Mechanism by which the IFN-beta enhanceosome activates transcription

Positive and negative control of virus-induced interferon-A gene expression

Transcriptional regulation is a consequence of the combination of both activation and repression for establishing specific patterns of eukaryotic gene expression. The regulation of the expression of type I interferon (IFN-A and -B) multigene family is controlled primarily at the transcriptional level and has been widely studied as a model to understand the mechanisms of stable repression, transient expression and postinduction repression of genes. The positive and negative regulatory elements required for this on/off switch have been defined within a complex 5' upstream region of their transcription start site. The differential expression pattern of IFN-A genes is thought to involve both substitutions in the virus responsive element (VRE-A) and presence or absence of the distal negative regulatory element (DNRE) which is delimited upstream of the VRE-A. The interferon regulatory factors (IRF)-3 and -7 binding to the VRE-A and interacting as homodimers or heterodimers participate in the virus-induced transcriptional activation of IFN-A family. This data and the presence of homeodomain protein pituitary homeobox 1 (Pitx1) binding to the distal DNRE, negatively regulating the IRF-3 and IRF-7 activities and interacting physically with IRF-3 and IRF-7 contribute to our understanding of the complex differential transcriptional activation and repression of the IFN-A genes.

Factors Binding a Non-classical Cis-element Prevent Heterochromatin Effects on Locus Control Region Activity

A locus control region (LCR) is a cis-acting gene-regulatory element capable of transferring the expression characteristics of its gene locus of origin to a linked transgene. Furthermore, it can do this independently of the site of integration in the genome of transgenic mice. Although most LCRs contain subelements with classical transcriptional enhancer function, key aspects of LCR activity are supported by cis-acting sequences devoid of the ability to act as direct transcriptional enhancers. Very few of these "non-enhancer" LCR components have been characterized. Consequently, the sequence requirements and molecular bases for their functions, as well as their roles in LCR activity, are poorly understood. We have investigated these questions using the LCR from the mouse T cell receptor (TCR) alpha/Dad1 gene locus. Here we focus on DNase hypersensitive site (HS) 6 of the TCRalpha LCR. HS6 does not support classical enhancer activity, yet has gene regulatory activity in an in vivo chromatin context. We have identified three in vivo occupied factor-binding sites within HS6, two of which interact with Runx1 and Elf-1 factors. Deletion of these sites from the LCR impairs its activity in vivo. This mutation renders the transgene locus abnormally inaccessible in chromatin, preventing the normal function of other LCR subelements and reducing transgene mRNA levels. These data show these factor-binding sites are required for preventing heterochromatin formation and indicate that they function to maintain an active TCRalpha LCR assembly in vivo.

Histone acetyltransferase-dependent chromatin remodeling and the vascular clock

Rhythmic gene expression is central to the circadian control of physiology in mammals. Transcriptional activation of Per and Cry genes by heterodimeric bHLH-PAS proteins is a key event in the feedback loop that drives rhythmicity; however, the mechanism is not clearly understood. Here we show the transcriptional coactivators and histone acetyltransferases, p300/CBP, PCAF, and ACTR associate with the bHLH-PAS proteins, CLOCK and NPAS2, to regulate positively clock gene expression. Furthermore, Cry2 mediated repression of NPAS2:BMAL1 is overcome by overexpression of p300 in transactivation assays. Accordingly, p300 exhibits a circadian time-dependent association with NPAS2 in the vasculature, which precedes peak expression of target genes. In addition, a rhythm in core histone H3 acetylation on the mPer1 promoter in vivo correlates with the cyclical expression of their mRNAs. Temporal coactivator recruitment and HAT-dependent chromatin remodeling on the promoter of clock controlled genes in the vasculature permits the mammalian clock to orchestrate circadian gene expression.

Elevated levels of polyamines alter chromatin in murine skin and tumors without global changes in nucleosome acetylation1Abbreviations used: HAT, histone acetyltransferase; HDAC, histone deacetylase; ODC, ornithine decarboxylase; DFMO, α-difluoromethylornithine; SDS–PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

Polyamines affect nucleosome oligomerization and DNA conformation in vitro, yet little information exists regarding the influence of naturally synthesized polyamines on mammalian chromatin. Capitalizing on the relative inefficiency of a moderate ionic strength extraction buffer to dissociate histones, we obtained evidence of altered chromatin in transgenic mice that overexpress ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), which catalyzes polyamine synthesis. Dissociation of histones from chromatin in ODC transgenic mouse skin, as well as in tumors that develop spontaneously in ODC/Ras bigenic mice, is dramatically reduced relative to normal littermate skin. This could reflect tighter tethering of nucleosomes to DNA or a more compacted chromatin structure due to elevated intracellular concentrations of polyamines since this effect is reversible upon treatment with alpha-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO), a specific inhibitor of ODC enzymatic activity. Impeded release of nonhistone chromatin proteins HP-1beta and nucleophosmin, but not Lamin B, HDAC-1, HMGB, HMGN2, or HMGA1, suggests that polyamines exert selective effects on specific chromatin protein complexes. Moreover, overall acetylation, as well as specific methylation, of nucleosomes in ODC mice is unaffected, implying that access by histone modifying enzymes is not generally restricted. The abnormal chromatin environment fostered by elevated levels of polyamines may be a necessary prerequisite for epithelial tumor growth and maintenance.

The co-activator p300 associates physically with and can mediate the action of the distal enhancer of the FGF-4 gene

Distal enhancers commonly regulate gene expression. However, the mechanisms of transcriptional mediation by distal enhancers remain largely unknown. To better understand distal enhancer-mediated transcription, we examined the regulation of the FGF-4 gene. The FGF-4 gene is regulated during early development by a powerful distal enhancer located downstream of the promoter in exon 3. Sox-2 and Oct-3 bind to the enhancer and are required for the activation of the FGF-4 gene. Previously, we implicated the co-activator p300 as a mediator of Sox-2/Oct-3 synergistic activation of a heterologous promoter, suggesting that p300 may play a role in mediating enhancer activation of the FGF-4 gene. In this study, we provide both functional and physical evidence that p300 plays an important role in the action of the FGF-4 enhancer. Specifically, we show that E1a, but not a mutant form of E1a that is unable to bind p300, inhibits enhancer activation of the FGF-4 promoter. We also demonstrate that Gal4/p300 fusion proteins can stimulate the FGF-4 promoter when bound to the FGF-4 enhancer. Additionally, we present evidence that p300 mediation of the FGF-4 enhancer requires acetyltransferase activity. Importantly, we also show that Sox-2 and p300 are physically associated with the endogenous FGF-4 enhancer but weakly associated with the endogenous FGF-4 promoter. These results are consistent with a model of transitory interaction between the distal enhancer and the FGF-4 promoter. Our results also suggest that intragenic distal enhancers may use mechanisms that differ from extragenic distal enhancers.

The beta -globin locus control region (LCR) functions primarily by enhancing the transition from transcription initiation to elongation

To investigate the molecular basis of beta-globin gene activation, we analyzed factor recruitment and histone modification at the adult beta-globin gene in wild-type (WT)/locus control region knockout (DeltaLCR) heterozygous mice and in murine erythroleukemia (MEL) cells. Although histone acetylation and methylation (Lys 4) are high before and after MEL differentiation, recruitment of the erythroid-specific activator NF-E2 to the promoter and preinitiation complex (PIC) assembly occur only after differentiation. We reported previously that targeted deletion of the LCR reduces beta-globin gene expression to 1%-4% of WT without affecting promoter histone acetylation. Here, we report that NF-E2 is recruited equally efficiently to the adult beta-globin promoters of the DeltaLCR and WT alleles. Moreover, the LCR deletion reduces PIC assembly only twofold, but has a dramatic effect on Ser 5 phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II and transcriptional elongation. Our results suggest at least three distinct stages in beta-globin gene activation: (1) an LCR-independent chromatin opening stage prior to NF-E2 recruitment to the promoter and PIC assembly; (2) an intermediate stage in which NF-E2 binding (LCR-independent) and PIC assembly (partially LCR-dependent) occur; and (3) an LCR-dependent fully active stage characterized by efficient pol II elongation. Thus, in its native location the LCR functions primarily downstream of activator recruitment and PIC assembly.

NF-kappa B-dependent assembly of an enhanceosome-like complex on the promoter region of apoptosis inhibitor Bfl-1/A1

Expression of the prosurvival Bcl-2 homologue Bfl-1/A1 is induced by NF-kappa B-activating stimuli, while B and T cells from c-rel knockout mice show an absolute defect in bfl-1/a1 gene activation. Here, we demonstrate NF-kappa B-dependent assembly of an enhanceosome-like complex on the promoter region of bfl-1. Binding of NF-kappa B subunit c-Rel to DNA nucleated the concerted binding of transcription factors AP-1 and C/EBP beta to the 5'-regulatory region of bfl-1. Optimal stability of the complex was dependent on proper orientation and phasing of the NF-kappa B site. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses demonstrated that T-cell activation triggers in vivo binding of endogenous c-Rel, c-Jun, C/EBP beta, and HMG-IC to the bfl-1 regulatory region, coincident with selective recruitment of coactivators TAFII250 and p300, SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling factor component BRG-1, and basal transcription factors TATA-binding protein (TBP) and TFIIB, as well as hyperacetylation of histones H3 and H4. These results highlight a critical role for NF-kappa B in bfl-1 transcription and point to the need for a complex and precise regulatory network to control bfl-1 expression. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of enhanceosome-mediated regulation of a cell death inhibitor.

Transcriptional specificity of human SWI/SNF BRG1 and BRM chromatin remodeling complexes

Mammalian SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes are involved in critical aspects of cellular growth and genomic stability. Each complex contains one of two highly homologous ATPases, BRG1 and BRM, yet little is known about their specialized functions. We show that BRG1and BRM associate with different promoters during cellular proliferation and differentiation, and in response to specific signaling pathways by preferential interaction with certain classes of transcription factors. BRG1 binds to zinc finger proteins through a unique N-terminal domain that is not present in BRM. BRM interacts with two ankyrin repeat proteins that are critical components of Notch signal transduction. Thus, BRG1 and BRM complexes may direct distinct cellular processes by recruitment to specific promoters through protein-protein interactions that are unique to each ATPase.

The transcriptional coactivator CREB-binding protein cooperates with STAT1 and NF-kappa B for synergistic transcriptional activation of the CXC ligand 9/monokine induced by interferon-gamma gene

Signal transducers and activators of transcription 1 (STAT1) and NF-kappaB cooperatively regulate the expression of many inflammatory genes. In the present study, we demonstrate that the transcriptional coactivator CREB-binding protein (CBP) mediated the STAT1/NF-kappaB synergy for transcription of the gene for CXC ligand 9 (CXCL9), an interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma)-inducible chemokine. Reporter gene analysis showed that expression of CBP potentiated IFN-gamma and tumor necrosis factor (TNFalpha)-induced promoter activity and that the CBP-mediated synergy depended upon STAT1- and NF-kappaB-binding sites in the promoter. Experiments with CBP mutants indicated that the N-terminal and C-terminal regions were necessary for the transcriptional synergy, although the histone acetyltransferase activity of CBP was dispensable. A co-immunoprecipitation assay demonstrated that STAT1 and NF-kappaB RelA (p65) simultaneously associated with CBP in vivo. Furthermore, chromatin immunoprecipitation revealed that, although costimulation with IFN-gamma and TNFalpha did not cooperatively enhance the levels of acetylated histones, it did result in increased recruitment of STAT1, CBP, and RNA polymerase II at the promoter region of the CXCL 9 gene. Together, these results demonstrate that the STAT1/NF-kappaB-dependent transcriptional synergy could result from the enhanced recruitment of RNA polymerase II complex to the promoter via simultaneous interaction of CBP with STAT1 and NF-kappaB.

Cooperativity in transcription factor binding to the coactivator CREB-binding protein (CBP). The mixed lineage leukemia protein (MLL) activation domain binds to an allosteric site on the KIX domain

The interactions between cAMP-response element-binding protein (CREB)-binding protein (CBP) and gene-specific transcription factors play an important role in activation of transcription from numerous genes. Cooperative interactions between CBP and multiple transcriptional activators may provide a mechanism for synergistic increases in transcriptional activation. Here we report the characterization of ternary complexes formed by the KIX domain of CBP and the transactivation domain of the trithorax group protein mixed lineage leukemia protein (MLL), together with either the phosphorylated kinase-inducible domain (pKID) of CREB or the activation domain from c-Myb. Isothermal titration calorimetry experiments show that KIX in complex with the MLL activation domain binds the c-Myb activation domain and pKID domain with 2-fold higher affinity than does the KIX domain alone. Thus, the activation domains of Myb and MLL or of pKID and MLL bind cooperatively to KIX. The thermodynamics of these interactions imply different mechanisms of binding cooperativity for the two ternary complexes; the KIX.MLL.pKID complex is stabilized by entropy increases, whereas the enhancement of Myb binding in the presence of the MLL activation domain is due to more favorable enthalpy. NMR experiments show that the MLL-binding site on KIX is distinct from the surface that binds the pKID and c-Myb activation domains. Our data indicate that KIX can directly mediate cooperative interactions between pairs of transcriptional regulatory proteins. In the case of MLL and c-Myb, both proteins are involved in proliferation of hematopoietic cells and leukemogenesis, and synergistic interactions mediated by CBP may play a functional role.

Deciphering the transcriptional histone acetylation code for a human gene

We report the results of experiments designed to test the histone code hypothesis. We found that only a small subset of lysines in histones H4 and H3 are acetylated in vivo by the GCN5 acetyltransferase during activation of the IFN-beta gene. Reconstitution of recombinant nucleosomes bearing mutations in these lysine residues revealed the cascade of gene activation via a point-by-point interpretation of the histone code through the ordered recruitment of bromodomain-containing transcription complexes. Acetylation of histone H4 K8 mediates recruitment of the SWI/SNF complex whereas acetylation of K9 and K14 in histone H3 is critical for the recruitment of TFIID. Thus, the information contained in the DNA address of the enhancer is transferred to the histone N termini by generating novel adhesive surfaces required for the recruitment of transcription complexes.

Modifying gene expression programs by altering core promoter chromatin architecture

Transcriptional activation of the IFN-beta gene in response to virus infection requires the assembly of an enhanceosome, which instructs a recruitment program of chromatin modifiers/remodelers and general transcription factors to the promoter. This program culminates with sliding of a nucleosome blocking the core promoter to a downstream position, a prerequisite for transcriptional activation. We show that delivery of this nucleosome to the same downstream position to create an accessible IFN-beta core promoter prior to enhanceosome assembly results in major changes in the gene expression program with regard to the temporal pattern and the signal specificity of the transcriptional response. Thus, the identity of a gene expression program is achieved and maintained by the dynamic interplay between specific enhanceosomes and specific local chromatin structure.

TFIID and human mediator coactivator complexes assemble cooperatively on promoter DNA

Activator-mediated transcription complex assembly on templates lacking chromatin requires the interaction of activators with two major coactivator complexes: TFIID and mediator. Here we employed immobilized template assays to correlate transcriptional activation with mediator and TFIID recruitment. In reactions reconstituted with purified proteins, we found that activator, TFIID, and mediator engage in reciprocal cooperative interactions to form a complex on promoter DNA. Preassembly of the coactivator complex accelerates the rate of transcription in a cell-free system depleted of TFIID and mediator. Our data argue that this coactivator complex is an intermediate in the assembly of an active transcription complex. Furthermore, the reciprocity of the interactions demonstrates that the complex could in principle be nucleated with either TFIID or mediator, implying that alternative pathways could be utilized to generate diversity in the way activators function in vivo.

Regulation of virus-induced interferon-A genes

Different members of the interferon regulatory factor (IRF) family are early activated by viral infection of eukaryotic cells. The IRFs participate in the virus-induced transcriptional regulation of different genes, including the multigenic interferon-A (IFN-A) family, members of which are involved in the establishment of an antiviral state, cell growth inhibition or apoptosis. This study presents the recent progress in the field of virus-induced transactivation and repression of IFN-A gene promoters. Data presented on the modular organization of IFN-A gene promoters and their transactivation dependent on IRF-3 and IRF-7 provide a new insight on the cooperativity mechanisms among the different IRF family members. Data on the transcriptional repression of virus-induced interferon-A promoters by the homeodomain protein Pitx1 contribute to our understanding of the complex differential transcriptional activation, repression and antirepression of the IFN-A genes.

p53 Transcriptional activity is mediated through the SRC1-interacting domain of CBP/p300

The tumor suppressor p53 recruits the cellular coactivator CBP/p300 to mediate the transcriptional activation of target genes. In this study, we identify a novel p53-interacting region in CBP/p300, which we call CR2, located near the carboxyl terminus. The 95-amino acid CR2 region (amino acids 2055--2150) is located adjacent to the C/H3 domain and corresponds precisely with the minimal steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC1)-interacting domain of CBP (also called IBiD). We show that the region of p53 that participates in the CR2 interaction resides within the first 107 amino acids of the protein. p53 binds strongly to the CR2 domain of both CBP and the highly homologous coactivator p300. Importantly, an in-frame deletion of CR2 within the full-length p300 protein strongly compromises p300-mediated p53 transcriptional activation from a chromatin template in vitro. The identification of the p53-interacting CR2 domain in CBP/p300 prompted us to ask if the human T-cell leukemia virus (HTLV-I) Tax protein, which also interacts with CR2, competes with p53 for binding to this domain. We show that p53 and Tax exhibit mutually exclusive binding to the CR2 region, possibly contributing to the previously reported Tax repression of p53 function. Together, these studies identify and molecularly characterize a new p53 binding site on CBP/p300 that participates in coactivator-mediated p53 transcription function. The identity of the p53.CR2 interaction indicates that at least three distinct sites on CBP/p300 may participate in mediating p53 transactivation.

Viruses and interferons

The interferon system is the first line of defense against viral infection in mammals. This system is designed to block the spread of virus infection in the body, sometimes at the expense of accelerating the death of the infected cells. As expected of potent cytokines, in addition to their antiviral effects, interferons have profound effects on many aspects of cell physiology. All these actions of interferons are mediated by hundreds of interferon-induced proteins that are usually not synthesized in resting cells. Interferons induce their synthesis by activating the Jak-STAT pathways, a paradigm of cell signaling used by many cytokines and growth factors. Surprisingly, some of the same genes can also be induced directly by viruses and double-stranded RNA, a common viral by-product. Some of the interferon-induced proteins have novel biochemical properties and some are inactive as such but can be activated by double-stranded RNA produced during virus infection. Finally, almost all viruses have evolved mechanisms to evade the interferon system by partially blocking interferon synthesis or interferon action. Thus, in nature interferons and viruses maintain an equilibrium that allows regulated viral replication.

p300-mediated tax transactivation from recombinant chromatin: histone tail deletion mimics coactivator function

Efficient transcription of the human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) genome requires Tax, a virally encoded oncogenic transcription factor, in complex with the cellular transcription factor CREB and the coactivators p300/CBP. To examine Tax transactivation in vitro, we used a chromatin assembly system that included recombinant core histones. The addition of Tax, CREB, and p300 to the HTLV-1 promoter assembled into chromatin activated transcription several hundredfold. Chromatin templates selectively lacking amino-terminal histone tails demonstrated enhanced transcriptional activation by Tax and CREB, with significantly reduced dependence on p300 and acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA). Interestingly, Tax/CREB activation from the tailless chromatin templates retained a substantial requirement for acetyl-CoA, indicating a role for acetyl-CoA beyond histone acetylation. These data indicate that during Tax transcriptional activation, the amino-terminal histone tails are the major targets of p300 and that tail deletion and acetylation are functionally equivalent.

Kinetic and mechanistic analysis of the RNA polymerase II transcrption reaction at the human interleukin-2 promoter

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) is a cytokine critical for the proper stimulation of T-cells during the mammalian immune response. Shortly after T-cell stimulation, transcription of the IL-2 gene is upregulated. Here, we studied the kinetic mechanism of basal transcription at the IL-2 promoter using a human in vitro RNA polymerase II transcription system. We experimentally divided the transcription reaction into discrete steps, including preinitiation complex formation, initiation, escape commitment, and promoter escape. Using pre-steady state approaches, we measured the rate at which each of these steps occurs. We found that the rate of functional preinitiation complex formation limits the overall rate of transcription at the IL-2 promoter under the conditions described here. Furthermore, we found that the recruitment of TFIIF and RNA polymerase II to a TFIID/TFIIA/TFIIB/promoter complex dictates the rate of preinitiation complex formation. The rate of synthesis of 28 nt RNA from preinitiation complexes was rapid compared to the rate of preinitiation complex formation. Moreover, we found that the synthesis of a four nucleotide RNA was necessary and sufficient to rapidly complete the escape commitment step of transcription at the IL-2 promoter. Comparative experiments with the adenovirus major late promoter revealed that, while the overall mechanism of transcription is the same at the two promoters, promoter sequence and/or architecture dictate the rate of promoter escape. We present a kinetic model for a single round of basal transcription at the IL-2 promoter that provides insight into mechanisms by which the IL-2 gene is transcriptionally regulated.

Chromatin-dependent cooperativity between constitutive and inducible activation domains in CREB

The cyclic AMP (cAMP)-responsive factor CREB induces target gene expression via constitutive (Q2) and inducible (KID, for kinase-inducible domain) activation domains that function synergistically in response to cellular signals. KID stimulates transcription via a phospho (Ser133)-dependent interaction with the coactivator paralogs CREB binding protein and p300, whereas Q2 recruits the TFIID complex via a direct association with hTAF(II)130. Here we investigate the mechanism underlying cooperativity between the Q2 domain and KID in CREB by in vitro transcription assay with naked DNA and chromatin templates containing the cAMP-responsive somatostatin promoter. The Q2 domain was highly active on a naked DNA template, and Ser133 phosphorylation had no additional effect on transcriptional initiation in crude extracts. Q2 activity was repressed on a chromatin template, however, and this repression was relieved by the phospho (Ser133) KID-dependent recruitment of p300 histone acetyltransferase activity to the promoter. In chromatin immunoprecipitation assays of NIH 3T3 cells, cAMP-dependent recruitment of p300 to the somatostatin promoter stimulated acetylation of histone H4. Correspondingly, overexpression of hTAFII130 potentiated CREB activity in cells exposed to cAMP, but had no effect on reporter gene expression in unstimulated cells. We propose that cooperativity between the KID and Q2 domains proceeds via a chromatin-dependent mechanism in which recruitment of p300 facilitates subsequent interaction of CREB with TFIID.

Small tumor virus genomes are integrated near nuclear matrix attachment regions in transformed cells

More than 15% of human cancers have a viral etiology. In benign lesions induced by the small DNA tumor viruses, viral genomes are typically maintained extrachromosomally. Malignant progression is often associated with viral integration into host cell chromatin. To study the role of viral integration in tumorigenesis, we analyzed the positions of integrated viral genomes in tumors and tumor cell lines induced by the small oncogenic viruses, including the high-risk human papillomaviruses, hepatitis B virus, simian virus 40, and human T-cell leukemia virus type 1. We show that viral integrations in tumor cells lie near cellular sequences identified as nuclear matrix attachment regions (MARs), while integrations in nonneoplastic cells show no significant correlation with these regions. In mammalian cells, the nuclear matrix functions in gene expression and DNA replication. MARs play varied but poorly understood roles in eukaryotic gene expression. Our results suggest that integrated tumor virus genomes are subject to MAR-mediated transcriptional regulation, providing insight into mechanisms of viral carcinogenesis. Furthermore, the viral oncoproteins serve as invaluable tools for the study of mechanisms controlling cellular growth. Similarly, our demonstration that integrated viral genomes may be subject to MAR-mediated transcriptional effects should facilitate elucidation of fundamental mechanisms regulating eukaryotic gene expression.

Sp1 is required for prolactin activation of the interferon regulatory factor-1 gene

Transcription of the interferon regulatory factor-1 gene (IRF-1) is induced in a biphasic manner (G1 and G1/S phase) in Nb2 T cells in response to prolactin (PRL) stimulation. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (Stat1) is required for PRL activation of the IRF-1 promoter. Mutation of a -200 bp Sp1 site in the IRF-1 promoter results in a loss of G1 but not G1/S IRF-1 transcriptional activity in response to PRL. These studies illustrate that the temporal transcription of the IRF-1 gene is mediated by not only Stat1 but also Sp1 in response to PRL stimulation.

Molecular biology of HMGA proteins: hubs of nuclear function

Members of the HMGA (a.k.a. HMGI/Y) family of 'high mobility group' (HMG) proteins participate in a wide variety of nuclear processes ranging from chromosome and chromatin mechanics to acting as architectural transcription factors that regulate the expression of numerous genes in vivo. As a consequence, they function in the cell as highly connected 'nodes' of protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions that influence a diverse array of normal biological processes including growth, proliferation, differentiation and death. The HMGA proteins, likewise, participate in pathological processes by, for example, acting as regulators of viral gene transcription and by serving as host-supplied proteins that facilitate retroviral integration. HMGA genes are bona fide proto-oncogenes that promote tumor progression and metastasis when overexpressed in cells. High constitutive HMGA protein levels are among the most consistent feature observed in all types of cancers with increasing concentrations being correlated with increasing malignancy. The intrinsic attributes that endow the HMGA proteins with these remarkable abilities are a combination of structural, biochemical and biological characteristics that are unique to these proteins. HMGA proteins have little, if any, secondary structure while free in solution but undergo disordered-to-ordered structural transitions when bound to substrates such as DNA or other proteins. Each protein contains three copies of a conserved DNA-binding peptide motif called the 'AT-hook' that preferentially binds to the minor groove of stretches of AT-rich sequence. In vivo HMGA proteins specifically interact with a large number of other proteins, most of which are transcription factors. They are also subject to many types of in vivo biochemical modifications that markedly influence their ability to interact with DNA substrates, other proteins and chromatin. And, most importantly, both the transcription of HMGA genes and the biochemical modifications of HMGA proteins are direct downstream targets of numerous signal transduction pathways making them exquisitely responsive to various environmental influences. This review covers recent advances that have contributed to our understanding of how this constellation of structural and biological features allows the HMGA proteins to serve as central 'hubs' of nuclear function.

Gene- and activation-specific mechanisms for insulin inhibition of basal and glucocorticoid-induced insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase transcription. Roles of forkhead and insulin response sequences

The insulin response sequence (IRS) of the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) promoter, located within the glucocorticoid response unit, was first characterized by its ability to mediate insulin inhibition when inserted into a thymidine kinase promoter. The IRSs of the PEPCK and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) promoters have been proposed to contribute to regulation by glucocorticoids and insulin. Forkhead (FKHR) recognizes IRS sequences, is phosphorylated in response to insulin, and mediates insulin inhibition of basal IGFBP-1 transcription in an IRS-dependent manner. Here, we investigate the contributions of FKHR and IRSs to insulin inhibition of basal and glucocorticoid-induced transcription of PEPCK and IGFBP-1. Expression of T/S/S, in which three putative protein kinase B (PKB) sites in FKHR are mutated, reduced insulin inhibition of basal expression of IGFBP-1 but not PEPCK. Mutation of the IGFBP-1 IRSs abolished insulin inhibition in the presence of T/S/S. Mutation of the PEPCK IRS had no effect on insulin inhibition in the presence of T/S/S, indicating that insulin inhibits PEPCK transcription independently of the IRS or of the putative PKB phosphorylation sites in FKHR. Mutations in the IRS or FKHR had no effect on insulin inhibition of glucocorticoid-induced transcription of either the PEPCK or IGFBP-1 gene. Thus, insulin uses gene- and activation-specific mechanisms to regulate the basal and glucocorticoid-induced activity of these genes.

Coordination of a transcriptional switch by HMGI(Y) acetylation

Dynamic control of interferon-beta (IFN-beta) gene expression requires the regulated assembly and disassembly of the enhanceosome, a higher-order nucleoprotein complex formed in response to virus infection. The enhanceosome activates transcription by recruiting the histone acetyltransferase proteins CREB binding protein (CBP) and p300/CBP-associated factors (PCAF)/GCN5, which, in addition to modifying histones, acetylate HMGI(Y), the architectural component required for enhanceosome assembly. We show that the accurate execution of the IFN-beta transcriptional switch depends on the ordered acetylation of the high-mobility group I protein HMGI(Y) by PCAF/GCN5 and CBP, which acetylate HMGI(Y) at distinct lysine residues on endogenous promoters. Whereas acetylation of HMGI(Y) by CBP at lysine-65 destabilizes the enhanceosome, acetylation of HMGI(Y) by PCAF/GCN5 at lysine-71 potentiates transcription by stabilizing the enhanceosome and preventing acetylation by CBP.

Nuclear receptors coordinate the activities of chromatin remodeling complexes and coactivators to facilitate initiation of transcription

Recent advances in the field of in vitro chromatin assembly have led to in vitro transcription systems which reproduce in the test tube, in vivo characteristics of ligand-dependent transcriptional activation by nuclear receptors. Dissection of these systems has begun to provide us with information concerning the underlying molecular mechanisms. Through recruitment of coactivator proteins, nuclear receptors act first to remodel chromatin within the promoter region and then to recruit the transcriptional machinery to the promoter region in order to initiate transcription. Here we present a possible sequential mechanism for ligand-dependent transcriptional activation by nuclear receptors and discuss the in vitro and in vivo data that support this model.

Chromatin remodeling and transcriptional activation: the cast (in order of appearance)

The number of chromatin modifying and remodeling complexes implicated in genome control is growing faster than our understanding of the functional roles they play. We discuss recent in vitro experiments with biochemically defined chromatin templates that illuminate new aspects of action by histone acetyltransferases and ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling engines in facilitating transcription. We review a number of studies that present an 'ordered recruitment' view of transcriptional activation, according to which various complexes enter and exit their target promoter in a set sequence, and at specific times, such that action by one complex sets the stage for the arrival of the next one. A consensus emerging from all these experiments is that the joint action by several types of chromatin remodeling machines can lead to a more profound alteration of the infrastructure of chromatin over a target promoter than could be obtained by these enzymes acting independently. In addition, it appears that in specific cases one type of chromatin structure alteration (e.g., histone hyperacetylation) is contingent upon prior alterations of a different sort (i.e., ATP-dependent remodeling of histone-DNA contacts). The striking differences between the precise sequence of action by various cofactors observed in these studies may be - at least in part - due to differences between the specific promoters studied, and distinct requirements exhibited by specific loci for chromatin remodeling based on their pre-existing nucleoprotein architecture.

HMGI/Y proteins: flexible regulators of transcription and chromatin structure

The mammalian HMGI/Y (HMGA) non-histone proteins participate in a wide variety of cellular processes including regulation of inducible gene transcription, integration of retroviruses into chromosomes and the induction of neoplastic transformation and promotion of metastatic progression of cancer cells. Recent advances have contributed greatly to our understanding of how the HMGI/Y proteins participate in the molecular mechanisms underlying these biological events. All members of the HMGI/Y family of 'high mobility group' proteins are characterized by the presence of multiple copies of a conserved DNA-binding peptide motif called the 'AT hook' that preferentially binds to the narrow minor groove of stretches of AT-rich sequence. The mammalian HMGI/Y proteins have little, if any, secondary structure in solution but assume distinct conformations when bound to substrates such as DNA or other proteins. Their intrinsic flexibility allows the HMGI/Y proteins to participate in specific protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions that induce both structural changes in chromatin substrates and the formation of stereospecific complexes called 'enhanceosomes' on the promoter/enhancer regions of genes whose transcription they regulate. The formation of such regulatory complexes is characterized by reciprocal inductions of conformational changes in both the HMGI/Y proteins themselves and in their interacting substrates. It may well be that the inherent flexibility of the HMGI/Y proteins, combined with their ability to undergo reversible disordered-to-ordered structural transitions, has been a significant factor in the evolutionary selection of these proteins for their functional role(s) in cells.

Enhanceosomes

Gene-specific transcriptional regulation in higher eukaryotes is mediated by complex cis-acting control elements that specify the location, timing and magnitude of the response. During the past five years, an argument has been made that in several cases specificity in gene transcription is achieved by the assembly of higher-order three-dimensional transcription factor/enhancer DNA complexes, termed enhanceosomes. The inherent co-operativity in enhanceosome assembly and the embedded synergy in transcription ensure that a specific gene would be selected for activation only if all the enhanceosome components are present in the same nucleus. Enhanceosomes activate transcription by recruiting chromatin-modifying activities and basal transcription factors to the nearby promoters.

Chromatin-mediated transcriptional regulation by the yeast architectural factors NHP6A and NHP6B

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae NHP6A and NHP6B proteins are chromatin architectural factors, functionally and structurally related to the mammalian high mobility group (HMG)-1 and -2 proteins, a family of non-sequence-specific DNA binding proteins. nhp6a nhp6b mutants have various morphological defects and are defective in the induced expression of several RNA polymerase II-transcribed genes. We found that NHP6A/B proteins are also required for full induction of the yeast CHA1 gene. Importantly, CHA1 basal level expression is increased 10-fold in an nhp6a nhp6b double deletion mutant. Micrococcal nuclease and DNase I analysis of the CHA1 gene in this strain showed an open promoter structure, characteristic of the activated state of this promoter, even under non-inducing conditions. To address the possible function of the NHP6A/B proteins in chromatin-mediated gene regulation, we performed whole-genome transcriptional profiling of a Deltanhp6a Deltanhp6b yeast strain. Our results suggest that NHP6A/B proteins play an important regulatory role, repressing as well as potentiating expression of genes involved in several cellular processes, and that NHP6A/B control is exerted at the level of the individual gene.

Magnitude of the CREB-dependent transcriptional response is determined by the strength of the interaction between the kinase-inducible domain of CREB and the KIX domain of CREB-binding protein

The activity of the transcription factor CREB is regulated by extracellular stimuli that result in its phosphorylation at a critical serine residue, Ser133. Phosphorylation of Ser133 is believed to promote CREB-dependent transcription by allowing CREB to interact with the transcriptional coactivator CREB-binding protein (CBP). Previous studies have established that the domain encompassing Ser133 on CREB, known as the kinase-inducible domain (KID), interacts specifically with a short domain in CBP termed the KIX domain and that this interaction depends on the phosphorylation of Ser133. In this study, we adapted a recently described Escherichia coli-based two-hybrid system for the examination of phosphorylation-dependent protein-protein interactions, and we used this system to study the kinase-induced interaction between the KID and the KIX domain. We identified residues of the KID and the KIX domain that are critical for their interaction as well as two pairs of oppositely charged residues that apparently interact at the KID-KIX interface. We then isolated a mutant form of the KIX domain that interacts more tightly with wild-type and mutant forms of the KID than does the wild-type KIX domain. We show that in the context of full-length CBP, the corresponding amino acid substitution resulted in an enhanced ability of CBP to stimulate CREB-dependent transcription in mammalian cells. Conversely, an amino acid substitution in the KIX domain that weakens its interaction with the KID resulted in a decreased ability of full-length CBP to stimulate CREB-dependent transcription. These findings demonstrate that the magnitude of CREB-dependent transcription in mammalian cells depends on the strength of the KID-KIX interaction and suggest that the level of transcription induced by coactivator-dependent transcriptional activators can be specified by the strength of the activator-coactivator interaction.

Identification of a novel gp130-responsive site in the vasoactive intestinal peptide cytokine response element

The neuropoietic cytokine ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) potently induces transcription of the vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) gene through a 180-base pair (bp) cytokine response element (CyRE) in the VIP promoter. We have previously shown that CNTF induction of STAT and AP-1 protein binding within the CyRE is necessary to mediate CNTF induction of VIP gene transcription. We now show that a third, previously uncharacterized site at the 3'-end of the CyRE is also critical to CNTF induction of CyRE transcription. A 4-bp mutation in this 3'-region reduced CNTF-mediated induction of transcription approximately 80%. Whereas mutations in both the STAT and AP-1 sites substantially reduced CNTF induction of transcription, mutations in these sites together with the novel 3'-site completely abolished the ability of CNTF to induce CyRE-mediated transcription. Gel shift analysis indicated that a complex in neuroblastoma cells bound specifically to this 3'-site. This complex was not altered by CNTF treatment. Mutations in an 8-bp sequence (TTACTGGA) eliminated binding of this protein complex and markedly reduced transcriptional activation of the CyRE by CNTF. Thus, we have identified a protein complex binding to a novel DNA sequence that is necessary for full CNTF induction of VIP gene transcription.

Ordered recruitment of chromatin modifying and general transcription factors to the IFN-beta promoter

Here, we show that the IFN-beta enhanceosome activates transcription by directing the ordered recruitment of chromatin modifying and general transcription factors to the IFN-beta promoter. The enhanceosome is assembled in the nucleosome-free enhancer region of the IFN-beta gene, leading to the modification and remodeling of a strategically positioned nucleosome that masks the TATA box and the start site of transcription. Initially, the GCN5 complex is recruited, which acetylates the nucleosome, and this is followed by recruitment of the CBP-PolII holoenzyme complex. Nucleosome acetylation in turn facilitates SWI/SNF recruitment by CBP, resulting in chromatin remodeling. This program of recruitment culminates in the binding of TFIID to the promoter and the activation of transcription.

Gene repression by coactivator repulsion

We show that the IRF-2 oncoprotein represses virus-induced IFN-beta gene transcription via a novel mechanism. Virus infection induces recruitment of IRF-2 to some of the endogenous IFN-beta enhancers as part of the enhanceosome. Enhanceosomes bearing IRF-2 cannot activate transcription, due to the presence of a domain in IRF-2 that prevents enhanceosome-dependent recruitment of the CBP-Pol II holoenzyme complex. As a consequence, IRF-2 incorporation into enhanceosomes restricts the number of IFN-beta promoters directing transcription. Remarkably, deletion of the IRF-2 gene increases IFN-beta expression by expanding the number of cells capable of inducing IFN-beta gene transcription in response to virus infection.

Histone binding protein RbAp48 interacts with a complex of CREB binding protein and phosphorylated CREB

A CREB-CREB binding protein (CBP) complex was used as bait to screen a mouse embryo cDNA library in yeast. One of the strongest interactions identified the histone binding protein RbAp48. RbAp48 also interacted weakly with CBP alone but did not interact with phosphorylated or nonphosphorylated CREB. CBP (or its homologue p300) from HeLa cell nuclear extracts coimmunoprecipitated with RbAp48 and its homologue RbAp46 and bound to a glutathione S-transferase-RbAp48 fusion protein. This interaction was stimulated by the addition of phosphorylated CREB and allowed the association of core histones and mononucleosomes in an acetylation-dependent manner. RbAp48 lowered the K(m) of CBP histone acetylase activity and facilitated p300-mediated in vitro transcription of a chromatinized template in the presence of acetylcoenzyme A. These data indicate that the association of phosphorylated CREB with CBP promotes the binding of RbAp48 and its homologue RbAp46, allowing the formation of a complex that facilitates histone acetylation during transcriptional activation.

Complex roles of Stat1 in regulating gene expression

Stat1 is a fascinating and complex protein with multiple, yet contrasting transcriptional functions. Upon activation, it drives the expression of many genes but also suppresses the transcription of others. These opposing characteristics also apply to its role in facilitating crosstalk between signal transduction pathways, as it participates in both synergistic activation and inhibition of gene expression. Stat1 is a functional transcription factor even in the absence of inducer-mediated activation, participating in the constitutive expression of some genes. This review summarizes the well studied involvement of Stat1 in IFN-dependent and growth factor-dependent signaling and then describes the roles of Stat1 in positive, negative and constitutive regulation of gene expression as well as its participation in crosstalk between signal transduction pathways. Oncogene (2000).

Insight into the tumor suppressor function of CBP through the viral oncoprotein tax

CREB binding protein (CBP) is a cellular coactivator protein that regulates essentially all known pathways of gene expression. The transcriptional coactivator properties of CBP are utilized by at least 25 different transcription factors representing nearly all known classes of DNA binding proteins. Once bound to their target genes, these transcription factors are believed to tether CBP to the promoter, leading to activated transcription. CBP functions to stimulate transcription through direct recruitment of the general transcription machinery as well as acetylation of both histone and transcription factor substrates. Recent observations indicate that a critical dosage of CBP is required for normal development and tumor suppression, and that perturbations in CBP concentrations may disrupt cellular homeostasis. Furthermore, there is accumulating evidence that CBP deregulation plays a direct role in hematopoietic malignancies. However, the molecular events linking CBP deregulation and malignant transformation are unclear. Further insight into the function of CBP, and its role as a tumor suppressor, can be gained through recent studies of the human T-cell leukemia virus, type I (HTLV-I) Tax oncoprotein. Tax is known to utilize CBP to stimulate transcription from the viral promoter. However, recent data suggest that as a consequence of the Tax-CBP interaction, many cellular transcription factor pathways may be deregulated. Tax disruption of CBP function may play a key role in transformation of the HTLV-I-infected cell. Thus, Tax derailment of CBP may lend important information about the tumor suppressor properties of CBP and serve as a model for the role of CBP in hematopoietic malignancies.