101
|
Yoshimura H. Potential of Single-Molecule Live-Cell Imaging for Chemical Translational Biology. Chembiochem 2021; 22:2941-2945. [PMID: 34254418 DOI: 10.1002/cbic.202100258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Single-molecule live-cell imaging is the most direct approach for monitoring the motility of molecules in living cells. Considering the relationship between the motility of molecules and their function, information obtained from single-molecule imaging involves essential clues for understanding the regulatory mechanisms of the processes of target molecules, and translation to applied sciences such as drug discovery. In this Concept, examples of single-molecule imaging studies on G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are mainly introduced, and recent techniques of single-molecule imaging for overcoming the limitation of single-molecule live-cell imaging are discussed. Based on these studies, the prospects of single-molecule imaging will be outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideaki Yoshimura
- Department of Chemistry, School of Science, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 1130033, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
Han MJ, He QT, Yang M, Chen C, Yao Y, Liu X, Wang Y, Zhu ZL, Zhu KK, Qu C, Yang F, Hu C, Guo X, Zhang D, Chen C, Sun JP, Wang J. Single-molecule FRET and conformational analysis of beta-arrestin-1 through genetic code expansion and a Se-click reaction. Chem Sci 2021; 12:9114-9123. [PMID: 34276941 PMCID: PMC8261736 DOI: 10.1039/d1sc02653d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) is a powerful tool for investigating the dynamic properties of biomacromolecules. However, the success of protein smFRET relies on the precise and efficient labeling of two or more fluorophores on the protein of interest (POI), which has remained highly challenging, particularly for large membrane protein complexes. Here, we demonstrate the site-selective incorporation of a novel unnatural amino acid (2-amino-3-(4-hydroselenophenyl) propanoic acid, SeF) through genetic expansion followed by a Se-click reaction to conjugate the Bodipy593 fluorophore on calmodulin (CaM) and β-arrestin-1 (βarr1). Using this strategy, we monitored the subtle but functionally important conformational change of βarr1 upon activation by the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) through smFRET for the first time. Our new method has broad applications for the site-specific labeling and smFRET measurement of membrane protein complexes, and the elucidation of their dynamic properties such as transducer protein selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Jie Han
- Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Tianjin Airport Economic Area Tianjin 300308 China
| | - Qing-Tao He
- Key Laboratory Experimental Teratology of the Ministry of Education and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University 44 Wenhua Xi Road Jinan 250012 Shandong China
- Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University, Key Laboratory of Molecular Cardiovascular Science, Ministry of Education Haidian District Beijing 100191 China
- Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences Chaoyang District Beijing 100101 China
| | - Mengyi Yang
- School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, Tsinghua University Haidian District Beijing 100084 China
| | - Chao Chen
- Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Tianjin Airport Economic Area Tianjin 300308 China
- University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS) Shijingshan District Beijing 100049 China
| | - Yirong Yao
- School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, Tsinghua University Haidian District Beijing 100084 China
| | - Xiaohong Liu
- Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences Chaoyang District Beijing 100101 China
| | - Yuchuan Wang
- Shenzhen Institute of Transfusion Medicine, Shenzhen Blood Center Futian District Shenzhen 518052 China
| | - Zhong-Liang Zhu
- School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China Baohe District Anhui 230026 China
| | - Kong-Kai Zhu
- School of Biological Science and Technology, University of Jinan Jinan Shandong 250022 China
| | - Changxiu Qu
- Key Laboratory Experimental Teratology of the Ministry of Education and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University 44 Wenhua Xi Road Jinan 250012 Shandong China
| | - Fan Yang
- Key Laboratory Experimental Teratology of the Ministry of Education and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University 44 Wenhua Xi Road Jinan 250012 Shandong China
| | - Cheng Hu
- Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences Chaoyang District Beijing 100101 China
| | - Xuzhen Guo
- Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences Chaoyang District Beijing 100101 China
| | - Dawei Zhang
- Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Tianjin Airport Economic Area Tianjin 300308 China
| | - Chunlai Chen
- School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, Tsinghua University Haidian District Beijing 100084 China
| | - Jin-Peng Sun
- Key Laboratory Experimental Teratology of the Ministry of Education and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University 44 Wenhua Xi Road Jinan 250012 Shandong China
- Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University, Key Laboratory of Molecular Cardiovascular Science, Ministry of Education Haidian District Beijing 100191 China
| | - Jiangyun Wang
- Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences Chaoyang District Beijing 100101 China
- University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS) Shijingshan District Beijing 100049 China
- Shenzhen Institute of Transfusion Medicine, Shenzhen Blood Center Futian District Shenzhen 518052 China
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
White DS, Chowdhury S, Idikuda V, Zhang R, Retterer ST, Goldsmith RH, Chanda B. cAMP binding to closed pacemaker ion channels is non-cooperative. Nature 2021; 595:606-610. [PMID: 34194042 PMCID: PMC8513821 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03686-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Electrical activity in the brain and heart depends on rhythmic generation of action potentials by pacemaker ion channels (HCN) whose activity is regulated by cAMP binding1. Previous work has uncovered evidence for both positive and negative cooperativity in cAMP binding2,3, but such bulk measurements suffer from limited parameter resolution. Efforts to eliminate this ambiguity using single-molecule techniques have been hampered by the inability to directly monitor binding of individual ligand molecules to membrane receptors at physiological concentrations. Here we overcome these challenges using nanophotonic zero-mode waveguides4 to directly resolve binding dynamics of individual ligands to multimeric HCN1 and HCN2 ion channels. We show that cAMP binds independently to all four subunits when the pore is closed, despite a subsequent conformational isomerization to a flip state at each site. The different dynamics in binding and isomerization are likely to underlie physiologically distinct responses of each isoform to cAMP5 and provide direct validation of the ligand-induced flip-state model6-9. This approach for observing stepwise binding in multimeric proteins at physiologically relevant concentrations can directly probe binding allostery at single-molecule resolution in other intact membrane proteins and receptors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David S White
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Sandipan Chowdhury
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Vinay Idikuda
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- Center for Investigation of Membrane Excitability Diseases, Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ruohan Zhang
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Scott T Retterer
- Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA
| | | | - Baron Chanda
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
- Center for Investigation of Membrane Excitability Diseases, Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
104
|
Wu Y, Zeng L, Zhao S. Ligands of Adrenergic Receptors: A Structural Point of View. Biomolecules 2021; 11:936. [PMID: 34202543 PMCID: PMC8301793 DOI: 10.3390/biom11070936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Adrenergic receptors are G protein-coupled receptors for epinephrine and norepinephrine. They are targets of many drugs for various conditions, including treatment of hypertension, hypotension, and asthma. Adrenergic receptors are intensively studied in structural biology, displayed for binding poses of different types of ligands. Here, we summarized molecular mechanisms of ligand recognition and receptor activation exhibited by structure. We also reviewed recent advances in structure-based ligand discovery against adrenergic receptors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiran Wu
- iHuman Institute, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China; (Y.W.); (L.Z.)
| | - Liting Zeng
- iHuman Institute, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China; (Y.W.); (L.Z.)
- School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China
| | - Suwen Zhao
- iHuman Institute, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China; (Y.W.); (L.Z.)
- School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Damian M, Louet M, Gomes AAS, M'Kadmi C, Denoyelle S, Cantel S, Mary S, Bisch PM, Fehrentz JA, Catoire LJ, Floquet N, Banères JL. Allosteric modulation of ghrelin receptor signaling by lipids. Nat Commun 2021; 12:3938. [PMID: 34168117 PMCID: PMC8225672 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23756-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The membrane is an integral component of the G protein-coupled receptor signaling machinery. Here we demonstrate that lipids regulate the signaling efficacy and selectivity of the ghrelin receptor GHSR through specific interactions and bulk effects. We find that PIP2 shifts the conformational equilibrium of GHSR away from its inactive state, favoring basal and agonist-induced G protein activation. This occurs because of a preferential binding of PIP2 to specific intracellular sites in the receptor active state. Another lipid, GM3, also binds GHSR and favors G protein activation, but mostly in a ghrelin-dependent manner. Finally, we find that not only selective interactions but also the thickness of the bilayer reshapes the conformational repertoire of GHSR, with direct consequences on G protein selectivity. Taken together, this data illuminates the multifaceted role of the membrane components as allosteric modulators of how ghrelin signal could be propagated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjorie Damian
- IBMM, UMR 5247, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, ENSCM, Montpellier, France
| | - Maxime Louet
- IBMM, UMR 5247, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, ENSCM, Montpellier, France
| | - Antoniel Augusto Severo Gomes
- IBMM, UMR 5247, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, ENSCM, Montpellier, France
- Laboratório de Física Biológica, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Céline M'Kadmi
- IBMM, UMR 5247, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, ENSCM, Montpellier, France
| | - Séverine Denoyelle
- IBMM, UMR 5247, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, ENSCM, Montpellier, France
| | - Sonia Cantel
- IBMM, UMR 5247, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, ENSCM, Montpellier, France
| | - Sophie Mary
- IBMM, UMR 5247, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, ENSCM, Montpellier, France
| | - Paulo M Bisch
- Laboratório de Física Biológica, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | | | - Laurent J Catoire
- Laboratoire de Biologie Physico-Chimique des Protéines Membranaires, UMR 7099, CNRS, Université de Paris, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique (FRC 550), Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Floquet
- IBMM, UMR 5247, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, ENSCM, Montpellier, France
| | - Jean-Louis Banères
- IBMM, UMR 5247, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, ENSCM, Montpellier, France.
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Heiss TK, Dorn RS, Prescher JA. Bioorthogonal Reactions of Triarylphosphines and Related Analogues. Chem Rev 2021; 121:6802-6849. [PMID: 34101453 PMCID: PMC10064493 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Bioorthogonal phosphines were introduced in the context of the Staudinger ligation over 20 years ago. Since that time, phosphine probes have been used in myriad applications to tag azide-functionalized biomolecules. The Staudinger ligation also paved the way for the development of other phosphorus-based chemistries, many of which are widely employed in biological experiments. Several reviews have highlighted early achievements in the design and application of bioorthogonal phosphines. This review summarizes more recent advances in the field. We discuss innovations in classic Staudinger-like transformations that have enabled new biological pursuits. We also highlight relative newcomers to the bioorthogonal stage, including the cyclopropenone-phosphine ligation and the phospha-Michael reaction. The review concludes with chemoselective reactions involving phosphite and phosphonite ligations. For each transformation, we describe the overall mechanism and scope. We also showcase efforts to fine-tune the reagents for specific functions. We further describe recent applications of the chemistries in biological settings. Collectively, these examples underscore the versatility and breadth of bioorthogonal phosphine reagents.
Collapse
|
107
|
Xi J, Yang N, Perez-Aguilar JM, Selling B, Grothusen JR, Lamichhane R, Saven JG, Liu R. Novel variants of engineered water soluble mu opioid receptors with extensive mutations and removal of cysteines. Proteins 2021; 89:1386-1393. [PMID: 34152652 DOI: 10.1002/prot.26160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
We have shown that water-soluble variants of the human mu opioid receptor (wsMOR) containing a reduced number of hydrophobic residues at the lipid-facing residues of the transmembrane (TM) helices can be expressed in E. coli. In this study, we tested the consequences of increasing the number of mutations on the surface of the transmembrane domain on the receptor's aqueous solubility and ligand binding properties, along with mutation of 11 cysteine residues regardless of their solvent exposure value and location in the protein. We computationally engineered 10 different variants of MOR, and tested four of them for expression in E. coli. We found that all four variants were successfully expressed and could be purified in high quantities. The variants have alpha helical structural content similar to that of the native MOR, and they also display binding affinities for the MOR antagonist (naltrexone) similar to the wsMOR variants we engineered previously that contained many fewer mutations. Furthermore, for these full-length variants, the helical content remains unchanged over a wide range of pH values (pH 6 ~ 9). This study demonstrates the flexibility and robustness of the water-soluble MOR variants with respect to additional designed mutations in the TM domain and changes in pH, whereupon the protein's structural integrity and its ligand binding affinity are maintained. These variants of the full-length MOR with less hydrophobic surface residues and less cysteines can be obtained in large amounts from expression in E. coli and can serve as novel tools to investigate structure-function relationships of the receptor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Xi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nanmu Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jose Manuel Perez-Aguilar
- Department of Chemistry, University of Pennsylvania School of Art and Science, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,School of Chemical Science, Meritorious Autonomous University of Puebla (BUAP), Puebla, Mexico
| | - Bernard Selling
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - John R Grothusen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rajan Lamichhane
- Department of Biochemistry & Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jeffery G Saven
- Department of Chemistry, University of Pennsylvania School of Art and Science, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Renyu Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
108
|
Elgeti M, Hubbell WL. DEER Analysis of GPCR Conformational Heterogeneity. Biomolecules 2021; 11:778. [PMID: 34067265 PMCID: PMC8224605 DOI: 10.3390/biom11060778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent a large class of transmembrane helical proteins which are involved in numerous physiological signaling pathways and therefore represent crucial pharmacological targets. GPCR function and the action of therapeutic molecules are defined by only a few parameters, including receptor basal activity, ligand affinity, intrinsic efficacy and signal bias. These parameters are encoded in characteristic receptor conformations existing in equilibrium and their populations, which are thus of paramount interest for the understanding of receptor (mal-)functions and rational design of improved therapeutics. To this end, the combination of site-directed spin labeling and EPR spectroscopy, in particular double electron-electron resonance (DEER), is exceedingly valuable as it has access to sub-Angstrom spatial resolution and provides a detailed picture of the number and populations of conformations in equilibrium. This review gives an overview of existing DEER studies on GPCRs with a focus on the delineation of structure/function frameworks, highlighting recent developments in data analysis and visualization. We introduce "conformational efficacy" as a parameter to describe ligand-specific shifts in the conformational equilibrium, taking into account the loose coupling between receptor segments observed for different GPCRs using DEER.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Elgeti
- Jules Stein Eye Institute and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Wayne L. Hubbell
- Jules Stein Eye Institute and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Plante A, Weinstein H. Ligand-Dependent Conformational Transitions in Molecular Dynamics Trajectories of GPCRs Revealed by a New Machine Learning Rare Event Detection Protocol. Molecules 2021; 26:molecules26103059. [PMID: 34065494 PMCID: PMC8161244 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26103059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Central among the tools and approaches used for ligand discovery and design are Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations, which follow the dynamic changes in molecular structure in response to the environmental condition, interactions with other proteins, and the effects of ligand binding. The need for, and successes of, MD simulations in providing this type of essential information are well documented, but so are the challenges presented by the size of the resulting datasets encoding the desired information. The difficulty of extracting information on mechanistically important state-to-state transitions in response to ligand binding and other interactions is compounded by these being rare events in the MD trajectories of complex molecular machines, such as G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). To address this problem, we have developed a protocol for the efficient detection of such events. We show that the novel Rare Event Detection (RED) protocol reveals functionally relevant and pharmacologically discriminating responses to the binding of different ligands to the 5-HT2AR orthosteric site in terms of clearly defined, structurally coherent, and temporally ordered conformational transitions. This information from the RED protocol offers new insights into specific ligand-determined functional mechanisms encoded in the MD trajectories, which opens a new and rigorously reproducible path to understanding drug activity with application in drug discovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ambrose Plante
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Harel Weinstein
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10065, USA;
- Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-212-746-6358
| |
Collapse
|
110
|
Yang Z, Xu H, Wang J, Chen W, Zhao M. Single-Molecule Fluorescence Techniques for Membrane Protein Dynamics Analysis. APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY 2021; 75:491-505. [PMID: 33825543 DOI: 10.1177/00037028211009973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Fluorescence-based single-molecule techniques, mainly including fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) and single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET), are able to analyze the conformational dynamics and diversity of biological macromolecules. They have been applied to analysis of the dynamics of membrane proteins, such as membrane receptors and membrane transport proteins, due to their superior ability in resolving spatio-temporal heterogeneity and the demand of trace amounts of analytes. In this review, we first introduced the basic principle involved in FCS and smFRET. Then we summarized the labeling and immobilization strategies of membrane protein molecules, the confocal-based and TIRF-based instrumental configuration, and the data processing methods. The applications to membrane protein dynamics analysis are described in detail with the focus on how to select suitable fluorophores, labeling sites, experimental setup, and analysis methods. In the last part, the remaining challenges to be addressed and further development in this field are also briefly discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziyu Yang
- Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, MOE Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, 12465 Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Haiqi Xu
- Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, MOE Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, 12465 Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Jiayu Wang
- Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, MOE Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, 12465 Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, MOE Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, 12465 Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Meiping Zhao
- Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, MOE Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, 12465 Peking University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
111
|
Hilger D. The role of structural dynamics in GPCR‐mediated signaling. FEBS J 2021; 288:2461-2489. [DOI: 10.1111/febs.15841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Hilger
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry Philipps‐University Marburg Germany
| |
Collapse
|
112
|
Biased cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism via small-molecule ligands binding P450 oxidoreductase. Nat Commun 2021; 12:2260. [PMID: 33859207 PMCID: PMC8050233 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22562-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Metabolic control is mediated by the dynamic assemblies and function of multiple redox enzymes. A key element in these assemblies, the P450 oxidoreductase (POR), donates electrons and selectively activates numerous (>50 in humans and >300 in plants) cytochromes P450 (CYPs) controlling metabolism of drugs, steroids and xenobiotics in humans and natural product biosynthesis in plants. The mechanisms underlying POR-mediated CYP metabolism remain poorly understood and to date no ligand binding has been described to regulate the specificity of POR. Here, using a combination of computational modeling and functional assays, we identify ligands that dock on POR and bias its specificity towards CYP redox partners, across mammal and plant kingdom. Single molecule FRET studies reveal ligand binding to alter POR conformational sampling, which results in biased activation of metabolic cascades in whole cell assays. We propose the model of biased metabolism, a mechanism akin to biased signaling of GPCRs, where ligand binding on POR stabilizes different conformational states that are linked to distinct metabolic outcomes. Biased metabolism may allow designing pathway-specific therapeutics or personalized food suppressing undesired, disease-related, metabolic pathways.
Collapse
|
113
|
Boltz HH, Sirbu A, Stelzer N, Lohse MJ, Schütte C, Annibale P. Quantitative spectroscopy of single molecule interaction times. OPTICS LETTERS 2021; 46:1538-1541. [PMID: 33793480 DOI: 10.1364/ol.413030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Single molecule fluorescence tracking provides information at nanometer-scale and millisecond-temporal resolution about the dynamics and interaction of individual molecules in a biological environment. While the dynamic behavior of isolated molecules can be characterized well, the quantitative insight is more limited when interactions between two indistinguishable molecules occur. We address this aspect by developing a theoretical foundation for a spectroscopy of interaction times, i.e., the inference of interaction from imaging data. A non-trivial crossover between a power law to an exponential behavior of the distribution of the interaction times is highlighted, together with the dependence of the exponential term upon the microscopic reaction affinity. Our approach is validated with simulated and experimental datasets.
Collapse
|
114
|
Ma N, Nivedha AK, Vaidehi N. Allosteric communication regulates ligand-specific GPCR activity. FEBS J 2021; 288:2502-2512. [PMID: 33738925 PMCID: PMC9805801 DOI: 10.1111/febs.15826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are membrane-bound proteins that are ubiquitously expressed in many cell types and take part in mediating multiple signaling pathways. GPCRs are dynamic proteins and exist in an equilibrium between an ensemble of conformational states such as inactive and fully active states. This dynamic nature of GPCRs is one of the factors that confers their basal activity even in the absence of any ligand-mediated activation. Ligands selectively bind and stabilize a subset of the conformations from the ensemble leading to a shift in the equilibrium toward the inactive or the active state depending on the nature of the ligand. This ligand-selective effect is achieved through allosteric communication between the ligand binding site and G protein or β-arrestin coupling site. Similarly, the G protein coupling to the receptor exerts the allosteric effect on the ligand binding region leading to increased binding affinity for agonists and decreased affinity for antagonists or inverse agonists. In this review, we enumerate the current state of our understanding of the mechanism of allosteric communication in GPCRs with a specific focus on the critical role of computational methods in delineating the residues involved in allosteric communication. Analyzing allosteric communication mechanism using molecular dynamics simulations has revealed (a) a structurally conserved mechanism of allosteric communication that regulates the G protein coupling, (b) a rational structure-based approach to designing selective ligands, and (c) an approach to designing allosteric GPCR mutants that are either ligand and G protein or β-arrestin selective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Ma
- Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010
| | - Anita K. Nivedha
- Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010
| | - Nagarajan Vaidehi
- Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010
| |
Collapse
|
115
|
Single-molecule FRET imaging of GPCR dimers in living cells. Nat Methods 2021; 18:397-405. [PMID: 33686301 PMCID: PMC8232828 DOI: 10.1038/s41592-021-01081-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Class C G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are known to form stable homodimers or heterodimers critical for function, but the oligomeric status of class A and B receptors, which constitute >90% of all GPCRs, remains hotly debated. Single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET) is a powerful approach with the potential to reveal valuable insights into GPCR organization but has rarely been used in living cells to study protein systems. Here, we report generally applicable methods for using smFRET to detect and track transmembrane proteins diffusing within the plasma membrane of mammalian cells. We leverage this in-cell smFRET approach to show agonist-induced structural dynamics within individual metabotropic glutamate receptor dimers. We apply these methods to representative class A, B and C receptors, finding evidence for receptor monomers, density-dependent dimers and constitutive dimers, respectively.
Collapse
|
116
|
Lerner E, Barth A, Hendrix J, Ambrose B, Birkedal V, Blanchard SC, Börner R, Sung Chung H, Cordes T, Craggs TD, Deniz AA, Diao J, Fei J, Gonzalez RL, Gopich IV, Ha T, Hanke CA, Haran G, Hatzakis NS, Hohng S, Hong SC, Hugel T, Ingargiola A, Joo C, Kapanidis AN, Kim HD, Laurence T, Lee NK, Lee TH, Lemke EA, Margeat E, Michaelis J, Michalet X, Myong S, Nettels D, Peulen TO, Ploetz E, Razvag Y, Robb NC, Schuler B, Soleimaninejad H, Tang C, Vafabakhsh R, Lamb DC, Seidel CAM, Weiss S. FRET-based dynamic structural biology: Challenges, perspectives and an appeal for open-science practices. eLife 2021; 10:e60416. [PMID: 33779550 PMCID: PMC8007216 DOI: 10.7554/elife.60416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 135] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Single-molecule FRET (smFRET) has become a mainstream technique for studying biomolecular structural dynamics. The rapid and wide adoption of smFRET experiments by an ever-increasing number of groups has generated significant progress in sample preparation, measurement procedures, data analysis, algorithms and documentation. Several labs that employ smFRET approaches have joined forces to inform the smFRET community about streamlining how to perform experiments and analyze results for obtaining quantitative information on biomolecular structure and dynamics. The recent efforts include blind tests to assess the accuracy and the precision of smFRET experiments among different labs using various procedures. These multi-lab studies have led to the development of smFRET procedures and documentation, which are important when submitting entries into the archiving system for integrative structure models, PDB-Dev. This position paper describes the current 'state of the art' from different perspectives, points to unresolved methodological issues for quantitative structural studies, provides a set of 'soft recommendations' about which an emerging consensus exists, and lists openly available resources for newcomers and seasoned practitioners. To make further progress, we strongly encourage 'open science' practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eitan Lerner
- Department of Biological Chemistry, The Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, and The Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Faculty of Mathematics & Science, The Edmond J. Safra Campus, The Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
| | - Anders Barth
- Lehrstuhl für Molekulare Physikalische Chemie, Heinrich-Heine-UniversitätDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Jelle Hendrix
- Dynamic Bioimaging Lab, Advanced Optical Microscopy Centre and Biomedical Research Institute (BIOMED), Hasselt UniversityDiepenbeekBelgium
| | - Benjamin Ambrose
- Department of Chemistry, University of SheffieldSheffieldUnited Kingdom
| | - Victoria Birkedal
- Department of Chemistry and iNANO center, Aarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark
| | - Scott C Blanchard
- Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research HospitalMemphisUnited States
| | - Richard Börner
- Laserinstitut HS Mittweida, University of Applied Science MittweidaMittweidaGermany
| | - Hoi Sung Chung
- Laboratory of Chemical Physics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaUnited States
| | - Thorben Cordes
- Physical and Synthetic Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenPlanegg-MartinsriedGermany
| | - Timothy D Craggs
- Department of Chemistry, University of SheffieldSheffieldUnited Kingdom
| | - Ashok A Deniz
- Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research InstituteLa JollaUnited States
| | - Jiajie Diao
- Department of Cancer Biology, University of Cincinnati School of MedicineCincinnatiUnited States
| | - Jingyi Fei
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and The Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, University of ChicagoChicagoUnited States
| | - Ruben L Gonzalez
- Department of Chemistry, Columbia UniversityNew YorkUnited States
| | - Irina V Gopich
- Laboratory of Chemical Physics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaUnited States
| | - Taekjip Ha
- Department of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteBaltimoreUnited States
| | - Christian A Hanke
- Lehrstuhl für Molekulare Physikalische Chemie, Heinrich-Heine-UniversitätDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Gilad Haran
- Department of Chemical and Biological Physics, Weizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael
| | - Nikos S Hatzakis
- Department of Chemistry & Nanoscience Centre, University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
- Denmark Novo Nordisk Foundation Centre for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Sungchul Hohng
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, and Institute of Applied Physics, Seoul National UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Seok-Cheol Hong
- Center for Molecular Spectroscopy and Dynamics, Institute for Basic Science and Department of Physics, Korea UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Thorsten Hugel
- Institute of Physical Chemistry and Signalling Research Centres BIOSS and CIBSS, University of FreiburgFreiburgGermany
| | - Antonino Ingargiola
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and Department of Physiology, University of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUnited States
| | - Chirlmin Joo
- Department of BioNanoScience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of TechnologyDelftNetherlands
| | - Achillefs N Kapanidis
- Biological Physics Research Group, Clarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Harold D Kim
- School of Physics, Georgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUnited States
| | - Ted Laurence
- Physical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryLivermoreUnited States
| | - Nam Ki Lee
- School of Chemistry, Seoul National UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Tae-Hee Lee
- Department of Chemistry, Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUnited States
| | - Edward A Lemke
- Departments of Biology and Chemistry, Johannes Gutenberg UniversityMainzGermany
- Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB)MainzGermany
| | - Emmanuel Margeat
- Centre de Biologie Structurale (CBS), CNRS, INSERM, Universitié de MontpellierMontpellierFrance
| | | | - Xavier Michalet
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and Department of Physiology, University of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUnited States
| | - Sua Myong
- Department of Biophysics, Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUnited States
| | - Daniel Nettels
- Department of Biochemistry and Department of Physics, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Thomas-Otavio Peulen
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUnited States
| | - Evelyn Ploetz
- Physical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Center for Nanoscience (CeNS), Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPSM) and Nanosystems Initiative Munich (NIM), Ludwig-Maximilians-UniversitätMünchenGermany
| | - Yair Razvag
- Department of Biological Chemistry, The Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, and The Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Faculty of Mathematics & Science, The Edmond J. Safra Campus, The Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
| | - Nicole C Robb
- Warwick Medical School, University of WarwickCoventryUnited Kingdom
| | - Benjamin Schuler
- Department of Biochemistry and Department of Physics, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Hamid Soleimaninejad
- Biological Optical Microscopy Platform (BOMP), University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia
| | - Chun Tang
- College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, PKU-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Peking UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Reza Vafabakhsh
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, Northwestern UniversityEvanstonUnited States
| | - Don C Lamb
- Physical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Center for Nanoscience (CeNS), Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPSM) and Nanosystems Initiative Munich (NIM), Ludwig-Maximilians-UniversitätMünchenGermany
| | - Claus AM Seidel
- Lehrstuhl für Molekulare Physikalische Chemie, Heinrich-Heine-UniversitätDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Shimon Weiss
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and Department of Physiology, University of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUnited States
- Department of Physiology, CaliforniaNanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
Huang SK, Pandey A, Tran DP, Villanueva NL, Kitao A, Sunahara RK, Sljoka A, Prosser RS. Delineating the conformational landscape of the adenosine A 2A receptor during G protein coupling. Cell 2021; 184:1884-1894.e14. [PMID: 33743210 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.02.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent a ubiquitous membrane protein family and are important drug targets. Their diverse signaling pathways are driven by complex pharmacology arising from a conformational ensemble rarely captured by structural methods. Here, fluorine nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (19F NMR) is used to delineate key functional states of the adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR) complexed with heterotrimeric G protein (Gαsβ1γ2) in a phospholipid membrane milieu. Analysis of A2AR spectra as a function of ligand, G protein, and nucleotide identifies an ensemble represented by inactive states, a G-protein-bound activation intermediate, and distinct nucleotide-free states associated with either partial- or full-agonist-driven activation. The Gβγ subunit is found to be critical in facilitating ligand-dependent allosteric transmission, as shown by 19F NMR, biochemical, and computational studies. The results provide a mechanistic basis for understanding basal signaling, efficacy, precoupling, and allostery in GPCRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuya Kate Huang
- Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, UTM, 3359 Mississauga Road North, Mississauga, Ontario L5L 1C6, Canada
| | - Aditya Pandey
- Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, UTM, 3359 Mississauga Road North, Mississauga, Ontario L5L 1C6, Canada; Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Duy Phuoc Tran
- School of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan
| | - Nicolas L Villanueva
- Department of Pharmacology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Akio Kitao
- School of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan
| | - Roger K Sunahara
- Department of Pharmacology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Adnan Sljoka
- Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, UTM, 3359 Mississauga Road North, Mississauga, Ontario L5L 1C6, Canada; RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, RIKEN, 1-4-1 Nihombashi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-0027, Japan.
| | - R Scott Prosser
- Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, UTM, 3359 Mississauga Road North, Mississauga, Ontario L5L 1C6, Canada; Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
118
|
Ligand modulation of the conformational dynamics of the A 2A adenosine receptor revealed by single-molecule fluorescence. Sci Rep 2021; 11:5910. [PMID: 33723285 PMCID: PMC7960716 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84069-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest class of transmembrane proteins, making them an important target for therapeutics. Activation of these receptors is modulated by orthosteric ligands, which stabilize one or several states within a complex conformational ensemble. The intra- and inter-state dynamics, however, is not well documented. Here, we used single-molecule fluorescence to measure ligand-modulated conformational dynamics of the adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR) on nanosecond to millisecond timescales. Experiments were performed on detergent-purified A2R in either the ligand-free (apo) state, or when bound to an inverse, partial or full agonist ligand. Single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) was performed on detergent-solubilized A2AR to resolve active and inactive states via the separation between transmembrane (TM) helices 4 and 6. The ligand-dependent changes of the smFRET distributions are consistent with conformational selection and with inter-state exchange lifetimes ≥ 3 ms. Local conformational dynamics around residue 2296.31 on TM6 was measured using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS), which captures dynamic quenching due to photoinduced electron transfer (PET) between a covalently-attached dye and proximal aromatic residues. Global analysis of PET-FCS data revealed fast (150-350 ns), intermediate (50-60 μs) and slow (200-300 μs) conformational dynamics in A2AR, with lifetimes and amplitudes modulated by ligands and a G-protein mimetic (mini-Gs). Most notably, the agonist binding and the coupling to mini-Gs accelerates and increases the relative contribution of the sub-microsecond phase. Molecular dynamics simulations identified three tyrosine residues (Y112, Y2887.53, and Y2907.55) as being responsible for the dynamic quenching observed by PET-FCS and revealed associated helical motions around residue 2296.31 on TM6. This study provides a quantitative description of conformational dynamics in A2AR and supports the idea that ligands bias not only GPCR conformations but also the dynamics within and between distinct conformational states of the receptor.
Collapse
|
119
|
β2-adrenoceptor ligand efficacy is tuned by a two-stage interaction with the Gαs C terminus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021; 118:2017201118. [PMID: 33836582 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2017201118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Classical pharmacological models have incorporated an "intrinsic efficacy" parameter to capture system-independent effects of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) ligands. However, the nonlinear serial amplification of downstream signaling limits quantitation of ligand intrinsic efficacy. A recent biophysical study has characterized a ligand "molecular efficacy" that quantifies the influence of ligand-dependent receptor conformation on G protein activation. Nonetheless, the structural translation of ligand molecular efficacy into G protein activation remains unclear and forms the focus of this study. We first establish a robust, accessible, and sensitive assay to probe GPCR interaction with G protein and the Gα C terminus (G-peptide), an established structural determinant of G protein selectivity. We circumvent the need for extensive purification protocols by the single-step incorporation of receptor and G protein elements into giant plasma membrane vesicles (GPMVs). We use previously established SPASM FRET sensors to control the stoichiometry and effective concentration of receptor-G protein interactions. We demonstrate that GPMV-incorporated sensors (v-SPASM sensors) provide enhanced dynamic range, expression-insensitive readout, and a reagent level assay that yields single point measurements of ligand molecular efficacy. Leveraging this technology, we establish the receptor-G-peptide interaction as a sufficient structural determinant of this receptor-level parameter. Combining v-SPASM measurements with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we elucidate a two-stage receptor activation mechanism, wherein receptor-G-peptide interactions in an intermediate orientation alter the receptor conformational landscape to facilitate engagement of a fully coupled orientation that tunes G protein activation.
Collapse
|
120
|
Bock A, Bermudez M. Allosteric coupling and biased agonism in G protein‐coupled receptors. FEBS J 2021; 288:2513-2528. [DOI: 10.1111/febs.15783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Bock
- Receptor Signaling Lab Max‐Delbrueck‐Center for Molecular Medicine Berlin Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
121
|
Fleetwood O, Carlsson J, Delemotte L. Identification of ligand-specific G protein-coupled receptor states and prediction of downstream efficacy via data-driven modeling. eLife 2021; 10:e60715. [PMID: 33506760 PMCID: PMC7886328 DOI: 10.7554/elife.60715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Ligand binding stabilizes different G protein-coupled receptor states via a complex allosteric process that is not completely understood. Here, we have derived free energy landscapes describing activation of the β2 adrenergic receptor bound to ligands with different efficacy profiles using enhanced sampling molecular dynamics simulations. These reveal shifts toward active-like states at the Gprotein-binding site for receptors bound to partial and full agonists, and that the ligands modulate the conformational ensemble of the receptor by tuning protein microswitches. We indeed find an excellent correlation between the conformation of the microswitches close to the ligand binding site and in the transmembrane region and experimentally reported cyclic adenosine monophosphate signaling responses. Dimensionality reduction further reveals the similarity between the unique conformational states induced by different ligands, and examining the output of classifiers highlights two distant hotspots governing agonism on transmembrane helices 5 and 7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Fleetwood
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Applied Physics, KTH Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden
| | - Jens Carlsson
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
| | - Lucie Delemotte
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Applied Physics, KTH Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden
| |
Collapse
|
122
|
Smith JS, Pack TF, Inoue A, Lee C, Zheng K, Choi I, Eiger DS, Warman A, Xiong X, Ma Z, Viswanathan G, Levitan IM, Rochelle LK, Staus DP, Snyder JC, Kahsai AW, Caron MG, Rajagopal S. Noncanonical scaffolding of G αi and β-arrestin by G protein-coupled receptors. Science 2021; 371:science.aay1833. [PMID: 33479120 DOI: 10.1126/science.aay1833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Revised: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein)-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are common drug targets and canonically couple to specific Gα protein subtypes and β-arrestin adaptor proteins. G protein-mediated signaling and β-arrestin-mediated signaling have been considered separable. We show here that GPCRs promote a direct interaction between Gαi protein subtype family members and β-arrestins regardless of their canonical Gα protein subtype coupling. Gαi:β-arrestin complexes bound extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), and their disruption impaired both ERK activation and cell migration, which is consistent with β-arrestins requiring a functional interaction with Gαi for certain signaling events. These results introduce a GPCR signaling mechanism distinct from canonical G protein activation in which GPCRs cause the formation of Gαi:β-arrestin signaling complexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey S Smith
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.,Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Thomas F Pack
- Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.,Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Asuka Inoue
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Japan
| | - Claudia Lee
- Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Kevin Zheng
- Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Issac Choi
- Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Dylan S Eiger
- Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Anmol Warman
- Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Xinyu Xiong
- Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Zhiyuan Ma
- Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Gayathri Viswanathan
- Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Ian M Levitan
- Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Lauren K Rochelle
- Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.,Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Dean P Staus
- Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Joshua C Snyder
- Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.,Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Alem W Kahsai
- Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Marc G Caron
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.,Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.,Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Sudarshan Rajagopal
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. .,Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
123
|
Liauw BWH, Afsari HS, Vafabakhsh R. Conformational rearrangement during activation of a metabotropic glutamate receptor. Nat Chem Biol 2021; 17:291-297. [PMID: 33398167 PMCID: PMC7904630 DOI: 10.1038/s41589-020-00702-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) relay information across cell membranes through conformational coupling between the ligand-binding domain and cytoplasmic signaling domain. In dimeric class C GPCRs, the mechanism of this process, which involves propagation of local ligand-induced conformational changes over 12 nm through three distinct structural domains, is unknown. Here, we used single-molecule FRET (smFRET) and live-cell imaging and found that metabotropic glutamate receptor 2 (mGluR2) interconverts between four conformational states, two of which were previously unknown, and activation proceeds through the conformational selection mechanism. Furthermore, the conformation of the ligand-binding domains and downstream domains are weakly coupled. We show that the intermediate states act as conformational checkpoints for activation and control allosteric modulation of signaling. Our results demonstrate a mechanism for activation of mGluRs where ligand binding controls the proximity of signaling domains, analogous to some receptor kinases. This design principle may be generalizable to other biological allosteric sensors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Reza Vafabakhsh
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
124
|
Wang X, Zhao W, Al-Abdul-Wahid S, Lu Y, Cheng T, Madsen JJ, Ye L. Trifluorinated Keto-Enol Tautomeric Switch in Probing Domain Rotation of a G Protein-Coupled Receptor. Bioconjug Chem 2020; 32:99-105. [PMID: 33377784 DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Conformational dynamics and transitions of biologically active molecules are pivotal for understanding the physiological responses they elicit. In the case of receptor activation, there are major implications elucidating disease mechanisms and drug discovery innovation. Yet, incorporation of these factors into drug screening systems remains challenging in part due to the lack of suitable approaches to include them. Here, we present a novel strategy to probe the GPCR domain rotation by utilizing the 19fluorine signal variability of a trifluorinated keto-enol (TFKE) chemical equilibrium. The method takes advantage of the high sensitivity of the TFKE tautomerism toward microenvironmental changes resulting from receptor conformational transitions upon ligand binding. We validated the method using the adenosine A2AR receptor as a model system in which the TFKE was attached to two sites exhibiting opposing motions upon ligand binding, namely, V229C6.31 on transmembrane domain VI (TM6) and A289C7.54 on TM7. Our results demonstrated that the TFKE switch was an excellent reporter for the domain rotation and could be used to study the conformational transition and dynamics of relative domain motions. Although further studies are needed in order to establish a quantitative relationship between the rotational angle and the population distribution of different components in a particular system, the research presented here provides a foundation for its application in studying receptor domain rotation and dynamics, which could be useful in drug screening efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xudong Wang
- Department of Cell Biology, Microbiology and Molecular Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620, United States
| | - Wenjie Zhao
- Department of Cell Biology, Microbiology and Molecular Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620, United States
| | - Sameer Al-Abdul-Wahid
- Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Center, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario NIG2W1, Canada
| | - Yiming Lu
- Institute of Functional Nano&Soft Materials, Soochow University, Dushu-Lake Campus, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215123, China
| | - Tao Cheng
- Institute of Functional Nano&Soft Materials, Soochow University, Dushu-Lake Campus, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215123, China
| | - Jesper J Madsen
- Department of Global Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33612, United States
| | - Libin Ye
- Department of Cell Biology, Microbiology and Molecular Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620, United States.,H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, Florida 33612, United States
| |
Collapse
|
125
|
Bondar A, Lazar J. Optical sensors of heterotrimeric G protein signaling. FEBS J 2020; 288:2570-2584. [DOI: 10.1111/febs.15655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Revised: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexey Bondar
- Center for Nanobiology and Structural Biology Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences Nove Hrady Czech Republic
- Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences Prague Czech Republic
- Faculty of Science University of South Bohemia Ceske Budejovice Czech Republic
| | - Josef Lazar
- Center for Nanobiology and Structural Biology Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences Nove Hrady Czech Republic
- Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences Prague Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
126
|
Calebiro D, Koszegi Z, Lanoiselée Y, Miljus T, O'Brien S. G protein-coupled receptor-G protein interactions: a single-molecule perspective. Physiol Rev 2020; 101:857-906. [PMID: 33331229 DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00021.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) regulate many cellular and physiological processes, responding to a diverse range of extracellular stimuli including hormones, neurotransmitters, odorants, and light. Decades of biochemical and pharmacological studies have provided fundamental insights into the mechanisms of GPCR signaling. Thanks to recent advances in structural biology, we now possess an atomistic understanding of receptor activation and G protein coupling. However, how GPCRs and G proteins interact in living cells to confer signaling efficiency and specificity remains insufficiently understood. The development of advanced optical methods, including single-molecule microscopy, has provided the means to study receptors and G proteins in living cells with unprecedented spatio-temporal resolution. The results of these studies reveal an unexpected level of complexity, whereby GPCRs undergo transient interactions among themselves as well as with G proteins and structural elements of the plasma membrane to form short-lived signaling nanodomains that likely confer both rapidity and specificity to GPCR signaling. These findings may provide new strategies to pharmaceutically modulate GPCR function, which might eventually pave the way to innovative drugs for common diseases such as diabetes or heart failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Calebiro
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Centre of Membrane Proteins and Receptors (COMPARE), Universities of Nottingham and Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Zsombor Koszegi
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Centre of Membrane Proteins and Receptors (COMPARE), Universities of Nottingham and Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Yann Lanoiselée
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Centre of Membrane Proteins and Receptors (COMPARE), Universities of Nottingham and Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Tamara Miljus
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Centre of Membrane Proteins and Receptors (COMPARE), Universities of Nottingham and Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Shannon O'Brien
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Centre of Membrane Proteins and Receptors (COMPARE), Universities of Nottingham and Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
127
|
Yano Y, Watanabe Y, Matsuzaki K. Thermodynamic and kinetic stabilities of transmembrane helix bundles as revealed by single-pair FRET analysis: Effects of the number of membrane-spanning segments and cholesterol. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOMEMBRANES 2020; 1863:183532. [PMID: 33316240 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2020.183532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The tertiary structures and conformational dynamics of transmembrane (TM) helical proteins are maintained by the interhelical interaction network in membranes, although it is complicated to analyze the underlying driving forces because the amino acid sequences can involve multiple and various types of interactions. To obtain insights into basal and common effects of the number of membrane-spanning segments and membrane cholesterol, we measured stabilities of helix bundles composed of simple TM helices (AALALAA)3 (1TM) and (AALALAA)3-G5-(AALALAA)3 (2TM). Association-dissociation dynamics for 1TM-1TM, 1TM-2TM, and 2TM-2TM pairs were monitored to compare stabilities of 2-, 3-, and 4-helical bundles, respectively, with single-pair fluorescence resonance energy transfer (sp-FRET) in liposome membranes. Both thermodynamic and kinetic stabilities of the helix bundles increased with a greater number of membrane-spanning segments in POPC. The presence of 30 mol% cholesterol strongly enhanced the formation of 1TM-1TM and 1TM-2TM bundles (~ - 9 kJ mol-1), whereas it only weakly stabilized the 2TM-2TM bundle (~ - 3 kJ mol-1). Fourier transform infrared-polarized attenuated total reflection (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy revealed an ~30° tilt of the helix axis relative to bilayer normal for the 1TM-2TM pair in the presence of cholesterol, suggesting the formation of a tilted helix bundle to release high lateral pressure at the center of cholesterol-containing membranes. These results demonstrate that the number of membrane-spanning segments affects the stability and structure of the helix bundle, and their cholesterol-dependences. Such information is useful to understand the basics of folding and assembly of multispanning TM proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiaki Yano
- Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| | - Yuta Watanabe
- Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| | - Katsumi Matsuzaki
- Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
128
|
Ellaithy A, Gonzalez-Maeso J, Logothetis DA, Levitz J. Structural and Biophysical Mechanisms of Class C G Protein-Coupled Receptor Function. Trends Biochem Sci 2020; 45:1049-1064. [PMID: 32861513 PMCID: PMC7642020 DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2020.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Revised: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Groundbreaking structural and spectroscopic studies of class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), such as rhodopsin and the β2 adrenergic receptor, have provided a picture of how structural rearrangements between transmembrane helices control ligand binding, receptor activation, and effector coupling. However, the activation mechanism of other GPCR classes remains more elusive, in large part due to complexity in their domain assembly and quaternary structure. In this review, we focus on the class C GPCRs, which include metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) and gamma-aminobutyric acid B (GABAB) receptors (GABABRs) most prominently. We discuss the unique biophysical questions raised by the presence of large extracellular ligand-binding domains (LBDs) and constitutive homo/heterodimerization. Furthermore, we discuss how recent studies have begun to unravel how these fundamental class C GPCR features impact the processes of ligand binding, receptor activation, signal transduction, regulation by accessory proteins, and crosstalk with other GPCRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amr Ellaithy
- Department of Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Javier Gonzalez-Maeso
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
| | - Diomedes A Logothetis
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, College of Science and Center for Drug Discovery, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Joshua Levitz
- Department of Biochemistry, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
129
|
Viewing rare conformations of the β 2 adrenergic receptor with pressure-resolved DEER spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020; 117:31824-31831. [PMID: 33257561 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2013904117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The β2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR) is an archetypal G protein coupled receptor (GPCR). One structural signature of GPCR activation is a large-scale movement (ca. 6 to 14 Å) of transmembrane helix 6 (TM6) to a conformation which binds and activates a cognate G protein. The β2AR exhibits a low level of agonist-independent G protein activation. The structural origin of this basal activity and its suppression by inverse agonists is unknown but could involve a unique receptor conformation that promotes G protein activation. Alternatively, a conformational selection model proposes that a minor population of the canonical active receptor conformation exists in equilibrium with inactive forms, thus giving rise to basal activity of the ligand-free receptor. Previous spin-labeling and fluorescence resonance energy transfer experiments designed to monitor the positional distribution of TM6 did not detect the presence of the active conformation of ligand-free β2AR. Here we employ spin-labeling and pressure-resolved double electron-electron resonance spectroscopy to reveal the presence of a minor population of unliganded receptor, with the signature outward TM6 displacement, in equilibrium with inactive conformations. Binding of inverse agonists suppresses this population. These results provide direct structural evidence in favor of a conformational selection model for basal activity in β2AR and provide a mechanism for inverse agonism. In addition, they emphasize 1) the importance of minor populations in GPCR catalytic function; 2) the use of spin-labeling and variable-pressure electron paramagnetic resonance to reveal them in a membrane protein; and 3) the quantitative evaluation of their thermodynamic properties relative to the inactive forms, including free energy, partial molar volume, and compressibility.
Collapse
|
130
|
Patel M, Finlay DB, Glass M. Biased agonism at the cannabinoid receptors - Evidence from synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists. Cell Signal 2020; 78:109865. [PMID: 33259937 DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2020.109865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Revised: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
The type 1 and type 2 cannabinoid receptors are G protein-coupled receptors implicated in a variety of physiological processes and diseases. Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) were originally developed to explore the therapeutic benefits of cannabinoid receptor activation, although more recently, these compounds have been diverted to the recreational drug market and are increasingly associated with incidences of toxicity. A prominent concept in contemporary pharmacology is functional selectivity or biased agonism, which describes the ability of ligands to elicit differential activation of signalling pathways through stabilisation of distinct receptor conformations. Biased agonists may maximise drug effectiveness by reducing on-target adverse effects if they are mediated by signalling pathways distinct from those that drive the therapeutic effects. For the cannabinoid receptors, it remains unclear as to which signalling pathways mediate desirable and adverse effects. However, given their structural diversity and potential to induce a plethora of signalling effects, SCRAs provide the most promising prospect for detecting and studying bias at the cannabinoid receptors. This review summarises the emerging evidence of SCRA bias at the cannabinoid receptors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Patel
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - David B Finlay
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Michelle Glass
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
131
|
Eddy MT, Martin BT, Wüthrich K. A 2A Adenosine Receptor Partial Agonism Related to Structural Rearrangements in an Activation Microswitch. Structure 2020; 29:170-176.e3. [PMID: 33238145 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2020.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2020] [Revised: 09/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
In drug design, G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) partial agonists enable one to fine-tune receptor output between basal and maximal signaling levels. Here, we add to the structural basis for rationalizing and monitoring partial agonism. NMR spectroscopy of partial agonist complexes of the A2A adenosine receptor (A2AAR) revealed conformations of the P-I-F activation motif that are distinctly different from full agonist complexes. At the intracellular surface, different conformations of helix VI observed for partial and full agonist complexes manifest a correlation between the efficacy-related structural rearrangement of this activation motif and intracellular signaling to partner proteins. While comparisons of A2AAR in complexes with partial and full agonists with different methods showed close similarity of the global folds, this NMR study now reveals subtle but distinct local structural differences related to partial agonism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew T Eddy
- Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Departments of Biological Sciences and Chemistry, Bridge Institute, The University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA; Department of Chemistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-7200, USA.
| | - Bryan T Martin
- Departments of Biological Sciences and Chemistry, Bridge Institute, The University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| | - Kurt Wüthrich
- Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| |
Collapse
|
132
|
Xing G, Woo AYH, Pan L, Lin B, Cheng MS. Recent Advances in β 2-Agonists for Treatment of Chronic Respiratory Diseases and Heart Failure. J Med Chem 2020; 63:15218-15242. [PMID: 33213146 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
β2-Adrenoceptor (β2-AR) agonists are widely used as bronchodilators. The emerge of ultralong acting β2-agonists is an important breakthrough in pulmonary medicine. In this review, we will provide mechanistic insights into the application of β2-agonists in asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and heart failure (HF). Recent studies in β-AR signal transduction have revealed opposing functions of the β1-AR and the β2-AR on cardiomyocyte survival. Thus, β2-agonists and β-blockers in combination may represent a novel strategy for HF management. Allosteric modulation and biased agonism at the β2-AR also provide a theoretical basis for developing drugs with novel mechanisms of action and pharmacological profiles. Overlap of COPD and HF presents a substantial clinical challenge but also a unique opportunity for evaluation of the cardiovascular safety of β2-agonists. Further basic and clinical research along these lines can help us develop better drugs and innovative strategies for the management of these difficult-to-treat diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gang Xing
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China.,Key Laboratory of Structure-Based Drug Design and Discovery of Ministry of Education, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China
| | - Anthony Yiu-Ho Woo
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Life Sciences and Biopharmaceutics, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China
| | - Li Pan
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China.,Key Laboratory of Structure-Based Drug Design and Discovery of Ministry of Education, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China
| | - Bin Lin
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China.,Key Laboratory of Structure-Based Drug Design and Discovery of Ministry of Education, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China
| | - Mao-Sheng Cheng
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China.,Key Laboratory of Structure-Based Drug Design and Discovery of Ministry of Education, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China
| |
Collapse
|
133
|
Lavington S, Watts A. Lipid nanoparticle technologies for the study of G protein-coupled receptors in lipid environments. Biophys Rev 2020; 12:10.1007/s12551-020-00775-5. [PMID: 33215301 PMCID: PMC7755959 DOI: 10.1007/s12551-020-00775-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a large family of integral membrane proteins which conduct a wide range of biological roles and represent significant drug targets. Most biophysical and structural studies of GPCRs have been conducted on detergent-solubilised receptors, and it is clear that detergents can have detrimental effects on GPCR function. Simultaneously, there is increasing appreciation of roles for specific lipids in modulation of GPCR function. Lipid nanoparticles such as nanodiscs and styrene maleic acid lipid particles (SMALPs) offer opportunities to study integral membrane proteins in lipid environments, in a form that is soluble and amenable to structural and biophysical experiments. Here, we review the application of lipid nanoparticle technologies to the study of GPCRs, assessing the relative merits and limitations of each system. We highlight how these technologies can provide superior platforms to detergents for structural and biophysical studies of GPCRs and inform on roles for protein-lipid interactions in GPCR function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Lavington
- Biochemistry Department, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QU, UK
| | - Anthony Watts
- Biochemistry Department, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QU, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
134
|
Girodat D, Pati AK, Terry DS, Blanchard SC, Sanbonmatsu KY. Quantitative comparison between sub-millisecond time resolution single-molecule FRET measurements and 10-second molecular simulations of a biosensor protein. PLoS Comput Biol 2020; 16:e1008293. [PMID: 33151943 PMCID: PMC7643941 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations seek to provide atomic-level insights into conformationally dynamic biological systems at experimentally relevant time resolutions, such as those afforded by single-molecule fluorescence measurements. However, limitations in the time scales of MD simulations and the time resolution of single-molecule measurements have challenged efforts to obtain overlapping temporal regimes required for close quantitative comparisons. Achieving such overlap has the potential to provide novel theories, hypotheses, and interpretations that can inform idealized experimental designs that maximize the detection of the desired reaction coordinate. Here, we report MD simulations at time scales overlapping with in vitro single-molecule Förster (fluorescence) resonance energy transfer (smFRET) measurements of the amino acid binding protein LIV-BPSS at sub-millisecond resolution. Computationally efficient all-atom structure-based simulations, calibrated against explicit solvent simulations, were employed for sampling multiple cycles of LIV-BPSS clamshell-like conformational changes on the time scale of seconds, examining the relationship between these events and those observed by smFRET. The MD simulations agree with the smFRET measurements and provide valuable information on local dynamics of fluorophores at their sites of attachment on LIV-BPSS and the correlations between fluorophore motions and large-scale conformational changes between LIV-BPSS domains. We further utilize the MD simulations to inform the interpretation of smFRET data, including Förster radius (R0) and fluorophore orientation factor (κ2) determinations. The approach we describe can be readily extended to distinct biochemical systems, allowing for the interpretation of any FRET system conjugated to protein or ribonucleoprotein complexes, including those with more conformational processes, as well as those implementing multi-color smFRET. Förster (fluorescence) resonance energy transfer (FRET) has been used extensively by biophysicists as a molecular-scale ruler that yields fundamental structural and kinetic insights into transient processes including complex formation and conformational rearrangements required for biological function. FRET techniques require the identification of informative fluorophore labeling sites, spaced at defined distances to inform on a reaction coordinate of interest and consideration of noise sources that have the potential to obscure quantitative interpretations. Here, we describe an approach to leverage advancements in computationally efficient all-atom structure-based molecular dynamics simulations in which structural dynamics observed via FRET can be interpreted in full atomistic detail on commensurate time scales. We demonstrate the potential of this approach using a model FRET system, the amino acid binding protein LIV-BPSS conjugated to self-healing organic fluorophores. LIV-BPSS exhibits large scale, sub-millisecond clamshell-like conformational changes between open and closed conformations associated with ligand unbinding and binding, respectively. Our findings inform on the molecular basis of the dynamics observed by smFRET and on strategies to optimize fluorophore labeling sites, the manner of fluorophore attachment, and fluorophore composition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan Girodat
- Theoretical Biology and Biophysics, Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America
| | - Avik K Pati
- Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Daniel S Terry
- Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Scott C Blanchard
- Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Karissa Y Sanbonmatsu
- Theoretical Biology and Biophysics, Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.,New Mexico Consortium, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
135
|
Advanced fluorescence microscopy reveals disruption of dynamic CXCR4 dimerization by subpocket-specific inverse agonists. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020; 117:29144-29154. [PMID: 33148803 PMCID: PMC7682396 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2013319117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Class A G protein−coupled receptors (GPCRs) can form dimers and oligomers via poorly understood mechanisms. We show here that the chemokine receptor CXCR4, which is a major pharmacological target, has an oligomerization behavior modulated by its active conformation. Combining advanced, single-molecule, and single-cell optical tools with functional assays and computational approaches, we unveil three key features of CXCR4 quaternary organization: CXCR4 dimerization 1) is dynamic, 2) increases with receptor expression level, and 3) can be disrupted by stabilizing an inactive receptor conformation. Ligand binding motifs reveal a ligand binding subpocket essential to modulate both CXCR4 basal activity and dimerization. This is relevant to develop new strategies to design CXCR4-targeting drugs. Although class A G protein−coupled receptors (GPCRs) can function as monomers, many of them form dimers and oligomers, but the mechanisms and functional relevance of such oligomerization is ill understood. Here, we investigate this problem for the CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4), a GPCR that regulates immune and hematopoietic cell trafficking, and a major drug target in cancer therapy. We combine single-molecule microscopy and fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy to investigate CXCR4 membrane organization in living cells at densities ranging from a few molecules to hundreds of molecules per square micrometer of the plasma membrane. We observe that CXCR4 forms dynamic, transient homodimers, and that the monomer−dimer equilibrium is governed by receptor density. CXCR4 inverse agonists that bind to the receptor minor pocket inhibit CXCR4 constitutive activity and abolish receptor dimerization. A mutation in the minor binding pocket reduced the dimer-disrupting ability of these ligands. In addition, mutating critical residues in the sixth transmembrane helix of CXCR4 markedly diminished both basal activity and dimerization, supporting the notion that CXCR4 basal activity is required for dimer formation. Together, these results link CXCR4 dimerization to its density and to its activity. They further suggest that inverse agonists binding to the minor pocket suppress both dimerization and constitutive activity and may represent a specific strategy to target CXCR4.
Collapse
|
136
|
Ma N, Lee S, Vaidehi N. Activation Microswitches in Adenosine Receptor A 2A Function as Rheostats in the Cell Membrane. Biochemistry 2020; 59:4059-4071. [PMID: 33054162 PMCID: PMC8526178 DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Although multiple components of the cell membrane modulate the stability and activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), insights into the dynamics of GPCR structures come from biophysical studies conducted in detergents. This is because of the challenges of studying activation in a multicomponent lipid bilayer. To understand the role of cellular membrane lipids and cations in GPCR activation, we performed multiscale molecular dynamics simulations (56 μs) on three different conformational states of adenosine receptor A2AR, in both the cell membrane-like lipid bilayer and in detergent micelles. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations show that the phosphatidylinositol bisphosphate (PIP2) interacts with the basic residues in the intracellular regions of A2AR, thereby reducing the flexibility of the receptor in the inactive state and limiting the transition to the active-intermediate state. In the G protein-coupled fully active state, PIP2 stabilizes the GPCR:G protein complex. Such stiffening effects are absent in non-ionic detergent micelles, and therefore, more transitions have been observed in detergents. The inter-residue distances that change significantly upon GPCR activation are known as activation microswitches. The activation microswitches show different levels of activation in the cell membrane, in the pure POPC bilayer, and in detergents. Thus, the temporal heat map of different activation microswitches calculated from the MD simulations suggests a rheostat model of GPCR activation microswitches rather than the binary switch model. These simulation results connect the chemistry of cell membrane lipids to receptor activity, which is useful for the design of detergents mimicking the cell membrane.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Ma
- Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, 1500 E Duarte Road, Duarte, CA-91010
| | - Sangbae Lee
- Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, 1500 E Duarte Road, Duarte, CA-91010
| | - Nagarajan Vaidehi
- Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, 1500 E Duarte Road, Duarte, CA-91010
| |
Collapse
|
137
|
Capturing Peptide-GPCR Interactions and Their Dynamics. Molecules 2020; 25:molecules25204724. [PMID: 33076289 PMCID: PMC7587574 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25204724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Many biological functions of peptides are mediated through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Upon ligand binding, GPCRs undergo conformational changes that facilitate the binding and activation of multiple effectors. GPCRs regulate nearly all physiological processes and are a favorite pharmacological target. In particular, drugs are sought after that elicit the recruitment of selected effectors only (biased ligands). Understanding how ligands bind to GPCRs and which conformational changes they induce is a fundamental step toward the development of more efficient and specific drugs. Moreover, it is emerging that the dynamic of the ligand–receptor interaction contributes to the specificity of both ligand recognition and effector recruitment, an aspect that is missing in structural snapshots from crystallography. We describe here biochemical and biophysical techniques to address ligand–receptor interactions in their structural and dynamic aspects, which include mutagenesis, crosslinking, spectroscopic techniques, and mass-spectrometry profiling. With a main focus on peptide receptors, we present methods to unveil the ligand–receptor contact interface and methods that address conformational changes both in the ligand and the GPCR. The presented studies highlight a wide structural heterogeneity among peptide receptors, reveal distinct structural changes occurring during ligand binding and a surprisingly high dynamics of the ligand–GPCR complexes.
Collapse
|
138
|
Liu Q, He QT, Lyu X, Yang F, Zhu ZL, Xiao P, Yang Z, Zhang F, Yang ZY, Wang XY, Sun P, Wang QW, Qu CX, Gong Z, Lin JY, Xu Z, Song SL, Huang SM, Guo SC, Han MJ, Zhu KK, Chen X, Kahsai AW, Xiao KH, Kong W, Li FH, Ruan K, Li ZJ, Yu X, Niu XG, Jin CW, Wang J, Sun JP. DeSiphering receptor core-induced and ligand-dependent conformational changes in arrestin via genetic encoded trimethylsilyl 1H-NMR probe. Nat Commun 2020; 11:4857. [PMID: 32978402 PMCID: PMC7519161 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18433-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Characterization of the dynamic conformational changes in membrane protein signaling complexes by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy remains challenging. Here we report the site-specific incorporation of 4-trimethylsilyl phenylalanine (TMSiPhe) into proteins, through genetic code expansion. Crystallographic analysis revealed structural changes that reshaped the TMSiPhe-specific amino-acyl tRNA synthetase active site to selectively accommodate the trimethylsilyl (TMSi) group. The unique up-field 1H-NMR chemical shift and the highly efficient incorporation of TMSiPhe enabled the characterization of multiple conformational states of a phospho-β2 adrenergic receptor/β-arrestin-1(β-arr1) membrane protein signaling complex, using only 5 μM protein and 20 min of spectrum accumulation time. We further showed that extracellular ligands induced conformational changes located in the polar core or ERK interaction site of β-arr1 via direct receptor transmembrane core interactions. These observations provided direct delineation and key mechanism insights that multiple receptor ligands were able to induce distinct functionally relevant conformational changes of arrestin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Liu
- Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 15 Datun Road, Chaoyang district, Beijing, 100101, China
- Key Laboratory Experimental Teratology of the Ministry of Education and Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Cheeloo college of Medicine, Shandong University, 44 Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China
| | - Qing-Tao He
- Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 15 Datun Road, Chaoyang district, Beijing, 100101, China
- Key Laboratory Experimental Teratology of the Ministry of Education and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Cheeloo college of Medicine, Shandong University, 44 Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Cardiovascular Science, Ministry of Education, Peking University, 15 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Xiaoxuan Lyu
- Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 15 Datun Road, Chaoyang district, Beijing, 100101, China
| | - Fan Yang
- Key Laboratory Experimental Teratology of the Ministry of Education and Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Cheeloo college of Medicine, Shandong University, 44 Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Cardiovascular Science, Ministry of Education, Peking University, 15 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Zhong-Liang Zhu
- School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, 96 Jinzhai Road, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, China
| | - Peng Xiao
- Key Laboratory Experimental Teratology of the Ministry of Education and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Cheeloo college of Medicine, Shandong University, 44 Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Cardiovascular Science, Ministry of Education, Peking University, 15 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Zhao Yang
- Key Laboratory Experimental Teratology of the Ministry of Education and Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Cheeloo college of Medicine, Shandong University, 44 Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Cardiovascular Science, Ministry of Education, Peking University, 15 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Feng Zhang
- Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 15 Datun Road, Chaoyang district, Beijing, 100101, China
| | - Zhao-Ya Yang
- Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 15 Datun Road, Chaoyang district, Beijing, 100101, China
- Key Laboratory Experimental Teratology of the Ministry of Education and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Cheeloo college of Medicine, Shandong University, 44 Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
| | - Xiao-Yan Wang
- Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 15 Datun Road, Chaoyang district, Beijing, 100101, China
| | - Peng Sun
- Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 30 Xiaohongshan Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei, 430071, China
| | - Qian-Wen Wang
- Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 30 Xiaohongshan Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei, 430071, China
| | - Chang-Xiu Qu
- Key Laboratory Experimental Teratology of the Ministry of Education and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Cheeloo college of Medicine, Shandong University, 44 Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Cardiovascular Science, Ministry of Education, Peking University, 15 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Zheng Gong
- Key Laboratory Experimental Teratology of the Ministry of Education and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Cheeloo college of Medicine, Shandong University, 44 Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
| | - Jing-Yu Lin
- Key Laboratory Experimental Teratology of the Ministry of Education and Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Cheeloo college of Medicine, Shandong University, 44 Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China
| | - Zhen Xu
- Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 15 Datun Road, Chaoyang district, Beijing, 100101, China
| | - Shao-le Song
- Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 15 Datun Road, Chaoyang district, Beijing, 100101, China
| | - Shen-Ming Huang
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Cardiovascular Science, Ministry of Education, Peking University, 15 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Sheng-Chao Guo
- Key Laboratory Experimental Teratology of the Ministry of Education and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Cheeloo college of Medicine, Shandong University, 44 Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Cardiovascular Science, Ministry of Education, Peking University, 15 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Ming-Jie Han
- Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 15 Datun Road, Chaoyang district, Beijing, 100101, China
- Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 32 Xiqi Road, Airport Economic Zone, Dongli District, Tianjin, 300308, China
| | - Kong-Kai Zhu
- School of Biological Science and Technology, University of Jinan, 336 Nanxinzhuangxi Road, Shizhong District, Jinan, 250022, China
| | - Xin Chen
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Engineering and Life Science, Changzhou University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, 213164, China
| | - Alem W Kahsai
- Duke University, School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Kun-Hong Xiao
- Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA
| | - Wei Kong
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Cardiovascular Science, Ministry of Education, Peking University, 15 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Fa-Hui Li
- Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 15 Datun Road, Chaoyang district, Beijing, 100101, China
| | - Ke Ruan
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Science at the Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, 443 Huangshan Road, Hefei, Anhui, 230027, China
| | - Zi-Jian Li
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Cardiovascular Science, Ministry of Education, Peking University, 15 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Xiao Yu
- Key Laboratory Experimental Teratology of the Ministry of Education and Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Cheeloo college of Medicine, Shandong University, 44 Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China
| | - Xiao-Gang Niu
- Beijing Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Center, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Chang-Wen Jin
- Beijing Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Center, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Jiangyun Wang
- Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 15 Datun Road, Chaoyang district, Beijing, 100101, China.
- College of Life Sciences and School of Future Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
| | - Jin-Peng Sun
- Key Laboratory Experimental Teratology of the Ministry of Education and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Cheeloo college of Medicine, Shandong University, 44 Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China.
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Cardiovascular Science, Ministry of Education, Peking University, 15 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
| |
Collapse
|
139
|
Ma X, Hu Y, Batebi H, Heng J, Xu J, Liu X, Niu X, Li H, Hildebrand PW, Jin C, Kobilka BK. Analysis of β 2AR-G s and β 2AR-G i complex formation by NMR spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020; 117:23096-23105. [PMID: 32868434 PMCID: PMC7502740 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2009786117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR) is a prototypical G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that preferentially couples to the stimulatory G protein Gs and stimulates cAMP formation. Functional studies have shown that the β2AR also couples to inhibitory G protein Gi, activation of which inhibits cAMP formation [R. P. Xiao, Sci. STKE 2001, re15 (2001)]. A crystal structure of the β2AR-Gs complex revealed the interaction interface of β2AR-Gs and structural changes upon complex formation [S. G. Rasmussen et al., Nature 477, 549-555 (2011)], yet, the dynamic process of the β2AR signaling through Gs and its preferential coupling to Gs over Gi is still not fully understood. Here, we utilize solution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and supporting molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to monitor the conformational changes in the G protein coupling interface of the β2AR in response to the full agonist BI-167107 and Gs and Gi1 These results show that BI-167107 stabilizes conformational changes in four transmembrane segments (TM4, TM5, TM6, and TM7) prior to coupling to a G protein, and that the agonist-bound receptor conformation is different from the G protein coupled state. While most of the conformational changes observed in the β2AR are qualitatively the same for Gs and Gi1, we detected distinct differences between the β2AR-Gs and the β2AR-Gi1 complex in intracellular loop 2 (ICL2). Interactions with ICL2 are essential for activation of Gs These differences between the β2AR-Gs and β2AR-Gi1 complexes in ICL2 may be key determinants for G protein coupling selectivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiuyan Ma
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Yunfei Hu
- Beijing Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Center, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100084, China
- Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Science, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Hossein Batebi
- Institute of Medical Physics and Biophysics, University Leipzig, 04107 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jie Heng
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Jun Xu
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Xiangyu Liu
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Xiaogang Niu
- Beijing Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Center, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Hongwei Li
- Beijing Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Center, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Peter W Hildebrand
- Institute of Medical Physics and Biophysics, University Leipzig, 04107 Leipzig, Germany
- Institute of Medical Physics and Biophysics, Charité Medical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, 10178 Berlin, Germany
| | - Changwen Jin
- Beijing Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Center, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100084, China;
| | - Brian K Kobilka
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305
| |
Collapse
|
140
|
Hilger D, Kumar KK, Hu H, Pedersen MF, O'Brien ES, Giehm L, Jennings C, Eskici G, Inoue A, Lerch M, Mathiesen JM, Skiniotis G, Kobilka BK. Structural insights into differences in G protein activation by family A and family B GPCRs. Science 2020; 369:369/6503/eaba3373. [PMID: 32732395 DOI: 10.1126/science.aba3373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Family B heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein)-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play important roles in carbohydrate metabolism. Recent structures of family B GPCR-Gs protein complexes reveal a disruption in the α-helix of transmembrane segment 6 (TM6) not observed in family A GPCRs. To investigate the functional impact of this structural difference, we compared the structure and function of the glucagon receptor (GCGR; family B) with the β2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR; family A). We determined the structure of the GCGR-Gs complex by means of cryo-electron microscopy at 3.1-angstrom resolution. This structure shows the distinct break in TM6. Guanosine triphosphate (GTP) turnover, guanosine diphosphate release, GTP binding, and G protein dissociation studies revealed much slower rates for G protein activation by the GCGR compared with the β2AR. Fluorescence and double electron-electron resonance studies suggest that this difference is due to the inability of agonist alone to induce a detectable outward movement of the cytoplasmic end of TM6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Hilger
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Kaavya Krishna Kumar
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Hongli Hu
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.,Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | | | - Evan S O'Brien
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Lise Giehm
- Zealand Pharma A/S, Sydmarken 11, Søborg 2860, Denmark
| | - Christine Jennings
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
| | - Gözde Eskici
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.,Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Asuka Inoue
- Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, Japan
| | - Michael Lerch
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
| | | | - Georgios Skiniotis
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. .,Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.,Department of Photon Science, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
| | - Brian K Kobilka
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
141
|
Wingler LM, Lefkowitz RJ. Conformational Basis of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling Versatility. Trends Cell Biol 2020; 30:736-747. [PMID: 32622699 PMCID: PMC7483927 DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2020.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 145] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Revised: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are privileged structural scaffolds in biology that have the versatility to regulate diverse physiological processes. Interestingly, many GPCR ligands exhibit significant 'bias' - the ability to preferentially activate subsets of the many cellular pathways downstream of these receptors. Recently, complementary information from structural and spectroscopic approaches has made significant inroads into understanding the mechanisms of these biased ligands. The consistently emerging theme is that GPCRs are highly dynamic proteins, and ligands with varying pharmacological properties differentially modulate the equilibrium among multiple conformations. Biased signaling and other recently appreciated complexities of GPCR signaling thus appear to be a natural consequence of the conformational heterogeneity of GPCRs and GPCR-transducer complexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M Wingler
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| | - Robert J Lefkowitz
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
142
|
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are targeted by a large fraction of approved drugs and regulate many important cellular processes. Association of GPCRs with heterotrimeric G proteins in response to agonist activation is thought to invariably lead to G protein activation. We find instead that G12 heterotrimers can associate with agonist-bound receptors in a manner that does not lead to activation. These unproductive agonist–receptor-G protein ternary complexes sequester G12 heterotrimers and thus inhibit rather than support G12 signaling. These findings reveal a mechanism whereby agonist activation of GPCRs can inhibit as well as promote G protein signaling. G proteins are activated when they associate with G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), often in response to agonist-mediated receptor activation. It is generally thought that agonist-induced receptor-G protein association necessarily promotes G protein activation and, conversely, that activated GPCRs do not interact with G proteins that they do not activate. Here we show that GPCRs can form agonist-dependent complexes with G proteins that they do not activate. Using cell-based bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) and luminescence assays we find that vasopressin V2 receptors (V2R) associate with both Gs and G12 heterotrimers when stimulated with the agonist arginine vasopressin (AVP). However, unlike V2R-Gs complexes, V2R-G12 complexes are not destabilized by guanine nucleotides and do not promote G12 activation. Activating V2R does not lead to signaling responses downstream of G12 activation, but instead inhibits basal G12-mediated signaling, presumably by sequestering G12 heterotrimers. Overexpressing G12 inhibits G protein receptor kinase (GRK) and arrestin recruitment to V2R and receptor internalization. Formyl peptide (FPR1 and FPR2) and Smoothened (Smo) receptors also form complexes with G12 that are insensitive to nucleotides, suggesting that unproductive GPCR-G12 complexes are not unique to V2R. These results indicate that agonist-dependent receptor-G protein association does not always lead to G protein activation and may in fact inhibit G protein activation.
Collapse
|
143
|
Abstract
In this issue of Cell, two papers report agonist-bound cryo-EM structures of the cannabinoid receptor, CB2, in complex with Gi. Importantly, beyond providing information that could help distinguish CB2 ligand binding from CB1, these structures support the existence of a nucleotide-free state during G-protein signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diane L Lynch
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 27412, USA
| | - Dow P Hurst
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 27412, USA
| | - Patricia H Reggio
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 27412, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
144
|
Rodríguez-Espigares I, Torrens-Fontanals M, Tiemann JKS, Aranda-García D, Ramírez-Anguita JM, Stepniewski TM, Worp N, Varela-Rial A, Morales-Pastor A, Medel-Lacruz B, Pándy-Szekeres G, Mayol E, Giorgino T, Carlsson J, Deupi X, Filipek S, Filizola M, Gómez-Tamayo JC, Gonzalez A, Gutiérrez-de-Terán H, Jiménez-Rosés M, Jespers W, Kapla J, Khelashvili G, Kolb P, Latek D, Marti-Solano M, Matricon P, Matsoukas MT, Miszta P, Olivella M, Perez-Benito L, Provasi D, Ríos S, R Torrecillas I, Sallander J, Sztyler A, Vasile S, Weinstein H, Zachariae U, Hildebrand PW, De Fabritiis G, Sanz F, Gloriam DE, Cordomi A, Guixà-González R, Selent J. GPCRmd uncovers the dynamics of the 3D-GPCRome. Nat Methods 2020; 17:777-787. [PMID: 32661425 DOI: 10.1038/s41592-020-0884-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are involved in numerous physiological processes and are the most frequent targets of approved drugs. The explosion in the number of new three-dimensional (3D) molecular structures of GPCRs (3D-GPCRome) over the last decade has greatly advanced the mechanistic understanding and drug design opportunities for this protein family. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have become a widely established technique for exploring the conformational landscape of proteins at an atomic level. However, the analysis and visualization of MD simulations require efficient storage resources and specialized software. Here we present GPCRmd (http://gpcrmd.org/), an online platform that incorporates web-based visualization capabilities as well as a comprehensive and user-friendly analysis toolbox that allows scientists from different disciplines to visualize, analyze and share GPCR MD data. GPCRmd originates from a community-driven effort to create an open, interactive and standardized database of GPCR MD simulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ismael Rodríguez-Espigares
- Research Programme on Biomedical Informatics, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute-Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mariona Torrens-Fontanals
- Research Programme on Biomedical Informatics, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute-Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Johanna K S Tiemann
- Institute of Medical Physics and Biophysics, Charite University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Medical Physics and Biophysics, Medical University Leipzig, Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany
| | - David Aranda-García
- Research Programme on Biomedical Informatics, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute-Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Manuel Ramírez-Anguita
- Research Programme on Biomedical Informatics, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute-Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Tomasz Maciej Stepniewski
- Research Programme on Biomedical Informatics, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute-Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nathalie Worp
- Research Programme on Biomedical Informatics, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute-Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alejandro Varela-Rial
- Computational Science Laboratory, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona Biomedical Research Park, Barcelona, Spain
- Acellera, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Adrián Morales-Pastor
- Research Programme on Biomedical Informatics, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute-Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Brian Medel-Lacruz
- Research Programme on Biomedical Informatics, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute-Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gáspár Pándy-Szekeres
- Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Eduardo Mayol
- Laboratori de Medicina Computacional, Unitat de Bioestadistica, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Toni Giorgino
- Biophysics Institute, National Research Council of Italy, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biosciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Jens Carlsson
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Xavier Deupi
- Laboratory of Biomolecular Research, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- Condensed Matter Theory Group, PSI, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Slawomir Filipek
- Faculty of Chemistry, Biological and Chemical Research Centre, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Marta Filizola
- Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - José Carlos Gómez-Tamayo
- Laboratori de Medicina Computacional, Unitat de Bioestadistica, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Angel Gonzalez
- Laboratori de Medicina Computacional, Unitat de Bioestadistica, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Hugo Gutiérrez-de-Terán
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Biomedical Center, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Mireia Jiménez-Rosés
- Laboratori de Medicina Computacional, Unitat de Bioestadistica, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Willem Jespers
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Biomedical Center, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Jon Kapla
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - George Khelashvili
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
- Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Kolb
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Dorota Latek
- Faculty of Chemistry, Biological and Chemical Research Centre, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Maria Marti-Solano
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Pierre Matricon
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Minos-Timotheos Matsoukas
- Laboratori de Medicina Computacional, Unitat de Bioestadistica, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - Przemyslaw Miszta
- Faculty of Chemistry, Biological and Chemical Research Centre, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Mireia Olivella
- Laboratori de Medicina Computacional, Unitat de Bioestadistica, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Laura Perez-Benito
- Laboratori de Medicina Computacional, Unitat de Bioestadistica, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Davide Provasi
- Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Santiago Ríos
- Laboratori de Medicina Computacional, Unitat de Bioestadistica, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Iván R Torrecillas
- Laboratori de Medicina Computacional, Unitat de Bioestadistica, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Jessica Sallander
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Biomedical Center, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Agnieszka Sztyler
- Faculty of Chemistry, Biological and Chemical Research Centre, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Silvana Vasile
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Biomedical Center, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Harel Weinstein
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
- Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ulrich Zachariae
- Computational Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
- Physics, School of Science and Engineering, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Peter W Hildebrand
- Institute of Medical Physics and Biophysics, Charite University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Medical Physics and Biophysics, Medical University Leipzig, Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gianni De Fabritiis
- Computational Science Laboratory, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona Biomedical Research Park, Barcelona, Spain
- Acellera, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ferran Sanz
- Research Programme on Biomedical Informatics, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute-Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David E Gloriam
- Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Arnau Cordomi
- Laboratori de Medicina Computacional, Unitat de Bioestadistica, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Ramon Guixà-González
- Laboratory of Biomolecular Research, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen PSI, Switzerland.
- Condensed Matter Theory Group, PSI, Villigen PSI, Switzerland.
| | - Jana Selent
- Research Programme on Biomedical Informatics, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute-Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
145
|
Yang Z, Li L, Ling J, Liu T, Huang X, Ying Y, Zhao Y, Zhao Y, Lei K, Chen L, Chen Z. Cyclooctatetraene-conjugated cyanine mitochondrial probes minimize phototoxicity in fluorescence and nanoscopic imaging. Chem Sci 2020; 11:8506-8516. [PMID: 34094186 PMCID: PMC8161535 DOI: 10.1039/d0sc02837a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 07/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Modern fluorescence-imaging methods promise to unveil organelle dynamics in live cells. Phototoxicity, however, has become a prevailing issue when boosted illumination applies. Mitochondria are representative organelles whose research heavily relies on optical imaging, yet these membranous hubs of bioenergy are exceptionally vulnerable to photodamage. We report that cyclooctatetraene-conjugated cyanine dyes (PK Mito dyes), are ideal mitochondrial probes with remarkably low photodynamic damage for general use in fluorescence cytometry. In contrast, the nitrobenzene conjugate of Cy3 exhibits enhanced photostability but unaffected phototoxicity compared to parental Cy3. PK Mito Red, in conjunction with Hessian-structural illumination microscopy, enables 2000-frame time-lapse imaging with clearly resolvable crista structures, revealing rich mitochondrial dynamics. In a rigorous stem cell sorting and transplantation assay, PK Mito Red maximally retains the stemness of planarian neoblasts, exhibiting excellent multifaceted biocompatibility. Resonating with the ongoing theme of reducing photodamage using optical approaches, this work advocates the evaluation and minimization of phototoxicity when developing imaging probes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhongtian Yang
- Institute of Molecular Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Peking University Beijing China
- Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University Beijing China
| | - Liuju Li
- Institute of Molecular Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Peking University Beijing China
- State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Peking University Beijing China
| | - Jing Ling
- Institute of Molecular Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Peking University Beijing China
- Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University Beijing China
| | - Tianyan Liu
- Institute of Molecular Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Peking University Beijing China
- Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University Beijing China
| | - Xiaoshuai Huang
- Institute of Molecular Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Peking University Beijing China
- State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Peking University Beijing China
| | - Yuqing Ying
- Zhejiang Provincial Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Key Laboratory of Growth Regulation, Translational Research of Zhejiang ProvinceSchool of Life Sciences, Westlake University Hangzhou Zhejiang Province China
- Institute of Biology, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study Hangzhou Zhejiang Province China
| | - Yun Zhao
- Zhejiang Provincial Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Key Laboratory of Growth Regulation, Translational Research of Zhejiang ProvinceSchool of Life Sciences, Westlake University Hangzhou Zhejiang Province China
- Institute of Biology, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study Hangzhou Zhejiang Province China
| | - Yan Zhao
- Institute of Molecular Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Peking University Beijing China
- Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University Beijing China
| | - Kai Lei
- Zhejiang Provincial Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Key Laboratory of Growth Regulation, Translational Research of Zhejiang ProvinceSchool of Life Sciences, Westlake University Hangzhou Zhejiang Province China
- Institute of Biology, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study Hangzhou Zhejiang Province China
| | - Liangyi Chen
- Institute of Molecular Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Peking University Beijing China
- State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Peking University Beijing China
- PKU-Nanjing Institute of Translational Medicine Nanjing China
| | - Zhixing Chen
- Institute of Molecular Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Peking University Beijing China
- Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University Beijing China
- PKU-Nanjing Institute of Translational Medicine Nanjing China
| |
Collapse
|
146
|
Shi P, Zhang Y, Lv P, Fang W, Ling S, Guo X, Li D, Liu S, Sun D, Zhang L, Liu D, Zheng JS, Tian C. A genetically encoded small-size fluorescent pair reveals allosteric conformational changes of G proteins upon its interaction with GPCRs by fluorescence lifetime based FRET. Chem Commun (Camb) 2020; 56:6941-6944. [PMID: 32435777 DOI: 10.1039/d0cc02691c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The dynamics of GPCRs (G protein-coupled receptors) coupling for cognate G proteins play a critical role in signal transduction. Herein, we reported a site-specifically labelled small-sized fluorescent pair 7-HC/FlAsH ((7-hydroxycoumarin-4-yl)-ethylglycine/fluorescein arsenical hairpin) for fluorescence lifetime based FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer) to reveal conformational differences of Gαi1 (inhibitory G proteins) and Gαs (stimulatory G proteins) upon β2AR (β2-adrenergic receptor) coupling. It offers a new generally applicable method to probe protein dynamic interactions or conformational changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pan Shi
- Hefei National Laboratory of Physical Science at Microscale and School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230027, P. R. China.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
147
|
Sutkeviciute I, Vilardaga JP. Structural insights into emergent signaling modes of G protein-coupled receptors. J Biol Chem 2020; 295:11626-11642. [PMID: 32571882 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.rev120.009348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2020] [Revised: 06/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest family of cell membrane proteins, with >800 GPCRs in humans alone, and recognize highly diverse ligands, ranging from photons to large protein molecules. Very important to human medicine, GPCRs are targeted by about 35% of prescription drugs. GPCRs are characterized by a seven-transmembrane α-helical structure, transmitting extracellular signals into cells to regulate major physiological processes via heterotrimeric G proteins and β-arrestins. Initially viewed as receptors whose signaling via G proteins is delimited to the plasma membrane, it is now recognized that GPCRs signal also at various intracellular locations, and the mechanisms and (patho)physiological relevance of such signaling modes are actively investigated. The propensity of GPCRs to adopt different signaling modes is largely encoded in the structural plasticity of the receptors themselves and of their signaling complexes. Here, we review emerging modes of GPCR signaling via endosomal membranes and the physiological implications of such signaling modes. We further summarize recent structural insights into mechanisms of GPCR activation and signaling. We particularly emphasize the structural mechanisms governing the continued GPCR signaling from endosomes and the structural aspects of the GPCR resensitization mechanism and discuss the recently uncovered and important roles of lipids in these processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ieva Sutkeviciute
- Laboratory for GPCR Biology, Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jean-Pierre Vilardaga
- Laboratory for GPCR Biology, Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
148
|
Möller J, Isbilir A, Sungkaworn T, Osberg B, Karathanasis C, Sunkara V, Grushevskyi EO, Bock A, Annibale P, Heilemann M, Schütte C, Lohse MJ. Single-molecule analysis reveals agonist-specific dimer formation of µ-opioid receptors. Nat Chem Biol 2020; 16:946-954. [PMID: 32541966 DOI: 10.1038/s41589-020-0566-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are key signaling proteins that mostly function as monomers, but for several receptors constitutive dimer formation has been described and in some cases is essential for function. Using single-molecule microscopy combined with super-resolution techniques on intact cells, we describe here a dynamic monomer-dimer equilibrium of µ-opioid receptors (µORs), where dimer formation is driven by specific agonists. The agonist DAMGO, but not morphine, induces dimer formation in a process that correlates both temporally and in its agonist- and phosphorylation-dependence with β-arrestin2 binding to the receptors. This dimerization is independent from, but may precede, µOR internalization. These data suggest a new level of GPCR regulation that links dimer formation to specific agonists and their downstream signals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Möller
- Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ali Isbilir
- Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Titiwat Sungkaworn
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.,Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Samut Prakan, Thailand
| | - Brendan Osberg
- Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Bioinformatics and Omics Data Science Platform, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christos Karathanasis
- Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Eugene O Grushevskyi
- Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Bock
- Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Paolo Annibale
- Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Mike Heilemann
- Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Christof Schütte
- Zuse Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Martin J Lohse
- Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany. .,Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. .,Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany. .,ISAR Bioscience Institute, Munich/Planegg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
149
|
Pritchard AB, Kanai SM, Krock B, Schindewolf E, Oliver-Krasinski J, Khalek N, Okashah N, Lambert NA, Tavares ALP, Zackai E, Clouthier DE. Loss-of-function of Endothelin receptor type A results in Oro-Oto-Cardiac syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 2020; 182:1104-1116. [PMID: 32133772 PMCID: PMC7202054 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Revised: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Craniofacial morphogenesis is regulated in part by signaling from the Endothelin receptor type A (EDNRA). Pathogenic variants in EDNRA signaling pathway components EDNRA, GNAI3, PCLB4, and EDN1 cause Mandibulofacial Dysostosis with Alopecia (MFDA), Auriculocondylar syndrome (ARCND) 1, 2, and 3, respectively. However, cardiovascular development is normal in MFDA and ARCND individuals, unlike Ednra knockout mice. One explanation may be that partial EDNRA signaling remains in MFDA and ARCND, as mice with reduced, but not absent, EDNRA signaling also lack a cardiovascular phenotype. Here we report an individual with craniofacial and cardiovascular malformations mimicking the Ednra -/- mouse phenotype, including a distinctive micrognathia with microstomia and a hypoplastic aortic arch. Exome sequencing found a novel homozygous missense variant in EDNRA (c.1142A>C; p.Q381P). Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer assays revealed that this amino acid substitution in helix 8 of EDNRA prevents recruitment of G proteins to the receptor, abrogating subsequent receptor activation by its ligand, Endothelin-1. This homozygous variant is thus the first reported loss-of-function EDNRA allele, resulting in a syndrome we have named Oro-Oto-Cardiac Syndrome. Further, our results illustrate that EDNRA signaling is required for both normal human craniofacial and cardiovascular development, and that limited EDNRA signaling is likely retained in ARCND and MFDA individuals. This work illustrates a straightforward approach to identifying the functional consequence of novel genetic variants in signaling molecules associated with malformation syndromes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Barone Pritchard
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Stanley M Kanai
- Department of Craniofacial Biology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Bryan Krock
- Division of Genomic Diagnostics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Erica Schindewolf
- Center for Fetal Diagnosis and Treatment, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Nahla Khalek
- Center for Fetal Diagnosis and Treatment, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Najeah Okashah
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical College of Georgia-Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Nevin A Lambert
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical College of Georgia-Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Andre L P Tavares
- Department of Craniofacial Biology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Elaine Zackai
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David E Clouthier
- Department of Craniofacial Biology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
150
|
Activation of the α 2B adrenoceptor by the sedative sympatholytic dexmedetomidine. Nat Chem Biol 2020; 16:507-512. [PMID: 32152538 DOI: 10.1038/s41589-020-0492-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2019] [Revised: 12/31/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The α2 adrenergic receptors (α2ARs) are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that respond to adrenaline and noradrenaline and couple to the Gi/o family of G proteins. α2ARs play important roles in regulating the sympathetic nervous system. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α2AR agonist used in post-operative patients as an anxiety-reducing, sedative medicine that decreases the requirement for opioids. As is typical for selective αAR agonists, dexmedetomidine consists of an imidazole ring and a substituted benzene moiety lacking polar groups, which is in contrast to βAR-selective agonists, which share an ethanolamine group and an aromatic system with polar, hydrogen-bonding substituents. To better understand the structural basis for the selectivity and efficacy of adrenergic agonists, we determined the structure of the α2BAR in complex with dexmedetomidine and Go at a resolution of 2.9 Å by single-particle cryo-EM. The structure reveals the mechanism of α2AR-selective activation and provides insights into Gi/o coupling specificity.
Collapse
|