Overall Survival with Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma

FAK inhibition combined with the RAF-MEK clamp avutometinib overcomes resistance to targeted and immune therapies in BRAF V600E melanoma

Widespread BRAF mutations result in persistent RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK (MAPK) signaling in melanoma. BRAF (BRAFi) and MEK (MEKi) inhibitors are approved for BRAF V600E melanomas, including those progressing on immunotherapy; however, rapid resistance to these agents highlights the need for novel strategies. Here, transcriptome analysis of BRAF V600E melanomas from patients resistant to BRAFi and MEKi shows activation of focal adhesion signaling. Consistently, BRAFi, MEKi, and the RAF-MEK clamp avutometinib activate focal adhesion kinase (FAK) in melanoma cells. Mechanistically, inhibition of an MAPK-RhoE (RND3) feedback loop results in the adaptive activation of RhoA-FAK-AKT. In turn, FAK inhibitors (FAKi) exert potent pro-apoptotic activity when combined with MAPK pathway inhibition. FAKi plus avutometinib overcomes resistance in multiple models derived from BRAFi plus MEKi-resistant melanoma patients and immunotherapy-resistant syngeneic mouse models. These findings provide a rationale for the development of avutometinib in combination with FAKi for patients with BRAF V600E melanoma progressing on BRAFi plus MEKi or immunotherapy.

Co-delivery of axitinib and PD-L1 siRNA for the synergism of vascular normalization and immune checkpoint inhibition to boost anticancer immunity

Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has become the mainstay of immunotherapy for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, only a small portion of patients exhibit a positive response to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy and the key reason is that RCC belongs to a vascular-rich tumor for promoting immunosuppression. Specifically, the dysfunctional tumor vasculature hinders effector T cell infiltration and induces immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment via the release of cytokine, which attenuates the therapeutic efficacy of ICI. Therefore, regulating abnormal tumor vasculature may be a promising strategy to overcome the immunosuppressive microenvironment and enhance ICI therapy. Here, we propose an NGR peptide-modified actively targeted liposome (Axi/siRNAPD-L1@NGR-Lipo) to encapsulate the anti-angiogenic agents Axitinib and PD-L1 siRNA to promote tumor vasculature normalization and relieve immune evasion for enhanced anti-tumor immunotherapy. With NGR-mediated tumor homing and active targeting, Axi/siRNAPD-L1@NGR-Lipo could act on tumor vascular endothelial cells to inhibit neo-angiogenesis, increase pericyte coverage and vascular perfusion, and normalize the structure and function of tumor blood vessels. Meanwhile, it also enhanced immune effector T cells and NK cells infiltration and reduced the proportion of immunosuppressive T cells including MDSC cells and Tregs, thus improving the tumor immunosuppressive microenvironment. Moreover, Axi/siRNAPD-L1@NGR-Lipo reduced the expression of PD-L1 protein in tumor cells, restored the recognition and killing ability of cytotoxic T cells, and relieved immune evasion. As expected, Axi/siRNAPD-L1@NGR-Lipo displayed superior anti-tumor and anti-metastatic efficacy in mice bearing RCC. Overall, this study demonstrated the important potential of regulating abnormal tumor vasculature to reshape the immunosuppressive microenvironment and boost ICI therapy, which represents a promising avenue for the synergistic anti-tumor with cancer immunotherapy.

Individualized Neoantigen-Directed Melanoma Therapy

Individualized neoantigen-directed therapy represents a groundbreaking approach in melanoma treatment that leverages the patient's own immune system to target cancer cells. This innovative strategy involves the identification of unique immunogenic neoantigens (mutated proteins specific to an individual's tumor) and the development of therapeutic vaccines that either consist of peptide sequences or RNA encoding these neoantigens. The goal of these therapies is to induce neoantigen-specific immune responses, enabling the immune system to recognize and destroy cancer cells presenting the targeted neoantigens. This individualized approach is particularly advantageous given the genetic heterogeneity of melanoma, which exhibits distinct mutations among different patients. In contrast to traditional therapies, neoantigen-directed therapy offers a tailored treatment that potentially reduces off-target side effects and enhances therapeutic efficacy. Recent advances in neoantigen prediction and vaccine development have facilitated clinical trials exploring the combination of neoantigen vaccines with immune checkpoint inhibitors. These trials have shown promising clinical outcomes, underscoring the potential of this personalized approach. This review provides an overview of the rationale behind neoantigen-directed therapies and summarizes the current state of knowledge regarding personalized neoantigen vaccines in melanoma treatment.

Navigating the landscape of immune checkpoint inhibitors and novel immunotherapies in melanoma: long-term outcomes, progress, and challenges

INTRODUCTION

Melanoma has become the poster child for transformative outcomes in advanced malignancy from the use of immunotherapy over the last 10-15 years with median survival improving from ~ 1 to > 5 years. With the increasing repertoire of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and other novel immunotherapeutic approaches, integrating and sequencing treatments to create new paradigms has gained prominence, with focus on optimizing toxicity management and complex scenarios such as immunotherapy resistance, brain metastases, fertility, and duration of follow-up.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we summarize the progress and emerging evidence in melanoma treatments to date and consider management and possible future directions to improve outcomes for above-mentioned specific patient cohorts.

EXPERT OPINION

Personalized care with integration of novel prognostic and predictive biomarkers is the way forward in tailoring not only patient selection and choice of therapy, but also duration of treatment and surveillance to allow for early recurrence detection and access to newer therapies such as tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) to maximize the curative fraction of melanoma patients. Further research is needed in optimizing ICI and other immunotherapy toxicity management, including reducing steroid exposure for better patient outcomes and preserving quality of life.

Impact of Adjuvant Interferon Therapy on Survival Outcomes for Cutaneous Melanoma With Parotid Involvement

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relative 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) outcomes for adjuvant interferon therapy in the treatment of head and neck cutaneous melanoma (HNCM) with parotid gland involvement.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary care institution to analyze patients undergoing parotidectomy for cutaneous head and neck melanoma involving the parotid gland from 2000 to 2014. Time-to-event analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank p-values and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 82 patients who underwent surgical resection of stage III HNCM with parotid involvement. The mean follow-up was 67.8 months (SD 65) after diagnosis. Twenty-one patients received adjuvant interferon therapy, 12 patients received adjuvant radiation therapy, and 49 patients received no adjuvant therapy. Crude 5-year OS rates were 95.0% for interferon therapy, 33.3% for adjuvant RT, and 40.4% for no adjuvant therapy. Crude 5-year RFS rates were 75.2%, 19.5%, and 40.8% respectively. In the fully adjusted model, adjuvant interferon therapy was associated with improved 5-year OS compared to adjuvant RT (HR 0.10, 95% CI 0.011-0.837; p = 0.034). There was no significant association between adjuvant interferon therapy and 5-year RFS in the fully adjusted model.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant interferon therapy for surgically resected stage III cutaneous melanoma with parotid gland involvement may be associated with improved survival outcomes. These findings support the growing evidence for the use of immunotherapy in melanoma, and potentially a unique role for when melanoma involves the lymphatic-rich parotid gland.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 135:1098-1104, 2025.

Real-world management of patients with complete response under immune-checkpoint inhibition for advanced melanoma

BACKGROUND

Up to now, the optimal duration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has not been evaluated in prospective studies. However, current clinical practice requires decisions to be made regarding the duration of ICI in complete responders.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A survey was sent to 80 DeCOG skin cancer centers to assess how decisions are made on treatment duration of ICI in melanoma after having reached complete response, and staging intervals after ICI discontinuation. All responses received by March 10, 2024 (51 centers) were included.

RESULTS

The duration of ICI after having achieved complete remission varies between centers from three to 36 months. In total, 66% of the DeCOG centers continue treatment for up to 6 months, after having achieved complete remission (CR) with ICI. In the first year after discontinuation of ICI, most centers perform staging intervals (CT/MRI) every 3 months. More than 60% of centers continue staging at least once per year even in the 4th and 5th year after discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

There are significant differences between the centers regarding staging intervals and duration of ICI upon CR. Prospective studies are necessary to determine the optimal time point of ICI discontinuation and follow-up.

Pathological diagnosis of central nervous system tumours in adults: what's new?

In the course of the last decade, the pathological diagnosis of many tumours of the central nervous system (CNS) has transitioned from a purely histological to a combined histological and molecular approach, resulting in a more precise 'histomolecular diagnosis'. Unfortunately, translation of this refinement in CNS tumour diagnostics into more effective treatment strategies is lagging behind. There is hope though that incorporating the assessment of predictive markers in the pathological evaluation of CNS tumours will help to improve this situation. The present review discusses some novel aspects with regard to the pathological diagnosis of the most common CNS tumours in adults. After a brief update on recognition of clinically meaningful subgroups in adult-type diffuse gliomas and the value of assessing predictive markers in these tumours, more detailed information is provided on predictive markers of (potential) relevance for immunotherapy especially for glioblastomas, IDH-wildtype. Furthermore, recommendations for improved grading of meningiomas by using molecular markers are briefly summarised, and an overview is given on (predictive) markers of interest in metastatic CNS tumours. In the last part of this review, some 'emerging new CNS tumour types' that may occur especially in adults are presented in a table. Hopefully, this review provides useful information on 'what's new' for practising pathologists diagnosing CNS tumours in adults.

Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Mucosal Melanoma: Preliminary Clinical Outcomes and the MedAustron Approach for Reporting RBE-Weighted Dose With 2 Models

Purpose

Head and neck mucosal melanomas (HNMMs) are aggressive, radiotherapy-resistant cancers. Previous JCROS studies demonstrated improved local control with carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT). This study evaluates early outcomes of CIRT for HNMM using the European and Japanese relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-adapted dose prescriptions.

Materials and Methods

Between November 2019 and April 2023, 14 HNMM patients received CIRT treatment. Postoperative CIRT for R2 resection: 9 cases; biopsies only: 5 cases. Immune checkpoint inhibitors used as primary treatment: 6 cases; salvage: 8 cases. CIRT delivered in DRBE dose of 68.8 (64.5-68.8) Gy (RBE)/16 fractions, optimized with the local effect model I (LEM-I, European) for RBE-weighted dose, recalculated using the modified-microdosimetric kinetic model (mMKM, Japanese).

Results

HNMM tumor and nodal stages: cT3: 2 (14%), cT4: 12 (86%), cN1: 1 (7%). The median follow-up was 22 months (range, 4-54). The 2-year local recurrence-free survival, regional recurrence-free survival, overall survival, and distant metastasis-free survival were 100%, 89% (CI, 71-100), 64% (CI, 44-95), and 43% (CI, 22-84), respectively. The median relative volumetric tumor regression at 3, 6, and 12 months post-CIRT was 40%, 63%, and 72%, respectively. CIRT-associated late toxicities were G3 mucositis: 2 (14%) and G3 anosmia: 1 (7%). The immune checkpoint inhibition-related late toxicities were G2 hypophysitis: 1 (11%) and G3 peripheral neuropathy: 1 (11%). The average attainable DRBE coverage for 95% of high-dose clinical target volume was 63.2 ± 6 Gy (RBE) (LEM-I) and 57.4 ± 5 Gy (RBE) (mMKM). The LETd distribution in high-dose clinical target volume was satisfactory, LETd50% (median) = 57.3 ± 6 keV/µm and LETd98% (near minimum) = 46.5 ± 6.1 keV/µm.

Conclusion

Bi-RBE model (LEM-I, mMKM) optimized CIRT protocol improved dose comparability of plans between different systems. It also improved intratumoral LETd distribution and resulted in rapid tumor regression, favorable toxicity profile, and excellent early loco-regional control. It provides a promising alternative to surgery, though distant metastasis remains the key prognostic factor.

Tumor Response to Immune-Oncology Therapy Despite High-Dose Steroid Intervention in a Patient With Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma and Immune-Related Myasthenia Gravis

Immune-oncology (IO) therapies, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, have significantly altered the treatment landscape for various cancers, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Unfortunately, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) during therapy often necessitate corticosteroid intervention, which may theoretically impair the anti-tumor immune response. In this article, we describe a unique case in which a patient with advanced papillary RCC developed immune-related myasthenia gravis (MG) while on nivolumab (a PD-1 inhibitor) and cabozantinib. Even while giving corticosteroid treatment for myasthenia gravis, the patient exhibited a striking treatment response, with substantial tumor shrinkage and regression of regional lymphadenopathy. This case highlights that IO agents can remain efficacious even in the presence of significant immunosuppression, raising important mechanistic and clinical considerations for managing irAEs.

[Management of immune-related adverse events]

With the implementation of immunotherapy, a completely new, broad spectrum of side effects has emerged in oncology-the immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Their management differs greatly from that of classic cytotoxic side effects and is based primarily on corticosteroids, immunomodulatory agents, and treatment interruptions. Whereas some events are low grade and reversible, others can be severe and lead to permanent disorders or even death. Therefore, early recognition and treatment in the context of interdisciplinary side effects management is critical for patients' safety, prognosis, and quality of life.

Interplay between CD28 and PD-1 in T cell immunotherapy

Immune checkpoint therapy targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis has revolutionised the treatment of solid tumors. However, T cell exhaustion underpins resistance to current anti-PD-1 therapies, resulting in lower response rates in cancer patients. CD28 is a T cell costimulatory receptor that can influence the PD-1 signalling pathway (and vice versa). CD28 signalling has the potential to counter T cell exhaustion by serving as a potential complementary response to traditional anti-PD-1 therapies. Here we discuss the interplay between PD-1 and CD28 in T cell immunotherapy and additionally how CD28 transcriptionally modulates T cell exhaustion. We also consider clinical attempts at targeting CD28; the challenges faced by past attempts and recent promising developments.

Optimizing TIL therapy for uveal melanoma: lessons learned and unlearned from cutaneous melanoma

Adoptive transfer of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL-ACT) is a personalized cancer therapy that harnesses the anti-tumor activity of tumor resident T cells through ex vivo activation and expansion. This therapy involves the infusion of a single dose of ex vivo expanded TIL together with high dose IL-2 following a preparative lymphodepleting chemotherapy. The United States Food and Drug Administration approved lifileucel in 2024 as the first autologous TIL product for patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma (CM), adding to the list of approved immunotherapies for this highly immunogenic cancer. However, the role for TIL-ACT in other solid tumors is unclear, especially for poorly immunogenic cancers with low tumor mutational burden. In this review, we describe the historical development of TIL-ACT, summarize the clinical results in advanced CM, and describe the novel application of TIL-ACT to metastatic uveal melanoma (UM), a prototypic immunotherapy-resistant solid tumor. We will highlight key biologic differences between CM and UM, their consequential influence on the manufacturing of UM-specific TIL products, and the development of novel biomarkers for precision TIL-ACT for metastatic UM.

Impact of immunotherapy on the care patterns and outcomes of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Modern immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors revolutionized cancer treatment and outcomes. This study aims to demonstrate how immunotherapy has impacted the national landscape of systemic treatment and palliative care in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort selecting patients from the U.S.-based National Cancer Database (NCDB) with clinical stages T3b/T4 and stage IV HCC from 2010 to 2021. We performed a multivariable analysis using the Cox proportional hazard for overall survival (OS) comparisons and a logistic regression model to study immunotherapy use.

RESULTS

Immunotherapy use increased from 0.27 % in 2010 to 33.80 % in 2021. The median OS survival (in months) was 2 for untreated patients, 7.20 for chemotherapy, and 7.46 for immunotherapy. There was a better OS with immunotherapy (HR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.56-0.62). Systemic therapy for palliation increased from 14.41 % in 2010 to 25.32 % in 2021. Compared to surgical palliation, radiation (HR 0.61, 95 % CI 0.52-0.71) and systemic palliative (HR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.51-0.69) therapies improved OS.

CONCLUSION

From 2010 to 2021, there was a significant increase in the use of immunotherapy, parallel to a large shift toward systemic therapy use for palliative care in patients with advanced HCC. Immunotherapy was associated with a significant OS benefit in the palliative setting.

AI Model for Predicting Anti-PD1 Response in Melanoma Using Multi-Omics Biomarkers

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated significantly improved clinical efficacy in a minority of patients with advanced melanoma, whereas non-responders potentially suffer from severe side effects and delays in other treatment options. Predicting the response to anti-PD1 treatment in melanoma remains a challenge because the current FDA-approved gold standard, the nonsynonymous tumor mutation burden (nsTMB), offers limited accuracy.

METHODS

In this study, we developed a multi-omics-based machine learning model that integrates genomic and transcriptomic biomarkers to predict the response to anti-PD1 treatment in patients with advanced melanoma. We employed least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression with 49 biomarkers extracted from tumor-normal whole-exome and RNA sequencing as input features. The performance of the multi-omics AI model was thoroughly compared to that of nsTMB alone and to models that use only genomic or transcriptomic biomarkers.

RESULTS

We used publicly available DNA and RNA-seq datasets of melanoma patients for the training and validation of our model, forming a meta-cohort of 449 patients for which the outcome was recorded as a RECIST score. The model substantially improved the prediction of anti-PD1 outcomes compared to nsTMB alone, with an ROC AUC of 0.7 in the training set and an ROC AUC of 0.64 in the test set. Using SHAP values, we demonstrated the explainability of the model's predictions on a per-sample basis.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that models using only RNA-seq or multi-omics biomarkers outperformed nsTMB in predicting the response of melanoma patients to ICI. Furthermore, our machine learning approach improves clinical usability by providing explanations of its predictions on a per-patient basis. Our findings underscore the utility of multi-omics data for selecting patients for treatment with anti-PD1 drugs. However, to train clinical-grade AI models for routine applications, prospective studies collecting larger melanoma cohorts with consistent application of exome and RNA sequencing are required.

Clinical Approaches for the Management of Skin Cancer: A Review of Current Progress in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis for Patients with Melanoma

Melanoma represents a significant public health challenge due to its increasing incidence and potential for metastasis. This review will explore the current clinical approaches to the management of melanoma, focusing on advancements in diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Methods for early detection and accurate staging have been enhanced by new diagnostic strategies. Treatment modalities have expanded beyond traditional surgical excision to include targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Prognostic assessment has benefited from the development of novel biomarkers and genetic profiling. This review will highlight the progress made in the multidisciplinary management of melanoma, underscoring the importance of continuous research to improve patient outcomes.

Breast cancer: pathogenesis and treatments

Breast cancer, characterized by unique epidemiological patterns and significant heterogeneity, remains one of the leading causes of malignancy-related deaths in women. The increasingly nuanced molecular subtypes of breast cancer have enhanced the comprehension and precision treatment of this disease. The mechanisms of tumorigenesis and progression of breast cancer have been central to scientific research, with investigations spanning various perspectives such as tumor stemness, intra-tumoral microbiota, and circadian rhythms. Technological advancements, particularly those integrated with artificial intelligence, have significantly improved the accuracy of breast cancer detection and diagnosis. The emergence of novel therapeutic concepts and drugs represents a paradigm shift towards personalized medicine. Evidence suggests that optimal diagnosis and treatment models tailored to individual patient risk and expected subtypes are crucial, supporting the era of precision oncology for breast cancer. Despite the rapid advancements in oncology and the increasing emphasis on the clinical precision treatment of breast cancer, a comprehensive update and summary of the panoramic knowledge related to this disease are needed. In this review, we provide a thorough overview of the global status of breast cancer, including its epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiology, and molecular subtyping. Additionally, we elaborate on the latest research into mechanisms contributing to breast cancer progression, emerging treatment strategies, and long-term patient management. This review offers valuable insights into the latest advancements in Breast Cancer Research, thereby facilitating future progress in both basic research and clinical application.

Presence of brain metastasis differentially impacts long-term survival after first-line therapy in melanoma depending on BRAF mutation status

Background

Modern therapeutic strategies have significantly improved the prognosis of advanced melanoma patients. Predictive factors of therapy response include serum LDH; however, predictive markers for long-term survival are currently largely lacking.

Patients and methods

Patients diagnosed with stage IV melanoma (AJCCv8) of cutaneous origin or unknown primary were identified from the prospective multicenter German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group (DeCOG) skin cancer registry ADOREG. Baseline characteristics were compared between patient groups with short-term versus long-term survival. Statistical analysis included ROC analysis and multinomial regression analysis.

Results

Of 3066 stage IV melanoma patients entered into the ADOREG between 05/2014 and 06/2021, 395 were identified for this study, of whom 301 (76.2%) survived ≤1 year, and 94 (23.8%) survived ≥5 years after stage IV diagnosis. The median follow-up time was 6 months (range 0-129 months). Regarding the baseline characteristics, only elevated serum LDH (P <0.001) was found to be independently predicting survival ≤1 year. Type of first-line therapy, immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) versus BRAF/MEK targeted therapy (TT), was not predictive of long-term survival ≥5 years. For survival ≤1 year, the presence of brain metastases at treatment start was an independent predictor in BRAF-mutated patients regardless if they received TT (N=113; P=0<0.001) or ICI (N=69; P=0.015), but not in BRAF-wildtype patients who received ICI (N=161; P=0.47).

Conclusions

Low serum LDH independently predicts long-term survival of stage IV melanoma patients in every subgroup of treatment type and BRAF status. Brain metastasis has a negative impact on long-term survival in BRAF-mutated, but not in BRAF-wildtype patients. Investigation of molecular features of brain metastases in BRAF-mutated vs. BRAF-wildtype melanomas may lead to new insights in tumor biology and may yield new therapeutic approaches.

Intratumoral administration of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine delays melanoma growth in mice

Immunotherapies are effective for cancer treatment but are limited in 'cold' tumor microenvironments due to a lack of infiltrating CD8+ T cells, key players in the anti-cancer immune response. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic sparked the widespread use of mRNA-formulated vaccines and is well documented that vaccination induces a Th1-skewed immune response. Here, we evaluated the effects of an intratumoral injection of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in subcutaneous melanoma tumor mouse models. Tumor growth and survival studies following a single intratumoral injection of the COVID-19 vaccine showed significant tumor suppression and prolonged survival in established B16F10 subcutaneous tumor-bearing mice. mRNA vaccine treatment resulted in a significant increase in CD8+ T cell infiltration into the tumor microenvironment, as observed using intravital imaging and flow cytometry. Further tumor growth suppression was achieved using additional mRNA vaccine treatments. Combination administration of mRNA vaccine with immune checkpoint therapies demonstrated enhanced effects, further delaying tumor growth and improving the survival time of tumor-bearing mice. This study demonstrates that mRNA vaccines may be used as adjuvants for immunotherapies.

Case report: Low-dose radiation reverses pembrolizumab resistance in melanoma

Immunotherapy has been the mainstay of the initial systemic treatment for metastatic melanoma regardless of the tumor's genetic mutation status (Atkins et al., 2022). It is known to offer long-term overall and treatment-free survival benefits, also with generally tolerable side effect profiles. However, upon disease progression on first- and second-line immunotherapy, further systemic treatment options are limited especially for cases without actionable molecular alterations. With emerging evidence suggesting that radiotherapy can enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy via various mechanisms, together with its potential abscopal effect, the possibility of overcoming immunotherapy resistance with radiotherapy is theoretically sound. We report a case of metastatic melanoma which demonstrated a reversal of immunotherapy resistance after the addition of low-dose radiotherapy to progressive tumor. Complete metabolic remission is achieved with durable response observed.

Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Immunotherapy in Patients with Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma is a rare primary liver cancer with poor prognosis, due to the advanced stage at the time of diagnosis and limited therapeutic options, with poor response. Chemotherapy remains the standard first-line treatment, but the advent of immunotherapy has recently induced promising results. Given the fact that diagnosis frequency is increasing nowadays and the survival rate remains very low, it is crucial to recognize patients who are suitable for immunotherapy and will have the best response. Different types of biomarkers, such as interleukins, exosomes, mi-RNA, ctDNA, and gene mutations, have been studied for their feasibility, not only for the early diagnosis of biliary tract cancer but also for the determination of responsiveness in treatment. Less frequently, these studies focus on finding and observing biomarkers in patients who receive immunotherapy. This review aims to summarize current knowledge of existing/promising biomarkers in patients with unresectable or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, treated with immunotherapy as monotherapy, or combined with chemotherapy.

Innovations in cancer immunotherapy: A comprehensive overview of recent breakthroughs and future directions

A major advance in cancer treatment has been the development and refinement of cancer immunotherapy. The discovery of immunotherapies for a wide range of cancers has revolutionized cancer treatment paradigms. Despite relapse or refractory disease, immunotherapy approaches can prolong the life expectancy of metastatic cancer patients. Multiple therapeutic approaches and agents are currently being developed to manipulate various aspects of the immune system. Oncolytic viruses, cancer vaccines, adoptive cell therapies, monoclonal antibodies, cytokine therapies, and inhibitors of immune checkpoints have all proven successful in clinical trials. There are several types of immunotherapeutic approaches available for treating cancer, and others are being tested in preclinical and clinical settings. Immunotherapy has proven successful, and many agents and strategies have been developed to improve its effectiveness. The purpose of this article is to present a comprehensive overview of current immunotherapy approaches used to treat cancer. Cancer immunotherapy advancements, emerging patterns, constraints, and potential future breakthroughs are also discussed.

Patient and Caregiver Experience With the Hope and Prognostic Uncertainty of Immunotherapy: A Qualitative Study

PURPOSE

Immunotherapy has improved survival for patients with melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Yet, as responses vary widely, immunotherapy also introduces challenges in prognostic communication. In this study, we sought to explore how patients and caregivers learned about the goal of immunotherapy and their experience of living with uncertainty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study of patients with stage III or IV melanoma or stage IV NSCLC within 12 weeks of initiating or 12 months of discontinuing immunotherapy, and their caregivers. We conducted in-depth interviews with participants to explore how they learned about immunotherapy from oncology clinicians and how they experienced uncertainty. We used a framework approach to analyze interview transcripts and synthesized concepts into themes.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients and 10 caregivers participated; median age was 67 years and most were male (68%), white (95%), married (61%), and had melanoma (62%). We identified four themes: (1) the oncology team shaped participants' hopeful expectations of immunotherapy, including as a potential cure among those with melanoma; (2) distress related to prognostic uncertainty particularly affected patients who experienced toxicity or progressive disease; (3) patients who did not have long-term responses experienced overwhelming disappointment; and (4) some patients and caregivers had conflicting preferences for prognostic information. Participants provided suggestions to improve education and underscored unmet psychosocial needs.

CONCLUSION

Patients and caregivers held optimistic expectations of immunotherapy, which resulted in heightened disappointment among the subset with progression or toxicity. Clinicians should elicit information preferences of both patients and caregivers, as these may be disparate. Our results highlight the need to optimize prognostic communication and support for living with uncertainty among patients receiving immunotherapy.

The first case of primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus to achieve pathologic complete response after preoperative ipilimumab + nivolumab followed by resection

Primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. Surgical resection is common, but there is no consensus on perioperative treatment. Studies have reported the efficacy of programmed cell death-1 inhibitors (e.g., nivolumab, pembrolizumab) and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 agents (e.g., ipilimumab) in treating malignant melanoma. Here, we present the first case of primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus with lymph node metastases treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab followed by resection, achieving a pathologic complete response. A 75-year-old man presented with dysphagia. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a black, elevated lesion in the mid-thoracic esophagus. Biopsy confirmed primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus, showing tumor cells with melanin deposition, positive for HBM45 and S-100 staining. Computed tomography showed enlarged lymph nodes in the subclavian and mediastinum regions, suggesting metastases. After two courses of preoperative chemotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab, which significantly shrank the tumor, the patient underwent robot-assisted subtotal esophagectomy and 3-field lymph node dissection. Histopathological examination revealed no tumors or lymph node metastases, confirming a pathologic complete response. Given the rarity and poor prognosis of primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus, this case provides valuable insights for treatment strategies.

An Overview of Liver Directed Locoregional Therapies

An overview of all liver-directed locoregional therapies, including surgical resection for melanoma liver metastases (MLMs), is provided. MLM patients are divided by their primary melanoma location; cutaneous, uvea (eye), and mucosal melanoma. If patients with isolated cutaneous MLMs are considered for surgical resection, treatment with systemic therapy should be part of the treatment course. For uveal MLMs, complete surgical or ablative treatment of all MLMs suggests superior results compared with other liver-directed or systemic therapies, based on current evidence, no recommendations for any liver-directed regional therapy in the treatment of mucosal MLMs can be made.

Treatment of metastatic melanoma with anti-PD-1 and anti-LAG-3 in a kidney transplant recipient

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have quickly emerged as standard therapy in multiple cancers, yet their application in organ transplant recipients (OTRs) remains challenging due to risk of graft rejection. In this case, report, we highlight the successful use of a lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3) inhibitor, relatlimab, in combination with nivolumab (a programmed cell death protein 1 [PD-1] inhibitor) for the treatment of metastatic melanoma in a kidney transplant recipient. The patient developed a complete metabolic response to therapy. LAG-3 expression was notably positive in the renal graft, but negative in the metastatic melanoma tumor tissue. Although the outcome resulted in rapid renal graft rejection, this underscores the need for further research into LAG-3's dual role in cancer therapy and allograft rejection in organ transplant recipients.

Single-Cell RNA Profiling of Ocular Adnexal Sebaceous Carcinoma Reveals a Complex Tumor Microenvironment and Identifies New Biomarkers

PURPOSE

Ocular adnexal sebaceous carcinoma (OaSC) is an aggressive malignancy that often necessitates orbital exenteration. Its tumor composition and transcriptional profile remain largely unknown, which poses a significant barrier to medical advances. Here, we report the first in-depth transcriptomic analysis of OaSC at the single-cell resolution and discern mechanisms underlying cancer progression for the discovery of potential globe-sparing immunotherapies, targeted therapies, and biomarkers to guide clinical management.

DESIGN

Laboratory investigation with a retrospective observational case series.

METHODS

Single-cell RNA sequencing was performed on six patient specimens: three primary tumors, two tumors with pagetoid spread, and a normal tarsus sample. Cellular components were identified via gene signatures. Molecular pathways underlying tumorigenesis and pagetoid spread were discerned via gene ontology analysis of the differentially expressed genes between specimens. CALML5 immunohistochemistry was performed on an archival cohort of OaSC, squamous cell carcinoma, ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN), and basal cell carcinoma cases.

RESULTS

Analysis of 29,219 cells from OaSC specimens revealed tumor, immune, and stromal cells. Tumor-infiltrating immune cells include a diversity of cell types, including exhausted T-cell populations. In primary OaSC tumors, mitotic nuclear division and oxidative phosphorylation pathways are upregulated, while lipid biosynthesis and metabolism pathways are downregulated. Epithelial tissue migration pathways are upregulated in tumor cells undergoing pagetoid spread. Single-cell RNA sequencing analyses also revealed that CALML5 is upregulated in OaSC tumor cells. Diffuse nuclear and cytoplasmic CALML5 staining was present in 28 of 28 (100%) OaSC cases. Diffuse nuclear and membranous CALML5 staining was present in 5 of 25 (20%) squamous cell carcinoma and OSSN cases, while diffuse nuclear staining was present in 1 of 12 (8%) basal cell carcinoma cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals a complex OaSC tumor microenvironment and confirms that the CALML5 immunohistochemical stain is a sensitive diagnostic marker.

Changes in tumor and cardiac metabolism upon immune checkpoint

Cardiovascular disease and cancer are the leading causes of death in the Western world. The associated risk factors are increased by smoking, hypertension, diabetes, sedentary lifestyle, aging, unbalanced diet, and alcohol consumption. Therefore, the study of cellular metabolism has become of increasing importance, with current research focusing on the alterations and adjustments of the metabolism of cancer patients. This may also affect the efficacy and tolerability of anti-cancer therapies such as immune-checkpoint inhibition (ICI). This review will focus on metabolic adaptations and their consequences for various cell types, including cancer cells, cardiac myocytes, and immune cells. Focusing on ICI, we illustrate how anti-cancer therapies interact with metabolism. In addition to the desired tumor response, we highlight that ICI can also lead to a variety of side effects that may impact metabolism or vice versa. With regard to the cardiovascular system, ICI-induced cardiotoxicity is increasingly recognized as one of the most life-threatening adverse events with a mortality of up to 50%. As such, significant efforts are being made to assess the specific interactions and associated metabolic changes associated with ICIs to improve both efficacy and management of side effects.

Advanced Polymeric Nanoparticles for Cancer Immunotherapy: Materials Engineering, Immunotherapeutic Mechanism and Clinical Translation

Cancer immunotherapy, which leverages immune system components to treat malignancies, has emerged as a cornerstone of contemporary therapeutic strategies. Yet, critical concerns about the efficacy and safety of cancer immunotherapies remain formidable. Nanotechnology, especially polymeric nanoparticles (PNPs), offers unparalleled flexibility in manipulation-from the chemical composition and physical properties to the precision control of nanoassemblies. PNPs provide an optimal platform to amplify the potency and minimize systematic toxicity in a broad spectrum of immunotherapeutic modalities. In this comprehensive review, the basics of polymer chemistry, and state-of-the-art designs of PNPs from a physicochemical standpoint for cancer immunotherapy, encompassing therapeutic cancer vaccines, in situ vaccination, adoptive T-cell therapies, tumor-infiltrating immune cell-targeted therapies, therapeutic antibodies, and cytokine therapies are delineated. Each immunotherapy necessitates distinctively tailored design strategies in polymeric nanoplatforms. The extensive applications of PNPs, and investigation of their mechanisms of action for enhanced efficacy are particularly focused on. The safety profiles of PNPs and clinical research progress are discussed. Additionally, forthcoming developments and emergent trends of polymeric nano-immunotherapeutics poised to transform cancer treatment paradigms into clinics are explored.

AIEgen-self-assembled nanoparticles with anti-PD-L1 antibody functionalization realize enhanced synergistic photodynamic therapy and immunotherapy against malignant melanoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) become integral in clinical practice, yet their application in cancer therapy is constrained by low overall response rates and the primary resistance of cancers to ICIs. Herein, this study proposes aggregation-induced emission (AIE)-based nanoparticles (NPs) for a more effective and synergistic approach combining immunotherapy and photodynamic therapy (PDT) to achieve higher responses than anti-PD-L1 monotherapy. The TBP@aPD-L1 NPs are constructed by functionalizing azide group-modified TBP-2 (TBP-N3) with anti-PD-L1 antibodies via the DBCO-S-S-PEG2000-COOH linker. The anti-PD-L1 target the tumor cells and promote the TBP-N3 accumulation in tumors for enhanced PDT. Notably, the TBP-N3, featuring aggregation-induced emission, boosts reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation through both type I and type II processes for enhanced PDT. The TBP@aPD-L1-mediated PDT induces more powerful effects of direct tumor cell-killing and further elicits effective immunogenic cell death (ICD), which exerts anti-tumor immunity by activating T cells for ICI treatment and reshapes the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), thereby enhancing the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade of anti-PD-L1. Consequently, TBP@aPD-L1 NPs demonstrated significantly enhanced inhibition of tumor growth in the mouse model of malignant melanoma (MM). Our NPs act as a facile and effective drug delivery platform for enhanced immunotherapy combined with enhanced PDT in treating MM.

Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 Signaling Pathway for Cancer Therapy: Focus on Biomarkers

The PD1/PD-L1 axis plays an important immunosuppressive role during the T-cell-mediated immune response, which is essential for the physiological homeostasis of the immune system. The biology of the immunological microenvironment is extremely complex and crucial for the development of treatment strategies for immunotherapy. Characterization of the immunological, genomic or transcriptomic landscape of cancer patients could allow discrimination between responders and non-responders to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has shown remarkable efficacy in a variety of malignancies in landmark trials and has fundamentally changed cancer therapy. Current research focuses on strategies to maximize patient selection for therapy, clarify mechanisms of resistance, improve existing biomarkers, including PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB), and discover new biomarkers. In this review, we focus on the function of the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway and discuss the immunological, genomic, epigenetic and transcriptomic landscape in cancer patients receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Finally, we provide an overview of the clinical trials testing the efficacy of antibodies against PD-1/PD-L1.

Exploring the Impact of the Multimodal CAPABLE eHealth Intervention on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Melanoma Undergoing Immune-Checkpoint Inhibition: Prospective Pilot Study

Background

Patients with melanoma receiving immunotherapy with immune-checkpoint inhibitors often experience immune-related adverse events, cancer-related fatigue, and emotional distress, affecting health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and clinical outcome to immunotherapy. eHealth tools can aid patients with cancer in addressing issues, such as adverse events and psychosocial well-being, from various perspectives.

Objective

This study aimed to explore the effect of the Cancer Patients Better Life Experience (CAPABLE) system, accessed through a mobile app, on HRQoL compared with a matched historical control group receiving standard care. CAPABLE is an extensively tested eHealth app, including educational material, remote symptom monitoring, and well-being interventions.

Methods

This prospective pilot study compared an exploratory cohort that received the CAPABLE smartphone app and a multisensory smartwatch for 6 months (intervention) to a 2:1 individually matched historical prospective control group. HRQoL data were measured with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 at baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), and 6 months (T2) after start of treatment. Mixed effects linear regression models were used to compare HRQoL between the 2 groups over time.

Results

From the 59 eligible patients for the CAPABLE intervention, 31 (53%) signed informed consent to participate. Baseline HRQoL was on average 10 points higher in the intervention group compared with controls, although equally matched on baseline and clinical characteristics. When correcting for sex, age, disease stage, and baseline scores, an adjusted difference in fatigue of -5.09 (95% CI -15.20 to 5.02, P=.32) at month 3 was found. No significant nor clinically relevant adjusted differences on other HRQoL domains over time were found. However, information satisfaction was significantly higher in the CAPABLE group (β=8.71, 95% CI 1.54-15.88, P=.02).

Conclusions

The intervention showed a limited effect on HRQoL, although there was a small improvement in fatigue at 3 months, as well as information satisfaction. When aiming at personalized patient and survivorship care, further optimization and prospective investigation of eHealth tools is warranted.

Dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in metastatic basal cell carcinoma

We report the basal cell cancer (BCC) cohort of the SWOG/NCI 1609 Dual Anti-CTLA-4 & Anti-PD-1 blockade in Rare Tumors (DART), a phase II prospective, multicenter basket trial of nivolumab and ipilimumab. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) (RECIST v1.1). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity were secondary endpoints. Sixteen patients with advanced/metastatic BCC were evaluable. The ORR was 31% (95% CI, 19-50%), and the 12-month OS, 75% (95% CI, 57-100%). Median PFS was 9.3 months (95% CI, 3.3-NA). Of 15 patients evaluable for clinical benefit, five partial responses (PRs) and five stable disease >6 months (total = 10/15 (66.7%)) were seen. The most common toxicities included fatigue (37.5%), pruritis (31.3%), and diarrhea (25%). In patients with advanced/metastatic BCC, ipilimumab and nivolumab produced an ORR of 31% and prolonged (>6 months) PFS in 73% of patients, with seven PFS/iPFS of >1 year, including one with prior anti-PD-1. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02834013 (Registered 7/15/2016; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02834013 ).

Combined programmed cell death protein 1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 blockade in an international cohort of patients with acral lentiginous melanoma

BACKGROUND

Combination immune checkpoint blockade targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) leads to high response rates and improved survival in patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma (CM). Less is known about the efficacy of this combination in acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM).

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of combination immune checkpoint blockade targeting PD-1 and CTLA-4 in a diverse, real-world population of patients with ALM.

METHODS

This multi-institutional retrospective study analysed patients with histologically confirmed ALM treated with a combination of PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors between 2010 and 2022. The primary objective of the study was the objective response rate (ORR) as per the RECIST criteria. The secondary objectives were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

In total, 109 patients with advanced ALM treated with combined PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade in any line of treatment were included. The majority of patients had stage IV disease (n = 81; 74.3%). The ORR for the entire cohort was 18.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.6-26.9], with 9 (8.3%) complete and 11 (10.1%) partial responses. A further 22 patients (20.2%) had stable disease, and the disease control rate was 38.5%. Median PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI 3.25-5.62), while median OS was 17 months (95% CI 12.4-23.1). Ninety-five patients (87.2%) had a treatment-related adverse event, with 40.4% (n = 44/109) experiencing at least one grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Elevated lactate dehydrogenase (P = 0.04), ≥ 2 lines of prior treatment (P = 0.03) and Asian ethnicity (P = 0.04) were associated with worse OS, while Hispanic/Latino ethnicity was associated with better OS (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade is less effective for ALM than for CM, despite similar toxicity. In particular, Asian patients appear to derive less benefit from this regimen. Novel treatment approaches are needed for this rare melanoma subtype.

Toxicity Associated with Pembrolizumab Monotherapy in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials

Background/Objectives: Pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting programmed death 1 (PD-1), is a widely employed therapy for various gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials investigating pembrolizumab monotherapy in GI cancer patients to assess the spectrum and incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with pembrolizumab. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE was performed to identify clinical trials investigating pembrolizumab monotherapy in GI cancer patients. Primary endpoints included the incidence of grade 3 or higher irAEs and the rate of treatment discontinuation due to irAEs. Secondary endpoints encompassed the incidence of any-grade irAEs, as well as specific irAEs. Results: Data extraction and analysis were performed on 25 articles. The analysis included 3101 patients with a median age of 62 years (range 53-68), with 30.2% being female. Tumor types encompassed were colorectal (12%), esophagogastric (46%), hepatocellular carcinoma (24%), and other GI tumor types (18%). The rate of treatment discontinuation due to irAEs was 6.8%. The most prevalent grade 3 or higher irAEs were hepatitis (3.6%), pneumonitis (0.8%), and colitis (0.7%). Death attributed to irAEs was infrequent (0.9%). Conclusions: In patients with GI cancers treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy, severe toxicities are infrequent, and irAEs leading to treatment discontinuation or death are uncommon.

European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 1: Diagnostics - Update 2024

This guideline was developed in close collaboration with multidisciplinary experts from the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of melanoma were developed on the basis of systematic literature research and consensus conferences. Cutaneous melanoma (CM) is the most dangerous form of skin tumor and accounts for 90 % of skin cancer mortality. The diagnosis of melanoma can be made clinically and must always be confirmed by dermoscopy. If melanoma is suspected, a histopathological examination is always required. Sequential digital dermoscopy and whole-body photography can be used in high-risk patients to improve the detection of early-stage melanoma. If available, confocal reflectance microscopy can also improve the clinical diagnosis in special cases. Melanoma is classified according to the 8th version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer classification. For thin melanomas up to a tumor thickness of 0.8 mm, no further diagnostic imaging is required. From stage IB, lymph node sonography is recommended, but no further imaging examinations. From stage IIB/C, whole-body examinations with computed tomography or positron emission tomography CT in combination with magnetic resonance imaging of the brain are recommended. From stage IIB/C and higher, a mutation test is recommended, especially for the BRAF V600 mutation. It is important to perform a structured follow-up to detect relapses and secondary primary melanomas as early as possible. A stage-based follow-up regimen is proposed, which in the experience of the guideline group covers the optimal requirements, although further studies may be considered. This guideline is valid until the end of 2026.

Advances in Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy of Malignant Melanoma

Malignant melanoma (MM) is a malignant tumor, resulting from mutations in melanocytes of the skin and mucous membranes. Its mortality rate accounts for 90% of all dermatologic tumor mortality. Traditional treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy are unable to achieve the expected results due to MM's low sensitivity, high drug resistance, and toxic side effects. As treatment advances, immunotherapy and targeted therapy have made significant breakthroughs in the treatment of MM and have demonstrated promising application prospects. However, the heterogeneity of tumor immune response causes more than half of patients to not benefit from clinical immunotherapy and targeted therapy, which delays the patient's condition and causes them to suffer adverse immune events' side effects. The combination of immunotherapy and targeted therapy can help improve therapeutic effects, delay drug resistance, and mitigate adverse effects. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current development status and research progress of immune checkpoints, targeted genes, and their inhibitors, with a view to providing a reference for the clinical treatment of MM.

European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 2: Treatment - Update 2024

A unique collaboration of multi-disciplinary experts from the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF), and the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) was formed to make recommendations on cutaneous melanoma diagnosis and treatment, based on systematic literature reviews and the experts' experience. Cutaneous melanomas are excised with one to two-centimeter safety margins. For a correct stage classification and treatment decision, a sentinel lymph node biopsy shall be offered in patients with tumor thickness ≥ 1.0 mm or ≥ 0.8 mm with additional histological risk factors, although there is as yet no clear survival benefit for this approach. Therapeutic decisions should be primarily made by an interdisciplinary oncology team ("Tumor Board"). Adjuvant therapies can be proposed in completely resected stage IIB-IV. In stage II only PD-1 inhibitors are approved. In stage III anti-PD-1 therapy or dabrafenib plus trametinib for patients with BRAFV600 mutated melanoma can be discussed. In resected stage IV, nivolumab can be offered, as well as ipilimumab and nivolumab, in selected, high-risk patients. In patients with clinically detected macroscopic, resectable disease, neoadjuvant therapy with ipilimumab plus nivolumab followed complete surgical resection and adjuvant therapy according to pathological response and BRAF status can be offered. Neoadjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab followed by complete surgical resection and adjuvant pembrolizumab is also recommended. For patients with disease recurrence after (neo) adjuvant therapy, further treatment should consider the type of (neo) adjuvant therapy received as well as the time of recurrence, i.e., on or off therapy. In patients with irresectable stage III/IV disease systemic treatment is always indicated. For first line treatment PD-1 antibodies alone or in combination with CTLA-4 or LAG-3 antibodies shall be considered. In stage IV melanoma with a BRAFV600 mutation, first-line therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors can be offered as an alternative to immunotherapy, in selected cases. In patients with primary resistance to immunotherapy and harboring a BRAFV600 mutation, this therapy shall be offered as second line. Other second line therapies include therapy with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors not used in first line. This guideline is valid until the end of 2026.

Cancer type-specific adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The distribution of adverse events (AEs) triggered by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) across different cancer types has never been demonstrated.

METHODS

Randomised controlled trials exclusively assessing ICI monotherapy in cohorts of over 100 patients were considered. Our primary outcome was a comprehensive summary of the distribution of all-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) as well as serious TRAEs (CTCAE grade 3 or higher) across different malignancies. The study is registered with PROSPERO CRD42023387934.

FINDINGS

75 trials that enrolled over 100 patients were included. While investigating the incidence of each TRAE across various cancers, we found special linkages existed between certain TRAEs and particular cancer types. In anti-PD-1 monotherapy group, melanoma patients experienced the most frequent fatigue (31.1 %, 95 % CI 29.7%-32.5 %); the incidences of severe pneumonitis and other respiratory disorders were highest in Hodgkin lymphoma (4.1 %, 95 % CI 1.5%-8.6 %; 4.1 %, 95 % CI 1.5%-8.6 %, respectively). Among individuals undergoing single-agent anti-PD-L1, higher frequency of all-grade pruritus occurred in 19.0 % of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients (95 % CI 15.2%-23.2 %), and the highest probability of developing other severe musculoskeletal disorders was observed in patients with RCC (6.2 %, 95 % CI 4.0%-9.0 %). In anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy, the incidences of both all-grade and severe diarrhea occurred most frequently in prostate cancer patients (41.9 %, 95 % CI 37.9%-47.9; 14.8 %, 95 % CI 11.5%-18.7 %, respectively).

INTERPRETATION

This is the first comprehensive study addressing the distribution of various TRAEs across cancer types. Our research emphasizes the significance of considering cancer-specific TRAEs when using ICIs for treatment.

Resistance mechanisms to immune checkpoint inhibitors: updated insights

The last decade has witnessed unprecedented succusses with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in treating cancer. Nevertheless, the proportion of patients who respond favorably to the treatment remained rather modest, partially due to treatment resistance. This has fueled a wave of research into potential mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors which can be classified into primary resistance or acquired resistance after an initial response. In the current review, we summarize what is known so far about the mechanisms of resistance in terms of being tumor-intrinsic or tumor-extrinsic taking into account the multimodal crosstalk between the tumor, immune system compartment and other host-related factors.

The Role of Metastasectomies and Immunotherapy in the Management of Melanoma Lung Metastases: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database

INTRODUCTION

Patients with metastatic melanoma to the lung typically have poor outcomes. Although a pulmonary metastasectomy for selected patients has been shown to improve survival, the role of surgical resection following the introduction of immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine predictors of survival for patients with melanoma metastatic to the lung in the era of immunotherapy.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, data from the National Cancer Database were abstracted for patients with melanoma lung metastases. The overall survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analysis, adjusting for previously described risk factors for mortality. Patients with concomitant metastases to organs other than the lung were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

A total of 625 patients with lung metastases at the time of a skin melanoma diagnosis were identified. A total of 280 patients underwent a pulmonary metastasectomy, 267 received immunotherapy, and 78 were treated with both a metastasectomy and immunotherapy. During a median follow-up time of 34.6 months [IQR: 14.2, 75.9], a metastasectomy was found to offer significantly improved survival compared to immunotherapy alone. No difference was noted between a metastasectomy and a combination of a metastasectomy and immunotherapy in the adjusted Cox proportional hazard model.

CONCLUSIONS

When statistical models were adjusted for risk factors, a metastasectomy maintained a significant survival advantage compared to immunotherapy. The addition of immunotherapy to the treatment of patients treated with a pulmonary metastasectomy did not improve survival. Our findings support the role of surgery for patients with pulmonary metastatic melanoma.

CD274/PD-L1 copy number gained malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are aggressive soft tissue sarcomas with a poor prognosis, particularly in metastatic cases. Traditional treatments have shown limited effectiveness, highlighting the need for innovative therapeutic approaches. This case report aims to emphasize the critical role of genomic profiling in identifying therapeutic targets, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, to improve treatment strategies for MPNST.

PATIENT CONCERNS

An 82-year-old male presented with a long-standing history of MPNST, multiple recurrences, and a recent rapid enlargement of a mass in the right axillary region. The patient also reported a 10% weight loss over the last 6 months.

DIAGNOSES

Comprehensive genomic profiling of the tumor revealed significant alterations, including CD274/PD-L1 amplification, CDKN2A loss, and TP53 mutation. These genetic findings were aligned with previous cases that responded favorably to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

INTERVENTIONS

Despite the potential for targeted immunotherapy, the patient's economic constraints prevented the initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. The patient underwent multiple surgical interventions, including an above-elbow amputation.

OUTCOMES

The patient experienced severe wound bleeding and a significant decline in general condition, requiring intensive care unit support. Given the poor prognosis and high surgical risks, the patient's caregivers opted for hospice care.

LESSONS

Genomic profiling identifies genetic alterations that could guide immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, offering the promise of personalized treatment for MPNST patients. By highlighting the potential of genomic profiling, this case demonstrates the importance of integrating personalized immunotherapy into future treatment paradigms for MPNST.

Advances in Cell and Immune Therapies for Melanoma

The incidence rate of cutaneous melanoma is on the rise worldwide, due to increased exposure to UV radiation, aging populations, and exposure to teratogen agents. However, diagnosis is more precise, and the increased number of new cases is related to the improved diagnosis tools. Despite better early diagnosis and better therapies, melanoma has remained a significant public health challenge because of its aggressive behavior and high potential for metastasis. In 2020, cutaneous melanoma constituted approximately 1.3% of all cancer deaths that occurred within the European Union, thereby highlighting the necessity for effective prevention, timely diagnosis, and sustainable treatment measures, especially as a growing number of cases occur among younger patients. Melanoma is regarded as one of the most inflamed cancers due to its high immune cell presence and strong response to immunotherapy, fueling the need for development of immune-driven innovative treatments. Approved therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4), have notably improved survival rates in melanoma. However, the limitations of the PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 axes inhibitors, such as low response rates, treatment resistance, and toxicity, have driven the need for continued research and advancements in treatment strategies. Current clinical trials are exploring various combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors with costimulatory receptor agonists, chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and other immunotherapies, with the goal of improving outcomes and reducing side effects for melanoma patients. Emerging approaches, including adoptive cell therapy with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and oncolytic virotherapy, are showing promise. While CAR-T cell therapy has been less successful in melanoma compared to blood cancers, ongoing research is addressing challenges like the tumor microenvironment and antigen specificity. This review provides an overview of the requirement for advances in these medications, to mark a significant step forward in melanoma management, set to bring a fresh breath of hope for patients.

Final, 10-Year Outcomes with Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Previous results from this trial showed longer overall survival after treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or with nivolumab monotherapy than with ipilimumab monotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma. Given that patients with advanced melanoma are living longer than 7.5 years, longer-term data were needed to address new clinically relevant questions.

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients with previously untreated advanced melanoma, in a 1:1:1 ratio, to one of the following regimens: nivolumab (1 mg per kilogram of body weight) plus ipilimumab (3 mg per kilogram) every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram) every 2 weeks; nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram) every 2 weeks plus placebo; or ipilimumab (3 mg per kilogram) every 3 weeks for four doses plus placebo. Treatment was continued until the occurrence of disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal of consent. Randomization was stratified according to BRAF mutation status, metastasis stage, and programmed death ligand 1 expression. Here, we report the final, 10-year results of this trial, including results for overall survival and melanoma-specific survival, as well as durability of response.

RESULTS

With a minimum follow-up of 10 years, median overall survival was 71.9 months with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, 36.9 months with nivolumab, and 19.9 months with ipilimumab. The hazard ratio for death was 0.53 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 to 0.65) for nivolumab plus ipilimumab as compared with ipilimumab and was 0.63 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.76) for nivolumab as compared with ipilimumab. Median melanoma-specific survival was more than 120 months with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (not reached, with 37% of the patients alive at the end of the trial), 49.4 months with nivolumab, and 21.9 months with ipilimumab. Among patients who had been alive and progression-free at 3 years, 10-year melanoma-specific survival was 96% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, 97% with nivolumab, and 88% with ipilimumab.

CONCLUSIONS

The final trial results showed a continued, ongoing survival benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and with nivolumab monotherapy, as compared with ipilimumab monotherapy, in patients with advanced melanoma. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and others; CheckMate 067 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01844505.).

An overview of immunotoxicity in drug discovery and development

The immune system is one of the common targets of drugs' toxicity (Immunotoxicity) and/or efficacy (Immunotherapy). Immunotoxicity leads to adverse effects on human health, which raises serious concerns for the regulatory agencies. Currently, immunotoxicity assessment is conducted using different in vitro and in vivo assays. In silico and in vitro human cell-based immunotoxicity assays should also be explored for screening purposes as these are time and cost effective as well as for ethical reasons. For in vivo studies, tier 1-3 assessments (Tier 1: hematology, serum globulin levels, lymphoid organ's weight and histopathology; Tier 2: immunophenotyping, TDAR and cell mediated immunity; and Tier 3: host resistance) should be used. These non-clinical in vivo assessments are useful to select immunological endpoints for clinical trials as well as for precautionary labeling. As per regulatory guidelines, adverse immunogenicity information of drug should be included in product's labeling to make health care practitioner aware of safety concerns before prescribing medicines and patient management (USFDA, 2022a, 2022b). This review mainly focuses on the importance of immunotoxicity assessment during drug discovery and development.

Current Perspectives of Immunotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the sixth most common tumor and the third leading cause of cancer death worldwide. It ranks fourth in the spectrum of malignant tumor incidence and second in the order of death from major malignant tumors in China. Hepatocellular carcinoma is a complex ecosystem containing non-tumor cells (mainly immune-related cells), and its immunotherapy can stimulate the recognition of specific tumor antigens, inhibit the proliferation of cancer cells, and produce over-memory lymphocytes, which can prevent recurrence. So, immunotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma is increasingly becoming a research hotspot in liver cancer treatment. With the intensive research in recent years, great progress has been made in immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, pericyte therapy, vaccination, and antiviral therapy. In addition, the study found that the therapeutic effect of combination therapy was enhanced compared to monotherapy. This review summarizes the most prominent immunotherapies currently available for the clinical treatment of patients with HCC and the main opportunities and challenges facing HCC research.

Overcoming Resistance Mechanisms to Melanoma Immunotherapy

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibition has revolutionized treatment of advanced melanoma. While most patients derive survival benefit from established immunotherapies, notably monoclonal antibodies blocking cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 and programmed cell death protein 1, a subset does not optimally respond due to the manifestation of innate or acquired resistance to these therapies. Combination regimens have proven efficacious relative to single-agent blockade, but also yield high-grade treatment toxicities that are often dose-limiting for patients. In this review, we discuss the significant strides made in the past half-decade toward expanding the melanoma immunotherapy treatment paradigm. These include newly approved therapies, adoption of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, and studies in the clinical trials pipeline targeting alternative immune checkpoints and key immunoregulatory molecules. We then review how developments in molecular and functional diagnostics have furthered our understanding of the tumor-intrinsic and -extrinsic mechanisms driving immunotherapy resistance, as well as highlight novel biomarkers for predicting treatment response. Throughout, we discuss potential approaches for targeting these resistance mechanisms in rational combination with established immunotherapies to improve outcomes for patients with melanoma.

Phase 1 trial of hypofractionated stereotactic re-irradiation in combination with nivolumab, ipilimumab, and bevacizumab for recurrent high-grade gliomas

Background

Our previous clinical investigation suggested that hypofractionated stereotactic re-irradiation (HFSRT) and PD-1 blockade may act synergistically to enhance the immune response against glioma. This subsequent trial investigated the dual blockade of CTLA4 and PD-1 in combination with HFSRT and bevacizumab.

Methods

This phase I study enrolled eligible patients with bevacizumab-naïve recurrent glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocytoma. Participants received nivolumab, ipilimumab, and bevacizumab concurrently with HFSRT (3000 cGy in 5 fractions). Subsequently, nivolumab, ipilimumab, and bevacizumab were administered for a total of 4 cycles followed by nivolumab and bevacizumab until progression. The primary end point of this study was the safety and tolerability of HFSRT in combination with nivolumab, ipilimumab, and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent HGGs. Secondary end points included 6-month survival and 9-month survival.

Results

Twenty-six patients were treated. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of grade 3 or 4 were observed in 12 (48%) evaluable patients with no unexpected TRAEs. Six months and 9 months survival were 92% (95% CI, 82-100%) and 75% (95% CI, 60-95%), respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 7.1 months (95% CI, 5.2-12.2) and 15.6 months (95% CI, 11.3-27.0), respectively.

Conclusions

The combination of HFSRT with ipilimumab, nivolumab, and bevacizumab is safe. Our results underscore the potential synergies between stereotactic re-irradiation and checkpoint immunotherapy in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas.

Cancer and treatment specific incidence rates of immune-related adverse events induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Immune-related adverse events (irAE) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are a treatment-limiting barrier. There are few large-scale studies that estimate irAE prevalence. This paper presents a systematic review that reports the prevalence of irAE by cancer type and ICI.

METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken in MEDLINE OVID, EMBASE and Web of Science databases from 2017-2021. A total of 293 studies were identified for analysis and, of these, event rate was calculated for 272 studies, which involved 58,291 patients with irAE among 305,879 total patients on ICI. Event rate was calculated by irAE and ICI type.

RESULTS

Mean event rate for general irAE occurrence across any grade was 40.0% (37.3-42.7%) and high grade was 19.7% (15.8-23.7%). Mean event rates for six specific types of irAE are reported. Mean event rate for ICI monotherapy was 30.5% (28.1-32.9%), 45.7% (29.6-61.7%) for ICI combination therapy, and 30.0% (25.3-34.6%) for both ICI monotherapy and combination therapy.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review characterises irAE prevalence across current research that examines irAE risk factors across cancers and ICI. The findings confirms that irAE occurrence is very common in the real-world setting, both high grade and irAE across any grade.

Application and Expectations for Immune Checkpoint Blockade of LAG3 and TIGIT

Immune checkpoint blockade targeting the novel targets of the lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG3) and the T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif domains (TIGIT) has marked a significant advancement in oncology, offering new therapeutic opportunities to fight diverse malignancies. This review covers the biological basis and clinical application of LAG3 and TIGIT inhibitors, highlighting pivotal trials and therapeutic outcomes. We underscore the use of dual therapy immune checkpoint blockade in enhancing antitumor immunity, particularly in settings where monotherapy has shown limited efficacy. Additionally, we address the emerging challenges such as treatment resistance and adverse effects. We explore the strategic integration of LAG3 and TIGIT blockade within the broader immunotherapy landscape, emphasizing innovative combinations and the quest for predictive biomarkers to optimize patient selection and treatment efficacy.

Long-term outcomes among patients who respond within the first year to nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab monotherapy: A pooled analysis in 935 patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the predictive value of RECIST response within 3, 6, or 12 months on long-term survival, and explore differences between nivolumab+ipilimumab and nivolumab monotherapy, we analyzed pooled 5-year data of 935 responder and non-responder patients at various time points after treatment initiation in CheckMate 069, 066, and 067 studies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Treatment-naive advanced melanoma patients received nivolumab+ipilimumab or nivolumab monotherapy. To decrease immortal time bias, 3-, 6-, or 12-month overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) landmark analyses were performed. Association between characteristics and response was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Response rates at any time were 58 % (239/409) for nivolumab+ipilimumab and 44 % (230/526) for nivolumab monotherapy. In 12-month landmark analyses, 5-year OS rates for responders versus non-responders were 82 % versus 40 % with nivolumab+ipilimumab (HR=0.23 [95 % CI, 0.15-0.35]) and 76 % versus 32 % with nivolumab monotherapy (HR=0.22 [95 % CI, 0.16-0.31]). PFS rates were 83 % versus 32 % and 69 % versus 46 %, respectively. Similar strong associations between response at 3 and 6 months and 5-year OS and PFS were also observed with more than 70 % of the responses observed in the first 3 months. Response rates correlated with baseline LDH and PD-L1 status by multivariate analysis but the association between response and long-term survival was maintained in landmark analyses even among patients with high LDH and low PD-L1 expression.

CONCLUSION

Clinical response evaluated in the first months of therapy is a strong predictor of long-term survival, even in patients with poor prognostic biomarkers.