Memantine treatment in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer disease already receiving donepezil: a randomized controlled trial

[Treatment of Alzheimer's disease: recommendations and suggestions of the Scientific Department of Cognitive Neurology and Aging of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology]

The present recommendations and suggestions on "Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease" were elaborated by a work group constituted by participants of the IV Meeting of Researchers on Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders, sponsored by the Scientific Department of Cognitive Neurology and Aging of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. They comprise topics on pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of cognitive impairment and functional decline, as well as of behavioral and psychological symptoms of this dementing disease. Several levels of evidence and of recommendations and suggestions are used for the various proposed drugs, as well as for non-pharmacological treatment, underpinned by a wide national and international bibliographical review.

Statin therapy in the treatment of Alzheimer disease: what is the rationale?

Alzheimer disease (AD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disorder that is manifested by cognitive decline, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and diffuse structural abnormalities in the brain. Its prevalence is predicted to rise 4-fold in the next 50 years. AD is characterized pathologically by deposition of extracellular beta-amyloid and accumulation of neurofibrillary tangles. Neuronal death and specific neurotransmitter deficits also are part of the pathologic picture. Strategies to delay symptom progression have focused on addressing the neurotransmitter deficits. Strategies to delay the onset or biologic progression of AD largely have targeted the plaques formed by the deposition of beta-amyloid. AD and cardiovascular disease share common risk factors, notably hypercholesterolemia, and occur together more often than expected by chance. Therapy with the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) is the first-line treatment option for hypercholesterolemia, and observational studies have suggested that the risk of AD is reduced in patients who receive statin therapy in midlife. This reduction in risk of AD observed with statin therapy may be due to statins reducing beta-amyloid formation and deposition or to their known anti-inflammatory effects. Two randomized double-blind statin trials in patients with AD to assess the potential for statins to slow disease progression are currently under way. If successful, statin AD primary prevention trials may be developed.

Assessing early to late stage dementia: the TSI and BANS-S scales in the nursing-home

BACKGROUND

The traditional assessment tools for dementia, such as the MMSE, have only limited ability to follow subjects with severe dementia because they show a floor effect. Specific observational and performance-based instruments were recently developed.

OBJECTIVES

To directly compare an observational scale to a performance-based instrument in moderate to severe dementia.

METHODS

We compared a slightly modified version of the performance-based Test for Severe Impairment (mTSI) to the observer-based Bedford Alzheimer Nursing Severity Scale (BANS-S). Both scales were administered, together with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR), to a nursing-home sample of 130 women suffering from different types of dementia (CDR range:1-4; MMSE range:0-18), defined according to DSM-IV criteria. Mean age was 86.9 +/- 7.3 years and mean education was 2.7 +/- 1.1 years.

RESULTS

The BANS-S could be applied to all patients, the mTSI to 87 subjects (66.9%). Mean mTSI score decreased progressively from CDR stage 2 to CDR stage 4, whereas no difference was detectable between CDR stages 1 and 2. By contrast, the BANS-S was not significantly different for CDR stages 1 to 3, and the mean BANS-S score worsened only in CDR stage 4. Results were similar for AD and non AD dementia. Both scales were independent from age and education and their test-retest and inter-rater reliabilities were satisfactory.

CONCLUSION

The mTSI looks promising in the moderate-to-severe range, whereas the BANS-S seems more useful in the very late stage of dementia. However, neither scale was optimal and additional instruments should be tested in future studies.

Translational research on the way to effective therapy for Alzheimer disease

CONTEXT

Alzheimer disease (AD) is a major public health issue with a prediction of 12 million Americans being affected by 2025 from the present 4 million. Molecular and genetic findings have provided significant insights into the roles that amyloid, tau, and apolipoprotein E isoforms have in the causation of AD. A central issue in AD pathogenesis is the amyloid cascade hypothesis. It states that abnormal amyloid processing and accumulation is the primary causative factor of AD and other associated neuropathologic abnormalities are of secondary consequence. It is presented to provide the rationale for novel drug and vaccination therapeutic strategies. Future research directed at prediction and prevention of AD through a genomic and proteomic analysis with identification of multiple polymorphic genes that interact, resulting in increased risk for late-onset AD, are the realistic and ultimate goals. A new approach for drug development is required, one that will emphasize a genomic and proteomic analysis to identify at-risk gene sets whose genetic expression is sufficient to cause late onset, sporadic AD. Prediction and prevention of disease prior to clinical signs and symptoms are the goals.

OBJECTIVE

A review and analysis from electronic literature databases and subsequent reference searches of the molecular genetic data. including pertinent genetic mutations and abnormal biochemical findings causal of AD, are cited. The amyloid cascade hypothesis, the contributions of apolipoprotein E, and hyperphosphorylated tau are discussed as to their roles in pathogenesis. Molecular targets for potential drug and vaccination therapies are cited from a critical assessment of the molecular and biomedical data. These data form the basis for rational, target-specific drug and vaccination therapies currently employed and planned for the near future. Phase 2 and 3 clinical trial results of drug and vaccination therapies are cited.

CONCLUSIONS

A new approach is needed as current pharmacologic therapy directed at symptomatic relief has proved to be marginally effective. The genomic and proteomic basis of AD will be defined in the near future, and corresponding molecular therapeutic targets will be identified. Genomic neurology has arrived and its application to resolving AD is our best hope.

Rationalizing therapeutic approaches in Alzheimer's disease

Deficits in cholinergic and glutamatergic neurotransmission have been linked to the symptomatology of Alzheimer's disease, and current therapies for Alzheimer's, including cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) and the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist memantine, have been developed to compensate for these deficits. This article reviews the results of clinical trials involving agents approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for use in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (namely, ChEIs for mild to moderate Alzheimer's and memantine for moderate to severe Alzheimer's). In particular, the efficacy of current monotherapy strategies in the treatment of cognitive and functional symptoms of Alzheimer's disease will be addressed. In addition, data from a clinical trial examining the use of a ChEI in combination with memantine will also be discussed, as it has been hypothesized that ChEIs and memantine may offer synergistic benefits due to their distinct mechanisms of action.

Behavioural changes and psychological symptoms in dementia disorders

The traditional view of dementia is that the features most important to accurate diagnosis and management are cognitive decline and functional disability. Behavioural and psychological symptoms have generally been thought to be of secondary importance, but new evidence suggests that these are important determinants of patients' distress, carer burden, and outcome in dementia; they can also be valuable diagnostic pointers to the underlying pathological cause and disease diagnosis. Better methods to detect and measure the severity of behavioural and psychological symptoms are needed and these could be used in well-designed intervention trials. Although pharmacological management is a commonly used option, it is often limited in its effects and can be associated with a substantial risk of side-effects. Progress in understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning behavioural and psychological symptoms in dementia will assist in developing more effective treatment approaches.

Memantine prolongs survival in an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mouse model

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease which results from selective loss of upper and lower motor neurons. Mouse models of ALS, such as one carrying the G93A mutant of the human Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase gene[SOD1(G93A)], develop motor neuron pathology and clinical symptoms similar to those observed in ALS patients. There is compelling evidence that both direct and indirect glutamate toxicity contribute to the pathogenesis of motor neuron degeneration. However, the therapeutic effect of various glutamate receptor antagonists has not been clearly demonstrated. Memantine is a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist. It has been shown to protect neurons against NMDA- or glutamate-induced toxicity in vitro and in animal models of neurodegenerative diseases. In the current study, we have examined the therapeutic efficacy of memantine in an ALS mouse model carrying a high copy number of SOD1(G93A). Memantine treatment significantly delayed the disease progression and increased the life span of SOD1(G93A) mice, from 121.4 +/- 5.5 to 129.7 +/- 4.5 days (P = 0.032). Furthermore, NMDA receptor subunits were reliably detected in the spinal cord of SOD1(G93A) mice and their expression levels were similar to those in the wild-type littermate control. Therefore, the neuroprotective effect of memantine in SOD1(G93A) mice is most probably due to the inhibition of spinal cord NMDA receptors. In view of the long-term usage of memantine for dementia patients, with excellent tolerance and safety, these data suggest that memantine may be used in ALS patients alone or in combination with other therapies to prolong survival.

Treating patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease: implications of recent pharmacologic studies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

As the prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) continues to rise, physicians will be challenged to manage increasing numbers of patients with moderate to severe AD. Despite the need for active treatment and management, the growing AD population has been overlooked in the primary care setting. Currently, the approved treatments for AD are the cholinesterase inhibitors donepezil, riva-stigmine, and galantamine and the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist memantine. The objective of this article is to review recent pharmacologic studies and discuss implications for treatment of moderate to severe AD.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION

A PubMed search was performed for publications from 1995 to 2004 using the search terms moderate or severe, efficacy, and Alzheimer. The search was limited to randomized, controlled trials published in English. The search was further restricted to prospective studies of pharmacologic agents that included patients with severe dementia (Mini-Mental State Examination score < 10). A total of 96 citations were retrieved. Of these, 5 met the inclusion criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in patients with moderate to severe AD have been conducted for donepezil and memantine. Patients treated with donepezil monotherapy showed improved cognition, stabilized function, and improved behavioral symptoms. Patients treated with memantine monotherapy showed less than expected decline in cognition, function, and behavioral symptoms. Patients who received memantine treatment adjunctive to stable, long-term donepezil treatment derived cognitive, functional, and behavioral benefits from add-on therapy.

CONCLUSION

Overall, published studies of donepezil and memantine report treatment benefits.

Safety, tolerability, and changes in amyloid beta concentrations after administration of a gamma-secretase inhibitor in volunteers

Amyloid beta (Abeta) may play a central role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease. A functional gamma-secretase inhibitor, LY450139, was developed that inhibits Abeta formation in whole cell assays, transgenic mice, and beagle dogs. The authors wished to determine the safety and tolerability of this drug, and the reduction of Abeta in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) after multiple doses. Volunteer subjects (N = 37) were studied using doses from 5 to 50 mg/day given for 14 days. Plasma and CSF concentrations of LY450139, Abeta(1-40) and Abeta(1-X) ("Abeta(total)") were determined, and safety and tolerability were assessed. The plasma half-life of LY450139 was approximately 2.5 hours. Pharmacokinetic analyses showed a linear relationship between dose and plasma concentrations, with a Cmax of 828 +/- 19.2 ng/mL after a 50-mg dose. Plasma Abeta concentrations decreased in a dose-dependent manner over a 6-hour interval following drug administration, with a maximum decrease of approximately 40% relative to baseline. After returning to baseline, Abeta concentrations were transiently increased. CSF Abeta concentrations were unchanged. Adverse events reported by subjects taking 5-mg, 20-mg, or 40-mg doses were similar to those reported by subjects taking placebo. Two of 7 subjects taking 50 mg/day experienced adverse events that may have been drug related. In this phase 1 volunteer study, reported adverse events after taking LY450139 were manageable. A dose-dependent reduction in plasma Abeta was demonstrated, and changes in plasma Abeta concentrations were temporally related to the pharmacokinetic characteristics of LY450139.

Experimental and potential future therapeutic approaches for HIV-1 associated dementia targeting receptors for chemokines, glutamate and erythropoietin

Severe and debilitating neurological problems that include behavioral abnormalities, motor dysfunction and frank dementia can occur after infection with the human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1). Infected peripheral immune-competent cells, in particular macrophages, infiltrate the central nervous system (CNS) and provoke a neuropathological response involving all cell types in the brain. HIV-1 infection results in activation of chemokine receptors, inflammatory mediators, extracellular matrix-degrading enzymes and glutamate receptor-mediated excitotoxicity, all of which can trigger numerous downstream signaling pathways that result in disruption of neuronal and glial function. Despite many major improvements in the control of viral infection in the periphery, a truly effective therapy for HIV-1 associated dementia is currently not available. This review will discuss experimental and potentially future therapeutic strategies based on recently uncovered pathologic mechanisms contributing to neuronal damage induced by HIV-1.

Beyond monoamines: glutamatergic function in mood disorders

The monoamine theory has implicated abnormalities in serotonin and norepinephrine in the pathophysiology of major depression and bipolar illness and contributed greatly to our understanding of mood disorders and their treatment. Nevertheless, some limitations of this model still exist that require researchers and clinicians to seek further explanation and develop novel interventions that reach beyond the confines of the monoaminergic systems. Recent studies have provided strong evidence that glutamate and other amino acid neurotransmitters are involved in the pathophysiology and treatment of mood disorders. Studies employing in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy have revealed altered cortical glutamate levels in depressed subjects. Consistent with a model of excessive glutamate-induced excitation in mood disorders, several antiglutamatergic agents, such as riluzole and lamotrigine, have demonstrated potential antidepressant efficacy. Glial cell abnormalities commonly associated with mood disorders may at least partly account for the impairment in glutamate action since glial cells play a primary role in synaptic glutamate removal. A hypothetical model of altered glutamatergic function in mood disorders is proposed in conjunction with potential antidepressant mechanisms of antiglutamatergic agents. Further studies elucidating the role of the glutamatergic system in the pathophysiology of mood and anxiety disorders and studies exploring the efficacy and mechanism of action of antiglutamatergic agents in these disorders, are likely to provide new targets for the development of novel antidepressant agents.

The AIDS dementia complex: clinical and basic neuroscience with implications for novel molecular therapies

The AIDS dementia complex (ADC, also referred to as HIV-associated cognitive impairment) is a common disorder among HIV-infected patients associated with both inflammatory and neurodegenerative processes. This review describes recent advances in the clinical and basic neurosciences of HIV infection and discusses the multivariable nature of what has become a chronic disorder in the context of highly active antiretroviral therapies (HAART). Since its initial description twenty years ago, advances in cell and molecular biology along with those in neuroimaging have furthered our understanding of the underlying pathogenic mechanisms. The clinical and neuropsychological profile of ADC is generally consistent with a "frontal-subcortical" pattern of injury. Neuropathogenesis is largely driven by indirect mechanisms mediated by infected, or more commonly, immune activated macrophages, which secrete viral and host-derived factors. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) provides a robust in vivo method to measure the inflammatory and neurotoxic events triggered by these factors and their associated signals. Although the use of combined or highly active antiretroviral therapies (HAART) has significantly improved survival rates, cerebral injury and cognitive impairment remain common events. Factors such as aging and chronic infection will likely impact the course of this disease, its pathogenesis, and treatment. The combined observations presented in this review suggest a number of critical areas for future inquiry.

Donepezil: a review

Donepezil is a selective acetylcholinesterase inhibitor that is widely prescribed for Alzheimer's disease (AD). It has been shown to be of benefit in mild, moderate and severe stages of AD, vascular dementia and dementia associated with Parkinson's disease. Donepezil is absorbed slowly, but completely, from the gut, reaching peak plasma levels in 3-4 h and, with daily dosing, steady-state concentration in 15-21 days. Within a relatively narrow range, there is a linear relationship between dose and pharmacodynamic effects, measured as red blood cell acetylcholinesterase inhibition and clinical efficacy. Donepezil is principally excreted unchanged in the urine, but there is also hepatic metabolism; some of its metabolites may be active. Despite being 96% bound to plasma proteins, it has few interactions with other drugs, and the 5-mg dose can be given safely to patients with mild-to-moderate hepatic and renal -disease. Side effects, which are mainly a consequence of its cholinomimetic mechanism of action, are usually mild and transient. Although donepezil was originally developed to inhibit the breakdown of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine as symptomatic therapy for AD, recent studies raise the possibility of other effects this drug has on the pathogenesis of AD.

Pharmacology of Alzheimer's disease: appraisal and prospects

Ten years after the introduction of the first drug, tacrine, in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, it seems appropriate to re-appraise the pharmacological processes of innovation in the research field of dementia. The aim of this review is to pinpoint concrete improvements achieved in this field, regarding experimental methods and clinical evaluation of the compounds, as well as the neurochemistry of the disease and cellular targets to consider in priority. This review deals with this objective in three parts: (1) assessment of current therapeutics, (2) discussion of the experimental models and clinical practices and (3) prospective drugs of the future. The implementation of considered strategies will require the involvement and close cooperation between political decisions, pharmaceutical companies and the scientific community.

Attitudes towards the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease among carers and non-carers

This article provides some preliminary data on preferences among non-carer older adults regarding disclosure of Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis, and compares these preferences to those of carers of people with AD (AD carers). Reasons underlying disclosure preference among carers and non-AD carers are investigated. The authors then explore the level of AD knowledge among carer and non-carer samples and investigate its relationship with disclosure preferences.

Participants were 20 elderly adults (aged 60–88 years) who were not caring for a relative with AD and 16 older adults (aged 51–79 years) who were caring for a relative with AD and who had attended a carer education programme. Participants completed a modified AD knowledge test and a test designed to measure the reasons for and against disclosure of an AD diagnosis.

AD knowledge among AD carers was significantly higher than that among non-carers. Views about disclosure of AD diagnoses did not differ between groups and generally, opinions were for disclosure. No significant differences were found when preferences for disclosure for oneself vs a significant other were compared. Similar reasons for disclosure were given by carers and non-carers, and included factors such as the person's right to know his or her diagnosis.

Nanoparticle and other metal chelation therapeutics in Alzheimer disease

Current therapies for Alzheimer disease (AD) such as the anticholinesterase inhibitors and the latest NMDA receptor inhibitor, Namenda, provide moderate symptomatic delay at various stages of disease, but do not arrest disease progression or supply meaningful remission. As such, new approaches to disease management are urgently needed. Although the etiology of AD is largely unknown, oxidative damage mediated by metals is likely a significant contributor since metals such as iron, aluminum, zinc, and copper are dysregulated and/or increased in AD brain tissue and create a pro-oxidative environment. This role of metal ion-induced free radical formation in AD makes chelation therapy an attractive means of dampening the oxidative stress burden in neurons. The chelator desferioxamine, FDA approved for iron overload, has shown some benefit in AD, but like many chelators, it has a host of adverse effects and substantial obstacles for tissue-specific targeting. Other chelators are under development and have shown various strengths and weaknesses. In this review, we propose a novel system of chelation therapy through the use of nanoparticles. Nanoparticles conjugated to chelators show a unique ability to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), chelate metals, and exit through the BBB with their corresponding complexed metal ions. This method may prove to be a safe and effective means of reducing the metal load in neural tissue thus staving off the harmful effects of oxidative damage and its sequelae.

Pharmacological implications of two distinct mechanisms of interaction of memantine with N-methyl-D-aspartate-gated channels

Unlike other N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonists, clinical trials have shown that memantine is clinically tolerated and effective in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. The mechanism for memantine tolerability, however, remains contentious but may be partly explained by its uncompetitive antagonism. The specific site of memantine block in the NMDAR channel interacts with magnesium and is assumed to be at or near a narrow constriction representing the channel selectivity filter. A second, very low-affinity site of memantine action has also been reported. Here, using mutational analysis and substituted cysteine accessibility methods on recombinant NR1/NR2A NMDARs expressed in Xenopus oocytes, we precisely localize both the specific and second memantine-blocking sites. Intriguingly, memantine interacts with its specific blocking site in the same fashion as intracellular rather than extracellular Mg(2+). Thus, the N-site asparagine (N) in the M2 region of the NR1 subunit represents the dominant site for uncompetitive antagonism by memantine. The N and N + 1 site asparagines in NR2A produce strong electrostatic interactions with memantine. In contrast, the second (superficial) memantine-blocking site, located at the extracellular vestibule of the channel, appears to be nonspecific and overlaps the site occupied by the nonspecific pore blocker hexamethonium. Residues in the post-M3 segment of the NR1 subunit are not directly involved in memantine binding. The distinct patterns of interaction and the relative degree of affinity of memantine for these two binding sites contribute to the drug's excellent pharmacological profile of clinical tolerability. In the future, these parameters should be considered in searching for improved neuroprotective agents in this class.

Alzheimer's disease and the 'ABSENT' hypothesis: mechanism for amyloid beta endothelial and neuronal toxicity

Alzheimer's disease [AD] is the most common cause of dementia among people age 65 and older. One of the biggest stumbling blocks in developing effective drug therapy for Alzheimer's disease has been the lack of a comprehensive hypothesis that explains the mechanism behind all of the histopathological changes seen in patients suffering from Alzheimer's disease. An overview of the currently popular 'amyloid' and 'vascular' hypotheses for AD demonstrates that neither hypothesis by itself can explain all the known histopathological and biochemical lesions seen in Alzheimer's disease. The paper presents a hypothesis that tries to explain the mechanism behind almost all the histopathological changes, and varying clinical manifestations seen in both diagnosed AD and Vascular Dementia [VaD]. The new hypothesis is based on the known dual toxicity of beta amyloid to both vascular and neuronal tissues, their synergy and the resultant net effect on the onset and progression of AD. The new hypothesis therefore will be known as the Amyloid Beta Synergistic Endothelial and Neuronal Toxicity [ABSENT] hypothesis. The ABSENT hypothesis will try to show the common chemical mechanism behind almost all of the pathological changes seen in AD. According to the ABSENT hypothesis, beta amyloid itself generates all the free radicals that cause both vascular dysfunction and the neuronal damage seen in AD. The chemical mechanism proposed is based on evidence from physical chemistry experiments, calculations as well as in vitro/in vivo experiments. The ABSENT hypothesis does not favor one mode of beta amyloid-induced brain damage over the other, rather it considers the net effects of the neuronal stress/damage caused by both the cerebrovascular dysfunction and direct neurotoxicity caused by beta amyloid. The hypothesis states that each patient has a different balance of predisposing factors that modulate the extent of neurotoxicity and cerebrovascular dysfunction caused by beta amyloid and thereby explains the wide range and mixed nature of damage and dysfunction seen in the studies done on patients diagnosed with AD, VaD or 'mixed dementias'. According to the hypothesis, beta amyloid peptides are necessary if not sufficient to cause AD, VaD and mixed senile dementias. The hypothesis, therefore, proposes the term Beta Amyloid Dementias [BAD] to describe the conditions currently covered by the diagnoses of 'AD', 'VaD' and 'Mixed [senile] Dementias'. Finally, the ABSENT hypothesis tries to put forth a direct chemical mechanism behind the apparent synergy and increased association between old age, pre- and coexisting vascular disease, diabetes and AD.

Multi-functional drugs for various CNS targets in the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders

Individuals with neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's disease or Alzheimer's disease are benefiting from drugs developed to act on a single molecular target. However, current pharmacological approaches are limited in their ability to modify significantly the course of the disease, and offer incomplete and transient benefit to patients. New therapeutic strategies comprise drug candidates designed specifically to act on multiple neural and biochemical targets for the treatment of cognition impairment, motor dysfunction, depression and neurodegeneration. Examples include the development of single molecular entities that combine two or more of the following properties: (i) cholinesterase inhibition; (ii) activation or inhibition of specific subtypes of acetylcholine receptors or alpha-adrenoceptors; (iii) anti-inflammatory activity; (iv) monoamine oxidase inhibition; (v) catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibition; (vi) nitric oxide production; (vii) neuroprotection; (viii) anti-apoptotic activity; and (ix) activation of mitochondrial-dependent cell-survival genes and proteins. These bi- or multi-functional compounds might provide greater symptomatic efficacy, and better utility as potential neuroprotective disease-modifying drugs.

Antipsychotic dose-sparing effect with addition of memantine

OBJECTIVE

To describe a case of an antipsychotic-sparing effect achieved after the addition of memantine to the regimen of a patient with severe Alzheimer's disease and aggressive behavioral disturbances.

CASE SUMMARY

A 78-year-old white man with severe Alzheimer's disease was receiving risperidone 2 mg 3 times daily for persistent aggressive and dangerous behavioral disturbances. Memantine was initiated, and the dose was titrated to 10 mg twice daily. The patient's response included improvement in functional status and resolution of problematic behaviors, allowing repeated reduction of the risperidone dose and ultimate discontinuation.

DISCUSSION

Antipsychotics are often employed to treat behavioral disturbances for patients with Alzheimer's disease; however, the adverse effect potential of these agents remains a significant concern. Adjunctive medications that maintain or improve behavioral symptoms yet allow an antipsychotic-sparing effect are attractive. Such experiences have previously been described with other drug classes, but clinical experience is evolving with memantine. For this patient, the effect of this agent on behavioral symptoms and risperidone requirements is one example of such an antipsychotic-sparing effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Response to memantine therapy may include behavioral improvements allowing a dose-sparing effect of antipsychotic medication. Changes in psychoactive drug burden may be a valuable surrogate marker of memantine's effects on behavior.

Donepezil in the treatment of dementia

Donepezil is an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor used to treat Alzheimer's disease. It has been shown to be effective in the treatment of cognitive symptoms, functional impairment and behavioral problems at mild, moderate and severe stages of the disease. Donepezil treatment results in modest short-term (6- to 9-month) improvement in some measures and attenuates the downward course of the disease for 1–3 years. Donepezil reaches peak plasma levels 3–4 h after ingestion and, with daily dosing, steady-state concentration in 14–21 days. The elimination half-life is approximately 70 h, and it is principally excreted unchanged in the urine. There is a linear relationship between plasma level and both red blood cell acetylcholinesterase inhibition and certain cognitive outcome measures. Donepezil is generally safe and well tolerated and, because of its dosing schedule, convenient to prescribe. Ongoing studies are examining the use of donepezil in combination with other drugs for Alzheimer's disease and for other conditions involving cognitive dysfunction.

Memantine for dementia

BACKGROUND

Memantine, a low affinity antagonist to glutamate NMDA receptors, may prevent excitatory neurotoxicity in dementia.

OBJECTIVES

To determine efficacy and safety of memantine for people with Alzheimer's disease (AD), vascular (VD) and mixed dementia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group was searched on 20 May 2005. This register contains references from all major healthcare databases and many ongoing trial databases and is updated regularly. In addition the search engines Copernic and Google were used to identify unpublished trials through inspection of the websites of licensing bodies like the FDA , EMEA and NICE and of companies' websites (Lundbeck, Merz, Forest, Suntori etc) and clinical trials registries.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, randomized trials of memantine in people with dementia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were pooled where possible. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and observed case (OC) analyses are reported.

MAIN RESULTS

1. Moderate to severe AD. Two out of three six month studies show a small beneficial effect of memantine. Pooled data indicate a beneficial effect at six months on cognition (4.12 points on the 100 point SIB , 95% CI 2.14 to 5.74, P < 0.00001), activities of daily living (1.27 points on the 54 point ADCS-ADLsev, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.09, P = 0.003) and behaviour (2.76 points on the 144 NPI, 95% CI 0.88 to 4.63, P = 0.004), supported by clinical impression of change (0.28 points on the 7 point CIBIC+, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.41, P < 0.0001).2. Mild to moderate AD. In a single six month trial, memantine had a beneficial effect on ITT analysis of cognition, (1.9 ADAS-Cog points, 95% CI 0.35 to 3.45, P = 0.02) and behaviour (3.50 NPI points 95% CI 0.15 to 6.85, P = 0.04) supported by clinical global impression of change (0.30 CIBIC+ points, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.51, P = 0.005), but no effect on activities of daily living or OC analysis of cognition. The statistical significance of these benefits could be overturned by data from two unpublished studies which are known to show no significant effect. 3. Mild to moderate vascular dementia. In two six month studies, memantine improved cognition (1.85 ADAS-Cog points, 95% CI 0.88 to 2.83, P = 0.0002), and behaviour (0.84 95% CI 0.06 to 0.91, P = 0.03) but this was not supported by clinical global measures.4. Patients taking memantine appeared to be less likely to develop agitation (93/1167 [8%] versus 134/1141 [12%] (Peto odds ratio (OR): 0.65, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.86, P = 0.002). This was consistently seen in moderate to severe dementia. There were no data which suggested an effect on agitation which is already present.5. Memantine is well tolerated.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Published data suggest a small beneficial effect of memantine at six months in moderate to severe AD. The beneficial effect on cognition in patients with mild to moderate vascular dementia was not detectable on global assessment at six months. Whether memantine has any effect in mild to moderate AD is unknown.

Detailed assessment of activities of daily living in moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease

Patients with Alzheimer's Disease (AD) who have reached a stage of moderate to severe dementia are capable of completing a restricted range of cognitive tests and performing a limited range of activities of daily living (ADL). As part of an initiative to develop instruments to evaluate AD, we analyzed data describing the performance of a large number of ADL and scores on cognitive and global assessment measures in a cohort of patients with AD with moderate to severe cognitive impairment, defined as a Mini-Mental State Examination score ranging from 0-15 (out of 30). From the large pool of ADL, 19 met criteria of applicability, reliability, good scaling, concordant validity, and sensitivity to detect change in performance over 6-12 months. A total score derived from these 19 ADL ratings, comprising a scale termed the Alzheimer Disease Cooperative Study ADL-sev, correlated strongly with measures of cognition and of global dementia severity. Patients with moderate to severe AD showed a decline on the ADL-sev and cognitive measures over 6 and 12 months, consistent with the progression of AD. Detailed evaluation of ADL may provide a useful index to evaluate patients with moderate to severe AD and may complement cognitive assessment, especially for characterizing change in interventional or therapeutic studies.

N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor in Human Prostate Cancer

Expression of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAr) and its involvement in cellular proliferation is well-known in tumors of neuronal tissue, such as glioma and neuroblastoma. We have investigated NMDAr expression in the normal, hyperplastic and neoplastic human prostate by immunohistochemistry. Low stromal NMDAr immunostaining was observed in 2 of 12 (17%) normal prostate specimens, but epithelial NMDAr staining was not seen. Of 18 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) specimens, none had stromal NMDAr staining, but 2 had low and 1 had high epithelial NMDAr immunoreactivity. Moderate to high NMDAr immunostaining was observed in the stroma of 60 of 145 (41%) prostate cancer (PCa) specimens. Epithelial NMDAr staining was low in 26 (18%) and moderate to high in 36 (25%) of 145 PCa specimens. We have also examined the effects of the NMDAr antagonist memantine on the growth of ten human cancer cell lines: four prostate, two breast and four colon. The NMDAr antagonist memantine inhibited in-vitro growth of all ten cell lines, with half-maximal growth-inhibition at 5 to 20 microg/ml (23 to 92 microM) memantine. An NMDA agonist, L-cysteinesulfinic acid, stimulated cellular proliferation of all ten cell lines, with maximal growth-stimulation (30% to 75%, depending on the cell line) observed between doses of 33 to 66 microM. Our data provide evidence for the expression and activity of NMDAr in prostate cancer.

Symptomatic effect of donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine and memantine on cognitive deficits in the APP23 model

RATIONALE

APP23 mice are a promising model of Alzheimer's disease, expressing several histopathological, cognitive and behavioural hallmarks of the human condition. A valid animal model should respond to therapeutic interventions in an equivalent manner as human patients.

OBJECTIVES

To further validate the APP23 model, we examined whether cognitive deficits could be antagonised by donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine or memantine, which are approved drugs for symptomatic treatment of dementia.

METHODS

Animals were tested at an age at which untreated APP23 mice display severe deficits in visual-spatial learning. Four-month-old APP23 mice and control littermates were administered donepezil (0.3 or 0.6 mg kg(-1)), rivastigmine (0.5 or 1.0 mg kg(-1)), galantamine (1.25 or 2.5 mg kg(-1)), memantine (2 or 10 mg kg(-1)) or saline through daily i.p. injections. After 1 week of treatment, acquisition phase commenced, with daily treatment continuing during cognitive testing.

RESULTS

All cholinesterase inhibitors reduced cognitive deficits with the following optimal daily doses: galantamine 1.25 mg kg(-1), rivastigmine 0.5 mg kg(-1) and donepezil 0.3 mg kg(-1). Higher dosages often did not exert beneficial effects in accordance with inverted U-shaped dose-response curves described for cholinomimetics. Symptomatic efficacy of memantine on cognition was mild, with significant amelioration manifesting during probe trial.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to simultaneously evaluate the efficacy of therapeutically relevant doses of these four compounds in one particular learning and memory paradigm, being the Morris water maze. The fact that symptomatic intervention was able to diminish cognitive impairment, substantially adds to the validity of the APP23 model as a valuable tool to evaluate future therapeutic approaches.

Treatments for Alzheimer Disease

As our population ages, the incidence and prevalence of Alzheimer disease (AD) will increase dramatically. A number of therapies have been investigated for the treatment and prevention of AD. Clinicians should be prepared to provide evidence-based answers to inquiries regarding AD treatment. There is insufficient evidence to recommend ginkgo biloba, estrogen, statins, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the prevention or treatment of AD. The use of vitamin E is supported by a single randomized controlled trial, while data on other antioxidants is mixed. There is good evidence that cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine are modestly effective in the treatment of AD. Cholinesterase inhibitors appear to be effective throughout the spectrum of AD, while memantine, alone or in combination with cholinesterase inhibitors, is effective in late stage disease. There is insufficient evidence to suggest superiority of one cholinesterase over another.

Efficacy and safety of donepezil in patients with more severe Alzheimer's disease: a subgroup analysis from a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

There have been very limited investigations of cholinesterase inhibitor therapy in more advanced stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The efficacy and safety of donepezil were evaluated in post hoc analyses of a subgroup of patients with more severe AD (standardized Mini-Mental State Examination [sMMSE] score 5-12) within a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in moderate to severe AD (MSAD study). Additional analyses examined whether donepezil's treatment effects were consistent across the full range of baseline AD severity studied (sMMSE score 5-17).

METHODS

Patients with moderate to severe AD (n = 290) who were living in the community or in assisted living facilities received donepezil or placebo for 24 weeks; n = 145 in the more severe AD subgroup. The primary outcome measure was the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change (CIBIC-plus) with secondary outcomes including the sMMSE, Severe Impairment Battery, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, and Disability Assessment for Dementia. Analysis of Variance and Analysis of Covariance models tested for treatment x disease severity interaction in the full MSAD study sample.

RESULTS

CIBIC-plus scores for donepezil patients were significantly improved compared with placebo for each time-point, with a 0.70 mean treatment difference at Week 24 last observation carried forward (LOCF; p = 0.0002). Significant differences favoring donepezil were noted at Week 24 LOCF for all secondary measures. There were no treatment x severity interactions for any of the efficacy measures.

CONCLUSIONS

In this analysis, donepezil had significant benefits over placebo on global, cognitive, functional, and behavioral measures in a subgroup of patients with more severe AD. Furthermore, the treatment effects of donepezil were not driven by a particular stratum within the moderate to severe dementia range.

Medicamenteuze behandeling van de ziekte van Alzheimer. De klinische praktijk in Nederland

Pharmacological therapy in Alzheimer's disease. Current clinical practice in The Netherlands. Dementia affects 195.000 patients of 65 years and older in The Netherlands currently. Rivastigmine and galantamine, both cholinesterase inhibitors, and memantine, an NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) antagonist, are licensed for the treatment of AD. In clinical practice, these drugs have limited effects on cognitive and other symptoms of dementia. We describe the practical care of some patients treated with these drugs and discuss the pros and cons of pharmacotherapy in AD. Extensive knowledge of the drugs, other treatment options and of dementia are necessary for good clinical practice in the treatment of these patients and the counselling of their caregivers.

Effects of memantine on behavioural symptoms in Alzheimer's disease patients: an analysis of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) data of two randomised, controlled studies

INTRODUCTION

Behavioural symptoms are common in moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease (AD). We have analysed the databases of two randomised studies with regard to the effects of memantine treatment on behavioural symptoms, measured using the 12-item version of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI).

SUBJECTS

The monotherapy study (memantine only) reported by Reisberg et al. (2003) involved 252 patients with baseline MMSE total score of between 3 and 14, whereas the combination study (memantine and donepezil) reported by Tariot et al. (2004) comprised 404 patients with MMSE scores of between 5 and 14. In both studies, patients received 10 mg memantine b.i.d. or matching placebo, and lived in the community.

METHODS

For both studies NPI total and individual domains scores were analysed in the ITT population. For the monotherapy study a dichotomised analysis was performed separately for patients who had behavioural symptoms at baseline and for those without pre-existing symptoms. Furthermore, a factor analysis was used to identify any behavioural clusters within the patient population.

RESULTS

In both studies, the change in NPI total scores at endpoint was consistently in favour of memantine treatment, reaching statistical significance in the combination study (p = 0.002). Memantine treatment showed a significant beneficial effect in comparison to placebo treatment in the NPI agitation/aggression domain in both studies (p = 0.008; p = 0.001). The dichotomised analysis of the monotherapy study showed that there was significantly less agitation/aggression emerging in the memantine-treated group compared to placebo (p = 0.003). Factor analysis showed that hyperactivity accounted for 27% of the data variance.

CONCLUSIONS

Memantine has a beneficial effect on the behavioural symptoms of patients with moderate to severe AD, with the most pronounced effect on agitation/aggression.

Current Status and Future Promise of Pharmacotherapeutic Strategies for Alzheimer’s Disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The pharmacotherapy of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is evolving rapidly. Unless new discoveries continue to emerge to facilitate prevention and effective treatment of the disease, the anticipated burden of this disease on caregivers and society at large will overwhelm resources. The objective of this paper is to review the state of development of approaches likely to yield effective interventional measures with regard to AD in the future.

DESIGN

A comprehensive systematic search of MEDLINE using focused search criteria, a search of reference lists from these studies and reviews, a review of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and a hand search of relevant journals was conducted. Selection of articles was based on the clinical focus. Additional inclusion criteria preferentially selected key articles that contained higher-level evidence in accordance with explicit, validated criteria.

RESULTS

Pharmaceutical interventions are being developed and tested that confer neuroprotective benefits by targeting causative mechanisms.

CONCLUSION

The paradigm that AD is pharmacologically unresponsive is shifting. Our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of neurodegeneration will soon allow us to more specifically target and interrupt the processes that contribute to this dementia.

In vivo regulation of GSK3 phosphorylation by cholinergic and NMDA receptors

Glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3), which is inhibited by serine-phosphorylation, is involved in the neuropathology of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We tested if the two therapeutic strategies used for AD, inhibition of acetylcholinesterase and of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, modulate the phosphorylation state of the two isoforms of GSK3 in mouse brain. Large, rapid increases in the levels of phospho-Ser21-GSK3alpha and phospho-Ser9-GSK3beta occurred in mouse hippocampus, cerebral cortex, and striatum after treatment of mice with the muscarinic agonist pilocarpine or the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor physostigmine. Treatment with memantine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, also increased the serine-phosphorylation of both GSK3 isoforms in mouse brain. Co-administration of physostigmine and memantine increased serine-phosphorylated GSK3 levels equally to that achieved by either agent alone, indicating that the actions of these two drugs converge on overlapping pools of GSK3. Thus, drugs in each class of therapeutic agents used for AD have the common property of increasing the regulatory serine-phosphorylation of GSK3 within common pools of the enzyme.

Evidence for improved performance in cognitive tasks following selective NR2B NMDA receptor antagonist pre-treatment in the rat

RATIONALE

We previously reported that the NR2B subunit-selective N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist Ro 63-1908 produced a marked deficit in response control in the five-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT).

OBJECTIVES

The present studies were designed to investigate this further by studying the NR2B NMDA antagonists, ifenprodil, traxoprodil (CP101,606), Ro 25-6981 as well as Ro 63-1908 in this test.

METHODS

Following training in the 5-CSRTT, separate groups of rats were either tested under (1) standard test conditions [5 s inter-trial interval (ITI), 0.5 s stimulus duration, 100 trials], (2) high (3 s ITI) and low (10 s ITI) event rate of stimulus presentation and (3) a 250-trial protocol in aged 2-year-old rats. In a final study, the effects of traxoprodil were investigated in an operant delayed match to position (DMTP) task, a test of working memory, and compared to dizocilpine and Ro 63-1908.

RESULTS

Similar to Ro 63-1908, both traxoprodil (1-10 mg/kg) and Ro 25-6981 (3--30 mg/kg) increased premature responding but also increased response speed with no error trade-off. Conversely, ifenprodil (1--10 mg/kg) slowed response speed and increased omissions with no effect on premature responding. Tested under a variable ITI, Ro 63--1908 (1 mg/kg) increased premature responding at all ITIs, but this change was proportional to controls. At short ITI (3 s), Ro 63-1908 reliably improved performance both in terms of response speed and accuracy (percent correct). In a 250-trial protocol in aged rats, both Ro 63-1908 (0.1-0.3 mg/kg) and, particularly, traxoprodil (1--3 mg/kg) improved performance-increasing response speed and increasing the number of rewards earned during test. Finally, traxoprodil (1--10 mg/kg) improved accuracy and increased response speed in the DMTP task.

CONCLUSIONS

The present studies support the view that selective NR2B NMDA antagonists promote impulsive-type responding in the 5-CSRTT; however, under certain test conditions, drugs of this class-notably traxoprodil-may also improve task performance.

Dementia of Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative disorders--memantine, a new hope

Alzheimer's disease is the fourth largest cause of death for people over 65 years of age. Dementia of Alzheimer's type is the commonest form of dementia, the other two forms being vascular dementia and mixed dementia. At present, the therapy of Alzheimer's disease is aimed at improving both, cognitive and behavioural symptoms and thereby, quality of life for the patients. Since the discovery of Alzheimer's disease by Alois Alzheimer, many pathological mechanisms have been proposed which led to the testing of various new treatments. Until recently the available drugs for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease are cholinesterase inhibitors, which have limited success because these drugs improve cognitive functions only in mild dementia and cannot stop the process of neurodegeneration. Moreover, drugs of this category show gastrointestinal side effects. As the cells of central and peripheral nervous system cannot regenerate, newer strategies are aimed at preserving the surviving neurons by preventing their degeneration. NMDA-receptor-mediated glutamate excitotoxicity plays a major role in Abeta-induced neuronal death. Hence, it was thought that NMDA receptors could be a promising target for preventing the progression of Alzheimer's disease. All the compounds synthesized initially in this category showed toxicity mainly because of their high affinity for NMDA receptors. Memantine (1-amino adamantane derivative), NMDA-receptor antagonist was reported to be effective therapeutically in Alzheimer's disease. It was available in Germany as well as European Union and has been approved for moderate to severe dementia in United States of America recently. It is an uncompetitive, moderate affinity antagonist of NMDA receptors that inhibits the pathological functions of NMDA receptors while physiological processes in learning and memory are unaffected. Memantine is also reported to have beneficial effects in other CNS disorders viz., Parkinson's disease (PD), stroke, epilepsy, CNS trauma, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), drug dependence and chronic pain. Mechanisms of neuroprotection, preclinical and clinical evidence for effectiveness of memantine have been provided. Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of memantine and other NMDA-receptor antagonists in comparison with currently approved drugs for dementia treatment have been discussed. The focus is on 'glutamate excitotoxicity' and glutamate receptors as drug target. Various other novel strategies for the treatment of dementia of neurodegenerative disorders have also been discussed.

Memantine: targeting glutamate excitotoxicity in Alzheimer's disease and other dementias

The management of dementia has changed since the development of new antidementia drugs. The benefits observed in Alzheimer's disease (AD) with selective cholinergic transmission treatments are mainly symptomatic, without clear evidence of neuroprotection. The hypothesis that glutamate-mediated neurotoxicity is involved in the pathogenesis of AD is finding increasingly more acceptance in the scientific community. Glutamate receptors are overactive, and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists have therapeutic potential for the treatment of AD and other neurological disorders. Memantine is a noncompetitive NMDA antagonist that is considered a neuroprotective drug. Memantine's capacity has been demonstrated in preclinical studies, and it is considered a useful symptomatic treatment for AD. Memantine has been shown to benefit cognition, function, and global outcome in patients with moderate to severe AD, and it is currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of moderate to severe AD. Recently, memantine has also demonstrated efficacy in the initial stages of AD, although FDA authorization is pending. This review highlights the important pharmacological and clinical aspects of memantine, as well as some basic mechanisms mediating glutamatergic neurodegeneration.

Pharmacologie de la maladie d’Alzheimer : vision du futur

Ten years after the introduction of the first drug for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, tacrine, it seems appropriate to reappraise the pharmacological processes of innovation in the field of research in dementia. The aim of this review is to pinpoint concrete improvements achieved in this field, in terms of experimental methods and clinical evaluation of the compounds, as well as the neurochemistry of the disease and cellular targets deserving of initial consideration. * The article first considers the use of animal models of Alzheimer's disease, which are classified according to two categories: animals with lesions of some neuronal pathways specifically implicated in clinical symptoms (i.e. lesions of the nucleus basalis of Meynert, the origin of cholinergic projections to the cortex underlying memory processes); and transgenic models, which are intended to reproduce some of the neuropathological hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease. Drugs can be tested in animals with such alterations for their effect on neuropathology, neurochemistry and behavioural disturbances. More recently, in silico models have been developed, which offer the possibility of simulating the pharmacodynamic effects of drugs in specific areas of the brain. These experiments are helpful in distinguishing purely symptomatic effects from disease-modifying effects, the latter being the ultimate goal of the modern pharmacology of dementia. * The second breakthrough considered in this article is the codification and standardisation of clinical methods for obtaining a more accurate and earlier diagnosis (the recent introduction of the concept of "Mild Cognitive Impairment", which includes patients who will later develop a true clinical dementia syndrome). In that respect, the determination of the biological markers of Alzheimer's disease (apolipoprotein E, amyloid substance, protein-tau, isoprostane) as well as progress in neuroimaging (functional positron emission tomography [fPET]-scan, single photon emission-computed tomography [SPECT], functional nuclear magnetic resonance [fNMR]) are discussed in terms of their potential as new tools in the early stages of drug development (surrogate markers). The methods used during the comparative clinical trials (phase III) have been elaborated and internationally standardised during the assessment of the different acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChE-I), with the knowledge that, since 1994, four of these have been officially approved: tacrine, donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine; the same methods have been used for developing memantine, a recently-launched modulator of glutamatergic neurotransmission. The validated scales now take into consideration not only the cognitive dimensions of Alzheimer's disease but also the behavioural symptoms, with the introduction of the concept of BPSD (behavioural psychological symptoms of dementia). Some proposals to improve this clinical assessment of anti-dementia drugs are presented here. * The section of this article dealing with prospective issues considers the main pathways of interest in drug innovation and the elucidation of new targets for the future compounds. As well as their symptomatic effects on the different components of cognition, drugs should be neuroprotective and limit the lesions documented in Alzheimer's disease, with the aim of progressing far beyond the amyloid hypothesis (immunisation, beta-sheet breakers, secretase inhibitors). The field of excitotoxicity (which is mainly glutamate dependent) appears fruitful, because of the possibility of pharmacological intervention at the different steps in the excitotoxic process. All the new directions presented in this article support the concept of true disease-modifying agents. In conclusion, this prospective review should be considered as a guide in fostering drug innovation in Alzheimer's disease and related disorders and should help to decrease the gap existing between neuroscience and therapeutics.

The benefits and risks associated with cholinesterase inhibitor therapy in Alzheimer’s disease

The 'second-generation' cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs), donepezil, galantamine and rivastigmine, are a class of medications that are currently approved for the treatment of mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). These medications have proven efficacy in improving cognition, behaviour, activities of daily living, and global functioning in mild-to-moderate AD. They have also been shown to reduce caregiver stress and to delay time to nursing home placement. Two separate meta-analyses have indicated that ChEIs confer a modest but significant therapeutic benefit in the treatment of AD, despite higher rates of treatment discontinuation and side effects than placebo. There is growing evidence to support their efficacy in treating moderate-to-severe AD. ChEIs are generally well-tolerated, with side effects that tend to be dose-related and are most problematic during dose titration. The most common adverse effects, related to cholinergic stimulation in the brain and peripheral tissues, include gastrointestinal, cardiorespiratory, extrapyramidal, genitourinary, and musculoskeletal symptoms, as well as sleep disturbances. Few clinically significant drug-drug interactions with ChEIs have been identified. Three head-to-head trials of ChEIs in the treatment of AD have been published to date, but are limited due to their open-label design, rates of titration, and the drug dosage levels utilised. Further study is needed to examine other indications for ChEIs, as well as their combination with newer treatments, such as memantine.

The neuropathogenesis of AIDS

HIV-associated dementia (HAD) is an important complication of the central nervous system in patients who are infected with HIV-1. Although the incidence of HAD has markedly decreased since it has become possible to effectively control viral replication in the blood by administering highly active antiretroviral therapy, a less severe form of HAD, comprising a milder cognitive and motor disorder, is now potentially a serious problem. Brain macrophages and microglia are the key cell types that are infected by HIV-1 in the central nervous system, and they are likely to mediate the neurodegeneration seen in patients with HAD; however, the precise pathogenesis of this neurodegeneration is still unclear. Here, we discuss the studies that are being carried out to determine the respective contributions of infection, and monocyte and macrophage activation, to disease progression.

Is there a double standard when it comes to dementia care?

Dementia, a diagnostic syndrome that includes Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia, affects more than 4 million Europeans. Its prevalence will increase as the population ages, even though half of cases remain undiagnosed. Dementia has a marked impact on the general health economy. The direct costs of caring for persons with AD alone exceed the cost of heart disease, cancer and stroke combined, primarily because of the need for expensive care in the later stages of the disease. Yet research spending for AD remains disproportionately small. Effective planning for the public health issues posed by AD mandates reduction of either the dependency or the prevalence of the disease. Some drug treatments have alleviated the symptoms of AD and improved the quality of life for patients and their families. However, many countries have introduced inappropriately stringent regulations for the use of medical therapy. These and related issues were addressed during the recent Facing Dementia Forum, in which 175 experts in dementia care discussed results of an extensive international survey. The experts identified three main barriers to effective care: (i) dementia is not considered a health care priority; (ii) there is a mistaken belief that nothing can be done about dementia; and (iii) early dementia is difficult to recognise. These observations provided a basis for the Agenda for Change, a series of strategies to overcome these barriers. The specific findings of the survey, as well as the Agenda for Change, will be reviewed in subsequent articles in this supplement.