Enzyme induction and inhibition by new antiepileptic drugs: a review of human studies

Antiepileptic drug interactions

INTRODUCTION

Antiepileptics are drugs used in the long-term treatment of epilepsy and other conditions such as pain or psychiatric diseases. They are often administered as polytherapy or in combination with other treatments. It is therefore important to know their potential interactions (with each other and with other substances) in order to avoid altering their efficacy or potentiating their side effects.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to review these aspects and stress the most important interactions in day-to-day clinical practice.

RESULTS

Older antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) such as phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital and valproic acid can significantly interfere not only with each other and other AEDs, but also with other treatments. Although newer AEDs have a more favourable pharmacokinetic profile, they are not entirely exempt from interactions and they are also commonly administered in combination with older AEDs. Another aspect that should be considered is the existence of any clinically important pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions in patients requiring the continuous administration of other treatments.

CONCLUSION

We must be aware of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions of AEDs. Because of a lack of significant interactions, drugs such as levetiracetam, gabapentin or pregabalin can be recommended in particular groups such as patients with cancer, transplants, anticoagulant treatments or HIV infection. In all cases, it is important to ensure AED efficacy and prevent serious complications.

Modern management of epilepsy: a practical approach

The epilepsies are among the most common serious brain disorders, can occur at all ages, and are characterized by a variety of presentations and causes. Diagnosis of epilepsy remains clinical, and neurophysiological investigations support the diagnosis of the syndrome. Brain imaging is able to identify many of the structural causes of the epilepsies. Current antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) block seizures without influencing the underlying tendency to generate seizures, and are effective in 60-70% of individuals. Several modern drugs are as efficacious as the older medications, but have important advantages including the absence of adverse drug interactions and hypersensitivity reactions. Epilepsy is associated with an increased prevalence of mental health disorders including anxiety, depression, and suicidal thoughts. An understanding of the psychiatric correlates of epilepsy is important to the adequate management of people with epilepsy. Anticipation of common errors in the diagnosis and management of epilepsy is important. Frequent early diagnostic errors include nonepileptic psychogenic seizures, syncope with myoclonus, restless legs syndrome, and REM behavioral disorders, the last mostly in elderly men. Overtreatment with too rapid titration and too high doses or too many AEDs should be avoided. For people with refractory focal epilepsy, vagus nerve stimulation offers palliative treatment with possible mood improvement and neurosurgical resection offers the possibility of a life-changing cure. Potential advances in the management of epilepsy are briefly discussed. This short review summarizes the authors' how-to-do approach to the modern management of people with epilepsy.

Topiramate: effects on serum lipids and lipoproteins levels in children

The present controlled study aims to evaluate topiramate (TPM) effect on total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein, very low-density lipoprotein, apolipoproteins A1, B and lipoprotein (a). Seventy patients in evolving age suffering from various types of epilepsy, treated with TPM, (age range: 6 months-22 years) were evaluated before and after 12 months of treatment and compared with 110 sex- and age-matched subjects. At baseline, no significant difference was present between controls and children treated with TPM. After a year, the BMI did not show significant change in adults and remained into respective growth curve. No significant difference in lipids and lipoproteins neither between first and second evaluation nor between patients and controls was found. Some intra-group variation has been noticed: whilst controls maintained similar levels, the 70 patients on TPM monotherapy showed a slight decrease in TC, triglycerides and HDL. These fluctuations, however, occurred in the normal range so neither dietary nor pharmacological treatment of hyperlipidaemia after a year of TPM was necessary.

Pharmacokinetics and interactions of headache medications, part II: prophylactic treatments

The present part II review highlights pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (excluding those of minor severity) of medications used in prophylactic treatment of the main primary headaches (migraine, tension-type and cluster headache). The principles of pharmacokinetics and metabolism, and the interactions of medications for acute treatment are examined in part I. The overall goal of this series of two reviews is to increase the awareness of physicians, primary care providers and specialists regarding pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of headache medications. The aim of prophylactic treatment is to reduce the frequency of headache attacks using beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, antidepressants, antiepileptics, lithium, serotonin antagonists, corticosteroids and muscle relaxants, which must be taken daily for long periods. During treatment the patient often continues to take symptomatic drugs for the attack, and may need other medications for associated or new-onset illnesses. DDIs can, therefore, occur. As a whole, DDIs of clinical relevance concerning prophylactic drugs are a limited number. Their effects can be prevented by starting the treatment with low dosages, which should be gradually increased depending on response and side effects, while frequently monitoring the patient and plasma levels of other possible coadministered drugs with a narrow therapeutic range. Most headache medications are substrates of CYP2D6 (e.g., beta-blockers, antidepressants) or CYP3A4 (e.g., calcium-channel blockers, selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, corticosteroids). The inducers and, especially, the inhibitors of these isoenzymes should be carefully coadministered.

Clinical development of antiepileptic drugs in adults

Over the last two decades, ten so-called newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been approved around the world, the majority of which have found and maintained a place in the seizure-fighting armamentarium for the whole spectrum of epilepsies and epileptic syndromes; some of these drugs have features that are improved compared with the older drugs. Within that same time period, the process of clinical development of AEDs has also undergone changes and has become much more complex and costly. Efforts are underway to shift decision-making about the clinical viability of AED candidates to earlier development stages, using the concept of translational medicine. However, thus far all of the newer AEDs have undergone a standard development as an adjunct in the control of adult partial seizures; in some cases, development has been expanded to other seizure types and pediatric syndromes. Currently, the path to global approval for use in monotherapy is under review and is often debated with regulatory authorities. Clinical treatment guidelines consider randomized, blinded, well controlled studies as the premier level of evidence-based medicine; these studies originate mostly in confirmatory phases of the development program. However, with the rigid designs and criteria in regulatory driven trials, effectiveness in the clinical practice setting may not be sufficiently predicted by these studies, leading to frustrations from individual practitioners. Finally, additional safety issues regularly occur only after the postlaunch exposure to a broader population making necessary a continuing, and thorough, pharmacovigilance after the AED has come to market.

Safety and tolerability of mood-stabilising anticonvulsants in the elderly

The authors review current research on the safety and tolerability of anticonvulsant medications used for individuals over the age of 60 years with affective disorders, agitation and other psychiatric disorders. Three anticonvulsants currently approved in the US for treatment of bipolar affective disorder are reviewed: valproate, lamotrigine and extended-release carbamazepine. The authors discuss the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, drug-drug interactions and the impact of ageing for each drug. There are few studies of anticonvulsant medications in elderly patients with bipolar disorder or other psychiatric conditions. Therefore, the authors summarise adverse events of greatest prevalence and/or greatest severity based on data derived predominately from studies of geriatric patients with epilepsy and/or other non-psychiatric indications. Guidelines are offered for the safe use of these medications in the elderly, based on research literature.

Interactions between Antiepileptic and Antipsychotic Drugs

Antiepileptic and antipsychotic drugs are often prescribed together. Interactions between the drugs may affect both efficacy and toxicity. This is a review of human clinical data on the interactions between the antiepileptic drugs carbamazepine, valproic acid (sodium valproate), vigabatrin, lamotrigine, gabapentin, topiramate, tiagabine, oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam, pregabalin, felbamate, zonisamide, phenobarbital and phenytoin with the antipsychotic drugs risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, clozapine, amisulpride, sulpiride, ziprasidone, aripiprazole, haloperidol and chlorpromazine; the limited information on interactions between antiepileptic drugs and zuclopenthixol, periciazine, fluphenazine, flupenthixol and pimozide is also presented. Many of the interactions depend on the induction or inhibition of the cytochrome P450 isoenzymes, but other important mechanisms involve the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase isoenzymes and protein binding. There is some evidence for the following effects. Carbamazepine decreases the plasma concentrations of both risperidone and its active metabolite. It also decreases concentrations of olanzapine, clozapine, ziprasidone, haloperidol, zuclopenthixol, flupenthixol and probably chlorpromazine and fluphenazine. Quetiapine increases the ratio of carbamazepine epoxide to carbamazepine and this may lead to toxicity. The data on valproic acid are conflicting; it may either increase or decrease clozapine concentrations, and it appears to decrease aripiprazole concentrations. Chlorpromazine possibly increases valproic acid concentrations. Lamotrigine possibly increases clozapine concentrations. Phenobarbital decreases clozapine, haloperidol and chlorpromazine concentrations. Phenytoin decreases quetiapine, clozapine, haloperidol and possibly chlorpromazine concentrations. There are major gaps in the data. In many cases there are no published clinical data on interactions that would be predicted on theoretical grounds.

Chronic levetiracetam treatment early in life decreases epileptiform events in young GAERS, but does not prevent the expression of spike and wave discharges during adulthood

PURPOSE

In Genetic Absence Epilepsy Rats from Strasbourg (GAERS), age-related absence seizures start to appear from postnatal day (PN) 30 concomitant with 'spike and wave discharges' (SWDs) appearing on cortical EEG recordings. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of early chronic levetiracetam (LEV) treatment on the development of SWDs in young and adult GAERS.

METHODS

From PN 23 until PN 60, LEV (54 mg/kg, i.p.) was administered once daily to GAERS (n=8), while control GAERS (n=7) received saline (0.9% NaCl, i.p.). All animals were implanted with four epidural EEG electrodes at PN 51. EEG was recorded for 3h daily, during the last 4 days of the treatment (PN 57-PN 60) and during 4 additional days after treatment had been terminated (PN 61-PN 64). The animals were monitored again at the age of 4 months (PN 120-PN 124), about 2 months after the last administration of LEV.

RESULTS

During treatment, epileptiform events in the LEV group were significantly reduced (62%, P<0.05) in comparison with the control group. During the following 4 days, epileptiform events were reduced in the LEV group, with an average difference of 53% (P=0.064). Once the animals had reached adult age, there was no difference in epileptiform events between the LEV group and controls.

CONCLUSION

In this study, chronic LEV administration induced a reduction in epileptiform events in young GAERS. This effect persisted to some extent after treatment cessation (PN 61-PN 64), which might indicate a slowing down of epileptogenic processes. However, at the age of 4 months all animals revealed a similar expression of epileptiform discharges.

An overview of psychotropic drug-drug interactions

The psychotropic drug-drug interactions most likely to be relevant to psychiatrists' practices are examined. The metabolism and the enzymatic and P-glycoprotein inhibition/induction profiles of all antidepressants, antipsychotics, and mood stabilizers are described; all clinically meaningful drug-drug interactions between agents in these psychotropic classes, as well as with frequently encountered nonpsychotropic agents, are detailed; and information on the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic results, mechanisms, and clinical consequences of these interactions is presented. Although the range of drug-drug interactions involving psychotropic agents is large, it is a finite and manageable subset of the much larger domain of all possible drug-drug interactions. Sophisticated computer programs will ultimately provide the best means of avoiding drug-drug interactions. Until these programs are developed, the best defense against drug-drug interactions is awareness and focused attention to this issue.

Alteration of thyroid hormone homeostasis by antiepileptic drugs in humans: involvement of glucuronosyltransferase induction

RATIONALE

The aim of this review article is to analyse which antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) alter thyroid hormone homeostasis in humans and when this can be explained, at least partially, by the induction of the glucuronoconjugation pathways.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched which have provided more than 300 articles. These have been integrated with fundamental books and personal information by experts in the different areas examined.

RESULTS

Alteration of thyroid hormone homeostasis by phenobarbital/primidone, phenytoin, and carbamazepine clearly occurs in humans. However, it is not associated with thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) increase and the clinical significance of altered serum concentrations of thyroid hormones by these antiepileptic drugs has remained unclear. The published information on the effect of the other antiepileptic drugs examined in this review article on thyroid hormones is lacking (felbamate, pregabalin, zonisamide) or limited. Oxcarbazepine appears to have some effects. Topiramate would need further investigations as well as gabapentin. Levetiracetam, tiagabine, vigabatrine, and lamotrigine do not alter at all, or only minimally, thyroid hormone homeostasis.

CONCLUSION

Concerning the antiepileptic drugs which alter thyroid hormone homeostasis, it is highly probable that the mechanism of induction of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases (UGT) is involved, at least partially, in such an alteration. However, it is not possible to estimate the relative contribution of the UGT induction by these drugs on the total alteration observed in thyroid hormone levels, as other mechanisms not investigated, or not examined in the present article, could contribute.

Long-lasting antiepileptic effects of levetiracetam against epileptic seizures in the spontaneously epileptic rat (SER): differentiation of levetiracetam from conventional antiepileptic drugs

PURPOSE

Some evidence suggests that levetiracetam (LEV) possesses antiepileptogenic characteristics. The purpose of this study was to investigate the time course of seizure protection by LEV compared with that of phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbital (PB), valproate (VPA), and carbamazepine (CBZ) in the spontaneously epileptic rat (SER). The SER is a double mutant (tm/tm, zi/zi) showing both tonic convulsions and absence-like seizures.

METHODS

The effect of single (40, 80, and 160 mg/kg, i.p.) and 5-day (80 mg/kg/day, i.p.) administration of LEV on tonic convulsions and absence-like seizures in SERs were studied. Tonic convulsions induced by blowing air onto the animal's head at 5-min intervals for 30 min and spontaneous absence-like seizures characterized by 5- to 7-Hz spike-wave-like complexes in the cortical and hippocampal EEG were recorded for 30 min. In the single-administration study, observations for seizure activity were performed once before and 3 times (45, 75, and 135 min) after drug administration. In the 5-day administration study, seizure observation was performed 4 times for 30 min (once before and 3 times after drug administration) during the 5-day drug-administration period, and continued once a day until 8 days after the final administration. The antiepileptic effects of 5-day administration of conventional AEDs (PHT, PB, VPA, and CBZ) were examined by using similar methods.

RESULTS

Tonic convulsions and absence-like seizures were inhibited by a single administration of LEV at 80 and 160 mg/kg, i.p., but not significantly at 40 mg/kg, i.p. When LEV was repeatedly administered at 80 mg/kg/day, i.p., for 5 days to SERs, the inhibitory effects on seizures increased with administration time. The number of tonic convulsions and absence-like seizures were significantly reduced to 39.1% and 38.4% compared with previous values, respectively, after 5-day LEV administration. Furthermore, significant inhibition of tonic convulsions was detected <or=3 days after the final administration, and significant inhibition of absence-like seizures was still observed 8 days after the final injection of LEV. This demonstrates long-lasting seizure protection by LEV after cessation of treatment. PHT, PB, VPA, and CBZ inhibited tonic convulsions more potently compared with LEV in SERs. The maximal antiseizure effects of these drugs were reached after the initial administration, with almost the same antiseizure effects observed through day 5, despite continued drug administration. Moreover, a long-lasting treatment effect was not observed with any of these drugs except for PHT and CBZ, both of which showed moderately prolonged antiseizure effects.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that LEV is effective in the treatment of both convulsive and absence-like seizures in SERs after single- and multiple-dose administration. Interestingly, in the 5-day administration study, it was found that the antiepileptic effects for tonic convulsions and absence-like seizures were observed both during the drug-administration period and <or=8 days after the final administration of LEV. This long-lasting effect suggests that LEV may possess an antiepileptogenic effect that it does not share with PHT, PB, VPA, and CBZ.

Induction of endogenous pathways by antiepileptics and clinical implications

The aim of this study was to review modifications of the endogenous pathways (e.g. enzyme elevations, normal body constituent depletion or higher formation/excretion of endogenous metabolites) which could be ascribed to enzyme induction by antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Information on older (e.g. phenobarbital, phenytoin and carbamazepine) and newer drugs (where information is available) is discussed together with clinical implications. The enzymes involved in the endogenous pathways and induced by the AEDs will not be limited to the hepatic microsomal enzymes; extrahepatic enzymes and/or enzymes present in other subcellular fractions will also be discussed, if pertinent. The induction of endogenous pathways by AEDs has been taken into account in the past, but much less emphasis has been given compared with the extensive literature on induction by AEDs of the metabolism of concomitantly administered drugs, either of the same or of different classes. Not all of the endogenous pathways examined and induced by AEDs appear to result in serious clinical consequences (e.g. induction of hepatic ALP, increased excretion of d-glucaric acid or of 6 beta-hydroxycortisol). In some cases, induction of some pathways (e.g. increase of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or of conjugated bilirubin) might even be a beneficial side-effect, however enzyme induction is considered rather a detrimental aspect for an AED, as induction is generally a broad and a non-specific phenomenon. The new AEDs have generally less induction potential than the older agents. Yet some (felbamate, topiramate, oxcarbazepine and lamotrigine) have the potential for inducing enzymes, whereas others (levetiracetam, gabapentin and vigabatrin) appear to be completely devoid of enzyme inducing characteristics, at least as far as the enzymes investigated are concerned.

Mood and affect during detoxification of opiate addicts: a comparison of buprenorphine versus methadone

Twenty-six in-patients with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual version IV (DSM-IV) criteria for opioid dependence were selected at random to receive either a combination of an 11-day low-dose buprenorphine and a 14-day carbamazepine regimen (n = 14) or a combination of an 11-day methadone and a 14-day carbamazepine regimen (n = 12) in a double-blind, randomized 14-day in-patient detoxification treatment. Patients with buprenorphine and carbamazepine showed a significantly better psychological state after the first and second weeks of treatment. Above all, the buprenorphine-treated patients demonstrated a less marked tiredness, sensitiveness and depressive state as well as a more prominent elevated mood during the detoxification process. Seven non-completers (after 7 days: four of 12 = 33.3%; after 14 days: seven of 12 = 58.3%) were treated with methadone and carbamazepine and five non-completers (after 7 days: two of 14 = 14.3%; after 14 days: five of 14 = 35.7%) received buprenorphine and carbamazepine. The difference in the overall dropout rate after day 14 was not significant. The present study supports the hypothesis that the combination of buprenorphine and carbamazepine leads to a better clinical outcome than does a combination of methadone and carbamazepine in the detoxification of opioid addicts with additional multiple drug abuse. The buprenorphine and carbamazepine-regimen provides a more effective short-term relief of affective disturbances than does methadone and carbamazepine. No severe side effects occurred during the treatment period in both groups.

Impairment of inhibitory control of the hypothalamic pituitary adrenocortical system in epilepsy

Excess comorbidity between depression and epilepsy proposes common pathophysiological patterns in both disorders. Neuroendocrine abnormalities were often observed in depression as well as in epilepsy. Lack of inhibitory control of the hypothalamic pituitary adrenocortical (HPA) system is a core feature of depression; main relay stations of this system are located in the amygdala and hippocampus, which are key regions for both disorders. Therefore we explored the feedback mechanism of the HPA system in epilepsy. In order to control for the impact of depression we focused on epilepsies without depression. We compared patients with epilepsy (subdivided by medication with or without hepatic enzyme inducing antiepileptic medication) with 16 healthy controls and 16 patients with unipolar major depression but without epilepsy. We observed a lack of inhibitory control of the HPA system in patients with epilepsy, also in the absence of enzyme inducing medication. An impact of the temporal lobe location of the epileptic focus could not be observed. Thus, epilepsies share with depression the deficiencies in the feedback mechanism of the HPA system, proposing common pathophysiological features of up to now unknown nature.

Side Effects of Antiepileptics- A Review

Older generation antiepileptic drugs like Phenobarbital (Luminal), carbamazepine (Tegretol), phenytoin (Dilantin), and valproic acid (Depakote) have several shortcomings such as suboptimal response rates, significant adverse effects, several drug interactions, and a narrow therapeutic index. New antiepileptic drugs have been developed in the last decade to overcome some of these problems. These newer generation antiepileptics like felbamate (Felbatol), gabapentin (Neurontin), lamotrigine (Lamictal), levetiracetam (Keppra), oxcarbazepine (Trileptal), tiagabine (Gabitril), topiramate (Topamax), and zonisamide (Zonegran) have better tolerability profiles, low interaction potential, and significantly less enzyme inducing or inhibiting properties. As the use of antiepileptic drugs has expanded to include treatment of neuropathic pain, newer side effects have been reported. In addition to the common side effects of antiepileptic drugs, like dizziness, drowsiness, and mental slowing; other side effects like weight gain, metabolic acidosis, nephrolithiasis, angle closure glaucoma, skin rash, hepatotoxicity, colitis, and movement and behavioral disorders, to name a few, have been brought to our attention. This review is an attempt to highlight the features and incidences of some of these side effects.

Enterocolitis: an adverse event in refractory epilepsy patients treated with levetiracetam?

INTRODUCTION

Levetiracetam (LEV) is a recently marketed novel anti-epileptic drug with a promising efficacy and safety profile. In this report we describe two patients who presented with enterocolitis and discuss the possible relationship with concurrent LEV intake.

PATIENTS

In two patients. LEV was initiated to control refractory complex partial seizures (CPS). The first patient was treated with 1500 mg/day and complained of abdominal pain and weight loss 6 months later. Internal examination and colonoscopy revealed a punctate colitis. The second patient presented with bloody stool 1 month after LEV initiation. Colonoscopy showed punctate colitis. In both patients gastrointestinal symptoms disappeared following tapering of LEV.

DISCUSSION

There are no reports in the literature describing colitis related to LEV intake. Three possible mechanisms of action are discussed. Colitis may be part of a hypersensitivity syndrome caused by LEV. Pharmacodynamic interactions with other anti-epileptic drugs, for example, carbamazepine may play a role. A haematological adverse event is another possibility since piracetam, a related molecule, has a known impact on erythrocytes and platelets.

CONCLUSION

The close temporal relationship between initiation of LEV intake, symptomatic colitis and clinical improvement following LEV tapering, suggests that colitis may be a possible and previously undescribed adverse effect of LEV.

Tiagabine increases cocaine-free urines in cocaine-dependent methadone-treated patients: results of a randomized pilot study

AIMS

We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the GABAergic agent tiagabine in reducing cocaine use among methadone-treated patients.

DESIGN

Ten-week randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

Opiate Treatment Research Program, Veteran's Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System in West Haven, Connecticut, USA.

PARTICIPANTS

The participants were 45 cocaine-dependent methadone-treated patients who were predominately Caucasian (75.6%), male (77.8%) and never married (53%) with an average age of 38 years (SD = 6.5).

INTERVENTIONS

Comparison groups received tiagabine 12 mg/day (n = 15), tiagabine 24 mg/day (n = 15) or placebo (n = 15).

MEASURES

Baseline assessments included the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, the Addiction Severity Index, a urine drug test, self-reported use and opiate withdrawal scales. Urine drug tests were performed thrice weekly.

FINDINGS

Treatment retention was over 80% for all treatment groups. The sample mean (+/- SE) of cocaine-free urines for the first week after study entry and before tiagabine was started was 1.16 (0.19) urines/week. During weeks 9 and 10 cocaine-free urines increased significantly from baseline by 33% with high-dose tiagabine (24 mg/day), by 14% with low-dose tiagabine (12 mg/day) and decreased by 10% with placebo (hierarchical linear model, Z= 2.03; P < 0.05). Self-reported cocaine use also decreased significantly more with active medications than with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Tiagabine at 24 mg/day was well tolerated among these methadone-treated patients with only one reporting headache. Tiagabine appears to be a promising GABAergic medication that moderately improves cocaine-free urines.

Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of 14C-levetiracetam, a new antiepileptic agent, in healthy volunteers

The absorption, disposition and metabolism of levetiracetam, a new antiepileptic drug, have been investigated after a single oral dose of the (14)C-labelled molecule administered to male healthy volunteers. As chiral inversion can occur during drug metabolism, the chiral inversion of levetiracetam and/or of its major metabolite produced by hydrolysis (the corresponding acid) was also investigated. Finally, the in vitro hydrolysis of levetiracetam to its major metabolite and the inhibition of this reaction in human blood have been studied. Levetiracetam was very rapidly absorbed in man, with the peak plasma concentration of the unchanged drug occurring at 0.25-0.50 h. The unchanged drug accounted for a very high percentage of plasma radioactivity (97-82%) at all the times measured, i.e. until 48 h after administration. The apparent volume of distribution of the compound was close (0.55-0.62 l/kg) to the volume of total body water. Total body clearance (0.80-0.97 ml/min/kg) was much lower than the nominal hepatic blood flow. The plasma elimination half-life of the unchanged drug varied between 7.4 h and 7.9 h. Plasma to blood ratio of total radioactivity concentrations was 1.1-1.3, showing that radioactivity concentrations were similar in blood cells and plasma. The balance of excretion was very high in all four volunteers. The predominant route of excretion was via urine, accounting for a mean of 95% of the administered dose after 4 days. Two major radioactive components were present in urine, the unchanged drug and the acid obtained by hydrolysis, accounting for 66% and 24% of the dose after 48 h, respectively. Hydrolysis of levetiracetam in human blood followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics with Km and V(max) values of 435 microM and 129 pmol/min/ml blood, respectively. Among the inhibitory agents investigated in this study, only paraoxon inhibited levetiracetam hydrolysis (92% inhibition at 100 microM). Oxidative metabolism occurred in man, although it accounted for no more than 2.5% of the dose. There was no evidence of chiral inversion.

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between retigabine and phenobarbitone at steady-state in healthy subjects

AIMS

To evaluate potential pharmacokinetic interactions between phenobarbitone and retigabine, a new antiepileptic drug.

METHODS

Fifteen healthy men received 200 mg of retigabine on day 1. On days 4-32, phenobarbitone 90 mg was administered at 22.00 h. On days 26-32, increasing doses of retigabine were given to achieve a final dose of 200 mg every 8 h on day 32. The pharmacokinetics of retigabine were determined on days 1 and 32, and those for phenobarbitone on days 25 and 31.

RESULTS

After administration of a single 200 mg dose, retigabine was rapidly absorbed and eliminated with a mean terminal half-life of 6.7 h, a mean AUC of 3936 ng x ml(-1) x h and a mean apparent clearance of 0.76 l x h(-1) x kg(-1). Similar exposure to the partially active acetylated metabolite (AWD21-360) of retigabine was observed. After administration of phenobarbitone dosed to steady-state, the pharmacokinetics of retigabine at steady-state were similar (AUC of 4433 ng x ml(-1) x h and t1/2 of 8.5 h) to those of retigabine alone. The AUC of phenobarbitone was 298 mg x l(-1) x h when administered alone and 311 mg x ml(-1) x h after retigabine administration. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of the AUC were 1.11 (0.97, 1.28) for retigabine, 1.01 (0.88, 1.06) for AWD21-360 and 1.04 (0.96, 1.11) for phenobarbitone. Individual and combined treatments were generally well tolerated. One subject was withdrawn from the study on day 10 due to severe abdominal pain. Headache was the most commonly reported adverse event. No clinically relevant changes were observed in the electrocardiograms, vital signs or laboratory measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no pharmacokinetic interaction between retigabine and phenobarbitone in healthy subjects. No dosage adjustment is likely to be necessary when retigabine and phenobarbitone are coadministered to patients.

Alternatives to lithium and divalproex in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVES

The role of lithium carbonate in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder is well established. Unfortunately, many patients fail to respond adequately to this agent or are unable to tolerate its adverse effects. Divalproex has become a commonly used alternative to lithium, but it also is ineffective or poorly tolerated in many patients. This article attempts to review the available data on maintenance therapy in bipolar disorder with a variety of anticonvulsants and antipsychotics (both conventional and novel), with reference to relevant studies in acute mania and bipolar depression as well.

METHODS

Evidence on maintenance therapy and relevant acute-phase data were collected using MEDLINE database searches.

RESULTS

Data on maintenance therapy with agents other than lithium and divalproex are sparse, and often derived from open, uncontrolled studies. Implications and flaws of available data are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Other than lithium, there are few robust double-blind data to support the use of a variety of agents in the maintenance phase. However, uncontrolled data suggest that a number of agents merit further study.

A review of the common properties of drugs with idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity and the "multiple determinant hypothesis" for the manifestation of idiosyncratic drug toxicity

Idiosyncratic drug toxicity is generally believed to be a phenomenon that cannot be readily evaluated experimentally. Reasons for this difficulty include the following: 1. It is a rare event (<1/5,000) and therefore impossible to be studied in clinical trials; 2. It is a human-specific event not detectable in experimental animals. To aid the understanding of idiosyncratic toxicity and to develop an experimental strategy for this phenomenon, a hypothesis is proposed. The hypothesis states that the low frequency of idiosyncratic drug toxicity is due to the requirements for the occurrence of multiple critical and discrete events, with the probability for the occurrence of idiosyncratic drug toxicity as a product of the probabilities of each event. The key determinants of these critical events are proposed to be: 1. Chemical properties; 2. exposure; 3. environmental factors; and 4. genetic factors. Based on this hypothesis, idiosyncratic drug toxicity can be evaluated experimentally via studying these key determinants. The chemical properties critical to idiosyncratic drug toxicity are identified via a review of the common properties of drugs that cause idiosyncratic liver toxicity. These properties include: 1. Formation of reactive metabolites. 2. Metabolism by P450 isoforms. 3. Preponderance of P450 inducers, and 4. Occurrence of clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions with co-administered drugs. Based on this review, it is proposed that these common properties may be useful experimental endpoints for the prediction and therefore avoidance of the selection of drug candidates with idiosyncratic drug toxicity for further development.

Antiepileptic-antipsychotic drug interactions: a critical review of the evidence

The potential for drug-drug interactions in psychiatry and patients with epilepsy is very high. Moreover, antiepileptic drugs are widely used outside epilepsy as psychotropic agents and their spectrum of activity on behavior is of considerable interest to psychopharmacology. In both neurologic and psychiatric practice, pharmacotherapy combinations are commonly used to treat comorbid psychiatric and neurologic disorders, to reduce or control the adverse effects of a medication or to increase its efficacy. This paper focuses on the metabolic pharmacokinetic interactions between two classes of psychotropic drugs: antiepileptic and antipsychotic drugs. The degree of documentation varies for many interactions from clinical case-report experiences to well established research outcomes. The evidence and the clinical significance of these interactions are reviewed. In general, it is better to use as few drugs as possible, as multicolored politherapies increase the possible adverse effects of drug interactions and reduce patient compliance.

Interactions between psychotropics, anaesthetics and electroconvulsive therapy: implications for drug choice and patient management

Despite many predictions that electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) would be replaced by pharmacotherapy, ECT has remained an invaluable adjunct in the management of severe psychiatric disease. Both pharmacotherapy and ECT continue to be used extensively, and will frequently be administered concurrently. The majority of patients requiring ECT will need anaesthesia; therefore, interactions could conceivably occur between the psychotropic drugs, ECT and the anaesthetic agents utilised. In managing an anaesthetic for ECT the effects of the anaesthetic agents and other medications on seizure intensity are important determinants influencing outcome. With regard to the antidepressants, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and ECT can be combined safely and beneficially. More care is required when ECT is administered in the setting of a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI), especially the older irreversible varieties and in patients recently placed on MAOI therapy. Of the anticonvulsants and mood stabilisers, lithium and ECT given concurrently add significant risk of delirium and/or organic syndromes developing. Possible concerns with valproate, carbamazepine, lamotrigine, gabapentin and topiramate are that they may inhibit seizure activity. Additionally, carbamazepine may prolong the action of suxamethonium (succinylcholine). The combination of antipsychotics and ECT is well tolerated, and may in fact be beneficial. As regards the anxiolytics, benzodiazepines have anticonvulsant properties that might interfere with the therapeutic efficacy of ECT. CNS stimulants on the other hand may prolong seizures as well as produce dysrhythmias and elevate blood pressure. Calcium channel antagonists should be used with great care to avoid significant cardiovascular depression. The anaesthesiologist should therefore remain vigilant at all times, as untoward responses during ECT might occur suddenly due to interactions between psychotropics, anaesthetic agents and/or ECT.

Levetiracetam does not alter the pharmacokinetics of an oral contraceptive in healthy women

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate whether levetiracetam, a novel antiepileptic drug (AED), influences the pharmacokinetics of steroid oral contraceptives.

METHODS

During a run-in phase, 18 healthy female patients received an oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol, 0.03 mg, and levonorgestrel, 0.15 mg, for the first 21 days of two consecutive menstrual cycles. In a subsequent double-blind, randomized, two-way crossover treatment phase, subjects received either levetiracetam, 500 mg, or placebo twice daily concomitant with the oral contraceptive. Plasma concentrations of ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel were measured on days 14 and 15 of the two treatment periods for the evaluation of the 24-h kinetic parameters, and an additional sample was collected on day 21 to determine the trough plasma concentrations. Serum progesterone and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels were determined on days 13, 14, 15, and 21 of each cycle of the treatment phase.

RESULTS

The plasma concentration-time curves and pharmacokinetic parameters of ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel were not statistically different during concomitant treatment with either levetiracetam or placebo. The ratios of the log-transformed geometric mean areas under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUCs), maximal (Cmax) and minimal (Cmin) plasma concentrations, and trough concentrations on day 21 (C21) ranged from 99.12 to 99.96% for ethinyl estradiol and from 97.13 to 99.41% for levonorgestrel. The 90% confidence intervals of these ratios were well within the 80 to 125% acceptance range for lack of interaction. Serum progesterone and LH concentrations were fairly constant during the run-in and treatment phases and remained markedly below their respective physiologic levels. Safety and menstrual-bleeding patterns were comparable during levetiracetam and placebo administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Levetiracetam does not affect the pharmacokinetics of an oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel, and on the basis of serum progesterone and LH levels, it does not affect the contraceptive efficacy.

Serum concentrations of topiramate in patients with epilepsy: influence of dose, age, and comedication

Topiramate is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) approved as add-on therapy. Previous studies have shown that topiramate has only a limited effect on other AEDs, but its own metabolism can be induced by enzyme-inducing drugs. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of topiramate dose, age, and comedication, especially of carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, and valproic acid (VPA) on topiramate serum concentrations in patients with epilepsy. In total, 480 samples of 344 inpatients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria (e.g., trough concentration, body weight available) were investigated. The topiramate serum concentration in relation to topiramate dose per body weight (level-to-dose ratio) was calculated and compared for patients receiving topiramate monotherapy and for patients receiving topiramate plus one other AED. Analysis of covariance (using age as covariate) showed that comedication had a highly significant influence on the topiramate serum concentrations. Regression analysis including all 480 samples confirmed that in combinations with phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, and oxcarbazepine, the topiramate concentrations were significantly lower compared with topiramate monotherapy, whereas VPA and lamotrigine had no significant influence. Moreover, regression analysis indicated that primidone and methsuximide lowered topiramate concentrations, whereas gabapentin, bromide, and sulthiame did not. In addition to comedication, the patient's age was significantly correlated with topiramate clearance. In accordance with the results of previous studies, these results indicated that infants and children had lower topiramate concentrations than adults receiving the same topiramate dose per body weight. Comedication and age should be considered in adjusting topiramate dosage. Determination of topiramate serum concentrations may be useful, especially when enzyme-inducing drugs are withdrawn or added.

Seizures in HIV-seropositive individuals: epidemiology and treatment

Seizures are a relatively common occurrence in patients with HIV infection. They may be a result of HIV infection of the CNS or a manifestation of an opportunistic infection. Because seizures are likely to recur in patients infected with HIV and because they are a poor prognostic indicator, it is generally recommended that all HIV-seropositive patients experiencing a first seizure without a recognisable and reversible cause be treated. Clinicians faced with treating seizures in HIV-seropositive patients often encounter a therapeutic dilemma since few data exist in this area. In selecting appropriate anticonvulsant therapy, clinicians must consider both therapy-compromising drug-drug and drug-disease interactions. Ideal anticonvulsants for this setting are those that do not effect viral replication, have limited protein binding and have no effects on the cytochrome P450 system, such as gabapentin, topiramate and tiagabine. Unless the benefits outweigh the risks, valproic acid (sodium valproate) should be avoided as it has been shown to stimulate HIV replication. Since few data exist, controlled trials examining pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between anticonvulsants and antiretrovirals are needed. Until such time, clinicians caring for these patients should examine existing data carefully and employ vigilant monitoring.

Summary of information on human CYP enzymes: human P450 metabolism data

This chapter is an update of the data on substrates, reactions, inducers, and inhibitors of human CYP enzymes published previously by Rendic and DiCarlo (1), now covering selection of the literature through 2001 in the reference section. The data are presented in a tabular form (Table 1) to provide a framework for predicting and interpreting the new P450 metabolic data. The data are formatted in an Excel format as most suitable for off-line searching and management of the Web-database. The data are presented as stated by the author(s) and in the case when several references are cited the data are presented according to the latest published information. The searchable database is available either as an Excel file (for information contact the author), or as a Web-searchable database (Human P450 Metabolism Database, www.gentest.com) enabling the readers easy and quick approach to the latest updates on human CYP metabolic reactions.

Selective blockade of N-type calcium channels by levetiracetam

PURPOSE

We investigated the effect of the new antiepileptic drug (AED) levetiracetam (LEV) on different types of high-voltage-activated (HVA) Ca2+ channels in freshly isolated CA1 hippocampal neurons of rats.

METHODS

Patch-clamp recordings of HVA Ca2+ channel activity were obtained from isolated hippocampal CA1 neurons. LEV was applied by gravity flow from a pipette placed near the cell, and solution changes were made by electromicrovalves. Ca2+ channel blockers were used for separation of the channel subtypes.

RESULTS

The currents were measured in controls and after application of 1-200 microM LEV. LEV irreversibly inhibited the HVA calcium current by approximately 18% on the average. With a prepulse stimulation protocol, which can eliminate direct inhibition of Ca2+ channels by G proteins, we found that G proteins were not involved in the pathways underlying the LEV inhibitory effect. This suggested that the inhibitory effect arises from a direct action of LEV on the channel molecule. The blocking mechanism of LEV was not related to changes in steady-state activation or inactivation of Ca2+ channels. LEV also did not influence the rundown of the HVA Ca2+ current during experimental protocols lasting approximately 10 min. Finally, LEV at the highest concentration used (200 microM) did not influence the activity of L-, P- or Q-type Ca2+ channels in CA1 neurons, while selectively influencing the activity of N-type calcium channels. The maximal effect on these channels separated from other channel types was approximately 37%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide evidence that LEV selectively inhibits N-type Ca2+ channels of CA1 pyramidal hippocampal neurons. These data suggest the existence of a subtype of N-type channels sensitive to LEV, which might be involved in the molecular basis of its antiepileptic action.

Drug metabolism and drug interactions in the elderly

In the elderly concomitant use of several drugs (polypharmacy) is very common. Thus, the risk for drug interactions might be increased in this population. Since most drugs are hepatically eliminated by various metabolic pathways, liver function has to be considered as an additional factor modifying drug response. This chapter focuses on the hepatic mechanisms of interactions, especially on various inhibitors and inducers of the most important cytochrome P450 isoenzymes involved in drug metabolism. In addition, age-dependent changes in liver function are addressed. Based on pharmacokinetic results with different probe drugs, some inconsistencies in this area are discussed. The most important metabolic drug-drug interactions are independent of the age of the patients. However, since elderly patients consume a greater proportional share of drugs, they represent a population at risk for interactions. Awareness of this clinical problem may help to diminish those risks.