Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: new evidence for the dynamic binding of purified anti-PF4–heparin antibodies to platelets and the resultant platelet activation

Risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients receiving thromboprophylaxis

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a clinicopathological syndrome associated with heparin therapy that is characterized by a decrease in platelet counts and/or the development of a new thrombosis. Two types of HIT exist, type I is nonimmune and self-resolves, whereas type II is immune-mediated and clinically important. The formation of antibodies against the platelet factor 4-heparin complexes results in platelet activation and thrombin formation, which lead to an increased risk of thrombosis. Unfractionated heparin is associated with a higher risk of HIT than low-molecular-weight heparins. Surgical patients, particularly those undergoing orthopedic or cardiac surgery, are at higher risk of HIT than medical patients. Treatment of HIT involves heparin cessation together with anticoagulation with direct thrombin inhibitors or indirect factor Xa inhibitors.

IgG-class anti-PF4/heparin antibodies and symptomatic DVT in orthopedic surgery patients receiving different anti-thromboembolic prophylaxis therapeutics

Background

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a thromboembolic complication that can occur with unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Our objective was to determine and compare the incidence of IgG-class HIT antibodies in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with different antithrombotic prophylaxis therapies and their contributions to the occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE).

Methods

A prospective observational study was performed for 374 Japanese patients undergoing THA or TKA to determine the incidence of VTE. IgG-class anti-PF4/heparin antibodies were measured using IgG-specific EIA before and after the operation.

Results

In the clinical outcome, the incidence of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was 15.0% (56/374, TKA; 35, THA; 21) and pulmonary emboli (PE) were not observed. The total seroconversion incidence of IgG-class PF4/heparin antibodies was 19.8% (74/374). The seroconversion incidence of IgG-class PF4/heparin antibodies was higher in patients receiving UFH (32.7%) compared to those receiving LMWH (9.5%) or fondaparinux (14.8%). Furthermore, the seroconversion incidence was significantly higher in patients undergoing TKA compared to those undergoing THA. Based on multivariate analysis, seroconversion of the IgG-class PF4/heparin antibodies was independent a risk factor for symptomatic DVT.

Conclusion

Our findings show that the seroconversion of IgG-class anti-PF4/heparin antibodies differed with various anti-thrombotic prophylaxis therapeutics and was associated with the risk of DVT in a subset of patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TKA and THA).

The role of the CXC chemokines platelet factor-4 (CXCL4/PF-4) and its variant (CXCL4L1/PF-4var) in inflammation, angiogenesis and cancer

Chemokines are chemotactic cytokines which recruit leukocytes to inflammatory sites. They also affect tumor development and metastasis by acting as growth factor, by attracting pro- or anti-tumoral leukocytes or by influencing angiogenesis. Platelet factor-4 (CXCL4/PF-4) was the first chemokine shown to inhibit angiogenesis. CXCL4L1/PF-4var, recently isolated from thrombin-stimulated platelets, differing from authentic CXCL4/PF-4 in three carboxy-terminally located amino acids, was found to be more potent than CXCL4/PF-4 in inhibiting angiogenesis and tumor growth. Both glycosaminoglycans (GAG) and CXCR3 are implicated in the activities of the PF-4 variants. This report reviews the current knowledge on the role of CXCL4/PF-4 and CXCL4L1/PF-4var in physiological and pathological processes. In particular, the role of CXCL4/PF-4 in cancer, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and atherosclerosis is described.

Laboratory methods and management of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

The clinical effects of heparin are meritorious and heparin remains the anticoagulant of choice for most clinical needs. However, as with any drug, adverse effects exist. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an important adverse effect of heparin associated with amputation and death due to thrombosis. Although the diagnosis and treatment of HIT can be difficult and complex, it is critical that patients with HIT be identified as soon as possible to initiate early treatment to avoid thrombosis.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: current status and diagnostic challenges

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a fairly common and potentially catastrophic complication of heparin therapy. Diagnosing HIT remains a challenge, as the patients at risk often have other reasons for thrombocytopenia and/or thrombosis. HIT is considered a clinicopathologic disorder whose diagnosis is generally made on the basis of both clinical criteria and the presence of "HIT antibodies" in the patient's serum or plasma. There are two basic laboratory approaches to detect HIT antibodies. The immunoassays detect antibodies based on their binding properties, whereas the functional assays detect antibodies based on their platelet-activating properties. Prompt and accurate diagnosis of HIT is imperative, as overdiagnosis exposes patients to alternative anticoagulants and their associated bleeding risks, whereas under- or delayed diagnosis leaves patients vulnerable to the thromboembolic sequelae of HIT, which can be life threatening. A critical interpretation of laboratory results by the clinician is an essential component of diagnosing HIT. This requires a keen understanding of the current concepts in the pathophysiologic mechanisms of the disease, and the application of these concepts when interpreting the results of both the functional and immunoassays. Equally important is an awareness of the strengths and weaknesses, as well as the current lack of standardization and proficiency testing, of these assays.

Monocyte-bound PF4 in the pathogenesis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life- and limb-threatening thrombotic disorder that develops after exposure to heparin, often in the setting of inflammation. We have shown previously that HIT is associated with antibodies to complexes that form between platelet factor 4 and glycosaminoglycan (GAG) side chains on the surface of platelets. However, thrombosis can occur in the absence of thrombocytopenia. We now show that platelet factor 4 binds to monocytes and forms antigenic complexes with their surface GAG side chains more efficiently than on platelets likely due to differences in GAG composition. Binding to monocytes is enhanced when the cells are activated by endotoxin. Monocyte accumulation within developing arteriolar thrombi was visualized by situ microscopy. Monocyte depletion or inactivation in vivo attenuates thrombus formation induced by photochemical injury of the carotid artery in a modified murine model of HIT while paradoxically exacerbating thrombocytopenia. These studies demonstrate a previously unappreciated role for monocytes in the pathogenesis of arterial thrombosis in HIT and suggest that therapies targeting these cells might provide an alternative approach to help limit thrombosis in this and possibly other thrombotic disorders that occur in the setting of inflammation.

Physiological changes in membrane-expressed platelet factor 4: implications in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Many heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) antibodies cause platelet activation in the serotonin release assay (SRA) in the absence of heparin. This in vitro observation may help unravel the mechanism of delayed-onset HIT, where seropositive patients develop thrombocytopenia and associated thrombosis after cessation of heparin.

OBJECTIVE

Studies were conducted to examine the relationship between platelet environment, surface PF4 expression, and the extent of heparin-independent platelet activation in the SRA.

METHODS

Ex vivo platelets were washed and labeled for SRA, then used either before or after 45 minutes of recovery at 37 degrees C. HIT antibody-mediated serotonin release in the absence of heparin was compared to the extent of surface staining of the platelets with fluorescent anti-human PF4 antibodies.

RESULTS

Handling of platelets for in vitro studies resulted in transient expression of surface PF4, and it was during this interval that platelets were most sensitive to activation by HIT antibodies in the absence of heparin. Heparin-independent platelet activation was attenuated when SRA-positive specimens were retested after platelets were incubated 45 minutes at 37 degrees C. Surface PF4 expression was diminished on the rested platelets, compared to the same platelets labeled immediately after handling. Thus compared to rested platelets, mildly activated platelets had elevated surface PF4 expression and a higher level of HIT antibody-mediated, heparin-independent platelet activation.

CONCLUSION

Surface expression of PF4 reflects HIT antigen presentation, and varies with the physiological state of platelets. Thus there can be differences in HIT antibody target availability among patients which may explain the variability in consequences of HIT antibody seropositivity.

Heparin and Oversulfated Heparin Byproduct Induce Thrombin Generation Through Contact System Activation in Plasma of Patients With HIT

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis (HITT) is the most severe side effect of heparin administration. Patients with HITT may die or have permanent sequelae such as stroke or limb amputation. Contaminated heparin is associated with anaphylactic reactions and deaths by activating the contact system. It is also associated with high incidence of HIT via a yet unknown mechanism. This study showed that although oversulfated heparin byproduct induced thrombin activities in both normal and HIT patient plasmas through the contact system activation, authentic heparin induced thrombin activities only in HIT patient plasmas containing autoantibodies against protein/ heparin complex. These data suggest that the negatively charged immunoglobulin G (IgG)/platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complex activate the contact system and produce thrombin in human plasma, and thrombin partially activates the platelets allowing subsequent platelet activation through IgG/Fc receptor II signaling. The newly discovered mechanism of heparin-induced thrombin activity could explain the increased incidence of HIT in patients exposed to contaminated heparin. Furthermore, the assays used in these studies would be valuable for HIT diagnosis, prevention, and treatment.

The low-molecular-weight heparin, nadroparin, inhibits tumour angiogenesis in a rodent dorsal skinfold chamber model

BACKGROUND

Recently, low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) were found to confer a survival advantage in cancer patients. The mechanism underlying this observation is unclear, but may involve inhibition of tumour angiogenesis. We aimed to examine the effects of nadroparin on tumour angiogenesis using a dorsal skinfold window chamber model in the Syrian hamster.

METHODS

AMel-3 and HAP-T1 tumours were grown in donor animals and fragments implanted in the window chambers. Animals (N=46) were treated with 200 IU of nadroparin or saline for 10 days. Repeated intravital fluorescence microscopy was performed to calculate functional microcirculatory parameters: number (N) and length (L) of microvessels, vascular area fraction (AF), and red blood cell velocity (V). Microvessel density (MVD), fractal dimension, and pericyte coverage were assessed histologically.

RESULTS

Active angiogenesis was observed in control animals, resulting in a significant increase in N, L, and AF. In nadroparin-treated animals, however, N and L did not increase whereas AF decreased significantly. Both groups showed an initial increase in V, but nadroparin treatment resulted in an earlier decrease in red blood cell velocity over time. Compared with control animals, nadroparin-treated animals showed a significantly lower MVD and fractal dimension but significantly higher pericyte coverage index (PCI).

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, these results suggest that the LMWH nadroparin inhibits tumour angiogenesis and results in microvessel normalisation.

β2 Glycoprotein I (β2GPI) binds platelet factor 4 (PF4): implications for the pathogenesis of antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune thrombophilia characterized by arterial/venous thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity in the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies that mainly recognize β2 glycoprotein I (β2GPI). To investigate potential platelet ligands of β2GPI, platelet membrane proteins from healthy persons and patients with APS were passed through a β2GPI-affinity column. By using mass spectrometry, platelet factor 4 (PF4) appeared as the dominant β2GPI binding protein. PF4 could bind in vitro, with high-affinity, recombinant β2GPI, and the binding was abrogated by soluble β2GPI. Coprecipitation experiments further confirmed this interaction. In silico molecular docking showed that PF4 tetramers can bind 2 β2GPI molecules simultaneously. Size exclusion chromatography confirmed that anti-β2GPI antibodies selectively interact with complexes composed of (β2GPI)2–(PF4)4. In addition, as shown by the β2GPI antigenicity evaluation, the reactivity of APS sera was higher against PF4–β2GPI complex than against β2GPI alone. On complex formation, anti-β2GPI–β2GPI–PF4 significantly induced platelet p38MAPK phosphorylation and TXB2 production, mainly through F(ab′)2 fragments of antibodies. In summary, this study makes evident that β2GPI forms stable complexes with PF4, leading to the stabilization of β2GPI dimeric structure that facilitates the antibody recognition. This interaction can probably be involved in the procoagulant tendency of APS.

The severity of trauma determines the immune response to PF4/heparin and the frequency of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin can induce heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). The combined effect of type of surgery (major vs minor) and heparin on this prothrombotic immune reaction to platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin was analyzed. In a randomized, double-blind study, trauma patients receiving low-molecular-weight (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH) for thrombosis prophylaxis were assessed for PF4/heparin-antibody seroconversion, HIT, and thrombosis according to type of surgery. The risk for seroconversion was higher than major versus minor surgery odds ratio, 7.98 [95% confidence interval, 2.06-31.00], P = .003, controlled for potential confounders, as was the risk for HIT (2.2% [95% confidence interval, 0.3%-4.1%] vs 0.0%, P = .010). During LMWH compared with UFH thromboprophylaxis, HIT (1 of 298 vs 4 of 316; P = .370) and PF4/heparin seroconversion (1.7% vs 6.6%; P = .002) were less frequent, driven by differences in patients undergoing major surgery (incidence of HIT: LMWH 0.8% vs UFH 4.0%; P = .180; seroconversion rates: 4.0% vs 17.0%; P = .001). After minor surgery, no case of HIT occurred. The severity of trauma and the need for major surgery strongly influence the risk of an anti-PF4/heparin immune response, which is then increased by UFH. In major trauma certoparin may be safer than UFH because it induces HIT-antibody seroconversion, and the corresponding risk of HIT, less frequently.

Evaluation of a clinical scoring scale to direct early appropriate therapy in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Background. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious adverse effect associated with heparin therapy. Current laboratory confirmation for immune mediated HIT often results in false positives and unnecessary treatment, exposing individuals to possible complications. As a result, clinical evaluation has been recommended in conjunction with laboratory testing. We hypothesize that utilization of a clinical scoring scale, the 4T’s, will result in the initial appropriate therapy for suspected HIT.

Methods. This is a retrospective chart review of 108 patients who underwent ELISA testing for HIT at a university hospital. The 4T’s scale was applied, stratifying individuals into low, intermediate, and high-risk categories. Each risk score was compared to the ELISA results to determine if the 4T’s can predict the diagnosis of HIT and result in appropriate management. ELISA optical density scores as well as incidence of adverse events were also compared among risk categories.

Study Results. Individuals with low risk correlate with a negative ELISA compared to intermediate and high-risk individuals (p = 0.01 and p<0.01) and also were significantly more likely to predict institution of appropriate therapy (p<0.01). Median optical density scores were 0.184 (0.046—2.116), 0.226 (0.067—1.887), and 0.476 (0.096—1.309) for low, intermediate, and high 4T scores. Major adverse events include thrombosis and bleeding.

Conclusions. Individuals with low risk were more likely to receive initial, appropriate therapy and were also significantly more likely to have a negative ELISA test result. Individuals with low risk determined by the 4T score therefore may have therapy and serologic testing for HIT withheld.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. A contemporary clinical approach to diagnosis and management

Thrombocytopenia following heparin administration can be associated with an immune reaction, now referred to as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT is essentially a prothrombotic disorder mediated by an IgG antiplatelet factor 4/heparin antibody, which induces platelet, endothelial cell, monocyte, and other cellular activation, leading to thrombin generation and thrombotic complications. Indeed, HIT can also be regarded as a serious adverse drug effect. Importantly, HIT can be a life-threatening and limb-threatening condition frequently associated with characteristically severe and extensive thromboembolism (both venous and arterial) rather than with bleeding. This article provides an overview of HIT, with an emphasis on the clinical diagnosis and management.

Heparin-induced anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions: two distinct but overlapping syndromes

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions are of increasing clinical and scientific interest, particularly given the recent identification of a syndrome of heparin-induced anaphylaxis due to oversulfated chondroitin sulfate (OSCS), a contaminant in certain heparin preparations. However, heparin-induced anaphylactoid reactions also have been reported to be a consequence of immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT).

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the clinical features and pathophysiology of two distinct disorders, HIT-associated anaphylactoid reactions as well as anaphylaxis resulting from OSCS-contaminated heparin.

METHODS

We review literature describing these two types of heparin-induced anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions, and seek potential pathophysiologic links between them.

RESULTS

Intravenous bolus heparin administered to patients with circulating 'HIT antibodies', usually as a result of recent heparin therapy, can produce anaphylactoid reactions, probably as a consequence of in vivo activation of platelets and, possibly, leukocytes. Affected patients often evince fever/chills, hypertension and/or acute respiratory compromise ('pseudo-pulmonary embolism'). In contrast, heparin-induced anaphylaxis is caused by activation of the contact system, with formation of vasoactive kinins (bradykinin, des-arg(9)-bradykinin). This latter syndrome has been linked in an epidemic form to administration of OSCS-contaminated heparin; these reactions feature prominent hypotension and laryngeal edema. Hemodialysis patients are at increased risk for both syndromes. There is evidence that OSCS-contaminated heparin itself increases the risk of HIT compared with non-contaminated heparin.

CONCLUSION

Two distinct syndromes of heparin-induced anaphylaxis and anaphylactoid reactions exist. These seem to share certain epidemiologic features, given that OSCS-contaminated heparin can produce anaphylaxis through contact system activation but also could increase risk of HIT and HIT-associated anaphylactoid reactions.

Studies of the immune response in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by platelet-activating antibodies that recognize PF4/heparin complexes. Uncertainties remain regarding HIT immunobiology, including the temporal relation of antibody formation to onset of thrombocytopenia, and whether immunoglobulin class switching occurs. Using serial plasma samples from 2 heparin thromboprophylaxis trials, we determined the time of onset, antibody levels, and immunoglobulin class distributions (IgG, IgA, IgM) for 12 patients with HIT and 36 patients who formed anti-PF4/heparin antibodies, but did not develop HIT (“seropositive non-HIT controls”). In patients with HIT, anti-PF4/heparin antibodies became detectable 4 days (median) after starting heparin; antibody detection preceded the platelet count decline by 2 days (median). Patients with HIT produced higher levels of IgG antibodies, but similar IgA and IgM levels, compared with seropositive non-HIT controls. Among all 48 seroconverting patients, the first day of a positive antibody test (median, day 6) did not differ among the immunoglobulin classes. Thus, the HIT immune response does not exhibit the classic paradigm of IgM class precedence/immunoglobulin class switching; rather, relatively rapid formation of IgG antibodies is observed, sometimes with concomitant IgA and IgM formation. Compared with seropositive non-HIT controls, HIT patients develop significantly higher anti-PF4/heparin IgG levels that are detectable before the onset of thrombocytopenia.

Clinical relevance of heparin-PF4 complex antibody in DVT after total joint replacement

Background

Antibodies to the heparin-platelet factor-4 (HPF-4) complex (HIT antibodies) have been observed in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). These antibodies are thought to be involved in thrombosis through activation of platelet/endothelial cells. This prospective study was conducted to determine the incidence of post-operative HIT antibodies to assess the associated risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

We studied 104 patients who underwent unilateral primary TKA (n = 44) and primary THA (n = 60) with short-duration prophylaxis (1–2 days of a fixed dose of unfractionated heparin). HIT antibodies were assayed using a sandwich-type ELISA before the operation and after heparin treatment (post-operative day 7).

Results

In the clinical outcome, the incidence of symptomatic DVT was 15.4% (16/104, TKA; 10, THA 6) and pulmonary embolism (PE) was not observed. The total seroconversion rate of HIT antibodies at post-operative day 7 was 34.6% (36/104). Among 36 seroconverted patients, 11 (30.6%) developed symptomatic DVT and 5 out of 68 of the non-seroconverted patients (7.4%) developed symptomatic DVT. The incidence for DVT was significantly higher in the seroconverted patients compared with that of the non-seroconverted patients (odds ratio 5.5, 95%CI: 1.7–17.6 p = 0.0028). Furthermore, in the patients with symptomatic DVT, the titer of HIT antibodies at post-operative day 7 was significantly higher compared with those without symptomatic DVT.

Conclusion

Our data therefore suggest that seroconversion for HIT antibodies generated by heparin is associated with a risk of DVT in patients undergoing total joint replacement.

Immune complexes formed following the binding of anti-platelet factor 4 (CXCL4) antibodies to CXCL4 stimulate human neutrophil activation and cell adhesion

We tested the possibility that immune complexes formed following platelet factor 4 (PF4/CXCL4) binding to anti-PF4 antibody can stimulate neutrophil activation, similar to previous reports with platelets. Monoclonal Abs against PF4 and IgG from a heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) patient were applied. We observed that although PF4 or anti-PF4 antibody alone did not alter neutrophil function, costimulation with both reagents resulted in approximately 3-fold increase in cell surface Mac-1 expression, enhanced cell adhesion via L-selectin and CD18 integrins, and degranulation of secondary and tertiary granules. The level of Mac-1 up-regulation peaked at an intermediate PF4 dose, suggesting that functional response varies with antigen-antibody stoichiometry. PF4 binding to neutrophils was blocked by chondroitinase ABC. Cell activation was inhibited by both chondroitinase ABC and anti-CD32/FcgammaRII blocking mAb, IV.3. Confocal microscopy demonstrated that immune complexes colocalize with CD32a. Studies with HIT IgG demonstrated that neutrophils could be activated in the absence of exogenous heparin. These data, together, show that leukocyte surface chondroitin sulfates promote neutrophil activation by enhancing immune-complex binding to CD32a. Studies with recombinant PF4 suggest a role for arginine 49 in stabilizing PF4-chondroitin binding. Neutrophils activated via this mechanism may contribute to thrombosis and inflammation in patients mounting an immune response to PF4-heparin.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II: a serious hazard in preemptive renal transplantation: a case report

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II (HIT II), is an immune-mediated complication of heparin therapy, associated with arterial and venous thrombosis. Herein we have reported a case of a 23-year-old woman who developed HIT following a living related donor, preemptive, renal transplantation. The patient was preoperatively exposed to both unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin as she underwent five hemodialysis sessions. HIT caused right common and external iliac vein and renal graft artery thrombosis, resulting in graft loss. Heparin-free hemodialysis was continued, and the patient was successfully treated with anticoagulation by the direct thrombin inhibitor lepirudin for both the thromboses and for hemodialysis. Finally, she was accepted for the continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis program. This report highlighted the importance of clinical awareness as far as previous heparin exposure is concerned for establishing an early diagnosis and delivering treatment of this life-threatening prothrombotic complication of heparin administration.

Incidence of antiheparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in Turkish patients undergoing cardiac surgery

The frequency of antiheparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies by means of antigenic and functional assays ((14) C-serotonin release assay and citrated plasma platelet aggregation) was determined in 115 Turkish patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Blood samples were taken immediately before surgery and on days 5 and 10 +/- 2. Platelet counts were recorded and thrombotic events were determined by clinical methods. Antibody generation measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay before surgery (n = 44) and on days 5 (n = 44) and 10 (n = 115) was 15.9%, 34.1%, and 65.2%, respectively. Positive samples from functional assays were 4.4% on day 0 and 7.0% on day 10. All positive samples had been negative on day 0. A high frequency of antiheparin-platelet factor 4 antibody generation and a low frequency of clinical heparin-induced thrombocytopenia were determined in these patients. These results obtained for Turkish patients are similar to those of other studies of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Unfractionated heparin is widely used for numerous clinical situations. A well-known adverse effect of heparin exposure is thrombocytopenia. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a clinicopathologic syndrome that can be associated with severe complications and significant mortality. The pathophysiology of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia includes an immune-mediated reaction to heparin that activates platelets and results in an acquired hypercoagulability. Diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia should incorporate clinical signs and symptoms and laboratory testing for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies. Therapy should include discontinuation of heparin, initiation of a direct thrombin inhibitor, and eventually therapy with warfarin (only after the platelet count is at least 100 x 10(9)/L).

Testing for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Antibodies

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) has a distinct clinical profile and unique pathogenesis. It is caused by platelet-activating IgG antibodies that recognize multimolecular complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) bound to heparin or certain other polyanions. Although an immune response to PF4/heparin associated with heparin treatment is very common, clinical HIT occurs only among the minority of patients whose antibodies are capable of strongly activating platelets. This explains why certain platelet activation assays and anti-PF4/polyanion immunoassays have high sensitivity for HIT and why diagnostic specificity is highest for those assays that preferentially detect pathogenic antibodies, such as the washed platelet activation assays or immunoassays that detect only IgG antibodies. Negative results obtained in a solid-phase PF4/polyanion immunoassay generally exclude HIT (high negative predictive value), especially in a setting of a low pretest probability. In addition, because the magnitude of a positive test result correlates with greater likelihood of HIT, a Bayesian diagnostic approach that combines pretest probability and the magnitude of a positive test result is recommended. Recent studies suggest that presence of anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies in certain clinical settings confers an adverse prognosis, even without clinically evident HIT. Whether such antibodies impart "forme fruste" HIT or are simply a surrogate marker for a non-HIT adverse risk factor such as inflammation is unresolved.

[Thrombocytopathy and blood complications in uremia]

Bleeding diathesis and thrombotic tendencies are characteristic findings in patients with end-stage renal disease. The pathogenesis of uremic bleeding tendency is related to multiple dysfunctions of the platelets. The platelet numbers may be reduced slightly, while platelet turnover is increased. The reduced adhesion of platelets to the vascular subendothelial wall is due to reduction of GPIb and altered conformational changes of GPIIb/IIIa receptors. Alterations of platelet adhesion and aggregation are caused by uremic toxins, increased platelet production of NO, PGI(2), calcium and cAMP as well as renal anemia. Correction of uremic bleeding is caused by treatment of renal anemia with recombinant human erythropoietin or darbepoetin alpha, adequate dialysis, desmopressin, cryoprecipitate, tranexamic acid, or conjugated estrogens. Thrombotic complications in uremia are caused by increased platelet aggregation and hypercoagulability. Erythrocyte-platelet-aggregates, leukocyte-platelet-aggregates and platelet microparticles are found in higher percentage in uremic patients as compared to healthy individuals. The increased expression of platelet phosphatidylserine initiates phagocytosis and coagulation. Therapy with antiplatelet drugs does not reduce vascular access thrombosis but increases bleeding complications in endstage renal disease patients. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT type II) may develop in 0-12 % of hemodialysis patients. HIT antibody positive uremic patients mostly develop only mild thrombocytopenia and only very few thrombotic complications. Substitution of heparin by hirudin, danaparoid or regional citrate anticoagulation should be decided based on each single case.

Treatment of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia with Drotrecogin Alfa (activated)

A patient was administered drotrecogin alfa (activated) in addition to the standard of care for presumed severe sepsis and circulatory shock. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and hepatic and splenic thromboses complicated her clinical course. Because drotrecogin alfa (activated) treatment is associated with improvement in thrombotic manifestations and thrombocytopenia, it was continued as the sole antithrombotic agent after the HIT became apparent. This approach was chosen despite the patient's severe hepatic and renal dysfunction, which made the use of direct thrombin inhibitors unfavorable. She survived with a reasonable outcome and salvage of her limbs. Although this case suggests a potential role of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in the management of HIT, systematic evaluation of its efficacy in this situation is warranted.

Preoperative anti-PF4/heparin antibody level predicts adverse outcome after cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE

Preexisting serum antibodies to heparin/platelet factor 4 complexes may predispose adult cardiac surgical patients to increased perioperative morbidity and mortality. We sought to determine the association between preoperative serum antibodies directed against platelet factor 4/heparin complexes and major complications (in-hospital death or length of stay >10 days) in adult cardiac surgical patients.

METHODS

In a prospective observational study of 466 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting, valvular heart surgery, or both, preoperative serum was assayed for anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibody by using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Asserachrom HPIA). Known preoperative risk factors were assessed, and patients were assigned a risk score by using the validated method of Parsonnet and colleagues.

RESULTS

Major complications (death or postoperative hospitalization >10 days) occurred in 108 patients (23%). Overall, 59 (13%) patients had a positive preoperative anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibody screen (upper limit of normal is 0.5 optical density units). A positive assay result independently predicted an increased risk of major complications (P = .0284; odds ratio, 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-3.62) over and above the effect of the Parsonnet risk score (P < .001; odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.10). The level of preoperative anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibody was also significantly associated with major complications (P = .036; odds ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.68) independently of the Parsonnet risk score. No association (P > .75) existed between the Parsonnet risk score and preoperative anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibody level.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum antibodies directed against platelet factor 4/heparin complexes are prevalent in the adult patient population undergoing cardiac surgery. The presence of these antibodies before surgery is an independent predictor for death or prolonged hospitalization after adult cardiac surgery.

Co-existence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in a postoperative cardiac surgery patient

Up to 50% of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery will develop antibodies against the heparin-platelet factor 4 complex, and a small percentage of those will go on to develop heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura has also been reported post-coronary artery bypass surgery. In this case report, we describe a patient who developed both heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura post-coronary artery bypass surgery. This patient had clinical features consistent with both entities, and the clinical picture could not be explained by either heparin-induced thrombocytopenia or thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura alone. It is hypothesized that these two entities may be related in this patient population, and this case report emphasizes the challenges in the diagnosis of thrombocytopenia in this patient population.

Role of platelet surface PF4 antigenic complexes in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia pathogenesis: diagnostic and therapeutic implications

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) antibodies recognize complexes between heparin and platelet factor 4 (PF4). Heparin and PF4 bind HIT antibodies only over a narrow molar ratio. We explored the involvement of platelet surface-bound PF4 as an antigen in the pathogenesis of experimental HIT. We show that cell-surface PF4 complexes are also antigenic only over a restricted concentration range of PF4. Heparin is not required for HIT antibody binding but shifts the concentration of PF4 needed for optimal surface antigenicity to higher levels. These data are supported by in vitro studies involving both human and murine platelets with exogenous recombinant human (h) PF4 and either an anti-PF4-heparin monoclonal antibody (KKO) or HIT immunoglobulin. Injection of KKO into transgenic mice expressing different levels of hPF4 demonstrates a correlation between the severity of the thrombocytopenia and platelet hPF4 expression. Therapeutic interventions in this model using high-dose heparin or protamine sulfate support the pathogenic role of surface PF4 antigenic complexes in the etiology of HIT. We believe that this focus on surface PF4 advances our understanding of the pathogenesis of HIT, suggests ways to identify patients at high risk to develop HIT upon heparin exposure, and offers new therapeutic strategies.

Unfractionated heparin compared with low-molecular-weight heparin as related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a severe side effect of treatment with unfractionated heparin. The relation of low-molecular-weight heparin to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is less well understood. This review will summarize what is known about the similarities and differences between thrombocytopenia induced by low-molecular-weight heparin and that induced by unfractionated heparin.

RECENT FINDINGS

The pathophysiology of unfractionated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, caused by the development of antibodies to heparin/platelet factor 4 complexes, holds true for low-molecular-weight heparin because the molecules of the latter are of the same saccharidic structure as those of unfractionated heparin. Owing to their smaller size, however, low-molecular-weight heparin does not interact with platelet factor 4 and platelets as efficiently as does unfractionated heparin. This translates to a two- to threefold lower risk of immune sensitization (antibody generation and occurrence of clinical heparin-induced thrombocytopenia). Low-molecular-weight heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies are more often immunoglobulin A and immunoglobulin M, in contrast to the immunoglobulin G antibodies generated with unfractionated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, which tend to be more often associated with clinical heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The clinical expression of low-molecular-weight heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is generally similar to that of unfractionated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia but can have a slower onset, more severe thrombocytopenia, and slower platelet count recovery. Given that low-molecular-weight heparin, of itself, is linked with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia pathophysiology and it can interact with most preexisting heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies generated after exposure to unfractionated heparin, treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia patients with low-molecular-weight heparin is contraindicated.

SUMMARY

The risk of the development of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with low-molecular-weight heparin treatment is reduced relative to the frequency of unfractionated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, but it is not eliminated, and platelet counts should be monitored with treatment.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in neonates

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), an immune-mediated response to heparin administration, has been recognized in adults for some time, but only recently recognized in neonates and children. HIT Type I is a mild, self-limiting condition. HIT type II is a severe immune reaction to heparin that leads to thrombocytopenia and often thromboembolic complications. The incidence of HIT Type II is 2-5 percent in adults on heparin products and may be as high in neonates and children. The mortality rate from HIT in adults is 7-30 percent and is unknown but potentially high in newborns as well. The cardinal sign of HIT is a drop in platelet count by 50 percent or platelet counts below 70,000-100,000/mm3. This drop usually occurs five to ten days after the first exposure to heparin. Treatment is immediate cessation of all heparin therapy and initiation of alternative anticoagulants, especially the direct thrombin inhibitors lepirudin and argatroban. This article reviews the literature on HIT and presents a case of neonatal HIT following heart surgery.

Roles for fibrinogen, immunoglobulin and complement in platelet activation promoted by Staphylococcus aureus clumping factor A

Staphylococcus aureus is an important cause of infective endocarditis (IE) in patients without a history of prior heart valve damage. The ability to stimulate the activation of resting platelets and their subsequent aggregation is regarded as an important virulence factor of bacteria that cause IE. Clumping factor A is the dominant surface protein responsible for platelet activation by S. aureus cells in the stationary phase of growth. This study used Lactococcus lactis as a surrogate host to study the mechanism of ClfA-promoted platelet activation. Expression of ClfA from a nisin-inducible promoter demonstrated that a minimum level of surface-expressed ClfA was required. Using platelets that were purified from plasma, the requirement for both bound fibrinogen and immunoglobulin was demonstrated. The immunoglobulin G (IgG) requirement is consistent with the potent inhibition of platelet activation by a monoclonal antibody specific for the platelet FcgammaRIIa receptor. Furthermore the IgG must contain antibodies specific for the ClfA A domain. A model is proposed whereby bacterial cells armed with a sufficient number of surface-bound fibrinogen molecules can engage resting platelet glycoprotein GPIIb/IIIa, aided by bound IgG molecules, which encourages the clustering of FcgammaRIIa receptors. This can trigger activation of signal transduction leading to activation of GPIIb/IIIa and aggregation of platelets. In addition, analysis of a mutant of ClfA totally lacking the ability to bind fibrinogen revealed a second, although less efficient, mechanism of platelet activation. The fibrinogen-independent pathway required IgG and complement deposition to trigger platelet aggregation.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: recognition, treatment, and prevention: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy

This chapter about the recognition, treatment, and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is part of the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence Based Guidelines. Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 suggests that individual patients' values may lead to different choices (for a full understanding of the grading, see Guyatt et al, CHEST 2004; 126:179S-187S). Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following: For patients in whom the risk of HIT is considered to be > 0.1%, we recommend platelet count monitoring (Grade 1C). For patients who are receiving therapeutic-dose unfractionated heparin (UFH), we suggest at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14, or until UFH is stopped, whichever occurs first (Grade 2C). For patients who are receiving postoperative antithrombotic prophylaxis with UFH (HIT risk > 1%), we suggest at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14 (or until UFH is stopped, whichever occurs first) [Grade 2C]. For medical/obstetric patients who are receiving prophylactic-dose UFH, postoperative patients receiving prophylactic-dose low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), postoperative patients receiving intravascular catheter UFH "flushes," or medical/obstetrical patients receiving LMWH after first receiving UFH (risk, 0.1 to 1%), we suggest platelet count monitoring every 2 days or 3 days from day 4 to day 14, or until heparin is stopped, whichever occurs first (Grade 2C). For medical/obstetrical patients who are only receiving LMWH, or medical patients who are receiving only intravascular catheter UFH flushes (risk < 0.1%), we suggest clinicians do not use routine platelet count monitoring (Grade 2C). For patients with strongly suspected (or confirmed) HIT, whether or not complicated by thrombosis, we recommend use of an alternative anticoagulant, such as lepirudin (Grade 1C+), argatroban (Grade 1C), bivalirudin (Grade 2C), or danaparoid (Grade 1B). For patients with strongly suspected (or confirmed) HIT, we recommend routine ultrasonography of the lower-limb veins for investigation of deep venous thrombosis (Grade 1C); against the use of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) [coumarin] therapy until after the platelet count has substantially recovered; that the VKA antagonist be administered only during overlapping alternative anticoagulation (minimum 5-day overlap); and begun with low, maintenance doses (all Grade 2C). For patients receiving VKAs at the time of diagnosis of HIT, we recommend use of vitamin K (Grade 2C) [corrected] For patients with a history of HIT who are HIT antibody negative and require cardiac surgery, we recommend use of UFH (Grade 1C).

The tyrosine phosphatase 1B regulates linker for activation of T-cell phosphorylation and platelet aggregation upon FcgammaRIIa cross-linking

Human platelets express the receptor for immunoglobulin G, FcgammaRIIa, that triggers cell aggregation upon interaction with immune complexes. Here, we report that the rapid tyrosine phosphorylation of the Linker for Activation of T-cell (LAT) in human platelets stimulated by FcgammaRIIa cross-linking was followed by its complete dephosphorylation in an alphaIIb/beta3 integrin-dependent manner. Concomitant to LAT dephosphorylation, the protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) was activated through a mechanism involving its proteolysis by calpains downstream of integrins. Both PTP1B and LAT were associated with the actin cytoskeleton complex formed during platelet aggregation. Moreover, phospho-LAT appeared as a good substrate of activated PTP1B in vitro and these two proteins interacted upon platelet activation by FcgammaRIIa cross-linking. The permeant substrate-trapping PTP1B (TAT-PTP1B D181A) partly inhibited LAT dephosphorylation in human platelets, strongly suggesting that this tyrosine phosphatase was involved in this regulatory pathway. Using a pharmacological inhibitor, we provide evidence that PTP1B activation and LAT dephosphorylation processes were required for irreversible platelet aggregation. Altogether, our results demonstrate that PTP1B plays an important role in the integrin-mediated dephosphorylation of LAT in human platelets and is involved in the control of irreversible aggregation upon FcgammaRIIa stimulation.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is not only a common but also a potentially serious drug adverse effect. Unlike other drug-induced thrombocytopenias, HIT does not usually cause bleeding, but instead causes thrombosis. Thrombosis in HIT can lead to limb gangrene (requiring leg amputation) or even death. HIT is mediated by an antibody that recognizes an epitope on the platelet factor 4 (PF4)-heparin complex. The antibody-PF4-heparin complex binds to FcgammaRII receptors on the platelet surface and cross-links the receptors. This induces intense platelet activation and platelet aggregation, and simultaneously activates blood-coagulation pathways. These changes are probably the basis of the thrombotic events in HIT. Diagnosis of HIT should be made mainly on clinical criteria but should be confirmed whenever possible by laboratory tests, particularly in patients with comorbid conditions, in whom the diagnosis of HIT cannot be made with certainty without testing. The tests for HIT antibodies are either immunoassays (e.g. ELISA), or functional tests, (e.g. 14C-serotonin release assay). Once a clinical diagnosis of HIT is made, heparin should be ceased immediately and treatment with an alternative anticoagulant (such as danaparoid, r-hirudin or argatroban) commenced. This should continue for at least 5 days unless the diagnosis of HIT is subsequently proven to be incorrect. Warfarin should also be commenced when the patient is clinically stable and thrombosis is under control. There should be an overlap of a few days between warfarin and the alternative anticoagulant therapy.

Investigations of the immunoglobulin subtype transformation of anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies during treatment with a low-molecular-weight heparin (clivarin) in orthopedic patients

CONTEXT

It is now widely accepted that the pathophysiology of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) syndrome is mediated by the generation of a wide array of functional and molecularly heterogeneous anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 (AHPF4) antibodies that may mediate platelet and/or endothelial cell activation/destruction.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the differential prevalence and functionality of AHPF4 immunoglobulin subtypes (IgA, IgG, and IgM) in plasmas obtained from orthopedic patients immobilized with Plaster-Cast and treated with clivarin (a low-molecular-weight heparin) in comparison to a placebo for the prophylaxis of deep-vein thrombosis.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Clivarin was administered subcutaneously at a fixed daily dosage of 1750 U without any adjustment or loading dosage. Citrated plasmas were obtained at baseline, at 10 to 14 days, and at postbrace procedure (5-12 weeks). An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to quantitate the AHPF4 antibody titers. The functionality of the ELISA-positive samples was determined by a 14C-serotonin release assay (SRA).

RESULTS

In the ELISA test, 16 of 1073 samples (1.5%; 6 in clivarin and 10 in placebo groups) were positive for AHPF4 antibodies (mean optical density [OD] = 0.46 +/- 0.02). None of the ELISA-positive samples for AHPF4 antibodies could mediate platelet activation responses as determined by the SRA (0%-3% serotonin release, P >.10, n = 16). Through differential immunoglobulin subtype analysis of the samples positive for (cumulative) AHPF4 antibodies, we determined that their relative prevalence in plasma were as follows: IgM (mean OD = 0.71 +/- 0.13) > IgG (0.31 +/- 0.08) > IgA (0.14 +/- 0.02). Although there was no significant difference in the total antibody titers between clivarin and placebo groups, the antibody subtyping data showed conversion trends (ie, IgA [clivarin to placebo], IgG [placebo to clivarin], and IgM [clivarin to placebo]).

CONCLUSION

These observations indicate that even at reduced dosages, clivarin can shift the immunogenic up-regulation toward the IgG subpopulation; however, the IgG subtype is of a nonfunctional type of AHPF4 antibody and thus may not cause any HIT-related pathogenic responses.

Rapid determination of anti-heparin/platelet factor 4 antibody titers in the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

PURPOSE

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is mediated by antibodies directed against the heparin-platelet factor 4 (heparin/PF4) complex. Our aim was to investigate whether rapid measurement of anti-heparin/PF4 antibodies could improve the diagnostic workup of patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

METHODS

We examined 148 consecutive patients in our laboratory between January 1995 and June 2001 for suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Clinical data allowed retrospective assessment of the likelihood of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Antibodies against the heparin/PF4 complex were detected by a rapid particle gel immunoassay.

RESULTS

Anti-heparin/PF4 antibodies were detected in 69 (47%) of the 148 patients, at dilution titers from 1 to 256. Clinically "likely" or "very likely" heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was significantly more common in patients with titers >or=4 (95% [39/41]) than in those with undetectable antibodies (13% [9/70]; P <0.0001), a titer of 1 (18% [4/22]; P <0.0001), or a titer of 2 (33% [2/6]; P = 0.001). All 19 samples with a positive platelet aggregation test had anti-heparin/PF4 antibody titers of at least 4, including 15 samples with titers >or=32. Thromboembolic complications in heparin-treated patients were significantly more prevalent in patients with titers >or=4 (63% [26/41]) than in those with undetectable antibodies (8% [6/79]; P <0.0001) or a titer of 1 (9% [2/22]; P <0.0001). Of the 11 patients with a titer of 1 who were maintained on heparin, none developed worse thrombocytopenia or thromboembolic complications.

CONCLUSION

Anti-heparin/PF4 antibody titers, which can be measured rapidly and reproducibly using a particle gel immunoassay, can be used as a confirmatory test to complement a clinical likelihood score among patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.