Tenecteplase versus alteplase in acute ischaemic cerebrovascular events (TRACE-2): a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial

Safety and Efficacy of Reteplase Versus Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Reteplase is a more affordable new-generation thrombolytic with a prolonged half-life. We aimed to determine the safety dose range of reteplase for patients with acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours of onset.

METHODS

This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled, open-label, blinded-end point phase 2 clinical trial. Patients with acute ischemic stroke aged between 18 and 80 years who were eligible for standard intravenous thrombolysis were enrolled from 17 centers in China and randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive intravenous reteplase 12+12 mg, intravenous reteplase 18+18 mg, or intravenous alteplase 0.9 mg/kg. The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SITS definition) within 36 hours. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of no more than 1 or a decrease of at least 4 points from the baseline at 14 days after thrombolysis.

RESULTS

Between August 2019 and May 2021, 180 patients were randomly assigned to reteplase 12+12 mg (n=61), reteplase 18+18 mg (n=67), or alteplase (n=52). Four patients did not receive the study agent. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 3 of 60 (5.0%) in the reteplase 12+12 mg group, 1 of 66 (1.5%) in the reteplase 18+18 mg group, and 1 of 50 (2.0%) in the alteplase group (P=0.53). The primary efficacy outcome in the modified intention-to-treat population occurred in 45 of 60 (75.0%) in the reteplase 12+12 mg group (odds ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.35-2.06]), 48 of 66 (72.7%) in the reteplase 18+18 mg group (odds ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.32-1.78]), and 39 of 50 (78.0%) in alteplase group.

CONCLUSIONS

Reteplase was well tolerated in patients with acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours of onset in China with a similar efficacy profile to alteplase. The efficacy and appropriate dosage of reteplase for patients with acute ischemic stroke need prospective validation.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04028518.

WITHDRAWN: Advances in Neurovascular Research: Scientific Highlights from the 15th World Stroke Congress

The Publisher regrets that this article is an accidental duplication of an article that has already been published, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107614. The duplicate article has therefore been withdrawn. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/article-withdrawal.

CHinese Acute Tissue-Based Imaging Selection for Lysis In Stroke Tenecteplase II (CHABLIS-T II): rationale and design

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Tenecteplase (TNK) has demonstrated non-inferiority to alteplase in patients who had an acute ischaemic stroke presenting within 4.5 hours from symptom onset. The trial is aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of TNK in Chinese patients who had an acute ischaemic stroke with large/medium vessel occlusion in an extended time window.

METHODS AND DESIGN

Chinese Acute Tissue-Based Imaging Selection for Lysis In Stroke Tenecteplase II (CHABLIS-T II) is a multicentre, prospective, block-randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, phase IIb study. Eligible patients are 1:1 randomised into two groups: 0.25 mg/kg TNK versus best medical management (excluding TNK). The safety and efficacy of 0.25 mg/kg TNK are assessed through reperfusion status and presence of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH).

STUDY OUTCOMES

The primary outcome is major reperfusion without sICH at 24-48 hours after randomisation. Major reperfusion is defined as restoration of blood flow to greater than 50% of the involved ischaemic territory assessed by catheter angiography or repeated perfusion imaging. Secondary outcomes include post-thrombolytic recanalisation, neurological improvements, change in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, haemorrhagic transformation at 24-48 hours, systematic bleeding at discharge, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-1, mRS 0-2, mRS 5-6, mRS distribution and Barthel index at 90 days.

DISCUSSION

CHABLIS-T II will provide important evidence of intravenous thrombolysis with TNK for patients who had an acute stroke in an extended time window.

Tenecteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke Thrombolysis: Practical Considerations and Real-World Implementation

The only FDA-approved medical treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is alteplase (commonly referred to as "tPA"). The utilization of a newer fibrinolytic agent, tenecteplase, in routine stroke care is increasing because of recent clinical trial findings, streamlined clinical workflows, and cost-effectiveness. The stroke community is monitoring this development with considerable interest and special attention to the following questions: (1) Does the current evidence support superiority or noninferiority of tenecteplase compared with standard-of-care alteplase? (2) What are the ramifications of off-label treatment with tenecteplase? (3) And what are the real-world considerations when transitioning from alteplase to tenecteplase for AIS thrombolysis? This commentary provides a practical synthesis of the current evidence and discusses our institutional experience with tenecteplase including treatment considerations, off-label use, patient consent, stroke center accreditation, and cost savings. Necessary "Code Stroke" workflow changes to ensure a safe transition from alteplase to tenecteplase are detailed.

Stem cell-based ischemic stroke therapy: Novel modifications and clinical challenges

Ischemic stroke (IS) causes severe disability and high mortality worldwide. Stem cell (SC) therapy exhibits unique therapeutic potential for IS that differs from current treatments. SC's cell homing, differentiation and paracrine abilities give hope for neuroprotection. Recent studies on SC modification have enhanced therapeutic effects for IS, including gene transfection, nanoparticle modification, biomaterial modification and pretreatment. These methods improve survival rate, homing, neural differentiation, and paracrine abilities in ischemic areas. However, many problems must be resolved before SC therapy can be clinically applied. These issues include production quality and quantity, stability during transportation and storage, as well as usage regulations. Herein, we reviewed the brief pathogenesis of IS, the "multi-mechanism" advantages of SCs for treating IS, various SC modification methods, and SC therapy challenges. We aim to uncover the potential and overcome the challenges of using SCs for treating IS and convey innovative ideas for modifying SCs.

Tenecteplase thrombolysis for stroke up to 24 hours after onset with perfusion imaging selection: the umbrella phase IIa CHABLIS-T randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The performance of intravenous tenecteplase in patients who had an acute ischaemic stroke with large/medium vessel occlusion or severe stenosis in an extended time window remains unknown. We investigated the promise of efficacy and safety of different doses of tenecteplase manufactured in China, in patients who had an acute ischaemic stroke with large/medium vessel occlusion beyond 4.5-hour time window.

METHODS

The CHinese Acute tissue-Based imaging selection for Lysis In Stroke-Tenecteplase was an investigator-initiated, umbrella phase IIa, open-label, blinded-endpoint, Simon's two-stage randomised clinical trial in 13 centres across mainland China. Participants who had salvageable brain tissue on automated perfusion imaging and presented within 4.5-24 hours from time of last seen well were randomised to receive 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase or 0.32 mg/kg tenecteplase, both with a bolus infusion over 5-10 s. The primary outcome was proportion of patients with promise of efficacy and safety defined as reaching major reperfusion without symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage at 24-48 hours after thrombolysis. Assessors were blinded to treatment allocation. All participants who received tenecteplase were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients who had an acute ischaemic stroke identified with anterior large/medium vessel occlusion or severe stenosis were included in this study from November 2019 to December 2021. All of the 86 patients enrolled either received 0.25 mg/kg (n=43) or 0.32 mg/kg (n=43) tenecteplase, and were available for primary outcome analysis. Fourteen out of 43 patients in the 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase group and 10 out of 43 patients in the 0.32 mg/kg tenecteplase group reached the primary outcome, providing promise of efficacy and safety for both doses based on Simon's two-stage design.

DISCUSSION

Among patients with anterior large/medium vessel occlusion and significant penumbral mismatch presented within 4.5-24 hours from time of last seen well, tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg and 0.32 mg/kg both provided sufficient promise of efficacy and safety.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04086147, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04086147).

Anti-stroke biologics: from recombinant proteins to stem cells and organoids

The use of biologics in various diseases has dramatically increased in recent years. Stroke, a cerebrovascular disease, is the second most common cause of death, and the leading cause of disability with high morbidity worldwide. For biologics applied in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke, alteplase is the only thrombolytic agent. Meanwhile, current clinical trials show that two recombinant proteins, tenecteplase and non-immunogenic staphylokinase, are most promising as new thrombolytic agents for acute ischaemic stroke therapy. In addition, stem cell-based therapy, which uses stem cells or organoids for stroke treatment, has shown promising results in preclinical and early clinical studies. These strategies for acute ischaemic stroke mainly rely on the unique properties of undifferentiated cells to facilitate tissue repair and regeneration. However, there is a still considerable journey ahead before these approaches become routine clinical use. This includes optimising cell delivery methods, determining the ideal cell type and dosage, and addressing long-term safety concerns. This review introduces the current or promising recombinant proteins for thrombolysis therapy in ischaemic stroke and highlights the promise and challenges of stem cells and cerebral organoids in stroke therapy.

Comparative safety of tenecteplase vs alteplase for acute ischemic stroke

INTRODUCTION

Tenecteplase has been compared to alteplase in acute stroke randomized trials, with similar outcomes and safety measures, but higher doses of tenecteplase have been associated with higher hemorrhage rates in some studies. Limited data are available on the safety of tenecteplase outside of clinical trials.

METHODS

We examined the safety measures of intracranial hemorrhage, angioedema, and serious extracranial adverse events in a 21-hospital integrated healthcare system that switched from alteplase (0.9 mg/kg, maximum dose 90 mg) to tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg, maximum dose 25 mg) for acute ischemic stroke.

RESULTS

Among 3,689 subjects, no significant differences were seen between tenecteplase and alteplase in the rate of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), parenchymal hemorrhage, or volume of parenchymal hemorrhage. Symptomatic hemorrhage (sICH) was not different between the two agents: sICH by NINDS criteria was 2.0 % for alteplase vs 2.3 % for tenecteplase (P = 0.57), and sICH by SITS criteria was 0.8 % vs 1.1 % (P = 0.39). Adjusted logistic regression models also showed no differences between tenecteplase and alteplase: the odds ratio for tenecteplase (vs alteplase) modeling sICH by NINDS criteria was 0.9 (95 % CI 0.33 - 2.46, P = 0.83) and the odds ratio for tenecteplase modeling sICH by SITS criteria was 1.12 (95 % CI 0.25 - 5.07, P = 0.89). Rates of angioedema and serious extracranial adverse events were low and did not differ between tenecteplase and alteplase. Elapsed door-to-needle times showed a small improvement after the switch to tenecteplase (51.8 % treated in under 30 min with tenecteplase vs 43.5 % with alteplase, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In use outside of clinical trials, complication rates are similar between tenecteplase and alteplase. In the context of a stroke telemedicine program, the rates of hemorrhage observed with either agent were lower than expected based on prior trials and registry data. The more easily prepared tenecteplase was associated with a lower door-to-needle time.

Comparison of pharmacokinetic properties of alteplase and tenecteplase. The future of thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke

INTRODUCTION

The drug most frequently used for thrombolysis in cases of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is alteplase. However, there is moderate-to-high-quality evidence that tenecteplase has similar or higher efficacy and safety. With improved pharmacokinetic properties over alteplase, tenecteplase could be a significant advantage in treating AIS.

AREAS COVERED

After conducting an extensive search on Scopus and PubMed, this manuscript reviews and compares the pharmacokinetic properties of alteplase and tenecteplase. Additionally, it provides information on pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, safety, tolerability, and drug-drug interactions.

EXPERT OPINION

The pharmacokinetic profile of alteplase and tenecteplase is derived from studies in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Thanks to its pharmacokinetic properties, tenecteplase is the drug closest to being the ideal fibrinolytic for AIS. Its longer half-life enables a single-bolus administration, which is particularly useful in emergencies. Tenecteplase has proven to have a good efficacy and safety profile in randomized clinical trials. Although we are awaiting the results of the ongoing phase 3 randomized clinical trials, we believe that tenecteplase has the potential to revolutionize the treatment of AIS through thrombolysis.

Tenecteplase versus alteplase for patients with acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Tenecteplase (TNK), a newer fibrinolytic agent with greater fibrin specificity and longer half-life than alteplase, may has practical advantages over alteplase in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) thrombolysis. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare different doses of TNK (0.1, 0.25, 0.4 mg/kg) and alteplase in acute ischemic stroke patients. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and https://clinicaltrials.gov/ for RCTs comparing TNK with alteplase in this population eligible for thrombolysis. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess study quality. Random-effects or fixed-effects meta-analysis models were used for evaluating all outcomes. Total 10 RCTs with 5097 patients were included. Compared with alteplase, TNK at doses of 0.25 mg/kg may associated with the greatest odds to achieve 90-day excellent independence (mRS score ≤1), but there were no significant differences between other doses of TNK (0.1 mg/kg and 0.4 mg/kg) and alteplase. Among secondary outcomes, no significant differences were found in functional outcome (mRS score ≤2) and mortality at 90 days between any dose of TNK and alteplase. Compared with alteplase, TNK was effective at doses of 0.1 mg/kg and 0.25 mg/kg without increased risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), but patients treated with TNK 0.4 mg/kg showed increased odds of sICH. In conclusion, compared with alteplase, intravenous thrombolysis with TNK at dose of 0.25 mg/kg has a better efficacy and similar safety profile and is a reasonable option for patients with AIS.

Intra-arterial tenecteplase following endovascular therapy in patients with acute posterior circulation arterial occlusion: study protocol and rationale

BACKGROUND

Recently, a randomized controlled trial showed a beneficial effect of intra-arterial thrombolysis following successful endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation. Due to differences in response to thrombolytics in occlusion of the posterior circulation, the purpose of ATTENTION IA is to explore the adjunct benefit of intra-arterial thrombolysis after successful recanalization in patients presenting with large and medium vessel occlusion of the posterior circulation.

METHODS

ATTENTION-IA is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial with open-label treatment and blinded endpoint assessment (PROBE). After achieving successful recanalization (expanded Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) 2b-3) of an occlusion of the vertebral, basilar, or posterior cerebral artery, patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive intra-arterial tenecteplase or standard of care. The primary effect parameter is a modified Rankin Score of 0-1 at day 90.

RESULTS

The trial recently completed enrollment, and data collection/verification is ongoing. The final results will be made available on completion of enrollment and follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

ATTENTION-IA will provide definitive evidence for the efficacy and safety of adjunct intra-arterial tenecteplase after successful EVT in patients with an acute posterior circulation arterial occlusion stroke presenting within 24 hours of symptom onset.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05684172.

Epidemiology, organization, diagnosis and treatment of acute ischemic stroke

The management of acute ischemic stroke is changing. Over the period of 2010-2050, the number of incident strokes is expected to be more than double. Rapid access to mechanical thrombectomy for patients with large vessel occlusion is critically associated with their functional outcome. Moreover, patients with first pass effect had a better clinical outcome, lower mortality, and fewer procedural adverse events. We discuss some advances in acute ischemic stroke regarding the organization, the diagnosis and the treatment.

Most Promising Approaches to Improve Stroke Outcomes: The Stroke Treatment Academic Industry Roundtable XII Workshop

The Stroke Treatment Academic Industry Roundtable XII included a workshop to discuss the most promising approaches to improve outcome from acute stroke. The workshop brought together representatives from academia, industry, and government representatives. The discussion examined approaches in 4 epochs: pre-reperfusion, reperfusion, post-reperfusion, and access to acute stroke interventions. The participants identified areas of priority for developing new and existing treatments and approaches to improve stroke outcomes. Although many advances in acute stroke therapy have been achieved, more work is necessary for reperfusion therapies to benefit the most possible patients. Prioritization of promising approaches should help guide the use of resources and investigator efforts.

Acute management of childhood stroke

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this paper is to review recent updates in the acute management of childhood arterial ischemic stroke, including reperfusion therapies and neuroprotective measures.

RECENT FINDINGS

With the emergence of pediatric stroke centers in recent years, processes facilitating rapid diagnosis and treatment have resulted in improved implementation of early targeted neuroprotective measures as well as the increased use of reperfusion therapies in childhood arterial ischemic stroke. Retrospective data has demonstrated that alteplase is safe in carefully selected children with arterial ischemic stroke in the first 4.5 h from symptom onset, though data regarding its efficacy in children are still lacking. There is also increasing data that suggests that thrombectomy in children with large vessel occlusion improves functional outcomes. Recent adult studies, including the use of Tenecteplase as an alteplase alternative and expansion of late thrombectomy to include patients with large ischemic cores, also are reviewed along with limitations to application of the adult data to pediatric care.

SUMMARY

There have been significant advances in the hyperacute care of children with ischemic stroke and early diagnosis and targeted management are of the upmost importance in improving long-term outcomes.

Effect of Time to Thrombolysis on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated With Tenecteplase Compared to Alteplase: Analysis From the AcT Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The AcT (Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase) randomized controlled trial showed that tenecteplase is noninferior to alteplase in treating patients with acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. The effect of time to treatment on clinical outcomes with alteplase is well known; however, the nature of this relationship is yet to be described with tenecteplase. We assessed whether the association of time to thrombolysis treatment with clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke differs by whether they receive intravenous tenecteplase versus alteplase.

METHODS

Patients included were from AcT, a pragmatic, registry-linked, phase 3 randomized controlled trial comparing intravenous tenecteplase to alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Eligible patients were >18 years old, with disabling neurological deficits, presenting within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, and eligible for thrombolysis. Primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 1 at 90 days. Safety outcomes included 24-hour symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and 90-day mortality rates. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to assess the following: (a) the association of stroke symptom onset to needle time; (b) door (hospital arrival) to needle time with outcomes; and (c) if these associations were modified by type of thrombolytic administered (tenecteplase versus alteplase), after adjusting for age, sex, baseline stroke severity, and site of intracranial occlusion.

RESULTS

Of the 1538 patients included in this analysis, 1146 (74.5%; 591 tenecteplase and 555 alteplase) presented within 3 hours versus 392 (25.5%; 196: TNK and 196 alteplase) who presented within 3 to 4.5 hours of symptom onset. Baseline patient characteristics in the 0 to 3 hours versus 3- to 4.5-hour time window were similar, except patients in the 3- to 4.5-hour window had lower median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Severity Scale (10 versus 7, respectively) and lower proportion of patients with large vessel occlusion on baseline CT angiography (26.9% versus 18.7%, respectively). Type of thrombolytic agent (tenecteplase versus alteplase) did not modify the association between continuous onset to needle time (Pinteraction=0.161) or door-to-needle time (Pinteraction=0.972) and primary clinical outcome. Irrespective of the thrombolytic agent used, each 30-minute reduction in onset to needle time was associated with a 1.8% increase while every 10 minutes reduction in door-to-needle time was associated with a 0.2% increase in the probability of achieving 90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 1, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of time to tenecteplase administration on clinical outcomes is like that of alteplase, with faster administration resulting in better clinical outcomes.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://classic.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT03889249.

Evolving Clinical-Translational Investigations of Cerebroprotection in Ischemic Stroke

Ischemic stroke is a highly morbid disease, with over 50% of large vessel stroke (middle cerebral artery or internal carotid artery terminus occlusion) patients suffering disability despite maximal acute reperfusion therapy with thrombolysis and thrombectomy. The discovery of the ischemic penumbra in the 1980s laid the foundation for a salvageable territory in ischemic stroke. Since then, the concept of neuroprotection has been a focus of post-stroke care to (1) minimize the conversion from penumbra to core irreversible infarct, (2) limit secondary damage from ischemia-reperfusion injury, inflammation, and excitotoxicity and (3) to encourage tissue repair. However, despite multiple studies, the preclinical-clinical research enterprise has not yet created an agent that mitigates post-stroke outcomes beyond thrombolysis and mechanical clot retrieval. These translational gaps have not deterred the scientific community as agents are under continuous investigation. The NIH has recently promoted the concept of cerebroprotection to consider the whole brain post-stroke rather than just the neurons. This review will briefly outline the translational science of past, current, and emerging breakthroughs in cerebroprotection and use of these foundational ideas to develop a novel paradigm for optimizing stroke outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in comparison to alteplase in acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Alteplase is the standard medical therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients who present within 4.5 h of symptom onset. Tenecteplase is a modified alteplase variant with pharmacological and practical advantages over alteplase. Many trials have investigated the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase against alteplase. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase to alteplase across randomized controlled trials.

METHOD

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were used to search the related articles until February 20, 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effectiveness and safety of tenecteplase against alteplase for AIS patients were included. Screening, risk of bias assessment, and data extraction were performed following PRISMA guidelines. Data were pooled using a random-effect model.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs were included, with a total of 5123 patients. There was no significant difference between the two interventions in modified rankin scale 0-1 (mRS 0-1) (RR= 1.04, 95% CI [0.99-1.10], P = 0.11, I2 =0%) and early neurological improvement (RR= 1.06, 95% CI [0.97-1.15], P = 0.21, I2 =35). There was no difference in the rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (RR= 1.18, 95% CI [0.84-1.65], P = 0.35, I2 = 0%). Tenecteplase was associated with significantly higher complete recanalization rate compared to alteplase (RR= 1.17, 95% CI [1.00-1.36], P = 0.05, I2 =0%). For large vessel occlusion (LVO) patients assigned to tenecteplase, there was a significant improvement in mRS 0-1 (RR= 1.28, 95% CI [1.07-1.52], P = 0.006, I2 =0%).

CONCLUSION

Based on our meta-analysis, tenecteplase has similar efficacy and safety to alteplase, with a more promising effect in patients with LVO.

A Comparative Study of Hemorrhagic Conversion Patterns After Stroke Thrombolysis With Alteplase Versus Tenecteplase

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Tenecteplase is the thrombolytic drug of choice for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) as it has unique pharmacologic properties, along with results demonstrating its non-inferiority compared to alteplase. However, there are contradictory data concerning the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. The purpose of the study was to report the rate and patterns of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) in AIS patients after thrombolysis with tenecteplase compared to alteplase.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study with data collected 90 days before and after the change from alteplase to tenecteplase from 15 Texas stroke centers. The primary endpoint is the incidence of sICH according to the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST) and European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study III (ECASS-3) criteria. The secondary endpoints are the radiographic pattern of hemorrhagic conversion according to the Heidelberg bleeding classification (HBC).

RESULTS

A total of 431 patients were eligible for thrombolytic therapy. Half of the cohort received alteplase (n=216), and the other half received tenecteplase (n=215). The average age of the alteplase group was 62.94 years old (SD=15.12) and 64.45 years old (SD=14.51) for the tenecteplase group. Seven patients in the alteplase group (3.2%) and 14 (6.5%) in the tenecteplase group had sICH, with an odds ratio of 1.44 (95% CI 0.60-3.43; P=0.41). An increased National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on arrival (1.06; 95% CI 1.0004-1.131; P=0.04) was a statistically significant predictor of sICH. Tenecteplase was associated with a statistically significant increase in HBC-3 (P=0.040) over alteplase.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with alteplase, our study revealed a higher rate of sICH with tenecteplase that was not statistically significant and a higher rate of HBC-3 hemorrhages that was statistically significant. The proposed mechanism of bleeding is hemorrhagic conversion in clinically silent infarcts and contusions underlying the lesions. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings and determine predictive risk factors.

Neurovascular Inflammation and Complications of Thrombolysis Therapy in Stroke

Intravenous thrombolysis via tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator) is the only approved pharmacological treatment for acute ischemic stroke, but its benefits are limited by hemorrhagic transformation. Emerging evidence reveals that tPA swiftly mobilizes immune cells which extravasate into the brain parenchyma via the cerebral vasculature, augmenting neurovascular inflammation, and tissue injury. In this review, we summarize the pronounced alterations of immune cells induced by tPA in patients with stroke and experimental stroke models. We argue that neuroinflammation, triggered by ischemia-induced cell death and exacerbated by tPA, compromises neurovascular integrity and the microcirculation, leading to hemorrhagic transformation. Finally, we discuss current and future approaches to attenuate thrombolysis-associated hemorrhagic transformation via uncoupling immune cells from the neurovascular unit.

Tenecteplase vs. Alteplase for Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, as one of the drugs for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), the clinical application of tenecteplase is still controversial. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tenecteplase versus alteplase to guide clinical practice.

METHODS

A search of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases until February 15, 2023 was conducted to identify eligible articles. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. RevMan 5.3 and Stata 17 were used to perform the meta-analysis and detect publication bias, and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were reported for each outcome measure.

RESULTS

A total of 1326 records were retrieved in this meta-analysis. As a result of the limited reports on tenecteplase in patients with AIS and the lack of high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and considering the impact of publication bias, we did not include any of these studies published before 2015. Ultimately we included 16 RCTs with a total of 7508 patients, including 3940 patients treated with alteplase and 3568 patients treated with tenecteplase. Tenecteplase was associated with better early neurological improvement (RR 0.10; 95% CI 0.00-0.19; P = 0.04), recanalization of blood vessels (RR 0.24; 95% CI 0.07-0.40; P = 0.01), and 90-day excellent neurological recovery (RR 0.12; 95% CI 0.01-0.24; P = 0.04). In addition, there were no significant differences in other efficacy and safety outcomes between the two groups. The funnel plot and Begg's as well as Egger's tests showed no significant publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis showed that tenecteplase was not inferior to alteplase in early thrombolytic therapy in patients with AIS, and was even better than alteplase on some efficacy outcomes with no significant differences in safety. However, as a result of some inherent limitations of this study, more high-quality prospective clinical studies are needed to confirm these results.

Contemporary Methods for Detection and Intervention of Distal Medium and Small Vessel Occlusions

The efficacy of using mechanical thrombectomy for proximal large vessel occlusions has been demonstrated in multiple large-scale trials and has further raised the question of its potential utility for distal medium and small vessel occlusions (DMSVOs). Their longer, more tortuous course and smaller corresponding vascular territories render a significant challenge for detection and intervention. The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive overview of the current imaging and endovascular intervention options for DMSVOs and review the current works in the literature. Compared with traditional computed tomography angiography (CTA) and CT perfusion, recent advances such as multiphase CTA and maps derived from the time-to-maximum parameter coupled with artificial intelligence have demonstrated increased sensitivity for the detection of DMSVOs. Furthermore, newer generations of mini stent retrievers and thromboaspiration devices have allowed for the access and navigation of smaller and more fragile distal arteries. Preliminary studies have suggested that mechanical thrombectomy using this newer generation of devices is both safe and feasible in distal medium-sized vessels, such as M2. However, endovascular intervention utilizing such contemporary methods and devices must be balanced at the discretion of operator experience and favorable vascular anatomy. Further large-scale multicenter clinical trials are warranted to elucidate the indications for as well as to strengthen the safety and efficacy of this approach.

Cost-effectiveness of tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke

INTRODUCTION

Alteplase is widely used as an intravenous thrombolytic drug in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Recently however, tenecteplase, a modified form of tissue plasminogen activator, has been shown to increase early recanalization rate and has proven to be non-inferior with a similar safety profile compared to alteplase. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase versus 0.9 mg/kg alteplase for intravenous thrombolysis in AIS patients from the Dutch healthcare payer perspective.

METHODS

A Markov decision-analytic model was constructed to assess total costs, total quality-adjusted life year (QALY), an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) of two treatments at willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds of €50,000/QALY and €80,000/QALY over a 10-year time horizon. One-way sensitivity analysis, probabilistic sensitivity analysis, and scenario analysis were conducted to test the robustness of results. Clinical data were obtained from large randomized controlled trials and real-world data.

RESULTS

Treatment with tenecteplase saved €21 per patient while gaining 0.05 QALYs, resulting in INMB of €2381, clearly rendering tenecteplase cost-effective compared to alteplase. Importantly, tenecteplase remained the cost-effective alternative in all scenarios, including AIS patients due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis proved tenecteplase to be cost-effective with a 71.0% probability at a WTP threshold of €50,000/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

Tenecteplase treatment was cost-effective for all AIS patients (including AIS patients with LVO) compared to alteplase. The finding supports the broader use of tenecteplase in acute stroke care, as health outcomes improve at acceptable costs while having practical advantages, and a similar safety profile.

Intravenous Tenecteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke Within 4.5-24 Hours of Onset (ROSE-TNK): A Phase 2, Randomized, Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Intravenous tenecteplase (TNK) efficacy has not been well demonstrated in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) beyond 4.5 hours after onset. This study aimed to determine the effect of intravenous TNK for AIS within 4.5 to 24 hours of onset.

METHODS

In this pilot trial, eligible AIS patients with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) mismatch were randomly allocated to intravenous TNK (0.25 mg/kg) or standard care within 4.5-24 hours of onset. The primary endpoint was excellent functional outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score of 0-1). The primary safety endpoint was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH).

RESULTS

Of the randomly assigned 80 patients, the primary endpoint occurred in 52.5% (21/40) of TNK group and 50.0% (20/40) of control group, with no significant difference (unadjusted odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval 0.46-2.66; P=0.82). More early neurological improvement occurred in TNK group than in control group (11 vs. 3, P=0.03), but no significant differences were found in other secondary endpoints, such as mRS 0-2 at 90 days, shift analysis of mRS at 90 days, and change in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at 24 hours and 7 days. There were no cases of sICH in this trial; however, asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 3 of the 40 patients (7.5%) in the TNK group.

CONCLUSION

This phase 2, randomized, multicenter study suggests that intravenous TNK within 4.5-24 hours of onset may be safe and feasible in AIS patients with a DWI-FLAIR mismatch.

Atrial Fibrillation and Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Ischaemic Stroke Patients: Prevalence and Outcomes-A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Atrial fibrillation (AF) significantly contributes to acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), yet its precise influence on clinical outcomes post-intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and post-endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has remained elusive. Furthermore, the overall prevalence of AF in AIS patients undergoing reperfusion therapy has not been clearly determined. Employing random-effects meta-analyses, this research aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of AF among AIS patients undergoing reperfusion therapy, while also examining the association between AF and clinical outcomes such as functional outcomes, symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH) and mortality. Studies comparing AF and non-AF patient groups undergoing reperfusion therapy were identified and included following an extensive database search. Forty-nine studies (n = 66,887) were included. Among IVT patients, the prevalence of AF was 31% (Effect Size [ES] 0.31 [95%CI 0.28-0.35], p < 0.01), while in EVT patients, it reached 42% (ES 0.42 [95%CI 0.38-0.46], p < 0.01), and in bridging therapy (BT) patients, it stood at 36% (ES 0.36 [95%CI 0.28-0.43], p < 0.01). AF was associated with significantly lower odds of favourable 90-day functional outcomes post IVT (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.512 [95%CI 0.376-0.696], p < 0.001), but not post EVT (OR 0.826 [95%CI 0.651-1.049], p = 0.117). Our comprehensive meta-analysis highlights the varying prevalence of AF among different reperfusion therapies and its differential impact on patient outcomes. The highest pooled prevalence of AF was observed in EVT patients, followed by BT and IVT patients. Interestingly, our analysis revealed that AF was significantly associated with poorer clinical outcomes following IVT. Such an association was not observed following EVT.

Advances in Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment: Current Status and Future Directions

The management of acute ischemic stroke has undergone a paradigm shift in the past decade. This has been spearheaded by the emergence of endovascular thrombectomy, along with advances in medical therapy, imaging, and other facets of stroke care. Herein, we present an updated review of the various stroke trials that have impacted and continue to transform stroke management. It is critical for the radiologist to stay abreast of the ongoing developments to provide meaningful input and remain a useful part of the stroke team.

Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage With Tenecteplase vs Alteplase in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The Comparative Effectiveness of Routine Tenecteplase vs Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke (CERTAIN) Collaboration

Importance

Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) is a serious complication of stroke thrombolytic therapy. Many stroke centers have adopted 0.25-mg/kg tenecteplase instead of alteplase for stroke thrombolysis based on evidence from randomized comparisons to alteplase as well as for its practical advantages. There have been no significant differences in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) reported from randomized clinical trials or published case series for the 0.25-mg/Kg dose.

Objective

To assess the risk of sICH following ischemic stroke in patients treated with tenecteplase compared to those treated with alteplase.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a retrospective observational study using data from the large multicenter international Comparative Effectiveness of Routine Tenecteplase vs Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke (CERTAIN) collaboration comprising deidentified data on patients with ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Data from more than 100 hospitals in New Zealand, Australia, and the US that used alteplase or tenecteplase for patients treated between July 1, 2018, and June 30, 2021, were included for analysis. Participating centers included a mix of nonthrombectomy- and thrombectomy-capacity comprehensive stroke centers. Standardized data were abstracted and harmonized from local or regional clinical registries. Consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke who were considered eligible and received thrombolysis at the participating stroke registries during the study period were included. All 9238 patients who received thrombolysis were included in this retrospective analysis.

Main Outcomes and Measures

sICH was defined as clinical worsening of at least 4 points on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), attributed to parenchymal hematoma, subarachnoid, or intraventricular hemorrhage. Differences between tenecteplase and alteplase in the risk of sICH were assessed using logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, NIHSS score, and thrombectomy.

Results

Of the 9238 patients included in the analysis, the median (IQR) age was 71 (59-80) years, and 4449 patients (48%) were female. Tenecteplase was administered to 1925 patients. The tenecteplase group was older (median [IQR], 73 [61-81] years vs 70 [58-80] years; P < .001), more likely to be male (1034 of 7313 [54%] vs 3755 of 1925 [51%]; P < .01), had higher NIHSS scores (median [IQR], 9 [5-17] vs 7 [4-14]; P < .001), and more frequently underwent endovascular thrombectomy (38% vs 20%; P < .001). The proportion of patients with sICH was 1.8% for tenecteplase and 3.6% for alteplase (P < .001), with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 0.42 (95% CI, 0.30-0.58; P < .01). Similar results were observed in both thrombectomy and nonthrombectomy subgroups.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this large study, ischemic stroke treatment with 0.25-mg/kg tenecteplase was associated with lower odds of sICH than treatment with alteplase. The results provide evidence supporting the safety of tenecteplase for stroke thrombolysis in real-world clinical practice.

Different doses of tenecteplase vs. alteplase for acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours of symptom onset: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

The optimal dose of tenecteplase vs. alteplase for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has yet to be established. Therefore, we included the latest randomized controlled trials (RCT) to assess the efficacy and safety of different doses of tenecteplase vs. alteplase for AIS within 4.5 hours of symptom onset.

Methods

Literature was searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and clinical trial registries until February 12, 2023. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI) were estimated using Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). Treatments were ranked based on efficacy and safety using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).

Results

Eleven RCTs with 5,475 patients were included. Tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg and alteplase 0.9 mg/kg had significantly higher rates of excellent functional outcome (tenecteplase: OR, 1.85; 95% CrI, 1.44-2.37; alteplase: OR, 1.60; 95% CrI, 1.29-1.97) and good functional outcome (tenecteplase: OR, 1.54; 95% CrI, 1.19-1.98; alteplase: OR, 1.40; 95% CrI, 1.14-1.74) than placebo, despite an increased risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Furthermore, the NMA (OR, 1.16; 95% CrI, 1.01-1.33) and the pairwise meta-analysis (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.02-1.33; P = 0.03) indicated that tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg was superior to alteplase 0.9 mg/kg in excellent functional outcome. Alteplase 0.9 mg/kg (OR, 2.54; 95% CrI, 1.45-8.08) significantly increased the risk of any intracranial hemorrhage compared with placebo. SUCRA results demonstrated that tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg ranked first and tenecteplase 0.4 mg/kg ranked last in efficacy outcomes.

Conclusions

The NMA indicated that tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg and alteplase 0.9 mg/kg are safe and significantly improve clinical outcomes in patients with AIS within 4.5 h of symptom onset. Furthermore, tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg provides more benefit and has the potential to replace alteplase 0.9 mg/kg in AIS treatment.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/index.php, identifier: CRD42022343948.

Improving neurological outcome for acute basilar artery occlusion with sufficient recanalization after thrombectomy by intraarterial tenecteplase (INSIST-IT): Rationale and design

BACKGROUND

The potential benefit of intraarterial tenecteplase in acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) patients with successful reperfusion following endovascular treatment (EVT) has not been studied.

AIMS

To explore the efficacy and safety of intraarterial tenecteplase in acute BAO patients with successful reperfusion after EVT.

SAMPLE SIZE ESTIMATES

A maximum of 228 patients are required to test the superiority hypothesis with 80% power according to a two-side 0.05 level of significance, stratified by center.

DESIGN

We will conduct a prospective, randomized, adaptive-enrichment, open-label, blinded-end point, multicenter trial. Eligible BAO patients with successful recanalization after EVT [modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2b-3] will be randomly assigned into the experimental and control group with a 1:1 ratio. Patients in the experimental group will receive intraarterial tenecteplase (0.2-0.3 mg/min for 20-30 min), while patients in the control group will receive routine treatment according to the usual practice of each center. Patients in both groups will receive standard guideline-based medical treatment.

OUTCOME

The primary efficacy endpoint is a favorable functional outcome, defined as the modified Rankin Scale 0-3 at 90 days after randomization. The primary safety endpoint is symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, defined as National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score increase ⩾4 caused by intracranial hemorrhage within 48 h after randomization. Subgroup analysis of the primary outcome will be performed by age, gender, baseline NIHSS score, baseline pc-ASPECTS, intravenous thrombolysis, time from estimated symptom onset to treatment, mTICI, blood glucose, and stroke etiology.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study will provide evidence of whether adjunct use of intraarterial tenecteplase after successful reperfusion with EVT is associated with better outcomes for acute BAO patients.

Combined Therapeutics: Future Opportunities for Co-therapy with Thrombectomy

Stroke is an urgent public health issue with millions of patients worldwide living with its devastating effects. The advent of thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy has transformed the hyperacute care of these patients. However, a significant proportion of patients receiving these therapies still goes on to have unfavorable outcomes and many more remain ineligible for these therapies based on our current guidelines. The future of stroke care will depend on an expansion of the scope of thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy to patients outside traditional time windows, more distal occlusions, and large vessel occlusions with mild clinical deficits, for whom clinical trial results have not proven therapeutic efficacy. Novel cytoprotective therapies targeting the ischemic cascade and reperfusion injury therapy, in combination with our existing treatment modalities, should be explored to further improve outcomes for these patients with acute ischemic stroke. In this review, we will review the current status of thrombolysis and thrombectomy, suggest additional data that is needed to enhance these therapies, and discuss how cytoprotection might be combined with thrombectomy.

Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the history of IV thrombolysis, its current indications and implementation, the duality of the "time is brain" versus "tissue clock" approaches, the impact of endovascular thrombectomy on IV thrombolysis, the emergence of tenecteplase, and future research directions.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

The growing use of factor Xa inhibitors has increasingly caused patients with stroke to be excluded from treatment with IV thrombolysis. Important geographic, socioeconomic, sex, race, and ethnic disparities have been identified in the implementation of IV thrombolysis and need to be overcome. IV thrombolysis substantially improves outcomes when provided within the first golden hour after stroke onset in patients treated in mobile stroke units, supporting the "time is brain" concept and encouraging the possible value of more widespread implementation of the mobile stroke unit approach. At the same time, other studies have shown that IV thrombolysis can be successful in patients whose "tissue clock" is still ticking up to 9 hours after stroke onset or in patients who awaken with their stroke, as demonstrated by favorable imaging profiles. These considerations, along with the emergence of endovascular thrombectomy, have fostered examination of our care systems, including the "drip and ship" versus direct to comprehensive or endovascular thrombectomy stroke center approaches, as well as the possibility of skipping IV thrombolysis in certain patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy. Data suggesting that tenecteplase is at least noninferior to alteplase, as well as its more convenient dosing, has led to its increased use. Ongoing studies are evaluating newer thrombolytics and adding antithrombotic therapy to IV thrombolysis.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

IV thrombolysis remains the most common acute stroke treatment. Advances in acting faster to treat stroke have increased its efficacy, and advances in imaging have expanded its use. However, implementing these advances and overcoming disparities in IV thrombolysis use remain major challenges.

Evolving Thrombolytics: from Alteplase to Tenecteplase

Alteplase has been the primary thrombolytic used in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke since thrombolysis was first established as an effective treatment of acute ischemic stroke in 1995. Tenecteplase, a genetically modified tissue plasminogen activator, has gained attention as an attractive alternative to alteplase given its practical workflow advantages and possible superior efficacy in large vessel recanalization. As more data is analyzed both from randomized trials and non-randomized patient registries, there is mounting support that tenecteplase appears to be at least equally, if not more, safe and potentially more effective than alteplase in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Randomized trials investigating tenecteplase in the delayed treatment window and with thrombectomy are ongoing, and their results are eagerly awaited. This paper provides an overview of completed and ongoing randomized trials and nonrandomized studies analyzing tenecteplase in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Results reviewed support the safe use of tenecteplase in clinical practice.