A threonine residue in the seventh transmembrane domain of the human A1 adenosine receptor mediates specific agonist binding

Determination of amino acid residues that are accessible from the ligand binding crevice in the seventh transmembrane-spanning region of the human A(1) adenosine receptor

The substituted-cysteine accessibility method (SCAM) was applied to transmembrane span seven of the human A(1) adenosine receptor (hA(1)AR) to reveal a subset of amino acids that are exposed to the ligand-binding crevice. The SCAM approach involved a systematic probe of receptor structure by individual substitutions of residues K265 (7.30) to R296 (7.61) with cysteine. In most cases, hA(1)AR substituted-cysteine mutant membranes displayed antagonist dissociation binding constants that did not differ significantly from wild-type (WT). Radioligand binding assays were used to compare cell membranes that were treated with hydrophilic, sulfhydryl-specific methanethiosulfonate derivatives with control cell membranes. Position H278 was previously reported to be required for A(1)AR ligand binding; however, that report did not establish that H278 represents a contact point for ligands. Cysteine-substitution at H278 yields membrane preparations with greatly decreased receptor density compared with WT membranes from cells in the same transfection experiment. However, H278C membranes retain a measurable fraction of antagonist binding. This observation allows for the investigation of binding-crevice accessibility at position 278 and suggests that H278 may not be required for binding of antagonist ligands. Our data reveal the binding-crevice accessibility of residues T270 (7.35), A273 (7.38), I274 (7.39), T277 (7.42), H278 (7.43), N284 (7.49), and Y288 (7.53) in the hA(1)AR. These data are consistent with the high-resolution structure of bovine rhodopsin that features three alpha-helical turns in this region that are interrupted by an elongated, nonhelical structure from positions 7.43 to 7.48 in the primary amino acid sequence.

3-Aryl[1,2,4]triazino[4,3-a]benzimidazol-4(10H)-ones: a new class of selective A1 adenosine receptor antagonists

Radioligand binding assays using bovine cortical membrane preparations and biochemical in vitro studies revealed that various 3-aryl[1,2,4]triazino[4,3-a]benzimidazol-4(10H)-one (ATBI) derivatives, previously reported by us as ligands of the central benzodiazepine receptor (BzR) (Primofiore, G.; et al. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 96-102), behaved as antagonists at the A1 adenosine receptor (A1AR). Alkylation of the nitrogen at position 10 of the triazinobenzimidazole nucleus conferred selectivity for the A1AR vs the BzR. The most potent ligand of the ATBI series (10-methyl-3-phenyl[1,2,4]triazino[4,3-a]benzimidazol-4(10H)-one 12) displayed a Ki value of 63 nM at the A1AR without binding appreciably to the adenosine A2A and A3 nor to the benzodiazepine receptor. Pharmacophore-based modeling studies in which 12 was compared against a set of well-established A1AR antagonists suggested that three hydrogen bonding sites (HB1 acceptor, HB2 and HB3 donors) and three lipophilic pockets (L1, L2, and L3) might be available to antagonists within the A1AR binding cleft. According to the proposed pharmacophore scheme, the lead compound 12 engages interactions with the HB2 site (via the N2 nitrogen) as well as with the L2 and L3 sites (through the pendant and the fused benzene rings). The results of these studies prompted the replacement of the methyl with more lipophilic groups at the 10-position (to fill the putative L1 lipophilic pocket) as a strategy to improve A1AR affinity. Among the new compounds synthesized and tested, the 3,10-diphenyl[1,2,4]triazino[4,3-a]benzimidazol-4(10H)-one (23) was characterized by a Ki value of 18 nM which represents a 3.5-fold gain of A1AR affinity compared with the lead 12. A rhodopsin-based model of the bovine adenosine A1AR was built to highlight the binding mode of 23 and two well-known A1AR antagonists (III and VII) and to guide future lead optimization projects. In our docking simulations, 23 receives a hydrogen bond (via the N1 nitrogen) from the side chain of Asn247 (corresponding to the HB1 and HB2 sites) and fills the L1, L2, and L3 lipophilic pockets with the 10-phenyl, 3-phenyl, and fused benzene rings, respectively.

Differential effects of the allosteric enhancer (2-amino-4,5-dimethyl-trienyl)[3-trifluoromethyl) phenyl]methanone (PD81,723) on agonist and antagonist binding and function at the human wild-type and a mutant (T277A) adenosine A1 receptor

The 2-amino-benzoylthiophene derivative PD81,723 [(2-amino-4,5-dimethyl-trienyl)[3-(trifluoromethyl) phenyl]methanone] has been shown to allosterically enhance agonist binding and function at the adenosine A(1) receptor. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the effects of PD81,723 both as an allosteric enhancer and as an antagonist on the adenosine A(1) receptor. We investigated its effect on the human wild-type in relation to a mutant (T277A) adenosine A(1) receptor for which agonists have a greatly diminished affinity. Binding (saturation and displacement experiments) and functional adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate studies were performed, and differential effects of allosteric enhancer PD81,723 on agonists and antagonists were observed on the wild-type (wt) and mutant adenosine A(1) receptor. Our results showed opposite effects of PD81,723 on the binding of agonists and antagonists. Within the concept of a simplified two-state receptor model, it is possible that the effects of PD81,723 are mainly "allosteric", enhancing the binding of adenosine A(1) agonists and inhibiting the binding of antagonists/inverse agonists. However, the suggestion that PD81,723 acts as an allosteric inhibitor of DPCPX (1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine) binding cannot be confirmed by kinetic studies, since PD81,723 does not seem to affect the dissociation kinetics of [(3)H]DPCPX. Nevertheless, our results show that the action of PD81,723 on DPCPX binding is due to more than mere competitive antagonistic activity, i.e. binding to the ligand-binding site and competing with the binding of DPCPX, as suggested previously. The effect of PD81,723 on the mutant receptor was much less pronounced. Mutation of Thr277 to Ala not only decreased agonist affinity but also inhibited the effects of PD81,723. Insensitivity of the mutT277A to PD81,723 may be linked to the fact that this mutant appears to be uncoupled from G proteins. It further supported a differential binding mode of PD81,723 compared to competitive antagonists for the adenosine A(1) receptor.

Reduced food intake in response to CGP 71683A may be due to mechanisms other than NPY Y5 receptor blockade

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to test the continuing validity of the hypothesis that neuropeptide Y (NPY) produced in the brain controls food intake through an interaction with the NPY Y(5) receptor subtype.

METHODS

The hypothesis was tested using CGP 71683A a potent and highly selective non-peptide antagonist of the NPY Y(5) receptor which was administered into the right lateral ventricle of obese Zucker fa/fa rats.

RESULTS

Intraventricular injection of 3.4 nmol/kg NPY increased food intake during a 2 h test period. Doses of CGP 71683A in excess of 15 nmol/kg (i.cv.) resulted in blockade of the increase in food intake produced by NPY. Repeated daily injection of CGP 71683A (30--300 nmol/kg, i.cv.) immediately before the dark phase produced a dose-dependent and slowly developing decrease in food intake. CGP 71683A has a low affinity for NPY Y(1), Y(2) and Y(4) receptors but a very high affinity for the NPY Y(5) receptor (Ki, 1.4 nM). Surprisingly, CGP 71683A had similarly high affinity for muscarinic receptors (Ki, 2.7 nM) and for the serotonin uptake recognition site (Ki, 6.2 nM) in rat brain. Anatomic analysis of the brain after treatment with CGP 71683A demonstrated an inflammatory response associated with the fall in food intake.

CONCLUSIONS

While the fall in food intake in response to CGP 71683A may have a Y(5) component, interactions with other receptors or inflammatory mediators may also play a role. It is concluded that CGP 71683A is an imprecise tool for investigating the role of the NPY Y(5) receptor in the control of physiological processes including food intake. International Journal of Obesity (2001) 25, 84-94

The role of receptor structure in determining adenosine receptor activity

Adenosine produces a wide variety of physiological effects through the activation of cell surface adenosine receptors (ARs). ARs are members of the G-protein-coupled receptor family, and currently, four subtypes, the A1AR, A2AAR, A2BAR, and A3AR, are recognized. This review focuses on the role of receptor structure in governing various facets of AR activity. Ligand-binding properties of ARs are primarily dictated by amino acids in the transmembrane domains of the receptors, although a role for extracellular domains of certain ARs has been suggested. Studies have identified certain amino acids conserved amongst AR subtypes that are critical for ligand recognition, as well as additional residues that may differentiate between agonist and antagonist ligands. Receptor regions responsible for activation of Gs have been identified for the A2AAR. The location of these intracellular sites is consistent with findings described for other G-protein-coupled receptors. Site-directed mutagenesis has been employed to analyze the structural basis for the differences in the kinetics of the desensitization response displayed by various AR subtypes. For the A2AAR and A3AR, agonist-stimulated phosphorylation of the AR, presumably via a G-protein receptor kinase, has been shown to occur. For these AR subtypes, intracellular regions or individual amino acids that may be targets for this phosphorylation have been identified. Finally, the role of A1AR gene structure in regulating the expression of this AR subtype is reviewed.

A1 adenosine receptor of human and mouse adipose tissues: cloning, expression, and characterization

The aberrant functioning of the A1 adenosine receptor of adipose tissue has been implicated as a factor in obesity. To begin to address questions concerning this relationship, the possibility of a unique A1 adenosine receptor in adipose tissue must be investigated. Therefore, cDNAs encoding the A1 adenosine receptors of adipose tissues of a mouse and an obese human were isolated, sequenced, and expressed in eukaryotic cells. We found their sequences to be 90% identical and each identical to published sequences of the receptors in brain preparations of the two species. The two cDNAs were transiently expressed in 293T cells, a human kidney cell line. Despite the 90% identity in their sequences, the ligand binding properties of the human and mouse cDNAs expressed in the 293T cell line differed markedly. With respect to amino acid differences in the extracellular loops, four occur in the second extracellular loop, which has been implicated in binding by other studies. The ligand binding characteristics of the recombinant receptors matched those of native receptors from human and mouse adipose tissue. The human A1 receptor cDNA was also expressed in ob17 preadipocyte cells to investigate reported influences of cellular environment on binding characteristics. We compared ligand binding of the expressed receptor in the two cell lines (ob17 and 293T). We also compared ligand binding of native receptors from mouse brain and adipose tissue preparations. In both studies, cellular environment had no affect on binding characteristics. This conclusive evidence resolves earlier conflicting reports in the literature.

Identification of the adenine binding site of the human A1 adenosine receptor

To provide new insights into ligand-A1 adenosine receptor (A1AR) interactions, site-directed mutagenesis was used to test the role of several residues in the first four transmembrane domains of the human A1AR. First, we replaced eight unique A1AR residues with amino acids present at corresponding transmembrane (TM) positions of A2AARs. We also tested the role of carboxamide amino acids in TMs 1-4, and the roles of Val-87, Leu-88, and Thr-91 in TM3. Following conversion of Gly-14 in TM1 to Thr-14, the affinity for adenosine agonists increased 100-fold, and after Pro-25 in TM1 was converted to Leu-25, the affinity for agonists fell. After conversion of TM3 sites Thr-91 to Ala-91, and Gln-92 to Ala-92, the affinity for N6-substituted agonists was reduced, and binding of ligands without N6 substituents was eliminated. When Leu-88 was converted to Ala-88, the binding of ligands with N6 substituents was reduced to a greater extent than ligands without N6 substituents. Following conversion of Pro-86 to Phe-86, the affinity for N6-substituted agonists was lost, and the affinity for ligands without N6 substitution was reduced. These observations strongly suggest that Thr-91 and Gln-92 in TM3 interact with the adenosine adenine moiety, and Leu-88 and Pro-86 play roles in conferring specificity for A1AR selective compounds. Using computer modeling based on the structure of rhodopsin, a revised model of adenosine-A1AR interactions is proposed with the N6-adenine position oriented toward the top of TM3 and the ribose group interacting with the bottom half of TMs 3 and 7.

Thermodynamics of full agonist, partial agonist, and antagonist binding to wild-type and mutant adenosine A1 receptors

A thermodynamic analysis of the binding of a full agonist (N6-cyclopentyladenosine), a partial agonist (8-butylamino-N6-cyclopentyladenosine) and an antagonist (8-cyclopentyltheophylline) to human wild-type and mutant (mutation of a threonine (Thr) to an alanine (Ala) residue at position 277) adenosine A1 receptors expressed on Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, and to rat brain adenosine A1 receptors was undertaken. The thermodynamic parameters deltaGo (standard free energy), deltaHo (standard enthalpy) and deltaSo (standard entropy) of the binding equilibrium to rat brain receptors were determined by means of affinity measurements carried out at four different temperatures (0, 10, 20 and 25 degrees) and van't Hoff plots. Two temperatures (0 and 25 degrees) were considered for human receptors. Affinity constants were obtained from inhibition assays on membrane preparations of rat brain and CHO cells by use of the antagonist [3H]1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine ([3H]DPCPX) as selective adenosine A1 receptor radioligand. As for rat brain receptors, full agonist binding was totally entropy driven, whereas antagonist binding was essentially enthalpy driven. Partial agonist binding appeared both enthalpy and entropy driven. As for human receptors, full agonist affinity was highly dependent on the presence of Thr277. Moreover, affinity to both wild-type and mutant receptors was enhanced by temperature increase, suggesting a totally entropy-driven binding. Antagonist binding did not depend on the presence of Thr277. Antagonist affinity decreased with an increase in temperature, suggesting a mainly enthalpy-driven binding. Partial agonist binding was significantly dependent on the presence of Thr277 at 25 degrees, whereas such a dependence was not evident at 0 degrees. It is concluded that Thr277 contributes only to the binding of adenosine derivatives and that its role changes drastically with the receptor conformation and with the type of agonist (full or partial) interacting with the adenosine A1 receptors.

Species differences in brain adenosine A1 receptor pharmacology revealed by use of xanthine and pyrazolopyridine based antagonists

1. The pharmacological profile of adenosine A1 receptors in human, guinea-pig, rat and mouse brain membranes was characterized in a radioligand binding assay by use of the receptor selective antagonist, [3H]-8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine ([3H]-DPCPX). 2. The affinity of [3H]-DPCPX binding sites in rat cortical and hippocampal membranes was similar. Binding site affinity was higher in rat cortical membranes than in membranes prepared from guinea-pig cortex and hippocampus, mouse cortex and human cortex. pKD values (M) were 9.55, 9.44, 8.85, 8.94, 8.67, 9.39 and 8.67, respectively. The binding site density (Bmax) was lower in rat cortical membranes than in guinea-pig or human cortical membranes. 3. The rank order of potency of seven adenosine receptor agonists was identical in each species. With the exception of 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA), agonist affinity was 3.5-26.2 fold higher in rat cortical membranes than in human and guinea-pig brain membranes; affinity in rat and mouse brain membranes was similar. While NECA exhibited 9.3 fold higher affinity in rat compared to human cortical membranes, affinity in other species was comparable. The stable GTP analogue, Gpp(NH)p (100 microM) reduced 2-chloro-N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA) affinity 7-13.9 fold, whereas the affinity of DPCPX was unaffected. 4. The affinity of six xanthine-based adenosine receptor antagonists was 2.2-15.9 fold higher in rat cortical membranes compared with human or guinea-pig membranes. The rank order of potency was species-independent. In contrast, three pyrazolopyridine derivatives, (R)-1-[(E)-3-(2-phenylpyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridin-3-yl) acryloyl]-2-piperidine ethanol (FK453), (R)-1-[(E)-3-(2-phenylpyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridin-3-yl) acryloyl]-piperidin-2-yl acetic acid (FK352) and 6-oxo-3-(2-phenylpyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridin-3-yl)-1(6H)-pyridazinebutyric acid (FK838) exhibited similar affinity in human, guinea-pig, rat and mouse brain membranes. pKi values (M) for [3H]-DPCPX binding sites in human cortical membranes were 9.31, 7.52 and 7.92, respectively. 5. Drug affinity for adenosine A2A receptors was determined in a [3H]-2-[4-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino]-5'-N-ethylcarboxamido ade nosine ([3H]-CGS 21680) binding assay in rat striatal membranes. The pyrazolopyridine derivatives, FK453, FK838 and FK352 exhibited pKi values (M) of 5.90, 5.92 and 4.31, respectively, compared with pKi values of 9.31, 8.18 and 7.57 determined in the [3H]-DPCPX binding assay in rat cortical membranes. These novel pyrazolopyridine derivatives therefore represent high affinity, adenosine A1 receptor selective drugs that, in contrast to xanthine based antagonists, exhibit similar affinity for [3H]-DPCPX binding sites in human, rat, mouse and guinea-pig brain membranes.

A mutational analysis of residues essential for ligand recognition at the human P2Y1 receptor

We conducted a mutational analysis of residues potentially involved in the adenine nucleotide binding pocket of the human P2Y1 receptor. Mutated receptors were expressed in COS-7 cells with an epitope tag that permitted confirmation of expression in the plasma membrane, and agonist-promoted inositol phosphate accumulation was assessed as a measure of receptor activity. Residues in transmembrane helical domains (TMs) 3, 5, 6, and 7 predicted by molecular modeling to be involved in ligand recognition were replaced with alanine and, in some cases, by other amino acids. The potent P2Y1 receptor agonist 2-methylthio-ATP (2-MeSATP) had no activity in cells expressing the R128A, R310A, and S314A mutant receptors, and a markedly reduced potency of 2-MeSATP was observed with the K280A and Q307A mutants. These results suggest that residues on the exofacial side of TM3 and TM7 are critical determinants of the ATP binding pocket. In contrast, there was no change in the potency or maximal effect of 2-MeSATP with the S317A mutant receptor. Alanine replacement of F131, H132, Y136, F226, or H277 resulted in mutant receptors that exhibited a 7-18-fold reduction in potency compared with that observed with the wild-type receptor. These residues thus seem to subserve a less important modulatory role in ligand binding to the P2Y1 receptor. Because changes in the potency of 2-methylthio-ADP and 2-(hexylthio)-AMP paralleled the changes in potency of 2-MeSATP at these mutant receptors, the beta- and gamma-phosphates of the adenine nucleotides seem to be less important than the alpha-phosphate in ligand/P2Y1 receptor interactions. However, T221A and T222A mutant receptors exhibited much larger reductions in triphosphate (89- and 33-fold versus wild-type receptors, respectively) than in diphosphate or monophosphate potency. This result may be indicative of a greater role of these TM5 residues in gamma-phosphate recognition. Taken together, the results suggest that the adenosine and alpha-phosphate moieties of ATP bind to critical residues in TM3 and TM7 on the exofacial side of the human P2Y1 receptor.

Mutagenesis reveals structure-activity parallels between human A2A adenosine receptors and biogenic amine G protein-coupled receptors

Structure-affinity relationships for ligand binding at the human A2A adenosine receptor have been probed using site-directed mutagenesis in the transmembrane helical domains (TMs). The mutant receptors were expressed in COS-7 cells and characterized by binding of the radioligands [3H]CGS21680, [3H]NECA, and [3H]XAC. Three residues, at positions essential for ligand binding in other G protein-coupled receptors, were individually mutated. The residue V(3.32) in the A2A receptor that is homologous to the essential aspartate residue of TM3 in the biogenic amine receptors, i.e., V84(3.32), may be substituted with L (present in the A3 receptor) but not with D (in biogenic amine receptors) or A. H250(6.52), homologous to the critical N507 of rat m3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, may be substituted with other aromatic residues or with N but not with A (Kim et al. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 13987-13997). H278(7.43), homologous to the covalent ligand anchor site in rhodopsin, may not be substituted with either A, K, or N. Both V84L(3.32) and H250N(6.52) mutant receptors were highly variable in their effect on ligand competition depending on the structural class of the ligand. Adenosine-5'-uronamide derivatives were more potent at the H250N(6.52) mutant receptor than at wild type receptors. Xanthines tended to be close in potency (H250N(6.52)) or less potent (V84L(3.32)) than at wild type receptors. The affinity of CGS21680 increased as the pH was lowered to 5.5 in both the wild type and H250N(6.52) mutant receptors. Thus, protonation of H250(6.52) is not involved in this pH dependence. These data are consistent with a molecular model predicting the proximity of bound agonist ligands to TM3, TM5, TM6, and TM7.

The human A1 adenosine receptor: ligand binding properties, sites of somatic expression and chromosomal localization

The A1 adenosine receptor (A1AR) exerts important biological effects in the mammalian biology. To provide insights into the role A1AR action in human physiology, we characterized the pharmacologic properties of the human A1AR, examined somatic sites of A1AR gene expression, and identified the chromosomal location of the human A1AR gene. Using stably transfected CHO cells, the ligand binding properties of human and rat A1ARs were directly compared. Saturation studies showed that the human and rat A1ARs had similar high affinity for the A1 agonist [(3)H]CCPA (human, K(d)=517±64 pM; B(max) 438±29 fmol/mg of protein; rat, K(d)=429±69 pM; B(max) 358±76 fmol/mg of protein). Competition studies performed using seven adenosine agonists and four adenosine antagonists also did not detect differences in the ligand binding properties among the rat and human A1ARs. Northern analysis of 16 human tissues revealed the presence of a single hybridizing transcript of 2.5 kb. Human A1AR receptor mRNA expression was greatest in brain and testis; lower levels of A1AR mRNA were present in heart, pancreas, kidney and spleen. Southern blotting and PCR analysis of human-rodent somatic cell hybrids showed that the A1AR gene is on human chromosome 1. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization, the human A1AR gene was further localized to the 1q32.1 region. These observations show that the human A1AR is a high affinity receptor that has ligand binding properties similar to the rat A1AR, human A1AR mRNA is heavily expressed in brain and testis, and the gene encoding the human A1AR is present on the long arm of chromosome 1.

Identification of domains of the human A1 adenosine receptor that are important for binding receptor subtype-selective ligands using chimeric A1/A2a adenosine receptors

To provide new insights into the regions of the human A1 adenosine receptor (A1AR) involved in ligand binding, a series of chimeric human A1 and rat A2a adenosine receptors (A1/A2a) were studied. Binding studies were initially performed on acutely transfected COS cells using fixed doses of the A2aAR agonist [3H]CGS-21680, the A1AR agonist [3H]2-chloro-N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA), and the A1AR antagonist [3H]8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX). When the region of the A2aAR from the amino terminus to the end of transmembrane (TM) 1 was replaced by the corresponding region of the A1AR (A1TM1/A2a), [3H]CGS-21680 and [3H]CCPA binding was detectable. When an A1TM1-2/A2a construct was studied, [3H]CGS-21680 binding was lost and [3H] DPCPX binding appeared. Saturation studies using [3H]CCPA revealed that the A1TM1/A2a construct had low affinity. However, with the subsequent addition of A1AR TMs 2-4 receptor affinity improved markedly. Saturation studies using [3H]DPCPX also revealed that the TMs 1-4 of the A1AR conferred wild-type receptor affinity. When the ligand binding properties of A1TM1-4/A2a, A1TM1-6/A2a, and wild type A1AR constructs were directly compared, no differences were found using 10 different compounds. When truncated A1ARs that extended from the amino terminus to shortly after TM4 were examined, no binding was detectable suggesting that the amino half of the receptor alone is not sufficient for ligand binding. Collectively, these data suggest that the important determinants for A1AR agonist and antagonist binding and ligand specificity are present in TMs 1-4.

Site-directed mutagenesis identifies residues involved in ligand recognition in the human A2a adenosine receptor

The A2a adenosine receptor is a member of the G-protein coupled receptor family, and its activation stimulates cyclic AMP production. To determine the residues which are involved in ligand binding, several residues in transmembrane domains 5-7 were individually replaced with alanine and other amino acids. The binding properties of the resultant mutant receptors were determined in transfected COS-7 cells. To study the expression levels in COS-7 cells, mutant receptors were tagged at their amino terminus with a hemagglutinin epitope, which allowed their immunological detection in the plasma membrane by the monoclonal antibody 12CA5. The functional properties of mutant receptors were determined by measuring stimulation of adenylate cyclase. Specific binding of [3H]CGS 21680 (15 nM) and [3H]XAC (4 nM), an A2a agonist and antagonist, respectively, was absent in the following Ala mutants: F182A, H250A, N253A, I274A, H278A, and S281A, although they were well expressed in the plasma membrane. The hydroxy group of Ser-277 is required for high affinity binding of agonists, but not antagonists. An N181S mutant lost affinity for adenosine agonists substituted at N6 or C-2, but not at C-5'. The mutant receptors I274A, S277A, and H278A showed full stimulation of adenylate cyclase at high concentrations of CGS 21680. The functional agonist potencies at mutant receptors that lacked radioligand binding were > 30-fold less than those at the wild type receptor. His-250 appears to be a required component of a hydrophobic pocket, and H-bonding to this residue is not essential. On the other hand, replacement of His-278 with other aromatic residues was not tolerated in ligand binding. Thus, some of the residues targeted in this study may be involved in the direct interaction with ligands in the human A2a adenosine receptor. A molecular model based on the structure of rhodopsin, in which the 5'-NH in NECA is hydrogen bonded to Ser-277 and His-278, was developed in order to visualize the environment of the ligand binding site.

Species Differences in Ligand Affinity at Central A3-Adenosine Receptors

[Table: see text] Binding affinities of purine derivatives at A3 adenosine receptors in different species were compared. Binding was carried out using the novel high affinity agonist ligand [125I]AB-MECA (3-iodo-4-aminobenzyladenosine-5'-N-methyluronamide) in the presence of 1.0 μM XAC (8-[4-[[[[(2-aminoethyl)amino]carbonyl]methyl]oxy]phenyl]-1,3-dipropylxanthine), an A1- and A2a-adenosine antagonist. XAC was added to eliminate binding to non-A3 receptors. In rat brain membranes [125I]AB-MECA exhibited saturable, specific binding with a Kd of 2.28 nM and a Bmax of 43 fmol/mg protein. The affinity of [125I]AB-MECA at the gerbil and rabbit brain A3-receptors was similar to the rat, suggesting that the affinity of this agonist is not highly species dependent. The affinity of various xanthine derivatives was measured in [125I]AB-MECA competition binding assays. Gerbil and rabbit brain A3-receptors were similar in the affinity of antagonists whose potency order in both species was: BWA522 ≥ CPX > XCC, XAC, SPX, BWA1433 > theophylline. The affinities of 8-arylxanthines at the rat, rabbit, and gerbil brain A3 receptors were considerably less than the previously reported affinities at cloned sheep and human A3 receptors. Species differences in agonist affinity were assessed by comparing Ki values at cloned rat brain A3 receptors expressed in CHO cells with cloned sheep and human A3 receptors. Human and rat brain A3 receptors were highly similar in the relative affinities of agonists, and sheep brain A3 receptors were unlike either human or rat A3 receptors in agonist affinity.

Locating ligand-binding sites in 7TM receptors by protein engineering

Over the past year, mutational analysis of peptide receptors has started to change our understanding of the interaction between G protein coupled receptors and their ligands, an area previously almost totally dominated by results from studies of monoamine receptors. A picture is currently emerging, in which small ligands appear to bind in three (more or less) overlapping ligand-binding pockets in between the transmembrane segments. In contrast, contact residues for peptide and protein ligands have mainly been found in exterior regions of peptide and protein receptors. It is also becoming increasingly clear that agonists and antagonists may interact in vastly different manners, even though they are competitive ligands for a common receptor.