Oxaliplatin as adjuvant therapy for colon cancer: updated results of NSABP C-07 trial, including survival and subset analyses

Adjuvant 5-Fluorouracil/leucovorin, capecitabine, and oxaliplatin-related regimens for stage II/III colon cancer patients 66 years or older

Adjuvant chemotherapy of leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU/LV), capecitabine, and adding oxaliplatin to 5-FU/LV or capecitabine (FLOX/OX) have been standard regimens for high-risk stage II or III colon cancer (CC). We aimed to evaluate their patterns of use, association with survival, and rate of emergency room visit (ER) or hospitalization during the treatment period. High-risk stage II or III patients aged >65 years diagnosed between 2007 and 2015, underwent colectomy, and received any of these three regimens were selected from SEER and Texas Cancer Registry (TC) linked with Medicare data. Chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, Cox regression, and logistic regression were used in data analysis. A total of 5621 (1080 stage II and 4541 stage III) patients with median age of 72 years were included in this study. For stage II, 24.4% used 5-FU/LV, 31.2% used capecitabine, and 44.4% used FLOX/OX; the respective numbers for stage III were 13.8%, 17.9%, and 68.3%. Patients aged <70 years, not in the West region, not in Medicare state-buy-in program, and with no comorbidity were more likely to use FLOX/OX. FLOX/OX was associated with improved overall survival (OS) in stage II and III patients and improved cancer-specific survival in stage III patients compared with 5-FU/LV. The survival benefit of FLOX/OX was sustained in stage III patients aged ≥70 years. Capecitabine had the lowest ER/hospitalization rate with 19.2% in stage II and 28.9% in III. The use of FLOX/OX was associated with improved survival compared with 5-FU/LV among CC patients. Capecitabine was associated with the lowest ER/hospitalization rate.

Clinical Performance of the Consensus Immunoscore in Colon Cancer in the Asian Population from the Multicenter International SITC Study

BACKGROUND: In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of Immunoscore in patients with stage I−III colon cancer (CC) in the Asian population. These patients were originally included in an international study led by the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) on 2681 patients with AJCC/UICC-TNM stages I−III CC. METHODS: CD3+ and cytotoxic CD8+ T-lymphocyte densities were quantified in the tumor and invasive margin by digital pathology. The association of Immunoscore with prognosis was evaluated for time to recurrence (TTR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Immunoscore stratified Asian patients (n = 423) into different risk categories and was not impacted by age. Recurrence-free rates at 3 years were 78.5%, 85.2%, and 98.3% for a Low, Intermediate, and High Immunoscore, respectively (HR[Low-vs-High] = 7.26 (95% CI 1.75−30.19); p = 0.0064). A High Immunoscore showed a significant association with prolonged TTR, OS, and DFS (p < 0.05). In Cox multivariable analysis stratified by center, Immunoscore association with TTR was independent (HR[Low-vs-Int+High] = 2.22 (95% CI 1.10−4.55) p = 0.0269) of the patient’s gender, T-stage, N-stage, sidedness, and MSI status. A significant association of a High Immunoscore with prolonged TTR was also found among MSS (HR[Low-vs-Int+High] = 4.58 (95% CI 2.27−9.23); p ≤ 0.0001), stage II (HR[Low-vs-Int+High] = 2.72 (95% CI 1.35−5.51); p = 0.0052), low-risk stage-II (HR[Low-vs-Int+High] = 2.62 (95% CI 1.21−5.68); p = 0.0146), and high-risk stage II patients (HR[Low-vs-Int+High] = 3.11 (95% CI 1.39−6.91); p = 0.0055). CONCLUSION: A High Immunoscore is significantly associated with the prolonged survival of CC patients within the Asian population.

A Dynamic Clinical Calculator for Estimating Conditional Recurrence-Free Survival After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer and Either Surgery or Watch-and-Wait Management

IMPORTANCE

The risk of recurrence in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer has historically been determined after surgery, relying on pathologic variables. A growing number of patients are being treated without surgery, and their risk of recurrence needs to be calculated differently.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a dynamic calculator for estimating the probability of recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with rectal cancer who undergo total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) (induction systemic chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy) and either surgery or watch-and-wait management.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study included patients who presented with stage II or III rectal cancer between June 1, 2009, and March 1, 2015, at a comprehensive cancer center. Conditional modeling was incorporated into a previously validated clinical calculator to allow the probability of RFS to be updated based on whether the patient remained in watch-and-wait management or underwent delayed surgery. Data were analyzed from November 2021 to March 2022.

EXPOSURE

TNT followed by immediate surgery or watch-and-wait management with the possibility of delayed surgery.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

RFS, concordance index, calibration curves.

RESULTS

Of the 302 patients in the cohort, 204 (68%) underwent surgery within 3 months from TNT completion (median [range] age, 51 [22-82] years; 78 [38%] women), 54 (18%) underwent surgery more than 3 months from TNT completion (ie, delayed surgery; median [range] age, 62 [31-87] years; 30 [56%] female), and 44 (14%) remained in watch-and-wait management as of April 21, 2021 (median [range] age, 58 [32-89] years; 16 [36%] women). Among patients who initially opted for watch-and-wait management, migration to surgery due to regrowth or patient choice occurred mostly within the first year following completion of TNT, and RFS did not differ significantly whether surgery was performed 3.0 to 5.9 months (73%; 95% CI, 52%-92%) vs 6.0 to 11.9 months (71%; 95% CI, 51%-99%) vs more than 12.0 months (70%; 95% CI, 49%-100%) from TNT completion (P = .70). RFS for patients in the watch-and-wait cohort at 12 months from completion of TNT more closely resembled patients who had undergone surgery and had a pathologic complete response than the watch-and-wait cohort at 3 months from completion of TNT. Accordingly, model performance improved over time, and the concordance index increased from 0.62 (95% CI, 0.53-0.71) at 3 months after TNT to 0.66 (95% CI, 0-0.75) at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study of patients with rectal cancer, the clinical calculator reliably estimated the likelihood of RFS for patients who underwent surgery immediately after TNT, patients who underwent delayed surgery after entering watch-and-wait management, and patients who remained in watch-and-wait management. Delayed surgery following attempted watch-and-wait did not appear to compromise oncologic outcomes. The risk calculator provided conditional survival estimates at any time during surveillance and could help physicians counsel patients with rectal cancer about the consequences of alternative treatment pathways and thereby support informed decisions that incorporate patients' preferences.

A clinical decision support system optimising adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancers by integrating deep learning and pathological staging markers: a development and validation study

BACKGROUND

The DoMore-v1-CRC marker was recently developed using deep learning and conventional haematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue sections, and was observed to outperform established molecular and morphological markers of patient outcome after primary colorectal cancer resection. The aim of the present study was to develop a clinical decision support system based on DoMore-v1-CRC and pathological staging markers to facilitate individualised selection of adjuvant treatment.

METHODS

We estimated cancer-specific survival in subgroups formed by pathological tumour stage (pT<4 or pT4), pathological nodal stage (pN0, pN1, or pN2), number of lymph nodes sampled (≤12 or >12) if not pN2, and DoMore-v1-CRC classification (good, uncertain, or poor prognosis) in 997 patients with stage II or III colorectal cancer considered to have no residual tumour (R0) from two community-based cohorts in Norway and the UK, and used these data to define three risk groups. An external cohort of 1075 patients with stage II or III R0 colorectal cancer from the QUASAR 2 trial was used for validation; these patients were treated with single-agent capecitabine. The proposed risk stratification system was evaluated using Cox regression analysis. We similarly evaluated a risk stratification system intended to reflect current guidelines and clinical practice. The primary outcome was cancer-specific survival.

FINDINGS

The new risk stratification system provided a hazard ratio of 10·71 (95% CI 6·39-17·93; p<0·0001) for high-risk versus low-risk patients and 3·06 (1·73-5·42; p=0·0001) for intermediate versus low risk in the primary analysis of the validation cohort. Estimated 3-year cancer-specific survival was 97·2% (95% CI 95·1-98·4; n=445 [41%]) for the low-risk group, 94·8% (91·7-96·7; n=339 [32%]) for the intermediate-risk group, and 77·6% (72·1-82·1; n=291 [27%]) for the high-risk group. The guideline-based risk grouping was observed to be less prognostic and informative (the low-risk group comprised only 142 [13%] of the 1075 patients).

INTERPRETATION

Integrating DoMore-v1-CRC and pathological staging markers provided a clinical decision support system that risk stratifies more accurately than its constituent elements, and identifies substantially more patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer with similarly good prognosis as the low-risk group in current guidelines. Avoiding adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients might be safe, and could reduce morbidity, mortality, and treatment costs.

FUNDING

The Research Council of Norway.

Differences in prognosis and underuse of adjuvant chemotherapy between elderly and non-elderly patients in stage III colorectal cancer

Aim

We aimed to clarify the use of adjuvant chemotherapy and the prognosis of elderly colorectal cancer patients compared with non-elderly patients, and the usefulness of sarcopenia as an indicator for the introduction and completion of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

Between 2013 and 2021, 215 patients with pStage III disease were included. We investigated perioperative clinicopathological factors, adjuvant chemotherapy details, and prognosis. Preoperative sarcopenia status was evaluated using computed tomography images. Elderly patients were defined as those aged ≥70 years.

Results

We included 121 (56.3%) and 94 (43.7%) non-elderly and elderly patients, respectively. Among the elderly patients, 47 had sarcopenia. There were no significant differences in the incompletion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy between elderly and non-elderly patients (27.1%/16.2%, P = 0.119). The most common reason for the discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy was side effects, regardless of age. The respective 3-year-disease free survival of patients with no/completed/incomplete adjuvant chemotherapy were 65.5%, 80.2%, and 57.7% for non-elderly patients (P = 0.045) and 73.4%, 70.6%, and 71.6% for elderly patients (P = 0.924). The number of elderly patients with sarcopenia was significantly higher in patients without adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.004) and those with incomplete adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.004). The 3-year-disease free survival of elderly sarcopenic patients without and with adjuvant chemotherapy were 78.3% and 59.2%, respectively (P = 0.833).

Conclusion

Elderly patients did not show a benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy regardless of whether they had completed adjuvant chemotherapy, unlike non-elderly patients. Moreover, the evaluation of preoperative sarcopenia in elderly colorectal cancer patients may be useful in determining the indication for adjuvant chemotherapy.

Perioperative Chemotherapy for Liver Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer: Lessons Learned and Future Perspectives

OPINION STATEMENT

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major public health problem and the 2nd leading-cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Around 30% of patients present with metastatic disease and 50% of those with early disease will eventually relapse. The metastatic spread occurs mainly to the liver, which is the exclusive site in 30-40% of the cases. Surgery is the main curative option for liver recurrence, but only one out of five patients are eligible for resection. Moreover, even if surgery is feasible, recurrence rate is high, occurring in up to 75% of patients. Therefore, additional treatment to improve these disappointing outcomes has been sought. Adjuvant and perioperative chemotherapy aim to eradicate early micrometastatic disease, decreasing recurrence rates, and improving survival outcomes. Different chemotherapy regimens, mainly extrapolated from the adjuvant experience, have showed conflicting results, with improvements in disease free but not in overall survival. The addition of targeted therapies to chemotherapy has improved response rates and resectability when administered preoperatively, but did not have an impact on survival in the adjuvant setting. There is a need to critically synthetize the available evidence on perioperative and conversion therapy from the past years, and appraise areas of current research and potential future directions.

Early-onset non-metastatic colon cancers do not portend worse prognosis - implications for adjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Early-onset colon cancers are increasing and the independent influence of age on prognosis and therapeutic efficacy of adjuvant therapy is unclear. The primary aim of the present study was to determine if young age was an independent prognostic factor for survival. Secondarily, age would be used in the context of known factors that predict benefit with adjuvant chemotherapy in stages II and III.

METHODS

Retrospective, single centre study of operated, non-metastatic colon cancer (> 15 cm from anal verge) without pre-operative therapy. Early onset cancers were defined as age ≤ 45 years. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Six-hundred thirty-three patients were included with 206 (32.5%) early-onset cancers. With a median follow-up of 48 months, 5-year DFS was 79.5% and 76.2% for early and late-onset cancers, respectively (p - 0.585). In multivariate analysis, only tumour sidedness, family history, T4 stage, node positivity and microsatellite instability status influenced DFS and not the age of onset (HR - 0.969; 95% - 0.63-1.49). These results were consistent with different models and with stage-wise distribution.

CONCLUSIONS

Early-onset colon cancers treated with curative intent had survivals similar to older cohorts. Age was not an independent prognostic factor for recurrences. Age did not influence disease-free survival when stage-wise predictive variables for therapeutic benefit with adjuvant chemotherapy were considered.

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and triweekly oxaliplatin versus capecitabine monotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a propensity-score matched study

Background

Distant metastasis has been the main failure pattern for locoregionally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients, and intensified neoadjuvant chemotherapy has become a popular research topic. The present study aimed to compare the survival outcomes, acute toxicities and surgical complications in LARC patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy with triweekly oxaliplatin and capecitabine (triweekly XELOX) or capecitabine.

Methods: Between 2007 and 2017, patients with clinically staged II-III rectal cancer who were treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy using either triweekly XELOX (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² plus capecitabine 825 mg/m²) or capecitabine were included. Variables potentially influencing chemotherapy treatment selection were used to generate propensity scores (PS). The association between chemotherapy regimens and survival endpoints, including distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), were evaluated and adjusted with PS. The acute toxicities and surgical complications were also compared.

Results

A total of 810 patients were included in the analysis; 277 (34.2%) patients received triweekly XELOX, and 533 (65.8%) received capecitabine. The pathological complete response (pCR) rates were 20.2 and 19.9% (P = 0.912) for the groups treated with triweekly XELOX and capecitabine, respectively. The 5-year DMFS, OS and DFS with triweekly XELOX versus capecitabine were 75.6% vs. 77.6% (P = 0.555), 79.2% vs. 83.3% (P = 0.101), and 69.9% vs. 73.7% (P = 0.283), respectively. Triweekly XELOX was not associated with an increased risk of severe toxicity during chemoradiotherapy, but it increased the risk of postoperative complications compared to capecitabine. After PS adjustment, the differences between the two groups remained insignificant in pCR rate, survival outcomes, and acute toxicities, and the difference in surgical complications disappeared.

Conclusions

Triweekly XELOX or capecitabine concurrent with neoadjuvant radiotherapy leads to similar long-term survival outcomes, acute toxicities and surgical complications in LARC patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09855-z.

Exploratory study on relative dose intensity and reasons for dose reduction of adjuvant CAPOX therapy in elderly patients with colorectal cancer

Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin, CAPOX, therapy is one of the standardized options for adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer, but the efficacy and the safety of CAPOX in elderly patients are unclear. In this study, we investigated the relative dose intensity (RDI) and reasons for dose reduction in patients over the age of 70 (elderly group) (n = 12) and those under the age of 70 (non-elderly group) (n = 24) receiving adjuvant CAPOX therapy for colorectal cancer. The median RDIs were 71.1% in the elderly group and 67.9% in the non-elderly group for oxaliplatin (p = 0.416), and 81.6% and 86.4% for capecitabine (p = 0.166), respectively. The rate of peripheral neuropathy which was the reason for dose reduction of oxaliplatin was approximately 4.5-fold higher in the non-elderly group than in the elderly group. In addition, hematologic toxicity was the most common reason for dose reduction at 50.0% in the elderly group. The results of this study suggested that a similar therapeutic intensity can be maintained in elderly patients relative to non-elderly patients by appropriate dose reduction and discontinuation of drug treatments. Elderly patients are more susceptible to hematologic toxicity than to peripheral neuropathy.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy Benefit in Elderly Stage II/III Colon Cancer Patients

Background

Studies providing more evidence to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in elderly colon cancer patients are expected.

Methods

We obtained data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2012. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed to calculate the cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate, and comparisons of survival difference between different subgroups were performed using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were carried out to estimate hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of different clinicopathological characteristics.

Results

In stage II colon cancer patients aged 70 years or older, the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the 5-year CSS rates of no chemotherapy and chemotherapy groups were 82.0% and 72.4%, respectively (P &lt; 0.001). In stage III colon cancer patients aged 70 years or older, the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the 5-year CSS rates of no chemotherapy and chemotherapy groups were 50.7% and 61.3%, respectively (P &lt; 0.001). Patients with chemotherapy receipt were independently associated with a 35.8% lower cancer-specific mortality rate (HR = 0.642, 95% CI: 0.620-0.665, P &lt; 0.001) compared with those who did not receive chemotherapy.

Conclusions

Adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered during the treatment of stage III colon cancer patients aged 70 years or older, but the chemotherapy benefit in elderly stage II colon cancer is suboptimal.

Final Analysis of 3 Versus 6 Months of Adjuvant Oxaliplatin and Fluoropyrimidine-Based Therapy in Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer: The Randomized Phase III ACHIEVE Trial

PURPOSE

The phase III ACHIEVE trial conducted in Japan was one of six prospective studies included in the International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Therapy collaboration, which explored whether 3 months of adjuvant fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) therapy would be noninferior to 6 months of treatment in patients with curatively resected stage III colon cancer. We report the final analyses of survival and long-term safety.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either 3 or 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy (modified [m]FOLFOX6 or CAPOX, as selected by the treating physician). Random assignment was stratified according to number of involved lymph nodes, center, regimen, primary site, and age. The primary end point was disease-free survival, assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population. Overall survival (OS) was a secondary end point.

RESULTS

The modified intention-to-treat population comprised 1,291 patients: 641 in the 6-month treatment group and 650 in the 3-month treatment group. Median follow-up for this analysis was 74.7 months. Five-year OS rates were comparable: 87.0% in the 3-month treatment group and 86.4% in the 6-month treatment group (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.20; P = .51). Subgroup analysis of OS did not reveal a significant interaction between baseline characteristics and treatment duration. Peripheral sensory neuropathy lasting longer than 5 years was more common in the 6- compared with 3-month treatment group (16% v 8%, respectively), and in those receiving mFOLFOX6 compared with CAPOX (14% v 11%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In Asian patients, shortening adjuvant therapy duration from 6 to 3 months did not compromise efficacy and reduced the rate of long-lasting peripheral sensory neuropathy. In this setting, 3 months of CAPOX therapy is an appropriate adjuvant treatment option.

The Conventional Technique Versus the No-touch Isolation Technique for Primary Tumor Resection in Patients With Colon Cancer (JCOG1006): A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Phase III Trial

OBJECTIVE

This phase III trial evaluated whether the no touch was superior to the conventional in patients with cT3/T4 colon cancer.

BACKGROUND

No touch involves ligating blood vessels that feed the primary tumor to limit cancer cell spreading. However, previous studies did not confirm the efficacy of the no touch.

METHODS

This open-label, randomized, phase III trial was conducted at 30 Japanese centers. The eligibility criteria were histologically proven colon cancer; clinical classification of T3-4, N0-2, andM0; and patients aged 20 to 80years. Patients were randomized (1:1) to undergo open surgery with conventional or the no touch. Patients with pathological stage III disease received adjuvant capecitabine chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) according to the intention-to-treat principle.

RESULTS

Between January 2011 and November 2015, 853 patients were randomized to the conventional group (427 patients) or the no touch group (426 patients). The 3-year DFS were 77.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 73.1%-81.0%] and 76.2% (95% CI 71.9%-80.0%) in the conventional and no touch groups, respectively. The superiority of no touch was not confirmed: hazard ratio for DFS = 1.029 (95% CI 0.800- 1.324; 1-sided P = 0.59). Operative morbidity was observed in 31 of 427 conventional patients (7%) and 26 of 426 no touch patients (6%). All grade adverse events were similar between the conventional and no touch groups. No in-hospital mortality occurred in either group.

CONCLUSION

The present study failed to confirm the superiority of the no touch.

Effect of oxaliplatin in elderly colon cancer patients with pathological T4 and/or N2 disease: a multicenter, propensity score-matched analysis

PURPOSE

Although adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) using fluoro-pyrimidine and oxaliplatin (FU + oxaliplatin) is recommended after curative resection for locally advanced colon cancer patients, several randomized controlled trials have shown no additional effect of oxaliplatin in patients aged ≥ 70 years. Here, we examined the effectiveness of FU + oxaliplatin on the long-term outcome of old patients with a high risk of recurrence.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective study included 346 colon cancer patients diagnosed with pathological T4 and/or N2 disease from 2016 to 2020. They were divided into an old group (≥ 70 years, n = 197) and a young group (< 70 years, n = 167). Propensity score matching was used to minimize selection bias, and 126 patients per group were matched.

RESULTS

Before matching, the rates of poor performance status (p < 0.001) and the presence of comorbidities (76.1% vs. 47.9%, p < 0.001) were higher in the old group. Although all baseline factors were similar between groups, after matching, the AC rate was lower in the old group (45.2% vs. 65.1%, p = 0.002). In the old group, relapse-free (82.2% vs. 55.6% and 69.6%, p < 0.05) and overall survival (83.1% vs. 80.0% and 44.4%, p < 0.05) rates were significantly higher in the AC patients with FU + oxaliplatin than in the AC patients with only FU and the non-AC patients.

CONCLUSION

The selected old colon cancer patients with a high risk of recurrence gained an additional benefit with respect to prognosis from FU + oxaliplatin as AC.

A retrospective analysis using deep-learning models for prediction of survival outcome and benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II/III colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Most of Stage II/III colorectal cancer (CRC) patients can be cured by surgery alone, and only certain CRC patients benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Risk stratification based on deep-learning from haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) images has been postulated as a potential predictive biomarker for benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. However, very limited success has been achieved in using biomarkers, including deep-learning-based markers, to facilitate the decision for adjuvant chemotherapy despite recent advances of artificial intelligence.

METHODS

We trained and internally validated CRCNet using 780 Stage II/III CRC patients from Molecular and Cellular Oncology. Independent external validation of the model was performed using 337 Stage II/III CRC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA).

RESULTS

CRCNet stratified the patients into high, medium, and low-risk subgroups. Multivariate Cox regression analyses confirmed that CRCNet risk groups are statistically significant after adjusting for existing risk factors. The high-risk subgroup significantly benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy. A hazard ratio (chemo-treated vs untreated) of 0.2 (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 0.05-0.65; P = 0.009) and 0.6 (95% CI 0.42-0.98; P = 0.038) are observed in the TCGA and MCO Fluorouracil-treated patients, respectively. Conversely, no significant benefit from chemotherapy is observed in the low- and medium-risk groups (P = 0.2-1).

CONCLUSION

The retrospective analysis provides further evidence that H&E image-based biomarkers may potentially be of great use in delivering treatments following surgery for Stage II/III CRC, improving patient survival, and avoiding unnecessary treatment and associated toxicity, and warrants further validation on other datasets and prospective confirmation in clinical trials.

New diagnostic measures of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral sensory neuropathy

OBJECTIVE

Oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN) is an unwanted side effect of oxaliplatin chemotherapy treatment. OIPN manifests in an acute phase that lasts a few days after injection and a persistent phase that may become chronic. Currently, there is no consensus about a clinically applicable, quantitative, and objective measure of OIPN.

METHODS

Seventeen patients treated with oxaliplatin containing adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer, but otherwise healthy, were tested with six quantitative sensory tests (QST) and five large fibre perception threshold tracking (PTT) measures (quantified by, e.g., rheobase and electrotonus threshold) one hour before each of the 12 chemotherapy cycles given at two weeks' intervals. These measures were repeated at 3, 6, and 12-month follow-ups. The temporal development of OIPN assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) scale, QST, and PTT measures was calculated by linear regression.

RESULTS

The CTCAE score showed a tri-phasic increase during the treatment and remained increased during the follow-up. The vibration threshold (R = 0.25, p<0.001), the cold pain threshold (R = 0.17, p = 0.02), and the rheobase (R = 0.28, p < 0.001) increased during treatment, whereas the cold detection threshold (R=-0.16, p = 0.002) decreased. The cold pain threshold and the rheobase remained increased, and the cold detection and heat pain threshold remained decreased during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased cold pain sensitivity and decreased large fibre sensitivity (increased rheobase) correlate to the persistent OIPN, whereas the CTCAE score assesses both acute and persistent OIPN. Furthermore, the novel PTT method assessed the nerve excitability changes caused by the oxaliplatin.

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Outcomes by Age Among ARCAD First- and Second-Line Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the time to progression (TTP) and survival outcomes of second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer among adults aged 70 years and older compared with younger adults following progression on first-line clinical trials.

METHODS

Associations between clinical and disease characteristics, time to initial progression, and rate of receipt of second-line therapy were evaluated. TTP and overall survival (OS) were compared between older and younger adults in first- and second-line trials by Cox regression, adjusting for age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, number of metastatic sites and presence of metastasis in the lung, liver, or peritoneum. All statistical tests were 2-sided.

RESULTS

Older adults comprised 16.4% of patients on first-line trials (870 total older adults aged >70 years; 4419 total younger adults aged ≤70 years, on first-line trials). Older adults and those with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status >0 were less likely to receive second-line therapy than younger adults. Odds of receiving second-line therapy decreased by 11% for each additional decade of life in multivariable analysis (odds ratio = 1.11, 95% confidence interval = 1.02 to 1.21, P = .01). Older and younger adults enrolled in second-line trials experienced similar median TTP and median OS (median TTP = 5.1 vs 5.2 months, respectively; median OS = 11.6 vs 12.4 months, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Older adults were less likely to receive second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer, though we did not observe a statistical difference in survival outcomes vs younger adults following second-line therapy. Further study should examine factors affecting decisions to treat older adults with second-line therapy. Inclusion of geriatric assessment may provide better criteria regarding the risks and benefits of second-line therapy.

Oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy rather than fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in rectal cancer is more efficient to decrease distant metastasis and increase survival after preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The standard treatment of stage II-III rectal cancer is preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT), followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). However, the rate of metastasis is still high following this treatment. Therefore, several adjuvant chemotherapy studies have been conducted on reducing subsequent metastases and increasing survival, although there are still no definite conclusions.

METHODS

We searched for published prospective randomized controlled trials comparing adjuvant chemotherapy regimens following standard preoperative CRT and curative surgery in stage II-III rectal cancer. We systematically searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for relevant trials done from January 2004 to January 2021. Review Manager (RevMan, version 5.3) was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

We initially searched 1955 studies. We screened and carefully selected four randomized controlled trials with 2897 patients. Compared to the 5-FU-based regimen group, the oxaliplatin-added regimen group attained a higher 3-year locoregional control rate (relative risk [RR] of 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.86; p = 0.003) and 3-year distant metastasis control rate (RR of 0.82, 95% CI, 0.71-0.95; p = 0.007). The oxaliplatin-added regimen group had significantly increased 3-year disease-free survival with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.74-0.97, p = 0.020), but not overall survival (p = 0.740). Grade 3 or higher acute toxicity rates did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.190).

CONCLUSION

The addition of oxaliplatin to adjuvant therapy for stage II-III rectal cancer following preoperative CRT and TME may increase disease-free survival without significant increases in toxicity, but not overall survival.

Whether Patients With Stage Ⅱ/Ⅲ Colorectal Cancer Benefit From Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Modeling Analysis of Literature Aggregate Data

Objective: This study used model analysis to clarify the benefits and risks of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy compared with surgery alone in patients with stage II/III colorectal cancer.

Methods: Clinical trials involving patients with stage II/III colorectal cancer who underwent surgery alone or those who received post-surgical adjuvant chemotherapy were searched in the PubMed and embase databases. By establishing a survival model, the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients who underwent surgery alone or postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy were quantitatively analyzed to compare the differences between the two. In addition, the incidence of grade 3/4 adverse reactions in the adjuvant chemotherapy group was analyzed using the random effects model in the single-arm meta-analysis.

Results: A total of 34 studies containing 33,069 patients were included in the analysis. This study found that postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy can effectively improve the OS and DFS of patients with colorectal cancer. The median OS of the adjuvant chemotherapy group and the surgery-only group was 118.8 months (95% CI: 96.6, 146.6) and 74.6 months (95% CI: 57.8, 96.1) respectively; and median DFS was 86.3 months (95% CI: 67.6, 110.6) and 40.8 months (95% CI: 23.7, 69.6) in the adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery-only groups, respectively. Common grade 3/4 adverse reactions in the adjuvant chemotherapy group include diarrhea, stomatitis, leukopenia, and nausea or vomiting, with an incidence of approximately 3%–6%.

Conclusion: Patients with mid-stage colorectal cancer can benefit significantly from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. This study provides the necessary quantitative information for decision-making regarding the benefits and risks of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy after resection in patients with colorectal cancer.

Landscape of Immunotherapy Options for Colorectal Cancer: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives beyond Immune Checkpoint Blockade

Colorectal cancer is the third most prevalent malignancy in Western countries and a major cause of death despite recent improvements in screening programs and early detection methods. In the last decade, a growing effort has been put into better understanding how the immune system interacts with cancer cells. Even if treatments with immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD1, anti-PD-L1, anti-CTLA4) were proven effective for several cancer types, the benefit for colorectal cancer patients is still limited. However, a subset of patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR)/microsatellite-instability-high (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer has been observed to have a prolonged benefit to immune checkpoint inhibitors. As a result, pembrolizumab and nivolumab +/− ipilimumab recently obtained the Food and Drug Administration approval. This review aims to highlight the body of knowledge on immunotherapy in the colorectal cancer setting, discussing the potential mechanisms of resistance and future strategies to extend its use.

MRI radiomics features of mesorectal fat can predict response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and tumor recurrence in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To interrogate the mesorectal fat using MRI radiomics feature analysis in order to predict clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer from 2009 to 2015. Three radiologists independently segmented mesorectal fat on baseline T2-weighted axial MRI. Radiomics features were extracted from segmented volumes and calculated using CERR software, with adaptive synthetic sampling being employed to combat large class imbalances. Outcome variables included pathologic complete response (pCR), local recurrence, distant recurrence, clinical T-category (cT), post-treatment T category (ypT), and post-treatment N category (ypN). A maximum of eight most important features were selected for model development using support vector machines and fivefold cross-validation to predict each outcome parameter via elastic net regularization. Diagnostic metrics of the final models were calculated, including sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, and AUC.

RESULTS

The study included 236 patients (54 ± 12 years, 135 men). The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for each clinical outcome were as follows: for pCR, 0.89, 78.0%, 85.1%, 52.5%, 94.9%, 83.9%; for local recurrence, 0.79, 68.3%, 80.7%, 46.7%, 91.2%, 78.3%; for distant recurrence, 0.87, 80.0%, 88.4%, 58.3%, 95.6%, 87.0%; for cT, 0.80, 85.8%, 56.5%, 89.1%, 49.1%, 80.1%; for ypN, 0.74, 65.0%, 80.1%, 52.7%, 87.0%, 76.3%; and for ypT, 0.86, 81.3%, 84.2%, 96.4%, 46.4%, 81.8%.

CONCLUSION

Radiomics features of mesorectal fat can predict pathological complete response and local and distant recurrence, as well as post-treatment T and N categories.

KEY POINTS

• Mesorectal fat contains important prognostic information in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). • Radiomics features of mesorectal fat were significantly different between those who achieved complete vs incomplete pathologic response (accuracy 83.9%, 95% CI: 78.6-88.4%). • Radiomics features of mesorectal fat were significantly different between those who did vs did not develop local or distant recurrence (accuracy 78.3%, 95% CI: 72.0-83.7% and 87.0%, 95% CI: 81.6-91.2% respectively).

Use of ascitic CEA levels as a predictive value for distant metastasis in high-risk stage II and III colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to analyze the effect of ascitic carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels on the long-term oncologic outcomes of colorectal cancer (CRC) following curative treatment.

METHODS

A total of 191 patients with stage II/III CRC were included. CEA was analyzed on the peritoneal fluid samples taken at the start of each surgery. Long-term oncologic outcomes were analyzed using known risk factors for recurrence in CRC.

RESULT

Multivariate analysis of recurrence showed that lymphatic invasion (hazards ratio (HR) 2.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-7, p = 0.038), vascular invasion (HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.2-6.3, p = 0.013), mucinous cancer (HR 3.6, 95% CI 1.3-10.1, p = 0.017), and peritoneal fluid CEA exceeding 5 ng/dl (odds ratio 3.1, 95% CI 1.2-7.7, p = 0.017) were significant risk factors. There were 14 patients with liver metastasis, 11 of whom had high ascitic CEA levels and no peritoneal metastasis. Additionally, eight had lung metastasis, and seven of them had high ascitic CEA levels.

CONCLUSION

High ascitic CEA levels showed significantly lower disease-free survival and were significantly associated with distant metastasis in the lung and liver.

Effectiveness of oral fluoropyrimidine monotherapy as adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II colon cancer

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Sustainable Clinical Development of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Colon Cancer

Numerous clinical studies in an adjuvant setting have been conducted and the combination therapy of 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin has been established as the standard treatment for Stage III and as an option for high-risk Stage II patients. Biologics such as bevacizumab and antiepidermal growth factor receptor antibodies have failed to show additional survival benefits. The indication of adjuvant chemotherapy has been determined according to the pathological stage. Nevertheless, a pathological diagnosis does not necessarily result in selection of the optimal treatment. To improve treatment decisions, many trials have aimed to stratify patients into treatment groups using genomic testing. Recently, gene signature, Immunoscore, and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assays have been reported and among them, ctDNA was shown to be a promising accurate predictive marker for recurrence. Treatment of ctDNA-positive patients with aggressive chemotherapy may reduce recurrence rates. The ultimate goal is to accurately predict the risk of recurrence and to prevent recurrence in colon cancer patients. In this review we focus on the clinical development of adjuvant chemotherapy and stratification of patients according to risk of recurrence and the future direction of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Clinical implication of adjuvant chemotherapy according to mismatch repair status in patients with intermediate-risk stage II colon cancer

Background

The present study evaluated the clinical implications of adjuvant chemotherapy according to the mismatch repair (MMR) status and clinicopathologic features of patients with intermediate- and high-risk stage II colon cancer (CC).

Methods

This study retrospectively reviewed 5,774 patients who were diagnosed with CC and underwent curative surgical resection at Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital. The patients were enrolled according to the following criteria: (1) pathologically diagnosed with primary CC; (2) stage II CC classified based on the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system; (3) intermediate- and high-risk features; and (4) available test results for MMR status. A total of 286 patients met these criteria and were included in the study.

Results

Among the 286 patients, 54 (18.9%) were identified as microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or deficient MMR (dMMR). Although all the patients identified as MSI-H/dMMR showed better survival outcomes, T4 tumors and adjuvant chemotherapy were identified as independent prognostic factors for survival. For the intermediate-risk patients identified as MSI-low (MSI-L)/microsatellite stable (MSS) or proficient MMR (pMMR), adjuvant chemotherapy exhibited a significantly better disease-free survival (DFS) but had no impact on overall survival (OS). Oxaliplatin-containing regimens showed no association with DFS or OS. Adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with DFS in intermediate-risk patients identified as MSI-H/dMMR.

Conclusion

The current study found that the use of adjuvant chemotherapy was correlated with better DFS in MSI-L/MSS or pMMR intermediate-risk stage II CC patients.

Debating Pros and Cons of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer

Simple Summary

Rectal cancers represent one third of all colorectal tumours. Patients diagnosed with localised colon cancer undergo surgery upfront, likely followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Those diagnosed with localised rectal cancer, however, frequently benefit from neoadjuvant treatments with either radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy before undergoing surgery. On the other hand, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting is more controversial. The main challenges in treating patients affected by rectal cancer encompass: decreasing the risks of local relapse and distant metastases, preserving the sphincter and minimising treatment-associated functional sequelae, and improving overall survival. Some of these fuelled the concept of total neoadjuvant therapy, namely giving all available treatments including radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy before surgery. Here, we critically review the pros and cons of such a treatment strategy, but also discuss the biological rational to support neoadjuvant treatment intensification.

Abstract

Recently, two large, randomised phase III clinical trials of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in locally advanced rectal cancer were published (RAPIDO and PRODIGE 23). These two trials compared short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) followed by chemotherapy with standard chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and chemotherapy followed by CRT with standard CRT, respectively. They showed improvement in some of the outcomes such as distant recurrence and pathological complete response (pCR). No improvement, however, was observed in local disease control or the de-escalation of surgical procedures. Although it seems lawful to integrate TNT within the treatment algorithm of localised stage II and III rectal cancer, many questions remain unanswered, including which are the optimal criteria to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from this intensive treatment. Instead of providing a sterile summary of trial results, we put these in perspective in a pros and cons manner. Moreover, we discuss some biological aspects of rectal cancer, which may provide some insights into the current decision-making process, and represent the basis for the future development of alternative, more effective treatment strategies.

Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis treatment and follow-up of patients with localised colon cancer

The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of localised colon cancer was published in 2020. It was decided by both the ESMO and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO) to convene a special virtual guidelines meeting in March 2021 to adapt the ESMO 2020 guidelines to take into account the ethnic differences associated with the treatment of localised colon cancer in Asian patients. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by experts in the treatment of patients with localised colon cancer representing the oncological societies of Japan (JSMO), China (CSCO), India (ISMPO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), Singapore (SSO) and Taiwan (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices and drug availability and reimbursement situations in the different Asian countries.

Adjuvant treatment of colon cancer with microsatellite instability - the state of the art

Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine (FP) plus oxaliplatin in stage III resected colorecatal cancer (RCRC) resulted in a 30% relative reduction of disease recurrence risk and mortality. The presence of altered mismatch repair genes identify tumors with microsatellite instability (MSI) that have a better prognosis than stable tumors, but data about adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in this subgroup are compelling. We investigate the role of adjuvant therapy in resected MSI RCRC. The standard treatment is the association of FP plus oxaliplatin, while it can avoided in low risk stage II, thanks to its good prognosis. We propose a practice strategy to approach MSI RCRC in line with the current knowledge. In consideration of the dramatic results in chemorefractory MSI metastatic CRC, there are assumptions that immunotherapy can become a potential alternative to classical systemic therapies also in the adjuvant setting. We await the results of ongoing studies to draw further conclusions."

[Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy of resectable colon cancer - Current standards and developments]

The present review focusses on perioperative diagnosis and treatment of resectable colon cancer. In UICC stages associated with a higher risk of recurrence, adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of the primary tumor is an established standard. While initial data also indicate the benefit of Neoadjuvant, pre-operative chemotherapy, a final evaluation is still pending. The main focus of molecular testing in the perioperative setting is the analysis of microsatellite instability, which should routinely be performed in defined subgroups. In UICC stage II without risk factors, adjuvant therapy has a limited benefit and therefore is not a preferred option. In UICC stage II with risk factors, adjuvant therapy can be performed. The approach here is based on the recommendations applicable to stage III. In UICC stage III with low risk, adjuvant chemotherapy with CAPOX for 3 months is preferentially recommended. In UICC stage III with high risk, adjuvant chemotherapy over 6 months is recommended, preferentially with FOLFOX. Microsatellite instability (MSI) is clearly associated with favorable prognosis in non-metastatic colon cancer. However, it cannot be considered a predictive factor for the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy. Specifically, recent data of the IDEA study have opened the arena for shared decision making between physicians and patients allowing to define individual treatment approaches based on common assessment of risks and benefits. After completion of perioperative treatment, structured follow-up is of great importance and should be carried out according to the recommendations of the S3 guideline.

High concentration of oxaliplatin may be a risk factor for vascular pain

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Oxaliplatin (L-OHP) is an antineoplastic agent that frequently causes vascular pain. However, the risk factors for vascular pain are unclear, and prevention methods have not been established. We retrospectively investigated patients who were treated with L-OHP to examine the influence of patient characteristics and concomitant analgesic use on the incidence of vascular pain.

METHODS

We collected information about the presence or absence of vascular pain, age, sex, treatment dose and analgesic use of patients who received L-OHP at Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center. We analysed the relevance of each factor between the vascular pain onset and non-onset groups.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Thirty-two patients (average age: 68.6 years; 69.8% and 30.2% men and women, respectively) were classified into the vascular pain onset (n = 64) and non-onset groups (n = 68). The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that L-OHP concentration (>358.5 mg/L) was an independent determinant of vascular pain development (odds ratio: 2.422, 95% CI: 1.117-5.252). Intergroup differences in age, sex, body mass index, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, and underlying pain from cancer and other comorbidities were not significant.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

High L-OHP concentration was identified as a significant risk factor for L-OHP-induced vascular pain. Our results indicate that the dilution of L-OHP may reduce the incidence of vascular pain.

Promethazine inhibits proliferation and promotes apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells by suppressing the PI3K/AKT pathway

AIM

To elucidate the potential effect of promethazine on colorectal cancer (CRC) cells and the underlying mechanism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Targets of the drug promethazine (PMTZ) were identified by DrugBank and comparative toxicogenomic databases (CTD), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis was performed with STRING software. The effects of PMTZ were predicted to be associated with the PI3K/AKT pathway. Cell Counting Kit 8 (CCK-8) assays were used to evaluate the effects of different concentrations of PMTZ on the proliferation of various types of CRC cells. Flow cytometry and Western blotting analyses were used to detect the degree of CRC cell apoptosis and the expression of the apoptosis-related proteins Bcl-2, Bax and caspase-3 after PMTZ treatment. The expression levels of PI3K/AKT pathway-related proteins [PI3K, AKT, phosphorylated (P)-PI3K and p-AKT] in CRC cells treated with PMTZ were analyzed by Western blotting.

RESULTS

PMTZ inhibited the proliferation and promoted the apoptosis of CRC cells and suppressed the activation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in a dose-dependent manner.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

PMTZ may suppress the proliferation and induce the apoptosis of CRC cells by inhibiting the PI3K/ AKT signaling pathway. This study reported, for the first time, the function of PMTZ in CRC cells and the underlying mechanism and further confirmed the potential antitumor effects of phenothiazine. The combination of bioinformatics analyses and experiments provides informative evidence for the reuse of drugs and the development of new drugs.

Women are predisposed to early dose-limiting toxicities during adjuvant CAPOX for colorectal cancer

AIM

Oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy was demonstrated to be beneficial for stage III or high-risk stage II colorectal cancer (CRC). Moreover, a recent international collaborative trial suggested 3-months CAPOX as an alternative regimen for low-risk stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Thus, it is important to clarify the frequency and predictive markers of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) developed within the short-course CAPOX cycles.

METHODS

We investigated CRC patients who underwent radical surgery and adjuvant CAPOX therapy at our hospital between December 2010 and February 2021. Patients who received initially reduced doses of CAPOX and those who had early recurrence were excluded. We reviewed the age, sex, comorbidities, physical, laboratory and oncological data and other perioperative factors. The associations between these variables and early DLTs within four cycles of CAPOX were examined by multivariate analyses using logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Among 168 patients (96 men, mean age: 58.3 years), 120 (71%) developed early DLTs. Patients with early DLTs were predominantly women and sarcopenic and habitual alcohol consumers. On multivariate analyses, only the female sex was an independent predictive factor for early DLTs (odds ratio: 2.61, P = .027).

CONCLUSION

Women were prone to early DLTs during adjuvant CAPOX in the current study. Doctors should be aware of the sex difference in the incidence of early DLTs, adjust the CAPOX dosage and provide supportive care for female CRC patients.

[Tumour deposition (TD), a probably underestimated poor prognostic criterion, to be taken into account in the therapeutic management of patients with stage III colon cancer]

The management of colorectal cancer (CRC) relies heavily on TNM staging. In order to improve this staging, it is essential to identify all histological markers bearing a significant prognostic value. Among these, tumor deposits (TDs), defined as tumor foci in the pericolonic or perirectal adipose tissue with no residual lymph node tissue, have been shown to be associated with poor prognosis in cohort studies leading to their individualization in the TNM7 classification as pN1c. However, TDs are only considered in the absence of lymph node metastases. There is no consensus on this particular way of integrating TDs in the TNM classification. Indeed, at the time when the choice of the type of adjuvant treatment and its duration in stage III colon cancers (i.e. with lymph node metastases) is based on pT and pN criteria, taking into account TDs only in the absence of concomitant lymph node metastases is potentially responsible for a misclassification of some patients and wrong therapeutic decisions. In addition, many questions concerning the true definition of TDs, their origin, their prognostic value and the optimization of their consideration remain open. The objective of this review is to provide a synthesis of current knowledge on TDs in CRC, in view of their prognostic importance, their biological complexity and the scientific interest they are currently the subject of.

Accurate population-based model for individual prediction of colon cancer recurrence

BACKGROUND

Prediction models are useful tools in the clinical management of colon cancer patients, particularly when estimating the recurrence rate and, thus, the need for adjuvant treatment. However, the most used models (MSKCC, ACCENT) are based on several decades-old patient series from clinical trials, likely overestimating the current risk of recurrence, especially in low-risk groups, as outcomes have improved over time. The aim was to develop and validate an updated model for the prediction of recurrence within 5 years after surgery using routinely collected clinicopathologic variables.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A population-based cohort from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry of 16,134 stage I-III colon cancer cases was used. A multivariable model was constructed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Three-quarters of the cases were used for model development and one quarter for internal validation. External validation was performed using 12,769 stage II-III patients from the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Registry. The model was compared to previous nomograms.

RESULTS

The nomogram consisted of eight variables: sex, sidedness, pT-substages, number of positive and found lymph nodes, emergency surgery, lymphovascular and perineural invasion. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.78 in the model, 0.76 in internal validation, and 0.70 in external validation. The model calibrated well, especially in low-risk patients, and performed better than existing nomograms in the Swedish registry data. The new nomogram's AUC was equal to that of the MSKCC but the calibration was better.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram based on recently operated patients from a population registry predicts recurrence risk more accurately than previous nomograms. It performs best in the low-risk groups where the risk-benefit ratio of adjuvant treatment is debatable and the need for an accurate prediction model is the largest.

Expression of astrocyte-elevated gene-1 indicates prognostic value of fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable stage III colorectal cancer

It is unclear which prognostic factor such as pathological features and gene mutation are majorly relevant for stage III disease and whether they aid in determining patients who will be benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. The expression of astrocyte-elevated gene-1 (AEG-1), thymidylate synthase (TS), excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was examined to investigate their role in adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with resectable stage III colorectal cancer (CRC). A significant positive correlation was observed between AEG-1, TS, ERCC1, EGFR, and VEGF gene expression levels in CRC cell lines, and low AEG-1 and TS expression were highly sensitive to 5-fluorouracil treatment. Our results showed that AEG-1 expression was high in T4 and caused CRC recurrence or metastasis. Patients with T4, high AEG-1, TS and VEGF expression had a significantly short disease-free survival and overall survival. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, high AEG-1 expression could be an independent prognostic factor indicating poor survival in patients with resectable stage III CRC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. In conclusion, AEG-1 expression and tumor grade are potential prognostic factors for recurrence and survival in patients with stage III CRC receiving adjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy.

Is stent insertion for obstructing colon cancer a good prognostic factor in long-term oncologic outcomes in symptomatic obstructive colon cancer?

Although obstructive colon cancer can often be treated with first-stage resection with primary anastomosis, the results of the oncological outcome of using stenting as a bridge of surgery in the literature are still controversial. Stent insertion for obstructed cancer provides an opportunity for bowel preparation and makes preoperative work-up and clinical staging possible. However, although stenting is becoming a more frequent treatment modality, studies with a significant number of patients acting as a bridge between surgery are still lacking. In this issue of Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery, the study by Kim et al. highlights the efficacy of stent insertion as the initial treatment and analyzed the prognostic factors in symptomatic obstructive colon cancer. The study demonstrated that emergent surgery, vascular invasion, and omitting adjuvant chemotherapy were independent poor prognostic factors in long-term oncologic outcomes suggested that stent insertion should be considered an initial treatment for symptomatic obstructive colon cancer.

The Ratio of CD86+/CD163+ Macrophages Predicts Postoperative Recurrence in Stage II-III Colorectal Cancer

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are pivotal for tumor progression and metastasis. We investigated the stromal CD86+TAM/CD163+TAM (CD86/CD163) ratio as a novel prognostic biomarker for stage II-III colorectal cancer (CRC). Two independently clinical cohorts of stage II-III CRC were retrospectively enrolled in this study. TAMs were detected using immunohistochemical staining for CD86 and CD163. The stromal CD86/CD163 ratio was calculated as a prognostic biomarker for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients with a low CD86/CD163 ratio had shorter RFS (HR=0.193, p<0.001) and OS (HR=0.180, p<0.001) than patients with a high CD86/CD163 ratio in the training cohort. CD86/CD163 ratio may be an independent predictor for RFS (HR=0.233, p<0.001) and OS (HR=0.224, p<0.001) in the training cohort. We obtained equivalent results in the validation cohort. The CD86/CD163 ratio tends to have better predictive values than tumor stage in the training (AUC: 0.682 vs 0.654, p=0.538) and validation (AUC: 0.697 vs 0.659, p=0.586) cohorts. CD86/CD163 ratio effectively predicts RFS for stage II (HR=0.203, p<0.001) and stage III CRC (HR=0.302, p<0.001). CD86/CD163 ratio also effectively predicts RFS in CRC patients with adjutant chemotherapy (HR=0.258, p<0.001) and without adjutant chemotherapy (HR=0.205, p<0.001). The stromal CD86/CD163 ratio could be used for individual risk assessment of recurrence and mortality for stage II-III CRC. Together with tumor stage, this ratio will aid in the personal treatment.

Do clinical trials change practice? A longitudinal, international assessment of colorectal cancer prescribing practices

INTRODUCTION

Over half of the 1.5 million individuals globally who are diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) present with stage II-III disease. Understanding clinician attitudes towards treatment for this group is paramount to contextualise real-world outcomes and plan future trials. The aim of this study was to assess clinician awareness of trials assessing the optimal duration of CRC adjuvant therapy, their attitudes towards shorter treatment and their self-reported practice.

METHODS

A survey was developed using OnlineSurveys® and distributed to clinicians in April 2019, with a follow-up survey disseminated to a subset of respondents in August 2020. Microsoft Excel® and Stata® were used for analysis.

RESULTS

265 clinicians replied to the first survey, with the majority aware of findings from the International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Therapy collaboration and contributory trials. Practice change was greatest for patients under 70 with low-risk stage III CRC, with most uncertainty around using 3-months of doublet chemotherapy for high-risk stage II disease. In August 2020, clinicians (n = 106) were more likely to use 3-months of FOLFOX for low-risk stage III disease and 3-months of CAPOX for stage II disease compared to April 2019. There was no indication that the COVID-19 pandemic had enduring changes on treatment decisions beyond those made in response to trial evidence.

DISCUSSION

Clinicians use a risk-stratified approach to treat CRC the adjuvant setting. Lower utilisation of doublet chemotherapy for older and stage II patients has affected the extent of trial implementation. Active dialogue regarding how trial results apply to these groups may improve consensus.

Preoperative Hepatic and Regional Arterial Chemotherapy in Patients Who Underwent Curative Colorectal Cancer Resection: A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of the addition of preoperative hepatic and regional arterial chemotherapy (PHRAC) on prognosis of stage II and III colorectal cancer (CRC) in a multicenter setting.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Our previous single-center pilot trial suggested that PHRAC in combination with surgical resection could reduce the occurrence of liver metastasis (LM) and improve survival in CRC patients.

METHODS

A prospective multi-center randomized controlled trial was conducted from December 2008 to December 2012 at 5 hospitals in China. Eligible patients with clinical stage II or III CRC who underwent curative resection were randomized to receive PHRAC plus adjuvant therapy (PHRAC arm) or adjuvant therapy alone (control arm). The primary endpoint was DFS. Secondary endpoints were cumulative LM rates, overall survival (OS), and safety (NCT00643877).

RESULTS

A total of 688 patients from 5 centers in China were randomly assigned (1:1) to each arm. The five-year DFS rate was 77% in the PHRAC arm and 65% in the control arm (HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.46-0.81; P = 0.001). The 5-year LM rates were 7% and 16% in the PHRAC and control arms, respectively (HR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.22-0.63; P < 0.001). The 5-year OS rate was 84% in the PHRAC arm and 76% in the control arm (HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.43-0.86; P = 0.005). There were no significant differences regarding treatment related morbidity or mortality between the two arms.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of PHRAC could improve DFS in patients with stage II and III CRC. It reduced the incidence of LM and improved OS without compromising patient safety.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00643877.

Comparison between oxaliplatin therapy and capecitabine monotherapy for high-risk stage II-III elderly colon cancer patients

PURPOSE

45% of colon cancer patients are elderly, yet they are often deviated from standard cancer management. The MOSAIC trial favored FOLFOX over FL with superior oncologic outcomes; however, which regimen is most beneficial in elderly population remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of oxaliplatin-added chemotherapy and capecitabine monotherapy in high-risk stage II/stage III elderly colon cancer patients.

METHODS

Colon cancer patients ≥70 years of age who received adjuvant chemotherapy at Inje University Busan Paik Hospital between February 2009 to April 2016 were included. Patients were separated into the oxaliplatin-added group and capecitabine monotherapy group. The primary outcomes were CSS and OS.

RESULTS

Of 74 patients, 45 received oxaliplatin-added chemotherapy and 29 received capecitabine monotherapy. There was no difference between the two groups in CSS or OS (p = 0.9670 and p = 0.6801, respectively). The N stage was significantly associated with CSS in both uni/multivariate analysis (p = 0.0565 and p = 0.0347, respectively). The oxaliplatin-added group had more stage III patients, so we performed a subgroup analysis of CSS and OS based on stage, which also showed no significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Capecitabine monotherapy is an oncologically safe regimen compared to oxaliplatin-added regimens in elderly patients with high-risk stage II/stage III colon cancer.

Predictive Biomarkers of Oxaliplatin-Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity

Oxaliplatin (OXA) is a platinum compound primarily used in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer. OXA-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (OXAIPN) is the major non-hematological dose-limiting toxicity of OXA-based chemotherapy and includes acute transient neurotoxic effects that appear soon after OXA infusion, and chronic non-length dependent sensory neuronopathy symmetrically affecting both upper and lower limbs in a stocking-and-glove distribution. No effective strategy has been established to reverse or treat OXAIPN. Thus, it is necessary to early predict the occurrence of OXAIPN during treatment and possibly modify the OXA-based regimen in patients at high risk as an early diagnosis and intervention may slow down neuropathy progression. However, identifying which patients are more likely to develop OXAIPN is clinically challenging. Several objective and measurable early biomarkers for OXAIPN prediction have been described in recent years, becoming useful for informing clinical decisions about treatment. The purpose of this review is to critically review data on currently available or promising predictors of OXAIPN. Neurological monitoring, according to predictive factors for increased risk of OXAIPN, would allow clinicians to personalize treatment, by monitoring at-risk patients more closely and guide clinicians towards better counseling of patients about neurotoxicity effects of OXA.

Adjuvant Therapies in Colon Cancer

Most of the patients with localized colon cancer undergo curative resection. However, significant number of patients will recur with metastatic disease, especially those with node positive cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy has shown to improve cure rate and survival by eradicating micrometastases. The benefit of adjuvant therapy is well established in node-positive cancers, while their role in stage II cancer is not well defined. A number of molecular markers have been identified that are prognostic and/or predictive in colon cancer. Such molecular markers, and other clinicopathological features play an important role in selection of appropriate therapy and duration of treatment. Emerging evidence for the utility of genomic profiling or detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are promising which may further facilitate decision making in the future. This chapter reviews the evolution of adjuvant therapy for resected colon cancer, the current evidence and the factors influence the choice of therapy.

How I treat stage II colon cancer patients

Stage II colon cancer (CC) is probably one of the best prognosis gastrointestinal tumors seen in our consultations, but often takes a lot of time for physicians to determine appropriate treatment because of the limited benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in these patients, together with the limited evidence in this situation. How to choose the best treatment for each individual patient is thus dependent on molecular (microsatellite instability/microsatellite stability status) and clinico-pathological features relevant enough to classify these tumors into low-, intermediate- and high-risk stage II disease and to choose an appropriate attitude for each of these subgroups. In practice, the first step in treatment decision making must be to assess the patient's status and comorbidities to see if the patient is eligible for an adjuvant treatment. Then, as fluoropyrimidines (FPs) are the corner stone of CC adjuvant treatment, screening for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency is mandatory in western countries. Finally, depending on the patient's characteristics and tumor risk stage, the strategy may be surveillance, adjuvant FP alone or oxaliplatin-based adjuvant CT. In the near future, new tools such as Immunoscore® (HalioDx; Luminy Biotech Enterprises, Marseille Cedex, France) and circulating tumor DNA may help to identify more precisely patients with minimal residual disease for more personalized adjuvant treatment approaches.

•

Stage II CC is a heterogeneous disease with a complex management due to the limited data and benefit of adjuvant CT.

•

Risk stratification through prognostic parameters is crucial to aid clinicians in determining the appropriate therapy.

•

Lymph node sampling <12 and pT4 are currently recognized as the major prognostic features associated with worse survival.

•

Adjuvant CT should be considered by incorporating prognostic features and balanced against patient's age and comorbidities.

Causes of Death Following Nonmetastatic Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis in the U.S.: A Population-Based Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Because of the improved colorectal cancer (CRC) survival in the U.S., patients may live long enough after CRC diagnosis to the point where non-cancer-related comorbidities may considerably impact their overall survival. In this study, we perform a long-term analysis of causes of death (CODs) following nonmetastatic CRC with respect to different demographic and tumor-related criteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We gained access to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data to review patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic CRC during 2000-2015. We calculated standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for each COD following CRC. SMRs represented the change of risk of a specific COD following CRC diagnoses when compared with the risk in the general U.S.

POPULATION

RESULTS

We reviewed 302,345 patients, of whom 112,008 died during the study period. More deaths (68.3%) occurred within 5 years following nonmetastatic CRC diagnosis, with 76,486 deaths. CRC was the most common COD (51.4%) within 5 years of diagnosis followed by heart disease (15.2%) and other cancers (8.4%). As time passed after diagnosis, the number of CRC deaths decreased, and other noncancer causes increased to the point that after 10 years only 10.4% of deaths were attributed to CRC, 15.3% were attributed to other cancers, and 34.2% were secondary to heart disease.

CONCLUSION

Following nonmetastatic CRC diagnosis, most deaths remain secondary to CRC. Other causes, including other cancers and cardiovascular disease, represent a significant number of deaths, especially in the 5 years following initial CRC diagnosis. Our findings help guide counseling patients with CRC regarding future health risks.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Most common causes of death following nonmetastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) are heart diseases, other cancers, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cerebrovascular diseases. Physicians should counsel patients regarding survivorship with cancer screening and focus on prevention of noncancer deaths. These findings should be considered by physicians who give care for survivors of nonmetastatic CRC.

Real-World Effectiveness of Adjuvant Oxaliplatin Chemotherapy in Stage III Colon Cancer: A Controlled Interrupted Time Series Analysis

Background: The real-world effectiveness of oxaliplatin in stage III colon cancer has not been determined in a large-scale population. We aimed to assess the real-world impact of adjuvant oxaliplatin treatment on the survival of these patients.

Methods: Based on Taiwan cancer registry, we evaluated 17,801 patients with resected stage III colon cancer, including 14,168 patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and 3,633 not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy as the control group between 2004 and 2014. We used the controlled interrupted time-series analysis to assess the three-year disease-free survival and five-year overall survival rates before (2004–2008) and after (2009–2014) the addition of oxaliplatin.

Results: The introduction of oxaliplatin was associated with no significant improvement in the slopes (per half-year) of the three-year disease-free survival rate (0.2%, 95% CI: −1.7∼2.2%) and five-year overall survival rate (0.6%, 95% CI: −1.8∼3%). The patients receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy also showed no significant increase in the slopes (per half-year) of the three-year disease-free survival rate (0.6%, 95% CI: −1.4∼2.6%) and five-year overall survival rate (1%, 95% CI: −1.5∼3.5%). The nonsignificant results were consistent across subgroup analyses of age (<70 vs. ≥70 years), recurrence risk (T1-3 or N1 vs. T4 or N2), and cycle of oxaliplatin use (≤6 vs. >6). However, oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy significantly increased the slope (per half-year) of the five-year OS (2%, 95% CI: 0.2∼3.8%) for patients in the high-risk group (T4 or N2). The present results were robust in several sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion: Among real-world patients with stage III colon cancer, the introduction of oxaliplatin does not yield a significant improvement in survival. Future work should identify the subpopulation(s) of patients who benefit significantly from the addition of oxaliplatin.

Perspectives for circulating tumor DNA in clinical management of colorectal cancer

Growing evidence has demonstrated that circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection in colorectal cancer might be a promising approach to address current important clinical questions. During chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer, tumor cells acquire potential resistance by generating additional somatic mutations related to therapeutic resistance. ctDNA can capture the tumor landscape, including heterogeneity, which might provide the opportunity for additional treatment options. Moreover, ctDNA detection is advantageous, because it can monitor tumor heterogeneity serially, in a non-invasive manner. ctDNA is considered valid for detecting minimal residual disease after a curable resection. By utilizing ctDNA detection, adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II-III colorectal cancer might be omitted for patients at low risk of recurrence; or conversely, adjuvant chemotherapy might be highly recommended for patients at high risk, based on ctDNA findings. During multidisciplinary treatments for locally advanced rectal cancer, it is essential to monitor the responses to sequential treatments to make appropriate decisions. Currently, these decisions are mainly based on radiological or pathological findings. ctDNA can add value by providing the real-time status of locally advanced rectal cancer. In this review, we summarized the current evidence and discussed future strategies for using ctDNA in the treatment of colorectal cancer.