Relationships between ligand affinities for the cerebellar cannabinoid receptor CB1 and the induction of GDP/GTP exchange

Pharmacological evaluation of cannabinoid receptor ligands in a mouse model of anxiety: further evidence for an anxiolytic role for endogenous cannabinoid signaling

Extracts of Cannabis sativa have been used for their calming and sedative effects for centuries. Recent developments in drug discovery have suggested that modulation of neuronal endogenous cannabinoid signaling systems could represent a novel approach to the treatment of anxiety-related disorders while minimizing the adverse effects of direct acting cannabinoid receptor agonists. In this study, we evaluated the effects of direct cannabinoid receptor agonists and antagonists and endocannabinoid-modulating drugs on anxiety-like behavior in mice using the elevated-plus maze. We found that the direct CB1 receptor agonists (1R,3R,4R)-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexan-1-ol (CP 55,940) (0.001-0.3 mg/kg) and 2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3[(4-morpholinyl)methyl]pyrrolo [1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazinyl]-(1-naphthalenyl)methanone mesylate) (WIN 55212-2) (0.3-10 mg/kg) increased time spent on the open arms (To) at low doses only. At the highest doses tested, both compounds altered overall locomotor activity. In contrast, Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (0.25-10 mg/kg) produced a dose-dependent reduction in To. The endocannabinoid uptake/catabolism inhibitor 4-hydroxyphenylarachidonylamide (AM404) (0.3-10 mg/kg) produced an increase in To at low doses and had no effect at the highest dose tested. The fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor cyclohexyl carbamic acid 3'-carbamoyl-biphenyl-3-yl ester (URB597) (0.03-0.3 mg/kg) produced a monophasic, dose-dependent increase in To. The CB1 receptor antagonists N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide HCl (SR141716) (1-10 mg/kg) and N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (AM251) (1-10 mg/kg) produced dose-related decreases in To. These data indicate that activation of CB1 cannabinoid receptors reduces anxiety-like behaviors in mice and further support an anxiolytic role for endogenous cannabinoid signaling. These results suggest that pharmacological modulation of this system could represent a new approach to the treatment of anxiety-related psychiatric disorders.

Cannabinoid receptors in invertebrates

Two cannabinoid receptors, CB1 and CB2, are expressed in mammals, birds, reptiles, and fish. The presence of cannabinoid receptors in invertebrates has been controversial, due to conflicting evidence. We conducted a systematic review of the literature, using expanded search parameters. Evidence presented in the literature varied in validity, ranging from crude in vivo behavioural assays to robust in silico ortholog discovery. No research existed for several clades of invertebrates; we therefore tested for cannabinoid receptors in seven representative species, using tritiated ligand binding assays with [3H]CP55,940 displaced by the CB1-selective antagonist SR141716A. Specific binding of [3H]CP55,940 was found in neural membranes of Ciona intestinalis (Deuterstoma, a positive control), Lumbricusterrestris (Lophotrochozoa), and three ecdysozoans: Peripatoides novae-zealandiae (Onychophora), Jasus edwardi (Crustacea) and Panagrellus redivivus (Nematoda); the potency of displacement by SR141716A was comparable to measurements on rat cerebellum. No specific binding was observed in Actinothoe albocincta (Cnidaria) or Tethya aurantium (Porifera). The phylogenetic distribution of cannabinoid receptors may address taxonomic questions; previous studies suggested that the loss of CB1 was a synapomorphy shared by ecdysozoans. Our discovery of cannabinoid receptors in some nematodes, onychophorans, and crustaceans does not contradict the Ecdysozoa hypothesis, but gives it no support. We hypothesize that cannabinoid receptors evolved in the last common ancestor of bilaterians, with secondary loss occurring in insects and other clades. Conflicting data regarding Cnidarians precludes hypotheses regarding the last common ancestor of eumetazoans. No cannabinoid receptors are expressed in sponges, which probably diverged before the origin of the eumetazoan ancestor.

Endocannabinoid lipids and mediated system: implications for alcoholism and neuropsychiatric disorders

Several natural lipids have emerged as candidate modulators of central nervous system (CNS) functions. Fatty acid amides and their coupled signaling pathways are known to regulate several physiological and behavioral processes. Recent studies from our laboratory and others also have implicated endogenous marijuana-like brain constituents, endocannabinoids (ECs), and cannabinoid-1 (CB1) receptors in the neural circuitry that mediate drug addiction and neuropsychiatric disorders. Neuroadaptation to chronic ethanol (EtOH) has been shown to involve changes in the EC system. These changes include alterations in the synthesis of EC, their precursors, as well as density and coupling efficacy of CB1 receptors. The evidence for the participation of the EC system in the pathophysiology of various neuropsychiatric disorders is just beginning to evolve. It is of great interest to explore the components of EC system in different areas of the CNS for further understanding of its role in health and disease. This article presents a comprehensive overview of the currently available literature pertaining to the role of the EC system in alcoholism, schizophrenia, depression and/or suicide.

Molecular biology of cannabinoid receptors

To date, two cannabinoid receptors have been isolated by molecular cloning. The CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptors are members of the G protein-coupled receptor family. There is also evidence for additional cannabinoid receptor subtypes. The CB1 and CB2 receptors recognize endogenous and exogenous cannabinoid compounds, which fall into five structurally diverse classes. Mutagenesis and molecular modeling studies have identified several key amino acid residues involved in the selective recognition of these ligands. Numerous residues involved in receptor activation have been elucidated. Regions of the CB1 receptor mediating desensitization and internalization have also been discovered. The known genetic structures of the CB1 and CB2 receptors indicate polymorphisms and multiple exons that maybe involved in tissue and species-specific regulation of these genes. The cannabinoid receptors are regulated during chronic agonist exposure, and gene expression is altered in disease states. There is a complex molecular architecture of the cannabinoid receptors that allows a single receptor to recognize multiple classes of compounds and produce an array of distinct downstream effects.

Characterization of the pharmacology of imidazolidinedione derivatives at cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors

The pharmacology of 3-(2-ethylmorpholino)-5,5'-di(p-bromophenyl)-imidazolidinedione (DML20), 3-(1-hydroxypropyl)-5,5'-di(p-bromophenyl)-imidazolidinedione (DML21) and 3-heptyl-5,5'-di(p-bromophenyl)-imidazolidinedione (DML23) was extended by studying affinity and GTP binding modulation on cannabinoid receptor subtypes (CB1 and CB2) from rat tissues and human cannabinoid receptors expressed in Chinese Hamster Ovary cells. Competitive binding studies indicated that DML20, DML21 and DML23 are selective ligands for cannabinoid CB1 receptors. In rat cerebellum homogenates, DML20, DML21 and DML23 were unable to influence [35S]GTPgammaS binding but competitively inhibit HU 210-induced [35S]GTPgammaS binding (pKB of 6.11 +/- 0.14, 6.25 +/- 0.06 and 5.74 +/- 0.09, respectively), indicating that they act as cannabinoid CB1 receptor neutral antagonists. However, in CHO cells homogenates expressing selectively either human cannabinoid CB1 or CB2 receptors, they behaved as inverse agonists decreasing the [35S]GTPgammaS binding, with similar efficacy. In conclusion, these derivatives exhibit different activities (neutral antagonism and inverse agonism) in the different models of cannabinoid receptors studied.

Synergistic interactions between cannabinoids and environmental stress in the activation of the central amygdala

Anxiety and panic are the most common adverse effects of cannabis intoxication; reactions potentiated by stress. Data suggest that cannabinoid (CB1) receptor modulation of amygdalar activity contributes to these phenomena. Using Fos as a marker, we tested the hypothesis that environmental stress and CB1 cannabinoid receptor activity interact in the regulation of amygdalar activation in male mice. Both 30 min of restraint and CB1 receptor agonist treatment (Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (2.5 mg/kg) or CP55940 (0.3 mg/kg); by i.p. injection) produced barely detectable increases in Fos expression within the central amygdala (CeA). However, the combination of restraint and CB1 agonist administration produced robust Fos induction within the CeA, indicating a synergistic interaction between environmental stress and CB1 receptor activation. An inhibitor of endocannabinoid transport, AM404 (10 mg/kg), produced an additive interaction with restraint within the CeA. In contrast, fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibitor-treated mice (URB597, 1 mg/kg) and FAAH-/- mice did not exhibit any differences in amygdalar activation in response to restraint compared to control mice. In the basolateral (BLA) and medial amygdala, restraint stress produced a low level of Fos induction, which was unaffected by cannabinoid treatment. Interestingly, the CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716 dose-dependently increased Fos expression in the BLA and CeA. These data suggest the CeA is an important neural substrate subserving the interactions between cannabinoids and environmental stress, and could be relevant to understanding the context-dependent emotional and affective changes induced by marijuana intoxication and the role of endocannabinoid signaling in the modulation of amygdalar activity.

Characterization and comparison of recombinant human and rat TRPV1 receptors: effects of exo- and endocannabinoids

BACKGROUND

TRPV1 is a ligand-gated ion channel whose activation by capsaicin increases intracellular Ca(2+) ([Ca(2+)](i)). TRPV1 and cannabinoid CB(1) receptor activation are capable of eliciting analgesia. In this study, using recombinant human (h) and rat (r) TRPV1 receptors expressed in HEK293 cells, we have performed a comparison of both TRPV1 species at 22 and 37 degrees C and compared endo- and exocannabinoid activity at both receptors.

METHODS

[Ca(2+)](i) was measured in Fura-2-loaded HEK293(hTRPV1) and HEK293(rTRPV1) cells. To assess native CB(1) receptor activity, [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to membranes prepared from rat cerebellum was measured.

RESULTS

Both capsaicin (pEC(50) rat approximately 6.9 and pEC(50) human approximately 6.8 at 37 degrees C) and anandamide (pEC(50) rat approximately 5.3 and pEC(50) human approximately 5.8 at 37 degrees C) produced a concentration-dependent increase in [Ca(2+)](i) in rat and human systems and at 22 and 37 degrees C. In HEK293(rTRPV1) cells, anandamide appeared to be a partial agonist. Capsazepine demonstrated competitive antagonism at both human and rat TRPV1 receptors and at both temperatures studied. Capsazepine effects were not temperature dependent: pK(B) at rTRPV1 was 5.98 at 22 degrees C and 6.02 at 37 degrees C, and pK(B) at hTRPV1 was 6.76 at 22 degrees C and 6.75 at 37 degrees C. However, there was a consistent 6-fold increase in capsazepine potency for hTRPV1 relative to rTRPV1. The exocannabinoid Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol failed to increase [Ca(2+)](i), although its solvent ethanol was an effective TRPV1 activator. In the [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding assay using rat cerebellar membranes, anandamide (pEC(50) approximately 5.8) and Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (pEC(50) approximately 7.1), but not capsaicin, stimulated binding. Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol was a partial agonist. pEC(50) values for anandamide at rTRPV1 and rCB(1) were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

There were small differences in the pharmacology of rat and human TRPV1 receptors. Whilst capsaicin activated TRPV1 and Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol activated CB(1), anandamide is an endogenous agonist for both receptor systems.

U-46619 but not serotonin increases endocannabinoid content in middle cerebral artery: evidence for functional relevance

Cerebral vascular smooth muscle cells express the CB(1) cannabinoid receptor, and CB(1) receptor agonists produce vasodilation of cerebral arteries. The purpose of this study was to determine whether vasoconstriction of rat middle cerebral artery (MCA) results in the local formation of endocannabinoids (eCBs), which, via activation of CB(1) receptors, oppose the vasoconstriction in a feedback manner. The thromboxane A(2) (TXA(2)) mimetic U-46619 significantly increased N-arachidonylethanolamine (AEA) and 2-arachidonylglycerol (2-AG) content of isolated MCA, whereas 5-hydroxytrypamine (5-HT) decreased AEA and 2-AG content. If eCBs play a feedback role in the regulation of MCA tone, then CB(1) receptor antagonists should enhance the constriction of MCA produced by U-46619 but not 5-HT. U-46619 caused concentration-dependent constrictions of endothelium-denuded MCA. Two CB(1) receptor antagonists SR-141716 and AM-251 decreased the EC(50) value for U-46619 to constrict endothelium-denuded MCA without affecting the maximal effect. A low concentration of CB(1) receptor agonist Win-55212-2 (30 nM) produced vasodilation of MCAs constricted with low but not saturating concentrations of U-46619. SR-141716 had no effect on the 5-HT concentration-contraction relationship. These data suggest that TXA(2) receptor activation increases MCA eCB content, which, via activation of CB(1) receptors, reduces the constriction produced by moderate concentrations of the TXA(2) agonist. Although 5-HT-induced vasoconstriction is reduced by exogenous CB(1) receptor agonist, activation of 5-HT receptors does not increase eCB content. These results suggest that MCA production of eCBs is not regulated by constriction per se but likely via a signaling pathway that is specific for TXA(2) receptors and not 5-HT receptors.

Efficacy in CB1 receptor-mediated signal transduction

CB(1) receptor cellular signal transduction is dependent on the expression of G proteins to which the receptor couples, the potential for precoupling of particular G proteins to the receptors either by scaffolding mechanisms or colocalization in lipid raft domains, and the effector mechanisms that these transducer molecules regulate. This discourse will evaluate studies of efficacy for CB(1) receptor-Gi/o activation at the molecular level. Evidence for brain regional differences in CB(1) receptor signal transduction efficacy and agonist selectivity for G proteins will be summarized. The possibility that CB(1) receptors interact with Gs or Gq will be evaluated, and questions with regard to the constitutive activity and G protein sequestration will be posed.

Inverse agonism and neutral antagonism at cannabinoid CB1 receptors

There are at least two types of cannabinoid receptor, CB1 and CB2, both G protein coupled. CB1 receptors are expressed predominantly at nerve terminals and mediate inhibition of transmitter release whereas CB2 receptors are found mainly on immune cells, one of their roles being to modulate cytokine release. Endogenous cannabinoid receptor agonists also exist and these "endocannabinoids" together with their receptors constitute the "endocannabinoid system". These discoveries were followed by the development of a number of CB1- and CB2-selective antagonists that in some CB1 or CB2 receptor-containing systems also produce "inverse cannabimimetic effects", effects opposite in direction from those produced by cannabinoid receptor agonists. This review focuses on the CB1-selective antagonists, SR141716A, AM251, AM281 and LY320135, and discusses possible mechanisms by which these ligands produce their inverse effects: (1) competitive surmountable antagonism at CB1 receptors of endogenously released endocannabinoids, (2) inverse agonism resulting from negative, possibly allosteric, modulation of the constitutive activity of CB1 receptors in which CB1 receptors are shifted from a constitutively active "on" state to one or more constitutively inactive "off" states and (3) CB1 receptor-independent mechanisms, for example antagonism of endogenously released adenosine at A1 receptors. Recently developed neutral competitive CB1 receptor antagonists, which are expected to produce inverse effects through antagonism of endogenously released endocannabinoids but not by modulating CB1 receptor constitutive activity, are also discussed. So too are possible clinical consequences of the production of inverse cannabimimetic effects, there being convincing evidence that released endocannabinoids can have "autoprotective" roles.

Comparison of cannabinoid ligands affinities and efficacies in murine tissues and in transfected cells expressing human recombinant cannabinoid receptors

Affinities and efficacies of several reference cannabinoid ligands were investigated at central and peripheral cannabinoid receptors in three different species (rat, mouse, and human). The tested compounds belong to different chemical classes such as classical and non-classical terpene derivatives (Delta(8)-THC, Delta(9)-THC, HU 210, CP 55,940, CP 55,244, CP 55,243 and CP 47,947), aminoalkylindole (WIN 55,212-2, WIN 55,212-3) and diarylpyrazole cannabinoids (SR 141716A, SR 144528). As cannabinoid receptors have been shown to be mainly coupled to Gi/o type G- proteins, and by using the [(35)S]-GTPgammaS nucleotide binding modulation, we characterized the functional activity of these ligands which can act as agonists (positive intrinsic activity), partial agonists (partial positive intrinsic activity), antagonists (no intrinsic activity), or inverse agonists (negative intrinsic activity). To our knowledge, some derivatives (Delta(8)-THC, WIN 55,212-3, CP 55,243 and CP 47,947) have never been characterized in [(35)S]-GTPgammaS binding assays and up to now, this study represents the largest survey of reference cannabinoids performed in unique experimental conditions and in the same laboratory.

Mechanisms of agonist action at D2 dopamine receptors

In this study, we investigated the biochemical mechanisms of agonist action at the G protein-coupled D2 dopamine receptor expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Stimulation of guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding by full and partial agonists was determined at different concentrations of [35S]GTPgammaS (0.1 and 10 nM) and in the presence of different concentrations of GDP. At both concentrations of [35S]GTPgammaS, increasing GDP decreased the [35S]GTPgammaS binding observed with maximally stimulating concentrations of agonist, with partial agonists exhibiting greater sensitivity to the effects of GDP than full agonists. The relative efficacy of partial agonists was greater at the lower GDP concentrations. Concentration-response experiments were performed for a range of agonists at the two [35S]GTPgammaS concentrations and with different concentrations of GDP. At 0.1 nM [35S]GTPgammaS, the potency of both full and partial agonists was dependent on the GDP concentration in the assays. At 10 nM [35S]GTPgammaS, the potency of full agonists exhibited a greater dependence on the GDP concentration, whereas the potency of partial agonists was virtually independent of GDP. We concluded that at the lower [35S]GTPgammaS concentration, the rate-determining step in G protein activation is the binding of [35S]GTPgammaS to the G protein. At the higher [35S]GTPgammaS concentration, for full agonists, [35S]GTPgammaS binding remains the slowest step, whereas for partial agonists, another (GDP-independent) step, probably ternary complex breakdown, becomes rate-determining.

Structural mimicry in class A G protein-coupled receptor rotamer toggle switches: the importance of the F3.36(201)/W6.48(357) interaction in cannabinoid CB1 receptor activation

In this study, we tested the hypothesis that a CB(1) TMH3-4-5-6 aromatic microdomain, which includes F3.25(190), F3.36(201), W5.43(280), and W6.48(357), is centrally involved in CB(1) receptor activation, with the F3.36(201)/W6.48(357) interaction key to the maintenance of the CB(1)-inactive state. We have shown previously that when F3.36(201), W5.43(280), and W6.48(357) are individually mutated to alanine, a significant reduction in ligand binding affinity is observed in the presence of WIN 55,212-2 and SR141716A but not CP55,940 and anandamide. In the work presented here, we report a detailed functional analysis of the F3.36(201)A, F3.25(190)A, W5.43(280)A, and W6.48(357)A mutant receptors in stable cell lines created in HEK cells for agonist-stimulated guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) binding and GIRK1/4 channel current effects in Xenopus oocytes where the mutant proteins were expressed transiently. The F3.36(201)A mutation showed statistically significant increases in ligand-independent stimulation of GTPgammaS binding versus wild type CB(1), although basal levels for the W6.48(357)A mutant were not statistically different from wild type CB(1). F3.36(201)A demonstrated a limited activation profile in the presence of multiple agonists. In contrast, enhanced agonist activation was produced by W6.48(357)A. These results suggest that a F3.36(201)/W6.48(357)-specific contact is an important constraint for the CB(1)-inactive state that may need to break during activation. Modeling studies suggest that the F3.36(201)/W6.48(357) contact can exist in the inactive state of CB(1) and be broken in the activated state via a chi(1) rotamer switch (F3.36(201) trans, W6.48(357) g+) --> (F3.36(201) g+, W6.48(357) trans). The F3.36(201)/W6.48(357) interaction therefore may represent a "toggle switch" for activation of CB(1).

Synergistic contributions of the functional groups of epinephrine to its affinity and efficacy at the beta2 adrenergic receptor

The structural basis of ligand affinity can be approached by studying the interactions between a drug and receptor residues; the basis for efficacy is more complex and must involve activation-associated conformational changes. We have used wild-type (WT), a constitutively active mutant (CAM), and a "constitutively inactive" mutant beta2 adrenergic receptor (beta(2)AR) to investigate changes in the binding site that accompany binding and activation. The active state (R(*)) probably involves repositioning of at least some of the agonist-contact residues, thereby optimizing their interactions with agonist and resulting in a higher affinity for agonist. A comparison of the binding affinities of a series of phenethylamine derivatives for WT revealed a remarkable synergism between the various functional groups present in epinephrine. Binding affinity was essentially unchanged with addition of beta-OH, N-CH(3), or catechol OHs to phenethylamine. In contrast, when each of these same groups was added to the appropriate compound, already containing the other two groups, to make epinephrine, the increase in affinity was quite large (60- to 120-fold). An initial interaction between two or more contacts may stabilize an intermediate conformation of beta(2)AR, R', either by altering amino acid side chain rotamer conformations or by a more global conformational change involving the repositioning of transmembrane segments. The pattern of these effects was different in the CAM in that fewer interactions were required to observe the synergistic effect, consistent with the hypothesis that the CAM mutation enriches the proportion of receptors in R(*) or in R' from which R(*) is more readily assumed.

Investigation of the mechanism of agonist and inverse agonist action at D2 dopamine receptors

This study investigated, for the D2 dopamine receptor, the relation between the ability of agonists and inverse agonists to stabilise different states of the receptor and their relative efficacies. Ki values for agonists were determined in competition versus the binding of the antagonist [3H]spiperone. Competition data were fitted best by a two-binding site model (with the exception of bromocriptine, for which a one-binding site model provided the best fit) and agonist affinities for the higher (Kh) (G protein-coupled) and lower affinity (Kl) (G protein-uncoupled) sites determined. Ki values for agonists were also determined in competition versus the binding of the agonist [3H]N-propylnorapomorphine (NPA) to provide a second estimate of Kh. Maximal agonist effects (Emax) and their potencies (EC50) were determined from concentration-response curves for agonist stimulation of guanosine-5'-O-(3-[32S]thiotriphosphate) ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding. The ability of agonists to stabilise the G protein-coupled state of the receptor (Kl/Kh determined from ligand-binding assays) did not correlate with either of two measures of relative efficacy (relative Emax, Kl/EC50) of agonists determined in [35S]GTPgammaS-binding assays, when the data for all of the compounds tested were analysed. For a subset of compounds, however, there was a relation between Kl/Kh and Emax. Competition-binding data versus [3H]spiperone and [3H]NPA for a range of inverse agonists were fitted best by a one-binding site model. Ki values for the inverse agonists tested were slightly lower in competition versus [3H]NPA compared to [3H]spiperone. These data do not provide support for the idea that inverse agonists act by binding preferentially to the ground state of the receptor.

Upregulation of CB1 receptors and agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding in the prefrontal cortex of depressed suicide victims

Endogenous and exogenous cannabinoids (CBs) acting through the CB(1) receptors have been implicated in the regulation of several behavioral and neuroendocrine functions. Modulation of endocannabinoidergic system by ethanol in mouse brain, and the association of suicide and mood disorders with alcoholism suggest possible involvement of the cannabinoidergic system in the pathophysiology of depression and suicide. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to examine the levels of CB(1) receptors and mediated signaling in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) of subjects with major depression who had died by suicides (depressed suicides, DS). [(3)H]CP-55,940 and CB(1) receptor-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding sites were analyzed in membranes obtained from DLPFC of DS (10) and matched normal controls (10). Upregulation (24%, P<0.0001) of CB(1) receptor density (B(max)) was observed in DS (644.6+/-48.8 fmol/mg protein) compared with matched controls (493.3+/-52.7 fmol/mg protein). However, there was no significant alteration in the affinity of receptor (DS; 1.14+/-0.08 vs control; 1.12+/-0.10 nM). Higher density of CB(1) receptors in DS (38%, P<0.001) was also demonstrated by Western blot analysis. The CB(1) receptor-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding was significantly greater (45%, P<0.001) in the DLPFC of DS compared with matched controls. The observed upregulation of CB(1) receptors with concomitant increase in the CB(1) receptor-mediated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding suggests a role for enhanced cannabinoidergic signaling in the prefrontal cortex of DS. The cannabinoidergic system may be a novel therapeutic target in the treatment of depression and/or suicidal behavior.

Integrity of extracellular loop 1 of the human cannabinoid receptor 1 is critical for high-affinity binding of the ligand CP 55,940 but not SR 141716A

Like other G-protein coupled receptors with hydrophobic ligands, the human cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) is thought to bind its ligands within the transmembrane region of the receptor. However, for some of these receptors the extracellular loops (ECs) have also been shown to play a role in ligand recognition and selectivity. We have taken a mutagenesis approach to examine the role of the amino terminus, EC1, and EC3 of CB1 in ligand binding. Eight mutant receptors, each with a dipeptide insertion, were constructed, expressed, and evaluated for binding to the cannabinoid ligands (-)-cis-3[2-hydroxy-4-(1',1'-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexanol (CP 55,940) and N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride (SR 141716A). Mutants with insertions in the membrane distal region of the amino terminus or EC3 maintained affinity for both ligands. Those with insertions in the membrane proximal region of the amino terminus or EC1 exhibited a loss of affinity for CP 55,940 while retaining wild-type affinity for SR 141716A. Representative mutants were analyzed for agonist-induced inhibition of cyclic AMP accumulation, and the results indicated that G-protein coupling remained intact. Alanine substitution mutants were made to address whether it was the perturbation of the overall structure of the region or the displacement of particular side chains that was responsible for the loss of CP 55,940 binding. We conclude that a structurally intact EC1, but not the comparably short EC3, is essential for high-affinity CP 55,940 binding.

Activation of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor may involve a W6 48/F3 36 rotamer toggle switch

The cannabinoid CB1 receptor, a member of the Rhodopsin (Rho) family of G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), exhibits high levels of constitutive activity. In contrast, Rho exhibits an exquisite lack of constitutive activity. In Rho, W6.48(265) on transmembrane helix 6 (TMH6) is flanked by aromatic residues at positions i-4 (F6.44) and i + 3 (Y6.51), while in CB1 the residues i-4 and i + 3 to W6.48 are leucines (L6.44 and L6.51). Based upon spectroscopic evidence, W6.48 has been proposed to undergo a rotamer switch (chi1 g+ -->trans) upon activation of Rho. In the work reported here, the biased Monte Carlo method, Conformational Memories (CM) was used to test the hypothesis that the high constitutive activity exhibited by CB1 may be due, in part, to the lack of aromatic residues i-4 and i + 3 from W6.48. In this work, the W6.48 rotamer shift (chi1 g+ -->trans) was used as the criterion for activation. Conformational Memories (CM) calculations on WT CB1 TMH6 and L6.44F and L6.51Y mutant TMH6s revealed that an aromatic residue at 6.44 tends to disfavor the W6.48 chi1 g+ -->trans transition and an aromatic residue at 6.51 would require a concomitant movement of the Y6.51 chi1 from trans-->g+ when the W6.48 chi1 undergoes a g+ -->trans shift. In contrast, CM calculations on WT CB1 TMH6 revealed that the presence of leucines at 6.44 and 6.51 provide W6.48 with greater conformational mobility, with a W6.48 transchi1 preferred. Conformational Memories calculations also revealed that the W6.48 chi1 g+ -->trans transition in WT CB1 TMH6 is correlated with the degree of kinking in TMH6. The average proline kink angles for TMH6 were higher for helices with a W6.48 g+ chi1 than for those with a W6.48 transchi1. These results are consistent with experimental evidence that TMH6 straightens during activation. Transmembrane helix (TMH) bundle models of the inactive (R) and active (R*) states of CB1 were then probed for interactions that may constrain W6.48 in the inactive state of CB1. These studies revealed that F3.36 (transchi1) helps to constrain W6.48 in a g+ chi1 in the inactive (R) state of CB1. In the R* state, these studies suggest that F3.36 must assume a g+ chi1 in order to allow W6.48 to shift to a transchi1. These results suggest that the W6.48/F3.36 interaction may act as the 'toggle switch' for CB1 activation, with W6.48 chi1 g+/F3.36 chi1 trans representing the inactive (R) and W6.48 chi1 trans/F3.36 chi1 g+ representing the active (R*) state of CB1.

Paradoxical pharmacological effects of deoxy-tetrahydrocannabinol analogs lacking high CB1 receptor affinity

The present study investigated the role of peripheral cannabinoid (CB(2)) receptors in producing hypomobility, antinociception and hypothermia in mice. Results revealed that the CB(2)-selective antagonist, SR144528, did not block cannabimimetic effects of a potent delta(8)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) analog in mice. While most of a series of CB(2)-selective 1-deoxy-THC analogs were active in vivo only if they also had good affinity for CB(1) receptors, four of these analogs showed in vivo activity even though their affinities for CB(1) receptors were poor. Further, this activity was blocked by the CB(1) antagonist SR141716A, but not by SR144528. One of the deoxy analogs also stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding, an effect that was blocked by SR141716A. These results provide further evidence that these cannabimimetic effects are not mediated through action at CB(2) receptors. In addition, some of these analogs may be very low efficacy agonists at CB(1) receptors that act as full agonists in vivo, but lack the ability to displace high affinity and high efficacy binding ligands in vitro.

Quantitative stoichiometry of G-proteins activated by mu-opioid receptors in postmortem human brain

Paradoxically, the potencies (EC(50)) of agonists stimulating [35S]GTPgammaS binding are several orders of magnitude lower than their affinities in receptor binding assays. We have investigated the quantitative stoichiometry of mu-opioid receptor-G-protein coupling in postmortem human brain. [D-Ala(2),N-Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]enkephalin (DAMGO) displaced [3H]naloxone binding in a biphasic pattern. The ratio between K(i-low) and EC(50) of DAMGO stimulating [35S]GTPgammaS binding was lower than one. The K(A) of DAMGO was calculated following mu-opioid receptor alkylation by beta-funaltrexamine from [35S]GTPgammaS binding data using the "nested hyperbolic method", yielding K(A)/EC(50)>1. Thus, only 1.2 +/- 0.2% of mu-opioid receptors was needed to be occupied to achieve the half-maximal effect of DAMGO. The estimated ratio between the G-proteins activated by 10 microM DAMGO (determined by isotopic dilution curves) and the occupied-mu-opioid receptors was 1304. In conclusion, we have determined the stoichiometric and the kinetic parameters in the mu-opioid receptor-G-protein system.

Characterization of cannabinoid receptors

This unit describes the use of cannabinoid radioligands in competitive binding assays for determining affinity parameters (IC(50), K(i)) of unlabeled compounds at cloned CB1 and CB2 receptors expressed in cells.

CB(1) and CB(2) receptor-mediated signalling: a focus on endocannabinoids

The discovery that the major psychoactive component of marijuana activated two G-protein coupled receptors prompted the search for the endogenous cannabinoid ligands now termed endocannabinoids. To date three putative ligands have been isolated, all consisting of arachidonic acid linked to a polar head group. Both synthetic and endogenous cannabinoids have been the focus of extensive study over the past few years. The signalling events produced by endocannabinoids as compared with Delta(9) -THC and synthetic cannabinoids contain many similarities. However, as research focuses more on endogenous ligands the divergence between these classes of compounds grows. This review focuses upon the developments in endocannabinoid signal transduction from receptor-mediated activation of common G-protein linked effector pathways through downstream regulation of gene transcription.

Biosynthesis and degradation of anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol and their possible physiological significance

N -arachidonoylethanolamine (anandamide) was the first endogenous cannabinoid receptor ligand to be discovered. Dual synthetic pathways for anandamide have been proposed. One is the formation from free arachidonic acid and ethanolamine, and the other is the formation from N -arachidonoyl phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) through the action of a phosphodiesterase. These pathways, however, do not appear to be able to generate a large amount of anandamide, at least under physiological conditions. The generation of anandamide from free arachidonic acid and ethanolamine is catalyzed by a degrading enzyme anandamide amidohydrolase/fatty acid amide hydrolase operating in reverse and requires large amounts of substrates. As for the second pathway, arachidonic acids esterified at the 1-position of glycerophospholipids, which are mostly esterified at the 2-position, are utilized for the formation of N -arachidonoyl PE, a stored precursor form of anandamide. In fact, the actual levels of anandamide in various tissues are generally low except in a few cases. 2-Arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) was the second endogenous cannabinoid receptor ligand to be discovered. 2-AG is a degradation product of arachidonic acid-containing glycerophospholipids such as inositol phospholipids. Several investigators have demonstrated that 2-AG is produced in a variety of tissues and cells upon stimulation. 2-AG acts as a full agonist at the cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2). Evidence is gradually accumulating and indicates that 2-AG is the most efficacious endogenous natural ligand for the cannabinoid receptors. In this review, we summarize the tissue levels, biosynthesis, degradation and possible physiological significance of two endogenous cannabimimetic molecules, anandamide and 2-AG.

Cannabinoid receptor agonists inhibit depolarization-induced calcium influx in cerebellar granule neurons

Neuronal cannabinoid receptors (CB(1)) are coupled to inhibition of voltage-sensitive Ca(2+) channels (VSCCs) in several cell types. The purpose of these studies was to characterize the interaction between endogenous CB(1) receptors and VSCCs in cerebellar granule neurons (CGN). Ca(2+) transients were evoked by KCl-induced depolarization and imaged using fura-2. The CB(1) receptor agonists CP55940, Win 55212-2 and N-arachidonylethanolamine (anandamide) produced concentration-related decreases in peak amplitude of the Ca(2+) response and total Ca(2+) influx. Pre-treatment of CGN with pertussis toxin abolished agonist-mediated inhibition. The inhibitory effect of Win 55212-2 on Ca(2+) influx was additive with inhibition produced by omega-agatoxin IVA and nifedipine but not with omega-conotoxin GVIA, indicating that N-type VSCCs are the primary effector. Paradoxically, the CB(1) receptor antagonist, SR141716, also inhibited KCl-induced Ca(2+) influx into CGN in a concentration-related manner. SR141716 inhibition was pertussis toxin-insensitive and was not additive with the inhibition produced by Win 55212-2. Confocal imaging of CGN in primary culture demonstrate a high density of CB(1) receptor expression on CGN plasma membranes, including the neuritic processes. These data demonstrate that the CB(1) receptor is highly expressed by CGN and agonists serve as potent and efficacious inhibitory modulators of Ca(2+) influx through N-type VSCC.

Cannabinoid receptors are absent in insects

The endocannabinoid system exerts an important neuromodulatory role in mammals. Knockout mice lacking cannabinoid (CB) receptors exhibit significant morbidity. The endocannabinoid system also appears to be phylogenetically ancient--it occurs in mammals, birds, amphibians, fish, sea urchins, leeches, mussels, and even the most primitive animal with a nerve network, the Hydra. The presence of CB receptors, however, has not been examined in terrestrial invertebrates (or any member of the Ecdysozoa). Surprisingly, we found no specific binding of the synthetic CB ligands [(3)H]CP55,940 and [(3)H]SR141716A in a panel of insects: Apis mellifera, Drosophila melanogaster, Gerris marginatus, Spodoptera frugiperda, and Zophobas atratus. A lack of functional CB receptors was confirmed by the inability of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and HU210 to activate G-proteins in insect tissues, utilizing a guanosine-5'-O-(3-[(35)]thio)-triphosphate (GTP gamma S) assay. No orthologs of human CB receptors were located in the Drosophila genome, nor did we find orthologs of fatty acid amide hydrolase. This loss of CB receptors appears to be unique in the field of comparative neurobiology. No other known mammalian neuroreceptor is understood to be missing in insects. We hypothesized that CB receptors were lost in insects because of a dearth of ligands; endogenous CB ligands are metabolites of arachidonic acid, and insects produce little or no arachidonic acid or endocannabinoid ligands, such as anandamide.

Cannabinoid receptors and pain

Mammalian tissues contain at least two types of cannabinoid receptor, CB(1) and CB(2), both coupled to G proteins. CB(1) receptors are expressed mainly by neurones of the central and peripheral nervous system whereas CB(2) receptors occur centrally and peripherally in certain non-neuronal tissues, particularly in immune cells. The existence of endogenous ligands for cannabinoid receptors has also been demonstrated. The discovery of this 'endocannabinoid system' has prompted the development of a range of novel cannabinoid receptor agonists and antagonists, including several that show marked selectivity for CB(1) or CB(2) receptors. It has also been paralleled by a renewed interest in cannabinoid-induced antinociception. This review summarizes current knowledge about the ability of cannabinoids to produce antinociception in animal models of acute pain as well as about the ability of these drugs to suppress signs of tonic pain induced in animals by nerve damage or by the injection of an inflammatory agent. Particular attention is paid to the types of pain against which cannabinoids may be effective, the distribution pattern of cannabinoid receptors in central and peripheral pain pathways and the part that these receptors play in cannabinoid-induced antinociception. The possibility that antinociception can be mediated by cannabinoid receptors other than CB(1) and CB(2) receptors, for example CB(2)-like receptors, is also discussed as is the evidence firstly that one endogenous cannabinoid, anandamide, produces antinociception through mechanisms that differ from those of other types of cannabinoid, for example by acting on vanilloid receptors, and secondly that the endocannabinoid system has physiological and/or pathophysiological roles in the modulation of pain.

Loss of cannabinoid-stimulated guanosine 5'-O-(3-[(35)S]Thiotriphosphate) binding without receptor down-regulation in brain regions of anandamide-tolerant rats

The endogenous cannabinoid anandamide has been reported to produce well-defined behavioral tolerance, but studies on the possible mechanisms underlying this process are few and often contradictory. The present study was designed to survey the cellular events involved in anandamide tolerance, in terms of the effects on receptor number, coupling with G proteins, and activation of the cyclic AMP (cAMP) cascade. Chronic treatment of rats with anandamide (20 mg/kg i.p. for 15 days) resulted in behavioral tolerance without any change in cannabinoid receptor binding in the brain regions studied (striatum, cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum), suggesting that receptor down-regulation was not involved in the development of anandamide behavioral tolerance. In contrast, prolonged exposure to anandamide significantly reduced agonist-stimulated guanosine 5'-O:-(3-[(35)S]thiotriphosphate) binding in the same areas, with losses of >50%, suggesting that receptor desensitization may be part of the molecular mechanism underlying this tolerance. Finally, concerning the cAMP cascade-the most well-known intracellular signaling pathways activated by CB(1) receptors-in the brain regions from rats tolerant to anandamide, we found no alteration in cAMP levels or in protein kinase A activity. We propose that anandamide, unlike Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol and other cannabinoids, does not alter the receptor system at multiple levels but that desensitization of the CB(1) receptor might account for behavioral tolerance to the drug.

Cannabinoid receptors and the regulation of immune response

Cannabinoid research underwent a tremendous increase during the last 10 years. This progress was made possible by the discovery of cannabinoid receptors and the endogenous ligands for these receptors. Cannabinoid research is developing in two major directions: neurobehavioral properties of cannabinoids and the impact of cannabinoids on the immune system. Recent studies characterized the cannabinoid-induced response as a very complex process because of the involvement of multiple signalling pathways linked to cannabinoid receptors or effects elicited by cannabinoids without receptor participation. The objective of this review is to present this complexity as it applies to immune response. The functional properties of cannabinoid receptors, signalling pathways linked to cannabinoid receptors and the modulation of immune response by cannabinoid receptor ligands are discussed. Special attention is given to 'endocannabinoids' as immunomodulatory molecules.

Cellular signal transduction by anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol

Anandamide (arachidonylethanolamide) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol mediate many of their actions via either CB(1) or CB(2) cannabinoid receptor subtypes. These agonist-receptor interactions result in activation of G proteins, particularly those of the G(i/o) family. Signal transduction pathways that are regulated by these G proteins include inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, regulation of ion currents (inhibition of voltage-gated L, N and P/Q Ca(2+)-currents; activation of K(+) currents); activation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK), mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) and induction of immediate early genes; and stimulation of nitric oxide synthase (NOS). Other effects of anandamide and/or 2-arachidonoylglycerol that are not mediated via cannabinoid receptors include inhibition of L-type Ca(2+) channels, stimulation of VR(1) vanilloid receptors, transient changes in intracellular Ca(2+), and disruption of gap junction function. Cardiovascular regulation by anandamide appears to occur by a variety of receptor-mediated and non-receptor-mediated mechanisms. This review will describe and evaluate each of these signal transduction pathways and mechanisms.

Cannabinoid receptor ligands: clinical and neuropharmacological considerations, relevant to future drug discovery and development

This review highlights some important advances that have taken place in cannabinoid research over the last four years. It focuses on novel ligands that are of interest either as experimental tools or as lead compounds for therapeutic agents and possible clinical applications for some of these ligands. The molecular targets for these compounds are various components of the system of endogenous cannabinoids (endocannabinoids) and receptors that together constitute the 'endocannabinoid system'. These are CB(1) cannabinoid receptors that are present mainly on central and peripheral neurones, CB(2) cannabinoid receptors that are expressed predominantly by immune cells, the biochemical mechanisms responsible for the tissue uptake or metabolism of endocannabinoids and vanilloid receptors. Other cannabinoid receptor types may also exist. Recently developed ligands include potent and selective agonists for CB(1) and CB(2) receptors, a potent CB(2)-selective antagonist/inverse agonist and inhibitors of endocannabinoid uptake or metabolism. Future research should be directed at characterising the endocannabinoid system more completely and at obtaining more conclusive clinical data about the possible beneficial effects of cannabinoids as well as their adverse effects. There is also a need for improved cannabinoid formulations/modes of administration in the clinic and advances in this area should be facilitated by the recent development of a potent water-soluble CB(1)/CB(2) receptor agonist. A growing number of strategies for separating sought-after therapeutic effects of cannabinoid receptor agonists from the unwanted consequences of CB(1) receptor activation are now emerging and these are discussed at the end of this review.

5-HT(1A) receptor agonist-antagonist binding affinity difference as a measure of intrinsic activity in recombinant and native tissue systems

1. It has been reported that radiolabelled agonist : antagonist binding affinity ratios can predict functional efficacy at several different receptors. This study investigates whether this prediction is true for recombinant and native tissue 5-HT(1A) receptors. 2. Saturation studies using [(3)H]-8-OH-DPAT and [(3)H]-MPPF revealed a single, high affinity site (K(D)approximately 1 nM) in HEK293 cells expressing human 5-HT(1A) receptors and rat cortex. In recombinant cells, [(3)H]-MPPF labelled 3 - 4 fold more sites than [(3)H]-8-OH-DPAT suggesting the presence of more than one affinity state of the receptor. [(3)H]-Spiperone labelled a single, lower affinity site in HEK293 cells expressing h5-HT(1A) receptors but did not bind to native tissue 5-HT(1A) receptors. These data suggest that, in transfected HEK293 cells, human 5-HT(1A) receptors exist in different affinity states but in native rat cortical tissue the majority of receptors appear to exist in the high agonist affinity state. 3. Receptor agonists inhibited [(3)H]-MPPF binding from recombinant 5-HT(1A) receptors in a biphasic manner, whereas antagonists and partial agonists gave monophasic inhibition curves. All compounds displaced [(3)H]-8-OH-DPAT and [(3)H]-spiperone binding in a monophasic manner. In rat cortex, all compounds displaced [(3)H]-MPPF and [(3)H]-8-OH-DPAT in a monophasic manner. 4. Functional evaluation of compounds, using [(35)S]-GTPgammaS binding, produced a range of intrinsic activities from full agonism, displayed by 5-HT and 5-CT to inverse agonism displayed by spiperone. 5. [(3)H]-8-OH-DPAT : [(3)H]-MPPF pK(i) difference correlated well with functional intrinsic activity (r=0.86) as did [(3)H]-8-OH-DPAT : [(3)H]-spiperone pK(i) difference with functional intrinsic activity (r=0.96). 6. Thus agonist : antagonist binding affinity differences may be used to predict functional efficacy at human 5-HT(1A) receptors expressed in HEK293 cells where both high and low agonist affinity states are present but not at native rat cortical 5-HT(1A) receptors in which only the high agonist affinity state was detectable.

Biochemistry and pharmacology of the endocannabinoids arachidonylethanolamide and 2-arachidonylglycerol

The purpose of this review is to discuss the cellular synthesis and inactivation of two putative endogenous ligands of the cannabinoid receptor, N-arachidonylethanolamine (AEA) and 2-arachidonylglycerol (2-AG). Both ligands are synthesized by neurons and brain tissue in response to increased intracellular calcium concentrations. Both ligands are substrates for fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH). Both AEA and 2-AG bind to the neuronal form of the cannabinoid receptor (CB1). AEA binds the receptor with moderate affinity and has the characteristics of a partial agonist, whereas, 2-AG binds with low affinity but exhibits full efficacy. Two possible physiological roles of the endocannabinoids and the CB1 receptor are discussed: the regulation of gestation and the regulation of gastrointestinal motility.

Effects of CB(1) cannabinoid receptor activation on cerebellar granule cell nitric oxide synthase activity

Cerebellar granule cells (CGCs) express the CB(1) subtype of cannabinoid receptor. CB(1) receptor agonists Win 55212-2, CP55940 and HU210 inhibit KCl-induced activation of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) in CGCs. Win 55212-2 has no effect on either basal NOS activity or on activation by N-methyl-D-aspartate and its effect is abolished by pre-treatment of the cells with pertussis toxin. The CB(1) receptor antagonist/inverse agonist SR141716A both reverses the effects of Win 55212-2 and produces an increase in NOS activity that is additive with KCl. These results support the hypothesis that activation of the CB(1) receptor in CGCs results in a decreased influx of calcium in response to membrane depolarization, resulting in a decreased activation of neuronal NOS.