Metformin-associated lactic acidosis in Sweden 1977-1991

Metformin Monitoring and Change in Serum Creatinine Levels in Patients Undergoing Radiologic Procedures Involving Administration of Intravenous Contrast Media

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the prevalence and magnitude of serum creatinine level elevations in patients receiving metformin who underwent radiologic procedures involving administration of intravenous contrast media, and to evaluate the efficacy of an electronic consultation in promoting timely evaluation of renal function after the procedure.

DESIGN

Retrospective evaluation.

SETTING

Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

PATIENTS

Ninety-seven patients receiving metformin who underwent a radiologic procedure involving administration of intravenous contrast media over a 27-month period.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients underwent a total of 111 radiologic procedures with documented administration of intravenous contrast dye. Average time from procedure to laboratory follow-up, excluding one patient, was 2.62+/-1.56 days. Average serum creatinine levels before and after the procedure were 1.10+/-0.19 and 1.13+/-0.23 mg/dl, respectively (p>0.05). Four patients developed contrast material-associated nephropathy. An additional four patients with borderline serum creatinine levels at baseline (1.4 mg/dl) had a serum creatinine level of 1.5 mg/dl or greater after the procedure.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated that electronic consultations result in timely evaluation of serum creatinine levels in patients receiving metformin who undergo a radiologic procedure involving intravenous contrast material. Also, the study suggests that nearly 4% of patients with diabetes mellitus and normal renal function may develop contrast material-associated nephropathy [corrected] with nonionic contrast material. In addition, about 8% of patients with diabetes treated with metformin (with baseline serum creatinine levels < 1.5 mg/dl) who undergo a procedure with nonionic intravenous contrast material acquire an increased risk (serum creatinine > or = 1.5 mg/dl) of lactic acidosis. These findings support the recommendations of the Food and Drug Administration regarding metformin monitoring in patients undergoing radiologic procedures involving administration of intravenous contrast media.

Metformin and lactic acidosis: cause or coincidence? A review of case reports

OBJECTIVE

Metformin has been associated with the serious side-effect lactic acidosis. However, it remains unclear whether the use of metformin was a cause or a coincidence in lactic acidosis.

DESIGN

A literature search of the Index Medicus (1959-66) and of the databases Embase, Medline, Medline Express (1966-99) was performed using the keywords metformin, biguanides and lactic acidosis. All articles of cases with metformin-induced lactic acidosis (MILA) were cross-referenced.

SUBJECTS

Cases were included for analysis if they met the following criteria: serum pH < or =7.35, lactate concentration > or =5 mmol L(-1).

INTERVENTION

A forum of six experts in intensive care medicine independently categorized the cases in MILA unlikely (score 0), possible MILA (score 1) or probable MILA (score 2).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Statistical analysis included the paired interobserver agreement (kappa) and multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of 80 reported cases, 33 were excluded because of insufficient quality. The forum scores of the remaining 47 cases were distributed normally with a mean score of 7 (range 2-10). The kappa-value was 0.041 (SD = 0.24, range -0.514, 0.427). Neither lactate concentration nor mortality correlated with serum metformin concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the low interobserver agreement and the lack of any relationship between metformin levels and outcome parameters, the concept that there is a simple, causal relationship between metformin use and lactic acidosis in diabetic patients has to be reconsidered.

A Comparison of Agents Used to Manage Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, the traditional method of initiating therapy with a sulfonylurea and increasing the dosage until maximum levels are reached before adding an insulin-sensitizing agent has persisted and should be re-evaluated. Similarly, the current practice of starting therapy with one agent and increasing to maximum dosage before adding a second agent, rather than starting with combination therapy, also needs to be addressed. There is much evidence to suggest that initiating therapy with lower doses of two agents that have complementary effects can increase the overall efficacy and decrease the incidence of adverse effects. Clearly, there is a need for a paradigm shift away from the traditional approach of therapy using insulin secretagogues to a more pathophysiologic approach using an insulin-sensitizing agent, such as the thiazolidinediones. The thiazolidinediones have been shown to reduce insulin resistance, improve the ability of beta-cells to produce insulin, and decrease cardiac risk factors. By reducing insulin resistance, improving glycemic control, and preserving beta-cell function with a thiazolidinedione early in the course of therapy, it is likely that durable glycemic control will be achieved and both microvascular and macrovascular complications may be reduced. Furthermore, early use of an insulin-sensitizing agent either alone or incombination is expected to improve both acute and long-term outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Metformin and thiazolidinedione use in Medicare patients with heart failure

CONTEXT

According to package inserts, metformin is contraindicated in diabetic patients receiving drug treatment for heart failure therapy, and thiazolidinediones are not recommended in diabetic patients with symptoms of advanced heart failure. Little is known about patterns of use of these antihyperglycemic drugs in diabetic patients with heart failure.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the proportions of patients hospitalized with heart failure and concomitant diabetes treated with metformin or thiazolidinediones.

DESIGN

Serial cross-sectional measurements using data from retrospective medical record abstraction.

SETTING

Nongovernmental acute care hospitals in the United States.

PATIENTS

Two nationally representative samples of Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized with the primary diagnosis of heart failure and concomitant diabetes between April 1998 and March 1999 and between July 2000 and June 2001.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The prescription of either metformin or a thiazolidinedione at hospital discharge.

RESULTS

In the 1998-1999 sample (n = 12 505), 7.1% of patients were discharged with a prescription for metformin, 7.2% with a prescription for a thiazolidinedione, and 13.5% with a prescription for either drug. In the 2000-2001 sample (n = 13 158), metformin use increased to 11.2%, thiazolidinedione use to 16.1%, and use of either drug to 24.4% (P<.001 for all comparisons). Similar increases were seen among patients of all age groups, all races, and both sexes.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of metformin and thiazolidinediones is common and has increased rapidly in Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes and heart failure in direct contrast with explicit warnings against this practice by the Food and Drug Administration. Further studies to establish the safety and effectiveness of this practice are needed to ensure optimal care of patients with diabetes and heart failure.

Risk of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis with metformin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Metformin is an oral anti-hyperglycemic agent used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The results of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study indicate that metformin treatment is associated with a reduction in total mortality compared to other anti-hyperglycemic treatments. Metformin, however, is thought to increase the risk of lactic acidosis, and is considered to be contraindicated in many chronic hypoxemic conditions that may be associated with lactic acidosis, such as cardiovascular, renal, hepatic and pulmonary disease, and advancing age.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the incidence of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis with metformin use compared to placebo and other glucose-lowering treatments in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A secondary objective was to evaluate the blood lactate levels for those on metformin treatment compared to placebo or non-metformin therapies.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A search was performed of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (up to 4/2000), Medline (up to 11/2000), Embase (up to 11/2000), Oldmedline, and Reactions (up to 5/2000), in order to identify all studies of metformin treatment from 1966 to November 2000. The Cumulated Index Medicus was used to search relevant articles from 1959 to 1965. The search was augmented by scanning references of identified articles, and by contacting principal investigators. Date of latest search: November 2000.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Prospective trials in patients with type 2 diabetes that lasted longer than one month were included if they evaluated metformin, alone or in combination with other treatments, compared to placebo or any other glucose-lowering therapy. Observational cohort studies of metformin treatment lasting greater than one month were also included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently selected trials to be included, assessed study quality and extracted data. The incidence of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis was recorded as cases per patient-years, for metformin treatment and for placebo or other treatments. The upper limit for the true incidence of cases in the metformin and non-metformin groups were calculated using Poisson statistics. In a second analysis lactate levels were measured as a net change from baseline or as mean treatment values (basal and stimulated by food or exercise) for treatment and comparison groups. The pooled results were recorded as a weighted mean difference (WMD) in mmol/L, using the fixed effects model for continuous data.

MAIN RESULTS

Pooled data from 176 comparative trials and cohort studies revealed no cases of fatal or nonfatal lactic acidosis in 35,619 patient-years of metformin use or in 30,002 patients-years in the non-metformin group. Using Poisson statistics with 95% confidence intervals the upper limit for the true incidence of metformin-associated lactic acidosis was 8.4 cases per 100,000 patient-years, and the upper limit for the true incidence of lactic acidosis in the non-metformin group was 9 cases per 100,000 patient-years. There was no difference in lactate levels, either as mean treatment levels or as a net change from baseline, for metformin compared to placebo or other non-biguanide therapies. The mean lactate levels were slightly lower for metformin treatment compared to phenformin (WMD -0.75 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.86 to -0.15).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence from prospective comparative trials or from observational cohort studies that metformin is associated with an increased risk of lactic acidosis, or with increased levels of lactate, compared to other anti-hyperglycemic treatments if prescribed under the study conditions, taking into account contra-indications.

Combination of insulin and metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the metabolic effects of metformin, as compared with placebo, in type 2 diabetic patients intensively treated with insulin.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Metformin improves glycemic control in poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients. Its effect in type 2 diabetic patients who are intensively treated with insulin has not been studied. A total of 390 patients whose type 2 diabetes was controlled with insulin therapy completed a randomized controlled double-blind trial with a planned interim analysis after 16 weeks of treatment. The subjects were selected from three outpatient clinics in regional hospitals and were randomly assigned to either the placebo or metformin group, in addition to insulin therapy. Intensive glucose monitoring with immediate insulin adjustments according to strict guidelines was conducted. Indexes of glycemic control, insulin requirements, body weight, blood pressure, plasma lipids, hypoglycemic events, and other adverse events were measured.

RESULTS

Of the 390 subjects, 37 dropped out (12 in the placebo and 25 in the metformin group). Of those who completed 16 weeks of treatment, metformin use, as compared with placebo, was associated with improved glycemic control (mean daily glucose at 16 weeks 7.8 vs. 8.8 mmol/l, P = 0.006; mean GHb 6.9 vs. 7.6%, P < 0.0001); reduced insulin requirements (63.8 vs. 71.3 IU, P < 0.0001); reduced weight gain (-0.4 vs. +1.2 kg, P < 0.01); and decreased plasma LDL cholesterol (-0.21 vs. -0.02 mmol/l, P < 0.01). Risk of hypoglycemia was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS-In type 2 diabetic patients who are intensively treated with insulin, the combination of insulin and metformin results in superior glycemic control compared with insulin therapy alone, while insulin requirements and weight gain are less.

Case-population studies in pharmacoepidemiology

The case-population approach aims at providing a risk estimate by comparing the incidence of the disease of interest among those exposed to the drug under study with the incidence among the non-exposed. For that purpose, the cases with the disease of interest have to be ascertained independently of the exposure status. Their rate and pattern of exposure have to be ascertained by interview with a structured questionnaire. Information on the patterns and the prevalence of drug consumption is needed in order to estimate the rate of exposure, and drug consumption statistics can be used to this end. In this paper, we review the main characteristics of studies using this approach or a similar one, and studies where series of cases exposed to the drug of interest were compared with drug consumption statistics. We looked at selected basic methodological requirements. Most of the studies reviewed suffer from incomplete case ascertainment, inaccurate definition of the disease of interest, incomplete information on exposures and other risk factors, and/or limited control of potential confounding, among other limitations. All the reviewed studies had several limitations regarding the estimation of the population at risk. The methods used in case-population studies should be clearly described, particularly with respect to the identification of the cases (numerator) and the estimation of the consumption prevalence (denominator). Case-population studies can give approximate risk estimates, but the method should be validated by comparing its results with those of case-control studies.

The relationship between metformin therapy and the fasting plasma lactate in type 2 diabetes: The Fremantle Diabetes Study

AIMS

To determine (i) which factors, including metformin, are associated with the fasting plasma lactate concentration in type 2 diabetes, and (ii) whether plasma lactate is associated with haemodynamic and metabolic effects.

METHODS

We measured fasting plasma lactate in 272 well-characterized diabetic patients from a community-based sample, 181 (67%) of whom were taking metformin with or without other therapies. Linear regression analysis was used to identify predictors, including metformin therapy, of the plasma lactate, and to investigate associations between plasma lactate and resting pulse rate and serum bicarbonate. Factor analysis assessed independent relationships between groups of cosegregating variables.

RESULTS

Metformin-treated patients had higher plasma lactate concentrations than nonmetformin-treated subjects (geometric mean [s.d. range] 1.86 [1.34-2.59] vs 1.58 [1.09-2.30] mmol x l(-1), respectively; P < 0.001). In a linear regression model, plasma glucose, BMI and metformin use (but not dose) were independently associated with plasma lactate (P < or = 0.028); after adjustment for the former two variables, metformin-treated patients had a mean plasma lactate 0.16 mmol l-1 greater than in subjects not taking the drug. Factor analysis revealed that plasma lactate, plasma glucose, BMI and pulse rate cosegregated but serum bicarbonate was not in this grouping.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results show that metformin therapy increases the fasting plasma lactate in ambulant patients with type 2 diabetes from a community-based cohort. From associations in the data we hypothesize that this increase reflects (i) increased sympathetic activity in patients with the metabolic syndrome (ii) increased substrate (glucose) availability and (iii) a direct metformin effect.

Contraindications to metformin therapy in patients with Type 2 diabetes--a population-based study of adherence to prescribing guidelines

AIMS

To define the number of people in Tayside, Scotland (population 349 303) with Type 2 diabetes who use metformin, the incidence of contraindications to its continued use in these people and the proportion that discontinued metformin treatment following the development of a contraindication.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of the incidence of contraindications to metformin in all patients with Type 2 diabetes using metformin from January 1993 to June 1995. The contraindications of acute myocardial infarction, cardiac failure, renal impairment and chronic liver disease were identified by: the regional diabetes information system, biochemistry database and hospital admissions database and a database of all encashed community prescriptions.

RESULTS

One thousand eight hundred and forty seven subjects (26.3% of those with Type 2 diabetes) redeemed prescriptions for metformin. Of these, 3.5% were admitted with an acute myocardial infarction (71 episodes); 4.2% were admitted with cardiac failure (114 episodes); 21.0% received metformin and loop diuretics for cardiac failure concurrently; 4.8% developed renal impairment; and 2.8% developed chronic liver disease. The development of contraindications rarely resulted in discontinuation of metformin, for example only 17.5% and 25% stopped metformin after admission with acute myocardial infarction and development of renal impairment, respectively. In total, 24.5% of subjects receiving metformin, 6.4% of all people with Type 2 diabetes, had contraindications to its use. There was one episode of lactic acidosis in 4600 patient years.

CONCLUSIONS

This population-based study shows that 24.5% of patients prescribed metformin have contraindications to its use. Development of contraindications rarely results in discontinuation of metformin therapy. Despite this, lactic acidosis remains rare. Diabet. Med. 18, 483-488 (2001)

Metformin-associated lactic acidosis

In 1995, the oral antihyperglycemic agent, metformin, was introduced in the United States for treating diabetes mellitus. Rare cases of metformin-associated lactic acidosis caused by the accumulation of the drug in patients with renal dysfunction have been described, although a detailed time course of the resulting metabolic derangements has not been reported. A case of metformin-associated lactic acidosis is presented along with key serial laboratory abnormalities observed during the treatment phase. The patient made a complete recovery following therapy with hemodialysis and supportive care.

Improved glycaemic control with miglitol in inadequately-controlled type 2 diabetics

OBJECTIVE

The study compared the long-term efficacy and safety of miglitol to placebo in Type 2 diabetic outpatients inadequately controlled on combination therapy of diet, glibenclamide and metformin.

METHODS

Type 2 diabetic patients (n = 154) receiving glibenclamide 7-20 mg/day and at least one 500-850 mg tablet metformin per day were randomized to receive additional miglitol or placebo for 24 weeks, titrated up stepwise from 25 to 100 mg trice daily.

RESULTS

Addition of miglitol to sulphonylureas and metformin (per protocol analysis) produced a statistically, significantly greater reduction in HbA1c (-0.55%, P = 0.04) and postprandial glucose (-2.6 mmol/l, P = 0.0009) from baseline to endpoint than placebo (-0.2% and -0.6 mol/l, respectively). Reduction in fasting blood glucose was greater with miglitol than placebo, and there was a possible difference in favor of miglitol for fasting and postprandial triglyceride levels, but these did not reach statistical significance. Flatulence and diarrhea were reported by statistically, significantly more patients receiving miglitol than placebo, but adverse events overall were reported by only 10% more patients in the miglitol group. No cases of hypoglycaemia were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Miglitol can safely and effectively be added to long-term combination therapy in people with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with glibenclamide plus metformin.

Non insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (type 2) secondary failure. Metformin-glibenclamide treatment

The goal of sulphonylurea (S) treatment in Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (NIDDM - type 2 diabetes) subjects should be to obtain a satisfactory glycemic control (fasting glycemic levels &#x003C; 140 mg&#x0025;). The loss of an adequate blood glucose control after an initial variable period of S is known as secondary failure (SF). The number of SF are extremely variable among different trials for many reasons, some of which are patient-related: increased food intake, weight gain, non-compliance, poor physical activity, stress, diseases and&#x00F7;or impaired pancreatic beta cell function, desensitization after S chronic therapy, reduced absorption, concomitant therapies. Many therapeutic strategies have been proposed to achieve an adequate metabolic control in type 2 diabetes patients: switch to intensive insulin therapy and subsequent return to S therapy; association with insulin; association with sulphonylureas plus biguanides. The association biguanides and S, in particular glibenclamide plus metformin, is now widely used by diabetologists in SF since glibenclamide improves insulin secretion while metformin exerts its antidiabetic.

Multicenter case series of pediatric metformin ingestion

OBJECTIVE

There are no large studies, case series, or case reports of metformin ingestion in children. This study summarizes the clinical course and outcomes of metformin ingestion in children reported to the American Association of Poison Control Centers-certified regional poison centers.

METHODS

This was a case series of all metformin ingestions in patients <18 years of age reported to eight regional poison centers. Data collection included age, gender, dose ingested, co-ingestants, symptoms, vital signs, laboratory values, length of hospital stay, and medical outcome. Entrance into the study required at least 24 hours of follow-up.

RESULTS

Fifty-five cases were collected. Ages ranged from 15 months to 17 years, with a mean (+/- SD) of 42+/-4.4 years. The dose ingested, by history, ranged from 250 mg to 16.5 g, with a mean and median of 1710+/-3391 and 500 mg, respectively. Forty-one children (76%) ingested a maximum of two tablets (< or =1700 mg). In the children younger than six years, dosage ranged from 9 to 196 mg/kg, with a mean and median of 60+/-41.1 and 40 mg/kg, respectively. Thirty-seven children were evaluated in a healthcare facility. Clinical effects were limited to nausea (2), diarrhea (2), and dizziness (1). None of the 38 children who had serial glucose measurements experienced hypoglycemia. Arterial blood gas and electrolyte measurements were performed in three and 19 children, respectively. No evidence of acidosis was demonstrated. Two children had lactate concentrations measured and were determined to be in the normal range. Twenty-nine patients received activated charcoal. Five patients received parenteral glucose and one adolescent with a history of diabetes received insulin for hyperglycemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Unintentional ingestion of < or =1700 mg of metformin in the healthy pediatric population does not appear to pose a significant health risk of hypoglycemia or detrimental outcome. In the 21 children who were tested for either blood glucose, electrolyte, or lactate concentrations, no evidence of lactic acidosis was seen.

Metformin-induced lacticacidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether metformin therapy can predispose patients with type 2 diabetes and normal renal function to lactic acidosis when certain conditions are present.

METHODS

We undertook this prospective cohort study in 110 consecutive patients (age range, 27 to 85 years) with normal serum creatinine levels (<1.5 mg/dL in men; <1.4 mg/dL in women), receiving metformin as monotherapy or in combination with sulfonylurea or insulin, who were undergoing assessment on a regular basis for diabetes care. Clinical evaluations were performed at 4- to 12-week intervals for up to 2 years. Serum electrolytes and creatinine as well as plasma lactic acid determinations were done in all patients, regardless of symptoms. The anion gap was calculated.

RESULTS

Plasma lactic acid concentrations were normal in 47 patients (mean, 9.4 +/- 18.0 mg/dL or 1.053 +/- 0.194 mmol/L) and high in 63 patients (19.63 +/- 5.11 mg/dL or 2.208 +/- 0.569 mmol/L; P<0.001). The anion gap was increased in the high lactic acid group in comparison with the normal group (P<0.001). Comorbid conditions (for example, cardiovascular or respiratory disease) that may predispose to hypoxemia or compromise tissue perfusion were significantly more prevalent in patients in the high lactic acid group than in those with normal lactic acid values.

CONCLUSION

Lacticacidemia may occur in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who have normal renal function. An increased anion gap and certain clinical symptoms may serve as clues for the presence of lacticacidemia. Progression from lacticacidemia to clinical lactic acidosis, under certain hemodynamic or respiratory adverse conditions, remains conjectural and needs further evaluation.

Safety of drugs commonly used to treat hypertension, dyslipidemia, and Type 2 diabetes (the metabolic syndrome): part 2

It is becoming increasingly acknowledged that people with Type 2 Diabetes represent what can be termed "an enriched population": a group that has the greatest risk of morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular diseases such as myocardial infarcts and strokes. Due to the tremendous toll, both human and financial, that these cardiovascular diseases result in, major efforts are being put forth to decrease their occurrence. It is clear that success in this endeavor is optimized by achieving target levels of glucose, blood pressure, and cholesterol. Analysis of the individual drugs used to treat these comorbidities of the cardiovascular dysmetabolic syndrome has brought an understanding that frequently monotherapy is ineffective, and a clear appraisal of the benefits of available pharmaceuticals can result in a successful decision about which agents to include in regimens of combination therapy. This success translates into ultimately reducing the untimely death and disability that is unfortunately all too common among the people with these illnesses. As diabetes continues to be increasing alarmingly among all segments of the population, there is an urgency for this need. The knowledge is present; only the application is not.

Effects of insulin and metformin on glucose metabolism in rat vascular smooth muscle

Glucose metabolism in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) is characterized by substantial lactate production even in fully oxygenated conditions. Insulin and metformin, an insulin-sensitizing agent, have direct effects on the vascular tissue metabolism. We investigated whether insulin or metformin can induce a switch in VSMC glucose metabolism from lactate production to pyruvate oxidation, by measuring lactate oxidation as determined by the conversion of [1-14C]-D,L-lactate to [1-14C]-pyruvate and subsequent oxidation to acetyl coenzyme A and 14CO2 by pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH). Lactate oxidation was measured in control rat aortic cultured VSMCs incubated for 30 minutes in media with and without additional glucose compared with VSMCs cultured in the presence of insulin or metformin. The addition of glucose to VSMCs decreased lactate oxidation (4.6+/-1.7 v 9.6+/-2.4 pmol/cell/min, P < .001). In the absence of additional glucose, metformin decreased lactate oxidation in VSMCs compared with controls (4.9+/-1.4 v 9.6+/-2.4 pmol/cell/min, P < .01). Metformin in the presence of glucose caused the greatest decline in lactate oxidation (2.5+/-0.4 pmol/cell/min, P < .001). In contrast to the effects of metformin, insulin increased lactate oxidation both with (12.9+/-1.5 pmol/cell/min, P < .001) and without (17.9+/-4.4, P < .01) additional glucose. This suggests that insulin facilitates VSMC utilization of lactate as a source of pyruvate and energy production even during noncontractile periods.

Pharmacologic therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic disorder that results from defects in both insulin secretion and insulin action. An elevated rate of basal hepatic glucose production in the presence of hyperinsulinemia is the primary cause of fasting hyperglycemia; after a meal, impaired suppression of hepatic glucose production by insulin and decreased insulin-mediated glucose uptake by muscle contribute almost equally to postprandial hyperglycemia. In the United States, five classes of oral agents, each of which works through a different mechanism of action, are currently available to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. The recently completed United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) has shown that type 2 diabetes mellitus is a progressive disorder that can be treated initially with oral agent monotherapy but will eventually require the addition of other oral agents, and that in many patients, insulin therapy will be needed to achieve targeted glycemic levels. In the UKPDS, improved glycemic control, irrespective of the agent used (sulfonylureas, metformin, or insulin), decreased the incidence of microvascular complications (retinopathy, neuropathy, and nephropathy). This review examines the goals of antihyperglycemic therapy and reviews the mechanism of action, efficacy, nonglycemic benefits, cost, and safety profile of each of the five approved classes of oral agents. A rationale for the use of these oral agents as monotherapy, in combination with each other, and in combination with insulin is provided.

Determination of plasma metformin by a new cation-exchange HPLC technique

Metformin is an oral antihyperglycemic agent used in the therapy of noninsulin-dependent diabetic patients. This biguanide can induce dangerous complications such as lactic acidosis when its plasma concentration is too high. For this reason, the determination of plasma metformin should always be done during treatment. We developed a new HPLC method, for the routine determination of plasma metformin, with good reliability, rapid execution, and low costs. Sample preparation involved precipitation of the plasma proteins containing the internal standard buformin with a mixture of methanol, zinc sulfate, and ethylene glycol; the diluted supernatant was injected into a cation-exchange column. The mobile phase was potassium dihydrogenphosphate buffer-containing acetonitrile. The eluent was monitored at 236 nm. The calibration curve is linear within the range of 20-4000 ng/mL; the within-day coefficients of variation were less than 2.2% for metformin and 1.5% for buformin; the day-to-day coefficients of variation were less than 2.5% for metformin and 1.9% for buformin. The mean recoveries obtained from supplemented samples were included between 99.4 and 104.2% for metformin. Many characteristics make this method useful and easily accessible to all clinical laboratories equipped with HPLC instrumentation.

A risk-benefit assessment of metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Metformin has been used for over 40 years as an effective glucose-lowering agent in type 2 (noninsulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Typically it reduces basal and postprandial hyperglycaemia by about 25% in more than 90% of patients when either given alone or coadministered with other therapies including insulin during a programme of managed care. Metformin counters insulin resistance and offers benefits against many features of the insulin resistance syndrome (Syndrome X) by preventing bodyweight gain, reducing hyperinsulinaemia and improving the lipid profile. In contrast to sulphonylureas, metformin does not increase insulin secretion or cause serious hypoglycaemia. Treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus with metformin from diagnosis also offers greater protection against the chronic vascular complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The most serious complication associated with metformin is lactic acidosis which has an incidence of about 0.03 cases per 1000 patients years of treatment and a mortality risk of about 0.015 per 1000 patient-years. Most cases occur in patients who are wrongly prescribed the drug, particularly patients with impaired renal function (e.g. serum creatinine level > 130 micromol/L or > 1.5 g/L). Other major contraindications include congestive heart failure, hypoxic states and advanced liver disease. Serious adverse events with metformin are predictable rather than spontaneous and are potentially preventable if the prescribing guidelines are respected. Gastrointestinal adverse effects, notably diarrhoea, occur in less than 20% of patients and remit when the dosage is reduced. The life-threatening risks associated with metformin are rare and could mostly be avoided by strict adherence to the prescribing guidelines. Given the 4 decades of clinical experience with metformin, its antihyperglycaemic efficacy and benefits against Syndrome X, metformin offers a very favourable risk-benefit assessment when compared with the chronic morbidity and premature mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Metformin-associated lactic acidosis: a rare or very rare clinical entity?

AIMS

Lactic acidosis is a well recognized complication of biguanide therapy which is potentially serious. Although the prevalence of metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) is much lower than that associated with phenformin, it is still being reported sporadically which raises concerns for the practising clinicians. We review the currently available world-wide data of the prevalence of MALA, the risk factors for its development and the current practical guidelines on the use of metformin to minimize the risk of this potential hazard.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was conducted from both Medline and Ovid (1965-98) using the following keywords: 'Type 2 diabetes mellitus', 'oral hypoglycaemic drugs', 'biguanides', 'metformin-associated lactic acidosis' and 'renal impairment'.

RESULTS

MALA was found to be a very rare clinical entity, being 20 times less common than phenformin-associated lactic acidosis. Amongst all the risk factors, renal impairment appears to be the major precipitating factor for the development of MALA in metformin-treated patients. We also found cases of MALA where no precipitating factors were identified and the underlying mechanism in these cases remains unclear. Practical recommendations of metformin use to minimize the risk of MALA have been listed based on previous reports.

CONCLUSIONS

The low prevalence of MALA is comparable to the prevalence of sulphonylurea-induced hypoglycaemia. Metformin has many beneficial metabolic effects in the management of Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Provided that the recommended guidelines for metformin use are strictly adhered to, its widespread use would be safe and the incidence of MALA will be further reduced.

The Diabetes Prevention Program. Design and methods for a clinical trial in the prevention of type 2 diabetes

The Diabetes Prevention Program is a randomized clinical trial testing strategies to prevent or delay the development of type 2 diabetes in high-risk individuals with elevated fasting plasma glucose concentrations and impaired glucose tolerance. The 27 clinical centers in the U.S. are recruiting at least 3,000 participants of both sexes, approximately 50% of whom are minority patients and 20% of whom are > or = 65 years old, to be assigned at random to one of three intervention groups: an intensive lifestyle intervention focusing on a healthy diet and exercise and two masked medication treatment groups--metformin or placebo--combined with standard diet and exercise recommendations. Participants are being recruited during a 2 2/3-year period, and all will be followed for an additional 3 1/3 to 5 years after the close of recruitment to a common closing date in 2002. The primary outcome is the development of diabetes, diagnosed by fasting or post-challenge plasma glucose concentrations meeting the 1997 American Diabetes Association criteria. The 3,000 participants will provide 90% power to detect a 33% reduction in an expected diabetes incidence rate of at least 6.5% per year in the placebo group. Secondary outcomes include cardiovascular disease and its risk factors; changes in glycemia, beta-cell function, insulin sensitivity, obesity, diet, physical activity, and health-related quality of life; and occurrence of adverse events. A fourth treatment group--troglitazone combined with standard diet and exercise recommendations--was included initially but discontinued because of the liver toxicity of the drug. This randomized clinical trial will test the possibility of preventing or delaying the onset of type 2 diabetes in individuals at high risk.

Management of antidiabetic medications in overdose

The drugs used to treat diabetes mellitus are diverse and involve several classes. However, these drugs can be roughly separated into hypoglycaemic agents, such as insulin and the sulphonylureas, and antihyperglycaemic agents, such as the biguanides, the alpha-glucosidase inhibitors and troglitazone. Reports of insulin overdose are rare. The major effects of insulin overdose are secondary to the insult to the CNS produced by hypoglycaemia. The mainstay of insulin overdose management is glucose replacement therapy. Sulphonylureas are the most commonly used oral antihyperglycaemic agents in the management of type 2 (non-insulin-dependent; NIDDM) diabetes mellitus. Sulphonylureas primarily cause serum glucose reduction by stimulating the release of preformed insulin from the pancreatic islets. The mainstay of sulphonylurea overdose management is glucose replacement therapy, and in severe cases, reduction of insulin release. In the large majority of patients intravenous glucose supplementation will be sufficient to maintain euglycaemia. Repaglinide, a meglitinide analogue, is a new nonsulphonylurea oral hypoglycaemic agent. In overdose, this drug may produce prolonged hypoglycaemia similar to the sulphonylureas. The primary problem with biguanide overdose is the potential for lactic acidosis. The management of biguanide overdose is largely supportive and directed at correcting the metabolic acidosis along with associated complications. The alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, acarbose, voglibose and miglitol competitively and reversibly inhibit the alpha-glucosidase enzymes (glucoamylase, sucrase, maltase and isomaltase) in the brush border in the small intestine, which delays the hydrolysis of complex carbohydrates. They appear unlikely to produce hypoglycaemia in overdose, but abdominal discomfort and diarrhoea may occur. Troglitazone is the first thiazolidinedione antidiabetic drug available. There are no data on overdose, probably because of its very recent introduction. Overdoses with antidiabetic drugs produce major morbidity, with many cases requiring intensive care medicine and prolonged hospital stays. However, fatalities are rare when treatment is initiated early. The management of the hypoglycaemic drugs (insulin and sulphonylureas) is based primarily on restoring and maintaining euglycaemia via intravenous dextrose supplementation. In the case of the sulphonylureas, reduction of insulin secretion via pharmacological intervention may also be necessary. With biguanides the main risk appears to be cardiovascular collapse secondary to profound acidosis. The management focus is on restoring acid-base balance with hyperventilation and the use of insulin to shift the utilisation of glucose from the nonoxidative pathway to the oxidative pathway. Use of haemodialysis has shown equivocal results but may be valuable in metformin overdose.

Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in the elderly

The prevalence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus dramatically increases with age. Older diabetic subjects have an increased frequency of complications from diabetes compared with their younger counterparts and higher morbidity and mortality rates compared with age-matched non-diabetic controls. Elderly patients with diabetes are generally treated following the same approach as in younger patients: dietary therapy first, followed by oral hypoglycaemic agents and ultimately insulin. However, several specificities should be pointed out. Changes associated with ageing may affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of both sulphonylureas (increasing the risk of severe hypoglycaemia) and biguanides (increasing the risk of lactic acidosis). The best insulin regimen in old age is not known, but a twice-daily injection of a pre-mixed insulin preparation is usually recommended. Goals of therapy must be realistic and not cause disabling side-effects. The general practitioner plays a crucial role in the care of elderly diabetic patients, but access to a multidisciplinary specialized team may be necessary.

Metformin treatment in NIDDM patients with mild renal impairment

Metformin is contraindicated in patients with renal failure because of the risk of lactic acidosis. This study assessed the complications of metformin treatment in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitis with normal and raised serum creatinine. Subjects using metformin with serum creatinine above the upper reference range (120 mu mol/l) were identified (n = 17) from a hospital diabetes register; those with abnormal liver function, cardiac failure, peripheral vascular disease or recent severe illness were excluded. Reference plasma lactate levels were established, mean 1.742 mu mol/l (SD 0.819) using age-matched non-diabetic subjects. Age-matched patients treated with metformin with normal serum creatinine levels formed the control group (n = 24). Details of gastrointestinal disturbance were recorded, and plasma lactic acid and vitamin B12 levels measured. The median total daily dose of metformin in both groups was 1700 mg. The mean plasma lactate in subjects with serum creatinine 80-120 mu mol/l (2.640 mmol/l (SD 1.434) p < 0.02) was higher than non-diabetic control levels while diabetic subjects with serum creatinine 120-160 mumol/l had a mean of 2.272 mmol/l (SD 0.763) p < 0.05. There was no significant difference between the two groups taking metformin, nor any significant difference in the reporting of gastrointestinal symptoms between the groups on metformin (11.76% vs 12.5%). Plasma lactic acid levels are higher in diabetic subjects taking metformin compared with healthy volunteers but, within the diabetic groups, the small elevation of serum creatinine was not associated with higher plasma lactate levels.

Metformin: an antihyperglycemic agent for treatment of type II diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To review the comparative efficacy of metformin, sulfonylureas, and insulin in the treatment of patients with type II diabetes.

DATA SOURCES

Articles were identified by a MEDLINE search of articles from 1966 to 1994, using the terms metformin, sulfonylurea, chlorpropamide, glipizide, glyburide, tolazamide, tolbutamide, and insulin, published in English, French, or German. Articles also were identified from bibliographies of pertinent articles.

STUDY SELECTION

With the exception of articles dealing with the pharmacology of metformin, only randomized, active, controlled studies were selected for review.

DATA EXTRACTION

Effects of metformin therapy on metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors were abstracted: weight, blood pressure, total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting and postprandial glucose, and glycosylated hemoglobin.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Metformin is an antihyperglycemic agent with a mean bioavailability of 50-60%. It is eliminated primarily by renal filtration and secretion and has a half-life of approximately 6 hours in patients with type II diabetes. Although the half-life of metformin is prolonged in patients with renal impairment, no specific dosage adjustments have been recommended. This agent has no effect in the absence of insulin. Metformin is as effective as the sulfonylureas in treating patients with type II diabetes and has a more prominent postprandial effect than the sulfonylureas or insulin. When combined with a sulfonylurea, metformin has been shown to exert antihyperglycemic effects in addition to the sulfonylurea with which it is combined. Metformin decreases absorption of vitamin B12 and folic acid, although reported cases of megaloblastic anemia are rare. Cimetidine decreases the elimination of metformin; therefore, the manufacturer reccommends a reduced metformin dosage when these agents are combined. The most frequently reported adverse effects of metformin are gastrointestinal in nature (diarrhea, nausea, abdominal pain, and metallic taste, in decreasing order). Metformin has been used in Canada, Great Britain, and the rest of Europe for more than 30 years and was approved for use in the US in December 1994.

CONCLUSIONS

Three trials comprise the Food and Drug Administration approval database (one foreign). Metformin will be most useful in managing patients with poorly controlled postprandial hyperglycemia, as its postprandial effect is much greater than that of the sulfonylureas. In contrast, sulfonylureas or insulin are more effective for managing patients with poorly controlled fasting hyperglycemia. Metformin should be considered a first-line agent, particularly in obese or hyperlipidemic patients.

Efficacy of metformin in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Multicenter Metformin Study Group

BACKGROUND

Sulfonylurea drugs have been the only oral therapy available for patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) in the United States. Recently, however, metformin has been approved for the treatment of NIDDM.

METHODS

We performed two large, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, controlled studies in which metformin or another treatment was given for 29 weeks to moderately obese patients with NIDDM whose diabetes was inadequately controlled by diet (protocol 1: metformin vs. placebo; 289 patients), or diet plus glyburide (protocol 2: metformin and glyburide vs. metformin vs. glyburide; 632 patients). To determine efficacy we measured plasma glucose (while the patients were fasting and after the oral administration of glucose), lactate, lipids, insulin, and glycosylated hemoglobin before, during, and at the end of the study.

RESULTS

In protocol 1, at the end of the study the 143 patients in the metformin group, as compared with the 146 patients in the placebo group, had lower mean (+/- SE) fasting plasma glucose concentrations (189 +/- 5 vs. 244 +/- 6 mg per deciliter [10.6 +/- 0.3 vs. 13.7 +/- 0.3 mmol per liter], P < 0.001) and glycosylated hemoglobin values (7.1 +/- 0.1 percent vs. 8.6 +/- 0.2 percent, P < 0.001). In protocol 2, the 213 patients given metformin and glyburide, as compared with the 210 patients treated with glyburide alone, had lower mean fasting plasma glucose concentrations (187 +/- 4 vs. 261 +/- 4 mg per deciliter [10.5 +/- 0.2 vs. 14.6 +/- 0.2 mmol per liter], P < 0.001) and glycosylated hemoglobin values (7.1 +/- 0.1 percent vs. 8.7 +/- 0.1 percent, P < 0.001). The effect of metformin alone was similar to that of glyburide alone. Eighteen percent of the patients given metformin and glyburide had symptoms compatible with hypoglycemia, as compared with 3 percent in the glyburide group and 2 percent in the metformin group. In both protocols the patients given metformin had statistically significant decreases in plasma total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations, whereas the values in the respective control groups did not change. There were no significant changes in fasting plasma lactate concentrations in any of the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Metformin monotherapy and combination therapy with metformin and sulfonylurea are well tolerated and improve glycemic control and lipid concentrations in patients with NIDDM whose diabetes is poorly controlled with diet or sulfonylurea therapy alone.

Metformin. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

The biguanide metformin (dimethylbiguanide) is an oral antihyperglycaemic agent used in the management of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). It reduces blood glucose levels, predominantly by improving hepatic and peripheral tissue sensitivity to insulin without affecting the secretion of this hormone. Metformin also appears to have potentially beneficial effects on serum lipid levels and fibrinolytic activity, although the long term clinical implications of these effects are unclear. Metformin possesses similar antihyperglycaemic efficacy to sulphonylureas in obese and nonobese patients with NIDDM. Additionally, interim data from the large multicentre United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) indicated similar antihyperglycaemic efficacy for metformin and insulin in newly diagnosed patients with NIDDM. Unlike the sulphonylureas and insulin, however, metformin treatment is not associated with increased bodyweight. Addition of metformin to existing antidiabetic therapy confers enhanced antihyperglycaemic efficacy. This may be of particular use in improving glycaemic control in patients with NIDDM not adequately controlled with sulphonylurea monotherapy, and may serve to reduce or eliminate the need for daily insulin injections in patients with NIDDM who require this therapy. The acute, reversible gastrointestinal adverse effects seen with metformin may be minimised by administration with or after food, and by using lower dosages, increased slowly where necessary. Lactic acidosis due to metformin is rare, and the risk of this complication may be minimised by observance of prescribing precautions and contraindications intended to avoid accumulation of the drug or lactate in the body. Unlike the sulphonylureas, metformin does not cause hypoglycaemia. Thus, metformin is an effective antihyperglycaemic agent which appears to improve aberrant plasma lipid and fibrinolytic profiles associated with NIDDM. Possible long term clinical benefits of this drug with regard to cardiovascular mortality and morbidity are not yet established but are being assessed in a major ongoing study. Since metformin does not promote weight gain or hypoglycaemia it should be considered first-line pharmacotherapy in obese patients with NIDDM inadequately controlled by nonpharmacological measures. Metformin appears similarly effective for the pharmacological management of NIDDM in nonobese patients.