Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy

Radiation Modifiers: Treatment Overview and Future Investigations

Many radiosensitizers are in current clinical use. In addition, a myriad of potential new targeted therapies, which may also interact with radiation, are in clinical development. The clinical utility of new targeted therapies, in combination with existing radiation sensitizers (chemotherapies) requires further evaluation, as does the understanding of their acute and late radiation effects. Free radical scavengers appear to show promise as radioprotectors, but data for mucoprotection are less convincing.

Comparison of the efficacy of oral capecitabine versus bolus 5-FU in preoperative radiotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer

The effects of treatment with oral capecitabine vs. bolus 5-FU, administered concurrently with preoperative radiotherapy, were compared in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). One hundred and twenty-seven patients with LARC received concurrent preoperative chemoradiation using two cycles bolus 5-FU (500 mg/m2/day) plus leucovorin (LV, 20 mg/m2/day) (Group I). Another LARC group received concurrent chemoradiation using two cycles 1,650 mg/m2/day of oral capecitabine and 20 mg/m2/day of LV (Group II, 97 patients). Radiation was delivered to the primary tumor at 50.4 Gy in both groups. Definitive surgery was performed 6 weeks after the completion of chemoradiation. A pathologic complete remission was achieved in 11.4% of patients in Group I and in 22.2% of patients in Group II (p= 0.042). The down-staging rates of the primary tumor and lymph nodes were 39.0/ 68.7% in Group I and 61.1/87.5% in Group II (p=0.002/0.005). Sphincter-preserving surgery was possible in 42.1% of patients in Group I and 66.7% of those in Group II (p=0.021). Grade 3 or 4 leucopenia, diarrhea, and radiation dermatitis were statistically more prevalent in Group I than in Group II, while the opposite was true for grade 3 hand-foot syndrome. Preoperative chemoradiation using oral capecitabine was better tolerated than bolus 5-FU and was more effective in the promotion of both down-staging and sphincter preservation in patients with LARC.

Phase II study of oral capecitabine in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Currently available treatment for hormone refractory prostate cancer is limited in efficacy and associated with significant toxicity. This phase II study was performed to assess the efficacy of the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine in advanced prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who had a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) despite androgen withdrawal, but who remained free from cancer-related symptoms. In total, 14 patients received oral capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 twice daily for two weeks of a three-week cycle. Tumour response was assessed using serum PSA measurement at 3-weekly intervals and, where present, imaging of soft tissue metastases.

RESULTS

One of 14 patients experienced a partial response as assessed by both PSA and imaging of liver metastases. In seven other patients (50%), treatment decreased the rate of PSA rise. The duration of PSA stabilisation was generally short, but in 5/14 patients (36%) was sustained beyond 18 weeks, and in one patient to 24 weeks. Toxicity was significant but manageable, the most common adverse events being nausea, mucositis and hand-foot syndrome, each occurring in 50% of patients. Other common side effects were diarrhoea and lymphopenia. All toxicities were grade 1 or 2, except for grade 3 hand-foot syndrome occurring in one patient, and no dose reduction was required because of toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Capecitabine has limited activity as a single agent in prostate cancer, but appears to modulate tumour biology. Considering the added convenience of oral administration, these results support further evaluation of combinations containing capecitabine in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

A pilot phase II study of capecitabine in advanced or recurrent breast cancer

BACKGROUND

A pilot phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Japanese intermittent regimen of capecitabine (Xeloda) in patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer.

METHODS

A total of 23 patients who had received no more than one prior chemotherapy regimen received oral 828 mg/m2 capecitabine twice daily for 3 weeks followed by a 1-week rest period. The response to capecitabine was evaluated in 22 patients (one patient ineligible).

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 45.5% (95% CI, 24.4-67.8%), including 1 complete response (4.5%) and 9 patients with partial response (40.9%). A further 7 patients (31.8%) had stable disease. The median duration of response was 7.2 months (range, 3.0-15.8 months) and the median time to progression was 6.4 months (95% CI, 4.1-15.1 months). Treatment-related adverse events >or= grade 3 were observed in 7 patients (30.1%).

CONCLUSION

Intermittent capecitabine therapy (828 mg/m(2) twice daily for 3 weeks followed by a 1-week rest period) was shown to be effective and well tolerated as second-line treatment for advanced or recurrent breast cancer. The Japanese regimen is worthy of further study in larger numbers of patients in phase II / III clinical trials.

Phase II trial of oral uracil/tegafur plus leucovorin in patients with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The current study evaluated the efficacy of oral uracil/tegafur (UFT) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate carcinoma.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with hormone-refractory metastatic carcinoma of the prostate who had undergone antiandrogen withdrawal and no more than 1 prior chemotherapy treatment were enrolled on a single-institution Phase II trial. Patients were treated with oral UFT at a dose of 300 mg/m2/d and oral LV at a dose of 90 mg/day for 28 days followed by 7 days off therapy on a 35-day cycle regimen.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. There was no response by objective criteria in 9 patients with measurable disease. Four responses by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) criteria (i.e., PSA decrease by > 50%) were noted (15%) lasting a mean of 20.5 weeks. Therapy was generally well tolerated, with 2 patients developing Grade 4 toxicity (1 patient each with diarrhea and hand-foot syndrome) and 4 patients having significant Grade 3 toxicity (anemia, hyperbilirubinemia, and vomiting) (Toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria). Six patients had stable disease by clinical, laboratory, and radiologic criteria for an average of 5 cycles of treatment (25 wks).

CONCLUSIONS

Although UFT and LV are generally well tolerated in the setting of hormone-refractory metastatic prostate carcinoma, the combination has a low level of activity. Its toxicity and activity is similar to that observed when intravenous 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine are given alone. It may be an option for further investigations in combination regimens.

A willingness-to-pay study of oral epidermal growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) are new agents in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Phase II studies demonstrate objective tumor responses and symptom improvement, combined with minimal toxicity and the convenience of an oral agent. We evaluated patient utility through willingness-to-pay (WTP) for these agents in the treatment of advanced NSCLC in Canada.

METHODS

Advanced NSCLC patients and healthy subjects participated in a structured interview and bidding exercise, reviewing current evidence supporting EGFR TKI therapy in advanced NSCLC and patient willingness-to-pay for treatment.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients and 54 healthy subjects participated. The median amount both groups were willing to pay for a month of oral EGFR TKI therapy was $100 CAD (range $0-5000 per month). A minority of NSCLC patients received employment income, the majority relying on disability, pension income, and social assistance for financial support. Affordability of these agents was a key concern for both advanced NSCLC patients and healthy subjects. Univariate predictors of WTP included marital status, prior chemotherapy treatment, receiving pension income or financial social assistance. In multivariate analysis, only prior chemotherapy remained a significant predictor of WTP (p=0.049).

CONCLUSION

Both advanced NSCLC patients and healthy subjects feel oral EGFR TKIs are worth paying for in the treatment of advanced NSCLC, but are willing to pay only a fraction of the market price. As many advanced NSCLC patients are financially disadvantaged, the potential for restricted access to newer therapies is of concern.

Analysis of the DPYD gene implicated in 5-fluorouracil catabolism in a cohort of Caucasian individuals

PURPOSE

Complete or partial loss of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) function has been described in cancer patients with intolerance to fluoropyrimidine drugs like 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or Xeloda. The intention of this population study is to assess and to evaluate gene variations in the entire coding region of the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene (DPYD), which could be implicated in DPD malfunction.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A cohort of 157 individuals was genotyped by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography; 100 of these genotypes were compared with functional studies on DPD activity and mRNA expression.

RESULTS

Twenty-three variants in coding and noncoding regions of the DPYD gene were detected, giving rise to 15 common haplotypes with a frequency of >1%. Rare sequence alterations included a frameshift mutation (295-298delTCAT) and three novel point mutations, 1218G>A (Met406Ile), 1236G>A (Glu412Glu), and 3067C>T (Pro1023Ser). DPD enzyme activity showed high variation in the analyzed population and correlated with DPD mRNA expression. In particular, the novel variants were not accompanied with decreased enzyme activity. However, a statistically significant deviation from the median DPD activity of the population was associated with the mutations 1601G>A (Ser534Asn) and 2846A>T (Asp949Val).

CONCLUSION

This work presents an analysis of DPYD gene variations in a large cohort of Caucasians. The results reflect the genetic and enzymatic variability of DPD in the population and may contribute to further insight into the pharmacogenetic disorder of DPD deficiency.

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of S-1 Combined with Weekly Paclitaxel in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer

OBJECTIVE

A dose-escalation study of weekly paclitaxel combined with S-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine, was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended dose (RD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in advanced gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twelve patients were enrolled. S-1 was given orally at a fixed dosage of 40 mg/m(2) b.i.d. for 14 consecutive days, followed by a 1-week rest. Paclitaxel was scheduled to be given intravenously on days 1 and 8 at a dose of 50, 60, 70 or 80 mg/m(2), depending on the DLTs. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. A pharmacokinetic study was conducted in an additional 5 patients on days 7 and 8 during the first course given at the RD.

RESULTS

The MTD of paclitaxel was presumed to be 60 mg/m(2), because 50.0% of patients (2/4) developed DLTs (mainly grade 3 anorexia). DLT was observed in 1 out of 8 patients at a dose of 50 mg/m(2). Therefore, the RD of paclitaxel was estimated to be 50 mg/m(2). The preliminary response rate was 62.5% (5/8) at the RD. There were no significant pharmacokinetic interactions between S-1 and paclitaxel. An adequate plasma paclitaxel concentration for an antineoplastic effect was achieved with weekly doses of 50 mg/m(2).

CONCLUSION

Weekly paclitaxel combined with S-1 was demonstrated to exhibit a tolerable toxicity profile with therapeutic plasma concentration at the dose of 50 mg/m(2). This regimen could represent a novel and low toxic combination for advanced gastric cancer.

A randomised cross-over trial comparing patient preference for oral capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin regimens in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) has been treated with intravenous (i.v.) 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV). The tumour-activated, oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine demonstrates superior activity and favourable safety compared with the Mayo regimen, while potentially avoiding the complications and inconvenience associated with i.v. regimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety-seven patients with previously untreated advanced/MCRC were randomised to receive capecitabine followed by i.v. 5-FU/LV [Mayo Clinic, in-patient de Gramont (IPdG) or out-patient modified de Gramont (OPdG) regimens], or i.v. 5-FU/LV followed by capecitabine.

RESULTS

Before treatment, of those patients for whom a preference was recorded, almost all (95%) preferred oral treatment (consistent across all treatment groups) and the majority retained this preference after treatment (64% overall; 86%, 63% and 50% in the Mayo, IPdG and OPdG groups, respectively). Following treatment, the principal reasons for oral treatment preference were increased convenience, home-based administration and tablet formulation. Treatment satisfaction was significantly higher with capecitabine compared with Mayo (P<0.05) and with OPdG compared with capecitabine (P<0.05). Quality of life (QoL) was largely constant across the regimens, although it appeared better with OPdG than capecitabine (P<0.05). Grade 3/4 adverse events were uncommon in all arms.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed that the majority of patients with MCRC prefer oral to i.v. therapy, although the OPdG regimen appears to be the most popular i.v. option. Capecitabine clearly represents an effective, well-tolerated oral alternative to i.v. 5-FU/LV.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of a powder-filled capsule formulation of oral irinotecan (CPT-11) given daily for 5 days every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE

Intravenous (i.v.) irinotecan is a cytotoxic topoisomerase I inhibitor with broad clinical activity in metastatic colorectal cancer and other tumors. The development of an oral formulation of irinotecan could enhance convenience and lessen the expense of palliative irinotecan delivery. This phase I study evaluated the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetics (PK) of irinotecan given as a powder-filled capsule (PFC) daily for 5 days every 3 weeks.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced solid tumors received escalating doses of oral irinotecan daily for 5 days every 3 weeks. Plasma samples were collected following the first and fifth doses of irinotecan during Cycle 1 to determine the PK of irinotecan and its major circulating metabolites: SN-38, SN-38G, and APC.

RESULTS

20 patients (median age 61.5 years, range 40-75; M/F 12/8; ECOG PS 0=5, 1=11, 2=4) received oral irinotecan at dose levels of 30 (n=3), 40 (n=3), 50 (n=6), and 60 (n=8) mg/m(2)/day. Of the eight patients enrolled at 60 mg/m(2), three patients experienced DLT (> or = grade 3) consisting of nausea (three patients), vomiting (three patients), diarrhea (two patients), and febrile neutropenia (two patients) for which all the three patients required hospitalization. Treatment of six patients at the 50-mg/m(2) dose level resulted in no DLT. Other toxicities observed include abdominal pain, alopecia, anorexia, and asthenia. After oral administration, irinotecan was rapidly absorbed into systemic circulation and converted to the active metabolite SN-38. Increasing dose levels resulted in a dose-dependent increase in mean exposure parameters (Cmax and AUC) of irinotecan and metabolites. Systemic exposure parameters (Cmax and AUC(0-24)) of irinotecan and SN-38 were comparable between days 1 and 5. The extent of conversion from irinotecan to SN-38 was approximately threefold higher after the oral administration compared to that previously observed after i.v. administration. The exposure parameters of irinotecan or SN-38 are of limited value in predicting severity of Cycle 1 toxicities in the twofold dose range evaluated.

CONCLUSION

Daily oral administration of irinotecan as the PFC formulation for 5 days every 3 weeks can safely deliver protracted exposure to SN-38, with the MTD of 50 mg/m(2)/d.

Temozolomide in combination with interferon-alfa versus temozolomide alone in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma: a randomized, phase III, multicenter study from the Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group

PURPOSE

Temozolomide (TMZ) has shown efficacy in metastatic melanoma equal to that of dacarbazine (DTIC), the standard chemotherapeutic agent for melanoma. As the combination with interferon-alfa (IFN-alpha) appears superior to single-agent DTIC regarding response rates, the purpose of this study was to compare TMZ alone and TMZ plus IFN-alpha in terms of objective response (OR), overall survival, and safety in a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred ninety-four patients with untreated stage IV metastatic melanoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system) were randomly assigned to receive either oral TMZ alone (200 mg/m2/day; days 1 through 5 every 28 days) or in combination with subcutaneous IFN-alpha (5 MU/m2; days 1, 3, and 5 every week).

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty-two patients were eligible for an intent-to-treat analysis, 271 patients were treated per protocol. In the TMZ + IFN-alpha arm, 33 (24.1%) of 137 patients responded to therapy (partial or complete remission) whereas in the monotherapy arm, in 18 (13.4%) of 134 patients, a response was evident. Thus, the response rate was significantly higher in the combination arm (P = .036). Median survival time was 8.4 months for patients treated with TMZ (95% CI, 7.07 to 9.27) and 9.7 months for those treated with the combination (95% CI, 8.26 to 11.18; P = .16). Dose modifications and interval prolongations due to hematologic toxicity were significantly more frequent in the TMZ + IFN-alpha arm (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

In metastatic melanoma treatment with TMZ + IFN-alpha leads to a significantly superior OR rate compared to treatment with TMZ alone, which did not translate into prolonged survival in our study population.

Patients' preference for administration of endocrine treatments by injection or tablets: results from a study of women with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Endocrine therapies for advanced breast cancer include tablets and intramuscular injections. When treatments have similar efficacy and tolerability profiles, addressing preferences about routes of administration is important.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred and eight women>2 years post-breast cancer diagnosis were interviewed about their preferences for daily tablets or monthly intramuscular injections. Health-care professionals treating the women estimated patients' preferences.

RESULTS

Sixty-three per cent of patients preferred tablets, 24.5% preferred the injection and 12.5% had no preference. The most cited reasons for tablet preference were convenience and dislike of needles; for injection preference, adherence and convenience. Variables associated with preferences were body mass index, educational level, attitudes towards injections and efficacy perceptions. Estimates about patients' preferences by health-care professionals varied widely. When asked to imagine scenarios where injections produced fewer hot flushes, or where two injections monthly improved efficacy, injection preference increased to 60.6% and 74.5%, respectively. Disturbingly, approximately 50% of patients admitted they sometimes forgot or chose not to take their current oral medication.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of breast cancer patients preferred hormone therapy via daily tablets rather than monthly injections. Information about side-effects or improved efficacy altered these preferences. Adherence to treatment cannot be assumed; patients' preferences about drug administration may influence this.

A phase I study of concurrent radiotherapy and capecitabine as adjuvant treatment for operable rectal cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the maximum tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicity of capecitabine with standard radiotherapy (RT) as adjuvant treatment in patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with Stage II/III rectal cancer after surgery were eligible. Total RT dose was delivered as DT 50 Gy in fractions of 2.0 Gy/day for 5 weeks to the pelvic area. Capecitabine was administered concurrently with RT in escalating doses, twice daily with a 12-h interval, for two cycles of 14 days separated by a 7-day rest. Dose-limiting toxicity included Grade 3 or Grade 4 hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were enrolled at the following dose levels: 1,000 (3 patients), 1,200 (3 patients), 1,400 (3 patients), 1,500 (3 patients), 1,600 (6 patients), and 1,700 mg/m2/day (6 patients). Dose-limiting toxicity was observed in 1 patient at 1,600 mg/m2/day (Grade 3 diarrhea) and in 2 patients at 1,700 mg/m2/day (1 patient had Grade 3 and 1 Grade 4 diarrhea).

CONCLUSION

The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of capecitabine given concurrently with RT was 1,600 mg/m2, daily from the 1st to the 14th day, with a 7-day rest, for two cycles.

Preoperative concurrent radiotherapy with capecitabine before total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Capecitabine is an attractive radiosensitizer which can be tumor specific. This study was undertaken to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of oral capecitabine when used with preoperative radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We conducted a prospective Phase II trial to assess the pathologic response, sphincter preservation effect, and acute toxicity of preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) in locally advanced (uT3-4/N +) but resectable adenocarcinoma of the lower two-thirds of the rectum. The radiation dose was 50 Gy over 5 weeks (46 Gy to whole pelvis + 4 Gy boost), and capecitabine was administered daily at a dose of 1650 mg/m(2) during the entire course of radiation therapy. Surgery was performed with standardized total mesorectal excision 4 to 6 weeks after completion of CRT and followed by four cycles of capecitabine (2500 mg/m(2)/day for 14 days).

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients were entered into this study; their median age was 55 (range, 31-75 years). Ninety (95%) patients completed preoperative CRT as planned, and complete resection was achieved in 92 of 94 resected cases (98%). Downstaging rate was 71% (56/79) on endorectal ultrasonography, and it was 76% (71/94) on pathology finding. No tumor cell was observed in the specimens of 11 patients (12%). Among the 54 whose tumor was located within 5 cm from the anal verge, 40 patients (74%) underwent sphincter-preserving procedures. Elevation of the distal tumor margin from the anal verge by preoperative CRT was 0.8 +/- 1.3 cm. Grade 3 toxicities were rare (diarrhea in 3% and neutropenia in 1%).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative CRT using capecitabine achieved encouraging rates of tumor downstaging and sphincter preservation with a low toxicity profile.

Reduced dose capecitabine is an effective and well-tolerated treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Fifty-seven patients with metastatic breast cancer have been treated with reduced dose capecitabine 1g/m2 twice daily for 14 days repeated every 3 weeks after failure of a number of chemotherapy regimens or hormonal treatment. The overall objective response rate was 28% with 2% complete response rate and 26% partial response. Twenty nine percent objective response rate was achieved in 17 patients pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes. The median duration of response and survival were 8.5 and 9 months, respectively. One and two year overall survival probabilities were 37% and 20%, respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events (all grades) were hand-foot syndrome (HFS) (32%), nausea (21%) and diarrhoea (19%). Dose limiting toxicities, especially HFS were rare. Within the limits of phase II trial, this reduced dose of capecitabine appears as effective for advanced breast cancer as full dose capecitabine with a lower incidence of toxicity.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the developed world. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents 85% of cases of lung cancer, and patients have a poor 5-year survival rate. Approximately one third of NSCLC patients present with early-stage disease that is amenable to potentially curative resection and multimodality therapy. Several randomized trials now have confirmed the survival benefit with adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy, as seen in the 1995 meta-analysis from the NSCLC Collaborative Group. The International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Collaborative Group Trial demonstrated a 4.5% improvement in survival for patients with stage I to III NSCLC. Studies from Japan have reported an improvement of 15.4% in the 5-year survival rate among patients with T1N0 disease after they had received adjuvant therapy with a combination of platinum and uracil-tegafur, and an improvement in the 5-year survival of 11% rate favoring chemotherapy with uracil-tegafur in a subgroup analysis of patients with T2N0 disease. Two recently published meta-analyses have estimated a relative risk reduction in mortality of 11 to 13% at 5 years. Significant improvement in the long-term survival rate has been demonstrated for patients with stage IB and II disease by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9633 trial (4-year survival rate, 12%) and the The National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group BR.10 trial (5-year survival rate, 15%; risk reduction for recurrence, 40%). Thus, there is compelling evidence to now recommend adjuvant platinum-based combination chemotherapy for patients after resection of early-stage NSCLC.

Treatment of stage IV colorectal carcinoma in elderly patients

Colorectal adenocarcinoma ranks second as a cause of death due to cancer in the Western world. In Europe, 40% of patients with colorectal cancer are over 70 years old and the incidence increased through the 1980's. Without any treatment the median survival after the detection of liver metastases is approximately 9 months, depending on the extent of disease at the time of diagnosis but not on the patients age. In the elderly there are only few data apt to define the standard regimen in the advanced disease, but results seem similar to those observed in younger patients. As a result of exclusion criteria and screening, elderly patients entering clinical trials are usually a select group, with good performance status, access to transportation, and limiting numbers of coexisting conditions. This paper examines the factors pertinent to the small number of clinical trials designed for metastatic colorectal cancer in this group of persons.

Phase I study of S-1 combined with irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (OGSG 0002)

OBJECTIVE

A dose-escalation study of irinotecan (CPT-11) combined with S-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine, was performed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose (RD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

S-1 was administered orally at 80 mg/m(2)/day for 21 consecutive days followed by a 2 week rest. CPT-11 was given intravenously on days 1 and 15 of each course, at an initial dose of 40 mg/m(2)/day, stepping up to 60, 80, 100 or 120 mg/m(2)/day depending on the DLT. Courses were repeated every 5 weeks, unless disease progression or severe toxicity was observed. At a level of the RD, five patients were added to conduct a pharmacokinetic (PK) study.

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients were entered in this study. The MTD of CPT-11 was considered to be 100 mg/m(2), because 50% of the patients (3/6) developed DLTs, diarrhea and rash. Therefore, the RD of CPT-11 was set at the dose immediately below 80 mg/m(2). The overall response rate (RR) by the criteria of the Japanese Research Society of Gastric Cancer was 58.3% (14/24) and the RR at the RD was 66.7% (6/9), suggesting promising clinical efficacy. There were no significant differences between the PK parameters of S-1 on days 10 and 15.

CONCLUSIONS

S-1 with CPT-11 can be combined safely without CPT-11 effect on S-1 PK data and holds promise as an effective regimen for advanced gastric cancer.

Oral versus intravenous vinorelbine: clinical safety profile

The availability of chemotherapeutic drugs administrable by oral route represents a step forward in the management of cancer patients. Among oral agents, vinorelbine is particularly interesting for its pharmacological characteristics and clinical efficacy. Oral vinorelbine is rapidly absorbed (1.5-3 hours) with an elimination half-life of approximately 40 hours. It shows a low level of binding to plasma proteins (13%), is highly bound to platelets (78%) and has a hepatic metabolism and an absolute bioavailability of 40% with a moderate and similar interpatient variability for the two forms. Food has no influence on the pharmacokinetic profile of oral vinorelbine even if nausea/vomiting is less frequent and less severe in the fed patients than in the fasting patients. Therefore, to ensure patient comfort, it is recommended that oral vinorelbine is administered with a snack. All the metabolites of oral vinorelbine have been identified and, among these, only deacetyl-vinorelbine presented activity demonstrating that for both oral and intravenous (i.v.) routes of administration the drug has the same metabolism pattern. Oral vinorelbine is eliminated mainly in a unconjugated form via the bile. In this process, the CYP 3A4 isoform of cytochrome P450 is mostly involved. Absorption of oral vinorelbine is not delayed in elderly patients. After oral administration, blood concentrations of vinorelbine in elderly patients are within the range of values observed in younger patients. The absolute bioavailability is close to 38% in elderly whereas it is close to 40% in younger patients. This difference is not significant. As compared to the intravenous drug, oral vinorelbine demonstrated linear pharmacokinetics as well an absolute bioavailability of approximately 40%, and a reliable dose-correspondence of 80 mg/m2 oral form --> 30 mg/m2 i.v. and 60 mg/m2 oral --> 25 mg/m2 i.v. Therefore, i.v. and oral forms show similar interindividual variability, same metabolism pattern, reproducible intra-patient blood exposure, and same pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship. Oral vinorelbine has shown significant activity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Given at 60 mg/m2/week for the first 3 administrations and then increased to 80 mg/m2/week achieved the same efficacy as i.v. vinorelbine in terms of progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response. Mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal toxicity, easily manageable with standard treatment was recorded. Reproducible efficacy compared to previously reported results with vinorelbine i.v. Also, in advanced breast cancer, oral vinorelbine has shown significant activity with a good therapeutic index. Albeit no formal comparison between the oral and the intravenous formulations of vinorelbine has been made, however, the oral route seems to offer major advantages to patients who are faced with a clear decrease in the frequency of hospital admissions as compared to that needed to give intravenous chemotherapy.

Performance of outpatient regimen of S-1 in combination with fractional cisplatin for advanced or recurrent gastric cancers: a phase I study

BACKGROUND

We designed an outpatient regimen consisting of fractional cisplatin in combination with S-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine derivative for the treatment of recurrent or advanced gastric cancer and conducted a phase I study to determine the dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) and recommended dose (RD).

METHODS

Escalating dosages of cisplatin (15, 20, and 25 mg/m(2), as levels 1, 2, and 3, respectively) were administered over 2 h on days 1, 8, and 15, with a fixed dose of S-1 for 3 consecutive weeks (days 1-21), repeated every 5 weeks. National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria(NCI-CTC) grade 2 toxicities required treatment delay. Primary first cycle DLTs were defined as NCI-CTC grade 3 or 4 toxicities (except for hemoglobin levels, nausea, and vomiting).

RESULTS

Nine patients were initially enrolled, and DLTs did not appear; however, one level-3 patient experienced grade 3 anemia. An additional three patients were enrolled in level 3 to confirm the toxicity profiles, and none experienced DLTs. Toxicity evaluations throughout a total of 62 cycles revealed that grade 1 or 2 hematological toxicities were common, although mostly transient, with recovery without specific treatment. One patient each in levels 1 and 3 required hospitalization due to grade 3 toxicities in the later cycles. Mean dose intensities for S-1 and cisplatin were both more than 91%. There were no treatment-related deaths. The preliminary response rate was 44%.

CONCLUSIONS

It was concluded that the RD of cisplatin in this regimen was 25 mg/m(2) (level 3). S-1 in combination with fractional cisplatin is a promising regimen that allows repeated drug administration, in an outpatient setting, for advanced or recurrent gastric cancers. A phase II study of the RD is now under way.

Phase II Study of an ‘All-Oral’ Regimen of Capecitabine, Idarubicin and Cyclophosphamide for Metastatic Breast Cancer – Safety, Efficacy and Quality of Life

OBJECTIVE

Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) generally have a poor prognosis. Many of these patients have a good performance status. A new all-oral regimen (XIC) was evaluated in a phase II trial. The impact of the regimen on the safety and efficacy of the drug, as well as quality of life (QOL) of the patients was assessed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From September 2000 to September 2001, informed consent was obtained from 20 heavily pretreated women with MBC. They were placed on a 6-week cycle regimen comprising capecitabine (X; 2,000 mg/m2/day in two divided doses for 2 weeks then 1 week rest), idarubicin (I; 10 mg/m2/day, days 1, 3 and 5) and cyclophosphamide (C; 100 mg/m2/day for 2 weeks then 1 week rest).

RESULTS

Toxicities were generally tolerable. One patient had grade III neutropenia, which was reversible on cessation of treatment. One patient (5%) had a complete response and 4 patients (20%) achieved partial responses, yielding an overall response rate of 25%. Eight patients (40%) had stable disease. Median time to disease progression and median survival time were 13.4 and 23.7 months, respectively. Global and physical EORTC QLQ-30 scores showed no significant decrease in QOL.

CONCLUSION

This is a small-scale study. XIC was generally well tolerated and favoured by the patients. This moderately active and convenient 'all-oral' regimen deserves clinical trials at a wider scale.

Phase II trial of capecitabine in recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy and safety of capecitabine in women with inoperable, recurrent, or metastatic squamous cell cervical cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a phase II IRB approved trial, capecitabine was given at a dosage of 2000 mg/m2/day orally in a divided dose daily for 14 days followed by a 7-day rest period. A standard dose modification scheme was used with one allowed dose reduction or dose escalation. National Cancer Institute criteria for progression, response, and toxicity were utilized. Quality of life data were obtained using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale and Functional Assessment for Cancer Therapy, which included a subscale for cervical cancer.

RESULTS

Twenty of 23 enrolled patients were evaluable for response. Stable disease was noted in 5 patients, with a median duration of response of 3.5 months (range, 3-6.5 months). No partial or complete responses were seen. Common grade 3 toxicities were fatigue (30.4%); abdominal pain, constipation, hand-foot syndrome, nausea, and vomiting (8.7% each); as well as dyspnea, headache, and coagulopathy (4.3% each). There were no grade 4 toxicities. All patients with previous exposure to infused 5-FU had evidence of progression. No statistically significant changes in quality of life were noted from baseline to post-cycle 2.

CONCLUSION

Single-agent capecitabine in patients with recurrent cervical cancer resulted in no objective responses. Although capecitabine is a well-tolerated regimen, as a single agent, it offers minimal benefit in a poor-prognosis cervical cancer population.

Fluoropyrimidine therapy: hyperbilirubinemia as a consequence of hemolysis

BACKGROUND

Hemolytic anemia has been noted during treatment with a variety of chemotherapeutic agents. We observed mild compensated hemolytic anemia in a patient receiving capecitabine during a randomized, controlled trial of adjuvant therapy. In order to investigate the hypothesis that hemolysis is the underlying cause of the hyperbilirubinemia sometimes observed during capecitabine treatment, we evaluated factors associated with hemolysis in ten patients. Factors were also analyzed in ten patients receiving 5-fluorourocil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV).

METHODS

Twenty chemotherapy-naïve patients undergoing surgery for Dukes' C colon cancer were included in the phase III, 'X-ACT' trial, and randomized to receive 24-week adjuvant treatment with either oral capecitabine (eight cycles of 1,250 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days, followed by a 7-day rest period) (n=10) or 5-FU/LV administered according to the Mayo Clinic regimen (six cycles of LV 20 mg/m2 followed by 5-FU 425 mg/m2, administered as an i.v. bolus on days 1-5 every 28 days) (n=10). Ten patients randomized in each treatment arm were evaluated. Hemolytic parameters evaluated included bilirubin, lactate dehydrogenase, haptoglobin, and reticulocytes.

RESULTS

Seven patients receiving capecitabine and three patients receiving 5-FU/LV experienced grade 1/2 elevations of bilirubin during the 24-week treatment period. In most cases, hyperbilirubinemia was associated with concomitant alterations in other hemolytic parameters. Five episodes of grade 1 compensated hemolytic anemia were reported in four capecitabine-treated patients, all of which were associated with hyperbilirubinemia.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant treatment with capecitabine or 5-FU/LV in a small sample of patients with Dukes' C colon cancer was associated with alterations in hemolytic parameters. These alterations, in particular hyperbilirubinemia, were associated in some patients with low-grade compensated hemolytic anemia. All changes were clinically insignificant, fully reversible, and may represent a fluoropyrimidine class effect. Further studies are indicated to evaluate the incidence and implications of this effect.

Vinorelbine alternating oral and intravenous plus epirubicin in first-line therapy of metastatic breast cancer: results of a multicentre phase II study

The combination of intravenous (i.v.) vinorelbine and epirubicin is highly active in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In an effort to improve patient convenience, we investigated a regimen alternating i.v. and oral vinorelbine in combination with epirubicin as first-line chemotherapy of patients with MBC. In all, 49 patients with MBC received, as first-line treatment, a combination regimen consisting of i.v. vinorelbine 25 mg m⁻² plus epirubicin 90 mg m⁻² given on day 1, and oral vinorelbine 60 mg m⁻² on day 8 (or day 15 if neutrophils <1500 mm⁻³) every 3 weeks, in an open-label, multicentre phase II study. Treatment was to be repeated for a maximum of six cycles. The study population had a median age of 55 years, half of the patients had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy and 86% presented a visceral involvement. In all, 25 responses were documented and validated by an independent panel review, yielding response rates of 51% (95% CI: 36–66) in the 49 enrolled patients and 54.5% (95% CI: 39–70) in the 44 evaluable patients. Median durations of progression-free survival and survival were 8 and 20 months, respectively. Neutropenia was the main dose-limiting toxicity, but complications were uncommon, four patients having experienced febrile neutropenia and six having developed neutropenic infection. Other frequently reported adverse events included stomatitis, nausea and vomiting, which were rarely severe. No toxic death was reported. Among patients who received six cycles, global score of quality of life remained stable. This regimen alternating oral and i.v. vinorelbine in combination with epirubicin is effective and safe. Oral vinorelbine on day 8 offers greater convenience to the patient, and decreases the need for i.v. injection and reduces time spent in hospital. Therefore, oral vinorelbine is a convenient alternative to the i.v. form in combination regimens commonly used to treat MBC.

Capecitabine Versus Continuous-Infusion 5-Fluorouracil for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Efficacy and Safety Comparison

For more than 40 years, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been considered the most effective systemic agent for managing advanced colorectal cancer. However, continuous-infusion (CI) schedules of 5-FU require central venous access devices, which are associated with catheter complications and are an inconvenience to patients. The novel oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine appears to offer comparable efficacy while providing a more convenient schedule that is often preferred by patients. Published phase II/III clinical studies of capecitabine-based regimens for colorectal cancer were compared with key studies of CI 5-FU-based regimens to assess safety, efficacy, quality of life, and pharmacoeconomics. Studies were identified via Medline searches and conference abstracts dating back to 1997. Qualitative analyses show that capecitabine as a single agent as well as in combination regimens is an effective first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer, providing a higher response rate compared with standard 5-FU/leucovorin. Costs associated with capecitabine also appear to be lower than those associated with catheter-based therapies. Capecitabine offers physicians a more convenient treatment for advanced colorectal cancer, with manageable toxicity and antitumor activity comparable to that of CI therapies.

Capecitabine as adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Intravenous bolus fluorouracil plus leucovorin is the standard adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. The oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine is an established alternative to bolus fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. We evaluated capecitabine in the adjuvant setting.

METHODS

We randomly assigned a total of 1987 patients with resected stage III colon cancer to receive either oral capecitabine (1004 patients) or bolus fluorouracil plus leucovorin (Mayo Clinic regimen; 983 patients) over a period of 24 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was at least equivalence in disease-free survival; the primary safety end point was the incidence of grade 3 or 4 toxic effects due to fluoropyrimidines.

RESULTS

Disease-free survival in the capecitabine group was at least equivalent to that in the fluorouracil-plus-leucovorin group (in the intention-to-treat analysis, P<0.001 for the comparison of the upper limit of the hazard ratio with the noninferiority margin of 1.20). Capecitabine improved relapse-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.74 to 0.99; P=0.04) and was associated with significantly fewer adverse events than fluorouracil plus leucovorin (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral capecitabine is an effective alternative to intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin in the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer.

Cost of temozolomide therapy and global care for recurrent malignant gliomas followed until death

Effectiveness and costs of care and treatment of recurrent malignant gliomas are largely unknown. In this study, 49 patients (32 males, 17 females; mean age, 49; age range, 23-79) were treated with temozolomide (TMZ) for recurrent or progressive malignant gliomas after standard radiation therapy. Cost assessment (payer's perspective) singled out treatment for first recurrence and all costs of care until death. We computed personnel costs as wages; drugs, imaging, and laboratory tests as prices; and hospitalizations as day rates. Patients were administered a median of five TMZ cycles at recurrence. Drug acquisition costs amounted to euro 2206 per cycle (76% of total costs). Seven patients showed no second recurrence (two are still alive), 16 received no further chemotherapy and died after 3.9 months, and 26 received second-line chemotherapy. After the second progression, median survival was 4.0 months (95% confidence interval, 1.8-6.1). Overall monthly costs of care varied between euro 2450 and euro 3242 among the different groups, and median cost-effectiveness and cost utility ranged from euro 28,817 to euro 38,450 and from euro 41,167 to euro 53,369 per life of year and per quality-adjusted life-year gained, respectively. We conclude that despite high TMZ drug acquisition costs, care of recurrent malignant gliomas is comparable to other accepted therapies.

Alternative administration of camptothecin analogues

In order to improve the therapeutic index of camptothecin (CPT) analogues, alternative administration of CPT analogues is being evaluated. Topotecan, irinotecan, rubitecan, lurtotecan and 9-aminocamptothecin have been administered orally with response rates equivalent to that seen after intravenous administration, where applicable. Oral availability and administration of some of the newer CPT analogues, including diflomotecan (BN80915) and grimatecan (ST1481), have also shown promising results. Aerosolisation of liposomal 9-nitrocamptothecin has been studied in patients with advanced malignancies involving the lung, demonstrating systemic antitumour activity. Intrathecal administration of topotecan has been studied in children with refractory neoplastic meningitis. It is well tolerated and associated with some antitumour activity. Intraperitoneal administration of topotecan as consolidation therapy in patients with ovarian cancer has shown promising results. Transdermal administration of rubitecan has been studied in mice. So far, no CPT has been approved for an alternative route of administration.

Randomized crossover trial of intravenous 5-FU versus oral UFT both modulated by leucovorin: a one-centre experience

Although intravenous (IV) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and uracil/futraful (UFT) have comparable antitumour efficacy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC), we wanted to assess which of these two regimens would be preferred by our patients. We randomized 20 previously untreated patients with MCC at our centre to receive oral UFT or bolus IV 5-FU both associated with leucovorin. After the first cycle patients were crossed over to the other arm. Before the third cycle we left patients to choose one of the regimens to continue their treatment until disease progression. Two patients chose 5-FU and 18 chose UFT (P < 0.001). Fewer side effects (50%) and convenience of home treatment (40%) were the main reasons for their choice for the oral regimen. UFT induced less mucositis (P = 0. 02) and diarrhoea (P = 0. 01). We conclude that convenience and lower toxicity may explain the observed preference for oral UFT.

Le maniement des médicaments anticancéreux chez les malades âgés

The management of elderly patients with cancer is not established. The use of antineoplastic agents (particularly of chemotherapy) raises a lot of questions. Efficiency and toxicity. Data come from subgroups of clinical trials and from selected populations. Chronological age itself does not contra-indicate chemotherapy. Pharmacokinetics. Physiologic and functional changes occur with aging but there is great inter-patient variability. Oral chemotherapy. Oral treatments underline the problem of compliance. Under-treatment. Elderly patients are under-represented in clinical trials. Relevant issues have to be defined individually and cancer's real place in patient's general situation has to be specified. Geriatric assessment. This tool has proved its usefulness in many domains for global management of elderly patients. A multidisciplinary team is necessary, under geriatrician coordination. The aim is to elaborate an individualized medico-social intervention program. Geriatric assessment in oncology. Its interest for cancer patients is shown by emerging reports but its routine use by oncologists is impossible. Treatment strategies. They are not validated.

FUTURE

New clinical and pharmacokinetic studies are necessary in order to specify the place of the various tools and to enhance the handling of such molecules.

Phase II trial of oral vinorelbine in combination with cisplatin followed by consolidation therapy with oral vinorelbine in advanced NSCLC

BACKGROUND

Among the cytotoxic agents commonly combined with cisplatin in the treatment of advanced NSCLC, vinorelbine has led to significant outcome improvements. Adding more than four cycles of the combination regimen increase toxicities. The availability of an oral form of vinorelbine appeared as a particularly convenient way to provide a consolidation treatment to patients who have achieved an objective response or stable disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multi-centre phase II open-label, non-comparative study was designed to evaluate the treatment with four cycles of the combination chemotherapy with oral vinorelbine at the dose of 60 mg/m2 on day 1 and day 8 for the first cycle and then 80 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks followed for patients with objective response or stable disease by consolidation therapy with oral vinorelbine at 80 mg/m2 weekly on patients with unresectable localised or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary endpoint was tumor response. The secondary objectives were progression free-survival, overall survival and toxicity assessment. Visual analogue scales (VAS) filled by the patients were also used to evaluate subjective changes under treatment, reflecting patients' clinical benefit.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients enrolled into the study from April 2001 to April 2002 received the combination regimen. Twenty-five patients (43.9%) also received the subsequent consolidation treatment. Partial tumor responses were obtained in 13 patients (26.5%, 95% CI 15.0-41.1) of 49 evaluable patients. Stable disease was observed in 22 (44.9%) of patients. The median duration of response was 6 months (95% CI 4.3-8.2). The median progression free-survival was 4.2 months (95% CI 2.8-6). The median overall survival time was 10 months (95% CI 7.4-14) and the 1 year survival was 42.6%. The main toxicities recorded were haematological. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia were observed in 16 patients (29.1%). Nausea, vomiting and fatigue were the major non-haematological toxicities reported. Among the symptoms recorded by the patients on VAS scales (appetite, fatigue, pain, cough, dyspnea, haemoptysis), except anorexia, all symptoms were improved during the combination therapy and in the consolidation phase.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that the efficacy of the cisplatin/oral vinorelbine combination in NSCLC is comparable to cisplatin/I.V. vinorelbine. This study also suggests that consolidation therapy with vinorelbine alone may probably prolong the efficacy of the combination regimen. The convenience offered to patients by an oral form of vinorelbine is a definite asset for consolidation therapy.

Phase I trial of Orzel (UFT plus leucovorin), cisplatin, and radiotherapy in the treatment of potentially resectable esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

Fluorinated pyrimidines have been established as radiosensitizers in the combined modality therapy of esophageal cancer. UFT, an oral combination of a 5-fluorouracil pro-drug (uracil) and a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor (ftorafur), may provide improvement in the ease of administration with equal efficacy. This Phase I study was designed to determine the maximal tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity of UFT, leucovorin, and cisplatin when given with radiotherapy in the neoadjuvant treatment of resectable esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Chemotherapy consisted of i.v. cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (Days 1 and 22) and UFT with leucovorin orally on Days 1-35. UFT was escalated in 50-mg/m(2) increments, starting at 200 mg/m(2)/d. Radiotherapy consisted of 4500 cGy in 25 fractions. Patients underwent resection 4-6 weeks after chemoradiotherapy.

RESULTS

Ten patients with resectable esophageal cancer were enrolled. Of the 7 patients entered at dose level 1, 1 developed a dose-limiting toxicity of nausea. All 3 patients entered at dose level 2 developed dose-limiting toxicity. The maximal tolerated dose for UFT was the starting level, 200 mg/m(2)/d. Of the 10 patients enrolled, 8 underwent esophagectomy and 2 developed progressive disease and did not undergo surgery. The disease of 6 of the 8 patients was downstaged at surgery.

CONCLUSION

The recommended UFT dose for Phase II studies is 200 mg/m(2)/d given orally in two divided doses when given with leucovorin, cisplatin, and radiotherapy.

Preoperative chemoradiation with oral tegafur within a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach in patients with T3-4 rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity in terms of downstaging histologic patterns of residual tumor and clinical tolerance of a neoadjuvant chemoradiation program with oral tegafur for rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From May 1998 to May 2001, 62 consecutive patients with cT(3-4) or cN(+) rectal cancer, or both, were treated with 45-50 Gy (1.8 Gy/day; 25 fractions) and oral tegafur 1200 mg/day. Surgery was performed 6 weeks after the completion of chemoradiation. All patients received a boost with intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (IOERT) over the presacral space.

RESULTS

Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity consisted on Grade 3 anemia in 1 patient. Nonhematologic toxicity was mild. Fifteen patients (23%) had Grade 3 dermatitis, 16 (25%) had Grade 3, and 2 (3%) had Grade 4 proctitis. The median dose of radiotherapy was 50.4 Gy. Surgery consisted on anterior resection in 38 patients (61%) and abdominoperineal amputation in 24 (39%). Five complete pathologic responses were observed (8%), and 29 patients (47%) had a minimal microscopic residual tumor (mic category). The total downstaging rate was 68%. With a median follow-up of 46 months, the pelvic control rate was 95%, disease-free survival 74.1%, and overall survival 76.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation with oral tegafur is feasible, well tolerated, and active, with the additional advantage of offering the convenience of oral chemotherapy.

A phase II trial of capecitabine in previously untreated patients with advanced and/or metastatic gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Capecitabine (Xeloda) is a novel, oral, selectively tumor-activated fluoropyrimidine with proven activity in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. This trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, safety and feasibility of capecitabine in previously untreated patients with advanced and/or metastatic gastric cancer, with a view to replacing 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in such patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-four patients received capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 twice daily (2500 mg/m2/day) for 14 days followed by 7 days of rest, for up to six cycles.

RESULTS

Capecitabine produced an objective response rate of 34% (all partial responses) and stable disease in 14 patients (30%). The median time to disease progression (TTP) was 3.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.7-6.4 months] and median overall survival was 9.5 months (95% CI 6.9-13.2 months). Hand-foot syndrome (HFS), nausea, anorexia, diarrhea and vomiting were the most common adverse events. While HFS was the most frequent grade 3/4 toxicity (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria), only 9% of patients experienced grade 3 HFS. Severe myelosuppression was not reported during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Capecitabine monotherapy is active and well tolerated as first-line therapy in patients with advanced/metastatic gastric cancer. Larger comparative trials investigating capecitabine-based combination regimens in patients with advanced gastric cancer are warranted.

Emerging drugs in colorectal cancer

A raft of novel agents with different modes of action is finally challenging the position of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as the gold standard treatment for colorectal cancer. Oral fluoropyrimidines, topoisomerase I inhibitors and new generation platinum compounds are all currently being investigated. There is also increasing interest in the development and use of biological therapies, which may allow treatments to become tailored to individual patients and cause less toxicity than conventional cytotoxics. It is hoped that with the development of these new drugs, the response rates and survival for patients with colorectal cancer will improve from the poor prognosis that many face at present.

Phase II trial of cisplatin and capecitabine in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, and correlative study of angiogenic factors

The combination of cisplatin and capecitabine was evaluated in patients with recurrent or unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC), and outcome parameters were correlated with the expression of thymidine phosphorylase (TP), thymidilate syntetase (TS), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) 1–3, and microvessel density (MVD). Patients with recurrent or unresectable HNSCC were eligible if they had received prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy, or no prior systemic therapy. Patients received cisplatin (75 mg m⁻² day 1), and capecitabine (2000 mg m⁻² day 1–14) every 3 weeks. A total of 41 patients received 194 cycles. In all, 16 complete responses (39%) and 12 partial responses (29%) were documented, for an overall response rate of 68% (95% CI, 53–80%). Grade 3–4 uncomplicated neutropenia was documented in five subjects. Asthenia, anorexia, hand–foot syndrome, and constipation were the most frequent nonhaematologic events. Median progression-free and overall survival were 6.4 and 12.6 months. Cytoplasmic TP expression was more prevalent in patients with a laryngeal location vs other, and in patients with a recurrence vs primary disease. Microvessel density count was higher in patients with recurrent vs primary disease. The combination of cisplatin and capecitabine is effective in recurrent or unresectable HNSCC, and shows a manageable toxicity.

Oral capecitabine: Bridging the Atlantic divide in colon cancer treatment

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) plus leucovorin (LV) has been the mainstay of treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC), with infused schedules more widely adopted in Europe and bolus schedules preferred in North America. However, the effective, oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine is increasingly replacing intravenous (IV) 5-FU/LV on both sides of the Atlantic. Capecitabine generates 5-FU preferentially in tumor and is a well-established, first-line treatment for metastatic CRC. In this setting, capecitabine achieves a superior response rate, at least equivalent time to disease progression (TTP) and overall survival, and favorable safety compared with bolus 5-FU/LV. The benefits of capecitabine have been transfered into the adjuvant setting. Recent data from a large, international, randomized trial (Xeloda Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial [X-ACT]) confirm that capecitabine (Xeloda, Roche Laboratories, Nutley, NJ) achieves favorable safety versus 5-FU/LV (Mayo Clinic regimen) and is at least as effective as IV 5-FU/LV in the adjuvant treatment of patients with resected stage III colon cancer. Capecitabine is also an effective and well-tolerated combination partner for oxaliplatin (XELOX) and irinotecan (XELIRI), achieving high efficacy with a good safety profile. An extensive phase III clinical trial program is further establishing the potential of the simplified capecitabine combinations to improve outcomes and unify treatment practices in the metastatic and adjuvant settings. New combinations with novel agents such as capecitabine/oxaliplatin plus erlotinib or bevacizumab are currently under investigation. Capecitabine has also shown promising activity and good tolerability in combination with radiotherapy in rectal cancer.

Absorption, distribution, and excretion of DJ-927, a novel orally effective taxane, in mice, dogs, and monkeys

DJ-927, currently undergoing Phase I clinical trial, is a new orally effective taxane with potent antitumor effects. The absorption, tissue distribution, and excretion of DJ-927 were investigated in mice, dogs, and monkeys after a single oral administration. After oral administration of [14C]DJ-927, radioactivity was rapidly absorbed, with the Cmax occurring within 1-2 h in all species. The blood and plasma radioactivity elimination was biphasic and species-dependent. Elimination half-life of plasma in dogs was much longer than those in monkeys or mice. In mice, radioactivity was rapidly distributed to all tissues except for the central nervous system, especially to adrenal glands, liver, pituitary glands, kidneys, lungs, and spleen. In all species, radioactivity was mainly excreted in feces. Following a single oral administration to mice, more than 80% of the radioactivity was excreted within 48 h; in dogs and monkeys, 80% of the radioactivity was excreted within 168 h. Urinary excretion was less than 7% of radioactive dose in all species. In vitro plasma protein binding of [14C]DJ-927 in the mouse, dog, and monkey plasma ranged from 92-98%. These studies showed that, the novel oral taxane DJ-927 was rapidly absorbed in all three species when administered by the oral route. The long biological half-life and slow elimination of radioactivity were distinctive in particular, compared with commercial taxanes. DJ-927 (as parent compound and its metabolites) is widely distributed to tissues except the brain. These preclinical data are useful for the design of clinical trials of DJ-927 and also for their interpretation.

Prospective phase II study of preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Capecitabine is an attractive oral chemotherapeutic agent that has a radiosensitizing effect and tumor-selectivity. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of preoperative chemoradiation therapy, when used with oral capecitabine, for locally advanced rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective phase II trial of preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced adenocarcinomas of the lower two-thirds of the rectum was conducted. A radiation dose of 50 Gy over five weeks and a daily dose of 1650 mg/m(2) capecitabine in two portions was administered during the entire course of radiation therapy. Surgery was performed with standardized total mesorectal excision four to six weeks after completion of the chemoradiation.

RESULTS

Between January 2002 and September 2003, 61 patients were enrolled onto this prospective phase II trial. The pretreatment clinical stages were T3 in 64% (n=39), T4 in 36% (n=22) and N1-2 in 82% (n=50) of these patients. Fifty-six (92%) patients completed the chemoradiation as initially planned and a complete resection performed in 58 (95%). Down-staging was observed in 45 patients (74%) and a pathologic complete response in 6 (10%). Among the 37 patients with tumors located within 5 cm from the anal verge on colonoscopy, 27 (73%) underwent a sphincter-preserving procedure. No grade 3 and 4 proctitis or hematological toxicities were observed.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative chemoradiation therapy with capecitabine achieved encouraging rates of tumor downstaging and sphincter preservation, with a low toxicity profile. This combined modality can be regarded as a safe and effective treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Oral vinorelbine given as monotherapy to advanced, elderly NSCLC patients: a multicentre phase II trial

Vinorelbine intravenously (i.v.) demonstrated its efficacy and tolerability in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, including elderly subjects. Since vinorelbine is now available as an oral formulation this phase II open study was designed to evaluate its activity and tolerability in advanced, elderly NSCLC patients. A total of 56 chemonaive patients were recruited from April 2001 through to March 2002. The dosage schedule, already tested in younger NSCLC patients, was 60 mg/m(2)once a week for three weeks (first cycle), followed by 80 mg/m(2) once a week until disease progression or development of unacceptable toxicity. A limited sampling scheme was used for performing pharmacokinetic analysis on 52 of 56 patients enrolled in the study. Treatment was well tolerated with grade 3/4 neutropenia in 11/17 patients (20/30%) and febrile neutropenia in 1 (2%). Six partial responses (11%) and 25 stable disease responses were recorded, with a disease control rate of 55%. Median overall survival was 8.2 months (95% Confidence Interval (CI) [6.2-11.3]). The clinical benefit response rate was 31% on 32 evaluable patients. Pharmacokinetic profiles appeared quite similar to the historical profiles recorded following i.v. administration. Oral vinorelbine appears to be a reasonable alternative to i.v. vinorelbine, both in terms of activity and tolerability, in advanced, elderly NSCLC patients.

Phase II study of UFT and oxaliplatin in first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, assesed as response rate, and toxicity of UFT (Tegafur-Uracil) in combination with oxaliplatin as first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). In all, 84 patients with recurrent or metastatic CRC with measurable disease were included. Treatment consisted of oxaliplatin 85 mg m⁻² in 120-min intravenous (i.v.) infusion on days 1 and 15; i.v. l,leucovorin (l,LV) 250 mg m⁻² given in 2 h on day 1, followed by oral UFT 390 mg m⁻² on days 1–14, and oral l,LV 7.5 mg/12 h on days 2–14. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. A total of 492 cycles of chemotherapy were delivered with a median of six per patient (range 1–12). There was one complete response (1%) and 28 partial responses (34%) for an overall response rate of 35% (95% confidence interval (CI): 24–46%). A total of 36 patients (44%) had stable disease, whereas 17 (21%) had a progression. The median time to progression was 7.3 months and the median overall survival was 16.8 months. A prescheduled preliminary analysis was performed after inclusion of 16 patients who detected a high gastrointestinal toxicity, which led to a reduction of the UFT dose to 300 mg m⁻². With this new dosage, grade 3–4 diarrhoea and grade 3–4 nausea/vomiting dropped to 21 and 14% of patients, respectively. Other grade 3–4 toxicities were stomatitis in one (1%), anaemia in three (5%), neutropenia in two (3%), thrombocytopenia in one(1%), fatigue in six (9%), peripheral sensory neuropathy in nine (14%) and laryngopharyngeal dysesthesia in two patients (2%). The combination of oxaliplatin and UFT–l,LV is an active, easy-to-administer regimen with moderate toxicity. Hence, this regimen is worthy of further investigation.

Giving patients a choice improves quality of life: a multi-centre, investigator-blind, randomised, crossover study comparing letrozole with anastrozole

AIMS

Although the third-generation aromatase inhibitors are generally well tolerated, side-effects still occur in up to 40% of women. As more women are taking these drugs for longer, the issue as to which version is better tolerated is now a significant patient concern. This study aimed to assess whether tolerance for either letrozole or anastrozole can differ for each individual in terms of early quality of life (QoL), whether patients welcome being given a preference and whether this correlated with formal toxicity scoring.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-blind, crossover trial, with 72 women with breast cancer who had experienced tamoxifen failure. Randomised to either letrozole 2.5 mg or anastrozole 1 mg, for 4 weeks, 1 week off, then crossover for 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Patients were confidently able to choose which drug suited them best (letrozole 68%, anastrozole 32%; P < 0.01). Fewer patients, when taking letrozole, experienced adverse events than when taking anastrozole (43% vs 65%; P = 0.0028). QoL was better when patients were taking letrozole than when they took anastrozole (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

As toxicity and QoL strongly correlated with patient preference for either drug, albeit with a tendency towards letrozole, this suggests that patient preference is now a legitimate and useful end point for future crossover studies. In routine practice, women would warmly welcome extra involvement in the decision-making process via a crossover manoeuvre if side-effects develop, whichever aromatase inhibitor is prescribed initially.

Quality‐of‐Life Considerations in Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer: Effect of Topotecan on Symptom Palliation and Quality of Life

Key goals in the treatment of lung cancer are to improve both survival and quality of life (QOL). While formal techniques are frequently used to evaluate survival and response, such rigor is used less often in assessing the impact of treatment on quality of life. Many patients with lung cancer are elderly and have complex medical histories and a myriad of comorbidities. In these patients, with limited survival expectations, symptom palliation, quality of life, and convenience of therapy are especially important end points. Indeed, clinical trials are now incorporating symptom scores and QOL outcomes in their designs (now combined as "patient reported outcomes" or PROs). Moreover, symptom palliation correlates well with QOL and survival duration, providing further rationale for therapy selection based on these parameters. The potential palliative and QOL benefits of chemotherapy have been investigated for several agents in lung cancer trials. Of these, topotecan (Hycamtin; GlaxoSmithKline; Philadelphia, PA) is the best characterized in relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In a phase III trial of topotecan versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin (Adriamycin; Bedford Laboratories; Bedford, OH), and vincristine (Oncovin; Eli Lilly and Company; Indianapolis, IN) (CAV) in patients with recurrent SCLC, topotecan was associated with statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvements in general symptoms (e.g., fatigue and interference with daily activity) and disease-specific symptoms (e.g., dyspnea and hoarseness). Moreover, the introduction of oral therapies, such as oral topotecan, may increase the convenience of therapy by reducing the time needed for therapy and the need for frequent venipuncture. This review summarizes the role of chemotherapy in symptom palliation, with an emphasis on the impact of topotecan therapy on symptom parameters in patients with relapsed SCLC and the emerging role of oral therapy in this setting.

The vital role of education and information in patients receiving capecitabine (Xeloda)

Use of oral capecitabine (Xeloda) as home-based therapy leads to savings in healthcare resources and costs and oral chemotherapy is preferred by many cancer patients over intravenous (i.v.) 5-FU. The demands of patient management for oral therapy differ significantly from those of i.v. chemotherapy. Consequently, cancer programmes have begun to implement strategies to meet these unique demands, offer educational programmes for clinicians who prescribe capecitabine, and consider potential changes in staff responsibilities. To encourage patients to take an active part in their care, which is vital with home-based oral therapy, they must be properly informed about their treatment. Patient information needs to be specific for the cancer type and relevant for the country. Various tools have been developed, including prescription guides, diary cards and support kits, which are useful in reinforcing verbal discussions about the use of capecitabine and in helping patients to manage their treatment. Nurses have a vital role to play in encouraging the optimal use of capecitabine and prompt management of adverse events, thereby enabling the patient to achieve a better clinical outcome and maintain an improved quality of life in the home environment.

Phase I study of an oral formulation of irinotecan administered daily for 14�days every 3�weeks in patients with advanced solid tumours

A phase I study was conducted with oral irinotecan given daily for 14 days every 3 weeks in 45 patients with solid tumours to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity, preliminary antitumour response and pharmacokinetics. Irinotecan was administered orally as a powder-filled capsule at doses ranging from 7.5 to 40 mg/m2 per day. Tumours were predominantly colorectal (30) together with 10 other gastrointestinal, 2 breast, 2 small cell lung and 1 ovarian. All but three patients had received prior chemotherapy. The median number of administered cycles was 3 (range 1-19). Gastrointestinal toxicities (grade 3 nausea, grade 3/4 vomiting and diarrhoea) and one incidence of grade 3 asthenia were dose limiting. There were no grade 3/4 haematological toxicities. The MTD was 30 mg/m2 per day. There were two documented partial responses, one in a patient with cancer of the small intestine and the other in a patient with colon cancer. Stable disease was seen in 16 patients (35.5%). Peak concentrations of irinotecan and metabolite SN-38 were reached within 2.0-2.4 h. The metabolic ratio of SN-38 AUC to irinotecan AUC was 0.17+/-0.10 (mean+/-SD). The dose recommended for phase II studies is 30 mg/m2 per day administered daily for 14 days every 3 weeks.

Phase II study of a triplet regimen in advanced colorectal cancer using methotrexate, oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil

Building upon the concept of schedule-specific biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil (FU), which alternates bolus and continuous infusion (CI) FU, we have incorporated oxaliplatin (l-OHP) following the bolus part of the regimen to explore the activity of this new combination. Patients with advanced, untreated, measurable colorectal cancer received sequential methotrexate (MTX) (days 1 and 15) → l-OHP+FU (days 2 and 16) (200, 85 and 600 mg m⁻², respectively) followed by 3 weeks of CI FU (200 mg m⁻² day⁻¹) given from day 29 to 50, modulated by weekly leucovorin (LV) (20 mg m⁻²). After 1 week of rest, the second cycle was started. The treatment was continued until progression or patient's refusal. According to the intention-to-treat analysis on all 46 patients accrued, the response rate was 42% (95% CL=28–55%), with three complete responses and 16 partial responses. The median overall survival was 15.9 months and the median progression-free survival 6.9 months. Toxicity was very mild, with the bolus part of the regimen more toxic than the infusional part (24 vs 7% of grade III–IV, respectively). This new combination of MTX → l-OHP−FU followed by FU CI is well tolerated, feasible and produces activity results similar to other more simple, but more toxic, regimens. Pros and cons of the different fluoropyrimidines–l-OHP combinations are discussed.

Can we afford to add chemotherapy to radiotherapy for glioblastoma multiforme? Cost-identification analysis of concomitant and adjuvant treatment with temozolomide until patient death

BACKGROUND

Adding temozolomide (TMZ) to standard radiotherapy as a first-line therapy for glioma may increase costs to a disproportionate degree compared with the resulting survival benefits.

METHODS

Forty-six consecutive patients (28 males and 18 females; median age, 52 years; age range, 24-70 years) received concomitant TMZ with radiotherapy for 6 weeks followed by adjuvant TMZ for 6 cycles, and they were followed until disease recurrence and then until death. The authors assessed the costs associated with the four phases of treatment from a hospital-centered perspective.

RESULTS

Treatment was discontinued early in 3 patients, 9 patients, and 15 patients during concomitant TMZ, before adjuvant TMZ, and during adjuvant TMZ, respectively. Karnofsky index values varied between 85% (at the beginning of treatment) and 76% (at the end of treatment). The nature of care after disease recurrence was diverse. Overall survival ranged from 1.4 months to 64.3 months (median, 15.8 months) and was better if surgical debulking could be carried out before treatment. Global costs amounted to Euros 39,092 +/- Euros 21,948 (concomitant TMZ, Euros 14,539 +/- Euros 4998; adjuvant TMZ, Euros 13,651 +/- Euros 4320; follow-up, Euros 6363 +/- Euros 6917; and recurrence, Euros 12,344 +/- Euros 18,327), with 53% of these costs being related to the acquisition of TMZ; this represented an eightfold increase in cost compared with radiotherapy alone.

CONCLUSIONS

TMZ may be an effective but costly adjuvant outpatient therapy for patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Definite cost-effectiveness/utility must be assessed in a randomized Phase III trial.

A novel combination of cisplatin, irinotecan, and capecitabine in patients with advanced cancer

BACKGROUND

We conducted a dose escalation study combining cisplatin, irinotecan, and capecitabine (CIC), aiming to establish the maximum tolerated doses (MTD), side effect profile, and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of this novel regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Intravenous cisplatin and irinotecan were to be administered on days 1 and 8, and oral capecitabine on days 1-14 of a 3-week cycle. The study was conducted in three parts. Part A: escalating doses of irinotecan (40 --> 80 mg/m2) and capecitabine (1000 --> 3300 mg/d) combined with a fixed dose of cisplatin (30 mg/m2). Part B: escalating doses of irinotecan (MTD-A --> MTD-A + 40 mg/m2) with fixed doses of cisplatin (20 mg/m2) and capecitabine (MTD-A level). Part C: escalating doses of capecitabine (1300 mg/d-->2600 mg/d) with fixed doses of cisplatin (20 mg/m2) and irinotecan (60 mg/m2).

RESULTS

Of 51 eligible patients 27 (53%) were male, median age was 58 years and 88% had PS 0-1. Major primary disease sites were colorectal (24%), unknown (14%), stomach (14%), and pancreas (12%). MTD-A was cisplatin 30 mg/m2, irinotecan 60 mg/m2, capecitabine 1000 mg/d and MTD-B was cisplatin 20 mg/m2, irinotecan 90 mg/m2, capecitabine 1000 mg/d. An MTD was not formally established for part C. DLTs consisted of infection with neutropenia (1), diarrhea and fatigue (1), hypokalemia (1), diarrhea and febrile neutropenia (1) and C2 delay of > or = 2 weeks or 25% dose reduction in C1 due to neutropenia or thrombocytopenia (6). Seven patients had a partial response to treatment (four colorectal, one SCLC, one NSCLC, one unknown primary), twenty seven SD (53%), twelve PD (24%) and five NE (10%).

CONCLUSION

CIC was associated with moderate toxicity and only modest antitumor activity. We conclude that this regimen has insufficient activity to justify further study in the phase II setting.