Myogenic specification in somites: induction by axial structures

Regulation of paraxis expression and somite formation by ectoderm- and neural tube-derived signals

During vertebrate embryogenesis, the paraxial mesoderm becomes segmented into somites, which form as paired epithelial spheres with a periodicity that reflects the segmental organization of the embryo. As a somite matures, the ventral region gives rise to a mesenchymal cell population, the sclerotome, that forms the axial skeleton. The dorsal region of the somite remains epithelial and is called dermomyotome. The dermomyotome gives rise to the trunk and limb muscle and to the dermis of the back. Epaxial and hypaxial muscle precursors can be attributed to distinct somitic compartments which are laid down prior to overt somite differentiation. Inductive signals from the neural tube, notochord, and overlying ectoderm have been shown to be required for patterning of the somites into these different compartments. Paraxis is a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor expressed in the unsegmented paraxial mesoderm and throughout epithelial somites before becoming restricted to epithelial cells of the dermomyotome. To determine whether paraxis might be a target for inductive signals that influence somite patterning, we examined the influence of axial structures and surface ectoderm on paraxis expression by performing microsurgical operations on chick embryos. These studies revealed two distinct phases of paraxis expression, an early phase in the paraxial mesoderm that is dependent on signals from the ectoderm and independent of the neural tube, and a later phase that is supported by redundant signals from the ectoderm and neural tube. Under experimental conditions in which paraxis failed to be expressed, cells from the paraxial mesoderm failed to epithelialize and somites were not formed. We also performed an RT-PCR analysis of combined tissue explants in vitro and confirmed that surface ectoderm is sufficient to induce paraxis expression in segmental plate mesoderm. These results demonstrate that somite formation requires signals from adjacent cell types and that the paraxis gene is a target for the signal transduction pathways that regulate somitogenesis.

Distinct signal/response mechanisms regulate pax1 and QmyoD activation in sclerotomal and myotomal lineages of quail somites

Pax1 and QmyoD are early sclerotome and myotome-specific genes that are activated in epithelial somites of quail embryos in response to axial notochord/neural tube signals. In situ hybridization experiments reveal that the developmental kinetics of activation of pax1 and QmyoD differ greatly, suggesting that myotome and sclerotome specification are controlled by distinct developmental mechanisms. pax1 activation always occurs in somite IV throughout development, indicating that pax1 regulation is tightly coordinated with early steps in somite maturation. In contrast, QmyoD is delayed and does not occur until embryos have 12-14 somites. At this time, QmyoD is the first of the myogenic regulatory factor (MRF) genes to be activated in preexisting somites in a rapid, anterior to posterior progression until the 22 somite stage, after which time QmyoD is activated in somite I immediately following somite formation. Experiments involving transplantation of newly formed somites to ectopic sites along the anterior to posterior embryonic axis were performed to distinguish the contributions of axial signals and somite response pathways to the developmental regulation of pax1 and QmyoD. These studies show that pax1 activation is regulated by somite formation and maturation, not by the availability of axial signals, which are expressed prior to somite formation. In contrast, the delayed activation of QmyoD is controlled by developmental regulation of the production of axial signals as well as by the competence of somites to respond to these signals. These somite transplantation studies, therefore, provide a basis for understanding the different developmental kinetics of activation of pax1 and QmyoD during sclerotome and myotome specification, and suggest specific molecular models for the developmental regulation of myotome and sclerotome formation in somites through distinct signal/response pathways.

N-cadherin promotes the commitment and differentiation of skeletal muscle precursor cells

Cells with the potential to form skeletal muscle are present in the chick embryo prior to gastrulation. Muscle differentiation begins after gastrulation within the somites. The role of cadherin-mediated adhesion in the commitment and differentiation of skeletal muscle precursor cells was examined by analyzing the expression of cell-cell adhesion molecules in cultures of epiblast, segmental plate, and somite cells and by determining the effects of adhesion-perturbing antibodies on the accumulation of MyoD and sarcomeric myosin. Cultured primitive streak stage epiblast cells downregulate E-cadherin and upregulate N-cadherin. This switch in cadherin expression also occurs in vivo as epiblast cells enter the primitive streak. Although MyoD protein is present in cells with N- or E-cadherin, only cells with N-cadherin differentiate into skeletal muscle. In contrast to the primitive streak stage epiblast cells, prestreak epiblast cells maintain the expression of E-cadherin in vitro. While the majority of prestreak cells contain MyoD, only a few synthesize myosin. Treatment of primitive streak stage epiblast cells with function-perturbing antibodies to N-cadherin resulted in an inhibition of myosin accumulation and a decrease in the percentage of cells with MyoD. Segmental plate and somite cells are similar to primitive streak stage epiblast cells in that most differentiated into skeletal muscle when cultured in serum-free medium. While function-perturbing antibodies to N-cadherin inhibited the accumulation of myosin in these mesoderm cells, the number of MyoD positive cells was unaffected in somite cultures and only partially reduced in segmental plate cultures. These results suggest that N-cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion is involved in both the commitment of muscle precursors and their terminal differentiation.

The winged helix transcription factor MFH1 is required for proliferation and patterning of paraxial mesoderm in the mouse embryo

The gene mfh1, encoding a winged helix/forkhead domain transcription factor, is expressed in a dynamic pattern in paraxial and presomitic mesoderm and developing somites during mouse embryogenesis. Expression later becomes restricted to condensing mesenchyme of the vertebrae, head, limbs, and kidney. A targeted disruption of the gene was generated by homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells. Most homozygous mfh1 null embryos die prenatally but some survive to birth, with multiple craniofacial and vertebral column defects. Using molecular markers, we show that the initial formation and patterning of somites occurs normally in mutants. Differentiation of sclerotome-derived cells also appears unaffected, although a reduction of the level of some markers [e.g., mtwist, mf1, scleraxis, and alpha1(II) collagen] is seen in the anterior of homozygous mutants. The most significant difference, however, is a marked reduction in the proliferation of sclerotome-derived cells, as judged by BrdU incorporation. This proliferation defect was also seen in micromass cultures of somite-derived cells treated with transforming growth factor beta1 and fibroblast growth factors. Our findings establish a requirement for a winged helix/forkhead domain transcription factor in the development of the paraxial mesoderm. A model is proposed for the role of mfh1 in regulating the proliferation and differentiation of cell lineages giving rise to the axial skeleton and skull.

Perturbation of BMP signaling in somitogenesis resulted in vertebral and rib malformations in the axial skeletal formation

Axial skeletons such as vertebrae, ribs, and scapulae develop from the embryonic somitic mesoderm through interactions with neural tube/notochord and skin ectoderm. Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) seem to play important roles in these tissue interactions; however, the relationship between BMP signaling and the early development of axial skeletons is poorly understood. In this report, we investigated possible roles of BMP signaling in axial skeletal formation. First, we describe the expression patterns of BMP4 and type I receptors for BMP during somitogenesis in chick embryos based on whole mount in situ hybridization. Next, the effects of BMP on axial skeletal morphogenesis were investigated by implantation of BMP proteins into the dorsal mesoderm at the time of somitogenesis. Transcripts for both BMP4 ligand and its receptors are expressed in the dorsal ectoderm and mesoderm. Implantation of BMP4 and BMP2 into the dorsal regions of embryos result in subsequent anomalies of vertebrae, ribs, and scapulae. The effects of BMP implantation on the skeleton are shown to be dependent upon the somitic stage. Vertebral anomalies are restricted to the dorsolateral elements of the vertebrae and specifically observed after BMP implantation into embryonic day 2 (E2) embryos, but not E3 embryos. These results indicate that implantation of BMP into the dorsal part of embryos where endogenous BMP ligand and BMP receptors are expressed perturbs BMP signaling and causes axial skeletal malformations. The findings presented here suggest that BMP signaling may be involved in the early developmental process of the axial skeleton.

Notochord alters the permissiveness of myotome for pathfinding by an identified motoneuron in embryonic zebrafish

During zebrafish development, identified motoneurons innervate cell-specific regions of each trunk myotome. One motoneuron, CaP, extends an axon along the medial surface of the ventral myotome. To learn how this pathway is established during development, the CaP axon was used as an assay to ask whether other regions of the myotome were permissive for normal CaP pathfinding. Native myotomes were replaced with donor myotomes in normal or reversed dorsoventral orientations and CaP pathfinding was assayed. Ventral myotomes were permissive for CaP axons, even when they were taken from older embryos, suggesting that the CaP pathway remained present on ventral myotome throughout development. Dorsal myotomes from young embryos were also permissive for CaP axons, however, older dorsal myotomes were non-permissive, showing that permissiveness of dorsal myotome for normal CaP pathfinding diminished over time. This process appears to depend on signals from the embryo, since dorsal myotomes matured in vitro remained permissive for CaP axons. Genetic mosaics between wild-type and floating head mutant embryos revealed notochord involvement in dorsal myotome change of permissiveness. Dorsal and ventral myotomes from both younger and older floating head mutant embryos were permissive for CaP axons. These data suggest that initially both dorsal and ventral myotomes are permissive for CaP axons but as development proceeds, there is a notochord-dependent decrease in permissiveness of dorsal myotome for CaP axonal outgrowth. This change participates in restricting the CaP pathway to the ventral myotome and thus to neuromuscular specificity.

Spatial and temporal effects of axial structures on myogenesis of developing somites

To elucidate the precise roles of axial structures in the myogenic differentiation of the somite, we have examined the effects of the axial organs' precise spatial position during migration and differentiation of somitic cells by using in vivo transplantation of the neural tube and of the notochord directly into the paraxial mesoderm. Differentiation of myotomal cells was identified through the use of Quox 1 antibody which recognizes specifically a quail homeoprotein Quox 1. We have demonstrated that both ectopic neural tube and notochord are able to influence the myogenesis in somites, but that the spatial position of axial organs and the degree of somite maturation at grafting time are decisive. At the level of the somites which were already formed and developmentally advanced (somites III-VI), both neural tube and notochord promote myogenesis, and the promoting effect of notochord is more efficient than that of the neural tube. In the newly formed somites (I-II) and/or the segmental plate mesoderm, the notochord inhibits the myogenesis of somites, whereas the neural tube plays an evident myogenic promoting role. But the myogenic effect of the neural tube depends not only upon the stage of developing somites and presomitic mesoderm, but also on the developmental maturation of the neural tube. We have demonstrated that the myogenic effect of the rostral part of neural tube is stronger than that of its caudal part. This observation suggests that there is a gradient of myogenic effect along the rostrocaudal axis of the neural tube, which depends on the developmental maturation of neural tube, and that the generation of skeletal muscle during somitogenesis may be in relation with the rostrocaudal gradient of the capacity of the neural tube to stimulate myogenesis since somites are also distributed along an anteroposterior axis.

Three zebrafish MEF2 genes delineate somitic and cardiac muscle development in wild-type and mutant embryos

The zebrafish is an important experimental system for vertebrate embryology, and is well suited to the molecular analysis of muscle development. Transcription factors, such as the MEF2s, regulate skeletal and cardiac muscle-specific genes during development. We report the identification of three zebrafish MEF2 genes which, like their mammalian counterparts, encode factors that function as DNA-binding transcriptional activators of muscle specific promoters. The pattern of MEF2 expression in zebrafish defines discrete cell populations in the developing somites and heart and has mechanistic implications for developmental regulation of the MEF2 genes, when compared with other species. Alteration of MEF2 expression in two mutants affecting somitogenesis provides insight into the control of muscle formation in the embryo.

I-mf, a novel myogenic repressor, interacts with members of the MyoD family

During embryogenesis, cells from the ventral and dorsal parts of the somites give rise to sclerotome and dermomyotome, respectively. Dermomyotome contains skeletal muscle precursors that are determined by the MyoD family of myogenic factors. We have isolated a novel myogenic repressor, I-mf (Inhibitor of MyoD family), which is highly expressed in the sclerotome. In contrast, MyoD family members are concentrated in the dermomyotome. We demonstrate that I-mf inhibits the transactivation activity of the MyoD family and represses myogenesis. I-mf associates with MyoD family members and retains them in the cytoplasm by masking their nuclear localization signals. I-mf can also interfere with the DNA binding activity of MyoD family members. We postulate that I-mf plays an important role in the patterning of the somite early in development.

Innervation regulates myosin heavy chain isoform expression in developing skeletal muscle fibers

The influence of innervation on primary and secondary myogenesis and its relation to fiber type diversity were investigated in two specific wing muscles of quail embryo, the posterior (PLD) and anterior latissimus dorsi (ALD). In the adult, these muscles are composed almost exclusively of pure populations of fast and slow fibers, respectively. When slow ALD and fast PLD muscles developed in ovo in an aneurogenic environment induced after neural tube ablation, the cardiac ventricular myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoform was not expressed. The adult slow MHC isoform, SM2, appeared by embryonic day 7 (ED 7) in normal innervated slow ALD but was not expressed in denervated muscle. Analysis of in vitro differentiation of myoblasts from fast PLD and slow ALD muscles isolated from ED 7 control and neuralectomized quail embryos showed no fundamental differences in the pattern of MHC isoform expression. Newly differentiated fibers accumulated cardiac ventricular, embryonic fast, slow SM1 and SM3 MHC isoforms. Nevertheless, the expression of slow SM2 isoform in myotubes formed from slow ALD myoblasts only occurred when myoblasts were cultured in the presence of embryonic spinal cord. Our studies demonstrate that the neural tube influences primary as well as secondary myotube differentiation in avian forelimb and facilitates the expression of different MHC, particularly slow SM2 MHC gene expression in slow myoblasts.

Induction of a specific muscle cell type by a hedgehog-like protein in zebrafish

The notochord plays a central role in vertebrate development, acting as a signalling source that patterns the neural tube and somites. In in vitro assays, the secreted protein Sonic hedgehog mimics the inducing effects of notochord on both presomitic mesoderm and neural plate explants of amniote embryos, suggesting that both patterning activities of the notochord may be mediated by this protein in vivo. In zebrafish, however, mutants with disrupted notochord development lack a specific muscle cell type, the muscle pioneers, although they retain the ability to induce neural differentiation, raising the possibility that neural tube and somite patterning may be mediated by distinct signals. Here we describe a new member of the hedgehog family, echidna hedgehog, that is expressed exclusively in the notochord and has the ability to rescue the differentiation of muscle pioneer cells in mutants with no notochord. Moreover, we show that a combination of ectopic echidna hedgehog and sonic hedgehog expression induces supernumary muscle pioneers in wild-type embryos, suggesting that both signals act sequentially to pattern the developing somites.

How is myogenesis initiated in the embryo?

Skeletal myoblasts are derived from paraxial mesoderm, but how myoblasts acquire their identity is still a matter of speculation. The characterization of molecular markers and, in some cases, the analysis of mutations in the corresponding genes, has now made it possible to ask specific questions about this process. Specification of somite cell fate depends on epigenetic factors. Adjacent tissues, such as the neural tube, notochord, dorsal ectoderm and lateral mesoderm, act either positively or negatively on the different myogenic precursor populations in the somite. Candidate molecules for this complex signalling activity include sonic hedgehog and the Wnt proteins as positive signals, and BMP4 as a possible inhibitor. Although it is generally assumed that induction is required, some observations suggest that embryonic cells might have a tendency to undergo myogenesis as a 'default' pathway. By analogy with Drosophila, where the neurogenic genes affect myogenesis, the vertebrate homologues of notch and its ligands could be candidate molecules for a repression or derepression mechanism. Similar studies with cultured muscle cells also implicate other HLH factors as potential inhibitors of the MyoD family and, hence, of inappropriate myogenesis.

Notochord signals control the transcriptional cascade of myogenic bHLH genes in somites of quail embryos

Microsurgical, tissue grafting and in situ hybridization techniques have been used to investigate the role of the neural tube and notochord in the control of the myogenic bHLH genes, QmyoD, Qmyf5, Qmyogenin and the cardiac alpha-actin gene, during somite formation in stage 12 quail embryos. Our results reveal that signals from the axial neural tube/notochord complex control both the activation and the maintenance of expression of QmyoD and Qmyf5 in myotomal progenitor cells during the period immediately following somite formation and prior to myotome differentiation. QmyoD and Qmyf5 expression becomes independent of axial signals during myotome differentiation when somites activate expression of Qmyogenin and alpha-actin. Ablation studies reveal that the notochord controls QmyoD activation and the initiation of the transcriptional cascade of myogenic bHLH genes as epithelial somites condense from segmental plate mesoderm. The dorsal medial neural tube then contributes to the maintenance of myogenic bHLH gene expression in newly formed somites. Notochord grafts can activate ectopic QmyoD expression during somite formation, establishing that the notochord is a necessary and sufficient source of diffusible signals to initiate QmyoD expression. Myogenic bHLH gene expression is localized to dorsal medial cells of the somite by inhibitory signals produced by the lateral plate and ventral neural tube. Signaling models for the activation and maintenance of myogenic gene expression and the determination of myotomal muscle in somites are discussed.

The role of positive and negative signals in somite patterning

Signals from the axial tissues, neural tube and notochord play a crucial role in patterning cell fates in adjacent somitic tissue. Work over the past four decades has indicated how signals from the axial tissues, as well as the surface ectoderm and lateral plate mesoderm, together act to pattern somitic cell fate. Furthermore, recent results have shed light on how some of these molecules control the specification and migratory behaviour of somitic cells.

Activation of different myogenic pathways: myf-5 is induced by the neural tube and MyoD by the dorsal ectoderm in mouse paraxial mesoderm

Newly formed somites or unsegmented paraxial mesoderm (UPM) have been cultured either in isolation or with adjacent structures to investigate the influence of these tissues on myogenic differentiation in mammals. The extent of differentiation was easily and accurately quantified by counting the number of beta-galactosidase-positive cells, since mesodermal tissues had been isolated from transgenic mice that carry the n-lacZ gene under the transcriptional control of a myosin light chain promoter, restricting expression to striated muscle. The results obtained showed that axial structures are necessary to promote differentiation of paraxial mesoderm, in agreement with previous observations. However, it also appeared that the influence of axial structures could be replaced by dorsolateral tissues, adjacent to the paraxial mesoderm. To elucidate which of these tissues exerts this positive effect, we cultured the paraxial mesoderm with a variety of adjacent structures, either adherent to the mesoderm or recombined in vitro. The results of these experiments indicated that the dorsal ectoderm exerts a positive influence on myogenesis but only if left in physical proximity to it. In contrast, lateral mesoderm delays the positive effect of the ectoderm (and has no effect on its own) suggesting that this tissue produces an inhibitory signal. To investigate whether axial structures and dorsal ectoderm induce myogenesis through common or separate pathways, we dissected the medial half of the unsegmented paraxial mesoderm and cultured it with the adjacent neural tube. We also cultured the lateral half of the unsegmented paraxial mesoderm with adjacent ectoderm. The induction of the myogenic regulatory factors myf-5 and MyoD was monitored by double staining of cultured cells with antibodies against MyoD and beta-galactosidase since the tissues were isolated from mouse embryos that carry n-lacZ targeted to the myf-5 gene, so that myf-5 expressing cells could be easily identified by either histochemical or immunocytochemical staining for beta-galactosidase. After 1 day in culture myogenic cells from the medial half expressed myf-5 but not MyoD, while myogenic cells from the lateral half expressed MyoD but not myf-5. By the next day in vitro, however, most myogenic cells expressed both gene products. These data suggest that the neural tube activates myogenesis in the medial half of paraxial mesoderm through a myf-5-dependent pathway, while the dorsal ectoderm activates myogenesis through a MyoD-dependent pathway. The possible developmental significance of these observations is discussed and a model of myogenic determination in mammals is proposed.

Severe defects in the formation of epaxial musculature in open brain (opb) mutant mouse embryos

The differentiation of somite derivatives is dependent on signals from neighboring axial structures. While ventral signals have been described extensively, little is known about dorsal influences, especially those from the dorsal half of the neural tube. Here, we describe severe phenotypic alterations in dorsal somite derivatives of homozygous open brain (opb) mutant mouse embryos which suggest crucial interactions between dorsal neural tube and dorsal somite regions. At Theiler stage 17 (day 10.5 post coitum) of development, strongly altered expression patterns of Pax3 and Myf5 were observed in dorsal somite regions indicating that the dorsal myotome and dermomyotome were not differentiating properly. These abnormalities were later followed by the absence of epaxial (dorsal) musculature; whereas, body wall and limb musculature formed normally. Analysis of Mox1 and Pax1 expression in opb embryos revealed additional defects in the differentiation of the dorsal sclerotome. The observed abnormalities coincided with defects in differentiation of dorsal neural tube regions. The implications of our findings for interactions between dorsal neural tube, surface ectoderm and dorsomedial somite regions in specifying epaxial musculature are discussed.

The dorsal neural tube organizes the dermamyotome and induces axial myocytes in the avian embryo

Somites, like all axial structures, display dorsoventral polarity. The dorsal portion of the somite forms the dermamyotome, which gives rise to the dermis and axial musculature, whereas the ventromedial somite disperses to generate the sclerotome, which later comprises the vertebrae and intervertebral discs. Although the neural tube and notochord are known to regulate some aspects of this dorsoventral pattern, the precise tissues that initially specify the dermamyotome, and later the myotome from it, have been controversial. Indeed, dorsal and ventral neural tube, notochord, ectoderm and neural crest cells have all been proposed to influence dermamyotome formation or to regulate myocyte differentiation. In this report we describe a series of experimental manipulations in the chick embryo to show that dermamyotome formation is regulated by interactions with the dorsal neural tube. First, we demonstrate that when a neural tube is rotated 180 degrees around its dorsoventral axis, a secondary dermamyotome is induced from what would normally have developed as sclerotome. Second, if we ablate the dorsal neural tube, dermamyotomes are absent in the majority of embryos. Third, if we graft pieces of dorsal neural tube into a ventral position between the notochord and ventral somite, a dermamyotome develops from the sclerotome that is proximate to the graft, and myocytes differentiate. In addition, we also show that myogenesis can be regulated by the dorsal neural tube because when pieces of dorsal neural tube and unsegmented paraxial mesoderm are combined in tissue culture, myocytes differentiate, whereas mesoderm cultures alone do not produce myocytes autonomously. In all of the experimental perturbations in vivo, the dorsal neural tube induced dorsal structures from the mesoderm in the presence of notochord and floorplate, which have been reported previously to induce sclerotome. Thus, we have demonstrated that in the context of the embryonic environment, a dorsalizing signal from the dorsal neural tube can compete with the diffusible ventralizing signal from the notochord. In contrast to dorsal neural tube, pieces of ventral neural tube, dorsal ectoderm or neural crest cells, all of which have been postulated to control dermamyotome formation or to induce myogenesis, either fail to do so or provoke only minimal inductive responses in any of our assays. However, complicating the issue, we find consistent with previous studies that following ablation of the entire neural tube, dermamyotome formation still proceeds adjacent to the dorsal ectoderm. Together these results suggest that, although dorsal ectoderm may be less potent than the dorsal neural tube in inducing dermamyotome, it does nonetheless possess some dermamyotomal-inducing activity. Based on our data and that of others, we propose a model for somite dorsoventral patterning in which competing diffusible signals from the dorsal neural tube and from the notochord/floorplate specify dermamyotome and sclerotome, respectively. In our model, the positioning of the dermamyotome dorsally is due to the absence or reduced levels of the notochord-derived ventralizing signals, as well as to the presence of dominant dorsalizing signals. These dorsal signals are possibly localized and amplified by binding to the basal lamina of the ectoderm, where they can signal the underlying somite, and may also be produced by the ectoderm as well.

Combinatorial signaling by Sonic hedgehog and Wnt family members induces myogenic bHLH gene expression in the somite

We have demonstrated previously that a combination of signals from the neural tube and the floor plate/notochord complex synergistically induce the expression of myogenic bHLH genes and myogenic differentiation markers in unspecified somites. In this study we demonstrate that Sonic hedgehog (Shh), which is expressed in the floor plate/notochord, and a subset of Wnt family members (Wnt-1, Wnt-3, and Wnt-4), which are expressed in dorsal regions of the neural tube, mimic the muscle inducing activity of these tissues. In combination, Shh and either Wnt-1 or Wnt-3 are sufficient to induce myogenesis in somitic tissue in vitro. Therefore, we propose that myotome formation in vivo may be directed by the combinatorial activity of Shh secreted by ventral midline tissues (floor plate and notochord) and Wnt ligands secreted by the dorsal neural tube.

Myogenesis in paraxial mesoderm: preferential induction by dorsal neural tube and by cells expressing Wnt-1

Previous studies have demonstrated that the neural tube/notochord complex is required for skeletal muscle development within somites. In order to explore the localization of myogenic inducing signals within the neural tube, dorsal or ventral neural tube halves were cultured in contact with single somites or pieces of segmental plate mesoderm. Somites and segmental plates cultured with the dorsal half of the neural tube exhibited 70% and 85% myogenic response rates, as determined by immunostaining for myosin heavy chain. This response was slightly lower than the 100% response to whole neural tube/notochord, but was much greater than the 30% and 10% myogenic response to ventral neural tube with and without notochord. These results demonstrate that the dorsal neural tube emits a potent myogenic inducing signal which accounts for most of the inductive activity of whole neural tube/notochord. However, a role for ventral neural tube/notochord in somite myogenic induction was clearly evident from the larger number of myogenic cells induced when both dorsal neural tube and ventral neural tube/notochord were present. To address the role of a specific dorsal neural tube factor in somite myogenic induction, we tested the ability of Wnt-1-expressing fibroblasts to promote paraxial mesoderm myogenesis in vitro. We found that cells expressing Wnt-1 induced a small number of somite and segmental plate cells to undergo myogenesis. This finding is consistent with the localized dorsal neural tube inductive activity described above, but since the ventral neural tube/notochord also possesses myogenic inductive capacity yet does not express Wnt-1, additional inductive factors are likely involved.

Determination versus differentiation and the MyoD family of transcription factors

The myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs) form a family of basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors consisting of Myf-5, MyoD, myogenin, and MRF4. The MRFs play key regulatory roles in the development of skeletal muscle during embryogenesis. Sequence homology, expression patterns, and gene-targeting experiments have revealed a two-tiered subclassification within the MRF family. Myf-5 and MyoD are more homologous to one another than to the others, are expressed in myoblasts before differentiation, and are required for the determination or survival of muscle progenitor cells. By contrast, myogenin and MRF4 are more homologous to one another than to the others and are expressed upon differentiation, and myogenin is required in vivo as a differentiation factor while the role of MRF4 remains unclear. On this basis, MyoD and Myf-5 are classified as primary MRFs, as they are required for the determination of myoblasts, and myogenin and MRF4 are classified as secondary MRFs, as they likely function during terminal differentiation.

Epithelial-mesenchymal conversion of dermatome progenitors requires neural tube-derived signals: characterization of the role of Neurotrophin-3

Development of the somite-derived dermatome involves conversion of the epithelial dermatome progenitors into mesenchymal cells of the dermis. In chick embryos, neural tube-derived signals are required for this conversion, as the interposition of a membrane between neural tube and somites results in a failure of the dermatome to lose its epithelial arrangement. However, dermis formation can be completely rescued by coating the membranes with Neurotrophin-3, but not with the related molecule Nerve growth factor. Neurotrophin-3 was also found to be necessary for dermatome dissociation using in vitro explants or partially dissociated dermomyotomes. The functional relevance of these observations was investigated by neutralizing endogenous Neurotrophin-3 using a specific blocking antibody. Antibody-treated embryos revealed the presence of tightly aggregated cells between myotome and ectoderm instead of the loose dermal mesenchyme observed in embryos treated with control antibodies. As previous studies have demonstrated the presence of Neurotrophin-3 in the neural tube, these results suggest that it may be a necessary neural tube-derived signal required for early stages of dermis formation.

Migration of myogenic cells from the somites to the fore-limb buds of developing mouse embryos

In this study, we have isolated newly formed somites from the caudal regions of 8.5 day mouse embryos and transplanted them orthotopically into correspondingly staged hosts at the level of the prospective limb-forming region. The experimental embryos were then cultured intact for 32-36 hr. The donor somites used were pre-labelled with DiI, a fluorescent lipophilic dye, or were obtained from transgenic embryos that carried a 1 kb 5' regulatory sequence of the desmin gene linked to the gene encoding Escherichia coli beta-galactosidase. The transgene is specifically expressed in skeletal muscles (Li et al. [1993] Development 117:947-959). The aim of these experiments was to show definitively that the musculature of the mammalian limb is derived from the somites. The results demonstrated that DiI-labelled cells from the implanted somites were able to invade the proximal region of the fore-limb bud during the course of development. The use of transgenic somites as grafts confirmed that some of the somitic cells found in the limbs were myogenic cells. To determine whether the displacement of somitic cells is an active or passive process, somatopleure obtained from the prospective limb-forming regions of day 8.5 day embryos was implanted into 8.5 day hosts. We did not detect the presence of DiI-labelled somatopleural cells in the fore-limb after 32-36 hr of culture. This suggests that somitic cells reached the limb bud via active locomotion rather than as a result of being passively dragged there, as the limb elongates during development. In addition, we injected latex beads into the somites, as probes, to determine whether extracellular matrix-driven translocation plays a role in driving the somitic cells to the limb bud. In a majority of the specimens examined, we could not detect the presence of these beads in the limb bud. However, in the trunk of these embryos, the beads were found dispersed throughout the ventral neural crest pathway.

Conversion of Xenopus ectoderm into neurons by NeuroD, a basic helix-loop-helix protein

Basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins are instrumental in determining cell type during development. A bHLH protein, termed NeuroD, for neurogenic differentiation, has now been identified as a differentiation factor for neurogenesis because (i) it is expressed transiently in a subset of neurons in the central and peripheral nervous systems at the time of their terminal differentiation into mature neurons and (ii) ectopic expression of neuroD in Xenopus embryos causes premature differentiation of neuronal precursors. Furthermore, neuroD can convert presumptive epidermal cells into neurons and also act as a neuronal determination gene. However, unlike another previously identified proneural gene (XASH-3), neuroD seems competent to bypass the normal inhibitory influences that usually prevent neurogenesis in ventral and lateral ectoderm and is capable of converting most of the embryonic ectoderm into neurons. The data suggest that neuroD may participate in the terminal differentiation step during vertebrate neuronal development.

Early stages of chick somite development

We report on the formation and early differentiation of the somites in the avian embryo. The somites are derived from the avian embryo. The somites are derived from the mesoderm which, in the body (excluding the head), is subdivided into four compartments: the axial, paraxial, intermediate and lateral plate mesoderm. Somites develop from the paraxial mesoderm and constitute the segmental pattern of the body. They are formed in pairs by epithelialization, first at the cranial end of the paraxial mesoderm, proceeding caudally, while new mesenchyme cells enter the paraxial mesoderm as a consequence of gastrulation. After their formation, which depends upon cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, the somites impose segmental pattern upon peripheral nerves and vascular primordia. The newly formed somite consists of an epithelial ball of columnar cells enveloping mesenchymal cells within a central cavity, the somitocoel. Each somite is surrounded by extracellular matrix material connecting the somite with adjacent structures. The competence to form skeletal muscle is a unique property of the somites and becomes realized during compartmentalization, under control of signals emanating from surrounding tissues. Compartmentalization is accompanied by altered patterns of expression of Pax genes within the somite. These are believed to be involved in the specification of somite cell lineages. Somites are also regionally specified, giving rise to particular skeletal structures at different axial levels. This axial specification appears to be reflected in Hox gene expression. MyoD is first expressed in the dorsomedial quadrant of the still epithelial somite whose cells are not yet definitely committed. During early maturation, the ventral wall of the somite undergoes an epithelio-mesenchymal transition forming the sclerotome. The sclerotome later becomes subdivided into rostral and caudal halves which are separated laterally by von Ebner's fissure. The lateral part of the caudal half of the sclerotome mainly forms the ribs, neural arches and pedicles of vertebrae, whereas within the lateral part of the rostral half the spinal nerve develops. The medially migrating sclerotomal cells form the peri-notochordal sheath, and later give rise to the vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs. The somitocoel cells also contribute to the sclerotome. The dorsal half of the somite remains epithelial and is referred to as the dermomyotome because it gives rise to the dermis of the back and the skeletal musculature. the cells located within the lateral half of the dermomyotome are the precursors of the muscles of the hypaxial domain of the body, whereas those in the medial half are precursors of the epaxial (back) muscles.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Combinatorial signals from the neural tube, floor plate and notochord induce myogenic bHLH gene expression in the somite

The neural tube, floor plate and notochord are axial tissues in the vertebrate embryo which have been demonstrated to play a role in somite morphogenesis. Using in vitro coculture of tissue explants, we have monitored inductive interactions of these axial tissues with the adjacent somitic mesoderm in chick embryos. We have found that signals from the neural tube and floor plate/notochord are necessary for expression of the myogenic bHLH regulators MyoD, Myf5 and myogenin in the somite. Eventually somitic expression of the myogenic bHLH genes is maintained in the absence of the axial tissues. In organ culture, at early developmental stages (HH 11-), induction of myogenesis in the three most recently formed somites can be mediated by the neural tube together with the floor plate/notochord, while in more rostral somites (stages IV-IX) the neural tube without the floor plate/notochord is sufficient. By recombining somites and neural tubes from different axial levels of the embryo, we have found that a second signal is necessary to promote competence of the somite to respond to inducing signals from the neural tube. Thus, we propose that at least two signals from axial tissues work in combination to induce myogenic bHLH gene expression; one signal derives from the floor plate/notochord and the other signal derives from regions of the neural tube other than the floor plate.

The MyoD family of transcription factors and skeletal myogenesis

Gene targeting has allowed the dissection of complex biological processes at the genetic level. Our understanding of the nuances of skeletal muscle development has been greatly increased by the analysis of mice carrying targeted null mutations in the Myf-5, MyoD and myogenin genes, encoding members of the myogenic regulatory factor (MRF) family. These experiments have elucidated the hierarchical relationships existing between the MRFs, and established that functional redundancy is a feature of the MRF regulatory network. Either MyoD or Myf-5 is sufficient for the formation or survival of skeletal myoblasts. Myogenin acts later in development and plays an essential in vivo role in the terminal differentiation of myotubes.

Neural tube can induce fast myosin heavy chain isoform expression during embryonic development

We investigated the role of the neural tube in muscle cell differentiation in developing somitic myotome of chick embryo, particularly through fast myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoform expression. An embryonic fast MHC labeled with EB165 mAb was expressed in somitic cells from stage 15 of Hamburger and Hamilton (H.H.) (24 somites). Moreover, a distinct early embryonic fast MHC was expressed only from stage 15 of H.H. to stage 36 (E10). Like neonatal MHC, this isoform was labeled with 2E9 mAb but differed in its immunopeptide mapping. Expression of EB165-labeled embryonic fast MHC occurred in somitic myotomes deprived of neural tube influence by in ovo ablation as well as in somite explants cultured alone in vitro. Conversely, ablation of the neural tube prevented somitic expression of MHC labeled with 2E9 mAb. The neural tube induced in vitro expression of this MHC in explants of somites which failed to express it when cultured alone. These results indicate that signals emanating from the neural tube are required for the expression of early embryonic fast MHC isoform in developing somitic myotome.

Widespread expression of the eve1 gene in zebrafish embryos affects the anterior-posterior axis pattern

The zygotic expression of the eve1 gene is restricted to the ventral and lateral cells of the marginal zone. At later stages, the mRNAs are localized in the most posterior part of the extending tail tip. An eve1 clone (pcZf14), containing a poly-A tail, has been isolated. In order to address eve1 gene function, pcZf14 transcript injections into zebrafish embryos have been performed. The injection into uncleaved eggs of a synthetic eve1 mRNA (12 pg), which encodes a protein of approximately 28 kd, produces embryos with anterior-posterior (A-P) axis defects and the formation of additional axial structures. The first category of 24 h phenotypes (87%) mainly displays a gradual decrease in anterior structures. This is comparable to previous phenotypes observed following Xhox3 messenger injection either in Xenopus or in zebrafish that have been classified according to the index of axis deficiency (zf-IAD). These phenotypes result in anomalies of the development of the neural keel, from microphthalmia to acephaly. The second category (13%) corresponds to the phenotypes described above together with truncal or caudal supernumerary structures. Additional truncal structures are the most prominent of these duplicated phenotypes, displaying a "zipper" shape of axial structures including neural keels and notochords. Caudal duplication presents no evident axis supernumerary structures. The observation of these phenotypes suggests an important role for the eve1 gene in mesodermal cell specification and in the development of the posterior region, and more particularly of the most posterior tail tip where endogenous eve1 messengers are found.

Ectopic expression of Sonic hedgehog alters dorsal-ventral patterning of somites

Differentiation of somites into sclerotome, dermatome, and myotome is controlled by a complex set of inductive interactions. The ability of axial midline tissues, the notochord and floor plate, to induce sclerotome has been well documented and has led to models in which ventral somite identity is specified by signals derived from the notochord and floor plate. Herein, we provide evidence that Sonic hedgehog, a vertebrate homolog of the Drosophila segment polarity gene hedgehog, is a signal produced by the notochord and floor plate that directs ventral somite differentiation. Sonic hedgehog is expressed in ventral midline tissues at critical times during somite specification and has the ability, when ectopically expressed, to enhance the formation of sclerotome and antagonize the development of dermatome.

Patterning of mammalian somites by surface ectoderm and notochord: evidence for sclerotome induction by a hedgehog homolog

An early step in the development of vertebrae, ribs, muscle, and dermis is the differentiation of the somitic mesoderm into dermomyotome dorsally and sclerotome ventrally. To analyze this process, we have developed an in vitro assay for somitic mesoderm differentiation. We show that sclerotomal markers can be induced by a diffusible factor secreted by notochord and floor plate and that heterologous cells expressing Sonic hedgehog (shh/vhh-1) mimic this effect. In contrast, expression of dermomyotomal markers can be caused by a contact-dependent signal from surface ectoderm and a diffusible signal from dorsal neural tube. Our results extend previous studies by suggesting that dorsoventral patterning of somites involves the coordinate action of multiple dorsalizing and ventralizing signals and that a diffusible form of Shh/Vhh-1 mediates sclerotome induction.

Aprotinin, a Kunitz-type protease inhibitor, stimulates skeletal muscle differentiation

Aprotinin, a Kunitz-type inhibitor of serine proteases, stimulates myotube formation by mouse G8-1 and C2C12 skeletal muscle myoblasts. This stimulation of morphological differentiation is accompanied by accumulation of myogenin transcripts and production of muscle-specific proteins. In contrast, active TGF beta prevents differentiation of G8-1 and C2C12 myoblasts. When active TGF beta and aprotinin are both added to myoblast cultures, differentiation is inhibited, suggesting the active growth factor acts downstream of the protease inhibitor. TGF beta is found in serum as a latent, dimeric propolypeptide that is cleaved by limited proteolysis to release the biologically active carboxy-terminal dimer. To address the possibility that aprotinin may effect myogenesis by inhibiting proteolytic activation of latent TGF beta, levels of the endogenous growth factor were measured in differentiating myoblast cultures. Latent TGF beta is rapidly depleted from control cultures within 24 hours of plating, but remains relatively stable in aprotinin-treated cultures. Consistent with this, aprotinin-treated cultures have reduced levels of active TGF beta. These data indicate that Kunitz-domain containing protease inhibitors may help orchestrate the onset of myogenesis, possibly by regulating the activity of TGF beta-like molecules.