Role of the second and third intracellular loops of metabotropic glutamate receptors in mediating dual signal transduction activation

The intracellular loops of the GB2 subunit are crucial for G-protein coupling of the heteromeric gamma-aminobutyrate B receptor

The gamma-aminobutyrate B (GABA(B)) receptor is the first discovered G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that needs two subunits, GB1 and GB2, to form a functional receptor. The GB1 extracellular domain (ECD) binds GABA, and GB2 contains enough molecular determinants for G-protein activation. The precise role of the two subunits in G-protein coupling is investigated. GB1 and GB2 are structurally related to the metabotropic glutamate, Ca(2+)-sensing and other family 3 GPCRs in which the second (i2) as well as the third (i3) intracellular loop play important roles in G-protein coupling. Here, the role of the i2 loops of GB1 and GB2 in the GABA(B) receptor ability to activate G(alpha)-proteins is investigated. To that aim, the i2 loops were swapped between GB1 and GB2 heptahelical domains (HDs), either in the wild-type subunits or in the chimeric subunits GB1/2 that contain the ECD of GB1 and the HD of GB2. The effect of an additional mutation within the i3 loop of GB2 that prevents coupling of the heteromeric receptor was also examined. Combinations of interest were found to be correctly addressed at the cell surface and to assemble into heteromers. Taken together our data revealed the following new information on the G-protein coupling of the heteromeric GABA(B) receptor: 1) the i2 loop of GB2 within the GB2 HD is required for the heteromeric GABA(B) receptor to couple to G-proteins, whereas the i2 loop of GB1 is not; 2) the presence of the i2 loop of GB2 within the GB1 HD is not sufficient to allow coupling of GB1; 3) the GB2 HD activates the Gqi9 protein whether it is associated with the GB2 or GB1 ECD; 4) in the combination with two GB2 HDs, each is able to couple to G-proteins; and finally, 5) the use of mutations in i2, i3, or both within the GB2 HD brings evidence for the absence of domain swapping enabling the exchange of region including i2 and i3 between the subunits.

Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 and calcium signaling in retinal amacrine cells

To begin to understand the modulatory role of glutamate in the inner retina, we examined the mechanisms underlying metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5)-dependent Ca(2+) elevations in cultured GABAergic amacrine cells. A partial sequence of chicken retinal mGluR5 encompassing intracellular loops 2 and 3 suggests that it can couple to both G(q) and G(s). Selective activation of mGluR5 stimulated Ca(2+) elevations that varied in waveform from cell to cell. Experiments using high external K(+) revealed that the mGluR5-dependent Ca(2+) elevations are distinctive in amplitude and time course from those engendered by depolarization. Experiments with a Ca(2+) -free external solution demonstrated that the variability in the time course of mGluR5-dependent Ca(2+) elevations is largely due to the influx of extracellular Ca(2+). The sensitivity of the initial phase of the Ca(2+) elevation to thapsigargin indicates that this phase of the response is due to the release of Ca(2+) from the endoplasmic reticulum. Pharmacological evidence indicates that mGluR5-mediated Ca(2+) elevations are dependent upon the activation of phospholipase C. We rule out a role for L-type Ca(2+) channels and cAMP-gated channels as pathways for Ca(2+) entry, but provide evidence of transient receptor potential (TRP) channel-like immunoreactivity, suggesting that Ca(2+) influx may occur through TRP channels. These results indicate that GABAergic amacrine cells express an avian version of mGluR5 that is linked to phospholipase C-dependent Ca(2+) release and Ca(2+) influx, possibly through TRP channels.

Role of cAMP-PKA-PLC signaling cascade on dopamine-induced PKC-mediated inhibition of renal Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase activity

We studied the molecular events set into motion by stimulation of D(1)-like receptors downstream of Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase, while measuring apical-to-basal ouabain-sensitive, amphotericin B-induced increases in short-circuit current in opossum kidney (OK) cells. The D(1)-like receptor agonist SKF-38393 decreased Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase activity (IC(50), 130 nM). This effect was prevented by the D(1)-like receptor antagonist SKF-83566, overnight cholera toxin treatment, the protein kinase A (PKA) antagonist H-89, or the PKC antagonist chelerythrine, but not the mitogen-activated PK inhibitor PD-098059 or phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors wortmannin and LY-294002. Dibutyryl cAMP (DBcAMP) and phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate (PDBu) both effectively reduced Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase activity. PKA downregulation abolished the inhibitory effects of SKF-38393 and DBcAMP but not those of PDBu. PKC downregulation abolished inhibition by PDBu, SKF-38393, and DBcAMP. The phospholipase C (PLC) inhibitor U-73122 prevented inhibition by SKF-38393 and DBcAMP. However, DBcAMP increased PLC activity. Although OK cells express both G(s)alpha and G(q/11)alpha proteins, D(1)-like receptors are coupled to G(s)alpha proteins only, as evidenced by studies in cells treated overnight with specific antibodies raised against G(s)alpha and G(q/11)alpha proteins. We conclude that PLC and Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase are effector proteins for PKA and PKC, respectively, after stimulation of D(1)-like receptors coupled to G(s)alpha proteins, in a sequence of events that begins with adenylyl cyclase-PKA system activation followed by PLC-PKC system activation.

Modelling the consequences of receptor-G-protein promiscuity

Many G-protein-coupled receptors interact with more than one type of G protein, giving rise to extreme variability in the effects of receptor activation, depending on, for example, receptor density and desensitization, efficacy of agonists, and availability of specific G proteins. This leads to errors in interpretation of data. To facilitate understanding the consequences of receptor-G-protein promiscuity, we use two simplified models to simulate such consequences. Applied to the regulation of adenylyl cyclase and phosphoinositidase, the models predict seemingly paradoxical situations and explain some phenomena that, at first sight, might seem to require the induction of agonist-specific (G-protein-selective) receptor conformations.

Alternative splicing unmasks dendritic and axonal targeting signals in metabotropic glutamate receptor 1

Precise targeting of neurotransmitter receptors to different neuronal compartments is a fundamental step for the establishment and function of synaptic circuitry. Group I metabotropic glutamate receptors, mGluR1 and mGluR5, control glutamatergic neurotransmission by acting both postsynaptically and presynaptically. Four alternatively spliced variants of the mGluR1 gene exist, which differ in their signaling properties and subcellular localization. The present study was undertaken to identify the molecular signals responsible for trafficking of these receptors to different neuronal compartments. Here we report that targeting of mGluR1 to dendrites and axons of transfected retina neurons is controlled by alternative splicing. We have identified in the tail of the receptor a tripeptide motif, which is necessary and sufficient to exclude the splice variant mGluR1b from distal dendrites and to drive it to the axon. This motif, which is present in all the mGluR1 receptors, is masked in mGluR1a by a dominant dendritic signal sequence harbored by the extended C-terminal tail of this splice variant. Furthermore, we show that the identified axonal and dendritic targeting signals are also necessary and sufficient to localize mGluR1b and mGluR1a to the apical and basolateral compartment of Madin-Darby canine kidney cells, respectively, consistent with the existence of common trafficking components for polarized targeting in epithelial cells and neurons.

A single subunit (GB2) is required for G-protein activation by the heterodimeric GABA(B) receptor

Although G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been shown to assemble into functional homo or heteromers, the role of each protomer in G-protein activation is not known. Among the GPCRs, the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type B receptor (GABA(B)R) is the only one known so far that needs two subunits, GB1 and GB2, to function. The GB1 subunit contains the GABA binding site but is unable to activate G-proteins alone. In contrast the GB2 subunit, which does not bind GABA, has an heptahelical domain able to activate G-proteins when assembled into homodimers (Galvez, T., Duthey, B., Kniazeff, J., Blahos, J., Rovelli, G., Bettler, B., Prézeau, L., and Pin, J.-P. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 2152-2159). In the present study, we have examined the role of each subunit within the GB1-GB2 heteromer, in G-protein coupling. To that end, point mutations in the highly conserved third intracellular loop known to prevent G-protein activation of the related Ca-sensing or metabotropic glutamate receptors were introduced into GB1 and GB2. One mutation, L686P introduced in GB2 prevents the formation of a functional receptor, even though the heteromer reaches the cell surface, and even though the mutated subunit still associates with GB1 and increases GABA affinity on GB1. This was observed either in HEK293 cells where the activation of the G-protein was assessed by measurement of inositol phosphate accumulation, or in cultured neurons where the inhibition of the Ca(2+) channel current was measured. In contrast, the same mutation when introduced into GB1 does not modify the G-protein coupling properties of the heteromeric GABA(B) receptor either in HEK293 cells or in neurons. Accordingly, whereas in all GPCRs the same protein is responsible for both agonist binding and G-protein activation, these two functions are assumed by two distinct subunits in the GABA(B) heteromer: one subunit, GB1, binds the agonists whereas the other, GB2, activates the G-protein. This illustrates the importance of a single subunit for G-protein activation within a dimeric receptor.

The C terminus of the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtypes 2 and 7 specifies the receptor signaling pathways

There is accumulating evidence that the specificity of the transduction cascades activated by G protein-coupled receptors cannot solely depend on the nature of the coupled G protein. To identify additional structural determinants, we studied two metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors, the mGlu2 and mGlu7 receptors, that are both coupled to G(o) proteins but are known to affect different effectors in neurons. Thus, the mGlu2 receptor selectively blocks N- and L-type Ca(2+) channels via a protein kinase C-independent pathway, whereas the mGlu7 receptor selectively blocks P/Q-type Ca(2+) channels via a protein kinase C-dependent pathway, and both effects are pertussis toxin-sensitive. We examined the role of the C-terminal domain of these receptors in this coupling. Chimeras were constructed by exchanging the C terminus of these receptors and transfected into neurons. Different chimeric receptors bearing the C terminus of mGlu7 receptor blocked selectively P/Q-type Ca(2+) channels, whereas chimeras bearing the C terminus of mGlu2 receptor selectively blocked N- and L-type Ca(2+) channels. These results show that the C terminus of mGlu2 and mGlu7 receptors is a key structural determinant that allows these receptors to select a specific signaling pathway in neurons.

GABA(B2) is essential for g-protein coupling of the GABA(B) receptor heterodimer

GABA(B) receptors are unique among G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in their requirement for heterodimerization between two homologous subunits, GABA(B1) and GABA(B2), for functional expression. Whereas GABA(B1) is capable of binding receptor agonists and antagonists, the role of each GABA(B) subunit in receptor signaling is unknown. Here we identified amino acid residues within the second intracellular domain of GABA(B2) that are critical for the coupling of GABA(B) receptor heterodimers to their downstream effector systems. Our results provide strong evidence for a functional role of the GABA(B2) subunit in G-protein coupling of the GABA(B) receptor heterodimer. In addition, they provide evidence for a novel "sequential" GPCR signaling mechanism in which ligand binding to one heterodimer subunit can induce signal transduction through the second partner of a heteromeric complex.

Structural, signalling and regulatory properties of the group I metabotropic glutamate receptors: prototypic family C G-protein-coupled receptors

In 1991 a new type of G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) was cloned, the type 1a metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptor, which, despite possessing the defining seven-transmembrane topology of the GPCR superfamily, bore little resemblance to the growing number of other cloned GPCRs. Subsequent studies have shown that there are eight mammalian mGlu receptors that, together with the calcium-sensing receptor, the GABA(B) receptor (where GABA is gamma-aminobutyric acid) and a subset of pheromone, olfactory and taste receptors, make up GPCR family C. Currently available data suggest that family C GPCRs share a number of structural, biochemical and regulatory characteristics, which differ markedly from those of the other GPCR families, most notably the rhodopsin/family A GPCRs that have been most widely studied to date. This review will focus on the group I mGlu receptors (mGlu1 and mGlu5). This subgroup of receptors is widely and differentially expressed in neuronal and glial cells within the brain, and receptor activation has been implicated in the control of an array of key signalling events, including roles in the adaptative changes needed for long-term depression or potentiation of neuronal synaptic connectivity. In addition to playing critical physiological roles within the brain, the mGlu receptors are also currently the focus of considerable attention because of their potential as drug targets for the treatment of a variety of neurological and psychiatric disorders.

mGluR1-mediated potentiation of NMDA receptors involves a rise in intracellular calcium and activation of protein kinase C

Potentiation of ionotropic glutamate receptor activity by metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) is thought to modulate activity at glutamatergic synapses in the hippocampus. However, the precise pathway by which this modulation occurs is not well understood. The present study tests the hypothesis that mGluR1-mediated potentiation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) occurs via a phospholipase C (PLC)-initiated cascade. NMDAR functional activity was examined by whole-cell recording from Xenopus oocytes expressing recombinant NMDARs and mGluR1alpha. The mGluR1 agonist (1S,3R)-1-amino-cyclopentane-1,3-dicarboxylic acid (ACPD) significantly potentiated NMDA-elicited currents. mGluR1alpha-mediated potentiation of NMDA responses was eliminated by the PLC inhibitor U-73122. Buffering of intracellular Ca2+ by BAPTA-AM or depletion of intracellular Ca2+ by the Ca2+/ATPase inhibitor thapsigargin greatly reduced ACPD potentiation. ACPD potentiation was reduced by the specific protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor Ro-32-0432 and eliminated by the broad spectrum kinase inhibitor staurosporine. ACPD produced no further potentiation after potentiation of NMDARs by the PKC-activating phorbol ester 12-O-tetradecanoyl phorbol-13-acetate (TPA). Thus, Group I mGluRs potentiate NMDA responses via activation of PLC; at least part of the potentiation is due to rise in intracellular Ca2+ and stimulation of PKC. Cytochalasin D, which disrupts the actin cytoskeleton, blocked ACPD-elicited chloride currents and ACPD-induced potentiation of NMDAR currents, consistent with a role for cytoskeletal protein(s) in the signaling pathway. As Group I mGluRs are localized to the perisynaptic region in juxtaposition to NMDARs at glutamatergic synapses, mGluR-mediated potentiation of NMDAR activity may play a role in synaptic transmission and plasticity including LTP.

C-terminal interaction is essential for surface trafficking but not for heteromeric assembly of GABA(b) receptors

Assembly of fully functional GABA(B) receptors requires heteromerization of the GABA(B(1)) and GABA(B(2)) subunits. It is thought that GABA(B(1)) and GABA(B(2)) undergo coiled-coil dimerization in their cytoplasmic C termini and that assembly is necessary to overcome GABA(B(1)) retention in the endoplasmatic reticulum (ER). We investigated the mechanism underlying GABA(B(1)) trafficking to the cell surface. We identified a signal, RSRR, proximal to the coiled-coil domain of GABA(B(1)) that when deleted or mutagenized allows for surface delivery in the absence of GABA(B(2)). A similar motif, RXR, was recently shown to function as an ER retention/retrieval (ERR/R) signal in K(ATP) channels, demonstrating that G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and ion channels use common mechanisms to control surface trafficking. A C-terminal fragment of GABA(B(2)) is able to mask the RSRR signal and to direct the GABA(B(1)) monomer to the cell surface, where it is functionally inert. This indicates that in the heteromer, GABA(B(2)) participates in coupling to the G-protein. Mutagenesis of the C-terminal coiled-coil domains in GABA(B(1)) and GABA(B(2)) supports the possibility that their interaction is involved in shielding the ERR/R signal. However, assembly of heteromeric GABA(B) receptors is possible in the absence of the C-terminal domains, indicating that coiled-coil interaction is not necessary for function. Rather than guaranteeing heterodimerization, as previously assumed, the coiled-coil structure appears to be important for export of the receptor complex from the secretory apparatus.

Allosteric interactions between GB1 and GB2 subunits are required for optimal GABA(B) receptor function

Recent studies on G-protein-coupled receptors revealed that they can dimerize. However, the role of each subunit in the activation process remains unclear. The gamma-amino-n-butyric acid type B (GABA(B)) receptor is comprised of two subunits: GB1 and GB2. Both consist of an extracellular domain (ECD) and a heptahelical domain composed of seven transmembrane alpha-helices, loops and the C-terminus (HD). Whereas GB1 ECD plays a critical role in ligand binding, GB2 is required not only to target GB1 subunit to the cell surface but also for receptor activation. Here, by analysing chimeric GB subunits, we show that only GB2 HD contains the determinants required for G-protein signalling. However, the HD of GB1 improves coupling efficacy. Conversely, although GB1 ECD is sufficient to bind GABA(B) ligands, the ECD of GB2 increases the agonist affinity on GB1, and is necessary for agonist activation of the receptor. These data indicate that multiple allosteric interactions between the two subunits are required for wild-type functioning of the GABA(B) receptor and highlight further the importance of the dimerization process in GPCR activation.

Cell type-specific differences in the coupling of recombinant mGlu1alpha receptors to endogenous G protein sub-populations

In this study the effects of cell background on the coupling of the type 1alpha metabotropic glutamate (mGlu1alpha) receptor to different G protein sub-populations by recombinant expression of this receptor subtype in baby hamster kidney (BHK) and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells have been investigated. Receptor-G protein interactions were assessed using [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding and subsequent Galpha subunit-specific immunoprecipitation. In a CHO cell line (CHO-lac-mGlu1alpha), where mGlu1alpha receptor expression is under inducible control, stimulation of membranes with the mGlu receptor agonist quisqualate resulted in an increase in specific [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to G(q/11)alpha only, whereas in a BHK cell line (BHK-mGlu1alpha) agonist stimulation increased [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to G(q/11)alpha and also to pertussis toxin (PTx)-sensitive G(i/o) proteins (assessed using G(i1/2)alpha- and G(i3/o)alpha-specific antibodies). These data are consistent with our previous observations of dual, antagonistic G(q/11)/G(i/o) regulation of phospholipase C (PLC) in BHK-mGlu1alpha cells, whereas no evidence was found for a G(i/o) modulation of PLC activity in the CHO-lac-mGlu1alpha cell line. PTx pre-treatment of either cell line had no effect on either the magnitude or the concentration-dependency of agonist-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS-G(q/11)alpha binding, excluding the possibility that receptor-G(i/o) uncoupling can unmask an increase in receptor-G(q/11) interaction. mGlu1alpha receptor expression per se had little effect on Galpha protein expression levels in either CHO or BHK cell lines, with the possible exception of a small, but consistent increase in G(o)alpha expression in BHK-mGlu1alpha cells compared to the vector-transfected control cell line (BHK-570). Semi-quantitative assessment of mGlu1alpha receptor immunoreactivity and [(3)H]quisqualate saturation binding analysis demonstrated a ca 10-fold higher mGlu1alpha receptor content in BHK cells. Whether the higher receptor expression level in BHK-mGlu1alpha cells underlies the additional G(i/o) coupling observed in this cell line, or additional factors contribute to the phenomenon are discussed.

Molecular determinants of metabotropic glutamate receptor signaling

Metabotropic glutamate (mglu) receptors are implicated in the regulation of many physiological and pathological processes in the CNS, including synaptic plasticity, learning and memory, motor coordination, pain transmission and neurodegeneration. Several recent studies have elucidated the molecular determinants of mglu receptor signaling and show that several mechanisms acting at different steps in signal propagation are involved. We attempt to offer an integrated view on how homologous and heterologous mechanisms regulate the initial steps of signal propagation, mainly at the level of mglu-receptor-G-protein coupling. Particular emphasis is placed on the role of phosphorylation mechanisms mediated by protein kinase C and G-protein-coupled receptor kinases, and on the emerging importance of some members of the regulators of G-protein signaling family, such as RGS2 and RGS4, which facilitate the GTPase activity that is intrinsic to the alpha-subunits of G(q) and G(i).

Cloning and functional expression of GABA(B) receptors from Drosophila

The neurotransmitter GABA (gamma-aminobutyric acid) functions as the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system of vertebrates and invertebrates. In vertebrates GABA signals both through ionotropic receptors (GABA(A), GABA(C)), which induce fast synaptic inhibitory responses, and through metabotropic receptors (GABA(B)), which play a fundamental role in the reduction of presynaptic transmitter release and postsynaptic inhibitory potentials. Whilst GABA(A) and GABA(C) receptors have been cloned from vertebrates as well as invertebrates, GABA(B) receptors have only been identified in vertebrate species to date, although indirect evidence suggests their existence in arthropods, too. Here we report the cloning of three putative invertebrate GABA(B) receptor subtypes (D-GABA(B)R1, R2 and R3) isolated from Drosophila melanogaster. Whilst D-GABA(B)R1 and R2 show high sequence identity to mammalian GABA(B)R1 and R2, respectively, the receptor D-GABA(B)R3 seems to be an insect-specific subtype with no known mammalian counterpart so far. All three D-GABA(B)R subtypes are expressed in the embryonic central nervous system. In situ hybridization of Drosophila melanogaster embryos shows that two of the D-GABA(B)Rs (D-GABA(B)R1 and R2) are expressed in similar regions, suggesting a coexpression of the two receptors, whilst the third D-GABA(B)R (D-GABA(B)R3) displays a unique expression pattern. In agreement with these results we have only been able to functionally characterize D-GABA(B)R1 and R2 when the two subtypes are coexpressed either in Xenopus laevis oocytes or mammalian cell lines, whilst D-GABA(B)R3 was inactive in any combination. The pharmacology of the coexpressed D-GABA(B)R1/2 receptor was different from the mammalian GABA(B)Rs: e.g. baclofen, an agonist of mammalian GABA(B)Rs, showed no effect.

Amino acids in the second and third intracellular loops of the parathyroid Ca2+-sensing receptor mediate efficient coupling to phospholipase C

To determine the role of amino acids in the second and third intracellular (IC) loops of the Ca(2+)-sensing receptor (CaR) in phospholipase C (PLC) activation, we mutated residues in these loops either singly or in tandem to Ala and assessed PLC activity by measuring high extracellular [Ca(2+)] ([Ca(2+)](o))-induced inositol phosphate accumulation and protein expression by immunoblotting and immunocytochemistry in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Two CaR constructs in the second IC loop, F707A CaR and to a lesser extent L704A CaR, demonstrated reduced activation of PLC, despite levels of protein expression comparable with the wild-type (wt) CaR. Substitution of Tyr or His for Phe-707, but not Leu, Val, Glu, or Trp, partially restored the ability of high [Ca(2+)](o) to activate PLC. Eight residues in the third IC loop were involved in PLC signaling. The responses to high [Ca(2+)](o) in cells expressing CaRs with Ala substitutions at these sites were <35% of the wt CaR. The L798A, F802A, and E804A CaRs were dramatically impaired in their responses to [Ca(2+)](o) even up to 30 mm. Substitutions of Leu-798 with other hydrophobic residues (Ile, Val, or Phe), but not with acidic, basic, or polar residues, produced reduced responses compared with wt. Phe-802 could be replaced with either Tyr or Trp with partial retention of the ability to activate PLC. Glu-804 could only be substituted with Asp or Gln and maintain its signaling capacity. Cell surface expression of the CaRs mutated at Leu-798 and Phe-802 appeared normal compared with wt CaR. Cell surface CaR expression was, however, reduced substantially in cells expressing several mutants at position Glu-804 by confocal microscopy. These studies strongly implicate specific hydrophobic and acidic residues in the second and third IC loops of the parathyroid CaR (and potentially larger stretches of the third loop) in mediating efficient high [Ca(2+)](o)-induced PLC activation and or CaR expression.

Opposing effects of protein kinase C and protein kinase A on metabotropic glutamate receptor signaling: selective desensitization of the inositol trisphosphate/Ca2+ pathway by phosphorylation of the receptor-G protein-coupling domain

Signaling by the metabotropic glutamate receptor 1alpha (mGluR1alpha) can lead to the accumulation of inositol 1,4, 5-trisphosphate (InsP(3)) and cAMP and to the modulation of K(+) and Ca(2+) channel opening. At present, very little is known about how these different actions are integrated and eventually turned off. Unraveling the molecular mechanisms underlying these functions is crucial for understanding mGluR-mediated regulation of synaptic transmission. It has been shown that receptor-induced activation of the InsP(3) pathway is subject to feedback inhibition mediated by protein kinase C (PKC). In this study, we provide evidence for a differential regulation by PKC and protein kinase A of two distinct mGluR1alpha-dependent signaling pathways. PKC activation selectively inhibits agonist-dependent stimulation of the InsP(3) pathway but does not affect receptor signaling via cAMP. In contrast, protein kinase A potentiates agonist-independent signaling of the receptor via InsP(3). Furthermore, we demonstrate that the selectivity of PKC action on receptor signaling rests on phosphorylation of a threonine residue located in the G protein-interacting domain of the receptor. Modification at Thr(695) selectively disrupts mGluR1alpha-G(q/11) interaction without affecting signaling through G(s). Together, these data provide insight on the mechanisms by which selective down-regulation of a specific receptor-dependent signaling pathway can be achieved and on how cross-talk between different second messenger cascades may contribute to fine-tune short- and long-term receptor activity.

The role of members of the pertussis toxin-sensitive family of G proteins in coupling receptors to the activation of the G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium channel

Inwardly rectifying potassium (K(+)) channels gated by G proteins (Kir3.x family) are widely distributed in neuronal, atrial, and endocrine tissues and play key roles in generating late inhibitory postsynaptic potentials, slowing the heart rate and modulating hormone release. They are directly activated by G(betagamma) subunits released from G protein heterotrimers of the G(i/o) family upon appropriate receptor stimulation. Here we examine the role of isoforms of pertussis toxin (PTx)-sensitive G protein alpha subunits (G(ialpha1-3) and G(oalphaA)) in mediating coupling between various receptor systems (A(1), alpha(2A), D(2S), M(4), GABA(B)1a+2, and GABA(B)1b+2) and the cloned counterpart of the neuronal channel (Kir3.1+3.2A). The expression of mutant PTx-resistant G(i/oalpha) subunits in PTx-treated HEK293 cells stably expressing Kir3.1+3.2A allows us to selectively investigate that coupling. We find that, for those receptors (A(1), alpha(2A)) known to interact with all isoforms, G(ialpha1-3) and G(oalphaA) can all support a significant degree of coupling to Kir3.1+3.2A. The M(4) receptor appears to preferentially couple to G(ialpha2) while another group of receptors (D(2S), GABA(B)1a+2, GABA(B)1b+2) activates the channel predominantly through G(betagamma) liberated from G(oA) heterotrimers. Interestingly, we have also found a distinct difference in G protein coupling between the two splice variants of GABA(B)1. Our data reveal selective pathways of receptor activation through different G(i/oalpha) isoforms for stimulation of the G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K(+) channel.

New perspectives for the development of selective metabotropic glutamate receptor ligands

The metabotropic glutamate receptors are GTP-binding-protein (G-protein) coupled receptors that play important roles in regulating the activity of many synapses in the central nervous system. As such, these receptors are involved in a wide number of physiological and pathological processes. Within the last few years, new potent and selective agonists and antagonists as well as radioligands acting on these receptors have been developed. Molecular modeling studies revealed the structural features of the glutamate binding site, and will be useful for the design of more selective and potent ligands. More interestingly, recent data revealed new regulatory sites on the receptor protein, able either to decrease or potentiate the action of the endogenous ligand. No doubt that in the near future a multitude of new tools to modulate the activity of these receptors will be discovered, enabling the identification of the possible therapeutic applications for these new neuroactive molecules.

Mutagenesis and modeling of the GABAB receptor extracellular domain support a venus flytrap mechanism for ligand binding

The gamma-aminobutyric acid type B (GABAB) receptor is distantly related to the metabotropic glutamate receptor-like family of G-protein-coupled receptors (family 3). Sequence comparison revealed that, like metabotropic glutamate receptors, the extracellular domain of the two GABAB receptor splice variants possesses an identical region homologous to the bacterial periplasmic leucine-binding protein (LBP), but lacks the cysteine-rich region common to all other family 3 receptors. A three-dimensional model of the LBP-like domain of the GABAB receptor was constructed based on the known structure of LBP. This model predicts that four of the five cysteine residues found in this GABAB receptor domain are important for its correct folding. This conclusion is supported by analysis of mutations of these Cys residues and a decrease in the thermostability of the binding site after dithiothreitol treatment. Additionally, Ser-246 was found to be critical for CGP64213 binding. Interestingly, this residue aligns with Ser-79 of LBP, which forms a hydrogen bond with the ligand. The mutation of Ser-269 was found to differently affect the affinity of various ligands, indicating that this residue is involved in the selectivity of recognition of GABAB receptor ligands. Finally, the mutation of two residues, Ser-247 and Gln-312, was found to increase the affinity for agonists and to decrease the affinity for antagonists. Such an effect of point mutations can be explained by the Venus flytrap model for receptor activation. This model proposes that the initial step in the activation of the receptor by agonist results from the closure of the two lobes of the binding domain.

Extreme C terminus of G protein alpha-subunits contains a site that discriminates between Gi-coupled metabotropic glutamate receptors

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGlu receptors), the Ca2+-sensing receptor, gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptors, and one group of pheromone receptors constitute a unique family (also called family 3) of heptahelical receptors. This original family shares no sequence similarity with any other G protein-coupled receptors. The identification and comparison of the molecular determinants of receptor/G protein coupling within the different receptor families may help identify general rules involved in this protein/protein interaction. In order to detect possible contact sites important for coupling selectivity between family 3 receptors and the G protein alpha-subunits, we examined the coupling of the cyclase-inhibiting mGlu2 and mGlu4 receptors to chimeric alphaq-subunits bearing the 5 extreme C-terminal amino acid residues of either Galphai, Galphao, or Galphaz. Whereas mGlu4 receptor activated all three chimeric G proteins, mGlu2 receptor activated Galphaqi and Galphaqo but not Galphaqz. The mutation of isoleucine -4 of Galphaqz into cysteine was sufficient to recover coupling of the mutant G protein to mGlu2 receptor. Moreover, the mutation of cysteine -4 of Galphaqo into isoleucine was sufficient to suppress the coupling to mGlu2 receptor. Mutations at positions -5 and -1 had an effect on coupling efficiency, but not selectivity. Our results emphasize the importance of the residue -4 of the alpha-subunits in their specific interaction to heptahelical receptors by extending this finding on the third family of G protein-coupled receptors.

Mediation of cyclic AMP signaling by the first intracellular loop of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor

The gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor, which is a unique G protein-coupled receptor without a C-terminal cytoplasmic domain, activates both inositol phosphate (InsP) and cAMP signaling responses. The function of the highly basic first intracellular (1i) loop of the GnRH receptor in signal transduction was evaluated by mutating selected residues located in its N and C termini. Replacements of Leu58, Lys59, Gln61, and Lys62 at the N terminus, and Leu73, Ser74, and Leu80 at the C terminus, caused no change in binding affinity. The agonist-induced InsP and cAMP responses of the Q61E and K59Q,K62Q receptors were also unaffected, but the L58A receptor showed a normal InsP response and an 80% decrease in cAMP production. At the C terminus, the InsP response of the L73R receptor was normal, but cAMP production was reduced by 80%. The EC50 for GnRH-induced InsP responses of the S74E and L80A receptors was increased by about one order of magnitude, and the cAMP responses were essentially abolished. These findings indicate that cAMP signaling from the GnRH receptor is dependent on specific residues in the 1i loop that are not essential for activation of the phosphoinositide signaling pathway.