A SMAD ubiquitin ligase targets the BMP pathway and affects embryonic pattern formation

Nedd8-modification of Cul1 is promoted by Roc1 as a Nedd8-E3 ligase and regulates its stability

SCF is a ubiquitin ligase and is composed of Skp1, Cul1, F-box protein, and Roc1. The catalytic site of the SCF is the Cul1/Roc1 complex and RING-finger protein Roc1. It was shown earlier that when Cul1 was co-expressed with Roc1 in Sf-9 cells in a baculovirus protein expression system, Cul1 was highly neddylated in the cell, suggesting that Roc1 may function as a Nedd8-E3 ligase. However, there is no direct evidence that Roc1 is a Nedd8-E3 in an in vitro enzyme system. Here we have shown that Roc1 binds to Ubc12, E2 for Nedd8, but not to Ubc9, E2 for SUMO-1 and Roc1 RING-finger mutant, H77A, did not bind to Ubc12. In in vitro neddylation system using purified Cul1/Roc1 complex expressed in bacteria, Roc1 promotes neddylation of Cul1. These results demonstrate that Roc1 functions as a Nedd8-E3 ligase toward Cul1. Furthermore, Roc1 and Cul1 were ubiquitinylated in a manner dependent on the neddylation of Cul1 in vitro. In addition, Cul1 was degraded through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, and a non-neddylated mutant Cul1, K720R, was more stable than wild-type in intact cells. Thus, neddylation of Cul1 might regulate SCF function negatively via degradation of Cul1/Roc1 complex.

SANE, a novel LEM domain protein, regulates bone morphogenetic protein signaling through interaction with Smad1

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are members of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily that play important roles in bone formation, embryonic patterning, and epidermal-neural cell fate decisions. BMPs signal through pathway specific mediators such as Smads1 and 5, but the upstream regulation of BMP-specific Smads has not been fully characterized. Here we report the identification of SANE (Smad1 Antagonistic Effector), a novel protein with significant sequence similarity to nuclear envelop proteins such as MAN1. SANE binds to Smad1/5 and to BMP type I receptors and regulates BMP signaling. SANE specifically blocks BMP-dependent signaling in Xenopus embryos and in a mammalian model of bone formation but does not inhibit the TGF-beta/Smad2 pathway. Inhibition of BMP signaling by SANE requires interaction between SANE and Smad1, because a SANE mutant that does not bind Smad1 does not inhibit BMP signaling. Furthermore, inhibition appears to be mediated by inhibition of BMP-induced Smad1 phosphorylation, blocking ligand-dependent nuclear translocation of Smad1. These studies define a new mode of regulation for intracellular BMP/Smad1 signaling.

Regulation of BMP and Activin Signaling in Drosophila

Cytokines of the TGF-beta superfamily act through an evolutionarily conserved signaling pathway to elicit a diverse range of biological responses in vertebrates as well as invertebrates. Drosophila has proved to be a powerful system to unravel the profound complexities underlying the regulation of this superficially simple signaling system for two reasons--the availability of sophisticated genetic tools and the restricted number of core signaling components compared to vertebrates. A BMP signaling pathway in Drosophila that regulates growth, differentiation and morphogenesis of the embryo and the larva has been extensively characterized. This work has provided major insights into how gradients of secreted proteins can be established and maintained in vivo, allowing a single ligand to induce multiple cell fates rather than function as an on-off switch. More recently, an activin signaling pathway has also been delineated that is required for growth and neuronal function during development. This review provides an overview of TGF-beta signaling in Drosophila with emphasis on the extensive modulation of signaling activity both within and outside the cell, that enables ligands to trigger specific and context-dependent effects.

Bone morphogenetic proteins and their antagonists in skin and hair follicle biology

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP) are members of the transforming growth factor-beta superfamily regulating a large variety of biologic responses in many different cells and tissues during embryonic development and postnatal life. BMP exert their biologic effects via binding to two types of serine/threonine kinase BMP receptors, activation of which leads to phosphorylation and translocation into the nucleus of intracellular signaling molecules, including Smad1, Smad5, and Smad8 ("canonical" BMP signaling pathway). BMP effects are also mediated by activation of the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathway ("noncanonical" BMP Signaling pathway). BMP activity is regulated by diffusible BMP antagonists that prevent BMP interactions with BMP receptors thus modulating BMP effects in tissues. During skin development, BMPs its receptors and antagonists show stringent spatiotemporal expressions patterns to achieve proper regulation of cell proliferation and differentiation in the epidermis and in the hair follicle. In normal postnatal skin, BMP are involved in the control of epidermal homeostasis, hair follicle growth, and melanogenesis. Furthermore, BMP are implicated in a variety of pathobiologic processes in skin, including wound healing, psoriasis, and carcinogenesis. Therefore, BMPs represent new important players in the molecular network regulating homeostasis in normal and diseased skin. Pharmacologic modulation of BMP signaling may be used as a new approach for managing skin and hair disorders.

Two major Smad pathways in TGF-beta superfamily signalling

Members of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily bind to two different serine/threonine kinase receptors, i.e. type I and type II receptors. Upon ligand binding, type I receptors specifically activate intracellular Smad proteins. R-Smads are direct substrates of type I receptors; Smads 2 and 3 are specifically activated by activin/nodal and TGF-beta type I receptors, whereas Smads 1, 5 and 8 are activated by BMP type I receptors. Nearly 30 proteins have been identified as members of the TGF-beta superfamily in mammals, and can be classified based on whether they activate activin/TGF-beta-specific R-Smads (AR-Smads) or BMP-specific R-Smads (BR-Smads). R-Smads form complexes with Co-Smads and translocate into the nucleus, where they regulate the transcription of target genes. AR-Smads bind to various proteins, including transcription factors and transcriptional co-activators or co-repressors, whereas BR-Smads interact with other proteins less efficiently than AR-Smads. Id proteins are induced by BR-Smads, and play important roles in exhibiting some biological effects of BMPs. Understanding the mechanisms of TGF-beta superfamily signalling is thus important for the development of new ways to treat various clinical diseases in which TGF-beta superfamily signalling is involved.

The ubiquitin ligase Hyperplastic discs negatively regulates hedgehog and decapentaplegic expression by independent mechanisms

Photoreceptor differentiation in the Drosophila eye disc progresses from posterior to anterior in a wave driven by the Hedgehog and Decapentaplegic signals. Cells mutant for the hyperplastic discs gene misexpress both of these signaling molecules in anterior regions of the disc, leading to premature photoreceptor differentiation and overgrowth of surrounding tissue. The two genes are independently regulated by hyperplastic discs; decapentaplegic can still be misexpressed in cells mutant for both hyperplastic discs and hedgehog, and a repressor form of the transcription factor Cubitus interruptus can block decapentaplegic misexpression but not hedgehog misexpression. Loss of hyperplastic discs causes the accumulation of full-length Cubitus interruptus protein, but not of Smoothened, in both the eye and wing discs. hyperplastic discs encodes a HECT domain E3 ubiquitin ligase that is likely to act by targeting Cubitus interruptus and an unknown activator of hedgehog expression for proteolysis.

Integration of the TGF-beta pathway into the cellular signalling network

Transforming growth factor-betas (TGF-betas) regulate pivotal cellular processes such as proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. After ligand binding, the signals are transmitted by two types of transmembrane serine/threonine kinase receptors. The type I receptor phosphorylates Smad proteins, intracellular effectors which upon oligomerization enter the nucleus to regulate transcription following assembly with transcriptional co-factors and co-modulators. The cellular distribution of TGF-beta receptors along with their oligomerization mode and their complex formation with different cell surface receptors represent crucial steps in determining the initiation of distinct signalling cascades. In addition, the broad array of intracellular proteins that influence the TGF-beta pathway demonstrates that signal transduction does not proceed in a linear fashion but rather comprises a complex network of cascades that mutually influence each other. The present review describes the intricate control of TGF-beta signal transduction on various levels of the cascade with particular focus (i) on the assembly of different receptor subtypes and (ii) on the multitude of crosstalk with signal transducers from other pathways. Integration of the TGF-beta/Smad pathway into the signalling network has taken on added importance as it substantially contributes to elicit the plethora of cell- and tissue-specific effects of TGF-beta.

Genetic analysis of the mammalian transforming growth factor-beta superfamily

Members of the TGF-beta superfamily, which includes TGF-betas, growth differentiation factors, bone morphogenetic proteins, activins, inhibins, and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, are synthesized as prepropeptide precursors and then processed and secreted as homodimers or heterodimers. Most ligands of the family signal through transmembrane serine/threonine kinase receptors and SMAD proteins to regulate cellular functions. Many studies have reported the characterization of knockout and knock-in transgenic mice as well as humans or other mammals with naturally occurring genetic mutations in superfamily members or their regulatory proteins. These investigations have revealed that TGF-beta superfamily ligands, receptors, SMADs, and upstream and downstream regulators function in diverse developmental and physiological pathways. This review attempts to collate and integrate the extensive body of in vivo mammalian studies produced over the last decade.

Cell cycle regulatory E3 ubiquitin ligases as anticancer targets

Disregulation of the cell cycle and proliferation play key roles in cellular transformation and tumorigenesis. Such processes are intimately tied to the concentration, localization and activity of enzymes, adapters, receptors, and structural proteins in cells. Ubiquitination of these cellular regulatory proteins, governed by specific enzymes in the ubiquitin (Ub) conjugation cascade, has profound effects on their various functions, most commonly through proteasome targeting and degradation. This review will focus on a variety of E3 Ub ligases as potential oncology drug targets, with particular emphasis on the role of these molecules in the regulation of stability, localization, and activity of key proteins such as tumor suppressors and oncoproteins. E3 ubiquitin ligases that have established roles in cell cycle and apoptosis, such as the anaphase-promoting complex (APC), the Skp-1-Cul1-F-box class, and the murine double minute 2 (MDM2) protein, in addition to more recently discovered E3 ubiquitin ligases which may be similarly important in tumorigenesis, (e.g. Smurf family, CHFR, and Efp), will be discussed. We will present evidence to support E3 ligases as good biological targets in the development of anticancer therapeutics and address challenges in drug discovery for these targets.

Extracellular regulation of BMP signaling in vertebrates: a cocktail of modulators

The transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily contains a variety of growth factors which all share common sequence elements and structural motifs. These proteins are known to exert a wide spectrum of biological responses on a large variety of cell types in both vertebrates and invertebrates. Many of them have important functions during embryonic development in pattern formation and tissue specification, and in adult tissues, they are involved in processes such as wound healing, bone repair, and bone remodeling. The family is divided into two general branches: the BMP/GDF and the TGF-beta/Activin/Nodal branches, whose members have diverse, often complementary effects. It is obvious that an orchestered regulation of different actions of these proteins is necessary for proper functioning. The TGF-beta family members act by binding extracellularly to a complex of serine/threonine kinase receptors, which consequently activate Smad molecules by phosphorylation. These Smads translocate to the nucleus, where they modulate transcription of specific genes. Three levels by which this signaling pathway is regulated could be distinguished. First, a control mechanism exists in the intracellular space, where inhibitory Smads and Smurfs prevent further signaling and activation of target genes. Second, at the membrane site, the pseudoreceptor BAMBI/Nma is able to inhibit further signaling within the cells. Finally, a range of extracellular mediators are identified which modulate the functioning of members of the TGF-beta superfamily. Here, we review the insights in the extracellular regulation of members of the BMP subfamily of secreted growth factors with a major emphasis on vertebrate BMP modulation.

Smad2 mediates transforming growth factor-beta induction of endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression

Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) increases expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), although the precise mechanism by which it does so is unclear. We report that Smad2, a transcription factor activated by TGF-beta, mediates TGF-beta induction of eNOS in endothelial cells. TGF-beta induces Smad2 translocation from cytoplasm to nucleus, where it directly interacts with a specific region of the eNOS promoter. Overexpression of Smad2 increases basal levels of eNOS, and further increases TGF-beta stimulation of eNOS expression. Ectopic expression of Smurf, an antagonizer of Smad2, decreases Smad2 expression and blocks TGF-beta induction of eNOS. Because Smad2 can interact with a variety of transcription factors, coactivators, and corepressors, Smad2 may thus act as an integrator of multiple signals in the regulation of eNOS expression.

Identification of mZnf8, a mouse Krüppel-like transcriptional repressor, as a novel nuclear interaction partner of Smad1

To identify novel genes that play critical roles in mediating bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signal pathways, we performed a yeast two-hybrid screen using Smad1 as bait. A novel mouse Krüppel-type zinc finger protein, mZnf8, was isolated. Interactions between mZnf8 and Smad proteins were further analyzed with various in vitro and in vivo approaches, including mammalian two-hybrid, in vitro glutathione S-transferase pulldown, and copurification assays. Results from functional analysis indicate that mZnf8 is a nuclear transcriptional repressor. Overexpression of mZnf8 represses activity of BMP and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) reporters. Silencing the expression of endogenous mZnf8 with an RNA interference approach caused a significant increase in the expression of one BMP reporter. These results suggest that mZnf8 negatively regulates the TGF-beta/BMP signaling pathway in vivo. Transcription of mZnf8 is ubiquitous in mouse embryos, but high levels are specifically observed in adult mouse testes, with the same cell- and stage-specific transcription pattern as Smad1. Our data support the hypothesis that mZnf8 plays critical roles in mediating BMP signaling during spermatogenesis.

The expression of TGFβ signal transducers in the hypodermis regulates body size inC. elegans

In C. elegans, a TGFβ-related signaling pathway regulates body size. Loss of function of the signaling ligand (dbl-1),receptors (daf-4 and sma-6) or Smads (sma-2, sma-3and sma-4) results in viable, but smaller animals because of a reduction in postembryonic growth. We have investigated the tissue specificity of this pathway in body size regulation. We show that different tissues are reduced in size by different proportions, with hypodermal blast cell size most closely proportional to body size. We show that SMA-3 Smad is expressed in pharynx, intestine and hypodermis, as has been previously reported for the type I receptor SMA-6. Furthermore, we find that SMA-3::GFP is nuclear localized in all of these tissues, and that nuclear localization is enhanced by SMA-6 activity. Interestingly, SMA-3 protein accumulation was found to be negatively regulated by the level of Sma/Mab pathway activity. Using genetic mosaic analysis and directed expression of SMA-3, we find that SMA-3 activity in the hypodermis is necessary and sufficient for normal body size. Asdbl-1 is expressed primarily in the nervous system, these results suggest a model in which postembryonic growth of hypodermal cells is regulated by TGFβ-related signaling from the nervous system to the hypodermis.

Smurf1 regulates the inhibitory activity of Smad7 by targeting Smad7 to the plasma membrane

Smad ubiquitin regulatory factor 1 (Smurf1), a HECT-type E3 ubiquitin ligase, interacts with inhibitory Smad7 and induces cytoplasmic localization of Smad7. Smurf1 then associates with transforming growth factor-beta type I receptor (TbetaR-I) and enhances the turnover of this receptor. However, the mechanisms of the nuclear export and plasma membrane localization of the Smurf1.Smad7 complex have not been elucidated. We show here that Smurf1 targets Smad7 to the plasma membrane through its N-terminal conserved 2 (C2) domain. Both wild-type Smurf1 (Smurf1(WT)) and Smurf1 lacking the C2 domain (Smurf1(deltaC2)) bound to Smad7 and translocated nuclear Smad7 to the cytoplasm. However, unlike Smurf1(WT), Smurf1(deltaC2) did not move to the plasma membrane and failed to recruit Smad7 to the cell surface TbetaR-II.TbetaR-I complex. Moreover, although Smurf1(deltaC2) induced ubiquitination of Smad7, it failed to induce the ubiquitination and degradation of TbetaR-I and did not enhance the inhibitory activity of Smad7. Thus, these results suggest that the plasma membrane localization of Smad7 by Smurf1 requires the C2 domain of Smurf1 and is essential for the inhibitory effect of Smad7 in the transforming growth factor-beta signaling pathway.

Regulated proteolysis of Xom mediates dorsoventral pattern formation during early Xenopus development

To identify a regulatory role for proteolysis during early Xenopus development, we developed a biochemical screen for proteins that are degraded in an embryonic stage-specific manner. We found that Xom, a homeobox transcriptional repressor of dorsal-specific genes, was degraded precipitously during early gastrulation. Xom degradation is regulated by phosphorylation at a GSK3-like consensus site and is most likely mediated by the SCF-beta-TRCP complex. Expression of nondegradable Xom represses transcription of dorsal genes much more effectively than wild-type Xom and results in a more strongly ventralized phenotype. We propose that regulated Xom proteolysis plays an essential role in the establishment of the dorsoventral axis, by converting a gradient in BMP abundance into a sharp dorsoventral pattern.

Activins, inhibins, and follistatins: from endocrinology to signaling. A paradigm for the new millennium

It has been 70 years since the name inhibin was used to describe a gonadal factor that negatively regulated pituitary hormone secretion. The majority of this period was required to achieve purification and definitive characterization of inhibin, an event closely followed by identification and characterization of activin and follistatin (FS). In contrast, the last 15-20 years saw a virtual explosion of information regarding the biochemistry, physiology, and biosynthesis of these proteins, as well as identification of activin receptors, and a unique mechanism for FS action-the nearly irreversible binding and neutralization of activin. Many of these discoveries have been previously summarized; therefore, this review will cover the period from the mid 1990s to present, with particular emphasis on emerging themes and recent advances. As the field has matured, recent efforts have focused more on human studies, so the endocrinology of inhibin, activin, and FS in the human is summarized first. Another area receiving significant recent attention is local actions of activin and its regulation by both FS and inhibin. Because activin and FS are produced in many tissues, we chose to focus on a few particular examples with the most extensive experimental support, the pituitary and the developing follicle, although nonreproductive actions of activin and FS are also discussed. At the cellular level, it now seems that activin acts largely as an autocrine and/or paracrine growth factor, similar to other members of the transforming growh factor beta superfamily. As we discuss in the next section, its actions are regulated extracellularly by both inhibin and FS. In the final section, intracellular mediators and modulators of activin signaling are reviewed in detail. Many of these are shared with other transforming growh factor beta superfamily members as well as unrelated molecules, and in a number of cases, their physiological relevance to activin signal propagation remains to be elucidated. Nevertheless, taken together, recent findings suggest that it may be more appropriate to consider a new paradigm for inhibin, activin, and FS in which activin signaling is regulated extracellularly by both inhibin and FS whereas a number of intracellular proteins act to modulate cellular responses to these activin signals. It is therefore the balance between activin and all of its modulators, rather than the actions of any one component, that determines the final biological outcome. As technology and model systems become more sophisticated in the next few years, it should become possible to test this concept directly to more clearly define the role of activin, inhibin, and FS in reproductive physiology.

VCY2 protein interacts with the HECT domain of ubiquitin-protein ligase E3A

VCY2 locates in the AZFc region on chromosome Yq and is frequently deleted in infertile men with severe oligozoospermia or azoospermia. VCY2 is a testis-specific protein with unknown function. This study was to identify the protein that interacts with VCY2. We used the full-length VCY2 as bait to screen the human testis cDNA library using yeast two-hybrid approach. We identified a number of positive-interacting clones that encode ubiquitin-protein ligase E3A (UBE3A). UBE3A contains a HECT domain that binds VCY2. The specificity of the interaction was confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation and yeast mating. Northern blot analyses revealed two UBE3A transcripts 1.4 and 2kb that were abundantly expressed in human testis. We also showed that both VCY2 and UBE3A mRNAs were expressed in ejaculated human spermatozoa, indicating that both genes localize in the germ cell compartment. These data suggest that UBE3A ubiquitination may be required for VCY2 function.

Mechanism for the action of bone morphogenetic proteins and regulation of their activity

Although the bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are multifunctional proteins, implantation of osteogenic BMPs such as BMP-2 and BMP-7 at an osseous or extraosseous site results in bone and cartilage formation. These molecules are soluble, local-acting signaling proteins, which bind to specific receptors on the surface of the cell. The receptors then transduce the signal via a group of proteins called Smads, which in turn activate particular genes. In vivo, these BMPs act primarily as differentiation factors, turning responsive mesenchymal cells into cartilage- and bone-forming cells. A summary of the in vitro and in vivo studies suggests that implantation of these BMPs stimulates cells from the soft and hard tissues (e.g., muscle, bone marrow, periosteum) to become bone, and in some cases, cartilage forming cells. The activity of BMPs is tightly controlled at many levels. The tissue-specific transcription factor (basic helix-loop-helix factor) and its binding sequence (E-box) together play a critical role in deciding the expression of BMPs. Outside the cell, soluble inhibitory proteins such as noggin, chordin, and follistatin can bind certain of the BMPs and inhibit their binding to cell surface receptors. Inside the cell, the activity of BMPs is controlled through the combination of signal-transducing and inhibitory Smad proteins. Bone morphogenetic proteins can upregulate expression of the inhibitory Smad proteins. These Smads are phosphorylated and translocate into the nucleus, where they regulate the transcription of target genes together with other transcription factors including PEBP2alphaA/Cbfa1. Cooperation between PEBP2alphaA/Cbfa1 and BMP-activated Smad (Smad1/5) in the nucleus induces the expression of the genes related to the osteoblast phenotype. In addition, a number of negative regulators of BMP action exist within the nucleus. All of these regulatory mechanisms together cause the bone-induction process to be controlled tightly and self-limiting. Thus, bone induction is observed only locally at the site of BMP and matrix implantation, as defined by the volume of matrix, and it is limited temporally only to the time when the BMP is present.

Drosophila Nedd4, a ubiquitin ligase, is recruited by Commissureless to control cell surface levels of the roundabout receptor

Crossing the midline produces changes in axons such that they are no longer attracted to the midline. In Drosophila, Roundabout reaches high levels on axons once they have crossed the midline, and this prohibits recrossing. Roundabout protein levels are regulated by Commissureless. We show that Commissureless binds to and is regulated by the ubiquitin ligase DNedd4. We further show that the ability of Commissureless to regulate Roundabout protein levels requires an intact DNedd4 binding site and ubiquitin acceptor sites within the Commissureless protein. The ability of Commissureless to regulate Robo in the embryo also requires a Commissureless/DNedd4 interaction. Our results show that changes in axonal sensitivity to external cues during pathfinding across the midline makes use of ubiquitin-dependent mechanisms to regulate transmembrane protein levels.

EDD, the human hyperplastic discs protein, has a role in progesterone receptor coactivation and potential involvement in DNA damage response

The ubiquitin-protein ligase EDD encodes an orthologue of the hyperplastic discs tumor suppressor gene, which has a critical role in Drosophila development. Frequent allelic imbalance at the EDD chromosomal locus in human cancers suggests a role in tumorigenesis. In addition to a HECT (homologous to E6-AP carboxyl terminus) domain, the EDD protein contains a UBR1 zinc finger motif and ubiquitin-associated domain, each of which indicates involvement in ubiquitinylation pathways. This study shows that EDD interacts with importin alpha 5 through consensus basic nuclear localization signals and is localized in cell nuclei. EDD also binds progesterone receptor (PR) and potentiates progestin-mediated gene transactivation. This activity is comparable with that of the coactivator SRC-1, but, in contrast, the interaction between EDD and PR does not appear to involve an LXXLL receptor-binding motif. EDD also binds calcium- and integrin-binding protein/DNA-dependent protein kinase-interacting protein, a potential target of ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis, and an altered association is found between EDD and calcium- and integrin-binding protein/DNA-dependent protein kinase-interacting protein in response to DNA damage. The data presented here demonstrate a role for EDD in PR signaling but also suggest a link to cancer through DNA damage response pathways.

A novel link between the proteasome pathway and the signal transduction pathway of the bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs)

BACKGROUND

The intracellular signaling events of the bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) involve the R-Smad family members Smad1, Smad5, Smad8 and the Co-Smad, Smad4. Smads are currently considered to be DNA-binding transcriptional modulators and shown to recruit the master transcriptional co-activator CBP/p300 for transcriptional activation. SNIP1 is a recently discovered novel repressor of CBP/p300. Currently, the detailed molecular mechanisms that allow R-Smads and Co-Smad to co-operatively modulate transcription events are not fully understood.

RESULTS

Here we report a novel physical and functional link between Smad1 and the 26S proteasome that contributes to Smad1- and Smad4-mediated transcriptional regulation. Smad1 forms a complex with a proteasome beta subunit HsN3 and the ornithine decarboxylase antizyme (Az). The interaction is enhanced upon BMP type I receptor activation and occur prior to the incorporation of HsN3 into the mature 20S proteasome. Furthermore, BMPs trigger the translocation of Smad1, HsN3 and Az into the nucleus, where the novel CBP/p300 repressor protein SNIP1 is further recruited to Smad1/HsN3/Az complex and degraded in a Smad1-, Smad4- and Az-dependent fashion. The degradation of the CBP/p300 repressor SNIP1 is likely an essential step for Smad1-, Smad4-mediated transcriptional activation, since increased SNIP1 expression inhibits BMP-induced gene responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Our studies thus add two additional important functional partners of Smad1 into the signaling web of BMPs and also suggest a novel mechanism for Smad1 and Smad4 to co-modulate transcription via regulating proteasomal degradation of CBP/p300 repressor SNIP1.

Enhancing effect of Tob deficiency on bone formation is specific to bone morphogenetic protein-induced osteogenesis

Tob is a recently reported novel bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) inhibitor, which originally was identified by West-Western procedure using ErbB2 as a probe and contains a nuclear localization signal. To further characterize the effects of Tob deficiency on BMP-induced new bone (NB) formation, we examined microcomputed tomography (microCT) on the cross-section of the bone induced by daily injection with BMP onto the calvariae of newborn mice. The calvariae of the saline-injected Tob-deficient (TD) mice were similar to those of the saline-injected or untreated wild-type (WT) mice. BMP injection locally produced NB on the calvaria in WT mice as known previously. In contrast to WT mice, BMP injection onto the calvariae of TD mice produced a calcified area in the cross-section of NB, which was more than that produced by BMP in the WT calvariae. In addition, the horizontal width and the vertical height of the NB induced by BMP in TD mice were several-fold more than those in WT mice. The effect of Tob deficiency on bone-forming activity was selective to the response to the injection with BMP because the levels of injury-induced NB formation examined by microCT 10 days after bone marrow ablation in the femora were similar between the TD and WT mice. These data indicate that Tob acts as a novel specific antagonist against bone formation induced by BMP treatment in bone.

The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction

Between the 1960s and 1980s, most life scientists focused their attention on studies of nucleic acids and the translation of the coded information. Protein degradation was a neglected area, considered to be a nonspecific, dead-end process. Although it was known that proteins do turn over, the large extent and high specificity of the process, whereby distinct proteins have half-lives that range from a few minutes to several days, was not appreciated. The discovery of the lysosome by Christian de Duve did not significantly change this view, because it became clear that this organelle is involved mostly in the degradation of extracellular proteins, and their proteases cannot be substrate specific. The discovery of the complex cascade of the ubiquitin pathway revolutionized the field. It is clear now that degradation of cellular proteins is a highly complex, temporally controlled, and tightly regulated process that plays major roles in a variety of basic pathways during cell life and death as well as in health and disease. With the multitude of substrates targeted and the myriad processes involved, it is not surprising that aberrations in the pathway are implicated in the pathogenesis of many diseases, certain malignancies, and neurodegeneration among them. Degradation of a protein via the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway involves two successive steps: 1) conjugation of multiple ubiquitin moieties to the substrate and 2) degradation of the tagged protein by the downstream 26S proteasome complex. Despite intensive research, the unknown still exceeds what we currently know on intracellular protein degradation, and major key questions have remained unsolved. Among these are the modes of specific and timed recognition for the degradation of the many substrates and the mechanisms that underlie aberrations in the system that lead to pathogenesis of diseases.

Regulation of cell proliferation by Smad proteins

Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) family members which include TGF-betas, activins, and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) regulate a broad spectrum of biological responses on a large variety of cell types. TGF-beta family members initiate their cellular responses by binding to distinct receptors with intrinsic serine/threonine kinase activity and activation of specific downstream intracellular effectors termed Smad proteins. Smads relay the signal from the cell membrane to the nucleus, where they affect the transcription of target genes. Smad activation, subcellular distribution, and stability have been found to be intricately regulated and a broad array of transcription factors have been identified as Smad partners. Important activities of TGF-beta are its potent anti-mitogenic and pro-apoptotic effects that, at least in part, are mediated via Smad proteins. Escape from TGF-beta/Smad-induced growth inhibition and apoptosis is frequently observed in tumors. Certain Smads have been found to be mutated in specific types of cancer and gene ablation of particular Smads in mice has revealed increased rate of tumorigenesis. In late stage tumors, TGF-beta has been shown to function as a tumor promoter. TGF-beta can stimulate the de-differentiation of epithelial cells to malignant invasive and metastatic fibroblastic cells. Interestingly, TGF-beta may mediate these effects directly on tumor cells via subverted Smad-dependent and/or Smad-independent pathways.

Determinants of ligand specificity in groups I and IV WW domains as studied by surface plasmon resonance and model building

WW domains are universal protein modules for binding Pro-rich ligands. They are classified into four groups according to their binding specificity. Arg-14 and Arg-17, on the WW domain of Pin1, are thought to be important for the binding of Group IV ligands that have (Ser(P)/Thr(P))-Pro sequences. We have applied surface plasmon resonance to determine the ligand specificity of several WW domains containing Arg-14. Among these WW domains, Rsp5.2 and mNedd4.3 bound only to the Group I ligand containing Pro-Pro-Xaa-Tyr with K(D) values of 11 and 55 microm, respectively. The WW domains of hPin1, Caenorhabditis elegans Pin1 homologue (Y110), PinA, and SspI bound to Group IV ligands with K(D) values ranging from 22 to 700 microm. PinA and SspI do not have Arg-17, unlike Pin1 and Y110. The modeled structures of the WW domains of PinA and SspI revealed that the structure and the network of hydrogen bonds of Loop I, which are also formed in Pin1 and Y110, are conserved. We propose that this configuration of Loop I (referred to as the "p patch") is necessary for binding Group IV ligands and that it can be used to predict the specificity and functions of other WW domains.

Mechanisms underlying ubiquitination

The conjugation of ubiquitin to other cellular proteins regulates a broad range of eukaryotic cell functions. The high efficiency and exquisite selectivity of ubiquitination reactions reflect the properties of enzymes known as ubiquitin-protein ligases or E3s. An E3 recognizes its substrates based on the presence of a specific ubiquitination signal, and catalyzes the formation of an isopeptide bond between a substrate (or ubiquitin) lysine residue and the C terminus of ubiquitin. Although a great deal is known about the molecular basis of E3 specificity, much less is known about molecular mechanisms of catalysis by E3s. Recent findings reveal that all known E3s utilize one of just two catalytic domains--a HECT domain or a RING finger--and crystal structures have provided the first detailed views of an active site of each type. The new findings shed light on many aspects of E3 structure, function, and mechanism, but also emphasize that key features of E3 catalysis remain to be elucidated.

A maternal Smad protein regulates early embryonic apoptosis in Xenopus laevis

We identified cDNAs encoding the Xenopus Smad proteins most closely related to mammalian Smad8, and we present a functional analysis of this activity (also referred to recently as xSmad11). Misexpression experiments indicate that xSmad8(11) regulates pathways distinct from those regulated by the closely related xSmad1. Embryos that develop from eggs depleted of xSmad8(11) mRNA fail to gastrulate; instead, at the time of gastrulation, they initiate a widespread program of apoptosis, via a CPP32/caspase 3 pathway. Embryos that avoid this fate display gastrulation defects. Activation of apoptosis is rescued by expression of xSmad8(11) but not xSmad1. Our results demonstrate an embryonic requirement for Smad8(11) activity and show that a maternally derived Smad signaling pathway is required for gastrulation and for mediating a cell survival program during early embryogenesis. We suggest that xSmad8(11) functions as part of a maternally derived mechanism shown previously by others to monitor Xenopus early embryonic cell cycles.

Regulation of cell proliferation, apoptosis, and carcinogenesis by activin

The aim of this review is to provide insight into the molecular mechanisms by which activin A modulates cell proliferation, apoptosis, and carcinogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Activin A, a member of the TGFbeta superfamily, has various effects on diverse biological systems, including cell growth inhibition in many cell types. However, the mechanism(s) by which activin exerts its inhibitory effects are not yet understood. This review highlights activin's effects on activin receptors and signaling pathway, modulation of activin signaling, and regulation of cell proliferation and apoptosis by activin. Based on the experiences of all the authors, we emphasized cell cycle inhibitors such as p16 and p21 and regulators of apoptosis such as p53 and members of the bcl-2 family. Aside from activin's inhibition of cell proliferation and enhancement of apoptosis, other newly developed methods for molecular studies of apoptosis by activin were briefly presented that support the role of activin as an inhibitor of carcinogenesis and cancer progression. These methods include subtractive hybridization based on covalent bonding, a simple and accurate means to determine molecular profile of as few as 20 cells based on an RNA-PCR approach, and a messenger RNA-antisense DNA interference phenomenon (D-RNAi), resulting in a long-term gene knockout effects.

Transforming growth factor-beta signaling through the Smad pathway: role in extracellular matrix gene expression and regulation

Transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta represents a prototype of multifunctional cytokine. Its broad activities include, among others, context-specific inhibition or stimulation of cell proliferation, control of extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis and degradation, control of mesenchymal-epithelial interactions during embryogenesis, mediation of cell and tissue responses to injury, control of carcinogenesis, and modulation of immune functions. Regulation of production and turnover of ECM components is essential for tissue homeostasis and function. TGF-beta exerts its effects on cell proliferation, differentiation, and migration in part through its capacity to modulate the deposition of ECM components. Specifically, TGF-beta isoforms have the ability to induce the expression of ECM proteins in mesenchymal cells, and to stimulate the production of protease inhibitors that prevent enzymatic breakdown of the ECM. Deregulation of these functions is associated with abnormal connective tissue deposition, as observed, for example, during scarring or fibrotic processes. In this review we discuss the current understanding of the signaling mechanisms used by TGF-beta to elicit its effects on target genes, focusing primarily on Smad proteins and their role in the transcriptional regulation of ECM gene expression. Other signaling mechanisms, such as the MAP/SAP kinase or Ras pathways, although potentially important for transmission of some of the TGF-beta signals, will not be described. Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) plays a critical role in the regulation of extracellular matrix gene expression. Its overexpression is believed to contribute to the development of tissue fibrosis. The recent identification of Smad proteins, TGF-beta receptor kinase substrates that translocate into the cell nucleus to act as transcription factors, has increased our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying TGF-beta action. This review focuses primarily on the mechanisms underlying Smad modulation of gene expression and how they relate to wound healing. Potential implications for the development of therapeutic approaches against tissue fibrosis are discussed.

The TGF-beta--Smad network: introducing bioinformatic tools

The TGF-beta superfamily is an important class of intercellular signalling molecule, including TGF-beta and bone morphogenetic proteins. Intracellular signalling cascades triggered by these molecules eventually activate transcription factors of the Smad family, which then regulate expression of their respective target genes. This article will discuss the TGF-beta--Smad signalling networks and how these processes are represented in databases of signal transduction and transcription control mechanisms. These databases can provide a well-structured overview of the subject and a basis for advanced bioinformatics analyses to interpret the function of genomic sequences or to analyse signalling networks.

Jab1 antagonizes TGF-beta signaling by inducing Smad4 degradation

Tumor suppressor Smad4 is the common signaling effector in the transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) superfamily. Phosphorylated regulatory Smads (R-Smads) interact with Smad4, and the complex translocates into the nucleus to regulate gene transcription. Proper TGF-beta signaling requires precise control of Smad functions. Smurfs have been shown to mediate the degradation of R-Smads but not the common-partner Smad4. We report a novel mechanism of Smad4 degradation. Jab1 interacts directly with Smad4 and induces its ubiquitylation for degradation. Jab1 was initially identified as a co-activator of c-Jun, and it also induces degradation of cell cycle inhibitor p27 and tumor suppressor p53. Ectopic expression of Jab1 decreased endogenous Smad4 steady-state levels. The 26S proteasome inhibitors lactacystin and MG132 reduced the degradation rate of Smad4 protein. Examination of the effects of JAB1-induced Smad4 degradation indicates that Jab1 inhibited TGF-beta-induced gene transcription. Our data suggest that Jab1 antagonizes TGF-beta function by inducing degradation of Smad4 through a distinct degradation pathway.

Identification of developmentally expressed proteins that functionally interact with Nedd4 ubiquitin ligase

Nedd4 is a HECT domain-containing ubiquitin ligase that mediates ubiquitylation and proteasome degradation of target proteins. The molecular basis for the interaction of Nedd4 with substrates lies in its WW domains, which can bind proline-rich (PY) domains in target proteins. Nedd4 is a developmentally expressed protein and may have a fundamental role to play in embryonic processes. However, whether Nedd4 has such a function is currently unknown, in part because few developmentally regulated ubiquitylation substrates have been identified or characterized. We have carried out a yeast two-hybrid screen and identified four proteins expressed in the mid-gestation embryo that are able to interact with Nedd4. Characterization of their functional interaction with Nedd4 in vitro and in vivo demonstrated that three of the four are bona fide Nedd4 binding partners, and two have the capacity to be ubiquitylation substrates. One of these is the first identified nonviral substrate for Nedd4-mediated monoubiquitylation. Interestingly, neither of these two ubiquitylated proteins interacts with Nedd4 through PY-mediated mechanisms. For one of the three Nedd4 binding partners, there was no discernable evidence of ubiquitylation. However, this protein clearly associates with Nedd4 through its PY domains and can alter the location of Nedd4 in cells, suggesting a role other than as a ubiquitylation substrate.

Alternative splicing determines the domain structure of WWP1, a Nedd4 family protein

Nedd-4-like proteins are E3 ubiquitin-ligase molecules which regulate key trafficking decisions, including targeting of proteins to proteosomes or lysosomes. Here we show that a human Nedd4 family gene, WWP1, is localized on 8q21 and generates at least six isoforms through alternative splicing. We show that alternative splicing affects the domain structure of WWP1, with forms that contain or lack an N-terminal C2 domain. Interestingly, the relative ratio of these forms varies in a tissue-specific manner. Other splice forms were also identified which may disrupt the structure of the C2 domain by removing its predicted C-terminal beta-strands. One splice form generates, through the introduction of a reading frame shift, a C2 domain-only form of WWP1. We discuss the hypothesis that regulation of splice site usage may modulate the activity of WWP1 and possibly other Nedd4 family proteins.

Smad regulation in TGF-β signal transduction

Smad proteins transduce signals from transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) superfamily ligands that regulate cell proliferation, differentiation and death through activation of receptor serine/threonine kinases. Phosphorylation of receptor-activated Smads (R-Smads) leads to formation of complexes with the common mediator Smad (Co-Smad), which are imported to the nucleus. Nuclear Smad oligomers bind to DNA and associate with transcription factors to regulate expression of target genes. Alternatively, nuclear R-Smads associate with ubiquitin ligases and promote degradation of transcriptional repressors, thus facilitating target gene regulation by TGF-β. Smads themselves can also become ubiquitinated and are degraded by proteasomes. Finally, the inhibitory Smads (I-Smads) block phosphorylation of R-Smads by the receptors and promote ubiquitination and degradation of receptor complexes, thus inhibiting signalling.

Nedd4 regulates ubiquitination and stability of the guanine-nucleotide exchange factor CNrasGEF

Cyclic nucleotide ras GEF (CNrasGEF) is a guanine-nucleotide exchange factor previously isolated in a screen for Nedd4-WW domain interacting proteins (Pham, N., Cheglakov, I., Koch, C. A., de Hoog, C. L., Moran, M. F., and Rotin, D. (2000) Curr. Biol. 10, 555-558). It activates Ras in a cAMP-dependent manner and Rap-1 independent of cAMP. Here we show that CNrasGEF is a likely substrate of the ubiquitin protein ligase Nedd4. CNrasGEF possesses two PY motifs at its C terminus that are responsible for binding to Nedd4 in vitro. Moreover, Nedd4 and CNrasGEF co-immunoprecipitate from 293T cells expressing ectopic CNrasGEF and endogenous Nedd4, and this co-immunoprecipitation is abrogated in PY motif-mutated CNrasGEF (CNrasGEFDelta2PY). CNrasGEF is ubiquitinated in cells, and this ubiquitination is augmented upon overexpression of wt-Nedd4 but is inhibited in cells overexpressing a catalytically inactive Nedd4 (Nedd4(CS)) or in cells expressing CNrasGEFDelta2PY, which cannot bind Nedd4. Moreover, pulse-chase experiments have demonstrated that the half-life of CNrasGEF is reduced 5-fold (from approximately 10 to approximately 2 h) in cells co-expressing Nedd4 with CNrasGEF but not with CNrasGEFDelta2PY (t(0.5) approximately 14 h). CNrasGEF is also stabilized in cells co-expressing Nedd4(CS) or following treatment with lactacystin, indicating proteasomal degradation of this protein. Deletion/mutation of the CDC25 domain to abrogate Ras (or Rap-1) binding leads to impaired ubiquitination of CNrasGEF, suggesting that such binding is critical for ubiquitination. Treatment of cells with the cAMP analogue 8-bromo-cAMP does not affect the ability of CNrasGEF to bind Nedd4 nor its level of ubiquitination, suggesting that Ras binding per se and not its activation is the critical step in triggering ubiquitination of CNrasGEF. These results suggest that CNrasGEF is a substrate for Nedd4, which regulates its ubiquitination and stability in cells.

Proteasomal degradation of Smad1 induced by bone morphogenetic proteins

The bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) regulate early embryogenesis and morphogenesis of multiple organs, such as bone, kidney, limbs, and muscle. Smad1 is one of the key signal transducers of BMPs and is responsible for transducing receptor activation signals from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, where Smad1 serves as a transcriptional regulator of various BMP-responsive genes. Based upon the ability of Smad1 to bind multiple proteins involved in proteasome-mediated degradation pathway, we investigated whether Smad1 could be a substrate for proteasome. We found that Smad1 is targeted to proteasome for degradation in response to BMP type I receptor activation. The targeting of Smad1 to proteasome involves not only the receptor activation-induced Smad1 ubiquitination but also the targeting functions of the ornithine decarboxylase antizyme and the proteasome beta subunit HsN3. Our studies provide the first evidence for BMP-induced proteasomal targeting and degradation of Smad1 and also reveal new players and novel mechanisms involved in this important aspect of Smad1 regulation and function.

Identification of multiple CDH1 homologues in vertebrates conferring different substrate specificities

CDC20/CDH1 activates the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) and targets various substrates for degradation, thereby allowing the ordered progression through mitosis and G(1). We have found multiple functional CDH1 homologues in the chick. The transcripts of these novel genes are differentially localized to proliferating, differentiated, and postmitotic tissues. All four proteins bind and form a complex with APC in vitro and in cultural cells and have quantitatively different activities in mediating ubiquitination of various APC substrates. Our results suggest that multiple CDH1s may temporally and spatially regulate APC activity both within and outside of the cell cycle.

Regulation of transforming growth factor-beta signaling

Members of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) family are potent regulators of multiple cellular functions, including cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, organization, and death. Yet the signaling pathways underpinning a wide array of biological activities of TGF-beta appear to be deceptively simple. At every step from TGF-beta secretion to activation of its target genes, the activity of TGF-beta is regulated tightly, both positively and negatively. Biologically active TGF-beta is cleaved from a precursor protein (latent form) and multiple process factors control the levels of active TGF-beta. The efficient secretion, correct folding and deposition to the extracellular matrices require the cosecretion of latent TGF-beta binding proteins (LTBPs). Once activated, TGF-beta ligand signals through a heteromeric receptor complex of two distinct type I and type II serine/threonine kinase receptors TbetaRI and TbetaRII. Many factors appear to influence the formation of the active ligand-receptor complex. The relative orientation of TbetaRI and TbetaRII in the ligand-receptor complex is critical for activation: through TbetaRI, the activated ligand-receptor complex directly binds and phosphorylates downstream intracellular substrates, called Smads. Inhibitory Smads, Smad6 and 7, can antagonize this process. The phosphorylation of Smads leads to the formation of complexes which translocate to the nucleus. Other signaling systems can modulate the activity of the Smads: e.g., ras activity can prevent Smad complexes from entering the nucleus and specific ubiquitin ligases can target Smad for degradation. In the nucleus, the Smad complexes associate with other transcription activators or suppressors to regulate gene expression, either positively or negatively. The combined effects of the positive and/or negative TGF-beta controlled gene expression together with the endogenous protein set of the target cell are responsible for the multiplicity of biological functions.

The anaphase-promoting complex mediates TGF-beta signaling by targeting SnoN for destruction

Degradation of SnoN is thought to play an important role in the transactivation of TGF-beta responsive genes. We demonstrate that the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) is a ubiquitin ligase required for the destruction of SnoN and that the APC pathway is regulated by TGF-beta. The destruction box of SnoN is required for its degradation in response to TGF-beta signaling. Furthermore, the APC activator CDH1 and Smad3 synergistically regulate SnoN degradation. Under these circumstances, CDH1 forms a quaternary complex with SnoN, Smad3, and APC. These results suggest that APC(CDH1) and SnoN play central roles in regulating growth through the TGF-beta signaling system.

Neural induction takes a transcriptional twist

Over the past decade, several molecules have been identified that influence neural cell fate in vertebrate embryos during gastrulation. The first neural inducers studied were proteins produced by dorsal mesoderm (the Spemann organizer); most of these proteins act by directly binding to and antagonizing the function of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). Recent experiments have suggested that other secreted signals, such as Wnt and FGF, may neuralize ectoderm before organizer function by a different mechanism. Neural effector genes that mediate the response of ectoderm to secreted neuralizing signals have also been discovered. Interestingly, most of these newly identified neuralizing pathways continue the theme of BMP antagonism, but rather than antagonizing BMP protein function, they may neuralize tissue by suppressing Bmp expression. Down-regulation of Bmp expression in the prospective neural plate during gastrulation seems to be a shared feature of neural induction in vertebrate embryos. However, the signals used to accomplish this task seem to vary among vertebrates. Here, we will discuss the role of the recently identified secreted signals and neural effector genes in vertebrate neurogenesis.

Intracellular BMP signaling regulation in vertebrates: pathway or network?

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), members of the TGF-beta superfamily of secreted signaling molecules, have important functions in many biological contexts. They bind to specific serine/threonine kinase receptors, which transduce the signal to the nucleus through Smad proteins. The question of how BMPs can have such diverse effects while using the same canonical Smad pathway has recently come closer to an answer at the molecular level. Nuclear cofactors have been identified that cooperate with the Smads in regulating specific target genes depending on the cellular context. In addition, the pivotal role BMP signaling plays is underscored by the identification of factors that regulate members of this pathway at the cell surface, in the cytoplasm, and in the nucleus. Many of these factors are BMP-inducible and inhibit the BMP pathway, thus establishing negative feedback loops. Members of the BMP-Smad pathway can also physically interact with components of other signaling pathways to establish crosstalk. Finally, there is accumulating evidence that an alternative pathway involving MAP kinases can transduce BMP signals. The evidence and implications of these findings are discussed with an emphasis on early embryonic development of Xenopus and vertebrates.

Smad3 recruits the anaphase-promoting complex for ubiquitination and degradation of SnoN

Smad proteins mediate transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) signaling to regulate cell growth and differentiation. SnoN is an important negative regulator of TGF-beta signaling that functions to maintain the repressed state of TGF-beta target genes in the absence of ligand. On TGF-beta stimulation, Smad3 and Smad2 translocate into the nucleus and induce a rapid degradation of SnoN, allowing activation of TGF-beta target genes. We show that Smad2- or Smad3-induced degradation of SnoN requires the ubiquitin-dependent proteasome and can be mediated by the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) and the UbcH5 family of ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes. Smad3 and to a lesser extent, Smad2, interact with both the APC and SnoN, resulting in the recruitment of the APC to SnoN and subsequent ubiquitination of SnoN in a destruction box (D box)-dependent manner. In addition to the D box, efficient ubiquitination and degradation of SnoN also requires the Smad3 binding site in SnoN as well as key lysine residues necessary for ubiquitin attachment. Mutation of either the Smad3 binding site or lysine residues results in stabilization of SnoN and in enhanced antagonism of TGF-beta signaling. Our studies elucidate an important mechanism and pathway for the degradation of SnoN and more importantly, reveal a novel role of the APC in the regulation of TGF-beta signaling.

The DSmurf ubiquitin-protein ligase restricts BMP signaling spatially and temporally during Drosophila embryogenesis

We identified Drosophila Smurf (DSmurf) as a negative regulator of signaling by the BMP2/4 ortholog DPP during embryonic dorsal-ventral patterning. DSmurf encodes a HECT domain ubiquitin-protein ligase, homologous to vertebrate Smurf1 and Smurf2, that binds the Smad1/5 ortholog MAD and likely promotes its proteolysis. The essential function of DSmurf is restricted to its action on the DPP pathway. DSmurf has two distinct, possibly mechanistically separate, functions in controlling DPP signaling. Prior to gastrulation, DSmurf mutations cause a spatial increase in the DPP gradient, as evidenced by ventrolateral expansion in expression domains of target genes representing all known signaling thresholds. After gastrulation, DSmurf mutations cause a temporal delay in downregulation of earlier DPP signals, resulting in a lethal defect in hindgut organogenesis.

TGF-beta signalling pathways in early Xenopus development

Many different ligands of the TGF-beta superfamily signal in the early Xenopus embryo and are required for the specification and patterning of the three germ layers as well as for gastrulation. Recent advances in the field are helping us understand how ligand activity is regulated both spatially and temporally, the mechanism by which the signals are transduced to the nucleus and how essentially the same signalling pathway can activate completely different sets of genes in different regions of the embryo.

A new Smurf in the village

TGF-beta signaling is modulated by Smurfs, E3-ubiquitin ligases that selectively target the receptors and Smad proteins for degradation. New evidence from Drosophila suggests that Smurfs regulate the amplitude and the duration of the cellular response to signaling in vivo.

Substrate recognition by the Cdc20 and Cdh1 components of the anaphase-promoting complex

The specificity of ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation with regards to the selection of substrates to be polyubiquitinated has only been determined rather recently. Substrate targeting by the N-end rule and HECT (homology to E6AP carboxyl terminus) domain ubiquitin ligases occurs through substrate-specific binding domains. In contrast, the SCF complex recruits substrates through a substrate adaptor protein, the F-box subunit. Despite evidence showing that Cdc20 and Cdh1 bind and activate the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) in a substrate-specific manner, there is no evidence that the activating protein and substrate interact directly; hence, no clear model exists for the mechanism of APC activation or recruitment of substrates. We show here that the activators Cdc20 and Cdh1 can associate with substrates via their N termini. In the absence of APC, Cdc20 and Cdh1 bind substrates reflecting Cdc20-APC and Cdh1-APC specificity. The N termini of Cdc20 and Cdh1 provide specificity functionally, as demonstrated by the generation of active chimeras that display the specificity corresponding to their N termini. Thus, Cdc20 and Cdh1 act as both substrate recognition and activating modules for APC.

Ligand-dependent degradation of Smad3 by a ubiquitin ligase complex of ROC1 and associated proteins

Smads are signal mediators for the members of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily. Upon phosphorylation by the TGF-beta receptors, Smad3 translocates into the nucleus, recruits transcriptional coactivators and corepressors, and regulates transcription of target genes. Here, we show that Smad3 activated by TGF-beta is degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Smad3 interacts with a RING finger protein, ROC1, through its C-terminal MH2 domain in a ligand-dependent manner. An E3 ubiquitin ligase complex ROC1-SCF(Fbw1a) consisting of ROC1, Skp1, Cullin1, and Fbw1a (also termed betaTrCP1) induces ubiquitination of Smad3. Recruitment of a transcriptional coactivator, p300, to nuclear Smad3 facilitates the interaction with the E3 ligase complex and triggers the degradation process of Smad3. Smad3 bound to ROC1-SCF(Fbw1a) is then exported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm for proteasomal degradation. TGF-beta/Smad3 signaling is thus irreversibly terminated by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway.