Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor inactivation in CAR T-cells prevents monocyte-dependent release of key cytokine release syndrome mediators

Hurdles to breakthrough in CAR T cell therapy of solid tumors

Autologous T cells genetically engineered to express chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) have shown promising outcomes and emerged as a new curative option for hematological malignancy, especially malignant neoplasm of B cells. Notably, when T cells are transduced with CAR constructs, composed of the antigen recognition domain of monoclonal antibodies, they retain their cytotoxic properties in a major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-independent manner. Despite its beneficial effect, the current CAR T cell therapy approach faces myriad challenges in solid tumors, including immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), tumor antigen heterogeneity, stromal impediment, and tumor accessibility, as well as tribulations such as on-target/off-tumor toxicity and cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Herein, we highlight the complications that hamper the effectiveness of CAR T cells in solid tumors and the strategies that have been recommended to overcome these hurdles and improve infused T cell performance.

TCR-independent Activation in Presence of a Src-family Kinase Inhibitor Improves CAR-T Cell Product Attributes

Chimeric antigen receptor expressing T cells (CAR-T cells) have shown remarkable efficacy against some blood cancers and have potential to treat many other human diseases. During CAR-T cell manufacturing, T cells are activated via engagement of the T-cell receptor (TCR); however, persistent TCR engagement can induce unchecked activation, differentiation, and exhaustion, which can negatively affect CAR-T cell product quality and in vivo potency. In addition, T cells may not uniformly respond to TCR-dependent activation (TCRD) contributing to lot-to-lot variability, poor expansion, and manufacturing failures. TCRD also presents challenges during manufacturing of allogeneic CAR-T cells when endogenous TCR is deleted to prevent graft-versus-host disease. Thus, novel strategies to activate T cells may help improve CAR-T cell product attributes and reduce manufacturing failures. In this study, we compared the effect of TCRD and TCR-independent activation (TCRI) on CAR-T cell product attributes. We found that TCRI in presence of a Src-kinase inhibitor significantly improved CAR-T cell expansion and yield without affecting viability and CD4/CD8 ratio. Markers of T-cell activation, exhaustion and differentiation were also reduced in these CAR-T cells compared with CAR-T cells manufactured by TCRD. TCRI did not affect CAR-T cell in vitro potency; however, following co-culture with target cells, CAR-T cells manufactured by TCRI released significantly less inflammatory cytokines compared with CAR-T cells manufactured by TCRD. Together, these data suggest that manufacturing CAR-T cells by TCRI activation in the presence of a Src-kinase inhibitor improves product quality attributes and may help reduce manufacturing failures and improve CAR-T cell safety and efficacy in vivo.

Recent advances in the prevention and management of cytokine release syndrome after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy

Adoptive immunotherapy has recently garnered widespread interests owing to the successful application of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy. CAR-T cells are “living drugs” that can live in patients for several years and act as an effective antitumor agent. Over the last few years, five types of CAR-T cells have been approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of hematologic malignancies. Despite their impressive clinical efficacy, the current application of CAR-T cell therapy is restricted by the uncontrollable release of cytokines (cytokine release syndrome and cytokine release syndrome) due to serious treatment-related toxicities resulting from synchronous activation and rapid proliferation of CAR-T cells. CRS is the most common toxicity and its severity can range from low-grade physical symptoms to a high-grade syndrome linked with life-threatening multiple organ dysfunction. Treatment-related deaths from severe CRS have been reported, suggesting the importance of appropriate intervention. Gaining a better understanding of CRS and developing new treatments for CRS are active areas of laboratory and clinical research. Herein, we summarize the current studies on prevention and management of CRS to expand the safety and applicability of CAR-T cell therapy in various malignancies.

Alignment of practices for data harmonization across multi-center cell therapy trials: a report from the Consortium for Pediatric Cellular Immunotherapy

Immune effector cell (IEC) therapies have revolutionized our approach to relapsed B-cell malignancies, and interest in the investigational use of IECs is rapidly expanding into other diseases. Current challenges in the analysis of IEC therapies include small sample sizes, limited access to clinical trials and a paucity of predictive biomarkers of efficacy and toxicity associated with IEC therapies. Retrospective and prospective multi-center cell therapy trials can assist in overcoming these barriers through harmonization of clinical endpoints and correlative assays for immune monitoring, allowing additional cross-trial analysis to identify biomarkers of failure and success. The Consortium for Pediatric Cellular Immunotherapy (CPCI) offers a unique platform to address the aforementioned challenges by delivering cutting-edge cell and gene therapies for children through multi-center clinical trials. Here the authors discuss some of the important pre-analytic variables, such as biospecimen collection and initial processing procedures, that affect biomarker assays commonly used in IEC trials across participating CPCI sites. The authors review the recent literature and provide data to support recommendations for alignment and standardization of practices that can affect flow cytometry assays measuring immune effector function as well as interpretation of cytokine/chemokine data. The authors also identify critical gaps that often make parallel comparisons between trials difficult or impossible.

Effect of early granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor administration in the prevention of febrile neutropenia and impact on toxicity and efficacy of anti-CD19 CAR-T in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cells (CAR-T) are an outbreaking treatment option for relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are the most common specific toxicities, while severe neutropenia and infections are often observed as well. From March 2020, early G-CSF prophylaxis at day (D) two post-infusion was systematically proposed. We then compared patients treated before that date who did not receive G-CSF or who received late (after D5) G-CSF as control group. Patients administered with early G-CSF had similar duration of grade 4 neutropenia but significantly decreased incidence of febrile neutropenia (58% versus 81%, p = 0.018). Similar rate of toxicities was observed, including overall and grade 3-4 CRS (p = 0.93 and p = 0.28, respectively), and overall and grade 3-4 ICANS (p = 0.62 and p = 0.88, respectively). We observed no difference in the quality of CAR T-cells expansion (p = 0.79, %Cmax), nor in response rate (best ORR, 57.6% vs 61.8%, p = 0.93), nor survival even in a group of patients adjusted by a propensity score. In conclusion, early G-CSF administration was safe and effective in reducing febrile neutropenia without impact on toxicities nor on anti-lymphoma activity of CAR-T.

Novel Treatments for Pediatric Relapsed or Refractory Acute B-Cell Lineage Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Precision Medicine Era

With the markedly increased cure rate for children with newly diagnosed pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), relapse and refractory B-ALL (R/R B-ALL) remain the primary cause of death worldwide due to the limitations of multidrug chemotherapy. As we now have a more profound understanding of R/R ALL, including the mechanism of recurrence and drug resistance, prognostic indicators, genotypic changes and so on, we can use newly emerging technologies to identify operational molecular targets and find sensitive drugs for individualized treatment. In addition, more promising and innovative immunotherapies and molecular targeted drugs that are expected to kill leukemic cells more effectively while maintaining low toxicity to achieve minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity and better bridge hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have also been widely developed. To date, the prognosis of pediatric patients with R/R B-ALL has been enhanced markedly thanks to the development of novel drugs. This article reviews the new advancements of several promising strategies for pediatric R/R B-ALL.

Mechanisms of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome after CAR-T treatment

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) treatment has revolutionized the landscape of cancer therapy with significant efficacy on hematologic malignancy, especially in relapsed and refractory B cell malignancies. However, unexpected serious toxicities such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) still hamper its broad application. Clinical trials using CAR-T cells targeting specific antigens on tumor cell surface have provided valuable information about the characteristics of ICANS. With unclear mechanism of ICANS after CAR-T treatment, unremitting efforts have been devoted to further exploration. Clinical findings from patients with ICANS strongly indicated existence of overactivated peripheral immune response followed by endothelial activation-induced blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction, which triggers subsequent central nervous system (CNS) inflammation and neurotoxicity. Several animal models have been built but failed to fully replicate the whole spectrum of ICANS in human. Hopefully, novel and powerful technologies like single-cell analysis may help decipher the precise cellular response within CNS from a different perspective when ICANS happens. Moreover, multidisciplinary cooperation among the subjects of immunology, hematology, and neurology will facilitate better understanding about the complex immune interaction between the peripheral, protective barriers, and CNS in ICANS. This review elaborates recent findings about ICANS after CAR-T treatment from bed to bench, and discusses the potential cellular and molecular mechanisms that may promote effective management in the future. This article is categorized under: Cancer > Biomedical Engineering Immune System Diseases > Molecular and Cellular Physiology Neurological Diseases > Molecular and Cellular Physiology.

Genome Editing as a Vehicle to Drive Successful Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapies to the Clinic

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have emerged as an effective therapy for patients with relapsed and refractory haematological malignancies. However, there are many challenges preventing clinical efficacy and thus broader translation of this approach. These hurdles include poor autologous T cell fitness, manufacturing issues and lack of conserved tumour-restricted antigens to target. Recent efforts have been directed toward incorporating genome editing technologies to address these challenges and develop potent CAR T cell therapies for a diverse array of haematopoietic cancers. In this review, the authors discuss gene editing strategies that have been employed to augment CAR T cell fitness, generate allogeneic ‘off-the-shelf’ CAR T cell products, and safely target elusive myeloid and T cell cancers that often lack appropriate tumour-specific antigens.

State of the CAR-T: Risk of Infections with Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy and Determinants of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Responses

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy has shown unprecedented response rates in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) hematologic malignancies. Although CAR-T therapy gives hope to heavily pretreated patients, the rapid commercialization and cumulative immunosuppression of this therapy predispose patients to infections for a prolonged period. CAR-T therapy poses distinctive short- and long-term toxicities and infection risks among patients who receive CAR T-cells after multiple prior treatments, often including hematopoietic cell transplantation. The acute toxicities include cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. The long-term B cell depletion, hypogammaglobulinemia, and cytopenia further predispose patients to severe infections and abrogate the remission success achieved by the living drug. These on-target-off-tumor toxicities deplete B-cells across the entire lineage and further diminish immune responses to vaccines. Early observational data suggest that patients with hematologic malignancies may not mount adequate humoral and cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. In this review, we summarize the immune compromising factors indigenous to CAR-T recipients. We discuss the immunogenic potential of different SARS-CoV-2 vaccines for CAR-T recipients based on the differences in vaccine manufacturing platforms. Given the lack of data related to the safety and efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in this distinctively immunosuppressed cohort, we summarize the infection risks associated with Food and Drug Administration-approved CAR-T constructs and the potential determinants of vaccine responses. The review further highlights the potential need for booster vaccine dosing and the promise for heterologous prime-boosting and other novel vaccine strategies in CAR-T recipients. © 2021 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Genome-Editing-Mediated Restructuring of Tumor Immune Microenvironment for Prevention of Metastasis

Modulating the tumor immune microenvironment to activate immune cells has been investigated to convert cold to hot tumors. Here, we report that metal-lipid hybrid nanoparticle (MLN)-mediated gene editing of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) can restructure the tumor microenvironment to an "immune activated" state for subsequent immunotherapy. MLNs with cationic lipids and elemental metallic Au inside were designed to deliver plasmid DNA encoding TGF-β single guide RNA and Cas9 protein (pC9sTgf) and to convert near-infrared light (NIR) to heat. Upon NIR irradiation, MLNs induced photothermal anticancer effects and calreticulin exposure on B16F10 cancer cells. Lipoplexes of pC9sTgf and MLN (pC9sTgf@MLN) provided gene editing of B16F10 cells and in vivo tumor tissues. In mice treated with pC9sTgf@MLNs and NIR irradiation, the tumor microenvironment showed increases in mature dendritic cells, cytotoxic T cells, and interferon-γ expression. In B16F10 tumor-bearing mice, intratumoral injection of pC9sTgf@MLNs and NIR irradiation resulted in ablation of primary tumors. Application of pC9sTgf@MLNs and NIR irradiation prevented the growth of secondarily challenged B16F10 cells at distant sites and B16F10 lung metastasis. Combined TGF-β gene editing and phototherapy is herein supported as a modality for restructuring the tumor immune microenvironment and preventing tumor recurrence.

Mechanisms of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity of CAR T-cell therapy and associated prevention and management strategies

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has yielded impressive outcomes and transformed treatment algorithms for hematological malignancies. To date, five CAR T-cell products have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Nevertheless, some significant toxicities pose great challenges to the development of CAR T-cell therapy, most notably cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Understanding the mechanisms underlying these toxicities and establishing prevention and treatment strategies are important. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms underlying CRS and ICANS and provide potential treatment and prevention strategies.

Optimizing the Clinical Impact of CAR-T Cell Therapy in B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Looking Back While Moving Forward

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has been successful in creating extraordinary clinical outcomes in the treatment of hematologic malignancies including relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). With several FDA approvals, CAR-T therapy is recognized as an alternative treatment option for particular patients with certain conditions of B-ALL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, or multiple myeloma. However, CAR-T therapy for B-ALL can be surrounded by challenges such as various adverse events including the life-threatening cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity, B-cell aplasia-associated hypogammaglobulinemia and agammaglobulinemia, and the alloreactivity of allogeneic CAR-Ts. Furthermore, recent advances such as improvements in media design, the reduction of ex vivo culturing duration, and other phenotype-determining factors can still create room for a more effective CAR-T therapy in R/R B-ALL. Herein, we review preclinical and clinical strategies with a focus on novel studies aiming to address the mentioned hurdles and stepping further towards a milestone in CAR-T therapy of B-ALL.

Neoantigen-reactive T cell: An emerging role in adoptive cellular immunotherapy

Adoptive cellular immunotherapy harnessing the intrinsic immune system for precise treatment has exhibited preliminary success against malignant tumors. As one of the emerging roles in adoptive cellular immunotherapy, neoantigen-reactive T cell (NRT) focuses on the antigens expressed only by tumor cells. It exclusively obliterates tumor and spares normal tissues, achieving more satisfying effects. However, the development of NRT immunotherapy remains in a relatively primitive stage. Current challenges include identification of NRTs and maintenance of adoptive cell efficacy in vivo. The possible side effects and other limitations of this treatment also hinder its application. Here, we present an overview of NRT immunotherapy and discuss the progress and challenges as well as the prospects in this promising field.

Cytokine Release Syndrome in the Immunotherapy of Hematological Malignancies: The Biology behind and Possible Clinical Consequences

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is an acute systemic inflammatory syndrome characterized by fever and multiple organ dysfunction associated with (i) chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy, (ii) therapeutic antibodies, and (iii) haploidentical allogeneic stem cell transplantation (haplo-allo-HSCT). Severe CRS can be life-threatening in some cases and requires prompt management of those toxicities and is still a great challenge for physicians. The pathophysiology of CRS is still not fully understood, which also applies to the identifications of predictive biomarkers that can forecast these features in advance. However, a broad range of cytokines are involved in the dynamics of CRS. Treatment approaches include both broad spectrum of immunosuppressant, such as corticosteroids, as well as more specific inhibition of cytokine release. In the present manuscript we will try to review an update regarding pathophysiology, etiology, diagnostics, and therapeutic options for this serious complication.

Gene editing to enhance the efficacy of cancer cell therapies

Adoptive T cell therapies have shown impressive signals of activity, but their clinical impact could be enhanced by technologies to increase T cell potency and diminish the cost and labor involved in manufacturing these products. Gene editing platforms are under study in this arena to (1) enhance immune cell potency by knocking out molecules that inhibit immune responses; (2) deliver genetic payloads into precise genomic locations and thereby enhance safety and/or improve the gene expression profile by leveraging physiologic promoters, enhancers, and repressors; and (3) enable off-the-shelf therapies by preventing alloreactivity and immune rejection. This review discusses gene editing approaches that have been the best studied in the context of human T cells and adoptive T cell therapies, summarizing their current status and near-term potential for translation.

Signaling pathways in the regulation of cytokine release syndrome in human diseases and intervention therapy

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) embodies a mixture of clinical manifestations, including elevated circulating cytokine levels, acute systemic inflammatory symptoms and secondary organ dysfunction, which was first described in the context of acute graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation and was later observed in pandemics of influenza, SARS-CoV and COVID-19, immunotherapy of tumor, after chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) therapy, and in monogenic disorders and autoimmune diseases. Particularly, severe CRS is a very significant and life-threatening complication, which is clinically characterized by persistent high fever, hyperinflammation, and severe organ dysfunction. However, CRS is a double-edged sword, which may be both helpful in controlling tumors/viruses/infections and harmful to the host. Although a high incidence and high levels of cytokines are features of CRS, the detailed kinetics and specific mechanisms of CRS in human diseases and intervention therapy remain unclear. In the present review, we have summarized the most recent advances related to the clinical features and management of CRS as well as cutting-edge technologies to elucidate the mechanisms of CRS. Considering that CRS is the major adverse event in human diseases and intervention therapy, our review delineates the characteristics, kinetics, signaling pathways, and potential mechanisms of CRS, which shows its clinical relevance for achieving both favorable efficacy and low toxicity.

The immunologic aspects of cytokine release syndrome and graft versus host disease following CAR T cell therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are the pioneers of cancer immunotherapy, which to this date have several FDA-approved products. They have been substantially improved since their first introduction in 1993 and have shown promising results regardless of their inevitable side effects. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS), the most common toxicity after CAR T cell treatment, is affiliated to a systemic inflammation through surge of cytokines, mainly IL-6, IL-1, and INF-γ. Furthermore, difference between histocompatibility antigens activates the graft versus host disease (GvHD) effect of the allogenic CAR T cells against the host cells. Immunological reactions induced by CAR T cells in the form of CRS or GvHD is necessary for fostering good responses, while excess reactions can potentially threaten patient life. In this review, we first describe the history, applications, and structure of CAR T cells, followed by a comprehensive review of CRS regarding its definition, management, and immunological aspects. Finally, we discuss about the clinical aspects of CRS and GvHD after CAR T cell therapy and how to harness anti-tumoral effects, while mitigating the adverse effects.

Management of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell induced cytokine release syndrome: Current and emerging approaches

The most common adverse event associated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is cytokine release syndrome, which is characterized by fever, hypoxia, and hypotension in varying degrees of severity. In severe cases, cytokine release syndrome can result in life-threatening symptoms such as multi-organ failure. The widely accepted first-line therapy for cytokine release syndrome management is tocilizumab with or without corticosteroids, but there is very limited guidance on the proper management of patients unresponsive to this regimen. There are emerging strategies that target cytokine release syndrome through novel mechanisms, showing promise in treating or preventing severe cytokine release syndrome. Although further clinical investigation is necessary to assess the applicability of the emerging approaches, these exploratory therapies may shape the future landscape of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell induced cytokine release syndrome management. This review article provides a comprehensive overview of the current and emerging therapies for the management of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell induced cytokine release syndrome, especially cases that are refractory to tocilizumab and steroids.

Focused evaluation of the roles of macrophages in chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy associated cytokine release syndrome

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a major obstacle to the widespread clinical application of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies. CRS can also be induced by infections (such as SARS-CoV-2), drugs (such as therapeutic antibodies), and some autoimmune diseases. Myeloid-derived macrophages play key roles in the pathogenesis of CRS, and participate in the production and release of the core CRS cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and interferon-γ. In this review, we summarize the roles of macrophages in CRS and discuss new developments in macrophage activation and the related mechanisms of cytokine regulation in CRS.

[Effects of glucocorticoids on the proliferation of CD19 CAR-T cells targeting B-cell tumor cell lines]

Objective: To evaluate the effects of glucocorticoids (dexamethasone and methylprednisolone) on the proliferation of CD19 Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) modified T cells in vitro. Methods: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy volunteers were collected as T cells. CD19 CAR-T cells were prepared by CD3 magnetic beads sorting and CD19 CAR lentivirus transfection. The transfection rates and the proportion of CD19 CAR-T cells in the culture system were analyzed using a flow cytometer. The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CD19 CAR-T cells was measured after staining with Carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester cell proliferation tracer fluorescent probe, Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) cytotoxicity assay was used to detect the effects of different concentrations of glucocorticoid on the killing activity of B-cell tumor cell lines. Results: In this study, the CD19 CAR transfection rate of CD19 CAR-T cells was (51.34±5.28) %. The killing activities of different doses of methylprednisolone on Nalm6, Pfeiffer, and U2932 tumor cells were higher than that of dexamethasone at 24 h. The killing activities of 4 mg/mL methylprednisolone on Nalm6, Pfeiffer, and U2932 were higher than that of 0.75 mg/ml group, while the killing activity of 12 mg/ml methylprednisolone was lower than that of 2.25 mg/ml dexamethasone at 48 h. However, the killing activities of different doses of methylprednisolone on EHEB tumor cells were lower than those of different doses of dexamethasone at 24 and 48 h. The average MFI and proportion of CD19 CAR-T cells under different concentrations of glucocorticoid the proliferation inhibition of CD19 CAR-T cells by dexamethasone was higher than that of methylprednisolone. The proliferation inhibition of CD19 CAR-T cells of the two glucocorticoids in high concentration groups were more obvious than that in low concentration groups. When CD19 CAR-T cells were co-cultured with different tumor cells, the proportion and average MFI of CD19 CAR-T cells showed that the proliferation inhibition of dexamethasone was higher than that of methylprednisolone. The proliferation inhibition of CD19 CAR-T cells of the two glucocorticoids in high concentration groups was more obvious than that in low concentration groups. Conclusion: Dexamethasone inhibits the cell proliferation of CD19 CAR-T cells more than methylprednisolone during the targeting of different tumor cell lines. The inhibition effect of dexamethasone on the proliferation and amplification of CD19 CAR-T cells was greater than that of methylprednisolone during the targeting of CD19 CAR-T cells to different tumor cell lines. Moreover, the inhibition effect of the high dose group was more obvious.

Optimized two-step electroporation process to achieve efficient nonviral-mediated gene insertion into primary T cells

The development of gene editing technologies over the past years has allowed the precise and efficient insertion of transgenes into the genome of various cell types. Knock‐in approaches using homology‐directed repair and designer nucleases often rely on viral vectors, which can considerably impact the manufacturing cost and timeline of gene‐edited therapeutic products. An attractive alternative would be to use naked DNA as a repair template. However, such a strategy faces challenges such as cytotoxicity from double‐stranded DNA (dsDNA) to primary cells. Here, we sought to study the kinetics of transcription activator‐like effector nuclease (TALEN)‐mediated gene editing in primary T cells to improve nonviral gene knock‐in. Harnessing this knowledge, we developed a rapid and efficient gene insertion strategy based on either short single‐stranded oligonucleotides or large (2 Kb) linear naked dsDNA sequences. We demonstrated that a time‐controlled two‐step transfection protocol can substantially improve the efficiency of nonviral transgene integration in primary T cells. Using this approach, we achieved modification of up to ˜ 30% of T cells when inserting a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) at the T‐cell receptor alpha constant region (TRAC) locus to generate ‘off‐the shelf’ CAR‐T cells.

The potential of CAR T cell therapy for prostate cancer

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell immunotherapy involves the genetic modification of the patient's own T cells so that they specifically recognize and destroy tumour cells. Considerable clinical success has been achieved using this technique in patients with lymphoid malignancies, but clinical studies that investigated treating solid tumours using this emerging technology have been disappointing. A number of developments might be able to increase the efficacy of CAR T cell therapy for treatment of prostate cancer, including improved trafficking to the tumour, techniques to overcome the immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment, as well as methods to enhance CAR T cell persistence, specificity and safety. Furthermore, CAR T cell therapy has the potential to be combined with other treatment modalities, such as androgen deprivation therapy, radiotherapy or chemotherapy, and could be applied as focal CAR T cell therapy for prostate cancer.

A deep insight into CRISPR/Cas9 application in CAR-T cell-based tumor immunotherapies

To date, two chimeric antigen receptors (CAR)-T cell products from autologous T cells have been approved by The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The case-by-case autologous T cell generation setting is largely considered as a pivotal restraining cause for its large-scale clinical use because of the costly and prolonged manufacturing procedure. Further, activated CAR-T cells mainly express immune checkpoint molecules, including CTLA4, PD1, LAG3, abrogating CAR-T anti-tumor activity. In addition, CAR-T cell therapy potently results in some toxicity, such as cytokine releases syndrome (CRS). Therefore, the development of the universal allogeneic T cells with higher anti-tumor effects is of paramount importance. Thus, genome-editing technologies, in particular, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-Cas9 are currently being used to establish "off-the-shelf" CAR-T cells with robust resistance to immune cell-suppressive molecules. In fact, that simultaneous ablation of PD-1, T cell receptor alpha constant (TRAC or TCR), and also β-2 microglobulin (B2M) by CRISPR-Cas9 technique can support the manufacture of universal CAR-T cells with robust resistance to PD-L1. . Indeed, the ablation of β2M or TARC can severely hinder swift elimination of allogeneic T cells those express foreign HLA-I molecules, and thereby enables the generation of CAR-T cells from allogeneic healthy donors T cells with higher persistence in vivo. Herein, we will deliver a brief overview of the CAR-T cell application in the context of tumor immunotherapy. More importantly, we will discuss recent finding concerning the application of genome editing technologies for preparing universal CAR-T cells or cells that can effectively counter tumor escape, with a special focus on CRISPR-Cas9 technology.

Sequential CD19/22 CAR T-cell immunotherapy following autologous stem cell transplantation for central nervous system lymphoma

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell immunotherapy following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a promising method for refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma, but explicit data for central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) are lacking. Here, we treated 13 CNSL patients with ASCT sequential CD19/22 CAR T-cell infusion and simultaneously evaluated the clinical efficacy and toxicity. The 13 CNSL patients analyzed included four primary CNSL and nine secondary CNSL patients. Patients 1 and 10, who had complete remission status before enrollment, maintained clinical efficacy without recurrence. Nine of the remaining 11 patients responded to our protocol with a median durable time of 14.03 months, and the overall response and complete remission rate were 81.81% and 54.55%, respectively. No patient suffered grades 3–4 cytokine-release syndrome (CRS), and only patient 10 experienced severe immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). In addition, increases in serum ferritin and interleukin-6 levels were often accompanied by CRS and ICANS. After a median follow-up time of 14.20 months, the estimated 1-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 74.59% and 82.50%, respectively. Sequential CD19/22 CAR T-cell immunotherapy following ASCT as a novel method for CNSL appears to have encouraging long-term efficacy with relatively manageable side effects.

Toci or not toci: innovations in the diagnosis, prevention, and early management of cytokine release syndrome

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) remains a significant toxicity of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy for hematologic malignancies. While established guidelines exist for the management of Grade 2+ CRS with immunosuppressive agents such as tocilizumab or corticosteroids, the management of early-grade CRS (i.e. Grade 1 CRS with isolated fevers) has no such consensus beyond supportive care. In this review, we discuss early-grade CRS with an emphasis on its diagnosis, management, and prevention. Strategies to target early-grade CRS include immunosuppression preemptively (once CRS develops) or prophylactically (before CRS develops) as well as novel small-molecule inhibitors or fractionated CAR-T dosing. In the near future, next-generation CAR-T therapies may be able to target CRS precisely or obviate CRS entirely. If shown to prevent CRS-associated morbidity while maintaining therapeutic anti-neoplastic efficacy, these innovative strategies will enhance the safety of CAR-T therapy while also improving its operationalization and accessibility in the real-world setting.

CAR-T Cell Therapy: Mechanism, Management, and Mitigation of Inflammatory Toxicities

Engineered T cell therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) expressing T cells (CAR-T cells) have great potential to treat many human diseases; however, inflammatory toxicities associated with these therapies present safety risks and can greatly limit its widespread use. This article briefly reviews our current understanding of mechanisms for inflammatory toxicities during CAR T-cell therapy, current strategies for management and mitigation of these risks and highlights key areas of knowledge gap for future research.

Cytokine release syndrome and associated neurotoxicity in cancer immunotherapy

A paradigm shift has recently occurred in the field of cancer therapeutics. Traditional anticancer agents, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy and small-molecule drugs targeting specific signalling pathways, have been joined by cellular immunotherapies based on T cell engineering. The rapid adoption of novel, patient-specific cellular therapies builds on scientific developments in tumour immunology, genetic engineering and cell manufacturing, best illustrated by the curative potential of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy targeting CD19-expressing malignancies. However, the clinical benefit observed in many patients may come at a cost. In up to one-third of patients, significant toxicities occur that are directly associated with the induction of powerful immune effector responses. The most frequently observed immune-mediated toxicities are cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. This Review discusses our current understanding of their pathophysiology and clinical features, as well as the development of novel therapeutics for their prevention and/or management.

This Review discusses our current understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome associated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies, and how this might be used for the prevention or management of these toxicities.

Reactions Related to CAR-T Cell Therapy

The application of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy as a tumor immunotherapy has received great interest in recent years. This therapeutic approach has been used to treat hematological malignancies solid tumors. However, it is associated with adverse reactions such as, cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), off-target effects, anaphylaxis, infections associated with CAR-T-cell infusion (CTI), tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), B-cell dysplasia, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)/macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) and coagulation disorders. These adverse reactions can be life-threatening, and thus they should be identified early and treated effectively. In this paper, we review the adverse reactions associated with CAR-T cells, the mechanisms driving such adverse reactions, and strategies to subvert them. This review will provide important reference data to guide clinical application of CAR-T cell therapy.

CRISPR-edited CART with GM-CSF knockout and auto secretion of IL6 and IL1 blockers in patients with hematologic malignancy

Revolutionary CART therapy still faces the challenge of severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS). While IL6 and IL1 have been demonstrated as essential contributors, GM-CSF is one of the most abundant inflammatory cytokines secreted by CART and has also been suggested in contributing to CRS. To minimize GM-CSF production from CART to reduce its associated toxicity, we conducted a pilot study (ChiCTR2000032124) of CRISPR-edited GM-CSF knockout (KO) in CART secreting anti-IL6 scFv and IL1RA, with additional TCR KO for tracing edited CART. The initial results of three patients (1 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and 2 multiple myelomas (MMs)) are summarized as: 3/3 complete response, 2/3 none CRS, 1/3 grade 2 CRS, and 0/3 neurotoxicity. The analysis revealed low levels of GM-CSF, IL6 and IL1B at the time of interferon-gamma (IFNG) peaks, and elevated IL1RA. We also observed significant expansion of CD3^– CART during treatment and no aberrant expansion of CD3^– CART in the follow-up. Re-expansion of CD3^– CART was observed in two patients while recurring CD19⁺ cells were eradicated in the patient with NHL. In summary, our study supported the safety and durable potency of CRISPR-edited CART in patients, providing a novel platform for developing autologous or allogeneic CART to minimize GM-CSF-associated toxicity in addition to autonomous IL6/IL1 blockade.

Delivery technologies for T cell gene editing: Applications in cancer immunotherapy

While initial approaches to adoptive T cell therapy relied on the identification and expansion of rare tumour-reactive T cells, genetic engineering has transformed cancer immunotherapy by enabling the modification of primary T cells to increase their therapeutic potential. Specifically, gene editing technologies have been utilized to create T cell populations with improved responses to antigens, lower rates of exhaustion, and potential for use in allogeneic applications. In this review, we provide an overview of T cell therapy gene editing strategies and the delivery technologies utilized to genetically engineer T cells. We also discuss recent investigations and clinical trials that have utilized gene editing to enhance the efficacy of T cells and broaden the application of cancer immunotherapies.

Pharmacologic Control of CAR T Cells

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) therapy is a promising modality for the treatment of advanced cancers that are otherwise incurable. During the last decade, different centers worldwide have tested the anti-CD19 CAR T cells and shown clinical benefits in the treatment of B cell tumors. However, despite these encouraging results, CAR treatment has also been found to lead to serious side effects and capricious response profiles in patients. In addition, the CD19 CAR success has been difficult to reproduce for other types of malignancy. The appearance of resistant tumor variants, the lack of antigen specificity, and the occurrence of severe adverse effects due to over-stimulation of the therapeutic cells have been identified as the major impediments. This has motivated a growing interest in developing strategies to overcome these hurdles through CAR control. Among them, the combination of small molecules and approved drugs with CAR T cells has been investigated. These have been exploited to induce a synergistic anti-cancer effect but also to control the presence of the CAR T cells or tune the therapeutic activity. In the present review, we discuss opportunistic and rational approaches involving drugs featuring anti-cancer efficacy and CAR-adjustable effect.

CAR-T cell therapy: current limitations and potential strategies

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is a revolutionary new pillar in cancer treatment. Although treatment with CAR-T cells has produced remarkable clinical responses with certain subsets of B cell leukemia or lymphoma, many challenges limit the therapeutic efficacy of CAR-T cells in solid tumors and hematological malignancies. Barriers to effective CAR-T cell therapy include severe life-threatening toxicities, modest anti-tumor activity, antigen escape, restricted trafficking, and limited tumor infiltration. In addition, the host and tumor microenvironment interactions with CAR-T cells critically alter CAR-T cell function. Furthermore, a complex workforce is required to develop and implement these treatments. In order to overcome these significant challenges, innovative strategies and approaches to engineer more powerful CAR-T cells with improved anti-tumor activity and decreased toxicity are necessary. In this review, we discuss recent innovations in CAR-T cell engineering to improve clinical efficacy in both hematological malignancy and solid tumors and strategies to overcome limitations of CAR-T cell therapy in both hematological malignancy and solid tumors.

Strategies for Dodging the Obstacles in CAR T Cell Therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has offered cancer patients a new alternative therapeutic choice in recent years. This novel type of therapy holds tremendous promise for the treatment of various hematologic malignancies including B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and lymphoma. However, CAR T cell therapy has experienced its ups and downs in terms of toxicities and efficacy shortcomings. Adverse events such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurotoxicity, graft rejection, on-target off-tumor toxicities, and tumor relapse have tied the rescuing hands of CAR T cell therapies. Moreover, in the case of solid tumor treatment, CAR T cell therapies have not yielded encouraging results mainly due to challenges such as the formidable network of the tumor microenvironments (TME) that operates in a suppressive fashion resulting in CAR T cell dysfunction. In this review, we tend to shine a light on emerging strategies and solutions for addressing the mentioned barriers. These solutions might dramatically help shorten the gap between a successful clinical outcome and the hope for it.

Targeting macrophages in cancer immunotherapy

Immunotherapy is regarded as the most promising treatment for cancers. Various cancer immunotherapies, including adoptive cellular immunotherapy, tumor vaccines, antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and small-molecule inhibitors, have achieved certain successes. In this review, we summarize the role of macrophages in current immunotherapies and the advantages of targeting macrophages. To better understand and make better use of this type of cell, their development and differentiation characteristics, categories, typical markers, and functions were collated at the beginning of the review. Therapeutic strategies based on or combined with macrophages have the potential to improve the treatment efficacy of cancer therapies.

CAR T cell therapy as a promising approach in cancer immunotherapy: challenges and opportunities

BACKGROUND

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cell therapy has shown great potential in the immunotherapy of patients with hematologic malignancies. In spite of this striking achievement, there are still major challenges to overcome in CAR T cell therapy of solid tumors, including treatment-related toxicity and specificity. Also, other obstacles may be encountered in tackling solid tumors, such as their immunosuppressive microenvironment, the heterogeneous expression of cell surface markers, and the cumbersome arrival of T cells at the tumor site. Although several strategies have been developed to overcome these challenges, aditional research aimed at enhancing its efficacy with minimum side effects, the design of precise yet simplified work flows and the possibility to scale-up production with reduced costs and related risks is still warranted.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we review main strategies to establish a balance between the toxicity and activity of CAR T cells in order to enhance their specificity and surpass immunosuppression. In recent years, many clinical studies have been conducted that eventually led to approved products. To date, the FDA has approved two anti-CD19 CAR T cell products for non-Hodgkin lymphoma therapy, i.e., axicbtagene ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel. With all the advances that have been made in the field of CAR T cell therapy for hematologic malignancies therapy, ongoing studies are focused on optimizing its efficacy and specificity, as well as reducing the side effects. Also, the efforts are poised to broaden CAR T cell therapeutics for other cancers, especially solid tumors.

Befriending the Hostile Tumor Microenvironment in CAR T-Cell Therapy

T-cells genetically engineered to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) have shown remarkable results in patients with B-cell malignancies, including B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and mantle cell lymphoma, with some promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma. However, the efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy is still hampered by local immunosuppression and significant toxicities, notably cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity. The tumor microenvironment (TME) has been identified to play a major role in preventing durable responses to immunotherapy in both solid and hematologic malignancies, with this role exaggerated in solid tumors. The TME comprises a diverse set of components, including a heterogeneous population of various cells and acellular elements that collectively contribute towards the interplay of pro-immune and immunosuppressive signaling. In particular, macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, regulatory T-cells, and cell-free factors such as cytokines are major contributors to local immunosuppression in the TME of patients treated with CAR T-cells. In order to create a more favorable niche for CAR T-cell function, armored CAR T-cells and other combinatorial approaches are being explored for potential improved outcomes compared to conventional CAR T-cell products. While these strategies may potentiate CAR T-cell function and efficacy, they may paradoxically increase the risk of adverse events due to increased pro-inflammatory signaling. Herein, we discuss the mechanisms by which the TME antagonizes CAR T-cells and how innovative immunotherapy strategies are being developed to address this roadblock. Furthermore, we offer perspective on how these novel approaches may affect the risk of adverse events, in order to identify ways to overcome these barriers and expand the clinical benefits of this treatment modality in patients with diverse cancers. Precise immunomodulation to allow for improved tumor control while simultaneously mitigating the toxicities seen with current generation CAR T-cells is integral for the future application of more effective CAR T-cells against other malignancies.

Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for lymphoma: predictive biomarkers and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (CAR-T) has emerged as effective for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (R/R LBCL). The neurologic toxicity seen with CAR-T, referred to as immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), is poorly understood. To better elucidate the clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes, and correlative biomarkers of ICANS, we review here a single-center analysis of ICANS after CAR T-cell therapy in R/R LBCL.

METHODS

Patients (n = 45) with R/R LBCL treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) were identified. Data regarding treatment course, clinical outcomes, and correlative studies were collected. Patients were monitored and graded for ICANS via CARTOX-10 scoring and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03 criteria, respectively.

RESULTS

Twenty-five (56%) patients developed ICANS, 18 (72%) of whom had severe (CTCAE grades 3-4) ICANS. Median time to development of ICANS was 5 days (range, 3-11). Elevated pre-infusion (day 0 [D0]) fibrinogen (517 vs 403 mg/dL, upper limit of normal [ULN] 438 mg/dL, P = 0.01) and D0 lactate dehydrogenase (618 vs 506 units/L, ULN 618 units/L, P = 0.04) were associated with ICANS. A larger drop in fibrinogen was associated with ICANS (393 vs 200, P < 0.01). Development of ICANS of any grade had no effect on complete remission (CR), progression-free survival (PFS), or overall survival (OS). Duration and total dose of steroid treatment administered for ICANS did not influence CR, PFS, or OS.

CONCLUSIONS

ICANS after CAR-T with axi-cel for R/R LBCL was seen in about half of patients, the majority of which were high grade. Contrary to previous reports, neither development of ICANS nor its treatment were associated with inferior CR, PFS, or OS. The novel finding of high D0 fibrinogen level can identify patients at higher risk for ICANS.

Myeloid cell and cytokine interactions with chimeric antigen receptor-T-cell therapy: implication for future therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy is a revolutionary tool in the treatment of cancer. CAR-T cells exhibit their effector functions through the recognition of their specific antigens on tumor cells and recruitment of other immune cells. However, this therapy is limited by the development of severe toxicities and modest antitumor activity in solid tumors. The host and tumor microenvironment interactions with CAR-T cells play an important role in orchestrating CAR-T-cell functions. Specifically, myeloid lineage cells and their cytokines critically influence the behavior of CAR-T cells. Here, we review the specific effects of myeloid cell interactions with CAR-T cells, their impact on CAR-T-cell response and toxicities, and potential efforts to modulate myeloid cell effects to enhance CAR-T-cell therapy efficacy and reduce toxicities.

RECENT FINDINGS

Independent studies and correlative science from clinical trials indicate that inhibitory myeloid cells and cytokines contribute to the development of CAR-T-cell-associated toxicities and impairment of their effector functions.

SUMMARY

These findings illuminate a novel way to reduce CAR-T-cell-associated toxicities and enhance their efficacy through the modulation of myeloid lineage cells and inhibitory cytokines.

CAR-T cell therapy and infection: a review

Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T cell therapy) is a novel immunotherapy with promising results in the treatment of relapsed or refractory B cell malignancies. Patients undergoing CAR-T cell therapy are at increased risk of infection due to prior immunosuppression, lymphodepleting chemotherapy, treatment of unique toxicities with tocilizumab and/or steroids, on-target effects of hypogammaglobulinaemia, and prolonged cytopenias.Areas covered: A narrative review of infections (PubMed, August 2020) occurring in patients undergoing CAR-T cell therapy is described, and the evidence for infection prevention strategies is presented.Expert commentary: The rapid adoption of CAR-T cell therapy into clinical practice presents many challenges for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of infection. Ongoing surveillance of the spectrum of infectious complications and effectiveness of prophylaxis is required to support safe and effective patient care.

Cytokines in CAR T Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells provide new therapeutic options for patients with relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies. However, neurotoxicity is a frequent, and potentially fatal, complication. The spectrum of manifestations ranges from delirium and language dysfunction to seizures, coma, and fatal cerebral edema. This novel syndrome has been designated immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). In this review, we draw an arc from our current understanding of how systemic and potentially local cytokine release act on the CNS, toward possible preventive and therapeutic approaches. We systematically review reported correlations of secreted inflammatory mediators in the serum/plasma and cerebrospinal fluid with the risk of ICANS in patients receiving CAR T cell therapy. Possible pathophysiologic impacts on the CNS are covered in detail for the most promising candidate cytokines, including IL-1, IL-6, IL-15, and GM-CSF. To provide insight into possible final common pathways of CNS inflammation, we place ICANS into the context of other systemic inflammatory conditions that are associated with neurologic dysfunction, including sepsis-associated encephalopathy, cerebral malaria, thrombotic microangiopathy, CNS infections, and hepatic encephalopathy. We then review in detail what is known about systemic cytokine interaction with components of the neurovascular unit, including endothelial cells, pericytes, and astrocytes, and how microglia and neurons respond to systemic inflammatory challenges. Current therapeutic approaches, including corticosteroids and blockade of IL-1 and IL-6 signaling, are reviewed in the context of what is known about the role of cytokines in ICANS. Throughout, we point out gaps in knowledge and possible new approaches for the investigation of the mechanism, prevention, and treatment of ICANS.

CART Cell Toxicities: New Insight into Mechanisms and Management

T cells genetically engineered with chimeric antigen receptors (CART) have become a potent class of cancer immunotherapeutics. Numerous clinical trials of CART cells have revealed remarkable remission rates in patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies. Despite recent clinical success, CART cell therapy has also led to significant morbidity and occasional mortality from associated toxicities. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) present barriers to the extensive use of CART cell therapy in the clinic. CRS can lead to fever, hypoxia, hypotension, coagulopathies, and multiorgan failure, and ICANS can result in cognitive dysfunction, seizures, and cerebral edema. The mechanisms of CRS and ICANS are becoming clearer, but many aspects remain unknown. Disease type and burden, peak serum CART cell levels, CART cell dose, CAR structure, elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines, and activated myeloid and endothelial cells all contribute to CART cell toxicity. Current guidelines for the management of toxicities associated with CART cell therapy vary between clinics, but are typically comprised of supportive care and treatment with corticosteroids or tocilizumab, depending on the severity of the symptoms. Acquiring a deeper understanding of CART cell toxicities and developing new management and prevention strategies are ongoing. In this review, we present findings in the mechanisms and management of CART cell toxicities.

Side-effect management of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells directed against the B-cell marker CD19 are currently changing the landscape for treatment of patients with refractory and/or relapsed B-cell malignancies. Due to the nature of CAR T cells as living drugs, they display a unique toxicity profile. As CAR T-cell therapy is extending towards other diseases and being more broadly employed in hematology and oncology, optimal management strategies of side-effects associated with CAR T-cell therapy are of high relevance. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and cytopenias constitute challenges in the treatment of patients with CAR T cells. This review summarizes the current understanding of CAR T-cell toxicity and its management.

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy and nephrotoxicity: From diagnosis to treatment strategies

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy is a breakthrough in cancer treatment. With the widespread use of this therapy, increasing evidence is available that CAR-T cell therapy is associated with acute kidney injury (AKI). Nephrologists need to understand the potential nephrotoxicity arising from CAR-T cell therapy. Determining the cause of AKI is a key factor of clinical management. This review focuses on the clinical use of CAR-T cell therapy and the cause and outcomes of nephrotoxicity with its use. We also provide clinical suggestions for clinicians towards both better diagnosis and management of AKI in those receiving CAR-T cell therapy.

Genome-wide CRISPR screens for the identification of therapeutic targets for cancer treatment

INTRODUCTION

Exploring the function of every gene is a challenging task. There is a paradigm shift of RNA interference with the introduction of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-based genome-wide screening. CRISPR-based screening can detect the loss-of-function and gain-of-function targets. Many DNA-binding proteins are engineered as effective tools for modulating gene expression and for investigating therapeutic targets for a spectrum of diseases. Among them, CRISPR-Cas9 has received extensive attention with its potential for screening cancer treatment targets.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews CRISPR toolkit and its applications in screening cancer therapeutic targets, especially genome-wide screens using different CRISPR-Cas9 systems. We compare and summarize the characteristics of CRISPR systems, which would be helpful for understanding and optimizing current CRISPR toolkits, as well as reflecting on the potential future development and clinical applications of CRISPR screens.

EXPERT OPINION

The application of CRISPR-based therapeutic target screening is broadly used in cancer drug development. Its application in cancer immunotherapy and precision oncology is blooming. Nevertheless, more effective methods of Cas protein delivery and the development of more accurate and efficient genome-editing tools are needed.

Systemic Reprogramming of Monocytes in Cancer

Monocytes influence multiple aspects of tumor progression, including antitumor immunity, angiogenesis, and metastasis, primarily by infiltrating tumors, and differentiating into tumor-associated macrophages. Emerging evidence suggests that the tumor-induced systemic environment influences the development and phenotype of monocytes before their arrival to the tumor site. As a result, circulating monocytes show functional alterations in cancer, such as the acquisition of immunosuppressive activity and reduced responsiveness to inflammatory stimuli. In this review, we summarize available evidence about cancer-induced changes in monopoiesis and its impact on the abundance and function of monocytes in the periphery. In addition, we describe the phenotypical alterations observed in tumor-educated peripheral blood monocytes and highlight crucial gaps in our knowledge about additional cellular functions that may be affected based on transcriptomic studies. We also highlight emerging therapeutic strategies that aim to reverse cancer-induced changes in monopoiesis and peripheral monocytes to inhibit tumor progression and improve therapy responses. Overall, we suggest that an in-depth understanding of systemic monocyte reprogramming will have implications for cancer immunotherapy and the development of clinical biomarkers.

Neurotoxicity and Cytokine Release Syndrome After Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy: Insights Into Mechanisms and Novel Therapies

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cell immunotherapy has been remarkably successful in treating certain relapsed/refractory hematological cancers. However, CART cell therapy is also associated with toxicities which present an obstacle to its wider adoption as a mainstay for cancer treatment. The primary toxicities following CART cell administration are cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). New insights into the mechanisms of these toxicities have spurred novel treatment options. In this review, we summarize the available literature on the clinical manifestations, mechanisms, and treatments of CART-associated CRS and ICANS.

The model of cytokine release syndrome in CAR T-cell treatment for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cell therapy has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of haematologic malignancies. However, the accompanying adverse events, the most common of which is cytokine release syndrome (CRS), substantially limit its wide application. Due to its unique physiological characteristics, CRS in CAR T-cell treatment for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) may exhibit some special features. Although existing guidelines had greatly promoted the recognition and management of CRS, many recommendations are not fully applicable to B-NHL. Therefore, it is imperative to identify responses that are specific to CRS observed following CAR T treatment for B-NHL. Based on underlying biological processes and known pathophysiological mechanisms, we tentatively propose a new model to illustrate the occurrence and evolution of CAR T-cell-therapy-related CRS in B-NHL. In this model, tumour burden and bone marrow suppression are considered determinants of CRS. Novel phenomena after CAR T-cell infusion (such as local inflammatory response) are further identified. The proposed model will help us better understand the basic biology of CRS and recognize and manage it more rationally.