How Much Pain Is Significant? Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the Visual Analog Scale for Pain After Total Joint Arthroplasty

With or without a Tourniquet? A Comparative Study on Total Knee Replacement Surgery in Patients without Comorbidities

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to determine the effects of tourniquet use and the complications of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients without comorbidities to investigate whether tourniquet application can be employed without adverse effects and to assess its impact on the occurrence of any complications. Materials and Methods: A total of 106 patients who underwent unilateral TKA were divided randomly into two groups according to whether a tourniquet was used during the surgery or not. Patients with comorbidities (except arterial hypertension) were excluded from the study. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, joint range of motion, visual analog scale (VAS) score, total blood loss during and after surgery, postoperative analgesic consumption, and side effects were the main factors evaluated in the study. Results: In the tourniquet group, where the VAS scores were higher, the use of analgesics was also significantly higher. While there was no statistically significant difference in total blood loss between the tourniquet and non-tourniquet groups, the postoperative and occult blood losses were higher in the tourniquet group. The differences between the two groups in all other parameters were very small and not statistically significant. Conclusions: The findings of the current study suggest that when the comorbidities of patients are thoroughly documented and clarified prior to surgery, tourniquets should be applied selectively to individuals without any pre-existing health conditions.

Effectiveness of Different Electrical Stimulation Modalities for Pain and Masticatory Function in Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Temporomandibular disorders comprise a set of conditions that include alterations of the temporomandibular joint and masticatory muscles. Although different modalities of electric currents are widely used for treating temporomandibular disorders, previous reviews have suggested these are ineffective. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of different electrical stimulation modalities in patients with temporomandibular disorders for reducing musculoskeletal pain, increasing the range of movement, and improving muscle activity. An electronic search was conducted of randomized controlled trials published until March of 2022 that compared the application of an electrical stimulation therapy versus a sham or control group. The main outcome measure was pain intensity. Seven studies were included in the qualitative analysis and in the quantitative analysis (n = 184 subjects). The overall effect of electrical stimulation on pain reduction was statistically superior to sham/control (MD = -1.12 cm; CI 95%: -1.5 to -0.8), showing moderate heterogeneity of results (I2 = 57%, P = .04). The overall effect on range of movement of the joint (MD = 0.97 mm; CI 95%: -0.3 to 2.2) and muscle activity (SMD = -2.9; CI 95%: -8.1 to 2.3) were not significant. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and high-voltage current stimulation reduces pain intensity clinically in people with temporomandibular disorders with a moderate quality of evidence. On the other hand, there is no evidence of the effect of different electrical stimulation modalities on range of movement and muscle activity in people with temporomandibular disorders with a moderate and low quality of evidence respectively. PERSPECTIVE: TENS and high voltage currents are valid options for the control of pain intensity in patients suffering from temporomandibular disorder. Data suggest clinically relevant changes compared to sham. Healthcare professionals should take this into account as it is inexpensive therapy, has no adverse effects and can be self-administered by patients.

The effects of continuous catheter adductor canal block for pain management in knee replacement therapy: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Adductor canal block has emerged as a favourable element of multimodal analgesia regimens for total knee arthroplasty, due to the exclusive sensory blockade it provides. However, it is controversial as to whether a single shot or continuous technique adductor canal block is superior. This meta-analysis examined the effect of both these techniques on pain management associated with total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

All randomised controlled trials published on Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE, Scopus, and PsychINFO were systematically searched. The PEDro scale was used to assess the quality of studies. A total of 8 articles, 2 of which were split by subgroup analyses to create 10 studies, with 828 adults were selected for inclusion in the analysis. The mean difference and effect size with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were analysed for the pooled results.

RESULTS

Statistically significant pooled effects of analgesia technique in favour of catheter use were found in the reduction of pain scores and VAS scores, and total rescue analgesia dosage. No significant changes were observed in the hospital stay time. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with BMI 30 or more reported higher pain scores than those with BMI below 30.

CONCLUSION

Based upon studies that are currently available, our meta-analysis appears to demonstrate that continuous administration of analgesia through an adductor canal catheter provides greater pain reduction in total knee arthroplasty than single shot analgesia. Despite these current findings, future studies with larger sample sizes and greater control of study parameters are required to confirm the current findings.

Pain Relief After Total Knee Arthroplasty with Intravenous and Periarticular Corticosteroid: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a cost-effective procedure, but it is also associated with substantial postoperative pain. The present study aimed to compare pain relief and functional recovery after TKA among groups that received intravenous corticosteroids, periarticular corticosteroids, or a combination of both.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blinded clinical trial in a local institution in Hong Kong recruited 178 patients who underwent primary unilateral TKA. Six of these patients were excluded because of changes in surgical technique; 4, because of their hepatitis B status; 2, because of a history of peptic ulcer; and 2, because they declined to participate in the study. Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive placebo (P), intravenous corticosteroids (IVS), periarticular corticosteroids (PAS), or a combination of intravenous and periarticular corticosteroids (IVSPAS).

RESULTS

The pain scores at rest were significantly lower in the IVSPAS group than in the P group over the first 48 hours (p = 0.034) and 72 hours (p = 0.043) postoperatively. The pain scores during movement were also significantly lower in the IVS and IVSPAS groups than in the P group over the first 24, 48, and 72 hours (p ≤ 0.023 for all). The flexion range of the operatively treated knee was significantly better in the IVSPAS group than in the P group on postoperative day 3 (p = 0.027). Quadriceps power was also greater in the IVSPAS group than in the P group on postoperative days 2 (p = 0.005) and 3 (p = 0.007). Patients in the IVSPAS group were able to walk significantly further than patients in the P group in the first 3 postoperative days (p ≤ 0.003). Patients in the IVSPAS group also had a higher score on the Elderly Mobility Scale than those in the P group (p = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

IVS and IVSPAS yielded similar pain relief, but IVSPAS yielded a larger number of rehabilitation parameters that were significantly better than those in the P group. This study provides new insights into pain management and postoperative rehabilitation following TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Discordance Abounds in Minimum Clinically Important Differences in THA: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is intended to detect a change in a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) large enough for a patient to appreciate. Their growing use in orthopaedic research stems from the necessity to identify a metric, other than the p value, to better assess the effect size of an outcome. Yet, given that MCIDs are population-specific and that there are multiple calculation methods, there is concern about inconsistencies. Given the increasing use of MCIDs in total hip arthroplasty (THA) research, a systematic review of calculated MCID values and their respective ranges, as well as an assessment of their applications, is important to guide and encourage their use as a critical measure of effect size in THA outcomes research.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We systematically reviewed MCID calculations and reporting in current THA research to answer the following: (1) What are the most-reported PROM MCIDs in THA, and what is their range of values? (2) What proportion of studies report anchor-based versus distribution-based MCID values? (3) What are the most common methods by which anchor-based MCID values are derived? (4) What are the most common derivation methods for distribution-based MCID values? (5) How do the reported medians and corresponding ranges compare between calculation methods for each PROM?

METHODS

The EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases were systematically reviewed from inception through March 2022 for THA studies reporting an MCID value for any PROMs. Two independent authors reviewed articles for inclusion. All articles calculating new PROM MCID scores after primary THA were included for data extraction and analysis. MCID values for each PROM, MCID calculation method, number of patients, and study demographics were extracted from each article. In total, 30 articles were included. There were 45 unique PROMs for which 242 MCIDs were reported. These studies had a total of 1,000,874 patients with a median age of 64 years and median BMI of 28.7 kg/m 2 . Women made up 55% of patients in the total study population, and the median follow-up period was 12 months (range 0 to 77 months). The overall risk of bias was assessed as moderate using the modified Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies criteria for comparative studies (the mean score for comparative papers in this review was 18 of 24, with higher scores representing better study quality) and noncomparative studies (for these, the mean score was 10 of a possible 16 points, with higher scores representing higher study quality). Calculated values were classified as anchor-based, distribution-based, or not reported. MCID values for each PROM, MCID calculation method, number of patients, and study demographics were extracted from each study. Anchor-based and distribution-based MCIDs were compared for each unique PROM using a Wilcoxon rank sum test, given the non-normal distribution of values.

RESULTS

The Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and the Hip Injury and Osteoarthritis Score (HOOS) Pain and Quality of Life subscore MCIDs were the most frequently reported, comprising 12% (29 of 242), 8% (20 of 242), and 8% (20 of 242), respectively. The EuroQol VAS (EQ-VAS) was the next-most frequently reported (7% [17 of 242]) followed by the EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) (7% [16 of 242]). The median anchor-based value for the OHS was 9 (IQR 8 to 11), while the median distribution-based value was 6 (IQR 5 to 6). The median anchor-based MCID values for HOOS Pain and Quality of Life were 33 (IQR 28 to 35) and 25 (14 to 27), respectively; the median distribution-based values were 10 (IQR 9 to 10) and 13 (IQR 10 to 14), respectively. Thirty percent (nine of 30) of studies used an anchor-based method to calculate a new MCID, while 40% (12 of 30) used a distribution-based technique. Thirty percent of studies (nine of 30) calculated MCID values using both methods. For studies reporting an anchor-based calculation method, a question assessing pain relief, satisfaction, or quality of life on a five-point Likert scale was the most commonly used anchor (30% [eight of 27]), followed by a receiver operating characteristic curve estimation (22% [six of 27]). For studies using distribution-based calculations, the most common method was one-half the standard deviation of the difference between preoperative and postoperative PROM scores (46% [12 of 26]). Most reported median MCID values (nine of 14) did not differ by calculation method for each unique PROM (p > 0.05). The OHS, HOOS JR, and HOOS Function, Symptoms, and Activities of Daily Living subscores all varied by calculation method, because each anchor-based value was larger than its respective distribution-based value.

CONCLUSION

We found that MCIDs do not vary very much by calculation method across most outcome measurement tools. Additionally, there are consistencies in MCID calculation methods, because most authors used an anchor question with a Likert scale for the anchor-based approach or used one-half the standard deviation of preoperative and postoperative PROM score differences for the distribution-based approach. For some of the most frequently reported MCIDs, however, anchor-based values tend to be larger than distribution-based values for their respective PROMs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

We recommend using a 9-point increase as the MCID for the OHS, consistent with the median reported anchor-based value derived from several high-quality studies with large patient groups that used anchor-based approaches for MCID calculations, which we believe are most appropriate for most applications in clinical research. Likewise, we recommend using the anchor-based 33-point and 25-point MCIDs for the HOOS Pain and Quality of Life subscores, respectively. We encourage using anchor-based MCID values of WOMAC Pain, Function, and Stiffness subscores, which were 29, 26, and 30, respectively.

Lack of standardization in dry needling dosage and adverse event documentation limits outcome and safety reports: a scoping review of randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVES

Examine: (1) whether variability in dry needling (DN) dosage affects pain outcomes, (2) if effect sizes are clinically important, and (3) how adverse events (AE) were documented and whether DN safety was determined.

METHODS

Nine databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating DN in symptomatic musculoskeletal disorders. Methodological quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. Included RCTs met PEDro criteria #1 and scored > 7/10. Data extraction included DN dosage, pain outcome measures, dichotomous AE reporting (yes/no), and AE categorization. Clinically meaningful differences were determined using the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for pain outcomes .

RESULTS

Out of 22 identified RCTs, 11 demonstrated significant between-group differences exceeding the MCID, suggesting a clinically meaningful change in pain outcomes. Nine documented whether AE occurred. Only five provided AEs details and four cited a standard means to report AE.

DISCUSSION

There was inconsistency in reporting DN dosing parameters and AE. We could not determine if DN dosing affects outcomes, whether DN consistently produces clinically meaningful changes, or establish optimal dosage. Without more detailed reporting, replication of methods in future investigations is severely limited. A standardized method is lacking to report, classify, and provide context to AE from DN. Without more detailed AE reporting in clinical trials investigating DN efficacy, a more thorough appraisal of relative risk, severity, and frequency was not possible. Based on these inconsistencies, adopting a standardized checklist for reporting DN dosage and AE may improve internal and external validity and the generalizability of results.

Changes in Neuraxial Anesthesia Protocols and Improved Efficiency of Same-Day Discharge Total Knee Arthroplasty in an Ambulatory Surgery Center: A Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated the effect of bupivacaine versus mepivacaine spinal anesthesia and preoperative adductor canal block (ACB) on recovery, length of stay, pain, and complications of same-day discharge total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at a free-standing ambulatory surgery center.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent TKA between March 2018 and September 2019. The patients were grouped based on the neuraxial anesthetic regimen: bupivacaine with ACB, bupivacaine without ACB, and mepivacaine without ACB. Preoperative ACBs were discontinued in December 2018, and use of mepivacaine spinal anesthesia was initiated in March 2019. Length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), time to controlled void and ambulation, postoperative pain, morphine milligram equivalents (MME), and transient neurologic symptoms were compared.

RESULTS

Ninety consecutive patients who underwent TKA were identified. Fifty patients received bupivacaine with ACB, 20 received bupivacaine without ACB, and 20 received mepivacaine without ACB. Mepivacaine spinal anesthesia led to a 93-minute shorter PACU stay (P < 0.001), 115-minute quicker time to void (P < 0.001), 60-minute earlier ambulation (P = 0.024), and 109-minute shorter total facility time (P = 0.003) but increased total MME (P = 0.049) despite nonsignificant difference in pain at discharge (P = 0.908) compared with bupivacaine. Patients receiving bupivacaine with and without ACB had a nonsignificant difference in pain scores at discharge, time to ambulation, and time to discharge (P ≥ 0.1). No transient neurologic symptoms or overnight stays were observed.

DISCUSSION

Mepivacaine spinal anesthesia for TKA safely facilitated more rapid same-day discharge through decreased times to controlled void and ambulation but with a slight increase in MME requirements. Discontinuing preoperative ACBs did not negatively affect PACU outcomes.

A Home-Based, Remote-Clinician-Controlled, Physical Therapy Device Leads to Superior Outcomes When Compared to Standard Physical Therapy for Rehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The optimal postoperative rehabilitation regimen following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is not clearly defined. The advent of telerehabilitation offers potential for increased patient convenience and decreased cost, while maintaining similar outcomes to traditional physical therapy (PT). Therefore, we evaluated a novel, home-based, clinician-controlled, multi-modal evaluation and therapy device with telerehabilitation functionality for TKA.

METHODS

A total of 135 consecutive TKA patients receiving standard therapy protocol (STP) were compared to 135 consecutive patients receiving a home-based clinician-controlled therapy system (HCTS). Outcomes were assessed at 2, 6, and 12 weeks, including visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score JR (KOOS JR), and knee range of motion (ROM) measured by the same certified physical therapists.

RESULTS

Postoperative knee ROM was greater in the HCTS group at all time points throughout the study period (P < .001 at 2, 6, and 12 weeks). VAS and the KOOS JR functional scores were statistically better (P < .001) in the HCTS group at all time points and exceeded the threshold for minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for both VAS and KOOS JR. There were significantly fewer cases of arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) in the HCTS group (1.48 versus 4.44%).

CONCLUSION

Following TKA, a novel, home-based, clinician-controlled, multi-modal therapy device was superior to standard PTduring the first 12 weeks postoperatively for ROM, KOOS JR, and VAS (with all scores exceeding the MCID) and had substantially fewer manipulations for arthrofibrosis.

Does the Addition of iPACK Block to Adductor Canal Block Provide Improved Analgesic Effect in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The interspace between popliteal artery and the capsule of posterior knee (iPACK) block was proposed in recent years to relieve posterior knee pain. Since adductor canal block (ACB) and iPACK involve different branches of the sensory nerves, it is theoretically feasible to combine iPACK block and ACB to relief pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We aim to validate the efficacy of adding iPACK block to ACB in the setting of a multimodal pain management protocol following TKA. A comprehensive literature review on Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and PubMed was performed. Eight studies (N = 1,056) that compared the efficacy of iPACK block + ACB with ACB alone were included. Primary outcomes consisted of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score at rest or during activity at various time points. Secondary outcomes include opioids consumption, walking distance, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Compared to ACB alone, VAS scores at rest (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.05 to -0.30) and during activity (SMD: -0.26; 95% CI: -0.49 to -0.03) on the day of surgery were lower in the iPACK block + ACB group. However, the difference did not reach the minimal clinically important difference. Opioids consumption at postoperative 24 hours was lower in the iPACK + ACB group (SMD: -0.295; 95% CI: -0.543 to -0.048). VAS score on postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD2, opioids consumption from 24 to 48 hours, walking distance, and LOS were not different. In conclusion, the addition of iPACK block to ACB in a multimodal pain management protocol can effectively reduce opioids consumption in the early postoperative period. This is a level III, meta-analysis study.

Efficacy of epinephrine in local infiltration analgesia on pain relief and opioid consumption following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) is one of the effective regimens to reduce pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Epinephrine is a commonly used sympathetic adjunct in LIA. It is expected to enhance the intensity and extend the duration of LIA. The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of epinephrine on postoperative pain control after primary TKA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 80 patients who underwent primary TKA were randomized into an epinephrine (EN) and a control (C) group. Postoperative visual analogue pain score (VAPS) and morphine consumption were recorded every 6 hours until 48 hours after operation. The VAPS 6-48 hours were compared using repeated measure statistics. The range of motion (ROM) on discharge and complications were also compared between these 2 groups.

RESULTS

The study showed that although VAPS differed statistically between the 2 groups at 12 hours (C higher) and 48 hours (C lower) postoperatively (p = 0.04 and 0.02, respectively), repeated measures analysis revealed that there were no significant differences in 6-48 hours VAPS (p = 0.6). Total morphine consumption in the EN and C groups was 3.4 (SD 3.7) and 4.2 (SD 4.4) mg, respectively (p = 0.4). ROM on discharge was also similar between the groups. No complications were detected in this study.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that additional epinephrine in LIA had a statistically significant reduction in VAPS at 12 hours and morphine usage during 6-12 hours when compared with the control group. However, the magnitude of difference did not reach minimal clinically importance difference (MCID) value for TKA.

A 1-Week Comprehensive Foam Rolling Intervention Program Can Improve Knee Pain but Not Muscle Function and Range of Motion in Patients with Total Knee Arthroplasty

We investigate the effect of a 1-week comprehensive foam rolling (FR) intervention program on knee pain, range of motion (ROM), and muscle function in patients with TKA.Thirty patients with TKA were randomly allocated to FR (n = 15) or control (n = 15) groups. The control group received only regular physical therapy. Patients in the FR group performed the FR intervention in addition to their regular physical therapy twice daily from postoperative weeks two to three (60 s × 3 repetitions × 2 times/day × 6 days: total = 2160 s). Pain score, knee flexion and extension ROM, muscle strength, walking function, and balance function were measured before and after the FR intervention. From the second to third postoperative weeks, there were significant improvements in all variables, and the reduction in pain score at stretching was significantly greater in the FR group (-26.0 ± 1.4; p < 0.05) than in the control group (-12.5 ± 1.9). However, there was no significant difference in changes in the other variables except for the pain score at stretching between FR and control groups. A 1-week comprehensive FR intervention program in patients with TKA could reduce pain scores at stretching without a synergistic effect on physical function, i.e., walking speed, balance function, and muscle strength of the knee extensors muscles.

No Benefit of Adductor Canal Block Compared with Anterior Local Infiltration Analgesia in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

An adductor canal block (ACB) performed by an anesthesiologist is an established component of analgesia after total knee arthroplasty. Alternatively, surgeons may perform periarticular local infiltration analgesia (LIA) intraoperatively. We hypothesized that ACB would be superior to anterior LIA in terms of morphine consumption in the first 48 hours after primary total knee arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia.

METHODS

This prospective controlled and blinded trial included 98 patients; 48 received an ACB plus sham (saline solution) anterior LIA, and 50 received a sham (saline solution) ACB plus anterior LIA. Both groups received posterior LIA with local anesthetic. The primary outcome was cumulative morphine consumption at 48 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes were pain while resting, standing, and walking, rehabilitation scores, opioid-related side effects, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

No difference in the primary outcome was found, and the 48-hour morphine consumption was low in both arms (28.8 ± 17.6 mg with ACB, 26.8 ± 19.2 mg with anterior LIA; p = 0.443). Pain scores were significantly better in the anterior LIA arm, but the differences were not clinically relevant. There were no differences in any other secondary outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

LIA may be used as the primary option for multimodal postoperative pain management in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty with spinal anesthesia.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Analgesic benefits of single-shot versus continuous adductor canal block for total knee arthroplasty: a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Adductor canal block (ACB) can provide important analgesic benefits following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), however, the extent to which these benefits can be enhanced or prolonged by a continuous catheter-based infusion compared with a single-shot injection of local anesthetic is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD42021292738) review sought to compare the analgesic effectiveness of single shot to continuous ACB following TKA.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

We sought randomized trials from the US National Library of Medicine database (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception to November 1, 2021, that compared single-shot to continuous ACB in adult patients undergoing TKA. The primary outcomes were (1) area under the curve (AUC) pain severity at rest and (2) cumulative opioid (oral morphine equivalent) consumption during the first 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain severity scores up to 48 hours, cumulative opioid consumption at 24 hours, functional recovery, opioid-related side effects, and block-related complications. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Statistical pooling was conducted using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects. No funding was obtained for this review.

FINDINGS

Eleven trials (1185 patients) were included. No differences were observed in rest pain severity (AUC) or cumulative opioid consumption up to 48 hours postoperatively. In addition, no differences were observed in individual postoperative rest pain scores in the recovery room and at 12 and 24 hours, or in cumulative opioid consumption at 24 hours, functional recovery, and opioid-related side effects. Finally, fewer block-related complications were observed with single-shot ACB, with an OR (95% CI) of 0.24 (0.14 to 0.41) (p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that continuous catheter-based ACB does not enhance or prolong the analgesic benefits when compared with single-shot ACB for TKA over the first 48 hours postoperatively. Overall, the results of our meta-analysis do not support the routine use of continuous ACB for postoperative analgesia after TKA.

Addition of infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (IPACK) to local infiltration analgesia for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) is a popular analgesic technique commonly administered during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Recent studies have demonstrated that the infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (IPACK) can be complementary to analgesic modalities. However, the combined and relative efficacy of LIA and IPACK is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the analgesic and functional outcomes among LIA, IPACK, and LIA+IPACK.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 120 patients undergoing primary TKA were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 groups: LIA (50 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine and 2.0 μg/mL epinephrine); IPACK (20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine and 2.0 μg/mL epinephrine); and LIA+IPACK. The primary outcome was the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score. Secondary outcomes were opioid use, knee range of motion (ROM), quadriceps muscle strength, mobilization distance, timed up and go (TUG) test, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

The mean VAS pain scores were significantly higher after using IPACK alone than after using LIA+IPACK and LIA within 24 hours (all p＜0.05). LIA+IPACK had lower mean VAS pain scores than LIA when the knees were at rest (within 12 hours, p < 0.05) and flexion (within 8 hours, p＜0.05). Patients receiving LIA+IPACK and LIA had significantly lower morphine equivalents (ME) than those receiving IPACK alone within 24 hours (26.3, 28.9 versus 47.8, both p＜0.05) and during hospitalization (98, 101.6, versus 128.4 both p＜0.05). Both LIA+IPACK and LIA had higher ROM (within two days), higher level of muscle strength (within 12 hours), longer mobilization distances (within one day), and shorter TUG time (till discharge) compared with IPACK alone (all p＜0.05), while LIA+IPACK only had a higher knee ROM than LIA on the first postoperative day (p＜0.05). There was no significant difference in any other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This randomized controlled trial demonstrated that there were significantly lower pain scores, less opioid consumption, and better functional results with LIA+IPACK and LIA when compared with IPACK alone, suggesting that IPACK alone was inferior for pain control.

Allergy Testing Has No Correlation with Intraoperative Histopathology from Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Implant-Related Metal Allergy

Lymphocyte transformation testing (LTT) is often used in the workup for possible metal allergy after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) but the correlation of this test with other diagnostic metal-allergy findings in patients undergoing revision TKA for suspected metal allergy has not been established. A single-center, single-surgeon cohort of 19 TKAs in which both components were revised for presumed implant-related metal allergy based on history, physical, and LTT testing, to nonnickel-containing implants were retrospectively identified. Histopathologic samples obtained intraoperatively were semiquantitatively analyzed using both the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) synovial pathology score and the Campbell aseptic lymphocyte-dominant vasculitis-associated lesion (ALVAL) score. As histopathology control group, we included in the study an additional cohort of 17 patients who received aseptic revision TKA and had no history of reported or tested metal sensitivity. All preoperative LTT results were highly reactive to nickel. However, this did not correlate with local periarticular tissue response in 18 of 19 cases which demonstrated a low HSS synovial score (mean: 3.8 ± 2.8, of a maximum score of 28) and the low Campbell ALVAL scores (mean: 2.5/10 ± 1.3, of a maximum score of 10). There were not any significant differences between the study group (suspected implant-related metal allergy) and the control group (nonsuspected implant-related metal allergy) in regard to (1) the Campbell score and (2) the HSS synovial inflammatory score. Knee Society Clinical Rating System (KSCRS) function score improved significantly after revision (mean postoperative increase: 34.0 ± 17. 2; p < 0.001), as well as mean visual analog scale (VAS) pain (mean postoperative decrease: 33.3 ± 26.4; p < 0.01) score. The short-term survival rate (at mean follow-up of 26.1 months) of this patient cohort was 100%. In this cohort of revised TKA patients with suspected nickel allergy based on clinical presentation and LTT positive results, intraoperative histopathology was essentially normal. However, all patients with suspected nickel allergy showed a significant clinical and functional improvement with excellent short-term survival rates. The clinical significance of a positive LTT needs further study.

There are Considerable Inconsistencies Among Minimum Clinically Important Differences in TKA: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are frequently used to assess the impact of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on patients. However, mere statistical comparison of PROMs is not sufficient to assess the value of TKA to the patient, especially given the risk profile of arthroplasty. Evaluation of treatment effect sizes is important to support the use of an intervention; this is often quantified with the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). MCIDs are unique to specific PROMs, as they vary by calculation methodology and study population. Therefore, a systematic review of calculated MCID values, their respective ranges, and assessment of their applications is important to guide and encourage their use as a critical measure of effect size in TKA outcomes research.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In this systematic review of MCID calculations and reporting in primary TKA, we asked: (1) What are the most frequently reported PROM MCIDs and their reported ranges in TKA? (2) What proportion of studies report distribution- versus anchor-based MCID values? (3) What are the most common methods by which these MCID values are derived for anchor-based values? (4) What are the most common derivation methods for distribution-based values? (5) How do the reported medians and corresponding interquartile ranges (IQR) compare between calculation methods for each PROM?

METHODS

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic review was conducted using the PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases from inception through March 2022 for TKA articles reporting an MCID value for any PROMs. Two independent reviewers screened articles for eligibility, including any article that calculated new MCID values for PROMs after primary TKA, and extracted these data for analysis. Overall, 576 articles were identified, 38 of which were included in the final analysis. These studies had a total of 710,128 patients with a median age of 67.7 years and median BMI of 30.9 kg/m 2 . Women made up more than 50% of patients in most studies, and the median follow-up period was 17 months (range 0.25 to 72 months). The overall risk of bias was assessed as moderate using the Jadad criteria for one randomized controlled trial (3 of 5 ideal global score) and the modified Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies criteria for comparative studies (mean 17.2 ± 1.8) and noncomparative studies (mean 9.6 ± 1.3). There were 49 unique PROMs for which 233 MCIDs were reported. Calculated values were classified as anchor-based, distribution-based, or not reported. MCID values for each PROM, MCID calculation method, number of patients, and study demographics were extracted from each study. Anchor-based and distribution-based MCIDs were compared for each unique PROM using a Wilcoxon rank sum test given non-normal distribution of values.

RESULTS

The WOMAC Function and Pain subscores were the most frequently reported MCID value, comprising 9% (22 of 233) and 9% (22 of 233), respectively. The composite Oxford Knee Score (OKS) was the next most frequently reported (9% [21 of 233]), followed by the WOMAC composite score (6% [13 of 233]). The median anchor-based values for WOMAC Function and Pain subscores were 23 (IQR 16 to 33) and 25 (IQR 14 to 31), while the median distribution-based values were 11 (IQR 10.8 to 11) and 22 (IQR 17 to 23), respectively. The median anchor-based MCID value for the OKS was 6 (IQR 4 to 7), while the distribution-based value was 7 (IQR 5 to 10). Thirty-nine percent (15 of 38) used an anchor-based method to calculate a new MCID, while 32% (12 of 38) used a distribution-based technique. Twenty-nine percent of studies (11 of 38) calculated MCID values using both methods. For studies reporting an anchor-based calculation method, a question assessing patient satisfaction, pain relief, or quality of life along a five-point Likert scale was the most commonly used anchor (40% [16 of 40]), followed by a receiver operating characteristic curve estimation (25% [10 of 40]). For studies using distribution-based calculations, all articles used a measure of study population variance in their derivation of the MCID, with the most common method reported as one-half the standard deviation of the difference between preoperative and postoperative PROM scores (45% [14 of 31]). Most reported median MCID values (15 of 19) did not differ by calculation method for each unique PROM (p > 0.05) apart from the WOMAC Function component score and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain and Activities of Daily Living subscores.

CONCLUSION

Despite variability of MCIDs for each PROM, there is consistency in the methodology by which MCID values have been derived in published studies. Additionally, there is a consensus about MCID values regardless of calculation method across most of the PROMs we evaluated.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Given their importance to treatment selection and patient safety, authors and journals should report MCID values with greater consistency. We recommend using a 7-point increase as the MCID for the OKS, consistent with the median reported anchor-based value derived from several high-quality studies with large patient groups that used anchor-based approaches for MCID calculation, which we believe are most appropriate for most applications in clinical research. Likewise, we recommend using a 10-point to 15-point increase for the MCID of composite WOMAC, as the median value was 12 (IQR 10 to 17) with no difference between calculation methods. We recommend use of median reported values for WOMAC function and pain subscores: 21 (IQR 15 to 33) and 23 (IQR 13 to 29), respectively.

Mepivacaine Versus Bupivacaine in Adult Surgical Patients: A Meta-analysis, Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE

Evidence supporting the choice between mepivacaine and bupivacaine is inconclusive. This meta-analysis aims to determine whether mepivacaine can reach a similar effect to bupivacaine after surgeries.

DESIGN

A meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

RCTs were identified in PubMed, EMBASE (Ovid), Medline (Ovid), and Cochrane Library using a controlled vocabulary (MeSH) and keywords. There were no date and language restrictions. We strictly included RCTs comparing mepivacaine with bupivacaine. The primary outcome was motor function recovery time. Secondary outcomes included postoperative analgesic requirement, transient neurologic symptoms (TNS), pain score at 24 hours, length of stay (LOS), duration of analgesia, complications, and patient satisfaction. A trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed for motor function recovery time, postoperative analgesic requirement, and TNS.

FINDINGS

Seven RCTs with a total of 672 patients were included. Return of motor function was quicker in patients who received mepivacaine than in those who received bupivacaine (weighted mean differences [WMD] = -2.23 minutes; 95% confidence intervals [CI], -3.58 to -0.88; P = .02; I² = 97.08%; TSA adjusted CI -17.52 to -10.9). Postoperative analgesic requirement was significantly more with mepivacaine (risk ratio [RR] = 3.23; 95% CI, 1.37-7.62; P = .01; I² = 55.11%; TSA adjusted CI 5.73-63.27). Duration of analgesia (WMD = -8.83 hours; 95% CI, -11.75 to -7.90; P < .001; I² = 0%) and LOS (WMD = -3.95 hours; 95% CI, -4.83 to -3.07; P < .001; I² = 0%) in group mepivacaine was significantly shorter compared with bupivacaine. There were no differences for TNS (RR = 3.90; 95% CI, 0.94-16.22; P = .062; I² = 72.23%), postoperative pain score (standard mean differences [SMD] = 0; 95% CI, -0.10 to 0.10; P = .972; I² = 0%), complications (RR = 1; 95% CI, 0.70-1.43; P = .998; I² = 0%), and satisfaction (RR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.85-1.11; P = .40; I² = 45%) between bupivacaine and mepivacaine.

CONCLUSIONS

Mepivacaine appears to yield a faster return of motor function and shorter LOS compared with bupivacaine. and may be more popular in short-stay and outpatient surgery. However, the results of TSA indicate that more high-quality trials are needed to confirm the true effects.

Comparison of the Imaging and Clinical Outcomes among the Measured Resection, Gap Balancing, and Hybrid Techniques in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

Although many studies have compared the measured resection (MR) technique to the gap balancing (GB) technique, few studies have investigated the hybrid technique. In this study, we compared imaging and clinical outcomes of the MR, GB, and hybrid techniques in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

From January 2016 to January 2019, we conducted a retrospective study on 90 patients who underwent unilateral primary TKA; 30 received the MR technique, 30 received the GB technique, and 30 received the hybrid technique. Radiological outcomes, including joint line level, mechanical alignment of the lower limb, positions of the femoral and tibial components, and rotation of the femoral component, and clinical outcomes, including the visual analog scale score for pain, the Knee Society Score, and the range of motion, were assessed among the three groups. One-way analysis of variance and Dunnett's test were performed for normally distributed data. Kruskal-Wallis H test and Dunn-Bonferroni test were conducted for non-normally distributed data.

RESULTS

No significant difference in the mechanical alignment (p = 0.151) and the positions of the tibial and femoral components (p = 0.230 for α angle, p = 0.517 for β angle, p = 0.686 for femoral flexion angle, and p = 0.918 for tibial slope angle) was found among the three groups. No significant difference in the elevation of the joint line between the MR and the hybrid groups was found (2.1 ± 0.3 mm vs 2.1 ± 0.1 mm, p = 0.627), but the GB group (2.8 ± 0.2 mm) differed significantly from the other two groups (p < 0.001). Although rotation of the femoral component in the GB group was larger than that of the MR and hybrid groups, the difference was not significant (1.8° ± 0.2° vs 1.7° ± 0.3° vs. 1.7° ± 0.2°, p = 0.101). The clinical outcomes were not significantly different (p > 0.05), although the results in the hybrid group were slightly higher.

CONCLUSION

The hybrid technique helped to restore the mechanical alignment of the lower limb and realize optimal positions of the femoral and tibial components without significant differences relative to the MR and GB techniques. The hybrid technique was more helpful for maintaining the original height of the joint line, which was similar to the MR technique. Additionally, although the improvement in the clinical outcomes in the hybrid group was slightly higher, it was not significantly different among the three groups.

The significance of the pelvic incidence measurement as a possible predictor of TKA outcome

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association between the sagittal alignment of the pelvis and residual knee flexion contracture after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This is important as a flexion contraction can be associated with the risk of poor outcomes and patient satisfaction after TKA.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, case-control, study of 200 osteoarthritic knees, contributed by 200 patients, over a mean follow-up of 2.4 years. The following factors were compared between patients 'with' (46 knees) and 'without' (154 knees) a residual flexion contracture ≥ 10° after TKA: age, sex, pelvic incidence (PI), anterior femoral bowing, femoral component flexion angle (FFA), and patient-reported outcomes. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to identify predictive factors.

RESULTS

The following factors were predictive of a residual flexion contracture ≥ 10°: a pelvic incidence ≥ 55° (odds ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.59; P = 0.031) and the FFA (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.14; P = 0.044). A pelvic incidence cutoff of 55° yielded a significant between-group difference, with a sensitivity of 78.4% and specificity of 89.9% to differentiate a residual knee flexion contracture ≥ 10° (P = 0.001), patient satisfaction (P = 0.029), EuroQol 5-Dimension score (P = 0.028), anterior femoral curvature (P = 0.031), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement score (P = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

A pelvic incidence > 55° is associated with a residual knee flexion contracture ≥ 10° after TKA. The significance of the pelvic incidence measurement as a possible predictor of TKA outcome was highlighted, including its impact on patient satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Effect of balance training using virtual reality-based serious games in individuals with total knee replacement: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Virtual reality (VR) and serious games (SGs) are widespread in rehabilitation for many orthopedic and neurological diseases. However, few studies have addressed the effects of rehabilitation with VR-based SGs on clinical, gait, and postural outcomes in individuals with total knee replacement (TKR).

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was the efficacy of balance training using non-immersive VR-based SGs compared to conventional therapy in TKR patients on the Time Up and Go test. Secondary objectives included the efficacy on clinical, gait, and postural outcomes.

METHODS

We randomly allocated 56 individuals with unilateral TKR to the experimental group (EG) or control group (CG) for 15 sessions (45 min; 5 times per week) of non-immersive VR-based SGs or conventional balance training, respectively. The primary outcome was functional mobility measured by the Timed Up and Go test; secondary outcomes were walking speed, pain intensity, lower-limb muscular strength, independence in activities of daily living as well as gait and postural parameters.

RESULTS

We found significant within-group differences in all clinical outcomes and in a subset of gait (p<0.0001) and postural (p ≤ 0.05) parameters. Analysis of the stance time of the affected limb revealed significant between-group differences (p = 0.022): post-hoc analysis revealed within-group differences in the EG (p = 0.002) but not CG (p = 0.834). We found no significant between-group differences in other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Balance training with non-immersive VR-based SGs can improve clinical, gait, and postural outcomes in TKR patients. It was not superior to the CG findings but could be considered an alternative to the conventional approach and can be added to a regular rehabilitation program in TKR patients. The EG had a more physiological duration of the gait stance phase at the end of the treatment than the CG.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV: NCT03454256.

Surgeon-Performed Intraoperative Peripheral Nerve Blocks and Periarticular Infiltration During Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Critical Analysis Review

➢

Surgeon-performed intraoperative peripheral nerve blocks may improve operating room efficiency and reduce hospital resource utilization and, ultimately, costs. Additionally, these blocks can be safely performed intraoperatively by most orthopaedic surgeons, while only specifically trained physicians are able to perform ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks.

➢

IPACK (infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee) blocks are at least noninferior to periarticular infiltration when combined with an adductor canal block for analgesia following total knee arthroplasty.

➢

Surgeon-performed intraoperative adductor canal blocks are technically feasible and offer reliable anesthesia comparable with ultrasound-guided blocks performed by anesthesiologists. While clinical studies have shown promising results, additional Level-I studies are required.

➢

A surgeon-performed intraoperative psoas compartment block has been described as a readily available and safe technique, although there is some concern for femoral nerve analgesia, and temporary sensory changes have been reported.

Robot-assisted rehabilitation for total knee or hip replacement surgery patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to update the current evidence and evaluate the effects of robot-assisted rehabilitation (RAR) in comparison with conventional rehabilitation (CR) in patients following total knee (TKR) or hip replacements (THR).

METHODS

PubMed Central, OVID Medline, Cochrane Collaboration Library, and EMBASE for a comprehensive search for all relevant studies, from database inception to July 2022. The following inclusion criteria were used to determine eligibility for studies: randomized and matched controlled trials recruiting men and women who underwent TKR and THR; and studies examining the effect of RAR on outcome measures of physical function and pain.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies (230 patients) were included in this review and 4 were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of 2 studies showed that Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) training for 5 days, significantly improved pain measured on a visual analogue scale, compared to CR in patients following TKR (SMD = 1.05, 95% confidence interval [Cl] 0.39-1.71). Heterogeneity for I2 value was lower than moderate (tau^2 = 0.0121; I2 = 5%; P = .30). There were 2 studies that assessed self-selected walking speed. The meta-analysis of these studies showed that HAL training was significantly superior to CR in patients following TKR (SMD = 48.70, 95% Cl -50.53 to 147.94) at 2 months. A high heterogeneity was detected (P < .01; I2 = 97%).

CONCLUSION

The result of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that RAR may be an effective treatment in TKR and THR patients. However, high-quality studies are needed to verify the long-term effect on their recovery.

Short-term outcomes vary by surgical approach in total hip arthroplasty: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The direct anterior approach (DAA) has increased in popularity in recent years. Proponents cite its muscle-sparing approach and purported reduction in pain and improvement in function when compared to the traditional surgical approaches. There remains controversy surrounding the validity of these claims. The objective of this study was to compare the common total hip surgical approaches in terms of pain scores, functional outcomes, opioid use and complications within the first 12 weeks postoperatively.

METHODS

A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing postoperative outcomes of different surgical approaches in primary THA up to 12 weeks was performed. PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and SCOPUS were systematically searched from inception to May 2020. Outcomes included pain scores, functional outcome scores, length of stay (LOS), complications and opioid consumption.

RESULTS

Twenty-five RCTs (n = 2339) were included. The DAA demonstrated statistically significant improvement in Harris Hip Scores at 6 weeks when compared to the posterior and direct lateral approaches. The DAA reduced pain scores on postoperative day 2 and at 2 weeks compared to the direct lateral approach. The anterolateral approach was found to have a significantly shorter LOS compared to the other major surgical approaches. The differences in functional outcomes or pain scores did not surpass conventional cutoffs for a minimal clinically important difference.

CONCLUSION

The DAA led to functional improvements at 6 weeks compared to the posterior and direct lateral approaches and reduced postoperative pain compared to the direct lateral approach. However, these improvements failed to reach clinical significance. All major surgical approaches led to large improvements in function by 12 weeks with relatively low complication rates. Whether a short-term statistically significant improvement in function is sufficiently patient important to recommend DAA as a standard remains uncertain.

Spinal Compared with General Anesthesia in Contemporary Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties

BACKGROUND

The specific advantages of spinal anesthesia compared with general anesthesia for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the pain control, length of stay, and postoperative outcomes associated with spinal anesthesia compared with general anesthesia in a large cohort of primary THAs from a single, high-volume academic institution.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 13,730 primary THAs (11,319 patients) from 2001 to 2016 using our total joint registry. Of these cases, 58% had general anesthesia and 42% had spinal anesthesia. The demographic characteristics were similar between groups, with mean age of 64 years, 51% female, and mean body mass index (BMI) of 31 kg/m 2 . Data were analyzed using an inverse probability of treatment weighted model based on a propensity score that accounted for numerous patient and operative factors. The mean follow-up was 6 years.

RESULTS

Patients treated with spinal anesthesia had lower Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) scores (p < 0.001) and required fewer postoperative oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) at all time points evaluated (p < 0.001). Patients treated with spinal anesthesia also had shorter hospital length of stay (p = 0.02), fewer altered mental status events (odds ratio [OR], 0.7; p = 0.02), and fewer intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (OR, 0.7; p = 0.01). There was no difference in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (p = 0.8), pulmonary embolism (p = 0.4), 30-day readmissions (p = 0.17), 90-day readmissions (p = 0.18), all-cause revisions (p = 0.17), or all-cause reoperations (p = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large, single-institution study, we found that spinal anesthesia was associated with reduced pain scores and OME use postoperatively. Furthermore, spinal anesthesia resulted in fewer altered mental status events and ICU admissions. These data favor the use of spinal anesthesia in primary THAs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Equivalent outcomes of ultra-congruent and standard cruciate-retaining inserts in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

No systematic review has compared the clinical outcome of anterior stabilized ultra-congruent and standard cruciate-retaining inserts in fixed-bearing primary total knee arthroplasty. This study aimed to compare the outcomes and establish the superiority or equivalence of these inserts.

METHODS

Pubmed, EMBASE, Medline, AMED, ERIC, and Proquest databases were searched electronically. PRISMA guidelines were followed in the conduct of the study. The clinical outcomes compared in the meta-analysis were overall knee score, WOMAC, score for knee function, score for knee pain, SF-12 PCS, knee flexion, manipulation under anaesthesia for postoperative knee stiffness, revision total knee arthroplasty or change of polyethylene insert for post-operative instability (relative risk [RR]) and survivorship. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and the Modified Jadad scale.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies comprising 9989 knees (three RCTs and 11 comparative case-cohort studies) were included for qualitative and quantitative analysis. The pooled analysis of the ultracongruent insert and the standard cruciate retaining insert was based on a cohort of 2860 and 7129 TKA, respectively. Knee pain was significantly better in patients that had standard inserts (p = 0.02; 95% CI - 1.06 to - 0.10), and the physical component of health-related quality of life was also significantly better in patients that had standard inserts (p = 0.02; 95% CI - 6.43 to - 0.64). There was a 72% lesser chance of revision TKA or change of insert for postoperative instability in knees that had been implanted with ultracongruent inserts (RR = 0.28; p = 0.0002; 95% CI 0.15-0.55). There was no difference in the otheroutcome measures. There was no significant difference between the two inserts, considering the minimal clinically important difference or absolute ratio.

CONCLUSION

Differences observed between the two types of inserts were not clinically significant. Therefore, based on current evidence, arthroplasty surgeons can use either of these inserts with cruciate-retaining knee prosthesis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level II.

Topical Cannabidiol (CBD) After Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Decrease Pain or Opioid Use: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blinded Placebo-Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Multimodal analgesia has become the standard of care for pain management following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Cannabidiol (CBD) is increasingly utilized in the postoperative period. The purpose of this study was to analyze the analgesic benefits of topical CBD following primary TKA.

METHODS

In this randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial, 80 patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA applied topical CBD (CBD; n = 19), essential oil (EO; n = 21), CBD and essential oil (CBD + EO; n = 21), or placebo (PLA; n = 19) thrice daily around the knee for two weeks postoperatively. This supplemented a standardized multimodal analgesic protocol. Outcomes included visual analog scale (VAS) pain and numeric rating scale (NRS) sleep scores (collected on postoperative day [POD] 0, 1, 2, 7, 14, 42), and cumulative postoperative opioid use (42 days).

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics were similar among the four cohorts. Preoperative VAS and NRS scores were similar among groups. The CBD cohort had a higher mean VAS pain score on POD 2 compared to the EO cohort (CBD: 69.9 ± 19.3 versus. EO: 51.0 ± 18.2; P = .013). No statistically significant differences existed for VAS scores at other times, and no statistically significant differences were observed for postoperative NRS sleep scores or postoperative opioid use at any time point.

CONCLUSION

Utilization of topical CBD in supplement to multimodal analgesia did not reduce pain or opioid consumption, or improve sleep scores following TKA. These results suggest that the local effects of topical CBD are not beneficial for providing additional pain relief after TKA.

Fluctuation of visual analog scale pain scores and opioid consumption before and after total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Patients who undergo orthopedic procedures are often given excess opioid medication. Understanding the relationship between pain and opioid consumption following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is key to creating safe and effective opioid prescribing guidelines.

AIM

To evaluate the association between the quantity of opioid consumption in relation to pain scores both pre-and postoperatively in patients undergoing primary THA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent primary THA from November 2018-May 2019 and answered both the visual analog scale (VAS) pain and opioid medication questionnaires pre-and postoperatively. Both surveys were delivered daily for 7-days before surgery through the first 30 postoperative days. Survey results were divided into preoperative, postoperative days 1-7, postoperative days 8-14, and postoperative days 15-30 for analysis. Mean opioid pill consumption and VAS pain scores in each time period were determined and compared to patients' preoperative status using hierarchical Poisson and linear regressions, respectively.

RESULTS

There were 105 patients included. Mean VAS pain scores were the highest preoperatively 7.41 ± 1.72. However, VAS pain scores significantly declined in each successive postoperative category compared to preoperative scores: postoperative day 1-7 (5.07 ± 1.79; P < 0.001), postoperative day 8-14 (3.60 ± 1.64; P < 0.001), and postoperative day 15-30 (3.15 ± 1.63; P < 0.001). Mean opioid pill consumption preoperatively was 0.68 ± 1.29 pills. Compared to preoperative opioid consumption, opioid use was significantly greater between postoperative days 1-7 (1.51 ± 1.58; P = 0.001) and postoperative days 8-14 (1.00 ± 1.27; P = 0.043). Opioid consumption declined below preoperative levels between postoperative days 15-30 (0.35 ± 0.72; P = 0.160) which correlates with a VAS pain score of 3.15.

CONCLUSION

All patients experienced significant benefit and pain relief from having undergone THA. Average postoperative opioid consumption decreased below preoperative consumption between postoperative days 15-30, which was associated with a VAS pain score of 3.15. These results can be used to appropriately guide opioid prescribing practices and set patient expectations regarding pain management following THA.

Analgesic benefits of the quadratus lumborum block in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is reported to reduce pain and improve function following total hip arthroplasty; however, randomised controlled trials evaluating the benefits of adding this block to general or spinal anaesthesia in this population are conflicting. We performed a systematic review seeking randomised controlled trials investigating QLB benefits for total hip arthroplasty, stratifying comparisons regarding the addition of QLB to either general or spinal anaesthesia. The primary outcome was 24-h area under the curve (AUC) pain score. Pain scores were interpreted in the context of a population-specific minimal clinically important difference of 1.86 cm on a 10-cm visual analogue scale, or an AUC pain score of 5.58 cm.h. Secondary outcomes included analgesic consumption, functional recovery and opioid-related side-effects. In all, 18 trials (1318 patients) were included. Adding QLB to general or spinal anaesthesia improved 24-h AUC rest pain scores by a mean difference (95%CI) of -3.56 cm.h (-6.70 to -0.42; p = 0.034) and - 4.19 cm.h (-7.20 to -1.18; p = 0.014), respectively. These improvements failed to reach the pre-determined minimal clinically important difference, as did the reduction in analgesic consumption. Quadratus lumborum block improved functional recovery for general, but not spinal, anaesthesia. Opioid-related side-effects were reduced with QLB regardless of anaesthetic modality. Low-to-moderate quality evidence suggests that the extent to which adding QLB to either general or spinal anaesthesia reduces postoperative pain and opioid consumption after total hip arthroplasty is statistically significant but may be clinically unimportant for most patients. However, adding QLB to general anaesthesia might enhance functional recovery. Taken together, our findings do not support the routine use of QLB as part of multimodal analgesic regimens for total hip arthroplasty.

Recurrent SARS-CoV-2 Serology Testing and Pandemic Anxiety: A Study of Pediatric Healthcare Workers

Background: Limited access to SARS-CoV-2 testing has been identified as a potential source of anxiety among healthcare workers (HCWs), but the impact of repeated testing on pandemic-related anxiety in pediatric HCWs has not been examined. We sought to understand the impact of repeated SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing on pediatric HCWs’ COVID-19 anxiety. Methods: This longitudinal cohort study was conducted between April and July 2020. Participants, 362 pediatric HCWs, underwent rapid SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing either every 96 h or weekly and were asked to rate their COVID-19 anxiety on a visual analog scale. Changes in self-reported anxiety from the study baseline were calculated for each testing day response. Bivariate analyses, repeated measures, and logistic regression analyses were performed to examine demographics associated with changes in anxiety. Results: Baseline COVID-19 anxiety was significantly higher in HCWs with less than 10 years of experience (Z = −2.63, p = 0.009), in females compared to males (Z = −3.66 p < 0.001), and in nurses compared to other HCWs (F (3,302) = 6.04, p = 0.003). After excluding participants who received a positive test result, repeated measures analyses indicated that anxiety decreased over time (F (5,835) = 3.14, p = 0.008). Of the HCWs who reported decreased anxiety, 57 (29.8%) had a clinically meaningful decrease (≥30%) and Emergency Department (ED) HCWs were 1.97 times more likely to report a clinically meaningful decrease in anxiety (X2 (1) = 5.05, p = 0.025). Conclusions: The results suggest that repeated SARS-CoV-2 antibody serology testing is associated with decreased COVID-19 anxiety in HCWs. Routine screening for the disease may be a helpful strategy in attenuating pandemic-related anxiety in pediatric HCWs.

Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty : a multicentre study

Aims

The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up.

Methods

This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m² (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants.

Results

There were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and > two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%).

Conclusion

RA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589–595.

Differences in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Between Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Realistic Patient Expectations for Patients With Low Baseline Activity

Primary total hip arthroplasty (pTHA) and revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) are not often compared in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). However, surgeons and patients need to better understand the differences in PROMs between primary and revision surgery to set realistic patient expectations and recovery milestones. A matched cohort study of pTHA to rTHA was performed with our arthroplasty database of a single surgeon's experience from 2012 to 2018. There was a significant difference in both pre-operative assessment and change from preoperative to postoperative assessment of the PROMs. Patients undergoing pTHA had higher visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores (67.9 vs 57.9, P=.004). Those undergoing rTHA had higher Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) (57.1 vs 50.1, P=.008) and Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12) (33.5 vs 33.1, P=.01) scores. However, a significant change was noted in the difference from preoperative to postoperative scores between the pTHA and rTHA groups: Harris Hip Score (HHS) total score (pTHA 30.7 vs rTHA 4.4, P<.001), WOMAC score (pTHA 29.3 vs rTHA 12.2, P<.001), and VAS pain score (pTHA -48.3 vs rTHA -26.5, P<.001) as well as groin pain (pTHA 1.4% vs rTHA 7.1%, P=.02). Further, PROMs after rTHA were inferior to those after pTHA with several outcome instruments, including HHS, WOMAC score, and VAS pain score. In addition, groin pain was significantly greater in the rTHA cohort compared with the pTHA cohort at the latest follow-up. This study allows surgeons and patients to better understand the differences in PROMs to set realistic patient expectations and recovery milestones. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(4):251-255.].

Larger 5-year migration but similar polyethylene wear of cementless hemispherical cups with electrochemically applied hydroxyapatite (BoneMaster) coating compared with porous plasma-spray titanium: a randomized 5-year RSA study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

BoneMaster (BM) is a thin electrochemically applied hydroxyapatite (HA) implant coating marketed with expectations of improved osseointegration properties but less polyethylene (PE) wear. We compared the midterm cup migration and PE wear of cementless porous-coated hemispherical cups with and without BM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this patient-blinded, randomized controlled trial, 53 patients with a mean age of 64 years (55-75) received total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated (P) or porous and BoneMaster (PBM) coated Exceed cup and ArCom E1 infused PE. Patients were followed with RSA, Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and Euro-Qol-5-3L (EQ-5D) at 3 and 6 months, and 1-, 2-, and 5-year follow-up.

RESULTS

At 5-year follow-up, total translation and maximum total point motion was 0.28 mm (95% CI 0.08; 0.47) and 0.52 mm (CI 0.12; 0.93) higher in the PBM group than in the P group. PE wear was comparable between PBM and P cups, and 2D wear rate from 1-year follow-up to last follow-up was 0.03 mm (CI 0.02-0.03). The 5-year anterior translation was 0.05 mm (CI -0.10 to 0.21) in the normal BMD group and 0.40 mm (CI 0.22-0.57) in the osteopenia group.

INTERPRETATION

At 5-year follow-up, Exceed cups in the PBM group migrated more than in the P group but the PE wear rate was low and similar. This study does not indicate any advantage of additional BoneMaster coating compared with porous coating alone on cementless hemispherical cups with regards to migration, polyethylene wear, and clinical outcomes.

20-year hip survivorship and patient-reported outcome measures after transpositional osteotomy of the acetabulum for dysplastic hips

AIMS

Although periacetabular osteotomies are widely used for the treatment of symptomatic dysplastic hips, long-term surgical outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are still unclear. Accordingly, we assessed hip survival and PROMs at 20 years after transpositional osteotomy of the acetabulum (TOA).

METHODS

A total of 172 hips in 159 patients who underwent TOA were followed up at a mean of 21.02 years (16.6 to 24.6) postoperatively. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess survivorship with an endpoint of total hip arthroplasty (THA). PROMs included the visual analogue scale (VAS) Satisfaction, VAS Pain, Oxford Hip Score (OHS), and Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12). Thresholds for favourable outcomes for OHS (≥ 42) and FJS-12 (≥ 51) were obtained using the receiver operating characteristic curve with VAS Satisfaction ≥ 50 and VAS Pain < 20 as anchors.

RESULTS

THA was performed on 37 hips (21.5%) by the latest follow-up. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that the hip survival rate at 20 years was 79.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 73.7 to 86.3). Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative Tönnis grade significantly influenced hip survival. Tönnis grades 0, 1, and 2 were associated with 20-year survival rates of 93.3% (95% CI 84.8 to 100), 86.7% (95% CI 79.8 to 94.3), and 54.8% (95% CI 41.5 to 72.3), respectively. More than 60% of the patients exhibited favourable PROMs. An advanced Tönnis grade at the latest follow-up and a higher BMI were both significantly associated with unfavourable OHS, but not with other PROMs.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the durability of TOA for hips with Tönnis grades 0 to 1 at 20 years. While the presence of advanced osteoarthritis and higher BMI was associated with lower hip functions (OHS), it was not necessarily associated with worse patient satisfaction and joint awareness. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(7):767-774.

The direct anterior approach without traction table: How does it compare with the posterior approach? - A prospective non-randomised trial

PURPOSE

The direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip replacement (THR) is relatively new. It has been proved superior to other techniques concerning early functional outcomes, stability, and earlier recovery. But DAA-THR has a steeper surgical learning curve and, in its original description, needs special operating room equipment. This study aims to present clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes of DAA compared to the posterior approach (PA), performed using a routine operating table and instrumentation sets.

METHODS

Eighty patients undergoing THR were non-randomly allocated prospectively into Group 1 DAA and Group 2 PA. Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain was recorded preoperatively and at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after the surgery and at 1st and 2nd year postoperatively. Both groups' functional outcomes were evaluated pre-and postoperatively at 1st and 2nd-year follow-up with Harris hip score (HHS) and SF-12. Perioperative parameters like blood loss, length of hospital stay, duration of surgery, postoperative complications, and radiological prosthesis positioning were also compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

All patients were comparable according to their baseline demographic characteristics. DAA was found to have significantly better early HHS at one year (p = 0.001) and VAS for hip pain (p < 0.05) at 12, 24, 48, and 72 hrs postoperative period only. Clinical outcomes were comparable at the final follow-up of 2 years. Perioperative variables were also similar except the incision length, length of stay in the hospital, and average time to weight bear without walking aids which were statistically better in DAA than PA group. There was no difference in radiological prosthesis positioning. Postoperative complication rates were also comparable in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Though technically demanding, DAA provides better early functional outcomes with comparable radiological outcomes and complication rates than the PA.Level of evidence: Non-randomized comparative trial, Level II.

Is There a Difference between Perineural Dexamethasone with Single-Shot Interscalene Block (SSIB) and Interscalene Indwelling Catheter Analgesia (IICA) for Early Pain after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair? A Pilot Study

Interscalene block is applied to control acute postoperative pain after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR), typically with single-shot interscalene block (SSIB) or continuous interscalene indwelling catheter analgesia (IICA), and dexamethasone (Dex) for extending the analgesic effect. This study investigated whether perineural Dex can extend the postoperative analgesic effect of SSIB to match that of IICA. A total of 130 patients were recruited and divided into two groups (Group D, SSIB with perineural Dex, n = 94; Group C, IICA, n = 36). The surgical and anesthetic processes were identical except for the method of nerve block. Pain was measured by a visual analog scale (VAS) at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after ARCR. The number of each and the total analgesics used and adverse effects were compared. The duration of ARCR was longer in group D. The VAS score was higher in group C 6 h after ARCR, but there was no difference at other time points. More postoperative analgesics were administered to group C, and there was no difference in the number of adverse effects. In conclusion, combining perineural Dex with SSIB can reduce rebound hyperalgesia after 6 h and extend the duration of the analgesic effect to that of IICA. Therefore, IICA could be substituted with SSIB and Dex between at 6 and 48 h after ARCR.

Predictive radiological parameters of failure following surgical management of femoroacetabular impingement associated with borderline acetabular dysplasia

INTRODUCTION

The role of arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) in mild or borderline hip dysplasia (lateral center edge angle=18-25) is controversial. It is recommended to combine capsular plication with femoral neck osteoplasty and suture repair of the labrum. Few studies have investigated which radiological parameters are associated with failure of this procedure.

HYPOTHESIS

A larger number of radiological signs of mild or borderline hip dysplasia than radiological signs of FAI negatively influence the outcomes of arthroscopic treatment.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study done with data collected prospectively after a minimum of 2 years' follow-up in patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment of FAI due to cam impingement combined with mild to moderate hip dysplasia. Patients with hip osteoarthritis graded as ≥ Tönnis 2 were excluded. Functional outcome scores (mHHS and NAHS) were determined along with the need for reoperation. Three groups were defined based on the outcomes: success (mHHS ≥ Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State [PASS]); moderate improvement (improvement in mHHS + mHHS<PASS) and failure (worsening of the mHHS). Demographic data, radiographic parameters (LCEA, Tönnis angle, alpha angle, offset, FEAR index, Shenton's line, Cliff sign, anterior wall index [AWI], posterior wall index [PWI]) and intraoperative findings were compared between these three groups. The area under the curve (AUC) for the most relevant data identified during the univariate analysis were then modeled to define which factors were the best at predicting failed arthroscopic treatment a posteriori.

RESULTS

The study analyzed 39 patients. The mean mHHS was 76±15 [40-92]. The "success" group consisted of 21 patients (56%, 21/39), the "moderate improvement" group of 12 patients (31%, 12/39) and the failure group of 6 patients (13%, 6/39) (2 subsequently underwent total hip replacement, 4 underwent shelf acetabuloplasty). The FEAR index was significantly higher and the AWI and VCE were significantly lower in the "failure" group. The FEAR index was the best predictive factor; an index ≥ 4° detected 100% of failures with 96% specificity. The patients in the "moderate improvement" group were significantly older (37 years±8 [18-45]<p= 0.04) with a significantly higher offset (2mm±3 [-5-5]<p=0.004); an offset ≥ 2mm could detect 73% of them with a specificity of 72%.

CONCLUSION

A FEAR index ≥ 4° and offset ≥ 2mm is best able to detect patients at risk of failure and unsatisfactory results, respectively, in the mild clinical cam-type impingement in a population of FAI patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective series.

Arthroscopic treatment of type I and II greater trochanteric pain syndrome

The goal of this study was to describe and evaluate endoscopic bursectomy combined with fascia lata lengthening in the treatment of type I and II greater trochanteric pain syndrome recalcitrant to conservative management. This was a retrospective study of 20 patients (7 type I, 13 type II) reviewed with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The mean follow-up was 44±11 [26-65] months. While significant improvements in pain, mHHS and NAHS were found, 80% of patients still had hip pain graded at≥3 on VAS. The satisfaction rate was 7/10±2 [3-10]. Snapping in the hip had been eliminated in 100% of cases. No complications were observed. This is a minimally invasive surgery that is feasible in patients who have failed an optimal course of conservative treatment. But patients must be informed that pain might not be completely eliminated by this procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective, case series.

Adductor canal block combined with local infiltration analgesia with morphine and betamethasone show superior analgesic effect than local infiltration analgesia alone for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Background

Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) and adductor canal block (ACB) provide postoperative analgesia for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). ACB blocks the saphenous nerve and has smaller impacts on quadriceps muscle weakness. ACB theoretically does not have enough analgesic effects on posterior sensory nerves. LIA may increase its analgesic effects on the posterolateral knee. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether ACB combined with a LIA cocktail of ropivacaine, morphine, and betamethasone has superior analgesic effect than LIA for TKA.

Methods

A total of 86 patients were assessed for eligibility from February 2019 to May 2019. 26 of those were excluded, and 60 patients were divided into 2 groups by computer-generated random number. Group A (LIA group) received LIA cocktail of ropivacaine, morphine and betamethasone. Group B (LIA+ ACB group) received ultrasound-guided ACB and LIA cocktail of ropivacaine, morphine and betamethasone. Postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) resting or active pain scores, opioid consumption, range of motion (ROM), functional tests, complications and satisfaction rates were measured. The longest follow-up was 2 years.

Results

Two groups have no differences in terms of characteristics, preoperative pain or function (P > 0.05). ACB combined with LIA had significantly lower resting and active VAS pain scores, better ROM, better sleeping quality and higher satisfaction rates than LIA alone within 72 h postoperatively (P < 0.05). Complications, or adverse events and HSS score, SF-12 score were observed no significant differences within 2 years postoperatively.

Conclusions

Adductor canal block combined with Local infiltration analgesia provide better early pain control. Although the small statistical benefit may not result in minimal clinically important difference, Adductor canal block combined with Local infiltration analgesia also reduce opioid requirements, improve sleeping quality, and do not increase the complication rate. Therefore, Adductor canal block combined with Local infiltration analgesia still have good application prospects as an effective pain management for total knee arthroplasty.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900021385, 18/02/2019.

Utility of unidimensional and functional pain assessment tools in adult postoperative patients: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

We aimed to appraise the evidence relating to the measurement properties of unidimensional tools to quantify pain after surgery. Furthermore, we wished to identify the tools used to assess interference of pain with functional recovery.

METHODS

Four electronic sources (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO) were searched in August 2020. Two reviewers independently screened articles and assessed risk of bias using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies with a total of 12 498 participants were included. Most of the studies failed to meet the methodological quality standards required by COSMIN. Studies of unidimensional assessment tools were underpinned by low-quality evidence for reliability (five studies), and responsiveness (seven studies). Convergent validity was the most studied property (13 studies) with moderate to high correlation ranging from 0.5 to 0.9 between unidimensional tools. Interpretability results were available only for the visual analogue scale (seven studies) and numerical rating scale (four studies). Studies on functional assessment tools were scarce; only one study included an 'Objective Pain Score,' a tool assessing pain interference with respiratory function, and it had low-quality for convergent validity.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review challenges the validity and reliability of unidimensional tools in adult patients after surgery. We found no evidence that any one unidimensional tool has superior measurement properties in assessing postoperative pain. In addition, because promoting function is a crucial perioperative goal, psychometric validation studies of functional pain assessment tools are needed to improve pain assessment and management.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42020213495.

Safety and Efficacy of Injecting Mesenchymal Stem Cells Into a Human Knee Joint To Treat Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

Intraarticular stem cell therapy has become increasingly used to treat knee osteoarthritis (KOA) with minimal high-quality evidence to support its use. This study aims to see how well intra-articular injections of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) worked and how safe they were for individuals with KOA. A total of 10 studies were extracted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and PMC from 2017 to 2021 in the English language. An assessment of the risk of bias was applied via the Cochrane Collaborative Bias Risk Tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality. Changes in pain and functional outcomes in patients with KOA were measured by a Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) scores, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores at baseline, and follow-up evaluation criteria. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was evaluated using the whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging score (WORMS) and cartilage volume changes. A total of six randomized controlled trials (RCTs), three prospective retrospective clinical trials, and one retrospective clinical trial included 723 patients. They were diagnosed with unilateral or bilateral KOA with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade 1-4 KOA and followed up for six, 12, and 24 months. The experimental groups received multipotent MSCs, mesenchymal progenitor cells (MPCs), adipose tissue progenitor stem cells (AD-MPCs), adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs), bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs), bone marrow aspiration (BMA), bone marrow aspiration concentration (BMAC), or micro fragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) while the controlled groups received normal saline (NS), hyaluronic acid (HA), placebo, or went through conservative management. In conclusion, significant improvements were noticed in the MSCs groups via different outcome measuring tools like KOOS, VAS, WOMAC, and MRI. Furthermore, no significant adverse events (AEs) have been observed. Therefore, intra-articular injections of MSCs are effective and safe in relieving pain and improving motor function in individuals with KOA in the short term, contrary to earlier research findings.

Analysis of Clinical Efficacy of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery for Uterine Fibroids

In order to determine the clinical efficacy of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for uterine fibroids (UFs), the study population comprises 65 patients who underwent hysteromyoma enucleation in our hospital from January 2020 to September 2021. Among them, 30 patients with conventional multiport laparoscopic myomectomy (MLS-M) are taken as the control group (CG), and the rest 35 patients with laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy (LESS-M) are taken as the research group (RG). Perioperative indicators and incidence of complications are compared between groups. Measurements of inflammatory factors (IFs) (tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-6, and C-reactive protein (CRP)) as well as ovarian function indices (follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and estradiol (E2)) were carried out by using ELISA. Patients' pain sensation, body image satisfaction, incision aesthetic satisfaction, and quality of life (QOL) are assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Body Image Scale (BIS), Cosmetic Score (CS), and SF-36, respectively. LESS-M is beneficial to patients' early recovery after operation, with little influence on ovarian function and high incision aesthetic satisfaction, which reserves clinical popularization.

Efficacy of Sacroiliac Joint Injection With Anesthetic and Corticosteroid: A Prospective Observational Study

Sacroiliac joint injection aims to provide pain relief, improve work status, and early return to work. We aimed to investigate the role of corticosteroid and anesthetic mixture to provide short- and long-term pain relief in patients with sacroiliac joint pain. This prospective observational study included 27 patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction who received a combination of triamcinolone and ropivacaine for sacroiliac joint injection followed by three scheduled visits at four weeks, eight weeks, and six months. The pain was assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS), physician's assessment on the number of positive provocative tests, and patients' self-reported assessment to evaluate their functional outcome. At the four weeks and eight weeks follow up evaluations, the mean VAS reduced from 5.85 (±1.03) at baseline to 3.30 (±1.77) at four weeks, 3.30 (±1.86) at eight weeks, and 3.00 (±1.86) at six months. At each interval, improvement in terms of clinical assessment using a series of provocative tests was seen with a mean of 1.37 (±1.33), 1.63 (±1.31), and 1.48 (±1.05) at four weeks, eight weeks, and six months, respectively. For the functional effectiveness parameters (Roland-Morris questionnaires), the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) injected with these drugs combination showed a more significant improvement in symptoms and function, baseline (13.56±3.36), at four weeks (9.04±3.33), at eight weeks (9.07±4.13), and six months (8.26±4.92). Using the one-way repeated measures ANOVA, the SIJ pain, provocative test, and functional outcome significantly improved over time after injection with triamcinolone and ropivacaine (p<0.001). No complications of the administration of these medications were noted. Our findings support the intermediate-term (six months) effectiveness and safety of a combination of corticosteroid and anesthetic injection for patients with SIJ dysfunction who failed conservative treatment.

Association of Use of Tourniquets During Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Elderly Patients With Post-operative Pain and Return to Function

Objective

During total knee arthroplasty (TKA), tourniquet may negatively impact post-operative functional recovery. This study aimed at investigating the effects of tourniquet on pain and return to function.

Methods

Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to February 15th, 2020. Search terms included; total knee arthroplasty, tourniquet, and randomized controlled trial. RCTs evaluating the efficacies of tourniquet during and after operation were selected. Two reviewers independently extracted the data. Effect estimates with 95% CIs were pooled using the random-effects model. Dichotomous data were calculated as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Mean differences (MD) with 95% CI were used to measure the impact of consecutive results. Primary outcomes were the range of motion (ROM) and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores.

Results

Thirty-three RCTs involving a total of 2,393 patients were included in this study. The mean age is 65.58 years old. Compared to no tourniquet group, the use of a tourniquet resulted in suppressed ROM on the 3rd post-operative day [MD, −4.67; (95% CI, −8.00 to −1.35)] and the 1st post-operative month [MD, −3.18; (95% CI, −5.92 to −0.44)]. Pain increased significantly when using tourniquets on the third day after surgery [MD, 0.39; (95% CI, −0.19 to 0.59)]. Moreover, tourniquets can reduce intra-operative blood loss [MD, −127.67; (95% CI, −186.83 to −68.50)], shorter operation time [MD, −3.73; (95% CI, −5.98 to −1.48)], lower transfusion rate [RR, 0.85; (95% CI, 0.73–1.00)], higher superficial wound infection rates RR, 2.43; [(5% CI, 1.04–5.67)] and higher all complication rates [RR, 1.98; (95% CI, 1.22–3.22)].

Conclusion

Moderate certainty evidence shows that the use of a tourniquet was associated with an increased risk of higher superficial wound infection rates and all complication rates. Therefore, the findings did not support the routine use of a tourniquet during TKA.

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Phase I/IIa Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Single Intra-Articular Injection of YYD302 in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis

This study was a phase I/IIa, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, parallel, placebo-controlled clinical trial that aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a single intra-articular injection of YYD302, a novel high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid with divinyl sulfone cross-linking. Thirty adults with knee osteoarthritis were randomized to receive a single 2 mL intra-articular injection of YYD302 (test group 1), 3 mL of YYD302 (test group 2), or 3 mL of the placebo (placebo group). We compared the changes from the baseline in the weight-bearing pain of 100 mm using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OASRSI) responder rates, and the use of rescue analgesics to assess the safety of this novel drug. A total of 26 subjects (10 in test group 1, 10 in test group 2, and 6 in the placebo group) were included in the full analysis set. At 12 weeks, only test groups 1 and 2 showed significant changes in the weight-bearing pain VAS scores (p = 0.0015 and p = 0.0085), symptoms, and average daily KOOS values compared to the baseline (p < 0.001, p = 0.0124, and p = 0.0018, p = 0.0426, respectively). While the rate and frequency of consuming the rescue drug continued to increase in the placebo group until 12 weeks, there was no change in the test groups. Our findings showed that YYD302, especially 2 mL of YYD302, reduced pain and improved knee joint function compared to the placebo.

Comparison of the Effect of MFAT and MFAT + PRP on Treatment of Hip Osteoarthritis: An Observational, Intention-to-Treat Study at One Year

Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is a major contributor to reduced quality of life and concomitant disability associated with lost working life months. Intra-articular injection of various biological materials has shown promise in alleviating symptoms and potentially slowing down the degenerative process. Here, we compared the effects of treatment of a cohort of 147 patients suffering from grade 1–4 hip OA; with either micro-fragmented adipose tissue (MFAT), or a combination of MFAT with platelet-rich plasma (PRP). We found significant improvements in both the visual analogue score for pain (VAS) and Oxford hip score (OHS) that were similar for both treatments with over 60% having an improvement in the VAS score of 20 points or more. These results suggest a positive role for intra-articular injection of MFAT + PRP as a treatment for hip osteoarthritis which may be important particularly in low body mass index (BMI) patients where the difficulty in obtaining sufficient MFAT for treatment could be offset by using this combination of biologicals.

The comparison of dexamethasone and triamcinolone periarticular administration in total knee arthroplasty: retrospective cohort study

Background

Intraoperative periarticular injection of corticosteroid effectively reduces perioperative pain in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, which corticosteroid is most effective for intraoperative periarticular injection remains controversial. We compared the effects of corticosteroids between dexamethasone and triamcinolone acetonide periarticular administration for reducing pain and postoperative nausea and increasing fasting blood glucose concentrations during the perioperative period following TKA.

Methods

One hundred and two patients who underwent TKA from August 2018 to September 2020 were divided into two groups: one received 10 mg dexamethasone for intraoperative periarticular injection and another receiving 40 mg triamcinolone acetonide. Postoperative pain scores at rest and during walking and nausea scores were recorded using a 0-to-10 Numerical Rating Scale. C-reactive protein (CRP) and fasting blood glucose levels were measured pre- and postoperatively.

Results

Pain scores in the triamcinolone group were significantly lower than in the dexamethasone group at rest 7 days postoperatively (1.5 vs. 2.0; p = 0.046) and while walking at both 72 h (3.9 vs. 4.8; p = 0.008) and 7 days postoperatively (3.2 vs. 4.0; p = 0.03). The CRP levels in the triamcinolone group were significantly lower than in the dexamethasone group at 7 days postoperatively (1.6 mg/dl vs. 3.0 mg/dl: p < 0.001). The fasting blood glucose levels at 1 day postoperatively were increased in both groups but not significantly different between the groups. No significant differences in the nausea score were noted between the groups.

Conclusions

Triamcinolone acetonide periarticular administration provided greater pain relief by reducing inflammation to a greater degree than dexamethasone.