Low-dose prednisone chronotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised clinical trial (CAPRA-2)

New concepts to reduce glucocorticoid toxicity

70 years after their first use, low-dose glucocorticoids are a common part of pharmacological rheumatoid arthritis treatment. This is due to their well-proven capacities in symptom severity and disease activity reduction, in particular when combined with a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, such as methotrexate. Nevertheless, glucocorticoid administration, in long-term especially, is also seen critically because of its potential adverse conditions. In order to achieve a reduction in treatment-related adverse events, modern therapy regimes should take into consideration patients' risk factors and therefore be individual. The Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index is a method to measure side effects of glucocorticoid therapy objectively and will be central in future studies comparing different therapy regimes. Such a new therapy regime is modified-release prednisone, which - thanks to a different time of liberation - seems to capable of reducing morning stiffness much more effectively than conventional prednisone, whilst showing similar properties in disease activity reduction and safety. Still, confirmation of these first data in further trials will be necessary. Eventually, other innovative concepts are liposomal glucocorticoids, dissociated agonists of glucocorticoid receptors and intramuscular application of glucocorticoids. Though these approaches appear to be promising, additional research will be required.

Modeling the influence of chronopharmacological administration of synthetic glucocorticoids on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis

Natural glucocorticoids, a class of cholesterol-derived hormones, modulate an array of metabolic, anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressive and cognitive signaling. The synthesis of natural glucocorticoids, largely cortisol in humans, is regulated by the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and exhibits pronounced circadian variation. Considering the central regulatory function of endogenous glucocorticoids, maintenance of the circadian activity of the HPA axis is essential to host survival and chronic disruption of such activity leads to systemic complications. There is a great deal of interest in synthetic glucocorticoids due to the immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory properties and the development of novel dosing regimens that can minimize the disruption of endogenous activity, while still maintaining the pharmacological benefits of long-term synthetic glucocorticoid therapy. Synthetic glucocorticoids are associated with an increased risk of developing the pathological disorders related to chronic suppression of cortisol rhythmicity as a result of the potent negative feedback by synthetic glucocorticoids on the HPA axis precursors. In this study, a mathematical model was developed to explore the influence of chronopharmacological dosing of exogenous glucocorticoids on the endogenous cortisol rhythm considering intra-venous and oral dosing. Chronic daily dosing resulted in modification of the circadian rhythmicity of endogenous cortisol with the amplitude and acrophase of the altered rhythm dependent on the administration time. Simulations revealed that the circadian features of the endogenous cortisol rhythm can be preserved by proper timing of administration. The response following a single dose was not indicative of the response following long-term, repeated chronopharmacological dosing of synthetic glucocorticoids. Furthermore, simulations revealed the inductive influence of long-term treatment was only associated with low to moderate doses, while high doses generally led to suppression of endogenous activity regardless of the chronopharmacological dose. Finally, chronic daily dosing was found to alter the responsiveness of the HPA axis, such that a decrease in the amplitude of the cortisol rhythm resulted in a partial loss in the time-of-day dependent response to CRH stimulation, while an increase in the amplitude was associated with a more pronounced time-of-day dependence of the response.

Effect of prednisone treatment for 30 and 90 days on bone metabolism in collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) rats

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are often prescribed to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the long term, but there is still controversy in the administration of GCs, mainly because of the adverse reactions such as osteoporosis. Numerous studies have demonstrated that osteoporosis could be induced by GCs in normal rats. However, few experiments have focused on whether osteoporosis could be induced or aggravated by GCs in collagen induced arthritis (CIA) rats. We have investigated bone changes in CIA rats treated with prednisone at 4.5 mg/kg/day for 30 and 90 days by bone histomorphometry, bone mineral density (BMD), micro-CT, biomechanical test, and enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay. We found that high bone turnover osteoporosis was shown in CIA rats. Prednisone treatment for 30 and 90 days improved articular structure and decelerated the degeneration of the femur in CIA rats, but did not improve BMD and bone biomechanics. We conclude that osteoporosis was not aggravated in CIA rats treated with prednisone for 30 and 90 days. On the contrary, prednisone treatment for 30 and 90 days could prevent bone loss of the femur in CIA rats. There was a negative effect on bone metabolism in CIA rats treated with prednisone for 90 days.

Morning Stiffness in Elderly Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: What is Known About the Effect of Biological and Targeted Agents?

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects all age groups, but the prevalence appears to increase with age. Elderly-onset RA (after the age of 60 years) has distinct clinical patterns. Treatment of RA in older individuals is confounded by the presence of medical comorbidities, concurrent medications, drug interactions, and the altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics related to aging and organ dysfunction. Patients with RA commonly experience morning stiffness, which is associated with reduced quality of life and work disability. However, despite its importance, morning stiffness is seldom assessed in clinical practice and usually only its duration is measured in the research setting. Whether the intensity, timing, location and impact of this symptom should be assessed in future clinical trials requires further evaluation. The biologic and newer targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs have been shown to be effective in reducing the duration of morning stiffness in patients with RA. Glucocorticoids are a double-edged sword in RA. Although they can effectively reduce inflammation and retard radiological damage (disease modifying), the long-term use of glucocorticoids is associated with numerous adverse effects. Thus, glucocorticoids should be used for short-term treatment of RA only. Night-time administration of glucocorticoids has been shown to alleviate morning stiffness and should be considered in patients with serious morning joint stiffness symptoms.

Efficacy and safety of glucocorticoids in rheumatoid arthritis: Systematic literature review

OBJECTIVES

1) To systematically and critically review the evidence on the characteristics, efficacy and safety of glucocorticoids (CS) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA); 2) to generate practical recommendations.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed through a sensitive bibliographic search strategy in Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library. We selected randomized clinical trials that analyzed the efficacy and/or safety of CS in patients with RA. Two reviewers performed the first selection by title and abstract. Then 10 reviewers selected the studies after a detailed review of the articles and data collection. The quality of the studies was evaluated with the Jadad scale. In a nominal group meeting, based on the results of the systematic literature review, related recommendations were reached by consensus.

RESULTS

A total of 47 articles were finally included. CS in combination with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs help control disease activity and inhibit radiographic progression, especially in the short-to-medium term and in early RA. CS can also improve function and relieve pain. Different types and routes of administration are effective, but there is no standardized scheme (initial dose, tapering and duration of treatment) that is superior to others. Adverse events when using CS are very frequent and are dose-dependent and variable severity, although most are mild. Seven recommendations were generated on the use and risk management of CS.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations aim to resolve some common clinical questions and aid in decision-making for CS use in RA.

The 70th anniversary of glucocorticoids in rheumatic diseases: the second youth of an old friend

Seventy years ago, the first administration of cortisone in a patient with RA marked a milestone in the treatment of inflammatory diseases. However, the initial enthusiasm rapidly vanished as the administration of high doses for lengthy periods revealed worrisome adverse effects. It has taken several decades to overcome the (sometimes excessive) mistrust and to achieve a more differentiated evaluation of the benefit–risk profile and the adequate usage of glucocorticoids (GCs). Today, GCs remain indispensable for the treatment of many inflammatory conditions and their usefulness in RA as a disease-modifying low-dose co-medication is widely acknowledged. Recent studies show promising results concerning both traditional GCs and new formulations. Still, decades of relatively little scientific attention have resulted in a continuing lack of detailed evidence. Hence there is an ongoing need for further research regarding mechanisms of GC actions, the further optimization of treatment parameters for traditional GCs and new formulations.

Development and testing of candidate items for inclusion in a new rheumatoid arthritis stiffness patient-reported outcome measure

Objective

To qualitatively develop and test a set of candidate items for a new RA stiffness patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that capture the patient perspective. This is an essential first step in PROM development, prior to quantitative development, assessment and validation.

Methods

Focus groups further examined the previously developed stiffness conceptual model and explored the patient perspective regarding stiffness assessment. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. An iterative process of item development was then performed by the expert study team of researchers, patients and clinicians, based on the two qualitative datasets and informed by measurement theory and guidelines. Finally, these candidate items were tested using formal cognitive interview methodology and subsequently refined.

Results

Sixteen RA patients from the UK participated in focus groups. Data confirmed the conceptual model of the RA patient experience of stiffness and provided insight into stiffness assessment, including suggestions regarding patient-relevant stiffness assessment categories such as impact, location and timing. These data informed the development of 77 candidate stiffness PROM items, including multiple formats for some. Eleven RA patients participated in cognitive interviews. Minor changes were made to items to enhance understanding and 32 items were removed, resulting in 45 candidate PROM items.

Conclusion

Rigorous qualitative methodology and considerable patient involvement has underpinned items for a new RA stiffness PROM with strong content validity. Crucially, patient involvement broadened assessment beyond early morning stiffness duration, which may address existing PROM limitations. Items are now suitable for quantitative item reduction, structural development of the final PROM and validation.

Harm, benefit and costs associated with low-dose glucocorticoids added to the treatment strategies for rheumatoid arthritis in elderly patients (GLORIA trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the joints affecting 1% of the world population. It has major impact on patients through disability and associated comorbidities. Current treatment strategies have considerably improved the prognosis, but recent innovations (especially biologic drugs and the new class of so-called “JAK/STAT inhibitors”) have important safety issues and are very costly. Glucocorticoids (GCs) are highly effective in RA, and could reduce the need for expensive treatment with biologic agents. However, despite more than 65 years of clinical experience, there is a lack of studies large enough to adequately document the benefit/harm balance. The result is inappropriate treatment strategies, i.e. both under-use and over-use of GCs, and consequently suboptimal treatment of RA.

Methods

The GLORIA study is a pragmatic multicentre, 2-year, randomised, double-blind, clinical trial to assess the safety and effectiveness of a daily dose of 5 mg prednisolone or matching placebo added to standard of care in elderly patients with RA. Eligible participants are diagnosed with RA, have inadequate disease control (disease activity score, DAS28 ≥ 2.6), and are ≥ 65 years. The primary outcome measures are the time-averaged mean value of the DAS28 and the occurrence of serious adverse events or adverse events of special interest. During the trial, change in antirheumatic therapy is permitted as clinically indicated, except for GCs. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility are secondary outcomes. The main challenge is the interpretation of the trial result with two primary endpoints and the pragmatic trial design that allows co-interventions. Another challenge is the definition of safety and the relative lack of power to detect differences between treatment groups. We have chosen to define safety as the number of patients experiencing at least one serious adverse event. We also specify a decision tree to guide our conclusion on the balance of benefit and harm, and our methodology to combat potential confounding caused by co-interventions.

Discussion

Pragmatic trials minimise impact on daily practice and maximise clinical relevance of the results, but analysis and interpretation of the results is challenging. We expect that the results of this trial are of importance for all rheumatologists who treat elderly patients with RA.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02585258. Registered on 20 October 2015.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2396-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

[The treatment of patients with elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis at Niigata Rheumatic Center]

AIM

To investigate the clinical course of patients with elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

We compared the characteristics, and clinical course of 55 patients who developed RA at over 80 years of age (elderly-onset [EO] group) with 119 patients who developed RA at 40-59 years of age (non-elderly onset [non-EO] group). We also investigated the characteristics and clinical course of 19 patients who developed RA at over 80 and who received biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs).

RESULTS

The mean DAS28-ESR (DAS) and HAQ-DI (HAQ) of the EO were significantly higher in comparison to the non-EO group (4.91±1.31 vs 4.41±1.47, p=0.043, 1.2±0.9 vs 0.5±0.6, p<0.01). For the first treatment, 87.3% in the EO group received conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs), none received MTX. The rate of prednisolone (PSL) administration in the EO group was significantly higher than the non-EO group (56.4% vs 30.3%, p<0.01). The DAS and HAQ were significantly decreased in both groups, while the HAQ of the EO group was higher than the non-EO group. The decrease in DAS and HAQ of the PSL users was significantly greater than the non-PSL users (ΔDAS: 2.55±1.83 vs 1.83±1.23, p<0.01, ΔHAQ: 0.9±1.0 vs 0.3±0.6, p=0.027). Among the 19 patients with bDMARDs, the mean DAS and HAQ at baseline were significantly decreased 6 months later.

CONCLUSION

Early use of csDMARDs and PSL was effective for functional disability of elderly-onset RA; however, some of them required bDMARDs. Further study should be performed to investigate the effectiveness of the early induction of MTX and bDMARDs.

In Vitro Evaluation of Cocoa Pod Husk Pectin as a Carrier for Chronodelivery of Hydrocortisone Intended for Adrenal Insufficiency

This study evaluated the in vitro potential of cocoa pod husk (CPH) pectin as a carrier for chronodelivery of hydrocortisone intended for adrenal insufficiency. FTIR studies found no drug-CPH pectin interactions, and chemometric analysis showed that pure hydrocortisone bears closer similarity to hydrocortisone in hot water soluble pectin (HWSP) than hydrocortisone in citric acid soluble pectin (CASP). CPH pectin-based hydrocortisone matrix tablets (~300 mg) were prepared by direct compression and wet granulation techniques, and the tablet cores were film-coated with a 15% HPMC formulation for timed release, followed by a 12.5% Eudragit® S100 formulation for acid resistance. In vitro drug release studies of the uncoated and coated matrix tablets in simulated gastrointestinal conditions showed that wet granulation tablets exhibit greater retardation of drug release in aqueous medium than directly compressed tablets. CASP showed greater suppression of drug release in aqueous medium than HWSP. Wet granulation HWSP-based matrix tablets coated to a final coat weight gain of ~25% w/w were optimized for chronodelivery of hydrocortisone in the colon. The optimized tablets exhibited a lag phase of ~6 h followed by accelerated drug release in the colonic region and have potential to control night time cortisol levels in patients with adrenal insufficiency.

Giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: current challenges and opportunities

The fields of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) have advanced rapidly, resulting in a new understanding of these diseases. Fast-track strategies and improved awareness programmes that prevent irreversible sight loss through early diagnosis and treatment are a notable advance. Ultrasonography and other imaging techniques have been introduced into routine clinical practice and there have been promising reports on the efficacy of biologic agents, particularly IL-6 antagonists such as tocilizumab, in treating these conditions. Along with these developments, which should improve outcomes in patients with GCA and PMR, new questions and unmet needs have emerged; future research should address which pathogenetic mechanisms contribute to the different phases and clinical phenotypes of GCA, what role imaging has in the early diagnosis and monitoring of GCA and PMR, and in which patients and phases of these diseases novel biologic drugs should be used. This article discusses the implications of recent developments in our understanding of GCA and PMR, as well as the unmet needs concerning epidemiology, pathogenesis, imaging and treatment of these diseases.

Switching From Immediate-Release to Delayed-Release Prednisone in Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Practice-Based Clinical Study

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) produces debilitating morning stiffness. Exogenous glucocorticoids can help with these symptoms when timed appropriately. Bedtime dosing of delayed-release prednisone (DR-prednisone) matches the rise of inflammatory cytokines before awakening and can improve stiffness and other RA symptoms. A prospective open-label study was conducted in patients currently on stable doses of immediate-release prednisone (IR-prednisone) who were switched to DR-prednisone to analyze the incremental benefit of better timed and lower dose glucocorticoid therapy.

Methods

Twelve US sites enrolled patients with moderate-severe RA into a 12-week prospective study. Patients were switched from IR- to DR-prednisone while maintaining other existing background therapies. Change from baseline in morning stiffness severity, morning stiffness duration, swollen and tender joint counts (S-TJC), 28 joint disease activity score (DAS28), and patient/physician global assessment (PGA/PhGA), among others, were measured. Post-hoc analyses were performed on those completing 10 weeks of treatment and those with >60 min of morning stiffness at baseline.

Results

Fifty-six patients had at least one follow-up visit and were similar in demographics to previous controlled trials with DR-prednisone with regard to baseline age and DAS28-CRP but had lower morning stiffness and RA duration. DR-prednisone produced a trend toward lower morning stiffness severity and duration with a reduction in daily prednisone dose of almost 1 mg. Patients treated with DR-prednisone for ≥10 weeks demonstrated significant reductions in morning stiffness duration, SJC, TJC, DAS28-CRP, and PhGA (all p ≤ 0.04). Patients treated for ≥10 weeks with >60 min of baseline morning stiffness produced similar results in these measures as well as a 21% reduction in morning stiffness severity (p = 0.02).

Conclusion

Patients switched to DR-prednisone from IR-prednisone in this practice-based study maintained or improved their outcomes across a variety of domains, and results were comparable to previous controlled trials in which patients completed at least 10 weeks of treatment.

Funding

Horizon Pharma USA, Inc.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02287610.

Dissonance between physicians’ and patients’ perspectives on managing impaired morning function in Asian patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Objectives

To estimate the prevalence of impaired morning function (IMF) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to understand physicians’ and patients’ perceptions on the impact of IMF and treatment in selected Asian countries.

Methods

A survey on the impact of IMF was conducted in Asia on rheumatologists and patients with moderate-to-severe RA who experienced IMF for ≥3 mornings a week. Participants underwent comprehensive face-to-face interviews using structured questionnaires.

Results

Sixty physicians and 300 patients from Hong Kong, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan were surveyed. Rheumatologists estimated that two-thirds of patients with RA experienced IMF and believed that the prevalence of IMF increased with RA severity (present in 42%, 73%, and 87% of patients with mild, moderate, and severe disease, respectively). Patients’ survey revealed that, on an average, patients with RA experienced IMF 5 days a week for 2 h each day. Thirty-eight percent of patients with RA considered a reduction in morning stiffness as an important treatment goal, but this was agreed by only 3% of rheumatologists. Only 22% of rheumatologists modified the treatment regimen specifically for IMF. Physicians considered prednisolone and other glucocorticoids (GCs) to be the most effective medication for the treatment of IMF. Fifty-one percent of patients with RA did not find their current medication effective in relieving IMF, and as a result, they reported negative emotions such as frustration, defeat, and anger, and 56% had missed work because of this symptom.

Conclusions

IMF is prevalent in RA and significantly affects patients’ quality of life (QoL). A higher proportion of patients compared to physicians view the reduction of morning stiffness as an important goal. More should be done to address the dissonance between physicians’ and patients’ views on IMF.

Efficacy of glucocorticoids, conventional and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a systematic literature review informing the 2016 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis

Objectives

To perform a systematic literature review (SLR) informing the 2016 update of the recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

An SLR for the period between 2013 and 2016 was undertaken to assess the efficacy of glucocorticoids (GCs), conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) (tofacitinib and baricitinib) in randomised clinical trials.

Results

For GCs, four studies were included in the SLR. Patients without poor prognostic factors experienced benefit when GCs were added to methotrexate (MTX). Lower doses of GCs were similar to higher doses. For csDMARDs, two new studies comparing MTX monotherapy with combination csDMARD were included in the SLR. In the tREACH trial at the end of 12 months no difference between the groups in disease activity, functional ability and radiographic progression was seen, using principles of tight control (treat-to-target). In the CareRA trial, combination therapy with csDMARDs was not superior to MTX monotherapy and monotherapy was better tolerated.

For tsDMARDs, tofacitinib and baricitinib were shown to be more effective than placebo (MTX) in different patient populations.

Conclusions

Addition of GCs to csDMARD therapy may be beneficial but the benefits should be balanced against the risk of toxicity. Under tight control conditions MTX monotherapy is not less effective than combination csDMARDs, but better tolerated. Tofacitinib and baricitinib are efficacious in patients with RA, including those with refractory disease.

Modified-release prednisone for polymyalgia rheumatica: a multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of modified-release (MR) versus immediate-release (IR) prednisone in newly diagnosed glucocorticoid (GC)-naïve patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR).

Methods

Patients were randomised to double-blind MR prednisone (taken at approximately 22:00) or IR prednisone (taken in the morning), 15 mg/day for 4 weeks. The primary end point was complete response rate (≥70% reduction in PMR visual analogue scale, duration of morning stiffness and C reactive protein (CRP) (or CRP <2× upper limit of normal (ULN))) at week 4. Non-inferiority was decided if the lower 95% confidence limit (MR vs IR prednisone) was above −15%. 400 patients were planned but only 62 were enrolled due to difficulties in recruiting GC-naïve patients with PMR with CRP ≥2×ULN.

Results

The percentage of complete responders at week 4 was numerically greater for MR prednisone (53.8%) than for IR prednisone (40.9%). Non-inferiority of MR versus IR prednisone was not proven in the primary analysis on the per protocol population (N=48; treatment difference: 12.22%; 95% CI −15.82% to 40.25%). However, sensitivity analysis on the full analysis population showed an evident trend favouring MR prednisone (N=62; treatment difference: 15.56%; 95% CI −9.16% to 40.28%). Adverse events were generally mild and transient with no unexpected safety observations.

Conclusions

The study showed a clear trend for favourable short-term efficacy of MR prednisone versus IR prednisone in early treatment of PMR. Further studies are warranted.

Trial registration number

EudraCT number 2011-002353-57; Results.

Chronotherapy with low-dose modified-release prednisone for the management of rheumatoid arthritis: a review

To date, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remains a debilitating, life-threatening disease. One major concern is morning symptoms (MS), as they considerably impair the patients’ quality of life and ability to work. MS change in a circadian fashion, resembling the fluctuations of inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6, whose levels are higher in RA patients compared to healthy donors. Conversely, serum levels of the potent anti-inflammatory glucocorticoid cortisol are similar to that of healthy subjects, suggesting an imbalance that sustains a pro-inflammatory state. From a therapeutic point of view, administering synthetic glucocorticoids (GCs) to RA patients represents an optimal strategy to provide for the inadequate levels of cortisol. Indeed, due to their high efficacy in RA, GCs remain a cornerstone more than 60 years after their first introduction, and despite the development of a wide range of targeted agents. However, to improve safety, low-dose GCs have been introduced, that have demonstrated high efficacy in reducing disease activity, radiological progression, and improving patients’ signs and symptoms especially in early RA when added to conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. A further improvement has been provided by the development of modified-release prednisone, which, by taking advantage of the circadian fluctuations of inflammatory cytokines, cortisol and MS, is given at bedtime to be released approximately 4 hours later. Several studies have already demonstrated the efficacy of this agent on disease activity, MS, and quality of life in the setting of established RA. Moreover, preliminary studies have shown that this new formulation not only has no impact on the adrenal function, but likely improves it. This review is a comprehensive, updated summary of the current evidence on the use of GCs in RA, with focus on the efficacy and safety of low-dose prednisone and modified-release prednisone, the latter representing a rational, cost-effective, and tailored approach to maximize the benefit/risk ratio in RA patients.

Low-dose modified-release prednisone in axial spondyloarthritis: 3-month efficacy and tolerability

Background

Oral glucocorticoids (GCs) have been shown to be effective in reducing the inflammatory symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis, but their use is not supported by evidence in spondyloarthritis (SpA). Modified-release (MR) oral prednisone taken at bedtime has been shown to be more effective than immediate-release prednisone taken in the morning. The efficacy of low-dose MR prednisolone in patients with SpA is unknown.

Patients and methods

This single-center cohort study retrospectively assessed the effectiveness and safety of 12-week low-dose MR prednisone (5 mg daily, bedtime administration) in GC-naïve adult patients with symptomatic axial SpA. A 50% improvement of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) or a final BASDAI score of <4 according to disease activity at baseline was chosen as the primary outcome parameter after MR prednisone.

Results

Fifty-seven patients were evaluated; of them, 41 had an active disease (BASDAI score of ≥4) at baseline. MR prednisone significantly reduced BASDAI (from 5.5±2.6 to 3.0±2.8, P<0.001) as well as inflammatory symptoms, pain, fatigue and morning stiffness. The overall response rate after MR prednisone was 52.6% (53.7% in patients with active SpA and 50.0% in patients with low-active disease; nonsignificant). At multivariable analysis, none of the considered clinical findings independently predicted the response to MR prednisone in subjects with active SpA. Overall, seven patients (11.8%) had nonserious adverse drug reactions after MR prednisone.

Conclusion

In patients with symptomatic SpA and naïve to GCs, low-dose MR prednisone reduced the symptoms and clinical indexes of disease activity and showed a positive safety profile.

Glucocorticoids and Rheumatoid Arthritis

Glucocorticoids (GCs) were discovered in the 1940s and were administered for the first time to patients with rheumatoid arthritis in 1948. However, side effects were subsequently reported. In the last 7 decades, the mechanisms of action for both therapeutic properties and side effects have been elucidated. Mechanisms for minimizing side effects were also developed. GCs are the most frequently used class of drugs in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis because of their efficacy in relieving symptoms and their low cost. A review of clinical applications, side effects, and drug interactions is presented.

The History of Cortisone Discovery and Development

Philip Hench, Edward Kendall, and Tadeus Reichstein received the Nobel Prize in medicine and physiology in 1950 for their "investigations of the hormones of the adrenal cortex." Hench and Kendall took compound E from the laboratory to the clinic to the Nobel Prize in a span of 2 years. This article examines the paths that led to the day when the first rheumatoid arthritis patient received cortisone, and from there to the 1950 Nobel Prize ceremony. The aftermath of this achievement is also discussed. Although there have been significant advances in corticosteroid preparations and use since 1950, the side effects remain daunting.

Circadian variations in clinical symptoms and concentrations of inflammatory cytokines, melatonin, and cortisol in polymyalgia rheumatica before and during prednisolone treatment: a controlled, observational, clinical experimental study

BACKGROUND

In contrast to rheumatoid arthritis (RA), no systematic investigation of diurnal variation has been carried out in polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). The aim of the study was to provide the often-requested documentation of the 24-h time course of clinical symptoms in PMR and relate them to concentrations during the day of melatonin, inflammatory cytokines, and cortisol. Furthermore, the effects of 14 days of prednisolone treatment were studied.

METHODS

Ten glucocorticoid-naive patients newly diagnosed with PMR and seven non-PMR control subjects were studied for 24 h before treatment and during the 14th day of treatment with 20 mg/day of prednisolone. Global pain and generalized muscle stiffness were monitored by using visual analogue scales, and blood was drawn repeatedly.

RESULTS

In untreated patients, pain and stiffness peaked in the early morning, showing a plateau between 04:00 and 08:00, and then declined to a nadir at 16:00 (2P < 0.05). Plasma concentrations of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, IL-1β, and IL-4 varied with time in both groups (2P < 0.05) and peaked between 04:00 and 08:00. Furthermore, except for IL-1β, concentrations of these cytokines and of IL-10 were higher throughout the 24-h observation period in patients than in control subjects (2P < 0.05). Also, melatonin and cortisol were consistently higher in patients (2P < 0.05) and varied with time (2P < 0.05), peaking around 02:00 and 08:00, respectively. In patients, prednisolone abolished symptoms, normalized C-reactive protein, and reduced melatonin, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α concentrations (2P < 0.05), while IL-10 increased between 10:00 and 14:00.

CONCLUSIONS

In PMR, key symptoms show diurnal variation. Furthermore, in PMR, concentrations of melatonin, several pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, and cortisol are increased throughout the day and show diurnal variation, as also seen in healthy subjects. The time courses and the inhibitory effects of prednisolone indicate that in PMR, as proposed for RA, melatonin stimulates cytokine production, which in turn accounts at least partly for the symptoms. Furthermore, overall, cortisol may downregulate cytokine production and symptoms. Stimulation of IL-10 secretion may participate in the anti-inflammatory effects of prednisolone. These findings support use of chronotherapy in PMR and encourage study of circadian variations in other inflammatory autoimmune diseases.

What Is the Relationship Between Morning Symptoms and Measures of Disease Activity in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis?

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about the relationship between morning symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and measures of disease activity currently used to assess RA. Information available from the Circadian Administration of Prednisone in Rheumatoid Arthritis (CAPRA-2) study was used to investigate these relationships.

METHODS

CAPRA-2 included 350 patients with RA who were symptomatic despite treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, randomized 2:1 to additional treatment with a 5-mg daily dose of delayed-release prednisone or placebo. Pearson's correlations were used to evaluate the relationships between change from baseline in symptoms (duration of morning stiffness, severity of morning stiffness, and intensity of pain on waking) and measures of disease activity (the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria [ACR20], the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints [DAS28], and the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index). Correlations were defined as weak (<0.3), moderate (0.3-0.7), or strong (>0.7).

RESULTS

There was a strong correlation between the severity of morning stiffness and the intensity of morning pain (Pearson's correlation 0.91, P < 0.001). There was a weak correlation between the duration of morning stiffness and measures of disease activity (0.24-0.28), with moderate correlations between the severity of morning stiffness or intensity of pain on waking and DAS28 or ACR20 scores (0.44-0.48). Severity of morning stiffness showed less variability and a greater effect size than did duration of morning stiffness.

CONCLUSION

Morning symptoms and measures of disease activity show weak to moderate correlations. Severity of morning stiffness showed less variability and greater effect size than did duration of morning stiffness. These findings suggest that severity is the preferred construct to measure the impact of morning stiffness in patients with RA, information that is not fully captured in the RA core set.

Post-transcriptional control of the mammalian circadian clock: implications for health and disease

Many aspects of human physiology and behavior display rhythmicity with a period of approximately 24 h. Rhythmic changes are controlled by an endogenous time keeper, the circadian clock, and include sleep-wake cycles, physical and mental performance capability, blood pressure, and body temperature. Consequently, many diseases, such as metabolic, sleep, autoimmune and mental disorders and cancer, are connected to the circadian rhythm. The development of therapies that take circadian biology into account is thus a promising strategy to improve treatments of diverse disorders, ranging from allergic syndromes to cancer. Circadian alteration of body functions and behavior are, at the molecular level, controlled and mediated by widespread changes in gene expression that happen in anticipation of predictably changing requirements during the day. At the core of the molecular clockwork is a well-studied transcription-translation negative feedback loop. However, evidence is emerging that additional post-transcriptional, RNA-based mechanisms are required to maintain proper clock function. Here, we will discuss recent work implicating regulated mRNA stability, translation and alternative splicing in the control of the mammalian circadian clock, and its role in health and disease.

Efficacy and safety of modified-release prednisone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

The introduction of modified-release (MR) prednisone adds a drug with encouraging potential to the armamentarium of the rheumatologist. In particular, for patients experiencing a reduced quality of life due to prolonged morning stiffness, it is a promising therapeutic approach. Two clinical trials and one open-label observational study investigated the effectiveness of MR prednisone in reducing rheumatoid arthritis-related morning stiffness for both new and current users of corticosteroids. The efficacy and safety of MR prednisone use in rheumatoid arthritis patients are reviewed in this article. This includes pivotal trials as well as pathophysiological considerations and clinical implications.

A matter of time: study of circadian clocks and their role in inflammation

Circadian rhythms regulate changes in physiology, allowing organisms to respond to predictable environmental demands varying over a 24 h period. A growing body of evidence supports a key role for the circadian clock in the regulation of immune functions and inflammatory responses, which influence the understanding of infections and inflammatory diseases and their treatment. A variety of experimental methods have been used to assess the complex bidirectional crosstalk between the circadian clock and inflammation. In this review, we summarize the organization of the molecular clock, experimental methods used to study circadian rhythms, and both the inflammatory and immune consequences of circadian disturbance.

Balancing benefits and risks of glucocorticoids in rheumatic diseases and other inflammatory joint disorders: new insights from emerging data. An expert consensus paper from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO)

PURPOSE

This consensus review article considers the question of whether glucocorticoid (GC) therapy is still relevant in the treatment of rheumatic diseases, with a particular focus on rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and whether its side effects can be adequately managed. Recent basic and clinical research on the molecular, cellular and clinical effects of GCs have considerably advanced our knowledge in this field. An overview of the subject seems appropriate.

METHODS

This review is the result of a multidisciplinary expert working group, organised by European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis. The recent literature was surveyed and the salient evidence synthetized.

RESULTS

The pathophysiological basis of RA (and other inflammatory rheumatic diseases) now strongly implicates the adaptive immune system in addition to innate mechanisms. The molecular effect of GCs and differential GC sensitivity is better understood, although exploiting this knowledge is still in its infancy. The newer treatment strategies of early and aggressive control of RA have gr eatly improved clinical outcomes, but improvements are still possible. Newer targeted anti-inflammatory drugs have made an important impact, yet they too are associated with numerous side effects.

DISCUSSION

Short durations of moderate doses of GCs are generally well tolerated and have a positive benefit/risk ratio. Patients should be assessed for fracture risk and bone preserving agents and be prescribed calcium and vitamin D supplementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Within a strategy of a disease modifying approach to inflammatory disease, combination therapy including a GC is effective approach.

Infection Risk and Safety of Corticosteroid Use

Corticosteroids are frequently used to treat rheumatic diseases. Their use comes with several well-established risks, including osteoporosis, avascular necrosis, glaucoma, and diabetes. The risk of infection is of utmost concern and is well documented, although randomized controlled trials of short-term and lower-dose steroids have generally shown little or no increased risk. Observational studies from the real world, however, have consistently shown dose-dependent increases in risk for serious infections as well as certain opportunistic infections. In patients who begin chronic steroid therapy, vaccination and screening strategies should be used in an attempt to mitigate this risk.

Chronotherapy in practice: the perspective of the community pharmacist

BACKGROUND

Optimising the time of drug administration in alignment with circadian rhythms to enhance the clinical effect or minimise/avoid adverse effects is referred to as chronotherapy. Pharmacists have a key role in providing medicine related information, including counselling about the optimal time for medication administration. Where applicable, the principles of chronotherapy should underlie this aspect of medication counselling. Despite significant developments in the science of chronotherapy for specific pharmacological treatments, the perspective of pharmacists about their understanding and application of these principles in practice has not been explored.

OBJECTIVE

To explore community pharmacist's viewpoints about and experience with the application of chronotherapy principles in practice.

SETTING

Community pharmacies within metropolitan Sydney in New South Wales, Australia.

METHODS

Semi-structured, face to face interviews with a convenience sample of community pharmacists were conducted. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed using a 'grounded theory' approach, given the novelty of this area. Main outcome measure Community pharmacists' awareness, current practice and future practice support requirements about the principles of chronotherapy.

RESULTS

Twenty-five semi-structured interviews were conducted. Most participants reported encountering cases where clinical decision making about suggesting appropriate times of drug administration to patients was needed. Their approach was mainly pragmatic rather than based on theoretical principles of circadian variation in drug disposition or on current or emerging evidence; thus there was an evidence practice chasm in some cases. However, most participants believed they have an important role to play in counselling patients about optimal administration times and were willing to enact such roles or acquire skills/competence in this area.

CONCLUSION

Community pharmacists contribute to the safe and effective use of medications in providing the patients with information on optimal timing of drug administration during counselling. Further education, practical training and access to information may help pharmacists in translating principles of chronotherapy into the practice.

2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To develop a new evidence-based, pharmacologic treatment guideline for rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

We conducted systematic reviews to synthesize the evidence for the benefits and harms of various treatment options. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to rate the quality of evidence. We employed a group consensus process to grade the strength of recommendations (either strong or conditional). A strong recommendation indicates that clinicians are certain that the benefits of an intervention far outweigh the harms (or vice versa). A conditional recommendation denotes uncertainty over the balance of benefits and harms and/or more significant variability in patient values and preferences.

RESULTS

The guideline covers the use of traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), biologic agents, tofacitinib, and glucocorticoids in early (<6 months) and established (≥6 months) RA. In addition, it provides recommendations on using a treat-to-target approach, tapering and discontinuing medications, and the use of biologic agents and DMARDs in patients with hepatitis, congestive heart failure, malignancy, and serious infections. The guideline addresses the use of vaccines in patients starting/receiving DMARDs or biologic agents, screening for tuberculosis in patients starting/receiving biologic agents or tofacitinib, and laboratory monitoring for traditional DMARDs. The guideline includes 74 recommendations: 23% are strong and 77% are conditional.

CONCLUSION

This RA guideline should serve as a tool for clinicians and patients (our two target audiences) for pharmacologic treatment decisions in commonly encountered clinical situations. These recommendations are not prescriptive, and the treatment decisions should be made by physicians and patients through a shared decision-making process taking into account patients' values, preferences, and comorbidities. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies.

Opening the Debate: How to Fulfill the Need for Physicians' Training in Circadian-Related Topics in a Full Medical School Curriculum

BACKGROUND

Circadian rhythms are daily changes in our physiology and behavior that are manifested as patterns of brain wave activity, periodic hormone production, recurring cell regeneration, and other oscillatory biological activities. Their importance to human health is becoming apparent; they are deranged by shift work and jet-lag and in disparate conditions such as insomnia, sleep syndromes, coronary heart attacks, and depression, and are endogenous factors that contribute to cancer development and progression.

DISCUSSION

As evidence of the circadian connection to human health has grown, so has the number of Americans experiencing disruption of circadian rhythms due to the demands of an industrialized society. Today, there is a growing work force that experiences night shift work and time-zone shifts shaping the demands on physicians to best meet the needs of patients exposed to chronic circadian disruptions. The diverse range of illness associated with altered rhythms suggests that physicians in various fields will see its impact in their patients. However, medical education, with an already full curriculum, struggles to address this issue.

SUMMARY

Here, we emphasize the need for incorporating the topic of circadian rhythms in the medical curriculum and propose strategies to accomplish this goal.

Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: Unraveling the conundrum

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a heterogeneous disease with a complex and yet not fully understood pathophysiology, where numerous different cell-types contribute to a destructive process of the joints. This complexity results into a considerable interpatient variability in clinical course and severity, which may additionally involve genetics and/or environmental factors. After three decades of focused efforts scientists have now achieved to apply in clinical practice, for patients with RA, the "treat to target" approach with initiation of aggressive therapy soon after diagnosis and escalation of the therapy in pursuit of clinical remission. In addition to the conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, biologics have greatly improved the management of RA, demonstrating efficacy and safety in alleviating symptoms, inhibiting bone erosion, and preventing loss of function. Nonetheless, despite the plethora of therapeutic options and their combinations, unmet therapeutic needs in RA remain, as current therapies sometimes fail or produce only partial responses and/or develop unwanted side-effects. Unfortunately the mechanisms of 'nonresponse' remain unknown and most probable lie in the unrevealed heterogeneity of the RA pathophysiology. In this review, through the effort of unraveling the complex pathophysiological pathways, we will depict drugs used throughout the years for the treatment of RA, the current and future biological therapies and their molecular or cellular targets and finally will suggest therapeutic algorithms for RA management. With multiple biologic options, there is still a need for strong predictive biomarkers to determine which drug is most likely to be effective, safe, and durable in a given individual. The fact that available biologics are not effective in all patients attests to the heterogeneity of RA, yet over the long term, as research and treatment become more aggressive, efficacy, toxicity, and costs must be balanced within the therapeutic equation to enhance the quality of life in patients with RA.

Delayed-release prednisone improves fatigue and health-related quality of life: findings from the CAPRA-2 double-blind randomised study in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

Like morning stiffness, fatigue is a common, debilitating symptom of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Delayed-release (DR) prednisone is designed for evening administration (approximately 22:00) and releases 4 h later to coincide with the rise of nocturnal inflammatory cytokines associated with development of morning stiffness. The impact of DR prednisone on fatigue and other related patient-reported outcomes was analysed with data obtained from the Circadian Administration of Prednisone in Rheumatoid Arthritis (CAPRA) 2 study.

METHODS

Patients with symptomatic RA (n=350) despite treatment with a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) were randomised 2:1 to receive additional therapy with DR prednisone 5 mg or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Fatigue was assessed using validated instruments: the fatigue scale of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) and the vitality domain of the Short Form-36 (SF-36). General quality of life was assessed using the general score and individual domains of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) and SF-36.

RESULTS

The change from baseline to week 12 in FACIT-F score was statistically significantly different with DR prednisone/DMARD (3.8) versus placebo/DMARD (1.6; difference 2.2, p=0.0032). Improvement in FACIT-F score correlated positively with clinical response. Compared with placebo/DMARD, DR prednisone/DMARD showed a significantly greater improvement in SF-36 vitality score (5.6, p=0.001), physical component of SF-36 (2.3, p=0.0003) and general score with FACT-G (2.6, p=0.0233).

CONCLUSIONS

DR prednisone in addition to a DMARD significantly improves fatigue and other aspects of health-related quality of life in patients with symptomatic RA compared with DMARD treatment alone.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00650078.

Morning stiffness response with delayed-release prednisone after ineffective course of immediate-release prednisone

Objective: To assess morning stiffness in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients switched from immediate-release (IR) to delayed-release (DR) prednisone.

Method: Circadian Administration of Prednisone in Rheumatoid Arthritis-1 (CAPRA-1) is a 12-week, randomized, multicentre, active-controlled study of morning stiffness that consisted of a double-blind phase and a 9-month open-label extension. Patients receiving IR prednisone with no significant improvement after the double-blind study were switched to DR prednisone. Morning stiffness duration and median absolute and relative changes in pain and global assessment were evaluated (3, 6, and 9 months).

Results: In patients switched from IR to DR prednisone (n = 110), statistically significant reductions in morning stiffness occurred over 3 months and were sustained for 9 months. Absolute reduction of morning stiffness was ~50 min with > 40% relative reduction at each visit. Interleukin (IL)-6 levels were reduced by the same amount. Statistically significant and clinically meaningful mean reductions in morning stiffness were maintained at > 67 min at each visit along with significant improvements in pain and patient global assessment. There was no evidence of tachyphylaxis seen over the 9-month study.

Conclusions: Patients receiving disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and IR prednisone who had not had significant reductions in morning stiffness demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements when switched to DR prednisone.

Patient reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials

Patient reported outcomes (PRO) are at the core of assessing RA treatment response with patient assessments of global health or disease activity, pain, and physical function included in the calculation of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) responses. Progress has been made in assessing PROs that include additional patient-valued aspects of disease in recent RA randomized clinical trials (RCTs), particularly fatigue. Importantly, the National Institute of Health (NIH)--Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) development of psychometrically advanced generic health measures that span the range of symptoms potentially affected in RA, with high precision across the entire range of a symptom are undergoing additional study in RA and other rheumatologic diseases to establish their construct validity, responsiveness, and clinically meaningful cutoffs. PRO measures that are currently used and widely available can provide important perspectives not captured in composite clinical response criteria with the potential of better informing treatment decisions in clinical practice.

Clocking in: chronobiology in rheumatoid arthritis

Circadian rhythms are of crucial importance for cellular and physiological functions of the brain and body. Chronobiology has a prominent role in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with major symptoms such as joint pain and stiffness being most pronounced in the morning, possibly mediated by circadian rhythms of cytokine and hormone levels. Chronobiological principles imply that tailoring the timing of treatments to the circadian rhythm of individual patients (chronotherapy) could optimize results. Trials of NSAID or methotrexate chronotherapy for patients with RA suggest such an approach can improve outcomes and reduce adverse effects. The most compelling evidence for RA chronotherapy, however, is that coordinating the timing of glucocorticoid therapy to coincide with the nocturnal increase in blood IL-6 levels results in reduced morning stiffness and pain compared with the same glucocorticoid dose taken in the morning. Aside from optimizing relief of the core symptoms of RA, chronotherapy might also relieve important comorbid conditions such as depression and sleep disturbances. Surprisingly, chronobiology is not mentioned in official guidelines for conducting RA drug registration trials. Given the imperative to achieve the best value with approved drugs and health budgets, the time is ripe to translate the 'circadian concept' in rheumatology from bench to bedside.

More than Just Minutes of Stiffness in the Morning: Report from the OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Flare Group Stiffness Breakout Sessions

OBJECTIVE

Stiffness was endorsed within the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) flare core domain set at the previous Outcome Measures in Rheumatology meeting (OMERACT 11). Two stiffness breakout groups at the present OMERACT 12 RA flare workshop discussed results of new qualitative studies in RA stiffness.

METHODS

Results from 2 independent studies of RA stiffness were presented to breakout group participants, followed by group discussions about stiffness measurement.

RESULTS

Both studies identified stiffness as complex, variable with the level of disease activity, and as encompassing concepts of impact, intensity, timing, location, and duration. That stiffness has an effect on multiple dimensions of health was a common finding. Participants agreed that stiffness is an important aspect of RA flare. Whether measuring only morning stiffness duration, the traditional approach in RA, was sufficient in coverage of the concept was unclear. Groups agreed that more research on stiffness measurement is needed considering the importance patients place on the effect of stiffness.

CONCLUSION

Results from independent studies highlight stiffness effect as an important feature of RA, in addition to intensity, timing, location, and duration. Additional work is needed to identify optimal ways to assess stiffness in RA and other rheumatologic diseases.