Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma

Gene expression of prostate-specific membrane antigen (FOLH1) in clear cell renal cell carcinoma predicts angiogenesis and response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors

PURPOSE

Combination systemic therapies (CSTs) of immuno-oncologic (IO) and VEGF-inhibiting agents (VEGFi) have become the standard of care for management of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (m-ccRCC). However, treatment outcomes vary between patients, with no established biomarkers to determine optimal CST regimens (IO/IO or IO/VEGFi). Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA), encoded by the FOLH1 gene, is a marker of tumor neovasculature in ccRCC, the downstream target of VEGFi. We evaluated the relation between FOLH1 expression and angiogenesis, as well as clinical outcomes, in 5 m-ccRCC ST trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

using Spearman's rank correlation (SPRC) test, we assessed the correlation between FOLH1 expression and gene expression signature (GES) scores corresponding to angiogenic and immunologic features of the tumor microenvironment (TME) of m-ccRCC in our trial cohorts. Using Cox proportional hazard regression (Cox-PHR), we assessed the association between FOLH1 expression level, summarized by within-study quantiles (qFOLH1), and progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS).

RESULTS

Increased FOLH1 expression was significantly associated with higher TME angiogenesis GES scores (SPRC +0.5, P < 0.001), but did not consistently correlate with immune feature GES scores. Meta-analysis of PFS in the sunitinib TKI arm of trial cohorts showed an overall positive association with qFOLH1 (HR = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.85-0.94, P < 0.0001). qFOLH1 was not significantly associated with OS in the sunitinib arms of the two trials with OS data (COMPARZ, HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.71-1.07, P = 0.17; and Checkmate-214, HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.67-1.17, P = 0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

PSMA-encoding FOLH1 gene expression correlates with neoangiogenesis and predicts PFS in m-ccRCC patients treated with sunitinib TKI, suggesting that PSMA PET could be explored as a noninvasive biomarker for guiding CST choice (IO/IO or IO/VEGFi) as well as prediction of treatment response to VEGFi in m-ccRCC patients.

Impact of presurgical systemic therapy on perioperative outcomes of renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus

BACKGROUND

Surgery for inferior vena cava tumor thrombus (IVC-TT) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is highly invasive and is associated with perioperative mortality. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of presurgical systemic therapy (PT) on perioperative outcomes in RCC patients with IVC-TT.

METHODS

A total of 68 patients with right-sided RCC and level ≥ II IVC-TT were included in this study. The tumor response to PT was investigated, and we compared surgical outcomes and perioperative complications between patients with PT (n = 23) and those who underwent immediate surgical resection (non-PT, n = 45).

RESULTS

In the PT group, while 15 patients were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) alone, a combination of immune-oncology (IO) therapy and TKIs (IO + TKI) was used in 8 patients. Eleven of 23 (47.8%) patients in the PT group showed a reduction in the level of TT. PT significantly reduced the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, the need for extracorporeal circulation, the incidence of grade ≥ III perioperative complications, and the duration of hospitalization after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that PT may be effective in reducing surgical invasiveness in RCC patients with IVC-TT. Further prospective studies are needed to identify the optimal drug regimen for PT and to clarify its survival benefits.

Effects of cannabinoids on immune checkpoint inhibitor response: CCTG pooled analysis of individual patient data

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) benefit patients across various tumor types. ICIs block cancer and T-cell interactions whereas cannabinoids may inhibit T-cell activation, reducing lysis of tumor cells. Interactions between cannabinoid use and dual ICI treatment remain unknown.

METHODS

Individual patient data from 4 Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG) trials of patients treated with dual ICI ± chemotherapy (n = 684) were pooled. Cochran - Mantel - Haenszel and log-rank tests (stratified by trial/treatment arms) correlated cannabinoid use with clinicopathologic characteristics, Best Overall Response (BOR)/iBOR per RECIST 1.1/iRECIST, Progression-Free Survival (PFS)/iPFS, Overall Survival (OS) and immune-related adverse events (irAEs).

RESULTS

Sixty-five (9.5%) patients took cannabinoids at any time on trial, 32 (4.7%) of which were using cannabinoids at baseline. By multivariate analysis, cannabinoid use at baseline was significantly associated with improved iPFS (0.05), but not iBOR (p = 0.15), PFS (p = 0.12), OS (p = 0.35) or incidence of grade 1/2 or 3/4 irAEs (p = 0.96 and 0.65 respectively). Results were not significantly different with cannabinoid use at any time on trial.

CONCLUSION

Improved iPFS with cannabinoid use in patients treated with durvalumab plus tremelimumab ± chemotherapy did not translate into OS benefits. This study supports the safe use of cannabinoids in the context of combination ICI therapy.

Incidence and impact of immune combination therapies adverse events in advanced renal cell carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

Immune (IO)-combination therapies have revolutionized the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) but are more frequently associated with adverse events (AEs) compared to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) alone. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the incidence and prognostic significance of AEs in patients receiving combination therapies.

METHODS

We included patients treated with nivolumab/ipilimumab (NI), nivolumab/cabozantinib (NC), or pembrolizumab/axitinib (PA) at four Italian oncology centers between November 2023 and June 2024. The impact of AEs on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response, and disease control rate were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression.

RESULTS

AEs occurred in 78.8% of NI, 87.9% of NC, and 92.3% of PA patients. Grade 3-4 AEs were more common in IO-TKI vs. IO-IO combinations (32.9% vs. 15.1%, p = 0.05). Pruritus and pulmonary events were more frequent with IO-IO, while hypertension and mucositis were more common with IO-TKI. High-grade AEs did not impact PFS or OS, but TKI reduction due to AEs was associated with longer OS (p < 0.01). Steroid use also improved OS (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

AEs are common in ICI-based therapies for RCC. While they do not negatively affect survival, their management, especially through dose reductions or steroids, may improve outcomes.

Development of a Microvessel Density Gene Signature and Its Application in Precision Medicine

SIGNIFICANCE

A novel gene signature for MVD was developed. This MVD gene score enables the estimation of MVD, reflecting the sensitivity to antiangiogenic inhibitors, in transcriptomic datasets. We demonstrated the utility of the MVD gene score together with a T cell-inflamed gene signature for potential future use as a clinical biomarker.

Radiation therapy in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic lung cancer: Effect of fractionation

Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has improved the outcomes of patients with metastatic lung cancer in recent years. Despite improved prognosis, not all patients respond to treatment. Therapeutic interventions to build on the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors are needed. A retrospective review of patient records for patients who had received immune checkpoint inhibitors in a single cancer center over 4 years was undertaken. Demographic and disease characteristics of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer were recorded. Data on other treatments including chemotherapy and radiation therapy were extracted, and survival outcomes were calculated. Most (81.8%) of the 77 metastatic lung cancer patients examined had received palliative radiation therapy within 3 months of starting immune checkpoint inhibitors. While the survival outcomes of these patients did not differ from patients who had not received radiotherapy, patients who had undergone hypofractionated radiotherapy (defined as one or more fractions of 700 cGy or higher) displayed a better overall survival (OS) than the rest of the cohort. Palliative radiation therapy administered in proximity with immune checkpoint inhibitors immunotherapy had no effect on the OS of metastatic lung cancer patients. However, patients receiving palliative radiotherapy with fractions above 700 cGy showed better OS. Further studies are needed to optimize a combination strategy.

Increased risk of genitourinary cancer in kidney transplant recipients: a large-scale national cohort study and its clinical implications

PURPOSE

To investigate the risk of genitourinary (GU) cancer in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) compared to that in the general population, focusing on potential risk factors and clinical implications.

METHODS

Using a national cohort of approximately 360,000 individuals, including 31,542 KTRs, we conducted a retrospective analysis of the data from 2007 to 2018. Propensity score matching was used to compare KTRs with a healthy population, adjusting for age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia.

RESULTS

We identified a significantly increased risk of GU cancers, particularly bladder and kidney cancers, in KTRs. Multivariate analysis revealed a higher risk of GU cancer associated with kidney transplantation [hazard ratio (HR) 2.133, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.641-2.772] and hypercholesterolemia (HR 1.725, 95% CI 1.227-2.425), with older age and male sex also being significant risk factors. Conversely, no significant increase in prostate cancer risk was observed in KTRs compared to the general population.

CONCLUSION

This national cohort-based study indicated an increased risk of GU cancer in KTRs, underscoring the need for targeted cancer surveillance and pre- and post-transplant counseling. These findings provide valuable insights for the development of cancer surveillance programs for KTRs and highlight the necessity for further research in this field.

Overlooked and underserved: how healthcare fails men in the pursuit of equity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Men face distinctive health-related challenges as a result of biological, behavioral, and sociocultural factors. In addition, the modern healthcare system does not offer men equal opportunities and options to ensure sex-specific access and delivery to health services. Men's health concerns are, indeed, often not addressed or even forgotten. In this review, we wanted to assess the impact of biology and sociocultural effects on sex-specific life-expectancy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Globally, men have a shorter life expectancy than women. With a 5.8 years gender gap in the USA and 5.4 in the EU-27 (both in 2022). Cardiovascular disease, cancer, and accidents continue to represent the primary causes of mortality for both genders with all having disproportional preponderance in men. In recent years, there has been a notable decline in age-adjusted mortality rates related to cancer, while there has been an increase in deaths from accidental and intentional self-harm. Moreover, in the United States, men are more likely than women to develop and die from nonsex-specific cancers. As a result, men's poor health affects productivity, absenteeism, and employment.

SUMMARY

The status of men in healthcare is complex. It is rooted in history, culture, and institutions. To address disparities, we need a comprehensive approach that includes policy reforms, sociocultural changes, and a fair and equitable public discourse. Grassroots and top-down strategies are needed to ensure a value-based societal healthcare system acknowledging the unique health needs of men.

Cost-Effectiveness of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab versus Chemotherapy for Previously Untreated Metastatic NSCLC Using Mixture-Cure Survival Analysis Based on CheckMate 227 5-Year Data

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) versus platinum-doublet chemotherapy (chemo) in untreated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using mixture-cure modelling, an approach used to analyse immuno-oncology treatments due to their underlying methods depicting delayed but durable response in some patients.

METHODS

A mixture-cure economic model was developed from a US third-party payer perspective to assess the lifetime costs and benefits of NIVO+IPI versus chemo using data from Part 1 of the phase III CheckMate 227 trial with 5 years of follow-up. The model consisted of four health states: progression-free without long-term response (non-LTR), progression-free with long-term response (LTR), post-progression, and death. The primary outcomes were the incremental cost per life-year (LY) and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for NIVO+IPI versus chemo over a patient's lifetime time horizon. Model uncertainty was evaluated using one-way sensitivity analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

NIVO+IPI treatment showed a significant improvement in overall survival versus chemo; mean gain 1.69 LYs and 1.42 QALYs. The majority of the 4.04 LYs accrued by NIVO+IPI were in the LTR state (2.27 years). The incremental cost of NIVO+IPI versus chemo was US$125,321, resulting in an incremental cost/QALY gained of US$88,219.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests NIVO+IPI may be a cost-effective first-line treatment when compared with chemo in a US setting given a threshold of US$150,000 per QALY. The cost-effectiveness analysis used a mixture-cure approach, which may offer a more appropriate modelling method in immuno-oncology given LTR, by more accurately capturing the potential treatment benefit.

The multi-faceted roles of cancer-associated fibroblasts in pancreatic cancer

The tumor microenvironment (TME) has been linked with the pathogenesis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the most common histological subtype of pancreatic cancer. A central component of the TME are cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), which can either suppress or promote tumor growth in a context-dependent manner. In this review, we will discuss the multi-faceted roles of CAFs in tumor-stroma interactions influencing cancer initiation, progression and therapeutic response.

A neoantigen vaccine generates antitumour immunity in renal cell carcinoma

Personalized cancer vaccines (PCVs) can generate circulating immune responses against predicted neoantigens1-6. However, whether such responses can target cancer driver mutations, lead to immune recognition of a patient's tumour and result in clinical activity are largely unknown. These questions are of particular interest for patients who have tumours with a low mutational burden. Here we conducted a phase I trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02950766) to test a neoantigen-targeting PCV in patients with high-risk, fully resected clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC; stage III or IV) with or without ipilimumab administered adjacent to the vaccine. At a median follow-up of 40.2 months after surgery, none of the 9 participants enrolled in the study had a recurrence of RCC. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. All patients generated T cell immune responses against the PCV antigens, including to RCC driver mutations in VHL, PBRM1, BAP1, KDM5C and PIK3CA. Following vaccination, there was a durable expansion of peripheral T cell clones. Moreover, T cell reactivity against autologous tumours was detected in seven out of nine patients. Our results demonstrate that neoantigen-targeting PCVs in high-risk RCC are highly immunogenic, capable of targeting key driver mutations and can induce antitumour immunity. These observations, in conjunction with the absence of recurrence in all nine vaccinated patients, highlights the promise of PCVs as effective adjuvant therapy in RCC.

A case of papillary renal cell carcinoma with para-aortic lymph node metastasis that was completely resectable after treatment with combination therapy comprising lenvatinib and pembrolizumab and robot-assisted radical nephrectomy

Introduction

Combination therapy comprising immune checkpoint inhibitors and molecular targeted therapies can be effective for metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. We describe a patient with metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma that was completely pathologically resectable after combination treatment comprising lenvatinib and pembrolizumab and robot-assisted radical nephrectomy.

Case presentation

A 35-year-old man was referred to our department for examination of a renal tumor that was diagnosed as left renal cell carcinoma with lymph node metastasis (cT3aN1M0). Because metastasis affected the renal artery, combination therapy comprising lenvatinib and pembrolizumab was initiated. After 6 months of treatment, the patient underwent robot-assisted radical nephrectomy. The pathological results indicated papillary renal cell carcinoma with no viable cells in the lymph nodes.

Conclusion

Combination therapy comprising lenvatinib and pembrolizumab for unresectable papillary renal cell carcinoma may effectively allow radical resection and deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy.

Evaluating Therapeutic Efficacy of the Vascular Disrupting Agent OXi8007 Against Kidney Cancer in Mice

There has been much progress in treating kidney cancer, with several new drugs being approved over the last few years [...].

Prognostic implications of ERLncRNAs in ccRCC: a novel risk score model and its association with tumor mutation burden and immune microenvironment

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

The specific role of efferocytosis-related long noncoding RNAs (ERLncRNAs) in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC) has not been thoroughly examined. This study aims to identify and validate a signature of ERLncRNAs for prognostic prediction and characterization of the immune landscape in individuals with ccRCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Analysis of ccRCC samples was conducted by utilizing clinical and RNA sequencing information obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Pearson correlation analysis was utilized to identify lncRNAs associated with efferocytosis, which was then used to create a new prognostic model through univariate Cox regression, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression, and stepwise multivariate Cox analysis. In order to investigate the biological significance, we performed a functional enrichment analysis to assess how well the model predicts outcomes. Differences in the immune landscape were observed through a comparison of immune cell infiltration, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and tumor microenvironment (TME) characteristics. Following this, drug sensitivity analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

This led to the identification of a unique signature consisting of seven ERLncRNAs (LINC01615, RUNX3-AS1, FOXD2-AS1, AC002070.1, LINC02747, LINC00944, and AC092296.1). Model performance was measured by Kaplan-Meier curves and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The nomogram and C-index provided additional validation of the strong correlation between the risk signature and clinical decision-making.

CONCLUSION

On the whole, our innovative signature exhibits potential for prognostic prediction and assessment of immunotherapeutic response in patients with ccRCC.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus debulking surgery for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: clinical outcomes and immunological correlates of a prospective pilot trial

Surgical removal of primary tumors reverses tumor-mediated immune suppression in pre-clinical models with metastatic disease. However, how cytoreductive surgery in the metastatic setting modulates the immune responses in patients, especially in the context of immune checkpoint therapy (ICT), is not understood. We report the first prospective, pilot, non-comparative clinical trial (NCT02210117) to evaluate the feasibility, clinical benefits, and immunologic changes of combining three different ICT-containing strategies with cytoreductive surgery or biopsy for patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Primary safety endpoint of this trial has been met, with 43 patients completing cytoreductive surgery, 36 patients undergoing post-ICT biopsy, and 25 patients without either procedure due to progressive disease or toxicities or withdrawal of consent (total N = 104). Patients receiving ICT with cytoreductive surgery or biopsy, did not experience additional ICT- or procedure-related toxicities. The median overall survival was 54.7 months for patients who received ICT plus cytoreductive surgery. Immune-monitoring studies demonstrated that cytoreductive surgery increased antigen-presenting dendritic cell population and decreased KDM6B-expressing immune-suppressive myeloid cells in the peripheral blood. This study highlighted the feasibility of combining ICT with cytoreductive surgery in a metastatic setting and demonstrated the potential enhancement of immune responses following ICT plus cytoreductive surgery.

Navigating advanced renal cell carcinoma in the era of artificial intelligence

BACKGROUND

Research has helped to better understand renal cell carcinoma and enhance management of patients with locally advanced and metastatic disease. More recently, artificial intelligence has emerged as a powerful tool in cancer research, particularly in oncologic imaging. BODY: Despite promising results of artificial intelligence in renal cell carcinoma research, most investigations have focused on localized disease, while relatively fewer studies have targeted advanced and metastatic disease. This paper summarizes major artificial intelligence advances focusing mostly on their potential clinical value from initial staging and identification of high-risk features to predicting response to treatment in advanced renal cell carcinoma, while addressing major limitations in the development of some models and highlighting new avenues for future research.

CONCLUSION

Artificial intelligence-enabled models have a great potential in improving clinical practice in the diagnosis and management of advanced renal cell carcinoma, particularly when developed from both clinicopathologic and radiologic data.

MAGI3 enhances sensitivity to sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma by suppressing the MAS/ERK axis and serves as a prognostic marker

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) exhibits considerable heterogeneity, with approximately 25% of localized cases susceptible to relapse, highlighting the challenge of the absence of reliable predictive biomarkers for personalized treatment. Meanwhile, metastatic renal cell carcinoma is characterized by unfavorable survival rates, and although Sunitinib offers partial benefits, the clinical advantages are often constrained by drug resistance and adverse side effects. Here, MAGI3 was associate with ccRCC progression, as identified through comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of clinical datasets. A low level of MAGI3 emerged as a high-risk factor for ccRCC, indicating its potential as a prognostic marker. Individuals with MAGI3 expression in middle-to-low levels displayed a significantly poorer survival rate, indicating a need for additional treatment even in the early stages of ccRCC. Furthermore, patients with MAGI3 expression in middle-to-high levels exhibited increased sensitivity to Sunitinib compared to those with lower MAGI3 levels, suggesting that individuals with MAGI3 expression at middle levels may potentially benefit from Sunitinib treatment even in the early stages of ccRCC. Through its interaction with the MAS receptor, MAGI3 has been identified as a regulator of cell proliferation and a determinant of Sunitinib resistance in ccRCC, operating via the Ang-(1-7)/MAS/ERK axis. The loss of MAGI3 expression in ccRCC patients activated the ERK signaling pathway, contributing to both cancer progression and Sunitinib resistance. Therefore, our study not only highlight MAGI3's pivotal role in ccRCC progression and Sunitinib resistance, but also reinforces MAGI3's prospective value as a predictive marker.

Human endogenous retrovirus-H long terminal repeat-associating 2: an emerging immune checkpoint for cancer immunotherapy

Human endogenous retrovirus-H long terminal repeat-associating 2 (HHLA2), a member of the B7 family of co-signaling molecules, is aberrantly expressed in various human cancers and has emerged as a promising target for cancer immunotherapy. It exhibits a unique structure and tissue distribution pattern compared to other B7 family members, where its expression is regulated by the complex physiological and tumor microenvironment. HHLA2 plays a crucial but contradictory role in immune modulation and is thereby associated with heterogeneous prognostic implications across different cancer types. It interacts with two distinct receptors: transmembrane and immunoglobulin domain-containing 2 (TMIGD2), which is predominantly expressed on naïve T and natural killer (NK) cells to deliver co-stimulatory signals to T cells and NK cells, and killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor, three immunoglobulin domains, and long cytoplasmic tail (KIR3DL3), which is prevalent on terminally differentiated T and CD56dim CD16+ NK cells to transmit inhibitory signals. The expression dynamics of these receptors on immune cells contribute to the maintenance of immune response homeostasis. Therapeutic strategies targeting the HHLA2 immune checkpoint aim to selectively inhibit the immunosuppressive HHLA2-KIR3DL3 pathway while preserving the HHLA2-TMIGD2 signaling. Several anti-HHLA2 and anti-KIR3DL3 antibodies are currently under investigation in early clinical trials, building upon encouraging results observed in humanized mouse models. Notably, the nonoverlapping expression of HHLA2 and PD-L1 in tumors suggests potential synergistic benefits of combining HHLA2-KIR3DL3-targeted therapies with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade or anti-CTLA-4 to augment antitumor activity.

Efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic variant histology (non-clear cell) renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (nivo/ipi) is a standard of care first-line (1 L) therapy for patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), but its role in patients with metastatic, non-ccRCC has not been fully defined. We report a single-institution experience with nivo/ipi in non-ccRCC.

METHODS

Between November 2017 and February 2024, 55 patients with metastatic non-ccRCC received nivo/ipi at MD Anderson Cancer Center. The tumor response was assessed by blinded radiologists using RECIST v1.1. The overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), PFS milestone, duration of response (DoR), and overall survival (OS) were determined. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on available tumor specimens.

RESULTS

Twenty-five (45.5%) patients had papillary histology (pRCC), 12 (21.8%) patients had chromophobe (chRCC), and 18 (32.7%) patients had unclassified RCC (uRCC). Fifty-two (94.5%) patients received nivo/ipi in 1 L. Sarcomatoid features (SF) were found in 20 (36.4%) cases. ORR was 48% (12/25) in pRCC, 25% (3/12) in chRCC (all 3 cases had SF), 27.8% (5/18) in uRCC, and 55% (11/20) across histologies with SF.The median PFS was 10.6 months (95% CI: 2.8 to 22.8) in pRCC, 3.6 months (95% CI: 0.9 - NE) in chRCC, and 3 months (95% CI: 2.1 to 7) in uRCC; 6-month milestone PFS was 56% (95% CI: 36.3 to 75.7), 41.7% (95% CI: 22 to 61.3), and 38.9% (95% CI: 21.7 to 56.1) in pRCC, chRCC, and uRCC, respectively. The median DoR for the entire cohort was 8.5 months (95% CI: 8 - NE). The median OS was 36.7 months (95% CI: 11.5 to 54.8) in pRCC, 25.7 months (95% CI: 0.9 - NE) in chRCC, and 11.1 months (95% CI: 6.5 - NE) in uRCC.Ten (18.2%) patients discontinued treatment due to treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Grade 3/4 immune-mediated AEs were noted in 17 (30.9%) patients. We performed NGS on 26 cases: TP53 (42%), PTEN (23%), and TERT (23%) alterations were most frequently found, with TERT and TP53 mutations enriched in pRCC and chRCC, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Nivo/ipi produced favorable outcomes in patients with pRCC supporting its use as 1 L therapy. Responses in patients with chRCC were noted exclusively with SF. Despite achieving an ORR of 27.8% with nivo/ipi, patients with uRCC had short PFS and inferior OS.

Cabozantinib for brain metastases in renal cell carcinoma: a single-institution retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

Brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) present considerable treatment challenges and poor prognoses. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of cabozantinib, a multi- tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), in improving the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with RCC with brain metastases.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 30 patients with RCC and brain metastases treated at a single institution between 2010 and 2024. Patient demographics, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes were analyzed. Systemic therapies included cabozantinib, TKIs, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Local therapies included Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) and whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Cabozantinib-treated patients (n = 12) exhibited significantly longer median PFS (21.6 vs. 4.1 months; P < .001) and OS (25.7 vs. 8.3 months; P = .019) compared to non-cabozantinib patients (n = 18). In patients treated with GKS, cabozantinib further improved PFS (29.6 vs. 3.9 months; P < .001) and OS (25.7 vs. 12.8 months; P < .001). Cox regression analysis identified cabozantinib as the sole independent predictor of improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.09; P = .004) and OS (HR, 0.17; P = .009).

CONCLUSION

Cabozantinib significantly improved survival outcomes in RCC patients with brain metastases, underscoring its role as an effective systemic therapy. However, potential risks such as brain hemorrhage highlight the importance of careful patient selection and close monitoring. Further prospective studies are warranted to explore optimal combination strategies.

Association of baseline inflammatory biomarkers and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the mainstay treatment of metastatic kidney cancer, demonstrating enhanced outcomes and durable responses in select patient subgroups. However, identifying reliable prognostic biomarkers for treatment outcomes remains challenging.

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the correlation between baseline inflammatory markers and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and clinical benefit (CB) in metastatic kidney cancer patients receiving ICIs. CB was defined as patients achieving stable disease, partial response, or complete response.

Design

Retrospective, single-center study.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 401 adult patients with advanced kidney cancer treated with ICIs at Emory Winship Cancer Institute between 2018 and 2023. Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte (MLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR), and neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratios (NER) were collected from baseline blood samples.

Results

Among 401 patients (median age, 66; 71% male; 21% Black/African American), median follow-up was 43.0 months (95% CI, 36.6-51.4). Patients with mGPS scores of 0 had longer OS than those with a score of 1 (hazard ratio (HR), 0.38; 95% CI, 0.23-0.62; p < 0.001) and 2 (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.20-0.67; p = 0.001), and longer PFS compared to patients with mGPS scores of 1 (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-0.98; p = 0.039) and 2 (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.29-0.67; p < 0.001). Low baseline NLR was associated with longer PFS (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.97; p = 0.032). Low baseline MLR correlated with improved OS (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.44-0.83; p = 0.002) and PFS (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.55-0.97; p = 0.031). Similarly, low baseline PLR was associated with higher CB likelihood (odds ratio (OR), 2.20; 95% CI, 1.31-3.69; p = 0.003), and low baseline NER was linked to improved OS (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46-0.87; p = 0.004), PFS (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51-0.88; p = 0.003), and higher CB (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.20-3.46; p = 0.008).

Conclusion

Lower levels of systemic inflammatory markers are associated with more favorable clinical outcomes with ICI treatment. Prospective studies are needed for further validation.

Towards a Consensus on the Management of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Insights from a European Delphi Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains complex despite clinical guidelines. The aim of this Delphi study was to achieve consensus among RCC experts on the definition, diagnosis, and first-line treatments for mRCC.

METHODS

Between May 2023 and April 2024, 14 experts from ten European countries completed two Delphi rounds of a 51-item questionnaire covering four topics: (1) oligometastatic RCC; (2) first-line treatment for metastatic clear-cell RCC; (3) treatment duration for metastatic clear-cell RCC; and (4) treatment of non-clear-cell RCC. Agreement was scored as absent/poor (<50%), fair (50-74%), or consensus (≥75%).

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Consensus was reached for 12 of 51 items (24%) in the first round and 25 of 49 items (51%) by the study end. Notably, 79% of experts defined oligometastatic RCC as five or fewer metastases and agreed that it typically does not require immediate systemic treatment. All experts (100%) emphasized the importance of clinical performance status in guiding treatment for metastatic clear-cell RCC, with 86% agreeing on additional factors such as International Society of Urological Pathology grade and sarcomatoid features. Nivolumab plus cabozantinib was favored for patients with brain or bone metastases (93% and 86% agreement, respectively), while there was fair agreement on pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib for patients with liver metastases. In addition, 71% supported stopping immune checkpoint inhibitors after 2 yr, while 86% agreed on the undefined duration of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

This Delphi study offers insights into mRCC management, and highlights the importance of multidisciplinary discussions for this challenging disease.

Belzutifan for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma

Belzutifan received its first FDA approval in 2021 for treating clinical manifestations of von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease including renal cell carcinoma (RCC) followed by approval in 2023 for treating advanced sporadic RCC that has progressed through multiple lines of treatment. It is the first FDA-approved drug to target hypoxia-inducible factor 2 alpha (HIF-2α). By inhibiting the HIF-2α transcription factor, belzutifan prevents HIF-2α from dimerizing with HIF-1β, thereby preventing the transcription of downstream oncogenes. Most clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) tumors are associated with VHL deletion or inactivation resulting in HIF-2α overexpression that represents a key contributor to tumorigenesis, thereby making belzutifan a uniquely optimal drug for targeting ccRCC. Belzutifan has demonstrated activity in clinical trials as a front- and later-line therapy, and in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. It has been largely well tolerated, although anemia represents a common on-target side effect and, along with hypoxia, requires monitoring during treatment. Ongoing phase III trials are investigating belzutifan in combination regimens in the relapsed/refractory, front-line, and adjuvant settings. Future studies will focus on identifying predictive biomarkers and resistance pathways.

Updated overall survival in patients with prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy in the phase III TIVO-3 study

BACKGROUND

The phase III TIVO-3 study demonstrated improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) with tivozanib compared with sorafenib in patients with 2-3 prior systemic regimens for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

METHODS

The TIVO-3 trial enrolled patients with measurable mRCC who had received 2 or more prior systemic therapies, including a vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGF-TKI). Patients were stratified by International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk score and type of prior treatment and were randomized 1:1 to receive tivozanib or sorafenib. Efficacy was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 criteria, with PFS as the primary endpoint. Safety was evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version v4.03, and statistical analyses included Cox regression for overall survival (OS) and descriptive statistics for duration of response (DOR). The current post-hoc long-term follow-up analysis consists of an assessment of OS in the previously stratified subpopulation of patients with prior CPI exposure.

RESULTS

Between May 2016, and August 2017, 350 patients were randomized, of which 26% had prior CPI exposure, with final analysis data cut off on June 21, 2021. In patients previously treated with CPIs (n = 91), the median PFS of tivozanib was 7.3 months versus 5.1 months with sorafenib and hazard ratio (HR) of 0.55 (95% CI, 0.32-0.94). The OS HR in the CPI-treated subset was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.43-1.11, P =.0992) favoring tivozanib, although with a median OS of 18.1 and 20.9 months, for tivozanib and sorafenib, respectively. Tivozanib demonstrated a longer median DOR of 20.3 versus 5.7 months for sorafenib in the subset previously treated with CPIs. The safety profile favored tivozanib, with lower rates of VEGF-TKI class-related grade ≥3 adverse events compared with sorafenib. However, in the subset of patients previously treated with CPIs, the incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events was higher, at 58% for tivozanib and 67% for sorafenib, compared with the ITT population, at 46% and 55%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this long-term post-hoc update of the TIVO-3 trial, we show that in CPI-resistant mRCC, the PFS benefit of tivozanib over sorafenib is accompanied with improved OS data, although not statistically significant, and durable responses.

Early detection of myocarditis caused by immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab for advanced recurrent renal cell carcinoma

Combination therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) may cause immune-related myocarditis; however, its incidence in this cancer type and regimen remains unknown. At our institution, we measure biomarkers, such as high-sensitivity Troponin (hsTn), and perform electrocardiograms (ECGs) and echocardiography before and every month after the initiation of this therapy, and the findings obtained and patients' symptoms are continuously monitored by physicians and pharmacists. A retrospective survey was conducted on physiological and biochemical test findings and immune-related adverse events in patients with advanced RCC who received combination therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab between October 1, 2018 and December 31, 2023. Patients suspected of having myocarditis consulted with cardiologists. Myocarditis due to this therapy was detected in 5 of the 86 patients (5.8%) assessed using the European Society of Cardiology 2022 guidelines. There were no fatal symptoms or death due to myocarditis. The median time to the onset of myocarditis was 25 days (21-86 days). The early detection of myocarditis caused by this therapy requires the monitoring of changes by periodically measuring hsTn and other cardiac markers and performing ECGs and echocardiography from the early stages of administration through to the end of treatment. In addition to checking symptoms, if these abnormalities are detected and myocarditis is suspected, prompt collaboration with cardiologists is recommended. Our management strategy of care by a onco-cardiology team may contribute to the early diagnosis and treatment of myocarditis.

Real-World Efficacy and Toxicity of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab as First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) in a Subpopulation of Elderly and Poor Performance Status Patients

BACKGROUND

Ipilimumab and nivolumab (ipi/nivo) improved overall survival (OS) compared to sunitinib in the pivotal Checkmate 214 trial of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) intermediate/poor risk disease. We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of ipi/nivo in older and frailer populations in a real-world mRCC cohort.

METHODS

Analysis was conducted on a real-world cohort with mRCC (N = 551) treated with first-line ipi/nivo from the Canadian Kidney Cancer information system (CKCis) database from January 2014 to December 2021. A comparison was made between outcomes and toxicity in patients 1. <70 versus (vs.) ≥70 yo, 2. <75 vs. ≥75 yo, and 3. KPS ≥70 vs. <70 yo. OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and time to treatment failure (TTF) were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Log-rank tests were used for comparison between groups.

RESULTS

Ipi/nivo treatment had no impact on survival outcomes or toxicity for patients >70 yo and >75 yo when controlled for IMDC. However, when comparing patients with KPS > 70 vs. KPS < 70, patients with a poor performance status had decreased median OS at 54.5 m vs. 10.8 m (p-value < 0.0001) and PFS at 11.6 vs. 3.1 m (p-value < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of ipi/nivo in mRCC demonstrated similar survival outcomes and toxicity in an older patient population. In patients with a poor performance status, it was associated with inferior OS and PFS. We believe that ipi/nivo is a reasonable treatment option for these patient populations, particularly in older patients.

The Relationship Between Response Rate and Survival Benefits in Randomized Immunotherapy Studies

Understanding the relationship between the Objective Response Rate (ORR) and survival outcomes, notably Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS), is relevant for assessing the efficacy of regimens in oncology. We evaluate the relationship between ORR, PFS and OS in immuno-oncology (IO) trials. Data from 68 clinical trials submitted to the FDA were evaluated, examining immunotherapy regimens, notably immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-programmed death (ligand)-1 [anti-PD-(L)1], cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors and combination therapies [e.g., IO + IO, anti-PD-L1 + chemotherapy, anti-PD-L1 + CTLA-4, anti-PD-L1 + TKI (tyrosine kinase inhibitors)]. Studies were included based on their reporting of ORR, PFS, and OS. Of the 68 clinical trials reviewed, 55 were included in the analysis. The correlation between ORR and PFS was moderate across most immunotherapy regimens, indicating that ORR can serve as a useful predictor of short-term disease control. However, the correlation between ORR and OS was weaker, especially in trials including combination therapies, indicating that ORR alone may not reliably predict long-term survival outcomes. ORR predicts PFS better in first-line treatment but declines in later lines and remains a weak OS predictor overall. Differing degrees of correlation between ORR and survival metrics, particularly across treatment lines and combinations, are observed. While ORR can serve as a surrogate marker for PFS in IO trials, its utility in predicting OS is restricted and the interpretation of the relationship between ORR and PFS or OS is a key limitation. Rather, a decline in PFS with increasing ORR may reflect trial differences rather than a direct relationship. Future analyses should adopt better methodologies to capture these dynamics and focus on improving surrogate endpoints for immunotherapy to improve clinical trial design and patient outcomes.

Primary resistance to nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy affects second-line treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) has a long-term response rate of 30% for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, 20% of patients develop primary resistant disease (PRD) to NIVO+IPI and show poor survival outcomes. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of PRD as a second-line treatment in patients with mRCC. The data used in this multi-institutional, retrospective cohort were collected between August 2015 and January 2023. In total, 189 patients with mRCC were treated with NIVO+IPI and then with a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Associations between PRD and progression-free survival of second-line treatment (PFS), progression-free survival 2 (PFS2), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. The median age at NIVO+IPI initiation was 67 years in the male-dominant population (n = 140, 74.1%), and most patients had clear cell histology (n = 140, 74.1%). PRD was recorded in 42 (22.2%) of 189 patients during NIVO+IPI therapy. Patients who experienced PRD showed poor PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.788; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.176-2.718; p = 0.007), PFS2 (HR, 4.127; 95% CI, 2.649-6.431; p < 0.001), and OS (HR, 3.330; 95% CI, 2.040-5.437; p < 0.001). Before starting second-line therapy, patients with PRD tended to have a poor performance status compared with non-PRD patients and a higher IMDC risk. Second-line drug therapy was not associated with treatment outcomes in patients with PRD. PRD in patients with mRCC receiving NIVO+IPI as first-line treatment was associated with poor clinical course, even with second-line therapy.

Persisting challenges in the development of predictive biomarkers for immuno-oncology therapies for renal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Immuno-oncology (IO) therapies have become integral to renal cell carcinoma (RCC) management, RCC remains a complex malignancy with diverse clinical behaviors and a heterogeneous tumor microenvironment, highlighting the need for predictive biomarkers to optimize therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review synthesizes recent findings from clinical trials, translational studies, and molecular analyses to provide an updated perspective on biomarker research for IO therapies in RCC. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for articles published between January 2010 and November 2024.

EXPERT OPINION

IO combination therapies have demonstrated significant improvements in progressionfree survival and overall survival compared with sunitinib. However, treatment outcomes vary according to the IMDC risk groups, metastatic sites, and histological subtypes, such as sarcomatoid differentiation. Advances in molecular biology have elucidated the roles of genetic alterations and immune phenotypes in modulating IO efficacy. Emerging biomarkers, including tertiary lymphoid structures, human endogenous retroviruses, and the gut microbiome, show promise but require further validation. Addressing challenges such as intratumoral heterogeneity and dynamic immune responses will be key to identifying actionable biomarkers. Continued integration of clinical and molecular insights is essential for improving patient selection and outcomes in RCC treated with IO therapies.

Dose Per Body Weight Predicts Incidence and Severity of Apalutamide-Related Skin Rash in Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

A survival advantage with apalutamide (APA) combined with androgen deprivation therapy for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) has been demonstrated in the clinical trial, irrespective of race. However, the incidence of APA-induced skin rash in the Japanese subpopulation is higher than that in the global population. In the present study, we investigated the predictive value of APA dose per body weight for the incidence of skin rash.

METHODS

A total of 128 patients with mCSPC treated with APA between January 2018 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to identify the optimal APA cutoff dose. In addition to comparing the status of APA-induced skin rash, the progression-free survival (PFS) was compared after propensity score matching.

RESULTS

The optimal cutoff dose predicting the occurrence of skin rash was 3.33 mg/kg. Our cutoff value significantly stratified the 2 groups in time to occurrence of APA-induced skin rash and discontinuation of APA due to skin rash (P = .005 and P = .009, respectively). The incidence of a ≥G3 skin rash in patients receiving ≥3.33 mg/kg was significantly higher than in others (6.5% vs. 19.7%, P = .037). There was no significant difference in the PFS between patients administered <3.33 mg/kg and those administered ≥3.33 mg/kg.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the drug dosage per body weight may predict the incidence and severity of APA-induced skin rash. Further large-scale prospective studies are needed to validate the predictive value of drug dosage per body weight and identify the optimal cutoff value.

A Prospective Non-interventional Real-World Study of cabozantinib in Pretreated Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Refractory to Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Targeted Therapy (CASSIOPE)

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of published data on real-world cabozantinib use in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma after prior vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy.

METHODS

CASSIOPE was a real-world, prospective, multicenter, non-interventional postauthorization safety study of cabozantinib in adult patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma in Europe following prior VEGF-targeted treatment (NCT03419572). Endpoints included cabozantinib utilization (dose modifications due to adverse events [AEs; primary endpoint], dose, dose modifications, and treatment duration), safety, effectiveness (progression-free survival [PFS], overall survival [OS], best overall response [BOR]), and healthcare resource utilization.

FINDINGS

Full analysis set (FAS)/safety population comprised 679 patients; 433 of these initiated cabozantinib at 60 mg/day (recommended dose) (primary safety population). Median age (FAS) was 67 (range, 29-93) years; most were male (73·0%), had clear-cell histology (85·7%), metastatic disease at cabozantinib initiation (97·8%), and prior nephrectomy (80·3%). In the primary safety population, 77·1% experienced dose modification owing to an AE. In the safety population, the median daily dose was 40·0 (range, 7·8-60·0) mg/day and the median treatment duration was 7·8 (< 0·1-15·2) months. Treatment-emergent and treatment-related AEs were experienced by 95·9% and 90·4% of patients, respectively. Median PFS (FAS) assessed by the local investigator using any method was 8·3 months, and 1-year OS rate was 74%. Approximately one-third of all patients had a BOR of partial response and 6 had a complete response.

INTERPRETATION

Second- or later-line cabozantinib was effective and manageable in a real-world setting and had a safety profile consistent with previous studies.

Immunogenomic determinants of exceptional response to immune checkpoint inhibition in renal cell carcinoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitors can lead to 'exceptional', durable responses in a subset of persons. However, the molecular basis of exceptional response (ER) to immunotherapy in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) has not been well characterized. Here we analyzed pretherapy genomic and transcriptomic data in treatment-naive persons with mccRCC treated with standard-of-care immunotherapies: (1) combination of programmed cell death protein and ligand 1 (PD1/PDL1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 inhibitors (IO/IO) or (2) combination of PD1/PDL1 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor inhibitors (IO/VEGF). In the IO/IO cohort, clonal neoantigen load was significantly higher in persons with ER. In the IO/VEGF cohort, ER participants displayed strong enrichment of B cell receptor signaling-related pathways, tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) signatures and evidence of increased metabolic activity. Our results suggest that ER may be related to clonal neoantigen-driven cytotoxic T cell responses and TLS formation in tumor microenvironments. Therapeutic combinations that elicit both T cell-directed and B cell-directed antitumor immunity may be important to achieve exceptional benefit to IO-based treatment in ccRCC.

Dynamics of resistance to immunotherapy and TKI in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma

Immune-based combinations are the cornerstone of the first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients, leading to outstanding outcomes. Nevertheless, primary resistance and disease progression is a critical clinical challenge. To properly address this issue, it is pivotal to understand the mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, that tumor eventually develop under treatment. In this review of the literature, we aim at exploring resistance mechanisms arising in patients treated with first-line immune-based combinations in order to understand the biological pattern that should be investigated to overcome them. In more detail, mechanisms of resistance to nivolumab and pembrolizumab are divided into intrinsic to cancer cells and extrinsic (stromal or immune cells). Regarding axitinib, the increased expression of Nuclear protein 1 (NUPR1) or decreased levels of insulin receptor (INSR) characterize resistant cells. The secretion of non-VEGF pro-angiogenic factors, such as PDGF-BB, IL-1β, MMP-9, Gro-α, IL-8, IL-6, and CCL-2, can lead to resistance to cabozantinib. The reactivation of pathways previously targeted by lenvatinib or the activation of alternative pathways, such as EGFR-PAK2-ERK pathway, underlie the development of resistance to lenvatinib. Exploring resistance mechanism that arise during first-line therapy can lead to the development of treatment strategy able to overcome them in order to improve duration of response and patients outcomes.

Prognostic Impact of IMDC Category Shift From Baseline to Nivolumab Initiation in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Sub-Analysis of the MEET-URO 15 Study

INTRODUCTION

The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) score is the most important prognostic score to stratify patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), helping to guide treatment choice in first line. We hypothesized that IMDC change may also exert a prognostic role in subsequent lines of mRCC therapy.

METHODS

Meet-URO 15 is a multicenter Italian study of patients with mRCC receiving nivolumab as a second or subsequent line of therapy. This posthoc analysis aimed to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from nivolumab start as primary endpoints, overall response rate (ORR) and disease-control rate (DCR) as secondary endpoints, according to the change in the IMDC category from the first-line setting (baseline) to nivolumab start. Patients with available prognostic IMDC category information at baseline and before nivolumab were included.

RESULTS

492 patients were included in the analysis. At baseline, 165 (33.5%), 287 (58.3%), and 40 patients (8.2%) had favorable, intermediate, and poor IMDC categories, respectively. Before nivolumab, 364 patients (73.9%) remained in the same prognostic category as at baseline, 27 (5.5%) improved, and 101 (20.5%) deteriorated. Significantly longer mPFS (P = .01) and mOS (P < .01) were reached by patients with a stable favorable group compared to those worsening to intermediate/poor. A longer mOS was also achieved from intermediate/poor patients who improved their IMDC category before nivolumab compared to those remaining stable/worsening (P < .01 and P = .04, respectively). Maintaining IMDC category stability from baseline to nivolumab determined a more consistent DCR in favorable patients (P = .03). Overall, patients who improved their IMDC risk score reached better survival outcomes than those who remained stable/deteriorated.

CONCLUSIONS

In our sub-analysis, the shift in the IMDC risk category appears to be a helpful prognostic tool for assessing the outcomes of patients with mRCC treated with ≥2nd line nivolumab.

Treatment-free Survival After First-line Therapies for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: An International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Patients receiving immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy may experience periods of prolonged disease control without a need for systemic therapy. Treatment-free survival (TFS) is an important measure for this period, but no data are available for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) starting first-line agents. Our aim was to analyze TFS outcomes for patients with mRCC starting first-line therapy.

METHODS

We analyzed data for patients with mRCC starting first-line systemic therapy with VEGFR-targeted monotherapy, an ICB + VEGFR combination, or an ICB doublet from February 1, 2014 to February 1, 2023 from the multicenter International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) database. We estimated 36-mo TFS as the difference in restricted mean survival time between (1) the time to first-line therapy discontinuation and (2) the time to subsequent systemic therapy initiation.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

The study population included 3758 patients receiving either first-line VEGFR monotherapy (n = 2635), an ICB + VEGFR combination (n = 354), or doublet ICB (n = 769) were included. For the IMDC favorable-risk cohort, the 36-mo TFS estimate was 3.1 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-4.6) for the VEGFR monotherapy group and 3.7 mo (95% CI 0.2-7.2) for the ICB + VEGFR group. For the IMDC intermediate-/poor-risk cohort, TFS was 2.1 mo (95% CI 1.4-2.8) for the VEGFR monotherapy group, 3.7 mo (95% CI 1.0-6.4) for the ICB + VEGFR group, and 5.3 mo (95% CI 3.8-6.8) for ICB doublet group. Limitations include the retrospective design and an inability to quantify time spent with adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Our study demonstrates that patients with IMDC intermediate or poor risk treated with ICB doublet therapy experienced longer TFS than those treated with VEGFR monotherapy in the first-line setting. These results emphasize the utility of TFS as an informative endpoint and provide survival estimates to inform decision-making in mRCC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

For patients with metastatic kidney cancer, we compared the survival time free from a second treatment line for different first-line treatment options. The results show that the time free from second-line treatment was longer when first-line treatment was with a combination of two immunotherapy drugs (ipilimumab and nivolumab) in comparison to other treatment options.

Surgical Management of Genitourinary Cancer Liver Metastases

Genitourinary cancers are common. Liver metastases from genitourinary cancers are uncommon; isolated liver metastasis is rare. Liver resection in select patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma can lead to prolonged survival. Patients with metachronous and low-burden disease are most likely to benefit. Chemotherapy is first-line treatment of metastatic germ cell tumors. Liver resection is dependent on germ cell lineage and initial response to chemotherapy. Prognosis with liver metastases from prostate cancer is poor; liver-only lesions are rare. Liver resection generally is not indicated. Cumulative experience with liver resection for metastatic bladder cancer is limited. Liver metastases are poor prognostic indicators for metastasectomy.

Kidney cancer: From tumor biology to innovative therapeutics

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) constitutes the most frequent kidney cancer of the adult population and one of the most lethal malignant tumors worldwide. RCC often presents without early symptoms, leading to late diagnosis. Prognosis varies widely based on the stage of cancer at diagnosis. In the early-stage, localized RCC has a relatively good prognosis, while advanced or metastatic RCC has a poor outcome. Obesity, smoking, genetic mutations and family history are all considered risk factors for RCC, while inherited disorders, such as Tuberous Sclerosis and von Hippel-Lindau syndrome, are causally associated with RCC development. Genetic screening, deep sequencing analysis, quantitative proteomics and immunostaining analysis on RCC tissues, biological fluids and blood samples have been employed to identify novel biomarkers, predisposing factors and therapeutic targets for RCC with important clinical implications for patient treatment. Combined approaches of gene-targeting strategies coupled to a deep functional analysis of cancer cell biology, both in vitro and in appropriate animal models of RCC, significantly contributed to identify and characterize relevant pathogenic mechanisms underlying development and progression of RCC. These studies provided also important cues for the generation of novel target-specific therapeutics that selectively restore deranged cancer cell signalling and dysfunctional immune checkpoints, positively impacting on the survival rate of treated RCC patients. In this review, we will describe the recent discoveries concerning the most relevant pathogenic mechanisms of RCC and will highlight novel therapeutic strategies that interrupt oncogenic pathways and restore immune defences in RCC patients.

First and Second-line Treatments in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The treatment landscape for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has evolved significantly in recent years, leading to improved outcomes. The aim of this review is to provide clinicians with a practical guide for selecting first- and second-line treatments on the basis of current evidence.

METHODS

We critically evaluated systemic treatment strategies for mRCC. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed and Embase, alongside manual searches of guidelines and conference proceedings up to October 2024. A narrative review was performed to reach a consensus, with voting used to resolve differing opinions among authors.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

First-line treatment options include immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Four combination regimens have been approved internationally. Owing to the lack of head-to-head trials and standardized biomarkers, treatment decisions rely on factors such as International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk score, functional status, safety profiles, sarcomatoid features, use of immunosuppressive drugs, and need for immediate response. Despite advances, many patients will experience disease progression on ICI-based therapy, necessitating further treatment. The need for standardized second-line approaches remains unmet. TKIs, alone or with everolimus, show promising efficacy, while HIF2a inhibitors offer newer options with a favorable toxicity profile. Rechallenge with ICIs after early progression is not recommended.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

For optimal mRCC treatment selection, clinicians must carefully balance efficacy, toxicity, and patient preferences, especially when transitioning between first- and second-line therapies, to provide individualized care.

Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in Patients 75 Years and Older: Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) for elderly patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma have not been reported with sufficient evidence. Our study therefore aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of NIVO + IPI between patients ≥75 years and patients <75 years with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a multi-center cohort of the 156 patients that received NIVO + IPI treatment at eight institutions. Among them, 33 patients were ≥75 years old, and the remainder were <75 years old.

RESULTS

Patient demographics and tumor characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups except for age. The objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, or cancer-specific survival were not significantly different between the groups. However, overall survival in the patients ≥75 years was significantly shorter than that in the patients <75 years (median: 18 months vs. 46 months, p = 0.01). In addition, an age ≥75 years was shown in multivariable analysis to be a significant independent predictor of poor overall survival. Toxicity did not show any significant variation between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the clinical efficacy and safety of NIVO + IPI was demonstrated in patients ≥75 years old, it is suggested that the indication for NIVO + IPI in this age group should be carefully considered, taking into account patients' expected life expectancy.

The clinical significance of T cell infiltration and immune checkpoint expression in central nervous system germ cell tumors

Background

Primary central nervous system germ cell tumors (CNS GCTs) are rare intracranial malignancies, and their tumor microenvironment plays a crucial role in tumor initiation and progression. However, the specific characteristics of the immune microenvironment and their clinical significance remain poorly understood.

Methods

This study included 93 paraffin-embedded tissue samples from 90 patients diagnosed with CNS GCTs. Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence staining were used to assess the infiltration patterns of T cell subsets (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, Foxp3+) and the expression levels of immune checkpoints (CTLA-4, PD-1, PD-L1). Additionally, the study explored the relationship between these immune features and the patient's clinical characteristics and prognosis.

Results

The study revealed that germinomas exhibited significantly higher infiltration of CD4+ and Foxp3+ T cells compared to non-germinomatous GCTs (NGGCTs). Additionally, CTLA-4 expression was detected in 58.06% of cases, while PD-1 and PD-L1 were expressed in over 90%, with higher CTLA-4 levels in germinomas and elevated PD-L1 levels in NGGCTs. T cell infiltration was positively correlated with immune checkpoint expression, particularly in germinomas. The results also highlighted the strong immunosuppressive nature of the CNS GCTs' tumor microenvironment. Furthermore, T cell infiltration and immune checkpoint expression were closely associated with clinical characteristics and prognosis. Notably, PD-1 expression was identified as an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Conclusion

Our study highlighted the distinct characteristics of T cell infiltration and the significant expression of immune checkpoints in CNS GCTs, revealing the highly heterogeneous and immunosuppressive nature of the tumor microenvironment. PD-1 expression was identified as an independent prognostic predictor, offering a foundation for enhancing risk stratification in CNS GCT patients. These findings also support the potential for future clinical applications of immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as PD-1 monoclonal antibodies.

Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 Signaling Pathway for Cancer Therapy: Focus on Biomarkers

The PD1/PD-L1 axis plays an important immunosuppressive role during the T-cell-mediated immune response, which is essential for the physiological homeostasis of the immune system. The biology of the immunological microenvironment is extremely complex and crucial for the development of treatment strategies for immunotherapy. Characterization of the immunological, genomic or transcriptomic landscape of cancer patients could allow discrimination between responders and non-responders to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has shown remarkable efficacy in a variety of malignancies in landmark trials and has fundamentally changed cancer therapy. Current research focuses on strategies to maximize patient selection for therapy, clarify mechanisms of resistance, improve existing biomarkers, including PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB), and discover new biomarkers. In this review, we focus on the function of the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway and discuss the immunological, genomic, epigenetic and transcriptomic landscape in cancer patients receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Finally, we provide an overview of the clinical trials testing the efficacy of antibodies against PD-1/PD-L1.

Efficacy of innovative systemic treatments in combination with radiotherapy for bone metastases: a GEMO (the European Study Group of Bone Metastases) state of the art

The management of bone metastases (BoM) requires a multidisciplinary approach to prevent complications, necessitating updated knowledge in light of the rapid advancements in systemic treatments and surgical, interventional radiology or radiation techniques. This review aims to discuss efficacy of new systemic treatments on BoM, the benefits of radiotherapy adjunction, and the optimal methods for combining them. Preliminary evidence suggesting reduced efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), and several multi-kinase inhibitors regarding BoM may encourage early use of radiotherapy (RT). Systemic treatment efficacy modulation by RT and ablative RT strategies are explored. Concerns for increased side effects for several kinase inhibitors and double ICI in combination with RT imply suspending those systemic treatments during RT. Various timing strategies to combine prostate hormone therapies and RT are developed. Emerging internal vectorized radiotherapy molecules necessitate developing new combination strategies with RT. Further prospective data collection and comparative trials should be encouraged.

Phospholipase C Beta 2 as a Key Regulator of Tumor Progression and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition via PI3K/AKT Signaling in Renal Cell Carcinoma

Background: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents the most common form of invasive kidney cancer in adults. Among the components critical to cellular regulation is Phospholipase C Beta 2 (PLCB2), a member of the phospholipase C enzyme family. This enzyme plays a vital role in managing key cellular functions such as growth, differentiation, migration, and survival. Despite its significant importance, the specific expression patterns and molecular mechanisms of PLCB2 in the progression of RCC are not well understood. Methods: This investigation employed a combination of bioinformatics analyses, scRNA-seq, functional assays, transcriptome sequencing, real-time quantitative PCR (RT-PCR), immunofluorescence, rescue experiments, and Western blotting to explore the regulatory function of PLCB2 in driving the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in RCC through the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Results:PLCB2 expression is significantly elevated in RCC samples, and this increase is inversely correlated with patient prognosis. The knockdown of PLCB2 in RCC cell lines leads to a marked reduction in cell proliferation, invasion, migration, and EMT. Transcriptome sequencing further revealed that PLCB2 is significantly associated with the PI3K/AKT pathway. Notably, the PI3K activator 740Y-P was able to reverse the reductions in migration, invasion, and EMT caused by the PLCB2 knockdown. Conclusions: Our findings underscore the pivotal role of PLCB2 in regulating RCC invasion and metastasis by modulating the EMT via the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. This highlights PLCB2 not only as a key prognostic biomarker, but also as a promising therapeutic target in the treatment of advanced-stage RCC, offering new avenues for more effective interventions.

Dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in metastatic basal cell carcinoma

We report the basal cell cancer (BCC) cohort of the SWOG/NCI 1609 Dual Anti-CTLA-4 & Anti-PD-1 blockade in Rare Tumors (DART), a phase II prospective, multicenter basket trial of nivolumab and ipilimumab. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) (RECIST v1.1). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity were secondary endpoints. Sixteen patients with advanced/metastatic BCC were evaluable. The ORR was 31% (95% CI, 19-50%), and the 12-month OS, 75% (95% CI, 57-100%). Median PFS was 9.3 months (95% CI, 3.3-NA). Of 15 patients evaluable for clinical benefit, five partial responses (PRs) and five stable disease >6 months (total = 10/15 (66.7%)) were seen. The most common toxicities included fatigue (37.5%), pruritis (31.3%), and diarrhea (25%). In patients with advanced/metastatic BCC, ipilimumab and nivolumab produced an ORR of 31% and prolonged (>6 months) PFS in 73% of patients, with seven PFS/iPFS of >1 year, including one with prior anti-PD-1. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02834013 (Registered 7/15/2016; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02834013 ).

Stratification system with dual human endogenous retroviruses for predicting immunotherapy efficacy in metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Endogenous retrovirus (ERV) elements are genomic footprints of ancestral retroviral infections within the human genome. While the dysregulation of ERV transcription has been linked to immune cell infiltration in various cancers, its relationship with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response in solid tumors, particularly metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), remains inadequately explored.

METHODS

This study analyzed patients with metastatic ccRCC from two prospective clinical trials, encompassing 181 patients receiving nivolumab in the CheckMate trials (-009 to -010 and -025) and 48 patients treated with the ipilimumab-nivolumab combination in the BIONIKK trial. ERV expression was quantified using the ERVmap algorithm from RNA sequencing data. Our primary objective was to correlate ERV expression with progression-free survival, with overall survival and time-to-second-treatment survival as secondary endpoints. We used bootstrap methods with univariate Cox regression on 666 substantially expressed ERVs to evaluate their prognostic significance and stability.

RESULTS

Our analysis centered on two ERVs, E4421_chr17 and E1659_chr4, which consistently exhibited opposing prognostic impacts across both cohorts. We developed a stratification system based on their median expression levels, categorizing patients into four ERV subgroups. These subgroups were further consolidated into a three-tier risk model that significantly correlated with ICI treatment outcomes. The most responsive ERV risk category showed enhanced endothelial cell infiltration, whereas the resistant category was characterized by higher levels of myeloid dendritic cells, regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and markers of T-cell exhaustion. Notably, this ERV-based classification outperformed traditional transcriptomic signatures in predicting ICI efficacy and showed further improvement when combined with epigenetic DNA methylation markers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings introduce a dual ERV-based stratification system that effectively categorizes patient risk and predicts clinical outcomes for ccRCC patients undergoing ICI therapy. Beyond enhancing the predictive precision of existing transcriptomic models, this system paves the way for more targeted and individualized approaches in the realm of precision oncology.

Real-world short-term outcomes and treatment regimen comparisons in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line immune combinations

BACKGROUND

Immune-combinations have recently become the standard first-line treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This study evaluated the applicability of the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk model in predicting outcomes for patients treated with either immune-oncologic drug doublet (IO-IO) or immune-oncologic drug tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations (IO-TKI). A secondary objective to compare the effectiveness of IO-IO versus IO-TKI within the IMDC risk groups over a short follow-up period.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 172 patients with mRCC treated with first-line immunotherapy combinations. Progression free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure 2 (TTF2), and overall survival (OS) were compared between IMDC risk categories. Model fit was assessed using the c-index. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to adjust and compare outcomes between IO-IO and IO-TKI, except for IMDC favorable risk patients due to the small number of IO-IO cases.

RESULTS

The IMDC risk model demonstrated a c-index of 0.684 (OS) for entire cohort, 0.600 (PFS), 0.596 (TTF2), and 0.624 (OS) for IO-IO, and 0.667 (PFS), 0.702 (TTF2), and 0.751 (OS) for IO-TKI. In the IMDC intermediate and poor risk groups after IPTW adjustment, PFS (HR 0.72), TTF2 (HR 0.67), and OS (HR 0.74) did not significantly differ between IO-IO and IO-TKI. Specifically, in the IMDC intermediate risk group, PFS (HR 0.79), TTF2 (HR 0.69), and OS (HR 0.65) were longer in IO-TKI, though the differences were not statistically significant. In the IMDC poor risk group, PFS (HR 0.76), TTF2 (HR 0.77), and OS (HR 1.03) were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

The impact of IMDC risk model on survival was modest in IO-IO, while remained statistically substantial in IO-TKI. Survival outcomes did not significantly differ between IO-IO and IO-TKI during the short follow-up period.

Overall Survival of Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Following the Introduction of Targeted and Immunotherapies: A Norwegian Retrospective, Real-World Registry Data Study (RECON3)

Purpose

In Norway, 5-year survival rates of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are increasing. The objective of this study was to describe the survival of real-world patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) across Norway and to identify associated factors. The results may provide additional information on the benefits of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in clinical practice.

Patients and Methods

We performed a longitudinal, retrospective, non-interventional cohort study using data from four national registries. The study included adults diagnosed with mRCC between 1 January 1995 and 31 December 2018. Primary endpoint was to evaluate overall survival (OS) in all included patients. Secondary endpoints included further analysis of treatment patterns and possible impact on OS. Secondary endpoint analysis was performed in patients diagnosed with mRCC between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2018, as complete data on systemic therapies were available from 2008 and onwards.

Results

In total, 4078 patients were diagnosed with mRCC in the period from 1995 to 2018. The median OS since initial mRCC diagnosis was 1.17 years. OS appeared to improve over time, 5-year OS was 10% in patients diagnosed in the period 1995-2001 compared to 25% in 2012-2015. The secondary analysis included 2338 patients. Fifty-five percent (55%) of the patients received systemic treatment. No differences were observed in the number of treatment lines administered over time or in the number of lines of treatment administered according to tumor histology. Among 343 patients who received ≥3 treatment lines, we observed longer OS in patients who received an ICI as a part of their treatment, with a median OS of 4.51 compared to 2.31 years.

Conclusion

Provision of information into registries is mandatory in Norway. This retrospective, registry-based study provides real-world evidence on patient outcomes and treatments of the Norwegian patients with mRCC in the period from 1995 to 2018.

Immune-related encephalitis after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized cancer treatment but can trigger immune-related encephalitis. We report one of the largest case series of patients with immune-related encephalitis and review of the literature.

METHODS

Retrospective series of patients with immune-related encephalitis and literature review.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients with cancer treated with ICI (50% combination therapy) developed immune-related encephalitis. Diagnostic testing revealed cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) lymphocytic pleocytosis (85%) and elevated protein (69%), abnormal brain magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) (33%) or brain FDG-PET (25%), electroencephalogram (EEG) abnormalities (30%), and autoantibodies (31%). Encephalitis treatment included: corticosteroids (86%), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) (36%), plasmapheresis (7%), and rituximab (29%). There were no deaths and 12 patients had significant recovery, although long-term complications were observed. All patients discontinued ICI. Longitudinal follow-up demonstrated anti-cancer response to ICI at 3 months (85%) and 6 months post-ICI initiation (77%). A literature review identified 132 patients with immune-related encephalitis. Most were treated with PD-1 inhibitors (18% combination). Common abnormalities included elevated CSF protein (84%) or pleocytosis (77%), abnormal brain MRI (65%), or autoantibodies (47%). Nearly all were treated with corticosteroids, many required additional therapy with IVIg (26%) or rituximab (12%). Most patients had clinical improvement (81%) but a minority (10%) had a clinical relapse after completing corticosteroid taper. ICIs were resumed in 7 patients (5%), with relapse in 3.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Immune-related encephalitis is treatable and improves with corticosteroids in most cases but may require additional immunosuppression. Re-emergence of encephalitis is rare and does not typically result in adverse outcomes, and this should be considered in neurological immune-related adverse event management guidelines.

Feasibility and acceptability of a mindfulness app-based intervention among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a multinational study

BACKGROUND

Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) experience emotional distress and limited supportive care access. This study assesses a mindfulness app's feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy in improving emotional symptoms, trait mindfulness, and overall quality of life for patients with mRCC on immunotherapy.

METHODS

This multinational study recruited patients with mRCC undergoing immunotherapy from Brazil and the United States. Participants were required to engage in mindfulness app-based activities for 20-30 min daily, at least 4 days per week, over a 4-week period. Assessments were conducted at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 12 to evaluate emotional symptoms (PROMIS-Anxiety and Depression, Fear of Cancer Recurrence-7), fatigue (Brief Fatigue Inventory), trait mindfulness (Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale), and quality of life (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General). Self-reported data were used to assess adherence. Linear mixed-effects models were used to evaluate changes over time for the measured outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 50 patients with mRCC, the feasibility of this intervention was demonstrated; 96% of patients were assessed at week 4, with high adherence rates reported by 75% of patients. Participants expressed positive feedback on the smartphone-based approach. Significant improvements were observed in emotional symptoms, fatigue, and quality of life scores from baseline to post-intervention (P = .001 for each), suggesting the positive impact of this intervention.

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide encouraging evidence for the feasibility and acceptability of a mindfulness app-based intervention among patients with mRCC. This intervention may offer a viable and accessible means of providing psychosocial support to patients with mRCC.

Using Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

The variety of therapeutic associations in first-line treatment of advanced and metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) illustrates the complexity of toxicity management that can affect patients' health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Electronic monitoring applications have become part of the daily practice of providers in following up with people with cancer.

OBJECTIVES

This article offers perspectives for electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) in clinical practice to enhance symptom management and HRQOL for patients with mRCC.

METHODS

A narrative review combines the results of searches conducted on MEDLINE®, Embase®, and Cochrane Library for articles that identify therapeutic combinations used in treating mRCC, extract HRQOL data, and evaluate the benefits of ePROMs.

FINDINGS

ePROMs can be adapted to the toxicity and symptom specificities encountered in patients with mRCC undergoing front-line treatment. Combined with multidimensional HRQOL indicators, these tools can improve symptom management and provide early support adapted to the patient's needs.