1
|
Ben Ezzdine L, Dergaa I, Gaddas M, Ennouri E, Boussarsar M, Ben Saad H. QR codes and international databases: promoting transparency in IRB approvals for medical research. Libyan J Med 2024; 19:2381311. [PMID: 39028611 PMCID: PMC11262200 DOI: 10.1080/19932820.2024.2381311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/21/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lamia Ben Ezzdine
- High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Ksar Said, University of Manouba, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Ismail Dergaa
- High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of El Kef, University of Jendouba, El Kef, Tunisia
- Research Laboratory: Education, Motricity, Sport and Health, EM2S, LR19JS01, High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia
- Departement of Preventative Health, Primary Health Care Corporation (PHCC), Doha, Qatar
| | - Meriem Gaddas
- Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Laboratory of Physiology, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia
- Institutional Ethics and Research Committee of the University Hospital Farhat Hached (IORG 0007439), University Hospital Farhat Hached, Sousse, Tunisia
| | - Emna Ennouri
- Institutional Ethics and Research Committee of the University Hospital Farhat Hached (IORG 0007439), University Hospital Farhat Hached, Sousse, Tunisia
- Farhat Hached hospital, Research Laboratory LR12SP09 “Heart Failure”, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia
- Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Farhat Hached University Hospital. Medical Intensive Care Unit, Sousse, Tunisia
| | - Mohamed Boussarsar
- Institutional Ethics and Research Committee of the University Hospital Farhat Hached (IORG 0007439), University Hospital Farhat Hached, Sousse, Tunisia
- Farhat Hached hospital, Research Laboratory LR12SP09 “Heart Failure”, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia
- Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Farhat Hached University Hospital. Medical Intensive Care Unit, Sousse, Tunisia
| | - Helmi Ben Saad
- Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Laboratory of Physiology, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia
- Institutional Ethics and Research Committee of the University Hospital Farhat Hached (IORG 0007439), University Hospital Farhat Hached, Sousse, Tunisia
- Farhat Hached hospital, Research Laboratory LR12SP09 “Heart Failure”, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abu Kassim NL, Mohd Bakri SK, Nusrat F, Salim E, Manjurul Karim M, Rahman MT. Time-based changes in authorship trend in research-intensive universities in Malaysia. Account Res 2024; 31:56-71. [PMID: 35758245 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2094256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
Considering the fact that publications serve as an important criterion to evaluate the scientific accomplishments of an individual within respective fields in academia, there has been an increasing trend to publish scientific articles whereby multiple authors are defined as primary, co-, or corresponding authors according to the roles performed. This article analyzes the authorship pattern in 4,561 papers (including 60 single-authored papers) from 1990 till 2020 of 94 academics who hold a position as professors and are affiliated with the Faculty of Medicine at three different research universities in Malaysia. Only 708 papers (15.5% of 4,561 papers) were authored by less than three authors. In 3,080 papers (67.5% of 4,561 papers), those academics appeared as coauthors. Using different years as cutoff periods, it was observed that the appearance as coauthor in the papers had steeply risen around the years: 2006, 2007, 2008 and onwards. The increased number of authors in the multi-author papers and the appearance of the selected academics as coauthors reflect the extent of boosting of collaborative research in that period which corresponds to the adoption of the "publish or perish policy" by the Ministry of Higher Education in Malaysia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noor Lide Abu Kassim
- Faculty of Education, International Islamic University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | | - Fariha Nusrat
- Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Elnaz Salim
- Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cosgrove L, Mintzes B, Bursztajn HJ, D'Ambrozio G, Shaughnessy AF. Industry effects on evidence: a case study of long-acting injectable antipsychotics. Account Res 2024; 31:2-13. [PMID: 35634753 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2082289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
A vigorously debated issue in the psychiatric literature is whether long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) show clinical benefit over antipsychotics taken orally. In addressing this question, it is critical that systematic reviews incorporate risk of bias assessments of trial data in a robust way and are free of undue industry influence. In this paper, we present a case analysis in which we identify some of the design problems in a recent systematic review on LAIs vs oral formulations. This case illustrates how evidence syntheses that are shaped by commercial interests may undermine patient-centered models of recovery and care. We offer recommendations that address both the bioethical and research design issues that arise in the systematic review process when researchers have financial conflicts of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Cosgrove
- Counseling Psychology Department, Faculty Fellow, Applied Ethics Center, University of Massachusetts-Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Barbara Mintzes
- School of Pharmacy and Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Harold J Bursztajn
- Co-founder, Program in Psychiatry and the Law @ BIDMC Psychiatry of Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gianna D'Ambrozio
- Counseling Psychology Department, University of Massachusetts-Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Allen F Shaughnessy
- Department of Family Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Malden, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Brubaker L, Nodora J, Bavendam T, Connett J, Claussen AM, Lewis CE, Rudser K, Sutcliffe S, Wyman JF, Miller JM. A policy toolkit for authorship and dissemination policies may benefit NIH research consortia. Account Res 2024; 31:222-240. [PMID: 35998252 PMCID: PMC9975116 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2116318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Authorship and dissemination policies vary across NIH research consortia. We aimed to describe elements of real-life policies in use by eligible U01 clinical research consortia. Principal investigators of eligible, active U01 clinical research projects identified in the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools database shared relevant policies. The characteristics of key policy elements, determined a priori, were reviewed and quantified, when appropriate. Twenty one of 81 research projects met search criteria and provided policies. K elements (e.g., in quotations): "manuscript proposals reviewed and approved by committee" (90%); "guidelines for acknowledgements" (86%); "writing team formation" (71%); "process for final manuscript review and approval" (71%), "responsibilities for lead author" (67%), "guidelines for other types of publications" (67%); "draft manuscript review and approval" (62%); "recommendation for number of members per consortium site" (57%); and "requirement to identify individual contributions in the manuscript" (19%). Authorship/dissemination policies for large team science research projects are highly variable. Creation of an NIH policies repository and accompanying toolkit with model language and recommended key elements could improve comprehensiveness, ethical integrity, and efficiency in team science work while reducing burden and cost on newly funded consortia and directing time and resources to scientific endeavors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Brubaker
- UC San Diego School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Jesse Nodora
- UC San Diego School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | | | - John Connett
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Amy M. Claussen
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Cora E. Lewis
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Kyle Rudser
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Siobhan Sutcliffe
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jean F. Wyman
- School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Janis M. Miller
- School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Avenell A, Bolland MJ, Gamble GD, Grey A. A randomized trial alerting authors, with or without coauthors or editors, that research they cited in systematic reviews and guidelines has been retracted. Account Res 2024; 31:14-37. [PMID: 35635109 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2082290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Retracted clinical trials may be influential in citing systematic reviews and clinical guidelines. We assessed the influence of 27 retracted trials on systematic reviews and clinical guidelines (citing publications), then alerted authors to these retractions. Citing publications were randomized to up to three e-mails to contact author with/without up to two coauthors, with/without the editor. After one year we assessed corrective action. We included 88 citing publications; 51% (45/88) had findings likely to change if retracted trials were removed, 87% (39/45) likely substantially. 51% (44/86) of contacted citing publications replied. Including three authors rather than the contact author alone was more likely to elicit a reply (P = 0.03). Including the editor did not increase replies (P = 0.66). Whether findings were judged likely to change, and size of the likely change, had no effect on response rate or action taken. One year after e-mails were sent only nine publications had published notifications. E-Mail alerts to authors and editors are inadequate to correct the impact of retracted publications in citing systematic reviews and guidelines. Changes to bibliographic and referencing systems, and submission processes are needed. Citing publications with retracted citations should be marked until authors resolve concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Avenell
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Scotland
| | - Mark J Bolland
- Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Greg D Gamble
- Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Andrew Grey
- Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Some institutions have issued blacklists of academic journals in China and use them as a basis for research evaluation. However, due to a lack of transparent formulation criteria, the characteristics of blacklisted journals remain unclear. Using blacklisted academic journals of the East China University of Political Science and Law, this study analyzed differences in characteristics between blacklisted and non-blacklisted journals via web surveys and statistical analyses. Statistically significant differences were detected for article review time, article processing charges (APCs), the number of editorial board members, and the journal impact factor. There was no significant difference in the number of editors. While there is scientific merit in creating and publishing a blacklist of academic journals, the list development process requires more rigorous evaluation and a public process of development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gengyan Tang
- Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences, Institute of Journalism and Communication, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jingwen Jia
- Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences, Institute of Journalism and Communication, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
El Bairi K, El Kadmiri N, Fourtassi M. Exploring scientific misconduct in Morocco based on an analysis of plagiarism perception in a cohort of 1,220 researchers and students. Account Res 2024; 31:138-157. [PMID: 35938392 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2110866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
Plagiarism is widely regarded as an issue of low- and middle-income countries because of several factors such as the lack of ethics policy and poor research training. In Morocco, plagiarism and its perception by academics has not been investigated on a large scale. In this study, we evaluated different aspects of plagiarism among scholars based on a 23-question cross-sectional survey. Factors associated with plagiarism were explored using contingency tables and logistic regression. The survey results covered all public universities (n=12) and included 1,220 recorded responses. The academic level was significantly associated with plagiarism (p<0.001). Having publication records was statistically associated with a reduced plagiarism (p=0.002). Notably, the ability of participants to correctly define plagiarism was also significantly associated with a reduced plagiarism misconduct (p<0.001). Unintentional plagiarism (p<0.001), time constraint to write an original text (p<0.001), and inability of participants to paraphrase (p<0.001) were associated factors with plagiarism. Moreover, participants that considered plagiarism as a serious issue in academic research had significantly committed less plagiarism (p<0.001). The current study showed that various actionable factors associated with plagiarism can be targeted by educational interventions, and therefore, it provided the rationale to build training programs on research integrity in Morocco.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalid El Bairi
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohamed Ist University, Oujda, Morocco
| | - Nadia El Kadmiri
- Molecular Engineering, Biotechnology and Innovation Team, Geo-Bio-Environment Engineering and Innovation Laboratory, Polydisciplinary Faculty of Taroudant, Ibn Zohr University, Taroudannt city, Morocco
| | - Maryam Fourtassi
- Life and Health Sciences Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Abdelmalek Essaâdi University, Tangier, Morocco
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tang G, Cai H, Jia J. Status bias in Chinese scholarly publishing: an exploratory study based on mixed methods. Account Res 2024; 31:241-257. [PMID: 36001891 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2117621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
The academic community requires not only responsible research but also responsible academic journals. An exploratory study of Chinese-language academic journals that used mixed methods found Chinese-language academic journals on the humanities and social sciences exhibiting a widespread status bias. Most of them summarily rejected submissions from junior researchers and students without paying due attention to the quality of the research itself. The main reasons for this problem are editorial department resources, the scientific research evaluation system, the editorial department culture, and the wider academic environment. This study recommends that Chinese-language academic journals join the Committee on Publication Ethics, other publishing ethics organizations, and the "Responsible Journals" program as soon as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gengyan Tang
- Institute of Journalism and Communication, Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences, Chengdu, China
| | - Hao Cai
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Jingwen Jia
- Institute of Journalism and Communication, Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pizzolato D, Labib K, Skoulikaris N, Evans N, Roje R, Kavouras P, Aubert Bonn N, Dierickx K, Tijdink J. How can research institutions support responsible supervision and leadership? Account Res 2024; 31:173-195. [PMID: 35975399 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2112033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
Supervisors, PhD candidates and research leaders are expected to be the primary persons responsible for maintaining a high research integrity standards. However, research institutions should support them in this effort, by promoting responsible supervision and leadership practices. Although it is clear that institutions play a crucial role in this, there is a lack of institutional guidelines focusing on these topics. The development of the experience-based guidelines presented in this article consisted of a multi-step, iterative approach. We engaged 16 experts in supervision and research integrity in four workshops to co-create institutional guidelines for responsible supervision and leadership. To revise the guidelines and make them operational, we formed a dedicated working group and consulted experts in the field of supervision. This resulted in three guidelines focusing on what institutions can do to support: responsible supervision, PhD candidates during their PhD trajectory, and responsible leadership. The recommendations focus on the rights and responsibilities of the three targeted stakeholder groups, and institutions' responsibilities for the personal development and well-being of supervisors, PhD candidates and research leaders. The three guidelines can be used by institutions to foster responsible supervision and leadership by supporting researchers to conduct research with integrity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Pizzolato
- KU Leuven, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Krishma Labib
- Amsterdam UMC, VrijeUniversiteit Amsterdam, Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherland
| | - Niko Skoulikaris
- Amsterdam UMC, VrijeUniversiteit Amsterdam, Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherland
| | - Natalie Evans
- Amsterdam UMC, VrijeUniversiteit Amsterdam, Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherland
| | - Rea Roje
- Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia
| | - Panagiotis Kavouras
- RNanoLab, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Noémie Aubert Bonn
- Amsterdam UMC, VrijeUniversiteit Amsterdam, Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherland
| | - Kris Dierickx
- KU Leuven, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joeri Tijdink
- Amsterdam UMC, VrijeUniversiteit Amsterdam, Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherland
- Department of Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tajalli S, Aliyari R, Mansoureh AF, Heydari F, Motefakker S, Farahani AS. Assessment of the knowledge and attitudes of the Iranian medical faculty toward plagiarism. Account Res 2024; 31:38-55. [PMID: 35640020 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2083961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
This study is among the few investigations that assesses knowledge and attitudes of faculty members of medical sciences universities regarding plagiarism. This investigation focused on the relationship between personal factors and knowledge and attitudes toward plagiarism among Iranian faculty members of medical sciences affiliated with the Ministry of Health. This descriptive cross-sectional study was performed on 247 participants using demographic questionnaires that collected data on attitudes toward plagiarism and knowledge of plagiarism. The questionnaires were uploaded on Porsline. The subjects were provided with the purpose of the study, informed consent, and the link to the questionnaire through WhatsApp. The mean scores of knowledge variables and different domains of attitude were calculated, and then, the obtained averages were compared in terms of age, gender, and participation in ethics workshop using univariate tests. Finally, the MANCOVA was used considering five dimensions of the questionnaire to assess attitude, as multiple response variables, and independent variables, including gender and participation in the ethics workshop and control of knowledge and age. The mean age of the subjects in this study was 38.9 ± 8.4. 79.4% of the participants were women. Overall, 79.8% of people participated in ethics workshops, of whom 78% were women, and 86.5% were men. The mean score of knowledge in men and women was 1.35 ± 0.19 and 1.56. ± 0.24, respectively, which was higher in women than men (PV <0.001). The mean score of total attitudes was 3.19 ± 0.46. There was a high level of knowledge of plagiarism and positive attitudes toward plagiarism avoidance or prevention among participants in this study, which may spread to students, and help to promote integrity in the educational and clinical environment in Iran.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saleheh Tajalli
- Nursing Care Research Center (NCRC), School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Roqayeh Aliyari
- Ophthalmic Epidemiology Research Center, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran
| | - Ashghali Farahani Mansoureh
- Nursing Care Research Center (NCRC), School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Heydari
- Instructor of Nursing, Pediatric Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
| | - Sanaz Motefakker
- Instructor of Nursing, Pediatric Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
| | - Azam Shirinabadi Farahani
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Research Center, Research Institute for Children's Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hildt E, Laas K, Miller CZ, Taylor S. Student views on the culture of STEM research laboratories: Results from an interview study. Account Res 2024; 31:100-137. [PMID: 35912949 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2109018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
In this article, we present the results of 30 ethnographic interviews in which we asked STEM graduate and undergraduate students at a Midwest university in the United States about topics related to the culture of their research group, how group members communicate and interact, and their experience with ethical issues that arise within the laboratory. Here we focus on the culture of research laboratories and describe the key categories that emerged through analysis, including communication, community structure, governance, and collaboration that influence and shape lab culture. We also consider the critical role of the principal investigator (PI) to influence conditions in the lab that facilitate or inhibit lab culture and the subsequent effects on student feelings and behaviors, interpersonal communication, collaboration, work output, and ethics. Our findings suggest that the quality of research and the wellbeing of the lab members depend not only on purely scientific factors and routine research practices but are also dependent on the culture of the lab as it manifests in interpersonal relationships. The interviews reveal the critical role students ascribe to the PI in shaping the lab culture. Based on this study, we suggest how ethical lab cultures might be encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Hildt
- Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kelly Laas
- Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Christine Z Miller
- Design Management, School of Business Innovation, Savannah College of Art and Design, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Stephanie Taylor
- Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Muthanna A, Chaaban Y, Qadhi S. A model of the interrelationship between research ethics and research integrity. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2024; 19:2295151. [PMID: 38126140 PMCID: PMC10763899 DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2023.2295151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this article is to explore the interrelationship between research ethics and research integrity with a focus on the primary forms of research misconduct, including plagiarism, fabrication, and falsification. It also details the main factors for their occurrence, and the possible ways for mitigating their use among scholars.Methods: The method employed a detailed examination of the main ethical dilemmas, as delineated in literature, as well as the factors leading to these ethical breaches and the strategies to mitigate them. Further, the teaching experiences of the primary author are reflected in the development of the model.Results: The results of this article are represented in a model illustrating the interrelationship between research ethics and research integrity. Further, a significant aspect of our article is the identification of novel forms of research misconduct concerning the use of irrelevant or forced citations or references.Conclusion: In conclusion, the article highlights the substantial positive effects that adherence to research ethics and integrity have on the academic well-being of scholars.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulghani Muthanna
- Department of Teacher Education, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Youmen Chaaban
- Educational Research Center, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
| | - Saba Qadhi
- Core Curriculum Program, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Grey A, Avenell A, Bolland MJ. Procrastination and inconsistency: Expressions of concern for publications with compromised integrity. Account Res 2024; 31:196-209. [PMID: 35952654 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2112572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
Expressions of concern (EoC) can reduce the adverse effects of unreliable publications by alerting readers to concerns about publication integrity while assessment is undertaken. We investigated the use of EoC for 463 publications by two research groups for which we notified concerns about publication integrity to 142 journals and 44 publishers between March 2013 and February 2020. By December 2021, 95 papers had had an EoC, and 83 were retracted without an EoC. Median times from notification of concerns to EoC (10.4mo) or retraction without EoC (13.1mo) were similar. Among the 95 EoCs, 29 (30.5%) were followed by retraction after a median of 5.4mo, none was lifted, and 66 (69.5%) remained in place after a median of 18.1mo. Publishers with >10 notified publications issued EoCs for 0-81.8% of papers: for several publishers the proportions of notified papers for which EoCs were issued varied considerably between the 2 research groups. EoCs were issued for >30% of notified publications of randomized clinical trials and letters to the editor, and <20% of other types of research. These results demonstrate inconsistent application of EoCs between and within publishers, and prolonged times to issue and resolve EoCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Grey
- Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Alison Avenell
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Mark J Bolland
- Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kohl CBS, Faggion CM. A comprehensive overview of studies that assessed article retractions within the biomedical sciences. Account Res 2024; 31:557-575. [PMID: 36469621 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2154660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of previous research that has investigated retractions within the biomedical fields and assess their methodological quality. We searched three major electronic databases for articles on retractions within the biomedical field: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. In total, 162 articles were included in the analysis. We evaluated their methodological quality using the items of "a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews" (AMSTAR-2) checklist and the Cochrane guidance. The studies had been published in more than 20 biomedical disciplines or fields of investigation, and two-thirds were published after 2017. Concerning methodology, none of the studies fulfilled all the suggested items; five studies did not meet any of the suggested AMSTAR-2 categories or Cochrane guidelines. The most prevalent reported reasons for retraction were fraud and plagiarism (21.0%). In summary, there has been increasing interest in assessing the characteristics and impact of retractions in the biomedical sciences. The studies cited types of misconduct more often than honest errors as a major reason for retraction. The methodological quality of the existing studies in this area appears to be suboptimal. Future investigators should improve upon this, particularly in the quality of the data selection and extraction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Brigitte Susan Kohl
- Department of Periodontology and Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Clovis Mariano Faggion
- Department of Periodontology and Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Perković Paloš A, Roje R, Tomić V, Marušić A. Creating research ethics and integrity country report cards: Case study from Europe. Account Res 2024; 31:620-654. [PMID: 36635978 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2163632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Structures for and practices of research integrity (RI) and research ethics (RE) differ among countries. This study analyzed the processes and structures for RI and RE in Europe, following the framework developed at the World Conferences on Research Integrity. We present RI and RE Country Report Cards for 16 European countries, which included the information on RI and RE structures, processes and outcomes. While some of the countries are front-runners when it comes to RI and RE, with well-established and continually developing policies and structures, others are just starting their journey in RI and RE. Although RI and RE contextual divergences must be taken into account, a level of harmonization among the countries is necessary so that researchers working in the European area can similarly handle RI and RE issues and have similar expectations regardless of the organization in which they work. RI and RE Country Report Cards can be a tool to monitor, compare, and strengthen RE and integrity across countries through empowerment and inspiration by examples of good practices and developed systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrijana Perković Paloš
- Department of Research in Biomedicine in Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia
| | - Rea Roje
- Department of Research in Biomedicine in Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia
| | - Vicko Tomić
- ST-OPEN, University of Split, Split, Croatia
| | - Ana Marušić
- Department of Research in Biomedicine in Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hosseini M, Gordijn B, Wafford QE, Holmes KL. A systematic scoping review of the ethics of Contributor Role Ontologies and Taxonomies. Account Res 2024; 31:678-705. [PMID: 36641627 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2161049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Contributor Role Ontologies and Taxonomies (CROTs) provide a standard list of roles to specify individual contributions to research. CROTs most common application has been their inclusion alongside author bylines in scholarly publications. With the recent uptake of CROTs among publishers -particularly the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT)- some have anticipated a positive impact on ethical issues regarding the attribution of credit and responsibilities, but others have voiced concerns about CROTs shortcomings and ways they could be misunderstood or have unintended consequences. Since these discussions have never been consolidated, this review collated and explored published viewpoints about the ethics of CROTs. After searching Ovid Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, 30 papers met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. We identified eight themes and 20 specific issues related to the ethics of CROTs and provided four recommendations for CROT developers, custodians, or others seeking to use CROTs in their workflows, policy and practice: 1) Compile comprehensive instructions that explain how CROTs should be used; 2) Improve the coherence of used terms, 3) Translate roles in languages other than English, 4) Communicate a clear vision about future development plans and be transparent about CROTs' strengths and weaknesses. We conclude that CROTs are not the panacea for unethical attributions and should be complemented with initiatives that support social and infrastructural transformation of scholarly publications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Hosseini
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Bert Gordijn
- Institute of Ethics, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Q Eileen Wafford
- Galter Health Sciences Library and Learning Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kristi L Holmes
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Galter Health Sciences Library and Learning Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Barlevy D, Juengst E, Kahn J, Moreno J, Lambert L, Charo A, Chneiweiss H, Farooque M, Guston DH, Hyun I, Knoepfler PS, Selin C, Wilbanks R, Zaghlula M, Scott CT. Governing with public engagement: an anticipatory approach to human genome editing. SCIENCE & PUBLIC POLICY 2024; 51:680-691. [PMID: 39035203 PMCID: PMC11258878 DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scae010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
In response to calls for public engagement on human genome editing (HGE), which intensified after the 2018 He Jiankui scandal that resulted in the implantation of genetically modified embryos, we detail an anticipatory approach to the governance of HGE. By soliciting multidisciplinary experts' input on the drivers and uncertainties of HGE development, we developed a set of plausible future scenarios to ascertain publics values-specifically, their hopes and concerns regarding the novel technology and its applications. In turn, we gathered a subset of multidisciplinary experts to propose governance recommendations for HGE that incorporate identified publics' values. These recommendations include: (1) continued participatory public engagement; (2) international harmonization and transparency of multiple governance levers such as professional and scientific societies, funders, and regulators; and (3) development of a formal whistleblower framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorit Barlevy
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Eric Juengst
- Center for Bioethics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States
| | - Jeffrey Kahn
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
| | - Jonathan Moreno
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Lauren Lambert
- College of Global Futures, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, United States
| | - Alta Charo
- Law School, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, United States
| | - Hervé Chneiweiss
- Neuroscience, Institute of Biology Paris Seine, CNRS UMR8246, INSERM U1130, Sorbonne Université, Paris 75252, France
| | - Mahmud Farooque
- Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes, Arizona State University, Washington, DC 20006, United States
- School for the Future of Innovation in Society, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, United States
| | - David H Guston
- School for the Future of Innovation in Society, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, United States
- Julie Ann Wrigley Global Futures Laboratory, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, United States
| | - Insoo Hyun
- Museum of Science, Boston, MA 02114, United States
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| | - Paul S Knoepfler
- Department of Cell Biology & Human Anatomy, UC Davis School of Medicine, Davis, CA 95616, United States
| | - Cynthia Selin
- School for the Future of Innovation in Society, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, United States
- School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, United States
| | - Rebecca Wilbanks
- University Writing Program, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States
| | - Manar Zaghlula
- Innovative Genomics Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 97404, United States
| | - Christopher Thomas Scott
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gedik MS, Kaya E, Kilci Aİ. Evaluation of retracted articles in the field of emergency medicine on the web of science database. Am J Emerg Med 2024; 82:68-74. [PMID: 38820808 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The retraction of articles stands as the most significant mechanism employed to uphold the integrity of science, particularly in flawed studies. OBJECTIVES This study aims to explore the reasons for article retractions in the field of emergency medicine and elucidate the problems arising from such retractions. The goal is to identify parameters in retracted articles that compromise scientific knowledge and raise awareness. MATERIAL AND METHODS Retracted articles within the emergency medicine category were analyzed and assessed using the Web of Science database. The study sought to address the following questions: 1. In which year or years were the most articles retracted? 2. In which journals were the retracted articles published? 3. What is the distribution of topics in retracted articles? 4. What are the reasons for the retraction of articles? 5. What is the time difference and citation count between the publication and retraction years of the articles? RESULTS The study delved into reasons for article retractions, types of retracted articles, and other relevant factors. A total of 61 retracted articles were examined and analyzed, revealing an increasing trend in the rate of article retractions over the years. The majority of retracted articles occurred in 2023, with the highest retraction rate identified in the "Emergency Medicine International" journal. On average, articles were retracted 356 days after publication. Reasons for retracted articles included concerns related to data, authorship issues, plagiarism, duplication, and biased or fraudulent peer review. CONCLUSIONS This study provided an examination of retracted articles in the field of emergency medicine, highlighting a noteworthy increase in retractions due to various reasons. Despite retractions, it was observed that the citation counts of retracted articles increased. The growing number of retracted articles and frequent citations pose potential dangers from a scientific perspective, as citing retracted articles damages scientific integrity. The study underscores the importance of understanding the reasons for retracted articles and preventing the spread of such incidents in emergency medicine literature. The results, analyzed within various variables, indicate the need for further research and solutions, guiding future research efforts and contributing to the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammed Semih Gedik
- Emergency Medicine, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Faculty of Medicine, Turkey.
| | - Erhan Kaya
- Department of Public Health, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University Faculty of Medicine, Turkey.
| | - Ali İhsan Kilci
- Emergency Medicine, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Faculty of Medicine, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Verbeke K, Krawczyk T, Baeyens D, Piasecki J, Borry P. Assessing the acceptability of individual studies that use deception: A systematic review of normative guidance documents. Account Res 2024; 31:655-677. [PMID: 36448698 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2153675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Research participants are often deceived for methodological reasons. However, assessing the ethical acceptability of an individual study that uses deception is not straightforward. The academic literature is scattered on the subject and several aspects of the acceptability assessment are only scarcely addressed, which parallels reports of inconsistent ethics review. Therefore, we aimed to investigate where normative guidance documents agree and disagree about this assessment. A PRISMA-Ethics-guided systematic review of normative guidance documents that discuss deception of research participants was conducted. Our search strategy resulted in 55 documents that were subsequently analyzed through abductive thematic analysis. While guidance documents mention little about specific risks and opportunities of deception, our analysis describes a rich picture of the thresholds for acceptability of the risks and benefits of deception and their integration, the comparison with the risk-benefit analysis of alternative non-deceptive methods, and the bodies of people who are positioned to do the review. Our review reveals an agreement on the general process of assessing the acceptability of studies that use deception, although significant variability remains in the details and several topics are largely or completely unaddressed in guidance documents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamiel Verbeke
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven Belgium
| | - Tomasz Krawczyk
- Department of Philosophy and Bioethics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College (Poland)
| | - Dieter Baeyens
- Chair of Social and Societal Ethics Committee, KU Leuven, Belgium
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Research Unit Parenting and Special Education, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan Piasecki
- Department of Philosophy and Bioethics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College (Poland)
| | - Pascal Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chou C, Lee IJ, Fudano J. The present situation of and challenges in research ethics and integrity promotion: Experiences in East Asia. Account Res 2024; 31:576-599. [PMID: 36641764 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2155144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
As relatively new economies to the global research arena, East Asian nations have fully realized the importance of research integrity in recent decades. This article conducts document analysis to demonstrate and discuss the current situation of research integrity campaigns in Taiwan, Korea, and Japan, nations that have similar cultural backgrounds and socioeconomic statuses. This article emphasizes the common situations faced by these three nations both individually and collectively. Based on a four-pillar framework, research integrity campaigns in these nations are making progress in terms of policies and regulations, institutional management, researchers' education and training, and the handling of misconduct cases. Various issues and challenges have also emerged in this context, although these efforts may have had positive impacts on research communities in these three nations. Challenges associated with research integrity governance, institutional willingness, RCR instructor qualifications, the effectiveness of education, and the standardization of definitions of misconduct and noncompliance are also highlighted. The issues discussed in this article are expected to have implications for research communities and policy-makers in these three nations as well as in a global context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chien Chou
- Institute of Education, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - In Jae Lee
- Department of Ethics Education, Seoul National University of Education, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jun Fudano
- Center for Higher Education Studies, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Labib K, Pizzolato D, Stappers PJ, Evans N, Lechner I, Widdershoven G, Bouter L, Dierickx K, Bergema K, Tijdink J. Using co-creation methods for research integrity guideline development - how, what, why and when? Account Res 2024; 31:531-556. [PMID: 36472097 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2154154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Existing research integrity (RI) guideline development methods are limited in including various perspectives. While co-creation methods could help to address this, there is little information available to researchers and practitioners on how, why and when to use co-creation for developing RI guidelines, nor what the outcomes of co-creation methods are. In this paper, we aim to address this gap. First, we discuss how co-creation methods can be used for RI guideline development, based on our experience of developing RI guidelines. We elaborate on steps including preparation of the aims and design; participant sensitization; organizing and facilitating workshops; and analyzing data and translating them into guidelines. Secondly, we present the resulting RI guidelines, to show what the outcome of co-creation methods are. Thirdly, we reflect on why and when researchers might want to use co-creation methods for developing RI guidelines. We discuss that stakeholder engagement and inclusion of diverse perspectives are key strengths of co-creation methods. We also reflect that co-creation methods have the potential to make guidelines implementable if followed by additional steps such as revision working groups. We conclude that co-creation methods are a valuable approach to creating new RI guidelines when used together with additional methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishma Labib
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Pizzolato
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pieter Jan Stappers
- ID-StudioLab, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Natalie Evans
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Lechner
- Department of Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Guy Widdershoven
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lex Bouter
- Department of Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kris Dierickx
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Katinka Bergema
- Zwaluw | Innovation & Collaboration & VanWaarde, The Netherlands
| | - Joeri Tijdink
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hamilton DG, Everitt S, Page MJ, Fidler F. What do Australians affected by cancer think about oncology researchers sharing research data? A cross-sectional survey. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2024; 20:522-530. [PMID: 38708950 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.14075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
AIM Previous research has shown patients and the public in Australia generally support medical researchers in making de-identified research data available to other scientists. However, this research has focussed on certain types of data and recipients. We surveyed Australians affected by cancer to characterize their attitudes toward the sharing of research data with multiple third parties, including the public. METHODS A short, anonymous online survey of Australians with a previous diagnosis of cancer was advertised between October 27, 2022, and February 27, 2023. Quantitative responses were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Free-text responses were coded deductively and summarised using content analysis. RESULTS In total, 551 respondents contributed data to the survey. There was strong support for cancer researchers sharing non-human and de-identified human research data with clinicians (90% and 95%, respectively) and non-profit researchers (both 94%). However, fewer participants supported sharing data with for-profit researchers (both 64%) or publicly (both 61%). When asked if they would hypothetically consent to researchers at their treatment location using and sharing their de-identified data publicly, only half agreed. In contrast, after being shown a visual representation of the de-identified survey data, 80% of respondents supported sharing it publicly. CONCLUSION Australians affected by cancer support the sharing of research data, particularly with clinicians and non-profit researchers. Our results also imply that visualization of the data to be shared may enhance support for making it publicly available. These results should help alleviate any concerns about research participants' attitudes toward data sharing, as well as boost researchers' motivation for sharing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel G Hamilton
- MetaMelb Research Group, School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sarah Everitt
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Matthew J Page
- Methods in Evidence Synthesis Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Fiona Fidler
- MetaMelb Research Group, School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- School of History & Philosophy of Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hagen K. Misinterpretation of statistical nonsignificance as a sign of potential bias: Hydroxychloroquine as a case study. Account Res 2024; 31:600-619. [PMID: 36469591 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2155517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Abstract
The term "statistical significance," ubiquitous in the medical literature, is often misinterpreted, as is the "p-value" from which it stems. This article explores the implications of results that are numerically positive (e.g., those in the treatment arm do better on average) but not statistically significant. This lack of statistical significance is sometimes interpreted as strong, even decisive, evidence against an effect without due consideration of other factors. Three influential articles on hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as a treatment for COVID-19 are illustrative. They all involve numerically positive results that were not statistically significant that were misinterpreted as strong evidence against HCQ's efficacy. These and related considerations raise concerns regarding the reliability of academic/medical reasoning around COVID-19 treatments, as well as more generally, and regarding the potential for bias stemming from conflicts of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurtis Hagen
- Independent Scholar Former Associate Professor of Philosophy at SUNY Plattsburgh, Wesley Chapel, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Yeo-Teh NSL, Tang BL. Research data mismanagement - from questionable research practice to research misconduct. Account Res 2024; 31:706-713. [PMID: 36511716 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2157268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Good record keeping practice and research data management underlie responsible research conduct and promote reproducibility of research findings in the sciences. In many cases of research misconduct, inadequate research data management frequently appear as an accompanying finding. Findings of disorganized or otherwise poor data archival or loss of research data are, on their own, not usually considered as indicative of research misconduct. Focusing on the availability of raw/primary data and the replicability of research based on these, we posit that most, if not all, instances of research data mismanagement (RDMM) could be considered a questionable research practice (QRP). Furthermore, instances of RDMM at their worst could indeed be viewed as acts of research misconduct. Here, we analyze with postulated scenarios the contexts and circumstances under which RDMM could be viewed as a significant misrepresentation of research (ie. falsification), or data fabrication. We further explore how RDMM might potentially be adjudicated as research misconduct based on intent and consequences. Defining how RDMM could constitute QRP or research misconduct would aid the formulation of relevant institutional research integrity policies to mitigate undesirable events stemming from RDMM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Shu Ling Yeo-Teh
- Research Compliance and Integrity Office, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Bor Luen Tang
- Department of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bouter L. Tackling research misconduct. BMJ 2024; 386:q1595. [PMID: 39048125 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.q1595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Lex Bouter
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Khurana P, Sharma K, Uddin Z. Unraveling retraction dynamics in COVID-19 research: Patterns, reasons, and implications. Account Res 2024:1-24. [PMID: 39041839 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2379906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, while the world sought solutions, few scholars exploited the situation for personal gains through deceptive studies and manipulated data. This paper presents the extent of 400 retracted COVID-19 papers listed by the RetractionWatch database until the month of February 2024. The primary purpose of the research was to analyze journal quality and retractions trends. Evaluating the journal's quality is vital for stakeholders, as it enables them to effectively address and prevent such incidents and their future repercussions. The present study found that one-fourth of publications were retracted within the first month of their publication, followed by an additional 6% within six months of publication. One third of the retractions originated from Q1 journals, with another significant portion coming from Q2 (29.8%). An analysis of the reasons for retractions indicates that a quarter of retractions were attributed to multiple causes, predominantly associated with publications in Q2 journals, while another quarter were linked to data issues, primarily observed in Q1 publications. Elsevier retracted 31% of papers, with the majority published as Q1, followed by Springer (11.5%), predominantly as Q2. The study also examined author contributions, revealing that 69.3% were male, with females (30.7%) mainly holding middle author positions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parul Khurana
- School of Computer Applications, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India
| | - Kiran Sharma
- School of Engineering and Technology, BML Munjal University, Gurugram, Haryana, India
| | - Ziya Uddin
- School of Engineering and Technology, BML Munjal University, Gurugram, Haryana, India
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Krewulak KD, Sheikh F, Heirali A, Marshall JC, Burns KEA, Kupsch S, Maratta C, Murthy S, O'Hearn K, Russell K, Mehta S, Fiest K. Core socioDemographic data variables in ICU Trials (CoDe-IT): a protocol for generating core data variables using a Delphi consensus process. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e082912. [PMID: 39043595 PMCID: PMC11268068 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sociodemographic variables influence health outcomes, either directly (ie, gender identity) or indirectly (eg, structural/systemic racism based on ethnoracial group). Identification of how sociodemographic variables can impact the health of critically ill adults is important to guide care and research design for this population. However, despite the growing recognition of the importance of collecting sociodemographic measures that influence health outcomes, insufficient and inconsistent data collection of sociodemographic variables persists in critical care studies. We aim to develop a set of core data variables (CoDaV) for social determinants of health specific to studies involving critically ill adults. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will conduct a scoping review to generate a list of possible sociodemographic measures to be used for round 1 of the modified Delphi processes. We will engage relevant knowledge users (previous intensive care unit patients and family members, critical care researchers, critical care clinicians and research co-ordinators) to participate in the modified Delphi consensus survey to identify the CoDaV. A final consensus meeting will be held with knowledge user representatives to discuss the final CoDaV, how each sociodemographic variable will be collected (eg, level of granularity) and how to disseminate the CoDaV for use in critical care studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The University of Calgary conjoint health research ethics board has approved this study protocol (REB22-1648).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karla D Krewulak
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Fatima Sheikh
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alya Heirali
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - John C Marshall
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karen E A Burns
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Scotty Kupsch
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Christina Maratta
- Department of Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Srinivas Murthy
- Department of Paediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Katie O'Hearn
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kristine Russell
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sangeeta Mehta
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kirsten Fiest
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences & O’Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Shepherd V, Hood K, Wood F. 'It's not making a decision, it's prompting the discussions': a qualitative study exploring stakeholders' views on the acceptability and feasibility of advance research planning (CONSULT-ADVANCE). BMC Med Ethics 2024; 25:80. [PMID: 39039465 PMCID: PMC11265470 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01081-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health and care research involving people who lack capacity to consent requires an alternative decision maker to decide whether they participate or not based on their 'presumed will'. However, this is often unknown. Advance research planning (ARP) is a process for people who anticipate periods of impaired capacity to prospectively express their preferences about research participation and identify who they wish to be involved in future decisions. This may help to extend individuals' autonomy by ensuring that proxy decisions are based on their actual wishes. This qualitative study aimed to explore stakeholders' views about the acceptability and feasibility of ARP and identify barriers and facilitators to its implementation in the UK. METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews with 27 researchers, practitioners, and members of the public who had participated in a preceding survey. Interviews were conducted remotely between April and November 2023. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS Participants were supportive of the concept of ARP, with differing amounts of support for the range of possible ARP activities depending on the context. Six main themes were identified: (1) Planting a seed - creating opportunities to initiate/engage with ARP; (2) A missing part of the puzzle - how preferences expressed through ARP could help inform decisions; (3) Finding the sweet spot - optimising the timing of ARP; (4) More than a piece of paper - finding the best mode for recording preferences; (5) Keeping the door open to future opportunities - minimising the risk of unintended consequences; and (6) Navigating with a compass - principles underpinning ARP to ensure safeguarding and help address inequalities. Participants also identified a number of implementation challenges, and proposed facilitative strategies that might overcome them which included embedding advance research planning in existing future planning processes and research-focused activities. CONCLUSIONS This study provides a routemap to implementing ARP in the UK to enable people anticipating impaired capacity to express their preferences about research, thus ensuring greater opportunities for inclusion of this under-served group, and addressing the decisional burden experienced by some family members acting as proxies. Development of interventions and guidance to support ARP is needed, with a focus on ensuring accessibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kerenza Hood
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Fiona Wood
- PRIME Centre Wales, Cardiff, UK
- Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Crean D, Gordijn B, Kearns AJ. Impact and Assessment of Research Integrity Teaching: A Systematic Literature Review. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 2024; 30:30. [PMID: 39042336 PMCID: PMC11266247 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-024-00493-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
Presented here is a systematic literature review of what the academic literature asserts about: (1) the stages of the ethical decision-making process (i.e. awareness, reasoning, motivation, and action) that are claimed to be improved or not improved by RI teaching and whether these claims are supported by evidence; (2) the measurements used to determine the effectiveness of RI teaching; and (3) the stage/s of the ethical decision-making process that are difficult to assess. Regarding (1), awareness was the stage most claimed to be amenable to improvement following RI teaching, and with motivation being the stage that is rarely addressed in the academic literature. While few, some sources claimed RI teaching cannot improve specific stages. With behaviour (action) being the stage referenced most, albeit in only 9% of the total sources, for not being amenable to improvement following RI teaching. Finally, most claims were supported by empirical evidence. Regarding (2), measures most frequently used are custom in-house surveys and some validated measures. Additionally, there is much debate in the literature regarding the adequacy of current assessment measures in RI teaching, and even their absence. Such debate warrants caution when we are considering the empirical evidence supplied to support that RI teaching does or does not improve a specific stage of the decision-making process. Regarding (3), only behaviour was discussed as being difficult to assess, if not impossible. In our discussion section we contextualise these results, and following this we derive some recommendations for relevant stakeholders in RI teaching.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Crean
- School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
- Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
- Institute of Ethics, School of Theology, Philosophy, and Music, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Bert Gordijn
- Institute of Ethics, School of Theology, Philosophy, and Music, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Alan J Kearns
- Institute of Ethics, School of Theology, Philosophy, and Music, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Majumder MA, Leek JT, Hansen KD, Razi A, McGuire AL. Large-scale genotype prediction from RNA sequence data necessitates a new ethical and policy framework. Nat Genet 2024:10.1038/s41588-024-01825-4. [PMID: 39039279 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-024-01825-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Mary A Majumder
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Jeffrey T Leek
- Biostatistics Program, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kasper D Hansen
- Department of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Afrooz Razi
- Department of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amy L McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Stevens ER, Cleland CM, Shunk A, El Shahawy O. Evaluating strategies to recruit health researchers to participate in online survey research. BMC Med Res Methodol 2024; 24:153. [PMID: 39026149 PMCID: PMC11256559 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02275-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Engaging researchers as research subjects is key to informing the development of effective and relevant research practices. It is important to understand how best to engage researchers as research subjects. METHODS A 24 factorial experiment, as part of a Multiphase Optimization Strategy, was performed to evaluate effects of four recruitment strategy components on participant opening of an emailed survey link and survey completion. Participants were members of three US-based national health research consortia. A stratified simple random sample was used to assign potential survey participants to one of 16 recruitment scenarios. Recruitment strategy components were intended to address both intrinsic and extrinsic sources of motivation, including: $50 gift, $1,000 raffle, altruistic messaging, and egoistic messaging. Multivariable generalized linear regression analyses adjusting for consortium estimated component effects on outcomes. Potential interactions among components were tested. Results are reported as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS Surveys were collected from June to December 2023. A total of 418 participants were included from the consortia, with final analytical sample of 400 eligible participants. Out of the final sample, 82% (341) opened the survey link and 35% (147) completed the survey. Altruistic messaging increased the odds of opening the survey (aOR 2.02, 95% CI: 1.35-2.69, p = 0.033), while egoistic messaging significantly reduced the odds of opening the survey (aOR 0.56, 95%CI 0.38-0.75, p = 0.08). The receipt of egoistic messaging increased the odds of completing the survey once opened (aOR 1.81, 95%CI: 1.39-2.23, p < 0.05). There was a significant negative interaction effect between the altruistic appeal and egoistic messaging strategies for survey completion outcome. Monetary incentives did not a have a significant impact on survey completion. CONCLUSION Intrinsic motivation is likely to be a greater driver of health researcher participation in survey research than extrinsic motivation. Altruistic and egoistic messaging may differentially impact initial interest and survey completion and when combined may lead to improved rates of recruitment, but not survey completion. Further research is needed to determine how to best optimize message content and whether the effects observed are modified by survey burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth R Stevens
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Charles M Cleland
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amelia Shunk
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Omar El Shahawy
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Koizumi S, Ide K, Becker C, Uchida T, Ishizaki M, Hashimoto A, Suzuki S, Sano M, Toyama M, Nishikawa Y, Okada H, Takahashi Y, Nakayama T. Research integrity in Instructions for Authors in Japanese medical journals using ICMJE Recommendations: A descriptive literature study. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0305707. [PMID: 39012857 PMCID: PMC11251596 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) has published Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. These provide a global standard for writing and editing medical articles, including research integrity. However, no study has examined the research integrity-related content of Japanese medical journals' Instructions for Authors. We therefore compared research integrity content in ICMJE member journals with those in the English- and Japanese-language journals of the Japanese Association of Medical Sciences (JAMS). MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a descriptive literature study. We obtained Instructions for Authors from English- and Japanese-language journals listed on the JAMS website and the ICMJE member journals listed on the ICMJE website as of September 1, 2021. We compared the presence of 20 topics (19 in the ICMJE Recommendations plus compliance with ICMJE) in the Instructions for Authors, and analyzed the content of the conflict of interest disclosure. RESULTS We evaluated 12 ICMJE member journals, and 82 English-language and 99 Japanese-language subcommittee journals. The median number of topics covered was 10.5 for ICMJE member journals, 10 for English-language journals, and three for Japanese-language journals. Compliance with ICMJE was mentioned by 10 (83%) ICMJE member journals, 75 (91%) English-language journals, and 29 (29%) Japanese-language journals. The ICMJE Conflicts of Interest Disclosure Form was requested by seven (64%) ICMJE member journals, 15 (18%) English-language journals, and one (1%) Japanese-language journal. CONCLUSIONS Although the topics in the JAMS English-language journals resembled those in the ICMJE member journals, the median value of ICMJE-related topic inclusion was approximately one-third lower in JAMS Japanese-language journals than in ICMJE member journals. It is hoped that Japanese-language journals whose conflict of interest disclosure policies differ from ICMJE standards will adopt international standards to deter misconduct and ensure publication quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiho Koizumi
- Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kazuki Ide
- Center for Infectious Disease Education and Research (CiDER) Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
- Research Center on Ethical, Legal and Social Issues, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Carl Becker
- Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Tomoe Uchida
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Miho Ishizaki
- Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine / School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Akane Hashimoto
- Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine / School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shota Suzuki
- Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine / School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, Nara Medical University Hospital, Nara, Japan
- Department of Social and Community Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Makiko Sano
- Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine / School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Critical Care Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Bukkyo University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Mayumi Toyama
- Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine / School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Nishikawa
- Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine / School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Okada
- Department of Social and Community Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Yoshimitsu Takahashi
- Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine / School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takeo Nakayama
- Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine / School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Tang G. The punishment intensity for research misconduct and its related factors: An exploratory study on hospitals in Mainland China. Account Res 2024:1-22. [PMID: 39003763 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2377723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024]
Abstract
Previous studies have found that factors such as gender and academic positions do not influence the severity of administrative actions taken by institutions. However, this study provides partly inconsistent evidence. It focuses on incidents of research misconduct in hospitals across Mainland China and explores factors related to punishment using a large cross-sectional dataset (N = 815). Regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between authorship order and the punishment intensity (p < 0.05). Under specific conditions, there was a significant correlation between the professional title (senior) and punishment intensity (p = 0.001), and an interaction between professional title and types of research misbehavior. Further analysis of simple effects showed that, in cases of fabrication and falsification, and combinations of multiple research misbehavior, researchers with senior titles received significantly lighter punishments compared to those with junior, intermediate, and associate senior titles (p < 0.05). The study unveils the potential accountability patterns (collective accountability and tiered punishment) that may be adopted by hospitals in Mainland China, as well as the challenges faced in ensuring fairness, emphasizing the importance of independent investigative bodies for incidents of research misconduct, and advocating for fairness as a priority in governance of research misconduct.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gengyan Tang
- Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Alnahhal KI, Wynn S, Gouthier Z, Sorour A, Damara FA, Baffoe-Bonnie H, Walker C, Sharew B, Kirksey L. Racial and Ethnic Representation in Peripheral Artery Disease Randomized Clinical Trials. Ann Vasc Surg 2024:S0890-5096(24)00421-7. [PMID: 39009128 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.05.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024]
Abstract
Clinical trial enrollment provides various benefits to study participants including early access to novel therapies that may potentially alter the trajectory of disease states. Trial sponsors benefit from enrolling demographically diverse trial participants enabling the trial outcomes to be generalizable to a larger proportion of the community at large. Despite these and other well-documented benefits, clinical trial enrollment for Black and Hispanic Americans as well as women continues to be low. Specific disease states such as PAD have a higher prevalence and clinical outcomes are relatively worse in Black Americans compared with non-Hispanic white Americans. The recruitment process for peripheral artery disease (PAD) clinical trials can be costly and challenging and usually comes at the expense of representation. Participant willingness and trust, engagement, and socioeconomic status play essential roles in the representation of underrepresented minority (URM) groups. Despite the contrary belief, URM groups such as Blacks and Hispanics are just as willing to participate in a clinical trial as non-Hispanic Whites. However, financial burdens, cultural barriers, and inadequate health literacy and education may impede URMs' access to clinical trials and medical care. Clinical trials' enrollment sites often pose transportation barriers and challenges that negatively impact creating a diverse study population. Lack of diversity among a trial population can stem from the stakeholder level, where corporate sponsors of academic readers do not consider diversity in clinical trials a priority due to false cost-benefit assumptions. The funding source may also impact the racial reporting or the results of a given trial. Industry-based trials have always been criticized for over-representing non-Hispanic White populations, driven by the desire to reach high completion rates with minimum financial burdens. Real efforts are warranted to ensure adequate minorities' representation in the PAD clinical trials and to the process toward the ultimate goal of developing more durable and effective PAD treatments that fit the needs of real-world populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khaled I Alnahhal
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Miller Family Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Sanaai Wynn
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Miller Family Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Zaira Gouthier
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Miller Family Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Ahmed Sorour
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Miller Family Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Fachreza Aryo Damara
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Miller Family Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Claudia Walker
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Lee Kirksey
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Miller Family Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Rashid MA. The emerging multipolar world order: Implications for medical education. MEDICAL TEACHER 2024:1-3. [PMID: 38994843 DOI: 10.1080/0142159x.2024.2377398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
|
36
|
Teixeira da Silva JA, Daly T, Türp JC, Sabel BA, Kendall G. The undeclared use of third-party service providers in academic publishing is unethical: an epistemic reflection and scoping review. NAUNYN-SCHMIEDEBERG'S ARCHIVES OF PHARMACOLOGY 2024:10.1007/s00210-024-03177-6. [PMID: 38990307 DOI: 10.1007/s00210-024-03177-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
There is a substantial body of scientific literature on the use of third-party services (TPS) by academics to assist as "publication consultants" in scholarly publishing. TPS provide a wide range of scholarly services to research teams that lack the equipment, skills, motivation, or time to produce a paper without external assistance. While services such as language editing, statistical support, or graphic design are common and often legitimate, some TPS also provide illegitimate services and send unsolicited e-mails (spam) to academics offering these services. Such illegitimate types of TPS have the potential to threaten the integrity of the peer-reviewed scientific literature. In extreme cases, for-profit agencies known as "paper mills" even offer fake scientific publications or authorship slots for sale. The use of such illegitimate services as well as the failure to acknowledge their use is an ethical violation in academic publishing, while the failure to declare support for a TPS can be considered a form of contract fraud. We discuss some literature on TPS, highlight services currently offered by ten of the largest commercial publishers and expect authors to be transparent about the use of these services in their publications. From an ethical/moral (i.e., non-commercial) point of view, it is the responsibility of editors, journals, and publishers, and it should be in their best interest to ensure that illegitimate TPS are identified and prohibited, while publisher-employed TPS should be properly disclosed in their publications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Timothy Daly
- Bioethics Program, FLACSO Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
- Science Norms Democracy, UMR 8011, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
| | - Jens C Türp
- Department of Oral Health & Medicine, University Center for Dental Medicine UZB, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Bernhard A Sabel
- Institute of Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke University of Magdeburg, Leipziger Straße 44, Magdeburg, 39120, Germany.
| | - Graham Kendall
- School of Engineering and Computing, MILA University, No. 1, Persiaran MIU, 71800 Putra Nilai, Negeri Sembilan Darul Khusus, Malaysia.
- School of Computer Science, The University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wang KR, Hecker J, McGeachie MJ. Quantifying the massive pleiotropy of microRNA: a human microRNA-disease causal association database generated with ChatGPT. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.07.08.602488. [PMID: 39026876 PMCID: PMC11257417 DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.08.602488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are recognized as key regulatory factors in numerous human diseases, with the same miRNA often involved in several diseases simultaneously or being identified as a biomarker for dozens of separate diseases. While of evident biological importance, miRNA pleiotropy remains poorly understood, and quantifying this could greatly aid in understanding the broader role miRNAs play in health and disease. To this end, we introduce miRAIDD (miRNA Artificial Intelligence Disease Database), a comprehensive database of human miRNA-disease causal associations constructed using large language models (LLM). Through this endeavor, we provide two entirely novel contributions: 1) we systematically quantify miRNA pleiotropy, a property of evident translational importance; and 2) describe biological and bioinformatic characteristics of miRNAs which lead to increased pleiotropy. Further, we provide our code, database, and experience using AI LLMs to the broader research community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Julian Hecker
- Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
- Channig Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Michael J McGeachie
- Channig Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
[International Multi-stakeholder Consensus Statement on Clinical Trial Integrity]. Semergen 2024; 50:102217. [PMID: 38996807 DOI: 10.1016/j.semerg.2024.102217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Science integrity initiatives require specific recommendations for randomised clinical trials (RCT). OBJECTIVE To prepare a set of statements for RCT integrity through an international multi-stakeholder consensus. METHODS The consensus was developed via multi-country multidisciplinary stakeholder group composition and engagement; evidence synthesis of 55 systematic reviews concerning RCT integrity; anonymised two-round modified Delphi survey with consensus threshold based on the average percent of majority opinions; and, a final consensus development meeting. RESULTS There were 30 stakeholders representing 15 countries from 5 continents including trialists, ethicists, methodologists, statisticians, consumer representative, industry representative, systematic reviewers, funding body panel members, regulatory experts, authors, journal editors, peer-reviewers and advisors for resolving integrity concerns. Delphi survey response rate was 86.7% (26/30 stakeholders). There were 111 statements (73 stakeholder-provided, 46 systematic review-generated, 8 supported by both) in the initial long list, with 8 additional statements provided during the consensus rounds. Through consensus the final set consolidated 81 statements (49 stakeholder-provided, 41 systematic review-generated, 9 supported by both). The entire RCT life cycle was covered by the set of statements including general aspects (n=6), design and approval (n=11), conduct and monitoring (n=19), reporting of protocols and findings (n=20), post-publication concerns (n=12), and future research and development (n=13). CONCLUSION Implementation of this multi-stakeholder consensus statement is expected to enhance RCT integrity.
Collapse
|
39
|
Daly T, Teixeira da Silva JA. Clarifying middle authorship contributions to reduce abuses in science publishing and assessment of top-ranked SJR biochemistry and pharmacology journals' authorship criteria. NAUNYN-SCHMIEDEBERG'S ARCHIVES OF PHARMACOLOGY 2024:10.1007/s00210-024-03277-3. [PMID: 38985314 DOI: 10.1007/s00210-024-03277-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2024] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024]
Abstract
So-called "middle authors," being neither the first, last, nor corresponding author of an academic paper, have made increasing relative contributions to academic scholarship over recent decades. No work has specifically and explicitly addressed the roles, rights, and responsibilities of middle authors, an authorship position which we believe is particularly vulnerable to abuse via growing phenomena such as paper mills. Responsible middle authorship requires transparent declarations of intellectual and other scientific contributions that journals can and should require of co-authors and established guidelines and criteria to achieve this already exist (ICMJE/CRediT). Although publishers, editors, and authors need to collectively uphold a situation of shared responsibility for appropriate co-authorship, current models have failed science since verification of authorship is impossible, except through blind trust in authors' statements. During the retraction of a paper, while the opinion of individual co-authors might be noted in a retraction notice, the retraction itself practically erases the relevance of co-author contributions and position/status (first, leading, senior, last, co-corresponding, etc.). Paper mills may have successfully proliferated because individual authors' roles and responsibilities are not tangibly verifiable and are thus indiscernible. We draw on a historical example of manipulated research to argue that authors and editors should publish publicly available, traceable contributions to the intellectual content of an article-both classical authorship or technical contributions-to maximize both visibility of individual contributions and accountability. To make our article practically more relevant to this journal's readership, we reviewed the top 50 Q1 journals in the fields of biochemistry and pharmacology, as ranked by the SJR, to appreciate which journals adopted the ICMJE or CRediT schools of authorship contribution, finding significant variation in adhesion to ICMJE guidelines nor the CRediT criteria and wording of author guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Daly
- Bioethics Program, FLACSO Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
- Science Norms Democracy, UMR 8011, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Sharma A, Karavadi V, Suresh H, Balasubramanian S, Singh P, Walia P, Venkatesh U. An analysis of retracted studies in cardiology in the last two decades. Future Cardiol 2024:1-8. [PMID: 38980315 DOI: 10.1080/14796678.2024.2370698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study is to analyze retracted studies in cardiovascular field. Methodology: PubMed and Embase databases were used to identify retracted publications from 2002 to 2022. Various characteristics of articles were retrieved, and an analysis was performed using R software. Results: We finally included 979 articles. Authors from China have the highest number of retracted studies (35.5%), followed by the USA (22.1%), and Japan (4%). The most common causes of retraction are mistakes and honest errors (24.5%) and duplicate data (17.7%). From 2002 to 2022, there has been a significant increase in retracted studies and a decrease in the impact factor of journals, number of citations, and time to retraction. Conclusion: The trend of retracting publications in cardiology is increasing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akash Sharma
- Department of Medicine, University at Buffalo - Catholic Health System, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA
- Department of Community Medicine, Saveetha Medical College, Saveetha Institute of Medical & Technical Sciences, Saveetha Univerisity, Chennai, India
| | - Vidusha Karavadi
- Department of Community Medicine, Rajarajeswari Medical College & Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560060, India
| | - Harshini Suresh
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Global Health Institute, Duke-NUS Medical School, 169857, Singapore
| | - Sowntappan Balasubramanian
- Department of Community Medicine, Seth G S Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - Priyali Singh
- Prateek Medical Center, Basti, Uttar Pradesh 272001, India
| | - Parteek Walia
- Department of Community Medicine & Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh 273008, India
| | - U Venkatesh
- Department of Community Medicine & Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh 273008, India
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
L. Seghier M. Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix the peer-review process. F1000Res 2024; 13:439. [PMID: 38962691 PMCID: PMC11221348 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.148985.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024] Open
Abstract
The exponential increase in the number of submissions, further accelerated by generative AI, and the decline in the availability of experts are burdening the peer review process. This has led to high unethical desk rejection rates, a growing appeal for the publication of unreviewed preprints, and a worrying proliferation of predatory journals. The idea of monetarily compensating peer reviewers has been around for many years; maybe, it is time to take it seriously as one way to save the peer review process. Here, I argue that paying reviewers, when done in a fair and transparent way, is a viable solution. Like the case of professional language editors, part-time or full-time professional reviewers, managed by universities or for-profit companies, can be an integral part of modern peer review. Being a professional reviewer could be financially attractive to retired senior researchers and to researchers who enjoy evaluating papers but are not motivated to do so for free. Moreover, not all produced research needs to go through peer review, and thus persuading researchers to limit submissions to their most novel and useful research could also help bring submission volumes to manageable levels. Overall, this paper reckons that the problem is not the peer review process per se but rather its function within an academic ecosystem dominated by an unhealthy culture of 'publish or perish'. Instead of reforming the peer review process, academia has to look for better science dissemination schemes that promote collaboration over competition, engagement over judgement, and research quality and sustainability over quantity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed L. Seghier
- Healthcare Engineering Innovation Center (HEIC), Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Blatch-Jones AJ, Lakin K, Thomas S. A scoping review on what constitutes a good research culture. F1000Res 2024; 13:324. [PMID: 38826614 PMCID: PMC11140362 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.147599.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The crisis in research culture is well documented, covering issues such as a tendency for quantity over quality, unhealthy competitive environments, and assessment based on publications, journal prestige and funding. In response, research institutions need to assess their own practices to promote and advocate for change in the current research ecosystem. The purpose of the scoping review was to explore ' What does the evidence say about the 'problem' with 'poor' research culture, what are the benefits of 'good' research culture, and what does 'good' look like?' Aims To examine the peer-reviewed and grey literature to explore the interplay between research culture, open research, career paths, recognition and rewards, and equality, diversity, and inclusion, as part of a larger programme of activity for a research institution. Methods A scoping review was undertaken. Six databases were searched along with grey literature. Eligible literature had relevance to academic research institutions, addressed research culture, and were published between January 2017 to May 2022. Evidence was mapped and themed to specific categories. The search strategy, screening and analysis took place between April-May 2022. Results 1666 titles and abstracts, and 924 full text articles were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 253 articles met the eligibility criteria for inclusion. A purposive sampling of relevant websites was drawn from to complement the review, resulting in 102 records included in the review. Key areas for consideration were identified across the four themes of job security, wellbeing and equality of opportunity, teamwork and interdisciplinary, and research quality and accountability. Conclusions There are opportunities for research institutions to improve their own practice, however institutional solutions cannot act in isolation. Research institutions and research funders need to work together to build a more sustainable and inclusive research culture that is diverse in nature and supports individuals' well-being, career progression and performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Jane Blatch-Jones
- School of Healthcare Enterprise and Innovation, University of Southampton, Southampton, England, SO16 7NS, UK
| | - Kay Lakin
- Hatch, School of Healthcare Enterprise and Innovation, University of Southampton, Southampton, England, SO16 7NS, UK
| | - Sarah Thomas
- Hatch, School of Healthcare Enterprise and Innovation, University of Southampton, Southampton, England, SO16 7NS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Junkin JC, Vraa D, Young JL, Rhon DI. Assessing the transparency in reporting of clinical trials investigating manual therapy interventions for low back pain: A methodological review. J Eval Clin Pract 2024. [PMID: 38973108 DOI: 10.1111/jep.14078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2024] [Revised: 06/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024]
Abstract
RATIONALE Low back pain (LBP) is a common condition with a significant societal burden. Manual therapy is an effective treatment for LBP and recommended in clinical practice guidelines. While the quantity of literature supporting the use of manual therapy is large, the methodological quality and transparency of this collective work are unclear. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES Explore the transparency in reporting of clinical trials assessing manual therapy interventions in patients with LBP by comparing planned components in the trial registration with what was reported in the published manuscript. METHODS Three databases were searched to identify trials assessing the treatment effect of manual therapy for LBP from January 2005 to May 2023. Studies were included if the manual therapy consisted of thrust manipulations, mobilizations or muscle energy techniques. RESULTS From 4462 studies initially identified, 167 studies remained in the final review after title, abstract and full-text review. Only 87 (52.1%) of the 167 studies were registered (n = 57 prospectively and n = 30 retrospectively). Primary outcomes in the publications were identical to the registration in 54 (62.1%) of the registered trials. Secondary outcomes in the publication were identical to the registration in 27 (31.0%) of the registered trials. The CONSORT reporting guideline was referenced in only 19 (21.8%) trials. Multiple discrepancies between registration and publication were noted for primary and secondary outcomes. All trials had eligibility criteria in the registration that matched their corresponding manuscript, while only four (4.6%) trial registrations addressed any type of statistical analysis plan. CONCLUSION Approximately half of the trials were not registered. Of those registered, only half were registered prospectively. Substantial discrepancies existed between registered and published outcomes that were never addressed by the authors, raising questions about potential bias. Transparency can be improved through more stringent requirements during manuscript submission to journals, and better reporting of the rationale for discrepancies between registration and publication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer C Junkin
- Department of Physical Therapy Program, Bellin College, Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Derek Vraa
- Department of Physical Therapy Program, Bellin College, Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Jodi L Young
- Department of Physical Therapy Program, Bellin College, Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Daniel I Rhon
- Department of Physical Therapy Program, Bellin College, Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Mills D, Mertkan S, Onurkan Aliusta G. 'Special issue-ization' as a growth and revenue strategy: Reproduction by the "big five" and the risks for research integrity. Account Res 2024:1-19. [PMID: 38972046 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2374567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024]
Abstract
The exponential growth of MDPI and Frontiers over the last decade has been powered by their extensive use of special issues. The "special issue-ization" of journal publishing has been particularly associated with new publishers and seen as potentially "questionable." Through an extended case-study analysis of three journals owned by one of the "big five" commercial publishers, this paper explores the risks that this growing use of special issues presents to research integrity. All three case-study journals show sudden and marked changes in their publication patterns. An analysis of special issue editorials and retraction notes was used to determine the specifics of special issues and reasons for retractions. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse data. Findings suggest that these commercial publishers are also promoting special issues and that article retractions are often connected to guest editor manipulation. This underlies the threat that "special issue-ization" presents to research integrity. It highlights the risks posed by the guest editor model, and the importance of extending this analysis to long-existing commercial publishers. The paper emphasizes the need for an in-depth examination of the underlying structures and political economy of science, and a discussion of the rise of gaming and manipulation within higher education systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Mills
- University of Oxford, Department of Education, Oxford, UK
| | - Sefika Mertkan
- Eastern Mediterranean University, Educational Sciences, Famagusta, Cyprus
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Gibbon VE, Thompson JC, Alves S. Informed proxy consent for ancient DNA research. Commun Biol 2024; 7:815. [PMID: 38965340 PMCID: PMC11224335 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06413-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Embracing the underlying principles and processes of informed proxy consent or relational autonomy consent in human ancient DNA research can transform research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria E Gibbon
- Division of Clinical Anatomy and Biological Anthropology, Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town, Observatory 7935, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Jessica C Thompson
- Department of Anthropology, Yale University, 10 Sachem Street, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA
- Yale Peabody Museum, Yale University, 170 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA
| | - Sianne Alves
- Office for Inclusivity & Change, Office of the Deputy Vice Chancellor for Transformation: University of Cape Town, Ivan Toms Building, 28 Rhodes Avenue Mowbray, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Yeo-Teh NSL, Tang BL. On "intent" in research misconduct. Account Res 2024:1-19. [PMID: 38963096 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2374577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
Research misconduct, broadly defined as acts of fabrication, falsification and/or plagiarism, violate the value system of science, cost significant wastage of public resources, and in more extreme cases endanger research participants or members of the society at large. Determination of culpability in research misconduct requires establishment of intent on the part of the respondent or perpetrator. However, "intent" is a state of mind, and its perception is subjective, unequivocal evidence for which would not be as readily established compared to the objective evidence available for the acts themselves. Here, we explore the concept of "intent" in research misconduct, how it is framed in criminological/legal terms, and narrated from a psychological perspective. Based on these, we propose a framework whereby lines of questioning and investigation, as defined by legislative terms and informed by the models and tools of psychology, could help in establishing a preponderance of evidence for culpable intent. Such a framework could be useful in research misconduct adjudications and in delivering sanctions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Shu Ling Yeo-Teh
- Academic and Research Compliance and Integrity Office, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Bor Luen Tang
- Department of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
van der Heyden MAG. Insight in article retractions in British Journal of Pharmacology between the years 2000-2023. Implications for reducing fraud-containing articles. Br J Pharmacol 2024. [PMID: 38964846 DOI: 10.1111/bph.16499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Marcel A G van der Heyden
- Department of Medical Physiology, Division of Heart & Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Consulting editor Research Integrity British Journal of Pharmacology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Helgesson G, Bülow W. Responsibility is an adequate requirement for authorship: a reply to Levy. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2024:jme-2024-110245. [PMID: 38964776 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2024-110245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
Neil Levy argues in a recent JME 'Current controversy' paper that responsibility is not an adequate authorship requirement for human researchers, which makes it unjustified to require it from artificial intelligence contributing to research and scientific paper production, although he softens his stance towards the end and accepts that a limited responsibility requirement might after all be reasonable. The main argument provided by Levy against a more extensive responsibility requirement in science is that there are many cases where not all researchers listed as coauthors can assume responsibility for the entire paper or even the central research questions. In this reply, we argue that the more limited responsibility requirement is the ethically reasonable one to ask of all authors, considering the conditions for and value of collaboration, and that this should also have ramifications for the legal regulation of scientific misconduct.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gert Helgesson
- Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - William Bülow
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Noordhof DA, Sandbakk Ø. Introducing IJSPP's First Reviewer Incentive: A Submission-Fee Waiver. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2024:1-2. [PMID: 38955330 DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2024-0252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Dionne A Noordhof
- Centre for Elite Sports Research, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Øyvind Sandbakk
- Centre for Elite Sports Research, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- School of Sport Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Kharumnuid SA, Singh Deo P. "Researchers' perceptions and awareness of predatory publishing: A survey". Account Res 2024; 31:479-496. [PMID: 36350722 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2145470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The term "Predatory" alludes to the assumption that these organizations prey on academics for financial gain by charging article processing charges (APC) while failing to meet scholarly publishing standards.Predatory publishing is a growing threat to the academic society. Considering this,the University Grants Commission (UGC),India's statutory body for higher education,has responded by launching the University Grants Commission-Consortium for Academic Research and Ethics (UGC-CARE) list,which attempts to promote research quality,integration,and publication ethics.An online survey was undertaken to determine the perception and awareness of North Eastern Hill University's researchers concerning predatory journals.A total of 160 respondents were recorded.The survey reveals that while the majority of participants (58.75%) were aware of predatory publications, a significant portion (41.25%) were not.It was found that a journal's listing in UGC-CARE list is the most crucial factor in submitting an original manuscript for publication.Researchers,aware of the negative consequences of publishing in piracy-related publications,prefer not to submit their scientific work to such publishers as it risk tarnishing their reputation.As a result,research findings emphasize the necessity for awareness initiatives to educate researchers about predatory publications early in their academic careers.Research initiatives like the UGC-CARE list should be encouraged to minimize predatory publishing; promote quality and transparency in research.Abbreviation: NEHU- North Eastern Hill University, UGC- University Grants Commission, APC- Article Processing Charge, UGC-CARE- University Grants Commission - Consortium for Academic Research and Ethics, DOAJ- Directory of Open Access Journals, DOI - Digital Object Identifiers, API- Academic Performance Indicator.
Collapse
|