung Suk Kim
- Department of Urology, Dongguk University Ilsan Medical Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Chang Wook Jeong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Cheol Kwak
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyeon Hoe Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ja Hyeon Ku
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lee CH, Ku JY, Jeong CW, Ku JH, Kwak C, Kim HH, Tae BS, Choi SH, Kim HT, Kim TH, Kwon TG, Hwang EC, Jung SI, Kang TW, Kwon DD, Ha HK. Predictors for Intravesical Recurrence Following Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A National Multicenter Analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2017; 15:e1055-e1061. [PMID: 28802888 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2017] [Revised: 07/06/2017] [Accepted: 07/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
19
|
Matsubayashi H, Ishiwatari H, Tanaka M, Iwai T, Matsui T, Fujie S, Kakushima N, Ito S, Yamashita R, Abe M, Sasaki K, Ono H. A Rare Case of Ureteral Carcinoma with Recurrence in the Duodenum Requiring Double Stenting. Intern Med 2017; 56:3077-3082. [PMID: 28943567 PMCID: PMC5725864 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.8821-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
A 61-year-old man who had undergone total nephrouretectomy eight months earlier for right ureteral carcinoma was referred for the investigation of elevated serum hepatobiliary enzymes. Computed tomography revealed a small mass invading the lower bile duct. Duodenoscopy revealed a central ulcerative tumor near the major papilla, and a biopsy histologically confirmed metastatic ureteral carcinoma. Endoscopic biliary stenting ameliorated the cholangitis, and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy was initiated. The patient was stable for a year until a duodenal stenosis developed and required duodenal stenting. Endoscopic procedures play important roles in the management of rare metastases to the duodenum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Masaki Tanaka
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Iwai
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Japan
| | - Toru Matsui
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Japan
| | - Shinya Fujie
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Japan
| | | | - Sayo Ito
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Japan
| | | | - Masato Abe
- Division of Pathology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Japan
| | - Keiko Sasaki
- Division of Pathology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ono
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Effects of methotrexate on the quality of oocyte maturation in vitro. EUROPEAN BIOPHYSICS JOURNAL: EBJ 2017; 47:249-260. [DOI: 10.1007/s00249-017-1254-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2016] [Revised: 09/02/2017] [Accepted: 09/11/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
21
|
Cohen A, Kuchta K, Park S. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy use in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2017; 35:322-327. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2016] [Revised: 11/12/2016] [Accepted: 11/29/2016] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|
22
|
Perioperative chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive review. World J Urol 2017; 35:1401-1407. [PMID: 28074261 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1995-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2016] [Accepted: 12/19/2016] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the role of neoadjuvant (NAC) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS A comprehensive review of the current literature was performed searching for all studies investigating NAC and AC in UTUC in MEDLINE and https://clinicaltrials.gov , prior to April 2016. The following keywords were used: "ureteral neoplasms," "urothelium," "ureter," "upper tract urothelial," "chemotherapy," "adjuvant," "neoadjuvant" and relevant variants. RESULTS No randomized trials investigated the role of AC or NAC for UTUC. There was one prospective study with n = 36 patients investigating AC with carboplatin-paclitaxel. We included 14 retrospective studies (four in the NAC and ten in the AC setting), with a total of 694 patients receiving cisplatin-based or non-cisplatin-based AC after RNU and 1437 patients undergoing RNU alone. We found that the current literature, mainly based on retrospective studies, suggests significant overall and cancer-specific survival benefits for AC in UTUC. NAC appears promising, with favorable pathologic response rates up to 14%. CONCLUSIONS Evidence is scarce for both NAC and AC use in UTUC. This comprehensive review suggests promising response rates for NAC and a survival benefit for patients treated with AC. Prospective randomized trials are needed to establish the role of AC and NAC in UTUC.
Collapse
|
23
|
Szarvas T, Módos O, Horváth A, Nyirády P. Why are upper tract urothelial carcinoma two different diseases? Transl Androl Urol 2016; 5:636-647. [PMID: 27785420 PMCID: PMC5071198 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2016.03.23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last few years growing evidence highlighted the differences between upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and urothelial bladder carcinoma (UBC) which cannot be explained solely by their different anatomical location. The aim of this review was to summarize current progress in UTUC research and to underline the differences and similarities between UTUC and UBC by focusing on epidemiology, etiology, staging and risk factors as well as on surgical and medical management. UBC and UTUC sharing common risk factors such as smoking and aromatic amines, while aristolochic acid exposure or familiar Lynch syndrome are rather specific for UTUC. The grading of UBC and UTUC are identical, but inherent from their different anatomical locations, there are some differences between their stage classifications. As an example, in contrast to UBC where a clear recommendation for pT3 subclassification exists, in UTUC current research aims to define an adequate subclassification for pelvic pT3 cases aiming to provide a better risk stratification. The primary treatment for both UBC and UTUC is surgery. Similarly to UBC, UTUC patients at high risk of disease progression are treated by radical surgery. However, because of the inaccurate preoperative or transurethral staging of UTUC, many radical nephroureterectomies are performed unnecessarily. Preoperative prediction of pathological stage or patients' prognosis may reduce this overtreatment by selecting patients for nephron-sparing surgery. To this end, predictive models combining histological and molecular features together with imaging data may be used. The antegrade or retrograde instillation of BCG or mitomycin C, as topical agents is feasible after conservative treatment of UTUC or for the treatment of CIS. However, the prognostic significance of lymph node positivity in UTUC seems to be similar to that of UBC, the therapeutic benefit of lymph node dissection (LND) in UTUC has not been firmly established yet. In addition, the number of lymph nodes to be removed and the sequence of lymphadenectomy also remain to be defined. Systemic neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapies appear to have beneficial effect on UTUC survival, however, this has to be confirmed by large prospective studies. Due to the intensive research of the last few years, our knowledge on UTUC has been largely improved, but many questions remained to be answered. Further research on the molecular background of UTUC holds the potential to identify prognostic or predictive markers which, together with imaging and histologic data, may help to overcome the inaccuracy of ureteroscopic endoscopy and may therefore help to improve therapeutic decision-making. Further, prospective studies should confirm the benefit of LND and adjuvant chemotherapy. Considering the low incidence of UTUC, conduction of such studies is difficult and may only be performed in a multicenter setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tibor Szarvas
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; ; Department of Urology, University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Orsolya Módos
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - András Horváth
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Péter Nyirády
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ide H, Kikuchi E, Hagiwara M, Hayakawa N, Hongo H, Miyajima A, Oya M. Urinary pH Levels are Strongly Associated with Bladder Recurrence After Nephroureterectomy in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Patients with a Smoking History. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23:1029-1038. [PMID: 27613550 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5555-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Aromatic amines, well-known bladder carcinogens, derived from cigarette smoke are activated by acidic urine. We herein determined whether urinary pH levels are associated with bladder recurrence in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients with a positive smoking history. METHODS A total of 256 upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients who were surgically treated at our institution between 1990 and 2013 were included. Urinary pH levels were defined as the median of at least two consecutive measurements within 1 month of surgery. RESULTS Ninety-six patients (37.5 %) had pH <5.5 and 160 (62.5 %) had pH ≥5.5, and urinary pH levels were identified as one of the significant predictors for bladder recurrence in univariate but not multivariate Cox regression analysis in overall. In patients with a positive smoking history among those without a history of bladder tumor (N = 110), the 5-year bladder recurrence-free survival rate was 52.5 % in patients with pH ≥5.5, which was significantly higher than that in those with pH <5.5 (25.9 %, p = 0.032). In the multivariate analysis, urinary pH <5.5 (p = 0.022, HR; 1.86) was independently associated with bladder recurrence. No significant difference for bladder recurrence was observed between these two groups in patients with no smoking history among them. CONCLUSIONS Urinary pH <5.5 is associated with an increased risk of bladder recurrence in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients with a positive smoking history among those without a history of bladder tumor. Modifications to pH for urine alkalization may prevent bladder recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki Ide
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eiji Kikuchi
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Masayuki Hagiwara
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nozomi Hayakawa
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Hongo
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Miyajima
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mototsugu Oya
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Miyake M, Tatsumi Y, Fujimoto K, Nagao K, Sakano S, Matsuyama H, Inamoto T, Azuma H, Yasumoto H, Shiina H. Changes in oncological outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma treated in the last two decades: a retrospective analysis based on a multicenter collaborative study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2016; 46:1148-1155. [PMID: 27576438 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyw128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2016] [Revised: 08/10/2016] [Accepted: 08/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We investigated chronological changes in the outcomes of patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma treated in the past two decades, during which there was an important change in treatment paradigm. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted of 1180 urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy in multicenter collaborative institutions between 1996 and 2015. The patients were divided into four groups according to the year when radical nephroureterectomy was performed, as follows: 1996-2000 (period 1; P1), 2001-05 (P2), 2006-10 (P3) and 2011-15 (P4). Variables including tumor grade, T and N categories, administration of perioperative chemotherapy and treatment outcomes were compared among the four groups. RESULTS There were 146 (12%), 312 (27%), 459 (39%) and 263 (22%) patients in the P1, P2, P3 and P4 groups, respectively. The proportion of patients harboring pT2/3 and Grade 3 tumors increased gradually from 42% (P1) to 58% (P4) and from 49% (P1) to 65% (P4), respectively. The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 74%, 74%, 73% and 75%, and the 5-year overall survival rates were 74%, 65%, 67% and 72% for the P1, P2, P3, and P4 groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis with adjustment for possible confounding factors revealed no significant differences in disease-specific survival, overall survival or intravesical recurrence-free survival among the four groups. CONCLUSIONS Despite advances in diagnostic instruments, surgery and systemic chemotherapy, the clinical outcome of urinary tract urothelial carcinoma after radical surgery has not significantly improved over the last two decades, and further research is therefore required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makito Miyake
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara
| | | | | | - Kazuhiro Nagao
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi
| | - Shigeru Sakano
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi
| | - Hideyasu Matsuyama
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi
| | - Teruo Inamoto
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka
| | - Haruhito Azuma
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka
| | - Hiroaki Yasumoto
- Department of Urology, Shimane University School of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Shiina
- Department of Urology, Shimane University School of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kim HS, Lee JS, Jeong CW, Kwak C, Kim HH, Ku JH. Adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: updated results of the Seoul National University Hospital experience. Int Braz J Urol 2016; 41:1067-79. [PMID: 26742963 PMCID: PMC4756931 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2015.0009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2015] [Accepted: 05/04/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study was to update the long-term outcome in the treatment of locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) regarding the role of adjuvant chemotherapy. Materials and methods: Clinical data from 138 patients who underwent RNU for locally advanced UTUC (pT3/4 or pN+) were analyzed. Results: The adjuvant chemotherapy group comprised 66 patients, and other 72 patients did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy was the most common regimen, depending on the patient's eligibility and renal function. The median follow-up period was 48.7 months (interquartile range: 29.2-96.9 months). The 3-and 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were 76.0% and 69.9% for the non-adjuvant chemotherapy group versus 74.6% and 54.5% for the adjuvant chemotherapy group (p=0.301, log-rank test). Overall survival (OS) rates for the same time period were 70.1% and 62.9% for the non-adjuvant chemotherapy group versus 73.8% and 53.2% for the adjuvant chemotherapy group (p=0.931, log-rank test). On multivariate analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy could not predict DSS and OS after surgery. When patients who received cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy (n=59) were compared to those who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, similar results were found. Conclusions: There does not appear to be a significant DSS or OS benefit associated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Prospective randomized clinical trials are necessary to verify the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on locally advanced UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyung Suk Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joong Sub Lee
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Wook Jeong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Cheol Kwak
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyeon Hoe Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ja Hyeon Ku
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Koie T, Ohyama C, Fujimoto H, Nishiyama H, Miyazaki J, Hinotsu S, Kikuchi E, Sakura M, Inokuchi J, Hara T, Ohyama C, Nishiyama H, Fujisawa M, Uemura H, Fujimoto H, Suzuki K, Eto M, Hara I, Matsubara A, Nonomura N, Nakanishi H, Koie T, Kanayama H, Miki T, Fukumori T, Naito S. Diversity in treatment modalities of Stage II/III urothelial cancer in Japan: sub-analysis of the multi-institutional national database of the Japanese Urological Association. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2016; 46:468-74. [PMID: 26851754 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyw005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2015] [Accepted: 01/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to survey treatment modalities for the patients with Stage II/III urothelial cancer in Japan. METHODS We used the multi-institutional national database of the Japanese Urological Association from 348 Japanese institutions, in which a total of 3707 patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer and 1538 with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma were registered in 2008 and 2011, respectively. Primary treatment was classified as surgery alone, surgery with chemotherapy, surgery with radiation, radiation alone, chemotherapy alone, combination of radiation and chemotherapy and observation. Overall and cancer-specific survivals were examined using the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival in the subgroups was analyzed using the log-rank test. RESULTS In Stage II/III bladder cancer patients, 49.7% of those were treated with radical operation and 22.3% received observation only. A total 97.2% of Stage II/III upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with radical surgery. A total 30.4% of Stage II/III bladder cancer patients received chemotherapy. Majority of the patients received cisplatin-based regimen, however, regimens of chemotherapy was rich in variety up to 13 regimens. Chemotherapy regimens for the patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma were also various up to eight regimens. Overall and cancer-specific survivals were statistically significantly stratified according to the clinical stage. The upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients diagnosed with clinical stage T3 had significantly poor prognosis compared with those diagnosed with clinical stage T2. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated the variety of treatments used for Japanese patients with Stage II/III urothelial cancer. Treatment standardization for these entities may be necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takuya Koie
- Working Group of the Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) Registration Committee of the Japanese Urological Association Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Aomori
| | - Chikara Ohyama
- Working Group of the Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) Registration Committee of the Japanese Urological Association Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Aomori
| | - Hiroyuki Fujimoto
- Working Group of the Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) Registration Committee of the Japanese Urological Association Urology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo
| | - Hiroyuki Nishiyama
- Working Group of the Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) Registration Committee of the Japanese Urological Association Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki
| | - Jun Miyazaki
- Working Group of the Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) Registration Committee of the Japanese Urological Association Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki
| | - Shiro Hinotsu
- Working Group of the Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) Registration Committee of the Japanese Urological Association Center for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama
| | - Eiji Kikuchi
- Working Group of the Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) Registration Committee of the Japanese Urological Association Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo
| | - Mizuaki Sakura
- Working Group of the Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) Registration Committee of the Japanese Urological Association Department of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation of Cancer Research, Tokyo
| | - Junichi Inokuchi
- Working Group of the Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) Registration Committee of the Japanese Urological Association Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tomohiko Hara
- Working Group of the Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) Registration Committee of the Japanese Urological Association Urology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Fujita K, Inamoto T, Yamamoto Y, Tanigawa G, Nakayama M, Mori N, Tsujihata M, Azuma H, Nonomura N, Uemura M. Role of adjuvant chemotherapy for lymph node-positive upper tract urothelial carcinoma and the prognostic significance of C-reactive protein: A multi-institutional, retrospective study. Int J Urol 2015; 22:1006-12. [DOI: 10.1111/iju.12868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2015] [Accepted: 06/10/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kazutoshi Fujita
- Department of Urology; Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine; Suita Osaka Japan
| | - Teruo Inamoto
- Department of Urology; Osaka Medical College; Takatsuki Osaka Japan
| | | | - Go Tanigawa
- Department of Urology; Osaka General Medical Center; Osaka Japan
| | - Masashi Nakayama
- Department of Urology; Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases; Osaka Japan
| | - Naoki Mori
- Department of Urology; Sumitomo Hospital; Osaka Japan
| | - Masao Tsujihata
- Department of Urology; Osaka Rosai Hospital; Sakai Osaka Japan
| | - Haruhito Azuma
- Department of Urology; Osaka Medical College; Takatsuki Osaka Japan
| | - Norio Nonomura
- Department of Urology; Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine; Suita Osaka Japan
| | - Motohide Uemura
- Department of Urology; Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine; Suita Osaka Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Shirotake S, Kikuchi E, Tanaka N, Matsumoto K, Miyazaki Y, Kobayashi H, Ide H, Obata J, Hoshino K, Kaneko G, Hagiwara M, Kosaka T, Kanao K, Kodaira K, Hara S, Oyama M, Momma T, Miyajima A, Nakagawa K, Hasegawa S, Nakajima Y, Oya M. Impact of an Adjuvant Chemotherapeutic Regimen on the Clinical Outcome in High Risk Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Japanese Multi-Institution Experience. J Urol 2015; 193:1122-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/07/2014] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Suguru Shirotake
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine (SS, EK, NT, KM, YM, HK, HI, JO, KH, GK, MH, TK, KK, AM, MO), Tokyo, Japan
- Saiseikai Central Hospital (KM), Tokyo, Japan
- Kyosai Tachikawa Hospital (HK), Tokyo, Japan
- Kawasaki City Hospital (GK, SH), Tokyo, Japan
- Musashino Yowakai Hospital (NT), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eiji Kikuchi
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine (SS, EK, NT, KM, YM, HK, HI, JO, KH, GK, MH, TK, KK, AM, MO), Tokyo, Japan
- Saiseikai Central Hospital (KM), Tokyo, Japan
- Kyosai Tachikawa Hospital (HK), Tokyo, Japan
- Kawasaki City Hospital (GK, SH), Tokyo, Japan
- Musashino Yowakai Hospital (NT), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine (SS, EK, NT, KM, YM, HK, HI, JO, KH, GK, MH, TK, KK, AM, MO), Tokyo, Japan
- Saiseikai Central Hospital (KM), Tokyo, Japan
- Kyosai Tachikawa Hospital (HK), Tokyo, Japan
- Kawasaki City Hospital (GK, SH), Tokyo, Japan
- Musashino Yowakai Hospital (NT), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Matsumoto
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine (SS, EK, NT, KM, YM, HK, HI, JO, KH, GK, MH, TK, KK, AM, MO), Tokyo, Japan
- Saiseikai Central Hospital (KM), Tokyo, Japan
- Kyosai Tachikawa Hospital (HK), Tokyo, Japan
- Kawasaki City Hospital (GK, SH), Tokyo, Japan
- Musashino Yowakai Hospital (NT), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasumasa Miyazaki
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine (SS, EK, NT, KM, YM, HK, HI, JO, KH, GK, MH, TK, KK, AM, MO), Tokyo, Japan
- Saiseikai Central Hospital (KM), Tokyo, Japan
- Kyosai Tachikawa Hospital (HK), Tokyo, Japan
- Kawasaki City Hospital (GK, SH), Tokyo, Japan
- Musashino Yowakai Hospital (NT), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine (SS, EK, NT, KM, YM, HK, HI, JO, KH, GK, MH, TK, KK, AM, MO), Tokyo, Japan
- Saiseikai Central Hospital (KM), Tokyo, Japan
- Kyosai Tachikawa Hospital (HK), Tokyo, Japan
- Kawasaki City Hospital (GK, SH), Tokyo, Japan
- Musashino Yowakai Hospital (NT), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Ide
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine (SS, EK, NT, KM, YM, HK, HI, JO, KH, GK, MH, TK, KK, AM, MO), Tokyo, Japan
- Saiseikai Central Hospital (KM), Tokyo, Japan
- Kyosai Tachikawa Hospital (HK), Tokyo, Japan
- Kawasaki City Hospital (GK, SH), Tokyo, Japan
- Musashino Yowakai Hospital (NT), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Obata
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine (SS, EK, NT, KM, YM, HK, HI, JO, KH, GK, MH, TK, KK, AM, MO), Tokyo, Japan
- Saiseikai Central Hospital (KM), Tokyo, Japan
- Kyosai Tachikawa Hospital (HK), Tokyo, Japan
- Kawasaki City Hospital (GK, SH), Tokyo, Japan
- Musashino Yowakai Hospital (NT), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Katsura Hoshino
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine (SS, EK, NT, KM, YM, HK, HI, JO, KH, GK, MH, TK, KK, AM, MO), Tokyo, Japan
- Saiseikai Central Hospital (KM), Tokyo, Japan
- Kyosai Tachikawa Hospital (HK), Tokyo, Japan
- Kawasaki City Hospital (GK, SH), Tokyo, Japan
- Musashino Yowakai Hospital (NT), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Gou Kaneko
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine (SS, EK, NT, KM, YM, HK, HI, JO, KH, GK, MH, TK, KK, AM, MO), Tokyo, Japan
- Saiseikai Central Hospital (KM), Tokyo, Japan
- Kyosai Tachikawa Hospital (HK), Tokyo, Japan
- Kawasaki City Hospital (GK, SH), Tokyo, Japan
- Musashino Yowakai Hospital (NT), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masayuki Hagiwara
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine (SS, EK, NT, KM, YM, HK, HI, JO, KH, GK, MH, TK, KK, AM, MO), Tokyo, Japan
- Saiseikai Central Hospital (KM), Tokyo, Japan
- Kyosai Tachikawa Hospital (HK), Tokyo, Japan
- Kawasaki City Hospital (GK, SH), Tokyo, Japan
- Musashino Yowakai Hospital (NT), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeo Kosaka
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine (SS, EK, NT, KM, YM, HK, HI, JO, KH, GK, MH, TK, KK, AM, MO), Tokyo, Japan
- Saiseikai Central Hospital (KM), Tokyo, Japan
- Kyosai Tachikawa Hospital (HK), Tokyo, Japan
- Kawasaki City Hospital (GK, SH), Tokyo, Japan
- Musashino Yowakai Hospital (NT), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kent Kanao
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine (SS, EK, NT, KM, YM, HK, HI, JO, KH, GK, MH, TK, KK, AM, MO), Tokyo, Japan
- Saiseikai Central Hospital (KM), Tokyo, Japan
- Kyosai Tachikawa Hospital (HK), Tokyo, Japan
- Kawasaki City Hospital (GK, SH), Tokyo, Japan
- Musashino Yowakai Hospital (NT), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kiichiro Kodaira
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine (SS, EK, NT, KM, YM, HK, HI, JO, KH, GK, MH, TK, KK, AM, MO), Tokyo, Japan
- Saiseikai Central Hospital (KM), Tokyo, Japan
- Kyosai Tachikawa Hospital (HK), Tokyo, Japan
- Kawasaki City Hospital (GK, SH), Tokyo, Japan
- Musashino Yowakai Hospital (NT), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Hara
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine (SS, EK, NT, KM, YM, HK, HI, JO, KH, GK, MH, TK, KK, AM, MO), Tokyo, Japan
- Saiseikai Central Hospital (KM), Tokyo, Japan
- Kyosai Tachikawa Hospital (HK), Tokyo, Japan
- Kawasaki City Hospital (GK, SH), Tokyo, Japan
- Musashino Yowakai Hospital (NT), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masafumi Oyama
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine (SS, EK, NT, KM, YM, HK, HI, JO, KH, GK, MH, TK, KK, AM, MO), Tokyo, Japan
- Saiseikai Central Hospital (KM), Tokyo, Japan
- Kyosai Tachikawa Hospital (HK), Tokyo, Japan
- Kawasaki City Hospital (GK, SH), Tokyo, Japan
- Musashino Yowakai Hospital (NT), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Momma
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine (SS, EK, NT, KM, YM, HK, HI, JO, KH, GK, MH, TK, KK, AM, MO), Tokyo, Japan
- Saiseikai Central Hospital (KM), Tokyo, Japan
- Kyosai Tachikawa Hospital (HK), Tokyo, Japan
- Kawasaki City Hospital (GK, SH), Tokyo, Japan
- Musashino Yowakai Hospital (NT), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Miyajima
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine (SS, EK, NT, KM, YM, HK, HI, JO, KH, GK, MH, TK, KK, AM, MO), Tokyo, Japan
- Saiseikai Central Hospital (KM), Tokyo, Japan
- Kyosai Tachikawa Hospital (HK), Tokyo, Japan
- Kawasaki City Hospital (GK, SH), Tokyo, Japan
- Musashino Yowakai Hospital (NT), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ken Nakagawa
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine (SS, EK, NT, KM, YM, HK, HI, JO, KH, GK, MH, TK, KK, AM, MO), Tokyo, Japan
- Saiseikai Central Hospital (KM), Tokyo, Japan
- Kyosai Tachikawa Hospital (HK), Tokyo, Japan
- Kawasaki City Hospital (GK, SH), Tokyo, Japan
- Musashino Yowakai Hospital (NT), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shintaro Hasegawa
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine (SS, EK, NT, KM, YM, HK, HI, JO, KH, GK, MH, TK, KK, AM, MO), Tokyo, Japan
- Saiseikai Central Hospital (KM), Tokyo, Japan
- Kyosai Tachikawa Hospital (HK), Tokyo, Japan
- Kawasaki City Hospital (GK, SH), Tokyo, Japan
- Musashino Yowakai Hospital (NT), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yosuke Nakajima
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine (SS, EK, NT, KM, YM, HK, HI, JO, KH, GK, MH, TK, KK, AM, MO), Tokyo, Japan
- Saiseikai Central Hospital (KM), Tokyo, Japan
- Kyosai Tachikawa Hospital (HK), Tokyo, Japan
- Kawasaki City Hospital (GK, SH), Tokyo, Japan
- Musashino Yowakai Hospital (NT), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mototsugu Oya
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine (SS, EK, NT, KM, YM, HK, HI, JO, KH, GK, MH, TK, KK, AM, MO), Tokyo, Japan
- Saiseikai Central Hospital (KM), Tokyo, Japan
- Kyosai Tachikawa Hospital (HK), Tokyo, Japan
- Kawasaki City Hospital (GK, SH), Tokyo, Japan
- Musashino Yowakai Hospital (NT), Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lucca I, Leow JJ, Shariat SF, Chang SL. Diagnosis and Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2015; 29:271-88, ix. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2014.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
31
|
A contemporary review of management and prognostic factors of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev 2015; 41:310-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2014] [Revised: 02/09/2015] [Accepted: 02/11/2015] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|
32
|
Gustin P, Yossi S, Lafont M, Peyraga G, Trémolières P, Rousseau D, Cellier P, Paumier A, Martin F, Chapet O, Mesgouez-Nebout N. [Use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract]. Cancer Radiother 2015; 19:120-6. [PMID: 25770883 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2014.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2014] [Revised: 10/22/2014] [Accepted: 11/12/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract are rare entities. Surgery remains the mainstay of the management. The use of others therapeutic modalities is not clearly defined yet. However, the frequency of local recurrence and locoregional encourage us to evaluate the indication of adjuvant therapies. We conducted a synthesis of key data in the literature on the use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis and ureter. A literature search on PubMed was performed using the following keywords (MeSH) "urothelial carcinoma", "upper urinary tract", "radiation", "chemotherapy", and adjuvant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Gustin
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, site Paul-Papin, 2, rue Moll, 49000 Angers, France.
| | - S Yossi
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, site Paul-Papin, 2, rue Moll, 49000 Angers, France
| | - M Lafont
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, site Paul-Papin, 2, rue Moll, 49000 Angers, France
| | - G Peyraga
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, site Paul-Papin, 2, rue Moll, 49000 Angers, France
| | - P Trémolières
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, site Paul-Papin, 2, rue Moll, 49000 Angers, France
| | - D Rousseau
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, site Paul-Papin, 2, rue Moll, 49000 Angers, France
| | - P Cellier
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, site Paul-Papin, 2, rue Moll, 49000 Angers, France
| | - A Paumier
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, site Paul-Papin, 2, rue Moll, 49000 Angers, France
| | - F Martin
- Service d'urologie, CHU d'Angers, 4, rue Larrey, 49933 Angers cedex 9, France
| | - O Chapet
- Département de radiothérapie, centre hospitalier Lyon-Sud, hospices civils de Lyon, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - N Mesgouez-Nebout
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, site Paul-Papin, 2, rue Moll, 49000 Angers, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Audenet F, Rouprêt M, Houédé N, Colin P. Traitements non chirurgicaux des tumeurs de la voie excrétrice supérieure : état-de-l’art pour le rapport annuel de l’Association française d’urologie. Prog Urol 2014; 24:1030-40. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2014.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2014] [Revised: 06/27/2014] [Accepted: 07/06/2014] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
34
|
Risk factors for intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A meta-analysis1These authors equally dedicated to this article. Urol Oncol 2014; 32:989-1002. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2013] [Revised: 01/06/2014] [Accepted: 01/24/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
35
|
Oya M, Kikuchi E. Evidenced-based clinical practice guideline for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (summary--Japanese Urological Association, 2014 edition). Int J Urol 2014; 22:3-13. [PMID: 25243652 DOI: 10.1111/iju.12630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2014] [Accepted: 08/28/2014] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma is more rare than bladder cancer, although they are both categorized as urothelial carcinoma. Because of the low incidence, little clinical evidence is available regarding the treatment of the former. However, recently such evidence has slowly begun to accumulate. The guideline presented herein was compiled for the purpose of ensuring proper diagnosis and treatment by physicians involved in the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. We carefully selected 16 clinical questions essential for daily clinical practice and grouped them into four major categories: epidemiology, diagnosis, surgery and systemic chemotherapy/other matters. Related literature was searched using PubMed and Japan Medical Abstracts Society databases for articles published between 1987 and 2013. If the judgment was made on the basis of insufficient or inadequate evidence, the grade of recommendation was determined on the basis of committee discussions and resultant consensus statements. Here, we present a short English version of the original guideline, and overview its key clinical issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mototsugu Oya
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Chiu SC, Huang SY, Chang SF, Chen SP, Chen CC, Lin TH, Liu HH, Tsai TH, Lee SS, Pang CY, Hsieh TF. Potential therapeutic roles of tanshinone IIA in human bladder cancer cells. Int J Mol Sci 2014; 15:15622-37. [PMID: 25192287 PMCID: PMC4200770 DOI: 10.3390/ijms150915622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2014] [Revised: 08/15/2014] [Accepted: 08/19/2014] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Tanshinone IIA (Tan-IIA), one of the major lipophilic components isolated from the root of Salviae Miltiorrhizae, has been found to exhibit anticancer activity in various cancer cells. We have demonstrated that Tan-IIA induces apoptosis in several human cancer cells through caspase- and mitochondria-dependent pathways. Here we explored the anticancer effect of Tan-IIA in human bladder cancer cell lines. Our results showed that Tan-IIA caused bladder cancer cell death in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Tan-IIA induced apoptosis through the mitochondria-dependent pathway in these bladder cancer cells. Tan-IIA also suppressed the migration of bladder cancer cells as revealed by the wound healing and transwell assays. Finally, combination therapy of Tan-IIA with a lower dose of cisplatin successfully killed bladder cancer cells, suggesting that Tan-IIA can serve as a potential anti-cancer agent in bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheng-Chun Chiu
- Department of Research, Taichung Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, No. 88, Section 1, Fengxing Road, Tanzi Dist., Taichung 427, Taiwan.
| | - Sung-Ying Huang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, No. 690, Section 2, Guangfu Road, East Dist., Hsinchu 30071, Taiwan.
| | - Shu-Fang Chang
- Department of Research, Taichung Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, No. 88, Section 1, Fengxing Road, Tanzi Dist., Taichung 427, Taiwan.
| | - Shee-Ping Chen
- Tzu Chi Stem Cells Center, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, No. 707, Section 3, Chung-Yang Road, Hualien 970, Taiwan.
| | - Chi-Cheng Chen
- Department of Urology, Taichung Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, No. 88, Section 1, Fengxing Road, Tanzi Dist., Taichung 427, Taiwan.
| | - Tien-Huang Lin
- Department of Urology, Taichung Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, No. 88, Section 1, Fengxing Road, Tanzi Dist., Taichung 427, Taiwan.
| | - Hsin-Ho Liu
- Department of Urology, Taichung Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, No. 88, Section 1, Fengxing Road, Tanzi Dist., Taichung 427, Taiwan.
| | - Tsung-Hsun Tsai
- Department of Urology, Taichung Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, No. 88, Section 1, Fengxing Road, Tanzi Dist., Taichung 427, Taiwan.
| | - Shang-Sen Lee
- Department of Urology, Taichung Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, No. 88, Section 1, Fengxing Road, Tanzi Dist., Taichung 427, Taiwan.
| | - Cheng-Yoong Pang
- Department of Medical Research, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, No. 707, Section 3, Chung-Yang Road, Hualien 970, Taiwan.
| | - Teng-Fu Hsieh
- Department of Urology, Taichung Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, No. 88, Section 1, Fengxing Road, Tanzi Dist., Taichung 427, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Leow JJ, Martin-Doyle W, Fay AP, Choueiri TK, Chang SL, Bellmunt J. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol 2014; 66:529-41. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 194] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2014] [Accepted: 03/04/2014] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
|
38
|
Nomogram predicting renal insufficiency after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma in the Chinese population: exclusion of ineligible candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2014; 2014:529186. [PMID: 25180185 PMCID: PMC4142385 DOI: 10.1155/2014/529186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2014] [Revised: 06/26/2014] [Accepted: 07/16/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report the decline of renal function after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients and to develop a nomogram to predict ineligibility for cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 606 consecutive Chinese UTUC patients treated by RNU from 2000 to 2010. We chose an eGFR of 60 and 45 ml/min/1.73 m(2) as cut-offs for full-dose and reduced-dose AC eligibility. RESULTS Median eGFR for all patients before and after surgery was 64 and 49 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients ineligible to receive full-dose and reduced-dose AC changed from 42% to 74% and from 20% to 38.1%. Older age (OR = 1.007), preoperative eGFR (OR = 0.993), absence of hydronephrosis (OR = 0.801), smaller tumor size (OR = 0.962), and tumor without multifocality (OR = 0.876) were predictive for ineligibility for full-dose AC. Preoperative eGFR (OR = 0.991), absence of hydronephrosis (OR = 0.881), tumor located in renal pelvis (OR = 1.164), and smaller tumor size (OR = 0.969) could predict ineligibility for reduced-dose AC. The c-index of the two models was 0.757 and 0.836. Postoperative renal function was not associated with worse survival. CONCLUSIONS Older age, lower preoperative eGFR, smaller tumor size, tumor located in renal pelvis, and absence of hydronephrosis or multifocality were predictors of postoperative renal insufficiency.
Collapse
|
39
|
Fradet V, Mauermann J, Kassouf W, Rendon R, Jacobsen N, Fairey A, Izawa J, Kapoor A, Black P, Tanguay S, Chin J, So A, Lattouf JB, Bell D, Saad F, Sheyegan B, Drachenberg D, Cagiannos I, Lacombe L. Risk factors for bladder cancer recurrence after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial tumors: Results from the Canadian Upper Tract Collaboration1Co-first authors. Urol Oncol 2014; 32:839-45. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2014] [Revised: 04/07/2014] [Accepted: 04/09/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
40
|
Lin YK, Kaag M, Raman JD. Rationale and timing of perioperative chemotherapy for upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 14:543-51. [PMID: 24666189 DOI: 10.1586/14737140.2014.882774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Radical surgery alone for high-risk upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is often inadequate for long-term cancer control. Numerous studies implicate failure presumably attributable to metastatic disease. Therefore, multimodal therapy by way of perioperative chemotherapy is integral to improve cancer outcomes and disease-specific survival. Despite this apparent reality, there is lack of consensus regarding which patients will need additional therapy, optimal timing for delivery of agents, and specific regimens to be utilized. Progress is being made, however, to explore these issues both by extrapolation from the bladder cancer literature as well as studying outcomes from retrospective UTUC series. Prospectively accruing studies for both neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy will likely mature in the next 5 years thereby providing higher level data to better guide standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Kuan Lin
- Division of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Porten S, Siefker-Radtke AO, Xiao L, Margulis V, Kamat AM, Wood CG, Jonasch E, Dinney CPN, Matin SF. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Cancer 2014; 120:1794-9. [PMID: 24633966 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 137] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2013] [Revised: 02/05/2014] [Accepted: 02/07/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is frequently upstaged after surgery and is associated with uniformly poor survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may offer a way to improve clinical outcomes. The authors compared the survival rates of patients with UTUC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery with the rates among patients who did not. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted of patients with high-risk UTUC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery from 2004 to 2008 (study group) compared with a matched cohort who underwent initial surgery from 1993 to 2003 (control group). Fisher exact tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and Kaplan-Meier methods were used. The log-rank test and Cox proportional-hazards models were used to evaluate the association of the 2 outcomes with patient, treatment, and tumor characteristics in univariate and multivariate models. RESULTS Of 112 patients, there were 31 in the study group and 81 in the control group. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy had improved overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) with a 5-year DSS rate of 90.1% and a 5-year OS rate of 80.2% versus DSS and OS rates of 57.6% for those who underwent initial surgery (P = .0204 and P = .0015, respectively). In multivariate analyses, the neoadjuvant group had a lower risk of mortality (OS: hazard ratio, 0.42 [P = .035]; DSS: hazard ratio, 0.19 [P = .006]). CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improved the survival of patients with UTUC compared with a matched historic cohort of patients who underwent initial surgery. Patients with high-risk UTUC should be considered for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in view of the limited opportunity to administer effective cisplatin-based chemotherapy after nephroureterectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sima Porten
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Sun M, Abdo A, Abdollah F, Schmitges J, Thuret R, Jeldres C, Shariat SF, Perrotte P, Karakiewicz PI. Management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 10:1955-65. [DOI: 10.1586/era.10.194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
43
|
Kim TS, Oh JH, Rhew HY. The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma. J Cancer 2013; 4:686-90. [PMID: 24155781 PMCID: PMC3805997 DOI: 10.7150/jca.7326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2013] [Accepted: 10/01/2013] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy for locally advanced upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma (UTUC) following radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff resection (RNU) in terms of survival and recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between January 2000 and January 2013, among 145 patients with upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma, a total of 65 patients with locally advanced UTUC (a diagnosis of pT3 or pT4 or pT1-2N1-3) underwent RNU. Of these 65 patients, 36 patients received at least three cycles of adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy and the remaining 29 patient did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Clinical characteristics, bladder recurrence, distant metastasis, and cancer-specific survival were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS The mean age of the 65 patients was 60.4 (range, 37-87) years and the median follow-up period was 34 (range, 12-114) months. Patent demographics were not statistically different between the two groups. During the follow-up period, 14 patients (21.5%) experienced distant metastasis; 8 (8/36, 22.2%) patients who had undergone adjuvant chemotherapy and 6 (6/29, 20.7%) patients who did not. Bladder recurrence was noted in 17 patients (26.2%), 5 (5/36, 13.9%) of whom received adjuvant chemotherapy while the remaining 12 (12/29, 41.4%) did not. Kaplan-Meire and multivariate analysis showed that the incidence of bladder recurrence was significantly higher in patients who did not undergo adjuvant chemotherapy, and cancer specific survival was not significantly associated with adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced UTUC can prevent bladder recurrence, but has a minimal effect on cancer-specific survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taek Sang Kim
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Yafi FA, Tanguay S, Rendon R, Jacobsen N, Fairey A, Izawa J, Kapoor A, Black P, Lacombe L, Chin J, So A, Lattouf JB, Bell D, Fradet Y, Saad F, Matsumoto E, Drachenberg D, Cagiannos I, Kassouf W. Adjuvant chemotherapy for upper-tract urothelial carcinoma treated with nephroureterectomy: assessment of adequate renal function and influence on outcome. Urol Oncol 2013; 32:31.e17-24. [PMID: 23428535 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2012] [Revised: 11/13/2012] [Accepted: 11/19/2012] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is associated with poor outcomes. Our aim was to assess adequacy of renal function and evaluate the role of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in patients with UTUC treated by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in a universal health care system. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective data from 1,029 patients treated with RNU across 10 Canadian academic centers were collected. Tested variables included various clinico-pathological parameters, the use of perioperative chemotherapy, preoperative and postoperative creatinine values, and estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR). Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models addressed overall survival and disease-specific survival after surgery. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare outcomes in patients who received or did not receive AC. RESULTS Median age of patients was 70 years with a median follow-up of patients who were alive of 26 months. The median preoperative and postoperative eGFR rates were 59 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and 47 mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively. Using a cutoff eGFR of 60, 49% of all the patients and 48% of the patients with ≥ pT3 or pTxN+ or both diseases would have been eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy preoperatively and only 18% and 21% of the patients, respectively remained eligible postoperatively. Of the patients who received AC, 75% had an eGFR<60. On multivariate analysis, AC was not prognostic for improved overall survival or disease-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS Chronic kidney disease is common in patients with UTUC. Following RNU, 57% of the high-risk patients with good preoperative renal function became ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Use of AC did not translate into improved survival. Whether this is due to inherent biases of retrospective analysis, limited efficacy of AC in patients with UTUC, or use of suboptimal regimen or dose because of poor postoperative renal function requires further evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faysal A Yafi
- Department of Surgery (Urology), McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Simon Tanguay
- Department of Surgery (Urology), McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ricardo Rendon
- Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Niels Jacobsen
- Department of Surgery (Urology), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Adrian Fairey
- Department of Surgery (Urology), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jonathan Izawa
- Department of Surgery (Urology), University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anil Kapoor
- Department of Surgery (Urology), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Louis Lacombe
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Laval University, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Joe Chin
- Department of Surgery (Urology), University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alan So
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - David Bell
- Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Yves Fradet
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Laval University, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Department of Surgery (Urology), University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Edward Matsumoto
- Department of Surgery (Urology), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Darrel Drachenberg
- Department of Surgery (Urology), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Ilias Cagiannos
- Department of Surgery (Urology), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Surgery (Urology), McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Cho DS, Kim SI, Ahn HS, Kim SJ. Predictive factors for bladder recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Int 2013; 91:153-9. [PMID: 23391941 DOI: 10.1159/000346086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2012] [Accepted: 11/24/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To identify predictive factors for developing subsequent bladder urothelial carcinoma (UC) in patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper urinary tract UC (UUT-UC). MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 78 patients with clinically localized UUT-UC who had undergone operation at our institution between June 1994 and December 2009. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to determine the predictive factors. RESULTS Out of a total of 78 patients, 14 (17.9%) developed bladder UC after radical nephroureterectomy at a median interval of 10 months (range: 3-46). Of these 14 patients, 11 (78.6%) experienced bladder recurrence within the first 2 years of follow-up. All 14 patients (100%) had non-muscle-invasive bladder UC and 10 patients (71.4%) had high-grade tumors. The univariate analysis identified preoperative voided urine cytology, tumor configuration, and adjuvant systemic chemotherapy as significant predictive factors for bladder recurrence, whereas the multivariate analysis indicated that only preoperative voided urine cytology was an independent predictive factor. CONCLUSIONS Positive preoperative voided urine cytology is an independent predictor for bladder recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for UUT-UC. Therefore, closer surveillance of the bladder is necessary, especially in patients with positive preoperative urine cytology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dae Sung Cho
- Department of Urology, Bundang Jesaeng General Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Hsieh TF, Chen CC, Yu AL, Ma WL, Zhang C, Shyr CR, Chang C. Androgen receptor decreases the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapeutic drugs in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma cells. Oncol Lett 2013; 5:1325-1330. [PMID: 23599788 PMCID: PMC3629091 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2013.1140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2012] [Accepted: 01/09/2013] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UUTUCs) represent relatively uncommon yet devastating tumors that affect more males than females. However, the correlation between gender difference and disease progression remains unclear. Androgen and the androgen receptor (AR) were previously hypothesized to account for the gender difference in the incidence of urothelial carcinomas; however, the role of AR in the development and progression of UUTUCs is not well understood. In addition, although UUTUCs are responsive to chemotherapy, various responses are presented among patients. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to determine the role of AR in the response of UUTUC cells to chemotherapeutic drugs. In this study, AR overexpression in UUTUC cells (BFTC 909) was identified to reduce the cytotoxic effect of chemotherapeutic drugs, including doxorubicin, cisplatin and mitomycin C and protected cells from drug-induced death. The expression of ABCG2, an ATP-binding cassette half-transporter associated with multidrug resistance, was increased in AR-overexpressing BFTC cells. In addition, use of the AR degradation enhancer, ASC-J9®, repressed the AR effect on increasing cell viability under drug treatment. In summary, results of the present study indicate that the status of AR expression levels in UUTUCs may be a significant factor in affecting the efficacy of chemotherapy and classic chemotherapeutic drugs and AR targeted therapy may provide a novel potential therapeutic approach to improve treatment of UUTUCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teng-Fu Hsieh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Taichung Branch, Taichung 40427
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hagiwara M, Kikuchi E, Tanaka N, Matsumoto K, Ide H, Miyajima A, Masuda T, Nakamura S, Oya M. Impact of smoking status on bladder tumor recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. J Urol 2013; 189:2062-8. [PMID: 23328579 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2013] [Accepted: 01/10/2013] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although smoking status has a significant association with clinical features in patients with bladder cancer, there are few reports of the impact of smoking on the clinical outcome of upper tract urothelial cancer. We investigated the possible influence of smoking status on bladder tumor recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified a study population of 245 consecutive patients treated surgically for upper tract urothelial cancer at our 3 institutions between 1994 and 2010. We analyzed associations between subsequent bladder tumor recurrence and patient clinicopathological parameters, including smoking status. RESULTS The 3-year bladder tumor recurrence-free survival rate was 32.6% in current smokers, 37.6% in former smokers and 61.7% in nonsmokers. Multivariate analysis revealed that male gender (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.15-3.16, p = 0.013) and smoking status (former vs none HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.07-2.93, p = 0.027 and current vs none HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.03-2.42, p = 0.035) were independent risk factors for subsequent bladder tumor recurrence. Also, of patients with a positive smoking history those with 50 pack-years or greater showed a significantly higher incidence of bladder tumor recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy (HR 2.00, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Positive smoking history and male gender were independent risk factors for bladder tumor recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy. A larger number of cigarettes smoked may increase the incidence of bladder tumor recurrence in patients with upper tract urothelial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masayuki Hagiwara
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Liang PI, Li WM, Wang YH, Wu TF, Wu WR, Liao AC, Shen KH, Wei YC, Hsing CH, Shiue YL, Huang HY, Hsu HP, Chen LT, Lin CY, Tai C, Lin CM, Li CF. HuR cytoplasmic expression is associated with increased cyclin A expression and poor outcome with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2012; 12:611. [PMID: 23259573 PMCID: PMC3571926 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2012] [Accepted: 12/18/2012] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background HuR is an RNA-binding protein that post-transcriptionally modulates the expressions of various target genes implicated in carcinogenesis, such as CCNA2 encoding cyclin A. No prior study attempted to evaluate the significance of HuR expression in a large cohort with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUCs). Methods In total, 340 cases of primary localized UTUC without previous or concordant bladder carcinoma were selected. All of these patients received ureterectomy or radical nephroureterectomy with curative intents. Pathological slides were reviewed, and clinical findings were collected. Immunostaining for HuR and cyclin A was performed and evaluated by using H-score. The results of cytoplasmic HuR and nuclear cyclin A expressions were correlated with disease-specific survival (DSS), metastasis-free survival (MeFS), urinary bladder recurrence-free survival (UBRFS), and various clinicopathological factors. Results HuR cytoplasmic expression was significantly related to the pT status, lymph node metastasis, a higher histological grade, the pattern of invasion, vascular and perineurial invasion, and cyclin A expression (p = 0.005). Importantly, HuR cytoplasmic expression was strongly associated with a worse DSS (p < 0.0001), MeFS (p < 0.0001), and UBRFS (p = 0.0370) in the univariate analysis, and the first two results remained independently predictive of adverse outcomes (p = 0.038, relative risk [RR] = 1.996 for DSS; p = 0.027, RR = 1.880 for MeFS). Cyclin A nuclear expression was associated with a poor DSS (p = 0.0035) and MeFS (p = 0.0015) in the univariate analysis but was not prognosticatory in the multivariate analyses. High-risk patients (pT3 or pT4 with/without nodal metastasis) with high HuR cytoplasmic expression had better DSS if adjuvant chemotherapy was performed (p = 0.015). Conclusions HuR cytoplasmic expression was correlated with adverse phenotypes and cyclin A overexpression and also independently predictive of worse DSS and MeFS, suggesting its roles in tumorigenesis or carcinogenesis and potentiality as a prognostic marker of UTUC. High HuR cytoplasmic expression might identify patients more likely to be beneficial for adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peir-In Liang
- Department of Pathology, Chi-Mei Foundational Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Morizane S, Iwamoto H, Masago T, Yao A, Isoyama T, Sejima T, Takenaka A. Preoperative prognostic factors after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Int Urol Nephrol 2012; 45:99-106. [PMID: 23229166 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-012-0347-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2012] [Accepted: 11/23/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the clinical significance of preoperative biomarkers such as laboratory data, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) and clinicopathological factors in patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. METHODS Between 1995 and 2011, a total of 99 patients treated at our institution for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma were enrolled in this study. The prognostic significance of various preoperative data and clinicopathological factors were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test and a Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS Median patient age was 73 years (range 44-86 years), and the median follow-up period after radical nephroureterectomy was 37.9 months (range 6.6-171.4 months). The 5-year intravesical recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival estimates were 47.1 and 70.0 %, respectively. On multivariate analysis, concomitant bladder carcinoma was an independent predictor of intravesical recurrence (hazard ratio 3.689; P = 0.002), and infiltration (hazard ratio 14.842; P = 0.002), preoperative serum creatinine level (hazard ratio 9.992; P = 0.005), preoperative serum hemoglobin level (hazard ratio 6.370; P = 0.018) and ECOG PS (hazard ratio 4.326; P = 0.037) were associated with worse cancer-specific survival. This study is limited by biases associated with its retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS This study indicates that not only clinicopathological factors, but also preoperative biomarkers, such as serum creatinine and hemoglobin levels and ECOG PS, predict a poor survival in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.
Collapse
|
50
|
The potential use of primary human upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma (UUT-UCC) cultured cells for prognostic indicators and chemosensitivity test. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012; 65:703-8. [PMID: 23069010 DOI: 10.1016/j.etp.2012.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2012] [Revised: 07/22/2012] [Accepted: 09/17/2012] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma (UUT-UCC) is a rare yet aggressive urologic tumor with a high rate of recurrence and metastasis, resulting in high mortality. Chemotherapy has been used to prevent recurrence and treat metastatic UUT-UCCs. Although UUT-UCC is sensitive to chemotherapy, the patients' responses to therapy vary and the therapy outcome is unpredictable. Therefore, the identification of patients who are at high risk of failure in chemotherapy is important for accurate prognostication, patient counseling, and better therapy. We have obtained cells from UUT-UCC tumor tissues after surgery and established individual primary cultured cell lines, which were used to evaluate E-cadherin and Ki-67 proliferation marker expression and their chemosensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs. Differential Ki-67 expression and chemosensitivity were observed in these primary cultured cell lines, suggesting these types of UUT-UCC cell lines could provide a platform for determining prognostic makers and evaluating the efficacy of chemotherapy. In conclusion, primary cultured cell lines from individual patients will be a great tool for evaluating and determining each individual's personalized chemotherapy course and for testing and screening new chemotherapeutic agents against UUT-UCCs.
Collapse
|