Dexmedetomidine: present and future directions

Perioperative Hypotension in Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Upper Extremity Surgery with Dexmedetomidine Sedation: A Retrospective Study

(1) Background: limited data exist regarding the occurrence of hypotension associated with dexmedetomidine use and its risk factors in the context of intraoperative sedation for patients receiving peripheral nerve blocks. (2) Method: This single-center retrospective study assessed the incidence of hypotension in patients undergoing orthopedic upper extremity surgery with brachial plexus blockade. Patients were classified into three groups: group N (non-sedated), group M (midazolam), and group D (dexmedetomidine), based on their primary intraoperative sedative use. The primary outcome was the incidence of perioperative hypotension, defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90 mmHg or mean blood pressure (MBP) < 60 mmHg, at a minimum of two recorded time points during the intraoperative period and post-anesthesia care unit stay. Multivariable logistic models for the occurrence of hypotension were constructed for the entire cohort and group D. (3) Results: A total of 2152 cases (group N = 445, group M = 678, group D = 1029) were included in the analysis. The odds ratio for the occurrence of hypotension in group D was 5.68 (95% CI, 2.86 to 11.28) compared with group N. Concurrent use of a beta blocker, longer duration of surgery, and lower preoperative SBP and higher preoperative heart rate were identified as significant risk factors. (4) Conclusions: the increased risk of hypotension and the associated factors should be taken into account before using dexmedetomidine in these cases.

Effect of pre-use of Dexmedetomidine on the effective inhibitory dose of remimazolam tosilate on positive cardiovascular response in double-lumen endobronchial intubation: a clinical study

BACKGROUND

Herein, the effect of pre-use of Dexmedetomidine(Dex) on the half-effective dose (ED50) and 95%-effective dose (ED95) of Remimazolam tosilate(RT) in inhibiting the positive cardiovascular response(CR) which means blood pressure or heart rate rises above a critical threshold induced by double-lumen bronchial intubation was evaluated.

METHODS

Patients who underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery were divided into groups A (0), B (0.5 µg/kg), and C (1 µg/kg) based on different Dex doses. Group A included subgroups comprising young (A-Y) and elderly (A-O) patients. Neither groups B nor C included elderly patients due of the sedative effect of Dex. Based on the previous subject's CR, the dose of RT was increased or decreased in the next patient using the sequential method. This trial would be terminated when the seventh crossover occurred, at which point the sample size met the stable estimate of the target dose. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were monitored throughout the trial, and sedation was assessed using the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scale. HR and MAP were recorded at baseline (T1), the end of Dex (T2), and the end of RT (T3), the maximum HR and MAP were recorded within 3 min of intubation from beginning to end (T4). There was a positive CR when the T4 levels rose above 15% of the baseline. The ED50/ED95 and corresponding confidence interval were calculated using probability regression.

RESULTS

In total, 114 patients completed the trial. Without the use of Dex, the ED50/ED95 of TR inhibiting the positive CR caused by double-lumen bronchial intubation was 0.198/0.227 and 0.155/0.181 mg/kg in groups A-Y and A-O, respectively. The changes in vital signs from T1 to T3 were similar in the subgroups, indicating that the elderly patients were more sensitive to the dose of RT. The ED50/ED95 of RT inhibiting the positive CR caused by double-lumen endobronchial intubation was 0.122/0.150 and 0.068/0.084 mg/kg in groups B and C, respectively. And, the fluctuation of blood pressure from T3 to T4 was reduced by using Dex. RT was 100% effective in sedation with no significant inhibition of circulation. Apart from one case of hypotension occurred in group A-Y, two cases of low HR in group B, and one case of low HR in group C, no other adverse events were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal dose of RT to inhibit positive CR induced by double-lumen bronchial intubation in elderly patients was 0.18 mg/kg and 0.23 mg/kg in younger patients. When the pre-use dose of Dex was 0.5 µg/kg, the optimal dose to inhibit positive CR of RT was 0.15 mg/kg. And, when the pre-use dose of Dex was 1 µg/kg, the optimal dose of RT was 0.9 mg/kg.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05631028.

Comparison of oxygen reserve index according to the remimazolam or dexmedetomidine for intraoperative sedation under regional anesthesia-A single-blind randomized controlled trial

Introduction

We aimed to evaluate the difference in intraoperative oxygen reserve index (ORi) between the sedatives remimazolam (RMMZ) and dexmedetomidine (DEX).

Methods

Seventy-eight adult patients scheduled for sedation under regional anesthesia were randomly assigned to either the DEX (n = 39) or RMMZ (n = 39) group. The primary outcome was the difference in perioperative ORi between the groups. The secondary outcomes included respiratory depression, hypo- or hypertension, heart rate (HR), blood pressure, respiratory rate and postoperative outcomes. Additionally, the number of patients who experienced a decrease in intraoperative ORi to < 50% and the associated factors were analyzed.

Results

The ORi was significantly higher in the RMMZ group at 15 min after sedation maintenance. There were no significant differences in respiratory depression between the two groups. The intraoperative HR was significantly higher in the RMMZ group after the induction of sedation, 15 min after sedation maintenance, and at the end of surgery. No other results were significantly different between the two groups. The incidence of a decrease in intraoperative ORi to < 50% was significantly higher in the DEX group. Factors associated with a decrease in the intraoperative ORi to < 50% were diabetes mellitus, low baseline peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), and DEX use. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for a decrease in the intraoperative ORi to < 50%, the cutoff baseline SpO2 was 97%.

Conclusion

RMMZ is recommended as a sedative for patients with a low baseline SpO2 and intraoperative bradycardia. Further studies should be conducted to establish the criteria for a significant ORi reduction.

Dexmedetomidine attenuates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in hyperlipidemic rats by inhibiting inflammation, oxidative stress and NF-κB

The present study was conducted to determine the protective effect of Dexmedetomidine (DEX) in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in hyperlipidemic rats. Towards this, the effect of DEX was first evaluated on the infarct size and the histopathology of cardiac tissues using TTC and H and E staining, and it was found that DEX significantly improved the infarct size and architecture of the myocardial tissues following the I/R injury. DEX also showed significant improvement in various examined hemodynamic parameters (e.g., LVSP, and ± dp/dtmax ) in a dose-dependent manner. The lipid profile (LDL, VLDL, TC, TG, and HDL level) of the rats were also found significantly improved in DEX-treated rats. The level of various pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17, and TNF-α), cardiac injury (CK, CK-MB, Troponin I AST, ALT, and LDH), and oxidative stress (MDA, SOD, and GSH) biomarkers were also found to be restored near to the normal in DEX-treated group. It has been found that DEX also significantly reduces apoptosis of rat cardiomyocytes. In western blot analysis, DEX showed a significant reduction in the activation of NF-κB. In conclusion, our study demonstrated the protective effect of Dexmedetomidine in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in hyperlipidemic rats possibly via amelioration of oxidative stress, and inflammation apoptosis.

Advances in Anesthesia for Shoulder Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Dexmedetomidine-Enhanced Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block

Surgical procedures on the shoulder pose distinctive challenges in managing pain during the perioperative period, underscoring the importance of exploring innovative anesthesia techniques. This comprehensive review article delves into integrating dexmedetomidine, an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist, within interscalene brachial plexus blocks for shoulder surgery. The review initiates by underscoring the pivotal role of effective anesthesia in shoulder surgery and elucidates the rationale behind investigating dexmedetomidine as an adjunct. It meticulously examines the anatomy and physiology of the brachial plexus, emphasizing its critical significance in shoulder surgery. Furthermore, the article expounds on dexmedetomidine's mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetics, encompassing its safety profile and potential side effects. The conventional interscalene brachial plexus block techniques, along with their limitations and challenges, are discussed, laying the foundation for the integration of dexmedetomidine. The review subsequently delves into exploring the role of dexmedetomidine in regional anesthesia, covering previous studies, mechanisms of action, and the potential advantages of incorporating it into nerve blocks. The review's core concentrates on the practical application of dexmedetomidine-enhanced interscalene brachial plexus blocks. This includes discussions on administration techniques, dosage guidelines, and compelling evidence supporting its utilization. Clinical scenarios where this approach proves most advantageous are thoroughly explored, comparing its effectiveness with traditional techniques in terms of pain control and patient outcomes. A comprehensive examination of relevant clinical trials and case studies highlights the evidence supporting its efficacy. The review also underscores safety considerations associated with dexmedetomidine. It proposes strategies for mitigating risks to ensure patient safety. Insights into future directions and research are provided, encompassing ongoing studies, areas necessitating further investigation, and potential refinements in technique. Finally, the article summarizes key findings, emphasizing the practicality of dexmedetomidine-enhanced interscalene brachial plexus blocks in shoulder surgery and its far-reaching implications for clinical practice and patient care.

Peri-anal infiltration versus caudal block for multimodal analgesia in paediatric patients with Hirschsprung's disease undergoing transanal endorectal pull-through procedure: A randomised trial

Background and Aims

Transanal endorectal pull-through (TERPT) is a standard procedure for managing paediatric patients with Hirschsprung's disease (HD). This study aimed to evaluate peri-anal infiltration versus caudal block as a part of multimodal analgesia for paediatric patients with HD undergoing the TERPT procedure.

Methods

This randomised trial included 60 patients of both genders, aged 6 to 18 months who underwent the TERPT procedure under general anaesthesia. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups to receive either peri-anal infiltration or caudal block with 1 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25% and dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg in 0.5 ml normal saline. The primary outcome was the time to the first rescue analgesia. The secondary outcomes were the total consumption, the frequency of nalbuphine administration as rescue analgesia within 24 hours and the level of postoperative sedation.

Results

The time to first rescue analgesia was significantly shorter in the peri-anal infiltration group versus the caudal block group (median [interquartile range] 10 [7.5-12.5] h versus 16 [13.5-18.5] h, respectively, P = 0.008). The frequency of administration and the total dose of nalbuphine was significantly higher in the peri-anal infiltration group (P = 0.003 and 0.013, respectively). The sedation score was significantly higher in the caudal block group postoperatively.

Conclusion

For paediatric patients undergoing the TERPT procedure, peri-anal infiltration was less effective than caudal block in terms of the duration of postoperative analgesia. However, both techniques were comparable during the first 6 hours postoperatively.

Objective Assessment of Perioperative Anxiety using Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy in Elderly Patients: A Prospective Randomized Observational Pilot Study

Background: Assessing and managing patient anxiety is essential to reduce postoperative complications in elderly patients. However, monitoring patient anxiety objectively is impossible. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between the level of fNIRS signals and anxiety in patients aged 65 and older undergoing artificial joint replacement surgery. Material and Methods: Sixty patients aged ≥65 years scheduled for elective total knee arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia were included. To differentiate the degree of anxiety, the patients were randomly divided into three groups, each consisting of 20 patients (group 1: administered normal saline as a placebo; groups 2 and 3: administered dexmedetomidine at a rate of 0.2 and 0.5 μg/kg/h, respectively, for 10 min). Functional near-infrared spectroscopy was measured continuously for 10 min in each session (session 1: pre-anesthetic period; session 2: immediately after the spinal anesthesia period; session 3: normal saline or dexmedetomidine receiving period) in all patients. Vital signs were measured thrice at 5-min intervals during each session. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory -S (STAI-S) and Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) scores were assessed at the end of each session. Results: The STAI-S score was significantly correlated with power of bandwidth (p = 0.034). In addition, the RSS score was significantly correlated with BW 1, 2, and 3 (p = 0.010, p < 0.001, and p = 0.003, respectively). Conclusion: The STAI-S score and BW 3 were significantly correlated, suggesting that fNIRS might help objectively and directly monitor anxiety levels.

Reno-protective effects of perioperative dexmedetomidine in kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

There is currently no FDA-approved medical therapy for delayed graft function (DGF). Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has multiple reno-protective effects preventing ischemic reperfusion injury, DGF, and acute kidney injury. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the reno-protective effects of perioperative DEX during renal transplantation.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from WOS, SCOPUS, EMBASE, PubMed, and CENTRAL until June 8th, 2022. We used the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and the mean difference for continuous outcomes; both presented with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). We registered our protocol in PROSPERO with ID: CRD42022338898.

RESULTS

We included four RCTs with 339 patients. Pooled risk ratio found no difference between DEX and placebo in reducing DGF (RR: 0.58 with 95% CI [0.34, 1.01], p = 0.05) and acute rejection (RR: 0.88 with 95% CI [0.52, 1.49], p = 0.63). However, DEX improved short-term creatinine on day 1 (MD: - 0.76 with 95% CI [- 1.23, - 0.3], p = 0.001) and day 2 (MD: - 0.28 with 95% CI [- 0.5, - 0.07], p = 0.01); and blood urea nitrogen on day 2 (MD: - 10.16 with 95% CI [- 17.21, - 3.10], p = 0.005) and day 3 (MD: - 6.72 with 95% CI [- 12.85, - 0.58], p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Although there is no difference between DEX and placebo regarding reducing DGF and acute rejection after kidney transplantation, there may be some evidence that it has reno-protective benefits because we found statistically significant improvement in the short-term serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels. More trials are required to investigate the long-term reno-protective effects of DEX.

Dexmedetomidine Preconditioning Attenuates Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Rats by Suppressing Mitophagy Via Activating Α2-Adrenergic Receptor

BACKGROUND

Dexmedetomidine (DEX), a specific α2-adrenergic receptor agonist, is protective against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury (MIRI). However, the association between DEX preconditioning-induced cardioprotection and mitophagy suppression remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

Hence, we aimed to investigate whether DEX preconditioning alleviates MIRI by suppressing mitophagy via α2-adrenergic receptor activation.

METHOD

Sixty isolated rat hearts were treated with or without DEX before inducing ischemia and reperfusion; an α2-adrenergic receptor antagonist, yohimbine (YOH), was also administered before ischemia, alone or with DEX. The heart rate (HR), left ventricular diastolic pressure (LVDP), left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), maximal and minimal rate of left ventricular pressure development (±dp/dtmax), and myocardial infarction size were measured. The mitochondrial ultrastructure and autophagosomes were assessed using transmission electron microscopy. Mitochondrial membrane potential and reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels were measured using JC-1 and dichloride hydrofluorescein diacetate assays, respectively. The expression levels of the mitophagy-associated proteins Beclin1, LC3II/I ratio, p62, PINK1, and Parkin were detected by western blotting.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, in the ischemia/reperfusion group, the HR, LVDP, and ±dp/dtmax were remarkably decreased (p< 0.05), whereas LVEDP and infarct sizes were significantly increased (p< 0.05). DEX preconditioning significantly improved cardiac dysfunction reduced myocardial infarction size, maintained mitochondrial structural integrity, increased mitochondrial membrane potential, inhibited autophagosomes formation, and decreased ROS production and Beclin1, LC3II/I ratio, PINK1, Parkin, and p62 expression(p< 0.05). When DEX and YOH were combined, YOH canceled the effect of DEX, whereas the use of YOH alone had no effect.

CONCLUSION

Therefore, DEX preconditioning was cardioprotective against MIRI in rats by suppressing mitophagy via α2-adrenergic receptor activation.

Low-dose nalmefene pretreatment reduces etomidate-induced myoclonus: A randomized, double-blind controlled trial

BACKGROUND

This study compared the effectiveness of nalmefene and fentanyl in reducing the incidence and severity of etomidate-induced myoclonus.

METHODS

One hundred fifty patients were randomized to receive 0.25ug/kg of nalmefene, 1ug/kg of fentanyl, or the same volume of normal saline 3 minutes prior to etomidate-induced anesthesia. The primary observational indexes were the severity level and incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus, and the secondary observational index included blood pressure, heart rate, and the incidence of adverse effects from anesthesia induction to resuscitation, such as cough, chest wall rigidity, dizziness, nausea, pain after awakening, and intraoperative awareness.

RESULTS

The incidence of myoclonus was significantly lower in the nalmefene group (8.0%) than in the fentanyl group (32.0%) (P = .003) and in the normal saline group (72.0%) (P = .000). The severity level of myoclonus in the nalmefene group was significantly lower than the fentanyl group (P = .001) and normal saline group (P = .000). Meanwhile, the incidences of cough and chest wall rigidity during anesthesia induction were significantly lower in the nalmefene group compared with the fentanyl group (P = .003, P = .027). There were no statistically significant differences in heart rate and mean arterial pressure among the 3 gruops (P > .05). There was no difference in the incidence of adverse effects among the 3 groups during recovery from anesthesia (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Intravenous injection of 0.25ug/kg of nalmefene 3 minutes prior to etomidate is more effective in preventing etomidate-induced myoclonus during general anesthesia than 1ug/kg of fentanyl.

The efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of dexmedetomidine was elusive for septic shock. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock.

METHODS

PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases have been searched through October 2022 and we included randomized controlled trials reporting the effect of dexmedetomidine in patients with septic shock.

RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with control group for septic shock, dexmedetomidine treatment was able to substantially decrease Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (mean difference [MD] = -0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.14 to -0.84; P < .00001) and duration of mechanical ventilation (MD = -0.90; 95% CI = -1.27 to -0.54; P < .00001), but showed no obvious influence on morality at 28 days (odds ratio = 0.79; 95% CI = 0.38 to 1.66; P = 054), hospital mortality (odds ratio = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.35 to 1.24; P = .20) or intensive care unit length of stay (MD = -1.47; 95% CI = -4.60 to 1.66; P = .36).

CONCLUSIONS

Dexmedetomidine administration may help treat patients with septic shock.

Effect of dexmedetomidine on perioperative haemodynamics and early cognitive function in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery

Introduction

Laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery has been widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of gynaecological diseases.

Aim

To investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine on perioperative haemodynamics and cognitive function in elderly gynaecological patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery.

Material and methods

Clinical baseline characteristics, haemodynamic parameters, renin activity, norepinephrine level, cognitive function, pain level, and sedation were compared between the 2 groups.

Results

At T4 (10 min after extubation) and T5 (1 h after extubation), significant differences were found in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate between the 2 groups (p < 0.05); renin activity and norepinephrine level were much lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the control group at T3 (10 min before extubation) and T4 (p < 0.05). One day before surgery, there were no significant differences in Mini-mental state examination (MMSE), visual analogue scale (VAS), and Ramsay scores between the 2 groups (p > 0.05), but the MMSE score 1 day after surgery and the Ramsay score at 12 h after surgery in the dexmedetomidine group were much higher than that in the control group (p < 0.05). Notably, at 2, 4, 12, 24, and 48 h after surgery, the VAS score in the dexmedetomidine group was significantly lower than that in the control group (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Dexmedetomidine has a better clinical effect in improving perioperative haemodynamics and early cognitive function in elderly gynaecological patients who received laparoscopic surgery.

Variant-based heritability assessment of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl clearance in pediatric patients

Despite complex pathways of drug disposition, clinical pharmacogenetic predictors currently rely on only a few high effect variants. Quantification of the polygenic contribution to variability in drug disposition is necessary to prioritize target drugs for pharmacogenomic approaches and guide analytic methods. Dexmedetomidine and fentanyl, often used in postoperative care of pediatric patients, have high rates of inter-individual variability in dosing requirements. Analyzing previously generated population pharmacokinetic parameters, we used Bayesian hierarchical mixed modeling to measure narrow-sense (additive) heritability (h SNP 2 ) of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl clearance in children and identify relative contributions of small, moderate, and large effect-size variants toh SNP 2 . We used genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to identify variants contributing to variation in dexmedetomidine and fentanyl clearance, followed by functional analyses to identify associated pathways. For dexmedetomidine, median clearance was 33.0 L/h (interquartile range [IQR] 23.8-47.9 L/h) andh SNP 2 was estimated to be 0.35 (90% credible interval 0.00-0.90), with 45% ofh SNP 2 attributed to large-, 32% to moderate-, and 23% to small-effect variants. The fentanyl cohort had median clearance of 8.2 L/h (IQR 4.7-16.7 L/h), with estimatedh SNP 2 of 0.30 (90% credible interval 0.00-0.84). Large-effect variants accounted for 30% ofh SNP 2 , whereas moderate- and small-effect variants accounted for 37% and 33%, respectively. As expected, given small sample sizes, no individual variants or pathways were significantly associated with dexmedetomidine or fentanyl clearance by GWAS. We conclude that clearance of both drugs is highly polygenic, motivating the future use of polygenic risk scores to guide appropriate dosing of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl.

Dexmedetomidine as an anesthetic adjunct is associated with reduced complications and cardiac intensive care unit length of stay after heart valve surgery

BACKGROUND

We sought to explore the relationship between dexmedetomidine as an anesthetic adjuvant in cardiac surgery and postoperative complications and length of stay (LOS) in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients aged 18 years and older who underwent heart valve surgery between October 2020 and June 2022. The primary endpoint of the study was major postoperative complications (cardiac arrest, atrial fibrillation, myocardial injury/infarction, heart failure) and the secondary endpoint was prolonged CICU LOS (defined as LOS > 90th percentile). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed for variables that were significant in the univariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 856 patients entered our study. The 283 patients who experienced the primary and secondary endpoints were included in the adverse outcomes group, and the remaining 573 were included in the prognostic control group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age > 60 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-2.31; p < 0.01), cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) > 180 min (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.03-2.55; p = 0.04) and postoperative mechanical ventilation time > 10 h (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.35-2.52; p < 0.01) were independent risk factors for major postoperative complications; Age > 60 years (OR, 3.20; 95% CI, 1.65-6.20; p < 0.01), preoperative NYHA class 4 (OR, 4.03; 95% CI, 1.74-9.33; p < 0.01), diabetes mellitus (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.22-5.41; p = 0.01), Intraoperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion > 650 ml (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.13-3.66; p = 0.02), Intraoperative bleeding > 1200 ml (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.42-5.12; p < 0.01) were independent risk factors for prolonged CICU length of stay. Intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine as an anesthetic adjunct was a protective factor for major complications (odds ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.74; p < 0.01) and prolonged CICU stay. (odds ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.73; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing heart valve surgery, age, duration of cardiopulmonary bypass, and duration of mechanical ventilation are associated with major postoperative complication. Age, preoperative NYHA classification 4, diabetes mellitus, intraoperative bleeding, and RBC transfusion are associated with increased CICU length of stay. Intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine may improve such clinical outcomes.

Anesthetic Management for Awake Craniotomy Applied to Neurosurgery

Our anesthetic technique proposed for awake craniotomy is the monitored anesthesia care (MAC) technique, with the patient in sedation throughout the intervention. Our protocol involves analgo-sedation through the administration of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in a continuous intravenous infusion, allowing the patient to be sedated and in comfort, but contactable and spontaneously breathing. Pre-surgery, the patient is pre-medicated with intramuscular clonidine (2 µg/kg); it acts both as an anxiolytic and as an adjuvant in pain management and improves hemodynamic stability. In the operating setting, dexmedetomidine in infusion and remifentanil in target controlled infusion (TCI) for effect are started. The purpose of the association is to exploit the pharmacodynamics of dexmedetomidine which guarantees the control of respiratory drive, and the pharmacokinetics of remifentanil characterized by insensitivity to the drug. Post-operative management: at the end of the surgical procedure, the infusion of drugs was suspended. Wake-up craniotomy is associated with reduced hospital costs compared to craniotomy performed in general anesthesia, mainly due to reduced costs in the operating room and shorter hospital stays. Greater patient satisfaction and the benefits of avoiding hospital stay have led to the evolution of outpatient intracranial neurosurgery.

Dexmedetomidine: A Sedation Alternative in the Intensive Care Setting

In the last 20 years, the occurrences of drug shortages have increased in frequency as well as duration before returning to the mainstream market. This has prompted intensive care unit nurses and medical staff to seek alternate medication infusion options that provide safe yet effective sedation for patients admitted to intensive care units across the country. Dexmedetomidine (PRECEDEX) emerged in 1999 after the Federal Drug Administration approved it for intensive care use but was quickly embraced by anesthesia providers as it rendered patients undergoing procedures or surgery with adequate analgesia and sedation. Dexmedetomidine (PRECEDEX) continued to maintain patients who required short-term intubation and mechanical ventilation with adequate sedation throughout the entire perioperative period. With patients remaining hemodynamically stable in the initial postoperative period, critical care nurses embraced the use of dexmedetomidine (PRECEDEX) in the intensive care unit setting. As dexmedetomidine (PRECEDEX) gained popularity, it has been used to help manage multiple disease processes such as delirium, agitation, alcoholic withdrawal, and anxiety. Dexmedetomidine (PRECEDEX) has been indicated to be a safer alternative to benzodiazepines, narcotics, or propofol (Diprivan), while providing adequate sedation and allowing patients to maintain hemodynamic stability.

Efficacy of two doses of dexmedetomidine on attenuating cardiovascular response and safety of respiratory tract to extubation

Introduction

Extubation can be associated with an adverse hemodynamic or respiratory response, which may be serious in cardiovascular written or in the elderly. The present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the effect of two different doses of dexmedetomidine in the prevention of extubation complications.

Methods

This randomized clinical trial was conducted in Isfahan in 2020-2021 on 174 patients undergoing elective surgery. Patients were randomly divided into 3 groups receiving dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg (D1), dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg (D2), and normal saline (S). Hemodynamic variables include heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and peripheral blood oxygen saturation (Spo2) was measured and recorded before removing the endotracheal tube and at 1, 3, 5 and 10 minutes after extubation. Also, airway responses to extubation such as cough, hoarseness, and laryngospasm were investigated.

Results

SBP, MAP, and HR in the D1 group were significantly lower than in other groups. In the D2 group, these measurements were lower than the control group at 3, 5, and 10 minutes after extubation (P<0.05 for all). In placebo group, SBP, MAP, and HR increased significantly after extubation (P=0.01). In group D1, cough (P=0.007) and its intensity (P=0.013), nausea and vomiting (P=0.04) and chills (P=0.001) were less than in other groups.

Conclusion

In the D1 group, attenuation of autonomic response to extubation was more than other groups and side effects were less than D2 group, and in both groups, these side effects were less than the saline group.

Comparison of dexmedetomidine with midazolam for third molar surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

The analgesic sedation of dexmedetomidine compared with midazolam for third molar surgery remains controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for third molar surgery.

METHODS

We have searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through December 2022 for randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for third molar surgery. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect model.

RESULTS

Four randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with midazolam for third molar surgery, dexmedetomidine administration leads to comparable oxygen saturation (standard mean difference [SMD] = 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.24 to 0.74; P = .31), heart rate (SMD = -0.37; 95% CI = -1.18 to 0.44; P = .37), SBP (SMD = -0.24; 95% CI = -0.57 to 0.09; P = .16), DBP (SMD = -0.26; 95% CI = -0.60 to 0.07; P = .12), as well as nausea and vomiting (OR = 0.58; 95% CI = 0.05-6.61; P = .66).

CONCLUSIONS

Dexmedetomidine may obtain the comparable sedation efficacy with midazolam for third molar surgery.

Incidence of acute kidney injury after noncardiac surgery in patients receiving intraoperative dexmedetomidine: a retrospective study

Background

Postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication and is associated with increased hospital length of stay and 30 day all-cause mortality. Unfortunately, we have neither a defined strategy to prevent AKI nor an effective treatment. In vitro, animal, and human studies have suggested that dexmedetomidine may have a renoprotective effect. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate if intraoperative dexmedetomidine was associated with a reduced incidence of AKI.

Methods

We collected data from 6625 patients who underwent major non-cardiothoracic cancer surgery. Before and after propensity score matching, we compared the incidence of postoperative AKI in patients who received intraoperative dexmedetomidine and those who did not. AKI was defined according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (creatinine alone values) criteria and calculated for postoperative Days 1, 2, and 3.

Results

Twenty per cent (n=1301) of the patients received dexmedetomidine. The mean [standard deviation] administered dose was 78 [49.4] mcg. Patients treated with dexmedetomidine were matched to those who did not receive the drug. Patients receiving dexmedetomidine had a longer anaesthesia duration than the non-dexmedetomidine group. The incidence of AKI was not significantly different between the groups (dexmedetomidine 8% vs no dexmedetomidine 7%; P=0.333). The 30 day rates of infection, cardiovascular complications, or reoperation attributable to bleeding were higher in patients treated with dexmedetomidine. The 30 day mortality rate was not statistically different between the groups.

Conclusions

The administration of dexmedetomidine during major non-cardiothoracic cancer surgery is not associated with a reduction in AKI within 72 h after surgery.

A Molecular Toolbox of Positron Emission Tomography Tracers for General Anesthesia Mechanism Research

With appropriate radiotracers, positron emission tomography (PET) allows direct or indirect monitoring of the spatial and temporal distribution of anesthetics, neurotransmitters, and biomarkers, making it an indispensable tool for studying the general anesthesia mechanism. In this Perspective, PET tracers that have been recruited in general anesthesia research are introduced in the following order: 1) ¹¹C/¹⁸F-labeled anesthetics, i.e., PET tracers made from inhaled and intravenous anesthetics; 2) PET tracers targeting anesthesia-related receptors, e.g., neurotransmitters and voltage-gated ion channels; and 3) PET tracers for studying anesthesia-related neurophysiological effects and neurotoxicity. The radiosynthesis, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of the above PET tracers are mainly discussed to provide a practical molecular toolbox for radiochemists, anesthesiologists, and those who are interested in general anesthesia.

Dexmedetomidine alleviates propofol-induced pyroptosis of hippocampal neurons through NLRP3 inflammasome pathway

Propofol is neurotoxic to trigger neuronal pyroptosis and dexmedetomidine possesses the ability to suppress proptosis. This study expounded on the protective functions of dexmedetomidine on propofol-induced pyroptosis of primary hippocampal neurons via NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome pathway. At first, primary hippocampal neurons underwent separation and identification and were treated with different concentrations of propofol (1, 10, and 100 μM). The toxicity of propofol in the neurons was evaluated. Prior to propofol treatment, the neurons were treated with different concentrations of dexmedetomidine (0.01, 0.1, 1, 5, and 10 μM). The viability of neurons with different treatments was detected. The mRNA expressions of homeobox A5 (HOXA5) and NLRP3 were identified. The protein levels of intracellular HOXA5, NLRP3, the N-terminal fragment of gasdermin D (GSDMD-N), and cleaved-caspase-1 and the concentrations of interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18 were examined. Subsequently, the binding of HOXA5 to the NLRP3 promoter was detected. Joint experiments were conducted with pcDNA3.1-HOXA5 or pcDNA3.1-NLRP3 in dexmedetomidine-treated neurons. Dexmedetomidine pretreatment attenuated propofol-induced pyroptosis of hippocampal neurons, increased cell viability, and repressed NLRP3, GSDMD-N, and cleaved-caspase-1 protein levels and IL-1β and IL-18 concentrations. Dexmedetomidine pretreatment inhibited intracellular HOXA5 expression, and HOXA5 bound to the NLRP3 promoter region to promote NLRP3 expression. Overexpressing HOXA5 or NLRP3 reversed anti-pyroptosis role of dexmedetomidine pretreatment in hippocampal neurons. Dexmedetomidine pretreatment suppressed NLRP3 expression by downregulating HOXA5 expression, inhibiting propofol-induced pyroptosis in primary hippocampal neurons.

Pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND

Cardiopulmonary bypass can affect the pharmacokinetics of anesthetic agents.

AIMS

We aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine for infants and small children undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass based on population pharmacokinetics.

METHODS

We enrolled 30 pediatric cardiac surgical patients in this study. After anesthetic induction with atropine (0.02 mg/kg), thiopental sodium (5 mg/kg), and fentanyl (2-3 μg/kg), we administered 1 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine for 10 min, followed by administration of 0.5 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine per hour during surgery. At the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass, 1 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine was infused over 5 min. Arterial blood was obtained at predefined time points. A pharmacokinetic model was developed using NONMEM. Theory-based allometric scaling with fixed exponents was applied. Weight, age, post-menstrual age, fat-free mass, whether to implement cardiopulmonary bypass and temperature were explored as covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 376 blood samples were obtained from 29 children (age: 20.3 ± 19.3 months, weight: 9.7 ± 4.1 kg). A two-compartment mammillary model with third compartment associated cardiopulmonary bypass procedure best explained the pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine. The pharmacokinetic parameter estimates (95% CI) standardized to a 70-kg person were as follows: V₁ (L) = 31.6 (17.9-39.5), V₂ (L) = 90.1 (44.0-330), Cl (L/min) = 1.08 (0.70-1.25), Q (L/min) = 2.0 (1.05-3.46). Volume for third compartment associated cardiopulmonary bypass procedure (L) = 39.4 (19.3-50.9). Clearance was not influenced by the presence of cardiopulmonary bypass in this model.

CONCLUSION

When cardiopulmonary bypass is applied, the plasma concentration of dexmedetomidine decreases due to an increase in the volume of distribution, so a loading dose is required to maintain the previous concentration.

Effect of Dexmedetomidine versus Propofol on Intraoperative Seizure Onset During Awake Craniotomy: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

The effect of dexmedetomidine (DEX) compared with propofol on intraoperative seizures (IOSs) detected using electrocorticography during awake craniotomy for resection of brain tumors is unknown. This investigation aimed to compare IOS rate in patients receiving DEX versus propofol as sedative agent.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center study, awake craniotomies performed from January 2014 to December 2019 were analyzed. All IOSs detected by electrocorticography along with vital signs were recorded.

RESULTS

Of 168 adults enrolled in the study, 58 were administered DEX and 110 were administered propofol. IOSs occurred more frequently in the DEX group (22%) versus the propofol group (11%) (P = 0.046). A higher incidence of bradycardia was also observed in the DEX group (P < 0.001). Higher incidence of hypertension and a higher mean heart rate were recorded in the propofol group (P = 0.006 and P < 0.001, respectively). No serious adverse events requiring active drug administration were noted in either group. At univariate regression analysis, DEX demonstrated a tendency to favor IOS onset but without statistical significance (odds ratio = 2.36, P = 0.051). Patients in both groups had a similar epilepsy outcome at the 1-year postoperative follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

IOSs detected with electrocorticography during awake craniotomy occurred more frequently in patients receiving DEX than propofol. However, patients receiving DEX were not shown to be at a statistically significant greater risk for IOS onset. DEX is a valid alternative to propofol during awake craniotomy in patients affected by tumor-related epilepsy.

[Polypharmacy and Delirium in the Elderly]

Polypharmacy and Delirium in the Elderly Abstract: Delirium often occurs in elderly hospitalized patients. Multimorbidity and associated polypharmacy are known risk factors for developing delirium. Moreover, delirium itself often leads to the prescription of additional drugs. This article aims to enlighten the interrelation of delirium and polypharmacy in the context of recent evidence. It also tries to show possibilities of deprescribing.

Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Immunomodulation and Pain Control in Videolaparoscopic Cholecystectomies: A Randomized, Two-Arm, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Aim: Digital and robotic technology applications in laparoscopic surgery have revolutionized routine cholecystectomy. Insufflation of the peritoneal space is vital for its safety but comes at the cost of aseptic ischemia-reperfusion-induced intraabdominal organ compromise before the return of physiologic functions. Dexmedetomidine in general anesthesia promotes controlling the response to trauma by altering the neuroinflammatory reflex. This strategy may improve clinical outcomes in the postoperative period by reducing postoperative narcotic use and lowering the risk of subsequent addiction. In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate dexmedetomidine’s therapeutic and immunomodulatory potential on perioperative organ function. Methods: Fifty-two patients were randomized 1:1: group A—sevoflurane and dexmedetomidine (dexmedetomidine infusion [1 µg/kg loading, 0.2–0.5 µg/kg/h maintenance dose]), and group B—sevoflurane with saline 0.9% infusion as a placebo control. Three blood samples were collected: preoperatively (T0 h), 4–6 h after surgery (T4–6 h), and 24 h postoperatively (T24 h). The primary outcome was the level analysis of inflammatory and endocrine medications. Secondary outcome measures were the time to return to normal preoperative hemodynamic parameters, spontaneous ventilation, and postoperative narcotic requirements to control surgical pain. Results: A reduction of Interleukin 6 was found at 4–6 h after surgery in group A with a mean of 54.76 (27.15–82.37; CI 95%) vs. 97.43 (53.63–141.22); p = 0.0425) in group B patients. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate were lower in group A patients, who also had a statistically significantly lower opioid consumption in the first postoperative hour when compared to group B patients (p < 0.0001). We noticed a similar return to spontaneous ventilation pattern in both groups. Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine decreased interleukin-6 4–6 h after surgery, likely by providing a sympatholytic effect. It provides good perioperative analgesia without respiratory depression. Implementing dexmedetomidine during laparoscopic cholecystectomy has a good safety profile and may lower healthcare expenditure due to faster postoperative recovery.

Correlation between perioperative dexmedetomidine administration and postoperative acute kidney injury in hypertensive patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery

Background: Previous studies have suggested that dexmedetomidine may have a protective effect on renal function. However, it is currently unclear whether perioperative dexmedetomidine administration is associated with postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence risk in hypertensive patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

Methods: This investigation was a retrospective cohort study. Hypertensive patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery in Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from June 2018 to December 2019 were included. The relevant data were extracted through electronic cases. The univariable analysis identified demographic, preoperative laboratory, and intraoperative factors associated with acute kidney injury. Multivariable stepwise logistic regression was used to assess the association between perioperative dexmedetomidine administration and postoperative acute kidney injury after adjusting for interference factors. In addition, we further performed sensitivity analyses in four subgroups to further validate the robustness of the results.

Results: A total of 5769 patients were included in this study, with a 7.66% incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury. The incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury was lower in the dexmedetomidine-administered group than in the control group (4.12% vs. 8.06%, p &lt; 0.001). In the multivariable stepwise logistic regression analysis, perioperative dexmedetomidine administration significantly reduced the risk of postoperative acute kidney injury after adjusting for interference factors [odds ratio (OR) = 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36–0.87, p = 0.010]. In addition, sensitivity analysis in four subgroups indicated parallel findings: i) eGRF &lt;90 mL/min·1.73/m2 subgroup (OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.19–0.84, p = 0.016), ii) intraoperative blood loss &lt;1000 mL subgroup (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.36–0.94, p = 0.025), iii) non-diabetes subgroup (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29–0.89, p = 0.018), and iv) older subgroup (OR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.32–0.93, p = 0.027).

Conclusion: In conclusion, our study suggests that perioperative dexmedetomidine administration is associated with lower risk and less severity of postoperative acute kidney injury in hypertensive individuals undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Therefore, future large-scale RCT studies are necessary to validate this benefit.

In a secondary analysis from a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial Dexmedetomidine blocks cholinergic dysregulation in delirium pathogenesis in patients with major surgery

Dexmedetomidine is an alpha-2 adrenoreceptor agonist with anti-inflammatory and anti-delirogenic properties. Pathogenesis of postoperative delirium (POD) includes cholinergic dysfunction and deregulated inflammatory response to surgical trauma. Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) are discussed as biomarkers for both POD and severity in acute inflammation. To show whether there is a link between blood cholinesterase activities and dexmedetomidine, we performed a secondary analysis of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that recently showed a lower incidence of POD in the dexmedetomidine group. Abdominal or cardiac surgical patients aged ≥ 60 years were randomised to receive dexmedetomidine or placebo intra- and postoperatively in addition to standard general anaesthesia. We analysed the course of perioperative cholinesterase activities of 56 patients, measured preoperatively and twice postoperatively. Dexmedetomidine resulted in no change in AChE activity and caused a rapid recovery of BChE activity after an initial decrease, while placebo showed a significant decrease in both cholinesterase activities. There were no significant between-group differences at any point in time. From these data it can be assumed that dexmedetomidine could alleviate POD via altering the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway (CAIP). We advocate for further investigations to show the direct connection between dexmedetomidine and cholinesterase activity.

Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine for Bronchoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

(1) Background: Anesthetic sedatives are widely used for bronchoscopy, and controversy surrounds the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine compared to other sedatives. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine in bronchoscopy through a systematic review. (2) Methods: PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched for a randomized controlled study of dexmedetomidine (Group D) or other sedative drugs (Group C) for bronchoscopy. Data extraction, quality assessment, and risk of bias analysis were performed in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis requirements. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2. (3) Results: Nine studies were included, with a total of 765 cases. Compared to Group C, the incidence of hypoxemia (OR = 0.40, 95% CI (0.25, 0.64) p = 0.0001, I² = 8%) and tachycardia (OR = 0.44, 95% CI (0.26,0.74), p = 0.002, I² = 14%) were lower, but bradycardia (OR = 3.71, 95% CI (1.84, 7.47), p = 0.0002, I² = 0%) was higher in Group D; no significant difference was observed in other outcome indicators. (4) Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine reduces the incidence of hypoxemia and tachycardia during bronchoscopy but is more likely to provoke bradycardia.

The role of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant for high-thoracic erector spinae plane block for analgesia in shoulder arthroscopy; a randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Management of postoperative pain after shoulder arthroscopy is an important issue. Dexmedetomidine, as an adjuvant, improves nerve block efficacy and decreases postoperative consumption of opioids. As a result, we designed this study to determine if adding dexmedetomidine to an erector spinae plane block (ESPB) that is guided by ultrasound (US) is beneficial for treating immediate postoperative pain following shoulder arthroscopy.

METHODS

This randomized controlled double-blind trial recruited 60 cases 18-65 years old of both sexes, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II, scheduled for elective shoulder arthroscopy. Random allocation of 60 cases was done equally into two groups according to the solution injected in US-guided ESPB at T2 before general anesthetic induction. Group (ESPB): 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine. Group (ESPB + DEX): 19 ml bupivacaine 0.25% + 1 mL dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg/kg. The primary outcome was The total rescue morphine consumption in the first 24 postoperative hours.

RESULTS

The mean intraoperative fentanyl consumption was significantly lower in the group (ESPB + DEX) compared to the group (ESPB) (82.86 ± 13.57 versus 100.74 ± 35.07, respectively, P = 0.015). The median (IQR) time of the 1^st rescue analgesic request was significantly delayed in the group (ESPB + DEX) compared to group (ESPB) [18.5 (18.25-18.75) versus 12 (12-15.75), P = 0.044]. The number of cases that required morphine was significantly lower in the group (ESPB + DEX) than in the group (ESPB) (P = 0.012). The median (IQR) of total postoperative morphine consumption in 1^st 24 h was significantly lower in the group (ESPB + DEX) compared to the group (ESPB) [0 (0-0) versus 0 (0-3), P = 0.021].

CONCLUSION

The dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in ESPB produced adequate analgesia by reducing the intraoperative and postoperative opioid requirements in shoulder arthroscopy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05165836; principal investigator: Mohammad Fouad Algyar; registration date: 21/12/ 2021).

Effects of Low versus Intermediate Doses of Dexmedetomidine Infusion on Blood Loss, Hemodynamics, and Operative Time in Transsphenoidal Pituitary Tumor Removal: A Prospective Randomized Study

Background Dexmedetomidine, an alpha-2 agonist, has been widely used as an anesthetic adjunct for transsphenoidal pituitary resection. However, there is no consensus on the appropriate infusion dosage. This study aimed to compare the effects of low (0.2 mcg/kg/h) and intermediate (0.5 mcg/kg/h) dexmedetomidine infusions during anesthetic maintenance on blood loss, hemodynamics, and operating time.

Methods A randomized controlled trial involving two centers was conducted. Between December 2015 and November 2019, 80 patients (40 in each group) who underwent elective transsphenoidal pituitary tumor resection were recruited. Dexmedetomidine was administered to group I at a loading dose of 0.5 mcg/kg, followed by 0.2 mcg/kg/h, and to group II at the same loading dose, followed by 0.5 mcg/kg/h. Comparative analyses were performed using the Student's t-test, repeated-measures analysis of variance, and Mann–Whitney U test; p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results Eighty patients were analyzed. Patient demographics were comparable. The difference in intraoperative blood loss between both groups (320 [220–525] vs. 250 [100-487] mL, p = 0.070) was not statistically significant. There were no differences in blood pressure or heart rate between the groups. In group II, the procedure took significantly less time (179 vs. 142 minutes, p = 0.018), with more episodes of transient hypotension (p = 0.034).

Conclusion When maintaining anesthesia for transsphenoidal pituitary resection, dexmedetomidine infusions of 0.2 and 0.5 mcg/kg/h showed the same effect on blood loss and hemodynamics; however, significantly more episodes of transient hypotension and shorter operating times were noted with the latter.

Effect of real-time binaural music on sedation with dexmedetomidine during spinal anesthesia: A triple-arm, assessor-blind, randomized controlled trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Binaural audio induces sedation and reduces pain and anxiety in surgical patients. This study tested the hypothesis that dexmedetomidine requirement for adequate sedation during spinal anesthesia would be lower in patients listening to music with binaural sound than that in patients listening to plain or no music.

DESIGN

A triple-arm, assessor-blind, randomized controlled study.

SETTING

Operating room.

PATIENTS

One hundred and eighty-nine patients undergoing orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to music with binaural sound, plain music, or no music groups. Dexmedetomidine was infused for sedation during surgery. The loading infusion rate was 6 μg/kg predicted body weight (PBW)/h, followed by continuous infusion at 0.6 μg/kg PBW/hr. Loading was stopped after achieving adequate sedation, defined as the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scale score of 3. Infusion rate was adjusted every 30 min per the OAA/S scale.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary outcomes were the difference in the dexmedetomidine loading dose adjusted for the patient's PBW between (1) the binaural and plain music groups and (2) the binaural and control groups. Secondary outcomes were the total dose and total loading time of dexmedetomidine; Patient State Index; relative powers of the alpha, theta, and delta bands; recovery from sedation; and patient satisfaction score.

MAIN RESULTS

The final analyses included 184 patients. The PBW-adjusted dexmedetomidine loading dose was significantly lower in patients listening to music with binaural sound (1.15 ± 0.30 μg/kg PBW) than that in patients without music (1.33 ± 0.33 μg/kg PBW; mean difference, 0.18 μg/kg PBW; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06 to 0.29; P = 0.002). However, the difference was not statistically significant when compared with the plain music group (1.26 ± 0.36 μg/kg PBW; mean difference, 0.11 μg/kg PBW; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.23; P = 0.070). Dexmedetomidine total dose, recovery from sedation, and patient satisfaction score showed no difference among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with no music, music with binaural sound reduced the dexmedetomidine loading dose; however, this sedative-sparing effect of binaural sound was not found when compared to plain music.

Asystole in 2 Pediatric Patients During Dexmedetomidine Infusion

INTRODUCTION

Bradycardia is a known side effect of dexmedetomidine. Reports of sinus pauses or asystole, however, are rare. We present 2 cases of pediatric patients who developed asystole on a dexmedetomidine infusion.

SUMMARY OF CASES

An 8-week-old male with RSV bronchiolitis and acute hypoxemic respiratory failure was started on dexmedetomidine for sedation at 0.2 mcg/kg/h with a maximum dose of 0.7mcg/kg/h. On Hospital day (HD) 4, on dexmedetomidine at 0.7 mcg/kg/h, he developed intermittent episodes of bradycardia with heart rates in the 60 s. Echocardiogram on HD 6 showed normal function. On HD 7, he began having periods of asystole lasting up to 6 seconds. Dexmedetomidine was discontinued, with the resolution of episodes of asystole after 6 hours. A 27-month-old male with a congenital left diaphragmatic hernia and pulmonary hypertension who had been weaned off sildenafil 6 months earlier underwent re-repair of left diaphragmatic hernia. Postoperatively he remained intubated and paralyzed. Dexmedetomidine was started at 0.3 mcg/kg/h for sedation, with a maximum dose of 1.2 mcg/kg/h. An echocardiogram on HD 3 showed good function with mild to moderate pulmonary hypertension. That evening, with dexmedetomidine at 1.1 mcg/kg/h, he developed a 15 second period of asystole requiring CPR. Dexmedetomidine was discontinued, and he was started on a midazolam infusion with no further episodes.

DISCUSSION

Both cases occurred in patients without cardiac conduction defects or on negative chronotropic or sympatholytic medications that have been associated with dexmedetomidine-induced asystole. We hypothesize that both episodes of asystole were due to increased patient-related vagal tone exacerbated by dexmedetomidine.

Clinical effects of remimazolam alone or in combination with dexmedetomidine in patients receiving bronchoscopy and influences on postoperative cognitive function: a randomized-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam and dexmedetomidine are commonly used as sedatives. However, the effects and safety of remimazolam alone or in combination with dexmedetomidine have not been investigated.

AIM

We sought to investigate the clinical effects of remimazolam alone or in combination with dexmedetomidine in bronchoscopy, and their influence on cognitive function.

METHOD

Ninety eligible patients who underwent bronchoscopy under intravenous anesthesia were randomly divided into three groups: propofol control, remimazolam, and remimazolam plus dexmedetomidine. The primary outcome was the incidence of perioperative hypoxemia. Secondary outcomes included induction and maintenance doses of remimazolam, hemodynamic variables, scores for modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S), coughing, limb movement, incidence of adverse events, patient satisfaction, bronchoscopist satisfaction, incidence of post-operative cognitive dysfunction (POCD), time to loss of consciousness (LoC), and time to awake.

RESULTS

The incidence of hypoxemia, hypotension, and bronchoscopist satisfaction score were significantly decreased, and time to LoC and time to awake were markedly longer in the remimazolam and remimazolam plus dexmedetomidine groups than in the propofol control group (p < 0.05). The remimazolam group had significantly decreased induction and maintenance doses of remimazolam and a shorter time to LoC than the remimazolam plus dexmedetomidine group (p < 0.05). Scores for coughing, limb movement, MOAA/S, and post-operative patient satisfaction were comparable among the three groups. POCD was not induced in any of the groups.

CONCLUSION

Remimazolam is safe and effective for painless bronchoscopy, with a low incidence of adverse reactions, and exhibits a good synergistic effect with dexmedetomidine.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial protocol had been registered on Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000041435, date: 2020 12 26.

Intraoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine for prevention of postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing craniotomy: a protocol of randomised clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common surgical complication. The incidence is 19% in neurological procedures, and advanced age is a risk factor for neurological procedures. Many studies have shown that dexmedetomidine (DEX) reduced the incidence of delirium after non-cardiac surgery in elderly patients. However, there are few studies focus on the effect of DEX on POD in elderly patients undergoing neurosurgery.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a randomised, double-blinded, paralleled-group and controlled trial. Patients older than 65 years and scheduled for elective craniotomy will be randomly assigned to the DEX group and the control group. After endotracheal intubation, patients in the DEX group will be administered with continuous DEX infusion at rate of 0.4 µg/kg/hour until the surgical haemostasis. In the control group, patients will receive the identical volume of normal saline in the same setting. The primary outcome is the incidence of POD during the first 5 days. Delirium will be evaluated through a combination of three methods, including the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS), the confusion assessment method for ICU (CAM-ICU) and the 3 min diagnostic interview for CAM (3D-CAM). The RASS, CAM-ICU and 3D-CAM will be evaluated two times per day (08:00-10:00 and 18:00-20:00 hours) during the first postoperative 5 days. Secondary outcomes include pain severity score, quality of recovery, quality of sleep, cognitive function, psychological health state, intraoperative data, physiological status, length of stay in ICU and hospital, hospitalisation costs, non-delirium complications, and 30-day all-cause mortality.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The protocol (V.4.0) has been approved by the medical ethics committee of Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University (KY2021-194-03). The findings of the study will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and at a scientific conference.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05168280.

General anaesthesia for photodynamic therapy of port-wine stain in children: A retrospective study

AIMS

This report intended to assess the safety and efficiency of general anaesthesia with preserved spontaneous breathing for pain management in photodynamic therapy (PDT) of port-wine stains (PWS) in paediatric patients.

METHODS

This study included 1960 Hemoporfin PDT procedures performed under general anaesthesia on 560 PWS patients. Medical records were retrospectively analysed. All of the procedures performed under general anaesthesia with preserved spontaneous breathing.

RESULTS

The patients comprised males (43.93%) and females (56.07%). Ninety percent of cases were ASA class I, and 10% were class II, no case was class III or higher. Adverse events accompanying general anaesthesia included postoperative irritability (8.98%), carbon dioxide pressure (PCO₂) >50 mmHg (15.97%), movement during surgery (6.98%), vomiting (0.2%), laryngospasm (0.2%), unplanned endotracheal intubation (0.05%), upper airway obstruction (0.05%), and hypoxia (0.1%). The FLACC score was <4 points in 84% of cases and 4∼6 points in 16% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

General anaesthesia with preserved spontaneous breathing has few complications and appears safe and feasible for PDT in most children with PWS.

Dexmedetomidine (Dex) exerts protective effects on rat neuronal cells injured by cerebral ischemia/reperfusion via regulating the Sphk1/S1P signaling pathway

AIM

To investigate the influence of dexmedetomidine (Dex) on cerebral ischemia/reperfusion (I/R)-injured rat neuronal cells by regulating the Sphk1/S1P pathway.

METHODS

The rats were divided into the following groups, with 18 rats in each group categorized on the basis of random number tables: sham (Sham), I/R (I/R), Dex, Sphk1 inhibitor (PF-543), and Dex together with the Sphk1 agonist phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (Dex+PMA). The neurological functions of the rats were assessed by the Longa scoring system at 24 h post reperfusion. The area of brain infarction was inspected using 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining, and the water content of brain tissue was determined by the dry-wet weight method. The morphology of neurons in the CA1 region of the rat hippocampus was inspected using Nissl staining, while the apoptosis of neurons in this region was detected by terminal-deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated nick end labeling staining. The Sphk1 and S1P protein levels were determined by immunofluorescence and western blotting, respectively.

RESULTS

Compared to the I/R group, rats in the Dex, PF-543, and Dex+PMA groups had a significantly lower neurological function score, as well as lower brain water content and a decreased infarction area. Moreover, the apoptotic index of the neurons and the Sphk1 and S1P levels in the hippocampal CA1 region were significantly lower in these groups (p<0.05). PMA, an agonist of Sphk1, was able to reverse the protective effects of Dex on I/R-induced neuronal cell injury.

CONCLUSION

Dex could protect cerebral I/R-induced neuronal cell injury by suppressing the Sphk1/S1P signaling pathway.

Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil for controlled hypotension under general anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This meta-analysis aimed to analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine applied respectively for controlled hypotension under general anesthesia. We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, SinoMed, Wanfang, and VIP databases, as well as dissertations and conference papers, to obtain randomized controlled trials comparing remifentanil and dexmedetomidine applied respectively for controlled hypotension before August 23, 2021. The primary outcomes included hemodynamic profiles, surgical field score, and blood loss. Extubation time, sedation and pain score at the PACU, and perioperative adverse events were the secondary outcomes. Nine randomized controlled trials with 543 patients (272 in the dexmedetomidine group and 271 in the remifentanil group) were eventually included. This meta-analysis indicated no significant difference between dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in terms of surgical field score, blood loss, minimum values of mean arterial pressure (MD 0.24 with 95% CI [-1.65, 2.13], P = 0.80, I2 = 66%) and heart rate (MD 0.42 [-1.33, 2.17], P = 0.64, I2 = 40%), sedation scores at the PACU (MD -0.09 [-0.69, 0.50], P = 0.76, I2 = 92%), and incidence of bradycardia (OR 2.24 [0.70, 7.15], P = 0.17, I2 = 0%). Compared with remifentanil, dexmedetomidine as the controlled hypotensive agent showed a lower visual analogue score at the PACU (MD -1.01 [-1.25, -0.77], P<0.00001, I2 = 0%) and incidence of shivering (OR 0.22 [0.08, 0.60], P = 0.003, I2 = 0%), nausea, and vomiting (OR 0.34 [0.13, 0.89], P = 0.03, I2 = 0%). However, extubation time was shorter in the remifentanil group (MD 3.34 [0.75, 5.93], P = 0.01, I2 = 90%). In conclusion, dexmedetomidine and remifentanil are both effective in providing satisfactory controlled hypotension and surgical conditions. Dexmedetomidine is better in easing postoperative pain at the PACU and reducing the occurrence of shivering, nausea, and vomiting. Meanwhile, remifentanil is a fast-track anesthesia with a shorter extubation time. Given the limitations of this meta-analysis, further studies are needed for a more definitive comparison of the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil.

The α2 Adrenoceptor Agonist and Sedative/Anaesthetic Dexmedetomidine Excites Diverse Neuronal Types in the Ventrolateral Preoptic Area of Male Mice

SUMMARY STATEMENT

Dexmedetomidine is an important ICU sedative. The mechanism of dexmedetomidine is not fully understood. Activating NA(-) and NA(+) neurons in the VLPO by dexmedetomidine using polysomnography and electrophysiological recording, this may explain the unique sedative properties with rapid arousal.

Determination of the effective dose of dexmedetomidine to achieve loss of consciousness during anesthesia induction

Background

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a sedative with greater preservation of cognitive function, reduced respiratory depression, and improved patient arousability. This study was designed to investigate the performance of DEX during anesthesia induction and to establish an effective DEX induction strategy, which could be valuable for multiple clinical conditions.

Methods

Patients undergoing abdominal surgery were involved in this dose-finding trial. Dixon's up-and-down sequential method was employed to determine the effective dose of DEX to achieve the state of "loss of consciousness", and an effective induction strategy was established with continuous infusion of DEX and remifentanil. The effects of DEX on hemodynamics, respiratory state, EEG, and anesthetic depth were monitored and analyzed.

Results

Through the strategy mentioned, the depth of surgical anesthesia was successfully achieved by DEX-led anesthesia induction. The ED50 and ED95 of the initial infusion rate of DEX were 0.115 and 0.200 μg/kg/min, respectively, and the mean induction time was 18.3 min. The ED50 and ED95 of DEX to achieve the state of "loss of consciousness" were 2.899 (95% CI: 2.703-3.115) and 5.001 (95% CI: 4.544-5.700) μg/kg, respectively. The mean PSI on the loss of consciousness was 42.8 among the patients. During anesthesia induction, the hemodynamics including BP and HR were stable, and the EEG monitor showed decreased α and β powers and increased θ and δ in the frontal and pre-frontal cortices of the brain.

Conclusion

This study indicated that continuous infusion of combined DEX and remifentanil could be an effective strategy for anesthesia induction. The EEG during the induction was similar to the physiological sleep process.

Dexmedetomidine protects against Ropivacaine-induced neuronal pyroptosis via the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has been demonstrated to protect against ropivacaine (Ropi)-induced neuronal damages. This study was conducted to explore the protective role of DEX in Ropi-induced neuronal pyroptosis and provide a strategy to eliminate Ropi-induced neurotoxicity. The impacts of different concentrations of Ropi and DEX on neurotoxicity in SK-N-SH cells were evaluated by cell counting kit-8 assay and lactic dehydrogenase assay kits. Levels of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1), NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3), cleaved Caspase-1, cleaved N-terminal gasdermin D, interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-18 were measured by real-time quantitative PCR, Western blotting, and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. The Nrf2 level after nuclear/cytoplasmic separation was quantified. SK-N-SH cells were treated with si-Nrf2, Nigericin (NLRP3 activator), and Zinc Protoporphyrin (HO-1 inhibitor) to validate the mechanism. Ropi reduced SK-N-SH cell viability in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. DEX treatment alleviated Ropi-induced toxicity and inhibited pyroptosis. Ropi increased the expression levels of Nrf2 and HO-1, and DEX further enhanced the increases and promoted Nrf2 nuclear translocation. Nrf2/HO-1 inhibition or NLRP3 activation both neutralized the inhibitory role of DEX in Ropi-induced pyroptosis of SK-N-SH cells. Overall, DEX promoted the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway to inhibit NLRP3 expression, thus alleviating Ropi-induced neuronal pyroptosis.

Efficacy of dexmedetomidine as adjuvant to bupivacaine in femoral-sciatic nerve blocks in dogs undergoing tibial plateau levelling osteotomy (TPLO)

The aim of this randomized, prospective clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine combined with bupivacaine on sciatic and femoral nerve blocks in dogs. Thirty dogs were selected for elective unilateral tibial plateau levelling osteotomy, and each subject was assigned randomly to receive perineural bupivacaine 0.5% (0.1 mL/kg) and intramuscular dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg/kg) in the BDs group, perineural bupivacaine 0.5% (0.1 mL/kg) plus dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg/kg) in the BDloc group, and perineural bupivacaine 0.5% (0.1 mL/kg) plus intramuscular administration of saline solution the in Bupi group. Nerve blocks were guided by electrolocation. The main intraoperative parameters were registered 10 min before the start of surgery (BASE) and during the skin incision (SKIN), the osteotomy (BONE) and the suture (SUTURE). At 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 15, 20 and 24 h after blocks, the Glasgow Composite Pain scale (GPCs) was used to identify the degree of pain during the postoperative period. Patients with scores ≥5/20 received rescue analgesia and were excluded. Furthermore, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, footstep capacity, reaction to wound touch and femoral and sciatic skin sensitivity were registered. Parametric data were compared at each time point of the study with the one-way ANOVA for repeated measures and Fisher's test for yes/no variables analysis (p < 0.05). No subject required intraoperative rescue analgesia. In BDloc group, the GCPs score was <5/20 for all dogs at all times of the study, and 70% of dogs did not need systemic analgesia. In the Bupi and BDs groups, 100% of subjects achieved a score ≥ 5/20 between 8 and 10 h after the blocks, and 100% of subjects showed femoral and sciatic skin sensitivity and required rescue analgesia within 10 h. Our results showed that the addition of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in SF blocks may prolong the sensory block and ensure sufficient analgesia for up to 24 h in dogs undergoing TPLO surgery.

Comparative Study of the Effect of Two Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine to Prevent Emergence Agitation in Tonsillectomy in Children Aged 2 to 12 Years Old

Background

Emergence agitation (EA) is one of the complications following anesthesia in pediatric surgery. Various drugs are used to prevent this complication, and one of them is dexmedetomidine. Choosing the right dose of this drug for the best efficiency is an important issue due to this complication.The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the prophylactic effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine in different doses in preventing EA after tonsillectomy in children.

Materials and Methods

Our study was a double-blind clinical trial performed on 75 children ASAI, II candidates for tonsillectomy. Patients were divided into three groups. The group 1 received a dose of 0.6 μg/kg per hour and group 2 received a dose of 0.3 μg/kg per hour and group 3 was the control group. Then vital signs and observational pain score (OPS) and pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium (PAEDS) criteria were measured in patients. The collected data were analyzed by using SPSS software version 23 and non-parametric tests such as Friedman, Mann-Whitney.

Results

According to the data analysis, mean blood pressure, mean heart rate, OPS and PAEDS score in group 1 were lower than other groups. Also, the average time of staying in recovery and extubation in group 1 was less than other groups.

Conclusion

A dose of 0.6 μg/kg dexmedetomidine has a better effect on reducing EA (emergence agitation) after pediatric tonsillectomy.

Dexmedetomidine premedication increases preoperative sedation and inhibits stress induced by tracheal intubation in adult: a prospective randomized double-blind clinical study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this prospective randomized double-blind study is to evaluate whether oral dexmedetomidine (DEX) premedication could increase sedation in order to reduce preoperative anxiety and inhibit stress response during general anesthesia tracheal intubation.

MATERIALS

A total of 100 ASA I and II adult patients undergoing elective neurosurgery were randomly divided into the control group (C group, n = 50) and the oral DEX premedication (DEX group, n = 50). Patients were administrated 4 μg/kg dexmedetomidine orally pre-anesthesia 120 min. Hemodynamic variables were monitored and recorded from premedication to 10 min after tracheal intubation. The primary outcome, the sedation level of all participants, was evaluated by Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS), and Numerical Rating Scale was to measure their intensity of thirst and satisfaction of patients' family members. During general anesthesia induction, the total dosage of induction anesthetics and complications relative to anesthesia induction were recorded. After tracheal intubation, blood sample was drain from radial atrial line to measure levels of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and cortisol.

RESULTS

RASS scores at 60 min after premedication and on arrival in the operating room were significantly reduced in the DEX group (P < 0.001). Oral DEX premedication not only increased the intensity of thirst but also the satisfaction of their family members (P < 0.001). The cortisol level after tracheal intubation was deduced by oral DEX premedication (P < 0.05). Oral DEX premedication reduced heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) on arrival in the operating room, and HR when tracheal intubation (P < 0.05). During the whole process of anesthesia induction, although the lowest MAP in two groups were not significantly different, the lowest HR was significantly lower in the DEX group (P < 0.05). Oral DEX premedication might reduce HR from premedication to 10 min after tracheal intubation. However MAP was reduced just from premedication to on arrival in the operating room. Total induction dosages of propofol, midazolam, sulfentanil and rocuronium were similar in two groups (P > 0.05), as well as the complications relative to anesthesia induction and cases of rescue dopamine therapy were similar (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Oral DEX 4 μg/kg premedication was an efficient intervention to increase preoperative sedation and reduce stress reaction induced by general anesthesia tracheal intubation, but also it was with the stable hemodynamic during the process of general anesthesia tracheal intubation, and improved the satisfaction of patients' family members. In this study, the sparing-anesthetic effect of 4 μg/kg DEX oral premedication was not significant, and this would be needed to study in future.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trail was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( https://www.chictr.org.cn , Jie Gao) on 15/04/2021, registration number was ChiCTR2100045458.

Opioid sparing effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine in orthopaedic surgery: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective alpha-2 receptor agonist without any effect on the GABA receptor. It provides an excellent sedative and analgesic profile with few side effects. We report our experience with dexmedetomidine use during orthopaedic surgery under locoregional anaesthesia to ensure adequate sedation and optimal postoperative pain control.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we included 128 patients who underwent orthopaedic surgery between January 2019 and December 2021. All patients received the same local anaesthetic dose of 20 ml of ropivacaine 0.375% + mepivacaine 0.5% for axillary and supraclavicular block and 35 ml of ropivacaine 0.375% + mepivacaine 0.5% for triple nerve block (femoral, obturator and sciatic nerve). The cohort was divided into two groups based on sedation drugs used during surgery (dexmedetomidine, or group D, vs midazolam, or group M). All patients received postoperative 24-h analgesia consisting of 60 mg of ketorolac, 200 mg of tramadol and 4 mg of ondansetron. The primary outcome measured how many patients in the two groups required an analgesic rescue dose of pethidine and the time to first pethidine administration. To reduce confounding, we included patients in two groups with non-statistically different demo-anamnestic parameters and who received the same dose of intraoperative local anaesthetic and postoperative analgesia.

RESULTS

The number of patients in group D who did not require a rescue dose of analgesia was significantly greater than in group M (49 vs 11, p < 0.001). Time-to-first postoperative opioid administration did not show a fundamental difference between the two groups under examination (523.75 ± 131.55 min vs 564 ± 117.84 min). Total opioid consumption was higher in the M group than in the D group (3529.8 ± 30.36 μg vs 1864.8 ± 31.59 μg, p 0.075), with a mean opioid consumption significantly higher in the M group than in the D group (26.26 ± 42.8 μg vs 69.21 ± 46.1 μg, p < 0.001): D group received 62.06% less opioid than M group.

CONCLUSIONS

The continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine during orthopaedic surgery performed under locoregional anaesthesia has been shown to increase the analgesic effect of local anaesthetics and reduce the consumption of major opioids in the postoperative period. Dexmedetomidine offers a unique ability to supply sedation and analgesia without respiratory depression, having a wide safety margin and an excellent sedative capacity. It does not increase the rate of postoperative complications.

Effect of dexmedetomidine-assisted ultrasound-guided lower extremity nerve block on postoperative cognitive function in elderly patients undergoing hip surgery

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine (Dex)-assisted ultrasound-guided lower extremity nerve block on elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed data of 60 elderly patients treated with unilateral artificial THA from January 2021 to February 2022. Among them, 30 patients anesthetized using Dex-assisted ultrasound-guided lower extremity nerve block were regarded as the research group (RG), and 30 patients anesthetized with the use of subarachnoid block were considered as the control group (CG). Serum interleukin 6 (IL-6) and interleukin 1β (IL-1β) levels were measured by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (Elisa) in patients. Also, the heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured before, 10 min and 60 min after the anesthesia. The cognitive function was evaluated before anesthesia, as well as 2 h, 6 h and 36 h after anesthesia. The adverse reactions during hospitalization were recorded, and the incidence of adverse reactions was calculated.

RESULTS

IL-1β and IL-6 levels in both groups after operation were higher than those before operation (P>0.05), but those in the RG were lower than those in the CG (P<0.05). The HR and MAP at 10 min after anesthesia were lower than those before anesthesia (P<0.05). After anesthesia, the HR and MAP at 60 min in the RG were higher than those at 10 min in the CG, while the two in the RG were lower than those in the CG at 60 min (P<0.05). In addition, the postoperative pain score of the RG was lower than that of the CG, while the cognitive score of the RG was higher than that of the CG (P<0.05). There was no marked difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Dex-assisted ultrasound-guided lower extremity nerve block can effectively inhibit the postoperative inflammation, improve the cognitive function, and benefit the postoperative rehabilitation in elderly patients undergoing THA.

Remifentanil combined with dexmedetomidine on the analgesic effect of breast cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy and the influence of perioperative T lymphocyte subsets

OBJECTIVE

To study the analgesic effect of breast cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy (MRM) and the influence of perioperative T lymphocyte subsets by remifentanil combined with dexmedetomidine.

METHODS

80 breast patients were divided into control group and research group based on the anesthesia protocol. Patients in control group was given remifentanil for anesthesia induction and maintenance, and patients in research group was given remifentanil and dexmedetomidine for anesthesia induction and maintenance. We compared the anesthesia time, operation time, surgical blood loss, postoperative wake-up time, extubation time, incidence of adverse reactions, VAS score and T lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood in the two groups of patients.

RESULTS

The baseline data including age, height, weight and BMI, ASA classification, stage of breast cancer, frequency of neoadjuvant therapy, and surgical characteristics including anesthesia time, operation time and bleeding volume all have no significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05). Compared to control group, the time of wake up and extubation in patients of research group were all significantly decreased (P < 0.05), and significantly decreased MBP and HR after loading dose of dexmedetomidine in research group (P < 0.05). The VAS scores of patients at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 h after surgery in the research group are all significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Before induction of anesthesia, there was no significant difference in the ratio of CD4+, CD8+ and CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes in peripheral blood between the two groups (P > 0.05). At 1 h during operation and 24 h after operation, the ratio of CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ cells in the research group was significantly higher than these of the control group (P < 0.05), while the ratio of CD8+ cells was lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For breast cancer patients undergoing MRM, the use of remifentanil combined with dexmedetomidine can enhance postoperative analgesia and reduce postoperative immunosuppression.

The effects of dexmedetomidine for patient-controlled analgesia on postoperative sleep quality and gastrointestinal motility function after surgery: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, and controlled trial

Background: Postoperative poor sleep quality and decreased gastrointestinal motility function are common clinical problems. This study investigated the effects of dexmedetomidine (DEX) combined with sufentanil for patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) on postoperative sleep quality and gastrointestinal motility function after surgery in patients with colorectal cancer.

Methods: Patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery were randomly divided into three groups, DEX 0, 200, or 400 μg, each combined with sufentanil 150 μg for PCA immediately after surgery. The primary outcome was sleep quality in the first 7 days after surgery based on the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) score. The secondary outcome was postoperative gastrointestinal motility recovery evaluated by the time of first flatus, first feces and first diet. Postoperative pain intensity, side effects and the length of postoperative hospital stay were also compared among groups. The study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (https://www.chictr.org.cn/enIndex.aspx, ChiCTR2000032601).

Results: Ultimately, 210 cases were included. Sleep quality was better in the DEX 200 μg group and DEX 400 μg group than in the DEX 0 μg group. Overall, in the DEX 200 μg group and DEX 400 μg group, the AIS score (p < 0.05) and the incidence of sleep disturbance (7.3%, 4.5% vs. 19.6%, p < 0.001) were lower than those in the DEX 0 μg group in the first 7 days after surgery. There were no significant differences in postoperative gastrointestinal motility among the three groups in the total surgical categories (p > 0.05). In the laparoscopic surgery patients of each group, the time of postoperative first flatus (p = 0.02) and first feces (p = 0.01) was significantly longer in the DEX 400 μg group than in the DEX 0 μg group. There were no differences in postoperative pain intensity, side effects or length of postoperative hospital stay (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The continuous infusion of DEX (200 or 400 μg) for PCA significantly improved postoperative sleep quality after colorectal cancer surgery. DEX (200 μg) was better at improving postoperative sleep quality without affecting gastrointestinal motility function than DEX (400 μg) in patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

The signaling and selectivity of α-adrenoceptor agonists for the human α2A, α2B and α2C-adrenoceptors and comparison with human α1 and β-adrenoceptors

α2-adrenoceptors, (α2A, α2B and α2C-subtypes), are Gi-coupled receptors. Central activation of brain α2A and α2C-adrenoceptors is the main site for α2-agonist mediated clinical responses in hypertension, ADHD, muscle spasm and ITU management of sedation, reduction in opiate requirements, nausea and delirium. However, despite having the same Gi-potency in functional assays, some α2-agonists also stimulate Gs-responses whilst others do not. This was investigated. Agonist responses to 49 different α-agonists were studied (CRE-gene transcription, cAMP, ERK1/2-phosphorylation and binding affinity) in CHO cells stably expressing the human α2A, α2B or α2C-adrenoceptor, enabling ligand intrinsic efficacy to be determined (binding KD /Gi-IC50 ). Ligands with high intrinsic efficacy (e.g., brimonidine and moxonidine at α2A) stimulated biphasic (Gi-Gs) concentration responses, however for ligands with low intrinsic efficacy (e.g., naphazoline), responses were monophasic (Gi-only). ERK1/2-phosphorylation responses appeared to be Gi-mediated. For Gs-mediated responses to be observed, both a system with high receptor reserve and high agonist intrinsic efficacy were required. From the Gi-mediated efficacy ratio, the degree of Gs-coupling could be predicted. The clinical relevance and precise receptor conformational changes that occur, given the structural diversity of compounds with high intrinsic efficacy, remains to be determined. Comparison with α1 and β1/β2-adrenoceptors demonstrated subclass affinity selectivity for some compounds (e.g., α2:dexmedetomidine, α1:A61603) whilst e.g., oxymetazoline had high affinity for both α2A and α1A-subtypes, compared to all others. Some compounds had subclass selectivity due to selective intrinsic efficacy (e.g., α2:brimonidine, α1:methoxamine/etilefrine). A detailed knowledge of these agonist characteristics is vital for improving computer-based deep-learning and drug design.