The Incidence and Prevalence of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in San Francisco County, California: The California Lupus Surveillance Project

History of Proliferative Glomerulonephritis Predicts End Stage Kidney Disease in Pure Membranous Lupus Nephritis

OBJECTIVES

Pure membranous (class V) lupus nephritis (LN) is considered a less aggressive phenotype, but tissue fibrosis and chronic kidney disease may still develop. This study aimed to elucidate the prognostic value of a history of class switch in pure membranous LN.

METHODS

We included LN patients with at least two clinically indicated kidney biopsies. New onset of end stage kidney disease (ESKD) was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate < 15 ml/min/1.73m2, initiation of dialysis, or kidney transplantation.

RESULTS

Among 220 patients (542 biopsies), 199 (90%) were female, and 118 (54%) were African American, 59 (27%) Caucasian, with median age of 28 years at the first kidney biopsy. Patients with pure class V in a first biopsy converted to proliferative LN in 41% of cases. Pure class V in a repeat biopsy was preceded by proliferative LN in 52%. Trajectory analysis of up to 4 repeat biopsies revealed that ISN class switch may happen at any time, even after multiple biopsies with the same class. New onset ESKD was observed within 2 years in 5/56 (9%) patients with pure class V in a repeat biopsy. All 5 patients had proliferative LN in the first biopsy (log rank p= 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

The conversion from proliferative to membranous (and vice-versa) is frequent in SLE. It can occur at any time in the course of disease, limiting the prognostic value of the first biopsy. Evidence of prior proliferative LN is key as it is associated with higher risk of ESKD in non-proliferative LN.

Prognostic Impact of Genetic Variants of MECP2 and TIRAP on Clinical Outcomes of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Nephritis

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune illness with a growing prevalence in many populations. Few studies have examined genetic predisposition to SLE, so we aimed to examine the clinical impact of the genetic polymorphisms MECP2 rs2734647and TIRAP rs8177374 on the outcomes and therapeutic precision of SLE with and without nephritis. This study included 110 SLE patients-divided into 63 with lupus nephritis (LN), and 47 without nephritis-and 100 controls. Laboratory measurements including CRP, ESR, ACR, CBC, anti-ds-DNA, vitamin A, C3, and C4 were carried out, along with genotyping of MECP2 rs2734647and TIRAP rs8177374 by real-time PCR and sequencing. Treg %, vitamin A, C3, and C4 were lower, whereas Th17 % was higher, in patients vs. controls (p < 0.001). The T allele of MECP2 rs2734647 was higher in LN than in non-nephritis and control subjects. Moreover, the T allele of TIRAP rs8177374 was higher in LN than in non-nephritis and control subjects. The MECP2 and TIRAP genes could play a role in predisposition to SLE, and can also predict disease progress to nephritis, helping to personalize medicine.

Global epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease with protean manifestations that predominantly affects young women. Certain ethnic groups are more vulnerable than others to developing SLE and experience increased morbidity and mortality. Reports of the global incidence and prevalence of SLE vary widely, owing to inherent variation in population demographics, environmental exposures and socioeconomic factors. Differences in study design and case definitions also contribute to inconsistent reporting. Very little is known about the incidence of SLE in Africa and Australasia. Identifying and remediating such gaps in epidemiology is critical to understanding the global burden of SLE and improving patient outcomes. Mortality from SLE is still two to three times higher than that of the general population. Internationally, the frequent causes of death for patients with SLE include infection and cardiovascular disease. Even without new therapies, mortality can potentially be mitigated with enhanced quality of care. This Review focuses primarily on the past 5 years of global epidemiological studies and discusses the regional incidence and prevalence of SLE and top causes of mortality.

Evaluation of SLE arthritis using frequency domain optical imaging

OBJECTIVES

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) affects the joints in up to 95% of patients. The diagnosis and evaluation of SLE arthritis remain challenging in both practice and clinical trials. Frequency domain optical imaging (FDOI) has been previously used to assess joint involvement in inflammatory arthritis. The objective of this study was to evaluate FDOI in SLE arthritis.

METHODS

Ninety-six proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints from 16 patients with SLE arthritis and 60 PIP joints from 10 age-matched, gender-matched and race/ethnicity-matched controls were examined. A laser beam with a wavelength of 670 nm, 1 mm in diameter and intensity modulated at 300 MHz and 600 MHz was directed onto the dorsal surface of each joint, scanning across a sagittal plane. The transmitted light intensities and phase shifts were measured with an intensified charge-coupled device camera. The data were analysed using Discriminant Analysis and Support Vector Machine algorithms.

RESULTS

The amplitude and phase of the transmitted light were significantly different between SLE and control PIPs (p<0.05). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of cross-validated models showed an Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC)of 0.89 with corresponding sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 79%, and accuracy of 80%.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first evaluation of optical methods in the assessment of SLE arthritis; there was a statistically significant difference in the FDOI signals between patients with SLE and healthy volunteers. The results show that FDOI may have the potential to provide an objective, user-independent, evaluation of SLE PIP joints arthritis.

The Asia-Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology consensus statements on the management of systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is prevalent in Asia and carries a variable prognosis among patients across the Asia-Pacific region, which could relate to access to health care, tolerability of medications, and adherence to therapies. Because many aspects of SLE are unique among patients from this region, the Asia-Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology developed the first set of consensus recommendations on the management of SLE. A core panel of 13 rheumatologists drafted a set of statements through face-to-face meeting and teleconferences. A literature review was done for each statement to grade the quality of evidence and strength of recommendation. 29 independent specialists and three patients with SLE were then recruited for a modified Delphi process to establish consensus on the statements through an online voting platform. A total of 34 consensus recommendations were developed. Panellists agreed that patients with SLE should be referred to a specialist for the formulation of a treatment plan through shared decision making between patients and physicians. Remission was agreed to be the goal of therapy, but when it cannot be achieved, a low disease activity state should be aimed for. Patients should be screened for renal disease, and hydroxychloroquine is recommended for all Asian people with SLE. Major organ manifestations of SLE should be treated with induction immunosuppression and subsequently maintenance; options include cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and calcineurin inhibitors, in combination with glucocorticoids. Biologics, combination regimens, plasma exchange, and intravenous immunoglobulins should be reserved for cases of refractory or life-threatening disease. Anticoagulation therapy with warfarin is preferred to the direct oral anticoagulants for thromboembolic SLE manifestations associated with a high-risk antiphospholipid antibody profile.

Pathways linking census tract typologies with subjective neighborhood disorder and depressive symptoms in the Black Women's Experiences Living with Lupus (BeWELL) Study

Depression is a common comorbidity among Black women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), an understudied autoimmune disease characterized by major racial and gender inequities. Research is needed that examines how area-level factors influence risk of depression in this population. Latent profile analysis revealed four neighborhood typologies among metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia census tracts that participants (n=438) in the Black Women's Experiences Living with Lupus (BeWELL) Study were living in: Integrated/High-SES, Moderately Segregated/Mid-SES, Highly Segregated/Mid-SES, and Highly Segregated/Low-SES. Structural equation models indicated that highly segregated census tracts were associated with the greatest levels of depression via increased subjective assessments of neighborhood disorder. Policies that invest in segregated areas and address physical and social aspects of the environment that contribute to neighborhood disorder may promote mental health among Black women with SLE.

Prevalence of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in the United States: Estimates From a Meta-Analysis of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Lupus Registries

OBJECTIVE

Epidemiologic data on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are limited, particularly for racial/ethnic subpopulations in the US. This meta-analysis leveraged data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Lupus Registry network of population-based SLE registries to estimate the overall prevalence of SLE in the US.

METHODS

The CDC National Lupus Registry network includes 4 registries from unique states and a fifth registry from the Indian Health Service. All registries defined cases of SLE according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1997 revised classification criteria for SLE. Case findings spanned either 2002-2004 or 2007-2009. Given the heterogeneity across sites, a random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled prevalence of SLE. An estimate of the number of SLE cases in the US was generated by applying sex/race-stratified estimates to the 2018 US Census population.

RESULTS

In total, 5,417 cases were identified as fulfilling the ACR SLE classification criteria. The pooled prevalence of SLE from the 4 state-specific registries was 72.8 per 100,000 person-years (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 65.3-81.0). The prevalence estimate was 9 times higher among females than among males (128.7 versus 14.6 per 100,000), and highest among Black females (230.9 per 100,000), followed by Hispanic females (120.7 per 100,000), White females (84.7 per 100,000), and Asian/Pacific Islander females (84.4 per 100,000). Among males, the prevalence of SLE was highest in Black males (26.7 per 100,000), followed by Hispanic males (18.0 per 100,000), Asian/Pacific Islander males (11.2 per 100,000), and White males (8.9 per 100,000). The American Indian/Alaska Native population had the highest race-specific SLE estimates, both among females (270.6 per 100,000) and among males (53.8 per 100,000). In 2018, an estimated 204,295 individuals (95% CI 160,902-261,725) in the US fulfilled the ACR classification criteria for SLE.

CONCLUSION

A coordinated network of population-based SLE registries provides more accurate estimates of the prevalence of SLE and the numbers of individuals affected with SLE in the US in 2018.

Overcoming barriers to recruitment and retention of African-American women with SLE in behavioural interventions: lessons learnt from the WELL study

Background

African–Americans are historically under-represented in SLE studies and engaging them in behavioural interventions is challenging. The Women Empowered to Live with Lupus (WELL) study is a trial conducted to examine the effectiveness of the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP) among African–American women with SLE. We describe enrolment and retention challenges and successful strategies of the WELL study.

Methods

The Georgians Organized Against Lupus (GOAL) cohort, a population-based cohort established in Atlanta, Georgia, was used to enrol a sample of 168 African–American women with SLE into the CDSMP. The CDSMP is a 6-week, group-based programme led by peers to enhance self-management skills in people with chronic conditions. Study performance standards were predefined and close monitoring of recruitment and retention progress was conducted by culturally competent staff members. Continuous contact with participants, research coordinators’ notes and regular research team meetings served to assess barriers and define strategies needed to meet the desired recruitment and retention outcomes.

Results

While no substantial barriers were identified to enrol GOAL participants into the WELL study, WELL participants faced difficulties registering for and/or completing (attending ≥4 sessions) a CDSMP workshop. Major barriers were unpredicted personal and health-related issues, misunderstanding of the scope and benefits of the intervention, and transportation problems. Early implementation of tailored strategies (eg, CDSMP scheduled on Saturdays, CDSMP delivered at convenient/familiar facilities, transportation services) helped to reduce participant barriers and achieve a CDSMP registration of 168 participants, with 126 (75%) completers. Frequent contact with participants and compensation helped to reach 92.3% retention for the 6-month survey.

Conclusions

Predefined standards and monitoring of participant barriers by a culturally competent research team and proactive solutions were critical to implementing successful strategies and achieving the desired recruitment and retention outcomes of a behavioural trial involving African–American women with SLE.

Trial registration number

NCT02988661.

Feasibility and preliminary data for a State-wide South Carolina Lupus Registry

BACKGROUND

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or lupus is an autoimmune disorder whose cause and reason for disproportionate impact on minorities remains enigmatic. Furthermore, statistics describing lupus incidence and prevalence are outdated and often based on small samples. To begin to address this disparity this report describes preliminary data to be utilized in the development of a state-wide lupus registry in South Carolina.

METHODS

A prospective survey and retrospective data from the South Carolina Budget and Control Board Office of Research & Statistics were used to capture data pertaining to knowledge of lupus, prevalence, and access to lupus care.

RESULTS

Retrospective ORS data indicated there were 11,690 individuals living with lupus in 2014 with the average direct cost of $69,999.40 in medical care. Prospective surveys (N = 325), in over 16 locations in South Carolina, showed 31% knew someone with lupus, 16% had been diagnosed with lupus, and 50% did not know of a medical facility that treated lupus.

CONCLUSION

A lupus registry and repository will provide ongoing access for researchers on the impact of lupus on communities in South Carolina. Lupus is highly prevalent, but disproportionately represented in terms of patient information and participation in clinical trials, so it is also expected that this preliminary work will provide an ongoing process in which the medical community can better engage lupus patients.

Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Dapirolizumab Pegol in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Objective

To evaluate the dose–response, efficacy and safety of dapirolizumab pegol (DZP) in patients with SLE.

Methods

Adults with moderately to severely active SLE (SLEDAI-2K score ≥6 and ≥1 BILAG A or ≥2 BILAG B domain scores), receiving stable CS (≤40 mg/day prednisone-equivalent), antimalarial or immunosuppressant drugs were included. Patients with stable LN (proteinuria ≤2 g/day) not receiving high-dose CS or CYC were permitted entry. Randomized patients received placebo or i.v. DZP (6/24/45 mg/kg) and standard-of-care (SOC) treatment every 4 weeks to week 24, after which patients received only SOC to week 48. The primary objective was to establish a dose–response relationship based on week 24 BILAG-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) responder rates.

Results

All DZP groups exhibited improvements in clinical and immunological outcomes vs placebo at week 24; however, BICLA responder rates did not fit pre-specified dose–response models [best-fitting model (E_max): P = 0.07]. Incidences of serious treatment-emergent adverse events across DZP groups were low and similar to placebo. Following DZP withdrawal, SLEDAI-2K, physician’s global assessment (PGA), BILAG, and Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) scores stabilized; BICLA and SLE Responder Index (SRI-4) responder rates declined (likely due to interventions with disallowed escape medications), BILAG flares increased, and immunologic parameters returned towards baseline.

Conclusions

Although the primary objective was not met, DZP appeared to be well tolerated, and patients exhibited improvements across multiple clinical and immunological measures of disease activity after 24 weeks relative to placebo. The potential clinical benefit of DZP warrants further investigation.

The racial/ethnic and sociocultural aspects of the pandemic in rheumatology

The disproportionate impact of coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) on communities of color is gaining global attention. Current research demonstrates that historically marginalized populations are experiencing disproportionate levels of SARS-Cov-2 infection and adverse clinical outcomes. However, research examining whether COVID-19 outcomes vary by race and ethnicity within the rheumatic disease population is limited. This paper will review data showing how SARS-CoV-2 infection has differentially affected racial and ethnic minorities in the general population and those with rheumatic disease. We will also highlight disparities in rheumatic disease risk and severity that existed prior to the pandemic, and discuss recent work examining severe outcomes of COVID-19 in rheumatic disease patients by race and ethnicity. Finally, we propose several actionable steps for the rheumatology community to address COVID-19 health disparities, which may have long-term effects on patients with rheumatic disease.

Association of Race and Ethnicity With COVID-19 Outcomes in Rheumatic Disease: Data From the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance Physician Registry

OBJECTIVE

Racial/ethnic minorities experience more severe outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the general US population. This study was undertaken to examine the association between race/ethnicity and COVID-19 hospitalization, ventilation status, and mortality in people with rheumatic disease.

METHODS

US patients with rheumatic disease and COVID-19 were entered into the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance physician registry between March 24, 2020 and August 26, 2020 were included. Race/ethnicity was defined as White, African American, Latinx, Asian, or other/mixed race. Outcome measures included hospitalization, requirement for ventilatory support, and death. Multivariable regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, rheumatic disease diagnosis, comorbidities, medication use prior to infection, and rheumatic disease activity.

RESULTS

A total of 1,324 patients were included, of whom 36% were hospitalized and 6% died; 26% of hospitalized patients required mechanical ventilation. In multivariable models, African American patients (OR 2.74 [95% CI 1.90-3.95]), Latinx patients (OR 1.71 [95% CI 1.18-2.49]), and Asian patients (OR 2.69 [95% CI 1.16-6.24]) had higher odds of hospitalization compared to White patients. Latinx patients also had 3-fold increased odds of requiring ventilatory support (OR 3.25 [95% CI 1.75-6.05]). No differences in mortality based on race/ethnicity were found, though power to detect associations may have been limited.

CONCLUSION

Similar to findings in the general US population, racial/ethnic minorities with rheumatic disease and COVID-19 had increased odds of hospitalization and ventilatory support. These results illustrate significant health disparities related to COVID-19 in people with rheumatic diseases. The rheumatology community should proactively address the needs of patients currently experiencing inequitable health outcomes during the pandemic.

Large-scale mortality gap between SLE and control population is associated with increased infection-related mortality in lupus

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to analyse the incidence, prevalence, mortality and cause of death data of adult SLE patients and matched controls in a full-populational, nationwide, retrospective study.

METHODS

This non-interventional study was based on database research of the National Health Insurance Fund of Hungary. A total of 7888 patients were included in the analyses, within which two subgroups of incident patients were created: the 'All incident SLE patients' group consisted of all incident SLE patients (4503 patients), while the 'Treated SLE patients' group contained those who received relevant therapy in the first 6 months after diagnosis (2582 patients).

RESULTS

The median age of the SLE population was found to be 46.5 years (women 85%). The incidence rate was 4.86 and 2.78 per 100 000 inhabitants in the 'All incident SLE patients' and 'Treated SLE patients' groups, respectively. The standardized mortality ratio was 1.63 and 2.09 in the 'All incident SLE patients' and 'Treated SLE patients' groups, respectively. Overall survival was significantly lower (P < 0.001) in both groups than in the general population, with hazard ratio = 2.17 in the 'All incident SLE patients' group and hazard ratio = 2.75 in the 'Treated SLE patients' group. There was no significant difference between SLE and control deaths regarding cerebrovascular conditions as the cause of death. Generally, cancer-related deaths were less common, while haematological cancer and infection-related deaths were more common in SLE patients.

CONCLUSION

Infections, especially sepsis, had the largest positive effect on top of the extra mortality of SLE. This highlights that SLE patients are at increased risk of infection-related death.

Impact of Limited Health Literacy on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

Health disparities in patient-reported outcomes by income and education are well documented; however, the impact of health literacy on patient-reported outcomes has received less attention. We examined independent effects of income, education, and health literacy on patient-reported outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

Data from the California Lupus Epidemiology Study (n = 323 participants) were used. Health literacy was assessed with a validated 3-item measure (ability to understand written information, reliance on others to understand written information, confidence in completing written forms). Patient-reported outcomes were administered by interview in English, Spanish, Cantonese, or Mandarin. Generic and disease-specific patient-reported outcomes were examined using the following: 10 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) short forms; the 8 Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey subscales; and 3 patient-reported SLE disease activity and damage measures. We conducted 2 sets of multivariable analyses: the first examined education, income, or health literacy individually; the second included all 3 simultaneously. All multivariable models included age, sex, race/ethnicity, language, disease duration, and physician-assessed disease activity and damage.

RESULTS

More than one-third of participants (38%) had limited health literacy (LHL), including >25% with greater than high school education. In multivariable analyses simultaneously considering education, income, and health literacy, LHL was associated with significantly worse scores on all patient-reported outcomes except disease damage. In contrast, disparities by income were seen in only 3 PROMIS scales, 3 SF-36 subscales, and 1 disease activity measure. No disparities by education level were noted.

CONCLUSION

We found significantly worse patient-reported outcome scores among individuals with LHL, even after controlling for disease activity and damage. Whether disparities are due to actual differences in health or measurement issues requires further study.

Major Depression and Adverse Patient-Reported Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Results From a Prospective Longitudinal Cohort

OBJECTIVE

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is reduced in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), partly driven by comorbid depression. Among patients with SLE, the association between major depression and HRQoL, measured using the NIH's Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), is not well characterized. The objective was to determine an association between major depression and HRQoL as measured by PROMIS.

METHODS

Cross-sectional data were obtained from the California Lupus Epidemiology Study, a cohort of adults in the San Francisco Bay Area with SLE. We studied the association between major depression (score ≥10 on the Patient Health Questionnaire 8 depression scale) and T scores (scaled to population mean ± SD of 50 ± 10) on 12 PROMIS domains representing physical, mental, and social health. Mean T scores in depressed and nondepressed individuals were compared using multiple linear regression models adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, disease activity, damage, body mass index, and household income.

RESULTS

Mean age of the 326 participants was 45 years; ~89% were women, 29% White, 23% Hispanic, 10% African American, and 36% Asian. One-fourth met the criteria for major depression. In multivariable analyses, major depression was independently associated with worse T scores on all 12 PROMIS domains (P < 0.001); compared with those without major depression, depressed individuals scored >10 points (1 SD) worse on fatigue, sleep impairment, negative psychosocial impact of illness, satisfaction in discretionary social activities, and satisfaction in social roles.

CONCLUSION

In individuals with SLE, major depression is associated with markedly worse PROMIS scores in physical, mental, and social domains. Diagnosing and treating depression may help improve HRQoL in individuals with SLE.

High Disease Severity Among Asians in a US Multiethnic Cohort of Individuals with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

Knowledge about systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) outcomes among US Asians is lacking. We examined SLE disease activity, severity, and damage among Asians of primarily Chinese and Filipino descent in a multiethnic cohort.

METHODS

California Lupus Epidemiology Study (CLUES, n=328) data were analyzed. Data were collected in English, Cantonese, Mandarin or Spanish, using validated instruments for disease activity (Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index), disease severity (Lupus Severity Index [LSI]) and disease damage (Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Damage Index). We assessed differences in SLE outcomes among racial/ethnic groups using multivariable linear regression including interaction terms for age at diagnosis and race/ethnicity.

RESULTS

Asians were the largest racial/ethnic group (38%; [Chinese=22%; Filipino=9%; Other=7%]). Average age at diagnosis (years) was younger among Asians (27.9), particularly Filipinos (22.2), compared with Whites (29.4) and Blacks (34.0). After adjustment, disease activity and damage were not significantly different across groups. Disease severity among Asians was significantly higher than Whites (LSI 7.1 vs 6.5; p<0.05) but similar to Blacks and Hispanics. Early age at diagnosis was associated with greater organ damage among Asians, Blacks, and Hispanics, but not Whites.

CONCLUSIONS

SLE was more severe among US Asians compared to Whites. Filipinos were affected at strikingly young ages. Asians and non-White groups with younger age at diagnosis had greater organ damage than Whites. Such racial/ethnic distinctions suggest the need for heightened clinical awareness to improve health outcomes among Asians with SLE. Further study of SLE outcomes across a range of US Asian subgroups is important.

Comparison of Role of Hand and Wrist Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Subclinical Synovitis in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Retrospective, Single-Center Study

Background

This retrospective study aimed to compare the roles of hand and wrist ultrasound in diagnosing subclinical synovitis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at a single center in Sichuan, China.

Material/Methods

Forty-one patients with SLE and 20 patients with RA were included. SLE was diagnosed using the American rheumatology Society (ACR) classification standard. Severity of SLE was evaluated using the SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI). General and clinical manifestations and laboratory indicators were measured. Spearman correlation analysis was used for analyzing correlations between musculoskeletal ultrasound results and indexes.

Results

Among 41 patients with SLE, 26 (63.4%) had joint pain, and 39 (95.1%) had at least 1 joint abnormality. Thirteen patients with SLE (31.7%) had wrist joint involvement, 7 (17.1%) had metacarpal phalangeal-1 (MCP1) involvement, 8 (19.5%) had MCP2 involvement, 17 (41.5%) had MCP3 involvement, 14 (34.1%) had MCP4 involvement, and 5 (12.2%) had MCP5 involvement. Meanwhile, 2 (4.8%) had proximal interphalangeal-1 (PIP1) involvement, 10 (24.4%) had PIP2 involvement, 17 (41.5%) had PIP3 involvement, 12 (29.3%) had PIP4 involvement, and 3 (7.3%) had PIP4 involvement. Twelve patients demonstrated knee joint involvement. MCP joints had the highest involvement frequency (P=0.003). The most frequently detected disease was synovitis, followed by tenosynovitis, joint effusion, and bone erosion. ESR (P=0.002), CRP (P=0.020), and SLEDAI (P=0.011) of patients with SLE with arthralgia were significantly higher compared to patients without arthralgia. In patients with RA, musculoskeletal ultrasound scores were correlated with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), disease activity score-28 (DAS28), and interleukin-6 (IL-6). In patients with SLE, musculoskeletal ultrasound scores were correlated with double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), ribonucleoprotein (RNP), DAS28, and IL-6.

Conclusions

Musculoskeletal ultrasound is highly sensitive in evaluating subclinical synovitis in patients with SLE, and its score is positively correlated with dsDNA, RNP IL-6, and DAS28 in patients with SLE.

Incidence and prevalence of systemic sclerosis and systemic sclerosis with interstitial lung disease in the United States

BACKGROUND

Although systemic sclerosis (SSc) with interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) is a serious condition and incurs a substantial clinical burden, the epidemiology has not been well characterized.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the incidence and prevalence of SSc and SSc-ILD among commercially insured adults in the United States.

METHODS

Adults with medical claims between 2011 and 2016 for SSc or SSc-ILD with and without high-resolution computed tomography scans were identified from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart. Incidence and prevalence were calculated as rates per 100,000 person-years and 100,000 people, respectively. The crude and age- and sex-adjusted prevalence and incidence of SSc and SSc-ILD were estimated and stratified by year and geography. Sensitivity analyses were conducted based on different cohort identification algorithms.

RESULTS

Overall, the crude incidence rates of SSc and SSc-ILD were 16.4 and 1.2 per 100,000 person-years, respectively, and the crude prevalence was 24.4 and 6.9 per 100,000 people, respectively. Patient characteristics were generally similar between the SSc and SSc-ILD groups. Mean age range was 59.2-59.9 years and 61.8-62.9 years in the SSc and SSc-ILD groups, respectively. SSc had an age- and sex-adjusted incidence rate of 15.1 per 100,000 person-years and an adjusted prevalence of 25.9 per 100,000 people. The adjusted incidence rate of SSc-ILD was 1.1 per 100,000 person-years and the adjusted prevalence was 7.3 per 100,000 people.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides current estimates of the national incidence and prevalence of SSc and SSc-ILD, which have not been previously well characterized. Further research in the future may help to support health management strategies and resource allocation for adults with SSc and SSc-ILD in the United States.

DISCLOSURES

This work was supported by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (BIPI), which reviewed the manuscript for medical and scientific accuracy, as well as intellectual property considerations. All authors are employed by BIPI and did not receive direct compensation related to the development of the manuscript.

Anti-Müllerian hormone in African-American women with systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

Women with SLE may experience ovarian insufficiency or dysfunction due to treatment or disease effects. Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), a marker of ovarian reserve, has been examined in small populations of women with SLE with conflicting results. To date, these studies have included very few African-American women, the racial/ethnic group at greatest risk of SLE.

METHODS

We enrolled African-American women aged 22-40 years diagnosed with SLE after age 17 from the Atlanta Metropolitan area. Women without SLE from the same area were recruited from a marketing list for comparison. AMH was measured in serum using the Ansh Labs assay (Webster, Texas, USA). We considered AMH levels <1.0 ng/mL and AMH <25th percentile of comparison women as separate dichotomous outcomes. Log-binomial regression models estimating prevalence ratios were adjusted for age, body mass index and hormonal contraception use in the previous year.

RESULTS

Our sample included 83 comparison women without SLE, 68 women with SLE and no history of cyclophosphamide (SLE/CYC-) and 11 women with SLE and a history of cyclophosphamide treatment (SLE/CYC+). SLE/CYC+ women had a greater prevalence of AMH <1.0 ng/mL compared with women without SLE (prevalence ratio (PR): 2.90, 95% CI: 1.29 to 6.51). SLE/CYC- women were also slightly more likely to have AMH <1.0 ng/mL (PR: 1.62, 95% CI: 0.93 to 2.82) than comparison women. Results were similar when considering AMH <25th percentile by age of comparison women.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with CYC is associated with low AMH in African-American women with SLE. SLE itself may also be associated with reduced AMH, but to a lesser extent.

Disparities in Lupus and Lupus Nephritis Care and Outcomes Among US Medicaid Beneficiaries

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a serious chronic autoimmune disease with substantial morbidity and mortality. Although improved diagnostics and therapeutics have contributed to declining mortality rates, important disparities exist in SLE survival rates by race, ethnicity, gender, age, country, and social disadvantage. This review highlights the burden of SLE and lupus nephritis among Medicaid beneficiaries, outlines barriers in access to high-quality SLE care and medication adherence in the Medicaid SLE population, and summarizes disparities in adverse outcomes among SLE patients enrolled in Medicaid.

The Contribution of Genetics and Epigenetics to Our Understanding of Health Disparities in Rheumatic Diseases

Socioeconomic determinants of health are associated with worse outcomes in the rheumatic diseases and contribute significantly to health disparities. However, genetic and epigenetic risk factors may affect different populations disproportionally and further exacerbate health disparities. We discuss the role of genetics and epigenetics to the health disparities observed in rheumatic diseases. We review concepts of population genetics and natural selection, current genome-wide genetic and epigenetic studies of several autoimmune diseases, and environmental exposures associated with disease risk in different populations. To understand how genomics influence health disparities in the rheumatic diseases, further studies in different populations worldwide are needed.

Understanding the Disproportionate Burden of Rheumatic Diseases in Indigenous North American Populations

Studies have described a high incidence and prevalence of several rheumatic diseases in indigenous North American populations. Conditions studied most frequently with consistently high burden of disease include rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Crystal-induced arthritis has been reported to have a lower prevalence than expected. Information about genetic and environmental risk factors is available for some of these conditions. An awareness of the epidemiology of rheumatic diseases in indigenous North American populations is important for clinicians involved in caring for patients in these populations as well as for planning health service delivery in these communities.

Dexamethasone prodrug nanomedicine (ZSJ-0228) treatment significantly reduces lupus nephritis in mice without measurable side effects - A 5-month study

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Glucocorticoids (GCs) are uniformly used in clinical LN management. Their notorious toxicities, however, have hampered the long-term clinical application. To circumvent GC side effects while maintaining their potent therapeutic efficacy, we have developed a macromolecular prodrug nanomedicine based on dexamethasone (ZSJ-0228). The focus of this study was to investigate its long-term efficacy and, most importantly, safety in the lupus-prone NZB/W F1 mouse. Monthly ZSJ-0228 treatment for five months significantly reduced the incidence of nephritis in NZB/W F1 mice with an improved survival rate. In contrast to treatment with dose equivalent daily free dexamethasone, long-term monthly ZSJ-0228 did not result in any measurable GC-associated side effects. With its outstanding efficacy and exceptional safety, it is anticipated that ZSJ-0228 may be a novel therapy for long-term clinical management of LN.

Infertility Among African American Women With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Compared to Healthy Women: A Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE

Some treatments for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) can cause infertility, but the effect of SLE itself on fertility, particularly in African American women, is less clear. We undertook this study to examine infertility experiences in African American women with SLE compared to healthy women.

METHODS

We enrolled women ages 22-40 years living in the Atlanta metropolitan area who were diagnosed with SLE after age 17 years. Women who had ever been treated with cyclophosphamide or who had a hysterectomy were excluded. African American women ages 22-40 years who were from the same area and recruited from a marketing list were used for comparison. Women were interviewed about their reproductive histories and goals. Periods of infertility were identified as times when women had regular, unprotected sex for ≥12 months without conceiving after 20 years of age. We separately considered any period of infertility and periods of infertility when attempting pregnancy. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to examine the association between SLE and time to infertility. Models were adjusted for age, nulliparity, and smoking. An age-matched analysis was also conducted to examine periods of infertility occurring after SLE diagnosis.

RESULTS

Our sample included 75 women with SLE and 154 women without SLE. SLE was associated with any infertility (adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj ] 2.08 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.38-3.15]), but less so with infertility when attempting pregnancy (HRadj 1.30 [95% CI 0.62-2.71]). The matched analysis generated similar point estimates.

CONCLUSION

Women with SLE may be more likely to experience episodes of infertility, but this may not translate to an inability to meet reproductive goals.

Establishing Consensus Understanding of the Barriers to Drug Development in Lupus

OBJECTIVE

Due to the extreme heterogeneity of lupus and the lack of consensus among stakeholders, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies have had limited success in developing treatments for lupus. For this reason, the Lupus Foundation of America (LFA), researchers at the Center for the Study of Drug Development at Tufts University School of Medicine (Tufts CSDD) and an advisory committee of 13 international lupus experts collaborated to launch the Addressing Lupus Pillars for Health Advancement (ALPHA) project.

METHODS

To inform the ALPHA project, 17 in-depth interviews among lupus experts and a global survey among lupus drug development and clinical care professionals was conducted to identify, characterize, and prioritize fundamental barriers and validate findings.

RESULTS

The global survey received 127 responses from experts across 20 countries. Results of the in-depth interviews and the survey findings were consistent. Top barriers to developing new medical treatments for lupus included the lack of a clear definition of the disease with respondents identifying 30 autoimmune conditions that may be lupus-related; lack of predictive biomarkers; flaws in clinical trial designs; and a lack of reliable outcome measures.

CONCLUSION

The study findings encourage drug development professionals to validate disease-specific measures and to identify if specific symptoms are caused by lupus. This original research also provides a methodology that can be applied to highly heterogenous diseases where low consensus on diagnosis and treatment exists among drug development and health professionals.

Discontinuation of hydroxychloroquine in older patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a multicenter retrospective study

Background

Although hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a mainstay of treatment for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), ocular toxicity can result from accumulated exposure. As the longevity of patients with SLE improves, data are needed to balance the risk of ocular toxicity and the risk of disease flare, especially in older patients with quiescent disease. Accordingly, this study was initiated to examine the safety of HCQ withdrawal in older SLE patients.

Methods

Data were obtained by retrospective chart review at three major lupus centers in New York City. Twenty-six patients who discontinued HCQ and thirty-two patients on HCQ matched for gender, race/ethnicity, and age were included in this study. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a lupus flare classified by the revised version of the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus: National Assessment version of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) Flare composite index, within 1 year of HCQ withdrawal or matched time of continuation.

Results

Five patients (19.2%) in the HCQ withdrawal group compared to five (15.6%) in the HCQ continuation group experienced a flare of any severity (odds ratio [OR] = 1.28; 95% CI 0.31, 5.30; p = 0.73). There were no severe flares in either group. The results were similar after adjusting for length of SLE, number of American College of Rheumatology criteria, low complement levels, and SELENA-SLEDAI score, and in a propensity score analysis (OR = 1.18; 95% CI 0.23, 6.16; p = 0.84). The analysis of time to any flare revealed a non-significant earlier time to flare in the HCQ withdrawal group (log-rank p = 0.67). Most flares were in the cutaneous and musculoskeletal systems, but one patient in the continuation group developed pericarditis. The most common reason for HCQ withdrawal was retinal toxicity (42.3%), followed by patient’s preference (34.6%), other confirmed or suspected adverse effects (15.4%), ophthalmologist recommendation for macular degeneration (3.8%), and rheumatologist recommendation for quiescent SLE (3.8%).

Conclusions

In this retrospective study of older stable patients with SLE on long-term HCQ, withdrawal did not significantly increase the risk of flares.

Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Prevalence and Time to Onset of Manifestations of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: The California Lupus Surveillance Project

OBJECTIVE

The California Lupus Surveillance Project (CLSP) is a population-based registry of individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) residing in San Francisco County, California from 2007 to 2009, with a special focus on Asian/Pacific Islander and Hispanic patients. We used retrospective CLSP data to analyze racial and ethnic differences in lupus manifestations and in the timing and risk of developing severe manifestations.

METHODS

A total of 724 patients with SLE were retrospectively identified. Prevalence ratios (PRs) of SLE manifestations were calculated using Poisson regression models stratified by race/ethnicity and adjusted for sex, age at SLE diagnosis, and disease duration. We studied onset of severe SLE manifestations after SLE diagnosis using Kaplan-Meier methods to examine time-to-event and Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). White patients were the referent group in all analyses.

RESULTS

African Americans, Asian/Pacific Islanders, and Hispanic patients had increased prevalence of renal manifestations (PR 1.74 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.40-2.16], PR 1.68 [95% CI 1.38-2.05], and PR 1.35 [95% CI 1.05-1.74], respectively). Furthermore, African Americans had increased prevalence of neurologic manifestations (PR 1.49 [95% CI 1.12-1.98]), and both African Americans (PR 1.09 [95% CI 1.04-1.15]) and Asian/Pacific Islanders (PR 1.07 [95% CI 1.01-1.13]) had increased prevalence of hematologic manifestations. African Americans, Asian/Pacific Islanders, and Hispanic patients, respectively, had higher risk of developing lupus nephritis (HR 2.4 [95% CI 1.6-3.8], HR 4.3 [95% CI 2.9-6.4], and HR 2.3 [95% CI 1.4-3.8]) and thrombocytopenia (HR 2.3 [95% CI 1.1-4.4], HR 2.3 [95% CI 1.3-4.2], and HR 2.2 [95% CI 1.1-4.7]). Asian/Pacific Islander and Hispanic patients had higher risk of developing antiphospholipid syndrome (HR 2.5 [95% CI 1.4-4.4] and HR 2.6 [95% CI 1.3-5.1], respectively).

CONCLUSION

This is the first epidemiologic study comparing lupus manifestations among 4 major racial and ethnic groups. We found substantial differences in the prevalence of several clinical SLE manifestations among racial/ethnic groups and discovered that African Americans, Asian/Pacific Islanders, and Hispanic patients are at increased risk of developing several severe manifestations following a diagnosis of SLE.

Relationships Between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Health Status in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are associated with poor adult health and immune dysregulation. The impact of ACEs on patients with autoimmune disease is unknown. The present study was undertaken to compare the prevalence of ACEs in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) to a population-based survey estimate and to investigate relationships between ACEs and SLE outcomes.

METHODS

Data derived from the California Lupus Epidemiology Study (CLUES), a sample of adult patients with SLE. Participants completed a 10-item ACE questionnaire covering 3 domains (abuse, neglect, household challenges). We estimated ACE prevalence in 269 CLUES participants compared to geographically matched respondents from the 2015 California Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), which was standardized to CLUES participant characteristics (age, sex, race/ethnicity). We examined associations of patient-reported and physician-assessed health status measures with overall ACE levels and domains using multivariable linear regression, controlling for sociodemographics, nephritis, and juvenile-onset SLE.

RESULTS

Although specific domains varied, overall ACE levels were similar for CLUES and BRFSS respondents. Among SLE patients, 63.2% had ≥1 ACE, and 19.3% had ≥4. ACEs were more prevalent in those who were older, women, Latino or African American, and without college degrees, but not in those with lupus nephritis. In adjusted models, higher ACE levels and ACE domains were associated with worse patient-reported SLE activity, depression, and health status but were not significantly associated with physician-assessed SLE activity, damage, or severity.

CONCLUSION

Given the association between ACE levels and important patient-reported outcomes in SLE, our study reinforces the need for prevention of ACEs in childhood and for clinical interventions to promote resilience among adults who have experienced ACEs.

The Southern California Lupus Registry: I. Baseline characteristics of lupus patients in uncharted territory

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the baseline characteristics of a multi-ethnic systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) cohort in Southern California established with the intent of addressing regional health inequity.

METHODS

Patients ≥18 years of age with SLE per the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria were recruited into the Southern California Lupus Registry (SCOLR) if they resided in San Bernardino and Riverside counties in California. Individuals were categorized according to their stated ethnicity as non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, Black, or Asian. Descriptive statistics were utilized for analysis. Predictors of renal disease were assessed by binomial regression.

RESULTS

The SCOLR cohort comprised 162 patients: 57 non-Hispanic White, 58 Hispanic, 17 Asian, and 30 Black. A difference in the rate of renal involvement and SLE duration was found among the four ethnic groups. Renal involvement was significantly higher in Hispanics compared with non-Hispanic Whites.

CONCLUSION

In line with other cohorts, this study shows greater renal involvement in Hispanics than non-Hispanic Whites, demonstrating a need for more aggressive screening and early intervention to improve long-term outcomes. As a multi-ethnic SLE cohort, the SCOLR serves as a foundation for longitudinal studies addressing health inequity in this region.

Update on lupus epidemiology: advancing health disparities research through the study of minority populations

The current review focuses on recent population-based studies that have examined the burden of lupus, disease outcomes, and gaps in quality of care, with an emphasis in research addressing health disparities.

Integrated urine proteomics and renal single-cell genomics identify an IFN-γ response gradient in lupus nephritis

Lupus nephritis, one of the most serious manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), has a heterogeneous clinical and pathological presentation. For example, proliferative nephritis identifies a more aggressive disease class that requires immunosuppression. However, the current classification system relies on the static appearance of histopathological morphology, which does not capture differences in the inflammatory response. Therefore, a biomarker grounded in the disease biology is needed in order to understand the molecular heterogeneity of lupus nephritis and identify immunologic mechanism and pathways. Here, we analyzed the patterns of 1000 urine protein biomarkers in 30 patients with active lupus nephritis. We found that patients stratify over a chemokine gradient inducible by IFN-γ. Higher values identified patients with proliferative lupus nephritis. After integrating the urine proteomics with the single-cell transcriptomics of kidney biopsies, we observed that the urinary chemokines defining the gradient were predominantly produced by infiltrating CD8+ T cells, along with natural killer and myeloid cells. The urine chemokine gradient significantly correlated with the number of kidney-infiltrating CD8+ cells. These findings suggest that urine proteomics can capture the complex biology of the kidney in lupus nephritis. Patient-specific pathways could be noninvasively tracked in the urine in real time, enabling diagnosis and personalized treatment.

The economic burden of systemic lupus erythematosus in commercially- and medicaid-insured populations in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the economic burden of systematic lupus erythematous (SLE), stratified by disease severity, in commercially- and Medicaid-insured US populations.

METHODS

Adults (≥18 years) with SLE treated with antimalarials, selected biologics, immunosuppressants, and systemic glucocorticoids (2010-2014) were identified within the commercial and Medicaid insurance IBM MarketScan® databases (index date = first SLE medication claim). Both cohorts were stratified into mild (receiving antimalarial or glucocorticoid monotherapy ≤5 mg/day) versus moderate/severe SLE (receiving glucocorticoids >5 mg/day, biologic, immunosuppressant, or combination therapy) during a 6-month exposure period. All-cause healthcare utilization and costs were evaluated during the 12 months following the exposure period.

RESULTS

Among 8231 commercially-insured patients, 32.6% had mild and 67.4% had moderate/severe SLE by our definition. Among 802 Medicaid-insured patients, 25.2% had mild and 74.8% had moderate/severe SLE. Adjusted mean total healthcare costs, excluding pharmacy, for moderate/severe SLE patients were higher than for mild SLE patients in the commercially-insured ($39,021 versus $23,519; p < 0.0001) and Medicaid-insured populations ($56,050 versus $44,932; p = 0.06). In both SLE severity populations total unadjusted costs were significantly higher among Medicaid-insured than commercially-insured patients.

CONCLUSION

Commercially-insured patients with treatment suggesting moderate/severe SLE incurred significantly higher adjusted mean healthcare costs, excluding pharmacy, compared with mild SLE patients. While not reaching statistical significance, moderate/severe Medicaid-insured patients had higher costs then mild SLE patients. Total unadjusted healthcare costs were significantly higher among Medicaid-insured than commercially-insured patients. These differential costs are important to consider and monitor when implementing interventions to improve health and reduce healthcare spending for SLE.

Quality of Care for the Screening, Diagnosis, and Management of Lupus Nephritis Across Multiple Health Care Settings

OBJECTIVE

We examined quality measures for screening, diagnosis, and treatment of lupus nephritis (LN) among participants of the California Lupus Epidemiology Study across 25 different clinical sites to identify gaps in quality of care.

METHODS

Data from 250 participants with lupus were analyzed across 3 sources (medical records, physician examination, and patient interviews). Overall performance on 8 quality measures was calculated separately for participants with and without LN. We used generalized estimating equations in which the outcome was performance on measures, adjusting for participant demographics, lupus disease severity, and practice characteristics.

RESULTS

Of 148 patients without LN, 42% underwent screening laboratory tests for nephritis, 38% underwent lupus activity serum studies, and 81% had their blood pressure checked every 6 months. Of 102 LN patients, 67% had a timely kidney biopsy, at least 81% had appropriate treatment, and 78% achieved target blood pressure within 1 year of diagnosis. Overall performance in participants across quality measures was 54% (no LN) and 80% (LN). Significantly higher overall performance for screening measures for LN was seen at academic (63.4-73%) versus community clinics (37.9-38.4%). Similarly, among those with LN, higher performance in academic (84.1-85.2%) versus community clinics (54.8-60.2%) was observed for treatment measures.

CONCLUSION

In this quality-of-care analysis across 25 diverse clinical settings, we found relatively high performance on measures for management of LN. However, future work should focus on bridging the gaps in lupus quality of care for patients without nephritis, particularly in community settings.

Lupus patient decisions about clinical trial participation: a qualitative evaluation of perceptions, facilitators and barriers

Objective

Although SLE disproportionately affects minority racial groups, they are significantly under-represented in clinical trials in the USA. This may lead to misleading conclusions in race-based subgroup analyses. We conducted focus groups to evaluate the perceptions of diverse patients with lupus about clinical trial participation.

Methods

A qualitative research design employed three 90 min focus groups led by a trained moderator and guided by the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Open-ended questions about trial participation included advantages and disadvantages (behavioural beliefs), approving and disapproving significant others (normative beliefs), and participation enhancers and barriers (control beliefs). Discussions were recorded, transcribed and analysed to identify emerging themes.

Results

Patients with SLE (n=23) aged 21-72, with increased proportion of minority groups (65%), participated. Reported advantages of trial participation included altruism and personal benefit. Disadvantages included uncertainties, disappointment, information burden, and life-health balance. Although some patients had discussed research participation with approving or disapproving family or friends, self-approval superseded external approval. Barriers included logistics and time, and facilitators included flexibility in scheduling, advance notice of studies, streamlined forms, and hope for SLE improvement.

Conclusions

Knowledge about potential benefits of clinical trial participation was high. Minority patients demonstrated confidence in making their own informed decisions, but major barriers for all participants included burdensome forms, travel, childcare, and work. These suggest a major impact on minority and all recruitment from behavioural and control aspects, which should be considered in the logistics of trial design. This does not minimise the potential importance of improved access and education about clinical research.

Characteristics and Symptom Severity of Patients Reporting Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in the PatientsLikeMe Online Health Community: A Retrospective Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Online health communities and research networks such as PatientsLikeMe (PLM) capture patient perspectives of diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We performed a retrospective observational study of data provided by patients in the PLM SLE community to characterize demographics, clinical characteristics, patient experience, and symptom impact.

METHODS

Adults who registered with PLM in 2011-2017 and reported SLE diagnosis and treatment with one or more SLE-related drug (antimalarials, immunosuppressives, corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, or biologics) were included in the analysis. Information reported within 30 days from PLM registration was used to assess patient eligibility; demographics and clinical characteristics; and primary outcome measures of SLE treatments, symptoms, primary lupus manifestations, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Among 21,101 PLM members included in this analysis, median ages at registration, onset of SLE symptoms, and SLE diagnosis were 46 years (interquartile range [IQR] 38-53, n = 21,101), 30 years (IQR 21-39; n = 6489), and 36 years (IQR 27-44; n = 6936), respectively. Most patients were female (96.8%, n = 20,370). Country of residence was reported by 19,502 patients (92.4%), of whom 18,491 (94.8%) were US residents. Race was recorded by 17,994 patients (85.3%), of whom 67.8% were white and 22.4% were black/African American. Patients reported a mean of 2.2 SLE-related medications, including antimalarials (83.8%), corticosteroids (78.8%), immunosuppressives (32.3%), and biologics (9.4%). Fatigue, pain, and joint pain were rated as moderate or severe by at least 80% of patients who reported these symptoms. Reported primary lupus manifestations and comorbidities included fibromyalgia (7.9%), discoid lupus (6.8%), lupus nephritis (6.3%), rheumatoid arthritis (4.8%), subacute cutaneous lupus (4.7%), central nervous system lupus (3.9%), Sjögren's syndrome (3.9%), and lupus pneumonitis (3.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Age, sex, and race of patients in the PLM SLE community are broadly consistent with characteristics of the general SLE population in the United States. The PLM SLE population may provide valuable data on self-reported patient experience. Plain language summary available for this article.

Identifying Research Priorities among Patients and Families of Children with Rheumatic Diseases Living in the United States

Objective

To improve the quality and participation in pediatric rheumatology research, patient-prioritized studies should be emphasized. We collaborated with United States–based pediatric rheumatology advocacy organizations to survey patients and caregivers of children with rheumatic diseases to identify what research topics were most important to them.

Methods

We conducted Web-based surveys and focus groups (FG) of patients and caregivers of children with juvenile myositis (JM), juvenile arthritis (JA), and childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE). Surveys were emailed to listservs and posted to social media sites of JM, JA, and cSLE patient advocacy organizations. An initial survey asked open-ended questions about patient/caregiver research preferences. Responses were further characterized through FG. A final ranking survey asked respondents to rank from a list of research themes the 7 most important to them.

Results

There were 365 JM respondents, 44 JA respondents, and 32 cSLE respondents to the final ranking survey. The top research priority for JM was finding new treatments, and for JA and cSLE, the priority was understanding genetic/environmental etiology. The 3 prioritized research themes common across all disease groups were medication side effects, disease flare, and disease etiology.

Conclusion

Patient-centered research prioritization is recognized as valuable in conducting high-quality research, yet there is a paucity of data describing patient/family preferences, especially in pediatrics. We used multimodal methodologies to assess current patient/caregiver research priorities to help frame the agenda for the pediatric rheumatology research community. Patients and caregivers from all surveyed disease groups prioritized the study of medication side effects, disease flares, and disease etiology.

Exploring the Perceived Impact of the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program on Self-Management Behaviors among African American Women with Lupus: A Qualitative Study

Objective

To qualitatively explore the processes through which the Chronic Disease Self‐Management Program (CDSMP)—a peer‐led, group‐based educational intervention for people with chronic conditions—affects self‐management behaviors among African American women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods

Using a longitudinal pre‐ and postintervention design, we conducted two waves of one‐on‐one, semistructured interviews with 24 purposefully sampled participants. Wave 1 interviews explored self‐management behaviors at baseline; wave 2 interviews focused on changes in these behaviors postintervention. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis methods.

Results

Study participants perceived the CDSMP to be a valuable resource that helped them improve fundamental self‐management behaviors, including exercise, relaxation, diet, and medication adherence. We found, with few exceptions, that in this sample, women's reported changes in self‐management behaviors did not vary by participant age, education, SLE disease severity, or depression status. Our analysis suggests that the CDSMP had the most widespread perceived effects on relaxation and exercise. Strategies that generated improvements in relaxation and exercise included goal setting, action planning, encouragement to pursue low‐impact physical activity, and introduction of mindfulness techniques to better manage SLE symptoms.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that African American women with SLE perceived the CDSMP as an effective educational self‐management intervention. The program can potentially catalyze improvements in self‐management behaviors in this population, regardless of demographic or disease characteristics.

Mediation of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Autoimmune Conditions by Pregnancy Complications: A Mediation Analysis of Autoimmune Conditions and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Autoimmune conditions are associated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy complications and outcomes, suggesting that pregnancy complications may mediate the excess risk. We performed a causal mediation analysis to quantify the mediated effects of autoimmune conditions on adverse pregnancy outcomes.

METHODS

We queried a California birth cohort created from linked birth certificates and hospital discharge summaries. From 2,963,888 births, we identified women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), psoriasis, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Pregnancy complications included preeclampsia/hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus, and infection in pregnancy. Adverse pregnancy outcomes were preterm birth, cesarean delivery, and small for gestational age. We performed a mediation analysis to estimate the total effects of each autoimmune condition and adverse pregnancy outcome and the indirect effects through pregnancy complications.

RESULTS

All 4 autoimmune conditions were associated with preterm birth and cesarean delivery, and RA, SLE, and IBD were associated with offspring that were small for gestational age. The strongest mediator of RA, SLE, and psoriasis was preeclampsia/hypertension, accounting for 20-33% of the excess risk of preterm births and 10-19% of excess cesarean deliveries. Gestational diabetes mellitus and infections generally mediated <10% of excess adverse pregnancy outcomes. Of the 4 autoimmune conditions, selected pregnancy complications mediated the least number of adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with IBD.

CONCLUSION

We found evidence that some excess risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes is mediated through pregnancy complications, particularly preeclampsia/hypertension. Quantifying excess risk and associated pathways provides insight into the underlying etiologies of adverse pregnancy outcomes and can inform intervention strategies.

Sex Differences in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Epidemiology, Clinical Considerations, and Disease Pathogenesis

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, multiorgan, systemic autoimmune disease that is more common in women than men and is typically diagnosed during reproductive age, necessitating sex-specific considerations in care. In women there is no substantive evidence to suggest that SLE reduces fertility, but subfertility may occur as a result of active disease, immunosuppressive drugs, and age-related declines in fertility related to delays in childbearing. Although pregnancy outcomes have improved, SLE still poses risks in pregnancy that contribute to poorer maternal and fetal outcomes. Cyclophosphamide, an important agent for the treatment of severe or life-threatening lupus, may adversely affect fertility, particularly with increases in dose and patient age. Fertility preservation techniques are therefore an important consideration for women and men before cytotoxic treatment. There is mixed evidence as to whether exogenous estrogen in the form of oral contraceptive pills or hormone replacement therapy may increase the risk for the development of SLE, but among women with SLE already diagnosed, combined oral contraceptive pills and hormone replacement therapy do not confer risk for severe flare and remain important in reproductive care. The higher incidence of SLE in women may nonetheless be attributable to effects of endogenous estrogen, as well as failures in X chromosome inactivation, increased Toll-like receptor gene products, and changes in microRNA function. A greater appreciation of the biological underpinnings and consequences of sex differences in SLE may lead to more targeted treatments and improved outcomes for patients with SLE.

Toward better outcomes in Sjögren's syndrome: The promise of a stratified medicine approach

Sjögren's syndrome is a systemic autoimmune disease defined by its targeted inflammation of the salivary and lacrimal glands, resulting in dry mouth and eyes in the majority and persistent or recurrent salivary gland enlargement in a minority of those affected. Involvement of major organs, an increased risk of lymphoma, and autoantibodies against ubiquitous cellular ribonucleoproteins define some of its systemic features. Those affected have a high symptom burden and the development of disease-modifying therapies is thus an urgent need. A stratified medicine approach offers promise as a means of targeting specific therapies to patients for whom the mechanism of action is most relevant. Implementation of this approach will require an understanding of the pathophysiological processes underlying different patient subsets, and then identifying or developing a drug that targets this pathway. Such therapies would be most effective if implemented early in the disease course before the advent of adverse outcomes or glandular damage. This review will provide a disease overview followed by an analysis of the feasibility of a stratified medicine approach, focusing on the disease heterogeneity, predictors of disease progression and adverse outcomes, and recent advances in the development of relevant outcome measures and new therapies.

Estimates of Responsiveness, Minimally Important Differences, and Patient Acceptable Symptom State in Five Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Forms in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

Examinations of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures in adult systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have provided support for their cross-sectional validity in SLE. We estimated responsiveness to change, meaningful changes (minimally important differences [MIDs]), and the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for five PROMIS short forms to facilitate longitudinal use and interpretation of PROMIS scales in SLE.

METHODS

Data from five administrations of PROMIS short forms in the FORWARD SLE cohorts were used. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess associations between changes in PROMIS measures and changes in anchor measures for responsiveness analyses. Worse, same, or better groups were defined for each anchor. Differences in PROMIS scores were calculated for each consecutive PROMIS administration; mean changes in PROMIS scores of individuals in the worse, same, and better groups were calculated. Both anchor-based and distribution-based methods were used to estimate MIDs. PASS was defined as the 75th-percentile positive score among those who considered their health to be acceptable or who were somewhat or very satisfied with their health.

RESULTS

All PROMIS short forms showed adequate responsiveness to changes in related patient-reported outcomes. However, only the fatigue and pain interference scales were responsive to self-reported SLE activity. Taking into account all methods, we estimated MIDs for each scale to be approximately two points. All PASS values were better than the population mean T-score of 50.

CONCLUSION

These results support use and further study of PROMIS short forms in SLE and should facilitate interpretation of PROMIS scores and changes.

Prevalence and incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus and associated outcomes in the 2009-2016 US Medicare population

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to update data on the prevalence and incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in the Medicare population and describe associated outcomes.

METHODS

This observational study used Medicare 20% random sample data 2007-2016 to estimate SLE prevalence and incidence 2009-2016. The study population included patients aged ≥18 years (stratified by <65 and ≥65 years) with Medicare fee-for-service coverage. The SLE definition was based on a published and validated algorithm. All-cause death, hospitalizations, and kidney disease incidence were defined for a prevalent SLE cohort 2011-2015. Unadjusted event rates during 5-year follow-up were reported per 100 patient-years.

RESULTS

The study included > 5 million eligible patients for each year 2009-2016. There were 19,518 (10,898, aged ≥65; 8620, aged <65) in 2016, extrapolated to 97,590 (54,490 aged ≥65; 43,100 aged <65) in the overall 2016 Medicare population. Age- and sex-adjusted prevalence rates (per 100,000 Medicare population) ranged from 301.1 in 2009 to 366.6 in 2016, all ages, and 184.0-239.9, ≥65 years. There were 2614 (1844 aged ≥65; 770 aged <65) incident patients in 2016; age-/sex-adjusted incidence rates (per 100,000 Medicare population) ranged from 46.9 in 2009 to 49.0 in 2016, all ages, and 37.5-40.8, ≥65. Five-year unadjusted mortality, elderly vs. younger, was 8.8 vs. 3.8, morbidity 34.5 vs. 32.4, and kidney disease incidence 19.8 vs. 18.0 per 100 patient-years.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence rates steadily increased while incidence was relatively stable 2009-2016. Our data should be interpreted with caution due to our elderly study population.

Psychometric Evaluation of the National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in a Multiracial, Multiethnic Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Cohort

OBJECTIVE

We examined psychometric performance of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures in a racially/ethnically and linguistically diverse cohort with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

Data were from the California Lupus Epidemiology Study, a multiracial/multiethnic cohort of individuals with physician-confirmed SLE. The majority (n = 332) attended in-person research visits that included interviews conducted in English, Spanish, Cantonese, or Mandarin. Up to 12 PROMIS short forms were administered (depending on language availability). An additional 99 individuals completed the interview by phone only. Internal consistency was examined with Cronbach's alpha and item-total correlations. Correlations with the Short Form 36 subscales and both self-reported and physician-assessed disease activity assessed convergent validity. All analyses were repeated within each racial/ethnic group. Differences in scores by race/ethnicity were examined in bivariate analyses and by multiple regression analyses controlling for age, sex, disease duration, and disease damage and activity.

RESULTS

The total sample was 30.0% white, 22.3% Hispanic, 10.9% African American, 33.7% Asian, and 3.0% other race/ethnicity. Seventy-seven percent of interviews were conducted in-person. Non-English interviews were conducted in 26.0% of the Hispanic subjects and 18.6% of the Asian subjects. Each scale demonstrated adequate reliability and validity overall and within racial/ethnic groups. Minimal floor effects were observed, but ceiling effects were noted. Missing item responses were minimal for most scales, except for items related to work. No differences were noted by mode of administration or by language of administration among Hispanics and Asians. After accounting for differences in disease status, age, and sex, few differences in mean scores between whites and other racial/ethnic groups were noted.

CONCLUSION

PROMIS measures appear reliable and valid in persons with lupus across racial/ethnic groups.

Population-based prevalence and incidence estimates of primary discoid lupus erythematosus from the Manhattan Lupus Surveillance Program

Objective

Epidemiological data for primary discoid lupus erythematosus (pDLE) remain limited, particularly for racial/ethnic populations in the USA. The Manhattan Lupus Surveillance Program (MLSP) is a population-based retrospective registry of cases with SLE and related diseases including pDLE in Manhattan and was used to provide estimates of the prevalence and incidence of pDLE across major racial/ethnic populations.

Methods

MLSP cases were identified from rheumatologists, hospitals and population databases. Two case definitions were used for pDLE: the primary case definition which was any physician diagnosis found in the chart and a secondary case definition which was limited to cases diagnosed by a rheumatologist and/or dermatologist. Rates among Manhattan residents were age-adjusted, and capture–recapture analyses were conducted to assess case under-ascertainment.

Results

Based on the primary definition, age-adjusted overall prevalence and incidence rates of pDLE among Manhattan residents were 6.5 and 0.8 per 100 000 person-years, which increased to 9.0 and 1.3 after capture–recapture adjustment. Prevalence and incidence rates were approximately two and six times higher, respectively, among women compared with men (p<0.0001). Higher prevalence was also found among non-Latino blacks (23.5) and Latinos (8.2) compared with non-Latino whites (1.8) and non-Latino Asians (0.6) (p<0.0001). Incidence was highest among non-Latino blacks (2.4) compared with all other racial/ethnic groups. Similar relationships were observed for the secondary case definition.

Conclusion

Data from the MLSP provide epidemiological estimates for pDLE among the major racial/ethnic populations in the USA and reveal disparities in pDLE prevalence and incidence by sex and race/ethnicity among Manhattan residents.

A phenotypic and genomics approach in a multi-ethnic cohort to subtype systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease in which outcomes vary among different racial groups. Here, we aim to identify SLE subgroups within a multiethnic cohort using an unsupervised clustering approach based on the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria. We identify three patient clusters that vary according to disease severity. Methylation association analysis identifies a set of 256 differentially methylated CpGs across clusters, including 101 CpGs in genes in the Type I Interferon pathway, and we validate these associations in an external cohort. A cis-methylation quantitative trait loci analysis identifies 744 significant CpG-SNP pairs. The methylation signature is enriched for ethnic-associated CpGs suggesting that genetic and non-genetic factors may drive outcomes and ethnic-associated methylation differences. Our computational approach highlights molecular differences associated with clusters rather than single outcome measures. This work demonstrates the utility of applying integrative methods to address clinical heterogeneity in multifactorial multi-ethnic disease settings.

Global consensus building and prioritisation of fundamental lupus challenges: the ALPHA project

Objective

Lupus is a complex, heterogeneous autoimmune disease that has yet to see significant progress towards more timely diagnosis, improved treatment options for short-term and long-term outcomes, and appropriate access to care. The Addressing Lupus Pillars for Health Advancement (ALPHA) project is the first step in establishing global consensus and developing concrete strategies to address the challenges limiting progress.

Methods

A Global Advisory Committee of 13 individuals guided the project and began barrier identification. Seventeen expert interviews were conducted to further characterise key barriers. Transcripts were analysed using Nvivo and a codebook was created containing a list of thematic ‘nodes’ (topics) and their descriptions. Findings were used to develop a final survey instrument that was fielded to a diverse, international stakeholder audience to achieve broad consensus.

Results

Expert interviews identified lupus heterogeneity as the primary barrier hindering advancement. Subsequent barriers were categorised into three areas: (1) Drug development. (2) Clinical care. (3) Access and value. The global survey received 127 completed responses from experts across 20 countries. Respondents identified barriers as high priority including the lack of biomarkers for clinical and drug development use, flawed clinical trial design, lack of access to clinicians familiar with lupus, and obstacles to effective management of lupus due to social determinants of care. Respondents also identified 30 autoimmune conditions that may be lupus-related based on overlapping features, shared autoantibodies and pathophysiology.

Conclusions

ALPHA is a comprehensive initiative to identify and prioritise the continuum of challenges facing people with lupus by engaging a global audience of lupus experts. It also explored views on lupus as a spectrum of related diseases. Conclusions from this effort provide a framework to generate actionable approaches to the identified high-priority barriers.