51
|
Ehrenreich SE, George MJ, Burnell K, Underwood MK. Importance of Digital Communication in Adolescents' Development: Theoretical and Empirical Advancements in the Last Decade. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON ADOLESCENCE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RESEARCH ON ADOLESCENCE 2021; 31:928-943. [PMID: 34820954 DOI: 10.1111/jora.12643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The past decade saw a sharp increase in the use of smartphones and digital communication platforms. This manuscript reviews advancements in the study of digital communication and adolescent development over the last decade. We highlight theoretical models that seek to explain the power of digital media in adolescents' lives. We then examine research conducted over the last decade on five aspects of digital media: (1) potential to contribute to adolescent development, (2) associations with mental health, (3) differential impact of active versus passive social media use, (4) cyberbullying, and (5) sexting. We conclude with a discussion of potential opportunities and challenges for studying the role of digital communication in adolescents' development during the coming decade.
Collapse
|
52
|
Hermes ED, Rosenheck RA, Burrone L, Dante G, Lukens C, Martino S. The Implementation and Effectiveness of Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in Primary Care: A Pilot Study. IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2021; 2:26334895211053659. [PMID: 37090002 PMCID: PMC9978641 DOI: 10.1177/26334895211053659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Digital interventions delivering Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for insomnia (Digital CBTi) may increase utilization of effective care for a common and serious condition. A low-intensity implementation strategy may facilitate digital CBTi use in healthcare settings. This pilot study assessed the feasibility of implementing a digital CBTi in Veterans Health Administration (VA) primary care through iterative modifications to a low-intensity implementation strategy, while evaluating clinical outcomes of a specific digital CBTi program. Methods A self-directed digital CBTi was implemented in the primary care clinics of a single VA facility using a cohort trial design that iteratively modified an implementation strategy over three 8-month phases. The phase 1 implementation strategy included (1) provider education; (2) point-of-care information via pamphlets; and (3) provider referral to digital CBTi through phone calls or messages. Phases 2 and 3 maintained these activities, while (1) adding a clinic-based coach who performed initial patient education and follow-up support contacts, (2) providing additional recruitment pathways, and (3) integrating the referral mechanism into provider workflow. Implementation outcomes included provider adoption, patient adoption, and acceptability. Clinical outcomes (insomnia severity, depression severity, and sedative hypnotic use) were compared among enrollees at baseline and 10 weeks. Results Across all phases 66 providers (48.9%) made 153 referrals, representing 0.38% of unique clinic patients. Of referrals, 77 (50.3%) enrolled in the study, 45 (29.4%) engaged in the program, and 24 (15.7%) completed it. Provider and patient adoption did not differ meaningfully across phases. Among enrollees, digital CBTi was acceptable and the Insomnia Severity Index decreased by 4.3 points (t = 6.41, p < 0.001) and 13 (18.6%) reached remission. The mean number of weakly sedative-hypnotic doses decreased by 2.2 (35.5%) (t = 2.39, p < 0.02). Conclusions Digital CBTi implementation in VA primary care is feasible using low-intensity implementation strategy, resulting in improved clinical outcomes for users. However, iterative implementation strategy modifications did not improve adoption. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03151083).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric D.A. Hermes
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine
| | - Robert A. Rosenheck
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine
| | | | - Greg Dante
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT
| | | | - Steve Martino
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
The Dosage, Context, and Modality of Interventions to Prevent Cyberbullying Perpetration and Victimization: a Systematic Review. PREVENTION SCIENCE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION RESEARCH 2021; 23:523-537. [PMID: 34714506 DOI: 10.1007/s11121-021-01314-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Past reviews of cyberbullying preventative interventions have critiqued the field regarding scientific rigor, and a meta-analysis found that randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of such interventions were more effective than non-RCTs. However, no review has examined the risk of bias, dosage, modality, and delivery context of such programs to date. The current study addresses this gap through a systematic review of the literature. Potential articles (N = 4,737) from 4 databases were identified and screened (Academic Search Premier including ERIC, PsychINFO, and the Psychology and Behavioral Collection; PubMed; Web of Science; Compendex); 72 articles were reviewed for eligibility. Final articles included (N = 30) were based on a rigorous search process guided by inclusion and exclusion criteria. The majority of studies were conducted in Europe; two were conducted in the USA, three in Australia, and two in the Middle East. Efforts to reduce risk of bias were evaluated using the Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool. Harvest plots were constructed to qualitatively illustrate the rigor, dosage, modality, and context of the interventions, and meta-analytic random effects models were conducted to examine effect sizes of the interventions on cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. Results suggest that cyberbullying interventions delivered through schools are effective, though expanded follow-up time is suggested, and additional evidence is needed for home settings and digital delivery.
Collapse
|
54
|
Torous J, Bucci S, Bell IH, Kessing LV, Faurholt-Jepsen M, Whelan P, Carvalho AF, Keshavan M, Linardon J, Firth J. The growing field of digital psychiatry: current evidence and the future of apps, social media, chatbots, and virtual reality. World Psychiatry 2021; 20:318-335. [PMID: 34505369 PMCID: PMC8429349 DOI: 10.1002/wps.20883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 269] [Impact Index Per Article: 89.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
As the COVID-19 pandemic has largely increased the utilization of telehealth, mobile mental health technologies - such as smartphone apps, vir-tual reality, chatbots, and social media - have also gained attention. These digital health technologies offer the potential of accessible and scalable interventions that can augment traditional care. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive update on the overall field of digital psychiatry, covering three areas. First, we outline the relevance of recent technological advances to mental health research and care, by detailing how smartphones, social media, artificial intelligence and virtual reality present new opportunities for "digital phenotyping" and remote intervention. Second, we review the current evidence for the use of these new technological approaches across different mental health contexts, covering their emerging efficacy in self-management of psychological well-being and early intervention, along with more nascent research supporting their use in clinical management of long-term psychiatric conditions - including major depression; anxiety, bipolar and psychotic disorders; and eating and substance use disorders - as well as in child and adolescent mental health care. Third, we discuss the most pressing challenges and opportunities towards real-world implementation, using the Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework to explain how the innovations themselves, the recipients of these innovations, and the context surrounding innovations all must be considered to facilitate their adoption and use in mental health care systems. We conclude that the new technological capabilities of smartphones, artificial intelligence, social media and virtual reality are already changing mental health care in unforeseen and exciting ways, each accompanied by an early but promising evidence base. We point out that further efforts towards strengthening implementation are needed, and detail the key issues at the patient, provider and policy levels which must now be addressed for digital health technologies to truly improve mental health research and treatment in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Torous
- Division of Digital Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Massachusetts Mental Health Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sandra Bucci
- Digital Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Centre for Health Informatics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Imogen H Bell
- Orygen, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lars V Kessing
- Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maria Faurholt-Jepsen
- Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Pauline Whelan
- Digital Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Centre for Health Informatics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Andre F Carvalho
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada
- IMPACT (Innovation in Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Treatment) Strategic Research Centre, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Matcheri Keshavan
- Division of Digital Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Massachusetts Mental Health Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jake Linardon
- Deakin University, Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development and School of Psychology, Burwood, VIC, Australia
| | - Joseph Firth
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Wasil AR, Palermo EH, Lorenzo-Luaces L, DeRubeis RJ. Is There an App for That? A Review of Popular Apps for Depression, Anxiety, and Well-Being. COGNITIVE AND BEHAVIORAL PRACTICE 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2021.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
56
|
Hentati A, Forsell E, Ljótsson B, Kaldo V, Lindefors N, Kraepelien M. The effect of user interface on treatment engagement in a self-guided digital problem-solving intervention: A randomized controlled trial. Internet Interv 2021; 26:100448. [PMID: 34471610 PMCID: PMC8387893 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resources are spent worldwide on the development of digital platforms and their user interfaces (UIs) for digital mental health services (DMHS). However, studies investigating the potential benefits of different UIs for DMHS are currently lacking. To fill this knowledge gap, the aim of this study was to investigate differences in treatment engagement between two different UIs for DMHS. METHODS A total of 397 participants from the Swedish general public were randomized (1:1) to use a self-guided digital problem-solving intervention during one week, either with an optimized UI (N = 198), based on user experience (UX) design principles and with automated features, or a basic UI (N = 199), analogous with a UI used in Swedish regular health care comprising elementary UI features and less automation. Primary outcome measures were self-rated usability, on the System Usability Scale, and treatment credibility, on the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire. Secondary outcome measures included behavioral engagement with the intervention. FINDINGS There were no significant differences between the UIs in ratings of usability or treatment credibility. However, participants who used the optimized UI were significantly more engaged with the intervention as measured by usage of the intervention at least once (odds ratio 2.54, 95% CI [1.67, 3.85]), total number of generated solutions (mean difference 1.41, 95% CI [0.72, 2.11]), and mean number of generated solutions per initiated problem-solving attempt (mean difference 1.45, 95% CI [1.06, 1.85]). Other findings included participants using the optimized UI rating the intervention as easier to understand, while feeling more overwhelmed, than those using the basic UI. INTERPRETATION Our findings indicate that an optimized UI based on UX design principles, in comparison to a basic UI comprising elementary UI features, do not affect overall self-rated usability or treatment credibility but increases some measures of behavioral engagement with a digital intervention. FUNDING Funded by the Government of Sweden, Ministry of Health and Social Affairs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amira Hentati
- Center for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
- Division of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Corresponding author at: Center for Psychiatry Research, Norra Stationsgatan 69, 113 64 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Erik Forsell
- Center for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Brjánn Ljótsson
- Division of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Viktor Kaldo
- Center for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden
| | - Nils Lindefors
- Center for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martin Kraepelien
- Center for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
- Division of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Knapp AA, Cohen K, Nicholas J, Mohr DC, Carlo AD, Skerl JJ, Lattie EG. Integration of Digital Tools Into Community Mental Health Care Settings That Serve Young People: Focus Group Study. JMIR Ment Health 2021; 8:e27379. [PMID: 34420928 PMCID: PMC8414307 DOI: 10.2196/27379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital mental health tools have substantial potential to be easily integrated into people's lives and fundamentally impact public health. Such tools can extend the reach and maximize the impact of mental health interventions. Before implementing digital tools in new settings, it is critical to understand what is important to organizations and individuals who will implement and use these tools. Given that young people are highly familiar with technology and many mental health concerns emerge in childhood and adolescence, it is especially crucial to understand how digital tools can be integrated into settings that serve young people. OBJECTIVE This study aims to learn about considerations and perspectives of community behavioral health care providers on incorporating digital tools into their clinical care for children and adolescents. METHODS Data were analyzed from 5 focus groups conducted with clinicians (n=37) who work with young people at a large community service organization in the United States. This organization provides care to more than 27,000 people annually, most of whom are of low socioeconomic status. The transcripts were coded using thematic analysis. RESULTS Clinicians first provided insight into the digital tools they were currently using in their treatment sessions with young people, such as web-based videos and mood-tracking apps. They explained that their main goals in using these tools were to help young people build skills, facilitate learning, and monitor symptoms. Benefits were expressed, such as engagement of adolescents in treatment, along with potential challenges (eg, accessibility and limited content) and developmental considerations (eg, digital devices getting taken away as punishment). Clinicians discussed their desire for a centralized digital platform that securely connects the clinician, young person, and caregivers. Finally, they offered several considerations for integrating digital tools into mental health care, such as setting up expectations with clients and the importance of human support. CONCLUSIONS Young people have unique considerations related to complex accessibility patterns and technology expectations that may not be observed when adults are the intended users of mental health technologies. Therefore, these findings provide critical insights to inform the development of future tools, specifically regarding connectivity, conditional restraints (eg, devices taken away as punishment and school restrictions), expectations of users from different generations, and the blended nature in which digital tools can support young people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley A Knapp
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Katherine Cohen
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Jennifer Nicholas
- Orygen Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David C Mohr
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Andrew D Carlo
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | | | - Emily G Lattie
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Steare T, Giorgalli M, Free K, Harju-Seppänen J, Akther S, Eskinazi M, O'Hanlon P, Rostill H, Amani S, Lloyd-Evans B, Osborn D, Johnson S. A qualitative study of stakeholder views on the use of a digital app for supported self-management in early intervention services for psychosis. BMC Psychiatry 2021; 21:311. [PMID: 34147075 PMCID: PMC8214784 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-021-03317-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital tools such as Smartphones have the potential to increase access to mental health support including self-management interventions for individuals with psychosis, and ultimately to improve outcomes. Self-management strategies, including relapse prevention and crisis planning and setting personal recovery goals, are intended to assist people with long-term conditions to take an active role in their recovery, with evidence for a range of benefits. However, their implementation is inconsistent, and access and uptake need to be improved. The current study explores the acceptability of a Smartphone app (My Journey 3) that has been developed to facilitate supported self-management in Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services. METHODS Semi-structured one-to-one interviews were conducted with twenty-one EIP service users who had access to My Journey 3 as part of a feasibility trial, and with thirteen EIP service clinicians who were supporting service users with the app. Interviews focused on the acceptability and usability of My Journey 3. Data was coded to themes based on the Acceptability of Healthcare Interventions framework. RESULTS Many service user participants found My Journey 3 to be acceptable. The symptom and medication trackers in particular were described as helpful. A smaller number of service users disliked the intervention. Individual-level factors that appeared to influence acceptability and engagement included recovery stage and symptom severity. Clinicians tended to report that My Journey 3 was a potentially positive addition to service users' care, but they often felt unable to provide support due to competing demands in their work, which in turn may have impacted acceptability and usage of the app. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that the app is perceived as having potential to improve users' capacity to self-manage and work towards recovery goals, but barriers prevented many clinicians providing consistent and effective support as intended. Further evaluation of supported self-management apps in psychosis is warranted but needs to address implementation challenges from the start.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Steare
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Maria Giorgalli
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Katherine Free
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Jasmine Harju-Seppänen
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, London, W1T 7NF, UK
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Syeda Akther
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, London, W1T 7NF, UK
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Institute of Clinical Psychology Training and Research, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Michelle Eskinazi
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, London, W1T 7NF, UK
- R&D Department, Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Puffin O'Hanlon
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Helen Rostill
- University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leatherhead, Surrey, UK
| | - Sarah Amani
- EIP Programme (South of England), NHS England, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Brynmor Lloyd-Evans
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - David Osborn
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, London, W1T 7NF, UK
- R&D Department, Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sonia Johnson
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
- R&D Department, Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Meyerhoff J, Haldar S, Mohr DC. The Supportive Accountability Inventory: Psychometric properties of a measure of supportive accountability in coached digital interventions. Internet Interv 2021; 25:100399. [PMID: 34026568 PMCID: PMC8122167 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND One of the most widely used coaching models is Supportive Accountability (SA) which aims to provide intervention users with clear expectations for intervention use, regular monitoring, and a sense that coaches are trustworthy, benevolent, and have domain expertise. However, few measures exist to study the role of the SA model on coached digital interventions. We developed the Supportive Accountability Inventory (SAI) and evaluated the underlying factor structure and psychometric properties of this brief self-report measure. METHOD Using data from a two-arm randomized trial of a remote intervention for major depressive disorder (telephone CBT [tCBT] or a stepped care model of web-based CBT [iCBT] and tCBT), we conducted an Exploratory Factor Analysis on the SAI item pool and explored the final SAI's relationship to iCBT engagement as well as to depression outcomes. Participants in our analyses (n = 52) included those randomized to a receive iCBT, but were not stepped up to tCBT due to insufficient response to iCBT, had not remitted prior to the 10-week assessment point, and completed the pool of 8 potential SAI items. RESULTS The best fitting EFA model included only 6 items from the original pool of 8 and contained two factors: Monitoring and Expectation. Final model fit was mixed, but acceptable (χ 2 (4) = 5.24, p = 0.26; RMSR = 0.03; RMSEA = 0.091; TLI = 0.967). Internal consistency was acceptable at α = 0.68. The SAI demonstrated good convergent and divergent validity. The SAI at the 10-week/mid-treatment mark was significantly associated with the number of days of iCBT use (r = 0.29, p = .037), but, contrary to expectations, was not predictive of either PHQ-9 scores (F(2,46) = 0.14, p = .89) or QIDS-C scores (F(2,46) = 0.84, p = .44) at post-treatment. CONCLUSION The SAI is a brief measure of the SA framework constructs. Continued development to improve the SAI and expand the constructs it assesses is necessary, but the SAI represents the first step towards a measure of a coaching protocol that can support both coached digital mental health intervention adherence and improved outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonah Meyerhoff
- Corresponding author at: Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 750 North Lake Shore Drive, 10th Floor, Chicago, IL 60611, United States of America.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
60
|
Hogue A, Bobek M, Levy S, Henderson CE, Fishman M, Becker SJ, Dauber S, Porter N, Wenzel K. Conceptual framework for telehealth strategies to increase family involvement in treatment and recovery for youth opioid use disorder. JOURNAL OF MARITAL AND FAMILY THERAPY 2021; 47:501-514. [PMID: 33760249 PMCID: PMC9830952 DOI: 10.1111/jmft.12499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2020] [Revised: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
With opioid use at crisis levels, it is imperative to support youth ages with opioid use disorders (OUD) in taking medication and accessing behavioral services over long periods. This article presents a conceptual framework for telehealth strategies that can be adopted to increase family involvement across a four-stage continuum of youth OUD treatment and recovery: Treatment Preparation, Treatment Initiation, Treatment Stabilization, OUD Recovery. It first identifies provider-delivered tele-interventions that can enhance OUD services in each of the four stages, including family outreach, family engagement, family-focused intervention, and family-focused recovery maintenance. It then introduces several types of direct-to-family tele-supports that can be used to supplement provider-delivered interventions. These include both synchronous tele-supports (remote interactions that occur in real time) such as helplines, peer-to-peer coaching, and online support groups; and asynchronous tele-supports (communications that occur without participants being simultaneously present) such as automated text messaging, self-directed internet-based courses, and digital web support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Hogue
- Family and Adolescent Clinical Technology & Science, Partnership to End Addiction, New York, NY, USA
| | - Molly Bobek
- Family and Adolescent Clinical Technology & Science, Partnership to End Addiction, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sharon Levy
- Adolescent Substance Use and Addiction Program, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Craig E. Henderson
- Department of Psychology, Sam Houston, State University, Huntsville, TX, USA
| | | | - Sara J. Becker
- Center for Alcohol and Addictions, Studies, Brown University School of Public, Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Sarah Dauber
- Family and Adolescent Clinical Technology & Science, Partnership to End Addiction, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicole Porter
- Family and Adolescent Clinical Technology & Science, Partnership to End Addiction, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|