Proposed Diagnostic Algorithm for Patients with Suspected Mast Cell Activation Syndrome

Clinical Impact of Inherited and Acquired Genetic Variants in Mastocytosis

Mastocytosis is a rare and complex disease characterized by expansion of clonal mast cells (MC) in skin and/or various internal organ systems. Involvement of internal organs leads to the diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis (SM). The WHO classification divides SM into indolent SM, smoldering SM and advanced SM variants, including SM with an associated hematologic neoplasm, aggressive SM, and MC leukemia. Historically, genetic analysis of individuals with pure cutaneous mastocytosis (CM) and SM have focused primarily on cohort studies of inherited single nucleotide variants and acquired pathogenic variants. The most prevalent pathogenic variant (mutation) in patients with SM is KIT p.D816V, which is detectable in most adult patients. Other somatic mutations have also been identified-especially in advanced SM-in TET2, SRSF2, ASXL1, RUNX1, CBL and JAK2, and shown to impact clinical and cellular phenotypes. Although only small patient cohorts have been analyzed, disease associations have also been identified in several germline variants within genes encoding certain cytokines or their receptors (IL13, IL6, IL6R, IL31, IL4R) and toll-like receptors. More recently, an increased prevalence of hereditary alpha-tryptasemia (HαT) caused by increased TPSAB1 copy number encoding alpha-tryptase has been described in patients with SM. Whereas HαT is found in 3-6% of general Western populations, it is identified in up to 17% of patients with SM. In the current manuscript we review the prevalence, functional role and clinical impact of various germline and somatic genetic variants in patients with mastocytosis.

Criteria for the Regression of Pediatric Mastocytosis: A Long-Term Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Mastocytosis is a neoplastic condition characterized by the accumulation of mast cells (MCs) in 1 or more organ. Adults tend to have persistent, systemic mastocytosis, whereas MC infiltration in children is usually limited to the skin and typically regresses after several years. Both adults and children could display mast cell activation symptoms (MCASs) due to MC mediator release. In more than 85% of both adult and pediatric cases, KIT mutations are present, with the KIT D816V mutation being present in most affected adults but in only half the affected children.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the clinical, biological, and molecular factors associated with the regression of cutaneous mastocytosis (CM) in children, and to assess the correlation between MCASs and CM regression.

METHODS

Patients having suffered from pediatric-onset mastocytosis for at least 8 years were included in a longitudinal cohort study. Clinical data, the baseline serum tryptase level, the KIT sequence, and the progression of MCASs and CM were recorded.

RESULTS

CM regressed in 210 of the 272 included patients (77.2%; mean time to regression, 6.10 years). The rare cases of aggressive systemic mastocytosis were symptomatic from the outset. Congenital mastocytosis and the KIT D816V mutation were associated with CM regression (odds ratio, 0.48, P = .031, and 0.173, P = .031, respectively). Aggravation of MCASs over time was correlated with the persistence of skin lesions. However, the MCASs became more intense in 19% of the patients with MCASs at baseline and CM regression, justifying long-term follow-up in this setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results open up new hypotheses with regard to the spontaneous regression of CM in pediatric patients.

Diagnosis, Classification and Management of Mast Cell Activation Syndromes (MCAS) in the Era of Personalized Medicine

Mast cell activation (MCA) is seen in a variety of clinical contexts and pathologies, including IgE-dependent allergic inflammation, other immunologic and inflammatory reactions, primary mast cell (MC) disorders, and hereditary alpha tryptasemia (HAT). MCA-related symptoms range from mild to severe to life-threatening. The severity of MCA-related symptoms depends on a number of factors, including genetic predisposition, the number and releasability of MCs, organs affected, and the type and consequences of comorbid conditions. In severe systemic reactions, MCA is demonstrable by a substantial increase of basal serum tryptase levels above the individual’s baseline. When, in addition, the symptoms are recurrent, involve more than one organ system, and are responsive to therapy with MC-stabilizing or mediator-targeting drugs, the consensus criteria for the diagnosis of MCA syndrome (MCAS) are met. Based on the etiology of MCA, patients can further be classified as having i) primary MCAS where KIT-mutated, clonal, MCs are detected; ii) secondary MCAS where an underlying IgE-dependent allergy or other reactive MCA-triggering pathology is found; or iii) idiopathic MCAS, where neither a triggering reactive state nor KIT-mutated MCs are identified. Most severe MCA events occur in combined forms of MCAS, where KIT-mutated MCs, IgE-dependent allergies and sometimes HAT are detected. These patients may suffer from life-threatening anaphylaxis and are candidates for combined treatment with various types of drugs, including IgE-blocking antibodies, anti-mediator-type drugs and MC-targeting therapy. In conclusion, detailed knowledge about the etiology, underlying pathologies and co-morbidities is important to establish the diagnosis and develop an optimal management plan for MCAS, following the principles of personalized medicine.

World allergy organization anaphylaxis guidance 2020

Anaphylaxis is the most severe clinical presentation of acute systemic allergic reactions. The occurrence of anaphylaxis has increased in recent years, and subsequently, there is a need to continue disseminating knowledge on the diagnosis and management, so every healthcare professional is prepared to deal with such emergencies. The rationale of this updated position document is the need to keep guidance aligned with the current state of the art of knowledge in anaphylaxis management. The World Allergy Organization (WAO) anaphylaxis guidelines were published in 2011, and the current guidance adopts their major indications, incorporating some novel changes. Intramuscular epinephrine (adrenaline) continues to be the first-line treatment for anaphylaxis. Nevertheless, its use remains suboptimal. After an anaphylaxis occurrence, patients should be referred to a specialist to assess the potential cause and to be educated on prevention of recurrences and self-management. The limited availability of epinephrine auto-injectors remains a major problem in many countries, as well as their affordability for some patients.

Mast cells as a unique hematopoietic lineage and cell system: From Paul Ehrlich's visions to precision medicine concepts

The origin and functions of mast cells (MCs) have been debated since their description by Paul Ehrlich in 1879. MCs have long been considered 'reactive bystanders' and 'amplifiers' in inflammatory processes, allergic reactions, and host responses to infectious diseases. However, knowledge about the origin, phenotypes and functions of MCs has increased substantially over the past 50 years. MCs are now known to be derived from multipotent hematopoietic progenitors, which, through a process of differentiation and maturation, form a unique hematopoietic lineage residing in multiple organs. In particular, MCs are distinguishable from basophils and other hematopoietic cells by their unique phenotype, origin(s), and spectrum of functions, both in innate and adaptive immune responses and in other settings. The concept of a unique MC lineage is further supported by the development of a distinct group of neoplasms, collectively referred to as mastocytosis, in which MC precursors expand as clonal cells. The clinical consequences of the expansion and/or activation of MCs are best established in mastocytosis and in allergic inflammation. However, MCs have also been implicated as important participants in a number of additional pathologic conditions and physiological processes. In this article, we review concepts regarding MC development, factors controlling MC expansion and activation, and some of the fundamental roles MCs may play in both health and disease. We also discuss new concepts for suppressing MC expansion and/or activation using molecularly-targeted drugs.

Risk and management of patients with mastocytosis and MCAS in the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic: Expert opinions

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) pandemic has massively distorted our health care systems and caused catastrophic consequences in our affected communities. The number of victims continues to increase, and patients at risk can only be protected to a degree, because the virulent state may be asymptomatic. Risk factors concerning COVID-19-induced morbidity and mortality include advanced age, an impaired immune system, cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and cancer treated with chemotherapy. Here, we discuss the risk and impact of COVID-19 in patients with mastocytosis and mast cell activation syndromes. Because no published data are yet available, expert opinions are, by necessity, based on case experience and reports from patients. Although the overall risk to acquire the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 may not be elevated in mast cell disease, certain conditions may increase the risk of infected patients to develop severe COVID-19. These factors include certain comorbidities, mast cell activation-related events affecting the cardiovascular or bronchopulmonary system, and chemotherapy or immunosuppressive drugs. Therefore, such treatments should be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis during a COVID-19 infection. In contrast, other therapies, such as anti-mediator-type drugs, venom immunotherapy, or vitamin D, should be continued. Overall, patients with mast cell disorders should follow the general and local guidelines in the COVID-19 pandemic and advice from their medical provider.

[Tryptase: A practical guide for the physician]

Tryptase is the most abundant endopeptidase released by mast cells degranulation, involved in many pro and anti-inflammatory processes. Normal serum tryptase range is 0-11.4 μg/L. Tryptase is a useful diagnostic tool for anaphylaxis, systemic mastocytosis (SM) and mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), where specific threshold values must be used. SM diagnosis criteria include evidence of dense mast cell infiltrate either in the bone marrow or the affected organ (such as skin), presence of KIT D816V mutation and elevated serum tryptase level (>20 μg/L). In SM, tryptase level is correlated with the burden of mast cells in bone marrow. MCAS should be considered in case of severe and recurrent typical clinical signs of systemic mast cell activation involving at least two organs, associated with an increase in serum tryptase level of 20% + 2 μg/L from the individual's baseline. Anaphylaxis is the most severe among hypersensitivity reactions. A clonal mast cell disorder is a central question in anaphylaxis and appropriate explorations should be conducted in these patients. Triggers for anaphylactic reactions vary significantly in the general population and in patients with MS or MCAS. Finally, physicians must be aware of the many pathological and physiological situations that affect tryptase levels.

Mast cell activation syndromes - evaluation of current diagnostic criteria and laboratory tools in clinical practice (Review)

Mast cell activation syndromes (MCAS) represent a heterogeneous clinical entity caused by episodic and severe mast cell activation, including primary and secondary mast cell disorders (MCDs). The group of primary or clonal MCDs refers to systemic mastocytosis, other clonal MCAS and hereditary hypertryptasemia, while the secondary MCAS is characterized by normal mast cells (MCs) which are activated by external triggers, such as allergens or physical stimuli. Another category of MCAS is the idiopathic form, when no trigger or genetic mutation can be identified. Symptoms of mast cell activation are due to release of specific mediators and can be seen in many diseases, such as allergies, with localized or systemic clinical manifestations. Confirmation of MCAS is based on diagnostic criteria proposed by an international group of experts and the best available evidence in this field. It is generally accepted that the clinical picture of MCAS is non-specific and there are few available laboratory tools, making it difficult for clinicians to identify and confirm this entity. The diagnosis is established after exclusion of other possible clinical entities in most of the cases. Therefore, the actual diagnostic criteria of MCASs, some relevant clinical aspects and laboratory tools used in clinical practice were reviewed.

Anaphylaxis to three humanized antibodies for severe asthma: a case study

Background

Omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab are the currently available biologics used to treat asthma in Japan. Anaphylaxis following treatment with mepolizumab or benralizumab is considered rare.

Case presentation

We report the case of a 35-year-old woman with severe asthma, who experienced anaphylaxis following the administration of benralizumab, mepolizumab, and omalizumab, separately. The therapy with biologics was chosen to avoid the repeated use of systemic corticosteroids for asthma exacerbations. The mechanisms underlying anaphylaxis caused by these three biologics remain unclear. The patient’s asthma symptoms and lung function improved after treatment with bronchial thermoplasty.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first report of an asthmatic patient developing anaphylaxis after commencement of benralizumab, mepolizumab, and omalizumab therapy. These three biologics should be administered carefully, and patients should be monitored for anaphylaxis.

Patient characteristics of suspected mast-cell activation syndrome with sinonasal obstruction: a single institution experience

BACKGROUND

Mast-cell activation syndrome (MCAS) is increasingly recognized. Sinonasal obstruction is common among these patients. There is a paucity of literature describing the characteristics of MCAS and treatment outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 192 patients with nasal congestion July 2017 to May 2019 among 3 providers (1 allergist, 2 rhinologists) was conducted. Suspected MCAS criteria were as follows: (1) at least 2 recurrent severe symptoms in addition to nasal congestion: flushing, pruritus, urticaria, angioedema, wheezing, throat swelling, headache, hypotension, diarrhea; (2) clinical response to medications that target mast cell mediators. Quality of life (QOL) outcomes were quantified using the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22).

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients with nasal congestion were suspected of MCAS. The median age was 47 years; 24 of 32 were female; 13 of 32 had prior history of sinonasal surgery and 11 of 32 allergen immunotherapy. Out of 32, 19 had history of asthma, 10 drug allergy, 11 food allergy, and 10 anaphylaxis. The median number of medications targeting mast cell activation was 4 (range, 2-7). Eleven patients were offered surgery by a rhinologist after adequate medical management. Three of 32 patients showed elevation of serum tryptase. Fourteen completed pretreatment and posttreatment SNOT-22 (4/14 surgery, 10/14 medical management). Pretreatment score was 59.8 ± 6.2 (mean ± standard error [SEM]) and posttreatment score was 42.8 ± 6.7; the difference was statistically and clinically significant (p = 0.0015). Both groups showed a mean 17-point reduction.

CONCLUSION

A multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of sinonasal symptoms using both escalation of medical therapy and surgical approaches may improve QOL of patients with suspected MCAS. Consensus criteria for MCAS, which includes elevation in tryptase over baseline during an episode, may exclude the full spectrum of individuals with MCAS from potentially beneficial treatment.

Mast cell activation syndrome in pregnancy, delivery, postpartum and lactation: a narrative review

Mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) is a chronic multisystem disease of aberrant constitutive and reactive mast cell mediator release causing generally inflammatory, allergic, and dystrophic issues. The pathobiology of MCAS drives extraordinary clinical complexity and heterogeneity, which led to only recent recognition despite increasingly apparent substantial prevalence, perhaps as high as 17%. It also has a strong female predilection. Thus, MCAS inescapably impacts pregnancy and the post-partum period in many women. No specific research in the pregnant or post-partum MCAS population has been performed yet. However, its prevalence and potential for driving substantial morbidity merit obstetric providers' acquaintance with this illness and its potential impacts on their patients during pregnancy, delivery, the post-partum period, and lactation. Extensive literature review across all medical specialities, plus direct experience in the authors' practices, provides guidance in recognising MCAS in pregnancy and diagnosing and effectively managing it. Described herein are manners in which MCAS, a protean multisystem disease, adversely affects all stages of pregnancy and post-partum. In order to reduce risks of MCAS causing complications before, during and after pregnancy, identifying and controlling the syndrome prior to pregnancy is best, but, even if the disease is not recognised until late, there may still be opportunities to mitigate its effects. There is precedent for improved outcomes if comorbid MCAS is recognised and controlled. This review provides the first comprehensive guide for obstetric providers regarding this emerging major comorbidity.

Mast Cell Activation: When the Whole Is Greater than the Sum of Its Parts

Mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) is a heterogeneous and rare disorder with episodic and severe activation of mast cells. Because symptoms of mast cell activation are nonspecific, it is important to base the diagnosis on best available clinical and scientific evidence, and not make it one of exclusion. MCAS, much like the mast cell itself, as a whole is greater than the sum of its proposed diagnostic criteria. When each component is considered in isolation, criteria can seem nonspecific, and thus, a broad constellation of symptoms can be attributed to MCAS when they may be due to other disease processes.

New developments in the field of mastocytosis and mast cell activation syndromes: a summary of the Annual Meeting of the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (ECNM) 2019

Mastocytosis are a group of hematologic neoplasms characterized by an accumulation of atypical mast cells in one or several organs/tissues, often accompanied by mast cell activation. Whereas in children the disease manifestations are mostly limited to the skin, in adults the disease is usually systemic (systemic mastocytosis; SM) and involves the bone marrow and/or other internal organs. Several variants of SM have been defined. Whereas most patients have indolent SM, some patients have advanced SM, which underlines the complexity of SM. In 2002, a European consortium of clinicians and scientists initiated a multidisciplinary, multi-national cooperative network, termed the 'European Competence Network on Mastocytosis' (ECNM), with the aim to improve diagnosis and therapy of patients with mastocytosis and other mast cell activation disorders. Since then, members of the ECNM have organized Annual Meetings in several European countries. The present article provides a summary of advances in the field presented during the 17th Annual ECNM meeting held in Salzburg in October 2019.

Recent advances in the understanding and therapeutic management of mastocytosis

Mastocytosis is a rare disease due to the abnormal accumulation of mast cells in various tissues. Its clinical presentation is heterogeneous depending on mast cell infiltration and mediators release. In some cases, it is associated with hematological malignancies. Prognosis varies from very good with a life expectancy similar to the general population in indolent forms of the disease to a survival time of just a few months in mast cell leukemia. Although in most cases a somatic KIT D816V mutation is found in tumor mast cells, the physiopathology of the disease is not yet fully understood. Additional germline and somatic mutations may explain this heterogeneity. Treatments aim at blocking effect of mast cell mediators, reducing mast cell activation and tumor burden. New drugs mainly directed against the tyrosine kinase activity of KIT have dramatically changed the quality of life and prognosis of mast cell diseases. Present and future therapeutic strategies are discussed in this review.

Survey of Mast Cell Mediator Levels from Patients Presenting with Symptoms of Mast Cell Activation

INTRODUCTION

Although 4 mast cell mediators can be routinely measured, the results of initial testing to evaluate symptoms of mast cell activation have not been widely reported.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the results of mast cell mediator tests used to assess patients with mast cell activation symptoms during a 5-year time span.

METHODS

After excluding patients with alternative diagnoses, records of 108 patients were reviewed for initial mediator test results. Mediators included serum tryptase plus urinary N-methyl histamine (N-MH), leukotriene (LT)E4, and 11β-prostaglandin (PG) F2α or 2,3-dinor-11β-PGF2α (BPG).

RESULTS

Most commonly, either a single measured elevation of 1 mediator (48.1%) or elevations of 2 (33.3%) mediators was found at baseline, during symptoms or at both time points. Elevated levels of a single mediator in order of frequency were: BPG > tryptase > LTE4 > N-MH, and for two mediators: BPG + tryptase (n = 16 cases) > BPG + LTE4 (n = 9) > BPG + N-MH (n = 6). Elevations in 3 mediators (n = 8) or 4 mediators (n = 2) were much less frequent. Monoclonal mast cell activation syndrome (n = 6), and systemic and cutaneous mastocytosis (n = 4) were also infrequent. Baseline plus symptom-associated tryptase values were obtained in only 7 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey suggests that elevations of 1 or 2 mediators are the most common (total 81.4% of cases) findings from initial tests for mast cell activation. Elevated levels of BPG were most commonly found both singly and in combination with other mediators, followed by the finding of elevated levels of tryptase. Baseline plus symptom-associated tryptase levels were measured in only a minority of patients.

Mast Cells in Liver Fibrogenesis

Mast cells (MCs) are immune cells of the myeloid lineage that are present in the connective tissue throughout the body and in mucosa tissue. They originate from hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow and circulate as MC progenitors in the blood. After migration to various tissues, they differentiate into their mature form, which is characterized by a phenotype containing large granules enriched in a variety of bioactive compounds, including histamine and heparin. These cells can be activated in a receptor-dependent and -independent manner. Particularly, the activation of the high-affinity immunoglobulin E (IgE) receptor, also known as FcεRI, that is expressed on the surface of MCs provoke specific signaling cascades that leads to intracellular calcium influx, activation of different transcription factors, degranulation, and cytokine production. Therefore, MCs modulate many aspects in physiological and pathological conditions, including wound healing, defense against pathogens, immune tolerance, allergy, anaphylaxis, autoimmune defects, inflammation, and infectious and other disorders. In the liver, MCs are mainly associated with connective tissue located in the surrounding of the hepatic arteries, veins, and bile ducts. Recent work has demonstrated a significant increase in MC number during hepatic injury, suggesting an important role of these cells in liver disease and progression. In the present review, we summarize aspects of MC function and mediators in experimental liver injury, their interaction with other hepatic cell types, and their contribution to the pathogenesis of fibrosis.

Symptoms of mast cell activation syndrome in functional gastrointestinal disorders

Objectives: Mast cell involvement is evident in functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID). FGID and mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) are associated with multi-organ symptoms. An overlap has not been assessed.Methods: MCAS symptoms were determined by questionnaires in 2083 FGID patients.Results: The median number of MCAS symptoms ([IQR] (range 0-16)) was 6 [4-8] in all FGID, and in functional dyspepsia (FD) patients, 7 [5-9] in overlapping irritable bowel syndrome and FD (IBS+FD), 5 [3-8] in IBS and 5 [3-6] in non-IBS/non-FD (p < .001 vs. FD and IBS + FD) patients. MCAS symptoms in ≥2 organ-systems existed in 1773 (85%) of all patients.Conclusions: MCAS symptoms are common in FGID warranting further mechanistic investigation.

Successful treatment of idiopathic mast cell activation syndrome with low-dose Omalizumab

Objectives

Idiopathic mast cell disorders, a recently defined and recognised syndrome in clinical practice, are similar to the previously termed non-clonal mast cell disorder. Patients with idiopathic mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) suffer all the classical signs of mast cell activation but do not have evidence of mast cell clonality. Furthermore, treatment of these patients can be limited and burdensome in those with refractory symptoms.

Methods

Here, we describe treatment of a patient with idiopathic MCAS utilising a single monthly subcutaneous injection of omalizumab and review the current classification and therapeutic options for clonal and non-clonal MCAS.

Results

Low-dose omalizumab treatment has successfully led to a 5-year, sustained clinical response, controlled debilitating symptoms of mast cell activation and allowed for reintroduction and long-term maintenance of bee venom subcutaneous immunotherapy.

Conclusion

Low-dose omalizumab of 150 mg monthly should be considered for maintenance management of patients with idiopathic MCAS for its cost and quality-of-life benefits.

Gastrointestinal motility and absorptive disorders in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: Prevalence, diagnosis and treatment

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), Crohn`s disease and ulcerative colitis, are chronic conditions associated with high morbidity and healthcare costs. The natural history of IBD is variable and marked by alternating periods of flare and remission. Even though the use of newer therapeutic targets has been associated with higher rates of mucosal healing, a great proportion of IBD patients remain symptomatic despite effective control of inflammation. These symptoms may include but not limited to abdominal pain, dyspepsia, diarrhea, urgency, fecal incontinence, constipation or bloating. In this setting, commonly there is an overlap with gastrointestinal (GI) motility and absorptive disorders. Early recognition of these conditions greatly improves patient care and may decrease the risk of mistreatment. Therefore, in this review we describe the prevalence, diagnosis and treatment of GI motility and absorptive disorders that commonly affect patients with IBD.

Food Intolerances

Food intolerances are estimated to affect up to 20% of the population but complete understanding of diagnosis and management is complicated, given presentation and non-immunological mechanisms associated vary greatly. This review aims to provide a scientific update on common food intolerances resulting in gastrointestinal and/or extra-intestinal symptoms. FODMAP sensitivity has strong evidence supporting its mechanisms of increased osmotic activity and fermentation with the resulting distention leading to symptoms in those with visceral hypersensitivity. For many of the other food intolerances reviewed including non-coeliac gluten/wheat sensitivity, food additives and bioactive food chemicals, the findings show that there is a shortage of reproducible well-designed double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, making understanding of the mechanisms, diagnosis and management difficult. Enzyme deficiencies have been proposed to result in other food sensitivities including low amine oxidase activity resulting in histamine intolerance and sucrase-isomaltase deficiency resulting in reduced tolerance to sugars and starch. Lack of reliable diagnostic biomarkers for all food intolerances result in an inability to target specific foods in the individual. As such, a trial-and-error approach is used, whereby suspected food constituents are reduced for a short-period and then re-challenged to assess response. Future studies should aim to identify biomarkers to predict response to dietary therapies.

Why the 20% + 2 Tryptase Formula Is a Diagnostic Gold Standard for Severe Systemic Mast Cell Activation and Mast Cell Activation Syndrome

Mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) is a condition characterized by recurrent episodes of clinically relevant, systemic, severe reactions to mast cell (MC)-derived mediators released in the context of anaphylaxis or another acute MC-related event. It is important to document MC involvement in these reactions in order to establish the diagnosis MCAS. The most specific and reliable marker of systemic MC activation is an acute and substantial event-related (transient) increase in the serum tryptase level over the individual's baseline value. However, the baseline level of tryptase varies depending on the underlying disease and the genetic background. For example, an estimated 3-5% of healthy individuals exhibit duplications or multiple copies of the TPSAB1 gene encoding for alpha-tryptase, and over 30% of all patients with myeloid neoplasms, including mastocytosis, have elevated basal tryptase levels. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to adjust the event-related diagnostic (MCAS-confirming) increase in tryptase over the individual baseline in a robust approach. To address this challenge, the 20% + 2 formula was proposed by the consensus group in 2012. Since then, this approach has been validated in clinical practice by independent groups and found to be sound. In the current article, we discuss the emerging importance and value of the 20% + 2 formula in clinical practice and its role as a criterion of severe systemic MC activation and MCAS.

Multidisciplinary Challenges in Mastocytosis and How to Address with Personalized Medicine Approaches

Mastocytosis is a hematopoietic neoplasm defined by abnormal expansion and focal accumulation of clonal tissue mast cells in various organ-systems. The disease exhibits a complex pathology and an equally complex clinical behavior. The classification of the World Health Organization (WHO) divides mastocytosis into cutaneous forms, systemic variants, and localized mast cell tumors. In >80% of patients with systemic mastocytosis (SM), a somatic point mutation in KIT at codon 816 is found. Whereas patients with indolent forms of the disease have a normal or near-normal life expectancy, patients with advanced mast cell neoplasms, including aggressive SM and mast cell leukemia, have a poor prognosis with short survival times. In a majority of these patients, multiple somatic mutations and/or an associated hematologic neoplasm, such as a myeloid leukemia, may be detected. Independent of the category of mastocytosis and the serum tryptase level, patients may suffer from mediator-related symptoms and/or osteopathy. Depending on the presence of co-morbidities, the symptomatology in such patients may be mild, severe or even life-threatening. Most relevant co-morbidities in such patients are IgE-dependent allergies, psychiatric, psychological or mental problems, and vitamin D deficiency. The diagnosis and management of mastocytosis is an emerging challenge in clinical practice and requires vast knowledge, a multidisciplinary approach, and personalized medicine procedures. In this article, the current knowledge about mastocytosis is reviewed with special emphasis on the multidisciplinary aspects of the disease and related challenges in daily practice.

Recent advances in our understanding of mast cell activation - or should it be mast cell mediator disorders?

INTRODUCTION

An increasing number of patients present with multiple symptoms affecting many organs including the brain due to multiple mediators released by mast cells. These unique tissue immune cells are critical for allergic reactions triggered by immunoglobulin E (IgE), but are also stimulated (not activated) by immune, drug, environmental, food, infectious, and stress triggers, leading to secretion of multiple mediators often without histamine and tryptase. The presentation, diagnosis, and management of the spectrum of mast cell disorders are very confusing. As a result, neuropsychiatric symptoms have been left out, and diagnostic criteria made stricter excluding most patients. Areas covered: A literature search was performed on papers published between January 1990 and November 2018 using MEDLINE. Terms used were activation, antihistamines, atopy, autism, brain fog, heparin, KIT mutation, IgE, inflammation, IL-6, IL-31, IL-37, luteolin, mast cells, mastocytosis, mediators, mycotoxins, release, secretion, tetramethoxyluteolin, and tryptase. Expert opinion: Conditions associated with elevated serum or urine levels of any mast cell mediator, in the absence of comorbidities that could explain elevated levels, should be considered 'Mast Cell Mediator Disorders (MCMD).' Emphasis should be placed on the identification of unique mast cell mediators, and development of drugs or supplements that inhibit their release.