Declining rates of treatment-related mortality in patients with newly diagnosed AML given 'intense' induction regimens: a report from SWOG and MD Anderson

Pre-treatment with oral hydroxyurea prior to intensive chemotherapy improves early survival of patients with high hyperleukocytosis in acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia with high white blood cell count (WBC) is a medical emergency. A reduction of tumor burden with hydroxyurea may prevent life-threatening complications induced by straight chemotherapy. To evaluate this strategy, we reviewed medical charts of adult patients admitted to our institution from 1997 to 2011 with non-promyelocytic AML and WBC over 50 G/L. One hundred and sixty patients were included with a median WBC of 120 G/L (range 50-450), 107 patients received hydroxyurea prior to chemotherapy, and 53 received emergency induction chemotherapy (CT). Hospital mortality was lower for patients treated with hydroxyurea (34% versus 19%, p = 0.047) even after adjusting for age (p < 0.01) and initial WBC count (p = 0.02). No evidence of any difference between treatment groups in terms of WBC decline kinetics and disease free survival (p = 0.87) was found. Oral hydroxyurea prior to chemotherapy seems a safe and efficient strategy to reduce early death of hyperleukocytic AML patients.

TP53 mutations in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia

The net benefits of induction therapy for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remain controversial. Because AML in older adults is a heterogeneous disease, it is important to identify those who are unlikely to benefit from induction therapy based on information available at the initial assessment. We used next-generation sequencing to analyze TP53 mutation status in AML patients aged 60 years or older, and evaluated its effects on outcomes. TP53 mutations were detected in 12 of 77 patients (16 %), and there was a significant association between TP53 mutations and monosomal karyotype. Patients with TP53 mutations had significantly worse survival than those without (P = 0.009), and multivariate analysis identified TP53 mutation status as the most significant prognostic factor for survival. Neverthelsess, TP53-mutated patients had a 42 % chance of complete remission and a median survival of 8.0 months, which compares favorably with those who did not undergo induction therapy, even in the short term. These results suggest that screening for TP53 mutations at diagnosis is useful for identifying older adults with AML who are least likely to respond to chemotherapy, although the presence of this mutation alone does not seem to justify rejecting induction therapy.

Should acute myeloid leukemia patients with actionable targets be offered investigational treatment after failing one cycle of standard induction therapy?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Therapeutic failure in acute myeloid leukemia remains common. It may be advantageous to identify patients with suboptimal treatment responses early as they may benefit from timely care strategy changes. Here, responses portending failure of standard induction therapy are reviewed and therapeutic options examined, including use of investigational, targeted agents for suitable patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients entering complete remission without minimal residual disease early, that is, with one cycle of standard induction chemotherapy, have a lower relapse risk and live longer than other similarly-treated patients, supporting the proposition of early complete remission without minimal residual disease as a criterion for induction therapy success. Investigational small molecule drugs are appealing for patients who fail standard therapies, but complete remission rates as a single agent are typically modest.

SUMMARY

The relative value of different treatment strategies if a first standard induction therapy cycle fails to produce complete remission is unknown. However, retreatment with the same therapy often leads to complete remission and provides a benchmark against which other approaches should be compared. Addition of investigational small molecule drugs to standard reinduction therapy in patients with actionable targets could offer an attractive therapeutic strategy in this situation that might improve outcomes and facilitate clinical drug testing.

Is the D14 bone marrow in acute myeloid leukemia still the gold standard?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Early bone marrow evaluation on day 14 of induction is common practice assisting in decision making regarding reinduction need in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Studies exploring day 14 bone marrow false positive and negative rates yielded diverse data, and a highly specific method for early bone marrow evaluation is warranted. Given the improved induction-associated death rate, the risk of redundant reinduction administered to patients anticipating remission with one induction cycle may be outweighed by the benefit from the potential reduction in the falsely interpreted nadir bone marrow. The purpose of this review is to analyze current evidence on ways to optimize early bone marrow evaluation during induction in AML.

RECENT FINDINGS

Day 14 bone marrow blast count is affected by patient's age, leukemic risk, and induction regimen, and its remission prediction power is enhanced if more stringent cutoffs are used to define significant residual blast numbers or if morphologic bone marrow evaluation is performed on day 5 of induction.

SUMMARY

Early bone marrow evaluation has a potential to personalize the induction regimen, but because of limitations of day 14 bone marrow results, earlier bone marrow evaluation or the use of flow cytometry to detect minor blast populations may improve remission prediction in AML.

Use of molecular markers to determine postremission treatment in acute myeloid leukemia with normal cytogenetics

Most patients with acute myeloid leukemia can be induced into complete remission, but postremission treatment is required for cure. The choice of postremission therapy in a majority of nonelderly patients, between intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, is largely determined by the results of conventional cytogenetic analysis. In 45% of patients with a normal karyotype, the presence or absence of specific molecular mutations should be used to determine the prognosis and postremission treatment. In addition, the identification of mutations may indicate a role for targeted intervention, including following transplantation.

Long-term follow-up of the AML97 study for patients aged 60 years and above with acute myeloid leukaemia: a study of the East German Haematology and Oncology Study Group (OSHO)

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of patients (pts) with acute myelogenous leukaemia (AML) above 60 years remains a challenge. We report long-term follow-up of the AML97 study, where pts were registered at diagnosis and received treatment dependent on their comorbidities: dose-intense cytarabine (AraC) and anthracycline in the curative arm, and low-dose chemotherapy in the palliative arm or best supportive care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 618 pts were enrolled in this protocol (curative 471, palliative 115 and supportive 32). In the curative arm, complete remission (CR) was obtained in 66.8 % of pts and the estimated probability of being alive at 2 years was 0.30 (±0.02 SE). In multivariate analysis, gender (p = 0.005), performance status (p = 0.04) and cytogenetics (p = 0.002) were significant factors for CR. With a median follow-up of 10 (range 0.1-11.8) years, the estimated probability of being event-free after 2 and 5 years according to cytogenetics was 0.48 ± 0.11 and 0.48 ± 0.11 for favourable, 0.20 ± 0.03 and 0.09 ± 0.03 for normal, 0.18 ± 0.06 and 0.10 ± 0.05 for other standard risk and 0.10 ± 0.03 and 0.05 ± 0.02 for unfavourable karyotypes, respectively. The median survival time for pts treated with palliative chemotherapy was 54 and 11 days with best supportive care only.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, treatment of older AML pts with dose-intense AraC is feasible in the majority of pts and induces high rates of CR. Nevertheless, except for favourable karyotype, OS and event-free survival remain low. These results need to be viewed in relation to the new modalities including stem cell transplantation following non-myeloablative conditioning, epigenetic and molecular therapies.

The Broad Anti-AML Activity of the CD33/CD3 BiTE Antibody Construct, AMG 330, Is Impacted by Disease Stage and Risk

The CD33/CD3-bispecific T-cell engaging (BiTE) antibody construct, AMG 330, potently lyses CD33+ leukemic cells in vitro. Using specimens from 41 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), we studied the factors that might contribute to clinical response or resistance. For this purpose, thawed aliquots of primary AML samples were immunophenotypically characterized and subjected to various doses of AMG 330 in the presence or absence of healthy donor T-cells. After 48 hours, drug-specific cytotoxicity was quantified and correlated with CD33 expression levels, amounts of T-cells present, and other disease characteristics. AMG 330 caused modest cytotoxicity that was correlated with the amount of autologous T-cells (P = 0.0001) but not CD33 expression, as AMG 330 exerted marked cytotoxic effects in several specimens with minimal CD33 expression. With healthy donor T-cells added, AMG 330 cytotoxicity depended on the drug dose and effector:target (E:T) cell ratio. High cytotoxic activity was observed even with minimal CD33 expression, and AMG 330 cytotoxicity and CD33 expression correlated only at high E:T cell ratio and high AMG 330 doses (P<0.003). AMG 330 resulted in significantly higher cytotoxicity in specimens from patients with newly diagnosed AML than those with relapsed/refractory disease despite similar levels of CD33 on myeloblasts. AMG 330 cytotoxicity also appeared greater in specimens from patients with favorable-risk disease as compared to other specimens. Together, our data demonstrate that AMG 330 is highly active in primary AML specimens across the entire disease spectrum, while suggesting the presence of yet undefined, CD33-independent, relative resistance mechanisms in specific patient subsets.

Primacy of resistance rather than toxicity in determining outcome of therapy for AML

Less intense therapies are currently attracting much interest in the treatment of newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although "less intense" often goes undefined, I understand it to mean a therapy that very likely causes less treatment-related mortality than does the standard remission induction regimen of 3 days of either daunorubicin or idarubicin and 7 days of ara-C, referred to as "3 + 7." The primary appeal of less intense therapy is the potential for less toxicity. However, in this article I will make the point that for most patients, including many in their 70s if not 80s, the fundamental obstacle to curing AML is lack of efficacy not excess toxicity.

How Center Volumes Affect Early Outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Early mortality (EM) is all too frequent during induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia. Older patients shoulder an undue amount of this burden as a result of the inherent biology of their disease and increased comorbidities. EM rates in academic centers have seen a sharp decline over the past 20 years; however, data from population-based registries show that EM rates for the general population have significantly lagged behind. In this review, we analyze the data available on EM in academic centers and the general population, explore recent improvements in supportive care and the use of predictive models, and finally investigate the relationship between case volume and complications during chemotherapy.

A randomized comparison of daunorubicin 90 mg/m2 vs 60 mg/m2 in AML induction: results from the UK NCRI AML17 trial in 1206 patients

Modifying induction therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) may improve the remission rate and reduce the risk of relapse, thereby improving survival. Escalation of the daunorubicin dose to 90 mg/m(2) has shown benefit for some patient subgroups when compared with a dose of 45 mg/m(2), and has been recommended as a standard of care. However, 60 mg/m(2) is widely used and has never been directly compared with 90 mg/m(2). As part of the UK National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) AML17 trial, 1206 adults with untreated AML or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome, mostly younger than 60 years of age, were randomized to a first-induction course of chemotherapy, which delivered either 90 mg/m(2) or 60 mg/m(2) on days 1, 3, and 5 combined with cytosine arabinoside. All patients then received a second course that included daunorubicin 50 mg/m(2) on days 1, 3, and 5. There was no overall difference in complete remission rate (73% vs 75%; odds ratio, 1.07 [0.83-1.39]; P = .6) or in any recognized subgroup. The 60-day mortality was increased in the 90 mg/m(2) arm (10% vs 5% (hazard ratio [HR] 1.98 [1.30-3.02]; P = .001), which resulted in no difference in overall 2-year survival (59% vs 60%; HR, 1.16 [0.95-1.43]; P = .15). In an exploratory subgroup analysis, there was no subgroup that showed significant benefit, although there was a significant interaction by FLT3 ITD mutation. This trial is registered at http://www.isrctn.com as #ISRCTN55675535.

Current challenges in clinical development of "targeted therapies": the case of acute myeloid leukemia

A fundamental difficulty in testing "targeted therapies" in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the limitations of preclinical models in capturing inter- and intrapatient genomic heterogeneity. Clinical trials typically focus on single agents despite the routine emergence of resistant subclones and experience in blast-phase chronic myeloid leukemia and acute promyelocytic leukemia arguing against this strategy. Inclusion of only relapsed-refractory, or unfit newly diagnosed, patients risks falsely negative results. There is uncertainty as to whether eligibility should require demonstration of the putative target and regarding therapeutic end points. Although use of in vivo preclinical models employing primary leukemic cells is first choice, newer preclinical models including "organoids" and combinations of pharmacologic and genetic approaches may better align models with human AML. We advocate earlier inclusion of combinations ± chemotherapy and of newly diagnosed patients into clinical trials. When a drug plausibly targets a pathway uniquely related to a specific genetic aberration, eligibility should begin with this subset, including patients with other malignancies, with subsequent extension to other patients. In other cases, a more open-minded approach to initial eligibility would facilitate quicker identification of responsive subsets. Complete remission without minimal residual disease seems a particularly useful short-term end point. Genotypic and phenotypic studies should be prespecified and performed routinely to distinguish responders from nonresponders.

Improvements in the early death rate among 9380 patients with acute myeloid leukemia after initial therapy: A SEER database analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is treated with conventional induction chemotherapy shortly after diagnosis for the majority of patients aged ≤ 65 years. A recent report suggested a substantial decline in the early, or 1-month, mortality rate in patients treated on clinical trials over the past 2 decades. It is unknown whether a similar improvement has been observed in the general population.

METHODS

The authors examined the 1-month mortality rate in a large population-based series of 9380 patients with AML who were aged ≤ 65 years and were diagnosed and treated with chemotherapy between 1973 and 2010.

RESULTS

A significant decline was observed in the 1-month mortality rate from 18.7% among patients diagnosed from 1973 through 1977 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 16.4%-21.2%) to 5.8% for those diagnosed between 2008 and 2010 (95% CI, 4.5%-7.6%) (P <.001). The median overall survival improved significantly from 6 months (95% CI, 5 months-7 months) in 1973 to 1977 to 23 months (95% CI, 16 months-20 months) in 2008 to 2010 (P <.001). Although age and geographic variation were found to significantly influence the 1-month mortality for the period between 1973 and 1977, these differences in 1-month mortality were no longer significant among patients with AML who were treated more recently (2008-2010).

CONCLUSIONS

Over the past 4 decades, early mortality has become uncommon in younger patients (aged ≤ 65 years) with newly diagnosed AML undergoing induction chemotherapy. It is encouraging that the improvements noted in 1-month mortality rate among a selective cohort of patients in clinical trials have also been observed in a population-based analysis.

Early mortality in acute myeloid leukemia

The Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) described the expected early mortality rate (EMR) for patients with non-M3 AML by age enrolled in clinical trials, but it is unclear how generalizable this data is. We sought to compare SWOG's reported EMR to that of the general population by utilizing the case listing session of SEER 18 matched to the accrual periods of the SWOG studies. 26,272 patients were identified within SEER compared to 968 in the SWOG cohort with mortality data. The EMR was 26.7% (7022 events) in the SEER cohort versus 12.2% (116) in the SWOG cohort. The EMR was higher in the SEER cohort in every studied age group and definition of EMR. Stepwise logistic regression analysis identified increasing age, black race (OR 1.15, CI 1.03-1.29, p<0.01), and monocytic differentiation (OR 1.55, CI 1.27-1.89, p<0.01) as predictors of higher EMR. This study demonstrates that EMR in patients with non-M3 AML is higher in the general patient population than reported in SWOG clinical trials.

Fate of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia who fail primary induction therapy

The aim of this study was to describe the fate of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who did not achieve an initial remission while being treated on a contemporary cooperative group trial. We analyzed the outcome of patients entered into S0106, a recently reported cooperative group trial for patients with newly diagnosed AML. A total of 589 eligible patients was treated, of whom 150 (25%) did not achieve a remission while on study and were available for further analysis. The 4-year survival rate for the entire cohort of 150 patients was 23%. Among the 64 patients who received an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant, the 4-year survival rate was 48% compared with 4% for the 86 patients who did not undergo transplantation. Among those transplanted, we could not detect a difference in outcome according to remission status, donor source, type of preparative regimen, or cytogenetic risk category. More than 20% of patients with newly diagnosed AML who fail induction therapy can still be cured, particularly if they are able to receive an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. These results suggest that early HLA typing and donor identification are important components of the initial therapy of AML.

How I treat the older patient with acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in older patients presents a notable therapeutic challenge to the clinical hematologist. The clinical biology of AML among patients is highly heterogeneous. Interpatient variations are relevant for prognosis and treatment choice. Outcome of treatment for patients of advanced age is often compromised by comorbid conditions and an enhanced susceptibility to toxicities from therapy. Here we present selected clinical vignettes that highlight distinct representative situations derived from clinical practice. The vignettes are specifically discussed in light of the perspective of treating older patients with leukemia. We review the clinical significance of various cytogenetic and molecular features of the disease, and we examine the various currently available treatment options as well as the emerging prognostic algorithms that may offer guidance in regard to personalized therapy recommendations. The dilemmas in tailoring treatment selection in this category of patients with AML are the central theme in this discussion.

Finding the optimal combination therapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed AML in older patients unfit for intensive therapy

There is no standard of care for older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) unfit for intensive therapy, and prognosis with currently recommended low-intensity therapies (decitabine, azacitidine, and low-dose cytarabine [LDAC]) remains poor. One promising strategy is to combine low-intensity treatments with novel agents. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin, tipifarnib, and barasertib have been investigated in phase 2/3 or 3 trials combined with LDAC, and phase 3 trials are currently investigating sapacitabine plus decitabine, and volasertib plus LDAC in AML. This review discusses current treatment recommendations and the development of combination therapies for older patients unfit for intensive therapy.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in older adults

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is primarily a disease of the elderly and the numbers of these patients are increasing. Patients ≥60 years of age continue to have poor prognosis. Preliminary results suggest benefit from reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in selected patients 60-80 years of age. However, although patients in this age range comprise >50% of those with AML, they currently constitute only 17% of those offered HCT. In the absence of prospective randomized studies comparing HCT and chemotherapy, the decision to recommend HCT rests on retrospective analyses of the risks of relapse and nonrelapse mortality after each approach. There is strong evidence that pre-HCT comorbidities can predict HCT-related morbidity and mortality. Age alone does not appear predictive and, particularly if the risk of relapse with chemotherapy is high, should not be the sole basis for deciding against HCT. Use of geriatric assessment tools, inflammatory biomarkers, and genetic polymorphism data may further aid in predicting nonrelapse mortality after HCT. Disease status and pretreatment cytogenetics with FLT3-TID, NPM-1, and CEBP-α status are the main factors predicting relapse and these are likely to be supplemented by incorporation of other molecular markers and the level of minimal residual disease after chemotherapy. HLA-matched related and unrelated donor grafts seem preferable to those from other donor sources. Donor age is of no clear significance. Models combining comorbidities with AML risk factors are useful in risk assessment before HCT. In this chapter, we integrated information on AML-specific, HCT-specific, and patient-specific risk factors into a risk-adapted approach to guide decisions about HCT versus no HCT.

Acute myeloid leukemia: 2014 update on risk-stratification and management

OVERVIEW

Evidence suggests that even patients aged 70 or above benefit from specific AML therapy. The fundamental decision in AML then becomes whether to recommend standard or investigational treatment. This decision must rest on the likely outcome of standard treatment. Hence we review factors that predict treatment related mortality and resistance to therapy, the latter the principal cause of failure even in patients aged 70 or above. We emphasize the limitations of prediction of resistance based only on pre-treatment factors and stress the need to incorporate post-treatment factors, for example indicators of minimal residual disease. We review various newer therapeutic options and considerations that underlie the decision to recommend allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant.

Postinduction Supportive Care of Pediatric Acute Myelocytic Leukemia: Should Patients be Kept in the Hospital?

Children with AML become profoundly neutropenic while they undergo remission induction chemotherapy. It is unknown whether these children should be kept in the hospital while they are severely neutropenic to prevent life-threatening complications associated with neutropenia and reduce fatality. We at our institution routinely discharge patients after completing remission induction chemotherapy in the presence of profound neutropenia, unless it is clinically contraindicated. We reviewed all AML patients who were consecutively treated at our hospital from 1989 to 2011. Thirteen patients were electively discharged after completion of induction I chemotherapy. Of the 13, 4 died due to relapse or complications of stem cell transplants (not due to neutropenia related complications). Another eight are long term survivors. In this very small series, discharge from the hospital even though patients were severely neutropenic did not adversely affect the survival.

Management of older or unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is primarily a disease of older adults, for whom optimal treatment strategies remain controversial. Because of the concern for therapeutic resistance and, in particular, excessive toxicity or even treatment-related mortality, many older or medically unfit patients do not receive AML-directed therapy. Yet, evidence suggests that outcomes are improved if essentially all of these patients are offered AML therapy, ideally at a specialized cancer center. Medical fitness for tolerating intensive chemotherapy can be estimated relatively accurately with multiparameter assessment tools; this information should serve as basis for the assignment to intensive or non-intensive therapy. Until our accuracy in predicting the success of individual therapies improves, all patients should be considered for participation in a randomized controlled trial. Comparisons between individual trials will be facilitated once standardized, improved response criteria are developed, and standard treatment approaches have been defined against which novel therapies can be tested.

Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in the Intensive Care Setting

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are newly diagnosed or relapsed and those who are receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy are predisposed to conditions such as sepsis due to bacterial and fungal infections, coagulopathies, hemorrhage, metabolic abnormalities, and respiratory and renal failure. These conditions are common reasons for patients with AML to be managed in the intensive care unit (ICU). For patients with AML in the ICU, providers need to be aware of common problems and how to manage them. Understanding the pathophysiology of complications and the recent advances in risk stratification as well as newer therapy for AML are relevant to the critical care provider.

Prediction of adverse events during intensive induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia or high-grade myelodysplastic syndromes

Intensive chemotherapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is associated with significant treatment-related morbidity and mortality. Herein, we investigate how pretreatment characteristics relate to early adverse outcomes in such patients, studying 205 consecutive individuals receiving curative-intent induction chemotherapy with cytarabine and an anthracycline ("7 + 3"; n = 175) or a "7 + 3"-like regimen (n = 30). Among the entire cohort, baseline grade 4 neutropenia (i.e., absolute neutrophil count <500 cells/µL) was associated with development of fever (P = 0.04), documented infection (P < 0.0001), and bacteremia (P = 0.002) but not requirement for intensive care unit-level care; after exclusion of the 30 patients who received "7 + 3"-like induction, baseline grade 4 neutropenia remained associated with documented infection (P < 0.0001) and bacteremia (P = 0.0005). Among patients achieving a complete remission with the initial treatment cycle, grade 4 neutropenia was associated with delayed neutrophil count recovery (P < 0.0001). Low monocyte and lymphocyte counts at baseline were similarly associated with increased risk of documented infection or bacteremia. After adjustment for age, gender, disease type, cytogenetic/molecular risk, and performance status, the risk of fever, documented infection, or bacteremia was 1.87 (95% confidence interval: 1.04-3.34; P=0.04)-fold, 4.95 (2.20-11.16; P<0.001)-fold, and 3.14 (0.99-9.98; P=0.05)-fold higher in patients with initial grade 4 neutropenia. Together, our studies identify severe baseline neutropenia as a risk factor for infection-associated adverse events after induction chemotherapy and may provide the rationale for the risk-adapted testing of myeloid growth factor support in this high-risk AML/MDS patient subset.

Outcome of adolescents and young adults with acute myeloid leukemia treated on COG trials compared to CALGB and SWOG trials

BACKGROUND

A retrospective meta-analysis of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was performed to determine if differences in outcome exist following treatment on pediatric versus adult oncology treatment regimens.

METHODS

Outcomes were compared of 517 AYAs with AML aged 16 to 21 years who were treated on Children's Oncology Group (COG), Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB), and Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) frontline AML trials from 1986 to 2008.

RESULTS

There was a significant age difference between AYA cohorts in the COG, CALGB, and SWOG trials (median, 17.2 versus 20.1 versus 19.8 years, P < .001). The 10-year event-free survival of the COG cohort was superior to the combined adult cohorts (38% ± 6% versus 23% ± 6%, log-rank P = .006) as was overall survival (45% ± 6% versus 34% ± 7%), with a 10-year estimate comparison of P = .026. However, the younger age of the COG cohort is confounding, with all patients aged 16 to 18 years doing better than those aged 19 to 21 years. Although the 10-year relapse rate was lower for the COG patients (29% ± 6% versus 57% ± 8%, Gray's P < .001), this was offset by a higher postremission treatment-related mortality of 26% ± 6% versus 12% ± 6% (Gray's P < .001). Significant improvements in 10-year event-free survival and overall survival were observed for the entire cohort in later studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated on pediatric trials had better outcomes than those treated on adult trials, but age is a major confounding variable, making it difficult to compare outcomes by cooperative group.