G protein specificity in receptor-effector coupling. Analysis of the roles of G0 and Gi2 in GH4C1 pituitary cells

Evidence for a direct negative coupling between dopamine-D2 receptors and PLC by heterotrimeric Gi1/2 proteins in rat anterior pituitary cell membranes

Dopamine (DA) is known to inhibit basal and hormone TRH- or angiotensin II (AngII)-stimulated PRL secretion and inositol phosphate accumulation in rat pituitary cells in primary culture. This inhibition persists when cells are incubated in a calcium-free medium (a condition in which DA could not inhibit PLC activities by blocking calcium influx) and is abolished by a Pertussis toxin treatment. These data suggest that DA receptor could be negatively coupled to PLC by a direct mechanism involving a Pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein. To demonstrate this hypothesis, we measured PLC activities on crude plasma membranes obtained from rat pituitary cells in primary culture grown in the presence of tritiated myo-inositol. We showed that 1) DA and quinpirole or RU24926 (specific D2 agonists) inhibited both basal and TRH- or AngII-stimulated membrane PLC activities. 2) Such inhibitions were completely prevented by sulpiride (specific D2 antagonist). 3) Heterotrimeric Gi1/2 proteins coupled the DA receptors to PLC because DA inhibitions were completely reversed by preincubation either with Pertussis toxin or with a specific G(alpha)i1/(alpha)i2 antibody. Such data are in favor of the existence of a direct negative coupling between DA-D2 receptor and PLC on a native physiological plasma membrane model.

Multiplicity of mechanisms of serotonin receptor signal transduction

The serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) receptors have been divided into 7 subfamilies by convention, 6 of which include 13 different genes for G-protein-coupled receptors. Those subfamilies have been characterized by overlapping pharmacological properties, amino acid sequences, gene organization, and second messenger coupling pathways. Post-genomic modifications, such as alternative mRNA splicing or mRNA editing, creates at least 20 more G-protein-coupled 5-HT receptors, such that there are at least 30 distinct 5-HT receptors that signal through G-proteins. This review will focus on what is known about the signaling linkages of the G-protein-linked 5-HT receptors, and will highlight some fascinating new insights into 5-HT receptor signaling.

Agonist regulation of D(2) dopamine receptor/G protein interaction. Evidence for agonist selection of G protein subtype

The D(2) dopamine receptor has been expressed in Sf21 insect cells together with the G proteins G(o) and G(i2), using the baculovirus system. Expression levels of receptor and G protein (alpha, beta, and gamma subunits) in the two preparations were similar as shown by binding of [(3)H]spiperone and quantitative Western blot, respectively. For several agonists, binding data were fitted best by a two-binding site model in either preparation, showing interaction of expressed receptor and G protein. For some agonists, binding to the higher affinity site was of higher affinity in D(2)/G(o) than in the D(2)/G(i2) preparation. Some agonists exhibited binding data that were best fitted by a two-binding site model in D(2)/G(o) and a one-binding site model in D(2)/G(i2). Therefore, receptor/G protein interaction seemed to be stronger in the D(2)/G(o) preparation. Agonist stimulation of [(35)S]GTP gamma S (guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate) binding in the two preparations also gave evidence for higher affinity D(2)/G(o) interaction. In the D(2)/G(o) preparation, agonist stimulation of [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding occurred at higher potency for several agonists, and a higher stimulation (relative to dopamine) was achieved in D(2)/G(o) compared with D(2)/G(i2). Some agonists were able to stimulate [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding in the D(2)/G(o) preparation but not in D(2)/G(i2). The extent of D(2) receptor selectivity for G(o) over G(i2) is therefore dependent on the agonist used, and thus agonists may stabilize different conformations of the receptor with different abilities to couple to and activate G proteins.

Most central nervous system D2 dopamine receptors are coupled to their effectors by Go

We reported previously that Go-deficient mice develop severe neurological defects that include hyperalgesia, a generalized tremor, lack of coordination, and a turning syndrome somewhat reminiscent of unilateral lesions of the dopaminergic nigro-striatal pathway. By using frozen coronal sections of serially sectioned brains of normal and Go-deficient mice, we studied the ability of several G protein coupled receptors to promote binding of GTPgammaS to G proteins and the ability of GTP to promote a shift in the affinity of D2 dopamine receptor for its physiologic agonist dopamine. We found a generalized, but not abolished reduction in agonist-stimulated binding of GTPgammaS to frozen brain sections, with no significant left-right differences. Unexpectedly, the ability of GTP to regulate the binding affinity of dopamine to D2 receptors (as seen in in situ [(35)S]sulpiride displacement curves) that was robust in control mice, was absent in Go-deficient mice. The data suggest that most of the effects of the Gi/Go-coupled D2 receptors in the central nervous system are mediated by Go instead of Gi1, Gi2, or Gi3. In agreement with this, the effect of GTP on dopamine binding to D2 receptors in double Gi1 plus Gi2- and Gi1 plus Gi3-deficient mice was essentially unaffected.

Cellular biology of somatostatin receptors

Somatostatin, and the recently discovered neuropeptide cortistatin, exert their physiological actions via a family of six G protein-coupled receptors (sst1, sst2A, sst2B, sst3, sst4, sst5). Following the cloning of somatostatin receptors significant advances have been made in our understanding of their molecular, pharmacological and signaling properties although much progress remains to be done to define their physiological role in vivo. In this review, the present knowledge regarding neuroanatomical localization, signal transduction pathways, desensitization and internalization properties of somatostatin receptors is summarized. Evidence that somatostatin receptors can form homo- and heterodimers and can physically interact with members of the SSTRIP/Shank/ProSAP1/CortBP1 family is also discussed.

Gbetagamma subunit combinations differentially modulate receptor and effector coupling in vivo

In vitro, little specificity is seen for modulation of effectors by different combinations of Gbetagamma subunits from heterotrimeric G proteins. Here, we demonstrate that the coupling of specific combinations of Gbetagamma subunits to different receptors leads to a differential ability to modulate effectors in vivo. We have shown that the beta(1)AR and beta(2)AR can activate homomultimers of the human inwardly rectifying potassium channel Kir 3.2 when coexpressed in Xenopus oocytes, and that this requires a functional mammalian Gs heterotrimer. Modulation was independent of cAMP production, suggesting a membrane-delimited mechanism. To analyze further the importance of different Gbetagamma combinations, we have tested the facilitation of Kir 3.2 activation by betaAR mediated by different Gbetagamma subunits. The subunits tested were Gbeta(1,5) and Ggamma(1,2,7,11). These experiments demonstrated significant variation between the ability of the Gbetagamma combinations to activate the channels after receptor stimulation. This was in marked contrast to the situation in vitro where little specificity for binding of a Kir 3.1 C-terminal GST fusion protein by different Gbetagamma combinations was detected. More importantly, neither receptor, although homologous both structurally and functionally, shared the same preference for Gbetagamma subunits. In the presence of beta(1)AR, Gbeta(5)gamma(1) and Gbeta(5)gamma(11) activated Kir 3.2 to the greatest extent, while for the beta(2)AR, Gbeta(1)gamma(7), Gbeta(1)gamma(11,) and Gbeta(5)gamma(2) produced the greatest responses. Interestingly, no preference was seen in the ability of different Gbetagamma subunits to facilitate receptor-stimulated GTPase activity of the Gsalpha. These results suggest that it is not the receptor/G protein alpha subunit interaction or the Gbetagamma/effector interaction that is altered by Gbetagamma, but rather that the ability of the receptor to interact productively with the Gbetagamma subunit directly and/or the G protein/effector complex is dependent on the specific G protein heterotrimer associated with the receptor.

Cannabinoid CB1 receptor-mediated inhibition of prolactin release and signaling mechanisms in GH4C1 cells

The GH4C1 cell line was used to study the cellular mechanisms of cannabinoid-mediated inhibition of PRL release. Cannabinoid CB1 receptor activation inhibited vasoactive intestinal polypeptide- and TRH-stimulated PRL release, but not its basal secretion. The cannabinoid-mediated inhibition of TRH-stimulated PRL release was reversed by the CB1 receptor-specific antagonist, SR141,716A, and was abolished by pertussis toxin pretreatment, indicating that G alpha subunits belonging to the G(i)alpha and G(o)alpha family were involved in the signaling. Photoaffinity labeling using [alpha-32P] azidoaniline GTP showed that cannabinoid receptor stimulation in cell membranes produced activation of four G alpha subunits (G(i)alpha2, G(i)alpha3, G(o)alpha1, and G(o)alpha2), which was also reversed by SR141,716A. The CB1 receptor agonists, WIN55,212-2 and CP55,940, inhibited cAMP formation and calcium currents in GH4C1 cells. The subtypes of calcium currents inhibited by WIN55,212-2 were characterized using holding potential sensitivity and calcium channel blockers. WIN55,212-2 inhibited the omega-conotoxin GVIA (Conus geographus)- and omega-agatoxin IVA (Aigelenopsis aperta)-sensitive calcium currents, but not the nisoldipine-sensitive calcium currents, suggesting the inhibition of N- and P-type, but not L-type, calcium currents. Taken together, the present findings indicate that CB1 receptors can couple through pertussis toxin-sensitive G alpha subunits to inhibit adenylyl cyclase and calcium currents and suppress PRL release from GH4C1 cells.

Activation of B-Raf and regulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway by the G(o) alpha chain

Many receptors coupled to the pertussis toxin-sensitive G(i/o) proteins stimulate the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. The role of the alpha chains of these G proteins in MAPK activation is poorly understood. We investigated the ability of Galpha(o) to regulate MAPK activity by transient expression of the activated mutant Galpha(o)-Q205L in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Galpha(o)-Q205L was not sufficient to activate MAPK but greatly enhanced the response to the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor. This effect was not associated with changes in the state of tyrosine phosphorylation of the EGF receptor. Galpha(o)-Q205L also potentiated MAPK stimulation by activated Ras. In Chinese hamster ovary cells, EGF receptors activate B-Raf but not Raf-1 or A-Raf. We found that expression of activated Galpha(o) stimulated B-Raf activity independently of the activation of the EGF receptor or Ras. Inactivation of protein kinase C and inhibition of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase abolished both B-Raf activation and EGF receptor-dependent MAPK stimulation by Galpha(o). Moreover, Galpha(o)-Q205L failed to affect MAPK activation by fibroblast growth factor receptors, which stimulate Raf-1 and A-Raf but not B-Raf activity. These results suggest that Galpha(o) can regulate the MAPK pathway by activating B-Raf through a mechanism that requires a concomitant signal from tyrosine kinase receptors or Ras to efficiently stimulate MAPK activity. Further experiments showed that receptor-mediated activation of Galpha(o) caused a B-Raf response similar to that observed after expression of the mutant subunit. The finding that Galpha(o) induces Ras-independent and protein kinase C- and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase-dependent activation of B-Raf and conditionally stimulates MAPK activity provides direct evidence for intracellular signals connecting this G protein subunit to the MAPK pathway.

Distinct roles for Galpha(i)2 and Gbetagamma in signaling to DNA synthesis and Galpha(i)3 in cellular transformation by dopamine D2S receptor activation in BALB/c 3T3 cells

Control of cell proliferation depends on intracellular mediators that determine the cellular response to external cues. In neuroendocrine cells, the dopamine D2 receptor short form (D2S receptor) inhibits cell proliferation, whereas in mesenchymal cells the same receptor enhances cell proliferation. Nontransformed BALB/c 3T3 fibroblast cells were stably transfected with the D2S receptor cDNA to study the G proteins that direct D2S signaling to stimulate cell proliferation. Pertussis toxin inactivates G(i) and G(o) proteins and blocks signaling of the D2S receptor in these cells. D2S receptor signaling was reconstituted by individually transfecting pertussis toxin-resistant Galpha(i/o) subunit mutants and measuring D2-induced responses in pertussis toxin-treated cells. This approach identified Galpha(i)2 and Galpha(i)3 as mediators of the D2S receptor-mediated inhibition of forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity; Galpha(i)2-mediated D2S-induced stimulation of p42 and p44 mitogen-activated kinase (MAPK) and DNA synthesis, whereas Galpha(i)3 was required for formation of transformed foci. Transfection of toxin-resistant Galpha(i)1 cDNA induced abnormal cell growth independent of D2S receptor activation, while Galpha(o) inhibited dopamine-induced transformation. The role of Gbetagamma subunits was assessed by ectopic expression of the carboxyl-terminal domain of G protein receptor kinase to selectively antagonize Gbetagamma activity. Mobilization of Gbetagamma subunits was required for D2S-induced calcium mobilization, MAPK activation, and DNA synthesis. These findings reveal a remarkable and distinct G protein specificity for D2S receptor-mediated signaling to initiate DNA synthesis (Galpha(i)2 and Gbetagamma) and oncogenic transformation (Galpha(i)3), and they indicate that acute activation of MAPK correlates with enhanced DNA synthesis but not with transformation.

Structure and function of dopamine receptors

Dopamine (DA) is the most abundant catecholamine in the brain. The involvement and importance of DA as a neurotransmitter in the regulation of different physiological functions in the central nervous system (CNS) is well known. Deregulation of the dopaminergic system has been linked with Parkinson's disease, Tourette's syndrome, schizophrenia, attention deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD) and generation of pituitary tumours. This review focuses on the pharmacological and biochemical features shared by the dopamine receptors. We address their coupling to secondary messenger pathways and their physiological function based upon studies using pharmacological tools, specific brain lesions and, more recently, genetically modified animal models.

Absence of somatostatin receptor type 2 A mutations and gip oncogene in pituitary somatotroph adenomas

OBJECTIVE

Somatostatin, acting via specific receptors in the anterior pituitary, tonically inhibits pituitary growth hormone secretion and somatotroph proliferation. Reduction of growth hormone secretion and tumour regression in GH-secreting pituitary adenomas treated with long-acting somatostatin analogues varies widely. In 30-40% of these tumours dominant somatic mutations of the Gsalpha gene (gsp) have been demonstrated leading to constitutive adenylyl cyclase induction. A relationship between somatostatin sensitivity and tumour pathogenesis in some tumours has been suggested. Changes in the function of the somatostatin receptor or intracellular signal elements may be of relevance. Somatostatin receptor type 2 A (sst2A) and Gi2 are proposed to mediate selectively the inhibition of GH release in the somatotroph. We therefore investigated the presence of sst2A mutations and gip oncogene in somatotrophic pituitary adenomas.

DESIGN

Tumour samples from 15 patients with pituitary somatotroph adenomas were obtained. RNA was isolated and used for reverse transcription and subsequent polymerase chain reaction. All samples were screened for the presence of sst2A mutations and of the gip oncogene by SSCP analysis and sequencing. For comparison, the gsp oncogene was examined. The relationship between clinical data and molecular analysis results was investigated.

RESULTS

Seven of the tumours harboured a gsp mutation. No mutations affecting the sst2A protein were found in any of the tumours analysed. Furthermore, gip oncogene was absent in all tumours.

CONCLUSION

Mutations of the somatostatin receptor type 2 A and the gip oncogene are unlikely to be involved in the pathogenesis of acromegaly.

Myr+-Gi2 alpha and Go alpha subunits restore the efficacy of opioids, clonidine and neurotensin giving rise to antinociception in G-protein knock-down mice

In mice whose Gi/o-protein function had been impaired by antisense 'knock-down' or pertussis toxin treatment, i.c.v. injection of myr+-Gi/o alpha subunits restored the effectiveness of beta-endorphin, morphine, DPDPE, clonidine and neurotensin to produce antinociception. Myr+-G alpha subunits of the class of G-proteins actually impaired were more effective than unlike but related myr+-G alpha subunits. Selectivity was noted in that only exogenous myr+-G alpha subunits affected (enhanced) the activity of agonists in G alpha-deficient signalling systems. This treatment had little effect on agonist potency when the impairment resided at the receptor level. The potential of the opioids, clonidine and R-PIA to increase G alpha-related in vitro hydrolysis of GTP was also re-established after injecting myr+-Gi2 alpha subunits into Gi2-knocked-down mice. Myr+-Gi2 alpha subunits pre-incubated with GTPgammaS or GDPbetaS before i.c.v. injection did not improve the activity of agonists in vivo (antinociception) or in vitro (regulation of low Km GTPase). After impairing the function of PKCbeta1 by antisense treatment or with the inhibitor H7, the effect of myr+-G alpha subunits on agonist potency was prevented. Electron microscope analysis showed the entry of gold-conjugated myr+-G alpha subunits into neural cells. These particles were found in the cytoplasm, associated with the plasma membranes of different neuronal processes and also in synaptic junctions. In cultured neurons and astrocytes myr+-Gi2 alpha-associated fluorescence was internalised in a dose-dependent manner and distributed in the plasma membrane and cytosol, as well as in nuclei of dividing astrocytes. Thus, G alpha subunits in CSF enter into neurons and functionally couple to the receptor-triggered signalling cascade. As G-proteins have been implicated in the pathophysiology of several neural disorders, this finding may be valuable in the therapy of such dysfunctions.

Dopamine D2 receptor isoforms expressed in AtT20 cells differentially couple to G proteins to acutely inhibit high voltage-activated calcium channels

The dopamine D2 receptor belongs to the serpentine superfamily of receptors, which have seven transmembrane segments and activate G proteins. D2 receptors are known to be linked, through Galpha(o)- and Galpha(i)-containing G proteins, to several signaling pathways in neuronal and secretory cells, including inhibition of adenylyl cyclase and high voltage-activated Ca2+ channels (HVA-CCs). The dopamine D2 receptor exists in two alternatively spliced isoforms, "long" and "short" (D2L, and D2S, respectively), which have identical ligand binding sites but differ by 29 amino acids in the third intracellular loop, the proposed site for G protein interaction. This has led to the speculation that the two isoforms may interact with different G proteins. We have transfected the AtT20 cell line with either D2L (KCL line) or D2S (KCS line) to facilitate experimentation on the individual isoforms. Both lines show dopamine agonist-dependent inhibition of Q-type HVA-CCs. We combined G protein antisense knock-down studies with multiwavelength fluorescence video microscopy to measure changes in HVA-CC inhibition to investigate the possibility of differential G protein coupling to this inhibition. The initial, rapid, K+ depolarization-induced increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration is due to influx through HVA-CCs. Our studies reveal that both D2 isoforms couple to Galpha(o) to partially inhibit this influx. However, D2L also couples to Galpha(i)3, whereas D2S couples to Galpha(i)2. These data support the hypothesis of differential coupling of D2 receptor isoforms to G proteins.

In vivo modulation of G proteins and opioid receptor function by antisense oligodeoxynucleotides

The work in our laboratory has been designed to characterize the transducer mechanisms coupled to neurotransmitter receptors in the plasma membrane. Particular attention has been paid to the physiological/pharmacological effects mediated by the opioid system. Antisense oligodeoxynucleotides have proved useful in correlating opioid receptor clones with those defined pharmacologically. The involvement of the cloned opioid receptors mu, delta, and kappa in analgesia has been determined by means of in vivo injection of ODNs directed to the receptor mRNAs. Using this strategy the classes of G-transducer proteins regulated by each type/subtype of opioid receptor in the promotion of antinociception have also been characterized. After displaying different patterns of binding to their receptors, opioids trigger a variety of intracellular signals. The physiological implications and therapeutic potential of these findings merit consideration.

The recombinant 5-HT1A receptor: G protein coupling and signalling pathways

The 5-hydroxytryptamine 5-HT1A receptor was one of the first G protein coupled receptors whose cDNA and gene were isolated by molecular cloning methods. Transfection of the cDNA of this receptor into cells previously bearing no 5-HT receptors has resulted in the acquisition of large amounts of information regarding potential signal transduction pathways linked to the receptor, correlations of receptor structure to its various functions, and pharmacological properties of the receptor. Transfection studies with the 5-HT1A receptor have generated critical new information that might otherwise have been elusive. This information notably includes the discovery of unsuspected novel signalling linkages, the elucidation of the mechanisms of receptor desensitization, the refinement of models of the receptor pharmacophore, and the development of silent receptor antagonists, among others. The current review summarizes the most important studies of the recombinant 5-HT1A receptor in the decade since the identification of its cDNA.

Somatostatin and its receptor family

Somatostatin (SST), a regulatory peptide, is produced by neuroendocrine, inflammatory, and immune cells in response to ions, nutrients, neuropeptides, neurotransmitters, thyroid and steroid hormones, growth factors, and cytokines. The peptide is released in large amounts from storage pools of secretory cells, or in small amounts from activated immune and inflammatory cells, and acts as an endogenous inhibitory regulator of the secretory and proliferative responses of target cells that are widely distributed in the brain and periphery. These actions are mediated by a family of seven transmembrane (TM) domain G-protein-coupled receptors that comprise five distinct subtypes (termed SSTR1-5) that are endoded by separate genes segregated on different chromosomes. The five receptor subtypes bind the natural SST peptides, SST-14 and SST-28, with low nanomolar affinity. Short synthetic octapeptide and hexapeptide analogs bind well to only three of the subtypes, 2, 3, and 5. Selective nonpeptide agonists with nanomolar affinity have been developed for four of the subtypes (SSTR1, 2, 3, and 4) and putative peptide antagonists for SSTR2 and SSTR5 have been identified. The ligand binding domain for SST ligands is made up of residues in TMs III-VII with a potential contribution by the second extracellular loop. SSTRs are widely expressed in many tissues, frequently as multiple subtypes that coexist in the same cell. The five receptors share common signaling pathways such as the inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, activation of phosphotyrosine phosphatase (PTP), and modulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) through G-protein-dependent mechanisms. Some of the subtypes are also coupled to inward rectifying K(+) channels (SSTR2, 3, 4, 5), to voltage-dependent Ca(2+) channels (SSTR1, 2), a Na(+)/H(+) exchanger (SSTR1), AMPA/kainate glutamate channels (SSTR1, 2), phospholipase C (SSTR2, 5), and phospholipase A(2) (SSTR4). SSTRs block cell secretion by inhibiting intracellular cAMP and Ca(2+) and by a receptor-linked distal effect on exocytosis. Four of the receptors (SSTR1, 2, 4, and 5) induce cell cycle arrest via PTP-dependent modulation of MAPK, associated with induction of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein and p21. In contrast, SSTR3 uniquely triggers PTP-dependent apoptosis accompanied by activation of p53 and the pro-apoptotic protein Bax. SSTR1, 2, 3, and 5 display acute desensitization of adenylyl cyclase coupling. Four of the subtypes (SSTR2, 3, 4, and 5) undergo rapid agonist-dependent endocytosis. SSTR1 fails to be internalized but is instead upregulated at the membrane in response to continued agonist exposure. Among the wide spectrum of SST effects, several biological responses have been identified that display absolute or relative subtype selectivity. These include GH secretion (SSTR2 and 5), insulin secretion (SSTR5), glucagon secretion (SSTR2), and immune responses (SSTR2).

Stable association of G proteins with beta 2AR is independent of the state of receptor activation

beta 2-Adrenergic receptors expressed in Sf9 cells activate endogenous Gs and adenylyl cyclase [Mouillac B., Caron M., Bonin H., Dennis M. and Bouvier M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 21733-21737]. However, high affinity agonist binding is not detectable under these conditions suggesting an improper stoichiometry between the receptor and the G protein and possibly the effector molecule as well. In this study we demonstrate that when beta 2-adrenergic receptors were co-expressed with various mammalian G protein subunits in Sf9 cells using recombinant baculoviruses signalling properties found in native receptor systems were reconstituted. For example, when beta 2AR was co-expressed with the Gs alpha subunit, maximal receptor-mediated adenylyl cyclase stimulation was greatly enhanced (60 +/- 9.0 versus 150 +/- 52 pmol cAMP/min/mg protein) and high affinity, GppNHp-sensitive, agonist binding was detected. When G beta gamma subunits were co-expressed with Gs alpha and the beta 2AR, receptor-stimulated GTPase activity was also demonstrated, in contrast to when the receptor was expressed alone, and this activity was higher than when beta 2AR was co-expressed with Gs alpha alone. Other properties of the receptor, including receptor desensitization and response to inverse agonists were unaltered. Using antisera against an epitope-tagged beta 2AR, both Gs alpha and beta gamma subunits could be co-immunoprecipitated with the beta 2AR under conditions where subunit dissociation would be expected given current models of G protein function. A desensitization-defective beta 2AR (S261, 262, 345, 346A) and a mutant which is constitutively desensitized (C341G) could also co-immunoprecipitate G protein subunits. These results will be discussed in terms of a revised view of G protein-mediated signalling which may help address issues of specificity in receptor/G protein coupling.

Stimulation of cAMP synthesis by Gi-coupled receptors upon ablation of distinct Galphai protein expression. Gi subtype specificity of the 5-HT1A receptor

The three Galphai subunits were independently depleted from rat pituitary GH4C1 cells by stable transfection of each Galphai antisense rat cDNA construct. Depletion of any Galphai subunit eliminated receptor-induced inhibition of basal cAMP production, indicating that all Galphai subunits are required for this response. By contrast, receptor-mediated inhibition of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)-stimulated cAMP production was blocked by selective depletions for responses induced by the transfected serotonin 1A (5-HT1A) (Galphai2 or Galphai3) or endogenous muscarinic-M4 (Galphai1 or Galphai2) receptors. Strikingly, receptor activation in Galphai1-depleted clones (for the 5-HT1A receptor) or Galphai3-depleted clones (for the muscarinic receptor) induced a pertussis toxin-sensitive increase in basal cAMP production, whereas the inhibitory action on VIP-stimulated cAMP synthesis remained. Finally, in Galphai2-depleted clones, activation of 5-HT1A receptors increased VIP-stimulated cAMP synthesis. Thus, 5-HT1A and muscarinic M4 receptor may couple dominantly to Galphai1 and Galphai3, respectively, to inhibit cAMP production. Upon removal of these Galphai subunits to reduce inhibitory coupling, stimulatory receptor coupling is revealed that may involve Gbetagamma-induced activation of adenylyl cyclase II, a Gi-stimulated cyclase that is predominantly expressed in GH4C1 cells. Thus Gi-coupled receptor activation involves integration of both inhibitory and stimulatory outputs that can be modulated by specific changes in alphai subunit expression level.

Distinct roles for Galphai2, Galphai3, and Gbeta gamma in modulation offorskolin- or Gs-mediated cAMP accumulation and calcium mobilization by dopamine D2S receptors

Previous studies have shown that a single G protein-coupled receptor can regulate different effector systems by signaling through multiple subtypes of heterotrimeric G proteins. In LD2S fibroblast cells, the dopamine D2S receptor couples to pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive Gi/Go proteins to inhibit forskolin- or prostaglandin E1-stimulated cAMP production and to stimulate calcium mobilization. To analyze the role of distinct Galphai/o protein subtypes, LD2S cells were stably transfected with a series of PTX-insensitive Galphai/o protein Cys --> Ser point mutants and assayed for D2S receptor signaling after PTX treatment. The level of expression of the transfected Galpha mutant subunits was similar to the endogenous level of the most abundant Galphai/o proteins (Galphao, Galphai3). D2S receptor-mediated inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP production was retained only in clones expressing mutant Galphai2. In contrast, the D2S receptor utilized Galphai3 to inhibit PGE1-induced (Gs-coupled) enhancement of cAMP production. Following stable or transient transfection, no single or pair set of mutant Galphai/o subtypes rescued the D2S-mediated calcium response following PTX pretreatment. On the other hand, in LD2S cells stably transfected with GRK-CT, a receptor kinase fragment that specifically antagonizes Gbeta gamma subunit activity, D2S receptor-mediated calcium mobilization was blocked. The observed specificity of Galphai2 and Galphai3 for different states of adenylyl cyclase activation suggests a higher level of specificity for interaction of Galphai subunits with forskolin- versus Gs-activated states of adenylyl cyclase than has been previously appreciated.

G protein-mediated mitogen-activated protein kinase activation by two dopamine D2 receptors

Two isoforms of dopamine D2 receptor, D2L (long) and D2S (short), differ by the insertion of 29 amino acids specific to D2L within the putative third intracellular loop of the receptor, which appears to be important in selectivity for G-protein coupling. We have generated D2L- and D2S-expressing Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, and regulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway was examined in these cells. Both D2L and D2S mediated a rapid and transient activation of MAPK with dominant activation of p42-kDa MAPK. Pertussis toxin treatment completely abrogated stimulation of MAPK mediated by D2L and D2S, demonstrating that both receptors couple to pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins in this signaling. Stimulation of MAPK mediated by both D2L and D2S receptor was markedly attenuated by coexpression of the C-terminus of beta-adrenergic receptor kinase (betaARKct), which selectively inhibits Gbetagamma-mediated signal transduction. Further analysis of D2L- and D2S-mediated MAPK activation demonstrated that D2L-mediated MAPK activation was not significantly affected by PKC depletion or partially affected by genistein. In contrast, D2S-mediated MAPK activation was potentially inhibited by PKC depletion and genistein was capable of completely inhibiting D2S-mediated MAPK activation. Together, these results suggest that D2L- and D2S-mediated MAPK activation is predominantly Gbetagamma subunit-mediated signaling and that protein kinase C and tyrosine phosphorylations are involved in these signaling pathways.

Activation of protein kinase C modulates alpha2-adrenergic signalling in rat pancreatic islets

Treatment of rat pancreatic islets with 4beta-phorbol-myristate-acetate (PMA) caused a significant reduction in the ability of the alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist noradrenaline to inhibit glucose-induced insulin secretion. This effect was most evident when low concentrations of the catecholamine were used (less than 1 microM) and was lost when the noradrenaline concentration was increased to 10 microM. The effect was probably mediated by activation of protein kinase C, because the ability of PMA to desensitise islets to noradrenaline was prevented by a selective inhibitor of calcium-dependent isoforms of the enzyme, Gö6976. The response to PMA was reproduced when islet protein kinase C was activated by a receptor-mediated mechanism involving incubation with the muscarinic agonist carbachol. In parallel with desensitisation of the inhibitory control of insulin secretion by noradrenaline, PMA treatment also reduced the ability of a low concentration of noradrenaline (0.1 microM) to inhibit islet cAMP formation. The loss of sensitivity to catecholamine, induced by PMA in rat islets, was not caused by any change in the levels of alpha2-adrenoceptor expression or in their ligand-binding affinity. It was, however, associated with a marked increase in the extent of phosphorylation of members of the Gi/Go, family of pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins in PMA-treated islets. Immunoprecipitation of Gi alpha2 and Galpha o from 32P-labelled islets after treatment with PMA revealed that both G proteins are substrates for protein kinase C. Overall, the results indicate that activation of protein kinase C leads to phosphorylation of islet Gi and Go causing their uncoupling from alpha2-adrenoceptors. We propose that this mechanism may form an important component of a physiological system designed to limit the tendency for catecholamines to inhibit insulin secretion under conditions in which the parasympathetic innervation of the islets is activated.

Influence of Gz and Gi2 transducer proteins in the affinity of opioid agonists to mu receptors

The affinity displayed by different opioids to mu receptors (ORs) was determined in mouse brain membranes incubated with antibodies directed to Galpha subunits of the guanine nucleotide-binding proteins Gi2 and Gz. Assays were conducted with 10 pm 125I-Tyr27-beta-endorphin in the presence of 300 nm N, N-diallyl-Tyr-(alpha-aminoisobutyric acid)2-Phe-Leu-OH (ICI-174 864), which prevented the binding of the iodinated neuropeptide to delta-ORs. Gpp(NH)p or the preincubation of mouse brain membranes with IgGs to Gi2alpha or Gzalpha subunits, promoted reductions in the affinity exhibited by the labelled probe. The potencies of beta-endorphin, [D-Ala2,N-MePhe4,Gly-ol5]-enkephalin (DAMGO) and [D-Pen2,5]enkephalin (DPDPE) were reduced after impairing the coupling of mu-ORs to Gi2 or Gz proteins. Morphine showed a loss of affinity towards the mu-OR after preincubation of membranes with IgGs to Gzalpha subunits. However, it retained its potency after treatment with the anti-Gi2alpha IgGs. Conversely, [D-Ala2, D-Leu5]enkephalin (DADLE) and [D-Ser2, Leu5] enkephalin-Thr6 (DSLET) showed decreased affinity to mu-ORs after treatment with anti-Gi2alpha IgGs, with no noticeable change following the use of IgGs to Gzalpha subunits. The affinity exhibited by the opioid antagonists naloxone, naltrexone, naloxonazine and [Cys2,Tyr3,Orn5, Pen7 amide]somatostatin analogue (CTOP) remained unchanged after either treatment. Therefore, the affinity exhibited by opioid agonists of mu-ORs, but not antagonists, depends on the nature of the G-protein coupled to these receptors.

The intrinsic activity of (-)-3-PPP vis-à-vis prolactin-suppressing dopamine D2 receptors in transfected GH4C1 cells is dependent on which secretagogue that is used to provoke prolactin release

The abilities of dopamine (DA) and the partial DA D2 receptor agonist (-)-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-n-propylpiperidine, (-)-3-PPP, to suppress prolactin (PRL) release induced by any of five different PRL secretagogues in GH4C1 cells transfected with the human D2 receptor (short isoform) were investigated. Whereas DA reduced the response to all five secretagogues. (-)-3-PPP reduced the response to vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH), but not to high medium potassium (K+) or to the potassium channel antagonist tetraethylammonium (TEA). (-)-3-PPP tended to reduce the PRL release induced by the Ca2+ channel agonist BAY K-8644 (BAY); however, this effect of the partial agonist was modest and not significant. Whereas the effects of both DA and (-)-3-PPP on the PRL response to VIP and TRH were counteracted by co-incubation with the D2 antagonist raclopride, the effects of DA on the PRL response to K+, BAY, and TEA were antagonized by co-incubation with either raclopride or (-)-3-PPP. The results show that, at a given receptor density, the intrinsic activity of a partial D2 agonist with respect to D2-mediated suppression of PRL release may vary from agonism to antagonism depending on which intracellular transduction systems that are being concomitantly activated.

Concomitant regulation of Ca2+ mobilization and G13 expression in human erythroleukemia cells

In human erythroleukemia (HEL) cells, stimulation of alpha2-adrenoceptors by adrenaline or neuropeptide Y Y1 receptors by neuropeptide Y, concomitantly inhibit cAMP accumulation and stimulate mobilization of Ca2+ from intracellular stores via pertussis toxin-sensitive G-proteins. Treatment of HEL cells in chemically-defined, serum-free medium with 1.25% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) for 4 days, increased alpha2-adrenoceptor number by 120%, while the neuropeptide Y receptor number was not significantly changed. In DMSO-treated HEL cells, Ca2+ elevations by adrenaline or neuropeptide Y were significantly reduced by 28% and 57%, respectively, while basal Ca2+ and elevations by thrombin or thapsigargin were not significantly altered. Adrenaline and neuropeptide Y-induced inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation was not significantly altered upon DMSO treatment. While immunodetectable alpha-subunits of Gi2 were not significantly changed by DMSO treatment, those of Gi3 were reduced by 27%. Inactivation of pertussis toxin substrates by pertussis toxin treatment and inhibition of adrenaline or neuropeptide Y stimulated Ca2+ elevations were linearly correlated. These data are compatible with the idea that, in HEL cells, alpha2-adrenoceptors and neuropeptide Y receptors couple to inhibition of adenylyl cyclase via Gi2 while they couple to Ca2+ elevations via Gi3.

Rethinking receptor-G protein-effector interactions

Hundreds of different receptors regulate the activity of effector proteins with the assistance of heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins). The hypothesis that G protein-coupled receptors (R) govern their effectors (E) indirectly via a shuttling mechanism involving the exchange of heterotrimeric G proteins (G[alpha betagamma]) or parts thereof (G[alpha], G[betagamma]) between ephemeral R-G and G-E complexes has become firmly established. While there is no direct evidence for the cyclical formation and dissociation of these complexes during signalling, experimental changes in second messenger production, GTPase activity, and the binding characteristics of agonists, antagonists, and guanine nucleotides commonly are believed to reflect perturbations in the equilibria between G protein and the other two components. However, a growing body of evidence seems to argue against the shuttling model. The random, transient association of G protein and receptor is largely inconsistent with the binding of agonists to receptors and the allosteric regulation of that binding by guanine nucleotides. Also, the prevailing paradigm does not readily account for receptor-effector coupling specificity, as the promiscuous interaction of most G proteins with both receptors and effectors in vitro is at odds with the general failure of G proteins to be shared among ostensibly congruous signal transduction pathways in vivo. The latter paradox would be obviated by the simultaneous interaction of G protein with both receptor and effector. Indeed, various findings indicate that R-G-E complexes do occur. How and where in the cell such complexes are assembled and disassembled should provide important clues to the true mechanism of G protein-linked transduction.

Dopamine receptors: from structure to function

The diverse physiological actions of dopamine are mediated by at least five distinct G protein-coupled receptor subtypes. Two D1-like receptor subtypes (D1 and D5) couple to the G protein Gs and activate adenylyl cyclase. The other receptor subtypes belong to the D2-like subfamily (D2, D3, and D4) and are prototypic of G protein-coupled receptors that inhibit adenylyl cyclase and activate K+ channels. The genes for the D1 and D5 receptors are intronless, but pseudogenes of the D5 exist. The D2 and D3 receptors vary in certain tissues and species as a result of alternative splicing, and the human D4 receptor gene exhibits extensive polymorphic variation. In the central nervous system, dopamine receptors are widely expressed because they are involved in the control of locomotion, cognition, emotion, and affect as well as neuroendocrine secretion. In the periphery, dopamine receptors are present more prominently in kidney, vasculature, and pituitary, where they affect mainly sodium homeostasis, vascular tone, and hormone secretion. Numerous genetic linkage analysis studies have failed so far to reveal unequivocal evidence for the involvement of one of these receptors in the etiology of various central nervous system disorders. However, targeted deletion of several of these dopamine receptor genes in mice should provide valuable information about their physiological functions.

Both overlapping and distinct signaling pathways for somatostatin receptor subtypes SSTR1 and SSTR2 in pituitary cells

To elucidate the signaling events mediated by specific somatostatin receptor (SSTR) subtypes, we expressed SSTR1 and SSTR2 individually in rat pituitary GH12C1 and F4C1 cells, which lack endogenous somatostatin receptors. In transfected GH12C1 cells, both SSTR1 and SSTR2 coupled to inhibition of Ca2+ influx and hyperpolarization of membrane potential via a pertussis toxin (PTx)-sensitive mechanism. These effects reflected modulation of ion channel activities which are important for regulation of hormone secretion. Somatostatin analogs MK678 and CH275 acted as subtype selective agonists as expected. In transfected F4C1 cells, both SSTR1 and SSTR2 mediated somatostatin-induced inhibition of adenylyl cyclase via a PTx-sensitive pathway. In addition, activation of SSTR2 in F4C1 cells, but not SSTR1, stimulated phospholipase C (PLC) activity and an increase in [Ca2+]i due to release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores. Unlike adenylyl cyclase inhibition, the PLC-mediated response was only partially sensitive to PTx. To determine the structural determinants in SSTR2 necessary for activation of PLC, we constructed chimeric receptors in which domains of SSTR2 were introduced into SSTR1. Chimeric receptors containing only the third intracellular loop, or all three intracellular loops from SSTR2, mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, but failed to stimulate PLC activity as did wild-type SSTR2. Furthermore, the C-terminal tail of SSTR2 was not required for coupling to PLC. Thus, by expressing individual somatostatin receptor subtypes in pituitary cells, we have identified both overlapping and distinct signaling pathways for SSTR1 and SSTR2, and have shown that sequences other than simply the intracellular domains are required for SSTR2 to couple to the PLC signaling pathway.

Expression of dopamine D2 receptor mRNA isoforms in the carotid body of rat, cat and rabbit

Using the Reverse transcription-Polymerase chain reaction, we detected dopamine D2 receptor mRNA short and long isoforms in the adult carotid body of rats, cats, and rabbits. For these animals, the relative short/long ratios were 0.60, 0.65 and 0.57, respectively. Our results suggest that the variety of dopamine effects on carotid chemoreceptor activity, that has been related to species differences, may not be dependent on the expression levels of the dopamine D2 receptor mRNA isoforms in the studied species.

Dopamine D2 receptor stimulation alters G-protein expression in rat pituitary intermediate lobe melanotropes

Stimulation of dopamine D2 receptors inhibits melanotrope pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) biosynthesis and alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (MSH) secretion. These effects are mediated by G-protein alpha i- and alpha o-subunits and are reversed by stimulating receptors linked to activation of G alpha s protein. Melanotrope activity is increased by haloperidol, a D2 receptor antagonist, and decreased by bromocriptine, a D2 receptor agonist. Both the short and long isoforms of the D2 receptor mRNA and protein increase following chronic haloperidol treatment. After chronic bromocriptine treatment the short isoform is downregulated, whereas the long isoform is upregulated. Our hypothesis is that specific G protein alpha- subunits alter in pattern of expression similarly to the receptor isoforms. Using immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization, this study examined changes in G alpha i, G alpha o, and G alpha s protein and mRNA expression following chronic treatments with bromocriptine or haloperidol. G alpha i3 and G alpha o immunoreactivities increased following bromocriptine treatment, whereas G alpha s and G alpha i1/2 did not change. Gs immunoreactivity increased after haloperidol treatment, whereas G alpha i1/2, G alpha i3, and G alpha o did not change. G alpha i and G alpha o mRNA increased following bromocriptine and decreased following haloperidol treatments, whereas the inverse results were observed with G alpha s mRNA. These results suggest D2 receptor activation can specifically increase G alpha i3 and G alpha o expression, and D2 receptor blockade increases G alpha s expression.

Coupling specificity between somatostatin receptor sst2A and G proteins: isolation of the receptor-G protein complex with a receptor antibody

Somatostatin initiates its actions via a family of seven-transmembrane domain receptors. Of the five somatostatin receptor genes cloned, sst2 exists as two splice variants with the sst2A isoform being predominantly expressed. This receptor is widely distributed in endocrine, exocrine, and neuronal cells, as well as in hormonally responsive tumors, and leads to inhibition of secretion, electrical excitability, and cell proliferation. To investigate the specificity of signal transduction by the sst2A receptor, we developed antibodies against two overlapping peptides located within the C terminus of the receptor protein: peptide 2C(SG), containing amino acids 334-348, and peptide 2C(ER), containing amino acids 339-359. Although antibodies to both peptides bound the inducing antigen with high affinity, only the antibodies against peptide 2C(ER) precipitated the receptor. The best antibody, R2-88, precipitated about 80% of the sst2A receptor-ligand complex solubilized from transfected CHO cells and was specific for the sst2A receptor isotype. Addition of GTPgammaS (10 microM) to the immunoprecipitated ligand-sst2A receptor complex markedly accelerated ligand dissociation, indicating that G proteins remained functionally associated with the receptor in the immunoprecipitate. Analysis of the G proteins coprecipitated with the sst2A receptor by immunoblotting with G protein antibodies showed that both G(alpha) and G(beta) subunits were bound to the hormone-receptor complex. Immunoprecipitation of the receptor was not affected by the presence of bound ligand. However, G protein subunits were coprecipitated only with the hormone-occupied receptor. Thus, the unoccupied receptor has low affinity for G proteins, and hormone binding stabilizes the receptor-G protein complex. Use of subtype-specific G protein antisera further showed that G alpha(i1), G alpha(i2), and G alpha(i3) were complexed with the sst2A receptor whereas Galpha(o), G alpha(z), and G alpha(q) were not. Together, these studies demonstrate that the sst2A receptor interacts selectively with G alpha(i) proteins in a hormone-dependent manner. The finding that this receptor couples to all three G alpha(i) subunits may help explain how somatostatin can regulate multiple signaling pathways.

An evaluation of strategies available for the identification of GTP-binding proteins required in intracellular signalling pathways

Strategies which can be used to elucidate the nature of a GTP-binding regulatory protein (G-protein) involved in an intracellular pathway of interest in the complex environment of the cell are described and evaluated. A desirable strategy is considered to be one in which the first stage indicates a requirement for one or more G-proteins, provides information on whether a monomeric, trimeric or other type of G-protein is involved, and gives some idea of the G-protein sub-class. In the second stage the specific G-protein involved is identified. Approaches available for investigations in the first stage include the use of analogues of GTP and GDP, AlF4-, inhibitors of G-protein isoprenylation, bacterial toxins which covalently modify G-proteins, and the introduction of a purified GDP dissociation inhibitor, GDP exchange and/or GTP-ase activating protein. Identification of the specific G-protein in the second stage can be achieved using anti G-protein antibodies, G-protein-or receptor-derived peptides, antisense G-protein RNA and over-expressed, constitutively-active or dominant-negative G-protein mutants. The correct interpretation of results obtained with GTP and GDP analogues and AlF4- in the first stage is complex and often difficult, and requires a thorough understanding of the functions and mechanisms of activation of G-proteins. Nevertheless, it is important to reach the correct conclusion at this stage since considerable time and expense are usually required for investigations in the second stage.

Dopamine D4 receptor-mediated inhibition of cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate production does not affect prolactin regulation

Under physiological conditions, PRL synthesis and secretion are predominantly under negative control by dopamine acting through dopamine D2 receptors present in the pituitary lactotroph cells. To investigate the role of D4 receptors in the regulation of PRL synthesis and secretion, we stably transfected the human D4 receptor complementary DNA into the somatomammotrophic cell line GH4C1. The pharmacological characteristics of D4 expressed in GH4C1 were in close agreement with previous D4 receptor studies in Chinese hamster ovary and COS-7 cells. In GH4C1 cells, activation of D4 receptor variants (D4.2, D4.4, and D4.7) resulted in a similar level of reduction in forskolin- and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)-stimulated cAMP levels (33% and 50%, respectively). In addition, the forskolin-stimulated activity of cAMP response elements fused to the VIP promoter driving the lacZ reporter gene could be blocked by D4 activation. However, quinpirole treatment had a minimal effect on transiently expressed luciferase reporter gene driven by a proximal PRL promoter in one of the D4-expressing cell lines. In contrast, the dopamine D2short receptor expressing GH4ZR7 cells treated with quinpirole displayed a significant decrease (51.3 +/- 4.1%) in PRL promoter activity. VIP-stimulated PRL release was not affected by D4 receptor activation, whereas in GH4ZR7 cells, a significant decrease in VIP-stimulated PRL levels was observed. Neither PRL promoter activity nor PRL secretion levels were affected in control untransfected GH4C1 cells. From this study it appears that although the D4 receptor may be expressed in the anterior pituitary, it does not have a major effect on PRL promoter activity or PRL secretion in GH4C1 cells despite its ability to reduce cAMP production. This might explain why D4- over D2-preferring antipsychotics such as clozapine do not cause hyperprolactinemia.

Melatonin action and signal transduction in the rat suprachiasmatic circadian clock: activation of protein kinase C at dusk and dawn

Nocturnal synthesis of the pineal hormone melatonin (MEL) is regulated by the circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus. We examined the hypothesis that MEL can feed back to regulate the SCN using a brain slice preparation from rat. We monitored the SCN ensemble firing rate and found that MEL advanced the time of peak firing rate by more than 3 h at restricted circadian times (CTs) near subjective dusk [CT 10-14 (10-14 h after lights on)] and dawn (CT 23-0) on days 2 and 3 after treatment. The effect of MEL at CT 10 was blocked by pertussis toxin. The protein kinase C (PKC) activator, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate, reset the SCN firing rate rhythm with a profile of temporal sensitivity congruent with that of MEL. Two specific PKC inhibitors, calphostin C and chelerythrine chloride, independently blocked MEL-induced phase advances at each sensitive period. Furthermore, MEL administration increased PKC phosphotransferase activity transiently to 200% at CT 10 and CT 23, but not at CT 6. These data demonstrate that 1) MEL can directly modulate the circadian timing of the SCN within two windows of sensitivity corresponding to dusk and dawn; and 2) MEL alters SCN cellular function via a pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein pathway that activates PKC.

Differential effect of shear stress on extracellular signal-regulated kinase and N-terminal Jun kinase in endothelial cells. Gi2- and Gbeta/gamma-dependent signaling pathways

Shear stress differentially regulates production of many vasoactive factors at the level of gene expression in endothelial cells that may be mediated by mitogen-activated protein kinases, including extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and N-terminal Jun kinase (JNK). Here we show, using bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAEC), that shear stress differentially regulates ERK and JNK by mechanisms involving Gi2 and pertussis toxin (PTx)-insensitive G-protein-dependent pathways, respectively. Shear activated ERK with a rapid, biphasic time course (maximum by 5 min and basal by 30-min shear exposure) and force dependence (minimum and maximum at 1 and 10 dyn/cm2 shear stress, respectively). PTx treatment prevented shear-dependent activation of ERK1/2, consistent with a Gi-dependent mechanism. In contrast, JNK activity was maximally turned on by a threshold level of shear force (0.5 dyn/cm2 or higher) with a much slower and prolonged time course (requiring at least 30 min to 4 h) than that of ERK. Also, PTx had no effect on shear-dependent activation of JNK. To further define the shear-sensitive ERK and JNK pathways, vectors expressing hemagglutinin epitope-tagged ERK (HA-ERK) or HA-JNK were co-transfected with other vectors by using adenovirus-polylysine in BAEC. Expression of the mutant (alpha)i2(G203), antisense G(alpha)i2 and a dominant negative Ras (N17Ras) prevented shear-dependent activation of HA-ERK, while that of (alpha)i2(G204) and antisense (alpha)i3 did not. Expression of a Gbeta/gamma scavenger, the carboxyl terminus of beta-adrenergic receptor kinase (betaARK-ct), and N17Ras inhibited shear-dependent activation of HA-JNK. Treatment of BAEC with genistein prevented shear-dependent activation of ERK and JNK, indicating the essential role of tyrosine kinase(s) in both ERK and JNK pathways. These results provide evidence that 1) Gi2-protein, Ras, and tyrosine kinase(s) are upstream regulators of shear-dependent activation of ERK and 2) that shear-dependent activation of JNK is regulated by mechanisms involving Gbeta/gamma, Ras, and tyrosine kinase(s).

Somatostatin receptors in Neuro2A neuroblastoma cells: operational characteristics

1. We have used somatostatin (SRIF) receptor subtype-selective ligands to determine some of the operational characteristics of somatostatin receptors in Neuro2A mouse neuroblastoma cells. The potent SRIF1-receptor selective ligand, BIM-23027, was able to displace completely the specific binding of radioiodinated somatostatin, [125I]-Tyr11-SRIF-14, with a pIC50 of 10.3, suggesting that Neuro2A cells contain predominantly receptors of the SRIF1 receptor group. The rank order of affinities for several somatostatin analogues tested in competition studies, together with the high affinity of BIM-23027, indicate that the majority of receptors in Neuro2A cells are of the sst2 subtype. 2. The stable radioligand, [125I]-BIM-23027, bound with high affinity (Kd = 13 pM, Bmax = 0.2 pmol mg-1 protein) to Neuro2A cell membranes, but its binding was only partially reversible at room temperature and below. Thus at 4 degrees C, only 36% of the bound ligand dissociated within 2 h. In contrast, 60% of the ligand dissociated at 15 degrees C and 89% of the ligand dissociated at 37 degrees C. 3. Equilibrium binding of [125I]-BIM-23027 was partially (25%) inhibited by 10 microM GTP, and by 120 mM NaCl (42% inhibition) but this inhibition was increased to 75% when sodium chloride and GTP were added together. This effect of GTP and sodium chloride was also seen in dissociation experiments. After incubation to equilibrium with [125I]-BIM-23027, dissociation was initiated with excess unlabelled ligand in the presence of GTP (10 microM) and sodium chloride (120 mM). Under these conditions 67% of the ligand dissociated at 4 degrees C, 81% at 15 degrees C and 93% at 37 degrees C. Binding was totally inhibited by pretreatment of cells with pertussis toxin. 4. Functionally, BIM-23027 inhibited forskolin-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation in a concentration-dependent manner with an IC50 of 1.0 nM and a maximal inhibition of 37%. This effect was abolished by pretreatment of the cells with pertussis toxin. However, unlike in studies reported with the recombinant sst2 receptor, no rise in intracellular calcium concentration was observed with SRIF-14. 5. We conclude that Neuro2A cells provide a stable neuronal cell line for the study of functionally coupled endogenous somatostatin receptors of the sst2 type. In addition, we have found that activation of the receptor is associated with ligand-receptor internalisation.

Signal transduction pathways modulated by the D2 subfamily of dopamine receptors

The D2 subfamily of dopamine receptors includes D2A, D2B, D3, and D4 dopamine receptors. These receptors activate cellular effector systems, principally through pertussis toxin-sensitive G-proteins. Historically, D2-like receptors in brain tissues were recognized as the dopamine receptor subtypes that inhibit adenylyl cyclase. Recent studies, reviewed here, have shown that multiple effector systems can be activated by these receptors, and the potential involvement of these in dopaminergic neutrotransmission is discussed.

Pharmacological analysis of dopamine stimulation of [35S]-GTP gamma S binding via human D2short and D2long dopamine receptors expressed in recombinant cells

1. The activation of G-proteins by agonist-occupied D2 or D3 dopamine receptors in membranes from recombinant cells expressing the cloned receptors has been analysed by a [35S]-guanosine 5'-[gamma-thio] triphosphate ([35S]-GTP gamma S) binding assay. 2. The rate of [35S]-GTP gamma S binding was increased by dopamine in a dose-dependent manner in membranes from CHO cells stably expressing either the D2short or D2long dopamine receptor. 3. The dopamine-induced stimulation of [35S]-GTP gamma S binding could be inhibited by a range of antagonists. Affinities for antagonists derived from the inhibition of the dopamine stimulation of [35S]-GTP gamma S binding correlated very well with affinities derived from radioligand binding studies. 4. When the maximum [35S]-GTP gamma S binding responses stimulated by dopamine acting at different receptor subtypes were compared, there was a tendency for the stimulation via the D2short receptor to be greater than via the D2long receptor and for the stimulation via the D3 dopamine receptor to be less than for either D2 receptor. These differences in maximal response were also seen when the inhibitory effects of dopamine on adenylyl cyclase via the three receptor subtypes were compared. 5. The stimulation of [35S]-GTP gamma S binding by dopamine in membranes from recombinant cells therefore provides an excellent system for studying the molecular nature of agonism and the receptor/G-protein interactions for these receptors.

Dopamine receptors and brain function

In the central nervous system (CNS), dopamine is involved in the control of locomotion, cognition, affect and neuroendocrine secretion. These actions of dopamine are mediated by five different receptor subtypes, which are members of the large G-protein coupled receptor superfamily. The dopamine receptor subtypes are divided into two major subclasses: the D1-like and D2-like receptors, which typically couple to Gs and Gj mediated transduction systems. In the CNS, the various receptor subtypes display specific anatomical distributions, with D1-like receptors being mainly post-synaptic and D2-like receptors being both pre- and post-synaptic. D1 and D2 dopamine receptors, the most abundant subtypes in the CNS, appear to be expressed largely in distinct neurons. Substance P and dynorphin, which are expressed in D1 receptor-containing neurons, as well as pre-proenkephalin in D2 receptor-containing neurons, have been used as monitors of dopaminergic activity in the CNS. Expression of immediate early genes, in particular fos, has also been found to correlate with dopaminergic transmission. Dopamine released from the hypothalamus controls the synthesis and secretion of prolactin from the anterior pituitary via D2 dopamine receptors. As yet none of the dopamine receptor subtypes have been associated with the etiology of psychotic disorders, such as schizophrenia. However, the recent characterization of D3 and D4 receptors which are, interestingly, expressed in areas of the CNS mediating cognition and affect or showing increased affinity for certain neuroleptics, have renewed the interest and hope of finding effective neuroleptics devoid of side effects. Finally, the recent production of genetically-derived animals lacking several of these receptor genes should help elucidate which specific physiological paradigms the receptors mediate.

The D2 receptor: blocked transcription in GH3 cells and cellular pathways employed by D2A to regulate prolactin promoter activity

Although the GH3 line of somatolactotropic rat pituitary cells has proven useful for many regulation studies, the absence of functional D2 receptors on these cells long prevented their use in studies of dopaminergic action. However, it is now possible to employ GH3 cells expressing recombinant D2 receptors for such investigations. We have investigated both the level at which expression of functional D2 receptors in GH3 cells is blocked, and the cellular pathways employed by the major pituitary D2 receptor isoform, D2A, to inhibit prolactin (PRL) gene transcription. In run-off transcription assays with nuclei from either parental GH3 cells or a GH3 cell line stably expressing a D2A expression vector, Pit-1 gene transcription was detectable in either cell line, but only the latter cell line yielded detectable D2 receptor transcription, implying that the block in D2 receptor expression by GH3 cells is transcriptional. Further investigations employed GH3 cells transiently co-transfected with a D2A expression vector plus a rat PRL promoter construct (-1957)PRL-CAT. Pertussis toxin blocked repression by quinpirole, a D2 agonist, of PRL-CAT activity, demonstrating that this action is mediated by a pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein. The observations that neither of two agents expected to raise intracellular Ca2+, Bay K8644 or thyrotropin-releasing hormone, prevented quinpirole repression of PRL-CAT activity, and that the repressive effects on this construct of quinpirole and the Ca2+ channel antagonist were independent, suggested that regulation of intracellular Ca2+ levels does not play a major role in D2A-mediated repression of the PRL promoter.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Alternative splicing of the dopamine D2 receptor directs specificity of coupling to G-proteins

Two isoforms of the dopamine D2 receptor have been characterized, D2L (long) and D2S (short), generated by alternative splicing from the same gene. They differ by an in-frame insert of 29 amino acids specific to D2L within the putative third intracytoplasmic loop of the receptor. We have previously demonstrated (Montmayeur, J.-P., Guiramand, J., and Borelli, E. (1993) Mol. Endocrinol. 7, 161-170) that D2S and D2L, although presenting very similar pharmacological profiles, couple differently to the alpha-subunit of guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory proteins (G-proteins). In particular, D2L, but not D2S, requires the presence of the alpha-subunit of the inhibitory G-protein (G alpha i2) to elicit greater inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity. The insert present in D2L must therefore confer the specificity of interaction with G alpha i2. Thus, we introduced substitution mutations within the D2L insert. These mutant receptors were expressed in JEG3 cells, a G alpha i2-deficient cell line, scoring for those presenting an increased inhibition of adenylyl cyclase by dopamine. Our analysis identified two mutants, S259/262A and D249V, with these properties. These results clearly show that the insert present in D2L plays a critical role in the selectivity for the G-proteins interacting with the receptor.

A dopamine-responsive domain in the N-terminal sequence of Pit-1. Transcriptional inhibition in endocrine cell types

The POU transcription factor Pit-1 activates the prolactin gene in pituitary lactotrophs and may integrate responses of the gene to external signals. To study the role of Pit-1 in dopaminergic inhibition of the prolactin gene, we transiently transfected Pit-1 and dopamine D2 receptor vectors into a series of heterologous cell lines and examined dopamine regulation of the prolactin gene promoter. Regulation was Pit-1-dependent in all cell lines tested. Moreover, dopamine responsiveness was cell type-specific: stimulatory in fibroblasts (COS-7) and muscle-type cells (P19/Me2SO-induced) and inhibitory in pancreatic endocrine (RIN, InR1-G9) and neural-like (P19/retinoic acid-induced) cells. Because dopaminergic responses in Pit-1-transfected RIN cells paralleled those in pituitary GH4 cells, the islet cell line was used to test for sequences in Pit-1 that mediate negative hormone signals. Dopamine responsiveness of the Pit-1 transactivation domain (residues 8-80) was examined using a chimeric LexA construct. LxPit-1, LxSp1, and Lx-glucocorticoid receptor fusions all activated basal transcription, but only LxPit-1 was regulated by dopamine. Regulatory responses of LxPit-1 and full-length Pit-1 were quantitatively similar. In addition, gain-of-function G alpha mutants that inhibit Pit-1-dependent promoters in GH4 cells also suppressed selectively Pit-1- or LxPit-1-dependent promoters in RIN cells. This demonstrates that Pit-1 can function as a specific target for distinct inhibitory G protein signals. Interestingly, Pit-1 sequences N-terminal to the DNA-binding POU domain appear to be sufficient in mediating regulation by these pathways.

Somatostatin receptor activation of cellular effector systems

Somatostatin (SRIF) induces its multiple biological actions by interacting with a family of receptors, referred to as SSTR1-SSTR5. These receptors are capable of associating with particular guanine nucleotide binding proteins to couple the receptors to distinct cellular effector systems. Therefore, G proteins have an important role in directing SRIF signalling and may provide the molecular basis for the diverse cellular actions of SRIF.

Antisense knockouts: molecular scalpels for the dissection of signal transduction

The complexity of signal transduction is becoming increasingly apparent following the cloning of multiple families of receptors, G proteins, and effectors. Therefore, new tools are needed to assess the importance of particular subtypes in receptor-mediated signal transduction. One such tool is the use of antisense approaches to specifically 'knockout' particular G protein subtypes and then assess the functional consequences for receptor-signalling pathways. In this article by Paul Albert and Stephen Morris, various antisense approaches (including transfection of full-length cDNA) are discussed and compared for their specificity and efficiency. The antisense approach is argued to be applicable to a wide variety of signal-transduction systems, including G-protein-coupled receptor signalling, for analysis of the downstream events that dictate biological responsiveness.