Association of Performance Status With Survival in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Pembrolizumab Monotherapy

Nivolumab and ipilimumab in recurrent or refractory cancer of unknown primary: a phase II trial

Cancer of unknown primary has a dismal prognosis, especially following failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. 10-20% of patients have a high tumor mutational burden (TMB), which predicts response to immunotherapy in many cancer types. In this prospective, non-randomized, open-label, multicenter Phase II trial (EudraCT 2018-004562-33; NCT04131621), patients relapsed or refractory after platinum-based chemotherapy received nivolumab and ipilimumab following TMBhigh vs. TMBlow stratification. Progression-free survival (PFS) represented the primary endpoint; overall survival (OS), response rates, duration of clinical benefit and safety were the secondary endpoints. The trial was prematurely terminated in March 2021 before reaching the preplanned sample size (n = 194). Among 31 evaluable patients, 16% had a high TMB ( > 12 mutations/Mb). Overall response rate was 16% (95% CI 6-34%), with 7.7% (95% CI 1-25%) vs. 60% (95% CI 15-95%) in TMBlow and TMBhigh, respectively. Although the primary endpoint was not met, high TMB was associated with better median PFS (18.3 vs. 2.4 months) and OS (18.3 vs. 3.6 months). Severe immune-related adverse events were reported in 29% of cases. Assessing on-treatment dynamics of circulating tumor DNA using combined targeted hotspot mutation and shallow whole genome sequencing as part of a predefined exploratory analysis identified patients benefiting from immunotherapy irrespective of initial radiologic response.

Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor with Anti-PD-1 Monotherapy or in Combination with Ipilimumab in Younger versus Older Adults with Advanced Melanoma

Background: The majority of melanoma is diagnosed in individuals between 55 and 84 years old. Current data varied in reporting differences in survival outcomes amongst different age groups. Methods: A retrospective, multi-center, provincial cohort database was used to investigate the relationship between age (<65 or ≥65 years old) and overall survival. Patients must have had histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic melanoma and had to have received at least one cycle of immunotherapy (single agent nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or combination ipilimumab plus nivolumab). Results: From August 2013 to May 2020, we identified 497 patients (median age = 64 [range 12-96 years]; 65.2% men; 36.4% with a BRAF mutation (V600E and V600K)). Of these, 260 were < 65 years old, and 237 were ≥65 years old. A total of 39.1% of the patients in the younger cohort received combination ICI compared with 10.2% in the older cohort, and the difference was statistically significant. Median survival amongst individuals aged ≥65 years old was shorter compared to individuals <65 years old, with a median overall survival of 17.1 (95% CI 12.3-22.9 months) months and 22.2 months (95% CI 18.7-33.8 months), respectively (p = 0.04), at a median follow-up of 34.4 months (range: 1.84-81.4 months). The survival difference was present in the cutaneous melanoma cohort where median OS was 18.2 months (95% CI 12.3-30.4 months) in patients ≥65 years old and 23.8 months (95% CI 19.2-48.2 months) in patients <65 years old, p = 0.04. There were no significant differences by age in the non-cutaneous melanoma cohort. A combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab was associated with an improved overall survival hazard ratio of 0.48 (95% CI 0.36-0.65) as compared to anti-PD-1 monotherapy alone (p < 0.001). In the cutaneous cohort treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy (n = 306), no significant differences were seen with median OS at 16.1 months (95% CI 11.4-25.7 months) in patients ≥65 years old and 17.1 months (95% CI 12.0-22.2 months) in patients <65 years old (p = 0.84). Tumor response to anti-PD-1 was higher in the older patients compared with the response in younger patients with cutaneous melanoma. Conclusions: Older melanoma patients have similar survival compared with younger patients after receiving the same treatment with anti-PD-1 monotherapy. The superior survival observed in the younger patients is possibly related to the higher utilization of combination ICI. Tumor response to immunotherapy is superior in older patients with cutaneous melanoma; however, younger patients may improve their survival by using combination ICI.

Development and Validation of a Prognostic Risk Model for Patients with Advanced Melanoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Risk stratification tools for patients with advanced melanoma (AM) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are lacking. We identified a new prognostic model associated with overall survival (OS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 318 treatment naïve patients with AM receiving ICI were collected from a multi-centre retrospective cohort study. LASSO Cox regression identified independent prognostic factors associated with OS. Model validation was carried out on 500 iterations of bootstrapped samples. Harrel's C-index was calculated and internally validated to outline the model's discriminatory performance. External validation was carried out in 142 advanced melanoma patients receiving ICI in later lines.

RESULTS

High white blood cell count (WBC), high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), low albumin, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥1, and the presence of liver metastases were included in the model. Patients were parsed into 3 risk groups: favorable (0-1 factors) OS of 52.9 months, intermediate (2-3 factors) OS 13.0 months, and poor (≥4 factors) OS 2.7 months. The C-index of the model from the discovery cohort was 0.69. External validation in later-lines (N = 142) of therapy demonstrated a c-index of 0.65.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver metastases, low albumin, high LDH, high WBC, and ECOG≥1 can be combined into a prognostic model for AM patients treated with ICI.

Stocking the toolbox-Using preclinical models to understand the development and treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced immune-related adverse events

Cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are susceptible to a broad and variable array of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). With increasing clinical use of ICIs, defining the mechanism for irAE development is more critical than ever. However, it currently remains challenging to predict when these irAEs occur and which organ may be affected, and for many of the more severe irAEs, inaccessibility to the tissue site hampers mechanistic insight. This lack of understanding of irAE development in the clinical setting emphasizes the need for greater use of preclinical models that allow for improved prediction of biomarkers for ICI-initiated irAEs or that validate treatment options that inhibit irAEs without hampering the anti-tumor immune response. Here, we discuss the utility of preclinical models, ranging from exploring databases to in vivo animal models, focusing on where they are most useful and where they could be improved.

Inpatient utilization of immune checkpoint inhibitors and clinical outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Retrospective studies have suggested that patients with poor performance status treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors have shorter overall survival and poorer response rates. This study was undertaken to investigate the possible relationships between inpatient immune checkpoint inhibitor use and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review of cancer patients who received an immune checkpoint inhibitor while hospitalized from 1 January 2016 to 30 December 2020. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality or admission to hospice rate. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, time to death or discharge to hospice, and descriptive summarization of patient characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients were analyzed. At 90 days, 68.2% of subjects were expired or admitted to hospice (95% CI: 54.7-81%). 90-day overall survival was 47.1%; median survival time was 81 days (95% CI: 28-242 days). The median time to death or hospice was 35 days (95% CI: 24-72 days). The time to death or hospice was shorter for immune checkpoint inhibitor-naive patients compared to those who received immune checkpoint inhibitors prior to admission (29 days, 95% CI: 12-43 days vs. 242 days, 95% CI: 36-1288 days, respectively; HR: 2.74, 95% CI: 1.2-6.25; p = 0.0121). No differences were found when comparing other baseline characteristics.

CONCLUSION

A majority of patients who received an immune checkpoint inhibitor while hospitalized were either discharged to hospice or expired by 90 days. An increased rate of death or discharge to hospice was observed for patients who were immune checkpoint inhibitor-naive prior to their admission.

Identification of predictive factors for early relapse in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer receiving consolidation durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiation therapy

BACKGROUND

Patients with locally advanced, unresectable, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) benefit from durvalumab consolidation therapy. However, predictive factors for early relapse during durvalumab maintenance have not yet been identified.

METHODS

The present study included the lung cancer cohort of the Catholic Medical Centers at the Catholic University of Korea from January 2018 to December 2021. A total of 51 NSCLC patients treated with durvalumab consolidation therapy after definitive CCRT were included in the analysis. Early relapse was defined as patients experiencing relapse within 6 months of starting initial durvalumab therapy.

RESULTS

Among the 51 patients, 15 (29.4%) relapsed during the study period. Median time from initial therapy of durvalumab to progression was 451.00 ± 220.87 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 18.10-883.90) in overall patients. In multivariate analysis, younger age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.792; 95% CI: 0.642-0.977; p = 0.030), higher pack-years (aOR, 1.315; 95% CI: 1.058-1.635; p = 0.014), non-COPD (aOR, 0.004; 95% CI: 0.000-0.828; p = 0.004) and anemia (aOR, 234.30; 95% CI: 1.212-45280.24; p = 0.042), were independent predictive factors for early relapse during durvalumab consolidation therapy.

CONCLUSION

Younger age, higher number of pack-years, non-COPD, and anemia were independent predictive factors for early relapse during durvalumab consolidation therapy in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC after definitive CCRT. Careful patient selection and clinical attention are needed for high-risk individuals.

Effect of whole-brain radiotherapy with platinum-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with multiple metastases including brain metastases

Current guidelines recommend that cytotoxic chemotherapy be considered first in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with multiple metastases, and whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is not initially recommended even if brain metastases are present. However, cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents are less effective in brain metastases due to poor blood-brain barrier permeability. We investigated the effect of WBRT in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy on survival in NSCLC patients who were EGFR, ALK, and PD-L1 negative, had an ECOG PS of 2, and had multiple metastases including brain metastases. From January 2005 to December 2018, histologically confirmed NSCLC patients who were EGFR, ALK, and PD-L1 negative, had an ECOG PS of 2, and had multiple metastases including brain metastases were included in this study. Patients were classified into two groups based on receiving WBRT prior to or concurrently with administration of first-line chemotherapeutic agents or receiving chemotherapy only. We compared intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and overall survival (OS). Of the 240 NSCLC patients with brain metastases at diagnosis and an ECOG PS of 2, 67 patients were EGFR, ALK, and PD-L1 negative with multiple metastases including brain metastases. Among those patients, 43 (64.2%) received WBRT prior to or concurrently with platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients who received WBRT prior to or concurrently with chemotherapy had better iPFS (7.7 months [4.8-10.6] vs. 3.5 months [2.1-4.9], p = 0.009) and OS (10.8 months [5.9-15.7] vs. 6.1 months [1.9-10.3], p = 0.038) than those who did not receive WBRT. In multivariate analyses, WBRT was significantly associated with iPFS (HR: 1.94 and 95% CI 1.11-3.40, p = 0.020) and OS (HR: 1.92 and 95% CI 1.08-3.42, p = 0.027). In NSCLC patients who are EGFR, ALK, and PD-L1 negative, have an ECOG PS of 2, and have multiple metastases including brain metastases, WBRT prior to or concurrently with chemotherapy could improve iPFS and OS. Therefore, the combination of WBRT with cytotoxic chemotherapy should be considered in these patients.

Improving the performance status in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with chemotherapy (ImPACt trial): a phase 2 study

PURPOSE

This phase II trial is designed to test whether the performance status (PS) of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) patients (pts) can improve with chemotherapy if their poor PS (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS of ≥ 2) is due to disease burden rather than comorbidities.

METHODS

Age18-65 years, Charlson's comorbidity index < 9, serum albumin ≥ 3.5 g/dl, adequate bone marrow and organ function, & ECOG PS ≥ 2 as judged by the worst score of three independent physicians were administered 3 doses of weekly paclitaxel at 60 mg/m2/dose. The primary endpoint was an improvement in ECOG PS by 1 point at 4 weeks; others: toxicity (CTCAE v 5.0), quality of life (QoL) assessment at baseline and 4 weeks by EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-LC13. Optimal Simon's 2-stage design was used.

RESULTS

 Forty-six patients were included with a median age of 56 years (interquartile range, IQR 54-59), 12 (26%) had comorbid conditions, and 87% with ECOG PS 3/4. PS improved in 11 pts at 4 weeks and in 7 beyond this time point. Grade 3/4 toxicities are seen in 20% (most common: anemia and diarrhea). At a median follow-up of 4.8 m (95% CI 3.27-14.9), the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.3 months (95% CI 2.36-5.6) and 6.8 months (95% CI 2.47-8.8), respectively. QoL improved for global QoL, role functioning, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, pain in the chest, pain in other parts, and worsened for alopecia and sore mouth.

CONCLUSIONS

 Abbreviated chemotherapy is a useful, well-tolerated strategy in carefully selected poor PS mNSCLC patients that can improve PS and QoL.

CLINICAL TRIAL

Clinical trial information: CTRI/2020/01/022617.

Consensus Recommendations for the Diagnosis, Biomarker Testing, and Clinical Management of Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition Exon 14 Skipping Mutations in the Middle East, Africa, and Russia

Mesenchymal-epithelial transition exon 14 (METex14) skipping mutations occur in about 3%-4% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This is an aggressive subtype associated with poor prognosis. METex14 skipping is a potentially targetable mutation. Targeted therapy is a promising treatment modality for patients with advanced/metastatic METex14-mutant NSCLC. Performing systematic molecular testing to detect the driver mutation is essential for initiating targeted therapy. However, there is a lack of guidelines on molecular testing for assessing the eligibility of patients for targeted therapy. Therefore, a multidisciplinary panel consisting of experts from the Middle East, Africa, and Russia convened via a virtual advisory board meeting to provide their insights on various molecular testing techniques for the diagnosis of METex14 skipping mutation, management of patients with targeted therapies, and developing consensus recommendations for improving the processes. The expert panel emphasized performing molecular testing and liquid biopsy before treatment initiation and tissue re-biopsy for patients with failed molecular testing. Liquid biopsy was recommended as complementary to tissue biopsy for disease monitoring and prognosis. Selective MET inhibitors were recommended as the first and subsequent lines of therapy. These consensus recommendations will facilitate the management of METex14 skipping NSCLC in routine practice and warrant optimum outcomes for these patients.

Efficacy of PD-(L)1 blockade monotherapy compared with PD-(L)1 blockade plus chemotherapy in first-line PD-L1-positive advanced lung adenocarcinomas: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Single-agent PD-(L)1 blockade (IO) alone or in combination with chemotherapy (Chemotherapy-IO) is approved first-line therapies in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs) with PD-L1 expression ≥1%. These regimens have not been compared prospectively. The primary objective was to compare first-line efficacies of single-agent IO to Chemotherapy-IO in patients with advanced LUADs. Secondary objectives were to explore if clinical, pathological, and genomic features were associated with differential response to Chemotherapy-IO versus IO.

METHODS

This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria were patients with advanced LUADs with tumor PD-L1 ≥1% treated with first-line Chemotherapy-IO or IO. To compare the first-line efficacies of single-agent IO to Chemotherapy-IO, we conducted inverse probability weighted Cox proportional hazards models using estimated propensity scores.

RESULTS

The cohort analyzed included 866 patients. Relative to IO, Chemotherapy-IO was associated with improved objective response rate (ORR) (44% vs 35%, p=0.007) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with tumor PD-L1≥1% (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.97, p=0.021) or PD-L1≥50% (ORR 55% vs 38%, p<0.001; PFS HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.87, p=0.002). Using propensity-adjusted analyses, only never-smokers in the PD-L1≥50% subgroup derived a differential survival benefit from Chemotherapy-IO vs IO (p=0.013). Among patients with very high tumor PD-L1 expression (≥90%), there were no differences in outcome between treatment groups. No genomic factors conferred differential survival benefit to Chemotherapy-IO versus IO.

CONCLUSIONS

While the addition of chemotherapy to PD-(L)1 blockade increases the probability of initial response, never-smokers with tumor PD-L1≥50% comprise the only population identified that derived an apparent survival benefit with treatment intensification.

Restricted Mean Survival Time-Can It Be a New Tool in Assessing the Survival of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors?

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer (LC) is the first and most lethal cancer in the world; identifying new methods to treat it, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), is needed. ICIs treatment is very effective, but it comes bundled with a series of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Restricted mean survival time (RMST) is an alternative tool for assessing the patients' survival when the proportional hazard assumption (PH) fails.

METHODS

We included in this analytical cross-sectional observational survey patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), treated for at least 6 months with ICIs in the first- and second-line settings. Using RMST, we estimated the overall survival (OS) of patients by dividing them into two groups. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to determine the impact of the prognostic factors on OS.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients were included (68.4% men, mean age 63.8), and 34/79 (43%) presented irAEs. The OS RMST of the entire group was 30.91 months, with a survival median of 22 months. Thirty-two out of seventy-nine (40.5%) died before we ended our study. The OS RMST and death percentage favored the patients who presented irAEs (long-rank test, p = 0.036). The OS RMST of patients with irAEs was 35.7 months, with a number of deaths of 12/34 (35.29%), while the OS RMST of the patients without irAEs was 17 months, with a number of deaths of 20/45 (44.44%). The OS RMST by the line of treatment favored the first line of treatment. In this group, the presence of irAEs significantly impacted the survival of these patients (p = 0.0083). Moreover, patients that experienced low-grade irAEs had a better OS RMST. This result has to be cautiously regarded because of the small number of patients stratified according to the grades of irAEs. The prognostic factors for the survival were: the presence of irAEs, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and the number of organs affected by metastasis. The risk of dying was 2.13 times higher for patients without irAEs than for the patients who presented irAEs, (CI) 95% of 1.03 to 4.39. Moreover, by increasing the ECOG performance status by one point, the risk of death increased by 2.28 times, with a CI 95% of 1.46 to 3.58, while the involvement of more metastatic organs was associated with a 1.60 times increase in the death risk, with a CI 95% of 1.09 to 2.36. Age and the type of tumor were not predictive for this analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The RMST is a new tool that helps researchers to better address the survival in studies with ICIs treatment where the PH fails, and the long-rank test is less efficient due to the existence of the long-term responses and delayed treatment effects. Patients with irAEs have a better prognosis than those without irAEs in the first-line settings. The ECOG performance status and the number of organs affected by metastasis must be considered when selecting patients for ICIs treatment.

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among individuals receiving first-line pembrolizumab therapy for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Pembrolizumab, a PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, is approved as first-line (1L) treatment for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) as monotherapy or in combination with platinum and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy. Limited data exist on the use of these regimens in real-world settings.

Objective

Our primary objectives were to describe baseline characteristics and real-world overall survival (rwOS), time on treatment (rwToT), and time to next treatment (rwTTNT) among individuals with R/M HNSCC receiving approved 1L pembrolizumab therapies. We also aimed to identify baseline factors associated with choice of 1L pembrolizumab therapy and with rwOS.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of adults with R/M HNSCC receiving 1L pembrolizumab monotherapy or pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. We used Kaplan-Meier analyses to assess real-world outcomes, logistic regression modeling to identify factors associated with choice of 1L pembrolizumab therapy, and Cox proportional hazards models to identify factors associated with rwOS.

Results

The study population included 431 individuals receiving 1L pembrolizumab monotherapy and 215 receiving 1L pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. The use of 1L pembrolizumab monotherapy was associated with higher baseline combined positive score for PD-L1 expression, older age, higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), laryngeal tumor site, and human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive tumor status. The pembrolizumab monotherapy group had a median (95% CI) rwOS of 12.1 (9.2-15.1) months, rwToT of 4.2 (3.5-4.6) months, and rwTTNT of 6.5 (5.4-7.4) months. Among this group, HPV-positive tumor status and lower ECOG PS were associated with longer rwOS, and oral cavity tumor site with shorter rwOS. The pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy cohort had a median (95% CI) rwOS of 11.9 (9.0-16.0) months, rwToT of 4.9 (3.8-5.6) months, and rwTTNT of 6.6 (5.8-8.3) months. In this group, HPV-positive tumor status was associated with longer rwOS.

Conclusions

This study adds to clinical trial data by summarizing real-world treatment outcomes with 1L pembrolizumab-containing therapies in a more heterogeneous population. Overall survival outcomes in both treatment groups were similar to those observed in the registration clinical trial. These findings support the use of pembrolizumab as standard of care for R/M HNSCC.

Pan-cancer efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitor in refractory solid tumor: A single-arm, open-label, phase II trial

The combination of immunotherapy and antiangiogenic agents for the treatment of refractory solid tumor has not been well investigated. Thus, our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new regimen of anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitor to treat refractory solid tumor. APICAL-RST is an investigator-initiated, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial in patients with heavily treated, refractory, metastatic solid tumor. Eligible patients experienced disease progression during prior therapy without further effective regimen. All patients received anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitor. The primary endpoints were objective response and disease control rates. The secondary endpoints included the ratio of progression-free survival 2 (PFS2)/PFS1, overall survival (OS) and safety. Forty-one patients were recruited in our study; 9 patients achieved a confirmed partial response and 21 patients had stable disease. Objective response rate and disease control rate were 22.0% and 73.2% in the intention-to-treat cohort, and 24.3% and 81.1% in the efficacy-evaluable cohort, respectively. A total of 63.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 46.9%-77.4%) of the patients (26/41) presented PFS2/PFS1 >1.3. The median OS was 16.8 months (range: 8.23-24.4), and the 12- and 36-month OS rates were 62.8% and 28.9%, respectively. No significant association was observed between concomitant mutation and efficacy. Thirty-one (75.6%) patients experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event. The most common adverse events were hypothyroidism, hand-foot syndrome and malaise. This phase II trial showed that anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitor exhibits favorable efficacy and tolerability in patients with refractory solid tumor.

Impact of Performance Status on Survival Outcomes and Health Care Utilization in Patients With Advanced NSCLC Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Introduction

Landmark trials testing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced NSCLC are difficult to extrapolate to real-world practice given the exclusion of patients with poor (i.e., ≥2) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS). We sought to evaluate the impact of ECOG PS on clinical outcomes and health care utilization in patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs in real-world practice.

Methods

Patients with advanced NSCLC who received at least one dose of pembrolizumab or nivolumab were retrospectively identified from the Alberta Immunotherapy Database. The primary outcome was median overall survival, as stratified by ECOG PS. Secondary outcomes included median time-to-treatment failure and metrics of health care utilization, including emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and death in hospital.

Results

A total of 790 patients were included, with 29.2% having poor ECOG PS at initiation of ICI. These patients had significantly lower median overall survival (3.3 versus 13.4 mo) and median time-to-treatment failure (1.4 versus 4.9 mo) compared with those with favorable ECOG PS (p < 0.0001 for both outcomes). Patients with poor ECOG PS were also more likely to present to the emergency department, be admitted to the hospital, and die in the hospital during their first admission (risk ratio = 1.6, 2.3-2.7, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Patients with NSCLC with poor ECOG PS treated with ICI had significantly worse survival outcomes and were significantly more likely to use health care services than those with favorable ECOG PS. The large proportion of patients with poor ECOG PS further justifies the urgent need for randomized trials evaluating the efficacy of ICI in this high-risk population.

Prognostic Value of Inflammatory and Nutritional Biomarkers of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment for Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

This study aimed to determine the prognostic value of inflammatory and nutritional biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (RMHNSCC) and to identify the most useful factor for prognosis assessment. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with RMHNSCC who received ICI therapy. The response rate for ICI therapy and the relationship between inflammatory and nutritional biomarkers and overall survival were examined. The included biomarkers did not correlate with an objective response rate but were associated with a disease control rate. Univariate analysis showed significant correlations between the serum albumin level, C-reactive protein level, platelet to lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic immune-inflammation index, and controlling the nutritional status score and overall survival; multivariate analysis showed that LMR was significantly correlated with overall survival. LMR was the most important biomarker according to the machine learning model. This study suggests that LMR may be the most useful biomarker for predicting the prognosis of ICI treatment for RMHNSCC.

Lung cancer in middle and southern Morocco

Purpose

Determining risk factors associated with a fatal disease such as lung cancer (LC) remains an important key to understanding the factors related to its development and therefore using the correct emergent or accessible treatments. For that, we sought to highlight by describing, and analysing, the risk factors related to LC survival, reflecting the actual situation in Morocco.

Patients and methods

We included 987 LC patients diagnosed from 2015 to 2021 at the Medical Oncology Department at the Mohammed VI University Hospital of Marrakech. An overview of the LC situation was described, and analysed, to determine the risk factors related to survival. The independent prognostic factors were determined using Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Analysis. To create a distinction between different risks group in the survival curve, stratification was done, respectively, within sex, age, histology type, treatments and radiation therapy.

Results

We finally included 862 patients with 15 parameters among the 27 extracted, all meeting the inclusion criteria. 89.1% of the patients were male (n = 768) and 10.9% were female (n = 94), of whom 83.5% had a history of tobacco smoking (n = 720). The median survival of both sexes was 716 (5-2,167) days. The average age at diagnosis was 60 years. Five hundred and thirty-four patients presented with advanced stage. Patients above 66 years were the more diagnosed category with adenocarcinoma at T4N2M1c pathological category, and endocrinal comorbidity, in addition to pleurisy syndrome. Moreover, family history was found to be a bad prognostic factor. Interestingly, smoking status was not a bad contributor to survival. Age at diagnosis, histology subtype, performance status, haemoglobin, numbers of cures of the first-line chemotherapy, radiotherapy, anaemia and treatments were identified as risk factors related to survival.

Conclusion

We established a descriptive and analytical overview of the current LC epidemiology situation in the oncology division of Mohammed VI University Hospital in a non-industrialised state taking into account smoking status.

27-gene Immuno-Oncology (IO) Score is Associated With Efficacy of Checkpoint Immunotherapy in Advanced NSCLC: A Retrospective BC Cancer Study

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are standard of care in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, not all patients benefit, even among PD-L1 tumor proportional score (TPS) ≥50%, indicating an unmet need for additional biomarkers such as those assessing the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). DetermaIO is a 27-gene assay that classifies TIME and has previously demonstrated association with ICI response.

METHODS

FFPE samples were selected from BC Cancer and West Clinic Cancer Center patients with performance status (PS) ≤2 who received at least 2 cycles of ICI monotherapy in the first (1L) or second line (2L). IO scores were generated and analyzed for association with PFS and OS.

RESULTS

In the entire cohort (N=147), IO score was significantly associated with OS (HR=0.68, 95%CI 0.47-0.99, P = .042) and PFS (HR=0.62, 95%CI 0.43-0.88, P = .0069). In 1L treated patients (PD-L1≥50%, N=78), IO score was significantly associated with PFS (HR=0.55, 95%CI 0.32-0.94, P = .028). In exploratory analyses, IO score was associated with benefit in 1L PS2 patients for OS (HR = 0.26, 95%CI 0.091-0.74, P = .012) and PFS (HR = 0.27, 95%CI 0.098-0.72, P = .0095) which was confirmed in PFS subgroup analysis in the independent West Cancer Center study (N=13 HR=0.14, 95%CI 0.027-0.76, P = .023).

CONCLUSION

These data confirm the association of DetermaIO with ICI clinical benefit in NSCLC, and expand on previous studies by demonstrating that first line treated PD-L1≥50% patients can further be stratified by IO score to identify efficacy. Exploratory analysis suggested that the IO score identifies benefit in patients with poor PS.

Impact of interstitial lung abnormality on survival after adjuvant durvalumab with chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has been the standard of care for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The results of the PACIFIC trial established the use of consolidative durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) as the standard of care for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). A subgroup analysis of the PACIFIC trial reported a better progression-free survival (PFS) in Asians. Although real-world data on LA-NSCLC patients who received CCRT plus durvalumab have been reported, there have been few large-scale reports on Asians. In this study, we investigated prognostic factors in the largest real-world data set in Asia of only Japanese LA-NSCLC patients treated with CCRT plus durvalumab.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and thirteen LA-NSCLC patients who received definitive CCRT and consolidative durvalumab at our institution between May 2018 and April 2021 were analyzed. Overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival (CSS), PFS, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and in-field progression-free survival (IFPFS) were investigated as treatment outcomes using competing risk analyses.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 5-47) after the initiation of durvalumab therapy, 31 patients died, of whom 23 died of lung cancer. In the multivariate analysis, the pretreatment factors that correlated with OS were ILA scores, adenocarcinoma, and performance status at the initiation of durvalumab. Furthermore, ILA score and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 1 % were significantly correlated with CSS, and PD-L1 TPS ≥ 1 % was significantly correlated with PFS and IFPFS.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment ILA, adenocarcinoma, and performance status may have an impact on OS of LA-NSCLC patients receiving CCRT plus durvalumab.

The determinants of health-related quality of life among patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer in Taiwan: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Although considered one of the most important prognostic factors for lung cancer patients, the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of the newly diagnosed lung cancer population remains scarcely focused on in the literature. Therefore, we aimed to identify the determinants of HRQOL among newly diagnosed lung cancer patients in Taiwan.

METHODS

Two hundred and fifty patients newly diagnosed with lung cancer were recruited from a medical center in northern Taiwan through convenience sampling. Four structured questionnaires, including the Taiwanese version of the MD Anderson symptom inventory (MDASI-T), the Taiwanese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI-T), the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF), and the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF), were used to collect data. Further, a multivariate stepwise linear regression was conducted to determine the independent risk factors for HRQOL. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The patients (mean age was 61.04 years, 51.2% male, 94.0% non-small-cell lung cancer, 56.4% stage IIIB-IV) had moderate levels of HRQOL among the physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains, as well as overall QOL. HRQOL was not correlated with married status, religion, and comorbidity. Gender, age, family income, smoking status, cancer stage, ECOG PS scores, PA, symptom burden (severity and interference), and PSQI global scores were correlated with HRQOL. Notably, symptom severity was the dominant negative predictor affecting the psychological and environmental domains of QOL (β = -4.313 and -3.500, respectively), accounting for 23.2% and 14.6% of the variance, respectively. On the other hand, symptom interference was the dominant negative predictor affecting the physical and social domains of QOL, as well as overall QOL (β = -3.592, -1.984, and -0.150, respectively), accounting for 44.4%, 15.0%, and 24.1% of the variance, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Newly diagnosed lung cancer patients suffered symptom severity and interference that significantly impaired their HRQOL; particularly, symptom interference affected the physical domain of QOL. Healthcare professionals should pay more attention to cancer-related symptom severity, symptom interference, and HRQOL changes when caring for newly diagnosed lung cancer patients.

Global retrospective analysis of clinician- and patient-reported clinical characteristics and humanistic burden of patients with gastroesophageal cancers on first-line treatment

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC), gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC), and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), together, are leading causes of cancer deaths worldwide. Patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and well-being has become increasingly important alongside traditional oncologic outcomes for both patients and clinicians and may aid treatment decisions. We conducted a survey to examine the clinical characteristics, humanistic burden, and the effects of first-line (1L) treatment in patients with GC/GEJC/EAC, across different geographic regions, to address the paucity of real-world data.

METHODS

Clinicians treating patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic GC/GEJC/EAC in China, France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States, during April-October 2019, were invited to provide data on their patients' demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment, and HRQoL via medical chart reviews, clinician surveys, and patient questionnaires. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, regression analyses comparing active treatment and best supportive care. Patients were also stratified into subgroups that were identified either as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive, HER2 negative (which has a higher prevalence but for whom there are limited treatment options), or unknown HER2 status.

RESULTS

Survey data were analyzed for 995 patients, 87% of whom were on active treatment, most commonly dual or triple chemotherapy. Demographics and clinical characteristics were similar across countries with most patients having GC and the lowest incidence of GEJC and EAC in China. Overall, most patients had de novo disease with good response to 1L treatment, while their HRQoL and well-being was significantly worse than the general population. In 682 patients on active treatment with HER2 negative or unknown status, HRQoL also appeared to be worse in those with recurrent disease. Regression analysis identified several drivers of treatment decisions and factors impacting patients' HRQoL, including stage of disease and comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with advanced GC/GEJC/EAC, screening and assessment of HER2 status as well as patient-reported HRQoL outcomes are invaluable in aiding treatment decisions. The introduction of appropriate therapy soon after diagnosis has the prospect of achieving improved HRQoL and survival in these patients.

Serum cytokine levels and other associated factors as possible immunotherapeutic targets and prognostic indicators for lung cancer

Lung cancer is one of the most prevalent cancer types and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80-85% of all cancer incidences. Lung cancer therapy and prognosis largely depend on the disease's degree at the diagnosis time. Cytokines are soluble polypeptides that contribute to cell-to-cell communication, acting paracrine or autocrine on neighboring or distant cells. Cytokines are essential for developing neoplastic growth, but they are also known to operate as biological inducers following cancer therapy. Early indications are that inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and IL-8 play a predictive role in lung cancer. Nevertheless, the biological significance of cytokine levels in lung cancer has not yet been investigated. This review aimed to assess the existing literature on serum cytokine levels and additional factors as potential immunotherapeutic targets and lung cancer prognostic indicators. Changes in serum cytokine levels have been identified as immunological biomarkers for lung cancer and predict the effectiveness of targeted immunotherapy.

Frontline immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with poor performance status

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapy (ICI-based combination) is a new standard of care for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the frontline setting. Patients with poor performance status (PS) (≥2) were excluded from pivotal trials. Hence, the activity and safety of ICI-based combination therapy in this group of patients is still unknown.

METHODS

We performed a multicentre retrospective study of PS ≥2 mRCC patients who received frontline ICI-based combination, either nivolumab-ipilimumab (NI) or pembrolizumab-axitinib (AP). Patients' characteristics, clinical outcomes, and toxicity were collected. We analysed overall response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS) and grade ≥3 adverse events (G ≥ 3AEs). The association between the predictive biomarker IPI (immune prognostic index) and ORR/PFS/OS was also evaluated.

RESULTS

We identified 70 mRCC patients with PS ≥2 treated with ICI-based combination across 14 institutions between October 2017 and December 2021, including 45 and 25 patients were treated with NI and AP, respectively. Median age at diagnosis was 63 years, 51 (73%) were male, only 17 (24%) had prior nephrectomy, 50 (71%) had synchronous metastatic disease at diagnosis, and 16 (23%) had brain metastases. Sixty-one (87%) and 9 (13%) patients had ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) PS 2 and 3, respectively, and 25 (36%) and 45 (64%) patients were intermediate and poor International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk, respectively. Among all, 91% were clear cell RCC, 7 patients had sarcomatoid features. At the time of the analysis (median follow-up 11.1 months), 41% patients were dead. Median PFS and mOS in the entire cohort were 5.4 months and 16.0 months, respectively; ORR was 31%. No significant differences in ORR, PFS, OS, or G ≥3AEs were seen between NI and AP. The intermediate and poor IPI groups were significantly associated with reduced ORR and shorter PFS.

CONCLUSION

We report the first cohort of PS ≥2 mRCC patients treated with frontline ICI-based combination therapy. The survival outcomes in our cohort were inferior to that reported in pivotal trials. No significant differences in ORR, PFS, OS or toxicity were seen between NI and AP. Prospective real-world studies are needed to confirm these results.

Impact of Frailty on Outcomes of First-Line Pembrolizumab Monotherapy in a Real-World Population with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

ICIs have been able to improve overall survival in advanced-stage lung cancer. The benefit of this therapy is limited in patients with poor ECOG PS. However, this scale is imprecise and can be influenced by different factors, such as frailty. Cancer patients have a high risk of frailty independently of age. In this observational, single-center, retrospective study, we investigated the effect of frailty on the effectiveness of pembrolizumab in first-line use in a cohort of 101 patients with metastatic NSCLC. Frailty was determined using a frailty score system developed by Sakakida et al. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to determine the prognostic role of frailty on OS and PFS. Median OS was significantly higher in patients with low frailty compared with intermediate and high frailty (23.8 vs. 7.0 and 1.8 months, respectively; p < 0.001). Median PFS was also significantly higher in patients with low frailty compared with intermediate and high frailty (10.5 vs. 3.9 and 1.6 months; p < 0.001, respectively). Frailty was the only variable that showed significant differences in OS and PFS. Multivariate analysis confirms frailty as an independent predictor of OS and PFS. Frailty assessment could help to select which patients are candidates for ICIs in NSCLC.

Efficacy of immunotherapy in KRAS-mutant advanced NSCLC: A real-world study in a Chinese population

Background

Immunotherapy has improved the clinical outcomes of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, in patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations, the superior efficacy of immunotherapy has not been elucidated and especially in real-world practice. Our study aimed to use real-world data to assess the efficacy of immunotherapy in KRAS-mutant NSCLC in a Chinese cohort.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we extracted the clinical, molecular, and pathologic data from the electronic health records of patients with advanced KRAS-mutant NSCLC at Shandong Cancer Hospital between January 2018 and May 2022. Furthermore, we evaluated the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the included patients.

Results

Between January 2018 and November 2020, 793 patients were identified with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC and a total of 122 patients with KRAS mutations were included in the analysis. The majority of patients were diagnosed with stage IV (82.0%) adenocarcinoma (93.4%), along with a history of smoking (57.4%). Of these, 42% of patients received anti-PD-(L)1 with or without chemotherapy (Immunotherapy-based regimens), while 58.2% of patients received chemotherapy (Chemotherapy-based regimens). The median overall survival (mOS) in this cohort was 22.9 months (95% CI: 14.1-31.7), while the median-progression-free survival (mPFS) was 9.4 months (95% CI: 6.6-12.1). Patients receiving immunotherapy-based regimens displayed better mOS than those receiving chemotherapy-based regimens (45.2 vs. 11.3 months; P=1.81E-05), with no statistical difference observed in the mPFS (10.5 vs. 8.2 months; P=0.706). Patients receiving immunotherapy-based regimens either in the first line (P=0.00038, P=0.010, respectively) or second-line setting (P=0.010, P=0.026, respectively) showed benefits in both PFS and OS. Subgroup analysis indicated that in patients having KRAS G12C or non-KRAS G12C mutant types, immunotherapy showed benefits of better OS (P=0.0037, P=0.020, respectively) than chemotherapy. Moreover, in advanced NSCLCs patients with or without KRAS/TP53 co-mutation the immunotherapy-based regimen achieved longer OS and PFS than chemotherapy-based regimens.

Conclusions

In the Chinese population of patients with KRAS-mutant advanced NSCLC, immunotherapy-based regimens achieved longer OS than chemotherapy-based regimens, which was independent of first or second-line setting, as well as KRAS mutational subtypes.

Sarcopenia, biological age and treatment eligibility in patients with cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cancer incidence will dramatically increase, especially among older adults, during the next few decades. This may lead to bankruptcy of the healthcare systems worldwide if the current approach to treatment eligibility is not improved. In fact, current treatment personalization is mostly focusing on the genetic and molecular characteristics of cancer cells, whereas clinical characterization of patients is still dependent on gross variables (i.e. chronological age, BMI, comorbidities, Performance Status and so on). This could have contributed to the poor performance of many anticancer drugs in the real-world setting when compared with the results obtained in prospective, randomized clinical trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

The role of chronological age in identifying patients with increased likelihood to respond to therapies has been challenged, pointing to biological age (i.e. accumulated damage to biological systems over the life course, leading to loss of reserve and capacity to respond to challenges) as a robust predictor of outcome encompassing genetic, phenotypic and clinical factors. Sarcopenia has been proposed as a reliable clinical index of biological age, but the complexity of body composition changes occurring during tumour growth appears to preclude its routine use when assessing eligibility in cancer patients.

SUMMARY

Integration of sarcopenia measures within scores of allostatic load may further increase the clinical relevance of changes of body composition, highlight its sensitivity to early nutritional intervention leading to mitigation of accelerated ageing, and contribute to wide delivery of precision oncology.

Can quantitative peritumoral CT radiomics features predict the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer? A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To provide an overarching evaluation of the value of peritumoral CT radiomics features for predicting the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer and to assess the quality of the available studies.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies predicting the prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using CT-based peritumoral radiomics features. Information about the patient, CT-scanner, and radiomics analyses were all extracted for the included studies. Study quality was assessed using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included with 2942 patients from 2017 to 2022. Only one study was prospective, and the others were all retrospectively designed. Manual segmentation and multicenter studies were performed by 69% and 46% of the included studies, respectively. 3D-Slicer and MATLAB software were most commonly used for the segmentation of lesions and extraction of features. The peritumoral region was most frequently defined as dilated from the tumor boundary of 15 mm, 20 mm, or 30 mm. The median RQS of the studies was 13 (range 4-19), while all of included studies were assessed as having a high risk of bias (ROB) overall.

CONCLUSIONS

Peritumoral radiomics features based on CT images showed promise in predicting the prognosis of NSCLC, although well-designed studies and further biological validation are still needed.

KEY POINTS

• Peritumoral radiomics features based on CT images are promising and encouraging for predicting the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer. • The peritumoral region was often dilated from the tumor boundary of 15 mm or 20 mm because these were considered safe margins. • The median Radiomics Quality Score of the included studies was 13 (range 4-19), and all of studies were considered to have a high risk of bias overall.

Sintilimab versus docetaxel as second-line treatment in advanced or metastatic squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: an open-label, randomized controlled phase 3 trial (ORIENT-3)

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC) after failure of first-line chemotherapy are limited. This study (ORIENT-3) aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab versus docetaxel as second-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC.

METHODS

ORIENT-3 was an open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled phase 3 trial that recruited patients with stage IIIB/IIIC/IV sqNSCLC after failure with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 200 mg of sintilimab or 75 mg/m² of docetaxel intravenously every 3 weeks, stratified by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in the full analysis set (FAS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR) and safety.

RESULTS

Between August 25, 2017, and November 7, 2018, 290 patients were randomized. For FAS, 10 patients from the docetaxel arm were excluded. The median OS was 11.79 (n = 145; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.28-15.57) months with sintilimab versus 8.25 (n = 135; 95% CI, 6.47-9.82) months with docetaxel (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56-0.96; P = 0.025). Sintilimab treatment significantly prolonged PFS (median 4.30 vs. 2.79 months; HR: 0.52; 95% CI, 0.39-0.68; P < 0.001) and showed higher ORR (25.50% vs. 2.20%, P < 0.001) and DCR (65.50% vs. 37.80%, P < 0.001) than the docetaxel arm. The median DoR was 12.45 (95% CI, 4.86-25.33) months in the sintilimab arm and 4.14 (95% CI, 1.41-7.23) months in the docetaxel arm (P = 0.045). Treatment-related adverse events of grade ≥ 3 were reported in 26 (18.1%) patients in the sintilimab arm and 47 (36.2%) patients in the docetaxel arm. Exploratory biomarker analysis showed potential predictive values of expression levels of two transcription factors, including OVOL2 (HR: 0.35; P < 0.001) and CTCF (HR: 3.50; P < 0.001)，for sintilimab treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with docetaxel, sintilimab significantly improved the OS, PFS, and ORR of Chinese patients with previously treated locally advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC.

Pembrolizumab monotherapy for untreated PD-L1-Positive non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly or those with poor performance status: A prospective observational study

Objectives

We investigated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab monotherapy as first-line treatment for poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) and elderly patients with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We also investigated clinical prognostic factors for the efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy, based on patient characteristics.

Materials and methods

In this prospective observational study, PS-2 and elderly NSCLC patients with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥1% who received first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy, from October 2019 to March 2021, at 10 institutions in Japan were enrolled. Patients judged eligible by their physicians for combined chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as first-line treatment were excluded. Clinicopathological characteristics and adverse events were investigated for correlation with clinical outcomes.

Results

Forty patients were enrolled in the study. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with PS 2 and those aged ≥ 75 years were 4.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9–14.4) months and 5.3 (95% CI 2.9–9.4) months, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) of patients with PS 2 and those aged ≥ 75 years were 11.6 (95% CI: 1.4–not evaluable [NE]) months and 11.6 (95% CI 7.4–18.1) months, respectively. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were observed in 19 patients; 6 patients had severe irAEs of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or higher. Patients who achieved stable disease or better, had a statistically significant increase in PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the acquisition of disease control with pembrolizumab monotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS.

Conclusion

Pembrolizumab monotherapy was relatively effective and tolerable as a first-line treatment for patients with PD-L1-positive advanced NSCLC who had poor PS or were elderly. Our results suggest that disease control might be an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS in this population. (UMIN000044052 https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000050176)

A unique hub-and-spoke model to optimize patient management in lymphoma using novel CAR-T cell therapy in Southeast and South Asia

Novel therapeutic options for cancer offer hope for patients and their families, particularly when the cancer has not responded to established treatment regimens. The CAR-T cell therapeutic approach has changed the treatment paradigm for relapsed or refractory lymphoma, extending the capacity of the patient's own T cells to detect and eliminate cancer cells through genetic modification of T-cell surface receptors. The process of establishing treatment centers and developing clinical expertize in this novel treatment strategy is complex. Time, resources, and a commitment to focusing health budgets on a new area are required. Currently, Singapore is the only country in southeast and south Asia with market authorization of the CAR-T product, tisagenlecleucel. Availability of CAR-T treatment across international borders provides patients in neighboring countries with choice in therapeutic options. This paper describes the unique hub-and-spoke cross-border collaboration developed between Singapore and its neighbors to provide access to CAR-T cell therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma. To date in 2022, four patients have been included in the CAR-T treatment cross-border collaboration. Their stay in Singapore has been at least 2 months' duration, including the pre-treatment evaluation, apheresis, CAR-T cell infusion and post-treatment monitoring. Patient support from referring and treating physicians, critical to the success of the undertaking, is characterized by early communication, patient selection, multi-disciplinary care, post-treatment monitoring, and attention to detail. The patient journey and the development and implementation of this unique collaboration are discussed.

Choosing the optimal immunotherapeutic strategies for non-small cell lung cancer based on clinical factors

The treatment landscape of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has changed dramatically since the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Although some patients achieve long survival with relatively mild toxicities, not all patients experience such benefits from ICI treatment. There are several ways to use ICIs in NSCLC patients, including monotherapy, combination immunotherapy, and combination chemoimmunotherapy. Decision-making in the selection of an ICI treatment regimen for NSCLC is complicated partly because of the absence of head-to-head prospective comparisons. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is currently considered a standard biomarker for predicting the efficacy of ICIs, although some limitations exist. In addition to the PD-L1 tumor proportion score, many other clinical factors should also be considered to determine the optimal treatment strategy for each patient, including age, performance status, histological subtypes, comorbidities, status of oncogenic driver mutation, and metastatic sites. Nevertheless, evidence of the efficacy and safety of ICIs with some specific conditions of these factors is insufficient. Indeed, patients with poor performance status, oncogenic driver mutations, or interstitial lung disease have frequently been set as ineligible in randomized clinical trials of NSCLC. ICI use in these patients is controversial and remains to be discussed. It is important to select patients for whom ICIs can benefit the most from these populations. In this article, we review previous reports of clinical trials or experience in using ICIs in NSCLC, focusing on several clinical factors that are associated with treatment outcomes, and then discuss the optimal ICI treatment strategies for NSCLC.

A unique hub-and-spoke model to optimize patient management in lymphoma using novel chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy in Southeast and South Asia

Novel therapeutic options for cancer offer hope for patients and their families, particularly when the cancer has not responded to established treatment regimens. The chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapeutic approach has changed the treatment paradigm for relapsed or refractory lymphoma, extending the capacity of the patient's own T cells to detect and eliminate cancer cells through genetic modification of T-cell surface receptors. The process of establishing treatment centers and developing clinical expertize in this novel treatment strategy is complex. Time, resources, and a commitment to focusing health budgets on a new area are required. Currently, Singapore is the only country in southeast and south Asia with market authorization of the CAR-T product, tisagenlecleucel. Availability of CAR-T treatment across international borders provides patients in neighboring countries with choice in therapeutic options. This paper describes the unique hub-and-spoke cross-border collaboration developed between Singapore and its neighbors to provide access to CAR-T cell therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma. To date in 2022, four patients have been included in the CAR-T treatment cross-border collaboration. Their stay in Singapore has been about 2 months' duration, including the pre-treatment evaluation, apheresis, CAR-T cell infusion and post-treatment monitoring. Patient support from referring and treating physicians, critical to the success of the undertaking, is characterized by early communication, patient selection, multi-disciplinary care, post-treatment monitoring, and attention to detail. The patient journey and the development and implementation of this unique collaboration are discussed.

The Association between Early Changes in Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Survival in Patients Treated with Immunotherapy

Dynamic changes in the blood-based biomarkers could be used as a prognostic biomarker in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), although the data are limited. We evaluated the association between the neutrophil−lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and early NLR changes with survival in ICI-treated patients. We retrospectively evaluated the data of 231 patients with advanced-stage cancer. We recorded baseline clinical characteristics, baseline NLR and fourth-week NLR changes, and survival data. A compound prognostic score, the NLR2-CEL score, was developed with the following parameters: baseline NLR (<5 vs. ≥5), ECOG status (0 vs. ≥1), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI, <9 vs. ≥9), LDH (N vs. ≥ULN), and fourth-week NLR change (10% or over NLR increase). In the multivariable analyses, higher NLR (HR: 1.743, p = 0.002), 10% or over NLR increase in the fourth week of treatment (HR: 1.807, p = 0.001), higher ECOG performance score (HR: 1.552, p = 0.006), higher LDH levels (HR: 1.454, p = 0.017), and higher CCI (HR: 1.400, p = 0.041) were associated with decreased OS. Compared to patients with the lowest scores, patients in the highest score group had significantly lower OS (HR: 7.967, 95% CI: 3.531−17.979, p < 0.001) and PFS. The composite score had moderate success for survival prediction, with an AUC of 0.702 (95% CI: 0.626−0.779, p < 0.001). We observed significantly lower survival in patients with higher baseline NLR values and increased NLR values under treatment.

Application of quantitative bias analysis for unmeasured confounding in cost-effectiveness modelling

Due to uncertainty regarding the potential impact of unmeasured confounding, health technology assessment (HTA) agencies often disregard evidence from nonrandomized studies when considering new technologies. Quantitative bias analysis (QBA) methods provide a means to quantify this uncertainty but have not been widely used in the HTA setting, particularly in the context of cost-effectiveness modelling (CEM). This study demonstrated the application of an aggregate and patient-level QBA approach to quantify and adjust for unmeasured confounding in a simulated nonrandomized comparison of survival outcomes. Application of the QBA output within a CEM through deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses and under different scenarios of knowledge of an unmeasured confounder demonstrates the potential value of QBA in HTA.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge After Prior Immune Toxicity

OPINION STATEMENT

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become an essential part of treatment for many cancer types. These monoclonal antibodies remove a critical negative regulatory signal that allows the immune system to recognize and destroy malignant cells that were previously undetectable. Unfortunately, their use has ushered in a whole new form of drug toxicity whereby the immune system attacks normal tissues in the body, referred to hereafter as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). irAEs are common and can result in treatment discontinuation, hospitalization, and death. When alternative modes of treatment are limited, or considered less efficacious, there may be a desire to resume treatment with ICIs after an irAE. Rechallenge with ICIs carries with it a heightened risk of subsequent toxicity, but with careful consideration and appropriate patient selection, this can be considered a reasonable approach.

Safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab for advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: before and during the COVID-19 pandemic

Purpose

The COVID-19 pandemic changed diagnostic and treatment pathways in oncology. We compared the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab amongst advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 50% before and during the pandemic.

Methods

Advanced NSCLC patients initiating pembrolizumab between June 2015 and December 2019 (“pre-pandemic cohort”) and between March 2020 and March 2021 (“pandemic cohort”) at BC Cancer were identified retrospectively. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated risk factors for immune-related adverse events (irAE) ≥ grade 3 at the 6 week, 3 month, and 6 month landmarks. Cox regression models of overall survival (OS) were constructed.

Results

The study population comprised 417 patients in the pre-pandemic cohort and 111 patients in the pandemic cohort. Between March and May 2020, 48% fewer advanced NSCLC cases with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% were diagnosed compared to similar intervals in 2018–2019. Telemedicine assessment [new patient consultations (p < 0.001) and follow-up (p < 0.001)] and extended interval pembrolizumab dosing (p < 0.001) were more common in the pandemic cohort. Patients initiating pembrolizumab after February 2020 (vs. before January 2020) experienced similar odds of developing severe irAE. 2/111 (1.8%) patients receiving pembrolizumab during the pandemic tested positive for COVID-19. On multivariable analysis, no association between pembrolizumab treatment period (before vs. during the COVID-19 pandemic) and OS was observed (p = 0.18).

Conclusion

Significant changes in healthcare delivery in response to the pandemic did not result in increased high grade toxicity or lower survival outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with pembrolizumab.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-022-04181-0.

Novel Inflammasome-Based Risk Score for Predicting Survival and Efficacy to Immunotherapy in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been approved to improve outcomes and reduce recurrence. Biomarkers for patient selection are needed. In this paper, we proposed an inflammasome-based risk score (IRS) system for prognosis and prediction of ICI response for early-stage NSCLC. Cox regression analysis was used to identify significant genes (from 141 core inflammasome genes) for overall survival (OS) in a microarray discovery cohort (n = 467). IRS was established and independently validated by other datasets (n = 1320). We evaluated the inflammasome signaling steps based on five gene sets, which were IL1B-, CASP-1-, IL18-, GSDMD-, and inflammasome-regulated genes. Gene set enrichment analysis, the Kaplan–Meier curve, receiver operator characteristic with area under curve (AUC) analysis, and advanced bioinformatic tools were used to confirm the ability of IRS in prognosis and classification of patients into ICI responders and non-responders. A 30-gene IRS was developed, and it indicated good risk stratification at 10-year OS (AUC = 0.726). Patients were stratified into high- and low-risk groups based on optimal cutoff points, and high-risk IRS had significantly poorer OS and relapse-free survival. In addition, the high-risk group was characterized by an inflamed immunophenotype and higher proportion of ICI responders. Furthermore, expression of SLAMF8 was the key gene in IRS and indicated good correlation with biomarkers associated with immunotherapy. It could serve as a therapeutic target in the clinical setting of immunotherapy.

Previously treated recurrent or advanced endometrial cancer in England: A real-world observational analysis

OBJECTIVES

In patients with recurrent/advanced endometrial cancer who have progressed after first-line treatment, there are a lack of real-world data on treatment patterns, characteristics, and survival outcomes. A novel study was conducted to determine real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in England.

METHODS

This non-interventional study used routine, administrative health data from the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service in England to identify patients diagnosed with recurrent/advanced endometrial cancer between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2018, inclusive. A cohort of patients who progressed to second-line treatment were identified as the 'immune checkpoint inhibitor-eligible second-line' cohort. The co-primary objectives were to summarise baseline demographics, disease characteristics, treatments received, and depict overall survival and time-to-next-treatment (a proxy for progression-free survival) from the start of second-line therapy using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

RESULTS

Overall, 12,058 patients were diagnosed with recurrent/advanced endometrial cancer; 999 patients were included in the immune checkpoint inhibitor-eligible second-line cohort and 77.9% (778 of 999) had advanced disease (Stage III/IV). The most common treatments received at second-line were carboplatin plus paclitaxel (27.9%), carboplatin plus liposomal doxorubicin (14.1%), liposomal doxorubicin monotherapy (13.0%), and paclitaxel monotherapy (11.6%). From initiation of second-line therapy, median (95% confidence interval) overall survival was 10.3 months (9.2-11.1), and median time-to-next-treatment was 7.7 months (7.1-8.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatments received in the relapsed setting were variable and survival outcomes poor at second-line, highlighting the need for standard of care guidance and innovative therapies to improve patient outcomes in England and in countries with similar treatment patterns.

FUNDING

GSK.

Comparison of FOLFIRINOX vs Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel as First-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Importance

FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin calcium [folinic acid], fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride, and oxaliplatin) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel are the 2 common first-line therapies for metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (mPC), but they have not been directly compared in a clinical trial, and comparative clinical data analyses on their effectiveness are limited.

Objective

To compare the FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel treatments of mPC in clinical data and evaluate whether there are differences in overall survival and posttreatment complications between them.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective, nonrandomized comparative effectiveness study used data from the AIM Specialty Health-Anthem Cancer Care Quality Program and from administrative claims of commercially insured patients, spanning 388 outpatient centers and clinics for medical oncology located in 44 states across the US. Effectiveness and safety of the treatments were analyzed by matching or adjusting for age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, ECOG performance status (PS) score, Social Deprivation Index (SDI), liver and lymph node metastasis, prior radiotherapy or surgical procedures, and year of treatment. Patients with mPC treated between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019, and followed up until June 30, 2020, were included in the analysis.

Interventions

Initiation of treatment with FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Outcomes were overall survival and posttreatment costs and hospitalization. Median survival time was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates adjusted with inverse probability of treatment weighting and 1:1 matching.

Results

Among the 1102 patients included in the analysis (618 men [56.1%]; median age, 60.0 [IQR, 55.5-63.7] years), those treated with FOLFIRINOX were younger (median age, 59.1 [IQR, 53.9-63.3] vs 61.2 [IQR, 57.2-64.3] years; P < .001), with better PS scores (226 [39.9%] with PS of 0 in the FOLFIRINOX group vs 176 [32.8%] in the gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel group; P = .02), fewer comorbidities (median Charlson Comorbidity Index, 0.0 [IQR, 0.0-1.0] vs 1.0 [IQR, 0.0-1.0]), and lower SDI (median, 36.0 [IQR, 16.2-61.0] vs 42.0 [IQR, 23.8-66.2]). After adjustments, the median overall survival was 9.27 (IQR, 8.74-9.76) and 6.87 (IQR, 6.41-7.66) months for patients treated with FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, respectively (P < .001). This survival benefit was observed among all subgroups, including different ECOG PS scores, ages, SDIs, and metastatic sites. FOLFIRINOX-treated patients also had 17.3% fewer posttreatment hospitalizations (P = .03) and 20% lower posttreatment costs (P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this comparative effectiveness cohort study, FOLFIRINOX was associated with improved survival of approximately 2 months compared with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and was also associated with fewer posttreatment complications. A randomized clinical trial comparing these first-line treatments is warranted to test the survival and posttreatment hospitalization (or complications) benefit of FOLFIRINOX compared with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel.

Treatment of Metastatic Disease with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab: Effect of Performance Status on Clinical Outcomes

Introduction

Although guidelines exist for appropriate use of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting based on performance status, such recommendations are less readily available for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We sought to determine whether there is a relationship between Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and outcomes of immunotherapy in patients treated for metastatic disease at our community-based oncology practice.

Methods

Patients (n = 253) were identified as receiving nivolumab or pembrolizumab for stage IV malignancy at Cancer Centers of Colorado, St. Joseph Hospital/SCL Health between June 2018 and November 2020. Patients who initiated therapy after May 2020 were excluded from analysis due to less than 6 months follow-up time. The remaining 183 patients were included in a retrospective cohort study comparing patients with ECOG 0, 1, and 2–4. Sex, age, type of cancer, line of therapy, time on therapy and best response to therapy were determined. These baseline factors and outcomes were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) for numeric variables and χ2 tests of association for categorical variables. Time from initiation of ICI to death or hospice was also compared using a log-rank test as well as a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Of the 183 patients included, 31.7% had an ECOG of 0, 48.6% an ECOG of 1, and 19.7% an ECOG of 2–4. Non–small cell lung cancer and melanoma represented the majority of patients in each group. Sex and line of therapy did not differ between groups. There was a significant difference in age, with mean age of 62, 66, and 70 in ECOG 0, 1, and 2–4, respectively. Patients (54.6%) remained on therapy for at least 6 months, with no significant difference between groups in ability to complete 6 months of therapy. For ECOG 0, 1, and 2–4, disease control was achieved in 67.2%, 59.6%, and 41.7%, respectively. Analysis of time to death or hospice with a log-rank test showed a significant difference between groups. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model revealed that patients with ECOG 0 had significantly longer time to death or hospice compared with patients in both other groups after controlling for age, sex, and line of therapy.

Conclusion

In this single institution retrospective study of patients receiving nivolumab or pembrolizumab for metastatic cancer, ECOG 0 was associated with disease control and increased time before death or transition to hospice.

Clinical and Biological Variables Influencing Outcome in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated with Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Antibodies: A Prospective Multicentre Study

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard of treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there are still many uncertainties regarding the selection of the patient who could benefit more from this treatment. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic and predictive role of clinical and biological variables in unselected patients with advanced NSCLC candidates to receive ICIs. Methods: This is an observational and prospective study. The primary objective is the evaluation of the relationship between clinical and biological variables and the response to ICIs. Secondary objectives included: safety; assessment of the relationship between clinical and biological parameters/concomitant treatments and progression-free survival at 6 months and overall survival at 6 and 12 months. Nomograms to predict these outcomes have been generated. Results: A total of 166 patients were included. An association with response was found in the presence of the high immunohistochemical PD-L1 expression, squamous cell histotype, and early line of treatment, whereas a higher probability of progression was seen in the presence of anemia, high LDH values and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), pleural involvement, and thrombosis before treatment. The nomogram showed that anemia, PD-L1 expression, NLR, and LDH represented the most informative predictor as regards the three parameters of interest. Conclusions: In the era of personalized medicine, the results are useful for stratifying the patients and tailoring the treatments, considering both the histological findings and the clinical features of the patients.

Baseline Electrocardiographic and Echocardiographic Assessment May Help Predict Survival in Lung Cancer Patients-A Prospective Cardio-Oncology Study

Cardiovascular disease and cancer coexist and lead to exertional dyspnea. The aim of the study was to determine the prognostic significance of cardiac comorbidities, ECG and baseline echocardiography in lung cancer patients with varying degrees of reduced performance status. This prospective study included 104 patients with histopathologically confirmed lung cancer, pre-qualified for systemic treatment due to metastatic or locally advanced malignancy but not eligible for thoracic surgery. The patients underwent a comprehensive cardio-oncological evaluation. Overall survival negative predictors included low ECOG 2 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status, stage IV (bone or liver/adrenal metastases in particular), pleural effusion, the use of analgesics and among cardiac factors, two ECG parameters: atrial fibrillation (HR = 2.39) and heart rate >90/min (HR = 1.67). Among echocardiographic parameters, RVSP > 39 mmHg was a negative predictor (HR = 2.01), while RVSP < 21 mmHg and RV free wall strain < −30% were positive predictors (HR = 0.36 and HR = 0.56, respectively), whereas RV GLS < −25.5% had a borderline significance (HR = 0.59; p = 0.05). Logistical regression analysis showed ECOG = 2 significantly correlated with the following echocardiographic parameters: increasing RVSP, RV GLS, RV free wall strain and decreasing ACT, FAC (p < 0.05). Selected echocardiographic parameters may be helpful in predicting poor performance in lung cancer patients and, supplemented with ECG evaluation, broaden the possibilities of prognostic evaluation.

Performance status (PS) as a predictor of poor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer (RMHNSCC) patients

BACKGROUND

Anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) represent an established standard-of-care for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RMHNSCC). Landmark studies excluded patients with ECOG performance status (PS) ≥2; the benefit of ICI in this population is therefore unknown.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed RMHNSCC patients who received 1+ dose of ICI at our institution between 2013 and 2019. Demographic and clinical data were obtained; the latter included objective response (ORR), toxicity, and any unplanned hospitalization (UH). Associations were explored using uni- and multivariate analysis. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model; ORR, toxicity, and UH were evaluated with logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the 152 patients, 29 (19%) had an ECOG PS ≥2. Sixty-six (44%) experienced toxicity; 54 (36%) had a UH. A multivariate model for OS containing PS, smoking status, and HPV status demonstrated a strong association between ECOG ≥2 and shorter OS (p < 0.001; HR = 3.30, CI = 2.01-5.41). An association between OS and former (vs. never) smoking was also seen (p < 0.001; HR = 2.17, CI = 1.41-3.35); current smoking did not reach statistical significance. On univariate analysis, poor PS was associated with inferior ORR (p = 0.03; OR = 0.25, CI = 0.06-0.77) and increased UH (p = 0.04; OR = 2.43, CI = 1.05-5.71). There was no significant association between toxicity and any patient characteristic.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed inferior OS, ORR, and rates of UH among ICI-treated RMHNSCC patients with ECOG 2/3. Our findings help frame discussion of therapeutic options in this poor-risk population.

Immunotherapy Versus Hospice: Treatment Decision-Making in the Modern Era of Novel Cancer Therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Modern advances in cancer treatment with immunotherapy have created substantial hope for patients and oncologists alike due to a new possibility of durable response which can verge on "cure." This, in combination with a more favorable toxicity profile, has led many oncologists to consider immunotherapy for patients who might have previously been recommended for hospice. In this narrative review, we discuss (1) the risks and benefits of immunotherapy in patients with far advanced cancer in the last months of life, (2) the role of supportive and palliative care, and (3) how to navigate complex treatment decisions for these patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Unfortunately, data on immunotherapy outcomes for patients with poor performance status and far advanced disease are quite limited. Where available, studies consistently report poorer survival outcomes compared to patients with preserved performance status. However, a minority of patients (15-30%) may achieve at least partial response with immunotherapy, which can be quite durable. Such prognostic uncertainty leads to additional challenges in treatment discussions and decision-making. Given such prognostic uncertainty, clinicians should individualize treatment with consideration for all the various factors that may inform each patient's expected outcome with immunotherapy. Early involvement of palliative care in the disease trajectory can help patients with advanced cancer to optimize their quality of life, improve illness understanding, navigate prognostic uncertainty, and facilitate complex decision-making regarding cancer treatments. With upfront, open discussions of immunotherapy expectations, oncologists can help ensure treatments are aligned with patient goals and optimize value outcomes.

Immunotherapy Outcomes in Individuals with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Poor Performance Status

Background

Patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated in real-world practice typically have worse performance status (PS) compared with clinical trial patients, and the effectiveness of immunotherapy in this population in unknown. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of standard of care immunotherapy for the first-line treatment of stage IV patients with NSCLC with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS greater than or equal to 2.

Methods

We selected ECOG PS greater than or equal to 2 patients from real-world oncology data from a deidentified database and included them if they were diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC and had documented Programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-(L)1] expression greater than 0. Patients with tumor PD-(L)1 expression of at least 50% treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy were compared with those who did not have any documented treatment. Patients with tumor PD-(L)1 expression less than 50% treated with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy were compared with those treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy and those without documented treatment.

Results

In our propensity score–adjusted analysis, patients with ECOG PS of at least 2 and tumor PD-(L)1 expression of at least 50% treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy had statistically significantly better real-world overall survival compared with those without documented treatment (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.39, 95% confidence internal [CI] = 0.32 to 0.47). For patients with tumor PD-(L)1 expression less than 50%, there was also a statistically significant real-world overall survival benefit for those who received treatment either with combination pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (adjusted HR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.32 to 0.46) or pembrolizumab monotherapy (adjusted HR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.41 to 0.70) compared with patients receiving no documented treatment.

Conclusions

Among a highly representative sample of patients with advanced NSCLC and poor PS, our findings suggest that immunotherapy may provide an important survival benefit in individuals with high PD-(L)1–expressing tumors and in conjunction with chemotherapy in tumors with low PD-(L)1 expression.

First-line immunotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with ECOG performance status 2: results of an International Expert Panel Meeting by the Italian Association of Thoracic Oncology

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy represents the standard of care in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), either as monotherapy in high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive tumors (≥50%) or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 status. However, most pivotal clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) did not include patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 2. Hence, a consensus is lacking on the safety and efficacy of ICIs in this specific subgroup of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A virtual International Expert Panel took place in July 2021 with the aim of reviewing the available evidence on the use of ICIs in NSCLC patients with ECOG PS 2, both in clinical practice and in a research setting.

RESULTS

All panelists expressed concern about the applicability of currently available PS scales to evaluate patients for ICI treatment. The panelists agreed that, though limited, the available data support the safety of single-agent immunotherapy in PS 2 NSCLC patients, whereas concern was raised on the safety of ICI combinations, mainly related to chemotherapy and/or anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 toxicity. On the basis of reviewed data, ICI efficacy may be speculated in PS 2 NSCLC patients; however, PS 2 remains a negative prognostic category as compared to PS 0-1 in patients treated with ICI, as it is for chemotherapy. The panelists defined high, medium and low priorities in clinical research. High priority was attributed to the inclusion of PS 2 patients in prospective clinical trials and the specific evaluation of combined ICI treatments with attenuated chemotherapy doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the current evidence, the panelists outlined the major limitations affecting PS 2 patients with NSCLC and reached common considerations on the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of ICI monotherapy and ICI combinations in the first-line setting.

Retrospective analysis of long-term survival factors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab

Background

Nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), has changed the treatment paradigm for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, factors associated with long‐term survival in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs remain unknown. This study aimed to evaluate patient characteristics and clinical laboratory changes related to long‐term survival in NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab, using real‐world data.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG‐PS) ≤1 treated with nivolumab. We defined patients with overall survival (OS) ≥3 years as long‐term survivors. We evaluated the differences in patient characteristics and tumor response between nonlong‐term survivors and long‐term survivors and performed univariate and multivariate analyses of factors associated with long‐term survival.

Results

Out of 213 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with nivolumab, 162 patients with ECOG‐PS ≤1 were included in the study. Young age, ECOG‐PS 0, absolute neutrophil count decrease, lymphocyte percentage increase, and neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) change (ΔNLR) <1 were significantly associated with long‐term survival. Long‐term survivors had significantly higher response and disease control rates than nonlong‐term survivors. Multivariate analysis showed that ΔNLR <1 was significantly associated with long‐term survival. Further, OS was significantly different between the PS 0 and PS 1 groups (median OS: 32.0 months vs. 10.6 months) and the nonincreasing NLR and increasing NLR groups (median OS: 20.8 months vs. 5.7 months).

Conclusions

ΔNLR <1 was a significant long‐term survival factor compared to ΔNLR ≥1 in advanced NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab.

The association between albumin-globulin ratio (AGR) and survival in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

The albumin-globulin ratio (AGR) could be a prognostic biomarker in patients with cancer, although the data is limited in patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the association between AGR and survival in ICI-treated patients.

METHODS

The data of 212 advanced-stage patients were retrospectively evaluated in this cohort study. The association between AGR with overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated with multivariate analyses. Additionally, receptor operating curve (ROC) analysis was conducted to assess the AGR's predictive power in the very early progression (progression within two months) and long-term benefit (more than twelve months survival).

RESULTS

The median AGR was calculated as 1.21, and patients were classified into AGR-low and high subgroups according to the median. In the multivariate analyses, patients with lower AGR (< 1.21) had decreased OS (HR: 1.530, 95% CI: 1.100-2.127, p= 0.011) and PFS (HR: 1.390, 95% CI: 1.020-1.895, p= 0.037). The area under curve of AGR to detect early progression and long-term benefit were 0.654 (95% CI: 0.562-0.747, p= 0.001) and 0.671 (95% CI: 0.598-0.744, p< 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, survival with ICIs was impaired in patients with lower AGR. Additionally, the AGR values could detect the very early progression and long-term benefit ICIs.