Systematic review: the prevalence of idiopathic bile acid malabsorption as diagnosed by SeHCAT scanning in patients with diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome

Pathophysiology and Clinical Management of Bile Acid Diarrhea

Bile acid malabsorption (BAM) represents a common cause of chronic diarrhea whose prevalence is under-investigated. We reviewed the evidence available regarding the pathophysiology and clinical management of bile acid diarrhea (BAD). BAD results from dysregulation of the enterohepatic recirculation of bile acids. It has been estimated that 25–33% of patients with functional diarrhea and irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea have BAM. Currently, the selenium homotaurocholic acid test is the gold standard for BAD diagnosis and severity assessment. However, it is an expensive method and not widely available. The validation of the utility in the clinical practice of several other serum markers, such as 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) and the fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) is ongoing. The first-line treatment of patients with BAD is bile acid sequestrants. Patients that are refractory to first-line therapy should undergo further diagnostics to confirm the diagnosis and to treat the underlying cause of BAD. An early and correct diagnosis of BAD would improve patient’s quality of life, avoiding additional diagnostic tests that burden health care systems. Considering the limited availability and tolerability of specific medications for BAD treatment, future research is awaited to identify other therapeutic approaches, such as gut microbiota modulating therapies.

Bile acid-gut microbiota crosstalk in irritable bowel syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder of gut-brain interaction with an increasing prevalence, and its precise aetiology remains unclear. Gut microbiota dysbiosis has been found to be associated with IBS pathogenesis. In addition, a high incidence of bile acid diarrhoea and disturbed bile acid metabolism has been observed in IBS patients. The abundant microorganisms inhabited in human gut have essential functions in bile acid biotransformation, and can immensely affect the size and constitution of bile acid pool. Meanwhile, the alterations of bile acid profile can inversely interfere with the gut microbiota. This review discussed the role of intricate correlations between bile acids and gut microbiota in IBS pathogenesis and delineated the possible molecular mechanisms, mainly the signalling induced by farnesoid X receptor and transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor 5. Besides, some biomarkers for identifying bile acid diarrhoea in IBS population were listed, assisting the diagnosis and classification of IBS. Moreover, it also assessed some therapeutic strategies for IBS that regulate the bile acid-gut microbiota axis, such as dietary modulation, probiotics/prebiotics, faecal microbiota transplantation, and antibiotics. Collectively, this article illustrated the relationship between bile acids and gut microbiota in IBS pathophysiology and might offer some novel therapeutic options for IBS.

Bile Acid Diarrhea in Adults and Adolescents

BACKGROUND

Bile acids are central to enterohepatic signaling pathways activated through natural receptors, farnesoid X receptor [FXR mediates synthesis of fibroblast growth factor-19 (FGF-19)], and G protein-coupled bile acid receptor 1 (GPBAR1, also known as TGR5). Although bile acid diarrhea (BAD) is more commonly encountered in ileal resection or disease, there is evidence documenting "idiopathic" BAD in about 20% of adolescents and 30% of adults presenting with chronic, non-bloody diarrhea often attributed to irritable bowel syndrome. Mechanism(s) leading to increased hepatic synthesis and colonic bile acid levels in "idiopathic" BAD include reduced synthesis of FGF-19 by the ileal mucosa, or genetic variation in hepatocyte proteins klotho β and FGF receptor 4 (FGFR4) that mediate negative feedback of bile acid synthesis.

PURPOSE

The objective of this review is to summarize the diagnosis of BAD in adults and adolescents. In addition to ⁷⁵ SeHCAT retention for diagnosis of BAD, studies have validated fasting serum 7αC4 and FGF-19, respectively, by-product and inhibitor of hepatic bile acid synthesis, as well as fecal bile acid measurements. These assays are widely available through reference laboratories, and they are being simplified (eg, measurement of primary fecal bile acids in a random stool sample). BAD has also been identified as a co-factor contributing to persistent diarrhea in other diseases in remission including inflammatory bowel disease, microscopic colitis, celiac disease, and neuroendocrine tumors. In summary, advances in diagnosis of BAD provide opportunities for generalists and pediatric and adult gastroenterologists to provide targeted treatment for BAD presenting as chronic non-bloody diarrhea.

Belgian consensus on irritable bowel syndrome

BACKGROUND

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is characterised by recurrent abdominal pain related to defaecation or associated with altered stool frequency or consistency. Despite its prevalence, major uncertainties in the diagnostic and therapeutic management persist in clinical practice.

METHODS

A Delphi consensus was conducted by 20 experts from Belgium, and consisted of literature review and voting process on 78 statements. Grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation criteria were applied to evaluate the quality of evidence. Consensus was defined as > 80 % agreement.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached for 50 statements. The Belgian consensus agreed as to the multifactorial aetiology of IBS. According to the consensus abdominal discomfort also represents a cardinal symptom, while bloating and abdominal distension often coexist. IBS needs subtyping based on stool pattern. The importance of a positive diagnosis, relying on history and clinical examination is underlined, while additional testing should remain limited, except when alarm features are present. Explanation of IBS represents a crucial part of patient management. Lifestyle modification, spasmolytics and water-solube fibres are considered first-line agents. The low FODMAP diet, selected probiotics, cognitive behavioural therapy and specific treatments targeting diarrhoea and constipation are considered appropriate. There is a consensus to restrict faecal microbiota transplantation and gluten-free diet, while other treatments are strongly discouraged.

CONCLUSIONS

A panel of Belgian gastroenterologists summarised the current evidence on the aetiology, symptoms, diagnosis and treatment of IBS with attention for the specificities of the Belgian healthcare system.

Enterohepatic, Gluco-metabolic, and Gut Microbial Characterization of Individuals With Bile Acid Malabsorption

Background and Aims

Bile acid malabsorption (BAM) is a debilitating disease characterized by loose stools and high stool frequency. The pathophysiology of BAM is not well-understood. We investigated postprandial enterohepatic and gluco-metabolic physiology, as well as gut microbiome composition and fecal bile acid content in patients with BAM.

Methods

Twelve participants with selenium-75 homocholic acid taurine test-verified BAM and 12 healthy controls, individually matched on sex, age, and body mass index, were included. Each participant underwent 2 mixed meal tests (with and without administration of the bile acid sequestrant colesevelam) with blood sampling and evaluation of gallbladder motility; bile acid content and microbiota composition were evaluated in fecal specimens.

Results

Patients with BAM were characterized by increased bile acid synthesis as assessed by circulating 7-alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one, fecal bile acid content, and postprandial concentrations of glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and glucagon. The McAuley index of insulin sensitivity was lower in patients with BAM than that in healthy controls. In patients with BAM, colesevelam co-administered with the meal reduced postprandial concentrations of bile acids and fibroblast growth factor 19 and increased 7-alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one concentrations but did not affect postprandial glucagon-like peptide 1 responses or other gluco-metabolic parameters. Patients with BAM were characterized by a gut microbiome with low relative abundance of bifidobacteria and high relative abundance of Blautia, Streptococcus, Ruminococcus gnavus, and Akkermansia muciniphila.

Conclusion

Patients with BAM are characterized by an overproduction of bile acids, greater fecal bile acid content, and a gluco-metabolic profile indicative of a dysmetabolic prediabetic-like state, with changes in their gut microbiome composition potentially linking their enterohepatic pathophysiology and their dysmetabolic phenotype. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03009916.

Downregulation of Serum and Distal Ileum Fibroblast Growth Factor19 in Bile Acid Diarrhoea Patients

BACKGROUND

Bile acid diarrhoea or BAD is a common but little recognised cause of chronic diarrhoea. Few of these patients in China have been diagnosed due to a lack of diagnostic options.

AIMS

To clarify the diagnostic value of serum fibroblast growth factor19 (FGF19) in BAD patients.

METHODS

We reported on 60 chronic diarrhoea patients and 80 healthy volunteers (HV). Based on the 90th percentile levels of serum 7a-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) of HV, these patients were divided into BAD group (C4 ≥ 90th) and non-bile acid diarrhoea group (NBAD, C4 < 90th). Serum FGF19 in the two clinical groups and HV group were compared, as was distal ileum FGF19 in clinical groups. The diagnostic value of serum FGF19 for BAD was evaluated.

RESULTS

The 90th percentile of serum C4 in HV group was 65.87 ng/ml. Serum FGF19 concentrations in BAD group (Median 69.28 pg/ml; n = 23) were significantly lower than those in HV (Median 122.18 pg/ml; n = 80) and NBAD (Median 129.57 pg/ml; n = 29) groups. FGF19 mRNA of the distal ileum in BAD group, was lower than that in NBAD group, P = 0.002. The rate of FGF19 protein low expression of distal ileum in BAD and NBAD group were 78.3% and 48.3%, P = 0.027. Using an ROC curve, statistical analysis yielded a threshold FGF19 concentration of 117.3 pg/ml (AUC, 0.906; 91.3% sensitivity, 79.3% specificity) for a clinical diagnosis of BAD.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum and distal ileum expression of FGF19 significantly decreased in BAD patients. The suggested clinical ranges for serum FGF19 < 117.3 pg/ml has high sensitivity and specificity for BAD patients with a normal structural and histological ileum.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of non-malignant, organic gastrointestinal disorders misdiagnosed as irritable bowel syndrome

Treatable gastrointestinal disorders in patients with symptoms typical for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) may be overlooked. The prevalence of five gastrointestinal conditions-bile acid diarrhoea (BAD), carbohydrate malabsorption (CM), microscopic colitis (MC), pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) was systematically assessed from studies including consecutive patients meeting diagnostic criteria for IBS. 4 databases were searched from 1978 to 2020. Studies were included if they evaluated the prevalence of these conditions in secondary healthcare setting. Estimated pooled rates were calculated and statistical heterogeneity between studies was evaluated using Q and I2 statistics. Seven studies (n = 597) estimated the pooled prevalence for BAD as 41% (95% CI 29-54). 17 studies (n = 5068) estimated that of MC as 3% (95% CI 2-4%). Two studies (n = 478) suggested a rate of 4.6% (range: 1.8-6.1%) for PEI. Using breath testing, 26 studies (n = 6700) and 13 studies (n = 3415) estimated the prevalence of lactose and fructose malabsorption as 54% (95% CI 44-64%) and 43% (95% CI 23-62%); 36 studies (n = 4630) and 22 studies (n = 2149) estimated that of SIBO as 49% (95% CI 40-57%) with lactulose and 19% (95% CI 13-27%) with glucose. Rates of all conditions were significantly higher than in healthy controls. A significant proportion of patients presenting to secondary care with IBS have an organic condition which may account for their symptoms. Failure to exclude such conditions will deny patients effective treatment.

A systems-level analysis of bile acids effects on rat colon epithelial cells

Bile acid diarrhea is a chronic condition caused by increased delivery of bile acids to the colon. The underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. To investigate genes involved in bile acid diarrhea, systems-level analyses were used on a rat bile acid diarrhea model. Twelve male Wistar Munich rats, housed in metabolic cages, were fed either control or bile acid-mixed (1% wt/wt) diets for 10 days. Food intake, water intake, urine volume, body weight, and fecal output were monitored daily. After euthanasia, colonic epithelial cells were isolated using calcium chelation and processed for systems-level analyses, that is, RNA-sequencing transcriptomics and mass spectrometry proteomics. Bile acid-fed rats suffered diarrhea, indicated by increased drinking, feces weight, and fecal water content compared with control rats. Urine output was unchanged. With bile acid feeding, RNA-sequencing revealed 204 increased and 401 decreased mRNAs; mass spectrometry revealed 183 increased and 111 decreased proteins. Among the altered genes were genes associated with electrolyte and water transport (including Slc12a7, Clca4, and Aqp3) and genes associated with bile acid transport (Slc2b1, Abcg2, Slc51a, Slc51b, and Fabps). Correlation analysis showed a significant positive correlation (Pearson's r = 0.28) between changes in mRNA expression and changes in protein expression. However, caution must be exercised in making a direct correlation between experimentally determined transcriptomes and proteomes. Genes associated with bile acid transport responded to bile acid feeding, suggesting that colonic bile acid transport also occur by regulated protein facilitated mechanisms in addition to passive diffusion. In summary, the study provides annotated rat colonic epithelial cell transcriptome and proteome with response to bile acid feeding.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Feeding rats with a bile acid caused changes in fecal output, underlining this bile acid diarrhea model's usefulness. Colonic epithelial expression of genes associated with facilitated transport of bile acids was altered during bile acid feeding. The study raises the possibility of regulated colonic transepithelial transport of bile acids in response to luminal bile acids. In addition, this study provides annotated rat colonic epithelial cell transcriptome and proteome with response to bile acid feeding.

Bile acids as regulatory molecules and potential targets in metabolic diseases

Bile acids are important hydroxylated steroids that are synthesized in the liver from cholesterol for intestinal absorption of lipids and other fatty-nutrient. They also display remarkable and immense functions such as regulating immune responses, managing the apoptosis of cells, participating in glucose metabolism, and so on. Some bile acids were used for the treatment or prevention of diseases such as gallstones, primary biliary cirrhosis, and colorectal cancer. Meanwhile, the accumulation of toxic bile acids leads to apoptosis, necrosis, and inflammation. Alteration of bile acids metabolism, as well as the gut microbiota that interacted with bile acids, contributes to the pathogenesis of metabolic diseases. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to summarize the current functions and pre-clinical or clinical applications of bile acids, and to further discuss the alteration of bile acids in metabolic disorders as well as the manipulation of bile acids metabolism as potential therapeutic targets.

Bile Acid Malabsorption as a Consequence of Cancer Treatment: Prevalence and Management in the National Leading Centre

The aim was to establish prevalence of bile acid malabsorption (BAM) and management in patients who underwent treatment for malignancy. Retrospective evaluation of data in patients seen within six months (August 2019-January 2020) was carried out. Demographic, nuclear medicine (Selenium Homocholic Acid Taurine (SeHCAT) scan result), clinical (previous malignancy, type of intervention (medication, diet), response to intervention) and laboratory (vitamin D, vitamin B12 serum levels) data were searched. In total, 265 consecutive patients were reviewed. Out of those, 87/265 (33%) patients (57 females, 66%) were diagnosed with BAM. Mean age was 59 +/- 12 years. The largest group were females with gynaecological cancer (35), followed by haematology group (15), colorectal/anal (13), prostate (9), upper gastrointestinal cancer (6), another previous malignancy (9). Severe BAM was most common in haematology (10/15; 67%) and gynaecological group (21/35; 60%). Medication and low-fat diet were commenced in 65/87 (75%), medication in 10/87 (11%), diet in 6/87 (7%). Colesevelam was used in 71/75 (95%). Symptoms improved in 74/87 (85%) patients. Vitamin D insufficiency/deficiency was diagnosed in 62/87 (71%), vitamin B12 deficiency in 39/87 (45%). BAM is a common condition in this cohort however treatments are highly effective.

Single scan SeHCAT studies: a model for the prediction of the 3-h counts

OBJECTIVES

As part of the 75-Selenium homocholic acid taurine (SeHCAT) study, counts are acquired as a baseline to allow the calculation of the retention at 7 days. In this work, we evaluated whether it was possible to replace the baseline image with a predictive model based on the patient's height and weight.

METHOD

Height and weight data from 723 patients scanned at three hospitals using seven gamma cameras were compiled. A number of different models were trialled, with fitting parameters determined by regression. A predictive model based on height and logarithm of weight was found to have the best correlation with the measured counts in the 3-h study.

RESULTS

There was a strong correlation (R2 = 0.91) between the measured counts and the predicted counts using a model based on height and logarithm of weight. Treating the standard SeHCAT test result as the gold standard, the test result when predicted baseline counts were used had a sensitivity and specificity of 97.5 and 98.0%, respectively, at a threshold of 15%. In total 694/723 (96.0%) of patients had no change to their severity grading when using the predicted baseline counts.

CONCLUSION

This work presents a model that was able to predict the counts in the 3 h SeHCAT study for patients on seven gamma cameras. This can enable a single scan study, giving significant savings to patient and staff time and imaging resources.

Physiological mechanisms of unexplained (functional) gastrointestinal disorders

Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) encompass a range of complex conditions with similar clinical characteristics and no overt pathology. Recent recognition of sub-clinical pathologies in FGIDs, in conjunction with physiological and biochemical abnormalities including increased intestinal permeability, microbial profile alterations, differences in metabolites and extra-intestinal manifestations of disease, call into question the designation of these conditions as 'functional'. This is despite significant heterogeneity in both symptom profile and specifics of reported physiological abnormalities hampering efforts to determine defined mechanisms that drive onset and chronicity of symptoms. Instead, the literature demonstrates these conditions are disorders of homeostatic imbalance, with disruptions in both host and microbial function and metabolism. This imbalance is also associated with extraintestinal abnormalities including psychological comorbidities and fatigue that may be a consequence of gastrointestinal disruption. Given the exploitation of such abnormalities will be crucial for improved therapeutic selection, an enhanced understanding of the relationship between alterations in function of the gastrointestinal tract and the response of the immune system is of interest in identifying mechanisms that drive FGID onset and chronicity. Considerations for future research should include the role of sex hormones in regulating physiological functions and treatment responses in patients, as well as the importance of high-level phenotyping of clinical, immune, microbial and physiological parameters in study cohorts. There is opportunity to examine the functional contribution of the microbiota and associated metabolites as a source of mechanistic insight and targets for therapeutic modulation.

[The new guideline on irritable bowel syndrome: what is new?]

IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME

WHAT IS NEW?:  The following refers only to irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in adults. The new guideline includes a separate section on IBS for paediatric patients. Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) presents as a heterogeneous picture with chronic abdominal complaints related to the bowel. These are usually accompanied by changes in bowel movements and lead to impaired quality of life. The genesis is multifactorial and there are complex underlying pathophysiological mechanisms associated with IBS. Thus, disturbances in various components of the gut-brain axis and the increasing importance of the microbiome can be identified. Various psychological comorbidities also play a role.

DIAGNOSTICS

The diagnosis is made by a thorough anamnesis and symptom-oriented exclusion of important differential diagnoses. A subdivision into different subtypes depending on the main symptoms is beneficial for the further management of IBS patients. The diagnosis of IBS should be made as early as possible after reliable exclusion of the important differential diagnoses. If diarrhoea dominates as a symptom, a detailed differential diagnosis and functional diagnosis should be carried out.

THERAPY

There is no proven causal and no established standard therapy. Due to the variable genesis and symptom manifestation of IBS, a broad spectrum of therapy options results, whereby there is no individual prediction regarding effectiveness and therefore every therapy is initially probationary. Symptom-independent general therapies that can be used for all subtypes include dietary methods (e. g. the low-FODMAP diet), probiotics, psychotherapy methods and complementary medicine. The choice of symptom-dependent drug treatments is made according to the subtype/main symptom. In the case of diarrhoea, bile acid binders, the non-absorbable antibiotic rifaximin or, in individual cases, 5-HT₃-antagonists can be used in addition to loperamide. In constipation, prucalopride and linaclotide have value in addition to the use of soluble fibre and macrogol/other laxatives. For abdominal pain/cramps, studies show good results for spasmolytics, especially peppermint oil, and for tricyclic-type antidepressants. For the main symptom of flatulence, probiotics, rifaximin and especially the low-FODMAP diet can show positive results in studies.

Making a Confident Diagnosis of Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is among the most common diagnoses made by medical providers and its symptoms are common causes for health care consultation. IBS is characterized by abdominal pain associated with abnormal stool consistency and/or frequency and is widely considered a diagnosis of exclusion, despite abundant evidence contradicting such an approach. A positive diagnosis is achieved through application of symptom-based clinical criteria, careful history and physical examination, evaluation for alarm sign/symptoms, and judicious use of diagnostic testing. This article reviews the symptom-based criteria for IBS and utility of diagnostic tests commonly included in the evaluation of IBS symptoms.

Medical Therapies for Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome is a common functional gastrointestinal disorder that manifests with abdominal pain and diarrheal bowel patterns, without structural explanation. Diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome is a heterogeneous condition resulting from diverse pathophysiologic processes. Treatment strategies with varied mechanisms of action are beneficial in its management. The clinician must become familiar with a multi-dimensional approach to irritable bowel syndrome. The 3 approved medications are central to disease management. Effective treatment uses off-label medications and emerging therapies and a growing number of over-the-counter and supplemental agents to optimize symptom improvement for the patient with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.

Gut microbiota dysbiosis in functional gastrointestinal disorders: Underpinning the symptoms and pathophysiology

Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs), currently known as disorders of gut-brain interaction, are emerging microbiota-gut-brain abnormalities that are prevalent worldwide. The pathogenesis of FGIDs is heterogeneous and is intertwined with gut microbiota and its derived molecule-modulated mechanisms, including gut dysmotility, visceral hypersensitivity, gut immune abnormalities, abnormal secretion, and impaired barrier function. There has been phenomenal progress in understanding the role of gut microbiota in FGIDs by underpinning the species alternations between healthy and pathological conditions such as FGIDs. However, the precise gut microbiota-directed cellular and molecular pathogeneses of FGIDs are yet enigmatic. Determining the mechanistic link between the gut microbiota and gastrointestinal (GI) diseases has been difficult due to (i) the lack of robust animal models imitating the various aspects of human FGID pathophysiology; (ii) the absence of longitudinal human and/or animal studies to unveil the interaction of the gut microbiota with FGID-relevant pathogenesis; (iii) uncertainty about connections between human and animal studies; and (iv) insufficient data supporting a holistic view of disease-specific pathophysiological changes in FGID patients. These unidentified gaps open possibilities to explore pathological mechanisms directed through gut microbiota dysbiosis in FGIDs. The current treatment options for dysbiotic gut microbiota are limited; dietary interventions, antibiotics, probiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation are the front-line clinical options. Here, we review the contribution of gut microbiota and its derived molecules in gut homeostasis and explore the possible pathophysiological mechanisms involved in FGIDs leading to potential therapeutics options.

The role of bile acids and their TGR5 receptor in irritable bowel syndrome and diarrhoea

This commentary looks at recent findings relating to bile acids in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea (IBS-D). Bile acid diarrhoea is recognised to be a frequent, treatable cause of chronic diarrhoea, with a clinical picture which overlaps IBS-D. In the study - by Wei and colleagues, a large proportion of IBS-D patients were shown to have increased faecal bile acids, and an increase in primary bile acids, reflecting changes in bacterial metabolism. Expression of the colonic membrane bile acid receptor, TGR5, was associated with faecal bile acids and the severity of symptoms.

Irritable bowel syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome is one of the most common functional bowel disorders, and has a substantial impact on patients' daily lives, as well as a big economic impact on society. It is characterised by abdominal pain, bloating and abdominal distention and altered bowel movements, with a predominance of diarrhoea, constipation, or alternation of these signs, which cannot be explained by a structural or biochemical abnormality. Its aetiopathogenesis and pathophysiological mechanism are unknown. The disease affects 5%-10% of healthy individuals at any given time and, in most people, has a relapsing-remitting course. This article reviews some of the main and most current evidence on its epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, diagnostic approach, and therapeutic options, both dietary, pharmacological and psychotherapeutic.

British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the management of irritable bowel syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) remains one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders seen by clinicians in both primary and secondary care. Since publication of the last British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guideline in 2007, substantial advances have been made in understanding its complex pathophysiology, resulting in its re-classification as a disorder of gut-brain interaction, rather than a functional gastrointestinal disorder. Moreover, there has been a considerable amount of new evidence published concerning the diagnosis, investigation and management of IBS. The primary aim of this guideline, commissioned by the BSG, is to review and summarise the current evidence to inform and guide clinical practice, by providing a practical framework for evidence-based management of patients. One of the strengths of this guideline is that the recommendations for treatment are based on evidence derived from a comprehensive search of the medical literature, which was used to inform an update of a series of trial-based and network meta-analyses assessing the efficacy of dietary, pharmacological and psychological therapies in treating IBS. Specific recommendations have been made according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system, summarising both the strength of the recommendations and the overall quality of evidence. Finally, this guideline identifies novel treatments that are in development, as well as highlighting areas of unmet need for future research.

Chronic intestinal failure and short bowel syndrome in Crohn's disease

Chronic intestinal failure (CIF) is a rare but feared complication of Crohn's disease. Depending on the remaining length of the small intestine, the affected intestinal segment, and the residual bowel function, CIF can result in a wide spectrum of symptoms, from single micronutrient malabsorption to complete intestinal failure. Management of CIF has improved significantly in recent years. Advances in home-based parenteral nutrition, in particular, have translated into increased survival and improved quality of life. Nevertheless, 60% of patients are permanently reliant on parenteral nutrition. Encouraging results with new drugs such as teduglutide have added a new dimension to CIF therapy. The outcomes of patients with CIF could be greatly improved by more effective prevention, understanding, and treatment. In complex cases, the care of patients with CIF requires a multidisciplinary approach involving not only physicians but also dietitians and nurses to provide optimal intestinal rehabilitation, nutritional support, and an improved quality of life. Here, we summarize current literature on CIF and short bowel syndrome, encompassing epidemiology, pathophysiology, and advances in surgical and medical management, and elucidate advances in the understanding and therapy of CIF-related complications such as catheter-related bloodstream infections and intestinal failure-associated liver disease.

Comparison of the Rome IV criteria with the Rome III criteria for the diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome in secondary care

OBJECTIVES

Despite being proposed 4 years ago, there has been no independent validation study of the Rome IV criteria for IBS. We assessed their performance for the diagnosis of IBS in secondary care and compared them with the previous iteration, the Rome III criteria.

DESIGN

We collected complete symptom data from consecutive adult patients with suspected IBS referred to a single UK clinic. All subjects underwent relatively standardised workup, with assessors blinded to symptom status. The reference standard used to confirm IBS was the presence of lower abdominal pain or discomfort in association with altered stool form or frequency, in a patient with no evidence of organic gastrointestinal disease after investigation. Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs), with 95% CIs, were calculated for each of the diagnostic criteria.

RESULTS

The level of agreement between the Rome IV and Rome III criteria was good (kappa=0.65). Compared with the reference standard, sensitivity and specificity of the Rome IV criteria in 572 patients (431 (75.3%) women, mean age 36.5 years) were 82.4% and 82.9%, respectively. Positive and negative LRs for the Rome IV criteria were 4.82 (95% CI 3.30 to 7.28) and 0.21 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.26), respectively. The Rome IV criteria performed best in those with IBS with constipation or mixed bowel habits. In 471 patients (350 (74.3%) women, mean age 36.7 years), compared with the reference standard, the sensitivity and specificity of the Rome III criteria were 85.8% and 65.0%; positive and negative LRs were 2.45 (95% CI 1.90 to 3.27) and 0.22 (0.16 to 0.29), respectively. Incorporating mood and extraintestinal symptom reporting into diagnostic criteria did not improve their performance significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

The Rome IV criteria performed significantly better than the Rome III criteria in diagnosing IBS in this single centre secondary care study, although the clinical relevance of this is uncertain.

Markers of Bile Acid Metabolism in Pediatric Diarrhea Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Healthy Controls

OBJECTIVES

Excessive fecal bile acids in adults have been associated with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D), but their role in pediatric IBS-D is unknown. Serum markers including 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) and fibroblast growth factor-19 (FGF-19) were validated in adults to detect bile acid diarrhea (BAD) compared to 48-hour fecal bile acid collection (48FBA). Our aims were to assess fasting serum C4 and FGF-19 and 48FBA in a pediatric population, to compare measurements in IBS-D patients and healthy controls (HC), and to determine the prevalence of BAD among children with IBS-D.

METHODS

Using a cross-sectional design, 26 patients with IBS-D and 56 HC were recruited in two pediatric tertiary care centers. Fasting serum C4 and FGF-19 and 48FBA were obtained. Participants completed a 7-day bowel diary coinciding with stool collection. Associations were analyzed using Spearman correlations.

RESULTS

Mean age was 14.7 ± 2.5 years (42.3% female) in IBS-D and 12.6 ± 2.4 years (39.3% female) in HC. There was a significant correlation of C4 with 48FBA (r = 0.48, P < 0.05) and an inverse association with FGF-19 (r = -0.43, P < 0.05). No significant differences were noted in C4 (P = 0.32), FGF-19 (P = 0.1), or 48FBA (P = 0.5) between IBS-D and HC groups; however, 20% of IBS-D patients had elevated C4 and 28% had low FGF-19 values.Fecal primary BA was significantly correlated with stool frequency (r = 0.45, P < 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Correlations of C4 with 48FBA and FGF-19 are confirmed in a pediatric population. Twenty percent of pediatric patients with IBS-D had abnormal fasting serum C4. This serum test could be applied to identify BAD in pediatric IBS-D.

The Risk of Osteoporosis and Osteoporotic Fracture Following the Use of Irritable Bowel Syndrome Medical Treatment: An Analysis Using the OMOP CDM Database

Patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are at increased risk of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture. This study investigated whether IBS medication attenuated the rate of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture risk. We conducted a retrospective large-scale multicenter study across eight hospital databases encoded in the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model (CDM). The primary outcome was the incidence of osteoporosis, whereas secondary outcomes were osteoporotic fractures. After 1:4 matching, 24,723 IBS patients, 78,318 non-IBS patients, 427,640 non-IBS patients with IBS medication, and 827,954 non-IBS patients without IBS medication were selected. The risk of osteoporosis was significantly increased in the IBS group compared to the non-IBS group (hazard ratio (HR) 1.33; confidence interval (CI) 1.17~1.51). Even in patients who were not diagnosed with IBS, the risk of osteoporosis was significantly increased in those with IBS medication compared to those without (HR 1.77, CI 1.62~1.93). The risk of osteoporotic fracture was significantly increased in the IBS medication group (HR 1.69, CI 1.55~1.84). Patients exposed to IBS treatment even without IBS diagnosis were at increased risk of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture. Early diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis should be considered in patients who have received medication for IBS symptoms.

Manipulating the Microbiome: An Alternative Treatment for Bile Acid Diarrhoea

Bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) is a widespread gastrointestinal disease that is often misdiagnosed as irritable bowel syndrome and is estimated to affect 1% of the United Kingdom (UK) population alone. BAD is associated with excessive bile acid synthesis secondary to a gastrointestinal or idiopathic disorder (also known as primary BAD). Current licensed treatment in the UK has undesirable effects and has been the same since BAD was first discovered in the 1960s. Bacteria are essential in transforming primary bile acids into secondary bile acids. The profile of an individual’s bile acid pool is central in bile acid homeostasis as bile acids regulate their own synthesis. Therefore, microbiome dysbiosis incurred through changes in diet, stress levels and the introduction of antibiotics may contribute to or be the cause of primary BAD. This literature review focuses on primary BAD, providing an overview of bile acid metabolism, the role of the human gut microbiome in BAD and the potential options for therapeutic intervention in primary BAD through manipulation of the microbiome.

Management of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea: focus on eluxadoline

OBJECTIVE

We sought to summarize current recommendations for the diagnosis of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) and describe available management options, highlighting a newer US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved agent, eluxadoline.

METHODS

Literature on IBS-D was assessed up to January 2020 using PubMed, with key search terms including "IBS-D diagnosis", "IBS-D management", and "eluxadoline".

RESULTS

IBS is a common gastrointestinal disorder affecting up to 14% of US adults and is particularly prevalent in women and those aged under 50. Symptoms include abdominal pain associated with altered bowel habits (i.e. diarrhea and/or constipation subtyped based on the predominant stool pattern). As IBS-D is challenging to manage with varying symptom severity, effective treatment requires a personalized management approach. Evidence-based therapeutic options endorsed by the American Gastroenterological Association and the American College of Gastroenterology can be used to effectively guide treatment. Dietary and lifestyle modifications, including adequate hydration, reducing caffeine and alcohol intake, and increasing soluble fiber intake may lead to symptom improvement. Over-the-counter medications such as loperamide are frequently recommended and may improve stool frequency and rectal urgency; however, for the outcome of abdominal pain, mixed results have been observed. Several off-label prescription medications are useful in IBS-D management, including tricyclic antidepressants, bile acid sequestrants, and antispasmodics. Three prescription medications have been approved by the FDA for IBS-D: alosetron, eluxadoline, and rifaximin.

CONCLUSIONS

IBS-D can be effectively managed in the primary care setting in the absence of alarm features. Benefits and risks of pharmacologic interventions should be weighed during treatment selection.

Serum 7-alfa-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one and fibroblast growth factor-19 as biomarkers diagnosing bile acid malabsorption in microscopic colitis and inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Bile acid malabsorption is common in microscopic colitis, irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea, and inflammatory bowel disease. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of 7-alfa-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one and compared it with fibroblast growth factor-19 as biomarkers for bile acid malabsorption.

METHODS

We enrolled consecutively 109 chronic diarrhea patients with standard laboratory tests, fecal calprotectin, and endoscopy separated into six groups: n = 30 with active inflammatory bowel disease, n = 21 with inflammatory bowel disease in remission reporting >3 bowel movements per day, n = 21 with inflammatory bowel disease after surgery, n = 23 with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea, n = 14 with microscopic colitis and 11 healthy subjects (controls). We defined bile acid malabsorption as >3 bowel movements and lower fibroblast growth factor-19 (<60 pg/ml).

RESULTS

Median levels of 7-alfa-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one in inflammatory bowel disease active were 53.1 ng/ml, inflammatory bowel disease remission were 52.2 ng/ml, inflammatory bowel disease after surgery were 85.7 ng/ml, irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea were 7.5 ng/ml, microscopic colitis were 69.3 ng/ml, and healthy controls were 3.7 ng/ml. We estimate a 7-alfa-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one cutoff of 48.9 ng/ml with 82.6% sensitivity and 84.3% specificity for detecting bile acid malabsorption. Both 7-alfa-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one >48.9 ng/ml and fibroblast growth factor-19 (<60 pg/ml) were found in 52% of the patients, compared with those 8% of patients below this 7-alfa-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one cutoff (P < 0.001). Serum 7-alfa-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one correlated with the number of bowel movements/day (r = -0.709; P < 0.001) and correlated inversely with fibroblast growth factor-19 (r = -0.741; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum 7-alfa-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one above 48.9 ng/ml and fibroblast growth factor-19 below 60 pg/ml identify patients with diarrhea likely attributable to bile acid malabsorption with high diagnostic accuracy and they can be used as screening biomarkers for bile acid malabsorption in microscopic colitis and inflammatory bowel disease.

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for irritable bowel syndrome 2020

Managing irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) has attracted international attention because single-agent therapy rarely relieves bothersome symptoms for all patients. The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE) published the first edition of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for IBS in 2015. Much more evidence has accumulated since then, and new pharmacological agents and non-pharmacological methods have been developed. Here, we report the second edition of the JSGE-IBS guidelines comprising 41 questions including 12 background questions on epidemiology, pathophysiology, and diagnostic criteria, 26 clinical questions on diagnosis and treatment, and 3 questions on future research. For each question, statements with or without recommendations and/or evidence level are given and updated diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms are provided based on new evidence. Algorithms for diagnosis are requisite for patients with chronic abdominal pain or associated symptoms and/or abnormal bowel movement. Colonoscopy is indicated for patients with one or more alarm symptoms/signs, risk factors, and/or abnormal routine examination results. The diagnosis is based on the Rome IV criteria. Step 1 therapy consists of diet therapy, behavioral modification, and gut-targeted pharmacotherapy for 4 weeks. For non-responders, management proceeds to step 2 therapy, which includes a combination of different mechanistic gut-targeted agents and/or psychopharmacological agents and basic psychotherapy for 4 weeks. Step 3 therapy is for non-responders to step 2 and comprises a combination of gut-targeted pharmacotherapy, psychopharmacological treatments, and/or specific psychotherapy. These updated JSGE-IBS guidelines present best practice strategies for IBS patients in Japan and we believe these core strategies can be useful for IBS diagnosis and treatment globally.

[Bile acid diarrhea, stepchild of chronic diarrhea - prevalence, diagnosis and treatment. Update 2021]

Bile acid diarrhea is one of the most frequently undiagnosed causes of chronic diarrhea. A variety of different pathophysiologic causes can underlie chronic diarrhea. Even after exclusion of the more frequent causes, up to 5 % of the population remains affected by unexplained chronic diarrhea. In up to 50 % within this cohort, bile acid diarrhea is the underlying cause.The various pathophysiologies leading to bile acid diarrhea are well characterized. In this way, bile acid diarrhea can be divided into primary, secondary and tertiary subtypes. Common to all causes is the increased amount of bile acids in the colon and in the faeces and the resulting secretory-osmotic diarrhea, in more severe forms in combination with steatorrhea. The diagnosis of bile acid diarrhea follows a clear algorithm which, in addition to the search for the cause and possibly a therapeutic trial, recognizes the 75SeHCAT test as the reference method for the detection of an increased loss of bile acids. In view of the chronic nature of the symptoms and the need for permanent, lifelong therapy, the use of a one-time, reliable diagnostic test is justified, though the test is currently only available at a few centers. In addition to the treatment of identifiable underlying diseases, the current treatment includes the use of drugs that bind bile acids, with additional nutritional recommendations and vitamin substitutions.The present review article summarizes the pathophysiology and importance of bile acid diarrhea and discusses the current approach towards diagnosis and treatment.

Prevalence of biliary acid malabsorption in patients with chronic diarrhoea of functional characteristics: a prospective study

Background

Bile acid malabsorption occurs in up to one third of patients with chronic diarrhoea of functional characteristics. The gold standard test for its diagnosis is the ⁷⁵Selenium homocholic acid taurine (⁷⁵SeHCAT) test. The aim of this work is to confirm previous data suggesting that bile acid malabsorption, diagnosed by ⁷⁵Se-HCAT test, is the underlying cause of diarrhoea in a significant proportion of patients previously diagnosed with a functional disorder. In addition, we have analysed the clinical response of bile acid sequestrants in those patients with a bile acid diarrhoea diagnosis.

Methods

This is a prospective, single-centre study including consecutive adult patients diagnosed with chronic diarrhoea of unknown origin and with functional characteristics; systematic rule out of common causes of chronic diarrhoea was performed before bile acid malabsorption evaluation by ⁷⁵SeHCAT scanning. A retention percentage less than 10% was considered positive. Clinical response to cholestyramine was further evaluated in those patients with a positive diagnosis of bile acid diarrhoea

Results

38 patients (20 male, mean age 37.5 years) were finally included. Twenty (52.6%) patients included had a positive ⁷⁵SeHCAT test. Median body mass index was significantly higher in those patients. We did not find significant differences in other clinical or biochemical variables ⁷⁵SeHCAT-positive and ⁷⁵SeHCAT-negative groups. Only 6 of 17 (35.3%) patients responded to cholestyramine treatment; 10 patients did not have response or withdraw the drug due to adverse events. Logistic regression analysis showed that none of the included variables was a predictor of clinical response to cholestyramine.

Conclusions

Bile acid malabsorption occurs in a high proportion of patients suffering from chronic diarrhoea with functional characteristics. Systematic investigation of bile acid malabsorption should be included in the diagnostic algorithms of patients with chronic watery diarrhoea in the routine clinical practice. Absence of response to cholestyramine does not rule out bile acid diarrhoea.

Protocol for a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, double-dummy 6-week clinical trial comparing the treatment effects of the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist liraglutide versus the bile acid sequestrant colesevelam on bile acid malabsorption

INTRODUCTION

Bile acid malabsorption (BAM) is a socially debilitating disease characterised by high stool frequency and urgency caused by a spillover of bile acids into the colon. Bile acid sequestrants (BASs) have limited therapeutic effect but represent the only available treatment option. Cases reporting total remission of BAM-related symptoms after treatment with liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue, prompted us to design a clinical trial investigating the therapeutic effect of this compound in patients with BAM.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Fifty adult individuals with moderate or severe BAM as assessed by the ⁷⁵selenium-homotaurocholic acid test (SeHCAT) will, after a run-in period of 10 days with no BAM treatment, be randomised to either treatment with the BAS colesevelam or liraglutide (double blinded) for 6 weeks. Daily symptom diaries and questionnaires will be filled in. Blood and faecal samples will be collected and SeHCAT will be performed at baseline, after week 3 and at end of trial. The primary endpoint is change in daily stool frequency. Secondary endpoints include changes from baseline in questionnaires, biochemistry, SeHCAT and faecal bile acid content and microbial composition.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study complies with Danish and European Union legislation and is approved by the Danish Medicines Agency, the Regional Scientific Ethics Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark and the Danish Data Protection Agency. The study is monitored by the Capital Region of Denmark's good clinical practice unit. All results, positive, negative and inconclusive, will be disseminated at national and/or international scientific meetings and in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

EudraCA: 2018-003575-34; Pre-results.

Prevalence and clinical features of bile acid diarrhea in patients with chronic diarrhea

OBJECTIVE

Bile acid diarrhea is a form of chronic diarrhea caused by excessive bile reaching the colon. Conditions involving the terminal ileum and cholecystectomy are predisposing factors but an idiopathic form of bile acid diarrhea has also been described. In this study we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of bile acid diarrhea in patients consecutively evaluated for chronic diarrhea in an Outpatient Gastroenterology Clinic.

METHODS

Medical records of all patients admitted for chronic diarrhea (>4 weeks) between June 2018 and April 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Bile acid diarrhea was suspected in patients with ileal disease, cholecystectomy or post-prandial diarrhea. Patients' age at diagnosis, sex, presenting symptoms, results of main test and examinations, final diagnoses and date of last follow-up visit were also collected. Exclusion of chronic diarrhea of other causes and a 6-month clinical improvement with cholestyramine treatment confirmed the diagnosis of bile acid diarrhea.

RESULTS

In total, 139 patients aged 46 ± 20 years (76 women and 63 men) were included. Diarrhea due to an organic cause was diagnosed in 16 patients. A clinical response to cholestyramine persisting for more than 6 months led to a diagnosis of bile acid diarrhea in 39 (aged 52 ± 19 years) out of the remaining 123 patients with functional forms of diarrhea. Therefore, the prevalence of bile acid diarrhea was 28.1% (95% confidence interval 19.9%-38.4%) in patients with chronic diarrhea.

CONCLUSIONS

Bile acid diarrhea is a very common, yet under-recognized cause of chronic functional diarrhea. A therapeutic trial of cholestyramine is a valid diagnostic strategy.

The fecal mycobiome in patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Alterations of the gut microbiota have been reported in various gastrointestinal disorders, but knowledge of the mycobiome is limited. We investigated the gut mycobiome of 80 patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) in comparison with 64 control subjects. The fungal-specific internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS-1) amplicon was sequenced, and mycobiome zero-radius operational taxonomic units (zOTUs) were defined representing known and unknown species and strains. The fungal community was sparse and individual-specific in all (both IBS and control) subjects. Although beta-diversity differed significantly between IBS and controls, no difference was found among clinical subtypes of IBS or in comparison with the mycobiome of subjects with bile acid malabsorption (BAM), a condition which may overlap with IBS with diarrhoea. The mycobiome alterations co-varied significantly with the bacteriome and metabolome but were not linked with dietary habits. As a putative biomarker of IBS, the predictive power of the fecal mycobiome in machine learning models was significantly better than random but insufficient for clinical diagnosis. The mycobiome presents limited therapeutic and diagnostic potential for IBS, despite co-variation with bacterial components which do offer such potential.

The patient with irritable bowel syndrome-type symptoms: when to investigate and how?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a very common disorder whose clinical presentation varies considerably between patients as well as within the same individual over time. Many of its symptoms, such as pain, diarrhea, constipation and bloating, may be manifestations of a host of other gastrointestinal diseases; some accompanied by increased mortality. This presents the clinician with a real dilemma: how to sensibly investigate the patient in which one suspects IBS but there is a nagging doubt that 'it could be something else'? Could one miss 'something serious'? This short review attempts to provide both an evidence-based response to these vexing questions and a practical guide to detecting alternative diagnoses in the subject with IBS-type symptoms.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical features, patient demographics and the clinical context can help to significantly narrow the differential diagnosis of the individual with IBS-type symptoms and may permit a positive diagnosis of IBS. The advent of noninvasive serological and stool tests has greatly facilitated differentiation from celiac disease and inflammatory bowel disease, respectively. In the older, female diarrhea sufferer microscopic colitis should be considered. The role of bile acid diarrhea in the individual with diarrhea-predominant IBS is emphasized; the status of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in IBS remain uncertain.

SUMMARY

Attention to detail in the clinical evaluation of the individual with IBS-like symptoms will facilitate a selective and targeted approach to investigation. Wherever indicated, widely available serological and fecal tests will serve to bolster the diagnosis by excluding other options. Proceeding to more invasive testing should be dictated by clinical presentation and scenario with the threshold for intervention being generally lower among those with prominent diarrhea.

Biochemical Diagnosis of Bile Acid Diarrhea: Prospective Comparison With the 75Seleno-Taurohomocholic Acid Test

INTRODUCTION

The diagnosis of bile acid diarrhea is often missed because the availability of the seleno-taurohomocholic acid (SeHCAT) test is limited. We aimed to compare the biomarkers 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) and fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) with the SeHCAT test.

METHODS

Patients with chronic diarrhea without intestinal resection referred for SeHCAT were prospectively recruited for this diagnostic accuracy study. Blood was sampled at fasting and after a stimulation meal with chenodeoxycholic acid. SeHCAT retention ≤10% defined bile acid diarrhea and >10% defined miscellaneous diarrhea. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were analyzed with SeHCAT as the gold standard. www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03059537).

RESULTS

Patients with bile acid diarrhea (n = 26) had mean C4 of 30 ng/mL (95% confidence interval: 19-46) vs 8 (7-11; P < 0.001) in the miscellaneous diarrhea group (n = 45). Area under the ROC curve (ROCAUC) for C4 was 0.83 (0.72-0.93). C4 < 15 ng/mL had 85% (74%-96%) negative predictive value; C4 > 48 ng/mL had 82% (59%-100%) positive predictive value. Twenty patients had C4 values 15-48 ng/mL, of whom 11/20 had SeHCAT ≤10%. Median fasting FGF19 was 72 pg/mL (interquartile range: 53-146) vs 119 (84-240) (P = 0.004); ROCAUC was 0.71 (0.58-0.83). Stimulated FGF19 responses did not differ (P = 0.54).

DISCUSSION

We identified C4 thresholds with clinically useful predictive values for the diagnosis of and screening for bile acid diarrhea in patients with chronic watery diarrhea. Further validation of the cutoff values with the placebo-controlled effect of sequestrant therapy is warranted (see Visual Abstract, Supplementary Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/AJG/B603).

Effects of Colesevelam on Bowel Symptoms, Biomarkers, and Colonic Mucosal Gene Expression in Patients With Bile Acid Diarrhea in a Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Approximately one-third of patients with IBS-diarrhea (IBS-D) have increased bile acid (BA) synthesis or excretion. An open-label study showed benefits of colesevelam on bowel functions, consistent with luminal BA sequestration by colesevelam. We compared the effects of colesevelam vs placebo on symptoms and gene expression patterns in the sigmoid colon mucosa in patients with BA diarrhea associated with IBS-D.

METHODS

We performed a double-blind, parallel-group study of 30 adults with IBS-D and evidence of increased BA synthesis or fecal excretion, from December 2017 through December 2018 at a single center. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to groups given colesevelam (3 tablets, 625 mg each) or matching placebo, orally twice daily for 4 weeks. Stool diaries documented bowel functions for 8 days before and 28 days during colesevelam or placebo. Stool and fasting serum samples were collected for analyses of fecal BAs and serum levels of C4 and FGF19. We measured colonic transit by scintigraphy, mucosal permeability by in vivo excretion of saccharide probes, and mRNA levels in rectosigmoid biopsies. All measurements were made at baseline and on the last days of treatment. The primary endpoints were change in total fecal BA concentration and stool consistency.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, colesevelam was associated with significant changes in sequestered fecal total BA excretion (P < .001) and serum levels of C4 and FGF19 (both P < .001), and with a mean increase in fecal level of deoxycholic acid (10%; P = .07) compared to placebo. Colesevelam decreased colon mucosal expression of NR1H4 and P2RY4 and increased expression of GPBAR1, compared with baseline. Stool frequency and consistency, colonic transit, and permeability did not differ significantly between groups. Colesevelam was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

In a randomized trial, we found that colesevelam increases delivery of total and secondary BAs to stool, hepatic BA synthesis, and colonic mucosal expression of genes that regulate BA, farnesoid X, and GPBAR1 receptors. Larger studies are needed to determine the effects on clinical responses. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT03270085.

Making the Diagnosis of Bile Acid Diarrhea

Bile acid diarrhea is a frequent, treatable cause of functional diarrhea but is difficult to diagnose when the nuclear medicine seleno-taurohomocholic acid test is unavailable. An alternative approach is testing blood for the bile acid precursor, 7α-OH-4-cholesten-3-one, which is raised with increased bile acid synthesis. A recent article has defined measurements that have high negative and positive predictive values, further exploring how they can be improved by incorporating measures such as age, stool number, fibroblast growth factor 19, or plasma sulfated bile acids. Other articles have looked at the percentage of fecal primary bile acids. Together, they promise better use of diagnostic biomarkers for this condition.

Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Medical Management Update

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a prevalent gastrointestinal disorder, which impacts the quality of life, work productivity and social activities of patients. Diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D) is one of several subtypes, and accounts for approximately one third of all cases. Currently available treatments are typically unable to alleviate the cardinal symptoms of IBS-D, including abdominal pain and diarrhea, and a clinical unmet need remains for an effective treatment which simultaneously relieves multiple symptoms. Patients may benefit from a multipronged, individualized approach, including dietary modifications, and psychological and pharmacological therapies. The aim of this review is to provide an update on the available and upcoming treatment options for IBS-D in Canada, with reference to the recently updated Canadian IBS consensus guidelines. Initial treatment approaches include lifestyle modifications, dietary modifications, and non-prescription therapies such as peppermint oil. While some medications such as tricyclic antidepressants are also used to treat IBS-D symptoms, eluxadoline and rifaximin are the only two pharmacological therapies approved for the treatment of IBS-D in Canada. Key clinical trial data for the currently available pharmacological options are presented to provide an overview of the efficacy and safety of these agents.

The pathophysiology of bile acid diarrhoea: differences in the colonic microbiome, metabolome and bile acids

Bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) is a common disorder resulting from increased loss of bile acids (BAs), overlapping irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea (IBS-D). The gut microbiota metabolises primary BAs to secondary BAs, with differing impacts on metabolism and homeostasis. The aim of this study was to profile the microbiome, metabolic products and bile acids in BAD. Patients with BAD diagnosed by SeHCAT testing, were compared with other IBS-D patients, and healthy controls. Faecal 16S ribosomal RNA gene analysis was undertaken. Faecal short chain fatty acid (SCFA) and urinary volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were measured. BAs were quantified in serum and faeces. Faecal bacterial diversity was significantly reduced in patients with BAD. Several taxa were enriched compared to IBS-D. SCFA amounts differed in BAD, controls and IBS-D, with significantly more propionate in BAD. Separation of VOC profiles was evident, but the greatest discrimination was between IBS-D and controls. Unconjugated and primary BA in serum and faeces were significantly higher in BAD. The faecal percentage primary BA was inversely related to SeHCAT. BAD produces dysbiosis, with metabolite differences, including VOC, SCFA and primary BAs when compared to IBS-D. These findings provide new mechanistic insights into the pathophysiology of BAD.

Gut Microbiota-Bile Acid Crosstalk in Diarrhea-Irritable Bowel Syndrome

The occurrence of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) is the result of multiple factors, and its pathogenesis has not yet been clarified. Emerging evidence indicates abnormal changes in gut microbiota and bile acid (BA) metabolism have a close relationship with IBS-D. Gut microbiota is involved in the secondary BA production via deconjugation, 7α-dehydroxylation, oxidation, epimerization, desulfation, and esterification reactions respectively. Changes in the composition and quantity of gut microbiota have an important impact on the metabolism of BAs, which can lead to the occurrence of gastrointestinal diseases. BAs, synthesized in the hepatocytes, play an important role in maintaining the homeostasis of gut microbiota and the balance of glucose and lipid metabolism. In consideration of the complex biological functional connections among gut microbiota, BAs, and IBS-D, it is urgent to review the latest research progress in this field. In this review, we summarized the alterations of gut microbiota in IBS-D and discussed the mechanistic connections between gut microbiota and BA metabolism in IBS-D, which may be involved in activating two important bile acid receptors, G-protein coupled bile acid receptor 1 (TGR5) and farnesoid X receptor (FXR). We also highlight the strategies of prevention and treatment of IBS-D via regulating gut microbiota-bile acid axis, including probiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), cholestyramine, and the cutting-edge technology about bacteria genetic engineering.

A proposed tailored investigational algorithm for women treated for gynaecological cancer with long-term gastrointestinal consequences

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Long-term changes in gastrointestinal function impacting quality of life after treatment for cancer are common. Peer reviewed guidance to investigate and manage GI dysfunction following cancer treatment has been published. This study reviewed gastrointestinal symptoms of women previously treated for gynaecological cancer and considered whether suggested algorithms could be amended to optimise management for this cohort.

METHODS

Demographic and clinical data recorded for patients attending a specialist consequences of cancer treatment gastroenterology service prospectively are reported using median and range. The Wilcoxon signed rank test analysed changes in symptoms between initial assessment to discharge from the service.

RESULTS

Between April 2013 and March 2016, 220 women, with a median age of 57 years (range 24-83 years), treated for gynaecological cancer (cervical (50%)), endometrial (28%), ovarian (15%), vaginal or vulval (7%) attended. Twelve gastrointestinal symptoms were statistically significantly reduced by time of discharge from the specialist gastroenterology clinic including bowel frequency ≥ 4/day (88%), type 6 or 7 stool consistency (36%), urgency (31%) and incontinence (21%). General quality of life improved from a median score of 4 at first assessment to a median of 6 at discharge (p < 0.001). A median of four (range, 1-9) diagnoses were made.

CONCLUSION

Women with gastrointestinal symptoms after cancer treatment benefit from a systematic management approach. After excluding disease recurrence, a proposed investigational algorithm and the oncology team includes FBC, U&Es, LFTs, thyroid function test, vitamin B12, vitamin D, a hydrogen methane breath test and a SeHCAT scan. If rectal bleeding is present, iron studies, flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy should be performed. Patients with normal investigations or symptoms not responding to treatment require gastroenterology input.

The Role of Bile Acids in Chronic Diarrhea

Bile acids (BAs) are the central signals in enterohepatic communication, and they also integrate microbiota-derived signals into enterohepatic signaling. The tissue distribution and signaling pathways activated by BAs through natural receptors, farsenoid X receptor and G protein-coupled BA receptor 1 (GPBAR1, also known as Takeda G-coupled receptor 5), have led to a greater understanding of the mechanisms and potential therapeutic agents. BA diarrhea is most commonly encountered in ileal resection or disease, in idiopathic disorders (with presentation similar to functional diarrhea or irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea), and in association with malabsorption such as chronic pancreatitis or celiac disease. Diagnosis of BA diarrhea is based on Se-homocholic acid taurine retention, 48-hour fecal BA excretion, or serum 7αC4; the latter being a marker of hepatic BA synthesis. BA diarrhea tends to be associated with higher body mass index, increased stool weight and stool fat, and acceleration of colonic transit. Biochemical markers of increased BA synthesis or excretion are available through reference laboratories. Current treatment of BA diarrhea is based on BA sequestrants, and, in the future, it is anticipated that farsenoid X receptor agonists may also be effective. The optimal conditions for an empiric trial with BA sequestrants as a diagnostic test are still unclear. However, such therapeutic trials are widely used in clinical practice. Some national guidelines recommend definitive diagnosis of BA diarrhea over empirical trial.

Bile acid diarrhoea: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management

The actual incidence of bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) is unknown, however, there is increasing evidence that it is misdiagnosed in up to 30% with diarrhoea-predominant patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Besides this, it may also occur following cholecystectomy, infectious diarrhoea and pelvic chemoradiotherapy. BAD may result from either hepatic overproduction of bile acids or their malabsorption in the terminal ileum. It can result in symptoms such as bowel frequency, urgency, nocturnal defecation, excessive flatulence, abdominal pain and incontinence of stool. Bile acid synthesis is regulated by negative feedback loops related to the enterohepatic circulation, which are dependent on the farnesoid X receptor and fibroblast growth factor 19. Interruption of these feedback loops is thought to cause bile acid overproduction leading to BAD. This process may occur idiopathically or following a specific trigger such as cholecystectomy. There may also be an interplay with the gut microbiota, which has been reported to be significantly different in patients with severe BAD. Patients with suspected BAD are investigated in various ways including radionucleotide imaging such as SeHCAT scans (though this is not available worldwide) and blood tests. However, other methods such as bile acid measurement in stool (either spot test or 48 hours samples) and urine tests have been explored. Importantly, delay in diagnosis and treatment of BAD greatly affects patient's quality of life and may double the overall cost of diagnosis.

Treating Chronic Abdominal Pain in Patients with Chronic Abdominal Pain and/or Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is probably the most common diagnosis in gastroenterology involving the brain-gut axis. By definition, pain is the most frequent symptom experienced by patients. It is important to understand the biopsychosocial and physiologic aspects of the disease when discussing treatment of IBS. Such therapies as lifestyle modifications, changes in diet, and cognitive behavioral therapy should be used in conjunction with pharmacotherapy rather than pharmacotherapy alone. The pathophysiologic mechanisms are reviewed in this article along with the current treatments available, in the era of growing demand for more effective treatments for the pain component of IBS.