Sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

A prospective Phase II trial of using extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy in primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma

A retrospective study has indicated that stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) has a value in treating both primary tumors and singular metastatic lesions that cause local symptoms. Here we present the results of a prospective study evaluating the safety and local efficacy of SRT in metastatic or inoperable primary renal cancer. Thirty patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) or inoperable primary RCC received high-dose fraction SRT. In total, 82 lesions were treated. Dose/fractionation schedules varied depending on target location and size. The most frequently used fractionations were 8 Gy x 4, 10 Gy x 4, 15 Gy x 2 or 15 Gy x 3 prescribed to the periphery of the PTV. Local control, defined as radiologically stable disease (SD) or partial/complete response (PR/CR) was obtained in 98% of treated lesions but 19% of lesions were in patients with a follow time of less than 6 months. CR was observed in 21% of the patients and 58% of the patients had a partial volume reduction or local stable disease after a median follow-up of 52 months (range 11-66) for patients alive and 18 months (range 4-57) for deceased patients. Local progression was seen in two lesions. Side effects were grade I-II in 90% of cases. The overall survival was 32 months. SRT for patients with primary and metastatic RCC resulted in high local control rate with generally low toxicity. The method can thus be considered a therapeutic option to surgery in patients with a limited number of metastases, as local treatment in RCC with an indolent presentation or as a method of reducing tumor burden prior to medical treatment.

Angiogenesis inhibitors in the treatment of lung cancer

Despite improvements in cytotoxic chemotherapy and combined modality therapies for lung cancer, the prognosis for patients remains poor, and the majority of patients die from the disease. Angiogenesis, i.e. the formation of new blood vessels, is important for tumor growth, invasion and metastasis and represents a rational target in the development of more effective treatments. The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathway plays a crucial role in the angiogenic process and consequently, inhibitors of this system are currently under development. The most studied anti-angiogenic agents include anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies and VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Recent clinical trials have yielded promising results. This article will review angiogenesis inhibitors targeting the VEGF pathway which are currently being developed for the treatment of lung cancer.

Hypothyroidism in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib

Sunitinib is an inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptors, and it has antitumor activity in metastatic renal cell carcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. To further investigate the fatigue associated with sunitinib therapy, thyroid function tests were performed on patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who were receiving sunitinib. Seventy-three patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma were treated with sunitinib at the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, and 66 of them had thyroid function test results available. Fifty-six (85%) of the 66 patients had one or more abnormality in their thyroid function test results, consistent with hypothyroidism, and 47 (84%) of the 56 patients with abnormal thyroid function tests had signs and/or symptoms possibly related to hypothyroidism. Thyroid hormone replacement was undertaken in 17 patients, and symptoms improved in nine of them. Thyroid function test abnormalities appear to be common in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib, and routine monitoring is warranted.

Adjuvant therapy for high-risk renal cell carcinoma patients

For most cases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the standard of care is surgical resection as monotherapy or as part of a multimodal approach. In patients with early localized disease, radical nephrectomy is associated with a favorable prognosis, whereas patients with advanced disease are rarely cured. A significant number of patients undergoing surgery for localized RCC experience recurrence, suggesting that there are some individuals in whom surgical excision is necessary but insufficient. In these patients, the development of effective adjuvant strategies is imperative. In this article, we review the prognostic variables and comprehensive staging algorithms for identifying patients at high risk for disease recurrence. Additionally, we review data from completed adjuvant RCC trials and highlight relevant ongoing trials.

Present strategies in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an update on molecular targeting agents

The understanding of cellular processes underlying tumour biology has allowed the development of novel molecular-targeted drugs with optimistic results in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Mutations in the von Hippel-Lindau gene are found in 75% of sporadic RCCs, which results in upregulation of several genes involved in angiogenesis, e.g. vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor. Other activated pathways in RCC are the epidermal growth factor receptor and the mTOR pathway, which regulate survival and cell growth. In addition to temsirolimus (an mTOR inhibitor) two different strategies have been studied to inhibit these targets: monoclonal antibodies, e.g. bevacizumab, and small molecule tyrosine-kinase inhibitors such as sorafenib, sunitinib and AG 013736. Phase II studies with these drugs reported substantial clinical activity in advanced RCC. Survival benefit was reported with temsirolimus, sunitinib and sorafenib in randomized trials, which led to the accelerated approval of sorafenib and sunitinib for advanced RCC by regulatory authorities in the USA and Europe. Nevertheless, as new therapies develop, new challenges arise for the optimum use of these targeted drugs. We discuss the rationale and the clinical development of these novel molecular-targeted agents, with special emphasis on updated information presented at recent meetings because of the relevance of the data reported and the potential future impact in the management of patients with RCC.

Prognostic factors associated with long-term survival in previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

To identify prognostic factors (PF) for long-term survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a metastatic RCC database at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation consisting of 358 previously untreated patients who were enrolled in institutional review board-approved clinical trials of immunotherapy and/or chemotherapy at our institution from 1987 to 2002. In order to identify patient characteristics associated with long-term survival, we compared 226 'short-term' survivors [defined as overall survival (OS) <2 years] with 31 'long-term' survivors (OS >or=5 years).

RESULTS

Using logistic regression models, four adverse PF were identified as independent predictors of long-term survival: hemoglobin less than the lower limit of normal, greater than two metastatic sites, involved kidney (left), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS). Using the number of poor prognostic features present, three distinct risk groups could be identified. Patients with 0 or 1 adverse prognostic feature present had an observed likelihood of long-term survival of 32% (21/66) compared with 9% (8/91) for patients with two adverse features present and only 1% (1/93) for patients with more than two adverse features.

CONCLUSIONS

Independent predictors of long-term survival in previously untreated metastatic RCC include baseline hemoglobin level, number of involved sites, involved kidney, and ECOG PS. Incorporation of these factors into a simple prognostic scoring system enables three distinct groups of patients to be identified.

Sorafenib in advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

We conducted a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor of tumor-cell proliferation and angiogenesis, in patients with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma.

METHODS

From November 2003 to March 2005, we randomly assigned 903 patients with renal-cell carcinoma that was resistant to standard therapy to receive either continuous treatment with oral sorafenib (at a dose of 400 mg twice daily) or placebo; 451 patients received sorafenib and 452 received placebo. The primary end point was overall survival. A single planned analysis of progression-free survival in January 2005 showed a statistically significant benefit of sorafenib over placebo. Consequently, crossover was permitted from placebo to sorafenib, beginning in May 2005.

RESULTS

At the January 2005 cutoff, the median progression-free survival was 5.5 months in the sorafenib group and 2.8 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio for disease progression in the sorafenib group, 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.55; P<0.01). The first interim analysis of overall survival in May 2005 showed that sorafenib reduced the risk of death, as compared with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.94; P=0.02), although this benefit was not statistically significant according to the O'Brien-Fleming threshold. Partial responses were reported as the best response in 10% of patients receiving sorafenib and in 2% of those receiving placebo (P<0.001). Diarrhea, rash, fatigue, and hand-foot skin reactions were the most common adverse events associated with sorafenib. Hypertension and cardiac ischemia were rare serious adverse events that were more common in patients receiving sorafenib than in those receiving placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

As compared with placebo, treatment with sorafenib prolongs progression-free survival in patients with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma in whom previous therapy has failed; however, treatment is associated with increased toxic effects. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00073307 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

The role of PDGF in radiation oncology

Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) was originally identified as a constituent of blood serum and subsequently purified from human platelets. PDGF ligand is a dimeric molecule consisting of two disulfide-bonded chains from A-, B-, C- and D-polypeptide chains, which combine to homo- and heterodimers. The PDGF isoforms exert their cellular effects by binding to and activating two structurally related protein tyrosine kinase receptors. PDGF is a potent mitogen and chemoattractant for mesenchymal cells and also a chemoattractant for neutrophils and monocytes. In radiation oncology, PDGF are important for several pathologic processes, including oncogenesis, angiogenesis and fibrogenesis. Autocrine activation of PDGF was observed and interpreted as an important mechanism involved in brain and other tumors. PDGF has been shown to be fundamental for the stability of normal blood vessel formation, and may be essential for the angiogenesis in tumor tissue. PDGF also plays an important role in the proliferative disease, such as atherosclerosis and radiation-induced fibrosis, regarding its proliferative stimulation of fibroblast cells. Moreover, PDGF was also shown to stimulate production of extracellular matrix proteins, which are mainly responsible for the irreversibility of these diseases. This review introduces the structural and functional properties of PDGF and PDGF receptors and discusses the role and mechanism of PDGF signaling in normal and tumor tissues under different conditions in radiation oncology.

Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Since sunitinib malate has shown activity in two uncontrolled studies in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma, a comparison of the drug with interferon alfa in a phase 3 trial is warranted.

METHODS

We enrolled 750 patients with previously untreated, metastatic renal-cell carcinoma in a multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial to receive either repeated 6-week cycles of sunitinib (at a dose of 50 mg given orally once daily for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks without treatment) or interferon alfa (at a dose of 9 MU given subcutaneously three times weekly). The primary end point was progression-free survival. Secondary end points included the objective response rate, overall survival, patient-reported outcomes, and safety.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the sunitinib group (11 months) than in the interferon alfa group (5 months), corresponding to a hazard ratio of 0.42 (95% confidence interval, 0.32 to 0.54; P<0.001). Sunitinib was also associated with a higher objective response rate than was interferon alfa (31% vs. 6%, P<0.001). The proportion of patients with grade 3 or 4 treatment-related fatigue was significantly higher in the group treated with interferon alfa, whereas diarrhea was more frequent in the sunitinib group (P<0.05). Patients in the sunitinib group reported a significantly better quality of life than did patients in the interferon alfa group (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Progression-free survival was longer and response rates were higher in patients with metastatic renal-cell cancer who received sunitinib than in those receiving interferon alfa (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00098657 and NCT00083889 [ClinicalTrials.gov]).

Kidney cancer therapy: new perspectives and avenues

Immunotherapy with interleukin-2 and interferon-alpha has been the only viable option in metastatic renal cell cancer for almost two decades. In the last several years, significant advances in the understanding of the underlying biological and molecular mechanisms of renal cell carcinoma, particularly the role of tumour angiogenesis, have led to the identification of rational therapeutic targets and permitted the design of molecularly targeted therapeutics. At present, new compounds targeting specific signalling pathways are available and have successfully passed clinical testing. The use of small molecules, such as multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors, the mTOR inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies, is dramatically changing the existing concepts of systemic treatment for metastatic kidney cancer.

Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

The discovery of a relationship for the VHL tumor suppressor gene, hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha, and vascular endothelial growth factor in the growth of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has identified a pathway for novel targeted therapy. This study evaluated the impact of these agents on metastatic RCC (mRCC), and highlights recent phase II and III trials. A systematic review examined the clinical data for novel targeted agents in mRCC, with a focus on randomized phase II and III trials of the novel targeted agents sunitinib, temsirolimus, sorafenib, and bevacizumab. Several agents, including the small-molecule targeted inhibitors sunitinib, temsirolimus, sorafenib, and the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab, have demonstrated antitumor activity in randomized trials. Superior activity was found with sunitinib and temsirolimus versus cytokines in first-line therapy. Improved progression-free survival was reported with sorafenib and bevacizumab given second-line compared with placebo. Targeted therapies show promising activity in this disease, and they have been changing patient management. Sunitinib and sorafenib were recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of mRCC, These drugs are currently included in clinical practice.

Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score in patients with metastatic renal cancer

BACKGROUND

Recently, it was shown that an inflammation-based prognostic score, the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), provides additional prognostic information in patients with advanced cancer. The objective of the current study was to examine the value of the GPS compared with established scoring systems in predicting cancer-specific survival in patients with metastatic renal cancer.

METHODS

One hundred nineteen patients who underwent immunotherapy for metastatic renal cancer were recruited. The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) score and the Metastatic Renal Carcinoma Comprehensive Prognostic System (MRCCPS) score were calculated as described previously. Patients who had both an elevated C-reactive protein level (>10 mg/L) and hypoalbuminemia (<35 g/L) were allocated a GPS of 2. Patients who had only 1 of those 2 biochemical abnormalities were allocated a GPS of 1. Patients who had neither abnormality were allocated a GPS of 0.

RESULTS

On multivariate analysis of significant individual factors, only calcium (hazard ratio [HR], 3.21; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.51-6.83; P = .002), white cell count (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.17-2.35; P = .004), albumin (HR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.38-5.03; P = .003), and C-reactive protein (HR, 2.85; 95% CI; 1.49-5.45; P = .002) were associated independently with cancer-specific survival. On multivariate analysis of the different scoring systems, the MSKCC (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.22-2.88; P = .004), the MRCCPS (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.97-2.09; P = .071), and the GPS (HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.51-3.67; P < .001) were associated independently with cancer-specific survival.

CONCLUSIONS

An inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) predicted survival independent of established scoring systems in patients with metastatic renal cancer.

Therapeutic options to target angiogenesis in human malignancies

The critical role of angiogenesis in tumour growth and metastasis is now well established in the literature. Growing tumours stimulate neovascularisation through the secretion of pro-angiogenic growth factors, in particular, basic fibroblast growth factor and VEGF. Several lines of evidence have implicated VEGF in tumourigenesis, and understanding the role of VEGF in tumour angiogenesis has facilitated the development of novel targeting agents that specifically interfere with angiogenesis. Different approaches to disrupting tumour-induced angiogenesis encompass tyrosine kinase inhibitor, monoclonal antibodies, small-molecule inhibitors and transcription inhibitors. However, monoclonal antibody and tyrosine kinase inhibitors are the most advanced drug classes currently being investigated in clinical trials. So far, three anti-VEGF inhibitors, bevacizumab, sunitinib and sorafenib, have been approved for the treatment of solid human malignancies including colorectal cancer, gastrointestinal stromal tumours and renal cell carcinoma. Other antiangiogenic drugs are being investigated in various types of cancer. This review summarises the current literature on the use of these agents to interfere with VEGF, VEGF receptor, the matrix breakdown or other mechanisms involved in angiogenesis.

Vascular endothelial growth factor pharmacogenetics: a new perspective for anti-angiogenic therapy

The pharmacogenetic approach to anti-angiogenic therapy should be considered a possible strategy for many pathological conditions with high incidence in Western countries, including solid tumors, age-related macular degeneration or endometriosis. While pharmacogenetic studies are building stronger foundations for the systematic investigations of phenotype–genotype relationships in many research and clinical fields of medicine, pharmacogenetic data regarding anti-angiogenic drugs are still lacking. Here we review preclinical and clinical genetic studies on angiogenic determinants such as vascular endothelial growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. We suggest that pharmacogenetic profiling of patients who are candidates for the currently available anti-angiogenic agents targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 may aid the selection of patients on the basis of their likelihood of responding to the drugs or suffering from toxicity.

Immunotherapy for Renal Cell Cancer

For eligible patients, the value of immunotherapy for metastatic clear-cell renal cancer is its curative potential, as demonstrated by long-term follow-up after interleukin-2. Advances in cellular therapies, manipulation of activating and inhibitory receptors on T cells and modification of allotransplantation regimens have all produced new tumor regressions in patients who did not respond to conventional interleukin-2 regimens. It is clear that renal cancer remains one of the most immunoresponsive of human malignancies and that advances in immune modulation are again translating into clinical responses for patients with this disease. As the array of biologic therapies for renal cancer expands with the approval of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immunotherapy, the only modality that can cure widespread renal cancer, must not be overlooked.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Compared with Cytokine Therapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Overview of Recent Clinical Trials Differentiating Clinical Response and Adverse Effects

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma has long been recognized as an aggressive, therapy-refractory epithelial cancer. Two decades of clinical experience with the biologic response modifiers, such as interferon and interleukin-2, have produced little in the way of clinically meaningful benefit for patients, with the notable exception of a very small number of patients treated with high-dose interleukin-2. The paradigm shifting development in the understanding of the molecular biology of clear-cell renal cancer and the rapid introduction of kinase inhibitors into our therapeutic armamentarium has provided clinicians and their patients real hope. Two important phase III trials are reviewed and placed into historical context with previous trials of biologic response modifiers.

Targeting Growth Factor and Antiangiogenic Pathways in Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Rationale and Ongoing Trials

Clear-cell renal cell carcinoma is characterized by the inactivation of the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene, which results in an overproduction of vascular endothelial growth factor that promotes tumor angiogenesis, growth, and metastasis after binding with its receptor. The mammalian target of rapamycin signal transduction pathway is involved in the translation of hypoxia inducible factor-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor. Sunitinib, sorafenib, bevacizumab, and temsirolimus have improved clinical outcomes by inhibiting these tumorigenic pathways. Other multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (lapatinib, axitinib, pazopanib) and antiangiogenic agents (lenalidomide) have also demonstrated activity in early studies. Combinations of these agents are being evaluated. Clinical trials designed to further assess these and other agents need to be vigorously supported.

Improving Outcomes with Novel Therapies for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Renal Cell Carcinoma

With the approval of sunitinib and sorafenib, 2 new multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors, for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the natural history and prognosis of patients with this disease has significantly improved. These drugs were approved based upon clinical data demonstrating robust, unprecedented response rates in one case and dramatic prolongation of progression-free survival in the other. In both cases, these results were seen in study patients in whom standard therapy had failed and who, on average, carried substantial disease burden. Important challenges today include integrating these therapies with other standard therapeutic options and into other advanced-stage RCC patient populations. This article addresses current data and practice patterns regarding the clinical use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced-stage RCC, including dose modifications and alternative dosing, the current role of debulking nephrectomy, and use in patients with indolent disease. Finally, a summary of the more common side effects and management strategies for these is also discussed. Ultimately, more clinical data is needed to address the chronic use of these agents alone, in combination with other agents, with radiation therapy, and in sequence.

Sunitinib malate

Recently, there has been a growing interest in understanding the role of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK), such as vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), stem cell factor receptor (KIT), and fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3), in promoting tumor angiogenesis, tumor growth and metastasis. Sunitinib (sunitinib malate; SU11248; SUTENT; Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA) is a novel, orally bio-available, oxindole, multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with high binding affinity for VEGFR and PDGFR which has shown anti-tumor and anti-angiogenic activities. This drug recently received approval from the US Food and Administration (FDA) in two indications simultaneously: advanced renal cell carcinoma (adRCC) and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), in patients who are resistant or intolerant to the treatment with imatinib. The present article reviews the recent pharmacologic and clinical data related to the use of this new promising drug in the field of oncology.

Methylation of tumour suppressor genes APAF-1 and DAPK-1 and in vitro effects of demethylating agents in bladder and kidney cancer

To examine the significance of the methylation level of the p53 target and tumour suppressor genes apoptotic protease activating factor-1 (APAF-1) and death-associated protein kinase-1 (DAPK-1) in 80 microdissected tumour samples from transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder and 80 tumour samples from clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) as well as from non-tumourous bladder and kidney tissue. Growth-inhibitory effects of the demethylating agents 5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine (5-Aza-CdR) and zebularine were investigated in TCC and RCC cell lines. The methylation frequency of APAF-1 (DAPK-1) was 100% (77%) in TCC and 100% (33%) in RCC. The methylation levels of APAF-1 could differentiate between the individual tumour stages in TCC as well as in RCC. The APAF-1 methylation levels in RCC were significantly higher in tumours larger than 4 cm and in high-grade tumours. The methylation frequencies in normal tissue for APAF-1 (DAPK-1) were 11% (8%) in bladder tissue and 9% (5%) in kidney tissue. The growth-inhibitory effect of the demethylating agents in TCC (RT4, T24) and RCC (A498, ClearCa-5) cell lines resulted in a 17–132% prolongation of the doubling time (DT). In RCC cell lines, zebularine was superior to 5-Aza-CdR in achieving a DT prolongation. Quantitative real time RT-PCR detected a re-expression of mRNA transcripts of APAF-1 or DAPK-1. In conclusion, demethylating agents effectively retard growth of TCC and RCC cell lines. Methylation level analysis of specific genes has the potential for further tumour characterisation in TCC and RCC.

Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of solid tumors: an update of recent developments

Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are developed to block intracellular signaling pathways in tumor cells, leading to deregulation of key cell functions such as proliferation and differentiation. Over 25 years ago, tyrosine kinases were found to function as oncogenes in animal carcinogenesis; however, only recently TKIs were introduced as anti cancer drugs in human cancer treatment. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors have numerous good qualities. First, in many tumor types they tend to stabilize tumor progression and may create a chronic disease state which is no longer immediately life threatening. Second, side effects are minimal when compared to conventional chemotherapeutic agents. Third, synergistic effects are seen in vitro when TKIs are combined with radiotherapy and/or conventional chemotherapeutic agents. In this article, we will give an update of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors that are currently registered for use or in an advanced stage of development, and we will discuss the future role of TKIs in the treatment of solid tumors. The following TKIs are reviewed: Imatinib (Gleevec/Glivec), Gefitinib (Iressa), Erlotinib (OSI-774, Tarceva), Lapatinib (GW-572016, Tykerb), Canertinib (CI-1033), Sunitinib (SU 11248, Sutent), Zactima (ZD6474), Vatalanib (PTK787/ZK 222584), Sorafenib (Bay 43-9006, Nexavar), and Leflunomide (SU101, Arava).

Novel therapies targeting signaling pathways in lung cancer

Despite advances in chemotherapy, the prognosis for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains dismal. Increasing understanding of the biological processes responsible for lung carcinogenesis has led to development of new therapeutic strategies targeting this disease at a molecular level. This article examines the molecular events believed to lead to cellular changes in lung cancer, and how knowledge of these is used to develop new agents used individually or in combination with available cytotoxic drugs to improve survival. Finally, it explores how a deeper understanding of the embryonic signaling pathways responsible for airway epithelial repair and tumorogenesis, such as Hedgehog (Hh), Notch, and Wingless (Wnt), can lead to the development of newer and more specific therapies for lung cancer.

Molecular biology of renal cell carcinoma

Recent developments in molecular biology have lead to an increased understanding of the events involved in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) carcinogenesis. In this field, basic molecular pathways important to oncogenic transformation secondary to Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumor suppression gene inactivation, associated to clear-cell RCC, have been elucidated. Loss of function of VHL results in the high-expression of pro-angiogenic growth factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet derived growth factor (PDGF). New therapies against specific targets in RCC have demonstrated significant clinical activity in patients. These therapeutic approaches are based on the VEGF inhibition by using anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies (bevacizumab) or multi-kinase inhibitors, that also target PDGF and c-kit tyrosine kinases (sorafenib, sunitinib); or by the inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway (temsirolimus). This article reviews current knowledge of molecular pathogenesis of inherited and sporadic RCC.

Antiangiogenetische Therapie beim Nierenzellkarzinom

Sunitinib and Sorafenib are both effective angiogenetic inhibitors for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. With these drugs of a new class of chronic therapy is performed. During chronic treatment, the inherent side effects may necessitate stopping the application of these drugs thus preventing the required effective therapy. Most of the effects can be avoided or attenuated by prophylaxis. In this paper the published data are reviewed and added with our experience in 138 patients over up to two and a half years.

Linking oncogenic pathways with therapeutic opportunities

The accumulation of multiple mutations and alterations in the cancer genome underlies the complexity of cancer phenotypes. A consequence of these alterations is the deregulation of various cell-signalling pathways that control cell function. Molecular-profiling studies, particularly DNA microarray analyses, have the potential to describe this complexity. These studies also provide an opportunity to link pathway deregulation with potential therapeutic strategies. This approach, when coupled with other methods for identifying pathway activation, provides an opportunity to both match individual patients with the most appropriate therapeutic strategy and identify potential options for combination therapy.

Long-term response with sunitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

A 65-year-old man with metastatic renal cell carcinoma developed progressive disease after treatment with interferon-alpha. He began treatment with sunitinib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, on clinical trial. The patient achieved a partial response after two cycles of therapy, with a durable response continuing after 2 years of treatment. This case report illustrates the long-term response to sunitinib for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Adjuvant Therapy of Renal Cell Carcinoma

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has a highly variable natural history and carries a dismal prognosis. Unlike many other tumors, RCC is generally unresponsive to cytotoxic, hormonal, and radiation adjuvant therapies after cytoreductive surgery. Different modalities of treatment have been tried and tested with modest success. Until recently, only immunotherapies such as interleukin-2 and interferon-alpha have been shown to provide a response, albeit in a minority of patients and often with severe treatment-associated toxicities. Other adjuvant therapies, such as active specific immunotherapy with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin and autologous renal tumor cell vaccines, have not provided alternative solutions. Recent approaches include heat-shock protein peptide complex 96 vaccine and cG250 monoclonal antibody therapy. Novel targeted therapies have been developed using our knowledge of the molecular genetics that belie RCC. This culminated in sorafenib and sunitinib, the first Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs for RCC in more than a decade in the United States. The future will see further trials being carried out in the development of targeted therapies with emphasis placed on patient selection. Staging systems will need to be updated to integrate molecular biomarkers, which could potentially act not just as diagnostic and prognostic predictors, but also as tools for appropriate patient selection for treatment. In the future, this could potentially lead us to our ultimate goal of personalized medicine.

Improved tolerability and quality of life with maintained efficacy using twice-daily low-dose interferon-α-2b

BACKGROUND

In vivo data have shown a more potent antiangiogenic effect and a higher antitumor activity of low-dose interferon (IFN) given twice daily. In a randomized Phase II trial, the authors tested the hypothesis that twice-daily low-dose IFN is more effective than daily intermediate-dose IFN in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (MRCC).

METHODS

A total of 118 patients (59 per arm) were randomly assigned to receive IFN at a dose of 0.5 million units (MU) given subcutaneously twice daily (IFN1) or IFN at a dose of 5 MU given subcutaneously daily (IFN5). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included response rate (RR), overall survival (OS), toxicity, and quality of life (QOL).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in either PFS or OS between IFN1 and IFN5 (median of 3.7 months and median of 3.4 months PFS, respectively; median of 25.5 months and median of 17.5 months OS, respectively). The RRs were identical in the 2 arms (6.7%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.8-16.5%). Two patients, 1 in each arm, remained in complete remission at the time of last follow-up, at 45+ and 38+ months from treatment. Thirty-two patients receiving IFN5 and 19 patients receiving IFN1 experienced Grade 3 or higher adverse events (graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria [version 2.0]) (P = .025). Eighteen patients receiving IFN5 and 4 patients receiving IFN1 had dose reductions (P = .002). There was a significant deterioration in QOL and an increase in depression associated with IFN5 but no change was noted with IFN1.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with IFN5, IFN1 is neither more nor less effective but is less toxic, with a better reported QOL. These results may have implications for the design of combination regimens incorporating IFN with targeted agents.