51
|
Lucia F, Geier M, Schick U, Bourbonne V. Narrative Review of Synergistics Effects of Combining Immunotherapy and Stereotactic Radiation Therapy. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10061414. [PMID: 35740435 PMCID: PMC9219862 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10061414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) has become an attractive treatment modality in full bloom in recent years by presenting itself as a safe, noninvasive alternative to surgery to control primary or secondary malignancies. Although the focus has been on local tumor control as the therapeutic goal of stereotactic radiotherapy, rare but intriguing observations of abscopal (or out-of-field) effects have highlighted the exciting possibility of activating antitumor immunity using high-dose radiation. Furthermore, immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of several types of cancers in recent years. However, resistance to immunotherapy often develops. These observations have led researchers to combine immunotherapy with SRT in an attempt to improve outcomes. The benefits of this combination would come from the stimulation and suppression of various immune pathways. Thus, in this review, we will first discuss the immunomodulation induced by SRT with the promising results of preclinical studies on the changes in the immune balance observed after SRT. Then, we will discuss the opportunities and risks of the combination of SRT and immunotherapy with the preclinical and clinical data available in the literature. Furthermore, we will see that many perspectives are conceivable to potentiate the synergistic effects of this combination with the need for prospective studies to confirm the encouraging data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Lucia
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, 29200 Brest, France; (U.S.); (V.B.)
- LaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University of Brest, 29200 Brest, France
- Correspondence:
| | - Margaux Geier
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital, 29200 Brest, France;
| | - Ulrike Schick
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, 29200 Brest, France; (U.S.); (V.B.)
- LaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University of Brest, 29200 Brest, France
| | - Vincent Bourbonne
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, 29200 Brest, France; (U.S.); (V.B.)
- LaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University of Brest, 29200 Brest, France
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Mulvey A, Muggeo-Bertin E, Berthold DR, Herrera FG. Overcoming Immune Resistance With Radiation Therapy in Prostate Cancer. Front Immunol 2022; 13:859785. [PMID: 35603186 PMCID: PMC9115849 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.859785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men and represents a significant healthcare burden worldwide. Therapeutic options in the metastatic castration-resistant setting remain limited, despite advances in androgen deprivation therapy, precision medicine and targeted therapies. In this review, we summarize the role of immunotherapy in prostate cancer and offer perspectives on opportunities for future development, based on current knowledge of the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Furthermore, we discuss the potential for synergistic therapeutic strategies with modern radiotherapy, through modulation of the tumor microenvironment. Emerging clinical and pre-clinical data suggest that radiation can convert immune desert tumors into an inflamed immunological hub, potentially sensitive to immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Mulvey
- Department of Oncology, Medical Oncology Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Department of Oncology, Immuno-Oncology Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Emilien Muggeo-Bertin
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Dominik R Berthold
- Department of Oncology, Medical Oncology Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Fernanda G Herrera
- Department of Oncology, Immuno-Oncology Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research - Lausanne Branch, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
DNA damage promotes HLA class I presentation by stimulating a pioneer round of translation-associated antigen production. Mol Cell 2022; 82:2557-2570.e7. [PMID: 35594857 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.04.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Antigen presentation by the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) on the cell surface is critical for the transduction of the immune signal toward cytotoxic T lymphocytes. DNA damage upregulates HLA class I presentation; however, the mechanism is unclear. Here, we show that DNA-damage-induced HLA (di-HLA) presentation requires an immunoproteasome, PSMB8/9/10, and antigen-transporter, TAP1/2, demonstrating that antigen production is essential. Furthermore, we show that di-HLA presentation requires ATR, AKT, mTORC1, and p70-S6K signaling. Notably, the depletion of CBP20, a factor initiating the pioneer round of translation (PRT) that precedes nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), abolishes di-HLA presentation, suggesting that di-antigen production requires PRT. RNA-seq analysis demonstrates that DNA damage reduces NMD transcripts in an ATR-dependent manner, consistent with the requirement for ATR in the initiation of PRT/NMD. Finally, bioinformatics analysis identifies that PRT-derived 9-mer peptides bind to HLA and are potentially immunogenic. Therefore, DNA damage signaling produces immunogenic antigens by utilizing the machinery of PRT/NMD.
Collapse
|
54
|
Stanniocalcin 2 (STC2): a universal tumour biomarker and a potential therapeutical target. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH : CR 2022; 41:161. [PMID: 35501821 PMCID: PMC9063168 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-022-02370-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Stanniocalcin 2 (STC2) is a glycoprotein which is expressed in a broad spectrum of tumour cells and tumour tissues derived from human breast, colorectum, stomach, esophagus, prostate, kidney, liver, bone, ovary, lung and so forth. The expression of STC2 is regulated at both transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels; particularly, STC2 is significantly stimulated under various stress conditions like ER stress, hypoxia and nutrient deprivation. Biologically, STC2 facilitates cells dealing with stress conditions and prevents apoptosis. Importantly, STC2 also promotes the development of acquired resistance to chemo- and radio- therapies. In addition, multiple groups have reported that STC2 overexpression promotes cell proliferation, migration and immune response. Therefore, the overexpression of STC2 is positively correlated with tumour growth, invasion, metastasis and patients' prognosis, highlighting its potential as a biomarker and a therapeutic target. This review focuses on discussing the regulation, biological functions and clinical importance of STC2 in human cancers. Future perspectives in this field will also be discussed.
Collapse
|
55
|
Mudassar F, Shen H, Cook KM, Hau E. Improving the synergistic combination of programmed death‐1/programmed death ligand‐1 blockade and radiotherapy by targeting the hypoxic tumour microenvironment. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 66:560-574. [PMID: 35466515 PMCID: PMC9322583 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibition with PD‐1/PD‐L1 blockade is a promising area in the field of anti‐cancer therapy. Although clinical data have revealed success of PD‐1/PD‐L1 blockade as monotherapy or in combination with CTLA‐4 or chemotherapy, the combination with radiotherapy could further boost anti‐tumour immunity and enhance clinical outcomes due to the immunostimulatory effects of radiation. However, the synergistic combination of PD‐1/PD‐L1 blockade and radiotherapy can be challenged by the complex nature of the tumour microenvironment (TME), including the presence of tumour hypoxia. Hypoxia is a major barrier to the effectiveness of both radiotherapy and PD‐1/PD‐L1 blockade immunotherapy. Thus, targeting the hypoxic TME is an attractive strategy to enhance the efficacy of the combination. Addition of compounds that directly or indirectly reduce hypoxia, to the combination of PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors and radiotherapy may optimize the success of the combination and improve therapeutic outcomes. In this review, we will discuss the synergistic combination of PD‐1/PD‐L1 blockade and radiotherapy and highlight the role of hypoxic TME in impeding the success of both therapies. In addition, we will address the potential approaches for targeting tumour hypoxia and how exploiting these strategies could benefit the combination of PD‐1/PD‐L1 blockade and radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faiqa Mudassar
- Translational Radiation Biology and Oncology Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Research The Westmead Institute for Medical Research Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Sydney Medical School The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Han Shen
- Translational Radiation Biology and Oncology Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Research The Westmead Institute for Medical Research Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Sydney Medical School The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Kristina M Cook
- Sydney Medical School The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Eric Hau
- Translational Radiation Biology and Oncology Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Research The Westmead Institute for Medical Research Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Sydney Medical School The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre Westmead Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Blacktown Hematology and Cancer Centre Blacktown Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Gao Y, Zhang N, Zeng Z, Wu Q, Jiang X, Li S, Sun W, Zhang J, Li Y, Li J, He F, Huang Z, Zhang J, Gong Y, Xie C. LncRNA PCAT1 activates SOX2 and suppresses radioimmune responses via regulating cGAS/STING signalling in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Transl Med 2022; 12:e792. [PMID: 35415876 PMCID: PMC9005924 DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2021] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The expression of long non‐coding RNA (lncRNA) prostate cancer‐associated ncRNA transcripts 1 (PCAT1) is increased in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It stimulates tumour growth and metastasis, but its role in the radioimmune responses remain unknown. We aimed to explore the impacts of PCAT1 on tumorigenesis and radioimmune responses and the underlying molecular mechanisms in NSCLC. Methods Comprehensive bioinformatics analysis was performed to identify immunosuppressive lncRNAs involved with tumour invasion in NSCLC. The expression levels of PCAT1 were analysed by in situ hybridisation in 55 paired NSCLC tissues and adjacent normal tissues. Both loss‐ and gain‐of‐function assays were performed to examine the effects of PCAT1 and SOX2 on NSCLC cell behaviours in vivo and in vitro. Bioinformatic analyses, chromatin isolation by RNA purification (ChIRP) and dual‐luciferase reporter assays were applied to validate the regulatory effects of PCAT1 on SOX2 expression. Chromatin immunoprecipitation, luciferase and rescue assays were utilised to identify the relationship between SOX2 and the cGAS/stimulator of interferon genes (STING) signalling. Results PCAT1 was immunosuppressive and related with NSCLC invasion. Increased PCAT1 was negatively correlated with immune cell infiltration in NSCLC. PCAT1 knockdown restrained proliferation, increased apoptosis, and repressed cell metastasis in vivo and in vitro. PCAT1 activated SOX2 that accelerated tumorigenesis and immunosuppression. SOX2 promoted tumour growth through inhibiting cytotoxic T‐cell immunity. Moreover, SOX2 restrained cGAS transcription and hampered downstream type I interferon (IFN)‐induced immune responses. Inhibition of PCAT1/SOX2 in collaboration with radiation further inhibited tumour growth, and initiated the cGAS/STING signalling pathway, which enhanced the immune responses of radiotherapy in NSCLC. Conclusions PCAT1/SOX2 axis promoted tumorigenesis and immunosuppression through inhibition of cGAS/STING signalling‐mediated T‐cell activation. Inhibition of PCAT1 and SOX2 synergised with radiotherapy to activate the immune response and could serve as potential therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanping Gao
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Nannan Zhang
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Zihang Zeng
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Qiuji Wu
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xueping Jiang
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Shuying Li
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Wenjie Sun
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Jianguo Zhang
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Yangyi Li
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Jiali Li
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Fajian He
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhengrong Huang
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Department of Biological Repositories, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Tumor Precision Diagnosis and Treatment Technology and Translational Medicine, Hubei Engineering Research Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Jinfang Zhang
- Frontier Science Center for Immunology and Metabolism, Medical Research Institute, School of Medicine, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Yan Gong
- Department of Biological Repositories, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Tumor Precision Diagnosis and Treatment Technology and Translational Medicine, Hubei Engineering Research Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Conghua Xie
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Wuhan Research Center for Infectious Diseases and Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Eke I, Aryankalayil MJ, Bylicky MA, Sandfort V, Vanpouille-Box C, Nandagopal S, Graves EE, Giaccia AJ, Coleman CN. Long-term expression changes of immune-related genes in prostate cancer after radiotherapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2022; 71:839-850. [PMID: 34435232 PMCID: PMC8873240 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-021-03036-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
The expression of immune-related genes in cancer cells can alter the anti-tumor immune response and thereby impact patient outcomes. Radiotherapy has been shown to modulate immune-related genes dependent on the fractionation regimen. To identify long-term changes in gene expression after irradiation, PC3 (p53 deleted) and LNCaP (p53 wildtype) prostate cancer cells were irradiated with either a single dose (SD, 10 Gy) or a fractionated regimen (MF) of 10 fractions (1 Gy per fraction). Whole human genome arrays were used to determine gene expression at 24 h and 2 months after irradiation. Immune pathway activation was analyzed with Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software. Additionally, 3D colony formation assays and T-cell cytotoxicity assays were performed. LNCaP had a higher basal expression of immunogenic genes and was more efficiently killed by cytotoxic T-cells compared to PC3. In both cell lines, MF irradiation resulted in an increase in multiple immune-related genes immediately after irradiation, while at 2 months, SD irradiation had a more pronounced effect on radiation-induced gene expression. Both immunogenic and immunosuppressive genes were upregulated in the long term in PC3 cells by a 10 Gy SD irradiation but not in LNCaP. T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity was significantly increased in 10 Gy SD PC3 cells compared to the unirradiated control and could be further enhanced by treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Irradiation impacts the expression of immune-related genes in cancer cells in a fractionation-dependent manner. Understanding and targeting these changes may be a promising strategy for primary prostate cancer and recurrent tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris Eke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Center for Clinical Sciences Research (CCSR), Stanford University School of Medicine, 269 Campus Dr., Room 1260, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
| | - Molykutty J Aryankalayil
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Michelle A Bylicky
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Veit Sandfort
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | | | - Saravanan Nandagopal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Center for Clinical Sciences Research (CCSR), Stanford University School of Medicine, 269 Campus Dr., Room 1260, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Edward E Graves
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Center for Clinical Sciences Research (CCSR), Stanford University School of Medicine, 269 Campus Dr., Room 1260, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Amato J Giaccia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Center for Clinical Sciences Research (CCSR), Stanford University School of Medicine, 269 Campus Dr., Room 1260, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
- Oxford Institute of Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX37DQ, UK
| | - C Norman Coleman
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
- Radiation Research Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Charpentier M, Spada S, VanNest S, Demaria S. Radiation therapy-induced remodeling of the tumor immune microenvironment. Semin Cancer Biol 2022; 86:737-747. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
59
|
Ernst M, Giubellino A. The Current State of Treatment and Future Directions in Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma. Biomedicines 2022; 10:822. [PMID: 35453572 PMCID: PMC9029866 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10040822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Malignant melanoma is the leading cause of death among cutaneous malignancies. While its incidence is increasing, the most recent cancer statistics show a small but clear decrease in mortality rate. This trend reflects the introduction of novel and more effective therapeutic regimens, including the two cornerstones of melanoma therapy: immunotherapies and targeted therapies. Immunotherapies exploit the highly immunogenic nature of melanoma by modulating and priming the patient's own immune system to attack the tumor. Treatments combining immunotherapies with targeted therapies, which disable the carcinogenic products of mutated cancer cells, have further increased treatment efficacy and durability. Toxicity and resistance, however, remain critical challenges to the field. The present review summarizes past treatments and novel therapeutic interventions and discusses current clinical trials and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alessio Giubellino
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Tuomela K, Ambrose AR, Davis DM. Escaping Death: How Cancer Cells and Infected Cells Resist Cell-Mediated Cytotoxicity. Front Immunol 2022; 13:867098. [PMID: 35401556 PMCID: PMC8984481 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.867098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytotoxic lymphocytes are critical in our immune defence against cancer and infection. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes and Natural Killer cells can directly lyse malignant or infected cells in at least two ways: granule-mediated cytotoxicity, involving perforin and granzyme B, or death receptor-mediated cytotoxicity, involving the death receptor ligands, tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and Fas ligand (FasL). In either case, a multi-step pathway is triggered to facilitate lysis, relying on active pro-death processes and signalling within the target cell. Because of this reliance on an active response from the target cell, each mechanism of cell-mediated killing can be manipulated by malignant and infected cells to evade cytolytic death. Here, we review the mechanisms of cell-mediated cytotoxicity and examine how cells may evade these cytolytic processes. This includes resistance to perforin through degradation or reduced pore formation, resistance to granzyme B through inhibition or autophagy, and resistance to death receptors through inhibition of downstream signalling or changes in protein expression. We also consider the importance of tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-induced cytotoxicity and resistance mechanisms against this pathway. Altogether, it is clear that target cells are not passive bystanders to cell-mediated cytotoxicity and resistance mechanisms can significantly constrain immune cell-mediated killing. Understanding these processes of immune evasion may lead to novel ideas for medical intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Daniel M. Davis
- The Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
QUAD SHOT radiotherapy and doublet immunotherapy in the management of anal mucosal melanoma: A case series of efficacy and toxicity of a novel treatment approach and a review of the literature. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2022; 21:e179-e186. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
62
|
Tuomela K, Mukherjee D, Ambrose AR, Harikrishnan A, Mole H, Hurlstone A, Önfelt B, Honeychurch J, Davis DM. Radiotherapy transiently reduces the sensitivity of cancer cells to lymphocyte cytotoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119:e2111900119. [PMID: 35042775 PMCID: PMC8785960 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2111900119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The impact of radiotherapy on the interaction between immune cells and cancer cells is important not least because radiotherapy can be used alongside immunotherapy as a cancer treatment. Unexpectedly, we found that X-ray irradiation of cancer cells induced significant resistance to natural killer (NK) cell killing. This was true across a wide variety of cancer-cell types as well as for antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Resistance appeared 72 h postirradiation and persisted for 2 wk. Resistance could also occur independently of radiotherapy through pharmacologically induced cell-cycle arrest. Crucially, multiple steps in NK-cell engagement, synapse assembly, and activation were unaffected by target cell irradiation. Instead, radiotherapy caused profound resistance to perforin-induced calcium flux and lysis. Resistance also occurred to a structurally similar bacterial toxin, streptolysin O. Radiotherapy did not affect the binding of pore-forming proteins at the cell surface or membrane repair. Rather, irradiation instigated a defect in functional pore formation, consistent with phosphatidylserine-mediated perforin inhibition. In vivo, radiotherapy also led to a significant reduction in NK cell-mediated clearance of cancer cells. Radiotherapy-induced resistance to perforin also constrained chimeric antigen receptor T-cell cytotoxicity. Together, these data establish a treatment-induced resistance to lymphocyte cytotoxicity that is important to consider in the design of radiotherapy-immunotherapy protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karoliina Tuomela
- The Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9NT, United Kingdom
| | - Debayan Mukherjee
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| | - Ashley R Ambrose
- The Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9NT, United Kingdom
| | - Ashish Harikrishnan
- The Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9NT, United Kingdom
| | - Holly Mole
- The Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9NT, United Kingdom
| | - Adam Hurlstone
- The Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9NT, United Kingdom
| | - Björn Önfelt
- Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Applied Physics, Science for Life Laboratory, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan Royal Institute of Technology, 17165 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jamie Honeychurch
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel M Davis
- The Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9NT, United Kingdom;
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Harnessing Antitumor CD4 + T Cells for Cancer Immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14010260. [PMID: 35008422 PMCID: PMC8750687 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Diverse evidence revealed that CD4+ T cells play an important role in antitumor immunity by promoting or suppressing cytotoxic T cell responses. This review outlines the role of CD4+ T subsets within the tumor microenvironment and summarizes the latest progress regarding their potentials in cancer immunotherapy and methods for improving outcomes in cancer strategies by modulating CD4+ T responses. Abstract Over the past decades, CD4+ T cells have been considered as a supporting actor in the fields of cancer immunotherapy. Until recently, accumulating evidence has demonstrated the critical role of CD4+ T cells during antitumor immunity. CD4+ T cells can either suppress or promote the antitumor cytotoxic CD8+ T cell responses, either in secondary lymphoid organs or in the tumor. In this review, we provide an overview of the multifaceted role of different CD4+ T cell subsets in cancer immune response and their contribution during cancer therapies. Specifically, we focus on the latest progress regarding the impact of CD4+ T cell modulation on immunotherapies and other cancer therapies and discuss the prospect for harnessing CD4+ T cells to control tumor progression and prevent recurrence in patients.
Collapse
|
64
|
Local radiotherapy and E7 RNA-LPX vaccination show enhanced therapeutic efficacy in preclinical models of HPV16 + cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2021; 71:1975-1988. [PMID: 34971406 PMCID: PMC9293862 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-021-03134-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Human papilloma virus (HPV) infection is a causative agent for several cancers types (genital, anal and head and neck region). The HPV E6 and E7 proteins are oncogenic drivers and thus are ideal candidates for therapeutic vaccination. We recently reported that a novel ribonucleic acid lipoplex (RNA-LPX)-based HPV16 vaccine, E7 RNA-LPX, mediates regression of mouse HPV16+ tumors and establishes protective T cell memory. An HPV16 E6/E7 RNA-LPX vaccine is currently being investigated in two phase I and II clinical trials in various HPV-driven cancer types; however, it remains a high unmet medical need for treatments for patients with radiosensitive HPV16+ tumors. Therefore, we set out to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of E7 RNA-LPX vaccine combined with standard-of-care local radiotherapy (LRT). We demonstrate that E7 RNA-LPX synergizes with LRT in HPV16+ mouse tumors, with potent therapeutic effects exceeding those of either monotherapy. Mode of action studies revealed that the E7 RNA-LPX vaccine induced high numbers of intratumoral-E7-specific CD8+ T cells, rendering cold tumors immunologically hot, whereas LRT primarily acted as a cytotoxic therapy, reducing tumor mass and intratumor hypoxia by predisposing tumor cells to antigen-specific T cell-mediated killing. Overall, LRT enhanced the effector function of E7 RNA-LPX-primed T cell responses. The therapeutic synergy was dependent on total radiation dose, rather than radiation dose-fractionation. Together, these results show that LRT synergizes with E7 RNA-LPX and enhances its anti-tumor activity against HPV16+ cancer models. This work paves into a new translational therapy for HPV16+ cancer patients.
Collapse
|
65
|
Nava S, Lisini D, Frigerio S, Bersano A. Dendritic Cells and Cancer Immunotherapy: The Adjuvant Effect. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms222212339. [PMID: 34830221 PMCID: PMC8620771 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222212339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Dendritic cells (DCs) are immune specialized cells playing a critical role in promoting immune response against antigens, and may represent important targets for therapeutic interventions in cancer. DCs can be stimulated ex vivo with pro-inflammatory molecules and loaded with tumor-specific antigen(s). Protocols describing the specific details of DCs vaccination manufacturing vary widely, but regardless of the employed protocol, the DCs vaccination safety and its ability to induce antitumor responses is clearly established. Many years of studies have focused on the ability of DCs to provide overall survival benefits at least for a selection of cancer patients. Lessons learned from early trials lead to the hypothesis that, to improve the efficacy of DCs-based immunotherapy, this should be combined with other treatments. Thus, the vaccine’s ultimate role may lie in the combinatorial approaches of DCs-based immunotherapy with chemotherapy and radiotherapy, more than in monotherapy. In this review, we address some key questions regarding the integration of DCs vaccination with multimodality therapy approaches for cancer treatment paradigms.
Collapse
|
66
|
Shi LZ, Bonner JA. Bridging Radiotherapy to Immunotherapy: The IFN-JAK-STAT Axis. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:12295. [PMID: 34830176 PMCID: PMC8619591 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222212295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The unprecedented successes of immunotherapies (IOs) including immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) and adoptive T-cell therapy (ACT) in patients with late-stage cancer provide proof-of-principle evidence that harnessing the immune system, in particular T cells, can be an effective approach to eradicate cancer. This instills strong interests in understanding the immunomodulatory effects of radiotherapy (RT), an area that was actually investigated more than a century ago but had been largely ignored for many decades. With the "newly" discovered immunogenic responses from RT, numerous endeavors have been undertaken to combine RT with IOs, in order to bolster anti-tumor immunity. However, the underlying mechanisms are not well defined, which is a subject of much investigation. We therefore conducted a systematic literature search on the molecular underpinnings of RT-induced immunomodulation and IOs, which identified the IFN-JAK-STAT pathway as a major regulator. Our further analysis of relevant studies revealed that the signaling strength and duration of this pathway in response to RT and IOs may determine eventual immunological outcomes. We propose that strategic targeting of this axis can boost the immunostimulatory effects of RT and radiosensitizing effects of IOs, thereby promoting the efficacy of combination therapy of RT and IOs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lewis Zhichang Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA
- Department of Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA
- Programs in Immunology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA
- O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA
| | - James A. Bonner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA
- O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Chabanon RM, Rouanne M, Lord CJ, Soria JC, Pasero P, Postel-Vinay S. Targeting the DNA damage response in immuno-oncology: developments and opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer 2021; 21:701-717. [PMID: 34376827 DOI: 10.1038/s41568-021-00386-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 143] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment and substantially improved patient outcome with regard to multiple tumour types. However, most patients still do not benefit from such therapies, notably because of the absence of pre-existing T cell infiltration. DNA damage response (DDR) deficiency has recently emerged as an important determinant of tumour immunogenicity. A growing body of evidence now supports the concept that DDR-targeted therapies can increase the antitumour immune response by (1) promoting antigenicity through increased mutability and genomic instability, (2) enhancing adjuvanticity through the activation of cytosolic immunity and immunogenic cell death and (3) favouring reactogenicity through the modulation of factors that control the tumour-immune cell synapse. In this Review, we discuss the interplay between the DDR and anticancer immunity and highlight how this dynamic interaction contributes to shaping tumour immunogenicity. We also review the most innovative preclinical approaches that could be used to investigate such effects, including recently developed ex vivo systems. Finally, we highlight the therapeutic opportunities presented by the exploitation of the DDR-anticancer immunity interplay, with a focus on those in early-phase clinical development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman M Chabanon
- ATIP-Avenir Group, Inserm Unit U981, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory and Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Mathieu Rouanne
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Inserm Unit U1015, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Département d'Urologie, Hôpital Foch, Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Université Paris-Saclay, Suresnes, France
| | - Christopher J Lord
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory and Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Jean-Charles Soria
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
- Faculté de Médicine, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - Philippe Pasero
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer, Institut de Génétique Humaine, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Sophie Postel-Vinay
- ATIP-Avenir Group, Inserm Unit U981, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
- Faculté de Médicine, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Image-Based Evaluation of Irradiation Effects in Brain Tissues by Measuring Absolute Electrical Conductivity Using MRI. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13215490. [PMID: 34771653 PMCID: PMC8583433 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13215490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2021] [Revised: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation-induced injury is damage to normal tissues caused by unintentional exposure to ionizing radiation. Image-based evaluation of tissue damage by irradiation has an advantage for the early assessment of therapeutic effects by providing sensitive information on minute tissue responses in situ. Recent magnetic resonance (MR)-based electrical conductivity imaging has shown potential as an effective early imaging biomarker for treatment response and radiation-induced injury. However, to be a tool for evaluating therapeutic effects, validation of its reliability and sensitivity according to various irradiation conditions is required. We performed MR-based electrical conductivity imaging on designed phantoms to confirm the effect of ionizing radiation at different doses and on in vivo mouse brains to distinguish tissue response depending on different doses and the elapsed time after irradiation. To quantify the irradiation effects, we measured the absolute conductivity of brain tissues and calculated relative conductivity changes based on the value of pre-irradiation. The conductivity of the phantoms with the distilled water and saline solution increased linearly with the irradiation doses. The conductivity of in vivo mouse brains showed different time-course variations and residual contrast depending on the irradiation doses. Future studies will focus on validation at long-term time points, including early and late delayed response and evaluation of irradiation effects in various tissue types.
Collapse
|
69
|
Abstract
The anti-tumor activity of interferons (IFNs) was first appreciated about half a century ago, and IFN-α2 was the first cancer immunotherapy approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Radiation therapy (RT), one of the pillars of cancer treatment, directly causes DNA damage, which can lead to senescence and cell death in tumor cells. In recent years, however, RT-induced immunomodulatory effects have been recognized to play an indispensable role in achieving the optimum therapeutic effect of RT. Increasing evidence indicates that RT enhances adaptive anti-tumor immunity by augmenting the innate immune sensing of tumors in a type I IFN-dependent matter. This review briefly introduces the role of type I interferon in cancer and the available evidence on the overall effects of RT on tumor immunity mediated via type I IFN. Recent advances in deciphering the molecular mechanisms underlying the induction of type I IFNs triggered by RT, their clinical implications, and therapeutic opportunities will be highlighted.
Collapse
|
70
|
Magee K, Marsh IR, Turek MM, Grudzinski J, Aluicio-Sarduy E, Engle JW, Kurzman ID, Zuleger CL, Oseid EA, Jaskowiak C, Albertini MR, Esbona K, Bednarz B, Sondel PM, Weichert JP, Morris ZS, Hernandez R, Vail DM. Safety and feasibility of an in situ vaccination and immunomodulatory targeted radionuclide combination immuno-radiotherapy approach in a comparative (companion dog) setting. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0255798. [PMID: 34383787 PMCID: PMC8360580 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Rationale Murine syngeneic tumor models have revealed efficacious systemic antitumor responses following primary tumor in situ vaccination combined with targeted radionuclide therapy to secondary or metastatic tumors. Here we present studies on the safety and feasibility of this approach in a relevant translational companion dog model (n = 17 dogs) with advanced cancer. Methods The three component of the combination immuno-radiotherapy approach were employed either separately or in combination in companion dogs with advanced stage cancer. In situ vaccination was achieved through the administration of hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy and intratumoral hu14.18-IL2 fusion immunocytokine injections to the index tumor. In situ vaccination was subsequently combined with targeted radionuclide therapy using a theranostic pairing of IV 86Y-NM600 (for PET imaging and subject-specific dosimetry) and IV 90Y-NM600 (therapeutic radionuclide) prescribed to deliver an immunomodulatory 2 Gy dose to all metastatic sites in companion dogs with metastatic melanoma or osteosarcoma. In a subset of dogs, immunologic parameters preliminarily assessed. Results The components of the immuno-radiotherapy combination were well tolerated either alone or in combination, resulting in only transient low grade (1 or 2) adverse events with no dose-limiting events observed. In subject-specific dosimetry analyses, we observed 86Y-NM600 tumor:bone marrow absorbed-dose differential uptakes ≥2 in 4 of 5 dogs receiving the combination, which allowed subsequent safe delivery of at least 2 Gy 90Y-NM600 TRT to tumors. NanoString gene expression profiling and immunohistochemistry from pre- and post-treatment biopsy specimens provide evidence of tumor microenvironment immunomodulation by 90Y-NM600 TRT. Conclusions The combination of external beam radiotherapy, intratumoral immunocytokine, and targeted radionuclide immuno-radiotherapy known to have activity against syngeneic melanoma in murine models is feasible and well tolerated in companion dogs with advanced stage, spontaneously arising melanoma or osteosarcoma and has immunomodulatory potential. Further studies evaluating the dose-dependent immunomodulatory effects of this immuno-radiotherapy combination are currently ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara Magee
- Department of Medical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Ian R. Marsh
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Michelle M. Turek
- Department of Surgical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Joseph Grudzinski
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Eduardo Aluicio-Sarduy
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Jonathan W. Engle
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Ilene D. Kurzman
- Department of Medical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Cindy L. Zuleger
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Elizabeth A. Oseid
- Office of Environment, Health and Safety, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Christine Jaskowiak
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Mark R. Albertini
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
- The Medical Service, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Karla Esbona
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Bryan Bednarz
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Paul M. Sondel
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
- Department of Human Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Jamey P. Weichert
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Zachary S. Morris
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Reinier Hernandez
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
- * E-mail: (RH); . (DMV)
| | - David M. Vail
- Department of Medical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
- * E-mail: (RH); . (DMV)
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
De Caluwé A, Buisseret L, Poortmans P, Van Gestel D, Salgado R, Sotiriou C, Larsimont D, Paesmans M, Craciun L, Stylianos D, Vandekerckhove C, Reyal F, Isabelle V, Eiger D, Piccart M, Romano E, Ignatiadis M. Neo-CheckRay: radiation therapy and adenosine pathway blockade to increase benefit of immuno-chemotherapy in early stage luminal B breast cancer, a randomized phase II trial. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:899. [PMID: 34362344 PMCID: PMC8343924 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08601-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Residual breast cancer after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) predicts disease outcome and is a surrogate for survival in aggressive breast cancer (BC) subtypes. Pathological complete response (pCR) rate, however, is lower for luminal B BC in comparison to the triple negative (TNBC) and HER2+ subtypes. The addition of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) to NACT has the potential to increase pCR rate but is hampered by the lower immunogenicity of luminal B BC. Novel strategies are needed to stimulate the immune response and increase the response rate to ICB in luminal B BC. METHODS The Neo-CheckRay trial is a randomized phase II trial investigating the impact of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the primary breast tumor in combination with an anti-CD73 (oleclumab) to increase response to anti PD-L1 (durvalumab) and NACT. The trial is designed as a three-arm study: NACT + SBRT +/- durvalumab +/- oleclumab. The result at surgery will be evaluated using the residual cancer burden (RCB) index as the primary endpoint. Six patients will be included in a safety run-in, followed by a randomized phase II trial that will include 136 evaluable patients in 3 arms. Inclusion is limited to luminal B breast cancers that are MammaPrint genomic high risk. DISCUSSION combination of ICB with chemotherapy in luminal B BC might benefit from immune priming agents to increase the response rate. As none have been identified so far, this phase II trial will evaluate SBRT and oleclumab as potential immune priming candidates. TRIAL REGISTRATION trial registered on ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03875573 ) on March 14th, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex De Caluwé
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Rue Héger Bordet 1, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Laurence Buisseret
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Rue Héger Bordet 1, 1000, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Dirk Van Gestel
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Rue Héger Bordet 1, 1000, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Christos Sotiriou
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Rue Héger Bordet 1, 1000, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Denis Larsimont
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Rue Héger Bordet 1, 1000, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marianne Paesmans
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Rue Héger Bordet 1, 1000, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ligia Craciun
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Rue Héger Bordet 1, 1000, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Drisis Stylianos
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Rue Héger Bordet 1, 1000, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - Veys Isabelle
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Rue Héger Bordet 1, 1000, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Daniel Eiger
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Rue Héger Bordet 1, 1000, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Martine Piccart
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Rue Héger Bordet 1, 1000, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Michail Ignatiadis
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Rue Héger Bordet 1, 1000, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Goedegebuure RSA, Harrasser M, de Klerk LK, van Schooten TS, van Grieken NCT, Eken M, Grifhorst MS, Pocorni N, Jordanova ES, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Pouw RE, Verheul HMW, van der Vliet JJ, van Laarhoven HWM, Thijssen VLJL, Bass AJ, De Gruijl TD, Derks S. Pre-treatment tumor-infiltrating T cells influence response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Oncoimmunology 2021; 10:1954807. [PMID: 34377591 PMCID: PMC8344794 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2021.1954807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is a disease with dismal treatment outcomes. Response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) varies greatly. Although the underlying mechanisms of CRT resistance are not identified, accumulating evidence indicates an important role for local antitumor immunity. To explore the immune microenvironment in relation to response to CRT we performed an in-depth analysis using multiplex immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry and mRNA expression analysis (NanoString) to generate a detailed map of the immunological landscape of pretreatment biopsies as well as peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of EAC patients. Response to CRT was assessed by Mandard’s tumor regression grade (TRG), disease-free- and overall survival. Tumors with a complete pathological response (TRG 1) to neoadjuvant CRT had significantly higher tumor-infiltrating T cell levels compared to all other response groups (TRG 2–5). These T cells were also in closer proximity to tumor cells in complete responders compared to other response groups. Notably, immune profiles of near-complete responders (TRG 2) showed more resemblance to non-responders (TRG 3–5) than to complete responders. A high CD8:CD163 ratio in the tumor was associated with an improved disease-free survival. Gene expression analyses revealed that T cells in non-responders were Th2-skewed, while complete responders were enriched in cytotoxic immune cells. Finally, complete responders were enriched in circulating memory T cells. preexisting immune activation enhances the chance for a complete pathological response to neoadjuvant CRT. This information can potentially be used for future patient selection, but also fuels the development of immunomodulatory strategies to enhance CRT efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R S A Goedegebuure
- Amsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Nederlands
| | - M Harrasser
- Amsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Nederlands
| | - L K de Klerk
- Amsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Nederlands.,Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Boston, MA, USA
| | - T S van Schooten
- Amsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Nederlands
| | - N C T van Grieken
- Amsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Eken
- Amsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M S Grifhorst
- Amsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N Pocorni
- Amsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E S Jordanova
- Amsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M I van Berge Henegouwen
- Amsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R E Pouw
- Amsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H M W Verheul
- Radboud UMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J J van der Vliet
- Amsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,LAVA Therapeutics, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - H W M van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - V L J L Thijssen
- Amsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A J Bass
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Boston, MA, USA.,Cancer Program, the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - T D De Gruijl
- Amsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Derks
- Amsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Nederlands
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
McGee HM, Marciscano AE, Campbell AM, Monjazeb AM, Kaech SM, Teijaro JR. Parallels Between the Antiviral State and the Irradiated State. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:969-979. [PMID: 33252657 PMCID: PMC8502484 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djaa190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Revised: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Improved understanding of host antiviral defense and antitumor immunity have elucidated molecular pathways important to both processes. During viral infection, RNA or DNA in the host cell serves as a danger signal that initiates the antiviral response. Recent studies have elucidated similarities in the signaling pathways activated by viruses and the signaling pathways induced by tumor DNA that is released into the cytoplasm of irradiated tumor cells. Both the host defense to viral infection and the sterile inflammation provoked by radiotherapy induce a type I interferon response that is necessary for pathogen control and immune-mediated tumor control, respectively. These findings have led to the hypothesis that radiotherapy employs a form of viral mimicry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather M McGee
- NOMIS Center for Immunobiology and Microbial Pathogenesis, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ariel E Marciscano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Allison M Campbell
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Arta M Monjazeb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Susan M Kaech
- NOMIS Center for Immunobiology and Microbial Pathogenesis, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - John R Teijaro
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Li M, Liu D, Lee D, Cheng Y, Baumhover NJ, Marks BM, Sagastume EA, Ballas ZK, Johnson FL, Morris ZS, Schultz MK. Targeted Alpha-Particle Radiotherapy and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Induces Cooperative Inhibition on Tumor Growth of Malignant Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13153676. [PMID: 34359580 PMCID: PMC8345035 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13153676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radiation therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been demonstrated to cooperatively activate adaptive anti-tumor immunity with curative potential in preclinical models of melanoma. Receptor-targeted radionuclide therapy can be systemically injected to selectively deliver ionizing radiation to tumor sites throughout the body, potentially rendering all tumor sites more susceptible to anti-tumor immune response. In this study, we demonstrated the feasibility of delivering alpha-particle radiation to murine melanoma tumors using a 212Pb radiolabeled peptide [212Pb]VMT01 that targets the melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R). Our data showed anti-tumor cooperation between [212Pb]VMT01 and ICIs in melanoma, mediated by induction of tumor-specific immunity. The immunogenicity of [212Pb]VMT01 in melanoma was also evidenced by enhanced tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and tumor vaccination assays. Abstract Radiotherapy can facilitate the immune recognition of immunologically “cold” tumors and enhance the efficacy of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in melanoma. Systemic administration of receptor-targeted radionuclide therapy has the potential to selectively deliver radionuclides to multiple tumors throughout the body in metastatic settings. By triggering immunologic cell death and increasing the immune susceptibility of surviving tumor cells in these locations, targeted radionuclide therapies may overcome resistance to ICIs and render immunologically “cold” tumors throughout the body responsive to ICIs and immunologically “hot”. Here, we show the anti-tumor cooperation of targeted α-particle radionuclide therapy (α-TRT) and ICIs in preclinical models of melanoma. Melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R)-targeted radiopeptide [212Pb]VMT01 was employed to deliver α-radiation to melanoma tumors in mice. A single injection of 4.1 MBq [212Pb]VMT01 significantly slowed the tumor growth of B16-F10 melanoma and the combination of [212Pb]VMT01 and ICIs induced a cooperative anti-tumor effect leading to 43% complete tumor response with no sign of malignancy on autopsy. Animals with complete response developed anti-tumor immunity to reject further tumor inoculations. This therapeutic cooperation was completely abolished in RAG1 KO mice, which are deficient in T-cell maturation. In addition, the anti-tumor cooperation was compromised when fractionated [212Pb]VMT01 was used in the combination. We also demonstrated that [212Pb]VMT01 induced immunogenic cell death in tumor vaccination assays and in vitro exposure to [212Pb]VMT01 sensitized immunotolerant melanoma to ICIs treatment in vivo. Enhanced tumor infiltrating CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ lymphocytes were observed following injection of 1.4 MBq [212Pb]VMT01. Overall, we demonstrated anti-tumor cooperation between α-TRT and ICIs in melanoma that is mediated by tumor specific immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengshi Li
- Viewpoint Molecular Targeting, Inc., Coralville, IA 52241, USA; (M.L.); (D.L.); (N.J.B.); (B.M.M.); (E.A.S.); (F.L.J.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA;
| | - Dijie Liu
- Viewpoint Molecular Targeting, Inc., Coralville, IA 52241, USA; (M.L.); (D.L.); (N.J.B.); (B.M.M.); (E.A.S.); (F.L.J.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA;
| | - Dongyoul Lee
- Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA;
| | - Yinwen Cheng
- Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Human Toxicology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA;
- Department of Pathology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| | - Nicholas J. Baumhover
- Viewpoint Molecular Targeting, Inc., Coralville, IA 52241, USA; (M.L.); (D.L.); (N.J.B.); (B.M.M.); (E.A.S.); (F.L.J.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA;
| | - Brenna M. Marks
- Viewpoint Molecular Targeting, Inc., Coralville, IA 52241, USA; (M.L.); (D.L.); (N.J.B.); (B.M.M.); (E.A.S.); (F.L.J.)
| | - Edwin A. Sagastume
- Viewpoint Molecular Targeting, Inc., Coralville, IA 52241, USA; (M.L.); (D.L.); (N.J.B.); (B.M.M.); (E.A.S.); (F.L.J.)
| | - Zuhair K. Ballas
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA;
| | - Frances L. Johnson
- Viewpoint Molecular Targeting, Inc., Coralville, IA 52241, USA; (M.L.); (D.L.); (N.J.B.); (B.M.M.); (E.A.S.); (F.L.J.)
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA;
| | - Zachary S. Morris
- Department of Human Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA;
| | - Michael K. Schultz
- Viewpoint Molecular Targeting, Inc., Coralville, IA 52241, USA; (M.L.); (D.L.); (N.J.B.); (B.M.M.); (E.A.S.); (F.L.J.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA;
- Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Human Toxicology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA;
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
- Department of Chemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-(865)-356-1861
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Angiogenesis and immune checkpoint dual blockade in combination with radiotherapy for treatment of solid cancers: opportunities and challenges. Oncogenesis 2021; 10:47. [PMID: 34247198 PMCID: PMC8272720 DOI: 10.1038/s41389-021-00335-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Several immune checkpoint blockades (ICBs) capable of overcoming the immunosuppressive roles of the tumor immune microenvironment have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as front-line treatments of various tumor types. However, due to the considerable heterogeneity of solid tumor cells, inhibiting one target will only influence a portion of the tumor cells. One way to enhance the tumor-killing efficiency is to develop a multiagent therapeutic strategy targeting different aspects of tumor biology and the microenvironment to provide the maximal clinical benefit for patients with late-stage disease. One such strategy is the administration of anti-PD1, an ICB, in combination with the humanized monoclonal antibody bevacizumab, an anti-angiogenic therapy, to patients with recurrent/metastatic malignancies, including hepatocellular carcinoma, metastatic renal cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and uterine cancer. Radiotherapy (RT), a critical component of solid cancer management, has the capacity to prime the immune system for an adaptive antitumor response. Here, we present an overview of the most recent published data in preclinical and clinical studies elucidating that RT could further potentiate the antitumor effects of immune checkpoint and angiogenesis dual blockade. In addition, we explore opportunities of triple combinational treatment, as well as discuss the challenges of validating biomarkers and the management of associated toxicity.
Collapse
|
76
|
Patel RR, He K, Barsoumian HB, Chang JY, Tang C, Verma V, Comeaux N, Chun SG, Gandhi S, Truong MT, Erasmus JJ, Hong DS, Lee PP, Ning MS, Nguyen QN, Heymach JV, Altan M, Blumenschein G, Fossella FV, Sezen D, Chen D, Carter BW, Davies MA, Glitza IC, Diab A, Ferrarotto R, Cabanillas ME, Yuan Y, Shah SJ, Parra ER, Sun B, Cortez MA, Welsh JW. High-dose irradiation in combination with non-ablative low-dose radiation to treat metastatic disease after progression on immunotherapy: Results of a phase II trial. Radiother Oncol 2021; 162:60-67. [PMID: 34237343 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.06.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
AIM To report early findings from a phase II trial of high-dose radiotherapy (HD-RT) with or without low-dose RT (LD-RT) for metastatic cancer. METHODS Eligible patients had metastatic disease that progressed on immunotherapy within 6 months. Patients were given either HD-RT (20-70 Gy total; 3-12.5 Gy/f), or HD-RT + LD-RT (0.5-2 Gy/f up to 1-10 Gy total) to separate lesions, with continued immunotherapy. Radiographic response was assessed per RECIST 1.1 and Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC). Primary endpoints: (1) 4-month disease control (DCR, complete/partial response [CR/PR] or stable disease [SD]) or an overall response (ORR, CR/PR) at any point in ≥10% of patients, per RECIST 1.1; (2) dose-limiting toxicity within 3 months not exceeding 30%. Secondary endpoint was lesion-specific response. RESULTS Seventy-four patients (NSCLC, n = 38; melanoma n = 21) were analyzed (39 HD-RT and 35 HD-RT + LD-RT). The median follow-up time was 13.6 months. The primary endpoint was met for 72 evaluable patients, with a 4-month DCR of 42% (47% [16/34] vs. 37% [14/38] in HD-RT + LD-RT vs. HD-RT, P = 0.38), and 19% ORR at any time (26% [9/34] vs. 13% [5/38] in HD-RT + LD-RT vs. HD-RT, P = 0.27). Three patients had toxicity ≥grade 3. LD-RT lesion response (53%) was improved compared to nonirradiated lesions in HD-RT + LD-RT (23%, P = 0.002) and HD-RT (11%, P < 0.001). T- and NK cell infiltration was enhanced in lesions treated with LD-RT. CONCLUSIONS HD-RT plus LD-RT safely improved lesion-specific response in patients with immune resistant solid tumors by promoting infiltration of effector immune cells into the tumor microenvironment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roshal R Patel
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Albany Medical College, Albany, USA
| | - Kewen He
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Departments of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Hampartsoum B Barsoumian
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Joe Y Chang
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Chad Tang
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Vivek Verma
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Nathan Comeaux
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Stephen G Chun
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Saumil Gandhi
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Mylene T Truong
- Departments of Thoracic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Jeremy J Erasmus
- Departments of Thoracic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - David S Hong
- Departments of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Percy P Lee
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Matthew S Ning
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Quynh-Nhu Nguyen
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - John V Heymach
- Departments of Thoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Mehmet Altan
- Departments of Thoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - George Blumenschein
- Departments of Thoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Frank V Fossella
- Departments of Thoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Duygu Sezen
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Dawei Chen
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Albany Medical College, Albany, USA
| | - Brett W Carter
- Departments of Thoracic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Michael A Davies
- Departments of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Isabella C Glitza
- Departments of Thoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Adi Diab
- Departments of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Renata Ferrarotto
- Departments of Thoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Maria E Cabanillas
- Departments of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Ying Yuan
- Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Shalin J Shah
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Edwin R Parra
- Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Baohua Sun
- Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Maria Angelica Cortez
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - James W Welsh
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Abstract
Radiation is a known immune modulator that drives both local and systemic immunologic effects. There is increasing interest and investigation into harnessing the pro-immunogenic effects of radiation for patients with metastatic cancer to improve systemic disease control and clinical outcomes. Here, we review fundamental immunology concepts in the context of our current understanding of both the pro-immunogenic and the less well-appreciated immunosuppressive effects of radiation therapy. Our aim is to offer the radiation oncology community a lens into the progress the field has made understanding the complex interaction between tumor-directed irradiation and immune-mediated tumor control, thus promoting further discovery and translation of radio-immuno-oncology innovation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine S Spina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Charles G Drake
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY; Department of Urology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY; Department of Hematology Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
78
|
Hui C, Chau B, Gan G, Stokes W, Karam SD, Amini A. Overcoming Resistance to Immunotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer Using Radiation: A Review. Front Oncol 2021; 11:592319. [PMID: 34277390 PMCID: PMC8280353 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.592319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy remains at the center of head and neck cancer treatment. With improvements in treatment delivery, radiation therapy has become an affective ablative modality for head and neck cancers. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are now also playing a more active role both in the locally advanced and metastatic setting. With improved systemic options, local noninvasive modalities including radiation therapy are playing a critical role in overcoming resistance in head and neck cancer. The aim of this review is to describe the role of radiation therapy in modulating the tumor microenvironment and how radiation dose, fractionation and treatment field can impact the immune system and potentially effect outcomes when combined with immunotherapy. The review will encompass several common scenarios where radiation is used to improve outcomes and overcome potential resistance that may develop with immunotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), including upfront locally advanced disease receiving definitive radiation and recurrent disease undergoing re-irradiation. Lastly, we will review the potential toxicities of combined therapy and future directions of their role in the management of HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caressa Hui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Brittney Chau
- School of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, United States
| | - Greg Gan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KA, United States
| | - William Stokes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Sana D. Karam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Arya Amini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Dua D, Kelly C, Kovarik J, Iqbal MS. The role of combining immunotherapy with primary (Chemo)radiotherapy in curative treatment settings of the head and neck cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2021; 18:e3-e10. [PMID: 34162017 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The introduction of immunotherapy into the radical management of head and neck cancer (HNC) is a fast moving phenomenon, which is constantly developing. Although now established in the management of recurrent and metastatic disease in HNC, its use in radical treatment is being investigated in a whole spectrum of clinical trials looking at which immune altering agents give the best results, which can be added safely to radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy for greatest efficiency and when the most appropriate time to add these agents is in the neoadjuvant, concurrent on adjuvant settings. These multiple questions produce a complex matrix for HNC investigators and this article brings together the existing evidence and contemporary trials going on with immunotherapy in HNC, giving an up to date snapshot of present investigations and near future directions for further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Divyanshu Dua
- Medical Oncology, The Canberra Hospital and Calvary Public Hospital, Canberra, Australia
| | - Charles Kelly
- Northern Centre for Cancer Care, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Josef Kovarik
- Northern Centre for Cancer Care, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Muhammad Shahid Iqbal
- Northern Centre for Cancer Care, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
80
|
Janssen QP, van Dam JL, Kivits IG, Besselink MG, van Eijck CHJ, Homs MYV, Nuyttens JJME, Qi H, van Santvoort HJ, Wei AC, de Wilde RF, Wilmink JW, van Tienhoven G, Groot Koerkamp B. Added Value of Radiotherapy Following Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:8297-8308. [PMID: 34142290 PMCID: PMC8591030 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10276-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Background The added value of radiotherapy following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer ((B)RPC) is unclear. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare outcomes of patients who received neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX alone or combined with radiotherapy. Methods A systematic literature search was performed in Embase, Medline (ovidSP), Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, and Google Scholar. The primary endpoint was pooled median overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included resection rate, R0 resection rate, and other pathologic outcomes. Results We included 512 patients with (B)RPC from 15 studies, of which 7 were prospective nonrandomized studies. In total, 351 patients (68.6%) were treated with FOLFIRINOX alone (8 studies) and 161 patients (31.4%) were treated with FOLFIRINOX and radiotherapy (7 studies). The pooled estimated median OS was 21.6 months (range 18.4–34.0 months) for FOLFIRINOX alone and 22.4 months (range 11.0–37.7 months) for FOLFIRINOX with radiotherapy. The pooled resection rate was similar (71.9% vs. 63.1%, p = 0.43) and the pooled R0 resection rate was higher for FOLFIRINOX with radiotherapy (88.0% vs. 97.6%, p = 0.045). Other pathological outcomes (ypN0, pathologic complete response, perineural invasion) were comparable. Conclusions In this meta-analysis, radiotherapy following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX was associated with an improved R0 resection rate as compared with neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX alone, but a difference in survival could not be demonstrated. Randomized trials are needed to determine the added value of radiotherapy following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in patients with (B)PRC. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-10276-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quisette P Janssen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacob L van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Isabelle G Kivits
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marjolein Y V Homs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost J M E Nuyttens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hongchao Qi
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar J van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital and University Medical Center Utrecht, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Alice C Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Roeland F de Wilde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geertjan van Tienhoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Petersen SH, Kua LF, Nakajima S, Yong WP, Kono K. Chemoradiation induces upregulation of immunogenic cell death-related molecules together with increased expression of PD-L1 and galectin-9 in gastric cancer. Sci Rep 2021; 11:12264. [PMID: 34112882 PMCID: PMC8192931 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91603-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgery alone or combined with chemo- and/or radiation therapy remains the primary treatment for gastric cancer (GC) to date and immunotherapeutic tools such as monoclonal antibodies are only slowly being implemented. This is partly due to the fact that the immune microenvironment in GC during chemoradiation and other treatment modalities is still poorly understood. 7 gastric cancer (GC) cell lines were tested for their response to chemoradiation using 5-FU in combination with X-ray irradiation. We conducted flow cytometric analysis to determine the cells’ ability to undergo immunogenic cell death (ICD) and their expression of the two immunosuppressive proteins programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and galectin-9 (Gal-9). We evaluated the overall immunogenicity of two cell lines (MKN7, MKN74) in co-culture experiments with human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (Mo-DCs). Chemoradiation induces distinct responses in different GC cell lines. We observe ICD in vitro in all tested GC cell lines in the form of calreticulin (CRT) translocation to the plasma membrane. As a resistance mechanism, these cells also upregulated Gal-9 and PD-L1. Mo-DC maturation experiments showed that GCs provoked the maturation of Mo-DCs after chemoradiation in vitro. The addition of α-PD-L1 blocking antibody further enhanced the immunogenicity of these cells while improving DC viability. Blocking Tim-3, as the main receptor for Gal-9, had no such effect. Our findings suggest that the benefits of chemoradiation can substantially depend on tumor subtype and these benefits can be offset by induced immune evasion in GC. Combination treatment using checkpoint inhibitors could potentially lead to enhanced immune responses and yield better patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S H Petersen
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117599, Singapore.
| | - L F Kua
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117599, Singapore
| | - S Nakajima
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.,Department of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.,Department of Progressive DOHaD Research, Faculty of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, 1 Hikariga-oka, Fukushima city, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan
| | - W P Yong
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117599, Singapore.,Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Hospital of Singapore, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - K Kono
- Department of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Leidner R, Crittenden M, Young K, Xiao H, Wu Y, Couey MA, Patel AA, Cheng AC, Watters AL, Bifulco C, Morris G, Rushforth L, Nemeth S, Urba WJ, Gough M, Bell RB. Neoadjuvant immunoradiotherapy results in high rate of complete pathological response and clinical to pathological downstaging in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9:jitc-2021-002485. [PMID: 33963014 PMCID: PMC8108690 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) have been tested in the neoadjuvant setting for the treatment of locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC); however, response rates are modest. We hypothesized that adding stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to anti-PD-1 would be safe prior to definitive surgical resection and would enhance pathological response compared with historical cohorts of patients with locoregionally advanced HNSCC treated with checkpoint inhibitor alone. METHODS The Neoadjuvant Immuno-Radiotherapy Trial was an investigator-initiated single institution phase Ib clinical trial that enrolled patients with previously untreated locally advanced HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNSCC between 2018 and 2019. Eligible patients were treated with neoadjuvant SBRT at a total dose of either 40 Gy in 5 fractions or 24 Gy in 3 fractions, delivered in a 1-week timespan, with or without nivolumab, prior to definitive surgical resection. Patients were then planned for treatment with adjuvant nivolumab for 3 months. The primary safety endpoint was unplanned delay in surgery considered to be at least possibly related to neoadjuvant treatment. The primary efficacy endpoints included pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response (mPR), and the rate of clinical to pathological downstaging after neoadjuvant treatment. RESULTS Twenty-one patients underwent neoadjuvant treatment, which was well tolerated and did not delay surgery, thus meeting the primary endpoint. Tissue responses were characterized by robust inflammatory infiltrates in the regression bed, plasma cells and cholesterol clefts. Among the entire study group, the mPR and pCR rate was 86% and 67%, respectively. Clinical to pathological downstaging occurred in 90% of the patients treated. CONCLUSION These data demonstrate that radiation delivered only to the gross tumor volume combined with immunotherapy was safe, resulted in a high rate of mPR and should be further evaluated as a locally focused neoadjuvant therapy for patients with head and neck cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER This study is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03247712) and is active, but closed to patient accrual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rom Leidner
- Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Earle A Chiles Research Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Marka Crittenden
- Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Earle A Chiles Research Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Division of Radiation Oncology, The Oregon Clinic, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kristina Young
- Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Earle A Chiles Research Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Division of Radiation Oncology, The Oregon Clinic, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Hong Xiao
- Department of Pathology, Providence Health and Services- Oregon, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Yaping Wu
- Department of Pathology, Providence Health and Services- Oregon, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | - Ashish A Patel
- Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Head and Neck Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | | | - Carlo Bifulco
- Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Earle A Chiles Research Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Department of Pathology, Providence Health and Services- Oregon, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - George Morris
- Earle A Chiles Research Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | | | - Walter J Urba
- Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Earle A Chiles Research Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Michael Gough
- Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Earle A Chiles Research Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - R Bryan Bell
- Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA .,Earle A Chiles Research Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Marciscano AE, Haimovitz-Friedman A, Lee P, Tran PT, Tomé WA, Guha C, (Spring) Kong FM, Sahgal A, El Naqa I, Rimner A, Marks LB, Formenti SC, DeWeese TL. Immunomodulatory Effects of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: Preclinical Insights and Clinical Opportunities. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:35-52. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.02.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Revised: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
84
|
Oweida AJ, Mueller AC, Piper M, Milner D, Van Court B, Bhatia S, Phan A, Bickett T, Jordan K, Proia T, Schulick R, Messersmith WA, Del Chiaro M, Clambey E, Gough MJ, Williams J, Hansen K, Goodman K, Karam SD. Response to radiotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is enhanced by inhibition of myeloid-derived suppressor cells using STAT3 anti-sense oligonucleotide. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2021; 70:989-1000. [PMID: 33097963 PMCID: PMC10991244 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-020-02701-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a heterogeneous tumor microenvironment (TME) comprised of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), tumor-associated macrophages, neutrophils, regulatory T cells, and myofibroblasts. The precise mechanisms that regulate the composition of the TME and how they contribute to radiotherapy (RT) response remain poorly understood. In this study, we analyze changes in immune cell populations and circulating chemokines in patient samples and animal models of pancreatic cancer to characterize the immune response to radiotherapy. Further, we identify STAT3 as a key mediator of immunosuppression post-RT. We found granulocytic MDSCs (G-MDSCs) and neutrophils to be increased in response to RT in murine and human PDAC samples. We also found that RT-induced STAT3 phosphorylation correlated with increased MDSC infiltration and proliferation. Targeting STAT3 using an anti-sense oligonucleotide in combination with RT circumvented RT-induced MDSC infiltration, enhanced the proportion of effector T cells, and improved response to RT. In addition, STAT3 inhibition contributed to the remodeling of the PDAC extracellular matrix when combined with RT, resulting in decreased collagen deposition and fibrotic tissue formation. Collectively, our data provide evidence that targeting STAT3 in combination with RT can mitigate the pro-tumorigenic effects of RT and improve tumor response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayman J Oweida
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Adam C Mueller
- Thomas Jefferson University, Bodine Center for Cancer Treatment, 1665 Aurora Court Suite 1032, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Miles Piper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 1665 Aurora Court Suite 1032, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Dallin Milner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 1665 Aurora Court Suite 1032, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Benjamin Van Court
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 1665 Aurora Court Suite 1032, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Shilpa Bhatia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 1665 Aurora Court Suite 1032, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Andy Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 1665 Aurora Court Suite 1032, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Thomas Bickett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 1665 Aurora Court Suite 1032, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Kimberly Jordan
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Theresa Proia
- Bioscience, Oncology, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Richard Schulick
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Wells A Messersmith
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Eric Clambey
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Michael J Gough
- Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Jason Williams
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Kirk Hansen
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Karyn Goodman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sana D Karam
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 1665 Aurora Court Suite 1032, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
85
|
Tsai TH, Chen YJ, Wang LY, Hsieh CH. Impact of Local Liver Irradiation Concurrent Versus Sequential with Lenvatinib on Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13071598. [PMID: 33808407 PMCID: PMC8037784 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Lenvatinib is a systemic treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an advanced technique of hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) that can be applied in patients with HCC. The current study showed that the area under the concentration–time curve of lenvatinib concentration (AUClenvatinib) increased by 148.8% with radiotherapy (RT)2Gy×3f’x (EBRT for the whole liver), and 68.9% with RT9Gy×3f’× (SBRT targeting a 1.5 × 1.5 cm region in the center of the liver) in the sequential regimen compared to the concurrent regimen in rats. Additionally, the AUClenvatinib was decreased by 50% in the concurrent regimen of both RT techniques with lenvatinib compared to the control group. The biodistribution of lenvatinib in the organs at risk was markedly decreased in the concurrent regimens. The radiation–drug interactions were between lenvatinib and RT, and showed sequential preferably. Abstract Concurrent and sequential regimens involving radiotherapy (RT) and lenvatinib were designed with off-target or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) doses in a freely moving rat model to evaluate the effect of RT on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of lenvatinib. Liver RT concurrent with lenvatinib decreased the area under the concentration–time curve of lenvatinib concentration (AUClenvatinib) by 51.1% with three fractions of 2 Gy (RT2Gy×3f’x, p = 0.03), and 48.9% with RT9Gy×3f’x (p = 0.03). The AUClenvatinib increased by 148.8% (p = 0.008) with RT2Gy×3f’x, and 68.9% (p = 0.009) with RT9Gy×3f’x in the sequential regimen compared to the concurrent regimen. There were no differences in the AUClenvatinib between RT2Gy×3f’x and RT9Gy×3f’x in the concurrent or sequential regimen. Both the RT2Gy×3f’x and RT9Gy×3f’x concurrent regimens markedly decreased the biodistribution of lenvatinib in the heart, liver, lung, spleen, and kidneys, which ranged from 31% to 100% for RT2Gy×3f’x, and 11% to 100% for RT9Gy×3f’x, compared to the sham regimen. The PK and biodistribution of lenvatinib can be modulated by simultaneous off-target irradiation and SBRT doses. The timing of lenvatinib administration with respect to RT, impacted the PK and biodistribution of the drug. Additionally, off-target and SBRT doses had a similar ability to modulate the effect of systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tung-Hu Tsai
- Institute of Traditional Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan; (T.-H.T.); (Y.-J.C.)
| | - Yu-Jen Chen
- Institute of Traditional Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan; (T.-H.T.); (Y.-J.C.)
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei 104, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan
- Department of Nursing, MacKay Junior College of Medicine, Nursing and Management, Taipei 112, Taiwan
| | - Li-Ying Wang
- School and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan;
- Physical Therapy Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Hsi Hsieh
- Institute of Traditional Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan; (T.-H.T.); (Y.-J.C.)
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, Taiwan
- Correspondence: or or ; Tel.: +886-2-8966-7000 (ext. 1033); Fax: +886-2-8966-0906
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Marcus D, Lieverse RIY, Klein C, Abdollahi A, Lambin P, Dubois LJ, Yaromina A. Charged Particle and Conventional Radiotherapy: Current Implications as Partner for Immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:1468. [PMID: 33806808 PMCID: PMC8005048 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) has been shown to interfere with inflammatory signals and to enhance tumor immunogenicity via, e.g., immunogenic cell death, thereby potentially augmenting the therapeutic efficacy of immunotherapy. Conventional RT consists predominantly of high energy photon beams. Hypofractionated RT regimens administered, e.g., by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), are increasingly investigated in combination with cancer immunotherapy within clinical trials. Despite intensive preclinical studies, the optimal dose per fraction and dose schemes for elaboration of RT induced immunogenic potential remain inconclusive. Compared to the scenario of combined immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and RT, multimodal therapies utilizing other immunotherapy principles such as adoptive transfer of immune cells, vaccination strategies, targeted immune-cytokines and agonists are underrepresented in both preclinical and clinical settings. Despite the clinical success of ICI and RT combination, e.g., prolonging overall survival in locally advanced lung cancer, curative outcomes are still not achieved for most cancer entities studied. Charged particle RT (PRT) has gained interest as it may enhance tumor immunogenicity compared to conventional RT due to its unique biological and physical properties. However, whether PRT in combination with immune therapy will elicit superior antitumor effects both locally and systemically needs to be further investigated. In this review, the immunological effects of RT in the tumor microenvironment are summarized to understand their implications for immunotherapy combinations. Attention will be given to the various immunotherapeutic interventions that have been co-administered with RT so far. Furthermore, the theoretical basis and first evidences supporting a favorable immunogenicity profile of PRT will be examined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damiënne Marcus
- The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW–School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands; (D.M.); (R.I.Y.L.); (P.L.); (L.J.D.)
| | - Relinde I. Y. Lieverse
- The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW–School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands; (D.M.); (R.I.Y.L.); (P.L.); (L.J.D.)
| | - Carmen Klein
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (C.K.); (A.A.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 222, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (C.K.); (A.A.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 222, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philippe Lambin
- The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW–School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands; (D.M.); (R.I.Y.L.); (P.L.); (L.J.D.)
| | - Ludwig J. Dubois
- The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW–School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands; (D.M.); (R.I.Y.L.); (P.L.); (L.J.D.)
| | - Ala Yaromina
- The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW–School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands; (D.M.); (R.I.Y.L.); (P.L.); (L.J.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
Craig DJ, Nanavaty NS, Devanaboyina M, Stanbery L, Hamouda D, Edelman G, Dworkin L, Nemunaitis JJ. The abscopal effect of radiation therapy. Future Oncol 2021; 17:1683-1694. [PMID: 33726502 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2020-0994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) in some cases results in a systemic anticancer response known as the abscopal effect. Multiple hypotheses support the role of immune activation initiated by RT-induced DNA damage. Optimal radiation dose is necessary to promote the cGAS-STING pathway in response to radiation and initiate an IFN-1 signaling cascade that promotes the maturation and migration of dendritic cells to facilitate antigen presentation and stimulation of cytotoxic T cells. T cells then exert a targeted response throughout the body at areas not subjected to RT. These effects are further augmented through the use of immunotherapeutic drugs resulting in increased T-cell activity. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte presence and TREX1, KPNA2 and p53 signal expression are being explored as prognostic biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Craig
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH 43614, USA
| | - Nisha S Nanavaty
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH 43614, USA
| | - Monika Devanaboyina
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH 43614, USA
| | - Laura Stanbery
- Department of Medical Affairs, Gradalis, Inc, Carrollton, TX 75006, USA
| | - Danae Hamouda
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH 43614, USA
| | - Gerald Edelman
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH 43614, USA.,Promedica Health System, Toledo, OH 43606, USA
| | - Lance Dworkin
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH 43614, USA
| | - John J Nemunaitis
- Department of Medical Affairs, Gradalis, Inc, Carrollton, TX 75006, USA
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Lee BM, Seong J. Radiotherapy as an immune checkpoint blockade combination strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:919-927. [PMID: 33776363 PMCID: PMC7968135 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i10.919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Revised: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In the immune oncology era, the clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) against most solid cancers is well known. In hepatocellular carcinoma, the recent success of combination therapy with targeting agents has accelerated the search for novel combination strategies. Radiotherapy (RT), an attractive modality, can be combined with ICIs, which act as strong modulators of the tumor immune microenvironment. Herein, we discuss immune modulation caused by radiation and the current trials of RT–ICI combination treatment as well as future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byung Min Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, South Korea
| | - Jinsil Seong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
HLA class I loss in colorectal cancer: implications for immune escape and immunotherapy. Cell Mol Immunol 2021; 18:556-565. [PMID: 33473191 PMCID: PMC8027055 DOI: 10.1038/s41423-021-00634-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
T cell-mediated immune therapies have emerged as a promising treatment modality in different malignancies including colorectal cancer (CRC). However, only a fraction of patients currently respond to treatment. Understanding the lack of responses and finding biomarkers with predictive value is of great importance. There is evidence that CRC is a heterogeneous disease and several classification systems have been proposed that are based on genomic instability, immune cell infiltration, stromal content and molecular subtypes of gene expression. Human leukocyte antigen class I (HLA-I) plays a pivotal role in presenting processed antigens to T lymphocytes, including tumour antigens. These molecules are frequently lost in different types of cancers, including CRC, resulting in tumour immune escape from cytotoxic T lymphocytes during the natural history of cancer development. The aim of this review is to (i) summarize the prevalence and molecular mechanisms behind HLA-I loss in CRC, (ii) discuss HLA-I expression/loss in the context of the newly identified CRC molecular subtypes, (iii) analyze the HLA-I phenotypes of CRC metastases disseminated via blood or the lymphatic system, (iv) discuss strategies to recover/circumvent HLA-I expression/loss and finally (v) review the role of HLA class II (HLA-II) in CRC prognosis.
Collapse
|
90
|
Piper K, DePledge L, Karsy M, Cobbs C. Glioma Stem Cells as Immunotherapeutic Targets: Advancements and Challenges. Front Oncol 2021; 11:615704. [PMID: 33718170 PMCID: PMC7945033 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.615704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most common and lethal primary brain malignancy. Despite major investments in research into glioblastoma biology and drug development, treatment remains limited and survival has not substantially improved beyond 1-2 years. Cancer stem cells (CSC) or glioma stem cells (GSC) refer to a population of tumor originating cells capable of self-renewal and differentiation. While controversial and challenging to study, evidence suggests that GCSs may result in glioblastoma tumor recurrence and resistance to treatment. Multiple treatment strategies have been suggested at targeting GCSs, including immunotherapy, posttranscriptional regulation, modulation of the tumor microenvironment, and epigenetic modulation. In this review, we discuss recent advances in glioblastoma treatment specifically focused on targeting of GCSs as well as their potential integration into current clinical pathways and trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keenan Piper
- Ben & Catherine Ivy Center for Advanced Brain Tumor Treatment, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.,Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Lisa DePledge
- Ben & Catherine Ivy Center for Advanced Brain Tumor Treatment, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.,University of Washington School of Medicine, Spokane, WA, United States
| | - Michael Karsy
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Charles Cobbs
- Ben & Catherine Ivy Center for Advanced Brain Tumor Treatment, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
Lei H, Shi M, Xu H, Bai S, Xiong X, Wei Q, Yang L. Combined Treatment of Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy for Urological Malignancies: Current Evidence and Clinical Considerations. Cancer Manag Res 2021; 13:1719-1731. [PMID: 33658847 PMCID: PMC7917304 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s288337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Although it has always been believed that radiation has immunosuppressive effects, more and more preclinical and clinical trials have shown that the combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy has a potential synergistic effect to treat cancers including urological malignancies. When radiotherapy is combined with immunotherapy, improved prognosis has been observed in different urinary tumors. However, there is no standard treatment, such as the optimal dose/fractionation and the sequence of immunotherapy and radiotherapy. In this review, we discussed the effects of radiotherapy on the cancer immune system and emphasized the synergy of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy. Although it has significantly improved the prognosis of tumors, there are still some unresolved questions about how to best use this combination in clinical practice. Ongoing trials will provide further information on the interaction of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy, and are expected to guide clinical practice and improve clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haoran Lei
- Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Ming Shi
- Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Hang Xu
- Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Shengjiang Bai
- Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Xingyu Xiong
- Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiang Wei
- Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Lu Yang
- Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
D'Andrea MA, Reddy GK. Brain Radiation Induced Extracranial Abscopal Effects in Metastatic Melanoma. Am J Clin Oncol 2021; 43:836-845. [PMID: 33044231 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Historically, the brain has been viewed as a specialized neurovascular inert organ with a distinctive immune privilege. Therefore, radiation-induced extracranial abscopal effects would be considered an unusual phenomenon due to the difficulty of the immunogenic signaling molecules to travel across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). However, it is now possible that localized central nervous system radiation has the ability to disrupt the structural integrity of the BBB and increase its endothelial permeability allowing the free passage of immunogenic responses between the intracranial and extracranial compartments. Thus, the nascent tumor-associated antigens produced by localized brain radiation can travel across the BBB into the rest of the body to modulate the immune system and induce extracranial abscopal effects. In clinical practice, localized brain radiation therapy-induced extracranial abscopal effects are a rarely seen phenomenon in metastatic melanoma and other advanced cancers. In this article, we provide a detailed overview of the current state of knowledge and clinical experience of central nervous system radiation-induced extracranial abscopal effects in patients with malignant melanoma. Emerging data from a small number of case reports and cohort studies of various malignancies has significantly altered our earlier understanding of this process by revealing that the brain is neither isolated nor passive in its interactions with the body's immune system. In addition, these studies provide clinical evidence that the brain is capable of interacting actively with the extracranial peripheral immune system. Thus, localized radiation treatment to 1 or more locations of brain metastases can induce extracranial abscopal responses. Collectively, these findings clearly demonstrate that localized brain radiation therapy-induced abscopal effects traverses the BBB and trigger tumor regression in the nonirradiated extracranial locations.
Collapse
|
93
|
Toffoli EC, Sheikhi A, Höppner YD, de Kok P, Yazdanpanah-Samani M, Spanholtz J, Verheul HMW, van der Vliet HJ, de Gruijl TD. Natural Killer Cells and Anti-Cancer Therapies: Reciprocal Effects on Immune Function and Therapeutic Response. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13040711. [PMID: 33572396 PMCID: PMC7916216 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Natural Killer (NK) cells are innate lymphocytes that play an important role in the immune response against cancer. Their activity is controlled by a balance of inhibitory and activating receptors, which in cancer can be skewed to favor their suppression in support of immune escape. It is therefore imperative to find ways to optimize their antitumor functionality. In this review, we explore and discuss how their activity influences, or even mediates, the efficacy of various anti-cancer therapies and, vice versa, how their activity can be affected by these therapies. Knowledge of the mechanisms underlying these observations could provide rationales for combining anti-cancer treatments with strategies enhancing NK cell function in order to improve their therapeutic efficacy. Abstract Natural Killer (NK) cells are innate immune cells with the unique ability to recognize and kill virus-infected and cancer cells without prior immune sensitization. Due to their expression of the Fc receptor CD16, effector NK cells can kill tumor cells through antibody-dependent cytotoxicity, making them relevant players in antibody-based cancer therapies. The role of NK cells in other approved and experimental anti-cancer therapies is more elusive. Here, we review the possible role of NK cells in the efficacy of various anti-tumor therapies, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy, as well as the impact of these therapies on NK cell function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa C. Toffoli
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (E.C.T.); (A.S.); (Y.D.H.); (P.d.K.); (H.J.v.d.V.)
| | - Abdolkarim Sheikhi
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (E.C.T.); (A.S.); (Y.D.H.); (P.d.K.); (H.J.v.d.V.)
- Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful 64616-43993, Iran
| | - Yannick D. Höppner
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (E.C.T.); (A.S.); (Y.D.H.); (P.d.K.); (H.J.v.d.V.)
| | - Pita de Kok
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (E.C.T.); (A.S.); (Y.D.H.); (P.d.K.); (H.J.v.d.V.)
| | - Mahsa Yazdanpanah-Samani
- Department of Medical Biotechnology, School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz 71348-45794, Iran;
| | - Jan Spanholtz
- Glycostem, Kloosterstraat 9, 5349 AB Oss, The Netherlands;
| | - Henk M. W. Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
| | - Hans J. van der Vliet
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (E.C.T.); (A.S.); (Y.D.H.); (P.d.K.); (H.J.v.d.V.)
- Lava Therapeutics, Yalelaan 60, 3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tanja D. de Gruijl
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (E.C.T.); (A.S.); (Y.D.H.); (P.d.K.); (H.J.v.d.V.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-20-4444063
| |
Collapse
|
94
|
Qian JM, Schoenfeld JD. Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Current Evidence and Challenges. Front Oncol 2021; 10:608772. [PMID: 33614492 PMCID: PMC7886974 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.608772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized cancer treatment over the past decade. However, although the immune landscape suggests a strong rationale for the use of these agents in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, the available clinical evidence indicates that most patients currently do not respond to ICI monotherapy. Radiotherapy is a primary treatment modality for many patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. While ionizing radiation traditionally has been thought to act in a purely cytotoxic fashion, a growing body of preclinical studies have demonstrated additional profound immunomodulatory effects. Consequently, there has been a surge of interest in the potential synergy between radiotherapy and immunotherapy, both the potential for radiotherapy to augment the systemic anti-tumor immune response and the potential for immunotherapy to improve in-field tumor response to radiation. In this review, we summarize the current preclinical and clinical evidence for radioimmunotherapy, with a particular focus on studies directly relevant to head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, as well as existing challenges and future directions for this emerging field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack M. Qian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Massachusetts General Hospital/Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jonathan D. Schoenfeld
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Wang Y. Advances in Hypofractionated Irradiation-Induced Immunosuppression of Tumor Microenvironment. Front Immunol 2021; 11:612072. [PMID: 33569059 PMCID: PMC7868375 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.612072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Hypofractionated radiotherapy is external beam irradiation delivered at higher doses in fewer fractions than conventional standard radiotherapy, which can stimulate innate and adaptive immunity to enhance the body’s immune response against cancer. The enhancement effect of hypofractionated irradiation to immune response has been widely investigated, which is considered an approach to expand the benefit of immunotherapy. Meanwhile, increasing evidence suggests that hypofractionated irradiation may induce or enhance the suppression of immune microenvironments. However, the suppressive effects of hypofractionated irradiation on immunomicroenvironment and the molecular mechanisms involved in these conditions are largely unknown. In this context, we summarized the immune mechanisms associated with hypofractionated irradiation, highlighted the advances in its immunosuppressive effect, and further discussed the potential mechanism behind this effect. In our opinion, besides its immunogenic activity, hypofractionated irradiation also triggers homeostatic immunosuppressive mechanisms that may counterbalance antitumor effects. And this may suggest that a combination with immunotherapy could possibly improve the curative potential of hypofractionated radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuxia Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
96
|
Martin-Broto J, Hindi N, Lopez-Pousa A, Peinado-Serrano J, Alvarez R, Alvarez-Gonzalez A, Italiano A, Sargos P, Cruz-Jurado J, Isern-Verdum J, Dolado MC, Rincon-Pérez I, Sanchez-Bustos P, Gutierrez A, Romagosa C, Morosi C, Grignani G, Gatti M, Luna P, Alastuey I, Redondo A, Belinchon B, Martinez-Serra J, Sunyach MP, Coindre JM, Dei Tos AP, Romero J, Gronchi A, Blay JY, Moura DS. Assessment of Safety and Efficacy of Combined Trabectedin and Low-Dose Radiotherapy for Patients With Metastatic Soft-Tissue Sarcomas: A Nonrandomized Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2020; 6:535-541. [PMID: 32077895 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.6584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Importance Active therapeutic combinations, such as trabectedin and radiotherapy, offer potentially higher dimensional response in second-line treatment of advanced soft-tissue sarcomas. Dimensional response can be relevant both for symptom relief and for survival. Objective To assess the combined use of trabectedin and radiotherapy in treating patients with progressing metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas. Design, Setting, and Participants Phase 1 of this nonrandomized clinical trial followed the classic 3 + 3 design, with planned radiotherapy at a fixed dose of 30 Gy (3 Gy/d for 10 days) and infusion of trabectedin at 1.3 mg/m2 as the starting dose, 1.5 mg/m2 as dose level +1, and 1.1 mg/m2 as dose level -1. Phase 2 followed the Simon optimal 2-stage design. Allowing for type I and II errors of 10%, treatment success was defined as an overall response rate of 35%. This study was conducted in 9 sarcoma referral centers in Spain, France, and Italy from April 13, 2015, to November 20, 2018. Adult patients with progressing metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma and having undergone at least 1 previous line of systemic therapy were enrolled. In phase 2, patients fitting inclusion criteria and receiving at least 1 cycle of trabectedin and the radiotherapy regimen constituted the per-protocol population; those receiving at least 1 cycle of trabectedin, the safety population. Interventions Trabectedin was administered every 3 weeks in a 24-hour infusion. Radiotherapy was required to start within 1 hour after completion of the first trabectedin infusion (cycle 1, day 2). Main Outcomes and Measures The dose-limiting toxic effects of trabectedin (phase 1) and the overall response rate (phase 2) with use of trabectedin plus irradiation in metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas. Results Eighteen patients (11 of whom were male) were enrolled in phase 1, and 27 other patients (14 of whom were female) were enrolled in phase 2. The median ages of those enrolled in phases 1 and 2 were 42 (range, 23-74) years and 51 (range, 27-73) years, respectively. In phase 1, dose-limiting toxic effects included grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than 5 days in 1 patient at the starting dose level and a grade 4 alanine aminotransferase level increase in 1 of 6 patients at the +1 dose level. In phase 2, among 25 patients with evaluable data, the overall response rate was 72% (95% CI, 53%-91%) for local assessment and 60% (95% CI, 39%-81%) for central assessment. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this study suggest that the recommended dose of trabectedin for use in combination with this irradiation regimen is 1.5 mg/m2. The trial met its primary end point, with a high overall response rate that indicates the potential of this combination therapy for achieving substantial tumor shrinkage beyond first-line systemic therapy in patients with metastatic, progressing soft-tissue sarcomas. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02275286.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Martin-Broto
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.,TERABIS Group, IBiS (Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla), Sevilla, Spain
| | - Nadia Hindi
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.,TERABIS Group, IBiS (Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla), Sevilla, Spain
| | - Antonio Lopez-Pousa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Creu i Sant Pau Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier Peinado-Serrano
- TERABIS Group, IBiS (Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla), Sevilla, Spain.,CIBERONC (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Rosa Alvarez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gregorio Marañon University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Antoine Italiano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Josefina Cruz-Jurado
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of the Canary Islands, Tenerife, Spain
| | | | - Maria Carmen Dolado
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of the Canary Islands, Tenerife, Spain
| | | | | | - Antonio Gutierrez
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital Son Espases, Mallorca, Spain
| | - Cleofe Romagosa
- Department of Pathology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carlo Morosi
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Grignani
- Division of Medical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Marco Gatti
- Division of Radiotherapy, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Pablo Luna
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Son Espases, Mallorca, Spain
| | - Ignacio Alastuey
- Radiotherapy Department, University Hospital Son Espases, Mallorca, Spain
| | - Andres Redondo
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain.,Health Research Institute of La Paz Hospital (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| | - Belen Belinchon
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Jean-Michel Coindre
- Department of Biopathology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.,Department of Biopathology, Bordeaux University, Talence, France
| | - Angelo P Dei Tos
- Department of Medicine, University of Padua School of Medicine, Padua, Italy
| | - Jesus Romero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alessandro Gronchi
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.,Département of Medicine, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - David S Moura
- TERABIS Group, IBiS (Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla), Sevilla, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
Immunostimulatory Effects of Radiotherapy for Local and Systemic Control of Melanoma: A Review. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21239324. [PMID: 33297519 PMCID: PMC7730562 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21239324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Recently, modern therapies involving immune checkpoint inhibitors, cytokines, and oncolytic virus have been developed. Because of the limited treatment effect of modern therapy alone, the immunostimulatory effect of radiotherapy attracted increasing attention. The combined use of radiotherapy and modern therapy has been examined clinically and non-clinically, and its effectiveness has been confirmed recently. Because melanomas have high immunogenicity, better therapeutic outcomes are desired when using immunotherapy. However, sufficient therapeutic effects have not yet been achieved. Thus far, radiotherapy has been used only for local control of tumors. Although extremely rare, radiotherapy has also been reported for systemic control, i.e., abscopal effect. This is thought to be due to an antitumor immune response. Therefore, we herein summarize past information on not only the mechanism of immune effects on radiotherapy but also biomarkers reported in case reports on abscopal effects. We also reviewed the animal model suitable for evaluating abscopal effects. These results pave the way for further basic research or clinical studies on new treatment methods for melanoma. Currently, palliative radiation is administered to patients with metastatic melanoma for local control. If it is feasible to provide both systemic and local control, the treatment benefit for the patients is very large.
Collapse
|
98
|
Ablative Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and High Dose Rate Brachytherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12123606. [PMID: 33276562 PMCID: PMC7761604 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12123606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Revised: 11/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radiation therapy is a standard of care treatment option for men with localized prostate cancer. Over the years, various radiation delivery modalities have contributed to the increased precision of radiation, employing radiobiological insights to shorten the overall treatment time with hypofractionation, while improving oncological control without increasing toxicities. Here, we discuss and compare two ablative radiation modalities, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRBT), in terms of oncological control, dose/fractionation and toxicities in men with localized prostate cancer. This review will highlight the levels of evidence available to support either modality as a monotherapy, will summarize safety and efficacy, help clinicians gain a deeper understanding of the safety and efficacy profiles of these two modalities, and highlight ongoing research efforts to address many unanswered questions regarding ablative prostate radiation. Abstract Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common noncutaneous solid organ malignancy among men worldwide. Radiation therapy is a standard of care treatment option that has historically been delivered in the form of small daily doses of radiation over the span of multiple weeks. PCa appears to have a unique sensitivity to higher doses of radiation per fraction, rendering it susceptible to abbreviated forms of treatment. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) are both modern radiation modalities that allow the precise delivery of ablative doses of radiation to the prostate while maximally sparing sensitive surrounding normal structures. In this review, we highlight the evidence regarding the radiobiology, oncological outcomes, toxicity and dose/fractionation schemes of SBRT and HDRBT monotherapy in men with low-and intermediate-risk PCa.
Collapse
|
99
|
Oxidative Stress-Inducing Anticancer Therapies: Taking a Closer Look at Their Immunomodulating Effects. Antioxidants (Basel) 2020; 9:antiox9121188. [PMID: 33260826 PMCID: PMC7759788 DOI: 10.3390/antiox9121188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer cells are characterized by higher levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) compared to normal cells as a result of an imbalance between oxidants and antioxidants. However, cancer cells maintain their redox balance due to their high antioxidant capacity. Recently, a high level of oxidative stress is considered a novel target for anticancer therapy. This can be induced by increasing exogenous ROS and/or inhibiting the endogenous protective antioxidant system. Additionally, the immune system has been shown to be a significant ally in the fight against cancer. Since ROS levels are important to modulate the antitumor immune response, it is essential to consider the effects of oxidative stress-inducing treatments on this response. In this review, we provide an overview of the mechanistic cellular responses of cancer cells towards exogenous and endogenous ROS-inducing treatments, as well as the indirect and direct antitumoral immune effects, which can be both immunostimulatory and/or immunosuppressive. For future perspectives, there is a clear need for comprehensive investigations of different oxidative stress-inducing treatment strategies and their specific immunomodulating effects, since the effects cannot be generalized over different treatment modalities. It is essential to elucidate all these underlying immune effects to make oxidative stress-inducing treatments effective anticancer therapy.
Collapse
|
100
|
Storozynsky Q, Hitt MM. The Impact of Radiation-Induced DNA Damage on cGAS-STING-Mediated Immune Responses to Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:E8877. [PMID: 33238631 PMCID: PMC7700321 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21228877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 105] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy is a major modality used to combat a wide range of cancers. Classical radiobiology principles categorize ionizing radiation (IR) as a direct cytocidal therapeutic agent against cancer; however, there is an emerging appreciation for additional antitumor immune responses generated by this modality. A more nuanced understanding of the immunological pathways induced by radiation could inform optimal therapeutic combinations to harness radiation-induced antitumor immunity and improve treatment outcomes of cancers refractory to current radiotherapy regimens. Here, we summarize how radiation-induced DNA damage leads to the activation of a cytosolic DNA sensing pathway mediated by cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP) synthase (cGAS) and stimulator of interferon genes (STING). The activation of cGAS-STING initiates innate immune signaling that facilitates adaptive immune responses to destroy cancer. In this way, cGAS-STING signaling bridges the DNA damaging capacity of IR with the activation of CD8+ cytotoxic T cell-mediated destruction of cancer-highlighting a molecular pathway radiotherapy can exploit to induce antitumor immune responses. In the context of radiotherapy, we further report on factors that enhance or inhibit cGAS-STING signaling, deleterious effects associated with cGAS-STING activation, and promising therapeutic candidates being investigated in combination with IR to bolster immune activation through engaging STING-signaling. A clearer understanding of how IR activates cGAS-STING signaling will inform immune-based treatment strategies to maximize the antitumor efficacy of radiotherapy, improving therapeutic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mary M. Hitt
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E1, Canada;
| |
Collapse
|