101
|
Conijn T, Nijmeijer SCM, Lakeman P, Henneman L, Wijburg FA, Haverman L. Preconception expanded carrier screening: Impact of information presented by text or video on genetic knowledge and attitudes. J Genet Couns 2021; 30:457-469. [PMID: 32940388 PMCID: PMC8048558 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Revised: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Preconception expanded carrier screening (ECS) aims to identify couples with an increased risk of having a child with an autosomal recessive (AR) disorder before pregnancy, thereby enabling reproductive choices. Genetic knowledge and experiential knowledge both influence the uptake of ECS. As people in the general public often lack such knowledge, it is essential to provide appropriate and understandable information when offering ECS. This study investigated the effect of an educational video, compared to an educational text, on the knowledge and attitudes toward preconception ECS in the general population. Both the text and video consisted of a brief educational summary on AR inheritance and on the type of disorders included in ECS, with the progressive neurodegenerative condition mucopolysaccharidosis type III (MPS III) as an example. Participants in the reproductive age were invited in collaboration with a research agency. Respondents (N = 789) were offered an educational video prior to completing an online questionnaire that examined genetic knowledge, the perceived severity of MPS III, perceived risk, and attitudes toward ECS. Outcomes were compared to reference data collected previously in which respondents had been offered an educational text (N = 781). We first again studied the attitudes toward ECS in a smaller educational text group (N = 266) in order to assess whether attitudes had changed over time due to increased media coverage on ECS, which did not reveal any significant changes. Respondents who were offered the video had a better genetic knowledge, perceived MPS III as more severe, perceived their risks higher and were more likely to participate in ECS compared to those who were offered text. Online video may well be used as supportive tool to the genetic counseling process, creating more knowledge on ECS and severe genetic disorders included in preconception screening panels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thirsa Conijn
- Pediatric Metabolic DiseasesEmma Children's Hospital and Amsterdam Lysosome Center “Sphinx”Amsterdam UMCUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
- Psychosocial departmentEmma Children's HospitalAmsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
| | - Stephanie C. M. Nijmeijer
- Pediatric Metabolic DiseasesEmma Children's Hospital and Amsterdam Lysosome Center “Sphinx”Amsterdam UMCUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
| | - Phillis Lakeman
- Department of Clinical GeneticsAmsterdam Reproduction and Development Research InstituteAmsterdam UMCUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Clinical GeneticsAmsterdam Reproduction and Development Research InstituteAmsterdam UMCVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
| | - Frits A. Wijburg
- Pediatric Metabolic DiseasesEmma Children's Hospital and Amsterdam Lysosome Center “Sphinx”Amsterdam UMCUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
| | - Lotte Haverman
- Psychosocial departmentEmma Children's HospitalAmsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
Vuorenlehto L, Hinnelä K, Äyräs O, Ulander VM, Louhiala P, Kaijomaa M. Women's experiences of counselling in cases of a screen-positive prenatal screening result. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0247164. [PMID: 33690660 PMCID: PMC7946296 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study women's apprehensions, understanding and experiences of counselling concerning a screen-positive result in screening for fetal chromosomal defects. METHODS A questionnaire study including different steps of the prenatal screening process was carried out in Helsinki University Hospital. Women's experiences concerning counselling immediately after a screen-positive result and during further examinations in the Fetal Medicine Unit (FMU) were analyzed. RESULTS 143 women filled in the questionnaire. Less than half of the women considered the primary counselling after a screen-positive result to be explicit (43.9%) and sufficient (43.1%). In the FMU, 88.3% and 89.8% of women were satisfied with the explicitness and sufficiency of counselling. Most women (75%) experienced worry before further examinations but less than half (45%) had considered their personal values concerning diagnostic tests. Half (50.5%) of women expected the worry to continue even if diagnostic tests turn out normal. Most (81%) women were aware that diagnostic tests are voluntary and were confident (85.3%) with their decision to participate. CONCLUSIONS After a screen-positive result, women have unanswered questions, experience anxiety and confusion. The possibility of an abnormal screening result is not seriously considered beforehand. To enable an informed consent for prenatal screening, improvements in prescreening counselling during the first visits of antenatal care need to be made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leena Vuorenlehto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- * E-mail:
| | - Kaisa Hinnelä
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Outi Äyräs
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Veli-Matti Ulander
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Pekka Louhiala
- Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Marja Kaijomaa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
IJzebrink A, van Dijk T, Franková V, Loeber G, Kožich V, Henneman L, Jansen M. Informing Parents about Newborn Screening: A European Comparison Study. Int J Neonatal Screen 2021; 7:ijns7010013. [PMID: 33652810 PMCID: PMC7930998 DOI: 10.3390/ijns7010013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Knowledge about newborn screening (NBS) is an important factor for parents to make an informed decision about participation. In Europe, countries inform parents differently about their NBS program, potentially including different knowledge aspects in their information. The aim of this study was to assess twenty-six European parental information products and to analyze their knowledge aspects through a content analysis. The analyzed aspects were compared to a list of eight knowledge aspects from scientific literature. The list includes aspects important for parents' decision-making, such as the purpose of screening. The study showed that most of the eight knowledge aspects are included in NBS information products of the majority of countries. However, there were differences between countries, for example in the amount of detail and phrasing of the information. Additional relevant knowledge aspects have also been identified and are recommended to optimize information products, such as the handling of residual bloodspot samples. This study only assessed knowledge aspects in information products meant for printing, but many countries also use other communication methods, and the impact on knowledge of the delivery of the information needs further study. Preferences of parents on alternative communication methods need to be considered and evaluated on their effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber IJzebrink
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (A.IJ.); (T.v.D.); (L.H.)
| | - Tessa van Dijk
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (A.IJ.); (T.v.D.); (L.H.)
| | - Věra Franková
- Department of Pediatrics and Inherited Metabolic Disorders, Charles University First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital Praque, 128 08 Prague 2, Czech Republic; (V.F.); (V.K.)
- Institute for Medical Humanities, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praque, 128 08 Praque 2, Czech Republic
| | - Gerard Loeber
- International Society for Neonatal Screening, 3721CK Bilthoven, The Netherlands;
| | - Viktor Kožich
- Department of Pediatrics and Inherited Metabolic Disorders, Charles University First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital Praque, 128 08 Prague 2, Czech Republic; (V.F.); (V.K.)
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (A.IJ.); (T.v.D.); (L.H.)
| | - Marleen Jansen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (A.IJ.); (T.v.D.); (L.H.)
- Centre for Health Protection, National Institue for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-20-444-3869
| |
Collapse
|
104
|
Bravo P, Dois A, Fernández-González L, Hernández-Leal MJ, Villarroel L. [Validation of the Informed Choice instrument for Chilean women facing a mammography decision in primary care]. Aten Primaria 2021; 53:101943. [PMID: 33592532 PMCID: PMC7893429 DOI: 10.1016/j.aprim.2020.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Revised: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objetivo Adaptar y validar el instrumento Informed Choice (IC) para la decisión de mamografía al contexto chileno. Diseño Estudio transversal, analítico, de adaptación y validación psicométrica. Emplazamiento Centro de atención primaria del sector sur oriente de Santiago de Chile. Métodos 1) traducir y contra-traducir IC; 2) realizar un grupo focal para la relevancia cultural/lingüística; 3) examinar la validez del contenido; 4) pilotar el instrumento; 5) aplicar para validación. Para la consistencia interna se usó el alfa de Cronbach, prueba de esfericidad de Bartlett y la medida de Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin para determinar correlaciones entre las variables y análisis factorial. Resultados Se construyeron 3 versiones del IC, modificándose según la opinión de usuarios y expertos. La validación se llevó a cabo en una muestra de 70 mujeres. La edad media fue de 54,4 años, el 47,1% de educación secundaria completa y el 92,9% al menos se había realizado alguna vez una mamografía. Se realizó análisis factorial del IC y se eliminó uno de sus ítems. El alfa de Cronbach final fue 0,79. Conclusión El uso de instrumentos de medición requiere de su validación previa ya que la versión original puede variar de acuerdo al contexto cultural donde será aplicado y las necesidades locales particulares. El proceso de validación del IC permite contar con un instrumento confiable para medir la decisión de las mujeres que deben realizarse la mamografía en la dimensión conocimiento, actitud e intención hacia el examen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulina Bravo
- Departamento de Salud de la Mujer, Escuela de Enfermería, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff. Reino Unido
| | - Angelina Dois
- Departamento de Salud de Adulto y Senescente, Escuela de Enfermería, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | | | - María José Hernández-Leal
- Facultat d'Economia i Empresa, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Campus Bellissens, Reus, España; Research Centre on Industrial and Public Economic (CREIP) Reus, España
| | - Luis Villarroel
- Departamento de Salud Pública, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Lemoine ME, O'Connell SBL, Grunberg PH, Gagné K, Ells C, Zelkowitz P. Information needs of people seeking fertility services in Canada: a mixed methods analysis. Health Psychol Behav Med 2021; 9:104-127. [PMID: 34104552 PMCID: PMC8158234 DOI: 10.1080/21642850.2021.1879650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infertility is a challenging experience associated with high levels of psychological distress. Many people seeking fertility services use the internet to obtain information about their conditions and treatments. OBJECTIVES This mixed-methods study aimed to describe the information-seeking experience of people seeking fertility services with respect to the fulfillment of their individually defined information needs and explore relationships between the fulfillment of information needs and psychological outcomes. METHODS One hundred and four participants completed a survey with close-ended and open-ended questions about their experience using an informational web-based application (app) called 'Infotility' and about their mental well-being before and after using the app. The questionnaires administered were the The Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS), the Fertility Quality of Life questionnaire (FertiQol), the Patient Empowerment Questionnaire (PEQ) and the General Anxiety Disorder 7-item Scale (GAD-7). Eleven participants completed in-depth qualitative interviews about their experience using the app. A thematic analysis was used to interpret qualitative results and quantitization was used to dichotomize participants into those with met information needs versus those with unmet information needs. Google Analytics was used to compare participants' reported experience with their actual use of the app. RESULTS The results of this study show that there is variability in the amount of information that people seeking fertility services wish to receive. Participants whose information needs were met reported improved psychological outcomes after using the app, while those with unmet needs showed no change in their psychological outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that fulfilling information needs was associated with improved psychological outcomes in people seeking fertility services. Our results also suggest that individual differences in information needs should be considered when developing health educational materials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Eve Lemoine
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montreal, Canada
- University of Montreal, School of Public Health, Montreal, Canada
| | | | | | - Karolanne Gagné
- Jewish General Hospital Psychiatry Research Division, Montreal, Canada
| | - Carolyn Ells
- McGill University, Biomedical Ethics Unit, Montreal, Canada
| | - Phyllis Zelkowitz
- Jewish General Hospital Institute of Community and Family Psychiatry, Psychiatry, Montreal, Canada
- McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Makarov DV, Feuer Z, Ciprut S, Lopez NM, Fagerlin A, Shedlin M, Gold HT, Li H, Lynch G, Warren R, Ubel P, Ravenell JE. Randomized trial of community health worker-led decision coaching to promote shared decision-making for prostate cancer screening among Black male patients and their providers. Trials 2021; 22:128. [PMID: 33568208 PMCID: PMC7876807 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05064-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Black men are disproportionately affected by prostate cancer, the most common non-cutaneous malignancy among men in the USA. The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) encourages prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing decisions to be based on shared decision-making (SDM) clinician professional judgment, and patient preferences. However, evidence suggests that SDM is underutilized in clinical practice, especially among the most vulnerable patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a community health worker (CHW)-led decision-coaching program to facilitate SDM for prostate cancer screening among Black men in the primary care setting, with the ultimate aim of improving/optimizing decision quality. METHODS We proposed a CHW-led decision-coaching program to facilitate SDM for prostate cancer screening discussions in Black men at a primary care FQHC. This study enrolled Black men who were patients at the participating clinical site and up to 15 providers who cared for them. We estimated to recruit 228 participants, ages 40-69 to be randomized to either (1) a decision aid along with decision coaching on PSA screening from a CHW or (2) receiving a decision aid along with CHW-led interaction on modifying dietary and lifestyle to serve as an attention control. The independent randomization process was implemented within each provider and we controlled for age by dividing patients into two strata: 40-54 years and 55-69 years. This sample size sufficiently powered the detection differences in the primary study outcomes: knowledge, indicative of decision quality, and differences in PSA screening rates. Primary outcome measures for patients will be decision quality and decision regarding whether to undergo PSA screening. Primary outcome measures for providers will be acceptability and feasibility of the intervention. We will examine how decision coaching about prostate cancer screening impact patient-provider communication. These outcomes will be analyzed quantitatively through objective, validated scales and qualitatively through semi-structured, in-depth interviews, and thematic analysis of clinical encounters. Through a conceptual model combining elements of the Preventative Health Care Model (PHM) and Informed Decision-Making Model, we hypothesize that the prostate cancer screening decision coaching intervention will result in a preference-congruent decision and decisional satisfaction. We also hypothesize that this intervention will improve physician satisfaction with counseling patients about prostate cancer screening. DISCUSSION Decision coaching is an evidence-based approach to improve decision quality in many clinical contexts, but its efficacy is incompletely explored for PSA screening among Black men in primary care. Our proposal to evaluate a CHW-led decision-coaching program for PSA screening has high potential for scalability and public health impact. Our results will determine the efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability of a CHW intervention in a community clinic setting in order to inform subsequent widespread dissemination, a critical research area highlighted by USPSTF. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was registered prospectively with the National Institute of Health registry ( www.clinicaltrials.gov ), registration number NCT03726320 , on October 31, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danil V Makarov
- VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, 423 E 23rd St, New York, NY, USA.
- Departments of Urology, NYU Langone Health, 227 E 30th St, New York, NY, USA.
- Population Health, NYU Langone Health, 227 E 30th St, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Zachary Feuer
- VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, 423 E 23rd St, New York, NY, USA
- Departments of Urology, NYU Langone Health, 227 E 30th St, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shannon Ciprut
- VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, 423 E 23rd St, New York, NY, USA
- Departments of Urology, NYU Langone Health, 227 E 30th St, New York, NY, USA
- Population Health, NYU Langone Health, 227 E 30th St, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Angela Fagerlin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Heather T Gold
- Population Health, NYU Langone Health, 227 E 30th St, New York, NY, USA
| | - Huilin Li
- Population Health, NYU Langone Health, 227 E 30th St, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gina Lynch
- Sunset Park Health Council, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Rueben Warren
- National Center for Bioethics in Research and Health Care, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, USA
| | - Peter Ubel
- The Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Joseph E Ravenell
- Population Health, NYU Langone Health, 227 E 30th St, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
107
|
Hecht L, Meyer G, Steckelberg A. A survey on critical health competences among diabetes educators using the Critical Health Competence Test (CHC Test). BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2021; 21:96. [PMID: 33563276 PMCID: PMC7874620 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02519-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diabetes associations claim to have a patient-centered approach in diabetes care including shared decision-making (SDM). Diabetes educators are important healthcare professionals for implementing the concept of informed SDM in diabetes care. They need critical health competences (CHC) in order to provide evidence-based information and to support patients in understanding the risks of the disease and also the possible benefits or harm of the healthcare options. Therefore, we surveyed the CHC of diabetes educators. METHODS We performed a cross-sectional survey using the validated Critical Health Competences (CHC) Test to measure CHC of certified diabetes educators and trainees in Germany. Diabetes educators were approached via newsletter, mailing lists or in person during the conference of the German Diabetes Association. Trainees were approached during their training sessions. We applied scenario 1 of the CHC test, which comprises 17 items with open-ended and multiple-choice questions. Mean person parameters with a range from 0 to 1000 were calculated to assess the levels of critical health competences and a multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to determine correlations between sociodemographic variables and levels of CHC. RESULTS A total of 325 participants, mean age 38.6 (±11.1) years, completed the CHC test; n = 174 (55.5%) were certified diabetes educators and n = 151 (46.5%) were trainees. The participants achieved a mean score of 409.84 person parameters (±88.10) (scale from 0 to 1000). A statistically significant association was found only between the level of education and the level of CHC (b = 0.221; p-value 0.002). Participants with grammar school education achieved higher mean scores compared to participants with secondary school education (432.88 ± 77.72 vs. 396.45 ± 85.95; mean difference 36.42 ± 9.29; 95%CI 18.15 to 54.71; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Diabetes educators achieved low competence scores and it can be assumed that they do not have sufficient CHC to conduct consultations based on the SDM principles. Poor CHC among healthcare providers are a major barrier for the implementation of SDM. Core concepts of evidence-based medicine should be implemented into the curricula for diabetes educators in order to increase their levels of CHC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Hecht
- School of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health, University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Herdecke, Germany.
| | - Gabriele Meyer
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Anke Steckelberg
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
108
|
Jackson C, Freeman ALJ, Szlamka Z, Spiegelhalter DJ. The adverse effects of bisphosphonates in breast cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0246441. [PMID: 33544765 PMCID: PMC7864400 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bisphosphonate drugs can be used to improve the outcomes of women with breast cancer. Whilst many meta-analyses have quantified their potential benefits for patients, attempts at comprehensive quantification of potential adverse effects have been limited. We undertook a meta-analysis with novel methodology to identify and quantify these adverse effects. METHODS We systematically reviewed randomised controlled trials in breast cancer where at least one of the treatments was a bisphosphonate (zoledronic acid, ibandronate, pamidronate, alendronate or clodronate). Neoadjuvant, adjuvant and metastatic settings were examined. Primary outcomes were adverse events of any type or severity (excluding death). We carried out pairwise and network meta-analyses to estimate the size of any adverse effects potentially related to bisphosphonates. In order to ascertain whether adverse effects differed by individual factors such as age, or interacted with other common adjuvant breast cancer treatments, we examined individual-level patient data for one large trial, AZURE. FINDINGS We identified 56 trials that reported adverse data, which included a total of 29,248 patients (18,301 receiving bisphosphonate drugs versus 10,947 not). 24 out of the 103 different adverse outcomes analysed showed a statistically and practically significant increase in patients receiving a bisphosphonate drug compared with those not (2 additional outcomes that appeared statistically significant came only from small studies with low event counts and no clinical suspicion so are likely artifacts). Most of these 24 are already clinically recognised: 'flu-like symptoms, fever, headache and chills; increased bone pain, arthralgia, myalgia, back pain; cardiac events, thromboembolic events; hypocalcaemia and osteonecrosis of the jaw; as well as possibly stiffness and nausea. Oral clodronate appeared to increase the risk of vomiting and diarrhoea (which may also be increased by other bisphosphonates), and there may be some hepatotoxicity. Four additional potential adverse effects emerged for bisphosphonate drugs in this analysis which have not classically be recognised: fatigue, neurosensory problems, hypertonia/muscle spasms and possibly dysgeusia. Several symptoms previously reported as potential side effects in the literature were not significantly increased in this analysis: constipation, insomnia, respiratory problems, oedema or thirst/dry mouth. Individual patient-level data and subgroup analysis revealed little variation in side effects between women of different ages or menopausal status, those with metastatic versus non-metastatic cancer, or between women receiving different concurrent breast cancer therapies. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis has produced estimates for the absolute frequencies of a range of side effects significantly associated with bisphosphonate drugs when used by breast cancer patients. These results show good agreement with previous literature on the subject but are the first systematic quantification of side effects and their severities. However, the analysis is limited by the availability and quality of data on adverse events, and the potential for bias introduced by a lack of standards for reporting of such events. We therefore present a table of adverse effects for bisphosphonates, identified and quantified to the best of our ability from a large number of trials, which we hope can be used to improve the communication of the potential harms of these drugs to patients and their healthcare providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alexandra L. J. Freeman
- Department of Pure Mathematics & Mathematical Statistics, Winton Centre for Risk & Evidence Communication, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Zśofia Szlamka
- Department of Pure Mathematics & Mathematical Statistics, Winton Centre for Risk & Evidence Communication, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - David J. Spiegelhalter
- Department of Pure Mathematics & Mathematical Statistics, Winton Centre for Risk & Evidence Communication, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Paquin RS, Peinado S, Lewis MA, Biesecker BB, Rini C, Roche M, Butterfield RM, Powell CM, Berg JS, Bailey DB. A behavior-theoretic evaluation of values clarification on parental beliefs and intentions toward genomic sequencing for newborns. Soc Sci Med 2021; 271:112037. [PMID: 30448267 PMCID: PMC6509013 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2018] [Revised: 11/06/2018] [Accepted: 11/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Decision aids commonly include values clarification exercises to help people consider which aspects of a choice matter most to them, and to help them make decisions that are congruent with their personal values and preferences. Using a randomized online experiment, we examined the influence of values clarification on parental beliefs and intentions about having genomic sequencing for newborns. We recruited 1186 women and men ages 18-44 who were pregnant or whose partner was pregnant or planning to become pregnant in the next two years. Participants (N = 1000) completed one of two versions of an online decision aid developed as part of a larger project examining the technical, clinical, and social aspects of using exome sequencing to screen newborns for rare genetic conditions. The education-only version provided information about using genomic sequencing to screen newborns for medically treatable conditions. The education-plus-values-clarification version included the same information, along with a values clarification exercise in which participants classified as important or unimportant five reasons in support of having and five reasons against having their newborn undergo genomic sequencing. We conducted partial correlations, regression analysis, and MANCOVAs with sex, health literacy, and experience with genetic testing as covariates. Participants who completed the decision aid with the values clarification exercise agreed less strongly with four of the five statements against sequencing compared to participants who viewed the education-only decision aid. The groups did not differ on agreement with reasons in support of sequencing. Agreement with four of five reasons against genomic sequencing was negatively associated with intentions to have their newborn sequenced, whereas agreement with all five reasons in support of sequencing were positively associated with intentions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan S Paquin
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.
| | - Susana Peinado
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| | - Megan A Lewis
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| | | | - Christine Rini
- Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ and Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Myra Roche
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Rita M Butterfield
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Cynthia M Powell
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Jonathan S Berg
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Donald B Bailey
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
110
|
Barabasch A, Riemann-Lorenz K, Kofahl C, Scheiderbauer J, Eklund D, Kleiter I, Kasper J, Köpke S, Lezius S, Zapf A, Rahn AC, Heesen C. Impact of a multimedia website with patient experiences of multiple sclerosis (PExMS) on immunotherapy decision-making: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial in a mixed-methods design. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2021; 7:16. [PMID: 33413658 PMCID: PMC7788927 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-020-00749-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A variety of management options (e.g. immunotherapies, lifestyle interventions, and rehabilitation) are available for people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Besides coping with the diagnosis, people with MS (pwMS) have to make complex decisions such as deciding about immunotherapies. In addition to factual information, reports of patient experiences (PEx) may support patients in decision-making. The added value of PEx in decision-making is not clear, and controlled studies are rare. Therefore, systematic methods are necessary to develop and analyse PEx. As there are no evaluated PEx for MS in Germany, we are currently creating a website presenting PEx structured according to topics and illustrated by video, audio, and text files. We aim to determine the feasibility of an intervention using PEx and evaluate whether PEx may help pwMS in their immunotherapy decision-making processes as a supplement to evidence-based information. Methods This project will follow the Medical Research Council framework for development and evaluation of complex interventions. After the development of a website with PEx, a randomised controlled pilot trial (pilot RCT) will be conducted in 2–3 MS centres, clinics, or rehabilitation centres including 55 pwMS and accompanied by a process evaluation. Patients with a RRMS diagnosis considering immunotherapy are eligible. The primary outcome is decision self-efficacy. Secondary outcomes include preparation for decision-making, decisional conflict, risk knowledge, confidence in active participation, affective forecasting, social support, and self-reported impact of eHealth on its users. Participants will be randomly assigned either to (i) an intervention group with 4 weeks access to an evidence-based patient information resource and the PExMS-website as an adjunct or to (ii) the control group with access to evidence-based information alone. A 6-member advisory panel involving representatives of pwMS, researchers, and neurologists, who accompany the whole project, will mentor this pilot RCT. Discussion The intervention was developed with systematic methods, created with active patient involvement and in critical appraisal by an expert advisory panel. The study is innovative as it contributes to the controversial evidence on the use of PEx in the context of evidence-based patient information. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04236544 Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-020-00749-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Barabasch
- Institute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis (INIMS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Karin Riemann-Lorenz
- Institute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis (INIMS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christopher Kofahl
- Institute of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.,Patient representative, Hamburg, Trier, Germany
| | | | | | - Ingo Kleiter
- Marianne-Strauß-Klinik, Behandlungszentrum Kempfenhausen für Multiple Sklerose Kranke gGmbH, Berg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Kasper
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, OsloMET, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sascha Köpke
- Institute for Clinical Nursing Science, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Susanne Lezius
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Antonia Zapf
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anne Christin Rahn
- Institute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis (INIMS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Heesen
- Institute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis (INIMS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
111
|
Kinchen E, Lange B, Newman D. Patient and Provider Decision-Making Experiences: A Qualitative Study. West J Nurs Res 2020; 43:713-722. [PMID: 33353517 DOI: 10.1177/0193945920977476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this qualitative descriptive study was to explore patient and provider experiences in making health care decisions. A convenience sample of primary care patients and providers was engaged in face-to-face and telephone interviews, to elicit participants' experiences in making health care decisions. Three main themes were identified in the data: Involvement, including being in control and accepting responsibility; seeking and confirming Information; and establishing communication and negotiating trust in the patient-provider Relationship. Themes identified in the data describe the elements involved in health care decision-making, and depict the relationship between patient and provider as being central to the making of health care decisions. In addition, the subthemes of control and negotiation merit additional in-depth exploration to illuminate the implicit and explicit expressions of hierarchy in the patient-provider relationship, as this hierarchy appears to hinder efforts at sharing decisions in health care encounters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bernadette Lange
- College of Nursing, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - David Newman
- College of Nursing, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
112
|
Dong D, Ahmed S, Nichini E, Yi H, Jafri H, Rashid Y, Ahmed M, Zhu J. Decision making on antenatal screening results: A comparative Q-method study of women from two Chinese cities. Health Expect 2020; 24:363-376. [PMID: 33316122 PMCID: PMC8077134 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although an integral part of ethical and quality health care, little is known about the informed decision making of Chinese women with different socioeconomic backgrounds within the context of antenatal testing. Methods To explore women's viewpoints on informed decision making regarding antenatal screening, a Q‐methodology study that combines both quantitative factor analysis and interviews was conducted between June 2016 and February 2017 in Shanghai and Duyun. A total of 169 women (84 Shanghai and 85 Duyun) participated in the study of 41 ranked statements along a Q‐sorting grid. Results Using by‐person factor analysis, five distinct viewpoints are identified: (a) choice is shared with the partner/husband, but the mother has the right to make the final decision; (b) having antenatal tests is not about choice but about a mother's responsibility; (c) choice is a shared decision led primarily by the partner/husband and secondarily by the doctors; (d) choice should be made using the advice of doctors, but the decision should be made with the partner/husband; and (e) choice is a responsibility shared with the partner, family and doctors. Conclusions The study reveals that women with better education and higher incomes demonstrate more autonomy than those with less education. The nuclear family clearly emerges as the main decision makers in health‐care services in China. Patient and Public Contribution The 169 participants shared their views and stories for at least an hour. They were debriefed after the interviews and contributed their thoughts on our study design and interpretation of the data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Dong
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.,Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.,Shenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China
| | - Shenaz Ahmed
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Elena Nichini
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Huso Yi
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore
| | | | | | - Mushtaq Ahmed
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Leeds NHS Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Jianfeng Zhu
- Anthropological and Ethnological Research Institute, Fudan-Harvard Medical Anthropology Collaborative Research Center, School of Social Development and Public Policy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
113
|
Sauceda JA, Dubé K, Brown B, Pérez AE, Rivas CE, Evans D, Fisher CB. Framing a Consent Form to Improve Consent Understanding and Determine How This Affects Willingness to Participate in HIV Cure Research: An Experimental Survey Study. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2020; 16:78-87. [PMID: 33307932 DOI: 10.1177/1556264620981205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
HIV cure research carries serious risks and negligible benefits. We investigated how participants understand these risks and what influences their willingness to participate. Through internet-based and in-person convenience sampling, 86 HIV+ participants completed an experimental survey. Participants were randomized to read a standard consent form describing a hypothetical HIV cure study or one adapted using Fuzzy Trace Theory-a decision-making model to facilitate complex information processing. We measured consent understanding and cognitive (e.g., safe/harmful) and affective (e.g., concerning, satisfying) evaluations of HIV cure research. Participants who read the adapted consent form had improved consent understanding, but only positive affective evaluations were associated with a willingness to participate. Consent processes can use decision-making theories to facilitate comprehension of study information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karine Dubé
- 2331University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, USA
| | | | | | | | - David Evans
- 455669Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise Martin Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
114
|
Meinhardt AL, Eggeling M, Cress U, Kimmerle J, Bientzle M. The impact of a physician's recommendation and gender on informed decision making: A randomized controlled study in a simulated decision situation. Health Expect 2020; 24:269-281. [PMID: 33274816 PMCID: PMC8077152 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2020] [Revised: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This study examined the influence of physicians’ recommendations and gender on the decision‐making process in a preference‐sensitive situation. Methods N = 201 participants were put in a hypothetical scenario in which they suffered from a rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). They received general information on two equally successful treatment options for this injury (surgery vs physiotherapy) and answered questions regarding their treatment preference, certainty and satisfaction regarding their decision and attitude towards the treatment options. Then, participants watched a video that differed regarding physician's recommendation (surgery vs physiotherapy) and physician's gender (female vs male voice and picture). Afterwards, they indicated again their treatment preference, certainty, satisfaction and attitude, as well as the physician's professional and social competence. Results Participants changed their treatment preferences in the direction of the physician's recommendation (P < .001). Decision certainty (P < .001) and satisfaction (P < .001) increased more strongly if the physician's recommendation was congruent with the participant's prior attitude than if the recommendation was contrary to the participant's prior attitude. Finally, participants’ attitudes towards the recommended treatment became more positive (surgery recommendation: P < .001; physiotherapy recommendation: P < .001). We found no influence of the physician's gender on participants’ decisions, attitudes, or competence assessments. Conclusion This research indicates that physicians should be careful with recommendations when aiming for shared decisions, as they might influence patients even if the patients have been made aware that they should take their personal preferences into account. This could be particularly problematic if the recommendation is not in line with the patient's preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Lea Meinhardt
- Knowledge Construction Lab, Leibniz-Institut fuer Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Marie Eggeling
- Knowledge Construction Lab, Leibniz-Institut fuer Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Ulrike Cress
- Knowledge Construction Lab, Leibniz-Institut fuer Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany.,Department of Psychology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Joachim Kimmerle
- Knowledge Construction Lab, Leibniz-Institut fuer Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany.,Department of Psychology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Martina Bientzle
- Knowledge Construction Lab, Leibniz-Institut fuer Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
115
|
Gabel P, Larsen MB, Edwards A, Kirkegaard P, Andersen B. Effectiveness of a decision aid for colorectal cancer screening on components of informed choice according to educational attainment: A randomised controlled trial. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0241703. [PMID: 33170877 PMCID: PMC7654753 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The decision to take up colorectal cancer screening has to be made on informed grounds balancing benefits and harms. Self-administered decision aids can support citizens in making an informed choice. A self-administered web-based decision aid targeting citizens with lower educational attainment has been evaluated within the target population. However, the effectiveness in the general screening population remains unexplored. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a web-based decision aid for colorectal cancer screening on components of informed choice among previous non-participants in colorectal cancer screening. METHODS AND FINDINGS The study was designed as a parallel randomised controlled trial among non-participants in colorectal cancer screening in Central Denmark Region (men and women aged 53-74 years). Respondents to baseline and follow-up questionnaires comprised the study population (n = 1,723). The intervention group received the decision aid electronically along with the second reminder. The control group received only the second reminder. The main outcomes (knowledge, attitudes, uptake and decisional conflict) were obtained through questionnaires data and from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Database. The decision aid increased the uptake rate by 8 percentage points (95% CI: 3.4;12.6) but had no effect on either knowledge (scale score differences: 0.09; 95% CI: -0.05;0.24) or attitudes (0.45; 95% CI: -0.00;0.91). Decisional conflict decreased by 1.69 scale points (95% CI: -3.18;-0.20). The effect was similar across educational attainment levels. CONCLUSIONS The web-based decision aid offers a feasible way to provide individualised screening information in a "one size fits all" approach that may hold the potential to increase informed CRC screening uptake. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT03253888.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pernille Gabel
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | - Mette Bach Larsen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- * E-mail:
| | - Adrian Edwards
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Pia Kirkegaard
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | - Berit Andersen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
116
|
Kasper J, Lühnen J, Hinneburg J, Siebenhofer A, Posch N, Berger-Höger B, Grafe A, Keppler J, Steckelberg A. MAPPinfo, mapping quality of health information: study protocol for a validation study of an assessment instrument. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e040572. [PMID: 33148762 PMCID: PMC7640523 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Health information is a prerequisite of informed decision-making. Criteria for development, content and presentation have recently been published in a corresponding guideline. Within a systematic search, 27 relevant checklists were identified, none of them, however, complying with the guideline or providing reasonably operationalised measurement items. Therefore, a draft of a checklist with 19 criteria was drafted. The current study aims at developing and validating this measure of quality. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The validation design consists of five single studies to be conducted at the University of Halle-Wittenberg/Germany and Graz/Austria. (1) Achieving content validity through expert reviews of the first draft, (2) achieving feasibility using 'think aloud' in piloting with untrained users, (3) pretesting the instrument applied to health information materials without use of secondary sources: determining inter-rater reliability and criterion validity, (4) determining construct validity using information on proceedings and methods in the development process provided by the developers and (5) determining divergent validity in comparison with the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQUIP) (expanded) Scale. The substudies will use varying samples of experts, students and developers and will apply the instrument to materials of various domains. Sample sizes will be adjusted to the particular research designs and questions. Analyses will employ qualitative methods, such as content analyses and discourse within the expert panel, and correlation-based methods both for determining inter-rater reliability and validity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The project is approved by the ethics committee of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (approval number: 2019 115). Results will be published, and the instrument made accessible on public health platforms. It is meant to become a certification standard. MAPPinfo can be used as a screening instrument without training or secondary sources. Although developed in the German language, the instrument will be applicable also in other languages. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AsPredected22546; date of registration: 24 July 2019. PROTOCOL VERSION July 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jürgen Kasper
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Health and Caring Sciences, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
- Oslo Metropolitan University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo, Norway
| | - Julia Lühnen
- Health and Nursing Science, Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Jana Hinneburg
- Health and Nursing Science, Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Andrea Siebenhofer
- Medical University Graz, Institute of General Practice and Evidence-Based Health Services Research, Graz, Austria
- Goethe University, Institute for General Practice, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Nicole Posch
- Institute of General Practice and Evidence-Based Health Services Research, Medizinische Universitat Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Birte Berger-Höger
- Health and Nursing Science, Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | | | - Jan Keppler
- Institute of Psychology, Christian-Albrechts-Universitat zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - A Steckelberg
- Health and Nursing Science, Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
The impact of hypothetical PErsonalised Risk Information on informed choice and intention to undergo Colorectal Cancer screening colonoscopy in Scotland (PERICCS)-a randomised controlled trial. BMC Med 2020; 18:285. [PMID: 33076932 PMCID: PMC7574531 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01750-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is currently no existing evidence on the effects of personalised risk information on uptake of colonoscopy following first line screening for colorectal cancer. This study aimed to measure the impact of providing risk information based on faecal haemoglobin concentration to allow a fully informed choice around whether or not to undergo colonoscopy. METHODS Two thousand seven hundred sixty-seven participants from the Scottish Bowel Screening Programme (SBoSP) database, who had not recently been invited for screening, were randomised to receive one of three types of hypothetical risk information materials: (1) numerical risk information (risk categories of one in 40, one in 1600 and one in 3500), (2) categorical risk information (highest, moderate and lowest risk), or (3) positive screening result letter (control group). The primary outcome was the impact of the risk materials on intention to undergo colonoscopy, to allow comparison with the current colonoscopy uptake of 77% for those with a positive screening result in the SBoSP. Secondary outcomes were knowledge, attitudes and emotional responses to the materials. RESULTS Four hundred thirty-four (15.7%) agreed to participate with 100 from the numerical risk group (69.0%), 104 from the categorical risk group (72.2%) and 104 from the control group (71.7%) returning completed materials. Intention to undergo colonoscopy was highest in the highest risk groups for the numerical and categorical study arms (96.8% and 95.3%, respectively), but even in the lowest risk groups was > 50% (58.1% and 60.7%, respectively). Adequate knowledge of colorectal screening and the risks and benefits of colonoscopy was found in ≥ 98% of participants in all three arms. All participants reported that they found the information easy-to-understand. 19.1%, 24.0% and 29.6% of those in the numerical, categorical and control group, respectively, reported that they found the information distressing (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Applying the risk categories to existing SBoSP data shows that if all participants were offered an informed choice to have colonoscopy, over two thirds of participants would intend to have the test. Equating to an increase in the number of screening colonoscopies from approx. 14,000 to 400,000 per annum, this would place an unmanageable demand on colonoscopy services, with a very small proportion of cancers and pre-cancers detected. However, the response to the materials were very positive, suggesting that providing risk information to those in lowest and moderate risk groups along with advice that colonoscopy is not currently recommended may be an option. Future research would be required to examine actual uptake. TRIAL REGISTRATION Date applied 1 December 2017 ISRCTN number 14254582 .
Collapse
|
118
|
Yu L, Li P, Yang S, Guo P, Zhang X, Liu N, Wang J, Zhang W. Web-based decision aids to support breast cancer screening decisions: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Comp Eff Res 2020; 9:985-1002. [PMID: 33025800 DOI: 10.2217/cer-2020-0052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer among women. Because guidelines on screening for breast cancer for certain ages are controversial, many experts advocate the use of shared decision making (SDM) using validated decision aids (DAs). Recent studies have concluded that DAs are beneficial; however, the results have great heterogeneity. Therefore, further studies are needed to improve understanding of these tools. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the impact of using web-based DAs in women aged 50 years and below facing the decision to be screened for breast cancer in comparison with usual care. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched up to February 2020 for studies assessing web-based DAs for women making a breast cancer screening decision and reported quality of decision-making outcomes. Using a random-effects model or a fixed-effects model, meta-analyses were conducted pooling results using mean differences (MD), standardized mean differences (SMD) and relative risks (RR). Results: Of 1097 unique citations, three randomized controlled trials and two before-after studies met the study eligibility criteria. Compared with usual care, web-based DAs increased knowledge (SMD = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.57-0.80; p < 0.00001), reduced decision conflict and increased the proportion of women who made an informed choice (RR = 1.86; 95% CI: 1.38 to 2.50; p < 0.0001), but did not change the intention of women deciding to be screened or affect decision regret. Conclusion: This analysis showed the positive effect of web-based DAs on patient-centered outcomes in breast cancer screening. In the future, more internet devices and free or larger discount WI-FI should be established to ensure more women can benefit from this effective tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Yu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Ping Li
- Department of Developmental Pediatrics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Shu Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Pingping Guo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Xuehui Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Na Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Jie Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
119
|
Fisher A, Keast R, Costa D, Sharpe L, Manicavasagar V, Anderson J, Juraskova I. Improving treatment decision-making in bipolar II disorder: a phase II randomised controlled trial of an online patient decision-aid. BMC Psychiatry 2020; 20:447. [PMID: 32943031 PMCID: PMC7495840 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-020-02845-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many patients with bipolar II disorder (BPII) prefer to be more informed and involved in their treatment decision-making than they currently are. Limited knowledge and involvement in one's treatment is also likely to compromise optimal BPII management. This Phase II RCT aimed to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and safety of a world-first patient decision-aid website (e-DA) to improve treatment decision-making regarding options for relapse prevention in BPII. The e-DA's potential efficacy in terms of improving quality of the decision-making process and quality of the decision made was also explored. METHODS The e-DA was based on International Patient Decision-Aid Standards and developed via an iterative co-design process. Adults with BPII diagnosis (n = 352) were recruited through a specialist outpatient clinical service and the social media of leading mental health organisations. Participants were randomised (1:1) to receive standard information with/without the e-DA (Intervention versus Control). At baseline (T0), post-treatment decision (T1) and at 3 months' post-decision follow-up (T2), participants completed a series of validated and purpose-designed questionnaires. Self-report and analytics data assessed the acceptability (e.g., perceived ease-of-use, usefulness; completed by Intervention participants only), safety (i.e., self-reported bipolar and/or anxiety symptoms), and feasibility of using the e-DA (% accessed). For all participants, questionnaires assessed constructs related to quality of the decision-making process (e.g., decisional conflict) and quality of the decision made (e.g., knowledge of treatment options and outcomes). RESULTS Intervention participants endorsed the e-DA as acceptable and feasible to use (82.1-94.6% item agreement); most self-reported using the e-DA either selectively (51.8%; relevant sections only) or thoroughly (34%). Exploratory analyses indicated the e-DA's potential efficacy to improve decision-making quality; most between-group standardised mean differences (SMD) were small-to-moderate. The largest potential effects were detected for objective treatment knowledge (- 0.69, 95% CIs - 1.04, - 0.33 at T1; and - 0.57, 95% CIs - 0.99,-0.14 at T2), decisional regret at T2 (0.42, 95% CIs 0.01, 0.84), preparation for decision-making at T1 (- 0.44, 95% CIs - 0.81, - 0.07), and the Decisional Conflict Scale Uncertainty subscale (0.42, 95% CIs 0.08, 0.08) and Total (0.36, 95% CIs 0.30, 0.69) scores, with all SMDs favouring the Intervention over the Control conditions. Regarding safety, e-DA use was not associated with worse bipolar symptoms or anxiety. CONCLUSION The e-DA appears to be acceptable, feasible, safe and potentially efficacious at improving patients' decision-making about BPII treatment. Findings also support the future adoption of the e-DA into patient care for BPII to foster treatment decisions based on the best available evidence and patient preferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12617000840381 (prospectively registered 07/06/2017).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alana Fisher
- The University of Sydney, The School of Psychology, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. .,The University of Sydney, The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| | - Rachael Keast
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XThe University of Sydney, The School of Psychology, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia ,grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XThe University of Sydney, The Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia
| | - Daniel Costa
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XThe University of Sydney, The School of Psychology, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia
| | - Louise Sharpe
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XThe University of Sydney, The School of Psychology, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia
| | - Vijaya Manicavasagar
- grid.1005.40000 0004 4902 0432The Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052 Australia
| | - Josephine Anderson
- grid.1005.40000 0004 4902 0432The Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052 Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XThe University of Sydney, The School of Psychology, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia ,grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XThe University of Sydney, The Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
120
|
Reumkens K, Tummers MHE, Severijns Y, Gietel-Habets JJG, van Kuijk SMJ, Aalfs CM, van Asperen CJ, Ausems MGEM, Collée M, Dommering CJ, Kets M, van der Kolk LE, Oosterwijk JC, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, van der Weijden T, de Die-Smulders CEM, van Osch LADM. Reproductive decision-making in the context of hereditary cancer: the effects of an online decision aid on informed decision-making. J Community Genet 2020; 12:101-110. [PMID: 32880035 PMCID: PMC7846643 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-020-00484-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Individuals having a genetic predisposition to cancer and their partners face challenging decisions regarding their wish to have children. This study aimed to determine the effects of an online decision aid to support couples in making an informed decision regarding their reproductive options. A nationwide pretest-posttest study was conducted in the Netherlands among 131 participants between November 2016 and May 2018. Couples were eligible for participation if one partner had a pathogenic variant predisposing for an autosomal dominant hereditary cancer syndrome. Participants completed a questionnaire before use (T0), and at 3 months (T3) after use of the decision aid to assess the primary outcome measure informed decision-making, and the secondary outcome measures decisional conflict, knowledge, realistic expectations, level of deliberation, and decision self-efficacy. T0-T3 comparisons show an overall positive effect for all outcome measures (all ps < 0.05; knowledge (ES = - 1.05), decisional conflict (ES = 0.99), participants' decision self-efficacy (ES = -0.55), level of deliberation (ES = - 0.50), and realistic expectations (ES = - 0.44). Informed decision-making increased over time and 58.0% of the participants made an informed reproductive decision at T3. The online decision aid seems to be an appropriate tool to complement standard reproductive counseling to support our target group in making an informed reproductive decision. Use of the decision aid may lessen the negative psychological impact of decision-making on couples' daily life and wellbeing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Reumkens
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Marly H E Tummers
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Yil Severijns
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands. .,Department of Health Promotion, School CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Postbox 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Joyce J G Gietel-Habets
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Sander M J van Kuijk
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Cora M Aalfs
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christi J van Asperen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Department of Genetics, Division of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Margriet Collée
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Charlotte J Dommering
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marleen Kets
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jan C Oosterwijk
- Department of Genetics, Groningen University Medical Center, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Trudy van der Weijden
- Department of Family Medicine, School CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Christine E M de Die-Smulders
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth A D M van Osch
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Health Promotion, School CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Postbox 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
121
|
Ritchie D, Van Hal G, Van den Broucke S. How is informed decision-making about breast cancer screening addressed in Europe? An international survey of 28 countries. Health Policy 2020; 124:1017-1031. [DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
122
|
De Looper M, Damman O, Smets E, Timmermans D, Van Weert J. Adapting Online Patient Decision Aids: Effects of Modality and Narration Style on Patients' Satisfaction, Information Recall and Informed Decision Making. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2020; 25:712-726. [PMID: 33256546 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1840674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Audiovisual and narrative information are often used in online decision aids. However, few studies have tested whether these strategies are more effective compared to other types of information. We tested the effect of these strategies on satisfaction with the information, recall and informed decision-making in a 2 (Modality: audiovisual vs. textual) x 2 (Narration style: narrative vs. factual) experimental design. Data was collected in an online experiment among 262 analogue cancer patients. Since most cancer patients are older people, we also assessed if the effectiveness of these strategies differs depending on the patient's age. Data was analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling. Findings showed audiovisual modality had a positive effect on satisfaction. Moreover, audiovisual modality improved recall, both directly and indirectly via satisfaction, which subsequently resulted in better-informed decision-making. Narratives resulted in more satisfaction, but not better recall or informed decision-making. These effects were found in patients of all ages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie De Looper
- Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olga Damman
- Public and Occupational Health, VU University Medical Center/EMGO+ Institute dor Health and Care Research , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen Smets
- Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Danielle Timmermans
- Public and Occupational Health, VU University Medical Center/EMGO+ Institute dor Health and Care Research , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Julia Van Weert
- Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
123
|
Blalock SJ, Solow EB, Reyna VF, Keebler M, Carpenter D, Hunt C, Hickey G, O'Neill K, Curtis JR, Chapman SB. Enhancing Patient Understanding of Medication Risks and Benefits. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 74:142-150. [PMID: 32799397 PMCID: PMC9305434 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2020] [Revised: 07/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of 2 interventions, including the DrugFactsBox format for presenting written medication information and the SMART (Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training) program designed to enhance gist (i.e., “bottom‐line” meaning) reasoning ability. Methods We used a 2 × 2 factorial research design. A total of 286 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups, including DrugFactsBox with the SMART program, DrugFactsBox without the SMART program, other consumer medication information (CMI) with the SMART program, and other CMI without the SMART program. Data were collected via telephone interviews and online questionnaires at 4 time points, including baseline and 6‐week, 3‐month, and 6‐month time points following baseline. The primary outcome variable was informed decision‐making, which was defined as making a value‐consistent decision concerning use of disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs based on adequate knowledge. Results We found no main effects for the 2 interventions, either alone or in combination. However, there was a significant interaction between assignment to the SMART/no SMART groups and informed decision‐making at baseline. Among participants in the SMART groups who did not meet the criteria for informed decision‐making at baseline, 42.5% met the criteria at the 6‐month follow‐up, compared to 23.6% of participants in the no SMART groups (mean difference 18.9 [95% confidence interval 5.6, 32.2]; P = 0.007). This difference was driven by increased knowledge in the SMART groups. Among participants who met the criteria for informed decision‐making at baseline, the difference between the SMART and no SMART groups was not statistically significant. Conclusion Participation in a theory‐driven program to enhance gist reasoning may have a beneficial effect on informed decision‐making among patients with inadequate knowledge concerning therapeutic options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan J Blalock
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Elizabeth B Solow
- Division of Rheumatic Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Valerie F Reyna
- Center for Behavioral Economics and Decision Research, Human Neuroscience Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - Molly Keebler
- Center for BrainHealth, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Delesha Carpenter
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Caprice Hunt
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Genevieve Hickey
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kimberlee O'Neill
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Curtis
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
124
|
Mokken SE, Özer M, van de Grift TC, Pigot GL, Bouman MB, Mullender M. Evaluation of the Decision Aid for Genital Surgery in Transmen. J Sex Med 2020; 17:2067-2076. [PMID: 32753281 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Revised: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple options of genital gender-affirming surgery are available to transmen. The transman should be able to weigh these options based on the outcomes, risks, and consequences that are most important to him. For this reason, a decision aid for genital surgery in transmen (DA-GST) was developed. It aims to support the transman in making thoughtful choices among treatment options and facilitate shared decision-making between the healthcare professionals and the transindividual. AIM The aim of this study was to evaluate the newly developed DA-GST. METHODS This was a cross-sectional study using mixed methods. Transmen considering to undergo genital surgery were eligible to partake in the study. The questionnaires used in this study were developed by adapting the validated Dutch translation of the "Decisional Conflict Scale," the "Measures of Informed Choice," and the "Ottawa Preparation for Decision-Making Scale." Qualitative interviews were conducted querying their subjective experience with the DA-GST. The data from the questionnaires were statistically analyzed, and the data from the interviews were thematically analyzed. OUTCOMES The main outcome measures were decisional conflict and decisional confidence measured via self-report items and qualitative data regarding the use of the DA-GST via interviews. RESULTS In total, 51 transmen participated in the questionnaires study, 99 questionnaires were analyzed, and 15 interviews were conducted. Although confident in their decision, most transmen felt responsible to collect the necessary information themselves. The ability to go through the decision aid independently aided the decision-making process by providing information and highlighting their subjective priorities. Suggested additions are pictures of postoperational outcomes and personal statements from experienced transmen. CLINICAL TRANSLATION The DA-GST could be implemented as an integral part of transgender health care. Clinicians could take the individual personal values into account and use it to accurately tailor their consult. This would ultimately improve the doctor-patient relationship and decrease decisional regret by enhancing effective shared decision-making. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS This mixed-method design study confirmed the use of the DA-GST while taking a broad range of decisional factors into account. Limitations include the absence of a baseline analysis and the limited power for the comparison of treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that the DA-GST helped transmen feel more prepared for their personal consult with the surgeon, reduced decisional conflict, and increased their decisional confidence. Mokken SE, Özer M, van de Grift TC, et al. Evaluation of the Decision Aid for Genital Surgery in Transmen. J Sex Med 2020;17:2067-2076.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sterre E Mokken
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Centre of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Müjde Özer
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Centre of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tim C van de Grift
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Centre of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Garry L Pigot
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark-Bram Bouman
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Centre of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Gender Surgery Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margriet Mullender
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Centre of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
125
|
Chen A, Tenhunen H, Torkki P, Heinonen S, Lillrank P, Stefanovic V. Women's decisional conflict in the pathway of prenatal screening and testing: an explorative study within Finnish public maternity care. J Perinat Med 2020; 48:527-537. [PMID: 32304311 DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2019-0450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2019] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Objectives To explore women's decisional conflict in the pathway of prenatal screening and testing (PreST) in Finland and to evaluate a counseling service. Methods Self-completion surveys were conducted at two medical settings (screening and further testing) of PreST. Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) was the main measure. Different types of statistical tests were used to compare women's decisional conflict at different medical settings of PreST, and before-after pre-test counseling. Multivariable linear regressions analyzed the influences of the medical settings and other factors on women's decisional conflict. Results Compared to women in population-based screening, women in further testing (before pre-test counseling) were more likely to feel well informed (P < 0.001), had increased values clarity (P < 0.001), but more likely experienced uncertainty (P = 0.040). Besides medical settings, maternal age, gravidity and previous experience of fetal aneuploidy significantly influenced decisional conflict. After counseling, screen-positive women felt better informed (P < 0.001), had increased values clarity (P < 0.001), perceived more support (P < 0.001), and had better decision certainty (P < 0.001) than before counseling. Conclusions Medical settings influence women's decisional conflict during PreST. Individual counseling is effective in improving screen-positive women's decisional conflict. This research adds knowledge and experience on developing decision-making supports across the pathway of PreST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- An Chen
- Institute of Healthcare Engineering, Management and Architecture (HEMA Institute), Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
| | - Henni Tenhunen
- Institute of Healthcare Engineering, Management and Architecture (HEMA Institute), Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
| | - Paulus Torkki
- Institute of Healthcare Engineering, Management and Architecture (HEMA Institute), Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.,Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Seppo Heinonen
- Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Paul Lillrank
- Institute of Healthcare Engineering, Management and Architecture (HEMA Institute), Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
| | - Vedran Stefanovic
- Professor of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Fetal Medicine, Senior Consultant, Senior Lecturer, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
126
|
Rocque R, Chipenda Dansokho S, Grad R, Witteman HO. What Matters to Patients and Families: A Content and Process Framework for Clarifying Preferences, Concerns, and Values. Med Decis Making 2020; 40:722-734. [PMID: 32696715 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x20940660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background. Values clarification, or sorting out what matters to a patient or family relevant to a health decision, is a fundamental part of shared decision making. We aimed to describe how values clarification occurs in routine primary care. Methods. Using framework analysis and an established taxonomy, 2 independent researchers analyzed 260 consultations in 5 family medicine clinics across Quebec. Two questions guided our analyses: 1) What categories exist regarding what matters to patients? 2) What patterns exist in discussions of what matters to patients? Results. 1) Five distinct categories of what matters to patients and families were discussed during values clarification: preferences, concerns, treatment-specific values, life goals or philosophies, and broader contextual or sociocultural values. Preferences and concerns were the matters most commonly raised. 2) Diverse patterns of values clarification emerged based on 3 analytical questions: Who initiates the discussion about what matters to patients? When? What information is discussed? The most frequent pattern was clinicians soliciting patients' concerns and preferences during the information-gathering phase. The second most common pattern was similar, except that patients' spontaneously raised what matters to them. Limitations. The study was descriptive and based on audio-recorded visits. We did not interview patients and clinicians to elicit their perspectives. Conclusions. There are 5 distinct categories of what matters to patients and families as well as clear patterns of how values clarification occurs in routine primary care consultations. Clinicians could be sensitive to these categories when engaging in the process of values clarification and may wish to pay particular attention to the opening minutes of a consultation. This study provides a structure for future identification of best practices in values clarification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhéa Rocque
- School of Psychology, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Selma Chipenda Dansokho
- Office of Education and Professional Development, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Roland Grad
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Herzl Family Practice Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Holly O Witteman
- Office of Education and Professional Development, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada.,Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada.,Research Centre in Sustainable Health (VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable), Quebec City, QC, Canada.,Research Center of the Laval University Academic Medical Centre (Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval), Quebec City, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
127
|
Pot M, Paulussen TG, Ruiter RA, Mollema L, Hofstra M, Van Keulen HM. Dose-Response Relationship of a Web-Based Tailored Intervention Promoting Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: Process Evaluation of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e14822. [PMID: 32520718 PMCID: PMC7395256 DOI: 10.2196/14822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2019] [Revised: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In the Netherlands, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination uptake remains low. To improve informed decision making (IDM) and HPV vaccination acceptability, we systematically developed an interactive, web-based tailored intervention to which mothers of Dutch girls were invited to participate. Objective The aim of this study was to provide insight into the intervention’s working mechanisms by evaluating (1) program use, (2) program acceptability, and (3) the relationship of program use with program acceptability and intervention effects (ie, dose-response relationship). Methods Only mothers from the intervention arm of a randomized controlled trial that assessed the effectiveness of the web-based, tailored intervention were included in this study. They were invited to visit the website of the web-based intervention between baseline (January 2015, just before access to the intervention) and follow up (March 2015, prior to the first HPV vaccination). Indicators for program use were time of website use (ie, duration of intervention exposure) and completeness (ie, proportion of all available web pages visited). HPV vaccination uptake registered by Praeventis was used as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were IDM, decisional conflict, and social-psychological determinants of HPV vaccination uptake. Results Among the 3995 invited mothers, 2509 (62.80%) logged on to the website, 2239 of whom (89.24%) visited at least one page of the intervention components. On average, mothers spent 21.39 minutes (SD 12.41) on the website and completed 50.04% (SD 26.18%) of the website components. Participants rated the website 7.64 (SD 1.39) on a 10-point scale. Program acceptability was significantly associated with completeness (β=4.36, P<.001), but not with time of website use (β=–.07, P=.77). Intention-to-treat analysis (N=3995) showed a significant positive effect of completeness on all outcome measures (all P<.003; Bonferroni-corrected α=.05/15 factors), including on HPV vaccination uptake. Time of website use had a significant positive effect on all outcomes (all P<.003), except for uptake (P=.20), risk perception when not vaccinated (P=.14), subjective norms (P=.03), and habit (P=.01). Conclusions Program use and acceptability of the intervention were adequate. Completeness was positively associated with acceptability. Furthermore, positive effects (ie, dose-response effects) were found for completeness and time of website use on the mothers’ IDM, decisional conflict, and almost all of the social-psychological determinants of HPV vaccination acceptability. In addition, the extent to which mothers completed the intervention had a positive impact on their daughters’ vaccination uptake. This indicates that the web-based, tailored intervention fits well with the mothers’ needs, and that completeness of use is essential for improving HPV vaccination uptake, acceptability, and IDM. Program use should therefore be promoted. Trial Registration Netherlands Trial Register NTR4795; https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/4795
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjam Pot
- Child Health, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Theo Gwm Paulussen
- Child Health, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Robert Ac Ruiter
- Department of Work and Social Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth Mollema
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Infectious Disease Control, Bilthoven, Netherlands
| | - Miranda Hofstra
- Child Health, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Hilde M Van Keulen
- Child Health, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
128
|
Bientzle M, Kimmerle J, Eggeling M, Cebi I, Weiss D, Gharabaghi A. Evidence-Based Decision Aid for Patients With Parkinson Disease: Protocol for Interview Study, Online Survey, and Two Randomized Controlled Trials. JMIR Res Protoc 2020; 9:e17482. [PMID: 32673261 PMCID: PMC7388050 DOI: 10.2196/17482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Revised: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision making is particularly important in situations with different treatment alternatives. For the treatment of idiopathic Parkinson disease, both pharmacological and surgical approaches can be applied. OBJECTIVE In this research project, a series of studies will be conducted to investigate how decision aids for patients with idiopathic Parkinson disease should be designed in order to support the decision-making process. METHODS In Study 1a, qualitative interviews will be conducted to determine which needs frequently occur for patients with idiopathic Parkinson disease. In Study 1b, the identified needs will then be rated for personal relevance by an independent group of patients in an online survey. In Study 2, a randomized controlled trial will be used to pretest different decision aids in a sample group of people who do not have a medical background and who do not have Parkinson disease. In Study 3, a randomized controlled trial will be used to investigate the effect of the decision aids that had been evaluated as positive in Study 2 with patients who have idiopathic Parkinson disease. RESULTS This series of studies received ethical approval in January 2020. As of June 2020, data collection for Study 1a has started, and it is estimated that Studies 1a, 1b, 2, and 3 will take approximately 4, 4, 6, and 6 months to complete, respectively. It is planned to present the results and analyses at international conferences and to submit the results to peer-reviewed journals for publication, once the studies have been completed. The findings will also be shared with clinicians and patients through presentations at information events. CONCLUSIONS This series of studies is intended to result in an evidence-based decision aid for patients with idiopathic Parkinson disease in order to support the informed and reflected shared decision-making process. We further intend to contribute to a deeper understanding of the individual preferences of patients with idiopathic Parkinson disease and the impact of those preferences on treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joachim Kimmerle
- Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Idil Cebi
- Division of Functional and Restorative Neurosurgery and Tübingen NeuroCampus, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Weiss
- Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Centre of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Alireza Gharabaghi
- Division of Functional and Restorative Neurosurgery and Tübingen NeuroCampus, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
129
|
Kregting LM, van Ravesteyn NT, Spijker W, Dierks T, Aitken CA, Geuzinge HA, Korfage IJ. Effects of a leaflet on breast cancer screening knowledge, explicit attitudes, and implicit associations. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2020; 103:S0738-3991(20)30350-5. [PMID: 32732022 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Revised: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of an information leaflet on knowledge, explicit attitudes, implicit associations, and attendance for breast cancer screening. METHODS Dutch women (aged 49-75 years) were approached three months before their breast cancer screening invitation. After providing informed consent, participants were randomised to receiving the information leaflet (intervention condition) or not (control condition). Screening knowledge, explicit attitudes, and implicit associations were assessed through web-based questionnaires, at baseline and two weeks later. Actual screening attendance data were collected. RESULTS In total, 988 women completed both questionnaires. Participants in the leaflet condition scored higher on knowledge (9.9 versus 9.6, p < 0.001, scale 0-11), and more often had positive explicit attitudes (97 % versus 95 %, p = 0.03), than those in the control condition. This contrast was bigger among first-time invitees. Implicit associations were not correlated with explicit attitudes or attendance. Explicit attitudes were moderately correlated with attendance (r=.30, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The information leaflet led to more knowledge and more positive explicit attitudes. Implicit associations towards breast cancer screening were not correlated with attendance. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Encouragement to learn about the screening programme can increase levels of knowledge of invitees and therefore support their decision-making about participation. This might be especially relevant for first-time invitees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindy M Kregting
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | - Tessa Dierks
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Clare A Aitken
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H Amarens Geuzinge
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ida J Korfage
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
130
|
French DP, Astley S, Brentnall AR, Cuzick J, Dobrashian R, Duffy SW, Gorman LS, Harkness EF, Harrison F, Harvie M, Howell A, Jerrison A, Machin M, Maxwell AJ, McWilliams L, Payne K, Qureshi N, Ruane H, Sampson S, Stavrinos P, Thorpe E, Ulph F, van Staa T, Woof V, Evans DG. What are the benefits and harms of risk stratified screening as part of the NHS breast screening Programme? Study protocol for a multi-site non-randomised comparison of BC-predict versus usual screening (NCT04359420). BMC Cancer 2020; 20:570. [PMID: 32552763 PMCID: PMC7302349 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07054-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In principle, risk-stratification as a routine part of the NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) should produce a better balance of benefits and harms. The main benefit is the offer of NICE-approved more frequent screening and/ or chemoprevention for women who are at increased risk, but are unaware of this. We have developed BC-Predict, to be offered to women when invited to NHSBSP which collects information on risk factors (self-reported information on family history and hormone-related factors via questionnaire; mammographic density; and in a sub-sample, Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms). BC-Predict produces risk feedback letters, inviting women at high risk (≥8% 10-year) or moderate risk (≥5 to < 8% 10-year) to have discussion of prevention and early detection options at Family History, Risk and Prevention Clinics. Despite the promise of systems such as BC-Predict, there are still too many uncertainties for a fully-powered definitive trial to be appropriate or ethical. The present research aims to identify these key uncertainties regarding the feasibility of integrating BC-Predict into the NHSBSP. Key objectives of the present research are to quantify important potential benefits and harms, and identify key drivers of the relative cost-effectiveness of embedding BC-Predict into NHSBSP. METHODS A non-randomised fully counterbalanced study design will be used, to include approximately equal numbers of women offered NHSBSP (n = 18,700) and BC-Predict (n = 18,700) from selected screening sites (n = 7). In the initial 8-month time period, women eligible for NHSBSP will be offered BC-Predict in four screening sites. Three screening sites will offer women usual NHSBSP. In the following 8-months the study sites offering usual NHSBSP switch to BC-Predict and vice versa. Key potential benefits including uptake of risk consultations, chemoprevention and additional screening will be obtained for both groups. Key potential harms such as increased anxiety will be obtained via self-report questionnaires, with embedded qualitative process analysis. A decision-analytic model-based cost-effectiveness analysis will identify the key uncertainties underpinning the relative cost-effectiveness of embedding BC-Predict into NHSBSP. DISCUSSION We will assess the feasibility of integrating BC-Predict into the NHSBSP, and identify the main uncertainties for a definitive evaluation of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of BC-Predict. TRIAL REGISTRATION Retrospectively registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04359420).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David P French
- Manchester Centre of Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Coupland Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, England.
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England.
| | - Susan Astley
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, England
| | - Adam R Brentnall
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, England
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, England
| | - Richard Dobrashian
- East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Haslingden Road, Lancashire, BB2 3HH, England
| | - Stephen W Duffy
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, England
| | - Louise S Gorman
- The Nightingale and Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, England
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, England
| | - Elaine F Harkness
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, England
- The Nightingale and Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, England
| | | | - Michelle Harvie
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England
- The Nightingale and Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, England
- Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, M20 4GJ, England
| | - Anthony Howell
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England
- The Nightingale and Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, England
- Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, M20 4GJ, England
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, M20 4BX, England
| | - Andrew Jerrison
- Research IT, IT Services, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, England
| | - Matthew Machin
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, England
| | - Anthony J Maxwell
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, England
- The Nightingale and Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, England
| | - Lorna McWilliams
- Manchester Centre of Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Coupland Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, England
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England
| | - Katherine Payne
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, England
| | - Nadeem Qureshi
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, England
| | - Helen Ruane
- The Nightingale and Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, England
| | - Sarah Sampson
- The Nightingale and Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, England
| | - Paula Stavrinos
- The Nightingale and Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, England
| | - Emma Thorpe
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England
| | - Fiona Ulph
- Manchester Centre of Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Coupland Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, England
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England
| | - Tjeerd van Staa
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, England
| | - Victoria Woof
- Manchester Centre of Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Coupland Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, England
| | - D Gareth Evans
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England
- The Nightingale and Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, England
- Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, M20 4GJ, England
- Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, The University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, England
| |
Collapse
|
131
|
A dynamic web-based decision aid to improve informed choice in organised breast cancer screening. A pragmatic randomised trial in Italy. Br J Cancer 2020; 123:714-721. [PMID: 32546834 PMCID: PMC7462858 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-0935-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2019] [Revised: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Improving the quality of information and communication is a priority in organised breast cancer screening and an ethical duty. Programmes must offer the information each woman is looking for, promoting informed decision-making. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a web-based dynamic decision aid (DA). Methods A pragmatic randomised trial carried out in six regional organised screening programmes recruited women at the first invitation receiving DA or a web-based standard brochure (SB). The primary outcome was informed choice measured on knowledge, attitudes, and intentions. Follow-up period: 7–10 days. Secondary outcomes included participation rate, satisfaction, decisional conflict, and acceptability of DA. Results Two thousand one hundred and nineteen women were randomised and 1001 completed the study. Respectively, 43.9% and 36.9% in the DA and SB reached the informed choice. The DA gave a 13-point higher proportion of women aware about overdiagnosis compared to SB (38.3% versus 25.2%, p < 0.0001). The percentage of women attending screening was the same: 84% versus 83%. Decisional conflict was significantly lower in the DA group (14.4%) than in the SB group (19.3%). Conclusion DA increases informed choice. Complete information including the pros, cons, controversies, and overdiagnosis–overtreatment issues boost a woman’s knowledge without reducing the rate of actual screening participation. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT 03097653.
Collapse
|
132
|
Isselhard A, Töpper M, Berger-Höger B, Steckelberg A, Fischer H, Vitinius F, Beifus K, Köberlein-Neu J, Wiedemann R, Rhiem K, Schmutzler R, Stock S. Implementation and evaluation of a nurse-led decision-coaching program for healthy breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA1/2) mutation carriers: a study protocol for the randomized controlled EDCP-BRCA study. Trials 2020; 21:501. [PMID: 32513307 PMCID: PMC7278068 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04431-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Female BRCA mutation carriers have an increased lifetime risk for breast and ovarian cancer compared to the general population. Women who carry this mutation have several options to deal with their cancer risk, such as risk-reducing surgeries or intensified breast cancer screening. Previous research has shown that preferences in this scenario are highly dependent on affected women’s personalities and value systems. To support these women in the decision-making process, a structured decision support consisting of decision coaching combined with a decision aid might be helpful. Methods/design A randomized controlled trial will be conducted in order to compare usual care with structured decision support alongside usual care. The decision support program entails nurse-led decision coaching as well as an evidence-based patient decision aid. Nurses are qualified by a 4-day training program in informed decision-making and decision coaching. Six centers for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer in Germany will be included in the study, with a planned sample size of 398 women. The primary outcome is the congruence between the preferred and the actual played role in the decision-making process as measured by the Control Preferences Scale. It is hypothesized that the structured decision support will enable women to play the preferred role in the decision-making process. Secondary outcomes include the knowledge and attitudes about preventive options, decisional conflict, depression and anxiety, coping self-efficacy, impact of event, and self-concept. A process evaluation will accompany the study. Discussion The EDCP-BRCA study is the first study to implement and evaluate decision coaching combined with a decision aid for healthy BRCA mutation carriers worldwide. Trial registration {2a} DRKS-ID: DRKS00015527. Registered 30 October 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Isselhard
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - M Töpper
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - B Berger-Höger
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - A Steckelberg
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - H Fischer
- Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - F Vitinius
- Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - K Beifus
- Center for Health Economics and Health Services Research, Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - J Köberlein-Neu
- Center for Health Economics and Health Services Research, Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - R Wiedemann
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - K Rhiem
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - R Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - S Stock
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
133
|
Horshauge PM, Gabel P, Larsen MB, Kirkegaard P, Edwards A, Andersen B. The association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake in a publicly funded screening program in Denmark: Cross-sectional study. Prev Med Rep 2020; 19:101132. [PMID: 32551215 PMCID: PMC7287294 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Revised: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 05/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
There are multiple reasons for not participating in colorectal cancer screening, but the role of health literacy in screening uptake is not well understood. The aims of this study were to determine the association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake and to explore whether socioeconomic and -demographic characteristics and worry and attitude variables modify this association. In a cross-sectional study, 10,030 53-74-year-old randomly selected citizens resident in Central Denmark Region received a questionnaire assessing health literacy using the European Health Literacy Survey Short Scale 16-item. Data on colorectal cancer screening uptake were obtained from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening database, and socioeconomic and -demographic data were linked from Statistics Denmark. The response rate was 71% (n = 7142). Odds ratio (OR) for uptake was 1.06 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96, 1.19) for problematic health literacy and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.87, 1.16) for inadequate health literacy, when using adequate health literacy as the reference value. The association was not modified by socioeconomic or -demographic characteristics, worry or attitude. No association was found between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake. Future research needs to clarify which dimensions of health literacy may predict screening uptake and how it is best measured.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petricia Marie Horshauge
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - Pernille Gabel
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark
| | - Mette Bach Larsen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark
| | - Pia Kirkegaard
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark
| | - Adrian Edwards
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark.,Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, UK
| | - Berit Andersen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
134
|
Douma LN, Uiters E, Verweij MF, Timmermans DRM. Autonomous and informed decision-making: The case of colorectal cancer screening. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0233308. [PMID: 32469889 PMCID: PMC7259584 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2019] [Accepted: 05/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION It is increasingly considered important that people make an autonomous and informed decision concerning colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. However, the realisation of autonomy within the concept of informed decision-making might be interpreted too narrowly. Additionally, relatively little is known about what the eligible population believes to be a 'good' screening decision. Therefore, we aimed to explore how the concepts of autonomous and informed decision-making relate to how the eligible CRC screening population makes their decision and when they believe to have made a 'good' screening decision. METHODS We conducted 27 semi-structured interviews with the eligible CRC screening population (eighteen CRC screening participants and nine non-participants). The general topics discussed concerned how people made their CRC screening decision, how they experienced making this decision and when they considered they had made a 'good' decision. RESULTS Most interviewees viewed a 'good' CRC screening decision as one based on both reasoning and feeling/intuition, and that is made freely. However, many CRC screening non-participants experienced a certain social pressure to participate. All CRC screening non-participants viewed making an informed decision as essential. This appeared to be the case to a lesser extent for CRC screening participants. For most, experiences and values were involved in their decision-making. CONCLUSION Our sample of the eligible CRC screening population viewed aspects related to the concepts of autonomous and informed decision-making as important for making a 'good' CRC screening decision. However, in particular the existence of a social norm may be affecting a true autonomous decision-making process. Additionally, the present concept of informed decision-making with its strong emphasis on making a fully informed and well-considered decision does not appear to be entirely reflective of the process in practice. More efforts could be made to attune to the diverse values and factors that are involved in deciding about CRC screening participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda N. Douma
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen Uiters
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel F. Verweij
- Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Danielle R. M. Timmermans
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
135
|
Lühnen J, Berger-Höger B, Haastert B, Hinneburg J, Kasper J, Steckelberg A. Efficacy of a training programme to support the application of the guideline evidence-based health information: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2020; 21:425. [PMID: 32450901 PMCID: PMC7249368 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04287-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 03/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The evidence-based guideline entitled guideline evidence-based health information emerged from the German Network for Evidence-based Medicine (DNEbM) and was published in February 2017. The guideline addresses providers of health information and its goal is to improve the quality of health information. In addition, we explored the competences of providers of health information and developed a training programme. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a training programme addressing providers of health information to support the application of the guideline evidence-based health information. We expected the intervention to improve the quality of health information in comparison to the provision of the guideline on its own. METHODS/DESIGN The trial uses a superiority randomised control group design with 10 months' follow-up. Twenty-six providers of health information (groups with up to ten members) will be enrolled to compare the intervention (guideline and training programme) with usual care (a publicly available guideline). The 5-day training programme comprises an evidence-based medicine training module and a module to prepare the application of the guideline. The primary outcome parameter is the quality of the health information. Quality is operationalised as the extent of adherence to the guideline's recommendations. Each provider will prepare a single health information item informing a health-related decision on a topic freely chosen before randomisation. The quality of this information will be rated using the Mapping Health Information Quality (MAPPinfo) Checklist. An accompanying process evaluation will then be conducted. DISCUSSION The study results should show whether the efficacy of the intervention justifies implementation of the training programme to enhance health information developers' competences in evidence-based medicine and to ensure high-quality evidence-based health information (EBHI) in the long term. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN registry, ID: ISRCTN96941060. Registered on 7 March 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Lühnen
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str. 8, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Birte Berger-Höger
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str. 8, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | | | - Jana Hinneburg
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str. 8, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Jürgen Kasper
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Health and Caring Sciences, University of Tromsø, Postbox 6050, Langnes, Norway
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anke Steckelberg
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str. 8, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
136
|
Witteman HO, Julien AS, Ndjaboue R, Exe NL, Kahn VC, (Angie) Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. What Helps People Make Values-Congruent Medical Decisions? Eleven Strategies Tested across 6 Studies. Med Decis Making 2020; 40:266-278. [DOI: 10.1177/0272989x20904955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background. High-quality health decisions are often defined as those that are both evidence informed and values congruent. A values-congruent decision aligns with what matters to those most affected by the decision. Values clarification methods are intended to support values-congruent decisions, but their effects on values congruence are rarely evaluated. Methods. We tested 11 strategies, including the 3 most commonly used values clarification methods, across 6 between-subjects online randomized experiments in demographically diverse US populations ( n1 = 1346, n2 = 456, n3 = 840, n4 = 1178, n5 = 841, n6 = 2033) in the same hypothetical decision. Our primary outcome was values congruence. Decisional conflict was a secondary outcome in studies 3 to 6. Results. Two commonly used values clarification methods (pros and cons, rating scales) reduced decisional conflict but did not encourage values-congruent decisions. Strategies using mathematical models to show participants which option aligned with what mattered to them encouraged values-congruent decisions and reduced decisional conflict when assessed. Limitations. A hypothetical decision was necessary for ethical reasons, as we believed some strategies may harm decision quality. Later studies used more outcomes and covariates. Results may not generalize outside US-based adults with online access. We assumed validity and stability of values during the brief experiments. Conclusions. Failing to explicitly support the process of aligning options with values leads to increased proportions of values-incongruent decisions. Methods representing more than half of values clarification methods commonly in use failed to encourage values-congruent decisions. Methods that use models to explicitly show people how options align with their values offer more promise for helping people make decisions aligned with what matters to them. Decisional conflict, while arguably an important outcome in and of itself, is not an appropriate proxy for values congruence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ruth Ndjaboue
- Universite Laval Faculte de medecine, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Nicole L. Exe
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
137
|
Kaucher S, Khil L, Kajüter H, Becher H, Reder M, Kolip P, Spallek J, Winkler V, Berens EM. Breast cancer incidence and mammography screening among resettlers in Germany. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:417. [PMID: 32228537 PMCID: PMC7106878 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-08534-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND European studies showed that women with a migration background are less likely to participate in mammography screenings than autochthonous women. However, the participation in the German mammography screening programme (MSP) among ethnic German migrants from countries of the former Soviet Union (called resettlers) is unclear so far. The aim of this study was to identify possible differences regarding MSP participation between resettlers from the FSU and the general German population. METHODS Data from two independent, complementary studies from North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany (a retrospective cohort study 1994-2013; a cross-sectional study 2013/14) were used for comparisons between resettlers and the general population: Odds Ratios (ORs) for MSP participation utilizing the cross-sectional data and time trends of breast cancer incidence rates as well as Chi-Square tests for breast cancer stages utilizing the cohort data. RESULTS Resettlers showed higher Odds to participate in the MSP than the general population (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.08-5.42). Among resettlers, a large increase in incidence rates was observed during the MSP implementation (2005-2009), resulting in stable and comparable incidence rates after the implementation. Furthermore, pre-MSP implementation, the proportion of advanced breast cancer stages was higher among resettlers than in the German population, post-MSP implementation the proportion was comparable. CONCLUSIONS MSP participating seems surprisingly high among resettlers. An explanation for the increased willingness to participate might be the structured invitation procedure of the MSP. However, the exact reasons remain unclear and future research is needed to confirm this hypothesis and rule out the possibility of selection bias in the cross-sectional study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Kaucher
- Unit of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Institute of Global Health, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laura Khil
- Federal Cancer Registry of North Rhine-Westphalia, Bochum, Germany
| | - Hiltraud Kajüter
- Federal Cancer Registry of North Rhine-Westphalia, Bochum, Germany
| | - Heiko Becher
- Unit of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Institute of Global Health, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maren Reder
- Institute of Psychology, University of Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany
- Department of Prevention and Health Promotion, Bielefeld School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Petra Kolip
- Department of Prevention and Health Promotion, Bielefeld School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Jacob Spallek
- Department of Public Health, Brandenburg University of Technology, Senftenberg, Germany
| | - Volker Winkler
- Unit of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Institute of Global Health, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva-Maria Berens
- Department of Health Services Research and Nursing Science, Bielefeld School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
138
|
Hinneburg J, Lühnen J, Steckelberg A, Berger-Höger B. A blended learning training programme for health information providers to enhance implementation of the Guideline Evidence-based Health Information: development and qualitative pilot study. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2020; 20:77. [PMID: 32183798 PMCID: PMC7079382 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-1966-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2019] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Guideline Evidence-based Health Information was published in 2017 and addresses health information providers. The long-term goal of the guideline is to improve the quality of health information. Evidence-based health information represents a prerequisite for informed decision-making. Health information providers lack competences in evidence-based medicine. Therefore, our aim was to develop and pilot-test a blended learning training programme for health information providers to enhance application of the guideline. METHODS 1. DEVELOPMENT We developed the training programme according to the Medical Research Council guidance for developing and evaluating complex interventions. The training programme was planned on the basis of problem-based learning. It aims to impart competences in evidence-based medicine. Furthermore, it comprises the application of criteria for evidence-based health information. 2.Pilot testing: We conducted a qualitative pilot study focusing on the acceptability and feasibility of the training programme. Health information providers were recruited and in-house training sessions were offered. Feasibility and acceptability were explored by structured class observations and in semi-structured focus group interviews with the participants after the training sessions. The transcripts and documentations were analysed using qualitative content analysis according to Mayring. The training was revised iteratively according to the results. RESULTS We conducted two training courses with 17 participants between November 2018 and March 2019. The adequacy of the training for the target group was identified as a major issue. There was significant heterogeneity concerning previous knowledge. Some wished to delve deeper while others seemed to be overwhelmed. In general, the work tasks were understandable. However, the participants asked for a more detailed theoretical introduction in advance. The practical relevance of the evidence-based medicine contents was rated rather low compared to the content about evidence-based health information. Based on these results, we revised the programme. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the training proved to be feasible for implementation. Meeting the needs of all the participants was a challenge, since they were heterogeneous. Not all of them will be able or intend to implement the training contents into their working routine to the full extent. The implementation will be evaluated in a randomised controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Hinneburg
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str. 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany.
| | - Julia Lühnen
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str. 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Anke Steckelberg
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str. 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Birte Berger-Höger
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str. 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
139
|
Pons-Rodríguez A, Martínez-Alonso M, Perestelo-Pérez L, Garcia M, Sala M, Rué M. [Informed choice in breast cancer screening: the role of education]. GACETA SANITARIA 2020; 35:243-249. [PMID: 32173050 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2020.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Revised: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of receiving information about the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening in informed choice, according to educational level. METHOD Secondary analysis of a randomized, controlled study, in four screening programs, in Catalonia and the Canary Islands (Spain). We analyzed 400 women who were going to be invited to participate for the first time. The intervention group received a decision aid that showed the benefits and harms of screening. The control group received a standard brochure that recommended participating in the screening program. Educational level was grouped into two categories, low and high. The primary outcome was informed choice defined as adequate knowledge and consistency between attitudes and intentions. RESULTS The intervention produced a greater increase in knowledge in women with a high educational level compared to those with a lower educational level. Among women who received the intervention, informed choice was almost three times higher in those with a high educational level (27% versus 11%). No differences were observed between educational levels in decisional conflict, confidence in the decision, anxiety and worry about breast cancer, in the intervention and control groups. CONCLUSIONS A decision aid for breast cancer screening had much more impact on informed choice among women with a high educational level. In women with low educational level, the attitude towards screening improved and there was an increase in the intention to be screened.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Montserrat Martínez-Alonso
- Departament de Ciències Mèdiques Bàsiques, Universitat de Lleida - Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida (IRB Lleida), Lleida, España; Grup de Recerca en Anàlisi Estadística i Econòmica en Salut (GRAEES), España
| | - Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, España; Unidad de Evaluación, Servicio Canario de la Salud, Tenerife, España
| | - Montse Garcia
- Programa de Prevenció i Control del Càncer, Institut Català d'Oncologia, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España
| | - Maria Sala
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, España; Servei d'Epidemiologia i Avaluació, Hospital del Mar Institut d'Investigació Mèdica, Barcelona, España
| | - Montserrat Rué
- Departament de Ciències Mèdiques Bàsiques, Universitat de Lleida - Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida (IRB Lleida), Lleida, España; Grup de Recerca en Anàlisi Estadística i Econòmica en Salut (GRAEES), España
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
140
|
Hong SJ. Uncertainty in the Process of Communicating Cancer-related Genetic Risk Information with Patients: A Scoping Review. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2020; 25:251-270. [PMID: 32271688 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1745963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
In the era of precision medicine, patients must manage the uncertainty caused by ambiguous genetic information. To aid health practitioners in effectively communicating genetic information, this study classified the types of uncertainty involved in these communication processes. A search of recent literature turned up 64 articles that measured and/or discussed patients' perceptions and/or feelings of uncertainty related to the communication process of cancer-related genetic information. In reviewing these papers, six types of uncertainty regarding cancer-related genetic information were identified: (1) uncertainty about understanding genetic information (n = 25; 39.1%); (2) uncertainty about future cancer risks (n = 34; 53.1%); (3) uncertainty about managing known genetic information or mutation status (n = 33; 51.6%); (4) uncertainty about the utility of genetic information (n = 5; 7.8%); (5) uncertainty about genetic test results before undergoing testing or receiving the results (n = 10; 15.6%); and (6) uncertainty about the impact of genetic results on family and life (n = 11; 17.2%). These six types of uncertainty serve as a helpful taxonomy for developing, validating, and utilizing future measures of uncertainty in the context of cancer-related genetic risk communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soo Jung Hong
- Department of Communications and New Media, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
141
|
Bunnik EM, Kater-Kuipers A, Galjaard RJH, de Beaufort ID. Should pregnant women be charged for non-invasive prenatal screening? Implications for reproductive autonomy and equal access. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2020; 46:194-198. [PMID: 31527142 PMCID: PMC7042959 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2019] [Revised: 09/02/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
The introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in healthcare systems around the world offers an opportunity to reconsider funding policies for prenatal screening. In some countries with universal access healthcare systems, pregnant women and their partners are asked to (co)pay for NIPT. In this paper, we discuss two important rationales for charging women for NIPT: (1) to prevent increased uptake of NIPT and (2) to promote informed choice. First, given the aim of prenatal screening (reproductive autonomy), high or low uptake rates are not intrinsically desirable or undesirable. Using funding policies to negatively affect uptake, however, is at odds with the aim of screening. Furthermore, copayment disproportionally affects those of lower socioeconomic status, which conflicts with justice requirements and impedes equal access to prenatal screening. Second, we argue that although payment models may influence pregnant women's choice behaviours and perceptions of the relevance of NIPT, the copayment requirement does not necessarily lead to better-informed choices. On the contrary, external (ie, financial) influences on women's personal choices for or against prenatal screening should ideally be avoided. To improve informed decision-making, healthcare systems should instead invest in adequate non-directive, value-focused pretest counselling. This paper concludes that requiring (substantial) copayments for NIPT in universal access healthcare systems fails to promote reproductive autonomy and is unfair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline M Bunnik
- Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adriana Kater-Kuipers
- Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert-Jan H Galjaard
- Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Inez D de Beaufort
- Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
142
|
Benoit A, Grynberg M, Morello R, Sermondade N, Grandazzi G, Moutel G. Does a web-based decision aid improve informed choice for fertility preservation in women with breast cancer (DECISIF)? Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e031739. [PMID: 32047010 PMCID: PMC7044978 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2019] [Revised: 12/04/2019] [Accepted: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chemotherapy may cause infertility in young survivors of breast cancer. Various fertility preservation techniques increase the likelihood of survivors becoming genetic mothers. Disclosure of cancer diagnosis may impact decision making about fertility preservation. This protocol will develop and test the effectiveness of a web-based decision aid for helping women with breast cancer to make well-informed choices about fertility preservation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study will be conducted in three phases using mixed methods. In phase I, the aim is to develop a web-based patient decision aid (PDA) in French with a steering committee and using a focus group of five women already treated for breast cancer. In phase II, the face validity of the decision aid will be assessed using questionnaires. In phase III, the PDA will be assessed by a two-arm randomised controlled trial. This will involve a quantitative evaluation of the PDA in clinical practice comparing the quality of the decision-making process between usual care and the PDA. The primary outcome will be informed choice and its components. The secondary outcomes will be decisional conflict and anxiety. Data will be collected during and after an oncofertility consultation. Phase III is underway. Since September 2018, 52 participants have been enrolled in the study and have completed the survey. We expect to have results by February 2020 for a total of 186 patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study protocol was approved by the Ouest V Research Ethics Board. Results will be spread through peer-reviewed publications, and reported at suitable meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER The ClinicalTrials.gov registry .(NCT03591848).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Benoit
- UNICAEN, Inserm U1086, ANTICIPE, Normandie Université, Caen, France
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Antoine-Béclère, Clamart, France
| | - Michael Grynberg
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Antoine-Béclère, Clamart, France
- U1133, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - Rémy Morello
- UNICAEN, Inserm U1086, ANTICIPE, Normandie Universite, Caen, France
- Biostatistics and Clinical Research Unit, CHU Caen, Caen, France
| | - Nathalie Sermondade
- Department of Cytogenetic and Reproductive Biology, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Bondy, France
| | - Guillaume Grandazzi
- UNICAEN, Inserm U1086, ANTICIPE, Normandie Universite, Caen, France
- Espace Régional de Réflexion éthique, CHU Caen, Caen, France
| | - Grégoire Moutel
- UNICAEN, Inserm U1086, ANTICIPE, Normandie Universite, Caen, France
- Espace Régional de Réflexion éthique, CHU Caen, Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
143
|
Douma LN, Uiters E, Timmermans DRM. Decision-making styles in the context of colorectal cancer screening. BMC Psychol 2020; 8:11. [PMID: 32014059 PMCID: PMC6998095 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-020-0381-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Accepted: 01/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our study examined the use of decision-making styles, as identified by Scott and Bruce (1995) (i.e. differentiating between a rational, intuitive, dependent, avoidant and spontaneous decision-making style), within the context of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening participation. In the field of cancer screening, informed decision-making is considered important, which follows the Rational Decision model. Subsequently, gaining more insight into decision-making styles being used in real life, could improve support to people when making their screening decision. In addition, we examined whether the decision-making style that people used was associated with their experienced decisional conflict. METHODS An online survey was carried out among a sample of first-time CRC screening invitees (1282 respondents, response rate 49%). We assessed people's decision-making styles, CRC screening participation, education level, self-reported health literacy, and decisional conflict, and examined the possible associations between them. RESULTS In our study, people who had to decide about CRC screening scored high on using both a rational and intuitive decision-making style. Respondents scoring higher on using a spontaneous or dependent decision-making style were more likely to have participated in CRC screening, while respondents scoring higher on using an avoidant decision-making style were more likely not to have participated in CRC screening. However, differences were small. Generally, people in our study experienced low decisional conflict. CONCLUSION Our eligible CRC screening population scored high on using both a rational and intuitive decision-making style. To optimise support to people, public education materials could be appealing more to the intuitive processes at hand. That being said, the current education materials aimed at informed/rational decision-making do not necessarily seem to create a problem, as people generally experienced low decisional conflict. Possible concerns regarding the use of a spontaneous, dependent or avoidant decision-making style could be that these styles might be contributing to less informed decisions. However, it is relevant to consider that the found differences are small and that any possible concern applies to a relatively small group of people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda N. Douma
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Postbus 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen Uiters
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Postbus 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Danielle R. M. Timmermans
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Postbus 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
144
|
Gabel P, Edwards A, Kirkegaard P, Larsen MB, Andersen B. The LEAD trial-The effectiveness of a decision aid on decision making among citizens with lower educational attainment who have not participated in FIT-based colorectal cancer screening in Denmark: A randomised controlled trial. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2020; 103:359-368. [PMID: 31451360 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Revised: 05/21/2019] [Accepted: 08/18/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This trial tested the effectiveness of a self-administered web-based decision aid, targeted at citizens with lower educational attainment, on informed choice about colorectal cancer screening participation as assessed by group levels of knowledge, attitudes and uptake. METHODS The randomised controlled trial was conducted among 2702 screening-naïve Danish citizens, 53-74 years old, with lower educational attainment. Baseline questionnaire respondents (62%) were allocated to intervention and control groups. Intervention group citizens received the decision aid. Outcomes were informed choice, worries and decisional conflict. RESULTS Analyses were conducted among 339 eligible citizens. The mean difference in knowledge score change between intervention and control group was 0.00 (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.38;0.38). Trends towards more positive screening attitudes (mean difference in score change: 0.72, 95% CI: -0.38;1.81) and higher screening uptake (7.6%, 95% CI:-2.2;17.4%) were observed. Worries (-0.33, 95% CI: -0.97;0.32) and decisional conflict (mean difference: -3.5, 95%CI: -7.0;-0.1) were slightly reduced. CONCLUSIONS The decision aid did not affect informed choice or knowledge. However, there were trends towards increased screening uptake and more positive screening attitudes. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Being a simple intervention and easily administered, the decision aid could represent a cost-effective way of enhancing screening uptake, and some elements of informed decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pernille Gabel
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.
| | - Adrian Edwards
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark; Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, UK.
| | - Pia Kirkegaard
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark.
| | - Mette Bach Larsen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark.
| | - Berit Andersen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
145
|
Pickles K, Kazda L, Barratt A, McGeechan K, Hersch J, McCaffery K. Evaluating two decision aids for Australian men supporting informed decisions about prostate cancer screening: A randomised controlled trial. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0227304. [PMID: 31940376 PMCID: PMC6961909 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Australian clinicians are advised to 'offer evidence-based decisional support to men considering whether or not to have a PSA test'. This randomised trial compared the performance and acceptability of two new decision aids (DAs) to aid men in making informed choices about PSA screening. METHODS ~3000 Australian men 45-60 years with varying educational attainment were recruited via an online panel and randomised to view one of two online decision aids (one full length, one abbreviated) and completed a questionnaire. The primary outcome was informed choice about PSA screening. FINDINGS Significantly more men in the long DA group (38%) made an informed choice than men who received the shorter DA (33%) (95% CI 1.1% to 8.2%; p = 0.008). On knowledge, the long DA group scored, on average, 0.45 points higher than the short DA group (95% CI 0.14 to 0.76; p = 0.004) and 5% more of the participants achieved an adequate knowledge score (95% CI 1.9% to 8.8%; p = 0.002). Men allocated the long DA were less likely to intend to have a PSA test in the future (53%) than men in the short DA group (59%). Both DAs rated highly on acceptability. CONCLUSIONS Both DAs were useful and acceptable to men regardless of education level and both supported informed decision making. The long version resulted in higher knowledge, and a higher proportion of men able to make an informed choice, but the differences were small. Long DAs may be useful for men whose informational needs are not satisfied by a short DA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen Pickles
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Luise Kazda
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexandra Barratt
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kevin McGeechan
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jolyn Hersch
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
146
|
Pestoff R, Svensson K, Paneque M, Malmgren CI. Developing a national certification pathway for genetic counselors in Sweden-a short report. J Community Genet 2020; 11:113-117. [PMID: 31154609 PMCID: PMC6962429 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-019-00426-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Accepted: 05/09/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
There is no Master's level education for genetic counseling in Sweden, meaning that genetic counselor professionals have very different backgrounds. Hence, there is a need to harmonize the quality of genetic counseling and introduce standards for practice. The Swedish Society for Genetic Counselors and the Swedish Society of Medical Genetics and Genomics collaborated to determine professional requirements and a career pathway, defining three vocational levels within the genetic counselor profession. We report here an individual educational pathway leading up to eligibility for certification as a genetic counselor in Sweden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecka Pestoff
- Department of Clinical Genetics, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Hospital, Linköping University, Universitetssjukhuset, 58185 Linköping, Sweden
| | - Karin Svensson
- Division of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, Region Skåne, Office for Medical services , SE-221 85, Lund, Sweden
| | - Milena Paneque
- i3S – Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- IBMC – Institute for Molecular and Cell Biology, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Centre for Predictive and Preventive Genetics (CGPP), Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Charlotta Ingvoldstad Malmgren
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Public Health and Caring Science, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Center for Fetal Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
147
|
Großer J, Kimmerle J, Shiozawa T, Hirt B, Bientzle M. Observing Inter-Professional Videos: Impact of Collaboration Between Physicians and Psychologists on Attitude and Knowledge Acquisition. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT 2020; 7:2382120520957648. [PMID: 33062896 PMCID: PMC7536483 DOI: 10.1177/2382120520957648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inter-professional collaboration (IPC) is an important prerequisite for successful patient care. Even though inter-professional education (IPE) is increasingly common in undergraduate medical education, few IPE approaches explicitly address the IPC among medical students and students of psychology. IPE videos can be used to give learners the opportunity to gather relevant knowledge from different professional perspectives. So far it has been unclear whether it is enough when the topic of the video itself is inter-professional or if it is necessary for experts from different professions explicitly to appear in the video. METHODS In an online experiment, medical students watched 1 of 2 videos about Parkinson's disease (PD) and the care of PD patients. The information was either provided by protagonists from only 1 profession (ie, physicians; mono-professional condition) or provided by protagonists from 2 different professions (ie, physicians and a psychologist; inter-professional condition). Attitude toward inter-professional interaction and learning, evaluation of the entertaining and illustrative character of the video, attitude toward physicians and psychologists, importance of IPC, evaluation of psychological treatment support, and knowledge acquisition served as dependent variables. RESULTS The analysis was based on 140 participants (74 in the mono-, 66 in the inter-professional condition). We found that the inter-professional video was perceived to be more entertaining than the mono-professional video (t (138) = -2.227; P = .028; d = 0.38). The inter-professional video was also considered to be more illustrative (t (138) = -6.269; P < .001; d = 1.06). Moreover, participants improved their attitude toward physicians by watching the video (F (1,138) = 4.860, P < .001, η 2 p = 0.11), but they did not change their attitude toward psychologists (P = .146). Participants who watched the inter-professional video considered IPC to be more important than participants who watched the mono-professional video (t (138) = -7.954; P < .001; d = 1.354). Finally, the inter-professional video led to better performance in the knowledge test (t (138) = -2.285; P = .024; d = 0.04). CONCLUSION Inter-professional videos showing explicitly the appearance of experts from different professions come along with several advantages. We discuss the implications of their application in educational practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was pre-registered on the pre-registration platform AsPredicted (aspredicted.org) before we began data collection (registration number: #33143). The pre-registration document can be accessed via the following link: https://aspredicted.org/blind.php?x=gd5hd8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Großer
- Knowledge Construction Lab, Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Joachim Kimmerle
- Knowledge Construction Lab, Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany
- Department of Psychology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Shiozawa
- Institute of Clinical Anatomy and Cell Analysis, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Bernhard Hirt
- Institute of Clinical Anatomy and Cell Analysis, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Martina Bientzle
- Knowledge Construction Lab, Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
148
|
Rubeis G, Orzechowski M, Steger F. Non-invasive prenatal testing as a routine procedure of prenatal care. Ethik Med 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s00481-019-00555-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
149
|
Housten AJ, Kamath GR, Bevers TB, Cantor SB, Dixon N, Hite A, Kallen MA, Leal VB, Li L, Volk RJ. Does Animation Improve Comprehension of Risk Information in Patients with Low Health Literacy? A Randomized Trial. Med Decis Making 2019; 40:17-28. [PMID: 31795820 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x19890296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Introduction. Enhanced visual effects, like animation, have the potential to improve comprehension of probabilistic risk information, particularly for those with lower health literacy. We tested the effect of presentation format on comprehension of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening probabilities to identify optimal risk communication strategies. Methods. Participants from a community foodbank and a cancer prevention center were randomized to 1 of 3 CRC screening risk presentations. The presentations used identical content but varied in format: 1) video with animated pictographs, 2) video with static pictographs, and 3) audiobooklet with static pictographs. Participants completed pre- and postpresentation surveys. The primary outcome was knowledge of probability/risk information regarding CRC screening, calculated as total, verbatim, and gist scores. Results. In total, 187 participants completed the study and were included in this analysis. Median age was 58 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 14 years), most participants were women (63%), and almost half had a high school education or less (46%). Approximately one-quarter had inadequate health literacy (Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults marginal/inadequate: 28%; Brief Health Literacy Screener low: 18%), and about half had low numeracy (Subjective Numeracy Scale low: 54%; Graphical Literacy Measure low: 50%). We found no significant differences in total, verbatim, or gist knowledge across presentation formats (all P > 0.05). Discussion. Use of an animated pictograph to communicate risk does not appear to augment or impede knowledge of risk information. Regardless of health literacy level, difficulty understanding pictographs presenting numerical information persists. There may be a benefit to teaching or priming individuals on how to interpret numerical information presented in pictographs before communicating risk using visual methods. Trial Registry: NCT02151032.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley J Housten
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Geetanjali R Kamath
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Therese B Bevers
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Scott B Cantor
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nickell Dixon
- Michigan Department of Health, Southern New Hampshire University, Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Andre Hite
- Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael A Kallen
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Viola B Leal
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Liang Li
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Robert J Volk
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
150
|
Woudstra AJ, Smets EMA, Verdam MGE, Fransen MP. The Role of Health Literacy in Explaining the Relation between Educational Level and Decision Making about Colorectal Cancer Screening. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:ijerph16234644. [PMID: 31766603 PMCID: PMC6926788 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16234644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2019] [Revised: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Little is known about why educational inequalities exist in informed decision making in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Insight into the role and impact of health literacy is essential for intervention development. This study investigates associations between health literacy and informed decision making in CRC screening and explores to what extent health literacy mediates the association between education and informed decision making in CRC screening. In total, 696 individuals eligible for CRC screening (55–75 years of age) were recruited from online panels and filled in an online questionnaire at T0 (n = 696), T1 (n = 407) and T2 (n = 327). A hypothetical mediation model was tested using structural equation modelling. Outcomes included CRC knowledge, CRC screening knowledge, attitude, injunctive norm, descriptive norm, risk perception, self-efficacy, decisional conflict and decisional certainty. Health literacy domains included Comprehension, Application, Numeracy and Communication. Comprehension, Application and Numeracy, were found to mediate the association between education and knowledge about CRC and CRC screening, injunctive norm, descriptive norm, decisional conflict and decisional certainty. In light of these findings, targeting multiple health literacy domains in decision-support interventions is essential for facilitating informed decision making in CRC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anke J. Woudstra
- Department of Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
- Correspondence:
| | - Ellen M. A. Smets
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (E.M.A.S.); (M.G.E.V.)
| | - Mathilde G. E. Verdam
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (E.M.A.S.); (M.G.E.V.)
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam P. Fransen
- Department of Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| |
Collapse
|