A pooled analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colon cancer in elderly patients

Completion of therapy by Medicare patients with stage III colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Certain factors, such as race or age, are known to be associated with variation in initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer, but little is known about what factors are associated with completion of adjuvant therapy. To determine whether predictors of initiation also predict completion, we analyzed Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program data linked to Medicare claims. We investigated mortality as a means to testing the validity of the completion measure that we created.

METHODS

We studied 3193 stage III colon cancer patients whose diagnosis was recorded in 1992-1996 SEER program data linked to 1991-1998 Medicare claims and who initiated adjuvant chemotherapy after colon cancer resection. We defined a measure of adjuvant chemotherapy completion as one chemotherapy administration claim in a month. We tested the validity of the created measure and its relation to 3-year cancer mortality adjusted for demographic, clinical, and environmental variables. We explored the association of patient characteristics and treating physician characteristics with chemotherapy completion by use of multivariable logistic regression modeling.

RESULTS

Of the 3193 patients, 2497 (78.2%) completed the course. Risk of cancer-related mortality was statistically significantly lower among those completing chemotherapy (relative risk = 0.79, 95% confidence interval = 0.69 to 0.89) than those with no adjuvant therapy. Patients who were female, widowed, increasingly elderly, rehospitalized, and living in certain regions were less likely to complete adjuvant chemotherapy than other patients. Race and other clinical, environmental, and physician characteristics were not associated with completion of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors associated with incomplete adjuvant chemotherapy may represent physical frailty, treatment complications, and lack of social and psychological support. Interventions to mitigate these influences are a logical next step toward increasing chemotherapy completion rates.

Evolving role of antineoplastic agents in colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

The epidemiology, natural history, patient presentation, staging, prognosis, and treatment of colorectal cancer are described.

SUMMARY

Colorectal cancer is a common malignancy that usually is not diagnosed when it is localized because it typically is asymptomatic in the early stages. Various cancer chemotherapeutic agents with different toxicities are available, including the recently introduced recombinant humanized immunoglobulin G(1) monoclonal antibodies cetuximab and bevacizumab. Chemotherapy may be used with or without surgery in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, usually for palliation rather than a cure. The results of clinical trials suggest that patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer probably should receive 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, and cetuximab at some time in the course of treatment, although the preferred combinations and sequence of these agents remain to be determined. After surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy may be used for curative purposes in patients with stage III disease and some patients with stage II disease at high risk for disease recurrence and death. Although 5-FU plus leucovorin has been the standard adjuvant therapy, clinical trials have demonstrated that adding oxaliplatin or using capecitabine alone instead is an alternative.

CONCLUSION

Several recently introduced chemotherapeutic agents appear promising for the treatment of colorectal cancer, but additional clinical research is needed to identify the ideal combinations and sequence of these agents.

Efficacy and tolerability of chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced oesophago-gastric cancer: A pooled analysis of three clinical trials

The aim of this study was to determine the benefits of chemotherapy for oesophago-gastric cancer (OGC) in patients 70 years and above (> or =70) in comparison to younger patients. 1080 patients were enrolled into three randomised controlled trials assessing fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy. Patients received either a platinum-containing regimen (ECF, MCF), PVI 5-FU (protracted venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil)+/-mitomycin C (MMC), or FAMTX. Of the 1080 patients randomised, 257 (23.8%) were aged > or =70 years. There were no significant differences in the incidence of grades 3/4 toxicity between the two cohorts. Objective and symptomatic response rates, failure-free and overall survival were not significantly different. In a multivariate analysis, independent prognostic factors for survival were performance status and locally advanced disease, not age. Patients > or =70 years with OGC obtained similar benefits from palliative chemotherapy with respect to symptomatic response, tumour regression and survival, without increased toxicities.

Estimating Costs of Care for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

This study examines the resource use patterns and costs of care for patients with incident metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) based on analyses of retrospective claims data from selected health plans in the United States.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A case-control analysis was performed using claims from years 1998-2004. Incident mCRC cases were identified based on evidence of a colorectal cancer diagnosis and a metastatic disease diagnosis. Incident mCRC cases could have no other evidence of cancer in the 1-year period before the date of their first mCRC diagnosis. Cases were matched to non-mCRC controls based on age, sex, geographic region, and duration of plan enrollment. Costs were evaluated by phase of disease: diagnosis, treatment, or death phases. Ordinary least squares regressions were performed to evaluate impact of covariates in each phase.

RESULTS

Total costs in the follow-up period averaged $97,031 more for mCRC cases than for controls. The main cost drivers for mCRC were hospitalizations ($37,369) and specialist visits ($34,582), which included chemotherapy administration. Approximately 40% of the 672 patients with mCRC who qualified for the phase analysis were identified with a fatal event during follow-up. Monthly costs were similar in the diagnostic phase ($12,205) and death phase ($12,328), but were significantly lower in the treatment phase ($4722). Both mean/median monthly costs increased over time during the study period, regardless of disease phase.

CONCLUSION

The economic burden of mCRC is substantial for patients with commercial health plans in the United States, and costs of care have increased substantially in recent years.

Duration of adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer and survival among the elderly

PURPOSE

In randomized trials, patients with stage III colon cancer who received 6 months of fluorouracil (FU)-based adjuvant chemotherapy had better survival than patients who did not. However, little is known about the predictors of, or the survival associated with, duration of chemotherapy in the community.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database was used to identify individuals > or = 65 years of age diagnosed with stage III colon cancer between 1995 and 1999. We used logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression models to analyze factors associated with early discontinuation of FU-based chemotherapy among these elderly colon cancer patients.

RESULTS

Among 1,722 patients who received 1 to 7 months of FU-based chemotherapy, older age, being unmarried, and having comorbid conditions were associated with receiving less than 5 months of treatment. Among the 1,579 patients who survived > or = 8 months, the 1,091 (69.1%) who received 5 to 7 months of treatment had lower overall (hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95%, CI 0.49 to 0.71) and colon cancer-specific (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.66) mortality than the 488 (30.9%) who received 1 to 4 months of treatment.

CONCLUSION

More than 30% of elderly patients who initiated FU-based chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer and survived for at least 8 months discontinued treatment early. Mortality rates among such patients were nearly twice as high as among patients who completed 5 to 7 months of treatment. If the association we observed between duration of treatment and survival is confirmed, additional investigation is warranted to determine whether dose-intensity, cumulative dose, or other factors related to receipt of full adjuvant treatment are responsible.

Beyond 5-fluorouracil: new horizons in systemic therapy for advanced colorectal cancer

Worldwide, colorectal cancer is a common cancer and a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Patients frequently present with, or later develop, metastatic disease. Median survival with supportive care alone is approximately 6 - 8 months. However, a number of recent developments have greatly increased the range of therapeutic options, improving median survival to > 20 months. Cytotoxic agents such as capecitabine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin are now established treatment strategies. In parallel, an improved understanding of tumour biology has led to the development of non-cytotoxic targeted therapies. Examples include bevacizumab (targeting tumour angiogenesis) and cetuximab (targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor). These agents have recently been incorporated into standard management. This paper reviews these and other advances in the care of patients with advanced colorectal cancer and discusses a number of agents that are currently under development.

Current issues in adjuvant treatment of stage II colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil modulated by folinic acid, combined with oxaliplatin, has now become an accepted standard of care for patients with stage III colon cancer. In contrast, the use of adjuvant therapy for stage II patients remains controversial, and the identification of reliable prognostic factors to aid therapeutic decision making is crucial.

METHODS

The authors critically review the results of clinical trials and meta-analyses investigating the value of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II patients, emphasizing the heterogeneous nature of this population and the difficulty of performing clinical trials with sufficient power to reliably assess treatment efficacy. They also discuss the evidence concerning potential prognostic factors, particularly molecular markers.

RESULTS

Available clinical trial data do not support the routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy for all stage II patients but suggest that it should be considered, particularly for certain high-risk patients. Recent guidelines advocate considering factors such as tumor differentiation, tumor perforation, number of lymph nodes examined, and T stage when assessing the likely benefit:risk ratio. Microsatellite instability and allelic imbalance seem to be strong predictors of good and poor prognosis, respectively, and in the near future, therapeutic decision-making models are likely to be further refined by the inclusion of such molecular markers.

CONCLUSIONS

There is growing evidence that the prognosis of certain stage II patients with unfavorable prognostic factors can be improved by adjuvant chemotherapy, and increasingly refined tools are now available to define those most likely to benefit. Referral of stage II patients for individual assessment is strongly recommended.

Psychosocial determinants and outcomes of chemotherapy in older women with breast cancer: what do we know? What do we need to know?

With the aging of the U.S. population and rising breast cancer incidence with advancing age, the absolute number of women aged 65 years and older diagnosed with and surviving breast cancer will dramatically increase over the coming decades. Despite this demographic imperative, we know little about the impact of adjuvant therapies in this age group. We synthesized data to describe key findings and gaps in knowledge about the outcomes of adjuvant breast cancer treatment in women aged 65 years and and older ("older women"). We reviewed research published between 1995 and June 2005 on breast cancer outcomes among older women treated with adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Outcomes included communication, emotional distress, satisfaction, and multiple quality-of-life domains. Only 16 articles focused exclusively on older women and chemotherapy; and only one included a large sample of older women (N = 1755). Most common domains included comorbidities, symptoms, and survival. Of the 13 clinical trials and three observational studies we reviewed, only one clinical trial measured quality of life and psychological factors such as coping. None of the studies examined patient preferences or patient-physician communication (processes of care) in older women. Few studies have been designed to specifically evaluate adjuvant therapy processes and outcomes among older women, especially interactions between treatment and comorbidity, and the impact of the processes of care on outcomes. In addition, only narrow segments of the older population with breast cancer (e.g., well-educated, nonminority women) have been included in trials to date. Thus, at present we do not have sufficient data to assist physicians and their older patients in developing adjuvant treatment decisions and plans tailored to older women's needs, preferences, and concerns.

Anemia and long-term outcome in adjuvant and neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy of stage II and III rectal adenocarcinoma: The Freiburg experience (1989-2002)

AIM: To evaluate the long-term outcome of standard 5-FU based adjuvant or neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and to identify the predictive factors, especially anemia before and after radiotherapy as well as hemoglobin increase or decrease during radiotherapy.

METHODS: Two hundred and eighty-six patients with Union International Contre Cancer (UICC) stage II and III rectal adenocarcinomas, who underwent resection by conventional surgical techniques (low anterior or abdominoperineal resection), received either postoperative (n = 233) or preoperative (n = 53) radiochemotherapy from January 1989 until July 2002. Overall survival (OAS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), local-relapse-free (LRS) and distant-relapse-free survival (DRS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier, Log-rank test and Cox’s proportional hazards as statistical methods. Multivariate analysis was used to identify prognostic factors. Median follow-up time was 8 years.

RESULTS: Anemia before radiochemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for improved DFS (risk ratio 0.76, P = 0.04) as well as stage, grading, R status (free radial margins), type of surgery, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, and gender. The univariate analysis revealed that anemia was associated with impaired LRS (better local control) but with improved DFS. In contrast, hemoglobin decrease during radiotherapy was an independent risk factor for DFS (risk ratio 1.97, P = 0.04). During radiotherapy, only 30.8% of R0-resected patients suffered from hemoglobin decrease compared to 55.6% if R1/2 resection was performed (P = 0.04). The 5-year OAS, CSS, DFS, LRS and DRS were 47.0%, 60.0%, 41.4%, 67.2%, and 84.3%, respectively. Significant differences between preoperative and postoperative radiochemotherapy were not found.

CONCLUSION: Anemia before radiochemotherapy and hemoglobin decrease during radiotherapy have no predictive value for the outcome of rectal cancer. Stage, grading, R status (free radial margins), type of surgery, CEA levels, and gender have predictive value for the outcome of rectal cancer.

Safety profile of platinum-based chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in elderly patients

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may be considered typical of advanced age. More than 50% of NSCLC patients are diagnosed at > 65 years of age and approximately one-third of all patients are > 70 years of age. Elderly patients tolerate chemotherapy poorly compared with their younger counterpart because of the progressive reduction of organ function and comorbidities related to age. For this reason, these patients are often not considered eligible for aggressive platinum-based chemotherapy, the standard medical treatment for advanced NSCLC. In clinical practice, single-agent chemotherapy should remain the standard treatment. Feasibility of platinum-based chemotherapy remains an open issue and has to be proven prospectively. Moreover, a multidimensional geriatric assessment for individualised treatment choice in NSCLC elderly patients is mandatory. This review focuses on the currently-available evidences for the treatment of elderly patients affected by advanced NSCLC with regards to the role and safety of platinum-based chemotherapy.

Front-line paclitaxel and topotecan chemotherapy in advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II trial

PURPOSE

Based on previous experience, we combined topotecan with paclitaxel (weekly administration) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our primary objective was to determine the response rate and survival and our secondary objective, the safety of the regimen.

METHODS

From October 2003, until March 2005, 45 patients all with histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC were enrolled. All patients were chemotherapy and radiotherapy naive. Both agents were infused on day 1 of every week once for three consecutive weeks, every 28 days. Three infusions were considered as one course. The treatment plan was to give three courses (nine infusions) and then to evaluate the response. Topotecan (1.75 mg/m2) was infused for 30 min and paclitaxel (70 mg/m2) for 90 min; these doses had been established as the maximum tolerated dose in a previous phase I-II trial.

RESULTS

Eighteen/45 (40%) patients responded, 2 (4.4%) complete responses and 16 (35.6%) partial responses. Twenty-one (46.7%) patients had stable disease, and 6 (13.3%) disease progression. The median duration of response was 8 months and median time to tumor progression 9 months. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was observed in two patients (in these two patients, the dose of both drugs was reduced by 25% and G-CSF was given), grade 4 thrombocytopenia in one patient and grade 4 anemia in one patient.

CONCLUSION

This novel combination of topotecan-paclitaxel in a weekly administration rendered a 40% response rate, with very low toxicity in stages IIIA, IIIB and IV NSCLC patients.

Mixed adherence to clinical practice guidelines for colorectal cancer in the Southern Netherlands in 2002

AIMS

Population-based cancer registries can provide excellent data for insight in disease management practice. This study examines the extent to which the consensus-based national clinical guidelines (version 2000-2001) for colorectal cancer (CRC) had been implemented in the diagnostic and treatment approach in the Southern Netherlands in 2002.

METHODS

Data were gathered from the medical records for a random sample from the Eindhoven Cancer Registry of 308 patients with colorectal cancer. Adherence to clinical guidelines was determined for diagnostic assessment, pathology, and treatment during the first year after diagnosis.

RESULTS

Surgical procedures and referral for pre-operative radiotherapy were carried out largely conform the recommendations. The number of performed colonoscopies among colon cancer patients amounted to 60%; contrast enemas after incomplete colonoscopy were performed in only 27% of patients. The median number of examined lymph nodes was only six for patients with colon and five for patients with rectal cancer; the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage III colon cancer decreased from 95% of patients younger than 70 years to 48% of patients over 70.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to clinical guidelines was not optimal. Feedback to surgeons and pathologists should improve adherence, especially with respect to nodal retrieval and assessment.

Phase III study of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and levamisole in high-risk stage II and III colon cancer: final report of Intergroup 0089

PURPOSE

In 1990, fluorouracil (FU) plus levamisole for 1 year became standard adjuvant treatment for patients with high-risk stages II and III colon cancer. Intergroup (INT) 0089 assessed the relative contributions of leucovorin and levamisole in such patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1988 to 1992, 3,794 patients were randomly assigned. Experimental treatment consisted of one of three chemotherapy regimens: the low-dose leucovorin plus FU (Mayo Clinic; LDLV) regimen, the high-dose leucovorin plus FU (Roswell Park; HDLV) regimen, and the low-dose leucovorin plus levamisole plus FU (LDLV plus LEV) regimen, each administered for 30 to 32 weeks. The control arm was levamisole plus FU (LEV) for 1 year.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 10 years, of 3,561 eligible patients, 1,691 (47%) have died and 1,330 (37%) have experienced disease recurrence; 137 (10%) of those experiencing recurrence are still alive. A total of 481 patients (13%) died without evidence of recurrence, and 1,723 (48%) are alive and disease free. Although there were toxicity differences among the four arms, none was statistically superior in disease-free or overall survival.

CONCLUSION

The 6- to 8-month regimens of LDLV and HDLV without levamisole used in this trial, rather than the previous standard regimen of 12 months of LEV, have become widely used. INT-0089 has long-term follow-up of the largest clinical trial of patients with high-risk colon cancer, documenting not only the durability of the treatment effects, but also the natural history of patients with high-risk colon cancer, and analyses of treatment based on age, race, and comorbid conditions such as obesity, diabetes, and second primary cancers.

Therapy Insight: therapeutic challenges in the treatment of elderly cancer patients

People over the age of 65 years constitute the fastest-growing segment of the US population. Within the next 30 years, this group will comprise over 20% of the total population. Importantly, 50% of all cancers and 70% of cancer mortality occur in this age group. Choosing the correct chemotherapy regimen and dose for the older patient can be extremely difficult because of physiological changes that occur with aging, as well as other comorbidities associated with this age group. Treatment decisions need to be based on a patient's individual performance, functional status and life expectancy. Although there are no accepted algorithms to guide management decisions in elderly cancer patients, data are becoming available that will help guide the use of chemotherapy in the older patient population.

Optimal antidiarrhea treatment for antitumor agent irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11)-induced delayed diarrhea

PURPOSE

An antitumor camptothecin derivative CPT-11 has proven a broad spectrum of solid tumor malignancy, but its severe diarrhea has often limited its more widespread use. We have demonstrated from a rat model that intestinal beta-glucuronidase may play a key role in the development of CPT-11-induced delayed diarrhea by the deconjugation of the luminal SN-38 glucuronide, and the elimination of the intestinal microflora by antibiotics or dosing of TJ-14, a Kampo medicine that contains beta-glucuronidase inhibitor baicalin, exerted a protective effect. In the present study, we assessed the efficacy of several potential treatments in our rat model to clarify which is the most promising treatment for CPT-11-induced delayed diarrhea.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Oral dosing (twice daily from days -1 to 4) of streptomycin 20 mg/kg and penicillin 10 mg/kg (Str/Pen), neomycin 20 mg/kg and bacitracin 10 mg/kg (Neo/Bac), both of which inhibited almost completely the fecal beta-glucuronidase activity, or TJ-14 1,000 mg/kg improved the decrease in body weight and the delayed diarrhea symptoms induced by CPT-11 (60 mg/kg i.v. from days 1 to 4) to a similar extent. The efficacy was less but significant in activated charcoal (1,000 mg/kg p.o. twice daily from days -1 to 4). In a separate experiment using rats bearing breast cancer (Walker 256-TC), TJ-14, Neo/Bac, and charcoal at the same dose regimen improved CPT-11-induced intestinal toxicity without reducing CPT-11's antitumor activity. In contrast, oral dosing (twice a day) of cyclosporin A (50 mg/kg), a P-glycoprotein and cMOAT/MRP2 inhibitor or valproic acid (200 mg/kg), a UDP-glucuronosyltranferase inhibitor, exacerbated the intestinal toxicity without modifying CPT-11's antitumor activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The result clearly demonstrated the ability of Neo/Bac, Str/Pen, and TJ-14, less but significant ability of activated charcoal, to ameliorate CPT-11-induced delayed-onset diarrhea, suggesting the treatments decreasing the exposure of the intestines to the luminal SN-38 are valuable for improvement of CPT-11-induced intestinal toxicity. In contrast, the treatments affecting the biliary excretion of CPT-11 and its metabolites might have undesirable results.

How much can current interventions reduce colorectal cancer mortality in the U.S.?

BACKGROUND

Although colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in the U.S., available interventions to reduce CRC mortality are disseminated only partially throughout the population. This study assessed the potential reduction in CRC mortality that may be achieved through further dissemination of current interventions for risk-factor modification, screening, and treatment.

METHODS

The MISCAN-COLON microsimulation model was used to simulate the 2000 U.S. population with respect to CRC risk-factor prevalence, screening use, and treatment use. The model was used to project age-standardized CRC mortality from 2000 to 2020 for 3 intervention scenarios.

RESULTS

Without changes in risk-factor prevalence, screening use, and treatment use after 2000, CRC mortality would decrease by 17% by the Year 2020. If the 1995 to 2000 trends continue, then the projected reduction in mortality would be 36%. However, if trends in the prevalence of risk-factors could be improved above continued trends, if screening use increased to 70% of the target population, and if the use of chemotherapy increased among all age groups, then a 49% reduction would be possible. Screening drove most (23%) of the projected mortality reduction with these optimistic trends; however, decreasing risk-factors (16%) and increasing use of chemotherapy (10%) also contributed substantially. The contribution of risk-factors may have been overestimated, because effect estimates could not be obtained from randomized controlled trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently available interventions for risk-factor modification, screening, and treatment have the potential to reduce CRC mortality by almost 50% by the Year 2020. However, without action now to further increase the uptake of current effective interventions, the reduction in CRC mortality may be only 17%.

Front-line paclitaxel and irinotecan combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase I-II trial

Our purpose was to determine the efficacy of irinotecan plus paclitaxel administered on day 1, repeated every 2 weeks, in untreated patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In total, 56 patients with inoperable or metastatic stage III and IV NSCLC with a histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis were enrolled. None of the patients had undergone prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Treatment involved irinotecan 125 mg m⁻² and paclitaxel 135 mg m⁻² administered on day 1 and repeated every 2 weeks for a planned number of nine cycles. With a standard dose of paclitaxel at 135 mg m⁻², the dosage of irinotecan was escalated at four levels: 75, 100, 125 and 150 mg m⁻²; 125 mg m⁻² was established as the maximum tolerated dose; this dosage was administered to 46 patients. A total of 52 patients (median age 65 years, range 38–77 years) were assessable for toxicity and survival and 46 for response rate. Out of 46 evaluable patients, 19 achieved partial response (41.3%), 17 had stable disease (37%) and 10 (21.7%) experienced disease progression. The median duration of response was 6 months (range 2–9+ months). The main adverse reactions were myelotoxicity (grades 3 and 4) in 10 (19.2%) patients and diarrhoea (grade 3) in four (7.7%) patients. Irinotecan combined with paclitaxel, administered every 2 weeks, appears to be an effective treatment for advanced-stage NSCLC.

Treatment of colorectal cancer in the elderly: a review of the literature

Although major progress has been achieved in the treatment of colorectal cancer, there are still several questions open for discussion concerning the management of elderly colorectal cancer patients. We conducted a review of the available literature concerning the use of adjuvant chemotherapy, palliative chemotherapy and surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer, using data from meta-analyses, non-systematic reviews and individual trials. All report similar survival benefits with adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy in elderly patients in comparison with younger age groups. Data on treatment-related side effects did not reveal a different toxicity profile for elderly patients. Efficacy and safety data were similar but more difficult to interpret concerning surgery, so this review is inconclusive about the proper use of this treatment modality in the elderly population. It is demonstrated that there is significant gain from chemotherapy in the adjuvant and palliative management of colorectal cancer patients irrespective of age. We, therefore, conclude that all patients should receive the most intensive treatment thought to be effective and safe, according to their biological age and comorbidities.

Guidelines for the management of the older cancer patient

Evaluation of: Balducci L, Cohen HJ, Enstrom PF et al.: Senior adult oncology clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J. Natl Compr. Cancer Center Netw. 3, 572–590 (2005). The management of older cancer patients with cytotoxic chemotherapy involves a new balance of benefits and risks, given the limited life expectancy and increased susceptibility to therapeutic complications of older individuals. The National Cancer Center Network has been issuing guidelines for the management of older cancer patients since 1999. This article reviews the basis of the most recent set of guidelines, issued in 2005. These include: some form of geriatric assessment for individuals aged 70 years and older to estimate their life expectancy and treatment tolerance; adjustment of the first dose of chemotherapy to glomerular filtration rate for individuals aged 65 years and older; prophylactic use of myelopoietic growth factors (e.g., filgrastim or pegfilgrastim) in patients aged 65 years and older treated with moderately toxic chemotherapy (of which cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone is the paradigm); maintainance of hemoglobin levels at approximately 12 gm/dl; and preferential use of drugs of low toxicity (e.g., capecitabine, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, weekly taxanes, gemcitabine or navelbine).

Combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFIRI regimen) as first line treatment for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase II trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with bolus and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) (FOLFIRI regimen) as first-line treatment of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC).

METHODS

Thirty consecutive, previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, aged (median 76 years; range 70-84) were enrolled. The performance status (WHO) was 0 in 8, 1 in 16 and 2 in 6 patients; 19 (63%) patients had prior surgery and 8 (27%) adjuvant chemotherapy. CPT-11 (180 mg/m(2) as a 90 min i.v. infusion) was administered on day 1, LV (200 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour i.v. infusion), 5-FU (400 mg/m(2)/d i.v. bolus followed by 600 mg/m(2)/d as a 22-hour i.v. continuous infusion) were given on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks.

RESULTS

Complete response was achieved in one (3.3%) patient and partial response in 10 (33.3%) (overall response rate: 36.6%; 95% C.I.: 26.6-48.4%); 11 (36.6%) patients had stable disease and, 8 (26.6%) disease progression. The median duration of response was 7.5 months and the median time to disease progression 7.0 months. After a median follow-up period of 17 months, the median overall survival was 14.5 months. Main toxicities were: grade 3-4 neutropenia (n = 6; 20%), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (n = 1; 3.3%), grade 2 anemia (n = 9; 30%), grade 3-4 diarrhea (n = 5; 17%) and grade 3 asthenia (n = 3; 10%). There was one treatment-related death due to neutropenic sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

The FOLFIRI combination is an active regimen with manageable toxicity as front-line treatment in patients above 70 years of age.

Outcomes in Elderly Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer Treated with Capecitabine: A Population-Based Analysis

BACKGROUND

Toxicity concerns impact the delivery of palliative chemotherapy to elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Capecitabine was approved for funding in the province of British Columbia in the spring of 2002 as an oral chemotherapeutic option for metastatic CRC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a population-based study to assess temporal trends in the use of systemic agents in elderly patients. Patients aged > or = 70 years with metastatic CRC diagnosed between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2000, and between June 1, 2002, and May 31, 2003, were identified through the British Columbia Cancer Agency Registry. The time cohorts were before and after the provincial approval of capecitabine. Data were obtained regarding demographics, systemic therapies, and outcomes.

RESULTS

In cohort A, 35 of 89 patients (39%) were treated with chemotherapy. In the treated versus untreated groups of cohort A, 66% and 57% of patients were male, median ages were 73 years and 76 years, and liver metastasis was seen in 69% and 70% of patients, respectively. In cohort B, 36 of 78 patients (46%) were treated with systemic therapy. In the treated versus untreated groups of cohort B, 58% and 40% of patients were male, median ages were 75 years and 78.5 years, and liver metastasis was seen in 78% and 64% of patients. The most common first-line chemotherapy regimens used in cohort A included single-agent 5-FU in 66%, irinotecan-based regimens in 17%, and other regimens in 11%. First-line chemotherapy in cohort B included capecitabine in 47%, oxaliplatin-based regimens in 19%, and irinotecan-based regimens in 17%. The median times to treatment failure resulting from toxicity, disease progression, or death were 37 days in cohort A and 61 days in cohort B. Overall survival between the 2 time cohorts did not differ significantly. Toxicities resulting in dose delay and/or reduction were comparable.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that, in patients > or = 70 years of age with advanced CRC, single-agent 5-FU and capecitabine were the favored palliative regimens in British Columbia in 2000 and 2002, respectively. Capecitabine was well tolerated, and both treatments demonstrated similar survival. There was a trend observed toward a greater proportion of patients being offered systemic therapy in the 2002 cohort; however, the difference was not statistically significant.

Adjuvant therapy for colon cancer

As there have been advances in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, exciting developments have also been achieved in the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer. At the same time, more questions have been raised, and some controversies remain. The results of the MOSAIC trial demonstrated the benefit of adding oxaliplatin to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (FOLFOX) in adjuvant therapy for stage II and III disease, but the optimal duration of therapy and the management of toxicities remain to be resolved. Capecitabine is at least equivalent to the Mayo Clinic bolus 5-FU and leucovorin regimen in the adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer with a lower incidence profile of adverse events, allowing additional options for patients and physicians. Routine adjuvant systemic therapy in all patients with stage II colon cancer is still debatable. Although a statistically significant advantage for adjuvant treatment in stage II disease was shown for the first time from a large randomized study (QUASAR), the subsets of patients who truly benefit from therapy need to be identified. The application of pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics in adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer will help to distinguish those patients with risk factors and to guide individualized therapy.

Elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer: tolerability and activity of chemotherapy

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is the most common gastrointestinal tumor in Western countries and is increasing in elderly patients. In recent years, new treatments based on the use of 5-fluorouracil associated with oxaliplatin or CPT-11 have shown promising activity. The aim of the present study was to analyze the tolerability and activity of chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin or CPT-11 in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Patients aged 70 years or older with advanced colorectal cancer were treated with 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m2 in bolus and 600 mg/m2 in a 22-hr continuous infusion on days 1-2) plus folinic acid (100 mg/m2) associated to oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2 on day 1, FOLFOX regimen) or CPT-11 (180 mg/m2 on day 1, FOLFIRI regimen), every 14 days.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients with a median age of 76 years (range, 70-82) were treated with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic disease. We observed a partial response in 8/29 (27.6%), stable disease in 11/29 (37.9%) and progressive disease in 10/29 (34.5%). Median survival was 21 months; 1-year survival probability was 89.8%. Grade III leukopenia was observed in 2/29 (7%) patients and grade III diarrhea in 1/29 patients. No other grade III-IV toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

FOLFOX and FOLFIRI appear to be active and well tolerated regimens for elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Disease-free survival versus overall survival as a primary end point for adjuvant colon cancer studies: individual patient data from 20,898 patients on 18 randomized trials

PURPOSE

A traditional end point for colon adjuvant clinical trials is overall survival (OS), with 5 years demonstrating adequate follow-up. A shorter-term end point providing convincing evidence to allow treatment comparisons could significantly speed the translation of advances into practice.

METHODS

Individual patient data were pooled from 18 randomized phase III colon cancer adjuvant clinical trials. Trials included 43 arms, with a pooled sample size of 20,898 patients. The primary hypothesis was that disease-free survival (DFS), with 3 years of follow-up, is an appropriate primary end point to replace OS with 5 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

The recurrence rates for years 1 through 5 were 12%, 14%, 8%, 5%, and 3%, respectively. Median time from recurrence to death was 12 months. Eighty percent of recurrences were in the first 3 years; 91% of patients with recurrence by 3 years died before 5 years. Correlation between 3-year DFS and 5-year OS was 0.89. Comparing control versus experimental arms within each trial, the correlation between hazard ratios for DFS and OS was 0.92. Within-trial log-rank testing using both DFS and OS provided the same conclusion in 23 (92%) of 25 cases. Formal measures of surrogacy were satisfied.

CONCLUSION

In patients treated on phase III adjuvant colon clinical trials, DFS and OS are highly correlated, both within patients and across trials. These results suggest that DFS after 3 years of median follow-up is an appropriate end point for adjuvant colon cancer clinical trials of fluorouracil-based regimens, although marginally significant DFS improvements may not translate into significant OS benefits.

Elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer: which therapy is the safest?

Patients > 65 years of age are the fastest growing segment of the cancer population. It is estimated that within 20 years, > 75% of cases and 85% of deaths from colorectal cancer (CRC) will be in this setting. Concerns about cancer treatment in the elderly relate to comorbidities, which increase proportionally with age, physiological changes associated with ageing that may influence drug metabolism and toxicity, and diminishing life expectancy, which particularly impacts decisions surrounding the benefits of adjuvant therapies. Over the last 10 years, significant improvements in the treatment of advanced CRC with combination therapy have been made. The randomised trials that have defined these improvements did not exclude elderly patients; however, the median age of patients in these trials has generally been approximately 60 years. Thus, it appears that some degree of selection is involved with younger and presumably fitter patients being the subjects in most of the pivotal trials. The availability of new molecularly targeted agents and newly improved existing agents has expanded the range of treatment options available. This variety gives greater flexibility in dealing with different subsets of patients, such as the elderly. However, some fit elderly patients seem to tolerate combination therapy reasonably well, whereas studies on unfit elderly subjects are needed.

Screening for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer in the elderly: a review of the evidence

There is general consensus that screening can reduce mortality from colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer among persons in their 50s and 60s. However, few screening trials have included persons over age 70 years. Therefore, indirect evidence must be used to determine when results in younger persons should be extrapolated to older persons. In this review, we focus on cancer screening tests that are well accepted in younger persons (mammography, Papanicolaou smears, and colorectal cancer screening) and discuss the strength of inference concerning benefits and harms of screening older persons. Some aspects of aging favor screening (eg, increased absolute risk of dying of cancer) whereas other aspects do not (eg, decreased life expectancy). Age also affects the behavior of some cancers (eg, increases the proportion of slow-growing breast cancers) and affects the accuracy of some screening tests (eg, increases the accuracy of mammography; decreases the accuracy of sigmoidoscopy). These effects make the application of evidence in younger populations to older populations complex. However, given the heterogeneity of the elderly population, there is no evidence of one age at which potential benefits of screening suddenly cease or potential harms suddenly become substantial for everyone. Therefore, characteristics of individual patients that go beyond age should be the driving factors in screening decisions. For example, persons who have a life expectancy less than 5 years or persons who would decline treatment should generally not be screened. Decisions to either continue or discontinue screening in the elderly should be based on health status, the benefits and harms of the test, and preferences of the patient, rather than solely on the age of the patient.

Treatment of stage IV colorectal carcinoma in elderly patients

Colorectal adenocarcinoma ranks second as a cause of death due to cancer in the Western world. In Europe, 40% of patients with colorectal cancer are over 70 years old and the incidence increased through the 1980's. Without any treatment the median survival after the detection of liver metastases is approximately 9 months, depending on the extent of disease at the time of diagnosis but not on the patients age. In the elderly there are only few data apt to define the standard regimen in the advanced disease, but results seem similar to those observed in younger patients. As a result of exclusion criteria and screening, elderly patients entering clinical trials are usually a select group, with good performance status, access to transportation, and limiting numbers of coexisting conditions. This paper examines the factors pertinent to the small number of clinical trials designed for metastatic colorectal cancer in this group of persons.

Effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive operable breast cancer in older women

BACKGROUND

Randomized clinical trials have shown the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in treating node-positive operable breast cancer in women aged < or = 69 years, but the benefit of chemotherapy in women aged > or = 70 is questionable. This study was to examine if adjuvant chemotherapy is effective for these women with breast cancer.

METHODS

We studied a cohort of 5464 women diagnosed with node-positive operable breast cancer at age > or = 65 in 1992 through 1996 with last follow-up of December 31, 1999 in five states and six metropolitan areas. Hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality was used for survival analysis with adjustment for patient and tumor characteristics; propensity analysis was used to control for observed factors; and sensitivity analysis was used to estimate potential effects of unmeasured confounders.

RESULTS

After adjusting for propensity to receive chemotherapy, the chemotherapy-treated and untreated groups were not statistically significantly different for covariates except for age and hormone receptor status. Mortality was significantly reduced in women aged 65-69 who received adjuvant chemotherapy compared to those who did not, after adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics (HR = 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.88) or after adjusting for propensity scores (HR = 0.76, 95% CI, 0.62-0.94). HR did not significantly differ between the treated and untreated women aged > or = 70 (HR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.83-1.09, and HR = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.87-1.14). These results were relatively insensitive to changes in unmeasured confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved survival in women with node-positive operable breast cancer aged 65-69 living in the community, but not in women aged > or = 70. These findings are consistent with those found in randomized controlled trials.

Age and colorectal cancer with focus on the elderly: trends in relative survival and initial treatment from a Danish population-based study

PURPOSE

Elderly patients with colorectal cancer undergo surgery with curative intent less frequently than younger patients, and survival declines with increasing age. We compared relative survival of colorectal cancer among patients older than 75 years with that of younger patients in Denmark during the period 1977 to 1999. We also examined trends in choice of initial treatment.

METHODS

From the files of the nationwide population-based Danish Cancer Registry, we identified all cases of colorectal cancer diagnosed between 1977 and 1999. We then linked this data to information on survival obtained from the Danish Register of Causes of Death and from the Central Population Register.

RESULTS

During the entire study period, short-term and long-term relative survival improved for patients of all ages, but the improvement was more pronounced among elderly patients (>75 years). Radical resection was increasingly chosen as the initial treatment for elderly patients; during the 1995 to 1999 period it was performed on approximately 50 percent of such patients, almost as frequently as among younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Relative survival of elderly colorectal cancer patients (>75 years) improved in Denmark between 1977 and 1999. In the most recent period studied, 1995 to 1997, only minor differences in five-year relative survival were observed among younger, middle-aged, and elderly patients. A simultaneous increase in the rate of radical resection among elderly patients, reflecting more effective treatment, may underlie this finding.

Irinotecan, continuous 5-fluorouracil, and low dose of leucovorin (modified FOLFIRI) as first line of therapy in recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Irinotecan, in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and a high dose of leucovorin (LV), known as FOLFIRI regimen, has shown activity in recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of irinotecan, 5-FU and a low dose of LV (modified FOLFIRI) as a first line of therapy for patients with relapsed or metastatic colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Between January 2002 and October 2004, 44 patients with histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled. The chemotherapy regimen schedule consisted of 180 mg/m2 of irinotecan being administered intravenously (i.v) on Day 1, 400 mg/m2 of 5-FU via i.v bolus with 600 mg/m2 of continuous infusion for 22 hrs on both Day 1 and 2, and 20 mg/m2 of leucovorin on both Day 1 and 2 , repeated every two weeks.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 47.8%. Of the 40 evaluated patients, one had CR (2.3%) and 20 had PR (46.5%). Toxicities were mild and easily manageable. Three patients experienced 23 episodes of Grade 3/4 leukopenia., Only one patient developed Grade 3/4 diarrhea. None experienced Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSION

Modified FOLFIRI with a low dose of LV is an effective and tolerable regimen for patients with recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer.

Clinical Pharmacology Issues Relevant to the Dosing and Toxicity of Chemotherapy Drugs in the Elderly

Persons over the age of 65 years are the fastest growing segment of the U.S. population. In the next 30 years, they will comprise more than 20% of the population. Fifty percent of all cancers occur in this age group, and therefore, there is an expected rise in the total cancer burden. Data are becoming available that will better guide the use of chemotherapy in the older patient population. In this paper, information regarding age-related physiologic changes and their relationship to pharmacology, functional status, and hematopoiesis is presented. The adjuvant treatment of breast and colon cancer, as well as the primary therapy of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma is reviewed. The treatment of more advanced breast, ovarian, and non-small cell lung cancer is also discussed.

Colorectal cancer adjuvant treatment in elderly patients

Colorectal adenocarcinoma ranks second as a cause of death due to cancer in the Western world. In Europe, 40% of patients with this disease is over 70 years old and only 52% of them with positive nodes usually receive an adjuvant chemotherapy. Despite early reports to the contrary, these patients tolerate cancer treatment and surgical resections as well as their younger counterparts but as a result of exclusion criteria, those receiving an adjuvant therapy are very few. This paper examines the factors pertinent to the small number of clinical trials designed for adjuvant colorectal cancer in the elderly.

Explaining black-white differences in receipt of recommended colon cancer treatment

BACKGROUND

Black-white disparities exist in receipt of recommended medical care, including colorectal cancer treatment. This retrospective cohort study examines the degree to which health systems (e.g., physician, hospital) factors explain black-white disparities in colon cancer care.

METHODS

Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program; Medicare claims; the American Medical Association Masterfile; and hospital surveys were linked to examine chemotherapy receipt after stage III colon cancer resection among 5294 elderly (> or = 66 years of age) black and white Medicare-insured patients. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with black-white differences in chemotherapy use. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Black and white patients were equally likely to consult with a medical oncologist, but among patients who had such a consultation, black patients were less likely than white patients (59.3% versus 70.4%, difference = 10.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.1% to 16.4%, P < .001) to receive chemotherapy. This black-white disparity was highest among patients aged 66-70 years (black patients 65.7%, white patients 86.3%, difference = 20.6%, 95% CI = 10.7% to 30.4%, P < .001) and decreased with age. The disparity among patients aged 66-70 years also remained statistically significant in the regression analysis. Overall, patient, physician, hospital, and environmental factors accounted for approximately 50% of the disparity in chemotherapy receipt among patients aged 66-70 years; surgical length of stay and neighborhood socioeconomic status accounted for approximately 27% of the disparity in this age group, and health systems factors accounted for 12%.

CONCLUSIONS

Black and white Medicare-insured colon cancer patients have an equal opportunity to learn about adjuvant chemotherapy from a medical oncologist but do not receive chemotherapy equally. Little disparity was explained by health systems; more was explained by illness severity, social support, and environment. Further qualitative research is needed to understand the factors that influence the lower receipt of chemotherapy by black patients.

Adjuvant therapy of colon cancer: current status and future developments

Options for the adjuvant therapy of resected stage III colon cancer have expanded beyond the previously well-accepted standard of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with leucovorin. The Xeloda in Adjuvant Colon Cancer Therapy (X-ACT) study confirmed that capecitabine (Xeloda) is at least as effective and is less toxic than a bolus 5-FU and leucovorin regimen for patients with stage III colon cancer. This study, in addition to National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) C-06, which demonstrated the equivalence of tegafur-uracil (UFT)/leucovorin with 5-FU/leucovorin, provides support for use of oral fluoropyrimidines for adjuvant therapy. Support for use of multiagent chemotherapy has been provided by the European MOSAIC study, which demonstrated a significant improvement in 3-year disease-free survival for the addition of oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) to infusional 5-FU and leucovorin (FOLFOX). Although adding irinotecan (Camptosar) to a bolus 5-FU and leucovorin regimen did not improve outcome in the adjuvant setting, the PETACC studies are evaluating the combination of infusional 5-FU, leucovorin, and irinotecan. In contrast to agreement on the appropriateness of therapy for stage III colon cancer, adjuvant therapy for patients with stage II disease remains controversial. Future advances in adjuvant therapy may include targeted therapies. Based on data demonstrating efficacy for the monoclonal antibodies bevacizumab (Avastin) and cetuximab (Erbitux) in the metastatic setting, clinical trials adding these agents to standard chemotherapy have been initiated in the adjuvant setting. Specifically, one U.S. cooperative group trial will evaluate the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy, a second will assess the addition of cetuximab, and a third trial will evaluate FOLFOX, infusional 5-FU/leucovorin (FOLFIRI), and FOLFOX followed by FOLFIRI. Finally, a study for patients with stage II disease and adverse prognostic factors will open. An important consideration in the new clinical trials is an assessment of molecular markers that either predict response or resistance to therapy or provide other prognostic information.

Trends in the management and survival of digestive tract cancers among patients aged over 80 years

BACKGROUND

Advances have occurred in the management of digestive tract cancers, but it is not known how much they have benefited the elderly.

AIMS

To determine trends in treatment, stage at diagnosis and prognosis of digestive tract cancers among patients aged > or =80 years in two well-defined French populations.

DESIGN

Time trends were studied in three age classes and in 5 four-year time intervals. A multivariate relative survival analysis was performed to estimate the independent effect of both age and period on prognosis.

RESULTS

Five-year relative survival rates were 1.9% for oesophageal cancer, 12% for stomach cancer, 41% for colon cancer and 37% for rectal cancer. The survival rates improved between the first and the fifth period for all cancer sites except for oesophageal cancer. This improvement remained significant after adjustment for age, sex, site and treatment. It was associated with an increase in the proportion of patients who underwent curative resection. Very few patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. The use of adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal and oesophageal cancers did not significantly increase over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Except for oesophageal cancers, substantial advances in the care of digestive tract cancers in the elderly have been achieved. Surgery should not be restricted on the basis of age alone. Further improvements can be made in particular to enhance adjuvant therapy whenever possible.

Cancer and ageing: a nexus at several levels

Cancer is largely a disease of older people. With the relatively recent expansive growth within the geriatric population, a number of pressing biological and clinical questions that currently remain unanswered need to be addressed. These include what effect age itself has on the development or growth of cancer, and what are the benefits and risks of cancer prevention and treatment for the older person? New insights into the underlying biological processes of ageing provide a frame of reference for addressing these and other related questions.

Is advanced age associated with increased incidence and severity of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy?

PURPOSE

The current setting tested the hypothesis that advanced age would be strongly associated with increased incidence and severity of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively studied 35 cancer patients treated with paclitaxel or cisplatin-based regimens for lung or breast cancer. All patients underwent a detailed clinical and electrophysiological evaluation for screening of CIPN at baseline, at the third, the sixth course of chemotherapy and up to 3 months after its cessation. Means of a modified Peripheral Neuropathy (PNP) score summarized the results of the clinical and electrophysiological study.

RESULTS

Patients were divided according to their age in two groups (mean age difference, p=0.000) to those younger than 65 years (group I, n=18) and those older or equal than 65 years (group II, n=17). According to the clinical, neurological and electrophysiological variables of each patient, the incidence and severity of CIPN was determined and then compared between groups. The incidence of neurotoxicity was similar (p=0.869) between group I (9/18 patients, 50%) and group II (8/17 patients, 52.9%). Likewise, according to the mean PNP scores, the severity of CIPN was similar between age groups (p=0.897). The between-age-groups comparison of electrophysiological data revealed no significant differences in any of the motor or sensory conduction parameters examined.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that elderly cancer patients do not have greater risk of CIPN, whilst advanced age was not associated with worst severity of CIPN.

Capecitabine/Oxaliplatin, a Safe and Active First-Line Regimen for Older Patients Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Post Hoc Analysis of a Large Phase II Study

PURPOSE

The tumor-activated fluoropyrimidine capecitabine achieves response rates superior to those of bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), with favorable safety and fewer hospitalizations. Capecitabine is also at least as effective as bolus 5-FU/LV in the adjuvant setting, again with a favorable safety profile. Improved outcomes with capecitabine versus bolus 5-FU/LV in the adjuvant setting have been shown in overall trial populations and in patients aged >or= 70 years. Capecitabine/oxaliplatin (XelOx) is a safe and active combination for the first-line treatment of metastatic CRC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This post hoc analysis of a large phase II trial compared data from older and younger patients treated with first-line XelOx: oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1 followed by oral capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily for 14 days every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

The median age of the overall population (N = 96) was 64 years (range, 34-79 years), including 52 younger patients (< 65 years of age) and 44 older patients (>or= 65 years of age). Both age groups received a median of 8 cycles (range, 1-26 cycles) of XelOx. The XelOx regimen had similar high activity in both groups, with response rates of 58% (95% CI, 43%-71%) and 52% (95% CI, 37%-68%) in younger and older patients, respectively. In addition, time to disease progression and overall survival were similar in both groups (P > 0.5 for both outcomes). The XelOx regimen also had a favorable safety profile, with no clinically relevant differences between older and younger patients. The overall incidence of adverse events (including grade 3/4), dose reductions, and withdrawals because of adverse events were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

In the context of an aging population, XelOx provides a highly effective and tolerable first-line treatment for patients with metastatic CRC.

Laparoscopic surgery in the old patient: do indications and outcomes differ?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In view of the increasing numbers of old and very old people in the general population, we evaluated the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery for differences between younger and older patients.

METHODS

A total of 4,823 patients with complete data sets from a prospective, clinical observational multicentre study initiated by the "Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group" were analysed for this investigation.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 909 (18.8%) were older and 3,914 (81.2%) younger than 75 years. In the older patient group, malignant disease was a significantly more common indication for surgery. As was expected, the rate of general complications (pneumonia, cardiopulmonary problems, urinary tract infection) was significantly higher in the older patient group with its greater prevalence of preoperative comorbidity, but there no differences in terms of intraoperative or postoperative surgical complications or conversion rate between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The higher rate of postoperative complications resulting from preoperative comorbidity in the older patients makes it necessary that the indication for surgery be established with care. In view of the advantages of the laparoscopic approach with regard to the postoperative course, the preferential use of laparoscopy for the treatment of colorectal problems requiring surgery in older patients should receive serious consideration.

Outcome of colorectal carcinoma in patients under 40 years of age

AIMS

Colorectal carcinoma in patients under 40 years of age usually has a poor prognosis. Controversies still exist regarding the features and the prognosis of colorectal cancer in young patients.

METHODS

The records of 45 patients with histologically confirmed colorectal carcinoma treated between 1992 and 2002 at the Division of Oncology at Taipei Veterans General Hospital were reviewed. The relevance of sex, duration of symptoms, tumor site, histological type, lymph node involvement, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels at the diagnosis and tumor stage to overall survival (OS) were determined by univariate analysis, and their independent significance were tested by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Most patients presented with an advanced tumor stage (24% Dukes' C and 66% Dukes' D). Colon carcinoma constituted 76% of the colorectal tumors. Family history was present in two patients and did not affect the OS. Two patients were found to have colon carcinoma during pregnancy. The 5-year survival rate in patients with Stage B, C, and D were 25, 16 and 0%, respectively. With aggressive treatment, patients with early stage carcinoma achieved longer survival. Eleven patients received resection of metastatic carcinoma of the liver, lung and ovary. Adjuvant chemotherapy with irinotecan/5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy seemed to improve the OS in such patients, though the OS was still poorer than in patients with early stage tumors. In univariate analysis, KPS (P = 0.0001), lymph node involvement (P = 0.0024), CEA (P = 0.0423) and LDH levels (P = 0.0126) at the diagnosis and tumor stage (P = 0.0122) proved to be significant predictors of overall survival. Multivariate analyses revealed that KPS > or =70% (P = 0.007) and normal LDH levels at diagnosis (P = 0.004) were predictive of overall survival in this population.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study shows that performance status and preoperative LDH levels were the major determinants for survival in patients with colorectal carcinoma under 40 years of age and the present series also suggests that surgical resection of metastatic colorectal carcinoma followed by adjuvant chemotherapy might be beneficial in certain patients. The data also suggests that current treatment modalities for young patients with advanced colorectal cancer might not be effective and more effective therapeutic regimens might be needed. Thus, it is important for surgeons to recognize the potential for colorectal cancer in young patients and to take an aggressive approach to the diagnosis and early treatment of the disease.

Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Elderly

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 20% of lung carcinomas. Chemotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment for SCLC. In limited disease, the median survival time is about 12-16 months, with a 4%-5% long-term survival rate; in extensive disease the median survival time is 7-11 months. More than 50% of lung cancer patients are diagnosed when they are over the age of 65, and about 30% are over 70. Elderly patients tolerate chemotherapy poorly compared with their younger counterparts, because of age-related progressive reductions in organ function and comorbidities. The standard therapy for limited disease is combined chemoradiotherapy, followed by prophylactic brain irradiation for patients achieving complete responses. In the elderly, the addition of radiotherapy to chemotherapy must be carefully evaluated, considering the slight survival benefit and potential for substantial toxicity incurred with this treatment. The best approach is to design clinical trials that specifically include geriatric assessment to develop active and well-tolerated chemotherapy regimens for elderly SCLC patients. Survival improvement for SCLC patients requires a better understanding of tumor biology and the subsequent development of novel therapeutic strategies. Several targeted agents have been introduced into clinical trials in SCLC, but a minority of these new agents offers a promise of improved outcomes, and negative results are reported more commonly than positive ones. This review focuses on the main issues in the treatment of elderly SCLC patients.

Adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent causes of cancer deaths. Survival for locoregional colorectal cancer is about 70% overall and 30-60% in stage III patients. Several randomized trials have shown that adjuvant chemotherapy can increase this survival rate. 5-Fluorouracil-based chemotherapy is strongly recommended in this context. There are still some questions about the setting in which patients should be treated as well as the optimal treatment. New data for different schedules and combinations are now available. Physicians have to choose between the different options now available to offer the best treatment to their patients. This Review analyses the current options for adjuvant therapy in colon and rectal cancer.

Modulation of irinotecan with cyclosporine: a phase II trial in advanced colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Despite the extensive clinical experience with irinotecan, significant concerns remain regarding its toxicity. In a phase I trial, we modulated irinotecan pharmacokinetics by inhibiting biliary excretion of SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, using cyclosporine. The modulation appeared to decrease the gastrointestinal toxicity of irinotecan and suggested that irinotecan activity might also be retained. Hence, we conducted this phase II trial in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) to further evaluate the toxicity and activity of irinotecan modulated with cyclosporine.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixteen patients with 5-fluorouracil refractory CRC were treated. Cyclosporine (5 mg/kg) was administered as a 6-h infusion and irinotecan (60 mg/m2/day, 90-min infusion) was started 3 h after initiation of the Cyclosporine. Both agents were given weekly for 4 weeks, every 6 weeks. Responses were assessed every 12 weeks, and toxicity was monitored weekly.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were evaluable for toxicity and 11 for response. There was 1 partial response (6%). Five patients had SD lasting a median of 12 weeks. Grade 3/4 diarrhea was observed in only 13% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacokinetic modulation of irinotecan using parenteral cyclosporine appears to decrease the incidence of diarrhea in CRC patients. Given the modest activity of irinotecan monotherapy, a larger study would be required to assess if the modulation improves the toxicity without compromising this activity. The available clinical data suggest that pharmacokinetic modulation of irinotecan should be evaluated further to define its optimal clinical utility.

Irinotecan combined with docetaxel in pre-treated metastatic breast cancer patients: a phase II study

PURPOSE

This is a phase II study where a novel chemotherapy combination was tested in pre-treated breast cancer patients: docetaxel and irinotecan have already been established as agents for breast and colorectal cancer, respectively.

METHODS

Forty-eight (median age 54 years, range 26-77 year) patients, all evaluable, were enrolled. All patients had been pre-treated with anthracycline-combined chemotherapy, 30 of whom were also treated with paclitaxel and 2 with docetaxel. World Health Organization (WHO) performance status was 0-2. The dominant metastasis was in the liver (54.17%), in the lungs (27.08%), in soft tissues (12.50%) and in the skeleton (6.25%). Treatment involved irinotecan infusion 200 mg/m(2) for 90 min and docetaxel infusion 80 mg/m(2) for 90 min, repeated once every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Twenty-five (52.08%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 37.95-66.21) patients showed responses: 3 complete (6.25%, 95% CI 0-13.05) and 22 (45.83%, 95% CI 31.74-59.92) partial; the most responsive metastases were observed at the liver site (53.85%). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was observed in 18 patients (37.50%); 14 (29.17%) patients developed anaemia and three (6.25%), thrombocytopenia. Concerning non-haematologic toxicity, alopecia and fatigue were common; grade 3 diarrhea was observed in only one (2.08%) patient.

CONCLUSION

The irinotecan-docetaxel combination produces quite a high response rate in pre-treated advanced breast cancer patients.

Adjuvant treatment for elderly patients with stage III colon cancer in the southern Netherlands is affected by socioeconomic status, gender, and comorbidity

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy significantly decreases mortality among patients with stage III colon cancer, but is less prescribed with rising age. We were interested in the pattern of adjuvant treatment and possible effects on survival among elderly patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All resected patients aged 65-79 with stage III colon carcinoma, diagnosed between 1995 and 2001 in the Comprehensive Cancer Centre South registry area in the Netherlands were included (n=577). We examined determinants of receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy and their relation to survival.

RESULTS

The proportion of elderly patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy increased from 19% in 1995 to 50% in 2001, but a large inter-hospital variation remained. In a multivariable analysis, females [odds ratio (OR) 0.5, P=0.006], patients with comorbidity [OR 0.5, P=0.005], and patients with a low socioeconomic status [OR 0.5, P=0.02] received less adjuvant therapy. Between 1995 and 2001 survival of elderly patients improved (hazard ratio 0.8, P=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Although an increasing proportion of elderly patients with colon cancer are treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, many elderly patients still do not receive this treatment. As expected, receipt of adjuvant treatment decreased in the presence of comorbidity, but the clinical rationale for undertreatment of women and patients with low socioeconomic status is not clear.