101
|
Ossenkoppele R, Lyoo CH, Jester-Broms J, Sudre CH, Cho H, Ryu YH, Choi JY, Smith R, Strandberg O, Palmqvist S, Kramer J, Boxer AL, Gorno-Tempini ML, Miller BL, La Joie R, Rabinovici GD, Hansson O. Assessment of Demographic, Genetic, and Imaging Variables Associated With Brain Resilience and Cognitive Resilience to Pathological Tau in Patients With Alzheimer Disease. JAMA Neurol 2021; 77:632-642. [PMID: 32091549 PMCID: PMC7042808 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.5154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Question Which demographic, genetic, and neuroimaging factors are associated with cognitive and brain resilience to pathological tau in patients with Alzheimer disease? Findings In this multicenter, cross-sectional, longitudinal study of 260 cognitively impaired amyloid-β–positive participants, young age and female sex were associated with greater brain resilience, whereas higher educational level and cortical thickness were associated with greater cognitive resilience. Meaning Cognitive and brain resilience may be associated with differential mechanisms, which may help explain interindividual differences in how well patients tolerate pathological tau. Importance Better understanding is needed of the degree to which individuals tolerate Alzheimer disease (AD)–like pathological tau with respect to brain structure (brain resilience) and cognition (cognitive resilience). Objective To examine the demographic (age, sex, and educational level), genetic (APOE-ε4 status), and neuroimaging (white matter hyperintensities and cortical thickness) factors associated with interindividual differences in brain and cognitive resilience to tau positron emission tomography (PET) load and to changes in global cognition over time. Design, Setting, an Participants In this cross-sectional, longitudinal study, tau PET was performed from June 1, 2014, to November 30, 2017, and global cognition monitored for a mean [SD] interval of 2.0 [1.8] years at 3 dementia centers in South Korea, Sweden, and the United States. The study included amyloid-β–positive participants with mild cognitive impairment or AD dementia. Data analysis was performed from October 26, 2018, to December 11, 2019. Exposures Standard dementia screening, cognitive testing, brain magnetic resonance imaging, amyloid-β PET and cerebrospinal fluid analysis, and flortaucipir (tau) labeled with fluor-18 (18F) PET. Main Outcomes and Measures Separate linear regression models were performed between whole cortex [18F]flortaucipir uptake and cortical thickness, and standardized residuals were used to obtain a measure of brain resilience. The same procedure was performed for whole cortex [18F]flortaucipir uptake vs Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) as a measure of cognitive resilience. Bivariate and multivariable linear regression models were conducted with age, sex, educational level, APOE-ε4 status, white matter hyperintensity volumes, and cortical thickness as independent variables and brain and cognitive resilience measures as dependent variables. Linear mixed models were performed to examine whether changes in MMSE scores over time differed as a function of a combined brain and cognitive resilience variable. Results A total of 260 participants (145 [55.8%] female; mean [SD] age, 69.2 [9.5] years; mean [SD] MMSE score, 21.9 [5.5]) were included in the study. In multivariable models, women (standardized β = −0.15, P = .02) and young patients (standardized β = −0.20, P = .006) had greater brain resilience to pathological tau. Higher educational level (standardized β = 0.23, P < .001) and global cortical thickness (standardized β = 0.23, P < .001) were associated with greater cognitive resilience to pathological tau. Linear mixed models indicated a significant interaction of brain resilience × cognitive resilience × time on MMSE (β [SE] = −0.235 [0.111], P = .03), with steepest slopes for individuals with both low brain and cognitive resilience. Conclusions and Relevance Results of this study suggest that women and young patients with AD have relative preservation of brain structure when exposed to neocortical pathological tau. Interindividual differences in resilience to pathological tau may be important to disease progression because participants with both low brain and cognitive resilience had the most rapid cognitive decline over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rik Ossenkoppele
- Lund University, Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund, Sweden.,Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Chul Hyoung Lyoo
- Gangnam Severance Hospital, Department of Neurology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Carole H Sudre
- King's College London School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, London, United Kingdom.,Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, University College London Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.,Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hanna Cho
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, University College London Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Young Hoon Ryu
- Gangnam Severance Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jae Yong Choi
- Gangnam Severance Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.,Division of Applied RI, Korea Institute Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ruben Smith
- Lund University, Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund, Sweden
| | - Olof Strandberg
- Lund University, Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Joel Kramer
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Adam L Boxer
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Maria L Gorno-Tempini
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Bruce L Miller
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Renaud La Joie
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Gil D Rabinovici
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco.,Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco.,Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California.,Associate Editor
| | - Oskar Hansson
- Lund University, Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund, Sweden.,Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
Therriault J, Pascoal TA, Benedet AL, Tissot C, Savard M, Chamoun M, Lussier F, Kang MS, Berzgin G, Wang T, Fernandes-Arias J, Massarweh G, Soucy JP, Vitali P, Saha-Chaudhuri P, Gauthier S, Rosa-Neto P. Frequency of Biologically Defined Alzheimer Disease in Relation to Age, Sex, APOE ε4, and Cognitive Impairment. Neurology 2021; 96:e975-e985. [PMID: 33443136 PMCID: PMC8055338 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000011416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the frequency of biologically defined Alzheimer disease (AD) in relation to age, sex, APOE ε4, and clinical diagnosis in a prospective cohort study evaluated with amyloid-PET and tau-PET. METHODS We assessed cognitively unimpaired (CU) elderly (n = 166), patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (n = 77), and patients with probable AD dementia (n = 62) who underwent evaluation by dementia specialists and neuropsychologists in addition to amyloid-PET with [18F]AZD4694 and tau-PET with [18F]MK6240. Individuals were grouped according to their AD biomarker profile. Positive predictive value for biologically defined AD was assessed in relation to clinical diagnosis. Frequency of AD biomarker profiles was assessed using logistic regressions with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS The clinical diagnosis of probable AD dementia demonstrated good agreement with biologically defined AD (positive predictive value 85.2%). A total of 7.88% of CU were positive for both amyloid-PET and tau-PET. Frequency of biologically defined AD increased with age (OR 1.14; p < 0.0001) and frequency of APOE ε4 allele carriers (single ε4: OR 3.82; p < 0.0001; double ε4: OR 17.55, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Whereas we observed strong, but not complete, agreement between clinically defined probable AD dementia and biomarker positivity for both β-amyloid and tau, we also observed that biologically defined AD was not rare in CU elderly. Abnormal tau-PET was almost exclusively observed in individuals with abnormal amyloid-PET. Our results highlight that even in tertiary care memory clinics, detailed evaluation by dementia specialists systematically underestimates the frequency of biologically defined AD and related entities. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class I evidence that biologically defined AD (abnormal amyloid PET and tau PET) was observed in 85.2% of people with clinically defined AD and 7.88% of CU elderly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Therriault
- From the Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Hospital (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.S., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., S.G., P.R.-N.), and the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., J.-P.S., P.V., S.G., P.R.-N.), Psychiatry (S.G., P.R.-N.), Radiochemistry (G.M.), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (P.S.-C.), McGill University, Montreal; and Montreal Neurological Institute (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., G.M., J.-P.S., P.R.-N.), Canada
| | - Tharick A Pascoal
- From the Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Hospital (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.S., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., S.G., P.R.-N.), and the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., J.-P.S., P.V., S.G., P.R.-N.), Psychiatry (S.G., P.R.-N.), Radiochemistry (G.M.), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (P.S.-C.), McGill University, Montreal; and Montreal Neurological Institute (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., G.M., J.-P.S., P.R.-N.), Canada
| | - Andrea L Benedet
- From the Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Hospital (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.S., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., S.G., P.R.-N.), and the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., J.-P.S., P.V., S.G., P.R.-N.), Psychiatry (S.G., P.R.-N.), Radiochemistry (G.M.), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (P.S.-C.), McGill University, Montreal; and Montreal Neurological Institute (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., G.M., J.-P.S., P.R.-N.), Canada
| | - Cecile Tissot
- From the Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Hospital (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.S., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., S.G., P.R.-N.), and the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., J.-P.S., P.V., S.G., P.R.-N.), Psychiatry (S.G., P.R.-N.), Radiochemistry (G.M.), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (P.S.-C.), McGill University, Montreal; and Montreal Neurological Institute (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., G.M., J.-P.S., P.R.-N.), Canada
| | - Melissa Savard
- From the Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Hospital (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.S., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., S.G., P.R.-N.), and the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., J.-P.S., P.V., S.G., P.R.-N.), Psychiatry (S.G., P.R.-N.), Radiochemistry (G.M.), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (P.S.-C.), McGill University, Montreal; and Montreal Neurological Institute (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., G.M., J.-P.S., P.R.-N.), Canada
| | - Mira Chamoun
- From the Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Hospital (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.S., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., S.G., P.R.-N.), and the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., J.-P.S., P.V., S.G., P.R.-N.), Psychiatry (S.G., P.R.-N.), Radiochemistry (G.M.), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (P.S.-C.), McGill University, Montreal; and Montreal Neurological Institute (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., G.M., J.-P.S., P.R.-N.), Canada
| | - Firoza Lussier
- From the Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Hospital (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.S., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., S.G., P.R.-N.), and the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., J.-P.S., P.V., S.G., P.R.-N.), Psychiatry (S.G., P.R.-N.), Radiochemistry (G.M.), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (P.S.-C.), McGill University, Montreal; and Montreal Neurological Institute (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., G.M., J.-P.S., P.R.-N.), Canada
| | - Min Su Kang
- From the Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Hospital (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.S., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., S.G., P.R.-N.), and the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., J.-P.S., P.V., S.G., P.R.-N.), Psychiatry (S.G., P.R.-N.), Radiochemistry (G.M.), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (P.S.-C.), McGill University, Montreal; and Montreal Neurological Institute (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., G.M., J.-P.S., P.R.-N.), Canada
| | - Gleb Berzgin
- From the Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Hospital (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.S., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., S.G., P.R.-N.), and the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., J.-P.S., P.V., S.G., P.R.-N.), Psychiatry (S.G., P.R.-N.), Radiochemistry (G.M.), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (P.S.-C.), McGill University, Montreal; and Montreal Neurological Institute (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., G.M., J.-P.S., P.R.-N.), Canada
| | - Tina Wang
- From the Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Hospital (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.S., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., S.G., P.R.-N.), and the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., J.-P.S., P.V., S.G., P.R.-N.), Psychiatry (S.G., P.R.-N.), Radiochemistry (G.M.), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (P.S.-C.), McGill University, Montreal; and Montreal Neurological Institute (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., G.M., J.-P.S., P.R.-N.), Canada
| | - Jaime Fernandes-Arias
- From the Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Hospital (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.S., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., S.G., P.R.-N.), and the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., J.-P.S., P.V., S.G., P.R.-N.), Psychiatry (S.G., P.R.-N.), Radiochemistry (G.M.), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (P.S.-C.), McGill University, Montreal; and Montreal Neurological Institute (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., G.M., J.-P.S., P.R.-N.), Canada
| | - Gassan Massarweh
- From the Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Hospital (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.S., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., S.G., P.R.-N.), and the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., J.-P.S., P.V., S.G., P.R.-N.), Psychiatry (S.G., P.R.-N.), Radiochemistry (G.M.), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (P.S.-C.), McGill University, Montreal; and Montreal Neurological Institute (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., G.M., J.-P.S., P.R.-N.), Canada
| | - Jean-Paul Soucy
- From the Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Hospital (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.S., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., S.G., P.R.-N.), and the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., J.-P.S., P.V., S.G., P.R.-N.), Psychiatry (S.G., P.R.-N.), Radiochemistry (G.M.), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (P.S.-C.), McGill University, Montreal; and Montreal Neurological Institute (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., G.M., J.-P.S., P.R.-N.), Canada
| | - Paolo Vitali
- From the Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Hospital (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.S., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., S.G., P.R.-N.), and the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., J.-P.S., P.V., S.G., P.R.-N.), Psychiatry (S.G., P.R.-N.), Radiochemistry (G.M.), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (P.S.-C.), McGill University, Montreal; and Montreal Neurological Institute (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., G.M., J.-P.S., P.R.-N.), Canada
| | - Paramita Saha-Chaudhuri
- From the Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Hospital (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.S., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., S.G., P.R.-N.), and the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., J.-P.S., P.V., S.G., P.R.-N.), Psychiatry (S.G., P.R.-N.), Radiochemistry (G.M.), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (P.S.-C.), McGill University, Montreal; and Montreal Neurological Institute (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., G.M., J.-P.S., P.R.-N.), Canada
| | - Serge Gauthier
- From the Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Hospital (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.S., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., S.G., P.R.-N.), and the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., J.-P.S., P.V., S.G., P.R.-N.), Psychiatry (S.G., P.R.-N.), Radiochemistry (G.M.), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (P.S.-C.), McGill University, Montreal; and Montreal Neurological Institute (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., G.M., J.-P.S., P.R.-N.), Canada
| | - Pedro Rosa-Neto
- From the Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Hospital (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.S., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., S.G., P.R.-N.), and the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., M.C., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., J.-P.S., P.V., S.G., P.R.-N.), Psychiatry (S.G., P.R.-N.), Radiochemistry (G.M.), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (P.S.-C.), McGill University, Montreal; and Montreal Neurological Institute (J.T., T.A.P., A.L.B., C.T., F.L., M.S.K., G.B., T.W., J.F.-A., G.M., J.-P.S., P.R.-N.), Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
Thijssen EH, Rabinovici GD. Rapid Progress Toward Reliable Blood Tests for Alzheimer Disease. JAMA Neurol 2021; 78:143-145. [PMID: 33165524 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth H Thijssen
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco.,Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gil D Rabinovici
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco.,Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco.,Associate Editor, JAMA Neurology
| |
Collapse
|
104
|
Karikari TK, Benedet AL, Ashton NJ, Lantero Rodriguez J, Snellman A, Suárez-Calvet M, Saha-Chaudhuri P, Lussier F, Kvartsberg H, Rial AM, Pascoal TA, Andreasson U, Schöll M, Weiner MW, Rosa-Neto P, Trojanowski JQ, Shaw LM, Blennow K, Zetterberg H. Diagnostic performance and prediction of clinical progression of plasma phospho-tau181 in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Mol Psychiatry 2021; 26:429-442. [PMID: 33106600 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-020-00923-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 184] [Impact Index Per Article: 61.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Whilst cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) biomarkers for amyloid-β (Aβ) and tau pathologies are accurate for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), their broad implementation in clinical and trial settings are restricted by high cost and limited accessibility. Plasma phosphorylated-tau181 (p-tau181) is a promising blood-based biomarker that is specific for AD, correlates with cerebral Aβ and tau pathology, and predicts future cognitive decline. In this study, we report the performance of p-tau181 in >1000 individuals from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), including cognitively unimpaired (CU), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD dementia patients characterized by Aβ PET. We confirmed that plasma p-tau181 is increased at the preclinical stage of Alzheimer and further increases in MCI and AD dementia. Individuals clinically classified as AD dementia but having negative Aβ PET scans show little increase but plasma p-tau181 is increased if CSF Aβ has already changed prior to Aβ PET changes. Despite being a multicenter study, plasma p-tau181 demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy to identify AD dementia (AUC = 85.3%; 95% CI, 81.4-89.2%), as well as to distinguish between Aβ- and Aβ+ individuals along the Alzheimer's continuum (AUC = 76.9%; 95% CI, 74.0-79.8%). Higher baseline concentrations of plasma p-tau181 accurately predicted future dementia and performed comparably to the baseline prediction of CSF p-tau181. Longitudinal measurements of plasma p-tau181 revealed low intra-individual variability, which could be of potential benefit in disease-modifying trials seeking a measurable response to a therapeutic target. This study adds significant weight to the growing body of evidence in the use of plasma p-tau181 as a non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic tool for AD, regardless of clinical stage, which would be of great benefit in clinical practice and a large cost-saving in clinical trial recruitment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas K Karikari
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Andréa L Benedet
- Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, H4H 1R3, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Nicholas J Ashton
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.,Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.,King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, London, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health & Biomedical Research Unit for Dementia at South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation, London, UK
| | - Juan Lantero Rodriguez
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Anniina Snellman
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.,Turku PET Centre, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, FI-20520, Turku, Finland
| | - Marc Suárez-Calvet
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Servei de Neurologia, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Firoza Lussier
- Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, H4H 1R3, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Hlin Kvartsberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.,Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Alexis Moscoso Rial
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.,Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Tharick A Pascoal
- Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, H4H 1R3, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Montreal Neurological Institute, H3A 2B4, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Ulf Andreasson
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.,Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Michael Schöll
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.,Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.,Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Michael W Weiner
- Department of Radiology, Medicine, and Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Pedro Rosa-Neto
- Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, H4H 1R3, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Montreal Neurological Institute, H3A 2B4, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - John Q Trojanowski
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Institute on Aging, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Leslie M Shaw
- Institute on Aging, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.,Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden. .,Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden. .,Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK. .,UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
105
|
Pampuscenko K, Morkuniene R, Krasauskas L, Smirnovas V, Tomita T, Borutaite V. Distinct Neurotoxic Effects of Extracellular Tau Species in Primary Neuronal-Glial Cultures. Mol Neurobiol 2021; 58:658-667. [PMID: 33001416 DOI: 10.1007/s12035-020-02150-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Recent data from various experimental models support the link between extracellular tau and neurodegeneration; however, the exact mechanisms by which extracellular tau or its modified forms or aggregates cause neuronal death remain unclear. We have previously shown that exogenously applied monomers and oligomers of the longest tau isoform (2N4R) at micromolar concentrations induced microglial phagocytosis of stressed-but-viable neurons in vitro. In this study, we investigated whether extracellular phosphorylated tau2N4R (p-tau2N4R), isoform 1N4R (tau1N4R) and K18 peptide can induce neuronal death or loss in primary neuronal-glial cell cultures. We found that p-tau2N4R at 30 nM concentration induced loss of viable neurons; however, 700 nM p-tau2N4R caused necrosis of both neurons and microglia, and this neuronal death was partially glial cell-dependent. We also found that extracellular tau1N4R oligomers, but not monomers, at 3 μM concentration caused neuronal death in mixed cell cultures: self-assembly tau1N4R dimers-tetramers induced neuronal necrosis and apoptosis, whereas Aβ-promoted tau1N4R oligomers caused glial cell-dependent loss of neurons without signs of increased cell death. Monomeric and pre-aggregated tau peptide containing 4R repeats (K18) had no effect in mixed cultures, suggesting that tau neurotoxicity might be dependent on N-terminal part of the protein. Taken together, our results show that extracellular p-tau2N4R is the most toxic form among investigated tau species inducing loss of neurons at low nanomolar concentrations and that neurotoxicity of tau1N4R is dependent on its aggregation state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katryna Pampuscenko
- Neuroscience Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
| | - Ramune Morkuniene
- Neuroscience Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Lukas Krasauskas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Vytautas Smirnovas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Taisuke Tomita
- Laboratory of Neuropathology and Neuroscience, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Vilmante Borutaite
- Neuroscience Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Van Egroo M, Chylinski D, Narbutas J, Besson G, Muto V, Schmidt C, Marzoli D, Cardone P, Vandeleene N, Grignard M, Luxen A, Salmon E, Lambert C, Bastin C, Collette F, Phillips C, Maquet P, Bahri MA, Balteau E, Vandewalle G. Early brainstem [18F]THK5351 uptake is linked to cortical hyperexcitability in healthy aging. JCI Insight 2021; 6:142514. [PMID: 33290274 PMCID: PMC7934880 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.142514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuronal hyperexcitability characterizes the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). In animals, early misfolded tau and amyloid-β (Aβ) protein accumulation — both central to AD neuropathology — promote cortical excitability and neuronal network dysfunction. In healthy humans, misfolded tau and Aβ aggregates are first detected, respectively, in the brainstem and frontomedial and temporobasal cortices, decades prior to the onset of AD cognitive symptoms. Whether cortical excitability is related to early brainstem tau — and its associated neuroinflammation — and cortical Aβ aggregations remains unknown. METHODS We probed frontal cortex excitability, using transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroencephalography, in a sample of 64 healthy late-middle–aged individuals (50–69 years; 45 women and 19 men). We assessed whole-brain [18F]THK5351 PET uptake as a proxy measure of tau/neuroinflammation, and we assessed whole-brain Aβ burden with [18F]Flutemetamol or [18F]Florbetapir radiotracers. RESULTS We found that higher [18F]THK5351 uptake in a brainstem monoaminergic compartment was associated with increased cortical excitability (r = 0.29, P = 0.02). By contrast, [18F]THK5351 PET signal in the hippocampal formation, although strongly correlated with brainstem signal in whole-brain voxel-based quantification analyses (P value corrected for family-wise error [PFWE-corrected] < 0.001), was not significantly associated with cortical excitability (r = 0.14, P = 0.25). Importantly, no significant association was found between early Aβ cortical deposits and cortical excitability (r = –0.20, P = 0.11). CONCLUSION These findings reveal potential brain substrates for increased cortical excitability in preclinical AD and may constitute functional in vivo correlates of early brainstem tau accumulation and neuroinflammation in humans. TRIAL REGISTRATION EudraCT 2016-001436-35. FUNDING F.R.S.-FNRS Belgium, Wallonie-Bruxelles International, ULiège, Fondation Simone et Pierre Clerdent, European Regional Development Fund.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Justinas Narbutas
- GIGA-Cyclotron Research Centre-In Vivo Imaging and.,Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, University of Liège (ULiège), Liège, Belgium
| | | | - Vincenzo Muto
- GIGA-Cyclotron Research Centre-In Vivo Imaging and.,Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, University of Liège (ULiège), Liège, Belgium
| | - Christina Schmidt
- GIGA-Cyclotron Research Centre-In Vivo Imaging and.,Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, University of Liège (ULiège), Liège, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | - André Luxen
- GIGA-Cyclotron Research Centre-In Vivo Imaging and
| | - Eric Salmon
- GIGA-Cyclotron Research Centre-In Vivo Imaging and.,Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, University of Liège (ULiège), Liège, Belgium.,Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Christian Lambert
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christine Bastin
- GIGA-Cyclotron Research Centre-In Vivo Imaging and.,Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, University of Liège (ULiège), Liège, Belgium
| | - Fabienne Collette
- GIGA-Cyclotron Research Centre-In Vivo Imaging and.,Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, University of Liège (ULiège), Liège, Belgium
| | - Christophe Phillips
- GIGA-Cyclotron Research Centre-In Vivo Imaging and.,GIGA-In Silico Medicine, ULiège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Pierre Maquet
- GIGA-Cyclotron Research Centre-In Vivo Imaging and.,Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
107
|
Chotipanich C, Kongthai S, Kunawudhi A, Promteangtrong C, Jantarato A. 18F-THK 5351 and 11C-PiB PET of the Thai normal brain template. ASIA OCEANIA JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2021; 9:21-30. [PMID: 33392346 DOI: 10.22038/aojnmb.2020.49623.1338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Objectives The aim of the study was to create a local normal database brain template of Thai individuals for 11C-Pittsburgh compound B (11C-PiB) and 18F-THK 5351 depositions using statistical parametric mapping (SPM) software, and to validate and optimize the established specific brain template for use in clinical practice with a highly reliability and reproducibility. Methods This prospective study was conducted in 24 healthy right-handed volunteers (13 men, 11 women; aged: 42-79 years) who underwent 18F-THK 5351 and 11C-PiB PET/CT scans. SPM was used for the 18F-THK 5351 and 11C-PiB PET/CT image analysis. All PET images were processed individually using Diffusion Tensor Image -Magnetic Resonance Imaging-weighted images (DTI-MRI images), which involved: (1) conversion of Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) files into an analyzable file extension (.NIFTI) for statistical parametric mapping, (2) setting of the origin (the anterior commissure was used as the anatomical landmark), (3) re-alignment, (4) co-registration of PET with B0 (T1W) and DTI-MRI images, (5) normalization, and (6) normal verification using the Thai MRI standard. We then compared the normal PET template with the abnormal deposition area of different dementia syndromes, including Alzheimer's disease and progressive supranuclear palsy. Results This method was able to differentiate cognitively normal from Alzheimer's disease and progressive supranuclear palsy subjects. Conclusions This normal brain template was able to be integrated into clinical practice and research using PET analyses at our center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chanisa Chotipanich
- National Cyclotron and PET Centre, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Supaporn Kongthai
- National Cyclotron and PET Centre, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Anchisa Kunawudhi
- National Cyclotron and PET Centre, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Attapon Jantarato
- National Cyclotron and PET Centre, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
108
|
Provost K, Iaccarino L, Soleimani-Meigooni DN, Baker S, Edwards L, Eichenlaub U, Hansson O, Jagust W, Janabi M, La Joie R, Lesman-Segev O, Mellinger TJ, Miller BL, Ossenkoppele R, Pham J, Smith R, Sonni I, Strom A, Mattsson-Carlgren N, Rabinovici GD. Comparing ATN-T designation by tau PET visual reads, tau PET quantification, and CSF PTau181 across three cohorts. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:2259-2271. [PMID: 33398408 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05152-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare rates of tau biomarker positivity (T-status) per the 2018 Alzheimer's Disease (AD) Research Framework derived from [18F]flortaucipir (FTP) PET visual assessment, FTP quantification, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) phosphorylated Tau-181 (PTau181). METHODS We included 351 subjects with varying clinical diagnoses from three cohorts with available FTP PET and CSF PTau181 within 18 months. T-status was derived from (1) FTP visual assessment by two blinded raters; (2) FTP standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) quantification from a temporal meta-ROI (threshold: SUVR ≥1.27); and (3) Elecsys® Phospho-Tau (181P) CSF (Roche Diagnostics) concentrations (threshold: PTau181 ≥ 24.5 pg/mL). RESULTS FTP visual reads yielded the highest rates of T+, while T+ by SUVR increased progressively from cognitively normal (CN) through mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD dementia. T+ designation by CSF PTau181 was intermediate between FTP visual reads and SUVR values in CN, similar to SUVR in MCI, and lower in AD dementia. Concordance in T-status between modality pairs ranged from 68 to 76% and varied by clinical diagnosis, being highest in patients with AD dementia. In discriminating Aβ + MCI and AD subjects from healthy controls and non-AD participants, FTP visual assessment was most sensitive (0.96) but least specific (0.60). Specificity was highest with FTP SUVR (0.91) with sensitivity of 0.89. Sensitivity (0.73) and specificity (0.72) were balanced for PTau181. CONCLUSION The choice of tau biomarker may differ by disease stage and research goals that seek to maximize sensitivity or specificity. Visual interpretations of tau PET enhance sensitivity compared to quantification alone, particularly in early disease stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Provost
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, Suite 190, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
| | - Leonardo Iaccarino
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, Suite 190, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - David N Soleimani-Meigooni
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, Suite 190, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Suzanne Baker
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Lauren Edwards
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, Suite 190, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | | | - Oskar Hansson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - William Jagust
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Mustafa Janabi
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Renaud La Joie
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, Suite 190, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Orit Lesman-Segev
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, Suite 190, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Taylor J Mellinger
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, Suite 190, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Bruce L Miller
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, Suite 190, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Julie Pham
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, Suite 190, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Ruben Smith
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ida Sonni
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UC Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Amelia Strom
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, Suite 190, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Gil D Rabinovici
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, Suite 190, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Zetterberg H, Bendlin BB. Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease-preparing for a new era of disease-modifying therapies. Mol Psychiatry 2021; 26:296-308. [PMID: 32251378 PMCID: PMC8172244 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-020-0721-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 190] [Impact Index Per Article: 63.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Revised: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Clinical trial results presented in 2019 suggest that antibody-based removal of cerebral amyloid β (Aβ) plaques may possibly clear tau tangles and modestly slow cognitive decline in symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (AD). Although regulatory approval of this approach is still pending, preparing the healthcare system for the advent of disease-modifying therapies against AD is imperative. In particular, it will be necessary to identify the most suitable biomarkers to facilitate appropriate treatment of AD. Here, we give an update on recent developments in fluid and imaging biomarkers for AD-related pathologies and discuss potential approaches that could be adopted to screen for and clarify the underlying pathology in people seeking medical advice because of cognitive symptoms. We succinctly review recent data regarding biomarkers for Aβ and tau pathology, neurodegeneration, synaptic dysfunction, and inflammation, highlight the need for further research into common copathologies, and suggest how different biomarkers could be used (most likely in combination) to facilitate the development and clinical implementation of novel drug candidates against AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henrik Zetterberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience & Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden.
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK.
- UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK.
| | - Barbara B Bendlin
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
110
|
Kodintsev AN, Kovtun OP, Volkova LI. Saliva Biomarkers in Diagnostics of Early Stages of Alzheimer’s Disease. NEUROCHEM J+ 2020. [DOI: 10.1134/s1819712420040042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
111
|
Increasing the reproducibility of fluid biomarker studies in neurodegenerative studies. Nat Commun 2020; 11:6252. [PMID: 33288742 PMCID: PMC7721731 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19957-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Biomarkers have revolutionized scientific research on neurodegenerative diseases, in particular Alzheimer's disease, transformed drug trial design, and are also increasingly improving patient management in clinical practice. A few key cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers have been robustly associated with neurodegenerative diseases. Several novel biomarkers are very promising, especially blood-based markers. However, many biomarker findings have had low reproducibility despite initial promising results. In this perspective, we identify possible sources for low reproducibility of studies on fluid biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases, with a focus on Alzheimer's disease. We suggest guidelines for researchers and journal editors, with the aim to improve reproducibility of findings.
Collapse
|
112
|
Regional Tau Effects on Prospective Cognitive Change in Cognitively Normal Older Adults. J Neurosci 2020; 41:366-375. [PMID: 33219003 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2111-20.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Revised: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Studies suggest that tau deposition starts in the anterolateral entorhinal cortex (EC) with normal aging, and that the presence of β-amyloid (Aβ) facilitates its spread to neocortex, which may reflect the beginning of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Functional connectivity between the anterolateral EC and the anterior-temporal (AT) memory network appears to drive higher tau deposition in AT than in the posterior-medial (PM) memory network. Here, we investigated whether this differential vulnerability to tau deposition may predict different cognitive consequences of EC, AT, and PM tau. Using 18F-flortaucipir (FTP) and 11C-Pittsburgh compound-B (PiB) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, we measured tau and Aβ in 124 cognitively normal human older adults (74 females, 50 males) followed for an average of 2.8 years for prospective cognition. We found that higher FTP in all three regions was individually related to faster memory decline, and that the effects of AT and PM FTP, but not EC, were driven by Aβ+ individuals. Moreover, when we included all three FTP measures competitively in the same model, only AT FTP significantly predicted memory decline. Our data support a model whereby tau, facilitated by Aβ, transits from EC to cortical regions that are most closely associated with the anterolateral EC, which specifically affects memory in the initial stage of AD. Memory also appears to be affected by EC tau in the absence of Aβ, which may be less clinically consequential. These findings may provide clarification of differences between normal aging and AD, and elucidate the transition between the two stages.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Tau and β-amyloid (Aβ) are hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease (AD) but are also found in cognitively normal people. It is unclear whether, and how, this early deposition of tau and Aβ may affect cognition in normal aging and the asymptomatic stage of AD. We show that tau deposition in the entorhinal cortex (EC), which is common in advanced age, predicts memory decline in older adults independent of Aβ, likely reflecting normal, age-related memory loss. In contrast, tau in anterior-temporal (AT) regions is most predictive of memory decline in Aβ+ individuals. These data support the idea that tau preferentially spreads to specific cortical regions, likely through functional connections, which plays a primary role in memory decline in the early stage of AD.
Collapse
|
113
|
Suárez-Calvet M, Karikari TK, Ashton NJ, Lantero Rodríguez J, Milà-Alomà M, Gispert JD, Salvadó G, Minguillon C, Fauria K, Shekari M, Grau-Rivera O, Arenaza-Urquijo EM, Sala-Vila A, Sánchez-Benavides G, González-de-Echávarri JM, Kollmorgen G, Stoops E, Vanmechelen E, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Molinuevo JL. Novel tau biomarkers phosphorylated at T181, T217 or T231 rise in the initial stages of the preclinical Alzheimer's continuum when only subtle changes in Aβ pathology are detected. EMBO Mol Med 2020; 12:e12921. [PMID: 33169916 PMCID: PMC7721364 DOI: 10.15252/emmm.202012921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 218] [Impact Index Per Article: 54.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Revised: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
In Alzheimer's disease (AD), tau phosphorylation in the brain and its subsequent release into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood is a dynamic process that changes during disease evolution. The main aim of our study was to characterize the pattern of changes in phosphorylated tau (p-tau) in the preclinical stage of the Alzheimer's continuum. We measured three novel CSF p-tau biomarkers, phosphorylated at threonine-181 and threonine-217 with an N-terminal partner antibody and at threonine-231 with a mid-region partner antibody. These were compared with an automated mid-region p-tau181 assay (Elecsys) as the gold standard p-tau measure. We demonstrate that these novel p-tau biomarkers increase more prominently in preclinical Alzheimer, when only subtle changes of amyloid-β (Aβ) pathology are detected, and can accurately differentiate Aβ-positive from Aβ-negative cognitively unimpaired individuals. Moreover, we show that the novel plasma N-terminal p-tau181 biomarker is mildly but significantly increased in the preclinical stage. Our results support the idea that early changes in neuronal tau metabolism in preclinical Alzheimer, likely in response to Aβ exposure, can be detected with these novel p-tau assays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Suárez-Calvet
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Servei de Neurologia, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de sFragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Thomas K Karikari
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Nicholas J Ashton
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, London, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health & Biomedical Research Unit for Dementia at South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation, London, UK
| | - Juan Lantero Rodríguez
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Marta Milà-Alomà
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de sFragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain.,Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Domingo Gispert
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gemma Salvadó
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carolina Minguillon
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de sFragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Karine Fauria
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de sFragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Mahnaz Shekari
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Oriol Grau-Rivera
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Servei de Neurologia, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de sFragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Eider M Arenaza-Urquijo
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de sFragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Aleix Sala-Vila
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gonzalo Sánchez-Benavides
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de sFragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain
| | - José Maria González-de-Echávarri
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden.,Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.,UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - José Luis Molinuevo
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de sFragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain.,Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
114
|
Cantero JL, Atienza M, Ramos-Cejudo J, Fossati S, Wisniewski T, Osorio RS. Plasma tau predicts cerebral vulnerability in aging. Aging (Albany NY) 2020; 12:21004-21022. [PMID: 33147571 PMCID: PMC7695405 DOI: 10.18632/aging.104057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Identifying cerebral vulnerability in late life may help prevent or slow the progression of aging-related chronic diseases. However, non-invasive biomarkers aimed at detecting subclinical cerebral changes in the elderly are lacking. Here, we have examined the potential of plasma total tau (t-tau) for identifying cerebral and cognitive deficits in normal elderly subjects. Patterns of cortical thickness and cortical glucose metabolism were used as outcomes of cerebral vulnerability. We found that increased plasma t-tau levels were associated with widespread reductions of cortical glucose uptake, thinning of the temporal lobe, and memory deficits. Importantly, tau-related reductions of glucose consumption in the orbitofrontal cortex emerged as a determining factor of the relationship between cortical thinning and memory loss. Together, these results support the view that plasma t-tau may serve to identify subclinical cerebral and cognitive deficits in normal aging, allowing detection of individuals at risk for developing aging-related neurodegenerative conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose L. Cantero
- Laboratory of Functional Neuroscience, Pablo de Olavide University, Seville, Spain
- CIBERNED, Network Center for Biomedical Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mercedes Atienza
- Laboratory of Functional Neuroscience, Pablo de Olavide University, Seville, Spain
- CIBERNED, Network Center for Biomedical Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jaime Ramos-Cejudo
- Division of Brain Aging, Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Silvia Fossati
- Alzheimer's Center at Temple, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
| | - Thomas Wisniewski
- Departments of Neurology, Pathology and Psychiatry, Center for Cognitive Neurology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Ricardo S. Osorio
- Division of Brain Aging, Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
115
|
Reimand J, Boon BDC, Collij LE, Teunissen CE, Rozemuller AJM, van Berckel BNM, Scheltens P, Ossenkoppele R, Bouwman F. Amyloid-β PET and CSF in an autopsy-confirmed cohort. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2020; 7:2150-2160. [PMID: 33080124 PMCID: PMC7664271 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Revised: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Accumulation of amyloid-β is among the earliest changes in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Amyloid-β positron emission tomography (PET) and Aβ42 in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) both assess amyloid-β pathology in-vivo, but 10-20% of cases show discordant (CSF+/PET- or CSF-/PET+) results. The neuropathological correspondence with amyloid-β CSF/PET discordance is unknown. METHODS We included 21 patients from our tertiary memory clinic who had undergone both CSF Aβ42 analysis and amyloid-β PET, and had neuropathological data available. Amyloid-β PET and CSF results were compared with neuropathological ABC scores (comprising of Thal (A), Braak (B), and CERAD (C) stage, all ranging from 0 [low] to 3 [high]) and neuropathological diagnosis. RESULTS Neuropathological diagnosis was AD in 11 (52%) patients. Amyloid-β PET was positive in all A3, C2, and C3 cases and in one of the two A2 cases. CSF Aβ42 was positive in 92% of ≥A2 and 90% of ≥C2 cases. PET and CSF were discordant in three of 21 (14%) cases: CSF+/PET- in a patient with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (A0B0C0), CSF+/PET- in a patient with FTLD-TDP type B (A2B1C1), and CSF-/PET+ in a patient with AD (A3B3C3). Two CSF+/PET+ cases had a non-AD neuropathological diagnosis, that is FTLD-TDP type E (A3B1C1) and adult-onset leukoencephalopathy with axonal spheroids (A1B1C0). INTERPRETATION Our study demonstrates neuropathological underpinnings of amyloid-β CSF/PET discordance. Furthermore, amyloid-β biomarker positivity on both PET and CSF did not invariably result in an AD diagnosis at autopsy, illustrating the importance of considering relevant comorbidities when evaluating amyloid-β biomarker results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juhan Reimand
- Department of Neurology & Alzheimer Center AmsterdamAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of Health TechnologiesTallinn University of TechnologyTallinnEstonia
- Radiology CentreNorth Estonia Medical CentreTallinnEstonia
| | - Baayla D. C. Boon
- Department of Neurology & Alzheimer Center AmsterdamAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of PathologyAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Lyduine E. Collij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Charlotte E. Teunissen
- Neurochemistry LaboratoryDepartment of Clinical ChemistryAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Annemieke J. M. Rozemuller
- Department of PathologyAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Bart N. M. van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Department of Neurology & Alzheimer Center AmsterdamAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Department of Neurology & Alzheimer Center AmsterdamAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research UnitLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Femke Bouwman
- Department of Neurology & Alzheimer Center AmsterdamAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
116
|
Kim H, Choe YS. High-yield synthesis of a tau PET radioligand and its nonradioactive ligand using an alternative protection and deprotection strategy. J Labelled Comp Radiopharm 2020; 64:150-158. [PMID: 33125755 DOI: 10.1002/jlcr.3894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Recently developed tau imaging radiopharmaceuticals show specific uptake in tau protein-rich regions in human brains without off-target binding. These radiopharmaceuticals and their nonradioactive reference ligands are generally obtained in low (radio)chemical yields. In the present study, we investigated high-yield synthesis of 18 F-RO948 ([18 F]1) and its nonradioactive ligand (1). The ligand 1 was synthesized by a Suzuki-Miyaura coupling reaction between 9-(4-methoxybenzyl)-9H-pyrrolo[2,3-b:4,5-c']dipyridin-2-yl trifluoromethanesulfonate (3) and 2-fluoro-5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)pyridine (4), followed by oxidative removal of the para-methoxybenzyl (PMB) group with ceric ammonium nitrate (CAN). This two-step reaction gave 1 in 55.8% yield. The precursor for [18 F]1 was synthesized from 3 and 2-nitro-5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)pyridine (6). The resulting PMB-protected precursor 8 was obtained in 74.5% yield. [18 F]1 was synthesized by radiofluorination of 8 (radiochemical conversion (RCC): 95.7 ± 1.7%), followed by deprotection of the PMB group with CAN. This one-pot, two-step radiochemical synthesis followed by HPLC purification gave [18 F]1 in high decay-corrected radiochemical yield (54-60%). The RCC of [18 F]fluoride to [18 F]1 in our two-step synthesis method was similar to that in a one-step radiofluorination reaction of a tert-butoxycarbonyl (BOC)-protected precursor 10 that proceeds with concomitant thermal deprotection of the BOC group. Taken together, the results of this study suggest that this high-yield synthesis method is useful for the synthesis of 18 F-labeled (NH)heteroarene compounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyunjung Kim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yearn Seong Choe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
Gabellieri E, Capotosti F, Molette J, Sreenivasachary N, Mueller A, Berndt M, Schieferstein H, Juergens T, Varisco Y, Oden F, Schmitt-Willich H, Hickman D, Dinkelborg L, Stephens A, Pfeifer A, Kroth H. Discovery of 2-(4-(2-fluoroethoxy)piperidin-1-yl)-9-methyl-9H-pyrrolo[2,3-b:4,5-c']dipyridine ([18F]PI-2014) as PET tracer for the detection of pathological aggregated tau in Alzheimer's disease and other tauopathies. Eur J Med Chem 2020; 204:112615. [PMID: 32771872 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The compound screening was initiated with a direct staining assay to identify compounds binding to Tau aggregates and not Abeta plaques using human brain sections derived from late stage Alzheimer's disease donors. The binding of Tau aggregate selective compounds was then quantitatively assessed with human brain derived paired helical filaments utilizing the label-free Back Scattering Interferometry assay. In vivo biodistribution experiments of selected fluorine-18 labeled compounds were performed in mice to assess brain uptake, brain washout, and defluorination. Compound 11 emerged as the most promising candidate, displaying high in vitro binding affinity and selectivity to neurofibrillary tangles. Fluorine-18 labeled compound 11 showed high brain uptake and rapid washout from the mouse brain with no observed bone uptake. Furthermore, compound 11 was able to detect Tau aggregates in tauopathy brain sections from corticobasal degeneration, progressive supranuclear palsy, and Pick's disease donors. Thus, 2-(4-(2-fluoroethoxy)piperidin-1-yl)-9-methyl-9H-pyrrolo[2,3-b:4,5-c']dipyridine (PI-2014, compound 11) was selected for characterization in a first-in-human study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jerome Molette
- AC Immune SA, EPFL Innovation Park, Building B, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Andre Mueller
- Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Tegeler Strasse 6-7, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mathias Berndt
- Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Tegeler Strasse 6-7, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hanno Schieferstein
- Formerly Piramal Imaging GmbH, Tegeler Strasse 6-7, 13353, Berlin, Germany; Merck KGaA, Frankfurter Strasse 250, 64293, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Tanja Juergens
- AC Immune SA, EPFL Innovation Park, Building B, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Yvan Varisco
- AC Immune SA, EPFL Innovation Park, Building B, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Felix Oden
- Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Tegeler Strasse 6-7, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - David Hickman
- AC Immune SA, EPFL Innovation Park, Building B, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ludger Dinkelborg
- Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Tegeler Strasse 6-7, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrew Stephens
- Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Tegeler Strasse 6-7, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrea Pfeifer
- AC Immune SA, EPFL Innovation Park, Building B, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Heiko Kroth
- AC Immune SA, EPFL Innovation Park, Building B, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
118
|
Chanisa C, Monchaya N, Anchisa K, Chetsadaporn P, Attapon J. Analysis of amyloid and tau deposition in Alzheimer's disease using 11C-Pittsburgh compound B and 18F-THK 5351 positron emission tomography imaging. World J Nucl Med 2020; 20:61-72. [PMID: 33850491 PMCID: PMC8034795 DOI: 10.4103/wjnm.wjnm_50_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 05/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aims to determine the deposition of 11C-Pittsburgh compound B (11C-PiB) and 18F-THK 5351 using a normal database of the optimal cut-off-points for standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. Sixteen AD patients and 24 cognitively normal individuals were enrolled in this study. The optimal cutoff points for the SUVR from the normal database were used for quantitative analysis. P-mod software with the Automated Anatomical Labeling merged atlas was employed to generate automatic volumes of interest to identify different brain regions, and the SUVRs of AD patients were compared with those of the age-matched normal controls. The correlation between PiB and THK5351 deposition at matching brain regions was identified. The mean regional 11C-PiB SUVRs of the AD patients were significantly higher than the healthy controls (P < 0.05). The 11C-PiB SUVR cut-offs were 1.46–1.81, with sensitivity ranging from 81.25% to 93.75% and specificity of 100%. The mean SUVRs of 18F-THK 5351 in various regions were also significantly higher in the AD patients than in the healthy controls (P < 0.05). The inferior temporal gyrus yielded an optimum SUVR cut-off-points of 1.5 with 80% sensitivity and 83.33% specificity. The correlation of PiB and THK5351 SUVR was reported at precuneus, parietal, and occipital brain areas, with spearman's rho of 0.67, 0.66, and 0.72, respectively. Our findings allow determination of the SUVRs of 11C-PiB and 18F-THK-5351 amyloid and tau positron emission tomography tracers for clinical use, according to the normal database of the optimal cut-off-points for SUVRs in AD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chotipanich Chanisa
- National Cyclotron and PET Centre, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Nivorn Monchaya
- National Cyclotron and PET Centre, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kunawudhi Anchisa
- National Cyclotron and PET Centre, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Jantarato Attapon
- National Cyclotron and PET Centre, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
119
|
Guo Y, Li H, Tan L, Chen S, Yang Y, Ma Y, Zuo C, Dong Q, Tan L, Yu J. Discordant Alzheimer's neurodegenerative biomarkers and their clinical outcomes. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2020; 7:1996-2009. [PMID: 32949193 PMCID: PMC7545611 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 08/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In the 2018 ATN framework, Alzheimer's neurodegenerative biomarkers comprised cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) total tau, 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography, and brain atrophy. We aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of having discordant Alzheimer's neurodegenerative biomarkers. METHODS A total of 721 non-demented individuals from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database were included and then further categorized into concordant-negative, discordant, and concordant-positive groups. Demographic distributions of the groups were compared. Longitudinal changes in clinical outcomes and risk of conversion were assessed using linear mixed-effects models and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models, respectively. RESULTS Discordant group was intermediate to concordant-negative and concordant-positive groups in terms of APOE ε4 positivity, CSF amyloid-beta, and phosphorylated tau. Compared with concordant-negative group, discordant group deteriorated faster in cognitive scores (Mini-Mental State Examination, the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes, and the Functional Activities Questionnaire) and demonstrated greater rates of atrophy in brain structures (hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, and whole brain), and concordant-positive group performed worse over time than discordant group. Moreover, the risk of cognitive decline increased from concordant-negative to discordant to concordant-positive. The results from longitudinal analyses were validated in A+T+, cognitively normal, and mild cognitive impairment individuals, and were also validated by applying different cutoffs and neurodegenerative biomarkers. INTERPRETATION Discordant neurodegenerative status denotes a stage of cognitive function which is intermediate between concordant-negative and concordant-positive. Identification of discordant cases would provide insights into intervention and new therapy approaches, particularly in A+T+ individuals. Moreover, this work may be a complement to the ATN scheme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Guo
- Department of NeurologyQingdao Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao UniversityQingdaoChina
| | - Hong‐Qi Li
- Department of Neurology and Institute of NeurologyHuashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Lin Tan
- Department of NeurologyQingdao Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao UniversityQingdaoChina
| | - Shi‐Dong Chen
- Department of Neurology and Institute of NeurologyHuashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Yu‐Xiang Yang
- Department of Neurology and Institute of NeurologyHuashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Ya‐Hui Ma
- Department of NeurologyQingdao Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao UniversityQingdaoChina
| | - Chuan‐Tao Zuo
- PET CenterHuashan Hospital, Fudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Qiang Dong
- Department of Neurology and Institute of NeurologyHuashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Lan Tan
- Department of NeurologyQingdao Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao UniversityQingdaoChina
| | - Jin‐Tai Yu
- Department of Neurology and Institute of NeurologyHuashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| | | |
Collapse
|
120
|
Bjorkli C, Sandvig A, Sandvig I. Bridging the Gap Between Fluid Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease, Model Systems, and Patients. Front Aging Neurosci 2020; 12:272. [PMID: 32982716 PMCID: PMC7492751 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a debilitating neurodegenerative disease characterized by the accumulation of two proteins in fibrillar form: amyloid-β (Aβ) and tau. Despite decades of intensive research, we cannot yet pinpoint the exact cause of the disease or unequivocally determine the exact mechanism(s) underlying its progression. This confounds early diagnosis and treatment of the disease. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, which can reveal ongoing biochemical changes in the brain, can help monitor developing AD pathology prior to clinical diagnosis. Here we review preclinical and clinical investigations of commonly used biomarkers in animals and patients with AD, which can bridge translation from model systems into the clinic. The core AD biomarkers have been found to translate well across species, whereas biomarkers of neuroinflammation translate to a lesser extent. Nevertheless, there is no absolute equivalence between biomarkers in human AD patients and those examined in preclinical models in terms of revealing key pathological hallmarks of the disease. In this review, we provide an overview of current but also novel AD biomarkers and how they relate to key constituents of the pathological cascade, highlighting confounding factors and pitfalls in interpretation, and also provide recommendations for standardized procedures during sample collection to enhance the translational validity of preclinical AD models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christiana Bjorkli
- Sandvig Group, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Axel Sandvig
- Sandvig Group, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.,Institute of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Department of Neurology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Neuro, Head, and Neck, University Hospital of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Ioanna Sandvig
- Sandvig Group, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
121
|
Lantero Rodriguez J, Karikari TK, Suárez-Calvet M, Troakes C, King A, Emersic A, Aarsland D, Hye A, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Ashton NJ. Plasma p-tau181 accurately predicts Alzheimer's disease pathology at least 8 years prior to post-mortem and improves the clinical characterisation of cognitive decline. Acta Neuropathol 2020; 140:267-278. [PMID: 32720099 PMCID: PMC7423866 DOI: 10.1007/s00401-020-02195-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 200] [Impact Index Per Article: 50.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The neuropathological confirmation of amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) remains the gold standard for a definitive diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Nowadays, the in vivo diagnosis of AD is greatly aided by both cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) biomarkers. Although highly accurate, their broad implementation is restricted by high cost, limited accessibility and invasiveness. We recently developed a high-performance, ultrasensitive immunoassay for the quantification of tau phosphorylated at threonine-181 (p-tau181) in plasma, which identifies AD pathophysiology with high accuracy. However, it remains unclear whether plasma p-tau181, measured years before the death, can predict the eventual neuropathological confirmation of AD, and successfully discriminates AD from non-AD dementia pathologies. We studied a unique cohort of 115 individuals with longitudinal blood collections with clinical evaluation at 8, 4 and 2 years prior to neuropathological assessment at death. The results demonstrate that plasma p-tau181 associates better with AD neuropathology and Braak staging than a clinical diagnosis 8 years before post-mortem. Moreover, while all patients had a diagnosis of AD dementia during life, plasma p-tau181 proved to discriminate AD from non-AD pathologies with high accuracy (AUC = 97.4%, 95% CI = 94.1–100%) even 8 years before death. Additionally, the longitudinal trajectory of plasma p-tau181 was assessed in all patients. We found that the main increases in plasma p-tau181 occurred between 8 and 4 years prior to death in patients with AD neuropathology and later plateauing. In contrast, non-AD pathologies and controls exhibited minor, albeit significant, increases in p-tau181 up until death. Overall, our study demonstrates that plasma p-tau181 is highly predictive and specific of AD neuropathology years before post-mortem examination. These data add further support for the use of plasma p-tau181 to aid clinical management in primary care and recruitment for clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Lantero Rodriguez
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Thomas K Karikari
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Marc Suárez-Calvet
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain
- Servei de Neurologia, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Claire Troakes
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Andrew King
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Andreja Emersic
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Dag Aarsland
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health and Biomedical Research Unit for Dementia at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation, London, UK
- Centre for Age-Related Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Abdul Hye
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health and Biomedical Research Unit for Dementia at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation, London, UK
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Nicholas J Ashton
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health and Biomedical Research Unit for Dementia at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation, London, UK.
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
122
|
McDade E, Bednar MM, Brashear HR, Miller DS, Maruff P, Randolph C, Ismail Z, Carrillo MC, Weber CJ, Bain LJ, Hake AM. The pathway to secondary prevention of Alzheimer's disease. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA (NEW YORK, N. Y.) 2020; 6:e12069. [PMID: 32885024 PMCID: PMC7453146 DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a continuum consisting of a preclinical stage that occurs decades before symptoms appear. As researchers make advances in investigating the continuum, the importance of developing drugs for secondary prevention is garnering increased discussion. For efficacious drug development for secondary prevention it is important to define what are the earliest biological stages of AD. The Alzheimer's Association Research Roundtable convened November 27 to 28, 2018 to focus on pre-clinical AD. This review will address the biological approach to defining pre-clinical AD, detection, identification of at-risk individuals, and lessons learned from trials such as A4 and TOMMORROW.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric McDade
- Department of NeurologyWashington University School of MedicineSaint LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Martin M. Bednar
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.Americas, Inc.CambridgeMassachusettsUSA
| | | | | | | | - Christopher Randolph
- MedAvante‐ProPhaseHamiltonNew JerseyUSA
- Department of NeurologyLoyola University Medical CenterMaywoodIllinoisUSA
| | - Zahinoor Ismail
- Cumming School of MedicineThe University of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
| | | | | | - Lisa J. Bain
- Independent Science WriterElversonPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Ann Marie Hake
- Eli Lilly and CompanyIndianapolisIndianaUSA
- Department of NeurologyIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
123
|
Camporesi E, Nilsson J, Brinkmalm A, Becker B, Ashton NJ, Blennow K, Zetterberg H. Fluid Biomarkers for Synaptic Dysfunction and Loss. Biomark Insights 2020; 15:1177271920950319. [PMID: 32913390 PMCID: PMC7444114 DOI: 10.1177/1177271920950319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Synapses are the site for brain communication where information is transmitted between neurons and stored for memory formation. Synaptic degeneration is a global and early pathogenic event in neurodegenerative disorders with reduced levels of pre- and postsynaptic proteins being recognized as a core feature of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathophysiology. Together with AD, other neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental disorders show altered synaptic homeostasis as an important pathogenic event, and due to that, they are commonly referred to as synaptopathies. The exact mechanisms of synapse dysfunction in the different diseases are not well understood and their study would help understanding the pathogenic role of synaptic degeneration, as well as differences and commonalities among them and highlight candidate synaptic biomarkers for specific disorders. The assessment of synaptic proteins in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), which can reflect synaptic dysfunction in patients with cognitive disorders, is a keen area of interest. Substantial research efforts are now directed toward the investigation of CSF synaptic pathology to improve the diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders at an early stage as well as to monitor clinical progression. In this review, we will first summarize the pathological events that lead to synapse loss and then discuss the available data on established (eg, neurogranin, SNAP-25, synaptotagmin-1, GAP-43, and α-syn) and emerging (eg, synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A and neuronal pentraxins) CSF biomarkers for synapse dysfunction, while highlighting possible utilities, disease specificity, and technical challenges for their detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Camporesi
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Johanna Nilsson
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ann Brinkmalm
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Bruno Becker
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Nicholas J Ashton
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, The Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, London, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health & Biomedical Research Unit for Dementia at South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation, London, UK
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
124
|
Luchsinger JA, Zetterberg H. Tracking the potential involvement of metabolic disease in Alzheimer's disease-Biomarkers and beyond. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF NEUROBIOLOGY 2020; 154:51-77. [PMID: 32739014 DOI: 10.1016/bs.irn.2020.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
There is a vast literature linking systemic metabolic conditions to dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD). Advances in in vivo measurements of AD neuropathology using brain imaging, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and/or blood biomarkers have led to research in AD that uses in vivo biomarkers as outcomes, focusing primarily on amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration as constructs. Studies of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and AD biomarkers seem to show that T2DM is not related to amyloid deposition, but is related to neurodegeneration and tau deposition. There is a dearth of studies examining adiposity, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome in relation to AD biomarkers and the associations in these studies are inconsistent. Metabolomics studies have reported associations of unsaturated fatty acids with AD neuropathology at autopsy, and sphingolipids and glycerophospholipids in relation to neurodegeneration and amyloid and tau. There are other neurodegenerative diseases, such as Lewy body disease that may overlap with AD, and specific biomarkers for these pathologies are being developed and should be integrated into AD biomarker research. More longitudinal studies are needed with concurrent assessment of metabolic factors and AD biomarkers in order to improve the opportunity to assess causality. Ideally, AD biomarkers should be integrated into clinical trials of interventions that affect metabolic factors. Advances in blood-based AD biomarkers, which are less costly and invasive compared with CSF and brain imaging biomarkers, could facilitate widespread implementation of AD biomarkers in studies examining the metabolic contribution to AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José A Luchsinger
- Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience & Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
125
|
Mullane K, Williams M. Alzheimer’s disease beyond amyloid: Can the repetitive failures of amyloid-targeted therapeutics inform future approaches to dementia drug discovery? Biochem Pharmacol 2020; 177:113945. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.113945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
126
|
Tau PET imaging with 18F-PI-2620 in aging and neurodegenerative diseases. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 48:2233-2244. [PMID: 32572562 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04923-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2019] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In vivo measurement of the spatial distribution of neurofibrillary tangle pathology is critical for early diagnosis and disease monitoring of Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS Forty-nine participants were scanned with 18F-PI-2620 PET to examine the distribution of this novel PET ligand throughout the course of AD: 36 older healthy controls (HC) (age range 61 to 86), 11 beta-amyloid+ (Aβ+) participants with cognitive impairment (CI; clinical diagnosis of either mild cognitive impairment or AD dementia, age range 57 to 86), and 2 participants with semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA, age 66 and 78). Group differences in brain regions relevant in AD (medial temporal lobe, posterior cingulate cortex, and lateral parietal cortex) were examined using standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) normalized to the inferior gray matter of the cerebellum. RESULTS SUVRs in target regions were relatively stable 60 to 90 min post-injection, with the exception of very high binders who continued to show increases over time. Robust elevations in 18F-PI-2620 were observed between HC and Aβ+ CI across all AD regions. Within the HC group, older age was associated with subtle elevations in target regions. Mildly elevated focal uptake was observed in the anterior temporal pole in one svPPA patient. CONCLUSION Preliminary results suggest strong differences in the medial temporal lobe and cortical regions known to be impacted in AD using 18F-PI-2620 in patients along the AD trajectory. This work confirms that 18F-PI-2620 holds promise as a tool to visualize tau aggregations in AD.
Collapse
|
127
|
LI LY, WANG XY. Progress in Analysis of Tau Protein. CHINESE JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s1872-2040(20)60024-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|
128
|
Visser D, Wolters EE, Verfaillie SCJ, Coomans EM, Timmers T, Tuncel H, Reimand J, Boellaard R, Windhorst AD, Scheltens P, van der Flier WM, Ossenkoppele R, van Berckel BNM. Tau pathology and relative cerebral blood flow are independently associated with cognition in Alzheimer's disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 47:3165-3175. [PMID: 32462397 PMCID: PMC7680306 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04831-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Purpose We aimed to investigate associations between tau pathology and relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF), and their relationship with cognition in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), by using a single dynamic [18F]flortaucipir positron emission tomography (PET) scan. Methods Seventy-one subjects with AD (66 ± 8 years, mini-mental state examination (MMSE) 23 ± 4) underwent a dynamic 130-min [18F]flortaucipir PET scan. Cognitive assessment consisted of composite scores of four cognitive domains. For tau pathology and rCBF, receptor parametric mapping (cerebellar gray matter reference region) was used to create uncorrected and partial volume-corrected parametric images of non-displaceable binding potential (BPND) and R1, respectively. (Voxel-wise) linear regressions were used to investigate associations between BPND and/or R1 and cognition. Results Higher [18F]flortaucipir BPND was associated with lower R1 in the lateral temporal, parietal and occipital regions. Higher medial temporal BPND was associated with worse memory, and higher lateral temporal BPND with worse executive functioning and language. Higher parietal BPND was associated with worse executive functioning, language and attention, and higher occipital BPND with lower cognitive scores across all domains. Higher frontal BPND was associated with worse executive function and attention. For [18F]flortaucipir R1, lower values in the lateral temporal and parietal ROIs were associated with worse executive functioning, language and attention, and lower occipital R1 with lower language and attention scores. When [18F]flortaucipir BPND and R1 were modelled simultaneously, associations between lower R1 in the lateral temporal ROI and worse attention remained, as well as for lower parietal R1 and worse executive functioning and attention. Conclusion Tau pathology was associated with locally reduced rCBF. Tau pathology and low rCBF were both independently associated with worse cognitive performance. For tau pathology, these associations spanned widespread neocortex, while for rCBF, independent associations were restricted to lateral temporal and parietal regions and the executive functioning and attention domains. These findings indicate that each biomarker may independently contribute to cognitive impairment in AD. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-020-04831-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise Visser
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Emma E Wolters
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sander C J Verfaillie
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma M Coomans
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa Timmers
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hayel Tuncel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Juhan Reimand
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
129
|
Ehrenberg AJ, Khatun A, Coomans E, Betts MJ, Capraro F, Thijssen EH, Senkevich K, Bharucha T, Jafarpour M, Young PNE, Jagust W, Carter SF, Lashley T, Grinberg LT, Pereira JB, Mattsson-Carlgren N, Ashton NJ, Hanrieder J, Zetterberg H, Schöll M, Paterson RW. Relevance of biomarkers across different neurodegenerative diseases. ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY 2020; 12:56. [PMID: 32404143 PMCID: PMC7222479 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-020-00601-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Background The panel of fluid- and imaging-based biomarkers available for neurodegenerative disease research is growing and has the potential to close important gaps in research and the clinic. With this growth and increasing use, appropriate implementation and interpretation are paramount. Various biomarkers feature nuanced differences in strengths, limitations, and biases that must be considered when investigating disease etiology and clinical utility. For example, neuropathological investigations of Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis can fall in disagreement with conclusions reached by biomarker-based investigations. Considering the varied strengths, limitations, and biases of different research methodologies and approaches may help harmonize disciplines within the neurodegenerative disease field. Purpose of review Along with separate review articles covering fluid and imaging biomarkers in this issue of Alzheimer’s Research and Therapy, we present the result of a discussion from the 2019 Biomarkers in Neurodegenerative Diseases course at the University College London. Here, we discuss themes of biomarker use in neurodegenerative disease research, commenting on appropriate use, interpretation, and considerations for implementation across different neurodegenerative diseases. We also draw attention to areas where biomarker use can be combined with other disciplines to understand issues of pathophysiology and etiology underlying dementia. Lastly, we highlight novel modalities that have been proposed in the landscape of neurodegenerative disease research and care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander J Ehrenberg
- Memory and Aging Center, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. .,Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. .,Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
| | - Ayesha Khatun
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Emma Coomans
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matthew J Betts
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany.,Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Federica Capraro
- The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.,Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Elisabeth H Thijssen
- Memory and Aging Center, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Konstantin Senkevich
- Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute names by B.P. Konstantinov of National Research Center, Kurchatov Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia.,First Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Tehmina Bharucha
- Oxford Glycobiology Institute, Department of Biochemistry , University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mehrsa Jafarpour
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Peter N E Young
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.,Wallenberg Center for Molecular and Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - William Jagust
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.,Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Stephen F Carter
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Tammaryn Lashley
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.,Queen Square Brain Bank for Neurological Disorders, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Lea T Grinberg
- Memory and Aging Center, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.,Global Brain Health Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joana B Pereira
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.,Wallenberg Center for Molecular and Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Nicholas J Ashton
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.,Wallenberg Center for Molecular and Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, London, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health & Biomedical Research Unit for Dementia at South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation, London, UK
| | - Jörg Hanrieder
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.,Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden.,UK Dementia Research Institute at University College London, London, UK
| | - Michael Schöll
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.,Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ross W Paterson
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
130
|
Malpetti M, Kievit RA, Passamonti L, Jones PS, Tsvetanov KA, Rittman T, Mak E, Nicastro N, Bevan-Jones WR, Su L, Hong YT, Fryer TD, Aigbirhio FI, O’Brien JT, Rowe JB. Microglial activation and tau burden predict cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease. Brain 2020; 143:1588-1602. [PMID: 32380523 PMCID: PMC7241955 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awaa088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Revised: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Tau pathology, neuroinflammation, and neurodegeneration are key aspects of Alzheimer's disease. Understanding whether these features predict cognitive decline, alone or in combination, is crucial to develop new prognostic measures and enhanced stratification for clinical trials. Here, we studied how baseline assessments of in vivo tau pathology (measured by 18F-AV-1451 PET), neuroinflammation (measured by 11C-PK11195 PET) and brain atrophy (derived from structural MRI) predicted longitudinal cognitive changes in patients with Alzheimer's disease pathology. Twenty-six patients (n = 12 with clinically probable Alzheimer's dementia and n = 14 with amyloid-positive mild cognitive impairment) and 29 healthy control subjects underwent baseline assessment with 18F-AV-1451 PET, 11C-PK11195 PET, and structural MRI. Cognition was examined annually over the subsequent 3 years using the revised Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination. Regional grey matter volumes, and regional binding of 18F-AV-1451 and 11C-PK11195 were derived from 15 temporo-parietal regions characteristically affected by Alzheimer's disease pathology. A principal component analysis was used on each imaging modality separately, to identify the main spatial distributions of pathology. A latent growth curve model was applied across the whole sample on longitudinal cognitive scores to estimate the rate of annual decline in each participant. We regressed the individuals' estimated rate of cognitive decline on the neuroimaging components and examined univariable predictive models with single-modality predictors, and a multi-modality predictive model, to identify the independent and combined prognostic value of the different neuroimaging markers. Principal component analysis identified a single component for the grey matter atrophy, while two components were found for each PET ligand: one weighted to the anterior temporal lobe, and another weighted to posterior temporo-parietal regions. Across the whole-sample, the single-modality models indicated significant correlations between the rate of cognitive decline and the first component of each imaging modality. In patients, both stepwise backward elimination and Bayesian model selection revealed an optimal predictive model that included both components of 18F-AV-1451 and the first (i.e. anterior temporal) component for 11C-PK11195. However, the MRI-derived atrophy component and demographic variables were excluded from the optimal predictive model of cognitive decline. We conclude that temporo-parietal tau pathology and anterior temporal neuroinflammation predict cognitive decline in patients with symptomatic Alzheimer's disease pathology. This indicates the added value of PET biomarkers in predicting cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease, over and above MRI measures of brain atrophy and demographic data. Our findings also support the strategy for targeting tau and neuroinflammation in disease-modifying therapy against Alzheimer's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maura Malpetti
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Rogier A Kievit
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Luca Passamonti
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council, Milano, Italy
| | - P Simon Jones
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kamen A Tsvetanov
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Timothy Rittman
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Elijah Mak
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nicolas Nicastro
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland
| | | | - Li Su
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Young T Hong
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tim D Fryer
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - John T O’Brien
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - James B Rowe
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
131
|
Vogels T, Leuzy A, Cicognola C, Ashton NJ, Smolek T, Novak M, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Hromadka T, Zilka N, Schöll M. Propagation of Tau Pathology: Integrating Insights From Postmortem and In Vivo Studies. Biol Psychiatry 2020; 87:808-818. [PMID: 31735253 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Revised: 09/20/2019] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Cellular accumulation of aggregated forms of the protein tau is a defining feature of so-called tauopathies such as Alzheimer's disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, and chronic traumatic encephalopathy. A growing body of literature suggests that conformational characteristics of tau filaments, along with regional vulnerability to tau pathology, account for the distinct histopathological morphologies, biochemical composition, and affected cell types seen across these disorders. In this review, we describe and discuss recent evidence from human postmortem and clinical biomarker studies addressing the differential vulnerability of brain areas to tau pathology, its cell-to-cell transmission, and characteristics of the different strains that tau aggregates can adopt. Cellular biosensor assays are increasingly used in human tissue to detect the earliest forms of tau pathology, before overt histopathological lesions (i.e., neurofibrillary tangles) are apparent. Animal models with localized tau expression are used to uncover the mechanisms that influence spreading of tau aggregates. Further, studies of human postmortem-derived tau filaments from different tauopathies injected in rodents have led to striking findings that recapitulate neuropathology-based staging of tau. Furthermore, the recent advent of tau positron emission tomography and novel fluid-based biomarkers render it possible to study the temporal progression of tau pathology in vivo. Ultimately, evidence from these approaches must be integrated to better understand the onset and progression of tau pathology across tauopathies. This will lead to improved methods for the detection and monitoring of disease progression and, hopefully, to the development and refinement of tau-based therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Vogels
- AXON Neuroscience R&D Services SE, Bratislava, Slovakia; Institute of Neuroimmunology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Antoine Leuzy
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Claudia Cicognola
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Nicholas J Ashton
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Biomedical Research Unit for Dementia, NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tomas Smolek
- AXON Neuroscience R&D Services SE, Bratislava, Slovakia; Institute of Neuroimmunology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Michal Novak
- Institute of Neuroimmunology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia; AXON Neuroscience SE, Larnaca, Cyprus
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom; UK Dementia Research Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tomas Hromadka
- AXON Neuroscience R&D Services SE, Bratislava, Slovakia; Institute of Neuroimmunology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Norbert Zilka
- AXON Neuroscience R&D Services SE, Bratislava, Slovakia; Institute of Neuroimmunology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Michael Schöll
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
132
|
Young PNE, Estarellas M, Coomans E, Srikrishna M, Beaumont H, Maass A, Venkataraman AV, Lissaman R, Jiménez D, Betts MJ, McGlinchey E, Berron D, O'Connor A, Fox NC, Pereira JB, Jagust W, Carter SF, Paterson RW, Schöll M. Imaging biomarkers in neurodegeneration: current and future practices. Alzheimers Res Ther 2020; 12:49. [PMID: 32340618 PMCID: PMC7187531 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-020-00612-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2019] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
There is an increasing role for biological markers (biomarkers) in the understanding and diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders. The application of imaging biomarkers specifically for the in vivo investigation of neurodegenerative disorders has increased substantially over the past decades and continues to provide further benefits both to the diagnosis and understanding of these diseases. This review forms part of a series of articles which stem from the University College London/University of Gothenburg course "Biomarkers in neurodegenerative diseases". In this review, we focus on neuroimaging, specifically positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), giving an overview of the current established practices clinically and in research as well as new techniques being developed. We will also discuss the use of machine learning (ML) techniques within these fields to provide additional insights to early diagnosis and multimodal analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter N E Young
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine and the Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Mar Estarellas
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Computer Science & Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Emma Coomans
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Meera Srikrishna
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine and the Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Helen Beaumont
- Neuroscience and Aphasia Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Anne Maass
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Ashwin V Venkataraman
- Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
- United Kingdom Dementia Research Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Rikki Lissaman
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff, UK
| | - Daniel Jiménez
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Matthew J Betts
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
- Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | | | - David Berron
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Antoinette O'Connor
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nick C Fox
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Joana B Pereira
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - William Jagust
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, USA
- Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Stephen F Carter
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, MAHSC, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ross W Paterson
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Michael Schöll
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine and the Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
133
|
Ashton NJ, Hye A, Rajkumar AP, Leuzy A, Snowden S, Suárez-Calvet M, Karikari TK, Schöll M, La Joie R, Rabinovici GD, Höglund K, Ballard C, Hortobágyi T, Svenningsson P, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Aarsland D. An update on blood-based biomarkers for non-Alzheimer neurodegenerative disorders. Nat Rev Neurol 2020; 16:265-284. [PMID: 32322100 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-020-0348-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Cerebrospinal fluid analyses and neuroimaging can identify the underlying pathophysiology at the earliest stage of some neurodegenerative disorders, but do not have the scalability needed for population screening. Therefore, a blood-based marker for such pathophysiology would have greater utility in a primary care setting and in eligibility screening for clinical trials. Rapid advances in ultra-sensitive assays have enabled the levels of pathological proteins to be measured in blood samples, but research has been predominantly focused on Alzheimer disease (AD). Nonetheless, proteins that were identified as potential blood-based biomarkers for AD, for example, amyloid-β, tau, phosphorylated tau and neurofilament light chain, are likely to be relevant to other neurodegenerative disorders that involve similar pathological processes and could also be useful for the differential diagnosis of clinical symptoms. This Review outlines the neuropathological, clinical, molecular imaging and cerebrospinal fluid features of the most common neurodegenerative disorders outside the AD continuum and gives an overview of the current status of blood-based biomarkers for these disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas J Ashton
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience & Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.,Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, King's College London, London, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health & Biomedical Research Unit for Dementia at South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation, London, UK
| | - Abdul Hye
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, King's College London, London, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health & Biomedical Research Unit for Dementia at South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation, London, UK
| | - Anto P Rajkumar
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, King's College London, London, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health & Biomedical Research Unit for Dementia at South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation, London, UK.,Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Antoine Leuzy
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Stuart Snowden
- Core Metabolomics and Lipidomics Laboratory, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marc Suárez-Calvet
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience & Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.,Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Department of Neurology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Thomas K Karikari
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience & Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Michael Schöll
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience & Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.,Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Renaud La Joie
- Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Gil D Rabinovici
- Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kina Höglund
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience & Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.,Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Center for Alzheimer Disease Research, Neurogeriatrics Division, Karolinska Institutet, Novum, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Tibor Hortobágyi
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, King's College London, London, UK.,MTA-DE Cerebrovascular and Neurodegenerative Research Group, Department of Neurology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Per Svenningsson
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, King's College London, London, UK.,Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience & Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.,Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience & Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.,Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden.,Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK.,UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK
| | - Dag Aarsland
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, King's College London, London, UK. .,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health & Biomedical Research Unit for Dementia at South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation, London, UK. .,Centre for Age-Related Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
134
|
Mattsson-Carlgren N, Andersson E, Janelidze S, Ossenkoppele R, Insel P, Strandberg O, Zetterberg H, Rosen HJ, Rabinovici G, Chai X, Blennow K, Dage JL, Stomrud E, Smith R, Palmqvist S, Hansson O. Aβ deposition is associated with increases in soluble and phosphorylated tau that precede a positive Tau PET in Alzheimer's disease. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2020; 6:eaaz2387. [PMID: 32426454 PMCID: PMC7159908 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz2387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 186] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
The links between β-amyloid (Aβ) and tau in Alzheimer's disease are unclear. Cognitively unimpaired persons with signs of Aβ pathology had increased cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) phosphorylated tau (P-tau181 and P-tau217) and total-tau (T-tau), which increased over time, despite no detection of insoluble tau aggregates [normal Tau positron emission tomography (PET)]. CSF P-tau and T-tau started to increase before the threshold for Amyloid PET positivity, while Tau PET started to increase after Amyloid PET positivity. Effects of Amyloid PET on Tau PET were mediated by CSF P-tau, and high CSF P-tau predicted increased Tau PET rates. Individuals with MAPT mutations and signs of tau deposition (but without Aβ pathology) had normal CSF P-tau levels. In 5xFAD mice, CSF tau increased when Aβ aggregation started. These results show that Aβ pathology may induce changes in soluble tau release and phosphorylation, which is followed by tau aggregation several years later in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Wallenberg Center for Molecular Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Emelie Andersson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Shorena Janelidze
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- VU University Medical Center, Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Philip Insel
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Olof Strandberg
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK
- UK Dementia Research Institute, London, UK
| | - Howard J. Rosen
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Gil Rabinovici
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Xiyun Chai
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | | | - Erik Stomrud
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ruben Smith
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sebastian Palmqvist
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Oskar Hansson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
135
|
Janelidze S, Mattsson N, Palmqvist S, Smith R, Beach TG, Serrano GE, Chai X, Proctor NK, Eichenlaub U, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Reiman EM, Stomrud E, Dage JL, Hansson O. Plasma P-tau181 in Alzheimer's disease: relationship to other biomarkers, differential diagnosis, neuropathology and longitudinal progression to Alzheimer's dementia. Nat Med 2020; 26:379-386. [PMID: 32123385 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-0755-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 587] [Impact Index Per Article: 146.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2019] [Accepted: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Plasma phosphorylated tau181 (P-tau181) might be increased in Alzheimer's disease (AD), but its usefulness for differential diagnosis and prognosis is unclear. We studied plasma P-tau181 in three cohorts, with a total of 589 individuals, including cognitively unimpaired participants and patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), AD dementia and non-AD neurodegenerative diseases. Plasma P-tau181 was increased in preclinical AD and further increased at the MCI and dementia stages. It correlated with CSF P-tau181 and predicted positive Tau positron emission tomography (PET) scans (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.87-0.91 for different brain regions). Plasma P-tau181 differentiated AD dementia from non-AD neurodegenerative diseases with an accuracy similar to that of Tau PET and CSF P-tau181 (AUC = 0.94-0.98), and detected AD neuropathology in an autopsy-confirmed cohort. High plasma P-tau181 was associated with subsequent development of AD dementia in cognitively unimpaired and MCI subjects. In conclusion, plasma P-tau181 is a noninvasive diagnostic and prognostic biomarker of AD, which may be useful in clinical practice and trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Niklas Mattsson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Wallenberg Center for Molecular Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sebastian Palmqvist
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ruben Smith
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | | | | | - Xiyun Chai
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.,Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden.,Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.,UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.,Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | | | - Erik Stomrud
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Oskar Hansson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. .,Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
136
|
Thijssen EH, La Joie R, Wolf A, Strom A, Wang P, Iaccarino L, Bourakova V, Cobigo Y, Heuer H, Spina S, VandeVrede L, Chai X, Proctor NK, Airey DC, Shcherbinin S, Duggan Evans C, Sims JR, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Karydas AM, Teunissen CE, Kramer JH, Grinberg LT, Seeley WW, Rosen H, Boeve BF, Miller BL, Rabinovici GD, Dage JL, Rojas JC, Boxer AL. Diagnostic value of plasma phosphorylated tau181 in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Nat Med 2020; 26:387-397. [PMID: 32123386 PMCID: PMC7101073 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-0762-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 440] [Impact Index Per Article: 110.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
With the potential development of new disease-modifying Alzheimer's disease (AD) therapies, simple, widely available screening tests are needed to identify which individuals, who are experiencing symptoms of cognitive or behavioral decline, should be further evaluated for initiation of treatment. A blood-based test for AD would be a less invasive and less expensive screening tool than the currently approved cerebrospinal fluid or amyloid β positron emission tomography (PET) diagnostic tests. We examined whether plasma tau phosphorylated at residue 181 (pTau181) could differentiate between clinically diagnosed or autopsy-confirmed AD and frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Plasma pTau181 concentrations were increased by 3.5-fold in AD compared to controls and differentiated AD from both clinically diagnosed (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.894) and autopsy-confirmed frontotemporal lobar degeneration (area under the curve of 0.878). Plasma pTau181 identified individuals who were amyloid β-PET-positive regardless of clinical diagnosis and correlated with cortical tau protein deposition measured by 18F-flortaucipir PET. Plasma pTau181 may be useful to screen for tau pathology associated with AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth H Thijssen
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Renaud La Joie
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Amy Wolf
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Amelia Strom
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ping Wang
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Leonardo Iaccarino
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Viktoriya Bourakova
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Yann Cobigo
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hilary Heuer
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Salvatore Spina
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lawren VandeVrede
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Xiyun Chai
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - John R Sims
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, University College London Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK
- UK Dementia Research Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Anna M Karydas
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Charlotte E Teunissen
- Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joel H Kramer
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lea T Grinberg
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - William W Seeley
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Howie Rosen
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Bruce L Miller
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Gil D Rabinovici
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Julio C Rojas
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Adam L Boxer
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
137
|
Prieto S, Valerio KE, Moody JN, Hayes SM, Hayes JP. Genetic Risk for Alzheimer's Disease Moderates the Association Between Medial Temporal Lobe Volume and Episodic Memory Performance Among Older Adults. J Alzheimers Dis 2020; 76:591-600. [PMID: 32538837 PMCID: PMC7558431 DOI: 10.3233/jad-191312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A complex set of interactions between biological, genetic, and environmental factors likely underlies the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Identifying which of these factors is most associated with AD is important for early diagnosis and treatment. OBJECTIVE We sought to examine genetic risk and structural brain volume on episodic memory in a sample of older adults ranging from cognitively normal to those diagnosed with AD. METHODS 686 adults (55-91 years old) completed a 3T MRI scan, baseline cognitive assessments, and biospecimen collection through the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Hierarchical linear regression analyses examined main and interaction effects of medial temporal lobe (MTL) volume and polygenic hazard score (PHS), indicating genetic risk for AD, on a validated episodic memory composite score. RESULTS Genetic risk moderated the relationship between MTL volume and memory, such that individuals with high PHS and lower hippocampal and entorhinal volume had lower memory composite scores [ΔF (1,677) = 4.057, p = 0.044, ΔR2 = 0.002]. Further analyses showed this effect was driven by the left hippocampus [ΔF(1,677) = 5.256, p = 0.022, ΔR2 = 0.003] and right entorhinal cortex [ΔF (1,677) = 6.078, p = 0.014, ΔR2 = 0.003]. CONCLUSIONS Among those with high genetic risk for AD, lower volume was associated with poorer memory. Results suggest that the interaction between AD genetic risk and MTL volume increases the likelihood for memory impairment among older adults. Results from this study suggest that genetic risk and brain volume should be considered key factors in tracking cognitive decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Prieto
- Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Kate E. Valerio
- Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jena N. Moody
- Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Scott M. Hayes
- Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
- Chronic Brain Injury Initiative, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jasmeet P. Hayes
- Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
- Chronic Brain Injury Initiative, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
138
|
Schöll M, Maass A. Does early cognitive decline require the presence of both tau and amyloid-β? Brain 2019; 143:10-13. [DOI: 10.1093/brain/awz399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
This scientific commentary refers to ‘Amyloid and tau imaging biomarkers explain cognitive decline from late middle-age’, by Betthauser et al. (doi: 10.1093/brain/awz378).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Schöll
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine and the Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
- Dementia Research Centre, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Anne Maass
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
139
|
Milà-Alomà M, Suárez-Calvet M, Molinuevo JL. Latest advances in cerebrospinal fluid and blood biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2019; 12:1756286419888819. [PMID: 31897088 PMCID: PMC6920596 DOI: 10.1177/1756286419888819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disease and its diagnosis has classically been based on clinical symptoms. Recently, a biological rather than a syndromic definition of the disease has been proposed that is based on biomarkers that reflect neuropathological changes. In AD, there are two main biomarker categories, namely neuroimaging and fluid biomarkers [cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood]. As a complex and multifactorial disease, AD biomarkers are important for an accurate diagnosis and to stage the disease, assess the prognosis, test target engagement, and measure the response to treatment. In addition, biomarkers provide us with information that, even if it does not have a current clinical use, helps us to understand the mechanisms of the disease. In addition to the pathological hallmarks of AD, which include amyloid-β and tau deposition, there are multiple concomitant pathological events that play a key role in the disease. These include, but are not limited to, neurodegeneration, inflammation, vascular dysregulation or synaptic dysfunction. In addition, AD patients often have an accumulation of other proteins including α-synuclein and TDP-43, which may have a pathogenic effect on AD. In combination, there is a need to have biomarkers that reflect different aspects of AD pathogenesis and this will be important in the future to establish what are the most suitable applications for each of these AD-related biomarkers. It is unclear whether sex, gender, or both have an effect on the causes of AD. There may be differences in fluid biomarkers due to sex but this issue has often been neglected and warrants further research. In this review, we summarize the current state of the principal AD fluid biomarkers and discuss the effect of sex on these biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Milà-Alomà
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC),
Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research
Institute), Barcelona
| | - Marc Suárez-Calvet
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC),
Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research
Institute), Barcelona
- Department of Neurology, Hospital del Mar,
Barcelona
| | - José Luís Molinuevo
- Scientific Director, Alzheimer’s Prevention
Program, Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Wellington 30, Barcelona,
08005, Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research
Institute), Barcelona
- CIBER Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable,
Madrid, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
140
|
Simrén J, Ashton NJ, Blennow K, Zetterberg H. An update on fluid biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases: recent success and challenges ahead. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2019; 61:29-39. [PMID: 31838254 DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2019.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Revised: 11/23/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Over the last twenty years, the characterization of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients has progressed from a description of clinical symptomatology followed by neuropathological findings at autopsy to in vivo pathophysiological signatures using cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET). Additionally, CSF biomarkers now reflect synaptic pathology, axonal injury and neuroinflammation. Novel techniques are capable of measuring proteins of pathophysiological importance at femtomolar concentrations in blood (e.g. amyloid, tau species and neurofilaments), which enable screening of large populations in the near future. This will be essential for secondary prevention trials and clinical management. However, common diseases such as dementia with Lewy bodies, Parkinson's disease and frontotemporal dementias, are still without reliable diagnostic biomarkers, although emerging techniques show promising pilot results for some of these diseases. This is likely to change in the next few years, which will be crucial to stratify populations enrolling in clinical trials, since pathologies often coexist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel Simrén
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience & Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Nicholas J Ashton
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience & Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Maurice Wohl Institute Clinical Neuroscience Institute, London, UK; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health and Biomedical Research Unit for Dementia at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation, London, UK
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience & Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience & Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
141
|
Bittar A, Bhatt N, Kayed R. Advances and considerations in AD tau-targeted immunotherapy. Neurobiol Dis 2019; 134:104707. [PMID: 31841678 PMCID: PMC6980703 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2019.104707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Revised: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The multifactorial and complex nature of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has made it difficult to identify therapeutic targets that are causally involved in the disease process. However, accumulating evidence from experimental and clinical studies that investigate the early disease process point towards the required role of tau in AD etiology. Importantly, a large number of studies investigate and characterize the plethora of pathological forms of tau protein involved in disease onset and propagation. Immunotherapy is one of the most clinical approaches anticipated to make a difference in the field of AD therapeutics. Tau –targeted immunotherapy is the new direction after the failure of amyloid beta (Aß)-targeted immunotherapy and the growing number of studies that highlight the Aß-independent disease process. It is now well established that immunotherapy alone will most likely be insufficient as a monotherapy. Therefore, this review discusses updates on tau-targeted immunotherapy studies, AD-relevant tau species, updates on promising biomarkers and a prospect on combination therapies to surround the disease propagation in an efficient and timely manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Bittar
- Department of Neurology, The Mitchell Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX 77555, United States of America.
| | - Nemil Bhatt
- Department of Neuroscience, Cell Biology and Anatomy, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX 77555, United States of America.
| | - Rakez Kayed
- Department of Neurology, The Mitchell Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX 77555, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
142
|
Ashton NJ, Ide M, Zetterberg H, Blennow K. Salivary Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders. Neurol Ther 2019; 8:83-94. [PMID: 31833026 PMCID: PMC6908535 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-019-00168-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The search for accessible and cost-effective biomarkers to complement current cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and imaging biomarkers in the accurate detection of Alzheimer disease (AD) and other common neurodegenerative disorders remains a challenging task. The advances in ultra-sensitive detection methods has highlighted blood biomarkers (e.g. amyloid-β and neurofilament light) as a valuable and realistic tool in a diagnostic or screening process. Saliva, however, is also a rich source of potential biomarkers for disease detection and offers several practical advantages over biofluids that are currently examined for neurodegenerative disorders. However, while this may be true for the general population, challenges in collecting saliva from an elderly population should be seriously considered. In this review, we begin by discussing how saliva is produced and how age-related conditions can modify saliva production and composition. We then focus on the data available which support the concept of salivary amyloid-β, tau species and novel biomarkers in detecting AD and alpha-synuclein (α-syn) in Parkinson's disease (PD).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas J Ashton
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience & Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
- King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Maurice Wohl Institute Clinical Neuroscience Institute, London, UK.
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health and Biomedical Research Unit for Dementia at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation, London, UK.
| | - Mark Ide
- Periodontology, Centre for Host Microbiome Interactions, Faculty of Dental, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Mucosal and Salivary Biology, Centre for Host Microbiome Interactions, Faculty of Dental, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience & Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK
- UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience & Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
143
|
Mueller A, Bullich S, Barret O, Madonia J, Berndt M, Papin C, Perrotin A, Koglin N, Kroth H, Pfeifer A, Tamagnan G, Seibyl JP, Marek K, De Santi S, Dinkelborg LM, Stephens AW. Tau PET imaging with 18F-PI-2620 in Patients with Alzheimer Disease and Healthy Controls: A First-in-Humans Study. J Nucl Med 2019; 61:911-919. [PMID: 31712323 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.236224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
18F-PI-2620 is a PET tracer with high binding affinity for aggregated tau, a key pathologic feature of Alzheimer disease (AD) and other neurodegenerative disorders. Preclinically, 18F-PI-2620 binds to both 3-repeat and 4-repeat tau isoforms. The purpose of this first-in-humans study was to evaluate the ability of 18F-PI-2620 to detect tau pathology in AD patients using PET imaging, as well as to assess the safety and tolerability of this new tau PET tracer. Methods: Participants with a clinical diagnosis of probable AD and healthy controls (HCs) underwent dynamic 18F-PI-2620 PET imaging for 180 min. 18F-PI-2620 binding was assessed visually and quantitatively using distribution volume ratios (DVR) estimated from noninvasive tracer kinetics and SUV ratio (SUVR) measured at different time points after injection, with the cerebellar cortex as the reference region. Time-activity curves and SUVR were assessed in AD and HC subjects, as well as DVR and SUVR correlations and effect size (Cohen's d) over time. Results: 18F-PI-2620 showed peak brain uptake around 5 min after injection and fast washout from nontarget regions. In AD subjects, focal asymmetric uptake was evident in temporal and parietal lobes, precuneus, and posterior cingulate cortex. DVR and SUVR in these regions were significantly higher in AD subjects than in HCs. Very low background signal was observed in HCs. 18F-PI-2620 administration was safe and well tolerated. SUVR time-activity curves in most regions and subjects achieved a secular equilibrium after 40 min after injection. A strong correlation (R 2 > 0.93) was found between noninvasive DVR and SUVR for all imaging windows starting at more than 30 min after injection. Similar effect sizes between AD and HC groups were obtained across the different imaging windows. 18F-PI-2620 uptake in neocortical regions significantly correlated with the degree of cognitive impairment. Conclusion: Initial clinical data obtained in AD and HC subjects demonstrated a high image quality and excellent signal-to-noise ratio of 18F-PI-2620 PET for imaging tau deposition in AD subjects. Noninvasive quantification using DVR and SUVR for 30-min imaging windows between 30 and 90 min after injection-for example, 45-75 min-provides robust and significant discrimination between AD and HC subjects. 18F-PI-2620 uptake in expected regions correlates strongly with neurocognitive performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Caroline Papin
- Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany.,Invicro, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
144
|
Bullich S, Barret O, Constantinescu C, Sandiego C, Mueller A, Berndt M, Papin C, Perrotin A, Koglin N, Kroth H, Pfeifer A, Tamagnan G, Madonia J, Seibyl JP, Marek K, De Santi S, Dinkelborg LM, Stephens AW. Evaluation of Dosimetry, Quantitative Methods, and Test-Retest Variability of 18F-PI-2620 PET for the Assessment of Tau Deposits in the Human Brain. J Nucl Med 2019; 61:920-927. [PMID: 31712324 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.236240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
18F-PI-2620 is a next-generation tau PET tracer that has demonstrated ability to image the spatial distribution of suspected tau pathology. The objective of this study was to assess the tracer biodistribution, dosimetry, and quantitative methods of 18F-PI-2620 in the human brain. Full kinetic modeling to quantify tau load was investigated. Noninvasive kinetic modeling and semiquantitative methods were evaluated against the full tracer kinetics. Finally, the reproducibility of PET measurements from test and retest scans was assessed. Methods: Three healthy controls (HCs) and 4 Alzheimer disease (AD) subjects underwent 2 dynamic PET scans, including arterial sampling. Distribution volume ratio (DVR) was estimated using full tracer kinetics (reversible 2-tissue-compartment [2TC] model and Logan graphical analysis [LGA]) and noninvasive kinetic models (noninvasive LGA [NI-LGA] and the multilinear reference tissue model [MRTM2]). SUV ratio (SUVR) was determined at different imaging windows after injection. The correlation between DVR and SUVR, effect size (Cohen's d), and test-retest variability (TRV) were evaluated. Additionally, 6 HCs received 1 tracer administration and underwent whole-body PET for dosimetry calculation. Organ doses and the whole-body effective dose were calculated using OLINDA 2.0. Results: A strong correlation was found across different kinetic models (R 2 > 0.97) and between DVR(2TC) and SUVR between 30 and 90 min, with an R 2 of more than 0.95. Secular equilibrium was reached at around 40 min after injection in most regions and subjects. TRV and effect size for SUVR across different regions were similar at 30-60 min (TRV, 3.8%; Cohen's d, 3.80), 45-75 min (TRV, 4.3%; Cohen's d, 3.77) and 60-90 min (TRV, 4.9%; Cohen's d, 3.73) and increased at later time points. Elimination was via the hepatobiliary and urinary systems. The whole-body effective dose was 33.3 ± 2.1 μSv/MBq for an adult female and 33.1 ± 1.4 μSv/MBq for an adult male, with a 1.5-h urinary bladder voiding interval. Conclusion: 18F-PI-2620 exhibits fast kinetics, suitable dosimetry, and low TRV. DVR measured using the 2TC model with arterial sampling correlated strongly with DVR measured by NI-LGA, MRTM2, and SUVR. SUVR can be used for 18F-PI-2620 PET quantification of tau deposits, avoiding arterial blood sampling. Static 18F-PI-2620 PET scans between 45 and 75 min after injection provide excellent quantification accuracy, a large effect size, and low TRV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Caroline Papin
- Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany.,Invicro, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
145
|
Head-to-head comparison of tau positron emission tomography tracers [ 18F]flortaucipir and [ 18F]RO948. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 47:342-354. [PMID: 31612245 PMCID: PMC6974501 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04496-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE [18F]flortaucipir binds to paired helical filament tau and accurately identifies tau in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, "off-target" binding interferes with the quantification of [18F]flortaucipir in several brain regions. Recently, other tau PET tracers have been developed. Here, we compare [18F]flortaucipir with the novel tau tracer [18F]RO948 head-to-head in vivo. METHODS We included 18 participants with AD, three with amyloid-β-positive amnestic mild cognitive impairment, and four healthy controls. All underwent [18F]flortaucipir (80-100 min) and [18F]RO948 (70-90) PET scans within approximately 1 month. Four study participants underwent 0-100-min dynamic scanning. Standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) were created using an inferior cerebellar reference region. RESULTS Neocortical tracer retention was highly comparable using both SUVR and distribution volume ratio-1 values obtained from dynamic scans. However, [18F]RO948 retention was significantly higher in the entorhinal cortex and lower in the basal ganglia, thalamus, and choroid plexus compared with [18F]flortaucipir. Increased off-target binding was observed with age for both tracers. Several cases exhibited strong [18F]RO948 retention in the skull/meninges. This extra-cerebral signal, however, did not affect diagnostic accuracy and remained relatively unchanged when re-examining a subsample after 1 year. Kinetic modeling showed an increase in [18F]flortaucipir SUVR over the scanning interval, compared with a plateau for [18F]RO948. CONCLUSION [18F]RO948 and [18F]flortaucipir bound comparably in neocortical regions, but [18F]RO948 showed higher retention in the medial temporal lobe and lower intracerebral "off-target" binding. Time-dependent bias of SUVR estimates may prove less of a factor with [18F]RO948, compared with previous tau ligands.
Collapse
|
146
|
Adams JN, Maass A, Harrison TM, Baker SL, Jagust WJ. Cortical tau deposition follows patterns of entorhinal functional connectivity in aging. eLife 2019; 8:e49132. [PMID: 31475904 PMCID: PMC6764824 DOI: 10.7554/elife.49132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2019] [Accepted: 08/31/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Tau pathology first appears in the transentorhinal and anterolateral entorhinal cortex (alEC) in the aging brain. The transition to Alzheimer's disease (AD) is hypothesized to involve amyloid-β (Aβ) facilitated tau spread through neural connections. We contrasted functional connectivity (FC) of alEC and posteromedial EC (pmEC), subregions of EC that differ in functional specialization and cortical connectivity, with the hypothesis that alEC-connected cortex would show greater tau deposition than pmEC-connected cortex. We used resting state fMRI to measure FC, and PET to measure tau and Aβ in cognitively normal older adults. Tau preferentially deposited in alEC-connected cortex compared to pmEC-connected or non-connected cortex, and stronger connectivity was associated with increased tau deposition. FC-tau relationships were present regardless of Aβ, although strengthened with Aβ. These results provide an explanation for the anatomic specificity of neocortical tau deposition in the aging brain and reveal relationships between normal aging and the evolution of AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna N Adams
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, UC BerkeleyBerkeleyUnited States
| | - Anne Maass
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, UC BerkeleyBerkeleyUnited States
- German Center for Neurodegenerative DiseaseMagdeburgGermany
| | | | | | - William J Jagust
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, UC BerkeleyBerkeleyUnited States
- Lawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBerkeleyUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
147
|
Zetterberg H, Burnham SC. Blood-based molecular biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease. Mol Brain 2019; 12:26. [PMID: 30922367 PMCID: PMC6437931 DOI: 10.1186/s13041-019-0448-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 160] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Accepted: 03/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
A major barrier to the effective conduct of clinical trials of new drug candidates against Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and to identifying patients for receiving future disease-modifying treatments is the limited capacity of the current health system to find and diagnose patients with early AD pathology. This may be related in part to the limited capacity of the current health systems to select those people likely to have AD pathology in order to confirm the diagnosis with available cerebrospinal fluid and imaging biomarkers at memory clinics. In the current narrative review, we summarize the literature on candidate blood tests for AD that could be implemented in primary care settings and used for the effective identification of individuals at increased risk of AD pathology, who could be referred for potential inclusion in clinical trials or future approved treatments following additional testing. We give an updated account of blood-based candidate biomarkers and biomarker panels for AD-related brain changes. Our analysis centres on biomarker candidates that have been replicated in more than one study and discusses the need of further studies to achieve the goal of a primary care-based screening algorithm for AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henrik Zetterberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, he Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden. .,Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska, University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden. .,Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK. .,UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK.
| | - Samantha C Burnham
- CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia. .,Centre of Excellence for Alzheimer's Disease Research and Care, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, 6027, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
148
|
Fichou Y, Al-Hilaly YK, Devred F, Smet-Nocca C, Tsvetkov PO, Verelst J, Winderickx J, Geukens N, Vanmechelen E, Perrotin A, Serpell L, Hanseeuw BJ, Medina M, Buée L, Landrieu I. The elusive tau molecular structures: can we translate the recent breakthroughs into new targets for intervention? Acta Neuropathol Commun 2019; 7:31. [PMID: 30823892 PMCID: PMC6397507 DOI: 10.1186/s40478-019-0682-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Insights into tau molecular structures have advanced significantly in recent years. This field has been the subject of recent breakthroughs, including the first cryo-electron microscopy structures of tau filaments from Alzheimer’s and Pick’s disease inclusions, as well as the structure of the repeat regions of tau bound to microtubules. Tau structure covers various species as the tau protein itself takes many forms. We will here address a range of studies that help to define the many facets of tau protein structures and how they translate into pathogenic forms. New results shed light on previous data that need now to be revisited in order to up-date our knowledge of tau molecular structure. Finally, we explore how these data can contribute the important medical aspects of this research - diagnosis and therapeutics.
Collapse
|