1
|
Mainardi M, Ciprietti D, Pilleri M, Bonato G, Weis L, Cianci V, Biundo R, Ferreri F, Piacentino M, Landi A, Guerra A, Antonini A. Deep brain stimulation of globus pallidus internus and subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease: a multicenter, retrospective study of efficacy and safety. Neurol Sci 2024; 45:177-185. [PMID: 37555874 PMCID: PMC10761504 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-023-06999-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapeutic option in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Literature data and recent guidelines remain inconclusive about the best choice as a target between the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and the globus pallidus internus (GPi). MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the clinical efficacy outcomes of 48 DBS-implanted patients (33 STN-DBS and 15 GPi-DBS) at a short- (<1 year from the surgery) and long-term (2-5 years) follow-up. Also, clinical safety outcomes, including postoperative surgical complications and severe side effects, were collected. RESULTS We found no difference between STN-DBS and GPi-DBS in improving motor symptoms at short-term evaluation. However, STN-DBS achieved a more prominent reduction in oral therapy (L-DOPA equivalent daily dose, P = .02). By contrast, GPi-DBS was superior in ameliorating motor fluctuations and dyskinesia (MDS-UPDRS IV, P < .001) as well as motor experiences of daily living (MDS-UPDRS II, P = .03). The greater efficacy of GPi-DBS on motor fluctuations and experiences of daily living was also present at the long-term follow-up. We observed five serious adverse events, including two suicides, all among STN-DBS patients. CONCLUSION Both STN-DBS and GPi-DBS are effective in improving motor symptoms severity and complications, but GPi-DBS has a greater impact on motor fluctuations and motor experiences of daily living. These results suggest that the two targets should be considered equivalent in motor efficacy, with GPi-DBS as a valuable option in patients with prominent motor complications. The occurrence of suicides in STN-treated patients claims further attention in target selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Mainardi
- Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Study Center for Neurodegeneration (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Dario Ciprietti
- Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Study Center for Neurodegeneration (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Manuela Pilleri
- Service of Neurology, Villa Margherita-Santo Stefano Private Hospital, Arcugnano, Italy
| | - Giulia Bonato
- Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Study Center for Neurodegeneration (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Luca Weis
- Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Study Center for Neurodegeneration (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Valeria Cianci
- Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Study Center for Neurodegeneration (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Roberta Biundo
- Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Study Center for Neurodegeneration (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy
- Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Florinda Ferreri
- Unit of Neurology, Unit of Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, 35128, Padova, Italy
| | - Massimo Piacentino
- Department of Neurosurgery, AULSS 8 Berica Ospedale San Bortolo, Viale Rodolfi, 37 36100, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Andrea Landi
- Academic Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, 35128, Padova, Italy
| | - Andrea Guerra
- Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Study Center for Neurodegeneration (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Angelo Antonini
- Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Study Center for Neurodegeneration (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
El Ouadih Y, Marques A, Pereira B, Luisoni M, Claise B, Coste J, Sontheimer A, Chaix R, Debilly B, Derost P, Morand D, Durif F, Lemaire JJ. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in severe Parkinson's disease: relationships between dual-contact topographic setting and 1-year worsening of speech and gait. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2023; 165:3927-3941. [PMID: 37889334 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-023-05843-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) alleviates severe motor fluctuations and dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease, but may result in speech and gait disorders. Among the suspected or demonstrated causes of these adverse effects, we focused on the topography of contact balance (CB; individual, right and left relative dual positions), a scantly studied topic, analyzing the relationships between symmetric or non-symmetric settings, and the worsening of these signs. METHOD An observational monocentric study was conducted on a series of 92 patients after ethical approval. CB was specified by longitudinal and transversal positions and relation to the STN (CB sub-aspects) and totalized at the patient level (patient CB). CB was deemed symmetric when the two contacts were at the same locations relative to the STN. CB was deemed asymmetric when at least one sub-aspect differed in the patient CB. Baseline and 1-year characteristics were routinely collected: (i) general, namely, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scores (UPDRS), II, III motor and IV, daily levodopa equivalent doses, and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire of Quality of Life (PDQ39) scores; (ii) specific, namely scores for speech (II-5 and III-18) and axial signs (II-14, III-28, III-29, and III-30). Only significant correlations were considered (p < 0.05). RESULTS Baseline characteristics were comparable (symmetric versus asymmetric). CB settings were related to deteriorations of speech and axial signs: communication PDQ39 and UPDRS speech and gait scores worsened exclusively with symmetric settings; the most influential CB sub-aspect was symmetric longitudinal position. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that avoiding symmetric CB settings, whether by electrode positioning or shaping of electric fields, could reduce worsening of speech and gait.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youssef El Ouadih
- Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont Auvergne INP, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, CNRS, Institut Pascal, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Service de Neurochirurgie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Ana Marques
- Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont Auvergne INP, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, CNRS, Institut Pascal, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Service de Neurologie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Bruno Pereira
- Direction de La Recherche Clinique Et de L'Innovation, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Maxime Luisoni
- Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont Auvergne INP, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, CNRS, Institut Pascal, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Béatrice Claise
- Service de Radiologie, Unité de Neuroradiologie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Jérôme Coste
- Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont Auvergne INP, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, CNRS, Institut Pascal, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Service de Neurochirurgie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Anna Sontheimer
- Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont Auvergne INP, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, CNRS, Institut Pascal, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Service de Neurochirurgie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Rémi Chaix
- Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont Auvergne INP, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, CNRS, Institut Pascal, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Service de Neurochirurgie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Bérangère Debilly
- Service de Neurologie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Philippe Derost
- Service de Neurologie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Dominique Morand
- Direction de La Recherche Clinique Et de L'Innovation, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Franck Durif
- Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont Auvergne INP, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, CNRS, Institut Pascal, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Service de Neurologie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Jean-Jacques Lemaire
- Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont Auvergne INP, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, CNRS, Institut Pascal, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
- Service de Neurochirurgie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kennis M, Hale EW, Hemendinger E, Davis R, Ojemann SG, Strom L, Klepitskaya O. Suicide in Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: A Retrospective Case-Control Study. JOURNAL OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE 2023; 13:415-419. [PMID: 36911947 DOI: 10.3233/jpd-225049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS), a treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD), has been associated with suicidality. We conducted a case-control study comparing suicide in four pairs of cohorts: PD patients with DBS or not, epilepsy patients with resection surgery or not, subjects with BMI≥30 with bariatric surgery or not, and patients with chronic kidney disease with transplantation or not. PD patients with DBS demonstrated a lower risk of suicide relative to PD patients without DBS. Findings from other elective surgeries indicate that patients receiving operative treatments do not possess predictable differences in suicide rates relative to their medically managed counterparts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Kennis
- School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Elijah W Hale
- School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Emily Hemendinger
- University of Colorado, Department of Psychiatry, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Rachel Davis
- University of Colorado, Department of Psychiatry, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Steven G Ojemann
- University of Colorado Hospital, Neurosciences Center - Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Laura Strom
- University of Colorado Hospital, Neurosciences Center - Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Olga Klepitskaya
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Weintraub D, Aarsland D, Biundo R, Dobkin R, Goldman J, Lewis S. Management of psychiatric and cognitive complications in Parkinson's disease. BMJ 2022; 379:e068718. [PMID: 36280256 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPSs) such as affective disorders, psychosis, behavioral changes, and cognitive impairment are common in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, NPSs remain under-recognized and under-treated, often leading to adverse outcomes. Their epidemiology, presentation, risk factors, neural substrate, and management strategies are incompletely understood. While psychological and psychosocial factors may contribute, hallmark PD neuropathophysiological changes, plus the associations between exposure to dopaminergic medications and occurrence of some symptoms, suggest a neurobiological basis for many NPSs. A range of psychotropic medications, psychotherapeutic techniques, stimulation therapies, and other non-pharmacological treatments have been studied, are used clinically, and are beneficial for managing NPSs in PD. Appropriate management of NPSs is critical for comprehensive PD care, from recognizing their presentations and timing throughout the disease course, to the incorporation of different therapeutic strategies (ie, pharmacological and non-pharmacological) that utilize a multidisciplinary approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Weintraub
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Parkinson's Disease Research, Education and Clinical Center (PADRECC), Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Dag Aarsland
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, England
- Centre for Age-Related Diseases, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Roberta Biundo
- Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
- Study Center for Neurodegeneration (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Roseanne Dobkin
- Department of Psychiatry, Rutgers-The State University of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Jennifer Goldman
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders, Chicago, IL
- Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Simon Lewis
- ForeFront Parkinson's Disease Research Clinic, Brain and Mind Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bove F, Genovese D, Moro E. Developments in the mechanistic understanding and clinical application of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. Expert Rev Neurother 2022; 22:789-803. [PMID: 36228575 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2022.2136030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a life-changing treatment for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and gives the unique opportunity to directly explore how basal ganglia work. Despite the rapid technological innovation of the last years, the untapped potential of DBS is still high. AREAS COVERED. This review summarizes the developments in the mechanistic understanding of DBS and the potential clinical applications of cutting-edge technological advances. Rather than a univocal local mechanism, DBS exerts its therapeutic effects through several multimodal mechanisms and involving both local and network-wide structures, although crucial questions remain unexplained. Nonetheless, new insights in mechanistic understanding of DBS in PD have provided solid bases for advances in preoperative selection phase, prediction of motor and non-motor outcomes, leads placement and postoperative stimulation programming. EXPERT OPINION. DBS has not only strong evidence of clinical effectiveness in PD treatment, but technological advancements are revamping its role of neuromodulation of brain circuits and key to better understanding PD pathophysiology. In the next few years, the worldwide use of new technologies in clinical practice will provide large data to elucidate their role and to expand their applications for PD patients, providing useful insights to personalize DBS treatment and follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Bove
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Danilo Genovese
- Fresco Institute for Parkinson's and Movement Disorders, Department of Neurology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Elena Moro
- Grenoble Alpes University, CHU of Grenoble, Division of Neurology, Grenoble, France.,Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences, INSERM, U1216, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Deuschl G, Antonini A, Costa J, Śmiłowska K, Berg D, Corvol J, Fabbrini G, Ferreira J, Foltynie T, Mir P, Schrag A, Seppi K, Taba P, Ruzicka E, Selikhova M, Henschke N, Villanueva G, Moro E. European Academy of Neurology/Movement Disorder Society ‐ European Section guideline on the treatment of Parkinson's disease: I. Invasive therapies. Eur J Neurol 2022; 29:2580-2595. [DOI: 10.1111/ene.15386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Günther Deuschl
- Department of Neurology, UKSH‐Kiel Campus Christian‐Albrechts‐University Kiel Germany
| | - Angelo Antonini
- Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Neuroscience University of Padua Padua Italy
| | - Joao Costa
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa Lisbon Portugal
| | - Katarzyna Śmiłowska
- Department of Neurology, UKSH‐Kiel Campus Christian‐Albrechts‐University Kiel Germany
| | - Daniela Berg
- Department of Neurology, UKSH‐Kiel Campus Christian‐Albrechts‐University Kiel Germany
| | - Jean‐Christophe Corvol
- Institut du Cerveau–Paris Brain Institute Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris Pitié‐Salpêtrière Hospital Department of Neurology, Centre d'Investigation Clinique Neurosciences Sorbonne Université Paris France
| | - Giovanni Fabbrini
- Department Human Neurosciences Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy
- Neuromed Rome Italy
| | - Joaquim Ferreira
- Faculdade de Medicina Universidade de Lisboa Lisbon Portugal
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes Lisbon Portugal
- Campus Neurológico Torres Vedras Portugal
| | - Tom Foltynie
- Department of Clinical & Movement Neurosciences Institute of Neurology London UK
| | - Pablo Mir
- Unidad de Trastornos del Movimiento Servicio de Neurología y Neurofisiología Clínica Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/Universidad de Sevilla Seville Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas Madrid Spain
- Departamento de Medicina Facultad de Medicina Universidad de Sevilla Seville Spain
| | - Annette Schrag
- Institute of Neurology, University Clinic London London UK
| | - Klaus Seppi
- Klinik f. Neurologie Medizinische Universität Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria
| | - Pille Taba
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Tartu Tartu Estonia
- Tartu University Hospital Tartu Estonia
| | - Evzen Ruzicka
- Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague Prague Czechia
| | - Marianna Selikhova
- Department of Neurology Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University Moscow Russia
| | | | | | - Elena Moro
- Division of Neurology, Grenoble, Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences Grenoble Alpes University Grenoble France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Deuschl G, Antonini A, Costa J, Śmiłowska K, Berg D, Corvol J, Fabbrini G, Ferreira J, Foltynie T, Mir P, Schrag A, Seppi K, Taba P, Ruzicka E, Selikhova M, Henschke N, Villanueva G, Moro E. European Academy of Neurology/Movement Disorder Society‐European Section Guideline on the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: I. Invasive Therapies. Mov Disord 2022; 37:1360-1374. [DOI: 10.1002/mds.29066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Günther Deuschl
- Department of Neurology, UKSH‐Kiel Campus Christian‐Albrechts‐University Kiel Germany
| | - Angelo Antonini
- Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Neuroscience University of Padua Padua Italy
| | - Joao Costa
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa Lisbon Portugal
| | - Katarzyna Śmiłowska
- Department of Neurology, UKSH‐Kiel Campus Christian‐Albrechts‐University Kiel Germany
| | - Daniela Berg
- Department of Neurology, UKSH‐Kiel Campus Christian‐Albrechts‐University Kiel Germany
| | - Jean‐Christophe Corvol
- Institut du Cerveau‐Paris Brain Institute, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié‐Salpêtrière Hospital, Department of Neurology, Centre d'Investigation Clinique Neurosciences Sorbonne Université Paris France
| | - Giovanni Fabbrini
- Department Human Neurosciences Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy
- IRCCS Neuromed Rome Italy
| | - Joaquim Ferreira
- Faculdade de Medicina Universidade de Lisboa Lisbon Portugal
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes Lisbon Portugal
- Campus Neurológico Torres Vedras Portugal
| | - Tom Foltynie
- Department of Clinical & Movement Neurosciences Institute of Neurology London UK
| | - Pablo Mir
- Unidad de Trastornos del Movimiento Servicio de Neurología y Neurofisiología Clínica Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/Universidad de Sevilla Seville Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas Madrid Spain
- Departamento de Medicina Facultad de Medicina Universidad de Sevilla Seville Spain
| | - Annette Schrag
- Institute of Neurology, University Clinic London London UK
| | - Klaus Seppi
- Klinik f. Neurologie Medizinische Universität Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria
| | - Pille Taba
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Tartu Tartu Estonia
- Tartu University Hospital Tartu Estonia
| | - Evzen Ruzicka
- Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague Prague Czechia
| | | | | | | | - Elena Moro
- Division of Neurology, Grenoble, Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences Grenoble Alpes University Grenoble France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Prange S, Klinger H, Laurencin C, Danaila T, Thobois S. Depression in Patients with Parkinson's Disease: Current Understanding of its Neurobiology and Implications for Treatment. Drugs Aging 2022; 39:417-439. [PMID: 35705848 PMCID: PMC9200562 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-022-00942-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Depression is one of the most frequent and burdensome non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease (PD), across all stages. Even when its severity is mild, PD depression has a great impact on quality of life for these patients and their caregivers. Accordingly, accurate diagnosis, supported by validated scales, identification of risk factors, and recognition of motor and non-motor symptoms comorbid to depression are critical to understanding the neurobiology of depression, which in turn determines the effectiveness of dopaminergic drugs, antidepressants and non-pharmacological interventions. Recent advances using in vivo functional and structural imaging demonstrate that PD depression is underpinned by dysfunction of limbic networks and monoaminergic systems, depending on the stage of PD and its associated symptoms, including apathy, anxiety, rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD), cognitive impairment and dementia. In particular, the evolution of serotonergic, noradrenergic, and dopaminergic dysfunction and abnormalities of limbic circuits across time, involving the anterior cingulate and orbitofrontal cortices, amygdala, thalamus and ventral striatum, help to delineate the variable expression of depression in patients with prodromal, early and advanced PD. Evidence is accumulating to support the use of dual serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (desipramine, nortriptyline, venlafaxine) in patients with PD and moderate to severe depression, while selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognitive behavioral therapy may also be considered. In all patients, recent findings advocate that optimization of dopamine replacement therapy and evaluation of deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus to improve motor symptoms represents an important first step, in addition to physical activity. Overall, this review indicates that increasing understanding of neurobiological changes help to implement a roadmap of tailored interventions for patients with PD and depression, depending on the stage and comorbid symptoms underlying PD subtypes and their prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stéphane Prange
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Service de Neurologie C, Centre Expert Parkinson, NS-PARK/FCRIN Network, 59 Boulevard Pinel, 69500, Bron, France. .,Physiopathology of the Basal Ganglia Team, Univ Lyon, Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, CNRS, UMR 5229, 67 Boulevard Pinel, 69675, Bron, France. .,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Hélène Klinger
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Service de Neurologie C, Centre Expert Parkinson, NS-PARK/FCRIN Network, 59 Boulevard Pinel, 69500, Bron, France
| | - Chloé Laurencin
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Service de Neurologie C, Centre Expert Parkinson, NS-PARK/FCRIN Network, 59 Boulevard Pinel, 69500, Bron, France.,Physiopathology of the Basal Ganglia Team, Univ Lyon, Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, CNRS, UMR 5229, 67 Boulevard Pinel, 69675, Bron, France
| | - Teodor Danaila
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Service de Neurologie C, Centre Expert Parkinson, NS-PARK/FCRIN Network, 59 Boulevard Pinel, 69500, Bron, France.,Physiopathology of the Basal Ganglia Team, Univ Lyon, Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, CNRS, UMR 5229, 67 Boulevard Pinel, 69675, Bron, France
| | - Stéphane Thobois
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Service de Neurologie C, Centre Expert Parkinson, NS-PARK/FCRIN Network, 59 Boulevard Pinel, 69500, Bron, France. .,Physiopathology of the Basal Ganglia Team, Univ Lyon, Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, CNRS, UMR 5229, 67 Boulevard Pinel, 69675, Bron, France. .,Faculté de Médecine et de Maïeutique Lyon Sud Charles Mérieux, Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Oullins, France.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Paulig M. Neuropsychiatrische Störungen bei idiopathischem Parkinson-Syndrom. NERVENHEILKUNDE 2021; 40:752-758. [DOI: 10.1055/a-1484-0686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
ZUSAMMENFASSUNGUnter nicht motorischen Symptomen nehmen neuropsychiatrische Störungen im gesamten Krankheitsverlauf eine herausragende Stellung ein. Sie sind nach wie vor unterdiagnostiziert, haben jedoch erhebliche Auswirkungen auf die Lebensqualität des Patienten und der Angehörigen. Einige Symptome können auf eine ungünstige Prognose verweisen. Die Mehrzahl der neuropsychiatrischen Störungen kann bei einer zielgerichteten klinischen Anamnese unter Einschluss der Angehörigen erfasst werden. Manchmal, z. B. bei kognitiven Defiziten, bedarf es einer neuropsychologischen Testung. Die Behandlung umfasst medikamentöse und nicht medikamentöse Maßnahmen. Allerdings gibt es nur relativ wenig Daten aus kontrollierten Studien, die die Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit einzelner Therapiemaßnahmen belegen.
Collapse
|
10
|
Mosley PE, Robinson K, Dissanayaka NN, Coyne T, Silburn P, Marsh R, Pye D. A Pilot Trial of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Caregivers After Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2021; 34:454-465. [PMID: 32400266 DOI: 10.1177/0891988720924720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Subthalamic deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease may not ameliorate burden among caregivers. An 8-session, manualized program of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) was delivered to a pilot sample of 10 caregivers (6 females, mean age: 60, age range: 34-79). Primary outcome measures were caregiver burden (Zarit Burden Interview) and caregiver quality of life (Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-Carer). Secondary outcome measures comprised ratings of depression and anxiety in the caregiver, in addition to relationship quality. Caregiver burden (t = 2.91 P = .017) and caregiver anxiety (t = 2.82 P = .020) symptoms were significantly reduced at completion of the program, and these benefits were maintained 3 months later. Caregiver quality of life had significantly improved by the end of the intervention (t = 3.02 P = .015), but this effect was not sustained after 3 months. The longitudinal influence of participation in the program on caregiver burden was confirmed in a linear, mixed-effects model, χ2 (3) = 15.1, P = .0017). The intervention was well received by participants, and qualitative feedback was obtained. These results indicate that caregiver burden is modifiable in this cohort with a short course of CBT, that benefits are maintained after termination of the program, and that psychological treatment is acceptable to participants. Larger, controlled trials are justified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip E Mosley
- Systems Neuroscience Group, 56362QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.,Neurosciences Queensland, St Andrew's War Memorial Hospital, Spring Hill, Queensland, Australia.,171919Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, 171919University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Katherine Robinson
- Systems Neuroscience Group, 56362QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Nadeeka N Dissanayaka
- UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.,310748School of Psychology, St Lucia, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Department of Neurology, 3883Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Terry Coyne
- 171919Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.,Brizbrain and Spine, The Wesley Hospital, Auchenflower, Queensland, Australia
| | - Peter Silburn
- Neurosciences Queensland, St Andrew's War Memorial Hospital, Spring Hill, Queensland, Australia.,171919Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rodney Marsh
- Neurosciences Queensland, St Andrew's War Memorial Hospital, Spring Hill, Queensland, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, 3883Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Deidre Pye
- 310748School of Psychology, St Lucia, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cleary RT, Bucholz R. Neuromodulation Approaches in Parkinson's Disease Using Deep Brain Stimulation and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2021; 34:301-309. [PMID: 34219521 DOI: 10.1177/08919887211018269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Parkinson's Disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease, characterized by progressive motor (such as resting tremor, hypokinesia, postural instability) and non-motor symptoms (such as neuropsychiatric decline and autonomic dysfunction). Since its introduction in the late 1980s, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has revolutionized the treatment of PD. Initially used in patients' with advanced PD with either medically refractory motor symptoms or medication intolerance, DBS typically provides excellent improvement in motor symptoms. Indications for DBS have continued to expand, with demonstrated efficacy in early PD and essential tremor, and promising preliminary results in the treatment of epilepsy, psychiatric disease, and depression. Advancements in DBS hardware, programming, neuroimaging, and surgical techniques have led to progressive improvement in efficacy and safety profiles. Thanks to ongoing research into remote programming, adaptive DBS, new targets, and alternative interventions, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, the opportunities for further improvements in DBS and neuromodulation are bright.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan T Cleary
- Department of Neurosurgery, 25213Saint Louis University Hospital, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Richard Bucholz
- Department of Neurosurgery, 25213Saint Louis University Hospital, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kucuker MU, Almorsy AG, Sonmez AI, Ligezka AN, Doruk Camsari D, Lewis CP, Croarkin PE. A Systematic Review of Neuromodulation Treatment Effects on Suicidality. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 15:660926. [PMID: 34248523 PMCID: PMC8267816 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.660926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Neuromodulation is an important group of therapeutic modalities for neuropsychiatric disorders. Prior studies have focused on efficacy and adverse events associated with neuromodulation. Less is known regarding the influence of neuromodulation treatments on suicidality. This systematic review sought to examine the effects of various neuromodulation techniques on suicidality. Methods: A systematic review of the literature from 1940 to 2020 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline was conducted. Any reported suicide-related outcome, including suicidal ideation, suicide intent, suicide attempt, completed suicide in reports were considered as a putative measure of treatment effect on suicidality. Results: The review identified 129 relevant studies. An exploratory analysis of a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of sertraline and transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) for treating depression reported a decrease in suicidal ideation favoring tDCS vs. placebo and tDCS combined with sertraline vs. placebo. Several studies reported an association between repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and improvements in suicidal ideation. In 12 of the studies, suicidality was the primary outcome, ten of which showed a significant improvement in suicidal ideation. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and magnetic seizure therapy was also shown to be associated with lower suicidal ideation and completed suicide rates. There were 11 studies which suicidality was the primary outcome and seven of these showed an improvement in suicidal ideation or suicide intent and fewer suicide attempts or completed suicides in patients treated with ECT. There was limited literature focused on the potential protective effect of vagal nerve stimulation with respect to suicidal ideation. Data were mixed regarding the potential effects of deep brain stimulation on suicidality. Conclusions: Future prospective studies of neuromodulation that focus on the primary outcome of suicidality are urgently needed. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=125599, identifier: CRD42019125599.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Utku Kucuker
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Ammar G. Almorsy
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Ayse Irem Sonmez
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Anna N. Ligezka
- Department of Clinical Genomics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Deniz Doruk Camsari
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Charles P. Lewis
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Paul E. Croarkin
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pontone GM, Mills KA. Optimal Treatment of Depression and Anxiety in Parkinson's Disease. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2021; 29:530-540. [PMID: 33648830 DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2021.02.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Depression and anxiety are highly prevalent and have major adverse effects on function and quality of life in Parkinson's disease (PD). Optimal management requires that motor symptoms and psychiatric symptoms be simultaneously addressed. While there is fairly robust evidence for the treatment of motor symptoms, there are no completed randomized controlled trials to guide pharmacological treatment of anxiety in PD and no nonpharmacologic interventions have proven efficacious. Several high-quality trials for depression in PD suggest a number of antidepressants and cognitive behavioral therapy may help, but there is no data on rates of recurrence, comparative efficacy, or augmentation strategies. In order to address the gaps in knowledge, the authors provide a summary of the current evidence for treating depression and anxiety in PD and offer an algorithm that extends beyond the current literature based on clinical experience working in a multidisciplinary specialty center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory M Pontone
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (GMP), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (GMP, KAM), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
| | - Kelly A Mills
- Department of Neurology (GMP, KAM), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Costanza A, Radomska M, Bondolfi G, Zenga F, Amerio A, Aguglia A, Serafini G, Amore M, Berardelli I, Pompili M, Nguyen KD. Suicidality Associated With Deep Brain Stimulation in Extrapyramidal Diseases: A Critical Review and Hypotheses on Neuroanatomical and Neuroimmune Mechanisms. Front Integr Neurosci 2021; 15:632249. [PMID: 33897384 PMCID: PMC8060445 DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2021.632249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a very well-established and effective treatment for patients with extrapyramidal diseases. Despite its generally favorable clinical efficacy, some undesirable outcomes associated with DBS have been reported. Among such complications are incidences of suicidal ideation (SI) and behavior (SB) in patients undergoing this neurosurgical procedure. However, causal associations between DBS and increased suicide risk are not demonstrated and they constitute a debated issue. In light of these observations, the main objective of this work is to provide a comprehensive and unbiased overview of the literature on suicide risk in patients who received subthalamic nucleus (STN) and internal part of globus pallidum (GPi) DBS treatment. Additionally, putative mechanisms that might be involved in the development of SI and SB in these patients as well as caveats associated with these hypotheses are introduced. Finally, we briefly propose some clinical implications, including therapeutic strategies addressing these potential disease mechanisms. While a mechanistic connection between DBS and suicidality remains a controversial topic that requires further investigation, it is of critical importance to consider suicide risk as an integral component of candidate selection and post-operative care in DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Costanza
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva (UNIGE), Geneva, Switzerland.,Department of Psychiatry, ASO Santi Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo Hospital, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Michalina Radomska
- Faculty of Psychology, University of Geneva (UNIGE), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Guido Bondolfi
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva (UNIGE), Geneva, Switzerland.,Department of Psychiatry, Service of Liaison Psychiatry and Crisis Intervention (SPLIC), Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Francesco Zenga
- Department of Neurosurgery, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Amerio
- Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Psychiatry, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.,Mood Disorders Program, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Andrea Aguglia
- Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Psychiatry, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Gianluca Serafini
- Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Psychiatry, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Mario Amore
- Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Psychiatry, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Isabella Berardelli
- Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, Suicide Prevention Center, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Maurizio Pompili
- Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, Suicide Prevention Center, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Khoa D Nguyen
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.,Tranquis Therapeutics, Palo Alto, CA, United States.,Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Azevedo P, Aquino CC, Fasano A. Surgical Management of Parkinson's Disease in the Elderly. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2021; 8:500-509. [PMID: 33981782 DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.13161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an increasingly popular therapy for Parkinson's Disease (PD). Despite the experience gained over time with DBS of either the subthalamus or the globus pallidus pars interna, there is still no consensus regarding the age limit for DBS indication. Objectives This narrative review of the literature discusses the issues of age and DBS, emphasizing the critical need for good quality evidence to support the surgical management of elderly patients with PD. Methods We searched PubMed using the terms Parkinson's Disease; Parkinson's Disease therapy; deep brain stimulation; antiparkinsonian agents therapeutic use; age factors; aged; aged, 80 and over; middle aged; treatment outcome; and risk assessments. Results We identified several limitations of the available evidence, such as under-representation of older patients in DBS studies, small sample sizes in studies with older participants, heterogeneity of outcomes, and conflicting results. Conclusions Despite preliminary suggestions that age might affect the outcomes of DBS, the evidence to support the hypothesis of age as an independent predictor of DBS outcomes is limited and results are controversial. Ultimately, finding an age-independent biomarker predicting DBS outcome is the final goal to expand this powerful treatment to all patients age in an effective and safe manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula Azevedo
- Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease and Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, UHN, Division of Neurology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Camila C Aquino
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.,Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada
| | - Alfonso Fasano
- Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease and Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, UHN, Division of Neurology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.,Krembil Brain Institute Toronto Ontario Canada.,CenteR for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application (CRANIA) Toronto Ontario Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus in Parkinson's Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Mood Effects. Neuropsychol Rev 2021; 31:385-401. [PMID: 33606174 DOI: 10.1007/s11065-020-09467-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2019] [Accepted: 11/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This meta-analysis examines mood changes after bilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Deep brain stimulation improves motor outcomes in Parkinson's disease but there appears to be conflicting reports as to subsequent mood outcomes. Pubmed, PsychINFO and SCOPUS were searched for studies assessing mood outcomes in PD patients who had undergone STN-DBS published between January 2003 and the end of January 2019. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted for all outcome groups with at least two studies homogenous in design and measure. Forty-eight studies, providing data on negative moods (such as depression, anxiety, apathy, and anger) and positive moods (pleasure and euphoria) were assessed. Results of the meta-analysis suggest that post-DBS, depression and anxiety symptoms improve and there is a reduction in negative affect, an increase in apathy, and in energy level. Although there have been reported cases of mania post-DBS surgery, the meta-analysis suggested no significant changes in symptoms of mania in the broader DBS population. Considerable heterogeneity was found and partially addressed through meta-regression and qualitative assessment of the included STN-DBS controlled studies. The major strengths of this meta-analysis, include attention to outcome validity, heterogeneity, independence of samples, and clinical utility, with the potential to improve post-operative safety through comprehensive consideration of mood and psychological adjustment. It appears that STN-DBS is a relatively safe and, in the case of mood symptomatology, an advantageous treatment of Parkinson's disease.
Collapse
|
17
|
Mosley PE, Akram H. Neuropsychiatric effects of subthalamic deep brain stimulation. THE HUMAN HYPOTHALAMUS - MIDDLE AND POSTERIOR REGION 2021; 180:417-431. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-820107-7.00026-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
|
18
|
Menchón JM, Real E, Alonso P, Aparicio MA, Segalas C, Plans G, Luyten L, Brunfaut E, Matthijs L, Raymakers S, Bervoets C, Higueras A, Katati M, Guerrero J, Hurtado M, Prieto M, Stieglitz LH, Löffelholz G, Walther S, Pollo C, Zurowski B, Tronnier V, Kordon A, Gambini O, Ranieri R, Franzini A, Messina G, Radu-Djurfeldt D, Schechtmann G, Chen LL, Eitan R, Israel Z, Bergman H, Brelje T, Brionne TC, Conseil A, Gielen F, Schuepbach M, Nuttin B, Gabriëls L. A prospective international multi-center study on safety and efficacy of deep brain stimulation for resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder. Mol Psychiatry 2021; 26:1234-1247. [PMID: 31664175 PMCID: PMC7985042 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-019-0562-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2017] [Revised: 09/30/2019] [Accepted: 10/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been proposed for severe, chronic, treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients. Although serious adverse events can occur, only a few studies report on the safety profile of DBS for psychiatric disorders. In a prospective, open-label, interventional multi-center study, we examined the safety and efficacy of electrical stimulation in 30 patients with DBS electrodes bilaterally implanted in the anterior limb of the internal capsule. Safety, efficacy, and functionality assessments were performed at 3, 6, and 12 months post implant. An independent Clinical Events Committee classified and coded all adverse events (AEs) according to EN ISO14155:2011. All patients experienced AEs (195 in total), with the majority of these being mild (52% of all AEs) or moderate (37%). Median time to resolution was 22 days for all AEs and the etiology with the highest AE incidence was 'programming/stimulation' (in 26 patients), followed by 'New illness, injury, condition' (13 patients) and 'pre-existing condition, worsening or exacerbation' (11 patients). Sixteen patients reported a total of 36 serious AEs (eight of them in one single patient), mainly transient anxiety and affective symptoms worsening (20 SAEs). Regarding efficacy measures, Y-BOCS reduction was 42% at 12 months and the responder rate was 60%. Improvements in GAF, CGI, and EuroQol-5D index scores were also observed. In sum, although some severe AEs occurred, most AEs were mild or moderate, transient and related to programming/stimulation and tended to resolve by adjustment of stimulation. In a severely treatment-resistant population, this open-label study supports that the potential benefits outweigh the potential risks of DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José M. Menchón
- grid.5841.80000 0004 1937 0247Bellvitge University Hospital-IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eva Real
- grid.5841.80000 0004 1937 0247Bellvitge University Hospital-IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pino Alonso
- grid.5841.80000 0004 1937 0247Bellvitge University Hospital-IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marco Alberto Aparicio
- grid.5841.80000 0004 1937 0247Bellvitge University Hospital-IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cinto Segalas
- grid.5841.80000 0004 1937 0247Bellvitge University Hospital-IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gerard Plans
- grid.5841.80000 0004 1937 0247Bellvitge University Hospital-IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Luyten
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884KU Leuven and/or UZ Leuven and/or UPC KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Els Brunfaut
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884KU Leuven and/or UZ Leuven and/or UPC KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Laurean Matthijs
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884KU Leuven and/or UZ Leuven and/or UPC KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Simon Raymakers
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884KU Leuven and/or UZ Leuven and/or UPC KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Chris Bervoets
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884KU Leuven and/or UZ Leuven and/or UPC KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Antonio Higueras
- grid.411380.f0000 0000 8771 3783Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | - Majed Katati
- grid.411380.f0000 0000 8771 3783Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | - José Guerrero
- grid.411380.f0000 0000 8771 3783Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | - Mariena Hurtado
- grid.411380.f0000 0000 8771 3783Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | - Mercedes Prieto
- grid.411380.f0000 0000 8771 3783Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | | | - Georg Löffelholz
- grid.411656.10000 0004 0479 0855Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sebastian Walther
- grid.411656.10000 0004 0479 0855Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland ,grid.412559.e0000 0001 0694 3235Translational Research Center, University Hospital of Psychiatry, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Claudio Pollo
- grid.411656.10000 0004 0479 0855Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Bartosz Zurowski
- grid.412468.d0000 0004 0646 2097Universitätsklinik Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Volker Tronnier
- grid.412468.d0000 0004 0646 2097Universitätsklinik Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Andreas Kordon
- grid.5963.9Oberbergklinik Schwarzwald, Hornberg, and Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Orsola Gambini
- grid.415093.aDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milano, San Paolo Hospital Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Rebecca Ranieri
- grid.415093.aDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milano, San Paolo Hospital Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Angelo Franzini
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Naz Neurologico C.Besta, Milano, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Messina
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Naz Neurologico C.Besta, Milano, Italy
| | - Diana Radu-Djurfeldt
- grid.24381.3c0000 0000 9241 5705Psykiatri Sydvast, OCD-departement, Karolinska University Hospital-region in Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gaston Schechtmann
- grid.24381.3c0000 0000 9241 5705Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Long-Long Chen
- grid.24381.3c0000 0000 9241 5705Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Renana Eitan
- grid.17788.310000 0001 2221 2926Psychiatry Department, Hadassah-University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Zvi Israel
- grid.17788.310000 0001 2221 2926Psychiatry Department, Hadassah-University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Hagai Bergman
- grid.17788.310000 0001 2221 2926Psychiatry Department, Hadassah-University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Tim Brelje
- grid.419673.e0000 0000 9545 2456Medtronic, Minneapolis, USA
| | - Thomas C. Brionne
- grid.471158.e0000 0004 0384 6386Medtronic International Trading Sàrl, Tolochenaz, Switzerland
| | - Aurélie Conseil
- grid.471158.e0000 0004 0384 6386Medtronic International Trading Sàrl, Tolochenaz, Switzerland
| | - Frans Gielen
- grid.419671.c0000 0004 1771 1765Medtronic Bakken Research Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Bart Nuttin
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884KU Leuven and/or UZ Leuven and/or UPC KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Loes Gabriëls
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884KU Leuven and/or UZ Leuven and/or UPC KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rossi S, Antal A, Bestmann S, Bikson M, Brewer C, Brockmöller J, Carpenter LL, Cincotta M, Chen R, Daskalakis JD, Di Lazzaro V, Fox MD, George MS, Gilbert D, Kimiskidis VK, Koch G, Ilmoniemi RJ, Lefaucheur JP, Leocani L, Lisanby SH, Miniussi C, Padberg F, Pascual-Leone A, Paulus W, Peterchev AV, Quartarone A, Rotenberg A, Rothwell J, Rossini PM, Santarnecchi E, Shafi MM, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Wassermann EM, Zangen A, Ziemann U, Hallett M. Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol 2021; 132:269-306. [PMID: 33243615 PMCID: PMC9094636 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 558] [Impact Index Per Article: 186.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
This article is based on a consensus conference, promoted and supported by the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN), which took place in Siena (Italy) in October 2018. The meeting intended to update the ten-year-old safety guidelines for the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in research and clinical settings (Rossi et al., 2009). Therefore, only emerging and new issues are covered in detail, leaving still valid the 2009 recommendations regarding the description of conventional or patterned TMS protocols, the screening of subjects/patients, the need of neurophysiological monitoring for new protocols, the utilization of reference thresholds of stimulation, the managing of seizures and the list of minor side effects. New issues discussed in detail from the meeting up to April 2020 are safety issues of recently developed stimulation devices and pulse configurations; duties and responsibility of device makers; novel scenarios of TMS applications such as in the neuroimaging context or imaging-guided and robot-guided TMS; TMS interleaved with transcranial electrical stimulation; safety during paired associative stimulation interventions; and risks of using TMS to induce therapeutic seizures (magnetic seizure therapy). An update on the possible induction of seizures, theoretically the most serious risk of TMS, is provided. It has become apparent that such a risk is low, even in patients taking drugs acting on the central nervous system, at least with the use of traditional stimulation parameters and focal coils for which large data sets are available. Finally, new operational guidelines are provided for safety in planning future trials based on traditional and patterned TMS protocols, as well as a summary of the minimal training requirements for operators, and a note on ethics of neuroenhancement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Rossi
- Department of Scienze Mediche, Chirurgiche e Neuroscienze, Unit of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Brain Investigation and Neuromodulation Lab (SI-BIN Lab), University of Siena, Italy.
| | - Andrea Antal
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center, Georg-August University of Goettingen, Germany; Institue of Medical Psychology, Otto-Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Sven Bestmann
- Department of Movement and Clinical Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK and Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carmen Brewer
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jürgen Brockmöller
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center, Georg-August University of Goettingen, Germany
| | - Linda L Carpenter
- Butler Hospital, Brown University Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Massimo Cincotta
- Unit of Neurology of Florence - Central Tuscany Local Health Authority, Florence, Italy
| | - Robert Chen
- Krembil Research Institute and Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Jeff D Daskalakis
- Center for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
- Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy
| | - Michael D Fox
- Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Mark S George
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Donald Gilbert
- Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Vasilios K Kimiskidis
- Laboratory of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA University Hospital, Greece
| | | | - Risto J Ilmoniemi
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering (NBE), Aalto University School of Science, Aalto, Finland
| | - Jean Pascal Lefaucheur
- EA 4391, ENT Team, Faculty of Medicine, Paris Est Creteil University (UPEC), Créteil, France; Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, (APHP), Créteil, France
| | - Letizia Leocani
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Experimental Neurology (INSPE), IRCCS-San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy
| | - Sarah H Lisanby
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Carlo Miniussi
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
| | - Frank Padberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alvaro Pascual-Leone
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research and Center for Memory Health, Hebrew SeniorLife, USA; Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Guttmann Brain Health Institut, Institut Guttmann, Universitat Autonoma Barcelona, Spain
| | - Walter Paulus
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center, Georg-August University of Goettingen, Germany
| | - Angel V Peterchev
- Departments of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical & Computer Engineering, and Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Angelo Quartarone
- Department of Biomedical, Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Alexander Rotenberg
- Department of Neurology, Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - John Rothwell
- Department of Movement and Clinical Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK and Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Paolo M Rossini
- Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, IRCCS San Raffaele-Pisana, Roma, Italy
| | - Emiliano Santarnecchi
- Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mouhsin M Shafi
- Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hartwig R Siebner
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark; Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Yoshikatzu Ugawa
- Department of Human Neurophysiology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Eric M Wassermann
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Abraham Zangen
- Zlotowski Center of Neuroscience, Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | - Ulf Ziemann
- Department of Neurology & Stroke, and Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Mark Hallett
- Human Motor Control Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chabardes S, Krack P, Piallat B, Bougerol T, Seigneuret E, Yelnik J, Fernandez Vidal S, David O, Mallet L, Benabid AL, Polosan M. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in obsessive-compulsives disorders: long-term follow-up of an open, prospective, observational cohort. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2020; 91:1349-1356. [PMID: 33033168 PMCID: PMC7677463 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-323421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2020] [Revised: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a major cause of disability in western country and responsible for severe impairment of quality of life. About 10% of patients present with severe OCD symptoms and require innovative treatment such as deep brain stimulation (DBS). Among possible targets, the non-motor subthalamic nucleus (STN) is a key node of the basal ganglia circuitry, strongly connected to limbic cortical areas known to be involved in OCD. METHOD We analysed, in a prospective, observational, monocentric, open label cohort, the effect of chronic non-motor STN-DBS in 19 patients with treatment-resistant OCD consecutively operated in a single centre. Severity of OCD was evaluated using the Yale and Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS). YBOCS scores at 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively were compared with baseline. Responders were defined by >35% improvement of YBOCS scores. Global Assessment Functioning (GAF) scale was used to evaluate the impact of improvement. RESULTS At a 24-month follow-up, the mean YBOCS score improved by 53.4% from 33.3±3.5 to 15.8±9.1 (95% CI 11.2-20.4; p<0.0001). Fourteen out of 19 patients were considered as responders, 5 out of 19 being improved over 75% and 10 out of 19 over 50%. GAF scale improved by 92% from 34.1±3.9 to 66.4±18.8 (95% CI 56.7-76.1; p=0.0003). The most frequent adverse events consisted of transient DBS-induced hypomania and anxiety. CONCLUSION Chronic DBS of the non-motor STN is an effective and relatively safe procedure to treat severe OCD resistant to conventional management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Chabardes
- CLINATEC, CEA Clinatec-Minatec, Grenoble, France .,Department of Neurosurgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Grenoble Institut neurosciences, University Grenoble Alpes-INSERM U1216, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - Paul Krack
- Division of Neurology, Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland, Bern, Switzerland.,Department of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Brigitte Piallat
- Grenoble Institut neurosciences, University Grenoble Alpes-INSERM U1216, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - Thierry Bougerol
- Department of Psychiatry, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Eric Seigneuret
- Department of Neurosurgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Jerome Yelnik
- Institut du Cerveau, ICM, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, F-75013, Paris, France
| | - Sara Fernandez Vidal
- Institut du Cerveau, ICM, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, F-75013, Paris, France
| | - Olivier David
- Grenoble Institut neurosciences, University Grenoble Alpes-INSERM U1216, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - Luc Mallet
- Institut du Cerveau, ICM, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, F-75013, Paris, France.,Département Médical-Universitaire de Psychiatrie et d'Addictologie, Univ Paris-Est Créteil, DMU IMPACT, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor - Albert Chenevier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France.,Department of Mental Health and Psychiatry, Global Health Institute, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Mircea Polosan
- Grenoble Institut neurosciences, University Grenoble Alpes-INSERM U1216, 38000 Grenoble, France.,Department of Psychiatry, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Thomsen BLC, Jensen SR, Clausen A, Karlsborg M, Jespersen B, Løkkegaard A. Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: Still Effective After More Than 8 Years. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2020; 7:788-796. [PMID: 33033736 PMCID: PMC7534016 DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.13040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2019] [Revised: 04/26/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) is well established and the most effective treatment for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). However, little is known of the long-term effects. Objectives The aim of this study was to examine the long-term effects of STN-DBS in PD and evaluate the effect of reprogramming after more than 8 years of treatment. Methods A total of 82 patients underwent surgery in Copenhagen between 2001 and 2008. Before surgery and at 8 to 15 years follow-up, the patients were rated with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) with and without stimulation and medicine. Furthermore, at long-term follow-up, the patients were offered a systemic reprogramming of the stimulation settings. Data from patients' medical records were collected. The mean (range) age at surgery was 60 (42-78) years, and the duration of disease was 13 (5-25) years. A total of 30 patients completed the long-term follow-up. Results The mean reduction of the motor UPDRS by medication before surgery was 52%. The improvement of motor UPDRS with stimulation alone compared with motor UPDRS with neither stimulation nor medication was 61% at 1 year and 39% at 8 to 15 years after surgery (before reprogramming). Compared with before surgery, medication was reduced by 55% after 1 year and 44% after 8 to 15 years. After reprogramming, most patients improved. Conclusions STN-DBS remains effective in the long run, with a sustained reduction of medication in the 30 of 82 patients available for long-term follow-up. Reprogramming is effective even in the late stages of PD and after many years of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgitte L C Thomsen
- Department of Neurology Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark.,Faculty of Health and Medical Science University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Steen R Jensen
- Department of Neurology Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Anders Clausen
- Department of Neurology Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Merete Karlsborg
- Department of Neurology Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Bo Jespersen
- Department of Neurosurgery Rigshospitalet University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Annemette Løkkegaard
- Department of Neurology Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark.,Faculty of Health and Medical Science University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sharma VD, Patel M, Miocinovic S. Surgical Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: Devices and Lesion Approaches. Neurotherapeutics 2020; 17:1525-1538. [PMID: 33118132 PMCID: PMC7851282 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-020-00939-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgical treatments have transformed the management of Parkinson's disease (PD). Therapeutic options available for the management of PD motor complications include deep brain stimulation (DBS), ablative or lesioning procedures (pallidotomy, thalamotomy, subthalamotomy), and dopaminergic medication infusion devices. The decision to pursue these advanced treatment options is typically done by a multidisciplinary team by considering factors such as the patient's clinical characteristics, efficacy, ease of use, and risks of therapy with a goal to improve PD symptoms and quality of life. DBS has become the most widely used surgical therapy, although there is a re-emergence of interest in ablative procedures with the introduction of MR-guided focused ultrasound. In this article, we review DBS and lesioning procedures for PD, including indications, selection process, and management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vibhash D Sharma
- Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3599 Rainbow Blvd, MS 3042, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
| | - Margi Patel
- Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Weintraub D. Management of psychiatric disorders in Parkinson's disease : Neurotherapeutics - Movement Disorders Therapeutics. Neurotherapeutics 2020; 17:1511-1524. [PMID: 32514891 PMCID: PMC7851231 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-020-00875-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Affective disorders (depression and anxiety), psychosis, impulse control disorders, and apathy are common and sometimes disabling psychiatric conditions in Parkinson disease (PD). Psychiatric aspects of PD are associated with numerous adverse outcomes, yet in spite of this and their high frequency, there remains incomplete understanding of epidemiology, presentation, risk factors, neural substrate, and management strategies. Psychiatric features are typically co- or multimorbid, and there is great intra- and interindividual variability in presentation [1]. The neuropathophysiological changes that occur in PD, as well as the association between PD treatment and particular psychiatric disorders, suggest a neurobiological contribution to many psychiatric symptoms. There is evidence that psychiatric disorders in PD are still under-recognized and undertreated, and although psychotropic medication use is common, randomized controlled trials demonstrating efficacy and tolerability are largely lacking. Future research on neuropsychiatric complications in PD should be oriented toward determining modifiable correlates or risk factors, and most importantly, establishing efficacious and well-tolerated treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Weintraub
- Psychiatry and Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Parkinson's Disease Research, Education and Clinical Center (PADRECC), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Parkinson's Disease-Related Risk of Suicide and Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation: Meta-Analysis. PARKINSONS DISEASE 2020; 2020:8091963. [PMID: 33062248 PMCID: PMC7537696 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8091963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2020] [Revised: 09/06/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Previous studies investigated the risk of suicide in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) but reported discrepant results. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective therapy for PD, while its effect on suicide risk has seldom been researched. This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the risk of suicide and/or suicidal ideation in PD patients and in PD patients who underwent DBS. Methods Relevant articles published in the PubMed or EMBASE or CNKI database from 1990 to December 2019 were sourced, and the combined standardized mortality rate (SMR) or odds ratio (OR) was pooled. Result A total of 1070 articles were found. After screening, 4 cross-sectional studies, 4 cohort studies, 2 randomized controlled trial studies, and 2 case-control studies were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled data indicated that PD patients may have increased risk of suicide (lnSMR, 0.459; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.286 to 0.632; p < 0.001). No significant difference was found in the risk of suicide when comparing PD patients who underwent DBS with PD patients who received only drug therapy (OR = 2.844, 95%CI: 0.619 to 13.072, p=0.179). DBS may increase the risk of suicide and/or suicidal ideation in PD patients compared with general population (lnSMR = 3.383, 95%CI: 2.839 to 3.927, p < 0.001). Conclusion PD patients have higher risk of suicide and/or suicidal ideation compared with controls, while PD patients who received DBS tend to have an increased risk of suicide or suicidal ideation. Psychological evaluation is needed in PD patients, and pre- and post-operation evaluations are necessary for PD patients who underwent DBS.
Collapse
|
25
|
Berardelli I, Belvisi D, Nardella A, Falcone G, Lamis DA, Fabbrini G, Berardelli A, Girardi P, Pompili M. Suicide in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review. CNS & NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS-DRUG TARGETS 2020; 18:466-477. [PMID: 31269887 DOI: 10.2174/1871527318666190703093345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2018] [Revised: 06/01/2019] [Accepted: 06/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Psychiatric disorders and suicide have been reported in patients suffering from Parkinson's disease. The aims of the present paper were to determine whether patients with Parkinson's disease have an increased rate of suicide and to identify the clinical features possibly associated with suicide risk in Parkinson's disease. We also reviewed the studies on suicide risk in Parkinson's disease in patients after deep brain stimulation. We performed a Medline, Excerpta Medica, PsycLit, PsycInfo and Index Medicus search to identify all articles published on this topic from 1970 to 2019. The following search terms were used: suicide OR suicide attempt OR suicidal ideation OR suicide risk AND Parkinson's disease AND Parkinson's disease and deep brain stimulation. The studies we identified that assessed the suicide rate associated with Parkinson's disease yielded contrasting results, although an increase in suicidal ideation did emerge. The studies on the effect of deep brain stimulation on suicide risk in Parkinson's disease also reported mixed findings. Psychiatric symptoms, including depression, appear to be associated with suicide risk in patients with Parkinson's disease undergoing medical and after surgical treatment. The studies reviewed suggest that suicidal ideation is increased in Parkinson's disease. Further longitudinal studies designed to assess suicidality in this condition are still needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella Berardelli
- Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, Suicide Prevention Center, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Adele Nardella
- Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, Suicide Prevention Center, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Falcone
- Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, Suicide Prevention Center, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Dorian A Lamis
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30303, United States
| | - Giovanni Fabbrini
- IRCSS Neuromed Institute Pozzilli, IS, Italy.,Department of Human Neurosciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alfredo Berardelli
- IRCSS Neuromed Institute Pozzilli, IS, Italy.,Department of Human Neurosciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Girardi
- Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, Suicide Prevention Center, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Maurizio Pompili
- Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, Suicide Prevention Center, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Dewandre Q, Dubuisson A, Kaschten B, Reuter G, Martin D. Refractory neuropathic pain from a median nerve injury: spinal cord or peripheral nerve stimulation? A case report. Acta Neurol Belg 2020; 120:867-871. [PMID: 30701421 DOI: 10.1007/s13760-018-01065-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Accepted: 12/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is the most frequently used neuromodulation technique even for neurogenic pain from a peripheral nerve injury although peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has been designed for this purpose. PNS appears less invasive than SCS or deep brain stimulation. It provides greater and specific target coverage and it could be more cost-effective than SCS because low electrical stimulation is exclusively delivered to the precise painful territory. We report a case of excellent result following median nerve stimulation at arm level after SCS failure and a 10-year history of intense pain. PNS would certainly have been considered much earlier if it was accepted and reimbursed by the Belgium National Insurance. PNS is a safe, simple, and efficient technique available for decades but it is still considered as experimental and underemployed. Belgian National Insurance fears an explosion of indications on neuromodulation if PNS was reimbursed. We consider that PNS aside SCS and other neuromodulation techniques should be made available in Belgium in case of peripheral chronic neuropathic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Q Dewandre
- Neurosurgery Department, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium.
| | - A Dubuisson
- Neurosurgery Department, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - B Kaschten
- Neurosurgery Department, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - G Reuter
- Neurosurgery Department, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - D Martin
- Neurosurgery Department, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Suicide and suicide attempts after subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci 2020; 42:267-274. [PMID: 32643134 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-020-04555-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep-brain stimulation is a well-established, effective treatment for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. Recent studies examining rates of suicide attempts and suicides after deep-brain stimulation in the bilateral subthalamic nucleus have reported varying results. Using this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to obtain a comprehensive understanding of suicidality in Parkinson's patients after subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation. METHODS We systematically examined Medline, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases to identify studies published before November 2019 that measured rates of suicidality in Parkinson's patients who underwent subthalamic nucleus stimulation. A meta-analysis of the data from the included studies was conducted using Stata 12.0. RESULTS A total of 18 studies met the eligibility criteria of this study. We found that the pooled rate of suicidal ideation was 4% (95% CI 0.00-7.2%, range 2-17%). The pooled rate of suicide attempts was 1% (95% CI 1.0-2.0%), while the pooled rate of suicide was 1% (95% CI 0.0-1.0%). CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate a relatively high rate of suicidality among Parkinson's patients after subthalamic nucleus deep-brain stimulation. It is important for clinicians to carefully monitor psychiatric disorders, especially suicidal ideation and suicide attempts, in Parkinson's patients before and after subthalamic nucleus deep-brain stimulation.
Collapse
|
28
|
|
29
|
Leal Rato M, Ferreira JJ. Reader response: Risk factors for suicidality in Huntington disease: An analysis of the 2CARE clinical trial. Neurology 2020; 94:637. [DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000009229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
30
|
Graat I, van Rooijen G, Mocking R, Vulink N, de Koning P, Schuurman R, Denys D. Is deep brain stimulation effective and safe for patients with obsessive compulsive disorder and comorbid bipolar disorder? J Affect Disord 2020; 264:69-75. [PMID: 31846903 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2019] [Revised: 11/07/2019] [Accepted: 11/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Bipolar disorder (BD) is generally considered a contra-indication for DBS due to frequently reported transient impulsivity or (hypo)mania. OBJECTIVE The present study is the first study to examine effectiveness and safety of DBS for patients with OCD and BD. METHODS Five consecutive patients suffering from treatment-refractory OCD with comorbid BD (I or II) underwent DBS of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule (vALIC). We examined effectiveness of DBS on symptoms of OCD and depression, using the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). We monitored side-effects, in particular DBS-induced (hypo)manic symptoms, using the Young mania rating scale (YMRS). RESULTS Follow-up time ranged between 15 and 68 months. vALIC-DBS led to a significant improvement of OCD and depressive symptoms. Mean Y-BOCS score decreased from 36.8 (SD 2.4) to 22.4 (SD 9.4). Mean HAM-D score dropped from 24.2 (SD 8.6) to 16.5 (SD 11.3). Transient hypomanic symptoms were observed in 4 out of 5 patients and in 1 patient, hypomanic symptoms resolved by adjusting stimulation and medication. Changes in YMRS scores were not significant. Hypomanic symptoms did not result in admission or lasting adverse consequences. CONCLUSION DBS effectively alleviates symptoms of OCD and depression in patients with OCD and BD but there is a large risk of developing transient hypomanic symptoms. Altogether, comorbid BD should not be considered as an absolute contra-indication for DBS in OCD patients with comorbid BD, but patients should be monitored carefully during optimization and follow-up of DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilse Graat
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Universitair Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Geeske van Rooijen
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Universitair Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roel Mocking
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Universitair Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nienke Vulink
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Universitair Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pelle de Koning
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Universitair Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rick Schuurman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Academic Medical Centre (Amsterdam UMC), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Damiaan Denys
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Universitair Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
|
32
|
Krack P, Volkmann J, Tinkhauser G, Deuschl G. Deep Brain Stimulation in Movement Disorders: From Experimental Surgery to Evidence‐Based Therapy. Mov Disord 2019; 34:1795-1810. [DOI: 10.1002/mds.27860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2019] [Revised: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Krack
- Department of Neurology Bern University Hospital and University of Bern Bern Switzerland
| | - Jens Volkmann
- Department of Neurology University Hospital and Julius‐Maximilian‐University Wuerzburg Germany
| | - Gerd Tinkhauser
- Department of Neurology Bern University Hospital and University of Bern Bern Switzerland
| | - Günther Deuschl
- Department of Neurology University Hospital Schleswig Holstein (UKSH), Kiel Campus; Christian‐Albrechts‐University Kiel Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rughani A, Schwalb JM, Sidiropoulos C, Pilitsis J, Ramirez-Zamora A, Sweet JA, Mittal S, Espay AJ, Martinez JG, Abosch A, Eskandar E, Gross R, Alterman R, Hamani C. Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guideline on Subthalamic Nucleus and Globus Pallidus Internus Deep Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Patients With Parkinson's Disease: Executive Summary. Neurosurgery 2019. [PMID: 29538685 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
QUESTION 1 Is bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) more, less, or as effective as bilateral globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation (GPi DBS) in treating motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease, as measured by improvements in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, part III (UPDRS-III) scores? RECOMMENDATION Given that bilateral STN DBS is at least as effective as bilateral GPi DBS in treating motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (as measured by improvements in UPDRS-III scores), consideration can be given to the selection of either target in patients undergoing surgery to treat motor symptoms. (Level I). QUESTION 2 Is bilateral STN DBS more, less, or as effective as bilateral GPi DBS in allowing reduction of dopaminergic medication in Parkinson's disease? RECOMMENDATION When the main goal of surgery is reduction of dopaminergic medications in a patient with Parkinson's disease, then bilateral STN DBS should be performed instead of GPi DBS. (Level I). QUESTION 3 Is bilateral STN DBS more, less, or as effective as bilateral GPi DBS in treating dyskinesias associated with Parkinson's disease? RECOMMENDATION There is insufficient evidence to make a generalizable recommendation regarding the target selection for reduction of dyskinesias. However, when the reduction of medication is not anticipated and there is a goal to reduce the severity of "on" medication dyskinesias, the GPi should be targeted. (Level I). QUESTION 4 Is bilateral STN DBS more, less, or as effective as bilateral GPi DBS in improving quality of life measures in Parkinson's disease? RECOMMENDATION When considering improvements in quality of life in a patient undergoing DBS for Parkinson's disease, there is no basis to recommend bilateral DBS in 1 target over the other. (Level I). QUESTION 5 Is bilateral STN DBS associated with greater, lesser, or a similar impact on neurocognitive function than bilateral GPi DBS in Parkinson disease? RECOMMENDATION If there is significant concern about cognitive decline, particularly in regards to processing speed and working memory in a patient undergoing DBS, then the clinician should consider using GPi DBS rather than STN DBS, while taking into consideration other goals of surgery. (Level I). QUESTION 6 Is bilateral STN DBS associated with a higher, lower, or similar risk of mood disturbance than GPi DBS in Parkinson's disease? RECOMMENDATION If there is significant concern about the risk of depression in a patient undergoing DBS, then the clinician should consider using pallidal rather than STN stimulation, while taking into consideration other goals of surgery. (Level I). QUESTION 7 Is bilateral STN DBS associated with a higher, lower, or similar risk of adverse events compared to GPi DBS in Parkinson's disease? RECOMMENDATION There is insufficient evidence to recommend bilateral DBS in 1 target over the other in order to minimize the risk of surgical adverse events. The full guideline can be found at: https://www.cns.org/guidelines/deep-brain-stimulation-parkinsons-disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anand Rughani
- Neuroscience Institute, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine
| | - Jason M Schwalb
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Medical Gr-oup, West Bloomfield, Michigan
| | | | - Julie Pilitsis
- Departments of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics and of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York
| | | | - Jennifer A Sweet
- Department of Neuro-surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Sandeep Mittal
- De-partment of Neurosurgery, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Alberto J Espay
- James J. and Joan A. Gardner Center for Parkinson Disease and Movement Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | - Aviva Abosch
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Emad Eskandar
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert Gross
- Department of Neu-rosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ron Alterman
- Division of Neurosurgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massa-chusetts
| | - Clement Hamani
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Weintraub D, Mamikonyan E. The Neuropsychiatry of Parkinson Disease: A Perfect Storm. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2019; 27:998-1018. [PMID: 31006550 PMCID: PMC7015280 DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Revised: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Affective disorders, cognitive decline, and psychosis have long been recognized as common in Parkinson disease (PD), and other psychiatric disorders include impulse control disorders, anxiety symptoms, disorders of sleep and wakefulness, and apathy. Psychiatric aspects of PD are associated with numerous adverse outcomes, yet in spite of this and their frequent occurrence, there is incomplete understanding of epidemiology, presentation, risk factors, neural substrate, and management strategies. Psychiatric features are typically multimorbid, and there is great intra- and interindividual variability in presentation. The hallmark neuropathophysiological changes that occur in PD, plus the association between exposure to dopaminergic medications and certain psychiatric disorders, suggest a neurobiological basis for many psychiatric symptoms, although psychological factors are involved as well. There is evidence that psychiatric disorders in PD are still under-recognized and undertreated and although psychotropic medication use is common, controlled studies demonstrating efficacy and tolerability are largely lacking. Future research on neuropsychiatric complications in PD should be oriented toward determining modifiable correlates or risk factors and establishing efficacious and well-tolerated treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Weintraub
- Perelman School of Medicine (DW, EM), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Parkinson's Disease Research, Education and Clinical Center (PADRECC) (DW), Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia.
| | - Eugenia Mamikonyan
- Perelman School of Medicine (DW, EM), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Chen KS, Chen R. Invasive and Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: Clinical Effects and Future Perspectives. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2019; 106:763-775. [DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kai‐Hsiang Stanley Chen
- Krembil Research Institute University Health Network Toronto Ontario Canada
- Department of Neurology National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin‐Chu Branch Hsin‐Chu Taiwan
| | - Robert Chen
- Krembil Research Institute University Health Network Toronto Ontario Canada
- Division of Neurology Department of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
- Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease University Health Network Toronto Ontario Canada
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Shepard MD, Perepezko K, Broen MPG, Hinkle JT, Butala A, Mills KA, Nanavati J, Fischer NM, Nestadt P, Pontone G. Suicide in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2019; 90:822-829. [PMID: 30661029 PMCID: PMC7187903 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-319815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2018] [Revised: 12/24/2018] [Accepted: 12/27/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Persons with Parkinson's disease (PwP) have many known risk factors for suicide and suicidal ideation (SI). Despite this, there is limited understanding of suicidality in this population. We conducted a systematic review to synthesise the available literature on suicidality in PwP and highlight areas for potential intervention and further research. We identified 116 articles discussing SI, suicidal behaviours, suicide attempts and/or fatal suicide in PwP. These articles describe prevalence, suicide methods, risk factors for suicide and SI and treatment of suicidality. In this review, we summarise the current literature and provide suggestions for how clinicians can identify and treat PwP who are at risk for suicide, for example, through aggressive treatment of depression and improved screening for access to lethal means.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Deanna Shepard
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kate Perepezko
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Martijn P G Broen
- Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jared Thomas Hinkle
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ankur Butala
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kelly A Mills
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Morris K. Udall Parkinson's Disease Research Center of Excellence, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Julie Nanavati
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Nicole Mercado Fischer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Paul Nestadt
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Gregory Pontone
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Morris K. Udall Parkinson's Disease Research Center of Excellence, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Accolla EA, Pollo C. Mood Effects After Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: An Update. Front Neurol 2019; 10:617. [PMID: 31258509 PMCID: PMC6587122 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 05/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Depression in Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a prevalent and invalidating symptom. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) allows for an improvement of PD motor features, but its effects on mood are difficult to predict. Here, we review the evidence regarding mood effects after DBS of either subthalamic nucleus (STN) or globus pallidus pars interna (GPi). Different influences of multiple factors contribute to impact the neuropsychiatric outcome after surgery. Psychosocial presurgical situation, postsurgical coping mechanisms, dopaminergic treatment modifications, and direct effects of the stimulation of either target are all playing a distinct role on the psychological well-being of patients undergoing DBS. No clear advantage of either target (STN vs. GPi) has been consistently found, both being effective and with a favorable profile on depression symptoms. However, specific patients' characteristics or anatomical considerations can guide the neurosurgeon in the target choice. Further research together with technological advances are expected to confine the stimulation area within dysfunctional circuits causing motor symptoms of PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ettore A. Accolla
- Neurology Unit, Department of Medicine, HFR – Hôpital Cantonal Fribourg and Fribourg University, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Claudio Pollo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Zangiabadi N, Ladino LD, Sina F, Orozco-Hernández JP, Carter A, Téllez-Zenteno JF. Deep Brain Stimulation and Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Review of the Literature. Front Neurol 2019; 10:601. [PMID: 31244761 PMCID: PMC6563690 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2018] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Deep brain stimulation is a safe and effective neurointerventional technique for the treatment of movement disorders. Electrical stimulation of subcortical structures may exert a control on seizure generators initiating epileptic activities. The aim of this review is to present the targets of the deep brain stimulation for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy. Methods: We performed a structured review of the literature from 1980 to 2018 using Medline and PubMed. Articles assessing the impact of deep brain stimulation on seizure frequency in patients with DRE were selected. Meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies were included. Results: To date, deep brain stimulation of various neural targets has been investigated in animal experiments and humans. This article presents the use of stimulation of the anterior and centromedian nucleus of the thalamus, hippocampus, basal ganglia, cerebellum and hypothalamus. Anterior thalamic stimulation has demonstrated efficacy and there is evidence to recommend it as the target of choice. Conclusion: Deep brain stimulation for seizures may be an option in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Anterior thalamic nucleus stimulation could be recommended over other targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasser Zangiabadi
- Shefa Neuroscience Research Center, Khatam Alanbia Hospital, Tehran, Iran
- Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Lady Diana Ladino
- Epilepsy Program, Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe, Neuroclinica, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Farzad Sina
- Department of Neurology, Rasool Akram Hospital, IUMS, Tehran, Iran
| | - Juan Pablo Orozco-Hernández
- Departamento de Investigación Clínica, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira-Clínica Comfamiliar, Pereira, Colombia
| | - Alexandra Carter
- Saskatchewan Epilepsy Program, Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Giannini G, Francois M, Lhommée E, Polosan M, Schmitt E, Fraix V, Castrioto A, Ardouin C, Bichon A, Pollak P, Benabid AL, Seigneuret E, Chabardes S, Wack M, Krack P, Moro E. Suicide and suicide attempts after subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson disease. Neurology 2019; 93:e97-e105. [PMID: 31101738 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000007665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2018] [Accepted: 02/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the postoperative attempted and completed suicide rates after subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) in a single-center cohort and to determine factors associated with attempted and completed suicide. METHODS We retrospectively included all patients with Parkinson disease (PD) who underwent bilateral STN-DBS surgery at the Grenoble University Hospital between 1993 and 2016. For each patient who committed or attempted suicide, 2 patients with PD with STN-DBS without any suicidal behaviors were matched for age (±1 year), sex, and year of surgery (±2 years). Clinical data were collected from medical records. Detailed preoperative and postoperative neuropsychological evaluations, including frontal and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scores, were gathered. RESULTS A total of 534 patients with PD were included. Completed and attempted suicide percentages were 0.75% (4 of 534) and 4.11% (22 of 534), respectively. The observed suicide rate in the first postoperative year (187.20 of 100,000 per year, 1 of 534) was higher than the expected National Observatory on Suicide Risks rate adjusted for age and sex (standardized mortality ratio 8.1). This rate remained similar over the second and third postoperative years. In a comparison of the 26 patients completing/attempting suicide and the 52 controls, the first group showed more frequent history of suicidal ideation/suicide attempts and psychotic symptoms, higher percentage of family psychiatric history, higher psychiatric medication use, and higher preoperative frontal and BDI scores on neuropsychological evaluations. CONCLUSIONS Suicide behaviors can occur after STN-DBS, especially during the first 3 years. A careful multidisciplinary assessment and long-term follow-up are recommended to recognize and treat this potentially preventable risk for mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Giannini
- From the IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (G.G.), UOC Clinica Neurologica; Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences (G.G.), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy; Movement Disorders Unit (G.G., E.L., E.S., V.F., A.C., C.A., A.B., P.P., P.K., E.M.), Division of Neurology and Clinique de Psychiatrie (M.F., M.P.), Pôle Neurologie Psychiatrie, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; Department of Neurosurgery (A.-L.B., E.S., S.C.), CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; and Department of Medical Informatics (M.W.), HEGP, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Matthieu Francois
- From the IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (G.G.), UOC Clinica Neurologica; Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences (G.G.), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy; Movement Disorders Unit (G.G., E.L., E.S., V.F., A.C., C.A., A.B., P.P., P.K., E.M.), Division of Neurology and Clinique de Psychiatrie (M.F., M.P.), Pôle Neurologie Psychiatrie, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; Department of Neurosurgery (A.-L.B., E.S., S.C.), CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; and Department of Medical Informatics (M.W.), HEGP, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Eugénie Lhommée
- From the IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (G.G.), UOC Clinica Neurologica; Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences (G.G.), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy; Movement Disorders Unit (G.G., E.L., E.S., V.F., A.C., C.A., A.B., P.P., P.K., E.M.), Division of Neurology and Clinique de Psychiatrie (M.F., M.P.), Pôle Neurologie Psychiatrie, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; Department of Neurosurgery (A.-L.B., E.S., S.C.), CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; and Department of Medical Informatics (M.W.), HEGP, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Mircea Polosan
- From the IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (G.G.), UOC Clinica Neurologica; Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences (G.G.), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy; Movement Disorders Unit (G.G., E.L., E.S., V.F., A.C., C.A., A.B., P.P., P.K., E.M.), Division of Neurology and Clinique de Psychiatrie (M.F., M.P.), Pôle Neurologie Psychiatrie, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; Department of Neurosurgery (A.-L.B., E.S., S.C.), CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; and Department of Medical Informatics (M.W.), HEGP, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Emmanuelle Schmitt
- From the IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (G.G.), UOC Clinica Neurologica; Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences (G.G.), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy; Movement Disorders Unit (G.G., E.L., E.S., V.F., A.C., C.A., A.B., P.P., P.K., E.M.), Division of Neurology and Clinique de Psychiatrie (M.F., M.P.), Pôle Neurologie Psychiatrie, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; Department of Neurosurgery (A.-L.B., E.S., S.C.), CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; and Department of Medical Informatics (M.W.), HEGP, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Valérie Fraix
- From the IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (G.G.), UOC Clinica Neurologica; Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences (G.G.), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy; Movement Disorders Unit (G.G., E.L., E.S., V.F., A.C., C.A., A.B., P.P., P.K., E.M.), Division of Neurology and Clinique de Psychiatrie (M.F., M.P.), Pôle Neurologie Psychiatrie, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; Department of Neurosurgery (A.-L.B., E.S., S.C.), CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; and Department of Medical Informatics (M.W.), HEGP, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Anna Castrioto
- From the IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (G.G.), UOC Clinica Neurologica; Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences (G.G.), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy; Movement Disorders Unit (G.G., E.L., E.S., V.F., A.C., C.A., A.B., P.P., P.K., E.M.), Division of Neurology and Clinique de Psychiatrie (M.F., M.P.), Pôle Neurologie Psychiatrie, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; Department of Neurosurgery (A.-L.B., E.S., S.C.), CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; and Department of Medical Informatics (M.W.), HEGP, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Claire Ardouin
- From the IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (G.G.), UOC Clinica Neurologica; Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences (G.G.), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy; Movement Disorders Unit (G.G., E.L., E.S., V.F., A.C., C.A., A.B., P.P., P.K., E.M.), Division of Neurology and Clinique de Psychiatrie (M.F., M.P.), Pôle Neurologie Psychiatrie, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; Department of Neurosurgery (A.-L.B., E.S., S.C.), CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; and Department of Medical Informatics (M.W.), HEGP, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Amélie Bichon
- From the IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (G.G.), UOC Clinica Neurologica; Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences (G.G.), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy; Movement Disorders Unit (G.G., E.L., E.S., V.F., A.C., C.A., A.B., P.P., P.K., E.M.), Division of Neurology and Clinique de Psychiatrie (M.F., M.P.), Pôle Neurologie Psychiatrie, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; Department of Neurosurgery (A.-L.B., E.S., S.C.), CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; and Department of Medical Informatics (M.W.), HEGP, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Pollak
- From the IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (G.G.), UOC Clinica Neurologica; Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences (G.G.), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy; Movement Disorders Unit (G.G., E.L., E.S., V.F., A.C., C.A., A.B., P.P., P.K., E.M.), Division of Neurology and Clinique de Psychiatrie (M.F., M.P.), Pôle Neurologie Psychiatrie, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; Department of Neurosurgery (A.-L.B., E.S., S.C.), CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; and Department of Medical Informatics (M.W.), HEGP, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Alim-Louis Benabid
- From the IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (G.G.), UOC Clinica Neurologica; Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences (G.G.), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy; Movement Disorders Unit (G.G., E.L., E.S., V.F., A.C., C.A., A.B., P.P., P.K., E.M.), Division of Neurology and Clinique de Psychiatrie (M.F., M.P.), Pôle Neurologie Psychiatrie, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; Department of Neurosurgery (A.-L.B., E.S., S.C.), CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; and Department of Medical Informatics (M.W.), HEGP, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Eric Seigneuret
- From the IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (G.G.), UOC Clinica Neurologica; Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences (G.G.), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy; Movement Disorders Unit (G.G., E.L., E.S., V.F., A.C., C.A., A.B., P.P., P.K., E.M.), Division of Neurology and Clinique de Psychiatrie (M.F., M.P.), Pôle Neurologie Psychiatrie, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; Department of Neurosurgery (A.-L.B., E.S., S.C.), CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; and Department of Medical Informatics (M.W.), HEGP, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Stephan Chabardes
- From the IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (G.G.), UOC Clinica Neurologica; Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences (G.G.), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy; Movement Disorders Unit (G.G., E.L., E.S., V.F., A.C., C.A., A.B., P.P., P.K., E.M.), Division of Neurology and Clinique de Psychiatrie (M.F., M.P.), Pôle Neurologie Psychiatrie, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; Department of Neurosurgery (A.-L.B., E.S., S.C.), CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; and Department of Medical Informatics (M.W.), HEGP, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Maxime Wack
- From the IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (G.G.), UOC Clinica Neurologica; Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences (G.G.), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy; Movement Disorders Unit (G.G., E.L., E.S., V.F., A.C., C.A., A.B., P.P., P.K., E.M.), Division of Neurology and Clinique de Psychiatrie (M.F., M.P.), Pôle Neurologie Psychiatrie, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; Department of Neurosurgery (A.-L.B., E.S., S.C.), CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; and Department of Medical Informatics (M.W.), HEGP, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Paul Krack
- From the IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (G.G.), UOC Clinica Neurologica; Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences (G.G.), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy; Movement Disorders Unit (G.G., E.L., E.S., V.F., A.C., C.A., A.B., P.P., P.K., E.M.), Division of Neurology and Clinique de Psychiatrie (M.F., M.P.), Pôle Neurologie Psychiatrie, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; Department of Neurosurgery (A.-L.B., E.S., S.C.), CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; and Department of Medical Informatics (M.W.), HEGP, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Elena Moro
- From the IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (G.G.), UOC Clinica Neurologica; Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences (G.G.), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy; Movement Disorders Unit (G.G., E.L., E.S., V.F., A.C., C.A., A.B., P.P., P.K., E.M.), Division of Neurology and Clinique de Psychiatrie (M.F., M.P.), Pôle Neurologie Psychiatrie, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; Department of Neurosurgery (A.-L.B., E.S., S.C.), CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University; and Department of Medical Informatics (M.W.), HEGP, AP-HP, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Laurencin C, Thobois S. Malattia di Parkinson e depressione. Neurologia 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/s1634-7072(19)42021-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
41
|
Formolo DA, Gaspar JM, Melo HM, Eichwald T, Zepeda RJ, Latini A, Okun MS, Walz R. Deep Brain Stimulation for Obesity: A Review and Future Directions. Front Neurosci 2019; 13:323. [PMID: 31057350 PMCID: PMC6482165 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2018] [Accepted: 03/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The global prevalence of obesity has been steadily increasing. Although pharmacotherapy and bariatric surgeries can be useful adjuvants in the treatment of morbid obesity, they may lose long-term effectiveness. Obesity result largely from unbalanced energy homeostasis. Palatable and densely caloric foods may affect the brain overlapped circuits involved with homeostatic hypothalamus and hedonic feeding. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) consists of delivering electrical impulses to specific brain targets to modulate a disturbed neuronal network. In selected patients, DBS has been shown to be safe and effective for movement disorders. We review all the cases reports and series of patients treated with DBS for obesity using a PubMed search and will address the following obesity-related issues: (i) the hypothalamic regulation of homeostatic feeding; (ii) the reward mesolimbic circuit and hedonic feeding; (iii) basic concepts of DBS as well as the rationale for obesity treatment; (iv) perspectives and challenges in obesity DBS. The small number of cases provides preliminary evidence for the safety and the tolerability of a potential DBS approach. The ventromedial (n = 2) and lateral (n = 8) hypothalamic nuclei targets have shown mixed and disappointing outcomes. Although nucleus accumbens (n = 7) targets were more encouraging for the outcomes of body weight reduction and behavioral control for eating, there was one suicide reported after 27 months of follow-up. The authors did not attribute the suicide to DBS therapy. The identification of optimal brain targets, appropriate programming strategies and the development of novel technologies will be important as next steps to move DBS closer to a clinical application. The identification of electrical control signals may provide an opportunity for closed-loop adaptive DBS systems to address obesity. Metabolic and hormonal sensors such as glycemic levels, leptin, and ghrelin levels are candidate control signals for DBS. Focused excitation or alternatively inhibition of regions of the hypothalamus may provide better outcomes compared to non-selective DBS. Utilization of the NA delta oscillation or other physiological markers from one or multiple regions in obesity-related brain network is a promising approach. Experienced multidisciplinary team will be critical to improve the risk-benefit ratio for this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas A Formolo
- Center for Applied Neuroscience, University Hospital, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.,Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil
| | - Joana M Gaspar
- Laboratory of Bioenergetics and Oxidative Stress, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.,Graduate Program in Biochemistry, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil
| | - Hiago M Melo
- Center for Applied Neuroscience, University Hospital, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.,Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil
| | - Tuany Eichwald
- Laboratory of Bioenergetics and Oxidative Stress, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.,Graduate Program in Biochemistry, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil
| | - Ramiro Javier Zepeda
- Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Chile University and Health Science Institute, O'Higgins University, Santiago, Chile
| | - Alexandra Latini
- Laboratory of Bioenergetics and Oxidative Stress, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.,Graduate Program in Biochemistry, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil
| | - Michael S Okun
- Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Roger Walz
- Center for Applied Neuroscience, University Hospital, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.,Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.,Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Graduate Program in Medical Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.,Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Iannone A, Allam N, Brasil-Neto JP. Safety of transcranial direct current stimulation in a patient with deep brain stimulation electrodes. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA 2019; 77:174-178. [PMID: 30970130 DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x20190019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2018] [Accepted: 12/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been investigated in movement disorders, making it a therapeutic alternative in clinical settings. However, there is still no consensus on the most appropriate treatment protocols in most cases, and the presence of deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes has been regarded as a contraindication to the procedure. We recently studied the effects of cerebellar tDCS on a female patient already undergoing subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) for generalized dystonia. She also presented with chronic pain and depression. With STN-DBS, there was improvement of dystonia, and botulinum toxin significantly reduced pain. However, depressive symptoms were worse after STN-DBS surgery. METHODS Neuromodulation with 2 mA anodal cerebellar tDCS was initiated, targeting both hemispheres in each daily 30 minute session: 15 minutes of left cerebellar stimulation followed by 15 minutes of right cerebellar stimulation. The DBS electrodes were in place and functional, but the current was turned off during tDCS. RESULTS Although our goal was to improve dystonic movements, after 10 tDCS sessions there was also improvement in mood with normalization of Beck Depression Inventory scores. There were no complications in spite of the implanted STN-DBS leads. CONCLUSION Our results indicate that tDCS is safe in patients with DBS electrodes and may be an effective add-on neuromodulatory tool in the treatment of potential DBS partial efficacy in patients with movement disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aline Iannone
- Universidade de Brasília, Laboratório de Neurociência e Comportamento, Instituto de Biologia, Brasília DF, Brasil
| | - Nasser Allam
- Universidade de Brasília, Laboratório de Neurociência e Comportamento, Instituto de Biologia, Brasília DF, Brasil
| | - Joaquim P Brasil-Neto
- Universidade de Brasília, Departamento de Ciências Fisiológicas, Instituto de Biologia, Brasília DF, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Hartmann CJ, Fliegen S, Groiss SJ, Wojtecki L, Schnitzler A. An update on best practice of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2019; 12:1756286419838096. [PMID: 30944587 PMCID: PMC6440024 DOI: 10.1177/1756286419838096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2017] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
During the last 30 years, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has evolved into the clinical standard of care as a highly effective treatment for advanced Parkinson’s disease. Careful patient selection, an individualized anatomical target localization and meticulous evaluation of stimulation parameters for chronic DBS are crucial requirements to achieve optimal results. Current hardware-related advances allow for a more focused, individualized stimulation and hence may help to achieve optimal clinical results. However, current advances also increase the degrees of freedom for DBS programming and therefore challenge the skills of healthcare providers. This review gives an overview of the clinical effects of DBS, the criteria for patient, target, and device selection, and finally, offers strategies for a structured programming approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian J Hartmann
- Department of Neurology/Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Sabine Fliegen
- Department of Neurology/Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Stefan J Groiss
- Department of Neurology/Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Lars Wojtecki
- Department of Neurology/Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Alfons Schnitzler
- Department of Neurology/Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ayobello A, Saway B, Greenage M. Attempted Suicide in a Parkinsonian Patient Treated with DBS of the VIM and High Dose Carbidopa-Levodopa. Case Rep Psychiatry 2019; 2019:2903762. [PMID: 31032135 PMCID: PMC6457313 DOI: 10.1155/2019/2903762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2018] [Revised: 02/17/2019] [Accepted: 03/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex disease that is often treated with dopaminergic medications such as carbidopa-levodopa and now with innovative interventions such as deep brain stimulation (DBS). While PD frequently presents with depression and apathy, research must elucidate whether its treatment modalities have an additive or synergistic effect that can lead to an increased suicide risk. DBS has been associated with depression, behavioral changes, and suicidality while dopaminergic treatment has also been shown to cause behavioral changes such as hypersexuality and impulsivity. Considering the now frequent practice of utilizing both DBS and carbidopa-levodopa to treat PD, it is crucial to understand how to properly manage PD patients who are displaying this overlap in symptomology. CASE REPORT A 56-year-old Caucasian male with a 6-year diagnosis of PD who was being treated with high dose carbidopa-levodopa and left DBS of the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) presented after a suicide attempt. The patient was found to be severely depressed and had exhibited behavioral changes in the weeks leading up to the attempt. Imaging was performed to assess positional changes of DBS and carbidopa-levodopa dosage adjusted while under close observation in the inpatient unit. The patient was started on fluoxetine to treat the depressive symptoms and was eventually discharged with close monitoring. DISCUSSION With PD and DBS being associated with behavioral changes and depressive symptoms and carbidopa-levodopa therapy being linked to behavioral changes such as impulsivity, it is important that these patients be closely monitored and research analyzes how these factors may interact and lead to an increased risk of suicide. Furthermore, when symptoms appear, a clear protocol must be established on managing these patients. We therefore recommend an approach that utilizes imaging to assess any changes in DBS placement, dose management of carbidopa-levodopa, and behavior monitoring in an inpatient setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayotunde Ayobello
- Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine and Research Institute, USA
| | - Brian Saway
- Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine and Research Institute, USA
| | - Michael Greenage
- Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine and Research Institute, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lhommée E, Wojtecki L, Czernecki V, Witt K, Maier F, Tonder L, Timmermann L, Hälbig TD, Pineau F, Durif F, Witjas T, Pinsker M, Mehdorn M, Sixel-Döring F, Kupsch A, Krüger R, Elben S, Chabardès S, Thobois S, Brefel-Courbon C, Ory-Magne F, Regis JM, Maltête D, Sauvaget A, Rau J, Schnitzler A, Schüpbach M, Schade-Brittinger C, Deuschl G, Houeto JL, Krack P. Behavioural outcomes of subthalamic stimulation and medical therapy versus medical therapy alone for Parkinson's disease with early motor complications (EARLYSTIM trial): secondary analysis of an open-label randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2019; 17:223-231. [PMID: 29452685 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30035-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2017] [Revised: 12/05/2017] [Accepted: 12/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although subthalamic stimulation is a recognised treatment for motor complications in Parkinson's disease, reports on behavioural outcomes are controversial, which represents a major challenge when counselling candidates for subthalamic stimulation. We aimed to assess changes in behaviour in patients with Parkinson's disease receiving combined treatment with subthalamic stimulation and medical therapy over a 2-year follow-up period as compared with the behavioural evolution under medical therapy alone. METHODS We did a parallel, open-label study (EARLYSTIM) at 17 surgical centres in France (n=8) and Germany (n=9). We recruited patients with Parkinson's disease who were disabled by early motor complications. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to either medical therapy alone or bilateral subthalamic stimulation plus medical therapy. The primary outcome was mean change in quality of life from baseline to 2 years. A secondary analysis was also done to assess behavioural outcomes. We used the Ardouin Scale of Behavior in Parkinson's Disease to assess changes in behaviour between baseline and 2-year follow-up. Apathy was also measured using the Starkstein Apathy Scale, and depression was assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory. The secondary analysis was done in all patients recruited. We used a generalised estimating equations (GEE) regression model for individual items and mixed model regression for subscores of the Ardouin scale and the apathy and depression scales. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00354133. The primary analysis has been reported elsewhere; this report presents the secondary analysis only. FINDINGS Between July, 2006, and November, 2009, 251 participants were recruited, of whom 127 were allocated medical therapy alone and 124 were assigned bilateral subthalamic stimulation plus medical therapy. At 2-year follow-up, the levodopa-equivalent dose was reduced by 39% (-363·3 mg/day [SE 41·8]) in individuals allocated bilateral subthalamic stimulation plus medical therapy and was increased by 21% (245·8 mg/day [40·4]) in those assigned medical therapy alone (p<0·0001). Neuropsychiatric fluctuations decreased with bilateral subthalamic stimulation plus medical therapy during 2-year follow-up (mean change -0·65 points [SE 0·15]) and did not change with medical therapy alone (-0·02 points [0·15]); the between-group difference in change from baseline was significant (p=0·0028). At 2 years, the Ardouin scale subscore for hyperdopaminergic behavioural disorders had decreased with bilateral subthalamic stimulation plus medical therapy (mean change -1·26 points [SE 0·35]) and had increased with medical therapy alone (1·12 points [0·35]); the between-group difference was significant (p<0·0001). Mean change from baseline at 2 years in the Ardouin scale subscore for hypodopaminergic behavioural disorders, the Starkstein Apathy Scale score, and the Beck Depression Inventory score did not differ between treatment groups. Antidepressants were stopped in 12 patients assigned bilateral subthalamic stimulation plus medical therapy versus four patients allocated medical therapy alone. Neuroleptics were started in nine patients assigned medical therapy alone versus one patient allocated bilateral subthalamic stimulation plus medical therapy. During the 2-year follow-up, two individuals assigned bilateral subthalamic stimulation plus medical therapy and one patient allocated medical therapy alone died by suicide. INTERPRETATION In a large cohort with Parkinson's disease and early motor complications, better overall behavioural outcomes were noted with bilateral subthalamic stimulation plus medical therapy compared with medical therapy alone. The presence of hyperdopaminergic behaviours and neuropsychiatric fluctuations can be judged additional arguments in favour of subthalamic stimulation if surgery is considered for disabling motor complications. FUNDING German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, French Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique National, and Medtronic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugénie Lhommée
- Movement Disorder Unit, Neurology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Grenoble Alpes, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences (GIN), and Institut National de Santé et en Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1216, Grenoble, France
| | - Lars Wojtecki
- Department of Neurology and Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Virginie Czernecki
- Sorbonne University, Pierre and Marie Curie University Paris 6, Paris, France; Brain and Spine Institute, Paris, France; Neurology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), INSERM, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière, and Centre d'Investigation Clinique (CIC) 1422, Paris, France
| | - Karsten Witt
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany
| | - Franziska Maier
- Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Lars Timmermann
- Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Neurology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Thomas D Hälbig
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center (NCRC), Charité University Medical Center, Charité (Campus Mitte), Berlin, Germany
| | - Fanny Pineau
- Sorbonne University, Pierre and Marie Curie University Paris 6, Paris, France; Brain and Spine Institute, Paris, France; Neurology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), INSERM, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière, and Centre d'Investigation Clinique (CIC) 1422, Paris, France
| | - Franck Durif
- Service de Neurologie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Tatiana Witjas
- Neurology, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Marcus Pinsker
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Mehdorn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Schlsewig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Friederike Sixel-Döring
- Department of Neurology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany; Paracelsus-Elena-Klinik, Kassel, Germany
| | - Andreas Kupsch
- Department of Neurology and Stereotactic Neurosurgery, University of Magdeburg, and Neurology Moves, Medical Center Bismarck Karrée, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rejko Krüger
- Center of Neurology, and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany; Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biology, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg; Department of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg
| | - Saskia Elben
- Department of Neurology and Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Stephan Chabardès
- Department of Neurosurgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Grenoble Alpes, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences (GIN), and Institut National de Santé et en Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1216, Grenoble, France
| | - Stéphane Thobois
- Movement Disorder Unit, Neurologie C, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut des Sciences Cognitives, Centre de Neurosciences Cognitives, Bron, France; Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Christine Brefel-Courbon
- Neurology Department and Centre Expert Parkinson, University Hospital Toulouse, Toulouse France; INSERM Toulouse NeuroImaging Centre, Toulouse France
| | - Fabienne Ory-Magne
- Neurology Department and Centre Expert Parkinson, University Hospital Toulouse, Toulouse France; INSERM Toulouse NeuroImaging Centre, Toulouse France
| | - Jean-Marie Regis
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - David Maltête
- Department of Neurology, Rouen University Hospital, INSERM U1073, Rouen Faculty of Medicine, Rouen, France
| | - Anne Sauvaget
- Addictology and Liaison-Psychiatry Department, CIC 0004, CHU de Nantes, Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Jörn Rau
- Coordinating Centre for Clinical Trials of the Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Alfons Schnitzler
- Department of Neurology and Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michael Schüpbach
- Neurology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), INSERM, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière, and Centre d'Investigation Clinique (CIC) 1422, Paris, France; Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Gunther Deuschl
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany
| | - Jean-Luc Houeto
- Department of Neurology, CIC-INSERM 1402, CHU de Poitiers; Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Paul Krack
- Movement Disorder Unit, Neurology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Grenoble Alpes, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences (GIN), and Institut National de Santé et en Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1216, Grenoble, France; Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Neurology), Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Yin Z, Cao Y, Zheng S, Duan J, Zhou D, Xu R, Hong T, Lu G. Persistent adverse effects following different targets and periods after bilateral deep brain stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Sci 2018; 393:116-127. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2018.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2017] [Revised: 06/22/2018] [Accepted: 08/14/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
|
47
|
Abbes M, Lhommée E, Thobois S, Klinger H, Schmitt E, Bichon A, Castrioto A, Xie J, Fraix V, Kistner A, Pélissier P, Seigneuret É, Chabardès S, Mertens P, Broussolle E, Moro E, Krack P. Subthalamic stimulation and neuropsychiatric symptoms in Parkinson's disease: results from a long-term follow-up cohort study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2018; 89:836-843. [PMID: 29436490 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2017-316373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2017] [Revised: 01/05/2018] [Accepted: 01/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reports on behavioural outcomes after subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease are controversial and limited to short-term data. Long-term observation in a large cohort allows a better counselling and management. METHODS To determine whether a long-term treatment with subthalamic stimulation induces or reduces impulse control behaviours, neuropsychiatric fluctuations and apathy, 69 patients treated with subthalamic stimulation are prospectively and retrospectively assessed using Ardouin Scale of Behavior in Parkinson's Disease before and after 3-10 years of stimulation. RESULTS At a mean follow-up of 6 years, all impulse control disorders and dopaminergic addiction were significantly decreased, apart from eating behaviour and hypersexuality. Neuropsychiatric fluctuations also significantly improved (ON euphoria: 38% of the patients before surgery and 1% after surgery, P<0.01; OFF dysphoria: 39% of the patients before surgery and 10% after surgery, P<0.01). However, apathy increased (25% of the patients after surgery and 3% before, P<0.01). With the retrospective analysis, several transient episodes of depression, apathy, anxiety and impulse control disorders occurred. CONCLUSIONS Bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation was overall very effective in improving impulse control disorders and neuropsychiatric fluctuations in parkinsonian patients in the long term despite a counteracting frequent apathy. Transient episodes of impulse control disorders still occurred within the follow-up. These findings recommend a close follow-up in parkinsonian patients presenting with neuropsychiatric symptoms before deep brain stimulation surgery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01705418;Post-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Abbes
- Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Psychiatry Neurology and Neurological Rehabilitation, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Eugénie Lhommée
- Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Psychiatry Neurology and Neurological Rehabilitation, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Inserm U1216, Grenoble, France
| | - Stéphane Thobois
- Faculté de Médecine et de Maïeutique Lyon Sud Charles Mérieux, Université de Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Neurologie C, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Lyon, France.,Centre de Neurosciences Cognitives, CNRS, UMR 5229, Bron, France
| | - Hélène Klinger
- Faculté de Médecine et de Maïeutique Lyon Sud Charles Mérieux, Université de Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Neurologie C, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Lyon, France.,Centre de Neurosciences Cognitives, CNRS, UMR 5229, Bron, France
| | - Emmanuelle Schmitt
- Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Psychiatry Neurology and Neurological Rehabilitation, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Inserm U1216, Grenoble, France
| | - Amélie Bichon
- Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Psychiatry Neurology and Neurological Rehabilitation, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Inserm U1216, Grenoble, France
| | - Anna Castrioto
- Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Psychiatry Neurology and Neurological Rehabilitation, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Inserm U1216, Grenoble, France
| | - Jing Xie
- Institut du vieillissement, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital des Charpennes, Lyon, France
| | - Valérie Fraix
- Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Psychiatry Neurology and Neurological Rehabilitation, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Inserm U1216, Grenoble, France
| | - Andrea Kistner
- Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Psychiatry Neurology and Neurological Rehabilitation, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Inserm U1216, Grenoble, France
| | - Pierre Pélissier
- Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Psychiatry Neurology and Neurological Rehabilitation, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Inserm U1216, Grenoble, France
| | - Éric Seigneuret
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Stéphan Chabardès
- Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Inserm U1216, Grenoble, France.,Department of Neurosurgery, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Patrick Mertens
- Neurochirurgie A, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Lyon, France
| | - Emmanuel Broussolle
- Faculté de Médecine et de Maïeutique Lyon Sud Charles Mérieux, Université de Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Neurologie C, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Lyon, France.,Centre de Neurosciences Cognitives, CNRS, UMR 5229, Bron, France
| | - Elena Moro
- Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Psychiatry Neurology and Neurological Rehabilitation, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Inserm U1216, Grenoble, France
| | - Paul Krack
- Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Psychiatry Neurology and Neurological Rehabilitation, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Inserm U1216, Grenoble, France.,Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Faculty University of Geneva, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Kisely S, Li A, Warren N, Siskind D. A systematic review and meta-analysis of deep brain stimulation for depression. Depress Anxiety 2018; 35:468-480. [PMID: 29697875 DOI: 10.1002/da.22746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2017] [Revised: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation is increasingly being used for treatment-resistant depression. Blinded, randomized controlled trials of active versus sham treatment have been limited to small numbers. METHOD We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in depression. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed/Medline, Embase and PsycINFO, Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System, and China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database were searched for single- or double placebo-controlled, crossover, and parallel-group trials in which DBS was compared with sham treatment using validated scales. RESULTS Ten papers from nine studies met inclusion criteria, all but two of which were double-blinded RCTs. The main outcome was a reduction in depressive symptoms. It was possible to combine data for 190 participants. Patients on active, as opposed to sham, treatment had a significantly higher response (OR = 5.50; 95% CI = 2.79, 10.85; p < .0001) and reductions in mean depression score (SMD = -0.42; 95% CI = -0.72, -0.12; p = .006). However, the effect was attenuated on some of the subgroup and sensitivity analyses, and there were no differences for most other outcomes. In addition, 84 participants experienced a total of 131 serious adverse effects, although not all could be directly associated with the device or surgery. Finally, publication bias was possible. CONCLUSIONS DBS may show promise for treatment-resistant depression but remains an experimental treatment until further data are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steve Kisely
- The University of Queensland Southern Clinical School, Queensland, Australia.,Metro South Health Service, Woolloongabba, Australia.,Griffith Institute of Health, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.,Departments of Psychiatry, Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Amy Li
- The University of Queensland Southern Clinical School, Queensland, Australia
| | - Nicola Warren
- The University of Queensland Southern Clinical School, Queensland, Australia.,Metro South Health Service, Woolloongabba, Australia
| | - Dan Siskind
- The University of Queensland Southern Clinical School, Queensland, Australia.,Metro South Health Service, Woolloongabba, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kubu CS. The Role of a Neuropsychologist on a Movement Disorders Deep Brain Stimulation Team. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2018; 33:365-374. [PMID: 29718080 PMCID: PMC7328472 DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acx130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Accepted: 12/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The term movement disorders is misleading in the implication that the symptoms are limited to motor problems. Most movement disorders include a variety of neurobehavioral and neurocognitive symptoms that require neuropsychological expertise. The goal of this paper is to provide a rationale and practical roadmap for neuropsychologists' involvement in a Movement Disorders team with a specific focus on pre-operative deep brain stimulation (DBS) evaluations. Pragmatic recommendations regarding requisite skills, clinical practice, recommendations, communication, and benefits are outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia S Kubu
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Bioethics, Cleveland Clinic
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Cleveland Clinic
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Rossi M, Bruno V, Arena J, Cammarota Á, Merello M. Challenges in PD Patient Management After DBS: A Pragmatic Review. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2018; 5:246-254. [PMID: 30363375 PMCID: PMC6174419 DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.12592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2017] [Revised: 01/01/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or internal globus pallidus (GPi) represents an effective and universally applied therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) motor complications. However, certain procedure-related problems and unrealistic patient expectations may detract specialists from indicating DBS more widely despite significant clinical effects. METHODS This review provides a pragmatic educational summary of the most conflicting postoperative management issues in patients undergoing DBS for PD. RESULTS DBS in PD has been associated with certain complications and post-procedural management issues, which can complicate surgical outcome interpretation. Many PD patients consider DBS outcomes negative due to unfulfilled expectations, even when significant motor symptom improvement is achieved. Speech, gait, postural stability, and cognition may worsen after DBS and body weight may increase. Although DBS may induce impulse control disorders in some cases, in others, it may actually improve them when dopamine agonist dosage is reduced after surgery. However, apathy may also arise, especially when dopaminergic medication tapering is rapid. Gradual loss of response with time suggests disease progression, rather than the wearing off of DBS effects. Furthermore, implantable pulse generator expiration is considered a movement disorder emergency, as it may worsen parkinsonian symptoms or cause life-threatening akinetic crises due to malignant DBS withdrawal syndrome. CONCLUSION Major unsolved issues occurring after DBS therapy preclude complete patient satisfaction. Multidisciplinary management at experienced centers, as well as careful and comprehensive delivery of information to patients, should contribute to make DBS outcome expectations more realistic and allow post procedural complications to be better accepted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malco Rossi
- Movement Disorders Section, Neuroscience DepartmentRaul Carrea Institute for Neurological Research (FLENI)Buenos AiresArgentina
| | - Verónica Bruno
- Movement Disorders Section, Neuroscience DepartmentRaul Carrea Institute for Neurological Research (FLENI)Buenos AiresArgentina
- Argentine National Scientific and Technological Research Council (CONICET)Buenos AiresArgentina
| | - Julieta Arena
- Movement Disorders Section, Neuroscience DepartmentRaul Carrea Institute for Neurological Research (FLENI)Buenos AiresArgentina
| | - Ángel Cammarota
- Movement Disorders Section, Neuroscience DepartmentRaul Carrea Institute for Neurological Research (FLENI)Buenos AiresArgentina
| | - Marcelo Merello
- Movement Disorders Section, Neuroscience DepartmentRaul Carrea Institute for Neurological Research (FLENI)Buenos AiresArgentina
- Argentine National Scientific and Technological Research Council (CONICET)Buenos AiresArgentina
| |
Collapse
|