51
|
Rezapour A, Souresrafil A, Barzegar M, Sheikhy-Chaman M, Tatarpour P. Economic evaluation of next-generation sequencing techniques in diagnosis of genetic disorders: A systematic review. Clin Genet 2023; 103:513-528. [PMID: 36808726 DOI: 10.1111/cge.14313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
In recent years, massively parallel sequencing or next generation sequencing (NGS) has considerably changed both the research and diagnostic fields, and rapid developments have led to the combination of NGS techniques in clinical practice, ease of analysis, and detection of genetic mutations. This article aimed at reviewing the economic evaluation studies of the NGS techniques in the diagnosis of genetic diseases. In this systematic review, scientific databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus, and CEA registry) were searched from 2005 to 2022 to identify the related literature on the economic evaluation of NGS techniques in the diagnosis of genetic diseases. Full-text reviews and data extraction were all performed by two independent researchers. The quality of all the articles included in this study was evaluated using the Checklist of Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES). Out of 20 521 screened abstracts, 36 studies met the inclusion criteria. The mean score of the QHES checklist for the studies was 0.78 (high quality). Seventeen studies were conducted based on modeling. Cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis, and cost-minimization analysis were done in 26 studies, 13 studies, and 1 study, respectively. Based on the available evidence and findings, exome sequencing, which is one of the NGS techniques, could have the potential to be used as a cost-effective genomic test to diagnose children with suspected genetic diseases. The results of the present study support the cost-effectiveness of exome sequencing in diagnosing suspected genetic disorders. However, the use of exome sequencing as a first- or second-line diagnostic test is still controversial. Most studies have been conducted in high-income countries, and research on the cost-effectiveness of NGS methods is recommended in low- and middle-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aziz Rezapour
- Health Management and Economics Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Aghdas Souresrafil
- Department of Health Services and Health Promotion, School of Health, Occupational Environment Research Center, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
| | - Mohammad Barzegar
- Department of English Language, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammadreza Sheikhy-Chaman
- Department of Health Economics, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Parvin Tatarpour
- School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Rezapour A, Souresrafil A, Shamsaei M, Barzegar M, Tashakori-Miyanroudi M, Ketabchi E. Economic evaluation of ferric carboxymaltose compared with placebo in iron-deficient patients with heart failure: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pharm 2023:10.1007/s11096-022-01532-2. [PMID: 36805379 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-022-01532-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It has been shown that ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) improves symptoms and quality of life in iron-deficient patients with heart failure (HF). AIM We aimed to systematically review studies conducted on the cost-effectiveness of FCM compared to placebo in iron-deficient patients with HF. METHOD We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science to find the relevant studies. After removing duplicates, two authors independently evaluated the titles, abstracts, and full texts. We included studies that investigated the full economic evaluations of FCM in HF patients with iron deficiency (cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis, and cost-benefit analysis) and used the CHEERS tool to evaluate the quality of the studies. RESULTS Seven studies were included which evaluated the economic analysis of treatments with FCM in iron-deficient patients with HF. The CHEERS scores for most of the studies (n = 6) were 0.77 or higher (very good quality). The lowest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) of FCM ($1801.96) was from Italy, and the highest ICER per QALY of FCM ($25,981.28) South Korea. Results of the studies showed that FCM, compared to placebo, was cost-effective in iron-deficient patients with HF. CONCLUSION FCM is a cost-effective treatment for iron-deficient patients with HF. Considering the fact that all the included studies in the present systematic review took place in high-income countries, we recommend further studies investigating the cost-effectiveness of FCM in low- and middle-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aziz Rezapour
- Health Management and Economics Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Aghdas Souresrafil
- Department of Health Services and Health Promotion, School of Health, Occupational Environment Research Center, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
| | - Monireh Shamsaei
- Department of Health Services Management, School of Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Mohammad Barzegar
- Department of English Language Teaching, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahsa Tashakori-Miyanroudi
- Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Addiction Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
| | - Ensiyeh Ketabchi
- Department of Health Services Management, School of Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Getchell M, Mantaring EJ, Yee K, Pronyk P. Cost-effectiveness of sub-national geographically targeted vaccination programs: A systematic review. Vaccine 2023; 41:2320-2328. [PMID: 36781333 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Abstract
Immunization is an essential component of national health plans. However, the growing number of new vaccine introductions, vaccination campaigns and increasing administrative costs create logistic and financial challenges, especially in resource-limited settings. Sub-national geographic targeting of vaccination programs is a potential strategy for governments to reduce the impact of infectious disease outbreaks while optimizing resource allocation and reducing costs, promoting sustainability of critically important national immunization plans. We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature to identify studies that investigated the cost-effectiveness of geographically targeted sub-national vaccination programs, either through routine immunization or supplementary immunization activities. A total of 16 studies were included in our review, covering nine diseases of interest: cholera, dengue, enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), hepatitis A, Japanese encephalitis, measles, rotavirus, Shigella and typhoid fever. All studies modelled cost-effectiveness of geographically targeted vaccination. Despite the variation in study design, disease focus and country context, studies generally found that in countries where a heterogenous burden of disease exists, sub-national geographic targeting of vaccination programs in areas of high disease burden was more cost-effective than a non-targeted strategy. Sensitivity analysis revealed that cost-effectiveness was most sensitive to variations in vaccine price, vaccine efficacy, mortality rate, administrative and operational costs, discount rate, and treatment costs. This systematic review identified several key characteristics related to geographic targeting of vaccination, including the vaccination strategy used, variations in modelling parameters and their impact on cost-effectiveness. Additional research and guidance is needed to support the appropriateness and feasibility of geographically targeted vaccination and to determine what country context would make this a viable complement to routine immunization programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marya Getchell
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore 169857, Singapore.
| | | | - Kaisin Yee
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore 169857, Singapore
| | - Paul Pronyk
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore 169857, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Najera RA, Gregory ST, Shofty B, Anand A, Gadot R, Youngerman BE, Storch EA, Goodman WK, Sheth SA. Cost-effectiveness analysis of radiosurgical capsulotomy versus treatment as usual for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Neurosurg 2023; 138:347-357. [PMID: 35907186 DOI: 10.3171/2022.5.jns22474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Stereotactic radiosurgical capsulotomy (SRS-C) is an effective neurosurgical option for patients with treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (TROCD). Unlike other procedures such as deep brain stimulation and radiofrequency ablation, the cost-effectiveness of SRS-C for TROCD has not been investigated. The authors herein report the first cost-effectiveness analysis of SRS-C for TROCD. METHODS Using a decision analytic model, the authors compared the cost-effectiveness of SRS-C to treatment as usual (TAU) for TROCD. Treatment response and complication rates were derived from a review of relevant clinical trials. Published algorithms were used to convert Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale scores into utility scores reflecting improvements in quality of life. Costs were approached from the healthcare sector perspective and were drawn from Medicare reimbursement rates and available healthcare economics data. A Monte Carlo simulation and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. RESULTS One hundred fifty-eight TROCD patients across 9 studies who had undergone SRS-C and had at least 36 months of follow-up were included in the model. Compared to TAU, SRS-C was more cost-effective, with an estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $28,960 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Within the 3-year time horizon, net QALYs gained were greater in the SRS-C group than the TAU group by 0.27 (95% CI 0.2698-0.2702, p < 0.0001). At willingness-to-pay thresholds of $50,000 and $100,000 per QALY, the Monte Carlo simulation revealed that SRS-C was more cost-effective than TAU in 83% and 100% of iterations, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Compared to TAU, SRS-C for TROCD is more cost-effective under a range of possible cost and effectiveness values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo A Najera
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Ben Shofty
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Adrish Anand
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Ron Gadot
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Brett E Youngerman
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York; and
| | - Eric A Storch
- 4Menninger Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Wayne K Goodman
- 4Menninger Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Sameer A Sheth
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Avşar TS, Yang X, Lorgelly P. How is the Societal Perspective Defined in Health Technology Assessment? Guidelines from Around the Globe. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2023; 41:123-138. [PMID: 36471131 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01221-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Some researchers have argued that the aim of an economic evaluation should be to offer guidance on resource allocation based on public interest from a societal perspective. The application of a societal perspective in health technology assessment (HTA), while common in many published studies, is not mandated in most countries, and there is limited discussion on what the societal perspective should encompass. This study aimed to systematically compare and contrast the HTA guidelines in different countries. HTA methods guidelines were identified through international HTA networks, such as the Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) and Guide to Economic Analysis Research (GEAR). The respective HTA agencies were grouped into two categories: well-established and newly developed, based on the establishment date. Data extracted from the guidelines summarised the methodological details in the reference cases, including specifics on the societal perspective. The database search yielded 46 guidelines, and 65% explicitly considered the societal perspective. The maturity of these agencies is reflected in their attitudes towards the societal perspective; the societal perspective is defined in 73% of the guidelines of well-established agencies and only 56% of those of newly developed agencies. The guidelines from multipayer healthcare systems are more likely to consider the societal perspective. Although most guidelines from the well-established agencies recommend the inclusion of a societal perspective, the types of costs and consequences that should be included and the recommended approaches to valuing them are variable. The direct costs to family and carers were included in 73% of the societal perspective definitions, while non-health outcomes were considered in only 40%. Most HTA guidelines lack clear guidance on what to include under specific perspectives. Considering the recent advancements in economic evaluation methods, it is timely to rethink the role of the societal perspective in HTA guidelines and adopt a more comprehensive perspective to include all costs and consequences of healthcare services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuba Saygın Avşar
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Xiaozhe Yang
- Institute of Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Paula Lorgelly
- School of Population Health and Department of Economics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Chapdelaine A, Vasiliadis HM, Provencher MD, Norton PJ, Roberge P. Cost-effectiveness of transdiagnostic group cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders v. treatment as usual: economic evaluation of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial over an 8-month time horizon using self-reported data. Psychol Med 2023; 53:1-13. [PMID: 36695038 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291722003920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This economic evaluation supplements a pragmatic randomized controlled trial conducted in community care settings, which showed superior improvement in the symptoms of adults with anxiety disorders who received 12 sessions of transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioural group therapy in addition to treatment as usual (tCBT + TAU) compared to TAU alone. METHODS This study evaluates the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of tCBT + TAU over an 8-month time horizon. For the reference case, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) obtained using the EQ-5D-5L, and the health system perspective were chosen. Alternatively, anxiety-free days (AFDs), derived from the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and the limited societal perspective were considered. Unadjusted incremental cost-effectiveness/utility ratios were calculated. Net-benefit regressions were done for a willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds range to build cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEAC). Sensitivity analyses were included. RESULTS Compared to TAU (n = 114), tCBT + TAU (n = 117) generated additional QALYs, AFDs, and higher mental health care costs from the health system perspective. From the health system and the limited societal perspectives, at a WTP of Can$ 50 000/QALY, the CEACs showed that the probability of tCBT + TAU v. TAU being cost-effective was 97 and 89%. Promising cost-effectiveness results using AFDs are also presented. The participation of therapists from the public health sector could increase cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS From the limited societal and health system perspectives, this first economic evaluation of tCBT shows favourable cost-effectiveness results at a WTP threshold of Can$ 50 000/QALY. Future research is needed to replicate findings in longer follow-up studies and different health system contexts to better inform decision-makers for a full-scale implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Chapdelaine
- PRIMUS Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12e avenue Nord, local Z7-3004, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1H 5N4, Canada
| | - Helen-Maria Vasiliadis
- Université de Sherbrooke - Campus de Longueuil, Charles-Le Moyne Research Center, 150 Place Charles Lemoyne, Longueuil, Québec, J4K 0A8, Canada
| | - Martin D Provencher
- École de psychologie, Pavillon Félix-Antoine-Savard, 2325, rue des Bibliothèques, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Peter J Norton
- The Cairnmillar Institute, 391-393 Tooronga Rd, Hawthorn East, Victoria 3123, Australia
| | - Pasquale Roberge
- Department of family medicine and emergency medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12e avenue Nord, local Z7-3004, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1H 5N4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Gulati S, Eckman MH. Anticoagulant Therapy for Cancer-Associated Thrombosis : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Ann Intern Med 2023; 176:1-9. [PMID: 36571839 PMCID: PMC10279520 DOI: 10.7326/m22-1258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) offer an alternative to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and warfarin for treating cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). OBJECTIVE To determine the cost and effectiveness of DOACs versus LMWH. DESIGN Cohort-state transition decision analytic model. DATA SOURCES Network meta-analysis comparing DOACs versus LMWH. TARGET POPULATION Adult patients with cancer at the time they develop thrombosis. TIME HORIZON Lifetime. PERSPECTIVE Health care sector. INTERVENTION Strategies of 1) enoxaparin, 2) apixaban, 3) edoxaban, and 4) rivaroxaban for treatment of CAT. OUTCOME MEASURES Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in 2022 U.S. dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS In the base-case scenario, using drug prices from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Federal Supply Schedule, apixaban dominated enoxaparin and edoxaban by being less costly and more effective. Rivaroxaban was slightly more effective than apixaban, with an ICER of $493 246. In a scenario analysis using "real-world" drug prices from GoodRx, rivaroxaban was cost-effective with an ICER of $50 053 per QALY. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS Results were highly sensitive to monthly drug costs. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000 per QALY, apixaban was preferred in 80% of simulations. However, sensitivity analyses also demonstrated that apixaban only remained cost-effective if monthly medication costs were below $530. Above this, rivaroxaban became cost-effective. LIMITATIONS An assumption was made that patients would continue anticoagulation indefinitely unless they suffered a major bleed. Nonmedical costs such as patient and caregiver loss of productivity were not accounted for, and long-term thrombotic complications were not explicitly modeled. CONCLUSION The 3 DOACs are more effective and more cost-effective than LMWH. The most cost-effective DOAC depends on the relative cost of each of these agents. These are important considerations for treating physicians and health policymakers. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuchi Gulati
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California (S.G.)
| | - Mark H Eckman
- University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, and Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (M.H.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Goshua G, Sinha P, Kunst N, Pischel L, Lee AI, Cuker A. Cost-effectiveness of second-line therapies in adults with chronic immune thrombocytopenia. Am J Hematol 2023; 98:122-130. [PMID: 35147241 PMCID: PMC9365880 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.26497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Major options for second-line therapy in adults with chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) include splenectomy, rituximab, and thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TRAs). The American Society of Hematology guidelines recommend rituximab over splenectomy, TRAs over rituximab, and splenectomy or TRAs while noting a lack of evidence on the cost-effectiveness of these therapies. Using prospective, observational, and meta-analytic data, we performed the first cost-effectiveness analysis of second-line therapies in chronic ITP, from the perspective of the U.S. health system. Over a 20-year time-horizon, our six-strategy Markov model shows that a strategy incorporating early splenectomy, an approach at odds with current guidelines and clinical practice, is the cost-effective strategy. All four strategies utilizing TRAs in the first or second position cost over $1 million per quality-adjusted life-year, as compared to strategies involving early use of splenectomy and rituximab. In a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, early use of splenectomy and rituximab in either order was favored in 100% of 10 000 iterations. The annual cost of TRAs would have to decrease over 80% to begin to become cost-effective in any early TRA strategy. Our data indicate that effectiveness of early TRA and late TRA strategies is similar with the cost significantly greater with early TRA strategies. Contrary to current practice trends and guidelines, early use of splenectomy and rituximab, rather than TRAs, constitutes cost-effective treatment in adults with chronic ITP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Goshua
- Section of Hematology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Pranay Sinha
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Natalia Kunst
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lauren Pischel
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Alfred Ian Lee
- Section of Hematology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Adam Cuker
- Department of Medicine and Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Pokhilenko I, Kast T, Janssen LMM, Evers SMAA, Paulus ATG, Simon J, Mayer S, Berger M, Konnopka A, Muntendorf L, Brodszky V, García-Pérez L, Park A, Salvador-Carulla L, Drost RMWA. International comparability of reference unit costs of education services: when harmonizing methodology is not enough (PECUNIA project). Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2023; 23:135-141. [PMID: 36472303 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2152331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health problems can lead to costs in the education sector. However, these costs are rarely incorporated in health economic evaluations due to the lack of reference unit costs (RUCs), cost per unit of service, of education services and of validated methods to obtain them. In this study, a standardized unit cost calculation tool developed in the PECUNIA project, the PECUNIA RUC Template for services, was applied to calculate the RUCs of selected education services in five European countries. METHODS The RUCs of special education services and of educational therapy were calculated using the information collected via an exploratory gray literature search and contact with service providers. RESULTS The RUCs of special education services ranged from €55 to €189 per school day. The RUCs of educational therapy ranged from €6 to €25 per contact and from €5 to €35 per day. Variation was observed in the type of input data and measurement unit, among other. DISCUSSION The tool helped reduce variability in the RUCs related to costing methodology and gain insights into other aspects that contribute to the variability (e.g. data availability). Further research and efforts to generate high quality input data are required to reduce the variability of the RUCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Pokhilenko
- Centre for Economics of Obesity, Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Dental and Medical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, The United Kingdom
| | - T Kast
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - L M M Janssen
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - S M A A Evers
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Centre of Economic Evaluation & Machine Learning, Trimbos Institute, National Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A T G Paulus
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,School of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - J Simon
- Department of Health Economics, Centre for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - S Mayer
- Department of Health Economics, Centre for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Berger
- Department of Health Economics, Centre for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - A Konnopka
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - L Muntendorf
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - V Brodszky
- Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
| | - L García-Pérez
- Servicio de Evaluación, Servicio Canario de la Salud (SESCS), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - A Park
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - L Salvador-Carulla
- Mental Health Policy Unit, Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia
| | - R M W A Drost
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
60
|
Leech AA, Lin PJ, D'Cruz B, Parsons SK, Lavelle TA. Family Spillover Effects: Are Economic Evaluations Misrepresenting the Value of Healthcare Interventions to Society? APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2023; 21:5-10. [PMID: 35997896 PMCID: PMC9839569 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-022-00755-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The societal impacts of health interventions are seldom incorporated into health economic evaluations, including the impact that illness can have on informal or unpaid caregivers and other family members (i.e., "family spillover effects"). Previous research has demonstrated that by excluding family spillover effects, the value of health interventions may be underestimated on average. In this commentary, we discuss how the inclusion of spillover effects influences how we value interventions and, given the extent to which caregiver/family effects are largely not captured or known, propose ways in which these data could be more systematically collected or estimated and used by researchers. These recommendations include prioritizing data collection alongside clinical trials and patient registries, engaging expert opinion panels, and developing mapping algorithms for estimating caregiver/family utility values from non-preference-based caregiver health-related quality-of-life measures and/or from patient preference-based measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley A Leech
- Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 2525 West End Avenue, Suite 1275-F, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA.
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Pei-Jung Lin
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brittany D'Cruz
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Susan K Parsons
- Center for Health Solutions, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tara A Lavelle
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Hall EW, Gounder P, Angles J, Nelson NP, Rosenberg ES, Weng MK. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of hepatitis B vaccination strategies in high-impact settings for adults. J Viral Hepat 2022; 29:1115-1126. [PMID: 36200313 DOI: 10.1111/jvh.13759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Adults at increased risk for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection are recommended to receive vaccination. We conducted a cost utility analysis to evaluate approaches for implementing that recommendation in selected high-risk settings: community outreach events with a large proportion of immigrants, syringe service programs, substance use treatment centres, sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics, tuberculosis (TB) clinics and jails. We utilized a decision tree framework with a Markov disease progression model to compare quality adjusted life-years and cost in 2021 United States dollars from four strategies: a 3-dose vaccination regimen with prevaccination screening and testing (PVST; baseline comparison); PVST at the initial encounter followed by a 2-dose series (Intervention 1); PVST with the first dose of a 2-dose vaccination series at the initial encounter (Intervention 2); and a 2-dose vaccination series without PVST (Intervention 3). In all settings, Intervention 1 resulted in worse health outcomes compared with the baseline strategy. Intervention 2 averted incident chronic HBV infections in all settings (range -9.4% in TB clinics, -14.8% in syringe service programs) and was a cost-saving approach in settings with higher risk of infection (i.e. jails, -$266 per person; syringe service programs, -$597; substance use treatment centres, -$130). Providing a 2-dose vaccination series without any screening (Intervention 3) averted incident HBV infections and was cost-saving in all settings but resulted in more HBV-related deaths in settings with higher HBV prevalence. These results demonstrate a 2-dose vaccine series is a cost-effective approach in these high-impact settings, even if prevaccination testing is not possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric W Hall
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Prabhu Gounder
- Acute Communicable Disease Control Program, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - John Angles
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University at Albany, Rensselaer, New York, USA
| | - Noele P Nelson
- Division of Viral Hepatitis, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Eli S Rosenberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University at Albany, Rensselaer, New York, USA.,New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Mark K Weng
- Division of Viral Hepatitis, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Li H, Zhuang T, Wu W, Gan W, Wu C, Peng S, Huan S, Liu N. A systematic review on the cost-effectiveness of the computer-assisted orthopedic system. HEALTH CARE SCIENCE 2022; 1:173-185. [PMID: 38938554 PMCID: PMC11080830 DOI: 10.1002/hcs2.23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
Computer-assisted orthopedic system (CAOS) is rapidly gaining popularity in the field of precision medicine. However, the cost-effectiveness of CAOS has not been well clarified. We performed this review to summarize and assess the cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) with regard to CAOS. Publications on CEA in CAOS have been searched in PubMed and CEA Registry up to May 31, 2022. The Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument was used to estimate the quality of studies. Relationships between qualities and potential factors were also examined. There were 15 eligible studies in the present review. Twelve studies evaluated CAOS joint arthroplasties and found that CAOS joint arthroplasties were cost-effective compared to manual methods. Three studies focused on spinal surgery, two of which analyzed the cost-effectiveness of CAOS for patients after spinal fusion, with conflicting results. One study demonstrated that CAOS was cost-effective in spinal pedicle screw insertion. The mean QHES score of CEAs included was 86.1. The potential factors had no significant relationship with the quality of studies. Based on available studies, our review reflected that CAOS was cost-effective in the field of joint arthroplasty. While in spinal surgery, the answer was unclear. Current CEAs represent high qualities, and more CEAs are required in the different disciplines of orthopedics where CAOS is employed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hua Li
- Department of OrthopaedicsThe First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan UniversityGuangzhouGuangdong ProvinceChina
| | - Tengfeng Zhuang
- Department of OrthopaedicsThe First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan UniversityGuangzhouGuangdong ProvinceChina
| | - Wenrui Wu
- Department of OrthopaedicsThe First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan UniversityGuangzhouGuangdong ProvinceChina
| | - Wenyi Gan
- Department of OrthopaedicsThe First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan UniversityGuangzhouGuangdong ProvinceChina
| | - Chongjie Wu
- Department of OrthopaedicsThe First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan UniversityGuangzhouGuangdong ProvinceChina
| | - Sijun Peng
- Department of OrthopaedicsThe First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan UniversityGuangzhouGuangdong ProvinceChina
| | - Songwei Huan
- Department of OrthopaedicsThe First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan UniversityGuangzhouGuangdong ProvinceChina
| | - Ning Liu
- Department of OrthopaedicsThe First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan UniversityGuangzhouGuangdong ProvinceChina
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Martins R, Connolly MP. Valuing live births from assisted reproduction: A health economics viewpoint. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2022; 85:149-158. [PMID: 36443158 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Infertility is a medical condition that can be overcome, thanks to advances in medically assisted reproductive (MAR) therapies. Despite the ultimate measure of MAR efficacy being the birth of a new human being, there are ethical and methodological questions as to which outcome best translates the value of MAR in cost-effectiveness analyses. Many authors favour cost per life birth outcomes instead of more traditional cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), which raises generalizability issues for decision-makers. Nonetheless, infertility and infertility treatments substantially differ from other health conditions and health treatments, particularly in the way they affect the quality of life of the infertile couple. Collecting quality of life measures in infertility and pregnancy is also surrounded by challenges not easily overcome. We reflect on cost-effectiveness methods applied to MAR technologies, on ethical considerations for valuing a MAR-generated life, and on its broader societal value for consideration by decision-makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Martins
- Global Market Access Solutions, Health Economics Unit, St-Prex, Switzerland; University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Mark P Connolly
- Global Market Access Solutions, Health Economics Unit, St-Prex, Switzerland; Unit of Pharmacoepidemiology & Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Schnitzler L, Evers SMAA, Jackson LJ, Paulus ATG, Roberts TE. Are intersectoral costs considered in economic evaluations of interventions relating to sexually transmitted infections (STIs)? A systematic review. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:2180. [PMID: 36434561 PMCID: PMC9701033 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14484-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) not only have an impact on the health sector but also the private resources of those affected, their families and other sectors of society (i.e. labour, education). This study aimed to i) review and identify economic evaluations of interventions relating to STIs, which aimed to include a societal perspective; ii) analyse the intersectoral costs (i.e. costs broader than healthcare) included; iii) categorise these costs by sector; and iv) assess the impact of intersectoral costs on the overall study results. METHODS Seven databases were searched: MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE (Ovid), Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EconLit and NHS EED. Key search terms included terms for economic evaluation, STIs and specific infections. This review considered trial- and model-based economic evaluations conducted in an OECD member country. Studies were included that assessed intersectoral costs. Intersectoral costs were extracted and categorised by sector using Drummond's cost classification scheme (i.e. patient/family, productivity, costs in other sectors). A narrative synthesis was performed. RESULTS Twenty-nine studies qualified for data extraction and narrative synthesis. Twenty-eight studies applied a societal perspective of which 8 additionally adopted a healthcare or payer perspective, or both. One study used a modified payer perspective. The following sectors were identified: patient/family, informal care, paid labour (productivity), non-paid opportunity costs, education, and consumption. Patient/family costs were captured in 11 studies and included patient time, travel expenses, out-of-pocket costs and premature burial costs. Informal caregiver support (non-family) and unpaid help by family/friends was captured in three studies. Paid labour losses were assessed in all but three studies. Three studies also captured the costs and inability to perform non-paid work. Educational costs and future non-health consumption costs were each captured in one study. The inclusion of intersectoral costs resulted in more favourable cost estimates. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review suggests that economic evaluations of interventions relating to STIs that adopt a societal perspective tend to be limited in scope. There is an urgent need for economic evaluations to be more comprehensive in order to allow policy/decision-makers to make better-informed decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Schnitzler
- grid.6572.60000 0004 1936 7486Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK ,grid.5012.60000 0001 0481 6099Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Silvia M. A. A. Evers
- grid.5012.60000 0001 0481 6099Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands ,grid.416017.50000 0001 0835 8259Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Louise J. Jackson
- grid.6572.60000 0004 1936 7486Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Aggie T. G. Paulus
- grid.5012.60000 0001 0481 6099Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands ,grid.5012.60000 0001 0481 6099School of Health Professions Education (SHE), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Tracy E. Roberts
- grid.6572.60000 0004 1936 7486Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Yi S, Hong J, Yoon H, Lim YN, Bae EY. Systematic Review and Quality Assessment of Health Economic Evaluation Studies (2007-2019) Conducted in South Korea. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2022; 20:819-834. [PMID: 35869356 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-022-00746-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND South Korea formally adopted economic evaluation in December 2006 to aid drug reimbursement decision-making. While this policy change is applied only to pharmaceuticals, it has also sparked interest in economic evaluations for non-pharmaceutical interventions and programmes. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to provide a snapshot of the current practice for published health economic evaluation studies and critically assess the quality of these studies. METHODS An electronic search was performed on multiple databases (EMBASE, PubMed, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, Scopus, Korean Medical database, Korean studies Information Service System, and Research Information Sharing Service) to identify health economic evaluation studies published between January 2007 and December 2019. The inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed, original health economic evaluations (cost-utility, cost-effectiveness, cost-minimisation, and cost-benefit analyses) published in English or Korean. Two reviewers selected studies for inclusion and extracted data from the included studies. Key characteristics of these studies were descriptively summarised, and study quality was assessed using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument on a 100-point scale. RESULTS A total of 162 studies were included in this review (63 for drugs, 51 for non-pharmaceutical treatments/health technologies, and 48 for health programmes). These numbers confirm a significant increase in the number of publications since the policy introduction. However, the quality of these studies remained relatively low, with a mean QHES score of 57.9 (± 16.0). Study quality also varied substantially, with the QHES scores ranging from 15 to 87. The scores were notably lower in studies with non-pharmaceutical interventions and programmes, cost-effectiveness analyses or cost-benefit analyses, retrospective study-based or simple modelling-based analyses, and those locally published. In addition, a considerable proportion of these studies did not state or specify essential components of economic evaluation, such as perspectives (30.2%), time horizons (29.6%), discount rates (34.6%), and sensitivity analyses (24.7%). While the use of local data either fully or partially was relatively higher for unit costs (94.4%) and resource utilisation (90.1%), it was lower for utility weights (47.1%), treatment effects (63.0%), and baseline risks (70.4%). Transferability or generalisability issues were infrequently discussed when relying on foreign sources. In addition, the included studies were often not well structured, making it difficult to assess their quality. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that there is still much room for improving the quality of health economic evaluation studies conducted in South Korea. Policymakers should critically evaluate available cost-effectiveness evidence, especially for non-pharmaceutical interventions and programmes, when using it for decision-making in South Korea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunghyun Yi
- Department of Health Policy and Management, General Graduate School of Gachon University, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Jihyung Hong
- Department of Healthcare Management, College of Social Science, Gachon University, Seongnam, 13120, South Korea.
| | - Haemin Yoon
- Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, York, UK
| | - You-Na Lim
- Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Eun-Young Bae
- College of Pharmacy, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
White TB, Petrovan SO, Booth H, Correa RJ, Gatt Y, Martin PA, Newell H, Worthington TA, Sutherland WJ. Determining the economic costs and benefits of conservation actions: A decision support framework. CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/csp2.12840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas B. White
- Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
| | - Silviu O. Petrovan
- Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
- Biosecurity Research Initiative at St Catharine's (BioRISC), St Catharine's College Cambridge UK
| | - Hollie Booth
- The Interdisciplinary Centre for Conservation Science (ICCS), Department of Zoology University of Oxford Oxford UK
- Wildlife Conservation Society New York City New York USA
| | - Roberto J. Correa
- Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
| | - Yasmine Gatt
- Centre for Nature‐Based Climate Solutions, Department of Biological Sciences National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore
| | - Philip A. Martin
- Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
- Biosecurity Research Initiative at St Catharine's (BioRISC), St Catharine's College Cambridge UK
- Basque Centre for Climate Change Leioa Spain
| | | | - Thomas A. Worthington
- Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
| | - William J. Sutherland
- Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
- Biosecurity Research Initiative at St Catharine's (BioRISC), St Catharine's College Cambridge UK
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Mendola ND, Oehrlein E, Perfetto EM, Westrich K, McQueen RB. Stakeholder perception of pharmaceutical value: A multicriteria decision analysis pilot case study for value assessment in the United States. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2022; 28:1190-1196. [PMID: 36125060 PMCID: PMC10372975 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.10.1190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent attention to value frameworks has highlighted limitations of current conventional value and health technology assessment (V/HTA) methods (eg, cost-effectiveness). Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) has potential as a supplemental tool to incorporate additional value criteria into conventional value assessment. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a pilot study to illustrate the impact of an MCDA approach on the value perceptions of hypothetical treatment profiles from a multistakeholder panel. METHODS: Participants voted on value perceptions of 2 hypothetical treatments with similar cost-effectiveness evidence: Treatment A for aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma in adults and treatment B for episodic migraine in adults. Participants voted treatments A and B as low, intermediate, or high value before and after a weighting exercise on prespecified, additional value criteria. Weights from participants were used to calculate treatment-specific MCDA scores from 0 (least favorable) to 100 (most favorable) and were presented to participants for a second value-perception vote. Analyses compared changes in value perceptions within treatments A and B post-MCDA exercise. RESULTS: Before considering MCDA scores for treatment A, 0% of participants considered it to be low, 52% intermediate, and 48% high value. After considering MCDA scores for treatment A, 4% considered it low, 29% intermediate, and 67% high value. Both before and after considering MCDA scores for treatment B, 13%, considered it low, 57% intermediate, and 30% high value. Mean MCDA scores for treatments A and B were 67 and 63, respectively. Of all stakeholders, 41% altered their perception of value for treatment A (9% negatively and 32% positively) and, separately, 45% for treatment B (23% both negatively and positively) after considering MCDA scores. CONCLUSIONS: With nearly half of participants altering their perception of value after consideration of additional value criteria, findings support the need for a more inclusive and flexible value assessment process. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by The National Pharmaceutical Council. Dr Perfetto was employed by the National Health Council (NHC) at the time this work was completed, and all honoraria and consulting and travel fees were paid to the NHC. The NHC is a not-for-profit, membership organization. It is supported through membership dues and sponsorship funds. The complete list of members and sponsors is located on the NHC's website at www.nationalhealthcouncil.org. She is also an advisor for the Brain Injury Association of America, Dan Lewis Foundation, and Canter for Medical Technology Policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas D Mendola
- Clinical Pharmacy Program, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | | | - Eleanor M Perfetto
- National Health Council, Washington, DC
- Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore
| | | | - Robert Brett McQueen
- Clinical Pharmacy Program, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Sevilla JP. The value of vaccines. Curr Opin Immunol 2022; 78:102243. [PMID: 36156412 DOI: 10.1016/j.coi.2022.102243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Revised: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Optimizing vaccine spending depends on recognizing the full value of vaccination (VoV). Existing taxonomies of such value are not comprehensive because they are not guided by general theories. I rely on two such theories: subjective-value theory claims that what has value is determined by what people actually or ideally want in life. A welfarist theory of government states that a fundamental objective of government is to promote social value (or social welfare). These jointly imply that any aspect of life that individuals actually or ideally value and that could be negatively affected by vaccine-preventable diseases (and therefore positively affected by preventive vaccines) is an element of VoV. I build a more comprehensive-value taxonomy than currently exists based on this implication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P Sevilla
- Data for Decisions, LLC, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Hall EW, Weng MK, Harris AM, Schillie S, Nelson NP, Ortega-Sanchez IR, Rosenthal E, Sullivan PS, Lopman B, Jones J, Bradley H, Rosenberg ES. Assessing the Cost-Utility of Universal Hepatitis B Vaccination Among Adults. J Infect Dis 2022; 226:1041-1051. [PMID: 35260904 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiac088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although effective against hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, hepatitis B (HepB) vaccination is only recommended for infants, children, and adults at higher risk. We conducted an economic evaluation of universal HepB vaccination among US adults. METHODS Using a decision analytic model with Markov disease progression, we compared current vaccination recommendations (baseline) with either 3-dose or 2-dose universal HepB vaccination (intervention strategies). In simulated modeling of 1 million adults distributed by age and risk groups, we quantified health benefits (quality-adjusted life years, QALYs) and costs for each strategy. Multivariable probabilistic sensitivity analyses identified key inputs. All costs reported in 2019 US dollars. RESULTS With incremental base-case vaccination coverage up to 50% among persons at lower risk and 0% increment among persons at higher risk, each of 2 intervention strategies averted nearly one-quarter of acute HBV infections (3-dose strategy, 24.8%; 2-dose strategy, 24.6%). Societal incremental cost per QALY gained of $152 722 (interquartile range, $119 113-$235 086) and $155 429 (interquartile range, $120 302-$242 226) were estimated for 3-dose and 2-dose strategies, respectively. Risk of acute HBV infection showed the strongest influence. CONCLUSIONS Universal adult vaccination against HBV may be an appropriate strategy for reducing HBV incidence and improving resulting health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric W Hall
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Mark K Weng
- National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Aaron M Harris
- National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sarah Schillie
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Noele P Nelson
- National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ismael R Ortega-Sanchez
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Elizabeth Rosenthal
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University at Albany, Rensselaer, New York, USA
| | - Patrick S Sullivan
- Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ben Lopman
- Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jeb Jones
- Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Heather Bradley
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Eli S Rosenberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University at Albany, Rensselaer, New York, USA.,New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Utami AM, Rendrayani F, Khoiry QA, Alfiani F, Kusuma ASW, Suwantika AA. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. J Multidiscip Healthc 2022; 15:2067-2076. [PMID: 36124175 PMCID: PMC9482370 DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s372000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background WHO reported that 5.5 million people died in the world because of COVID-19. One of the efforts to mitigate the pandemic is administrating the vaccines globally. Objective The objective of this study was to review cost-effectiveness analysis of COVID-19 vaccination in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods We searched PubMed and EBSCO for the eligible studies with inclusion criteria using cost-effectiveness analysis, free full text, low-middle-income countries, and the publication date since the last year. Four reviewers conducted the review independently. Results The review identified four articles meeting the eligibility criteria. The settings were LMICs. Different perspectives and economic modelling used by the countries confirmed a similar result. They all explained that vaccination could prevent the infection spread and mortality caused by COVID-19 and showed high cost-effectiveness values. Conclusion Administering COVID-19 vaccines was cost-effective and even cost-saving. The studies found that vaccination was more cost-effective in reducing the spread of the COVID-19 virus and the mortality it caused than no vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Auliasari M Utami
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
| | - Farida Rendrayani
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
| | - Qisty A Khoiry
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
| | - Fitri Alfiani
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.,Faculty of Health Science, Universitas Muhammadiyah Cirebon, Cirebon, West Java, Indonesia
| | - Arif S W Kusuma
- Department of Biological Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.,Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
| | - Auliya A Suwantika
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.,Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.,Center for Health Technology Assessment, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Pervin M, Hagmayer Y. Attitudes Towards Evidence-Based Practice of Professionals Working with Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder in Bangladesh. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2022; 49:861-880. [PMID: 35773439 PMCID: PMC9393150 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-022-01205-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Like in many lower-middle-income countries (LMIC), progress in implementing evidence-based practices (EBPs) for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has been slow in Bangladesh. This cross-sectional study examined professionals' attitudes towards evidence-based practice (EBP) for children and adolescents with ASD and explored how providers' demographic factors are related to attitudes to and adoption of EBPs in Bangladesh. The sample consisted of 150 mental health professionals and special teachers from the urban area of Dhaka. Attitudes were assessed by the Evidence-based Practice Attitude Scale-36. Findings indicated that professionals have favorable attitudes towards EBP. Their attitudes varied depending on service settings (public clinical, private clinical, and special school) and caseload per year. Professionals who work in private and special school settings claimed to be more willing to adopt an EBP when required and perceived a higher fit of EBPs and their work than those in public clinical settings. The number of different EBPs used also differed by service setting. Every type of intervention (except medication) was used by more professionals in special schools than in private and public clinical settings. Many professionals reported few barriers to the implementation of EBPs. These findings indicate conditions that are often conducive to the implementation of EBPs. However, these results do not reflect the situation in rural areas, in which poverty is more widespread and the number of specialized professionals is low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maleka Pervin
- Department of Psychology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh
- Institute of Psychology, Georg August University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - York Hagmayer
- Institute of Psychology, Georg August University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Fischer C, Mayer S, Perić N, Simon J. Harmonization issues in unit costing of service use for multi-country, multi-sectoral health economic evaluations: a scoping review. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2022; 12:42. [PMID: 35920934 PMCID: PMC9347135 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-022-00390-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Valuation is a critical part of the costing process in health economic evaluations. However, an overview of specific issues relevant to the European context on harmonizing methodological requirements for the valuation of costs to be used in health economic evaluation is lacking. We aimed to inform the development of an international, harmonized and multi-sectoral costing framework, as sought in the European PECUNIA (ProgrammE in Costing, resource use measurement and outcome valuation for Use in multi-sectoral National and International health economic evaluAtions) project. METHODS We conducted a scoping review (information extraction 2008-2021) to a) to demonstrate the degree of heterogeneity that currently exists in the literature regarding central terminology, b) to generate an overview of the most relevant areas for harmonization in multi-sectoral and multi-national costing processes for health economic evaluations, and c) to provide insights into country level variation regarding economic evaluation guidance. A complex search strategy was applied covering key publications on costing methods, glossaries, and international costing recommendations augmented by a targeted author and reference search as well as snowballing. Six European countries served as case studies to describe country-specific harmonization issues. Identified information was qualitatively synthesized and cross-checked using a newly developed, pilot-tested data extraction form. RESULTS Costing methods for services were found to be heterogeneous between sectors and country guidelines and may, in practice, be often driven by data availability and reimbursement systems in place. The lack of detailed guidance regarding specific costing methods, recommended data sources, double-counting of costs between sectors, adjustment of unit costs for inflation, transparent handling of overhead costs as well as the unavailability of standardized unit costing estimates in most countries were identified as main drivers of country specific differences in costing methods with a major impact on valuation and cost-effectiveness evidence. CONCLUSION This review provides a basic summary of existing costing practices for evaluative purposes across sectors and countries and highlights several common methodological factors influencing divergence in cost valuation methods that would need to be systematically incorporated and addressed in future costing practices to achieve more comparable, harmonized health economic evaluation evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Fischer
- Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15/1, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Susanne Mayer
- Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15/1, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Nataša Perić
- Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15/1, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Judit Simon
- Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15/1, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Vellekoop H, Versteegh M, Huygens S, Corro Ramos I, Szilberhorn L, Zelei T, Nagy B, Tsiachristas A, Koleva-Kolarova R, Wordsworth S, Rutten-van Mölken M. The Net Benefit of Personalized Medicine: A Systematic Literature Review and Regression Analysis. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2022; 25:1428-1438. [PMID: 35248467 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Amidst conflicting expectations about the benefits of personalized medicine (PM) and the potentially high implementation costs, we reviewed the available evidence on the cost-effectiveness of PM relative to non-PM. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature review of economic evaluations of PM and extracted data, including incremental quality-adjusted life-years (ΔQALYs) and incremental costs (Δcosts). ΔQALYs and Δcosts were combined with estimates of national cost-effectiveness thresholds to calculate incremental net monetary benefit (ΔNMB). Regression analyses were performed with these variables as dependent variables and PM intervention characteristics as independent variables. Random intercepts were used to cluster studies according to country. RESULTS Of 4774 studies reviewed, 128 were selected, providing cost-effectiveness data for 279 PM interventions. Most studies were set in the United States (48%) and the United Kingdom (16%) and adopted a healthcare perspective (82%). Cancer treatments (60%) and pharmaceutical interventions (72%) occurred frequently. Prognostic tests (19%) and tests to identify (non)responders (37%) were least and most common, respectively. Industry sponsorship occurred in 32%. Median ΔQALYs, Δcosts, and ΔNMB per individual were 0.03, Int$575, and Int$18, respectively. We found large heterogeneity in cost-effectiveness. Regression analysis showed that gene therapies were associated with higher ΔQALYs than other interventions. PM interventions for neoplasms brought higher ΔNMB than PM interventions for other conditions. Nonetheless, average ΔNMB in the 'neoplasm' group was found to be negative. CONCLUSIONS PM brings improvements in health but often at a high cost, resulting in 0 to negative ΔNMB on average. Pricing policies may be needed to reduce the costs of interventions with negative ΔNMB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heleen Vellekoop
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Matthijs Versteegh
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simone Huygens
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Isaac Corro Ramos
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Tamás Zelei
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Balázs Nagy
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | | | - Sarah Wordsworth
- Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Maureen Rutten-van Mölken
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Podolsky MI, Present I, Neumann PJ, Kim DD. A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of COVID-19 Interventions: Considerations of Non-Health Impacts and Distributional Issues. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2022; 25:1298-1306. [PMID: 35398012 PMCID: PMC8986127 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aims to conduct a systematic review of economic evaluations of COVID-19 interventions and to examine whether and how these studies incorporate non-health impacts and distributional concerns. METHODS We searched the National Institutes of Health's COVID-19 Portfolio as of May 20, 2021, and supplemented our search with additional sources. We included original articles, including preprints, evaluating both the health and economic effects of a COVID-19-related intervention. Using a pre-specified data collection form, 2 reviewers independently screened, reviewed, and extracted information about the study characteristics, intervention types, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). We used an Impact Inventory to catalog the types of non-health impacts considered. RESULTS We included 70 articles, almost half of which were preprints. Most articles (56%) included at least one non-health impact, but fewer (21%) incorporated non-economic consequences. Few articles (17%) examined subgroups of interest. After excluding negative ICERs, the median ICER for the entire sample (n = 243 ratios) was $67,000/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) (interquartile range [IQR] $9000-$893,000/QALY). Interventions including a pharmaceutical component yielded a median ICER of $93,000/QALY (IQR $4000-$7,809,000/QALY), whereas interventions including a non-pharmaceutical component were slightly more cost-effective overall with a median ICER of $81,000/QALY (IQR $12,000-$1,034,000/QALY). Interventions reported to be highly cost-effective were treatment, public information campaigns, quarantining identified contacts/cases, canceling public events, and social distancing. CONCLUSIONS Our review highlights the lack of consideration of non-health and distributional impacts among COVID-19-related economic evaluations. Accounting for non-health impacts and distributional effects is essential for comprehensive assessment of interventions' value and imperative for generating cost-effectiveness evidence for both current and future pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan I Podolsky
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Isabel Present
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David D Kim
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Loong D, Pham B, Amiri M, Saunders H, Mishra S, Radhakrishnan A, Rodrigues M, Yeung MW, Muller MP, Straus SE, Tricco AC, Isaranuwatchai W. Systematic Review on the Cost-Effectiveness of Seasonal Influenza Vaccines in Older Adults. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2022; 25:1439-1458. [PMID: 35659487 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Older adults are at high risk of influenza-related complications or hospitalization. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the relative cost-effectiveness of all influenza vaccine options for older adults. METHODS This systematic review identified economic evaluation studies assessing the cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccines in adults ≥65 years of age from 5 literature databases. Two reviewers independently selected, extracted, and appraised relevant studies using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Economic Evaluations and Heyland's generalizability checklist. Costs were converted to 2019 Canadian dollars and adjusted for inflation and purchasing power parity. RESULTS A total of 27 studies were included. There were 18 comparisons of quadrivalent inactivated vaccine (QIV) versus trivalent inactivated vaccine (TIV): 5 showed QIV dominated TIV (ie, lower costs and higher health benefit), and 13 showed the results depended on willingness to pay (WTP). There were 9 comparisons of high-dose TIV (TIV-HD) versus TIV: 5 showed TIV-HD dominated TIV, and 4 showed the results depended on WTP. There were 8 comparisons of adjuvanted TIV (TIV-ADJ) versus TIV: 4 showed TIV-ADJ dominated TIV, and 4 showed the results depended on WTP. There were few pairwise comparisons among QIV, TIV-HD, and TIV-ADJ. CONCLUSIONS The evidence suggests QIV, TIV-HD, and TIV-ADJ are cost-effective against TIV for a WTP threshold of $50 000 per quality-adjusted life-year. Future studies should include new and existing vaccine options for broad age ranges and use more robust methodologies-such as real-world evaluations or modeling studies accounting for methodological, structural, and parameter uncertainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Desmond Loong
- Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ba' Pham
- Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mohammadreza Amiri
- Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hailey Saunders
- Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sujata Mishra
- Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amruta Radhakrishnan
- Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Myanca Rodrigues
- Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Health Research Methodology Graduate Program, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Man Wah Yeung
- National Advisory Committee on Immunization Secretariat, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew P Muller
- Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Infection Prevention and Control, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sharon E Straus
- Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea C Tricco
- Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Epidemiology Division, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai
- Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Ma S, Olchanski N, Cohen JT, Ollendorf DA, Neumann PJ, Kim DD. The Impact of Broader Value Elements on Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Two Case Studies. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2022; 25:1336-1343. [PMID: 35315331 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.01.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to explore the impact of including broader value elements in cost-effectiveness analyses by presenting 2 case studies, one on human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and one on early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (ESHL). METHODS We identified broader value elements (eg, patient and caregiver time, spillover health effects, productivity) from the Second Panel's Impact Inventory and the ISPOR Special Task Force's value flower. We then evaluated the cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination versus no vaccination (case 1) and combined modality therapy (CMT) versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of adult ESHL (case 2) using published simulation models. For each case study, we compared incremental cost-effectiveness ratios considering health sector impacts only (the "base-case" scenario) with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios incorporating broader value elements. RESULTS For vaccination of US girls against HPV before sexual debut versus no vaccination, the base-case result was $38 334 per disability-adjusted life-year averted. Including each broader value element made cost-effectiveness progressively more favorable, with HPV vaccination becoming cost-saving (ie, reducing costs and averting more disability-adjusted life-years) when the analysis incorporated productivity costs. For CMT versus chemotherapy alone in patients with ESHL, the base-case result indicated that CMT was cost-saving. Including all elements made this treatment's net monetary benefits (the sum of its averted resource costs and the net value of its health impacts) less favorable, even as the contribution from CMT's near-term health benefits grew. CONCLUSIONS Including broader value elements can substantially influence cost-effectiveness ratios, although the direction and the magnitude of their impact can differ across interventions and disease context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyu Ma
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Natalia Olchanski
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel A Ollendorf
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David D Kim
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Chen MKY, Vissapragada R, Bulamu N, Gupta M, Werth V, Sebaratnam DF. Cost-Utility Analysis of Rituximab vs Mycophenolate Mofetil for the Treatment of Pemphigus Vulgaris. JAMA Dermatol 2022; 158:1013-1021. [PMID: 35895045 PMCID: PMC9330276 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.2878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance There is an increasing body of literature that supports the use of rituximab as a first-line steroid-sparing agent in pemphigus vulgaris. However, the cost of rituximab is substantial compared with conventional agents, and there are limited health economic data to justify its use. Objective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of rituximab biosimilars relative to mycophenolate mofetil as a first-line steroid-sparing agent for moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris. Design, Setting, and Participants A cost-utility analysis over a 24-month time horizon was conducted from the perspective of the Australian health care sector using a modeled cohort of treatment-naive adult patients with moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris. A Markov cohort model was constructed to simulate disease progression following first-line treatment with rituximab biosimilars or mycophenolate mofetil. The simulated cohort transitioned between controlled disease, uncontrolled disease, and death. Efficacy and utility data were obtained from available published literature. Cost data were primarily obtained from published government data. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess uncertainty. Primary outcomes were the changes in cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) over the 24 months. Interventions Rituximab biosimilars and mycophenolate mofetil. Results The simulated cohort of treatment-naive patients had a mean age of 50.8 years, a female-to-male ratio of 1.24, and moderate to severe disease as classified by the Harman criteria. First-line rituximab biosimilars were associated with a cost reduction of AU$639 and an improvement of 0.07 QALYs compared with mycophenolate mofetil, resulting in an ICER of -AU$8818/QALY. Rituximab biosimilars were therefore more effective and less costly compared with mycophenolate mofetil. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that rituximab biosimilars remained cost-effective across a range of values for cost, utility, and transition probability input parameters and willingness-to-pay thresholds. Conclusions and Relevance In this cost-utility analysis, rituximab biosimilars were cost-effective compared with mycophenolate mofetil for moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris. Further investigation into its cost-effectiveness over a longer time horizon is necessary, but the favorable results of this study suggest that the high acquisition costs of rituximab biosimilars may be offset by its effectiveness and provide economic evidence in support of its listing on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme for pemphigus vulgaris.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle K Y Chen
- Department of Dermatology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.,South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ravi Vissapragada
- Discipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Norma Bulamu
- Discipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Monisha Gupta
- Department of Dermatology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.,South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Victoria Werth
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Deshan Frank Sebaratnam
- Department of Dermatology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.,South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
78
|
Shah A, Sharma K, Rawal S, Sisodia R, Bhatt P, Christian C, Konat A. Commentary: Beyond 10-year risk: A cost-effectiveness analysis of statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:916695. [PMID: 35935628 PMCID: PMC9354450 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.916695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Aditya Shah
- B.J. Medical College and Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Kamal Sharma
- SAL Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
- *Correspondence: Kamal Sharma
| | - Shalin Rawal
- B.J. Medical College and Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Rhea Sisodia
- B.J. Medical College and Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Parjanya Bhatt
- B.J. Medical College and Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | | | - Ashwati Konat
- Department of Zoology, Biomedical Technology and Human Genetics, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Tran PB, Kazibwe J, Nikolaidis GF, Linnosmaa I, Rijken M, van Olmen J. Costs of multimorbidity: a systematic review and meta-analyses. BMC Med 2022; 20:234. [PMID: 35850686 PMCID: PMC9295506 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-022-02427-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multimorbidity is a rising global phenomenon, placing strains on countries' population health and finances. This systematic review provides insight into the costs of multimorbidity through addressing the following primary and secondary research questions: What evidence exists on the costs of multimorbidity? How do costs of specific disease combinations vary across countries? How do multimorbidity costs vary across disease combinations? What "cost ingredients" are most commonly included in these multimorbidity studies? METHODS We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42020204871) of studies published from January 2010 to January 2022, which reported on costs associated with combinations of at least two specified conditions. Systematic string-based searches were conducted in MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, Global Health, Web of Science, and Business Source Complete. We explored the association between costs of multimorbidity and country Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita using a linear mixed model with random intercept. Annual mean direct medical costs per capita were pooled in fixed-effects meta-analyses for each of the frequently reported dyads. Costs are reported in 2021 International Dollars (I$). RESULTS Fifty-nine studies were included in the review, the majority of which were from high-income countries, particularly the United States. (1) Reported annual costs of multimorbidity per person ranged from I$800 to I$150,000, depending on disease combination, country, cost ingredients, and other study characteristics. (2) Our results further demonstrated that increased country GDP per capita was associated with higher costs of multimorbidity. (3) Meta-analyses of 15 studies showed that on average, dyads which featured Hypertension were among the least expensive to manage, with the most expensive dyads being Respiratory and Mental Health condition (I$36,840), Diabetes and Heart/vascular condition (I$37,090), and Cancer and Mental Health condition in the first year after cancer diagnosis (I$85,820). (4) Most studies reported only direct medical costs, such as costs of hospitalization, outpatient care, emergency care, and drugs. CONCLUSIONS Multimorbidity imposes a large economic burden on both the health system and society, most notably for patients with cancer and mental health condition in the first year after cancer diagnosis. Whether the cost of a disease combination is more or less than the additive costs of the component diseases needs to be further explored. Multimorbidity costing studies typically consider only a limited number of disease combinations, and few have been conducted in low- and middle-income countries and Europe. Rigorous and standardized methods of data collection and costing for multimorbidity should be developed to provide more comprehensive and comparable evidence for the costs of multimorbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phuong Bich Tran
- Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
| | - Joseph Kazibwe
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Global Health, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Ismo Linnosmaa
- Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mieke Rijken
- Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Josefien van Olmen
- Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
80
|
Sánchez-Viñas A, Corral-Partearroyo C, Gil-Girbau M, Peñarrubia-María MT, Gallardo-González C, Olmos-Palenzuela MDC, Aznar-Lou I, Serrano-Blanco A, Rubio-Valera M. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an intervention to improve Initial Medication Adherence to treatments for cardiovascular diseases and diabetes in primary care: study protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial and economic model (the IMA-cRCT study). BMC PRIMARY CARE 2022; 23:170. [PMID: 35790915 PMCID: PMC9255541 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01727-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Between 2 and 43% of patients who receive a new prescription in PC do not initiate their treatments. Non-initiation is associated with poorer clinical outcomes, more sick leave and higher costs to the healthcare system. Existing evidence suggests that shared decision-making positively impacts medication initiation. The IMA-cRCT assesses the effectiveness of the IMA intervention in improving adherence and clinical parameters compared to usual care in patients with a new treatment for cardiovascular disease and diabetes prescribed in PC, and its cost-effectiveness, through a cRCT and economic modelling. METHODS The IMA intervention is a shared decision-making intervention based on the Theoretical Model of Non-initiation. A cRCT will be conducted in 24 PC teams in Catalonia (Spain), randomly assigned to the intervention group (1:1), and community pharmacies in the catchment areas of the intervention PC teams. Healthcare professionals in the intervention group will apply the intervention to all patients who receive a new prescription for cardiovascular disease or diabetes treatment (no other prescription from the same pharmacological group in the previous 6 months). All the study variables will be collected from real-world databases for the 12 months before and after receiving a new prescription. Effectiveness analyses will assess impact on initiation, secondary adherence, cardiovascular risk, clinical parameters and cardiovascular events. Cost-effectiveness analyses will be conducted as part of the cRCT from a healthcare and societal perspective in terms of extra cost per cardiovascular risk reduction and improved adherence; all analyses will be clustered. Economic models will be built to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of the IMA intervention, in terms of extra cost for gains in QALY and life expectancy, using clinical trial data and data from previous studies. DISCUSSION The IMA-cRCT represents an innovative approach to the design and evaluation of behavioural interventions that use the principles of complex interventions, pragmatic trials and implementation research. This study will provide evidence on the IMA intervention and on a new methodology for developing and evaluating complex interventions. The results of the study will be disseminated among stakeholders to facilitate its transferability to clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05026775 . Registered 30th August 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alba Sánchez-Viñas
- Health Technology Assessment in Primary Care and Mental Health (PRISMA) Research Group, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Santa Rosa 39-57, 08950, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona, c. Casanova 143, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carmen Corral-Partearroyo
- Health Technology Assessment in Primary Care and Mental Health (PRISMA) Research Group, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Santa Rosa 39-57, 08950, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain
- Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Preventive Medicine, Univ Autonoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Montserrat Gil-Girbau
- Health Technology Assessment in Primary Care and Mental Health (PRISMA) Research Group, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Santa Rosa 39-57, 08950, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain
- Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Doctor Antoni Pujadas 42, 08830, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain
| | - M Teresa Peñarrubia-María
- Health Technology Assessment in Primary Care and Mental Health (PRISMA) Research Group, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Santa Rosa 39-57, 08950, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Centre d'Atenció Primària Bartomeu Fabrés Anglada, Direcció D'Atenció Primària Regió Metropolitana Sud, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain
- Unitat de Suport a la Recerca Regió Metropolitana Sud, Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carmen Gallardo-González
- Health Technology Assessment in Primary Care and Mental Health (PRISMA) Research Group, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Santa Rosa 39-57, 08950, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain
- Centre d'Atenció Primària Bartomeu Fabrés Anglada, Direcció D'Atenció Primària Regió Metropolitana Sud, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain
- Unitat de Suport a la Recerca Regió Metropolitana Sud, Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain
| | - María-Del-Carmen Olmos-Palenzuela
- Health Technology Assessment in Primary Care and Mental Health (PRISMA) Research Group, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Santa Rosa 39-57, 08950, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain
- Centre d'Atenció Primària Bartomeu Fabrés Anglada, Direcció D'Atenció Primària Regió Metropolitana Sud, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Aznar-Lou
- Health Technology Assessment in Primary Care and Mental Health (PRISMA) Research Group, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Santa Rosa 39-57, 08950, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain.
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
| | - Antoni Serrano-Blanco
- Health Technology Assessment in Primary Care and Mental Health (PRISMA) Research Group, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Santa Rosa 39-57, 08950, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Doctor Antoni Pujadas 42, 08830, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Maria Rubio-Valera
- Health Technology Assessment in Primary Care and Mental Health (PRISMA) Research Group, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Santa Rosa 39-57, 08950, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Doctor Antoni Pujadas 42, 08830, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Byun JY, Park SK, Ng BP, Liu YS, Kim CR, Park C. A systematic review of economic evaluations of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Expert Opin Pharmacother 2022; 23:1247-1257. [PMID: 35759783 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2095203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have improved the efficacy of treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the accessibility of TKIs is limited due to high costs. Despite the critical role of the cost-effectiveness of TKIs on decision-making, no systematic reviews have compared the cost-effectiveness of comparable TKIs. Therefore, we systemically reviewed the economic evaluation studies on various TKIs for NSCLC. AREAS COVERED We searched PubMed and the Cochran Library to identify the published economic evaluation studies of TKIs in NSCLC patients that were published by January 2022. All of the included studies (n = 38) evaluated the cost-effectiveness of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-TKIs (n = 29) or anaplastic lymphocyte kinase (ALK)-TKIs (n = 9). The cost-effectiveness results were reported as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life-year, except for three studies. EXPERT OPINION We found that the economic evaluation studies of the first and second generation of EGFR-TKIs and ALK-TKIs varied by the country and study settings, such as comparator and input parameters. In 12 studies, osimertinib (EGFR-TKI) was not cost-effective compared to other first/second EGFR-TKIs, regardless of the study settings. More evidence can be provided about cost-effectiveness of the third-generation TKIs in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joo-Young Byun
- Health Outcomes Division, the University of Texas at Austin, College of Pharmacy, Austin, TX, USA.,School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Sun-Kyeong Park
- College of Pharmacy, the Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, South Korea
| | - Boon Peng Ng
- College of Nursing & Disability Aging and Technology Cluster, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Yi-Shao Liu
- Health Outcomes Division, the University of Texas at Austin, College of Pharmacy, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Chae-Rin Kim
- College of Pharmacy, the Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, South Korea
| | - Chanhyun Park
- Health Outcomes Division, the University of Texas at Austin, College of Pharmacy, Austin, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Daggett SM, Cantarelli T, Gyftopoulos S, Krueger P, Ross AB. Cost-effectiveness Analysis in Diagnostic Musculoskeletal Radiology: A Systematic Review. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2022; 52:20-24. [DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2022.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
83
|
Galvan FH, Liu H, Brooks RA, Chen YT, Mendoza Lepe R. Using social and sexual networking mobile applications to promote HIV testing, medical care and prevention services among Latino men who have sex with men in Los Angeles County, California, USA. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0268406. [PMID: 35560041 PMCID: PMC9106153 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
HIV disproportionately affects Latinos versus Whites, with Latinos having higher rates of HIV. Additionally, many HIV-positive Latinos are unaware of their infection. Proyecto Protégete, an HIV prevention intervention developed for Latino men who have sex with men (MSM), used social and sexual networking mobile applications (apps) to recruit individuals for HIV testing and linkage to medical care and prevention services. This study occurred in Los Angeles County, California, USA from December 18, 2015 to April 22, 2017. The study’s primary aim was to assess Proyecto Protégete‘s ability to successfully recruit Latino MSM involved in high-risk sexual activities. A secondary aim was to evaluate its capacity to promote HIV testing and linkage to HIV medical care and prevention services among this population by comparing it to two programs with similar samples. Comparisons using Fisher’s Exact Test were conducted between Proyecto Protégete and the HIV testing program of the agency in which Proyecto Protégete was located and the County-funded HIV testing programs to compare the samples’ rates of HIV-positive Latino MSM identified through HIV testing and linked to HIV medical care and prevention services. Participants were recruited through seven apps. In Proyecto Protégete, 9,573 individuals completed the screener, 4,657 were eligible, and 359 (7.7% of those eligible) enrolled. Among those enrolled, 79% reported anal sex without a condom in the previous twelve months; 51% reported anal sex under the influence of alcohol. The HIV positivity rates were as follows: Proyecto Protégete, 1.71%; the agency, 1.25% (p = .293, compared to Proyecto Protégete); and the County, 1.09% (p = .172, compared to Proyecto Protégete). The rates of those confirmed as new HIV-positives and linked to medical care within 30 days were as follows: Proyecto Protégete, 71.4%; the agency, 81.5% (p = .450, compared to Proyecto Protégete); and the County, 77.3% (p = .503, compared to Proyecto Protégete). Proyecto Protégete had a higher rate of linked referrals to prevention services than the agency’s testing program (19.5% versus 8.3%, p < .001). Proyecto Protégete experienced successes in some areas but not in others. Future research should build on Proyecto Protégete’s experiences to promote HIV-related services among Latino MSM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank H. Galvan
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Bienestar Human Services, Inc., Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Honghu Liu
- Division of Public Health & Community Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Department of Biostatistics, Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Ronald A. Brooks
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Bienestar Human Services, Inc., Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Department of Family Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Ying-Tung Chen
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Bienestar Human Services, Inc., Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Ricardo Mendoza Lepe
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Bienestar Human Services, Inc., Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Cost-Benefit and Cost-Utility Analyses to Demonstrate the Potential Value-for-Money of Supermarket Shelf Tags Promoting Healthier Packaged Products in Australia. Nutrients 2022; 14:nu14091919. [PMID: 35565886 PMCID: PMC9103654 DOI: 10.3390/nu14091919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The supermarket environment impacts the healthiness of food purchased and consumed. Shelf tags that alert customers to healthier packaged products can improve the healthiness of overall purchases. This study assessed the potential value-for-money of implementing a three-year shelf tag intervention across all major supermarket chains in Australia. Cost-benefit analyses (CBA) and cost-utility analyses (CUA) were conducted based on results of a 12-week non-randomised controlled trial of a shelf tag intervention in seven Australian supermarkets. The change in energy density of all packaged foods purchased during the trial was used to estimate population-level changes in mean daily energy intake. A multi-state, multiple-cohort Markov model estimated the subsequent obesity-related health and healthcare cost outcomes over the lifetime of the 2019 Australian population. The CBA and CUA took societal and healthcare sector perspectives, respectively. The intervention was estimated to produce a mean reduction in population body weight of 1.09 kg. The net present value of the intervention was approximately AUD 17 billion (B). Over 98% of the intervention costs were borne by supermarkets. CUA findings were consistent with the CBA-the intervention was dominant, producing both health benefits and cost-savings. Shelf tags are likely to offer excellent value-for-money from societal and healthcare sector perspectives.
Collapse
|
85
|
Sukri A, Salleh MZ, Masimirembwa C, Teh LK. A systematic review on the cost effectiveness of pharmacogenomics in developing countries: implementation challenges. THE PHARMACOGENOMICS JOURNAL 2022; 22:147-159. [PMID: 35319010 DOI: 10.1038/s41397-022-00272-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
The major challenges that delay the implementation of pharmacogenomics based clinical practice in the developing countries, primarily the low- and middle-income countries need to be recognized. This review was conducted to systematically review evidence of the cost-effectiveness for the conduct of pharmacogenomics testing in the developing countries. Studies that evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomics testing in the developing countries as defined by the United Nations were included in this study. Twenty-seven articles met the criteria. Pharmacogenomics effectiveness were evaluated for drugs used in the treatment of cancers, cardiovascular diseases and severe cutaneous adverse reactions in gout and epilepsy. Most studies had reported pharmacogenomics testing to be cost-effective (cancers, cardiovascular diseases, and tuberculosis) and economic models were evaluated from multiple perspectives, different cost categories and time horizons. Additionally, most studies used a single gene, rather than a gene panel for the pharmacogenomics testing. Genotyping cost and frequency of risk alleles in the populations influence the cost-effectiveness outcome. Further studies are warranted to examine the clinical and economic validity of pharmacogenomics testing in the developing countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asif Sukri
- Integrative Pharmacogenomics Institute, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Puncak Alam Campus, 42300, Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Mohd Zaki Salleh
- Integrative Pharmacogenomics Institute, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Puncak Alam Campus, 42300, Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Collen Masimirembwa
- African Institute of Biomedical Science & Technology, Wilkins Hospital, Corner J Tongogara and R Tangwena, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Lay Kek Teh
- Integrative Pharmacogenomics Institute, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Puncak Alam Campus, 42300, Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. .,Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Puncak Alam Campus, 42300, Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Conway KM, Grosse SD, Ouyang L, Street N, Romitti PA. Direct costs of adhering to selected Duchenne muscular dystrophy Care Considerations: Estimates from a midwestern state. Muscle Nerve 2022; 65:574-580. [PMID: 35064961 PMCID: PMC9109677 DOI: 10.1002/mus.27505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/AIMS The multidisciplinary Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) Care Considerations were developed to standardize care and improve outcomes. We provide cumulative cost estimates for selected key preventive (ie, excluding new molecular therapies and acute care) elements of the care considerations in eight domains (neuromuscular, rehabilitation, respiratory, cardiac, orthopedic, gastrointestinal, endocrine, psychosocial management) independent of completeness of uptake or provision of nonpreventive care. METHODS We used de-identified insurance claims data from a large midwestern commercial health insurer during 2018. We used Current Procedural Terminology and national drug codes to extract unit costs for clinical encounters representing key preventive elements of the DMD Care Considerations. We projected per-patient cumulative costs from ages 5 to 25 years for these elements by multiplying a schedule of recommended frequencies of preventive services by unit costs in 2018 US dollars. RESULTS Assuming a diagnosis at age 5 years, independent ambulation until age 11, and survival until age 25, we estimated 670 billable clinical events. The 20-year per-patient cumulative cost was $174 701 with prednisone ($2.3 million with deflazacort) and an expected total of $12 643 ($29 194) for out-of-pocket expenses associated with those events and medications. DISCUSSION Standardized monitoring of disease progression and treatments may reduce overall costs of illness. Costs associated with these services would be needed to quantify potential savings. Our approach demonstrates a method to estimate costs associated with implementation of preventive care schedules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin M Conway
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Scott D Grosse
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Lijing Ouyang
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Natalie Street
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Paul A Romitti
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
Assessing the Use of Data Systems to Estimate Return-on-Investment of Behavioral Healthcare Interventions: Opportunities and Barriers. J Behav Health Serv Res 2022; 50:80-94. [PMID: 35415803 DOI: 10.1007/s11414-022-09794-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/12/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
To improve access to and quality of affordable behavioral healthcare, there is a need for more research to identify which interventions can generate long-term, societal return-on-investment (ROI). Barriers to ROI studies in the behavioral health sector were explored by conducting semi-structured interviews with individuals from key stakeholder groups at state and national behavioral health-related organizations. Limited operating budgets, state-based payer systems, the lack of financial support, privacy laws, and other unique experiences of behavioral health providers and patients were identified as important factors that affect the collection and utilization of data. To comprehensively assess ROI of interventions, it is necessary to improve standardization and data infrastructure across multiple health and non-health systems and clarify or address legal, regulatory, and commercial conflicts.
Collapse
|
88
|
Neumann PJ, Garrison LP, Willke RJ. The History and Future of the "ISPOR Value Flower": Addressing Limitations of Conventional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2022; 25:558-565. [PMID: 35279370 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Since its publication as part of the 2018 ISPOR Special Task Force (STF) on US Value Assessments, the "ISPOR value flower," with its petals highlighting elements that may be overlooked or underappreciated in conventional drug value assessments, has been discussed and debated. We review the history of the value flower, describe recent developments, and consider implications for future value assessments. METHODS We discuss various antecedents to the value flower, as well as conceptual and empirical articles published in the past 4 years. RESULTS Since the publication of the ISPOR STF report, researchers have provided more rigorous theoretical and mathematical foundations for certain novel value elements (eg, severity of illness, value of insurance, value of hope) through "generalized risk-adjusted cost-effectiveness analysis," which incorporates risk aversion in people's preferences and uncertainty in treatment outcomes. Empirical estimates are also emerging to support key elements, such as insurance value, real option value, value of hope, and value of knowing. Although health technology assessment bodies have applied or are considering certain elements (eg, severity modifiers to cost-effectiveness thresholds), other elements have yet to gain traction. CONCLUSIONS Five years after the STF began its work, the development of novel value measures continues to evolve. Although it is encouraging to see supporting empirical studies emerging, more are needed. Additional efforts are also needed to illustrate how the estimates can be used in the deliberative processes that are integral to health technology assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Health at the Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Louis P Garrison
- Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, University of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Richard J Willke
- The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Portnoy A, Pedersen K, Nygård M, Trogstad L, Kim JJ, Burger EA. Identifying a Single Optimal Integrated Cervical Cancer Prevention Policy in Norway: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Med Decis Making 2022; 42:795-807. [PMID: 35255741 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x221082683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interventions targeting the same disease but at different points along the disease continuum (e.g., screening and vaccination to prevent cervical cancer [CC]) are often evaluated in isolation, which can affect cost-effectiveness profiles and policy conclusions. We evaluated nonavalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine (9vHPV) compared with bivalent HPV vaccine (2vHPV) alongside deintensified screening intervals for a vaccinated birth cohort to inform a single optimal integrated CC prevention policy. METHODS Using a multimodeling approach, we evaluated the health and economic impacts of alternative CC screening strategies for a Norwegian birth cohort eligible for HPV vaccination in 2021 assuming they received 1) 2vHPV or 2) 9vHPV. We conducted 1) a restricted analysis that evaluated the optimal HPV vaccine under current screening guidelines; and 2) a comprehensive analysis including alternative screening and vaccination strategy combinations. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and evaluated them according to different cost-effectiveness thresholds. RESULTS Assuming a cost-effectiveness threshold of $40,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, we found that, while holding screening intensity fixed, switching the routine vaccination program in Norway from 2vHPV to 9vHPV would not be considered cost-effective (ICER of $132,700 per QALY gained). However, when allowing for varying intensities of CC screening, we found that switching to 9vHPV would be cost-effective compared with 2vHPV under an alternative threshold of $55,000 per QALY gained, if coupled with reductions in the number of lifetime screens. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis highlights the importance of evaluating the full potential policy landscape for country-level decision makers considering policy adoption, including nonindependent primary and secondary prevention efforts, to draw appropriate conclusions and avoid sub-optimal outcomes. HIGHLIGHTS Without evaluating the full potential policy landscape, including primary and secondary prevention efforts, country-level decision makers may not be able to draw appropriate policy conclusions, resulting in suboptimal outcomes.An applied example from cervical cancer prevention in Norway compared a restricted analysis of current screening guidelines to a comprehensive analysis including alternative screening and vaccination strategy combinations.We found that a switch from bivalent to nonavalent human papillomavirus vaccine would be considered cost-effective in Norway if coupled with reductions in the number of lifetime screens compared with the current screening strategy.A comprehensive analysis that considers how different types of interventions along the disease continuum affect each other will be critical for decision makers interpreting cost-effectiveness analysis results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Portnoy
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kine Pedersen
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mari Nygård
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lill Trogstad
- The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jane J Kim
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emily A Burger
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
90
|
Kohli-Lynch CN, Lewsey J, Boyd KA, French DD, Jordan N, Moran AE, Sattar N, Preiss D, Briggs AH. Beyond Ten-Year Risk: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Statins for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation 2022; 145:1312-1323. [PMID: 35249370 PMCID: PMC9022692 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.121.057631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Cholesterol guidelines typically prioritize primary prevention statin therapy on the basis of 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease. The advent of generic pricing may justify expansion of statin eligibility. Moreover, 10-year risk may not be the optimal approach for statin prioritization. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of expanding preventive statin eligibility and evaluated novel approaches to prioritization from a Scottish health sector perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ciaran N Kohli-Lynch
- Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - James Lewsey
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Kathleen A Boyd
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Dustin D French
- Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Hines VA Hospital, Hines, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Ophthalmology and Medical Social Science, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Neil Jordan
- Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Hines VA Hospital, Hines, Chicago, Illinois; Departments of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences and Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Andrew E Moran
- Division of General Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, New York
| | - Naveed Sattar
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - David Preiss
- Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew H Briggs
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
Bertolaccini L, Ciani O, Spaggiari L. Comment on The Unbearable Lightness of Difference Between Statistical and Clinical Significance. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2022; 3:e114. [PMID: 37600085 PMCID: PMC10431439 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Bertolaccini
- From the Department of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Oriana Ciani
- Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Spaggiari
- From the Department of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
Jayasundera KT, Abuzaitoun RO, Lacy GD, Abalem MF, Saltzman GM, Ciulla TA, Johnson MW. Challenges of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Novel Therapeutics for Inherited Retinal Diseases. Am J Ophthalmol 2022; 235:90-97. [PMID: 34433085 PMCID: PMC8861129 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the challenges and potential improvement strategies of cost-effectiveness analyses performed for therapeutics targeting inherited retinal diseases (IRDs). DESIGN Perspective. METHODS A literature review was conducted with discussion of current limitations and improvement recommendations. RESULTS Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) performed for IRD therapeutics has multiple limitations. First, the available methods used to measure health-related quality of life and health utilities can be inaccurate when used in IRDs. Second, the financial burden to patients and society from vision impairment associated with IRDs has been inadequately studied and includes a variety of expenditures ranging from direct costs of IRD specialty health care to indirect expenses associated with daily living activities. Third, our collective understanding is limited in the areas of IRD natural history and health benefits gained from new IRD treatments (eg, gene therapies). In addition, the therapeutic effect from a patient perspective and its duration of action are not fully understood. Due to the scarcity of data, CEA for newly approved therapies has relied on assumptions and creations of predictive models for both costs and health benefits for these new therapeutics in order to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. CONCLUSIONS CEA studies performed for IRD therapeutics have been limited by the established health utilities in ophthalmology and the lack of disease-specific information. The assumptions and extrapolations in these studies create substantial uncertainty in incremental cost-effectiveness ratio results. An improved framework is required for CEA of IRD therapeutics in order to determine the cost-effectiveness of each therapy brought from clinical trials to clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Thiran Jayasundera
- From the Kellogg Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (K.T.J., R.O.A.,G.D.L., M.F.A., M.W.J.)
| | - Rebhi O Abuzaitoun
- From the Kellogg Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (K.T.J., R.O.A.,G.D.L., M.F.A., M.W.J.)
| | - Gabrielle D Lacy
- From the Kellogg Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (K.T.J., R.O.A.,G.D.L., M.F.A., M.W.J.)
| | - Maria Fernanda Abalem
- From the Kellogg Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (K.T.J., R.O.A.,G.D.L., M.F.A., M.W.J.); University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Department of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology (M.F.A.)
| | - Gregory M Saltzman
- University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Economics and Management (G.M.S.); Albion College, Albion, Michigan, USA; Department of Health Management and Policy (G.M.S.)
| | - Thomas A Ciulla
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Department of Ophthalmology (T.A.C.); Eugene and Marilyn Glick Eye Institute, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Clearside Biomedical, Inc (T.A.C.); Alpharetta, Georgia, USA; Retina Service, Midwest Eye Institute (T.A.C.), Carmel, Indiana, USA
| | - Mark W Johnson
- From the Kellogg Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (K.T.J., R.O.A.,G.D.L., M.F.A., M.W.J.).
| |
Collapse
|
93
|
Mow M, Thean LJ, Parnaby M, Mani J, Rafai E, Sahukhan A, Kama M, Tuicakau M, Kado J, Romani L, Engelman D, Whitfeld M, Kaldor J, Steer A, Carvalho N. Costs of mass drug administration for scabies in Fiji. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2022; 16:e0010147. [PMID: 35113888 PMCID: PMC8846527 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
In 2019, the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute in partnership with the Fiji Ministry of Health and Medical Services carried out an integrated mass drug administration (MDA) for the treatment of scabies and lymphatic filariasis in the Northern Division of Fiji (population estimate 131,914). We conducted a retrospective micro-costing exercise focused on the cost of scabies control in order to inform budgeting and policy decision making in an endemic setting. We collected detailed information on financial and economic costs incurred by both parties during the course of the MDA campaign (April 2018 to July 2019). We also conducted interviews with personnel involved in the financial administration of the MDA campaign. The economic cost of delivering two doses of ivermectin was US$4.88 per person. The cost of donated drugs accounted for 36.3% of total MDA costs. In this first large-scale MDA for the public health control of scabies, the estimated cost of delivering MDA per person for scabies was considerably more expensive than the costs reported for other neglected tropical diseases. The important cost drivers included the remuneration of health care workers who were extensively involved in the campaign, coverage of hard-to-reach, mainly rural populations and the two-dose regimen of ivermectin. These results highlight the importance of these cost determinants and can be used to plan current and future MDA programs. Scabies poses a significant burden on both health and economic systems. The Global Burden of Disease estimated that this skin disease affects more than 200 million people globally. However, the economic burden of scabies has not been studied widely and there are limited data on the cost of treating scabies in highly endemic areas. We conducted a costing study of a mass drug administration (MDA) program in the Northern Division of Fiji (population of 131,914). We collected financial and economic costs of administering ivermectin and permethrin to the whole of the Northern Division population in order to estimate the per capita cost of delivering MDA. The costs of MDA for scabies in Fiji were higher than those estimated in previous studies of MDA for other neglected tropical diseases. The study highlights significant cost components of implementing a large-scale MDA and provides key insights for the design and implementation of future MDA programs for scabies. It also adds to the general knowledge in understanding cost inputs and estimating the overall cost-effectiveness of this public health intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Mow
- Tropical Diseases Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Li Jun Thean
- Tropical Diseases Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthew Parnaby
- Tropical Diseases Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jyotishna Mani
- Tropical Diseases Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Eric Rafai
- Ministry of Health and Medical Services, Suva, Fiji
| | | | - Mike Kama
- Ministry of Health and Medical Services, Suva, Fiji
| | | | - Joseph Kado
- Ministry of Health and Medical Services, Suva, Fiji
- Wesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Lucia Romani
- Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Daniel Engelman
- Tropical Diseases Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Melbourne Children’s Global Health, Melbourne Children’s Campus, The Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Margot Whitfeld
- Department of Dermatology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John Kaldor
- Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew Steer
- Tropical Diseases Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Melbourne Children’s Global Health, Melbourne Children’s Campus, The Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Natalie Carvalho
- School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
94
|
Chambers JD, Margaretos NM, Enright DE, Wang R, Ye X. Is an Orphan Drug's Cost-Effectiveness Associated with US Health Plan Coverage Restrictiveness? PHARMACOECONOMICS 2022; 40:225-232. [PMID: 34697718 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-021-01096-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Orphan drugs' high prices raise questions about whether their costs are worth their benefits. We examined the association between an orphan drug's cost-effectiveness and health plan coverage restrictiveness. METHODS We analyzed a dataset of US commercial health plan coverage decisions (information current as of 2019) for orphan drugs (n = 3298). We used multi-level random-effect logistic regression to examine the association between orphan drug cost-effectiveness and coverage restrictiveness. We identified cost-effectiveness estimates from the Tufts Medical Center Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry, and from the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review's value assessments. We included only cost-effectiveness studies not funded by product manufacturers. We included the following independent variables: cancer indication, availability of alternatives, pediatric population, number of years since US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, disease prevalence, annual cost, additional non-orphan indication, safety, and inclusion in a FDA expedited review program. RESULTS Plans restricted drug coverage in 29.7% (n = 981) of decisions. Plans were more likely to restrict drugs with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $50,000-$175,000 per quality-adjusted life-year [QALY] (odds ratio = 1.855, p < 0.05), $175,000-$500,000 per QALY (odds ratio = 1.859, p < 0.05), and >$500,000 per QALY/dominated (odds ratio = 2.032, p < 0.01), compared to drugs with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios <$50,000 per QALY. Plans more often restricted drugs with non-cancer indications, having available alternatives, with more recent approval, in an FDA expedited review program, and for which the FDA additionally issued approval for a non-orphan disease. Plans more often restricted drugs with higher annual costs, and drugs indicated for higher prevalence diseases. All findings p < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS Among other factors, an orphan drug's cost-effectiveness was associated with health plan drug coverage restrictiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James D Chambers
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Nikoletta M Margaretos
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel E Enright
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rosa Wang
- Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ, USA
| | - Xin Ye
- Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Gold HT, McDermott C, Hoomans T, Wagner TH. Cost data in implementation science: categories and approaches to costing. Implement Sci 2022; 17:11. [PMID: 35090508 PMCID: PMC8796347 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01172-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
A lack of cost information has been cited as a barrier to implementation and a limitation of implementation research. This paper explains how implementation researchers might optimize their measurement and inclusion of costs, building on traditional economic evaluations comparing costs and effectiveness of health interventions. The objective of all economic evaluation is to inform decision-making for resource allocation and to measure costs that reflect opportunity costs—the value of resource inputs in their next best alternative use, which generally vary by decision-maker perspective(s) and time horizon(s). Analyses that examine different perspectives or time horizons must consider cost estimation accuracy, because over longer time horizons, all costs are variable; however, with shorter time horizons and narrower perspectives, one must differentiate the fixed and variable costs, with fixed costs generally excluded from the evaluation. This paper defines relevant costs, identifies sources of cost data, and discusses cost relevance to potential decision-makers contemplating or implementing evidence-based interventions. Costs may come from the healthcare sector, informal healthcare sector, patient, participant or caregiver, and other sectors such as housing, criminal justice, social services, and education. Finally, we define and consider the relevance of costs by phase of implementation and time horizon, including pre-implementation and planning, implementation, intervention, downstream, and adaptation, and through replication, sustainment, de-implementation, or spread.
Collapse
|
96
|
Kim HL, Kim KA, Choi GH, Jang ES, Ki M, Choi HY, Jeong SH. A cost-effectiveness study of universal screening for hepatitis C virus infection in South Korea: A societal perspective. Clin Mol Hepatol 2022; 28:91-104. [PMID: 34736311 PMCID: PMC8755471 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2021.0236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening compared to no screening in the Korean population from societal and healthcare system perspectives. METHODS A published decision-tree plus Markov model was used to compare the expected costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) between one-time universal HCV screening and no screening in the population aged 40-65 years using the National Health Examination (NHE) program. Input parameters were obtained from analyses of the National Health Insurance claims data, Korean HCV cohort data, or from the literature review. The population aged 40-65 years was simulated in a model spanning a lifetime from both the healthcare system and societal perspectives, which included the cost of productivity loss due to HCV-related deaths. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) between universal screening and no screening was estimated. RESULTS The HCV screening strategy had an ICER of $2,666/QALY and $431/QALY from the healthcare system and societal perspectives, respectively. Both ICERs were far less than the willingness-to-pay threshold of $25,000/QALY, showing that universal screening was highly cost-effective compared to no screening. In various sensitivity analyses, the most influential parameters on cost-effectiveness were the antibodies to HCV (anti-HCV) prevalence, screening costs, and treatment acceptance; however, all ICERs were consistently less than the threshold. If the anti-HCV prevalence was over 0.18%, screening could be cost-effective. CONCLUSION One-time universal HCV screening in the Korean population aged 40-65 years using NHE program would be highly cost-effective from both healthcare system and societal perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hye-Lin Kim
- College of Pharmacy, Sahmyook University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung-Ah Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Gwang Hyun Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Eun Sun Jang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Moran Ki
- Department of Cancer Control and Policy, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Hwa Young Choi
- Department of Cancer Control and Policy, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sook-Hyang Jeong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
Yuen SC, Amaefule AQ, Kim HH, Owoo BV, Gorman EF, Mattingly TJ. A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment. PHARMACOECONOMICS - OPEN 2022; 6:9-19. [PMID: 34427897 PMCID: PMC8807829 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-021-00298-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/08/2021] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with significant financial burden for patients and payers. The objective of this study was to review economic models to identify, evaluate, and compare cost-effectiveness estimates for HCC treatments. METHODS A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify economic evaluations was performed and studies that modeled treatments for HCC reporting costs and cost effectiveness were included. Risk of bias was assessed qualitatively, considering costing approach, reported study perspective, and funding received. Intervention costs were adjusted to 2021 US dollars for comparison. For studies reporting quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), we conducted analyses stratified by comparison type to assess cost effectiveness at the time of the analysis. RESULTS A total of 27 studies were included. Non-curative versus non-curative therapy comparisons were used in 20 (74.1%) studies, curative versus curative comparisons were used in 5 (18.5%) studies, and curative versus non-curative comparisons were used in 2 (7.4%) studies. Therapy effectiveness was estimated using a QALY measure in 20 (74.1%) studies, while 7 (25.9%) studies only assessed life-years gained (LYG). A health sector perspective was used in 26 (96.3%) of the evaluations, with only 1 study including costs beyond this perspective. Median intervention cost was $53,954 (range $4550-$4,760,835), with a median incremental cost of $6546 (range - $72,441 to $1,279,764). In cost-utility analyses, 11 (55%) studies found the intervention cost effective using a $100,000/QALY threshold at the time of the study, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) ranging from - $1,176,091 to $1,152,440 when inflated to 2021 US dollars. CONCLUSION The majority of HCC treatments were found to be cost effective, but with significant variation and with few studies considering indirect costs. Standards for value assessment for HCC treatments may help improve consistency and comparability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sydney C Yuen
- University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, 220 Arch Street, 12th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - Adaeze Q Amaefule
- University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, 220 Arch Street, 12th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - Hannah H Kim
- University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, 220 Arch Street, 12th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - Breanna-Verissa Owoo
- University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, 220 Arch Street, 12th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - Emily F Gorman
- Health Sciences and Human Services Library, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - T Joseph Mattingly
- University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, 220 Arch Street, 12th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
98
|
Neumann PJ, Podolsky MI, Basu A, Ollendorf DA, Cohen JT. Do Cost-Effectiveness Analyses Account for Drug Genericization? A Literature Review and Assessment of Implications. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2022; 25:59-68. [PMID: 35031100 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Revised: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We investigated how health technology assessment (HTA) organizations around the world have handled drug genericization (an allowance for future generic drug entry and subsequent drug price declines) in their guidelines for cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs). We also analyzed a large sample of published CEAs to examine prevailing practices in the field. METHODS We reviewed 43 HTA guidelines to determine whether and how they addressed drug genericization in their CEAs. We also selected a sample of 270 US-based CEAs from the Tufts Medical Center's CEA Registry, restricting the sample to studies on pharmaceuticals published from 1991 to 2019 and to analyses taking a lifetime time horizon. We determined whether each CEA examined genericization (and if so, whether in base case or sensitivity analyses), and how inclusion of genericization influenced the estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS Fourteen (33%) of the 43 HTA guidelines mention genericization for CEAs and 4 (9%) recommend that base case analyses include assumptions about future drug price changes due to genericization. Most published CEAs (95%) do not include assumptions about future generic prices for intervention drugs. Only 2% include such assumptions about comparator drugs. Most studies (72%) conduct sensitivity analyses on drug prices unrelated to genericization. CONCLUSIONS The omission of assumptions about genericization means that CEAs may misrepresent the long run opportunity costs for drugs. The field needs clearer guidance for when CEAs should account for genericization, and for the inclusion of other price dynamics that might influence a drug's cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Meghan I Podolsky
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anirban Basu
- The CHOICE Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Daniel A Ollendorf
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
99
|
Economic costs at age five associated with very preterm birth: multinational European cohort study. Pediatr Res 2022; 92:700-711. [PMID: 34773085 PMCID: PMC9556316 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-021-01769-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to estimate the economic costs of care provided to children born very preterm and extremely preterm across 11 European countries, and to understand what perinatal and socioeconomic factors contribute to higher costs. METHODS Generalised linear modelling was used to explore the association between perinatal and sociodemographic characteristics and total economic costs (€, 2016 prices) during the fifth year of life. RESULTS Lower gestational age was associated with increased mean societal costs of €2755 (p < 0.001), €752 (p < 0.01) and €657 (p < 0.01) for children born at < 26, 26-27 and 28-29 weeks, respectively, in comparison to the reference group born at 30-31 weeks. A sensitivity analyses that excluded variables (BPD, any neonatal morbidity and presence of congenital anomaly) plausibly lying on the causal pathway between gestational age at birth and economic outcomes elevated incremental societal costs by €1482, €763 and €144 at < 26, 26-27 and 28-29 weeks, respectively, in comparison to the baseline model. CONCLUSION This study provides new evidence about the main cost drivers associated with preterm birth in European countries. Evidence identified by this study can act as inputs within cost-effectiveness models for preventive or treatment interventions for preterm birth. IMPACT What is the key message of your article? This study provides new evidence about the magnitude and drivers of economic costs associated with preterm birth in European countries. What does it add to the existing literature? Lower gestational age is associated with increased mean societal costs during mid-childhood with indirect costs representing a key driver of increased costs. What is the impact? For policy makers, this study adds to sparse evidence about the main cost drivers associated with preterm birth in European countries beyond the first 2 years of life.
Collapse
|
100
|
Husereau D, Drummond M, Augustovski F, de Bekker-Grob E, Briggs AH, Carswell C, Caulley L, Chaiyakunapruk N, Greenberg D, Loder E, Mauskopf J, Mullins CD, Petrou S, Pwu RF, Staniszewska S. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR CHEERS II Good Practices Task Force. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2022; 25:10-31. [PMID: 35031088 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 280] [Impact Index Per Article: 140.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Health economic evaluations are comparative analyses of alternative courses of action in terms of their costs and consequences. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement, published in 2013, was created to ensure health economic evaluations are identifiable, interpretable, and useful for decision making. It was intended as guidance to help authors report accurately which health interventions were being compared and in what context, how the evaluation was undertaken, what the findings were, and other details that may aid readers and reviewers in interpretation and use of the study. The new CHEERS 2022 statement replaces the previous CHEERS reporting guidance. It reflects the need for guidance that can be more easily applied to all types of health economic evaluation, new methods and developments in the field, and the increased role of stakeholder involvement including patients and the public. It is also broadly applicable to any form of intervention intended to improve the health of individuals or the population, whether simple or complex, and without regard to context (such as healthcare, public health, education, and social care). This Explanation and Elaboration Report presents the new CHEERS 2022 28-item checklist with recommendations and explanation and examples for each item. The CHEERS 2022 statement is primarily intended for researchers reporting economic evaluations for peer-reviewed journals and the peer reviewers and editors assessing them for publication. Nevertheless, we anticipate familiarity with reporting requirements will be useful for analysts when planning studies. It may also be useful for health technology assessment bodies seeking guidance on reporting, given that there is an increasing emphasis on transparency in decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Don Husereau
- University of Ottawa, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada and Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (Husereau).
| | | | - Federico Augustovski
- Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics Department of the Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS- CONICET), Buenos Aires; University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires; CONICET (National Scientific and Technical Research Council), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Esther de Bekker-Grob
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew H Briggs
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England, UK
| | | | - Lisa Caulley
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Clinical Epidemiology Program and Center for Journalology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ontario, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Dan Greenberg
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er-Sheva, Israel
| | - Elizabeth Loder
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; The BMJ, London, UK
| | - Josephine Mauskopf
- RTI Health Solutions, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - C Daniel Mullins
- School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stavros Petrou
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Raoh-Fang Pwu
- National Hepatitis C Program Office, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Sophie Staniszewska
- Warwick Research in Nursing, University of Warwick Warwick Medical School, Warwick, UK
| |
Collapse
|