Evaluation of platelet activation in depressed patients with ischemic heart disease after paroxetine or nortriptyline treatment

Pharmacologic treatment of depression in patients with heart disease

The relationship between depression and cardiovascular disease is complex and multifaceted. There is a growing body of evidence that depression significantly and adversely affects cardiovascular health. Perhaps the most prominent finding is the documented increase in mortality rate in patients with depression after myocardial infarction. The critical questions of interest to both the clinician and researcher are whether there are safe and effective treatments for depression in patients with heart disease and whether treatment of depression reduces the increased risk of cardiac morbidity and mortality. Although the data are limited and are primarily from open or comparator trials, the tricyclics (TCAs) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) are effective for treatment of depression in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD), and response rates are comparable with those reported in depressed patients without heart disease. In terms of safety, the TCAs are associated with documented adverse cardiovascular effects, including increases in heart rate, orthostatic hypotension, and conduction delays. Use of TCAs in patients with IHD carries a proven increased risk of cardiac morbidity and perhaps of mortality as well. The SSRI appear to be relatively safe and effective in the treatment for depression in patients with comorbid IHD.

Negative impact of depression on outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease: mechanisms, treatment considerations, and future directions

Depressive symptoms are common in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients, and are associated with increased cardiac risk. Although an important relation exists between depression and CAD prognosis, the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are poorly understood. Additionally, evidence including the recently published ENRICHD (Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Patients) trial suggests that depression treatments do not lower recurrent cardiac risk. The reason for the observed lack of benefit with depression treatment in CAD patients is unclear. In this review, we discuss the impact of depression in CAD patients, the possible mechanisms involved, the studies that have examined the effects of psychological and antidepressant therapies on recurrent cardiac events, and the direction that future research should take.

Depression, alterations in platelet function, and ischemic heart disease

Platelets, the smallest corpuscular component of human blood, are central to various crucial biologic pathways in the human body. Diminished platelet function is thought to contribute to the increased risk of ischemic heart disease in patients with major depressive disorder, and to the increased morbidity and diminished survival of depressed patients after an index myocardial infarction. We reviewed both recent studies that evaluated platelet function in various patient groups and recent information regarding the potential beneficial effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on platelet reactivity.

Can SSRIs reduce the risk of preeclampsia in pregnant, depressed patients?

Preeclampsia causes substantial morbidity and mortality. A significant part of the etiology of preeclampsia involves endothelial damage and platelet activation and in this way can be conceived as an illness with a pathophysiology similar to coronary artery disease. Depression is an independent risk factor for the progression of cardiovascular disease [Am Heart J 140 (2000) S57] and there is evidence to suggest that it may be a risk factor for preeclampsia as well. SSRIs have been shown to reduce the progression of coronary artery disease, independent of improvement in mood. SSRIs may also reduce risk factors for preeclampsia in addition to treating depression in pregnancy. This is an important area for further research.

Why is depression bad for the failing heart? A review of the mechanistic relationship between depression and heart failure

BACKGROUND

Depression is 4 to 5 times as common in heart failure (HF) patients as in the general population, might confer a higher risk of developing HF, and negatively affects prognosis in established HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A review was undertaken via Medline (1966-2003) and PsycINFO (1872-2003) searches using the subject headings "depressive disorder" and "heart failure, congestive." Our findings suggest that the link between depression and HF may be due to shared pathophysiology. Depression may augment catecholamine release, arrhythmias, elaboration of proinflammatory cytokines, and platelet activation--processes that may influence prognosis in HF. Depression is also associated with a higher risk of noncompliance and lower levels of social support, which have been shown to worsen prognosis in HF. The impact of pharmacologic or behavioral treatment for depression on physiologic parameters or clinical outcomes in HF remains unclear. Inherent difficulties in recognition of depression in the setting of HF may decrease the likelihood that depressed patients receive the treatment they need.

CONCLUSIONS

Depression is common in HF, may contribute to the development of HF in susceptible populations, and is independently predictive of poor clinical outcomes. Pathophysiologic pathways and psychosocial issues that are shared between the 2 conditions might explain these observations and represent potential therapeutic targets. Vigilant attention to the recognition and treatment of depression in HF patients is warranted.

Whole blood serotonin and platelet activation in depressed post-myocardial infarction patients

Depression is an independent risk factor for post myocardial infarction (MI) mortality. Abnormalities in platelet function have been proposed as one of the mechanisms involved in increased cardiovascular risk among patients with depression post-MI. Depression in somatically healthy patients has been associated with increased platelet activation. Some but not all studies showed changes in blood serotonin level. Increased platelet activation and blood serotonin level have been associated with increased risk of cardiac events in patients with MI. The goal of this study was to investigate whether 1) depressed post-MI patients have higher markers of platelet activation as measured by plasma levels of beta-thromboglobulin (betaTG), platelet factor 4 (PF4) and soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) and higher serotonin (5-HT) levels than non-depressed post-MI patients and 2) treatment with the antidepressant mirtazapine decreases platelet activation. In this study, 25 depressed post-MI patients were asked for blood collection before start as well as after 8 weeks treatment with mirtazapine or placebo. The control group (n=22) consisted of non-depressed post-MI patients, matched for age, gender and time elapsed since MI. Plasma levels of betaTG, PF4 and sCD40L were not statistically different between the groups, but 5-HT levels were significantly higher in depressed patients. Treatment with mirtazapine resulted in a non-significant decrease in betaTG and PF4 and platelet 5-HT levels. Platelet and whole blood 5-HT, but not platelet activation was significantly increased in depressed post-MI patients. Treatment with mirtazapine showed a non-significant decrease in platelet activation and platelet 5-HT.

Platelets and anti-platelet therapy

Platelets play a central role in the hemostatic process and consequently are similarly involved in the pathological counterpart, thrombosis. They adhere to various subendothelial proteins, exposed either by injury or disease, and subsequently become activated by the thrombogenic surface or locally produced agonists. These activated platelets aggregate to form a platelet plug, release agonists which recruit more platelets to the growing thrombus, and provide a catalytic surface for thrombin generation and fibrin formation. These platelet-rich thrombi are responsible for the acute occlusion of stenotic vessels and ischemic injury to heart and brain. A range of anti-platelet drugs are currently used, both prophylactically and therapeutically, in regimens to manage thrombo-embolic disorders. These include inhibitors of the generation, or effects, of locally produced agonists; several large clinical trials have supported roles for cyclooxygenase inhibitors, which prevent thromboxane generation, and thienopyridine derivatives, which antagonize ADP receptors. Similarly intravenous alpha IIb beta 3 antagonists have been shown to be effective anti-thrombotics, albeit in highly selective situations; in contrast, to date studies with their oral counterparts have been disappointing. Recent advances in understanding of platelet physiology have suggested several novel, if yet untested, targets for anti-platelet therapy. These include the thrombin receptor, the serotonin handling system, and the leptin receptor.

Platelet hyperactivity in clinical depression and the beneficial effect of antidepressant drug treatment: how strong is the evidence?

OBJECTIVE

Platelet hyperactivity is thought to contribute to the increased coronary artery disease (CAD) risk in depression. This study reviewed the evidence for hyperactive platelets and for effects of antidepressant drug treatment on platelet 'stickiness' in clinical depression.

METHOD

By means of PubMed electronic library search, 34 studies in English were identified (1983-2003) and critically reviewed.

RESULTS

In depression, flow cytometry studies allowing detection of subtle platelet activation states consistently found at least one platelet activation marker to be increased, while the bulk of platelet aggregation studies did not suggest increased platelet aggregability. Platelets seem to be more activated in depressed patients with CAD than in depressed individuals without CAD. The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors normalized platelet hyperactivity in four studies.

CONCLUSION

Data on platelet activity in depression are inconclusive. To resolve this issue and its clinical implications, studies in larger sample sizes controlling for confounders of platelet functioning and prospectively designed are needed.

Paroxetine controlled release

A controlled-release (CR) formulation of the SSRI paroxetine has been developed. This CR formulation delays the release of paroxetine until the tablet has passed through the stomach; the drug is then released over 4-5 hours. In well designed placebo-controlled trials in patients with major depressive disorder (including a study in the elderly), social anxiety disorder or premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD), paroxetine CR was consistently superior to placebo with regards to primary endpoints (i.e. mean Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression total score [major depressive disorder], Liebowitz social anxiety scale total score and Clinical Global Impressions-Global Improvement score [social anxiety disorder] and Visual Analogue Scale-Mood score [PMDD]). The duration of treatment was 12 weeks or, in PMDD, over three menstrual cycles (intermittent or continuous administration). Paroxetine CR also demonstrated efficacy in three well designed studies in patients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia. Paroxetine CR was generally well tolerated in clinical trials, with an adverse-event profile typical of SSRIs, although recipients of paroxetine CR experienced significantly less nausea than recipients of immediate-release paroxetine in the first week of treatment.

Geriatric depression and vascular diseases: what are the links?

BACKGROUND

The term "vascular depression" has been proposed to describe a subset of depressive disorders that occurs in old age as a consequence of cerebrovascular disease. However, depression has been shown to result from other cardiovascular diseases such as coronary heart diseases, as well as to precipitate, worsen or precede vascular diseases. Depression also increases the likelihood of the incidence of vascular risk factors such as diabetes.

AIMS

To review clinical and epidemiological evidence linking geriatric depression and vascular diseases, and to discuss the potential mechanisms that could underlie this association.

METHOD

Systematic review of the literature of the last 5 years through Medline database search.

RESULTS

Papers report the following potential ways of association: (1) there is a direct influence of vascular disease, in particular, arteriosclerosis, on the incidence of depression; (2) depressive disorders have a direct impact on the cardiovascular system; (3) depression and vascular disease share either a common pathophysiological process or genetic determinants.

DISCUSSION

Depression can be understood as the direct consequence of brain damage in neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson's or Huntington's diseases. Similarly, vascular depression is mostly considered to be the consequence of microvascular lesions on prefrontal and subcortical regions. However, this functional neuroanatomical model offers no explanation for cases where depression has been shown to precede vascular diseases. Since cardiovascular diseases develop in a context of acquired environmental factors together with genetically determined disease, it may be postulated that geriatric depression could both result from brain lesions of vascular origin and also share some pathogenic or genetic determinants.

Effect of mental and physical stress on platelet activation markers in depressed patients and healthy subjects: a pilot study

Depression represents an independent risk factor for developing ischemic heart disease, with platelet hyperactivity possibly serving as an important mediator of this association. In this pilot study we analyzed platelet surface activation markers in response to two stimuli, mental stress and physical activity. Using flow cytometry, we quantified the presence of two functional activation-dependent glycoprotein receptors on platelets' surface (P-selectin, GP53). Platelet reactivity was assessed as the difference in markers' fluorescence intensity before and after stimulation. We included 10 depressed psychiatric inpatients and 10 age- and sex-matched healthy subjects in our study. There was a significant rise in platelet activation markers in both groups associated with the stress protocol. When the effect of stressors was analyzed separately, strenuous physical activity was found to lead to a significant rise in platelet activation markers in depressed patients but not in healthy subjects, although values indicated a higher baseline level of activation in healthy subjects. These preliminary results lend partial support to the hypothesis of an exaggerated platelet reactivity after physical activity in depression, thus possibly contributing to an increased cardiovascular risk in this disorder.

Should selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors be prescribed to all patients with ischemic heart disease?

Recent studies have uncovered more and more evidence demonstrating the adverse relationship between depression and ischemic heart disease. One of the most significant mechanisms that may explain the adverse relationship is the increased platelet activity, otherwise known as aggregation, observed to occur in patients with depression or ischemic heart disease. Platelet activity is further elevated in patients with depression and ischemic heart disease. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are antidepressants and also act like platelet inhibitors. The results of large-scale clinical trials suggest that the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors may reduce cardiac events in post-myocardial infarction patients or in those with unstable angina that may be related to the effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on platelet aggregation.

Effects of depressive symptoms and anxiety on hemostatic responses to acute mental stress and recovery in the elderly

Depression and anxiety are prospectively associated with cardiac morbidity and mortality. Increased clotting diathesis may mediate this link. We hypothesized that there would be an association between mood and hemostatic changes that occur during and following recovery from acute mental stress. Forty-eight community-dwelling elderly subjects underwent a laboratory speech stressor task. Plasma von Willebrand factor (vWF), thrombin/antithrombin III (TAT) complexes, D-dimer, tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA), and type I plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) were measured at rest, after conclusion of the speech, and 14 min afterwards (recovery). Mood was assessed with the Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression (Ham-D) and Anxiety (Ham-A). Mental stress elicited a hypercoagulable state as evidenced by increases in TAT and D-dimer, and by a decrease in t-PA. Overall, hypercoagulability had increased after recovery. Ham-D scores and Ham-A scores correlated with increases in D-dimer over the testing interval (i.e. area under the curve). Ham-A (but not Ham-D) uniquely explained 8% and 17% of the variance in resting D-dimer and D-dimer area under the curve, respectively. The independent association of anxiety symptoms with resting and stress-induced fibrin formation (D-dimer) may be a mechanism linking mood with cardiovascular disease risk in the elderly.

Mental health issues associated with cardiovascular disease in women

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in women and men. However, cardiovascular disease and its treatment affect women differently. Much data is emerging regarding the role that mood and anxiety disorders play in the development and prognosis of cardiovascular disease. Pharmacologic treatment of psychiatric disorders can also have direct cardiac effects. The good news is that many more studies are exploring this. However, further research is clearly needed, especially in the area of reproductive hormones and their impact on cardiac disease.

Increased coronary events in depressed cardiovascular patients: 5-HT2A receptor as missing link?

OBJECTIVE

Major depressive disorder and depressive symptoms have been identified as independent risk factors for cardiac morbidity and mortality in patients with ischemic heart disease. Increased susceptibility to platelet activation has been proposed as one of the mechanisms by which depression acts as a significant risk factor for thrombotic events. In this review, data on platelet activation and platelet aggregation measures in depressed patients with or without concomitant cardiovascular disease are given. Data on the influence of antidepressants on parameters of platelet activation are summarized.

METHODS

A literature search was done by checking MEDLINE Advanced and PsycInfo from 1990 to 2003 and through checking the bibliographies of these sources. The following key words were used for this search: platelet activation, platelet aggregation, depression, depressive disorder, ischemic heart disease, calcium, and serotonin.

RESULTS

There is an indication of enhanced platelet activation and aggregation in depressed patients. Next, patients with a depressive disorder show signs of a hyperactive platelet 5-HT2A receptor signal transduction system as measured by increased platelet calcium mobilization after stimulation of platelets with serotonin.

CONCLUSIONS

Depression appears to be associated with an increased susceptibility for serotonin-mediated platelet activation. Upregulation and/or increased sensitivity of 5-HT2A/1B receptors and downregulated 5-HT transporter receptors in the periphery may contribute to increased risk of thromboembolic events in patients with depression and cardiovascular disease. Increased platelet reactivity based on a hyperreactive 5-HT2A receptor signaling system might be influenced by antidepressive medication that antagonizes platelet 5-HT2A receptors.

Treatment of depression in patients with heart disease

There is a growing body of evidence that depression significantly and adversely affects cardiovascular health. Perhaps the most prominent finding is the documented increase in mortality rate in patients with depression after myocardial infarction. The critical questions of interest to both the clinician and researcher are whether there are safe and effective treatments for depression in patients with heart disease and whether treatment of depression reduces the increased risk of cardiac morbidity and mortality. Though the data are limited and are primarily from open or comparator trials, the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and specific psychotherapies appear to be effective for treatment of depression in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD), and response rates are comparable to those reported in depressed patients without heart disease; however, there has been only one placebo-controlled trial to date, and therefore it is premature to come to definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of antidepressant therapies in this patient population. With respect to safety, the TCAs are associated with documented adverse cardiovascular effects, including increases in heart rate, orthostatic hypotension, and conduction delays. Use of TCAs in patients with IHD carries a proven increased risk of cardiac morbidity and perhaps of mortality as well. The SSRIs appear to be relatively safe and effective treatment for depression in patients with comorbid IHD.

Depression and cardiovascular disease: mechanisms of interaction

This article explores the relationship between depression and cardiovascular disease from a mechanistic standpoint. Depression and cardiovascular disease are two of the most prevalent health problems in the United States and are the two leading causes of disability both in the United States and worldwide. Although depression is a known risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease, as well as an independent predictor of poor prognosis following a cardiac event, the mechanistic relationship between the two remains unclear. Depression is associated with changes in an individual's health status that may influence the development and course of cardiovascular disease, including noncompliance with medical recommendations, as well as the presence of cardiovascular risk factors such as smoking and hypertension. In addition, depression is associated with physiologic changes, including nervous system activation, cardiac rhythm disturbances, systemic and localized inflammation, and hypercoagulability, that negatively influence the cardiovascular system. Further, stress may be an underlying trigger that leads to the development of both depression and cardiovascular disease. This article reviews seven potential mechanisms for the relationship between depression and cardiovascular disease and presents the available evidence surrounding each mechanism. Finally, future directions for research are discussed.

Paroxetine-induced increase in metabolic end products of nitric oxide

Decreased production of endothelium-derived nitric oxide has been implicated in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases. Metabolic end products of nitric oxide (NO(x)) are often used as markers for endothelial nitric oxide production in humans. Decreased endothelium-derived nitric oxide has been suggested to mediate some of the deleterious effects of conventional cardiovascular risk factors such as hypercholesterolemia, smoking, and physical inactivity. A substantial number of patients with cardiovascular diseases suffer from comorbid major depressive disorder, which is a predictor of a poorer cardiovascular outcome. Paroxetine is a first-line antidepressant and has been reported to decrease plasma NO(x), theoretically suggesting a potential deleterious effect on the cardiovascular system. We assessed the hypothesis that paroxetine would induce a decrease in plasma NO(x) in healthy volunteers. Plasma NO(x) levels were measured by chemiluminescence at baseline, after 8 weeks of paroxetine administration, and at postdiscontinuation. Contrary to our hypothesis, we found that paroxetine administration induced a significant increase in NO(x) that normalized after paroxetine discontinuation. It remains to be demonstrated that the paroxetine-induced increase in NO(x) is associated with a modification of the cardiovascular risk in patients with major depressive disorder.

Clinical and health services relationships between major depression, depressive symptoms, and general medical illness

Patients with chronic medical illness have a high prevalence of major depressive illness. Major depression may decrease the ability to habituate to the aversive symptoms of chronic medical illness, such as pain. The progressive decrements in function associated with many chronic medical illnesses may cause depression, and depression is associated with additive functional impairment. Depression is also associated with an approximately 50% increase in medical costs of chronic medical illness, even after controlling for severity of physical illness. Increasing evidence suggests that both depressive symptoms and major depression may be associated with increased morbidity and mortality from such illnesses as diabetes and heart disease. The adverse effect of major depression on health habits, such as smoking, diet, over-eating, and sedentary lifestyle, its maladaptive effect on adherence to medical regimens, as well as direct adverse physiologic effects (i.e., decreased heart rate variability, increased adhesiveness of platelets) may explain this association with increased morbidity and mortality.

Broken heart: depression in cardiovascular disease

Heart disease and depression are among the most common diseases seen in developed countries. The relation-ship between heart disease and depression has been the subject of both popular interest and scientific research. Sadness is often portrayed as a feeling of heaviness in the chest or as a "broken heart." Interestingly as we learn more about the expression of emotions, it appears that these perceptions may simply be the language representation of somatic feelings. Large, prospective, longitudinal studies that have examined the relationship between depression and development of coronary artery disease (CAD) have shown that depression is a risk factor for the development of CAD. Depression also increases mortality in patients with stable CAD or myocardial infarction compared with patients without depression. The recent Sertraline AntiDepressant HeARt attack Trial (SADHART) has shown that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors like sertraline can be safely used in patients with depression following myocardial infarction. There is also intriguing evidence that treating depression with antidepressants may improve outcomes, including mortality.

Are psychosocial factors associated with the pathogenesis and consequences of cardiovascular disease in the elderly?

It is well known that older individuals are at higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). In addition, evidence exists for the relationship between psychosocial factors and the pathogenesis and cognitive consequences of CVD. However, less is known about the effect of psychosocial factors on the development and consequences of CVD in older individuals. Using a biopsychosocial framework, this article examines the influence of psychosocial factors, specifically depression, anxiety, and social isolation on older persons with CVD as well as the influence of CVD on psychosocial factors. The effectiveness of interventions for modifying adverse psychosocial factors is also discussed.

Safety of antidepressant drugs in the patient with cardiac disease: a review of the literature

Patients with cardiac disease, specifically ischemic heart disease and heart failure, have a higher frequency of major depressive disorder than patients without cardiac disease. The pathophysiologic reason for this is not completely understood. Previous depression, other debilitating illnesses, and type A personality are risk factors for the development of depression in cardiac patients. Depression has been shown to lower the threshold for ventricular arrhythmias. Therefore, treatment of depression potentially may prolong life in these patients. Antidepressant options that have been evaluated include several of the tricyclic antidepressants, trazodone, bupropion, and several of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Individual antidepressant drugs vary in their pharmacologic activity and side-effect profiles. Although clinical data are limited, it is important to individualize therapy in order to minimize cardiac adverse effects. Clinicians are encouraged to evaluate patients with cardiac disease for major depressive disorder and to consider antidepressant drug therapy for these patients when appropriate.

Platelet surface glycoprotein expression in post-stroke depression: a preliminary study

Depression is a significant risk factor for and consequence of both cardiovascular disease and stroke. The pathophysiological processes underlying this association are poorly understood. This study utilised a technique for measurement of whole blood platelet surface glycoproteins involved in early adhesion and aggregation in sample populations of patients with depression and stroke, and healthy controls. We analysed the platelet surface glycoproteins GPIb and GPIIbIIIa using flow cytometry in eight depressed subjects (Hamilton depression score >17), 14 post-stroke subjects (seven depressed and seven non-depressed), and in eight healthy control subjects. The number of GPIb receptors was significantly increased in subjects with depression and in post-stroke subjects compared to control subjects. The number of GPIb receptors from post-stroke subjects was not significantly different from that of depressed subjects. There were no differences between any groups in measures of GPIIbIIIa receptor numbers. No additive effect of co-morbid depression on the surface expression level of either marker could be detected in the post-stroke subjects. Platelet dysfunction may be involved in the pathophysiological process underlying the association between depression and cerebrovascular disease.

Does increased platelet release of Abeta peptide contribute to brain abnormalities in individuals with depression?

Increased platelet activation with release of procoagulant factors from their alpha granules has been demonstrated in individuals with major depression. Platelet activation has also been shown to be associated with release of beta-amyloid peptides, which have been implicated in Alzheimer's disease. Thus, we are hypothesizing that sustained elevations of Abeta peptides might occur in individuals with recurrent depression. We further hypothesize that such elevations contribute to brain abnormalities in depressed individuals through the formation of neurotoxic oligomeric forms of Abeta peptides and amyloid deposition. We also propose that increased amyloid Abeta peptides from platelet activation may be a mechanism underlying the increased risk for cognitive impairment in nondepressed patients who have other reasons for such activation. If true, our hypothesis would imply that platelet inhibitors may have a role in preventing or delaying the neuronal consequences of disorders characterized by activated platelets.

Depression as a risk factor for cardiac mortality and morbidity: a review of potential mechanisms

Depression increases the risk of cardiac mortality and morbidity in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), but the mechanisms that underlie this association remain unclear. This review considers the evidence for several behavioral and physiological mechanisms that might explain how depression increases the risk for incident coronary disease and for subsequent cardiac morbidity and mortality. The candidate mechanisms include: (1). antidepressant cardiotoxicity; (2). association of depression with cardiac risk factors such as cigarette smoking, hypertension, diabetes, and reduced functional capacity; (3). association of depression with greater coronary disease severity; (4). nonadherence to cardiac prevention and treatment regimens; (5). lower heart rate variability (HRV) reflecting altered cardiac autonomic tone; (6). increased platelet aggregation; and (7). inflammatory processes. Despite recent advances in our understanding of these potential mechanisms, further research is needed to determine how depression increases risk for cardiac morbidity and mortality.

Polymorphism of the serotonin transporter: implications for the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are used to treat a number of psychiatric disorders related to mood and anxiety, and variations in the serotonin transporter (5-HTT) gene may be involved in a number of these. A polymorphic site in the promoter region is associated with differences in 5-HTT gene expression. Studies suggest that the short allele of the 5-HTT promoter (5-HTTPR) site can adversely influence the antidepressant response to SSRIs, and is associated with anxiety-related traits, depression, and impulsive disorders such as alcohol abuse. Several studies do not replicate these findings; potential confounding factors include age, gender, and population stratification. Other 5-HTT polymorphisms also exist. For example, individuals with the short allele of a variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) polymorphism, located in the second intron, may have reduced responsiveness to SSRIs, and the STin2.12 allele at this site has been associated with bipolar disorder. Findings both supporting and inconsistent with these conclusions are reviewed. The clinical effects of the polymorphisms may be associated with effects on platelets, neural 5-HTT levels, and indices of serotonergic function.

Spotlight on paroxetine in psychiatric disorders in adults

Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), with antidepressant and anxiolytic activity. In 6- to 24-week well designed trials, oral paroxetine 10 to 50 mg/day was significantly more effective than placebo, at least as effective as tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and as effective as other SSRIs and other antidepressants in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Relapse or recurrence over 1 year after the initial response was significantly lower with paroxetine 10 to 50 mg/day than with placebo and similar to that with imipramine 50 to 275 mg/day. The efficacy of paroxetine 10 to 40 mg/day was similar to that of TCAs and fluoxetine 20 to 60 mg/day in 6- to 12-week trials in patients aged > or = 60 years with major depression. Paroxetine 10 to 40 mg/day improved depressive symptoms to an extent similar to that of TCAs in patients with comorbid illness, and was more effective than placebo in the treatment of dysthymia and minor depression. Paroxetine 20 to 60 mg/day was more effective than placebo after 8 to 12 weeks' treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), panic disorder, social anxiety disorder (social phobia), generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Improvement was maintained or relapse was prevented for 24 weeks to 1 year in patients with OCD, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder or GAD. The efficacy of paroxetine was similar to that of other SSRIs in patients with OCD and panic disorder and similar to that of imipramine but greater than that of 2'chlordesmethyldiazepam in patients with GAD. Paroxetine is generally well tolerated in adults, elderly individuals and patients with comorbid illness, with a tolerability profile similar to that of other SSRIs. The most common adverse events with paroxetine were nausea, sexual dysfunction, somnolence, asthenia, headache, constipation, dizziness, sweating, tremor and decreased appetite. In conclusion, paroxetine, in common with other SSRIs, is generally better tolerated than TCAs and is a first-line treatment option for major depressive disorder, dysthymia or minor depression. Like other SSRIs, paroxetine is also an appropriate first-line therapy for OCD, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, GAD and PTSD. Notably, paroxetine is the only SSRI currently approved for the treatment of social anxiety disorder and GAD, which makes it the only drug of its class indicated for all five anxiety disorders in addition to major depressive disorder. Thus, given the high degree of psychiatric comorbidity of depression and anxiety, paroxetine is an important first-line option for the treatment of major depressive disorder, OCD, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, GAD and PTSD.

Paroxetine: an update of its use in psychiatric disorders in adults

Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), with antidepressant and anxiolytic activity. In 6- to 24-week well designed trials, oral paroxetine 10 to 50 mg/day was significantly more effective than placebo, at least as effective as tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and as effective as other SSRIs and other antidepressants in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Relapse or recurrence over 1 year after the initial response was significantly lower with paroxetine 10 to 50 mg/day than with placebo and similar to that with imipramine 50 to 275 mg/day. The efficacy of paroxetine 10 to 40 mg/day was similar to that of TCAs and fluoxetine 20 to 60 mg/day in 6- to 12-week trials in patients aged > or =60 years with major depression. Paroxetine 10 to 40 mg/day improved depressive symptoms to an extent similar to that of TCAs in patients with comorbid illness, and was more effective than placebo in the treatment of dysthymia and minor depression. Paroxetine 20 to 60 mg/day was more effective than placebo after 8 to 12 weeks' treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), panic disorder, social anxiety disorder (social phobia), generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Improvement was maintained or relapse was prevented for 24 weeks to 1 year in patients with OCD, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder or GAD. The efficacy of paroxetine was similar to that of other SSRIs in patients with OCD and panic disorder and similar to that of imipramine but greater than that of 2'chlordesmethyldiazepam in patients with GAD. Paroxetine is generally well tolerated in adults, elderly individuals and patients with comorbid illness, with a tolerability profile similar to that of other SSRIs. The most common adverse events with paroxetine were nausea, sexual dysfunction, somnolence, asthenia, headache, constipation, dizziness, sweating, tremor and decreased appetite. In conclusion, paroxetine, in common with other SSRIs, is generally better tolerated than TCAs and is a first-line treatment option for major depressive disorder, dysthymia or minor depression. Like other SSRIs, paroxetine is also an appropriate first-line therapy for OCD, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, GAD and PTSD. Notably, paroxetine is the only SSRI currently approved for the treatment of social anxiety disorder and GAD, which makes it the only drug of its class indicated for all five anxiety disorders in addition to major depressive disorder. Thus, given the high degree of psychiatric comorbidity of depression and anxiety, paroxetine is an important first-line option for the treatment of major depressive disorder, OCD, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, GAD and PTSD.

Depression and heart disease: evidence of a link, and its therapeutic implications

Over several decades, a large body of evidence has emerged to suggest that depressive disorder is a risk factor for heart diseases, both aetiologically and prognostically. Several large, prospective, longitudinal studies have examined the relationship between depression and the development of coronary artery disease (CAD); they reveal that the relationship is significant and independent of conventional risk factors. Prognostic studies have shown that depression is associated with two to three times higher mortality after myocardial infarction, unstable angina or coronary artery bypass grafting, and in patients with stable CAD compared with such patients without depression. Depression also has been found to increase mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure, regardless of its aetiology. Such adverse associations persist after adjustment for conventional prognostic risk factors. Despite all of these findings, depressed patients with heart disease are less likely to be recognised clinically as being depressed than those patients who have depression but no heart disease. The very limited evidence available from pharmacological clinical trials raises concern about the safety of antidepressants in CAD and heart failure. In addition, no research has addressed whether the treatment of depression in patients with heart disease will improve their prognosis.

Management of Depression in Patients with Comorbid Cardiovascular Disease

Evidence suggests that depression commonly occurs in patients with cardiovascular disease and is associated with a poor prognosis including increased risk of cardiac mortality. Proposed pathophysiologic mechanisms include decreased heart rate variability, altered sympathetic and parasympathetic activity, increased ventricular instability, and abnormal platelet reactivity. Other proposed mechanisms involve the interference of depression with medication adherence and cardiac risk factor reduction. Despite this evidence, depression during cardiovascular disease is commonly unrecognized and inadequately treated. Tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) are efficacious for treating depression in this population but cause serious cardiac side effects and should be avoided in patients with significant cardiovascular disease. More recent studies with bupropion and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline) indicate that they are acceptable alternatives to TCAs with regard to cardiac risk in depressed patients with heart disease, although larger studies are needed to validate their safety and efficacy in this special population. There are 3 studies currently being conducted to investigate the effect of antidepressant therapy and/or psychotherapy on cardiac morbidity and mortality in post–myocardial infarction patients with depression and/or low social support. These studies will hopefully answer the long-posed question of whether appropriate treatment of depression can improve cardiac prognosis.

Increased platelet aggregability in major depression?

There is compelling evidence that depression constitutes an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. As exaggerated platelet reactivity is associated with an increased risk of intra-arterial thrombus formation, we studied platelet aggregability in patients with major depression both before and after 5 weeks of anti-depressant therapy as well as in healthy control subjects. Twenty-two depressed patients and 24 healthy control subjects participated in the study. Washed and rediluted platelets were stimulated with the agonists collagen and thrombin in three concentration steps. Depression was associated with a higher aggregability after stimulation with thrombin in the intermediate concentration and with collagen at the low concentration, with ceiling effects for the other concentrations. After 5 weeks of anti-depressant therapy, aggregability was somewhat less exaggerated, although this effect did not reach statistical significance. We thus conclude that major depression is associated with increased platelet aggregability, which seems to persist even under a marked improvement in depressive symptomatology. This effect may contribute to the increased cardiovascular morbidity in depressed patients.

Treatment of depression in comorbid medical illness

The rate of comorbid depression and medical illness varies from 10 to 40%. Over the years, there has been a paucity of studies completed despite the importance of knowing which antidepressants are the most effective and safest to use in comorbid states. In this review, focus is placed on disorders in these important areas: cardiovascular disease, neurological disorders, diabetes mellitus and cancer. Cardiovascular disease complications can be related in many cases to platelet clumping produced by medications; reductions in morbidity can be achieved by reducing platelet adhesiveness. Specific results have shown sertraline administration to be safe in the post myocardial infarction (MI) state. This is a time of depression-induced increases of 200-300% in mortality. Evidence for safe administration of bupropion, as well as the selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) fluoxetine and paroxetine, is also available. The appearance of major depression and diabetes mellitus has been successfully treated with fluoxetine, sertraline and nortriptyline (NTI), however, NTI may lead to a worsening of glucose indices due to its noradrenergic specificity. Regarding neurologic disorders, there is controlled data showing the safety and efficacy of citalopram, sertraline and fluoxetine in post stroke depression. Parkinson's disease has been associated frequently with depression, as might be expected from its characteristic dopamine deficient state. For perhaps the same reason, the agents that can block re-uptake of dopamine i.e., tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), have been effective in comorborbid depression with Parkinson's disease. In dementia, there is a paucity of information on new agents. However, double-blind data seems to show efficacy for sertraline, paroxetine and citalopram. There are few studies of cancer-related depression treated in a controlled fashion with antidepressants; imipramine, amitriptyline, fluoxetine, paroxetine, mirtazapine and mianserin (not available in the USA) all have support from some published studies.

Elevated P-selectin on platelets in depression: response to bupropion

Increased platelet activation has been suggested as a possible reason for the increased vulnerability of depressed patients to ischemic heart disease (IHD). Translocation of P-selectin, an integral alpha-granule membrane protein, to the platelet surface is a measure of platelet activation. Herein, western blots of platelet plasma membranes containing P-selectin were quantified in patients with major depression (n=19; mean age=39 +/- 2 years) and healthy comparison subjects (n=17; mean age=36 +/- 2 years). None evidenced clinical signs of IHD, and only two patients had a lifestyle IHD risk factor (smoking). Blood was obtained from all 19 depressed patients before treatment, and 15 returned after 6-8 weeks of open-label bupropion treatment. Bupropion was chosen as the antidepressant because it did not elevate plasma norepinephrine or serotonin, endogenous agonists that can induce platelet degranulation. Western blotting revealed more P-selectin immunoreactivity (75 kD band) in depressed patients compared to healthy controls (P=0.003). After bupropion treatment, P-selectin remained high in depressed patients. beta3-Integrin, a reference plasma membrane protein that does not translocate during activation, was of equivalent density in depressed patients and healthy control subjects, and was unchanged after treatment with bupropion. P-Selectin failed to correlate with severity of illness based on the Hamilton Depression scale, or with the post-treatment plasma concentration of bupropion. The results suggest an elevation in P-selectin on platelet plasma membranes might be a trait marker for depression.

Are platelets the link between depression and ischemic heart disease?

The role of platelets as the link between ischemic heart disease and depression is reviewed. Platelet function abnormalities, including increased platelet reactivity, may predispose depressed patients to clotting diatheses and may explain their vulnerability to cardiovascular disease. Platelet physiologic characteristics, influences on platelet response, and indicators of platelet reactivity are discussed. Measurements of platelet activation, secretion, and aggregation have enabled the study of platelet responses in patients with major depression. The findings of clinical trials evaluating platelet responses to antidepressant treatment are described, and recommendations for future studies are proposed.