51
|
Chu W, Taggar A, Ung Y, Chan KKW, Earle CC, Karotki A, Pasetka M, Presutti J, Wong J, Zhang L, Wong CS. Risk-adjusted chemoradiation according to human papilloma viral status for anal cancer: a pilot study. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1183854. [PMID: 37456246 PMCID: PMC10346840 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1183854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose HPV-associated or positive (HPV+) anal cancer patients may have better outcome compared to those with HPV negative (HPV-) disease. We report a planned interim analysis of a prospective registry study that tailors chemoradiation (CRT) for anal cancer according to HPV status. Materials and methods HPV+ patients received de-escalated radiation doses of 45, 50.4 and 55.8 Gy, while HPV- received 50.4, 55.8 and 63 Gy for T1, T2 and T3/T4 disease respectively. Chemotherapy consisted of a single dose of mitomycin-C and oral capecitabine on days of RT. All patients were planned by VMAT following CT, PET/CT and MR simulation. This cohort (n = 24) had a minimum 24-month follow-up. Disease free survival (DFS) and local failure rates (LFR) were compared with 180 patients managed by standard CRT (2 cycles of mitomycin-C and 5-fluorouracil, radiation doses 50.4-63 Gy based on T-category) from 2011-2018. Propensity score comparison was performed using a retrospective to prospective 2 to 1 match based on tumor size and N-category. Results In the HPV+ cohort (n = 20), there were 2 local failures. Two of 4 HPV- patients failed locally. The 30-month DFS and LFR were 79% and 17% respectively. Similar DFS and LFR were observed in the retrospective (80% and 15% respectively) and matched patients (76% and 16% respectively). No grade ≥3 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were observed in the registry cohort whereas 19% and 14% respectively were seen in the retrospective patients. Conclusion De-escalation of CRT for HPV+ anal cancer may result in decreased acute toxicities and similar cancer outcomes compared to standard CRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Amandeep Taggar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yee Ung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kelvin K. W. Chan
- Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Craig C. Earle
- Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Aliaksandr Karotki
- Department of Medical Physics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Pasetka
- Department of Pharmacy, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Joe Presutti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - John Wong
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Liying Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - C. Shun Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Ito Y, Hamaguchi T, Takashima A, Mizusawa J, Shimada Y, Shiozawa M, Mizoguchi N, Kodaira T, Komori K, Ohue M, Konishi K, Teraishi F, Kinouchi M, Murata K, Fujita F, Watanabe M, Iinuma G, Ishida F, Saida Y, Matsuda T, Katayama H, Fukuda H, Kanemitsu Y. Definitive S-1/mitomycin-C chemoradiotherapy for stage II/III anal canal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase I/II dose-finding and single-arm confirmatory study (JCOG0903). Int J Clin Oncol 2023:10.1007/s10147-023-02361-7. [PMID: 37286878 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-023-02361-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with 5-fluorouracil plus mitomycin-C is a standard treatment for stage II/III squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA). We performed this dose-finding and single-arm confirmatory trial of CRT with S-1 plus mitomycin-C to determine the recommended dose (RD) of S-1 and evaluate its efficacy and safety for locally advanced SCCA. METHODS Patients with clinical stage II/III SCCA (UICC 6th) received CRT comprising mitomycin-C (10 mg/m2 on days 1 and 29) and S-1 (60 mg/m2/day at level 0 and 80 mg/m2/day at level 1 on days 1-14 and 29-42) with concurrent radiotherapy (59.4 Gy). Dose-finding used a 3 + 3 cohort design. The primary endpoint of the confirmatory trial was 3-year event-free survival. The sample size was 65, with one-sided alpha of 5%, power of 80%, and expected and threshold values of 75% and 60%, respectively. RESULTS Sixty-nine patients (dose-finding, n = 10; confirmatory, n = 59) were enrolled. The RD of S-1 was determined as 80 mg/m2/day. Three-year event-free survival in 63 eligible patients who received the RD was 65.0% (90% confidence interval 54.1-73.9). Three-year overall, progression-free, and colostomy-free survival rates were 87.3%, 85.7%, and 76.2%, respectively; the complete response rate was 81% on central review. Common grade 3/4 acute toxicities were leukopenia (63.1%), neutropenia (40.0%), diarrhea (20.0%), radiation dermatitis (15.4%), and febrile neutropenia (3.1%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS Although the primary endpoint was not met, S-1/mitomycin-C chemoradiotherapy had an acceptable toxicity profile and favorable 3-year survival and could be a treatment option for locally advanced SCCA. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION jRCTs031180002.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshinori Ito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Showa University School of Medicine, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-Ku, Tokyo, 142-8666, Japan.
| | - Tetsuya Hamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Atsuo Takashima
- Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junki Mizusawa
- Japan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Yasuhiro Shimada
- Division of Clinical Oncology, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi, Japan
| | - Manabu Shiozawa
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Nobutaka Mizoguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kodaira
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Koji Komori
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Masayuki Ohue
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Koji Konishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Fuminori Teraishi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi, Japan
| | | | - Kohei Murata
- Department of Surgery, Suita Municipal Hospital, Suita, Japan
| | - Fumihiko Fujita
- Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
| | - Masahiko Watanabe
- Department of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Gen Iinuma
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fumio Ishida
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yoshihisa Saida
- Department of Surgery, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahisa Matsuda
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Katayama
- Japan Clinical Oncology Group Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Haruhiko Fukuda
- Japan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yukihide Kanemitsu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Rimini M, Franco P, Bertolini F, Berardino DB, Giulia ZM, Stefano V, Andrikou K, Arcadipane F, Napolitano M, Buno LV, Alessandra GM, Olivero F, Ferreri F, Ricardi U, Cascinu S, Casadei-Gardini A. The Prognostic Role of Baseline Eosinophils in HPV-Related Cancers: a Multi-institutional Analysis of Anal SCC and OPC Patients Treated with Radical CT-RT. J Gastrointest Cancer 2023; 54:662-671. [PMID: 35915202 PMCID: PMC9342937 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-022-00850-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) are rare tumors associated with HPV infection. Bioumoral predictors of response to chemoradiation (CT-RT) are lacking in these settings. With the aim to find new biomarkers, we investigated the role of eosinophils in both HPV-positive anal SCC and HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). METHODS We retrieved clinical and laboratory data of patients with HPV-positive anal SCC treated with CT-RT in 5 institutions, and patients with locally advanced OPC SCC treated with CT-RT in 2 institutions. We examined the association between baseline eosinophil count (the best cutoff has been evaluated by ROC curve analysis: 100 × 10^9/L) and disease-free survival (DFS). Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios by baseline characteristics were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS Three hundred four patients with HPV-positive anal SCCs and 168 patients with OPCs (122 HPV-positive, 46 HPV-negative diseases) were analyzed. In anal SCC, low eosinophil count (< 100 × 10^9/L) correlates to a better DFS (HR = 0.59; p = 0.0392); likewise, in HPV-positive OPC, low eosinophil count correlates to a better DFS (HR = 0.50; p = 0.0428). In HPV-negative OPC, low eosinophil count confers worse DFS compared to high eosinophil count (HR = 3.53; p = 0.0098). After adjustment for age and sex, eosinophils were confirmed to be independent prognostic factors for DFS (HR = 4.55; p = 0.0139). CONCLUSION Eosinophil count could be used as a prognostic factor in anal HPV-positive SCC. The worse prognosis showed in HPV-positive patients with high eosinophil count is likely to derive from an unfavorable interaction between the HPV-induced immunomodulation and eosinophils, which may hamper the curative effect of RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margherita Rimini
- Oncologic Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Hospital, 20019, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Oncology - Radiation Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| | - Federica Bertolini
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Division of Oncology, University Hospital Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - De Bari Berardino
- Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon, 25000, Besançon cedex, France
- Radiation Oncology, Réseau Hospitalier Neuchâtelois, CH-2300, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland
| | - Zampino Maria Giulia
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Vegge Stefano
- Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Kalliopi Andrikou
- Oncologic Department, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura Dei Tumori, IRCCS, Meldola (Forlì), Italy
| | - Francesca Arcadipane
- Department of Oncology - Radiation Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Martina Napolitano
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Division of Oncology, University Hospital Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Lavajo Vieira Buno
- Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon, 25000, Besançon cedex, France
| | | | - Francesco Olivero
- Department of Oncology - Radiation Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Filippo Ferreri
- Department of Oncology - Radiation Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Department of Oncology - Radiation Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Stefano Cascinu
- Oncologic Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Hospital, 20019, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Casadei-Gardini
- Oncologic Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Hospital, 20019, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Roeder F, Jensen AD, Lindel K, Mattke M, Wolf F, Gerum S. Geriatric Radiation Oncology: What We Know and What Can We Do Better? Clin Interv Aging 2023; 18:689-711. [PMID: 37168037 PMCID: PMC10166100 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s365495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Elderly patients represent a growing subgroup of cancer patients for whom the role of radiation therapy is poorly defined. Older patients are still clearly underrepresented in clinical trials, resulting in very limited high-level evidence. Moreover, elderly patients are less likely to receive radiation therapy in similar clinical scenarios compared to younger patients. However, there is no clear evidence for a generally reduced radiation tolerance with increasing age. Modern radiation techniques have clearly reduced acute and late side effects, thus extending the boundaries of the possible regarding treatment intensity in elderly or frail patients. Hypofractionated regimens have further decreased the socioeconomic burden of radiation treatments by reducing the overall treatment time. The current review aims at summarizing the existing data for the use of radiation therapy or chemoradiation in elderly patients focusing on the main cancer types. It provides an overview of treatment tolerability and outcomes with current standard radiation therapy regimens, including possible predictive factors in the elderly population. Strategies for patient selection for standard or tailored radiation therapy approaches based on age, performance score or comorbidity, including the use of prediction tests or geriatric assessments, are discussed. Current and future possibilities for improvements of routine care and creation of high-level evidence in elderly patients receiving radiation therapy are highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Falk Roeder
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Alexandra D Jensen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Marburg-Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Katja Lindel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Städtisches Klinikum, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Matthias Mattke
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Frank Wolf
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Sabine Gerum
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Lefèvre AC, Serup-Hansen E, Storm KS, Wind KL, Kronborg C, Spindler KLG. One-Year Treatment-Related Side Effects and Quality of Life After Chemoradiotherapy in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:1165-1177. [PMID: 36179989 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.09.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient-reported outcome (PRO) and National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) data for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) treated with modern radiation therapy (RT) are lacking. The primary aim of this study was to report bowel and bladder PRO and NCI-CTCAE for patients with SCCA 1 year after RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS From 2015 to 2020, we included patients in a prospective Danish national study. Data were collected before treatment (PT) and 1 year after treatment (1Y) using NCI-CTCAE version 4.0, as well as European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires C30 and CR29. We evaluated the combined PRO scores according to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer scoring guidelines, and classified changes according to score difference from PT to 1Y as no change (0-5), minor (5-10), moderate (11-20), and major (>20). Raw scores were reported as frequencies of each of the scores: Not at all, a little, quite a bit, and very much. RESULTS Of the 270 patients, 81% had complete data sets, including PT and 1Y answers. Functional mean scores were equal to a matched normal population cohort at PT and 1Y. From PT to 1Y, C30 scores were stable despite minor improvements in global health status/quality of life (7.3), emotional functioning (9.3), insomnia (8.0), and appetite loss (7.8). For questionnaire CR29, bowel and bladder symptoms and sore skin improved with minor change (6.2), and buttocks, anal, or rectal pain improved with moderate change (18.3). Flatulence worsened moderately (12.6), and fecal incontinence had minor worsening (7.8). Agreement between PROs and NCI-CTCAE was generally only fair to moderate, especially for quantitative symptoms, such as pain (κ = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS For patients with SCCA who underwent definitive RT, only a few patients had high scores (indicating quite a bit or very much frequency of bother) regarding bowel and bladder symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Cecilie Lefèvre
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
| | | | | | - Karen Lycke Wind
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Camilla Kronborg
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - Karen-Lise Garm Spindler
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Hernandez S, Das P, Holliday EB, Shen L, Lu W, Johnson B, Messick CA, Taniguchi CM, Skibber J, Ludmir EB, You YN, Smith GL, Bednarski B, Kostousov L, Koay EJ, Minsky BD, Tillman M, Portier S, Eng C, Koong AC, Chang GJ, Foo WC, Wang J, Soto LS, Morris VK. Differential Spatial Gene and Protein Expression Associated with Recurrence Following Chemoradiation for Localized Anal Squamous Cell Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:1701. [PMID: 36980587 PMCID: PMC10046657 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Revised: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The identification of transcriptomic and protein biomarkers prognosticating recurrence risk after chemoradiation of localized squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) has been limited by a lack of available fresh tissue at initial presentation. We analyzed archival FFPE SCCA specimens from pretreatment biopsies prior to chemoradiation for protein and RNA biomarkers from patients with localized SCCA who recurred (N = 23) and who did not recur (N = 25). Tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME) were analyzed separately to identify biomarkers with significantly different expression between the recurrent and non-recurrent groups. Recurrent patients had higher mean protein expression of FoxP3, MAPK-activation markers (BRAF, p38-MAPK) and PI3K/Akt activation (phospho-Akt) within the tumor regions. The TME was characterized by the higher protein expression of immune checkpoint biomarkers such as PD-1, OX40L and LAG3. For patients with recurrent SCCA, the higher mean protein expression of fibronectin was observed in the tumor and TME compartments. No significant differences in RNA expression were observed. The higher baseline expression of immune checkpoint biomarkers, together with markers of MAPK and PI3K/Akt signaling, are associated with recurrence following chemoradiation for patients with localized SCCA. These data provide a rationale towards the application of immune-based therapeutic strategies to improve curative-intent outcomes beyond conventional therapies for patients with SCCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharia Hernandez
- Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (S.H.)
| | - Prajnan Das
- Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Emma B. Holliday
- Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Li Shen
- Bioinformatics, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Wei Lu
- Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (S.H.)
| | - Benny Johnson
- Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Craig A. Messick
- Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Cullen M. Taniguchi
- Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - John Skibber
- Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ethan B. Ludmir
- Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Y. Nancy You
- Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Grace Li Smith
- Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Brian Bednarski
- Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Larisa Kostousov
- Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (S.H.)
| | - Eugene J. Koay
- Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Bruce D. Minsky
- Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Matthew Tillman
- Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Shaelynn Portier
- Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Cathy Eng
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Albert C. Koong
- Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - George J. Chang
- Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Wai Chin Foo
- Pathology, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jing Wang
- Bioinformatics, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Luisa Solis Soto
- Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (S.H.)
| | - Van K. Morris
- Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
HPV virus and biomarkers of resistance to chemoradiation in circulating tumor cells from patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. Pathol Res Pract 2023; 243:154327. [PMID: 36731178 DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2023.154327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Localized anal cancer is mostly represented by squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) and is cured in ≥80 % of cases by chemoradiation (CRT). Development of techniques for detection/evaluating circulating tumor cells (CTCs) for diagnosis/ prognosis/response to therapy can change the manner we treat/follow SCCA patients. OBJECTIVE to detect CTCs from patients with SCCA and evaluate the presence of HPV virus, p16 expression and markers related to resistance to CRT (RAD23B/ ERCC1/ TYMS) in CTCs at baseline and after CRT. METHODS CTCs were isolated/quantified by ISET®, protein expressions were analyzed by immunocytochemistry and HPV DNA was detected by chromogenic in situ hybridization. RESULTS We enrolled 15 patients: median age was 61 (43-73) years, the majority was women (10/15). CTCs were detected in all patients at baseline (median= 0.4 (0.4-3.33) CTCs/mL) and in 8/9 patients, after CRT (median= 2.33 (0-7.0) CTCs/mL). DNA from HPV was found in CTCs in 14/15 patients (93.33 %) at baseline and in 7/9 (77.7 %) after treatment. At a median follow-up of 22.20 (1.45-38.55) months, three patients expressed ERCC1 in CTCs after treatment, with one of them having disease recurrence. CONCLUSION We showed that detection of HPV in CTCs from patients with non-metastatic SCCA is feasible and appears to be a sensitive diagnostic method. These results may be clinically useful for better monitoring these patients. However, future larger cohorts may demonstrate whether there is any correlation between the presence of HPV and the expression of screening markers for CRT in SCCA.
Collapse
|
58
|
Lycke Wind K, Garm Spindler KL, Maria Lutz C, Nyvang L, Kronborg C. Estimated dose to site of loco-regional recurrence after radiotherapy in anal cancer using point of origin methods. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 25:100424. [PMID: 36817982 PMCID: PMC9929855 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Loco-regional recurrence (LRR) dominates the failure pattern after curative radiotherapy in anal cancer. The aim of this study was to estimate dose of LRRs in anal cancer using a point of origin-based method. Method and materials Of 321 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus, 31 patients with LRR (29 local recurrences and 5 regional lymph node recurrences) were available for analysis. The recurrence volumes were delineated on recurrence magnetic resonance imaging (rMRI). Rigid and subsequent deformable co-registration of planning computerised tomography scans and rMRI were performed. Point of origin was estimated as the centre of mass (COM) and an observer-based point of origin (obs-PO). Doses to COM and obs-PO, as well as the full recurrence volume, were estimated and the relation to target volumes was extracted. Results The median minimum dose to COM was 63.8 Gy (range 32.5-65.1 Gy) and 63.7 Gy (range 35.5-65.2 Gy) to obs-PO of local recurrences. COM was included in the high dose volume (64 Gy) in 86 % of cases, and obs-PO was included in 75 % of cases. There was no difference in minimum dose to COM and obs-PO, and the median distance between the two points was 3.3 mm (range 0.6-19.8 mm). No recurrences occurred in primarily boosted lymph nodes. Conclusion The majority of LLRs were located within the high dose volume indicating radioresistance as the primary cause of recurrence in anal cancer. No difference between the use of COM and obs-PO was evident.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Lycke Wind
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark,Corresponding author.
| | - Karen-Lise Garm Spindler
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Christina Maria Lutz
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Lars Nyvang
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Camilla Kronborg
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark,Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Annede P, Ferre M, Kirisits C, Pieters BR, Schmid M, Strnad V, Westerveld H, Chargari C. Brachytherapy boost in anal canal cancer - A GEC ESTRO PDR task force meta-analysis. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 39:100589. [PMID: 36785565 PMCID: PMC9918408 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose A meta-analysis is presented comparing clinical outcomes and toxicities between high dose rate (HDR) and pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy (BT) for anal cancer. Methods and material Retrospective or prospective clinical trials were identified on electronical databases. Data were collected per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and meta-Analyses guidelines. Pooled effect size for HDR and PDR BT were compared using subgroup analyses. Results Nine retrospective studies with a total of 481 patients treated were included of which 219 with HDR and 262 with PDR. Significant differences were observed between the two groups for baseline characteristics and treatment. The cumulative proportion of stage T3-T4 was lower in the HDR group, 0.15 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.07-0.29] vs 0.27 [95 %CI 0.09-0.57] in the LDR group, p < 0.001. Lower BT doses (in equivalent 2-Gy fraction dose) were given for patients in the HDR group, 11.9 Gy [95 %CI 8.2-15.5] vs 19.5 Gy [95 %CI 15.0-24.0] in the PDR group, p < 0.001. No significant differences were found for clinical outcomes or toxicities. The pooled effect size of the overall survival at 5 years for HDR and PDR was respectively 0.82 [95 %CI 0.70-0.94] and 0.82 [95 %CI 0.73-0.91], p > 0.99. The 5 years local control was 0.86 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.81-0.91] and 0.83 [95 %CI 0.77-0.89], p = 0.62. Cumulative toxicity-related colostomy proportion was 0.04 [95 %CI 0.02-0.09] and 0.03 [95 %CI 0.02-0.07], p = 0.85. Conclusion Both modalities provided a good profile of tolerance and are effective organ conservative strategies for patients with anal canal cancer. In parallel with ongoing developments to better determine the optimal fractionation and dose for HDR-BT treatments, especially in large tumors, PDR BT still has a crucial role for dose escalation strategy in advanced cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Annede
- Center of Radiation Oncology, French Red Cross, Toulon, France, Paris Saclay University, Paris, France
| | - Marjorie Ferre
- Department of Radiotherapy, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Christian Kirisits
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bradley R. Pieters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers/University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maximilian Schmid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Vratislav Strnad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Henrike Westerveld
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière – Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris – Paris Sorbonne University, France,Corresponding author.
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Murofushi KN, Itasaka S, Shimokawa M, Murakami Y, Yamamoto T, Nishimura Y, Kudo S, Sakamoto T, Ariga T, Ogo E, Taguchi K, Jingu K, Ogawa K. A phase II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin-C for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (the JROSG 10-2 trial). JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2023; 64:154-161. [PMID: 36280895 PMCID: PMC9855315 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrac069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
This study assessed the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCAC). Patients with T1-4N0-3M0 SCCAC received chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU, 800 mg/m2/day, 96-h infusion) and mitomycin-C (MMC, 10 mg/m2 bolus). Patients treated with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were administered 36.0 Gy in 20 fractions or 49.5 Gy in 33 fractions for elective nodal irradiation and 59.4 Gy in 33 fractions for primary tumor and metastatic nodal irradiation. The sample size was considered sufficient to estimate 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the true 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) within a width of +15% when the expected true 2-year DFS was 70%. The primary endpoint was 2-year DFS. The secondary endpoints were 2-year overall survival (OS), locoregional control (LC), colostomy-free survival (CFS) and adverse events. Thirty-one patients were enrolled between January 2014 and July 2019. The median follow-up was 33.3 months (range, 16.2-65.8 months). Among the 31 patients, 13%, 32%, 16% and 39% had stage I, II, IIIA and IIIB disease, respectively. Thirty patients were treated with IMRT. Complete response (CR) was achieved in 27 patients. The 2-year DFS, OS, LC and CFS rates were 77.4% (95% CI, 58.4-88.5%), 93.5% (95% CI, 76.6-98.3%), 83.9% (95% CI, 65.5-92.9%) and 80.6% (95% CI, 61.9-90.8%), respectively. One patient experienced grade 3 late adverse events; however, no grade ≥ 4 late adverse events occurred. Good DFS with a low rate of late adverse events was observed. Chemoradiotherapy with 5-FU and MMC was effective for SCCAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiko Nemoto Murofushi
- Corresponding author. Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8677, Japan. Tel: +81-3-3823-2101. Fax: +81-3-4463-7591.
| | - Satoshi Itasaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama 710-8602, Japan
| | - Mototsugu Shimokawa
- Department of Biostatistics, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan
| | - Yuji Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan
| | - Takaya Yamamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi 980-8575, Japan
| | - Yasumasa Nishimura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka 589-8511, Japan
| | - Shigehiro Kudo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama 362-0806, Japan
| | - Takashi Sakamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Kyoto 615-8256, Japan
| | - Takuro Ariga
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0215, Japan
- Health Information Management Center, University of the Ryukyus Hospital, Okinawa 903-0215, Japan
| | - Etsuyo Ogo
- Kurume University Radiation Oncology Center, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan
| | - Kentaro Taguchi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo 113-8677, Japan
| | - Keiichi Jingu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi 980-8575, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Ogawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Lukovic J, Hosni A, Liu A, Chen J, Tadic T, Patel T, Li K, Han K, Lindsay P, Craig T, Brierley J, Barry A, Wong R, Ringash J, Dawson LA, Kim JJ. Evaluation of dosimetric predictors of toxicity after IMRT with concurrent chemotherapy for anal cancer. Radiother Oncol 2023; 178:109429. [PMID: 36455685 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigates the impact of dosimetric parameters on acute and late toxicity for patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) treated with image-guided intensity modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients were enrolled in an observational cohort study between 2008 and 2013 (median follow-up 3.4 years). They were treated with standardized target and organ-at-risk (OAR) contouring, planning, and IG-IMRT. Radiotherapy dose, based on clinicopathologic features, ranged from 45 Gy to 63 Gy to gross targets and 27 Gy to 36 Gy to elective targets. Chemotherapy was concurrent 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C (weeks 1&5). Toxicity was prospectively graded using NCI CTCAE v.3 and RTOG scales. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between dose/volume parameters (e.g small bowel V5) and corresponding grade 2 + and 3+ (G2+/3 + ) toxicities (e.g. diarrhea). RESULTS In total, 87 and 79 patients were included in the acute and late toxicity analyses, respectively. The most common acute G2 + toxicities were skin (dermatitis in 87 % [inguino-genital skin], 91 % [perianal skin]) and hematologic in 58 %. G2 + late anal toxicity (sphincter dysfunction), gastrointestinal toxicity, and skin toxicity were respectively experienced by 49 %, 38 %, and 44 % of patients. Statistically significant associations were observed between: G2 + acute diarrhea and small bowel V35; G2 + acute genitourinary toxicity and bladder D0.5cc; G2 + inguino-genital skin toxicity and anterior skin V35; G2 + perianal skin toxicity and posterior skin V15; G2 + anemia and lower pelvis bone V45. D0.5 cc was significantly predictive of late toxicity (G2 + anal dysfunction, intestinal toxicity, and inguino-genital/perianal dermatitis). Maximum skin toxicity grade was significantly correlated with the requirement for a treatment break. CONCLUSION Statistically significant dose-volume parameters were identified and may be used to offer individualized risk prediction and to inform treatment planning. Additional validation of the results is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jelena Lukovic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Ali Hosni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Amy Liu
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Jasmine Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tony Tadic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Kecheng Li
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kathy Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Patricia Lindsay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tim Craig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - James Brierley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Aisling Barry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rebecca Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jolie Ringash
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Laura A Dawson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - John J Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Kharofa JR, Yothers G, Kachnic LA, Ajani J, Meyer JE, Augspurger ME, Okawara GS, Garg MK, Schefter TE, Swanson TA, Doncals DE, Kim H, Zaki BI, Narayan S, Lee RJ, Mamon HJ, Schwartz MA, Moughan J, Crane CH. Use of the Toxicity Index in Evaluating Adverse Events in Anal Cancer Trials: Analysis of RTOG 9811 and RTOG 0529. Am J Clin Oncol 2022; 45:534-536. [PMID: 36413683 PMCID: PMC9912479 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Novel toxicity metrics that account for all adverse event (AE) grades and the frequency of may enhance toxicity reporting in clinical trials. The Toxicity Index (TI) accounts for all AE grades and frequencies for categories of interest. We evaluate the feasibility of using the TI methodology in 2 prospective anal cancer trials and to evaluate whether more conformal radiation (using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy) results in improved toxicity as measured by the TI. Patients enrolled on NRG/RTOG 0529 or nonconformal RT enrolled on the 5-Fluorouracil/Mitomycin arm of NRG/RTOG 9811 were compared using the TI. Patients treated on NRG/RTOG 0529 had lower median TI compared with patients treated with nonconformal RT on NRG/RTOG 9811 for combined GI/GU/Heme/Derm events (3.935 vs 3.996, P=0.014). The TI methodology is a feasible method to assess all AEs of interest and may be useful as a composite metric for future efforts aimed at treatment de-escalation or escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Greg Yothers
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center
| | | | | | | | | | - Gordon S Okawara
- Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON
| | | | | | | | | | - Hyun Kim
- Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
63
|
Franco P, Porreca A, Mantello G, Valvo F, Gasparini L, Slim N, Manfrida S, De Felice F, Gerardi MA, Vagge S, Krengli M, Palazzari E, Osti MF, Gonnelli A, Catalano G, Pittoni P, Ivaldi GB, Lupattelli M, Rosetto ME, Niespolo RM, Guido A, Durante O, Macchia G, Munoz F, El Khouzai B, Lucido MR, Arcadipane F, Casadei Gardini A, Maria D'Angelillo R, Gambacorta MA, Genovesi D, Di Nicola M, Caravatta L. External validation of a composite bio-humoral index in anal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiation. Radiother Oncol 2022; 177:9-15. [PMID: 36273737 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2022] [Revised: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE A prognostic scoring system based on laboratory inflammation parameters, [Hemo-Eosinophils-Inflammation (HEI) index], including baseline hemoglobin level, the systemic inflammatory index and eosinophil count was recently proposed in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (ASCC). HEI was shown to discriminate disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival in ASCC patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation (CRT). We tested the accuracy of the model on a multicentric cohort for external validation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients treated with CRT were enrolled. The Kaplan-Meier curves for DFS and OS based on HEI risk group were calculated and the log-rank test was used. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the prognostic factors for DFS and OS. The exponential of the regression coefficients provided an estimate of the hazard ratio (HR). For model discrimination, we determined Harrell's C-index, Gönen & Heller K Index and the explained variation on the log relative hazard scale. RESULTS A total of 877 patients was available. Proportional hazards were adjusted for age, gender, tumor-stage, and chemotherapy. Two-year DFS was 77 %(95 %CI:72.0-82.4) and 88.3 %(95 %CI:84.8-92.0 %) in the HEI high- and low- risk groups. Two-year OS was 87.8 %(95 %CI:83.7-92.0) and 94.2 %(95 %CI:91.5-97). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed a HR = 2.02(95 %CI:1.25-3.26; p = 0.004) for the HEI high-risk group with respect to OS and a HR = 1.53(95 %CI:1.04-2.24; p = 0.029) for DFS. Harrel C-indexes were 0.68 and 0.66 in the validation dataset, for OS and DFS. Gonen-Heller K indexes were 0.67 and 0.71, respectively. CONCLUSION The HEI index proved to be a prognosticator in ASCC patients treated with CRT. Model discrimination in the external validation cohort was acceptable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierfrancesco Franco
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, and University Hospital "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy.
| | - Annamaria Porreca
- Laboratory of Biostatistics, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
| | - Giovanna Mantello
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy.
| | - Francesca Valvo
- Radiotherapy Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Lucrezia Gasparini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, "SS Annunziata" Hospital, "G. d'Annunzio" University, Via Dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy.
| | - Najla Slim
- Department of Radiotherapy, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Stefania Manfrida
- "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario, 00168 Roma, Italy.
| | - Francesca De Felice
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | - Marianna A Gerardi
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Stefano Vagge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Marco Krengli
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, and University Hospital "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy.
| | - Elisa Palazzari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Oncological Referral Center, Aviano, Italy.
| | - Mattia Falchetto Osti
- Unit of Radiation Oncology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00100 Rome, Italy.
| | - Alessandra Gonnelli
- Department of Radiotherapy, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
| | - Gianpiero Catalano
- Radiation Oncology Center, IRCCS Multimedica, Sesto San Giovanni, Italy.
| | - Patrizia Pittoni
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Asst Lariana, Ospedale di Como, Como, Italy.
| | | | - Marco Lupattelli
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, 06156, Perugia, Italy.
| | | | | | - Alessandra Guido
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Oreste Durante
- Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.
| | - Fernando Munoz
- Department of Radiotherapy, Azienda U. S. L. della Valle d'Aosta, 11100, Aosta, Italy.
| | - Badr El Khouzai
- Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology-IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
| | | | - Francesca Arcadipane
- Radiation Oncology, AOU Citta' della Salute e della Scienza, Presidio San Giovanni Antica Sede, Torino, Italy.
| | - Andrea Casadei Gardini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Università Vita-Salute, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, 20019 Milan, Italy.
| | - Rolando Maria D'Angelillo
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario, 00168 Roma, Italy.
| | - Domenico Genovesi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, "SS Annunziata" Hospital, "G. d'Annunzio" University, Via Dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy; Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
| | - Marta Di Nicola
- Laboratory of Biostatistics, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
| | - Luciana Caravatta
- Radiation Oncology Unit, "SS Annunziata" Hospital, "G. d'Annunzio" University, Via Dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Jaraudias C, Saint LMA, Schiappa R, Baron D, Marie L, Benezery K, Scouarnec C, François É, Evesque L. Failure of Initial Curative Treatment for Non-Metastatic Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: From Prognostic Factors Analysis to Stratified Treatment. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2022; 21:362-370. [PMID: 35934635 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
In squamous cell anal canal neoplasms, persistent disease or recurrence after initial chemoradiotherapy are not the rule, yet their occurrence deserves to be analyzed to better identify prognostics factors. The aim of our study was to describe the patterns of failures of the initial treatment, their subsequent evolution and to identify prognostic factors in these relapsed patients. All patients with non-metastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma initially treated with curative intent at the Centre Antoine Lacassagne between 1999 and 2019, and who presented persistent disease or recurrence were analyzed. The median follow-up was 44 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors. From our database of 528 patients, 77 patients were eligible: 25 with persistent disease and 52 with recurrence after complete response. The median overall survival was 39 months (95% CI: 25.5-52.3 months) from the date of treatment failure. In univariate analysis, prognostic factors were gender, initial lymph node status, type of failure, response to treatment's failure. In multivariate analysis, only female gender remained statistically significant (HR 0.43- P=0.016). 32% of patients with persistent disease had metastatic status. 17.3% and 5.8% of recurrences respectively occurred after three and five years of follow-up. Systematic imaging could be performed after initial treatment because of distant lesions in one third of patients with persistent disease. The follow-up should not be interrupted before five years, given the significant frequency of late recurrences. In multivariate analysis, only female gender was statistically significant. Stratified treatment based on prognostic factors could be envisaged, the details of which remain to be defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Jaraudias
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 Avenue Valombrose 06100 Nice, France.
| | | | - Renaud Schiappa
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Health Data, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 Avenue Valombrose 06100 Nice, France
| | - David Baron
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 Avenue Valombrose 06100 Nice, France
| | - Léa Marie
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 Avenue Valombrose 06100 Nice, France
| | - Karen Benezery
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 Avenue Valombrose 06100 Nice, France
| | - Cyrielle Scouarnec
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 Avenue Valombrose 06100 Nice, France
| | - Éric François
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 Avenue Valombrose 06100 Nice, France
| | - Ludovic Evesque
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 Avenue Valombrose 06100 Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Influence of radiation treatment technique (IMRT vs. 3D-RT) on acute toxicity and prognostic factors for survival for anal cancer. Sci Rep 2022; 12:19914. [PMID: 36402828 PMCID: PMC9675840 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-24362-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
We compared our institutional experience with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-RT) for definitive treatment of primary anal cancer. We performed a single-institution retrospective review of all patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive (chemo) radiotherapy with curative intent from 2004 through 2018. We assessed several prognostic factors in respect to relevant survival endpoints. In addition, acute toxicities were determined and compared between IMRT and 3D-RT patients. This study included 94 patients (58 IMRT, 36 3D-RT). Mean follow up for all patients, for IMRT and 3D-RT patients was 61 months (range 6-176), 46 months (range 6-118), and 85 months (range 6-176), respectively. 5-year overall survival (OS) was 86%, disease-free survival (DFS) was 72%, and colostomy-free survival (CFS) was 75% in the IMRT cohort. In the 3D-RT cohort, OS was 87%, DFS was 71%, and CFS was 81% (all p > 0.05). Male gender and Karnofsky Index (KI) were revealed as independent prognostic factors for 5-year OS (p = 0.017; p = 0.023). UICC stage was an independent prognostic factor for DFS and CFS (p = 0.023; p = 0.042). In addition, the pre-treatment leukocyte count was an independent prognostic factor for CFS (p = 0.042). Acute grade ≥ 3 toxicity was not significantly different between IMRT and 3D-RT patients, but the IMRT cohort had favorable outcomes. This study confirmed IMRT as the primary definitive treatment of anal cancer. With similar survival rates, IMRT had the potential to reduce acute toxicity by sparing organs at risk. Promising prognostic factors such as BMI, KI, and leucocyte and hemoglobin levels should be further investigated.
Collapse
|
66
|
Åström LM, Behrens CP, Storm KS, Sibolt P, Serup-Hansen E. Online adaptive radiotherapy of anal cancer: Normal tissue sparing, target propagation methods, and first clinical experience. Radiother Oncol 2022; 176:92-98. [PMID: 36174846 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) potentially spares OARs as PTV margins are reduced. This study evaluates dosimetric benefits, compared to standard non-adaptive radiotherapy (non-ART), target propagation methods, and first clinical treatments of CBCT-guided oART of anal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Treatment plans with standard non-ART and reduced oART PTV margins were retrospectively generated for 23 consecutive patients with anal cancer. For five patients randomly selected among the 23 patients, weekly CBCT-guided oART sessions were simulated, where the targets were either deformed or rigidly propagated. Preferred target propagation method and dose to OARs were evaluated. Ten consecutive patients with anal cancer were treated with CBCT-guided oART. Target propagation methods and oART procedure time were evaluated. RESULTS For the retrospective treatment plans, oART resulted in median reductions in bowel bag V45Gy of 11.4 % and bladder V35Gy of 16.1%. Corresponding values for the simulated sessions were 7.5% and 27.1%. In the simulated sessions, 35% of all targets were deformed while 65% were rigidly propagated. Manual editing and rigid propagation were necessary to obtain acceptable target coverage. In the clinical treatments, the primary and some elective targets were rigidly propagated, while other targets were deformed. The median oART procedure time, measured from CBCT acquisition to completion of plan review and QA, was 23 min. CONCLUSIONS Simulated oART reduced the dose to OARs, indicating potential reduction in toxicity. Rigid propagation of targets was necessary to reduce the need for manual edit. Clinical treatments demonstrated that oART of anal cancer is feasible but time-consuming.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina M Åström
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark.
| | - Claus P Behrens
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Katrine Smedegaard Storm
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Patrik Sibolt
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Eva Serup-Hansen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Romani AM. Cisplatin in Cancer Treatment. Biochem Pharmacol 2022; 206:115323. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2022.115323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 143] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
68
|
Mesorectal failure after chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus: is sphincter-saving surgery reasonable? Tech Coloproctol 2022; 27:379-388. [PMID: 36127625 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02698-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Abdominoperineal resection (APR) is today the standard treatment for improving survival in case of mesorectal failure without anal canal recurrence after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCC). The aim of this study was to assess if a sphincter-saving surgery is a safe alternative to classical salvage APR in these patients. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted on all patients who had total mesorectal excision (TME) with sphincter-saving surgery either with coloanal or low colorectal anastomosis, for mesorectal failure after CRT for SCC between 2012 and 2020 at our institution. The main endpoint of our study was oncological results at the end of follow-up. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were secondary endpoints. RESULTS There were 10 patients, (8 women, median age 55 years [range 45-61 years]). On TME specimens, R0 resections were noted in five (50%), R1 resection in four (40%) and R2 resection in one (10%). After a median follow-up of 42 months (4-74 months), five patients were alive, and four (40%) were alive at 5-year follow-up. During follow-up, locoregional failure after TME was noted in two patients (20%), distant relapse in three patients (30%) and both locoregional plus distant failure in two patients (20%). Only two patients (20%) had anal recurrence, one in the anal canal, the other in the peri-anastomotic area. Long- term local control was achieved in 2 of the 5 patients (40%) who underwent R0 resection versus only 1/4 patients (25%) with R1 resection. CONCLUSIONS Our preliminary study suggested that sphincter-saving surgery could be proposed in selected patients with SCC presenting mesorectal failure after CRT, providing a feasible R0 resection.
Collapse
|
69
|
Portale G, Parotto M, Pozza A, Scarpa M, Cavallin F. Chemoradiation vs. local excision in the management of early squamous cell carcinoma of the anus: a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis 2022; 37:1937-1944. [PMID: 36002749 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04241-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) suffers a constant increase each year in the last decades. Recent studies suggested the possibility of local excision (LE) as an option for early-stage SCAC patients. This systematic review aims to summarize the available evidence on the comparison of LE vs. chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in the treatment of early SCCA patients. METHODS We conducted a literature review including MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, clinicaltrials.gov, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews through June 2022. MOOSE guidelines were followed. We used the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) tool to assess quality. Data on survival and procedure-associated costs were extracted. RESULTS Four retrospective studies including 3323 patients were included. They were all comparative retrospective cohort studies (three were registry-based studies, either NCDB or SEER) with a MINORS score of 16-19 points. Overall survival (OS) was comparable between LE and CRT patients in three studies, with a 5-year OS of 85.3-100% in LE patients and 85-91.6% in CRT patients. One study investigated cancer-specific survival (CSS) and reported similar 5-year CSS in LE (98%) and CRT patients (96%). One investigated progression-free survival (PFS) and did not report any statistically significant difference in 5-year PFS between LE (91%) and CRT patients (83%). Only one study considered the mean costs associated with the two approaches (29,210 USD with LE and 46,350 USD with CRT). CONCLUSIONS LE may potentially be considered a valid alternative to CRT for patients with early-stage SCAA. Results of prospective randomized long-term trials comparing LE with CRT are warranted to draw definitive conclusions and consider LE as a true cost-effective strategy for T1N0 SCCA with similar oncologic results offered by CRT, which-to date-remains the "gold standard." PROSPERO REGISTRATION CRD42022338750.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Portale
- Department of General Surgery, ULSS 6 Euganea, Cittadella, Padua, Italy.
| | - Matteo Parotto
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anna Pozza
- Department of General Surgery, ULSS 2 MULLarca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy
| | - Marco Scarpa
- Department of General Surgery, University of Padova Medica Sciences, Padua, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
70
|
Mathias-Machado MC, Peixoto RD, Moniz CMV, Jácome AA. Biomarkers in Anal Cancer: Current Status in Diagnosis, Disease Progression and Therapeutic Strategies. Biomedicines 2022; 10:2029. [PMID: 36009576 PMCID: PMC9405643 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10082029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) is a rare neoplasm, but with rising incidence rates in the past few decades; it is etiologically linked with the human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and is especially prevalent in immunocompromised patients, mainly those infected with HIV. Fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiotherapy remains the cornerstone of the treatment of non-metastatic disease, but the locally advanced disease still presents high rates of disease recurrence and systemic therapy of SCCA is an unmet clinical need. Despite sharing common molecular aspects with other HPV-related malignancies, such as cervical and head and neck cancers, SCCA presents specific epigenomic, genomic, and transcriptomic abnormalities, which suggest that genome-guided personalized therapies should be specifically designed for this disease. Actionable mutations are rare in SCCA and immune checkpoint inhibition has not yet been proven useful in an unselected population of patients. Therefore, advances in systemic therapy of SCCA will only be possible with the identification of predictive biomarkers and the subsequent development of targeted therapies or immunotherapeutic approaches that consider the unique tumor microenvironment and the intra- and inter-tumoral heterogeneity. In the present review, we address the molecular characterization of SCCA and discuss potential diagnostic, predictive and prognostic biomarkers of this complex and challenging disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Cecília Mathias-Machado
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Oncoclinicas, São Paulo 04538-132, Brazil
- Department of Oncology, ICESP—Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-000, Brazil
| | | | - Camila Motta Venchiarutti Moniz
- Department of Oncology, ICESP—Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-000, Brazil
| | - Alexandre A. Jácome
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Oncoclinicas, Belo Horizonte 34000-000, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Theophanous S, Lønne PI, Choudhury A, Berbee M, Dekker A, Dennis K, Dewdney A, Gambacorta MA, Gilbert A, Guren MG, Holloway L, Jadon R, Kochhar R, Mohamed AA, Muirhead R, Parés O, Raszewski L, Roy R, Scarsbrook A, Sebag-Montefiore D, Spezi E, Spindler KLG, van Triest B, Vassiliou V, Malinen E, Wee L, Appelt AL. Development and validation of prognostic models for anal cancer outcomes using distributed learning: protocol for the international multi-centre atomCAT2 study. Diagn Progn Res 2022; 6:14. [PMID: 35922837 PMCID: PMC9351222 DOI: 10.1186/s41512-022-00128-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anal cancer is a rare cancer with rising incidence. Despite the relatively good outcomes conferred by state-of-the-art chemoradiotherapy, further improving disease control and reducing toxicity has proven challenging. Developing and validating prognostic models using routinely collected data may provide new insights for treatment development and selection. However, due to the rarity of the cancer, it can be difficult to obtain sufficient data, especially from single centres, to develop and validate robust models. Moreover, multi-centre model development is hampered by ethical barriers and data protection regulations that often limit accessibility to patient data. Distributed (or federated) learning allows models to be developed using data from multiple centres without any individual-level patient data leaving the originating centre, therefore preserving patient data privacy. This work builds on the proof-of-concept three-centre atomCAT1 study and describes the protocol for the multi-centre atomCAT2 study, which aims to develop and validate robust prognostic models for three clinically important outcomes in anal cancer following chemoradiotherapy. METHODS This is a retrospective multi-centre cohort study, investigating overall survival, locoregional control and freedom from distant metastasis after primary chemoradiotherapy for anal squamous cell carcinoma. Patient data will be extracted and organised at each participating radiotherapy centre (n = 18). Candidate prognostic factors have been identified through literature review and expert opinion. Summary statistics will be calculated and exchanged between centres prior to modelling. The primary analysis will involve developing and validating Cox proportional hazards models across centres for each outcome through distributed learning. Outcomes at specific timepoints of interest and factor effect estimates will be reported, allowing for outcome prediction for future patients. DISCUSSION The atomCAT2 study will analyse one of the largest available cross-institutional cohorts of patients with anal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. The analysis aims to provide information on current international clinical practice outcomes and may aid the personalisation and design of future anal cancer clinical trials through contributing to a better understanding of patient risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stelios Theophanous
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - Per-Ivar Lønne
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- MAASTRO (Dept of Radiotherapy), GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University and Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Maaike Berbee
- MAASTRO (Dept of Radiotherapy), GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University and Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Andre Dekker
- MAASTRO (Dept of Radiotherapy), GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University and Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Alexandra Gilbert
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Marianne Grønlie Guren
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lois Holloway
- Ingham Research Institute and Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Rajarshi Roy
- Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK
| | - Andrew Scarsbrook
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | | | - Baukelien van Triest
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Eirik Malinen
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Leonard Wee
- MAASTRO (Dept of Radiotherapy), GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University and Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Ane L Appelt
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Hunte SO, Clark CH, Zyuzikov N, Nisbet A. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT): a review of clinical outcomes—what is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation? Br J Radiol 2022; 95:20201289. [PMID: 35616646 PMCID: PMC10162061 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20201289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Modern conformal radiation therapy using techniques such as modulation, image guidance and motion management have changed the face of radiotherapy today offering superior conformity, efficiency, and reproducibility to clinics worldwide. This review assesses the impact of these advanced radiotherapy techniques on patient toxicity and survival rates reported from January 2017 to September 2020. The main aims are to establish if dosimetric and efficiency gains correlate with improved survival and reduced toxicities and to answer the question ‘What is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation of VMAT?’. Compared with 3DCRT, improvements have been reported with VMAT in prostate, locally advanced cervical carcinoma and various head and neck applications, leading to the shift in technology to VMAT. Other sites such as thoracic neoplasms and nasopharyngeal carcinomas have observed some improvement with VMAT although not in line with improved dosimetric measures, and the burden of toxicity and the incidence of cancer related deaths remain high, signaling the need to further mitigate toxicity and increase survival. As technological advancement continues, large randomised long-term clinical trials are required to determine the way-forward and offer site-specific recommendations. These studies are usually expensive and time consuming, therefore utilising pooled real-world data in a prospective nature can be an alternative solution to comprehensively assess the efficacy of modern radiotherapy techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherisse Ornella Hunte
- Radiotherapy Department, Cancer Centre of Trinidad and Tobago, St James, Trinidad and Tobago
- University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad & Tobago
| | - Catharine H Clark
- Radiotherapy Physics, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Metrology for Medical Physics National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK
- Department of Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Andrew Nisbet
- Department of Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Grave A, Blanc J, De Bari B, Pernot M, Boulbair F, Noirclerc M, Vienot A, Kim S, Borg C, Boustani J. Long-Term Disease Control After locoregional Pelvic Chemoradiation in Patients with Advanced Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2022; 12:918271. [PMID: 35936677 PMCID: PMC9354951 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.918271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The incidence of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is increasing. Even if systemic docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil (DCF) provide a high rate of long-term remission, the role of pelvic chemoradiation (CRT) is unknown in this setting. We reported the safety and efficacy of local CRT in patients with synchronous metastatic SCCA who achieved objective response after upfront DCF. Methods Patients included in Epitopes HPV01 or Epitopes HPV02 or SCARCE trials and treated with DCF followed by pelvic CRT were included. Concurrent chemotherapy was based on mitomycin (MMC) (10 mg/m² for two cycles) and fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine 825 mg/m² twice a day at each RT treatment day or two cycles of intra-venous 5FU 1000 mg/m² from day 1 to day 4). Primary endpoints were safety, local complete response rate, and local progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were PFS, overall survival (OS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Results From 2013 to 2018, 16 patients received DCF followed by a complementary pelvic CRT for advanced SCCA. Median follow-up was 42 months [range, 11-71]. All patients received the complete radiation dose. Compliance to concurrent CT was poor. Overall, 13/15 of the patients (87%) had at least one grade 1-2 acute toxicity and 11/15 of the patients (73%) had at least one grade 3-4 toxicity. There was no treatment-related death. The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse effects were neutropenia (36%), dermatitis (40%), and anitis (47%). Eleven patients (73%) had at least one chronic grade 1 or 2 toxicity. One patient had a grade 4 chronic rectitis (7%). Complete local response rate was 81% at first evaluation and 62.5% at the end of the follow-up. Median local PFS was not reached and the 3-year local PFS was 77% (95%CI 76.8-77). Conclusions In patients with metastatic SCCA who had a significant objective response after upfront DCF, local CRT was feasible with high complete local response rate. The good local control rate, despite interruptions due to toxicities and low CT compliance, underline the role of pelvic RT. The high rate of toxicity prompts the need to adapt CRT regimen in the metastatic setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athénaïs Grave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Julie Blanc
- Department of Statistics, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Berardino De Bari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Réseau hospitalier neuchâtelois, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland
| | - Mandy Pernot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Fatiha Boulbair
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nord Franche-Comté Hospital, Montbéliard, France
| | - Monique Noirclerc
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hasenrain Hospital, Mulhouse, France
| | - Angélique Vienot
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Stefano Kim
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Christophe Borg
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Jihane Boustani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France
- *Correspondence: Jihane Boustani,
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
ORUÇ AF, KARABULUT GUL S. Anal canal cancers. JOURNAL OF HEALTH SCIENCES AND MEDICINE 2022. [DOI: 10.32322/jhsm.1054519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Although anal canal cancer is rare, its incidence has increased in the last 30 years, especially in young men. The most common pathological type is squamous cell carcinoma. Definitive histopathological diagnosis is made by biopsy. “American Joint Committee on Cancer” (AJCC) TNM staging is used for staging. The standard approach in treatment is radiochemotherapy, and surgery is applied in persistent or recurrent failure.
Collapse
|
75
|
Vater LB, Lefebvre B, Turk A, Clasen SC. Fluoropyrimidine Cardiotoxicity: Incidence, Outcomes, and Safety of Rechallenge. Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:943-950. [PMID: 35347593 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01256-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Fluoropyrimidine (FDP) chemotherapy regimens used in the treatment of solid tumors such as breast, gastrointestinal, and hepatobiliary malignancies have led to significant survival benefits. However, FDP cardiotoxicity can lead to premature termination of FDP-based chemotherapy treatments. Resuming these crucial therapies after initial FDP cardiotoxicity can be challenging for patients and healthcare providers. RECENT FINDINGS Symptomatic cardiotoxicity occurs in up to 35% of patients treated with FDP-based chemotherapy. The most common symptom is chest pain, but palpitations, dyspnea, myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, and cardiac arrest can also occur. Several large studies have attempted to discern clinical and genetic risk factors in those who develop FDP cardiotoxicity. With cardiac risk factor optimization and aggressive pre-treatment with anti-anginal agents, rechallenging with FDP is possible and allows patients to resume optimal cancer-directed treatment. FDP cardiotoxicity remains a poorly understood identity. We highlight several recent publications attempting to define the risk factors associated with developing FDP cardiotoxicity. The management of FDP cardiotoxicity and consideration of rechallenge of FDP-based regimens highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary partnership between oncologists and cardiologists/cardio-oncologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura B Vater
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Bénédicte Lefebvre
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Anita Turk
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Suparna C Clasen
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, 1800 N. Capitol Ave, E308, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
The Role of Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Anal Cancer and Future Strategies. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2022; 23:1073-1085. [PMID: 35666353 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-022-00939-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Despite being markedly sensitive to chemoradiotherapy, patients with locally advanced (T3-4 and/or node-positive) squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) still present high rates of disease recurrence, which is characterized by meaningful morbidity and mortality. Abdominoperineal resection as salvage surgery may be considered for patients with local recurrence, but with an important negative impact in the quality of life. Systemic therapy of advanced SCCA is an unmet clinical need. Palliative chemotherapy for the management of unresectable or metastatic disease yields approximately 60% of objective response rate; however, it still portends a grim prognosis. Based on the recently published InterAACT trial, carboplatin plus paclitaxel has become the standard of care of advanced disease; modified DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil) may also be considered for fit patients amenable to intensive therapy. There are no FDA-approved therapies for the treatment of chemorefractory patients. Nevertheless, both nivolumab and pembrolizumab may be considered for these patients with promising results, regardless of PD-L1 expression or other predictive biomarkers. It is estimated that approximately 1 out of 5 patients with SCCA will derive large benefit from PD-1 inhibitors, which may produce considerable durations of response. Ongoing clinical trials exploring the combination of chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors in the first-line therapy, combination of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus anti-CTLA-4, and emerging immunotherapeutic approaches, such as adoptive T cell therapies, are eagerly awaited and may bring practice-changing results in the next few years for the treatment of this challenging disease.
Collapse
|
77
|
Eng C, Ciombor KK, Cho M, Dorth JA, Rajdev LN, Horowitz DP, Gollub MJ, Jácome AA, Lockney NA, Muldoon RL, Washington MK, O'Brian BA, Benny A, Lebeck Lee CM, Benson AB, Goodman KA, Morris VK. Anal Cancer: Emerging Standards in a Rare Rare Disease. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:2774-2788. [PMID: 35649196 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The social stigma surrounding an anal cancer diagnosis has traditionally prevented open discussions about this disease. However, as recent treatment options and an increasing rate of diagnoses are made worldwide, awareness is growing. In the United States alone, 9,090 individuals were expected to be diagnosed with anal cancer in 2021. The US annual incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus continues to increase by 2.7% yearly, whereas the mortality rate increases by 3.1%. The main risk factor for anal cancer is a human papillomavirus infection; those with chronic immunosuppression are also at risk. Patients with HIV are 19 times more likely to develop anal cancer compared with the general population. In this review, we have provided an overview of the carcinoma of the anal canal, the role of screening, advancements in radiation therapy, and current trials investigating acute and chronic treatment-related toxicities. This article is a comprehensive approach to presenting the existing data in an effort to encourage continuous international interest in anal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathy Eng
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center/Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Kristen K Ciombor
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center/Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - May Cho
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California- Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA
| | - Jennifer A Dorth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
| | - Lakshmi N Rajdev
- Division for Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Northwell Health/Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY
| | - David P Horowitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Alexandre A Jácome
- OncoBio Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Nova Lima, Brazil
| | - Natalie A Lockney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Roberta L Muldoon
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Mary Kay Washington
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Brittany A O'Brian
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center/Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Amala Benny
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center/Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Cody M Lebeck Lee
- VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Department of Internal Medicine, Nashville, TN
| | - Al B Benson
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine and Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Karyn A Goodman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Van Karlyle Morris
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
78
|
Sobrado LF, Nahas CSR, Marques CFS, Sobrado CW, Nahas SC. Pretreatment colostomy in patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma: Risk factors for a permanent stoma. J Surg Oncol 2022; 126:740-747. [PMID: 35639271 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current standard of care for anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is concurrent chemoradiation (CRT), which enables tumor eradication while preserving the anal sphincter. Patients with locally advanced tumors, however, may experience complications that preclude treatment before stoma creation. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the reversal rate of pretreatment stomas and the risk factors associated with nonreversal. METHODS This single-institution retrospective cohort study using a prospective database included patients diagnosed with anal SCC from January 2008 to December 2020 who required a stoma before curative CRT. RESULTS In total, 651 patients were identified; 65 required a stoma before chemoradiation due to obstruction (43.1%), rectovaginal fistula (20%), and perianal sepsis (36.9%). The stoma was reversed in nine patients after a mean follow-up of 35.8 months. Risk factors associated with a permanent stoma were perianal sepsis (p = 0.010), interruptions during radiotherapy for more than 7 days (p = 0.010), male sex (p = 0.013), poor performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] ≥ 2) (p = 0.023), large tumors (p = 0.045), and cisplatin-based chemotherapy (p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS Pretreatment stomas are unlikely to be reversed, and risk factors for a permanent stoma are perianal sepsis, interruptions during radiotherapy for more than 7 days, male sex, poor performance status (ECOG ≥ 2), large tumors, and cisplatin-based chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas F Sobrado
- Divisão de Cirurgia Colorretal, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Caio S R Nahas
- Divisão de Cirurgia Colorretal, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Carlos F S Marques
- Divisão de Cirurgia Colorretal, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Carlos W Sobrado
- Divisão de Cirurgia Colorretal, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Sergio C Nahas
- Divisão de Cirurgia Colorretal, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Johnsson A, Norman D, Angenete E, Cavalli-Björkman N, Lagerbäck C, Leon O, Lindh B, Lydrup ML, Nilsson MP, Perman M, Radu C, Zackrisson B. Anal cancer in Sweden 2015-2019. Implementation of guidelines, structural changes, national registry and early results. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:575-582. [PMID: 35274596 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2022.2048069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Squamous cell cancer of the anus is an uncommon malignancy, usually caused by human papilloma virus (HPV). Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the recommended treatment in localized disease with cure rates of 60-80%. Local failures should be considered for salvage surgery. With the purpose of improving and equalizing the anal cancer care in Sweden, a number of actions were taken between 2015 and 2017. The aim of this study was to describe the implementation of guidelines and organizational changes and to present early results from the first 5 years of the Swedish anal cancer registry (SACR). METHODS The following were implemented: (1) the first national care program with treatment guidelines, (2) standardized care process, (3) centralization of CRT to four centers and salvage surgery to two centers, (4) weekly national multidisciplinary team meetings where all new cases are discussed, (5) the Swedish anal cancer registry (SACR) was started in 2015. RESULTS The SACR included 912 patients with a diagnosis of anal cancer from 2015 to 2019, reaching a national coverage of 95%. We could show that guidelines issued in 2017 regarding staging procedures and radiotherapy dose modifications were rapidly implemented. At baseline 52% of patients had lymph node metastases and 9% had distant metastases. Out of all patients in the SACR 89% were treated with curative intent, most of them with CRT, after which 92% achieved a local complete remission and the estimated overall 3-year survival was 85%. CONCLUSIONS This is the first report from the SACR, demonstrating rapid nation-wide implementation of guidelines and apparently good treatment outcome in patients with anal cancer in Sweden. The SACR will hopefully be a valuable source for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Johnsson
- Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Eva Angenete
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | | | - Otilia Leon
- Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Birgitta Lindh
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Northern Sweden, Umeå, Sweden
| | | | | | - Mats Perman
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Calin Radu
- Department of Oncology, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Björn Zackrisson
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Northern Sweden, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
80
|
Impact of Definitive Chemoradiation on Quality-of-Life Changes for Patients With Anal Cancer: Long-term Results of a Prospective Study. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65:642-653. [PMID: 35067501 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maintaining and improving quality of life (QOL) are important goals of anal cancer management. This disease is generally curable, with many long-term survivors. OBJECTIVE Long-term QOL after chemoradiation for patients with anal cancer was evaluated. DESIGN This was a prospective cohort study. SETTINGS This study used data from a prospective study of patients with anal cancer who were treated with chemoradiation between 2008 and 2013. PATIENTS Patients with anal cancer who were treated with image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy were included. INTERVENTIONS English-speaking patients completed European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer cancer-specific (C30) and site-specific (CR29) QOL questionnaires at baseline, at end of radiation, at 3 and 6 months, and then annually. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES Long-term QOL was evaluated clinically (a change in score of ≥10 points was considered clinically significant) and statistically (using repeated-measurement analysis) by comparing the subscale scores at 1, 2, and 3 years with baseline scores. Subanalysis compared patients who received a radiation dose of 45 to 54 Gy versus 63 Gy. RESULTS Ninety-six patients were included (median follow-up of 56.5 months). The symptom and functional scales showed a clinically significant decline at the end of treatment with improvement by 3 months after treatment. There was a long-term statistically significant decline in dyspnea, body image, bowel embarrassment, fecal incontinence, and hair loss, and there was long-term statistically and clinically significant worsening of impotence. Higher radiation dose (63 Gy) was not associated with significantly worse QOL. LIMITATIONS Limitations included single-institution, single-arm study design, and lack of dose reconstruction (ie, analyses were based on prescribed, rather than delivered, dose). CONCLUSIONS Patients with anal cancer treated with chemoradiation reported recovery of overall QOL to baseline levels. Specific symptoms remained bothersome, emphasizing the need to address and manage the chemoradiation-induced symptoms, during treatment and in the long term. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B905. IMPACTO DE LA QUIMIORRADIACIN DEFINITIVA EN CAMBIOS EN LA CALIDAD DE VIDA DE LOS PACIENTES CON CNCER ANAL RESULTADOS A LARGO PLAZO DE UN ESTUDIO PROSPECTIVE ANTECEDENTES:Mantener y mejorar la calidad de vida son objetivos importantes del tratamiento del cáncer anal, ya que esta enfermedad generalmente es curable, con muchos sobrevivientes a largo plazo.OBJETIVO:Se evaluó la calidad de vida a largo plazo después de la quimiorradiación en pacientes con cáncer anal.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio de cohorte prospectivo.ENTORNO CLINICO:Utilizamos datos de un estudio prospectivo en pacientes con cáncer anal tratados con quimiorradiación entre 2008-2013.PACIENTES:Los pacientes con cáncer anal fueron tratados con radioterapia de intensidad modulada guiada por imágenes.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes de habla inglesa completaron los cuestionarios de calidad de vida específicos de cáncer (C30) y específicos del sitio (CR29) de la Organización Europea para la Investigación y el Tratamiento del Cáncer al inicio, al final de la radiación, 3 y 6 meses, y luego anualmente.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS:Se evaluó a largo plazo la calidad de vida clínicamente (un cambio en la puntuación de ≥10 puntos se consideraron clínicamente significativo) y estadísticamente (usando análisis de medición repetida) comparando las subescalas de puntuación al 1, 2, y 3 años. Con puntuaciones de referencia. El subanálisis comparó pacientes que recibieron 45-54 Gy versus 63 Gy.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron un total de 96 pacientes (mediana de seguimiento: 56,5 meses). La mayoría de las escalas funcionales y de síntomas mostraron una disminución clínicamente significativa al final del tratamiento con una mejoría a los 3 meses posteriores al tratamiento. Hubo una disminución estadísticamente significativa a largo plazo en disnea, imagen corporal, vergüenza intestinal, incontinencia fecal y pérdida de cabello; y hubo un empeoramiento a largo plazo estadística y clínicamente significativo en impotencia. La dosis de radiación más alta (63 Gy) no se asoció con una calidad de vida significativamente peor.LIMITACIONES:Institución única, diseño de estudio de un solo brazo y falta de recomposición de la dosis (es decir, los análisis se basan en la dosis prescrita, en lugar de la administrada).CONCLUSIÓNES:Los pacientes con cáncer anal tratados con quimiorradiación reportaron una recuperación de la QOL en general a los niveles de base. Síntomas específicos siguieron siendo molestos, lo que enfatiza la necesidad de resolver y tartar los síntomas inducidos por la quimiorradiación no solo durante el tratamiento, sino a largo plazo. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B905. (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon).
Collapse
|
81
|
Exploring hypoxic biology to improve radiotherapy outcomes. Expert Rev Mol Med 2022; 24:e21. [DOI: 10.1017/erm.2022.14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
82
|
Neelis KJ, Kip DM, Speetjens FM, van der Linden YM. Treatment results for patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of the anus, a single institution retrospective analysis. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:81. [PMID: 35443730 PMCID: PMC9022342 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02049-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose To gain insight into the treatment outcomes for anal cancer a retrospective analysis was performed with a special emphasis on trends in outcome and toxicities over time and on treatment of elderly patients. Materials and methods Medical records of 98 consecutive patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus of all stages treated with curative intent between 01-01-2009 and 31-12-2018 were analyzed with follow up until 31-12-2020. Standard tumor and pathological lymph node dose were 59.4 Gy (median 59.4 Gy, range 59.4–70 Gy) or 60 Gy (no deviation from intended dose), elective nodal regions were treated with 45 Gy (no deviations). Radiotherapy techniques in this period evolved from 3D-conformal to IMRT and VMAT. In 23 patients electron beams were used. Results Median age was 63 years (range 41–88), the majority of patients were female (60%). Twenty three patients were > 75 years old. The TNM stages were I, II, IIIA, and IIIB in 18%, 40%, 15% and 27%, 58% of patients had N0 status. Concurrent mitomycin C and 5-fluoruracil-based chemotherapy was given in 63 patients (64%). Five-year overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), locoregional control (LRC) and colostomy free survival (CFS) were 71%, 80%, 82%, and 82% for the whole group. Results in patients > 75 years of age were not statistically different from those in younger patients. With the introduction of more conformal techniques DFS did not change and toxicities decreased. Conclusion Real word treatment outcomes per disease stage were in line with what is reported in literature. Older patients should also be offered treatment with curative intent.
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02049-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen J Neelis
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Django M Kip
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frank M Speetjens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Yvette M van der Linden
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Corrigan KL, De B, Rooney MK, Ludmir EB, Das P, Smith GL, Taniguchi CM, Minsky BD, Koay EJ, Koong AC, Holliday EB. Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Chemoradiation in Patients with Anal Cancer: A Qualitative Analysis. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100986. [PMID: 35662810 PMCID: PMC9157211 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
84
|
The Evolving Role of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Older Adults with Gastrointestinal Cancers. Semin Radiat Oncol 2022; 32:159-167. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2021.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
85
|
Franco P, Segelov E, Johnsson A, Riechelmann R, Guren MG, Das P, Rao S, Arnold D, Spindler KLG, Deutsch E, Krengli M, Tombolini V, Sebag-Montefiore D, De Felice F. A Machine-Learning-Based Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Literature on Anal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071697. [PMID: 35406469 PMCID: PMC8996998 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Squamous-cell carcinoma of the anus, being a rare cancer, requires national and international collaborations, networking, organizational proficiency and leadership to overcome barriers towards the implementation of clinical trials to establish improved standards of care treatment strategies and the conduction of translational research projects to shed light into its biology and molecular characterization. The purpose of the present study is to obtain a global frame of the scientific literature related to anal cancer, through a bibliometric analysis of the published articles during the last 20 years (2000–2020), exploring trends and common patterns in research, tracking collaboration and networks to foresee future directions in basic and clinical research. Abstract Squamous-cell carcinoma of the anus (ASCC) is a rare disease. Barriers have been encountered to conduct clinical and translational research in this setting. Despite this, ASCC has been a prime example of collaboration amongst researchers. We performed a bibliometric analysis of ASCC-related literature of the last 20 years, exploring common patterns in research, tracking collaboration and identifying gaps. The electronic Scopus database was searched using the keywords “anal cancer”, to include manuscripts published in English, between 2000 and 2020. Data analysis was performed using R-Studio 0.98.1091 software. A machine-learning bibliometric method was applied. The bibliometrix R package was used. A total of 2322 scientific documents was found. The average annual growth rate in publication was around 40% during 2000–2020. The five most productive countries were United States of America (USA), United Kingdom (UK), France, Italy and Australia. The USA and UK had the greatest link strength of international collaboration (22.6% and 19.0%). Two main clusters of keywords for published research were identified: (a) prevention and screening and (b) overall management. Emerging topics included imaging, biomarkers and patient-reported outcomes. Further efforts are required to increase collaboration and funding to sustain future research in the setting of ASCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Translational Medicine (DIMET), University of Eastern Piedmont, 28100 Novara, Italy;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, “Maggiore della Carità” University Hospital, 28100 Novara, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0321-3733424; Fax: +39-0321-3733698
| | - Eva Segelov
- School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton 3168, Australia;
- Department of Oncology, Monash Health, Clayton 3168, Australia
| | - Anders Johnsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, 22002 Lund, Sweden;
| | - Rachel Riechelmann
- Department of Clinical Oncology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo 01000-000, Brazil;
| | - Marianne G. Guren
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, 0316 Oslo, Norway;
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
| | - Prajnan Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Sheela Rao
- GI Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London SW3 6JJ, UK;
| | - Dirk Arnold
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona, 22763 Hamburg, Germany;
| | | | - Eric Deutsch
- Institute Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France;
| | - Marco Krengli
- Department of Translational Medicine (DIMET), University of Eastern Piedmont, 28100 Novara, Italy;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, “Maggiore della Carità” University Hospital, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Tombolini
- Radiation Oncology, Policlinico “Umberto I” and Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (V.T.); (F.D.F.)
| | | | - Francesca De Felice
- Radiation Oncology, Policlinico “Umberto I” and Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (V.T.); (F.D.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Sauter C, Peeken JC, Borm K, Diehl C, Münch S, Combs SE, Dapper H. Quality of life in patients treated with radiochemotherapy for primary diagnosis of anal cancer. Sci Rep 2022; 12:4416. [PMID: 35292732 PMCID: PMC8924204 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08525-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Anal cancer and the related treatment are generally known to affect patients’ quality of life. The aim of this study was to assess self-reported quality of life (QoL) of anal cancer patients after combined radiation and chemotherapy, and to identify patient-, disease-, and therapy-related factors associated with QoL. A total of 94 patients treated with definitive chemoradiation for anal cancer at our institution in the period from 2004 to 2018 were identified from our database. QoL was assessed in the remaining 52 patients using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (cancer-specific QoL) and the newly developed anal cancer module QLQ-ANL27 (site-specific QoL). Differences in QoL between anal cancer patients and a German age and sex adjusted reference population were examined. The median follow-up was 71 months (range, 7–176). In the cancer-specific QoL module, the anal cancer cohort presented with significantly lower scores in role (− 12.2 points), emotional (− 6.6 points), and social functioning (− 6.8 points), but higher scores in diarrhea (+ 36.3 points) and constipation (+ 13.3 points) than the German reference population. There were no significant differences in disease- or therapy-related factors, but age greater than 70 years and a follow-up time greater than 71 months had a negative impact on global QoL. As for the site-specific QoL, patients with a tumor relapse showed significantly higher symptom scores than patients with a complete clinical remission in all scales except of micturition frequency. Compared to 3D conformal radiotherapy, IMRT treatment seemed to improve non-stoma bowel function (+ 23.3 points), female sexual functioning (+ 24.2 points), and came along with less scores in the symptom scales pain (− 35.9 points), toilet proximity (− 28.6 points), and cleanliness (− 26.2 points). Most of the functional scores of anal cancer patients were lower compared to the general German population, but did not seem to affect the general QoL. Fatigue, physical, and role functioning had the strongest impact on global QoL causing psychological symptoms as important as physical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Sauter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TU München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| | - Jan C Peeken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TU München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Kai Borm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TU München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Diehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TU München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Münch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TU München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TU München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Hendrik Dapper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TU München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
Tchelebi LT, Eng C, Messick CA, Hong TS, Ludmir EB, Kachnic LA, Zaorsky NG. Current treatment and future directions in the management of anal cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72:183-195. [PMID: 34847242 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Although rare, the rate of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is rising globally. Most patients present with nonmetastatic disease and are curable with appropriate treatment, which has evolved significantly over the last several decades. Before the 1970s, SCCA was managed with radical surgery, resulting in a permanent colostomy. Researchers found that preoperative treatment with chemotherapy and concurrent radiation could achieve a pathologic complete response. After this observation, definitive therapy shifted from radical surgery to sphincter-preserving chemoradiation. Investigations into the necessity of chemotherapy and the optimal regimen found that chemotherapy with mitomycin-C and 5-fluorouracil is required for cure. Further studies evaluating the addition of induction or maintenance chemotherapy, monoclonal antibody therapy, or higher radiation doses have demonstrated no significant benefit to disease control. Advanced radiation delivery with intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques is now considered the standard of care because of its prospectively determined, favorable acute toxicity profile compared with 3-dimensional conformal radiation. It is important to note that chemoradiation treatment response may be slow (up to 26 weeks) and should be assessed through serial clinical examinations. Today, surgical management of SCCA is reserved only for the lowest risk, early stage tumors or for recurrent/persistent disease. Current studies are evaluating radiation dose de-escalation in early stage disease and radiation dose escalation and the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced cancers. In reviewing how and why modern-day treatment of SCCA was established, the objective of this report is to reenforce adherence to current treatment paradigms to assure the best possible outcomes for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila T Tchelebi
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine, Hempstead, New York
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Mount Kisco, New York
| | - Cathy Eng
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Craig A Messick
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Lisa A Kachnic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Nicholas G Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Xiao W, Yuan Y, Wang S, Liao Z, Cai P, Chen B, Zhang R, Wang F, Zeng Z, Gao Y. Neoadjuvant PD-1 Blockade Combined With Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Immunoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Anal Canal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients: Antitumor Efficacy, Safety and Biomarker Analysis. Front Immunol 2022; 12:798451. [PMID: 35095878 PMCID: PMC8794813 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.798451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Anal canal squamous cell carcinoma (ACSCC) is an exceedingly rare malignant neoplasm with challenges in sphincter preservation, treatment toxicities and long-term survival. Little is known concerning the activity of PD-1 antibodies in locally advanced ACSCC. This study reports on the efficacy and toxicities of a neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade combined with chemotherapy followed by concurrent immunoradiotherapy in ACSCC patients, and describes biomarkers expression and mutation signatures. Methods In this cohort study, patients were treated as planned, including four cycles of neoadjuvant PD-1 antibody toripalimab combined with docetaxol and cisplatin, followed by radiotherapy and two cycles of concurrent toripalimab. Multiplex immunofluorescence staining (mIHC) with PD-L1, CD8, CD163, Pan-Keratin and DAPI was performed with the pretreatment tumor tissue. Whole exome sequencing was performed for the primary tumor and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The primary endpoint was the complete clinical response (cCR) rate at 3 months after overall treatment. Acute and late toxicities graded were assessed prospectively. Results Five female patients with a median age of 50 years old (range, 43-65 years old), finished treatment as planned. One patient had grade 3 immune related dermatitis. Two patients had grade 3 myelosuppression during neoadjuvant treatment. No severe radiation-related toxicities were noted. Four patients with PD-L1 expression >1% achieved a cCR after neoadjuvant treatment. and the other patient with negative PD-L1 expression also achieved a cCR at 3 months after radiotherapy. All the patients were alive and free from disease and had a normal quality of life, with 19.6-24 months follow up. Inconsistent expression of PD-L1 and CD163 was detected in 3 and 5 patients, respectively. TTN, POLE, MGAM2 were the top mutation frequencies, and 80 significant driver genes were identified. Pathway analysis showed enrichment of apoptosis, Rap1, Ras, and pathways in cancer signaling pathways. Eight significantly deleted regions were identified. Conclusions This small cohort of locally advanced ACSCC patients had quite satisfactory cCR and sphincter preservation rate, after neoadjuvant PD-1 antibody toripalimab combined with chemotherapy followed by concurrent immunoradiotherapy, with mild acute and long-term toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- WeiWei Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yan Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - SuiHai Wang
- Institute of Antibody Engineering, School of Laboratory Medicine and Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhidong Liao
- Department of Pathology, Meizhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Meizhou, China
| | - PeiQiang Cai
- Departments of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - BaoQing Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rong Zhang
- Department of Endoscopy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fang Wang
- Department of Molecular Diagnosis, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - ZhiFan Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - YuanHong Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Mahmood A, Bhuva N, Fokas E, Glynne-Jones R. Compliance to chemoradiation in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. Cancer Treat Rev 2022; 106:102381. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
|
90
|
Anal cancer brachytherapy: from radon seeds to Papillon technique in a century. What does the future hold? Radiother Oncol 2022; 169:25-34. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 01/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
91
|
Holliday EB, Morris VK, Johnson B, Eng C, Ludmir EB, Das P, Minsky BD, Taniguchi C, Smith GL, Koay EJ, Koong AC, Delclos ME, Skibber JM, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, You YN, Bednarski BK, Tillman MM, Chang GJ, Jennings K, Messick CA. Definitive Intensity-Modulated Chemoradiation for Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Outcomes and Toxicity of 428 Patients Treated at a Single Institution. Oncologist 2022; 27:40-47. [PMID: 35305097 PMCID: PMC8842324 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyab006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Although intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is considered the standard of care for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA), few large series have reported oncologic outcomes and toxicities. In this retrospective report, we aim to describe outcomes and toxicities after IMRT-based chemoradiation (CRT) for the treatment of SCCA, evaluate the impact of dose escalation (>54 Gy), and compare concurrent fluoropyrimidine in combination with either mitomycin or with cisplatin as chemosensitizers.
Methods
Patients treated at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2018 with IMRT-based CRT were included. Median time to locoregional recurrence, time to colostomy, and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method.
Results
A total of 428 patients were included; median follow-up was 4.4 years. Three hundred and thirty-four patients (78.0%) were treated with concurrent cisplatin and fluoropyrimidine, and 160 (37.4%) with >54 Gy. Two- and 5-year freedom from locoregional failure, freedom from colostomy failure, and overall survival were 86.5% and 81.2%, respectively, 90.0% and 88.3%, respectively, and 93.6% and 85.8%, respectively. Neither dose escalation nor mitomycin-based concurrent chemotherapy resulted in improved outcomes. Mitomycin-based concurrent chemotherapy was associated with in approximately 2.5 times increased grade 3 or greater acute toxicity. Radiation dose >54 Gy was associated with approximately 2.6 times increased Grade 3 or greater chronic toxicity.
Conclusions
Our results suggest IMRT-based CRT with concurrent fluoropyrimidine and cisplatin is a safe and feasible option for patient with SCCA and may cause less acute toxicity. The role for radiation dose escalation is unclear and requires further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma B Holliday
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Van K Morris
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Benny Johnson
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Cathy Eng
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Prajnan Das
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bruce D Minsky
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Cullen Taniguchi
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Grace L Smith
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eugene J Koay
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Albert C Koong
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Marc E Delclos
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John M Skibber
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Y Nancy You
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Mathew M Tillman
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - George J Chang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Craig A Messick
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
Kachnic LA, Winter K, Myerson RJ, Goodyear MD, Abitbol AA, Streeter OE, Augspurger ME, Schefter TE, Katz AW, Fisher BJ, Henke LE, Narayan S, Crane CH. Long-Term Outcomes of NRG Oncology/RTOG 0529: A Phase 2 Evaluation of Dose-Painted Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Combination With 5-Fluorouracil and Mitomycin-C for the Reduction of Acute Morbidity in Anal Canal Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 112:146-157. [PMID: 34400269 PMCID: PMC8688291 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A multi-institutional phase 2 trial assessed long-term outcomes of dose-painted intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and mitomycin-C (MMC) for anal canal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS T2-4N0-3M0 anal cancers received 5FU (1000 mg/m2/d, 96-hour infusion) and MMC (10 mg/m2 bolus) on days 1 and 29 of dose-painted IMRT prescribed as follows: T2N0 = 42 Gy elective nodal and 50.4 Gy anal tumor planning target volumes, 28 fractions; T3-4N0-3 = 45Gy elective nodal, 50.4 Gy ≤3 cm and 54 Gy >3cm metastatic nodal and 54 Gy anal tumor planning target volumes, 30 fractions. Local-regional failures, distant metastases, and colostomy failures were assessed using the cumulative incidence method, and disease-free survival, overall survival, and colostomy-free survival were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Late effects were scored using National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3. RESULTS Of 52 patients, 54% were stage II, 25% were stage IIIA, and 21% were stage IIIB. Median follow-up was 7.9 years (min-max, 0.02-9.2 years). Local-regional failure, colostomy failures, distant metastases, overall survival, disease-free survival, and colostomy-free survival at 5 years are 16% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7%-27%), 10% (95% CI, 4%-20%), 16% (95% CI, 7%-27%), 76% (95% CI, 61%-86%), 70% (95% CI, 56%-81%), and 74% (95% CI, 59%-84%); and at 8 years they are 16% (95% CI, 7%-27%), 12% (95% CI, 5%-23%), 22% (95% CI, 12%-34%), 68% (95% CI, 53%-79%), 62% (95% CI, 47%-74%) and 66% (95% CI, 51%-77%), respectively. Eight patients experienced local-regional failure, with 5 patients having persistent disease at 12 weeks. No isolated nodal failures occurred in the microscopic elective nodal volumes. Six patients required colostomy-5 for local-regional salvage and 1 for a temporary ostomy for anorectal dysfunction. Rates of late adverse events included: 28 patients (55%) with grade 2, 8 patients (16%) with grade 3, 0 patients with grade 4, and 2 patients (4%) with grade 5 events (sinus bradycardia and myelodysplasia, possibly owing to chemotherapy). Only 11 patients reported grade 1 to 3 sexual dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS Dose-painted IMRT with 5FU/MMC for the treatment of anal canal cancer yields comparable long-term efficacy as conventional radiation cohorts. Enhanced normal tissue protection lowered rates of grade 3 and higher late effects without compromising pelvic tumor control.
Collapse
|
93
|
Vítek P, Kubeš J, Vondráček V, Andrlik M, Navrátíl M, Zapletal R, Haas A, Dědečková K, Ondrová B, Grebenyuk A, Rosina J. Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) Chemoradiotherapy for Anal Canal Cancer-Single Institution Experience. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010185. [PMID: 35008349 PMCID: PMC8750423 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Eligible patients received PBS IMPT at a single institution. Treatment was administered in two volumes: 1—tumour with margins plus involved lymph nodes; 2—regional lymph node groups: perirectal (mesorectal), obturatory, inguinal, internal, external, and common iliac. The total doses of 57.5 GyE and 45 GyE, respectively, were administered in volumes 1 and 2 in 25 fractions, 5 fractions per week, respectively (a simultaneous integrated boost). Concomitant chemotherapy cisplatinum (CDDP) plus 5-FU or CDDP plus capecitabine was administered as per protocol. This single-institution study showed the high efficacy of PBS IMPT, achieving a high rate of complete regression. The 2-year overall survival, relapse-free survival and colostomy-free survival were 94.2, 93.8 and 91.0%, respectively. The haematological acute toxicity of grade 3–4 remained low. The acute toxicity completely resolved in all patients and had no lethal outcomes. Abstract Background: A favourable dose distribution has been described for proton beam therapy (PBT) of anal cancer in dosimetric studies. The relationship between dosimetric parameters in bone marrow and haematologic toxicity, treatment interruptions, and treatment efficacy has also been documented. There are only few references on clinical results of PBT for anal cancer. The primary objective of the retrospective study was to assess the efficacy of pencil beam scanning intensity-modulated proton therapy (PBS IMPT) in the definitive chemoradiotherapy of anal cancer. Secondary objectives were established to identify the risks of acute chronic toxicity risks and to assess colostomy rates. Materials and methods: Patients were treated for biopsy-proven squamous cell cancer (SCC) of the anus at initial or advanced stages. Eligible patients received PBS IMPT at a single institution. Treatment was administered in two volumes: 1—tumour with margins plus involved lymph nodes; 2—regional lymph node groups: perirectal (mesorectal), obturatory, inguinal, internal, external, and common iliac. The total doses of 57.5 GyE and 45 GyE, respectively, were administered in volumes 1 and 2 in 25 fractions, 5 fractions per week, respectively (a simultaneous integrated boost). Concomitant chemotherapy cisplatinum (CDDP) plus 5-FU or CDDP plus capecitabine was administered as per protocol. The treatment effect was assessed using DRE (digital rectal examination) and MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) within the follow-up period. Toxicity was scaled using CTCAE version 4.0 criteria. Results: 39 of 41 patients treated during the period of February 2014–August 2021 were eligible for analysis. All patients completed treatment, 76.9% without interruption. The median treatment time was 35 days (32–35). The median follow-up period was 30 months, 34 patients are alive to-date, 5 patients died prior to the date of analysis, and 2 deaths were unrelated to the primary disease. The 2-year overall survival, relapse-free survival, and colostomy-free survival were 94.2%, 93.8%, and 91.0%, respectively. Complete regression was achieved in 36 patients (92.3%), partial regression was achieved in 2 (5.1%), and immediate progression at end of treatment occurred in 1 patient (2.6%). Salvage resection was indicated for two patients in partial regression and due to severe chronic dermatologic toxicity. The grade 3 and 4 haematological toxicity rates were 7.7% and 5.1%, respectively. The most frequent non-haematological acute toxicities of grade 3–4 observed were dermatitis (23.1%), diarrhoea (7.7%), and dehydration (7.7%). Chronic toxicity emerged predominantly as skin atrophy/ulceration grade 2 (26.5%) and grade 3–4 (5.8%), and radiation proctitis grade 2 (38.2%) and grade 3 (2.9%). Discussion, conclusions: This single-institution study showed the high efficacy of PBS IMPT, achieving a high rate of complete regression. The haematological acute toxicity of grade 3–4 remained low; however, the impact of altered chemotherapy (CDDP instead of mitomycin C) remains unclear. The incidence of other acute toxicities shares similarity with photon therapy investigated in large studies. The acute toxicity completely resolved in all patients, had no lethal outcomes, and never resulted in the necessity for colostomy. By contrast, it was chronic toxicity, skin ulceration, perirectal fistulation, and fibrosis that resulted in salvage surgery and/or the need for a colostomy. A challenging question remains: to what extent can PBT prevent chronic toxicity? Longer follow-up remains necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavel Vítek
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (P.V.); (J.K.); (V.V.); (M.N.); (R.Z.); (A.H.); (K.D.); (B.O.)
- Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jiří Kubeš
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (P.V.); (J.K.); (V.V.); (M.N.); (R.Z.); (A.H.); (K.D.); (B.O.)
- Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University Prague, Sítná Square 3105, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic;
| | - Vladimír Vondráček
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (P.V.); (J.K.); (V.V.); (M.N.); (R.Z.); (A.H.); (K.D.); (B.O.)
- Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University Prague, Sítná Square 3105, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic;
| | - Michal Andrlik
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (P.V.); (J.K.); (V.V.); (M.N.); (R.Z.); (A.H.); (K.D.); (B.O.)
- Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University Prague, Sítná Square 3105, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +42-060-783-6338
| | - Matěj Navrátíl
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (P.V.); (J.K.); (V.V.); (M.N.); (R.Z.); (A.H.); (K.D.); (B.O.)
- Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University Prague, Sítná Square 3105, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic;
| | - Radek Zapletal
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (P.V.); (J.K.); (V.V.); (M.N.); (R.Z.); (A.H.); (K.D.); (B.O.)
- Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Alexandra Haas
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (P.V.); (J.K.); (V.V.); (M.N.); (R.Z.); (A.H.); (K.D.); (B.O.)
- Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Kateřina Dědečková
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (P.V.); (J.K.); (V.V.); (M.N.); (R.Z.); (A.H.); (K.D.); (B.O.)
- Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Barbora Ondrová
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (P.V.); (J.K.); (V.V.); (M.N.); (R.Z.); (A.H.); (K.D.); (B.O.)
- Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Alexander Grebenyuk
- Department of Health Protection and Disaster Medicine, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Lva Tolstogo 6-8, 197020 Saint Petersburg, Russia;
| | - Jozef Rosina
- Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University Prague, Sítná Square 3105, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic;
- Department of Medical Biophysics and Informatics, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruská 87, 116 36 Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
94
|
Siegel EM, Ajidahun A, Berglund A, Guerrero W, Eschrich S, Putney RM, Magliocco A, Riggs B, Winter K, Simko JP, Ajani JA, Guha C, Okawara GS, Abdalla I, Becker MJ, Pizzolato JF, Crane CH, Brown KD, Shibata D. Genome-wide host methylation profiling of anal and cervical carcinoma. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0260857. [PMID: 34882728 PMCID: PMC8659695 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
HPV infection results in changes in host gene methylation which, in turn, are thought to contribute to the neoplastic progression of HPV-associated cancers. The objective of this study was to identify joint and disease-specific genome-wide methylation changes in anal and cervical cancer as well as changes in high-grade pre-neoplastic lesions. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) anal tissues (n = 143; 99% HPV+) and fresh frozen cervical tissues (n = 28; 100% HPV+) underwent microdissection, DNA extraction, HPV genotyping, bisulfite modification, DNA restoration (FFPE) and analysis by the Illumina HumanMethylation450 Array. Differentially methylated regions (DMR; t test q<0.01, 3 consecutive significant CpG probes and mean Δβ methylation value>0.3) were compared between normal and cancer specimens in partial least squares (PLS) models and then used to classify anal or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia-3 (AIN3/CIN3). In AC, an 84-gene PLS signature (355 significant probes) differentiated normal anal mucosa (NM; n = 9) from AC (n = 121) while a 36-gene PLS signature (173 significant probes) differentiated normal cervical epithelium (n = 10) from CC (n = 9). The CC progression signature was validated using three independent publicly available datasets (n = 424 cases). The AC and CC progression PLS signatures were interchangeable in segregating normal, AIN3/CIN3 and AC and CC and were found to include 17 common overlapping hypermethylated genes. Moreover, these signatures segregated AIN3/CIN3 lesions similarly into cancer-like and normal-like categories. Distinct methylation changes occur across the genome during the progression of AC and CC with overall similar profiles and add to the evidence suggesting that HPV-driven oncogenesis may result in similar non-random methylomic events. Our findings may lead to identification of potential epigenetic drivers of HPV-associated cancers and also, of potential markers to identify higher risk pre-cancerous lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin M. Siegel
- Departments of Cancer Epidemiology, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Abidemi Ajidahun
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States of America
| | - Anders Berglund
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Whitney Guerrero
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States of America
| | - Steven Eschrich
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Ryan M. Putney
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Anthony Magliocco
- Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Bridget Riggs
- Departments of Cancer Epidemiology, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Kathryn Winter
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center–ACR, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Jeff P. Simko
- UCSF Medical Center-Mount Zion, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Jaffer A. Ajani
- M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Chandan Guha
- Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Gordon S. Okawara
- Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, United States of America
| | - Ibrahim Abdalla
- Cancer Research for the Ozarks CCOP, Springfield, MO, United States of America
| | - Mark J. Becker
- Columbus Community Clinical Oncology Program, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Joseph F. Pizzolato
- Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center CCOP, Miami, FL, United States of America
| | | | - Kevin D. Brown
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
| | - David Shibata
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Franco P, Chiloiro G, Montesi G, Montrone S, Arcelli A, Comito T, Arcadipane F, Caravatta L, Macchia G, Lupattelli M, Niespolo MR, Munoz F, Palazzari E, Krengli M, Valvo F, Gambacorta MA, Genovesi D, Mantello G. A Pattern of Care Report on the Management of Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus—A Study by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Gastrointestinal Tumors Study Group. Medicina (B Aires) 2021; 57:medicina57121342. [PMID: 34946287 PMCID: PMC8707820 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57121342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and objectives: The diagnosis and therapy of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus may vary significantly in daily clinical practice, even if international guidelines are available. Materials and Methods: We conducted a pattern of care survey to assess the management of patients with anal cancer in Italy (38 questions). We analyzed 58 questionnaires. Results: Most of the respondents work in public and/or university hospitals (75.8%) in northern Italy (65.5%). The majority (88.0%) treat less than 20 patients/year. Common examinations for diagnosis and staging are anorectal endoscopy (84.5%), computed tomography scan (86.2%) and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (96.5%). The most frequently prescribed dose to primary tumor is 50–54 Gy (46.5–58.6%) for early stage disease and 54–59.4 Gy (62.1–32.8%) for locally advanced cases. Elective volumes are prescribed around 45 Gy (94.8%). Most participants use volumetric intensity modulated radiotherapy (89.7%) and a simultaneous integrated boost (84.5%). Concurrent radiotherapy, 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin is considered the standard of care (70.6%). Capecitabine is less frequently used (34.4%). Induction chemotherapy is an option for extensive localized disease (65.5%). Consolidation chemotherapy is rarely used (18.9%). A response evaluation is conducted at 26–30 weeks (63.9%) with a pelvic MRI (91.4%). Follow-up is generally run by the multidisciplinary tumor board (62.1%). Conclusions: Differences were observed for radiotherapy dose prescription, calling for a consensus to harmonize treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ‘Maggiore della Carita’ University Hospital, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-032137-33-424
| | - Giuditta Chiloiro
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario ‘Agostino Gemelli’ IRCCS, Via della Pineta Sacchetti, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.C.); (M.A.G.)
| | - Giampaolo Montesi
- Radiation Oncology Department, ‘S.M. Della Misericordia’ Hospital, AULSS 5 Veneto, Viale Tre Martiri 140, 45100 Rovigo, Italy;
| | - Sabrina Montrone
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Alessandra Arcelli
- Radiation Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna University, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Tiziana Comito
- Radiotherapy Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy;
| | - Francesca Arcadipane
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, AOU ‘Citta’ della Salute e della Scienza’, Via Cavour 31, 10123 Turin, Italy;
| | - Luciana Caravatta
- Radiation Oncology Unit, ‘SS Annunziata Hospital’, ‘G. D’Annunzio’ University of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini, 66100 Chieti, Italy; (L.C.); (D.G.)
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital–Universita’ Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 1, 86100 Campobasso, Italy;
| | - Marco Lupattelli
- Radiation Oncology Section, Perugia General Hospital, Piazzale Meneghini 1, 06156 Perugia, Italy;
| | - Marina Rita Niespolo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Gerardo, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy;
| | - Fernando Munoz
- Radiation Oncology Department, ‘Umberto Parini’ Regional Hospital, AUSL Valle d’Aosta, Aosta, Viale Ginevra 3, 11100 Aosta, Italy;
| | - Elisa Palazzari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Oncological Referral Center, Via Gallini 2, 33081 Aviano, Italy;
| | - Marco Krengli
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ‘Maggiore della Carita’ University Hospital, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Francesca Valvo
- Scientific Direction Unit, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Strada Campeggi 53, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario ‘Agostino Gemelli’ IRCCS, Via della Pineta Sacchetti, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.C.); (M.A.G.)
| | - Domenico Genovesi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, ‘SS Annunziata Hospital’, ‘G. D’Annunzio’ University of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini, 66100 Chieti, Italy; (L.C.); (D.G.)
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, ‘G.D’Annunzio’, University of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini 31, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Giovanna Mantello
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Via Conca 71, Torrette, 60002 Ancona, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
96
|
Yuan Y, Xie WH, Li RZ, Chang H, Zeng ZF, Gao YH, Wang QX, Xiao WW. Comprehensive treatment experience of anal squamous cell carcinoma from a tertiary cancer center in South China. Cancer Med 2021; 11:117-127. [PMID: 34816622 PMCID: PMC8704146 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is a rare malignant tumor with increasing incidence. The goal of our study was to analyze the treatment outcome and prognostic factors of ASCC in South China in the past half‐century. Methods This study retrospectively included 59 patients with ASCC admitted from 1975 to 2018 in Sun Yat‐sen University cancer center. The clinical records and follow‐up information of all patients were collected. Survival analysis and univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed using the “survival” and “survminer” packages of R software. Results In 59 patients, 5 patients had distant metastasis at diagnosis. Among 54 M0 stage patients, 33 patients received chemoradiotherapy (CRT), 19 patients received local surgery, and 2 patients refused curative treatment and received the best supportive treatment (BST). The most common grade 3–4 acute toxicities during treatment were myelosuppression and radiation dermatitis. The median follow‐up time was 32 months. For the whole group, the 3‐year and 5‐year overall survival (OS) rates and disease‐free survival (DFS) were 71.1% and 63.6%, and 73.4% and 69.0%, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the T3–4 stage was an independent prognostic risk factor for OS, progression‐free survival (PFS), and DFS. And M1 was an independent prognostic risk factor for PFS and DFS. Patients in stage M0 mainly treated with CRT had better local control than those mainly treated with surgery (p = 0.027). For M0 patients, induction chemotherapy combined with CRT tends to prolong OS compared with CRT alone (p = 0.26). The 3‐year colostomy‐free survival for the whole group was 81.1%. Conclusions CRT is recommended as the first choice for the treatment of M0 stage ASCC. Induction chemotherapy may bring better survival benefits for some patients. Patients with ASCC in China seem to have a better local control rate, which suggested different treatment strategies may be needed in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Yuan
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Wei-Hao Xie
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Rong-Zhen Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Hui Chang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Zhi-Fan Zeng
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Yuan-Hong Gao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Qiao-Xuan Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Wei-Wei Xiao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
De B, Ludmir EB, Messick CA, Cagley MC, Morris VK, Das P, Minsky BD, Taniguchi CM, Smith GL, Koay EJ, Koong AC, Mohan R, Holliday EB. Prognostic impact of lymphopenia and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio for patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:2412-2422. [PMID: 34790402 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-21-323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Outcomes after definitive chemoradiation for squamous cell carcinoma are generally favorable. However, biomarkers to further yield prognostic information are desired. Treatment-related lymphopenia as well as an elevated baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio have been associated with worse survival in several cancer types. We evaluated absolute lymphocyte count and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio at baseline and at treatment-related nadir in patients with anal cancer for associations with oncologic endpoints. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of 428 consecutive patients with non-metastatic anal cancer treated with definitive, intensity-modulated radiation therapy-based chemoradiation. We analyzed absolute neutrophil and lymphocyte counts at several timepoints: pretreatment, weekly during treatment, and in the six weeks following treatment completion. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio was calculated at baseline and treatment-related nadir. We estimated oncologic endpoints using life tables and compared them using the log-rank test. We conducted univariate and multivariable time-to-event analyses using Cox proportional hazards. Results Median absolute lymphocyte count at baseline and nadir were 1.80 [interquartile range (IQR), 1.45-2.32] k/µL and 0.26 (IQR, 0.18-0.36) k/µL, respectively, and 31% developed treatment-related grade 4 lymphopenia. Median neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio at baseline and nadir were 2.34 (IQR, 1.68-3.30) and 8.80 (IQR, 5.86-12.68), respectively. Estimates of overall survival, local failure-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and freedom from colostomy at 5 years were 87%, 86%, 82%, and 88%, respectively. Baseline and nadir absolute lymphocyte count were not associated with selected outcomes on univariate analysis. On multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with death included T3-T4 disease, HIV-positive status, treatment break, and baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio >3. Baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio showed a trend toward association with distant progression or death (P=0.07). The 5-year overall survival estimates for patients with baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratios ≤3 and >3 were 92.3% and 80.6%, respectively. Conclusions Lymphopenia during and after chemoradiation for anal cancer is common but does not appear to be associated with worse survival, recurrence, or metastases. However, elevated baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio was independently associated with overall survival, local recurrence-free survival, and DMFS. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical utility of baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio to guide treatment and follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian De
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Craig A Messick
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthew C Cagley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Van K Morris
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Prajnan Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bruce D Minsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Cullen M Taniguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Grace L Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Albert C Koong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Radhe Mohan
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emma B Holliday
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
98
|
Armstrong SA, Malley R, Wang H, Lenz HJ, Arguello D, El-Deiry WS, Xiu J, Gatalica Z, Hwang JJ, Philip PA, Shields AF, Marshall JL, Salem ME, Weinberg BA. Molecular characterization of squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:2423-2437. [PMID: 34790403 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) is an uncommon malignancy with limited therapeutic options. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab show promising results in patients with SCCA. Human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative tumors are frequently TP53-mutated (TP53-MT) and often resistant to therapy. Methods We present a large molecularly-profiled cohort of SCCA, exploring the underlying biology of SCCA, differences between TP53-wild type (TP53-WT) and TP53-MT tumors, and differences between local and metastatic tumors. SCCA specimens (n=311) underwent multiplatform testing with immunohistochemistry (IHC), in situ hybridization (ISH) and next-generation sequencing (NGS). Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was calculated using only somatic nonsynonymous missense mutations. Chi-square testing was used for comparative analyses. Results The most frequently mutated genes included PIK3CA (28.1%), KMT2D (19.5%), FBXW7 (12%), TP53 (12%) and PTEN (10.8%). The expression of PD-1 was seen in 68.8% and PD-L1 in 40.5% of tumors. High TMB was present in 6.7% of specimens. HER2 IHC was positive in 0.9%, amplification by chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) was seen 1.3%, and mutations in ERBB2 were present in 1.8% of tumors. The latter mutation has not been previously described in SCCA. When compared with TP53-WT tumors, TP53-MT tumors had higher rates of CDKN2A, EWSR1, JAK1, FGFR1 and BRAF mutations. PD-1 and PD-L1 expression were similar, and high TMB did not correlate with PD-1 (P=0.50) or PD-L1 (P=0.52) expression. Conclusions Molecular profiling differences between TP53-MT and TP53-WT SCCA indicate different carcinogenic pathways which may influence response to therapy. Low frequency mutations in several druggable genes may provide therapeutic opportunities for patients with SCCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha A Armstrong
- Ruesch Center for the Cure of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Rita Malley
- Ruesch Center for the Cure of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Hongkun Wang
- Ruesch Center for the Cure of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Jimmy J Hwang
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Philip A Philip
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Anthony F Shields
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - John L Marshall
- Ruesch Center for the Cure of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Mohamed E Salem
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Benjamin A Weinberg
- Ruesch Center for the Cure of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
99
|
Marref I, Romain G, Jooste V, Vendrely V, Lopez A, Faivre J, Gerard JP, Bouvier AM, Lepage C. Outcomes of anus squamous cell carcinoma. Management of anus squamous cell carcinoma and recurrences. Dig Liver Dis 2021; 53:1492-1498. [PMID: 34193366 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal and its recurrence at a population level. The aim of this study was to draw a picture of management, recurrence and survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. MATERIAL AND METHODS The 5-year probability of recurrences was estimated using the cumulative incidence function to consider competing risks of death. Net survival was estimated and a multivariate survival analysis was performed. The study was conducted using data of the Burgundy Digestive Cancer Registry. Overall, 273 squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal registered between 1998 and 2014 were considered. RESULTS Overall, 80% of patients were treated with curative intent. Of these, 61% received chemoradiotherapy, 35% received radiotherapy and 4% received abdominoperineal resection alone. After these treatments, for cure the 5-year cumulative recurrence rate was 27% overall; it was 20% after chemoradiotherapy and 38% after radiotherapy. Five-year net survival was 71% overall; it was 81% after chemoradiotherapy and 55% after radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Chemoradiotherapy was highly effective in routine practice. We confirm that it is difficult to distinguish between persistent active disease and local inflammation due to radiotherapy. Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal recurrences remains a substantial problem, highlighting the interest of prolonged surveillance. Aggressive management of recurrences may be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imène Marref
- Digestive Cancer Registry of Burgundy, INSERM UMR 1231 EPICAD, University of Bourgogne-Franche Comté, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France
| | - Gaëlle Romain
- Digestive Cancer Registry of Burgundy, INSERM UMR 1231 EPICAD, University of Bourgogne-Franche Comté, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France
| | - Valerie Jooste
- Digestive Cancer Registry of Burgundy, INSERM UMR 1231 EPICAD, University of Bourgogne-Franche Comté, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France
| | - Véronique Vendrely
- CHU de Bordeaux, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy, Pessac, 33604, France
| | - Anthony Lopez
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Nancy, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Jean Faivre
- Digestive Cancer Registry of Burgundy, INSERM UMR 1231 EPICAD, University of Bourgogne-Franche Comté, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France
| | | | - Anne-Marie Bouvier
- Digestive Cancer Registry of Burgundy, INSERM UMR 1231 EPICAD, University of Bourgogne-Franche Comté, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France
| | - Côme Lepage
- Digestive Cancer Registry of Burgundy, INSERM UMR 1231 EPICAD, University of Bourgogne-Franche Comté, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France; CHU de Bordeaux, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy, Pessac, 33604, France; Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Nancy, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Department of Radiotherapy, Centre A Lacassagne, Nice, France; Department of Hepatogastroenterology and Digestive Oncology and Gastroenterology, , University Hospital of Dijon, University of Bourgogne-Franche Comté, 14 Rue Paul Gaffarel, 21000 Dijon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
100
|
Gerum S, Iglseder W, Schmid R, Peterka K, Knocke-Abulesz TH, Harl P, Schwaiger S, Reiter I, Salinger J, Venhoda C, Kurzweil G, Poetscher M, Jaeger R, Celedin B, Clemens P, Roeder F. Practice of radiation therapy for anal cancer in Austria-a survey on behalf of the Austrian radiation oncology society gastrointestinal tumor group (ÖGRO-GIT). Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:953-961. [PMID: 34591119 PMCID: PMC8547205 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01842-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Purpose We conducted a patterns-of-care survey on chemoradiation for locoregionally confined anal cancer in Austria to evaluate areas of disagreement and to identify possible targets for further standardization. Methods An anonymous questionnaire comprising 38 questions was sent to all Austrian radiation oncology departments. Results were analyzed descriptively and compared to two international guidelines. Results The response rate was 93%. Work-up generally includes DRE, endoscopy, and cross-sectional imaging of chest/abdomen and pelvis. PET-CT is used by 38%. Screening for HIV and biopsies of suspicious lymph nodes are infrequently used. All centers perform IMRT, mainly with daily IGRT. Median doses to the primary are 54.7 Gy (T1–2) and 59.4 Gy (T3–4). Suspicious nodes receive a boost (median dose 54 Gy), while elective nodal areas are mainly treated with 45–50.4 Gy. Target delineation of elective nodal areas seems generally uniform, although disagreement exists regarding inclusion of the common iliac nodes. No agreement was found for OAR-delineation and dose constraints. Concurrent chemotherapy is mitomycin and 5‑FU/capecitabine. Supportive care beyond skin care is infrequently offered. Intensive follow-up is performed for at least 5 years. Treatment of T1N0 shows considerable disagreement. Conclusion We found a high rate of agreement between the centers and concordance with major guidelines. PET-CT, routine HIV testing, and biopsies of suspicious LN seem underrepresented. The largest controversy regarding target volumes concerns inclusion of the common iliac nodes. Prescribed doses are generally in line with the recommendations or higher. OAR delineation, dose constraints, supportive care, and treatment of early anal cancer represent areas for further standardization. Supplementary Information The online version of this article (10.1007/s00066-021-01842-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Gerum
- Universitätsklinik für Radiotherapie und Radio-Onkologie, Landeskrankenhaus Salzburg, Uniklinikum der Paracelsus Medizinischen Universität, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
| | - W Iglseder
- Universitätsklinik für Radiotherapie und Radio-Onkologie, Landeskrankenhaus Salzburg, Uniklinikum der Paracelsus Medizinischen Universität, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - R Schmid
- Universitätsklinik für Radioonkologie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Universitätsklinikum AKH Wien, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Austria
| | - K Peterka
- Institut für Radioonkologie, Kaiser-Franz-Josef-Spital/SMZ Süd-Klinik Favoriten, Kundratstraße 3, 1100, Wien, Austria
| | - T H Knocke-Abulesz
- Sonderabteilung Strahlentherapie, Wiener Gesundheitsverbund Klinik Hietzing, Wolkersbergenstraße 1, 1130, Wien, Austria
| | - P Harl
- Institut für Radioonkologie, SMZ - Ost Donauspital der Stadt Wien, Langobardenstraße 122, 1220, Wien, Austria
| | - S Schwaiger
- Institut für Radioonkologie, Klinik Ottakring, Wilhelminenspital der Stadt Wien, Montleartstraße 37, 1160, Wien, Austria
| | - I Reiter
- Institut für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Landesklinikum Wiener Neustadt, Corvinusring 3-5, 2700, Wiener Neustadt, Germany
| | - J Salinger
- Klinische Abteilung für Strahlentherapie - Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Krems, Karl Landsteiner Privatuniversität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Mitterweg 10, 3500, Krems an der Donau, Austria
| | - C Venhoda
- Klinik für Radioonkologie, Klinikum der Barmherzigen Schwestern, Ordensklinikum Linz, Seilerstätte 4, 4010, Linz, Austria
| | - G Kurzweil
- Klinik für Radioonkologie/Strahlentherapie, Salzkammergutklinikum Vöcklabruck, Dr.-Wilhelm-Boch-Straße 1, 4840, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| | - M Poetscher
- Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie - Radioonkologie, Comprehensive Cancer Center Graz, Medizinische Universität Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 32, 8036, Graz, Austria
| | - R Jaeger
- Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie - Radioonkologie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - B Celedin
- Institut für Strahlentherapie/Radioonkologie, Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Feschnigstraße 11, 9020, Klagenfurt, Austria
| | - P Clemens
- Institut für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Landeskrankenhaus Feldkirch, Carinagasse 47, 6807, Feldkirch, Austria
| | - F Roeder
- Universitätsklinik für Radiotherapie und Radio-Onkologie, Landeskrankenhaus Salzburg, Uniklinikum der Paracelsus Medizinischen Universität, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|