Comparison of corticosteroid and sulphasalazine therapy in ulcerative colitis

Systematic review: does concurrent therapy with 5-ASA and immunomodulators in inflammatory bowel disease improve outcomes?

BACKGROUND

With greater use of immunomodulators in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), it is uncertain whether concurrent therapy with both 5-aminosalicylic acid [5-ASA, mesalazine (mesalamine)] and an immunomodulator is necessary.

AIM

To determine whether concurrent therapy with both 5-ASA and immunomodulator(s) improves outcomes in IBD.

METHODS

Systematic review with search terms 'azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, thiopurine(s), 5 aminosalicylic acid, mesalazine, inflammatory bowel disease, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, immunosuppressant(s), immunomodulator and methotrexate' in November 2007 to identify clinical trials on concurrent 5-ASA and immunomodulator therapy.

RESULTS

Two small controlled studies were found. Neither showed a benefit on disease control beyond immunomodulator monotherapy. Potential pharmacological interactions exist between 5-ASA and thiopurines. Whilst circumstantial, epidemiological and laboratory evidence suggests that 5-ASA may assist colorectal cancer (CRC) chemoprevention, it may simply be via anti-inflammatory effects. With changes in practice, ethical issues and the long lead-time needed to demonstrate or disprove an effect, no clinical studies can/will directly answer this. The costs of avoiding one CRC in IBD may be as low as 153 times the annual cost of 5-ASA therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

It is unclear whether concurrent 5-ASA and immunomodulator therapy improves outcomes of disease control, drug toxicity or compliance. Concurrent therapy of 5-ASA and immunomodulators may decrease CRC risk at 'acceptable' cost.

Clinical trial: oral prednisolone metasulfobenzoate (Predocol) vs. oral prednisolone for active ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Systemic corticosteroids are effective in ulcerative colitis but commonly cause side effects.

AIM

To compare the safety and efficacy of a sparingly absorbed formulation of prednisolone metasulfobenzoate (Predocol) with a conventional tapering course of oral prednisolone.

METHOD

In a double-blind randomized study, 59 active ulcerative colitis patients received Predocol 40 mg/day for 6 months, 61 received Predocol 60 mg/day for 6 months and 61 received prednisolone 40 mg/day for 2 weeks, tapered to week 8, followed by placebo until 6 months.

RESULTS

Steroid-related side effects assessed using a 10-cm visual analogue scale were fewer at 2 months with Predocol 40 mg [VAS 8.1 cm (2.6), mean (s.d.)], or 60 mg [8.1 (2.1)] compared with prednisolone [6.7 (2.7); P = 0.01]. Mood changes affected 43% receiving prednisolone at 4 weeks vs. 8% for Predocol 40 mg (P = 0.001). Remission rates (Powell-Tuck < or =2) at 2 months were Predocol 40 mg 46%, Predocol 60 mg 28% and tapering prednisolone 41% (P = 0.13). Visual analogue scale for efficacy also showed non-inferiority for Predocol 40 mg/day. Remission rates at 6 months were Predocol 40 mg 51%, Predocol 60 mg 38% and tapering prednisolone 32% (P = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

Predocol 40 mg/day has similar efficacy but markedly fewer side effects than a conventional tapering prednisolone regimen (ISRCTN14133410).

How important is onset of action in ulcerative colitis therapy?

Pharmacotherapy is the cornerstone of management in ulcerative colitis. However, controversy remains over optimal medical strategies. Specifically, differences in the onset of action of various drug therapies are thought to influence the achievement and maintenance of remission of disease, yet this is poorly characterised. There is a wide range of recent data concerning aminosalicylates, with much debate as to the relative merits of the various formulations and delivery systems. Meta-analyses confirm the efficacy of aminosalicylates for the induction and maintenance of remission and suggest that the newer agents are comparable in efficacy to sulfasalazine. Among aminosalicylates, data from clinical trials reveal that the onset of action is earlier with balsalazide than mesalazine. Although the efficacy of the newer 5-aminosalicylate agents is no greater than that of sulfasalazine, they have better adverse effect profiles. Factors such as tolerability and adherence appear more important than onset of action in long-term maintenance. Corticosteroids have long been used in the treatment of ulcerative colitis, yet there is a paucity of data regarding this. They have a rapid onset of action but considerable systemic adverse effects. Therefore, corticosteroids are reserved for disease that fails to respond to other agents or for primary therapy in patients with severe disease, although there is no universal acceptance of a threshold at which to initiate corticosteroid treatment.Rectal preparations of both aminosalicylates and corticosteroids have been developed in an attempt to exert a more rapid and direct onset of action while minimising adverse systemic effects. In clinical trials, topical preparations of both aminosalicylates and corticosteroids are effective in inducing remission. However, patient acceptability and proximal extent of disease dictate selection of a topical agent more than concern with rate of onset.A wide range of immunomodulators have been investigated in patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. The thioguanine derivatives are the most widely used but have a limited evidence base to support this use with controlled trials providing equivocal results regarding efficacy in severe ulcerative colitis. In addition, the thioguanine derivatives have a protracted onset of action and a considerable serious adverse effect profile. Calcineurin inhibitors and methotrexate have a more rapid onset of action than the thiopurines but have even less data to support their widespread use. They are widely regarded as salvage therapy and further data are required. Regarding biological agents, infliximab revolutionised the treatment of Crohn's disease, yet results in ulcerative colitis have been disappointing. Further trials are ongoing with great anticipation for more favourable data. The practical clinical implications of any differences between the agents depend on patient satisfaction with various therapies. Noncompliance is a major concern in maintenance therapy and is probably associated with relapse. Dose administration schedules and acceptability of therapy appear to be important factors in adherence. Overall, it is not clear that onset of action has a major influence on patient adherence and addressing issues of compliance may have more direct clinical impact.

Mesalamine delivery systems: do they really make much difference?

Sulfasalazine's role as the first-line of therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease has led to the development of other "designer" aminosalicylates, which eliminate the sulfa-moiety, and attempt to target the topically active mesalamine to the inflamed bowel. Olsalazine sodium and balsalazide disodium utilize the same azo-bond structure as sulfasalazine, requiring release of active mesalamine by colonic bacteria, and thus targeting these agents to the colon. Other mesalamine delivery systems use pH-dependant- or moisture-release to liberate the active mesalamine in both the large and small bowel. Direct application of mesalamine via enema or suppository is also effective in patients with distal colitis. The pharmacology and thus the undesirable drug absorption rates differ between drugs, although the clinical importance of these characteristics is debatable. Differences in release-systems, the impact of the fed and fasting state, and unique patient intolerances to individual agents demand an understanding of each of these products, and their application to patient therapy.

Recent developments in inflammatory bowel disease

The evolving medical armamentarium holds promise for more precise and effective therapies for IBD. The experience with anti-TNF therapy, particularly infliximab, illustrates the potential efficacy of therapies targeted at specific mediators or pathways involved in the pathogenesis. Advances in molecular technology have enabled the development of novel and potentially effective targeted therapies. Equally important is the increasing scientific understanding of the pathogenesis of IBD, which will likely improve the ability to stratify disease and to select therapies based on genotypic, immunologic, and phenotypic profiles in the future.

A double-blind comparison of balsalazide, 6.75 g daily, and sulfasalazine, 3 g daily, in patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed active ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Sulfasalazine is well established in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. Intolerance to sulfasalazine, however, is a common problem. Balsalazide has been designed to deliver 5-aminosalicylic acid to the colon without the poor tolerability of sulfasalazine.

AIM

To compare the safety and efficacy of balsalazide, 6.75 g daily, with sulfasalazine, 3 g daily, in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis of all grades of severity.

METHODS

Balsalazide and sulfasalazine were compared in a multicentre, double-blind, parallel group study over 12 weeks. Patients were stratified for disease severity and topical and/or oral steroids were co-administered where clinically necessary.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were randomized: 28 to receive balsalazide and 29 to receive sulfasalazine. Significantly fewer patients withdrew from the balsalazide group due to adverse events (2/28 vs. 9/29, P=0.041). These data confirm that balsalazide is better tolerated than sulfasalazine. In patients able to tolerate the treatment, similar improvements were recorded in clinical, sigmoidoscopic and histological assessments in both treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the better tolerability of balsalazide compared to sulfasalazine, and supports the use of balsalazide in ulcerative colitis of all grades of severity.

A double-blind comparison of balsalazide, 6.75 g, and sulfasalazine, 3 g, as sole therapy in the management of ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Sulfasalazine is accepted therapy for active ulcerative colitis, but side-effects and intolerance are common. Balsalazide is an azo-bonded pro-drug which also releases 5-aminosalicylic acid into the colon, but uses an inert carrier molecule.

AIM

To compare the safety and efficacy of sul- fasalazine, 3 g, with balsalazide, 6.75 g, in the initial daily treatment of mild to moderate ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

A randomized, multicentre, double-blind, parallel group study was performed, with a treatment duration of 8 weeks. Patients on previous maintenance treatment were excluded. The trial medication was the sole treatment for the colitis. Efficacy was assessed by patient diaries, symptom assessment, sigmoidoscopic appearance and histology.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were recruited: 26 allocated to the balsalazide group and 24 to the sulfasalazine group. More patients withdrew due to adverse events in the sulfasalazine group (nine patients vs. one patient in the balsalazide group, P=0.004). Improvement occurred in both groups, with a tendency to a faster response with balsalazide. Of the patients taking balsalazide, 61% achieved clinical and sigmoidoscopic remission.

CONCLUSIONS

Balsalazide, 6.75 g, is effective as the sole treatment for patients with mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis, with significantly fewer withdrawals due to side-effects than in a similar group of patients taking sulfasalazine, 3 g.

Intestinal luminal pH in inflammatory bowel disease: possible determinants and implications for therapy with aminosalicylates and other drugs

Measurements of luminal pH in the normal gastrointestinal tract have shown a progressive increase in pH from the duodenum to the terminal ileum, a decrease in the caecum, and then a slow rise along the colon to the rectum. Some data in patients with ulcerative colitis suggest a substantial reduction below normal values in the right colon, while limited results in Crohn's disease have been contradictory. Determinants of luminal pH in the colon include mucosal bicarbonate and lactate production, bacterial fermentation of carbohydrates and mucosal absorption of short chain fatty acids, and possibly intestinal transit. Alterations in these factors, as a result of mucosal disease and changes in diet, are likely to explain abnormal pH measurements in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It is conceivable that reduced intracolonic pH in active ulcerative colitis impairs bioavailability of 5-aminosalicylic acid from pH dependent release formulations (Asacol, Salofalk) and those requiring cleavage by bacterial azo reductase (sulphasalazine, olsalazine, balsalazide), but further pharmacokinetic studies are needed to confirm this possibility. Reports that balsalazide and olsalazine may be more efficacious in active and quiescent ulcerative colitis, respectively, than Asacol suggest that low pH may be a more critical factor in patients taking directly pH dependent release than azo bonded preparations. Reduced intracolonic pH also needs to be considered in the development of pH dependent colonic release formulations of budesonide and azathioprine for use in ulcerative and Crohn's colitis. This paper reviews methods for measuring gut pH, its changes in IBD, and how these may influence current and future therapies.

Insolubilization test of sodium chondroitin sulphate with a view to its use as colonic carrier of drugs

Several studies have been devoted to cross-linked sodium chondroitin sulphate (SCS), in the context of numerous strategies attempting to target the colon for the absorption or the therapeutic action of a drug. SCS, a glycosaminoglycan presenting a specific degradation in the colon, is in fact soluble in water and its use as drug carrier at such a distance from the digestive tube necessitates its hydrophobisation. One method described in the literature consists in manufacturing a three-dimensional network by cross-linking with bifunctional compounds. However, all the structural characterisations carried out on the products resulting from the catalysed treatments of SCS with diaminoalkanes demonstrate that there are no cross-linking bridges between the polymer chains. Moreover, treated SCS-based tablets containing theophylline as model drug lead in vitro to dissolution profiles which are identical to those obtained with the non-treated SCS. We were therefore unable to find the announced results using the method described.

Review article: the management of severe ulcerative colitis

Severe ulcerative colitis is a potentially life-threatening condition but the mortality has fallen dramatically over the past 30-40 years. It is now less than 2%, including surgical mortality, and should only be seen in patients with significant co-existing disease. Early recognition of the severity of the colitis, intensive medical therapy, close liaison between physician and surgeon, and prompt surgery when necessary have all contributed to this improved outcome. Despite the use of high-dose intravenous corticosteroids, 20-30% of patients will make a poor response and will require urgent surgery. The use of intravenous cyclosporin has proved effective at reducing the immediate surgical rate in this group of unresponsive patients and appears safe. Whether cyclosporin reduces the need for surgery in the longer term is much less certain. Clinical, radiological, endoscopic and laboratory parameters can now be used to predict the course of a severe attack. These help in the timing of urgent surgery and are potentially helpful in determining when to begin other therapies such as cyclosporin.

Management of the first presentation of severe acute colitis

Prompt diagnosis and exclusion of infection requires a minimum of rigid sigmoidoscopy, rectal mucosal biopsy and stool culture. Admission to hospital is mandatory for patients with features of severe disease, or who are in their first attack of ulcerative colitis and have bloody diarrhoea, even if the criteria for severe disease are not met. Once admitted, the patient should be monitored by plain abdominal X-ray, full blood count, serum albumin and C reactive protein on alternate days; temperature and pulse rate should be recorded four times per day. Treatment should be instituted as soon as the diagnosis is made with an intravenous corticosteroid (hydrocortisone 100 mg intravenously, four times daily, or equivalent). Antibiotics may be included if infection cannot be confidently excluded. Free diet can be allowed but attention should be given to nutritional, fluid and electrolyte status with intravenous replacement if necessary. Any evidence of colonic dilatation occurring despite maximal therapy should be regarded as an absolute indication for colectomy. The patient should be kept fully informed from an early stage about the likely natural history of the condition and about the possible therapeutic options including surgery. Cyclosporin therapy should be reserved for patients who have a poor response to the first 3-4 days of corticosteroid therapy, particularly those with serum C reactive protein > 45 mg/l and who do not yet have absolute indications for colectomy. Most patients who have not convincingly responded within 10 days of starting full medical therapy should undergo colectomy, although partial responders who are afebrile may reasonably continue for up to 14 days before a final decision. Approximately 30-40% of patients with severe colitis will need colectomy within the first 6 months. With optimal management, mortality should be zero, but better medical therapies are urgently needed to reduce the colectomy rate.

Sulphapyridine--a new agent for the treatment of ocular cicatricial pemphigoid

AIMS

Ocular cicatricial pemphigoid (OCP) is a severe, potentially sight threatening systemic disease that sometimes requires systemic immunosuppression. This study assessed the clinical outcome of patients with OCP treated with sulphapyridine, a sulphonamide with an anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive action but few side effects.

METHODS

A prospective, single armed, unmasked clinical trial was undertaken at Moorfields Eye Hospital. Twenty consecutive patients with moderate or marked conjunctival inflammation due to OCP were treated with oral sulphapyridine 500 mg twice daily. The degree of ocular inflammation was assessed as nil, mild, moderate, marked, or severe. Success was defined as resolution to mild or less. Ocular limbitis, systemic features of the disease, and side effects of the drug were also monitored.

RESULTS

Follow up was a mean of 12.3 (SD 4.0) months and ranged from 7 to 17 months. A successful reduction in inflammation was recorded in 22/39 eyes (56%) and 10/20 patients (50%). This improvement occurred within 1 month in 64% and in all by 2 months. Three patients developed allergy. Other side effects included nausea (n = 3), headache (n = 1), urinary hesitancy (n = 1), and mild lymphocytopenia (n = 1). These were dose dependent. Progression of cicatrisation was observed in 1/22 eyes. Success was less likely if there were systemic features of OCP or ocular limbitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Sulphapyridine was clinically effective in 50% of patients with moderate marked inflammation and had few side effects. It is a good alternative to dapsone.

Safety and efficacy of controlled-release mesalamine for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis. Pentasa UC Maintenance Study Group

This 12-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled study randomized 205 ulcerative colitis patients in remission to placebo or controlled-release mesalamine at 4 g/day for 12 months. Patients were stratified to either pancolitis or left-sided disease, based on previous diagnosis. Maintenance of remission was defined as a sigmoidoscopic index of < 5, less than five stools per day, and the absence of rectal bleeding. A significantly greater number of patients maintained remission on mesalamine 4 g/day than on placebo at each of five study visits, following the first one-month visit (P < 0.05). The estimated 12-month remission rates for the mesalamine group were 64% (38% for placebo, P = 0.0004). Baseline subgroups (disease location, time since last flare of active disease, and previous response to oral/rectal steroids or sulfasalazine) did not influence remission rates. Treatment-related adverse events were rare. Controlled-release mesalamine is a safe and efficacious single agent for maintaining remission of ulcerative colitis.

Salicylates for ulcerative colitis--their mode of action

Delivery of 5-aminosalicylic acid to the colon by sulphasalazine, other azo-bonded compounds and controlled-release preparations is introduced in the context of metabolism by epithelial cells and therapeutic efficacy in ulcerative colitis. Potential modes of action are then reviewed, including actions on luminal bacteria, epithelial cell surface receptors, cellular events (such as nitric oxide release or butyrate oxidation), electrolyte transport and epithelial permeability. Evidence for an influence of salicylates on circulating and lamina propria inflammatory cells is presented, as well as actions on adhesion molecules, chemotactic peptides and inflammatory mediators, such as eicosanoids, platelet-activating factor, cytokines or reactive oxygen metabolites. The precise mechanism will remain uncertain as long as the aetiology of ulcerative colitis is unknown, but a pluripotential mode of action of salicylates is an advantage when influencing the network of events that constitute chronic inflammation.

Salicylates for inflammatory bowel disease

Targeted delivery of 5-aminosalicylic acid to the small intestine and colon by controlled-release or azo-bonded compounds potentially offers treatment for ileal Crohn's disease as well as ulcerative colitis. The pharmacokinetics of sulphasalazine and aminosalicylate derivatives have been discussed and potential modes of action reviewed. These include actions on epithelial cell-surface receptors, cellular events and barrier function. Evidence for an influence of salicylates on circulating and tissue inflammatory cells is presented, as well as actions on adhesion molecules, chemotactic peptides, eicosanoids, cytokines and reactive oxygen metabolites. The precise mechanism remains unknown, but a pluripotential mode of action is an advantage when influencing the network of events that constitutes chronic inflammation. Controlled clinical trials of salicylates in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease have been reviewed. Their main role remains as maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis, but relatively high doses of controlled-release preparations benefit patients with ileal Crohn's disease, following resection, or those who have recently relapsed. Finally, issues of clinical relevance have been addressed, including the choice of salicylate and safety, indications for initiating therapy, dose and duration of treatment, role in managing refractory colitis and future developments.

Olsalazine-related diarrhoea: does rat intestine adapt in vivo?

Diarrhoea may occur in up to 10% of patients with ulcerative colitis treated with olsalazine, the azolinked dimer of 5-aminosalicylic acid. However, this symptom often disappears despite continued drug medication. To examine reversibility of and adaptation to olsalazine effects on intestinal absorption, rats were fed olsalazine (4 mg/100 g body weight/day) for 0 (controls), 12, 24, and 32 days. Jejunal, ileal, and colonic loops were perfused in situ with buffer or olsalazine (11.6 mM) in a pendular perfusion system. Water and electrolyte absorption was inhibited in all intestinal segments (p less than 0.001). In the proximal small intestine, however, sodium absorption was inhibited by 61%, whereas chloride and potassium absorptions were turned into net secretion. In contrast, in ileal and colonic segments sodium, chloride, and potassium absorptions were turned into a net secretion. All inhibitory effects were reversible within a short time. Intestinal absorption remained inhibitable compared with controls (p = not significant) after chronic administration of olsalazine even for 1 month. Jejunal monosaccharide absorption was not altered by acute olsalazine perfusion. In the ileum, glucose absorption was significantly inhibited, but the inhibitory capacity of acute olsalazine application decreased significantly (p less than 0.05) depending on duration of olsalazine pretreatment (51% (controls) versus 38% (32 days)). These results point to a complex, acute, but fully reversible effect of olsalazine on intestinal passive and chloride-coupled absorptive processes. Since a mucosal adaptation to these diarrheogenic effects does not occur, the resulting increase in fluid load on the diseased colon may be important in the pathogenesis of olsalazine-related diarrhoea.

Medical management of severe inflammatory disease of the rectum and distal colon: non-nutritional aspects

Rectal bleeding is the cardinal symptom in patients with inflammation of the rectum, and initial management must be directed at establishing an underlying diagnosis. In many patients in the Western World this will be idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease, although in all cases other causes such as infection must be excluded. Idiopathic proctitis is usually due to either ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease, and in both conditions corticosteroids, either systemic or topical, provide the mainstay of treatment. The 5-aminosalicylic acid drugs are helpful in both acute and maintenance treatment, again given either systemically or topically, while metronidazole is of value in patients with Crohn's disease. In those with refractory proctitis alternative agents such as azathioprine, immunomodulating drugs and barrier agents may be useful. Severe inflammation of the rectum secondary to pelvic irradiation will also usually respond to topical steroid therapy, although sucralfate enemas may be equally successful; in resistant cases other treatments may be needed. Infective proctitis, when diagnosed, may require treatment with specific antimicrobial agents.

Optimum dosage of 5-aminosalicylic acid as rectal enemas in patients with active ulcerative colitis

5-Aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), the active moiety of sulphasalazine (SASP), was given as a rectal enema to patients with mild to moderate distal ulcerative colitis to determine the minimum effective dosage. A double blind study was carried out using enemas containing 1, 2, or 4 g or 5-ASA or placebo for a one month treatment period. One hundred and thirteen patients with ulcerative colitis attending our outpatient clinic volunteered to participate. Clinical, sigmoidoscopic, and histological assessments were carried out at the beginning of the study and after 15 and 30 days of treatment. All patients who received 5-ASA enemas showed significantly better results than those who received a placebo enema (p less than 0.001) but no difference was detected among the patients receiving differing concentrations of 5-ASA. This study suggests that 1 g 5-ASA (in a 100 ml enema) is a sufficient dosage for patients with a mild to moderate attack of ulcerative colitis.

Scavenger effect of sulfasalazine, 5-aminosalicylic acid, and olsalazine on superoxide radical generation

The in vitro antioxidant capacity of sulfasalazine (SASP), its metabolites (SP, 5-ASA), and olsalazine (OAZ), was studied by evaluating their effects on superoxide (O2-.) production. Assay systems were the xanthine-xanthine oxidase (X/XOD) reaction and phorbol myristate acetate (PMA)-activated polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs), using the cytochrome c (cyt-c) reduction assay and a luminol-dependent chemiluminescence method. 5-ASA, SASP, and OAZ showed a dose-dependent scavenger effect in both O2-. generating systems, 5-ASA being the most powerful (greater than 50% of inhibition in the PMNs system and greater than 70% in the X/XOD system at 10 microM concentration). SP had an inhibitory effect only in the PMNs system but did not modify the activity of xanthine oxidase, thus excluding a scavenger action. These data suggest that the scavenger effect of 5-ASA, SASP, and OAZ may be an important mechanism of action.

Topical treatment of ulcerative proctitis with lidocaine

Rectal biopsy specimens from patients with ulcerative proctitis/proctosigmoiditis (UP/PS) were investigated immunocytochemically. In general, a changed mucosal innervation was demonstrated, with a marked increase in the number of nerve fibres and terminals with neuropeptide Y and tyrosine hydroxylase. In a few patients a hyperinnervation with VIPergic or SPergic nerves was seen. These findings indicate that hyperactive local nervous reflexes are of pathogenetic importance. To silence such activity, the diseased mucosa was treated with topically applied lidocaine. Such topical treatment with lidocaine gel in 21 consecutive patients with UP/PS for 3-8 weeks caused a rapid decrease of subjective and objective symptoms. During treatment mucosal integrity was restored, accompanied by depletion of OKT4 and OKT8 lymphocytes from the mucosa. However, the hyperinnervation pattern persisted during treatment.

In vitro induction of chromosome damage by sulphasalazine in human lymphocytes

Two different endpoints, sister-chromatid exchange and micronucleus induction, were measured in human peripheral blood lymphocytes stimulated to divide in short-term in vitro cultures. The cultures were exposed to sulphasalazine and 6 of its metabolites for 72 h in the absence of any exogenous metabolic activation system. Analysis of the sister-chromatid exchange and micronuclei frequencies clearly indicates that sulphasalazine itself is capable of inducing both sister-chromatid exchange and micronuclei while sulphapyridine and its acetylated metabolites only induce sister-chromatid exchange. 5-Aminosalicylic acid, the therapeutic moiety of sulphasalazine, and its acetylated metabolite did not induce either sister-chromatid exchange or micronuclei at the concentrations tested. The data from these in vitro experiments are discussed in relation to the previously reported elevations in sister-chromatid exchange and micronucleus frequencies in inflammatory bowel disease patients receiving sulphasalazine therapy.

Longterm olsalazine treatment: pharmacokinetics, tolerance and effects on local eicosanoid formation in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's colitis

To examine pharmacokinetics and tolerance of long term administration of olsalazine (azodisalicylate), increasing doses of the drug were given for one year to 31 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and nine patients with Crohn's colitis (CC), refractory to, or intolerant of sulphasalazine, until sustained remission was obtained or a maximum of 4 g/day was reached. Colonic drug metabolism was studied by equilibrium in vivo dialysis of faeces. Complete azoreduction occurred in most cases. Concentrations of 5-aminosalicylic acid, but not N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid, in faecal dialysates increased dose dependently. Serum concentrations disclosed no cumulation in the long term and olsalazine was well tolerated, although loose stools occurred transiently in some patients with extensive disease: this was associated with a larger proportion of unsplit olsalazine in the faecal dialysates. Patients with ulcerative colitis having a high prostaglandin E2 concentration (greater than ng/ml) determined by equilibrium dialysis of rectum, were less likely to benefit from treatment. Olsalazine is a very effective means of delivery of 5-aminosalicylic acid to the colonic mucosa in active disease. Use of the drug in controlled trials may be considered safe even in prolonged high dosage.

Comparison of delayed release 5 aminosalicylic acid (mesalazine) and sulphasalazine in the treatment of mild to moderate ulcerative colitis relapse

Oral formulations of 5-aminosalicylic acid (mesalazine) appear less toxic than sulphasalazine. We have therefore compared sulphasalazine, low dose mesalazine and high dose mesalazine in the treatment of mild to moderate relapse of ulcerative colitis. Sixty one patients (32 men, aged 20-78 years) were randomly allocated to sulphasalazine 2 g daily, mesalazine 800 mg daily, or mesalazine 2.4 g daily in a double blind, double dummy, four week trial. Groups were comparable for age, sex, extent of disease, and pretrial sulphasalazine intake. Four patients were unable to complete the study because of treatment failure (two taking sulphasalazine and two high dose mesalazine). A further two patients taking sulphasalazine developed side effects necessitating withdrawal. Within treatment comparisons revealed significant improvement of: sigmoidoscopic grade in the sulphasalazine group; rectal bleeding, sigmoidoscopic and histological grade in the low dose mesalazine group; stool frequency, rectal bleeding and sigmoidoscopic grade in the high dose mesalazine group. Greater improvement in rectal bleeding (p less than 0.05) and sigmoidoscopic appearances (p less than 0.05) occurred in patients taking high dose mesalazine than in those taking sulphasalazine. In two patients taking high dose mesalazine minor rises of plasma creatinine concentrations occurred, suggesting the need to monitor renal function.

Evolution of olsalazine

Sulphasalazine was first produced nearly 50 years ago through the inspiration of a Swedish doctor, Dr Nanna Svartz. Later, in controlled trials, this compound was shown to reduce substantially the frequency of recurrent attacks of ulcerative colitis when used as long-term maintenance therapy. Studies into the metabolism of sulphasalazine have shown that, when taken orally, most of the ingested dose reaches the colon intact, and within the colonic lumen, bacteria split sulphasalazine into two breakdown products, sulphapyridine and 5-ASA. 5-ASA was shown to be the active therapeutic moiety while sulphapyridine served simply as a carrier. Olsalazine was developed to retain the property of sulphasalazine of reaching the colon intact, but also to liberate two molecules of 5-ASA with no residual carrier.

Efficacy of 5-aminosalicylic acid enemas versus hydrocortisone enemas in ulcerative colitis

A controlled trial has been carried out in order to compare the efficacy of enemas containing a high dosage of 5-ASA (4 g) versus enemas containing hydrocortisone 100 mg. The trial was conducted on 86 patients, 44 of whom received 5-ASA and 42 received hydrocortisone. The results were favorable in terms of clinical, sigmoidoscopic, and histologic criteria for 5-ASA treatment. Other aspects have been investigated, such as retrograde spread of enemas which have been shown to reach the left colon. No nephrotoxicity was detected. The long term experience confirmed the preliminary positive results.

Controlled trial of intravenous metronidazole as an adjunct to corticosteroids in severe ulcerative colitis

A prospective double blind controlled trial was undertaken to examine the role of metronidazole as an adjunct to corticosteroids in the management of severe ulcerative colitis. Thirty nine patients with severe ulcerative colitis were randomised on admission to hospital to receive either intravenous metronidazole 500 mg eight hourly (19 patients) or an identical intravenous placebo (20 patients). The two groups were similar with respect to age, sex, and the extent of colitis. In addition all patients received a standard intravenous regimen consisting of methyl prednisolone 16 mg six hourly and parenteral nutrition together with a twice daily hydrocortisone 100 mg enema. Treatment was continued for five days when the patients were formally assessed. Fourteen of 19 patients (74%) receiving metronidazole and 14/20 (70%) receiving placebo were substantially improved, or in remission at the end of five days. Five patients treated with metronidazole and six with placebo had no improvement and all proceeded to urgent colectomy with no operative mortality. There were three late deaths, one in the metronidazole and two in the placebo group. These results do not support the routine use of intravenous metronidazole in the treatment of severe ulcerative colitis.

Sulphasalazine in ankylosing spondylitis

In recent years sulphasalazine has gained acceptance as an effective agent for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Ankylosing spondylitis is a disease where remission inducing drugs so far have been lacking. In this double blind trial sulphasalazine was compared with placebo in 37 patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Evaluation after three months' treatment showed reduction of inflammatory activity and improvement of clinical variables. The side effects were mild. The results suggest that sulphasalazine is a potentially effective and safe drug in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis.

Sulphasalazine: a review of 40 years' experience

Sulphasalazine, devised by Dr Nana Svartz for the treatment of 'infective polyarthritis', has been used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease for more than 40 years. Many controlled trials have shown that sulphasalazine 4g daily will induce remissions in between one-half and three-quarters of patients with acute attacks of ulcerative colitis. When given in a dosage of 2g daily it will prevent relapses in quiescent colitis. Relapses are 5 times more likely in untreated patients. It is less effective in Crohn's disease, where it exerts only a transient benefit in patients with active colonic disease and fails to prevent relapse or recurrence. Sulphasalazine is absorbed from the small intestine, re-excreted in bile and carried to the colon, where its azo bond is split by bacteria to release sulphapyridine, which is absorbed and is responsible for most of the drug's side effects, and 5-aminosalicylic acid, which is the active therapeutic moiety of the drug and exerts a beneficial topical action on the colonic mucosa. Side effects are common but are mainly reversible and not serious. Those related to high concentrations of sulphapyridine and to poor acetylation of the drug include gastrointestinal intolerance, malaise, headache, arthralgia, drug fever, effects on red blood cells and reversible male infertility. More serious, idiosyncratic side effects are skin rashes, leucopenia and agranulocytosis. Rarely, neurotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, polyarteritis, pulmonary fibrosis, a lupus-like syndrome and haemorrhagic colitis are produced. It is possible to desensitise most patients with drug-induced skin rashes. A number of less toxic alternatives to sulphasalazine have been devised and are undergoing trial. They either convey 5-aminosalicylic acid in a coated tablet to the colon or, when conjugated to a non-toxic carrier, release 5-aminosalicylic acid by bacterial cleavage there. Sulphasalazine remains a most useful drug in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease after 40 years of use.

Double blind controlled trial of oral vancomycin as adjunctive treatment in acute exacerbations of idiopathic colitis

A prospective double blind trial of vancomycin vs placebo was undertaken in 40 consecutive adult patients with exacerbation of idiopathic colitis (33 ulcerative colitis, seven Crohn's disease). Vancomycin or placebo (500 mg six hourly) was given for seven days in addition to routine medical therapy. Although there was no significant overall difference in outcome between the two groups, there was a trend towards a reduction in the need for operative intervention in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with vancomycin compared with controls. The efficacy of vancomycin was not attributable to its known action against C difficile, which was not isolated from any of the patients. The data suggest that microbiological factors may play a part in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis and that further studies using antimicrobials are desirable.

Olsalazine in active ulcerative colitis

Olsalazine (azodisalicylate) is a new drug in which two molecules of 5-aminosalicylic acid are linked by an azo bond. Its role in the treatment of mildly active, distal ulcerative colitis was investigated. Sixty patients were randomly allocated to receive olsalazine 1 g or a placebo as a retention enema nightly for two weeks. Clinical improvement was seen in 19 (66%) and sigmoidoscopic improvement in 17 (59%) of the 29 patients receiving olsalazine compared with 12 (43%) and 11 (39%), respectively, of the 28 in the control group. These differences were not significant. In a second trial 40 patients were randomised to receive oral olsalazine 2 g daily or a placebo capsule for two weeks. Significant clinical and sigmoidoscopic improvement was seen in the patients receiving oral olsalazine compared with the patients receiving placebo capsules. Oral olsalazine may be valuable in the treatment of mildly active ulcerative colitis. Its role in maintaining remission is yet to be determined.

Nutritional management of inflammatory bowel disease

Malnutrition and growth failure are frequent complications of inflammatory bowel disease in childhood owing to inadequate dietary nutrient intakes, excessive intestinal losses, malabsorption, and increased nutrient requirements. Aggressive nutritional therapy is indicated for primary and supportive management of disease activity, drug nutrient interactives, individual nutrient abnormalities, and the overall complications of inflammatory bowel disease, malnutrition, and growth failure. The prevention of nutritional disorders in inflammatory bowel disease is accomplished by monitoring anthropometric and biochemical indices and by instituting appropriate enteral or parenteral nutritional therapy when indicated.

Pharmacotherapy of inflammatory bowel disease. Part 1. Sulfasalazine

Published studies suggest that sulfasalazine is effective in treating mild to moderate attacks of ulcerative colitis. Its usefulness in severe attacks has not been adequately tested. Published reports also justify the use of sulfasalazine to prevent recurrence of ulcerative colitis. It is not clear how long maintenance therapy should be continued, but evidence to date favors prolonged treatment in the absence of side effects. In treatment of Crohn's disease, sulfasalazine has been shown to be effective when disease involves the colon or the colon and small intestine. Maintenance therapy does not prevent relapse. Recent studies have indicated that 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) may be the therapeutic moiety of sulfasalazine, and sulfapyridine (SP) may be related to most of the side effects. Therefore, research is under way to develop a product that contains 5-ASA without the sulfonamide component and that is capable of reaching the colon without being absorbed in the upper small intestine.