Long-Term Success of Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia

Personalized Digital-Heart Technology for Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Targeting in Hearts With Infiltrating Adiposity

BACKGROUND

Infiltrating adipose tissue (inFAT) is a newly recognized proarrhythmic substrate for postinfarct ventricular tachycardias (VT) identifiable on contrast-enhanced computed tomography. This study presents novel digital-heart technology that incorporates inFAT from contrast-enhanced computed tomography to noninvasively predict VT ablation targets and assesses the capability of the technology by comparing its predictions with VT ablation procedure data from patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

METHODS

Digital-heart models reflecting patient-specific inFAT distributions were reconstructed from contrast-enhanced computed tomography. The digital-heart identification of fat-based ablation targeting (DIFAT) technology evaluated the rapid-pacing-induced VTs in each personalized inFAT-based substrate. DIFAT targets that render the inFAT substrate noninducible to VT, including VTs that arise postablation, were determined. DIFAT predictions were compared with corresponding clinical ablations to assess the capabilities of the technology.

RESULTS

DIFAT was developed and applied retrospectively to 29 ischemic cardiomyopathy patients with contrast-enhanced computed tomography. DIFAT ablation volumes were significantly less than the estimated clinical ablation volumes (1.87±0.35 versus 7.05±0.88 cm³, P<0.0005). DIFAT targets overlapped with clinical ablations in 79% of patients, mostly in the apex (72%) and inferior/inferolateral (74%). In 3 patients, DIFAT targets colocalized with redo ablations delivered years after the index procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

DIFAT is a novel digital-heart technology for individualized VT ablation guidance designed to eliminate VT inducibility following initial ablation. DIFAT predictions colocalized well with clinical ablation locations but provided significantly smaller lesions. DIFAT also predicted VTs targeted in redo procedures years later. As DIFAT uses widely accessible computed tomography, its integration into clinical workflows may augment therapeutic precision and reduce redo procedures.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: Executive summary

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Real-world characteristics and readmissions among patients undergoing ablation for ventricular tachycardia: a retrospective database analysis of commercially insured patients in the USA

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency catheter ablation is an effective treatment to alleviate symptoms and reduce recurrent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD/CRT-D) shocks in patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT).

OBJECTIVE

To assess the characteristics and outcomes (complications, inpatient readmissions) of commercially insured patients in the USA undergoing ablation for ischaemic or non-ischaemic VT.

METHODS

Patients aged 18-64 years with a primary diagnosis of VT who underwent ablation between 2006 and 2015 were identified using the IBM MarketScan Commercial Database. The rate of complications including vascular complications, pericarditis, pulmonary embolism and pericardial tamponade over a 30-day post-ablation period (including index admission) was examined. Inpatient readmissions (VT-related, heart failure (HF)-related and non-VT arrhythmia-related) over the 12-month post-ablation period were examined. A Cox regression model was used to determine factors associated with inpatient readmissions.

RESULTS

5242 patients (488 with ischaemic and 4754 with non-ischaemic VT) met the study criteria. The majority of VT ablations occurred in an outpatient setting (57% for ischaemic and 66% for non-ischaemic VT). Among complications, vascular complications were most frequent (2.05% among ischaemic and 1.6% among non-ischaemic VT patients) over the 30-day post-ablation period. Among ischaemic VT patients, 17%, 7.6% and 4.7% had VT-related, HF-related and non-VT arrhythmia-related inpatient readmissions, respectively in the 12-month post-ablation period. For non-ischaemic VT patients, these numbers were 7.5%, 1.7% and 3.1%, respectively. Inpatient setting (vs outpatient), baseline ICD/CRT-D implantation, HF comorbidity and ≥2 prior hospitalisations were associated with a higher risk of post-ablation VT-related inpatient readmissions among ischaemic VT patients. Similar factors also were associated with a higher risk of post-ablation VT-related inpatient readmission among non-ischaemic VT patients.

CONCLUSION

Setting of ablation and comorbidity status were found to influence readmission rates. Complication and readmission rates following VT ablation were low indicating towards the favourable safety profile of VT ablation.

Secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death

The prevention and treatment of sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains a significant public health challenge. For patients with a history of sudden death attributable to ventricular arrhythmia, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy is a mainstay of treatment, although these patients remain at high risk for recurrent ventricular arrhythmia and defibrillator therapies. In this review, we summarize landmark clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of ICD therapy in secondary prevention patients, review clinical outcomes including mode of death in survivors of SCD, and highlight the role for systematic diagnostic evaluation. We additionally discuss the invasive electrophysiological management of these patients, including ICD selection and programming as well as the role and timing of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and catheter ablation. Finally, we frame future challenges and needs to advance the care for secondary prevention patients.

Epicardial Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Catheter ablation can effectively reduce the frequency of ventricular tachycardia in ischemic cardiomyopathy by ablating sites of reentry within complex regions of myocardial scar. In cases of near transmural infarction, this arrhythmia substrate may be nearer the epicardium than the endocardium, and epicardial ablation may be necessary. An epicardial substrate location can potentially be predicted by imaging that suggests transmural infarction. Percutaneous epicardial ablation improves outcomes in selected patients, but is higher risk and avoided in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting.

Optimal Timing of VT Ablation for Patients with ICD Therapies

Purpose of Review

Optimal timing for catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia is an important yet unresolved subject. While it is clear that it is indicated with relatively advanced disease, it is still uncertain how early it should be recommended. In this review, we will focus on the status of timing of catheter ablation for VT in patients with ICD therapies.

Recent Findings

The latest expert consensus statement added a new timing indication for catheter ablation after the first episode of monomorphic VT, in patients with ischemic heart disease and an ICD.

Summary

Early referral for catheter ablation reduces the number of VT recurrences; however, an impact on mortality has not been demonstrated yet. Guidelines and real-world data alike show an increasing trend to refer patients after the first VT episode in ICD patients. Randomized clinical trials powered to assess mortality are essential in order confirm the beneficial effects of an early strategy.

In vivo ratiometric optical mapping enables high-resolution cardiac electrophysiology in pig models

Aims

Cardiac optical mapping is the gold standard for measuring complex electrophysiology in ex vivo heart preparations. However, new methods for optical mapping in vivo have been elusive. We aimed at developing and validating an experimental method for performing in vivo cardiac optical mapping in pig models.

Methods and results

First, we characterized ex vivo the excitation-ratiometric properties during pacing and ventricular fibrillation (VF) of two near-infrared voltage-sensitive dyes (di-4-ANBDQBS/di-4-ANEQ(F)PTEA) optimized for imaging blood-perfused tissue (n = 7). Then, optical-fibre recordings in Langendorff-perfused hearts demonstrated that ratiometry permits the recording of optical action potentials (APs) with minimal motion artefacts during contraction (n = 7). Ratiometric optical mapping ex vivo also showed that optical AP duration (APD) and conduction velocity (CV) measurements can be accurately obtained to test drug effects. Secondly, we developed a percutaneous dye-loading protocol in vivo to perform high-resolution ratiometric optical mapping of VF dynamics (motion minimal) using a high-speed camera system positioned above the epicardial surface of the exposed heart (n = 11). During pacing (motion substantial) we recorded ratiometric optical signals and activation via a 2D fibre array in contact with the epicardial surface (n = 7). Optical APs in vivo under general anaesthesia showed significantly faster CV [120 (63–138) cm/s vs. 51 (41–64) cm/s; P = 0.032] and a statistical trend to longer APD₉₀ [242 (217–254) ms vs. 192 (182–233) ms; P = 0.095] compared with ex vivo measurements in the contracting heart. The average rate of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) decay of di-4-ANEQ(F)PTEA in vivo was 0.0671 ± 0.0090 min⁻¹. However, reloading with di-4-ANEQ(F)PTEA fully recovered the initial SNR. Finally, toxicity studies (n = 12) showed that coronary dye injection did not generate systemic nor cardiac damage, although di-4-ANBDQBS injection induced transient hypotension, which was not observed with di-4-ANEQ(F)PTEA.

Conclusions

In vivo optical mapping using voltage ratiometry of near-infrared dyes enables high-resolution cardiac electrophysiology in translational pig models.

Catheter Ablation in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock and Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia

BACKGROUND

There is paucity of data regarding radiofrequency ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with cardiogenic shock and concomitant VT refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs on mechanical support.

METHODS

Patients undergoing VT ablation at our center were enrolled in a prospectively maintained registry and screened for the current study (2010-2017).

RESULTS

All 21 consecutive patients with cardiogenic shock and concomitant refractory ventricular arrhythmia undergoing bailout ablation due to inability to wean off mechanical support were included. Median age was 61 years, 86% were men, median left ventricular ejection fraction was 20%, 81% had ischemic cardiomyopathy, and PAINESD score was 18±5. The type of mechanical support in place before the procedure was intra-aortic balloon pump in 14 patients (67%), Impella CP in 2, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in 2, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and intra-aortic balloon pump in 2, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Impella CP in 1. Endocardial voltage maps showed myocardial scar in 19 patients (90%). The clinical VTs were inducible in 13 patients (62%), whereas 6 patients had premature ventricular contraction-induced ventricular fibrillation/VT (29%), and VT could not be induced in 2 patients (9%). Activation mapping was possible in all 13 with inducible clinical VTs. Substrate modification was performed in 15 patients with scar (79%). After ablation and scar modification, the arrhythmia was noninducible in 19 patients (91%). Seventeen (81%) were eventually weaned off mechanical support successfully, but 6 (29%) died during the index admission from persistent cardiogenic shock. Patients who had ventricular arrhythmia and cardiogenic shock on presentation had a trend toward lower in-hospital mortality compared with those who presented with cardiogenic shock and later developed ventricular arrhythmia.

CONCLUSIONS

Bailout ablation for refractory ventricular arrhythmia in cardiogenic shock allowed successful weaning from mechanical support in a large proportion of patients. Mortality remains high, but the majority of patients were discharged home and survived beyond 1 year.

Non-invasive Stereotactic Radioablation: A New Option for the Treatment of Ventricular Arrhythmias

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Radiofrequency catheter ablation can be effective for the treatment of VT but it carries a high rate of recurrence often attributable to insufficient depth of penetration for reaching critical arrhythmogenic substrates. Stereotactic body radioablation (SBRT) is a commonly used technology developed for the non-invasive treatment of solid tumours. Recent evidence suggests that it can also be effective for the treatment of VT. It is a non-invasive procedure and it has the unique advantage of delivering ablative energy to any desired volume within the body to reach sites that are inaccessible with catheter ablation. This article summarises the pre-clinical studies that have formed the evidence base for SBRT in the heart, describes the clinical approaches for SBRT VT ablation and provides perspective on next steps for this new treatment modality.

Development of a Shock-Wave Catheter Ablation System for Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias: Validation Study in Pigs In Vivo

Background

Although radiofrequency catheter ablation is the current state‐of‐the‐art treatment for ventricular tachyarrhythmias, it has limited success for several reasons, including insufficient lesion depth, prolonged inflammation with subsequent recurrence, and thromboembolisms due to myoendocardial thermal injury. Because shock waves can be applied to deep lesions without heat, we have been developing a shock‐wave catheter ablation (SWCA) system to overcome these fundamental limitations of radiofrequency catheter ablation. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of our SWCA system for clinical application to treat ventricular tachyarrhythmia.

Methods and Results

In 33 pigs, we examined SWCA in vivo for the following 4 protocols. First, in an epicardial substrate model (n=8), endocardial SWCA significantly decreased the sensing threshold (pre‐ versus postablation: 11.4±3.8 versus 6.8±3.6 mV; P<0.05) and increased the pacing threshold (pre‐ versus postablation: 1.6±0.8 versus 2.0±1.1 V; P<0.05), whereas endocardial radiofrequency catheter ablation failed to do so. Second, in a myocardial infarction model (n=3), epicardial SWCA of the border zone of the infarcted lesion was as effective as ablation of the normal myocardium. Third, in a coronary artery application model (n=10), direct application of shock waves to the epicardial coronary arteries caused no adverse effects in either the acute or chronic phase. Fourth, with an epicardial approach (n=8), we found that 90 shots per site provided an ideal therapeutic condition to create deep lesions with less superficial damage.

Conclusions

These results indicate that our new SWCA system is effective and safe for treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias with deep arrhythmogenic substrates.

Catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias and in-hospital mortality: insights from the German-wide Helios hospital network of 5052 cases

AIMS

Catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular arrhythmias is one of the most challenging electrophysiological interventions with an increasing use over the last years. Several benefits must be weighed against the risk of potentially life-threatening complications which necessitates a steady reevaluation of safety endpoints. Therefore, the aims of this study were (i) to investigate overall in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing such procedures and (ii) to identify variables associated with in-hospital mortality in a German-wide hospital network.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between January 2010 and September 2018, administrative data provided by 85 Helios hospitals were screened for patients with main or secondary discharge diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) in combination with an arrhythmia-related CA using ICD- and OPS codes. In 5052 cases (mean age 60.9 ± 14.3 years, 30.1% female) of 30 different hospitals, in-hospital mortality was 1.27% with a higher mortality in patients ablated for VT (1.99%, n = 2, 955) compared to PVC (0.24%, n = 2, 097, P < 0.01). Mortality rates were 2.06% in patients with ischaemic heart disease (IHD, n = 2, 137), 1.47% in patients with non-ischaemic structural heart disease (NIHD, n = 1, 224), and 0.12% in patients without structural heart disease (NSHD, n = 1, 691). Considering different types of hospital admission, mortality rates were 0.35% after elective (n = 2, 825), 1.60% after emergency admission/hospital transfer <24 h (n = 1, 314) and 3.72% following delayed hospital transfer >24 h after initial admission (n = 861, P < 0.01 vs. elective admission and emergency admission/hospital transfer <24 h). In multivariable analysis, a delayed hospital transfer >24 h [odds ratio (OR) 2.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.59-3.28, P < 0.01], the occurrence of procedure-related major adverse events (OR 6.81, 95% CI 2.90-16.0, P < 0.01), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI, OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.56-3.66, P < 0.01) and its components congestive heart failure (OR 8.04, 95% CI 1.71-37.8, P < 0.01), and diabetes mellitus (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.13-2.22, P < 0.01) were significantly associated with in-hospital death.

CONCLUSIONS

We reported in-hospital mortality rates after CA of ventricular arrhythmias in the largest multicentre, administrative dataset in Germany which can be implemented in quality management programs. Aside from comorbidities, a delayed hospital transfer to a CA performing centre is associated with an increased in-hospital mortality. This deserves further studies to determine the optimal management strategy.

[Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia : Clinical outcome]

Catheter-based ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) is increasingly used in clinical practice. The reported success rates are especially high in idiopathic VT. In randomized controlled clinical trials like VANISH, ablation of scar-associated VT was superior in terms of mortality when compared to antiarrhythmic therapy. Treatment at experienced centers, e.g., using state-of-the-art electroanatomical mapping systems, is a promising option for these complex and often multimorbid patients.

Mapping and Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Cardiomyopathies

Mapping and ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathies remain a major challenge. The electroanatomic abnormalities are frequently inaccessible to conventional endocardial ablations. Diagnostic diligence with a thorough understanding of the potential mechanisms/substrate, coupled with detailed electroanatomic mapping, is essential. Careful procedural planning, advanced imaging, and unipolar recordings help to formulate ablation strategy, facilitate work flow, and improve outcomes. Inaccessibility of arrhythmogenic substrate and disease progression are important causes of ablation failure. Early intervention may help to improve outcome and minimize complications. Several novel adjunctive ablation techniques are capable of serving as alternative options in refractory cases.

Outcomes, Costs, and 30-Day Readmissions After Catheter Ablation of Myocardial Infarct-Associated Ventricular Tachycardia in the Real World: Nationwide Readmissions Database 2010 to 2015

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing catheter ablation of myocardial infarction-associated ventricular tachycardia (VT) have significant comorbidities that can increase the risks of adverse outcomes. The rates of readmissions after VT ablation are unknown. We sought to examine in-hospital outcomes, costs, and 30-day readmissions after catheter ablation of myocardial infarction-associated VT.

METHODS

Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, we evaluated 4109 admissions for catheter ablation of myocardial infarction-associated VT occurring between 2010 and 2015. On the basis of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification and Clinical Classification Software codes, we identified comorbidities, procedural complications, 30-day readmissions, and costs associated with VT ablation.

RESULTS

The index admission in-hospital mortality rate and procedural complication rate after VT ablation were 2.7% and 11.5%, respectively. Independent predictors of mortality included pulmonary hypertension, lung disease, obesity, and coagulopathy. Following discharge after VT ablation, the 30-day readmission rate was 19.2% with a median time to readmission of 10.0 days (IQR, 3.8-17.6 days) and an in-hospital mortality rate of 2.9%. Cardiac causes accounted for 74% of readmissions, with VT and congestive heart failure constituting 41% and 14% of all readmissions, respectively. Pulmonary hypertension, congestive heart failure, smoking, chronic pulmonary disease, and prolonged index hospitalization were significant independent predictors of 30-day readmission. After adjustment, 30-day readmissions were associated with a 38.9% increase in cumulative hospitalization costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Thirty-day readmissions after catheter ablation of VT occur in nearly 1 out of 5 cases, with the majority of readmissions being caused by recurrent VT or congestive heart failure. Baseline comorbidities are significant predictors of procedural mortality, complications, and readmissions. Strategies to reduce recurrent VT postablation by improving procedural success, optimizing postablation heart failure treatment, and ensuring close postdischarge follow-up may help reduce readmissions and healthcare costs.

The Role of Cardiac MRI in the Management of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Ischaemic and Non-ischaemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) and VF account for the majority of sudden cardiac deaths worldwide. Treatments for VT/VF include anti-arrhythmic drugs, ICDs and catheter ablation, but these treatments vary in effectiveness and carry substantial risks and/or expense. Current methods of selecting patients for ICD implantation are imprecise and fail to identify some at-risk patients, while leading to others being overtreated. In this article, the authors discuss the current role and future direction of cardiac MRI (CMRI) in refining diagnosis and personalising ventricular arrhythmia management. The capability of CMRI with gadolinium contrast delayed-enhancement patterns and, more recently, T1 mapping to determine the aetiology of patients presenting with heart failure is well established. Although CMRI imaging in patients with ICDs can be challenging, recent technical developments have started to overcome this. CMRI can contribute to risk stratification, with precise and reproducible assessment of ejection fraction, quantification of scar and 'border zone' volumes, and other indices. Detailed tissue characterisation has begun to enable creation of personalised computer models to predict an individual patient's arrhythmia risk. When patients require VT ablation, a substrate-based approach is frequently employed as haemodynamic instability may limit electrophysiological activation mapping. Beyond accurate localisation of substrate, CMRI could be used to predict the location of re-entrant circuits within the scar to guide ablation.

Histopathological Characterization of Radiofrequency Ablation in Ventricular Scar Tissue

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to characterize the histopathological features of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in heterogeneous ventricular scar in comparison to those in healthy myocardium.

BACKGROUND

The histopathological features of RFA have been studied largely in normal myocardium. However, its effect on clinically relevant heterogeneous scar is not well understood.

METHODS

Five swine with chronic infarction underwent RFA using 35-W, 45-s, 10-20 g (Biosense Webster, Irwindale, California) in heterogenous scar tissue (voltage ≤1.5 mV) and healthy myocardium (≥3.0 mV). The location of each application was marked using the electroanatomical mapping system. Histological sections at intervals of 0.5 mm with hematoxylin and eosin and Masson's trichrome stained intervals were created. A pathologist blinded to the myocardium type characterized the extent of RF injury in cellular, extracellular, and vascular structures.

RESULTS

In healthy myocardium, 23 of 23 lesions (100%) were well demarcated and could be precisely measured (width: 11.3 ± 3.3 mm; depth: 7.3 ± 2.0 mm). In scar tissue, only 3 of 30 lesions (10%) were identified, and none could be measured due to a lack of defined borders. Lesions in healthy myocardium had a distinctive architecture showing a coagulative necrosis core surrounded by an outer rim of contraction band necrosis. Lesions in scar had ill-defined tissue injury without a distinct architecture. In all ablated regions, viable myocytes remained interspersed between necrotic myocytes exhibiting characteristics of both coagulative and contraction band necrosis. Connective tissue was more resistant to thermal injury in comparison to cardiomyocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

RFA in scarred myocardium results in irregular tissue injury and unpredictable effect on surviving cardiomyocytes. This may be related to biophysical differences between healthy and scarred myocardium.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for ablation of ventricular tachycardia

Aims

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for ventricular tachycardias (VTs) could be an option after failed catheter ablation. In this study, we analysed the long-term efficacy and toxicity of SBRT applied as a bail-out procedure.

Methods and results

Patients with structural heart disease and unsuccessful catheter ablations for VTs underwent SBRT. The planning target volume (PTV) was accurately delineated using exported 3D electroanatomical maps with the delineated critical part of re-entry circuits. This was defined by detailed electroanatomic mapping and by pacing manoeuvres during the procedure. Using the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead as a surrogate contrast marker for respiratory movement compensation, 25 Gy was delivered to the PTV using CyberKnife. We evaluated occurrences of sustained VT, electrical storm, antitachycardia pacing, and shock; time to death; and radiation-induced events. From 2014 until March 2017, 10 patients underwent radiosurgical ablation (mean PTV, 22.15 mL; treatment duration, 68 min). After radiosurgery, four patients experienced nausea and one patient presented gradual progression of mitral regurgitation. During the follow-up (median 28 months), VT burden was reduced by 87.5% compared with baseline (P = 0.012) and three patients suffered non-arrhythmic deaths. After the blanking period, VT recurred in eight of 10 patients. The mean time to first antitachycardia pacing and shock were 6.5 and 21 months, respectively.

Conclusion

Stereotactic body radiotherapy appears to show long-term safety and effectiveness for VT ablation in structural heart disease inaccessible to catheter ablation. We report one possible radiation-related toxicity and promising overall survival, warranting evaluation in a prospective multicentre clinical trial.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: Executive summary

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS expert consensus statement on evaluation, risk stratification, and management of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is an arrhythmogenic disorder of the myocardium not secondary to ischemic, hypertensive, or valvular heart disease. ACM incorporates a broad spectrum of genetic, systemic, infectious, and inflammatory disorders. This designation includes, but is not limited to, arrhythmogenic right/left ventricular cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, Chagas disease, and left ventricular noncompaction. The ACM phenotype overlaps with other cardiomyopathies, particularly dilated cardiomyopathy with arrhythmia presentation that may be associated with ventricular dilatation and/or impaired systolic function. This expert consensus statement provides the clinician with guidance on evaluation and management of ACM and includes clinically relevant information on genetics and disease mechanisms. PICO questions were utilized to evaluate contemporary evidence and provide clinical guidance related to exercise in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Recommendations were developed and approved by an expert writing group, after a systematic literature search with evidence tables, and discussion of their own clinical experience, to present the current knowledge in the field. Each recommendation is presented using the Class of Recommendation and Level of Evidence system formulated by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association and is accompanied by references and explanatory text to provide essential context. The ongoing recognition of the genetic basis of ACM provides the opportunity to examine the diverse triggers and potential common pathway for the development of disease and arrhythmia.

Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Complicated with Ventricular Rupture

Patients with cardiomyopathy (CM) are at increased risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD), specifically, secondary to ventricular arrhythmias such as ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). Those that have CM are further stratified based on risk of death from ventricular arrhythmias. If determined high risk, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD), anti-arrhythmic medication or even ablation procedures are considered in order to minimize the risk of SCD. Ablation procedures have increased in number over the years, along with the recognition of high-risk CM patients. Along with the increase in number of ablation procedures, complications from such procedures have decreased in number and the ventricular arrhythmia ablation remains a relatively low-risk procedure. Here we describe a patient with known CM, specifically hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) with a relatively rare and high-risk complication, being ventricular aneurysm. HCM patients with ventricular aneurysm are often referred for ablation procedures as they are at a significantly higher risk for SCD due to arrhythmias. Our patient not only underwent an ablation procedure, but suffered from the rare complication of tamponade, which occurs on average <2% annually. Although, risk assessments exist for stratifying CM as high-risk prior to invasive procedures, risk assessments are lacking for the specific population of HCM patients with LV aneurysm, thus presenting us with an area for further research.

Mechanical Circulatory Support During Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia: Indications and Options

Mapping of scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) in structural heart disease is fundamentally driven by identifying the critical isthmus of conduction that supports re-entry in and around myocardial scar. Mapping can be performed using activation and entrainment techniques during VT, or by substrate mapping performed in stable sinus or paced rhythm. Activation and entrainment mapping requires the patient to be in continuous VT, which may not be haemodynamically tolerated, or, if tolerated, may lead to adverse sequelae related to impaired end organ perfusion. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices may facilitate haemodynamic stability and preserve end organ perfusion during sustained VT to permit mapping for long periods. Available options for haemodynamic support include an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), TandemHeart left atrial to femoral artery bypass system (CardiacAssist Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, USA), Impella left ventricle (LV) to aorta flow-assist system (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); the bypass and assist devices provide far better augmentation of cardiac output than IABP. MCS has potential key advantages including maintenance of vital organ perfusion, reduction of intra-cardiac filling pressures, reduction of LV volumes, wall stress, and myocardial consumption of oxygen, and improvement of coronary perfusion during prolonged periods of VT induction and/or mapping. Observational studies show MCS allows for longer duration of mapping, and increased likelihood of VT termination, without an increased risk of peri-procedural mortality or VT recurrence in follow-up, despite being used in a significantly sicker cohort of patients. However, MCS has increased risk of complications related to vascular access, bleeding, thromboembolic risk, mapping system interference, increase procedural complexity and increased cost. Acute haemodynamic decompensation occurs in ∼11% of patients undergoing VT ablation, and is associated with increased mortality. Prospectively identifying patients at risk of acute haemodynamic decompensation in the peri-procedural period may allow prophylactic MCS. Although observational studies of MCS in patients at high risk of haemodynamic decompensation are encouraging, its benefit needs to be proven in randomised trials. This review will summarise the indication for MCS, forms of MCS, procedural outcomes, complications and utility of MCS during VT ablation.

Epicardial ventricular tachycardia in ischemic cardiomyopathy: Prevalence, electrophysiological characteristics, and long-term ablation outcomes

INTRODUCTION

The characteristics of the epicardial (EPI) substrate responsible for ventricular tachycardia (VT) in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) are undefined, and data on the long-term outcomes of EPI catheter ablation limited. We evaluated the prevalence, electrophysiologic features, and outcomes of catheter ablation of EPI VT in ICM.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From December 2010 to June 2013, a total of 13 of 93 (14%) patients with ICM underwent catheter ablation at our institution and had conclusive evidence of critical EPI substrate demonstrated to participate in VT with activation, entrainment and/or pace mapping during sinus rhythm (two other patients underwent EPI mapping but had no optimal ablation targets). The electrophysiologic substrate characteristics and activation/entrainment mapping data were compared with a reference group of ICM patients without evidence of critical EPI substrate (N = 44), defined as a complete procedural success (noninducibility of any VT at programmed stimulation) after endocardial (ENDO)-only ablation. Patients with failed EPI access (N = 2) or history of cardiac surgery (N = 92) were excluded from the study. All 13 patients had evidence of abnormal EPI substrate with fractionated/late/split electrograms and low-bipolar voltage areas. The critical VT ablation sites were all located within the EPI bipolar "dense" scar (<1.0 mV) opposite the ENDO bipolar scar in 77% of cases and extending beyond the ENDO bipolar scar (within the ENDO unipolar low-voltage area) in the remaining patients. Compared with the reference ENDO-only group, patients with EPI VT had a smaller ENDO bipolar scar area, 54.0 (37.1-84) vs 86.7 (55.6-112) cm² ; P = 0.0159, with a similar extent of ENDO unipolar low voltage. No other substrate characteristics or location differed between the two groups. After 35.2 ± 24.2 months of follow-up, VT-free survival was 73% in patients with EPI VT compared with 66% in the ENDO-only group (log-rank P = 0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of the critical EPI substrate responsible for VT can be demonstrated in at least 14% of patients with ICM. The majority of EPI critical ablation sites are distributed opposite the ENDO bipolar scar area and catheter ablation is effective in achieving long-term arrhythmia control.

Repeat ablation of refractory ventricular arrhythmias in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy: Impact of midmyocardial substrate and role of adjunctive ablation techniques

INTRODUCTION

Multiple ablations are often necessary to manage ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) patients. We assessed characteristics and outcomes and role of adjunctive, nonstandard ablation in repeat VA ablation (RAbl) in NICM.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive NICM patients undergoing RAbl were analyzed, with characteristics of the last VA ablations compared between those undergoing 1 versus multiple-repeat ablations (1-RAbl vs. >1RAbl), and between those with or without midmyocardial substrate (MMS). VA-free survival was compared. Eighty-eight patients underwent 124 RAbl, 26 with > 1RAbl, and 26 with MMS. 1-RAbl and > 1-RAbl groups were similar in age (57 ± 16 vs. 57 ± 17 years; P = 0.92), males (76% vs. 69%; P = 0.60), LVEF (40 ± 17% vs. 40 ± 18%; P = 0.96), and amiodarone use (31% vs. 46%, P = 0.22). One-year VA freedom between 1-RAbl vs. > 1RAbl was similar (82% vs. 80%; P = 0.81); adjunctive ablation was utilized more in >1RAbl (31% vs. 11%, P = 0.02), and complication rates were higher (27% vs. 7%, P = 0.01), most due to septal substrate and anticipated heart block. >1-RAbl patients had more MMS (62% vs. 16%, P < 0.01). Although MMS was associated with worse VA-free survival after 1-RAbl (43% vs. 69%, P = 0.01), when >1RAbl was performed, more often with nonstandard ablation, VA-free survival was comparable to non-MMS patients (85% vs. 81%; P = 0.69). More RAbls were required in MMS versus non-MMS patients (2.00 ± 0.98 vs. 1.16 ± 0.37; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

For NICM patients with recurrent, refractory VAs despite previous ablation, effective arrhythmia control can safely be achieved with subsequent ablation, although >1 repeat procedure with adjunctive ablation is often required, especially with MMS.

Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) Substrate Characteristics: Insights from Multimodality Structural and Functional Imaging of the VT Substrate Using Cardiac MRI Scar, 123I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine SPECT Innervation, and Bipolar Voltage

Postischemic adaptation results in characteristic myocardial structural and functional changes in the ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrate. The aim of this study was to compare myocardial structural and functional adaptations (late gadolinium enhancement/abnormal innervation) with detailed VT mapping data to identify regional heterogeneities in postischemic changes. Methods: Fifteen patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and drug-refractory VT underwent late gadolinium enhancement cardiac MRI (CMR), ¹²³I-metaiodobenzylguanidine SPECT, and high-resolution bipolar voltage mapping to assess fibrosis (>3 SDs), abnormal innervation (<50% tracer uptake), and low-voltage area (<1.5 mV), respectively. Three-dimensional reconstructed CMR/¹²³I-metaiodobenzylguanidine models were coregistered for further comparison. Results: Postischemic structural and functional adaptations in all 3 categories were similar in size (reported as median [quartile 1-quartile 3]: CMR scar, 46.1 cm² [33.1-86.9 cm²]; abnormal innervation, 47.8 cm² [40.5-68.1 cm²]; and low-voltage area, 29.5 cm² [24.5-102.6 cm²]; P > 0.05). However, any single modality underestimated the total VT substrate area defined as abnormal in at least 1 of the 3 modalities (76.0 cm² [57.9-143.2 cm²]; P < 0.001). Within the total VT substrate area, regions abnormal in all 3 modalities were most common (25.2%). However, significant parts of the VT substrate had undergone heterogeneous adaptation (abnormal in <3 modalities); the most common categories were "abnormal innervation only" (18.2%), "CMR scar plus abnormal innervation only" (14.9%), and "CMR scar only" (14.6%). All 14 VT channel/exit sites (0.88 ± 0.74 mV) were localized to myocardium demonstrating CMR scar and abnormal innervation. This specific tissue category accounted for 68.3% of the CMR scar and 31.2% of the total abnormal postischemic VT substrate area. Conclusion: Structural and functional imaging demonstrated regional heterogeneities in the postischemic VT substrate not appreciated by any single modality alone. The coexistence of abnormal innervation and CMR scar may identify a particularly "proarrhythmic" adaptation and may represent a potential novel target for VT ablation.

Decompensated Heart Failure With Ventricular Arrhythmia: How Useful Is VT Ablation?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ventricular arrhythmias are common in patients with heart failure. Their management especially in the context of decompensated heart failure poses a clinical challenge to modern cardiologists. In this review article, we aim to summarise the current evidence on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of ventricular tachycardia in heart failure, focusing primarily on the use of catheter ablation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The evolution of electro-anatomical mapping techniques and ablation catheter technology in the recent years has paved the path for the successful application of catheter ablation in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias. The efficacy of catheter ablation in the management of ventricular tachycardia in patients with chronic heart failure has recently been the epicentre of a number of randomised controlled trials, demonstrating promising results with regard to arrhythmia suppression and all-cause mortality. The usefulness of catheter ablation in decompensated heart failure has been explored to a lesser degree, primarily in the setting of an electrical storm. Implantable cardiac defibrillators play the most important role in improving prognosis and preventing sudden cardiac death in patients with heart failure. Catheter ablation for the treatment of recurrent VT in patients with chronic heart failure is an efficacious strategy that can be applied adjunctively to or in instead of antiarrhythmic therapy, and it is highly successful at preventing recurrent ventricular tachycardia, ICD shocks. Its efficacy in the context of decompensated heart failure requires further research, with current evidence rendering its use promising.

Ablation Outcomes and Predictors of Mortality Following Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia: Data From the German Multicenter Ablation Registry

Background

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) causes significant morbidity and mortality. Implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator shocks terminate VT but confer a significant morbidity and mortality risk. Therefore, VT ablation is increasingly common. Patients with structural heart disease (SHD) and patients with structurally normal hearts as well as the subgroup with and without ischemic heart disease were assessed for predictors of mortality and nonfatal VT recurrence. We present the first multicenter, prospective German VT registry.

Methods and Results

In 334 patients, 118 structurally normal hearts and 216 SHD (74.5% ischemic heart disease), referred for VT ablation in 38 centers, long‐term follow‐up was assessed for a minimum of 12 months and analyzed for factors predicting VT recurrence rates and mortality. The VTs in SHD patients were more frequently hemodynamically unstable (34.7% versus 12.7%, P<0.0001) or incessant (9.7% versus 2.7%, P<0.05). More SHD patients underwent substrate modification than patients with structurally normal hearts who had more focal ablations. Ablation failure was 9% in both groups. Two‐year mortality was higher in patients with SHD (18.7% versus 3.5%, P<0.001). Predictors of mortality include age >60 years, incessant VT, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤30%, procedural failure, and Class I and III anti‐arrhythmic drug use at discharge. Only procedural failure is a predictor of nonfatal VT recurrence.

Conclusions

Procedural failure was the sole independent predictor for nonfatal VT recurrence for our study cohort. This emphasizes the importance of a successful ablation procedure in experienced hands to reduce long‐term mortality and nonfatal VT recurrence.

Non-contrast-enhanced T1 -weighted MRI of myocardial radiofrequency ablation lesions

PURPOSE

To demonstrate imaging of radiofrequency ablation lesions with non-contrast-enhanced T1 -weighted (T1w) MRI.

METHODS

Fifteen swine underwent left ventricular ablation followed by MRI using different preparations: endocardial or epicardial ablation of naïve animal, or endocardial ablation of animal with myocardial infarction. Lesion imaging was performed using free-breathing, non-contrast-enhanced, T1w sequence with long inversion time (TI). Also acquired were T1 maps and delayed contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging. Hearts were excised for ex vivo imaging, and sliced for gross pathology and histology.

RESULTS

All ablations were visibly enhanced in non-contrast-enhanced T1w imaging using TI = 700 ms. T1w enhancement agreed with regions of necrosis in gross pathology and histology. Enhanced lesion cores were surrounded by dark bands containing contraction band necrosis, hematoma, and edema. In animals with myocardial infarction, chronic scar was hypointense in T1w, whereas acute ablations were enhanced, allowing discrimination between chronic scar and acute lesions, unlike DCE. Contrast was sufficient to create 3D volume renderings of lesions after minor postprocessing.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-contrast-enhanced T1w imaging with long TI promises to be an effective method for visualizing necrosis within radiofrequency ablation lesions. Enhancement is more specific and stationary than that from DCE. The imaging can be repeated as needed, unlike DCE, and may be especially useful for assessing ablations during or after a procedure. Magn Reson Med 79:879-889, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Team Management of the Ventricular Tachycardia Patient

Ventricular tachycardia is a common arrhythmia in patients with structural heart disease and heart failure, and is now seen more frequently as these patients survive longer with modern therapies. In addition, these patients often have multiple comorbidities. While anti-arrhythmic drug therapy, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation and ventricular tachycardia ablation are the mainstay of therapy, well managed by the cardiac electrophysiologist, there are many other facets in the care of these patients, such as heart failure management, treatment of comorbidities and anaesthetic interventions, where the expertise of other specialists is essential for optimal patient care. A coordinated team approach is therefore essential to achieve the best possible outcomes for these complex patients.

Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Structural Heart Disease: Indications, Strategies, and Outcomes-Part II

In contrast to ventricular tachycardia (VT) that occurs in the setting of a structurally normal heart, VT that occurs in patients with structural heart disease carries an elevated risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD), and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are the mainstay of therapy. In these individuals, catheter ablation may be used as adjunctive therapy to treat or prevent repetitive ICD therapies when antiarrhythmic drugs are ineffective or not desired. However, certain patients with frequent premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) or VT and tachycardiomyopathy should be considered for ablation before ICD implantation because left ventricular function may improve, consequently decreasing the risk of SCD and obviating the need for an ICD. The goal of this paper is to review the pathophysiology, mechanism, and management of VT in the setting of structural heart disease and discuss the evolving role of catheter ablation in decreasing ventricular arrhythmia recurrence.