The temporal profile of calcineurin inhibition by cyclosporine in vivo

Ciclosporin A tapering monitored by NFAT-regulated gene expression: a new concept of individual immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

The impact of long-term immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients with respect to safety and efficacy remains undetermined. Pharmacodynamic monitoring of the relative reduction of T-cell-specific gene expression in renal transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine A (CsA) was applied in this study.

METHODS

During the study, 20 stable renal transplant recipients with tapered CsA dose and 20 patients with stable CsA dose (matched for age, gender, CsA dose, time after transplantation) were compared for a median period of 18 months (range 6-44). CsA dose was tapered in two stages of 15% each, and the expression of the nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT)-regulated genes was determined by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction method at CsA trough level and 2 hr after oral uptake.

RESULTS

The initial residual gene expression at 2 hr after CsA intake increased from 6.31% (range 1.30-16.6) to 21.3% (range 6.58-31.8) in patients with CsA dosage reduction. In one patient, the residual gene expression increased more than 40% and resulted in a reversible Banff 1A rejection episode. Blood pressure was significantly lower after CsA dosage reduction (P<0.05). In the pair-matched control group NFAT-regulated gene expression was comparable before and after the follow-up period (7.45% [range 0.21-18.3] vs. 5.87% [range 0.66-13.2]; P=NS). Estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly worse in the control group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our observation suggests that the measurement of the relative gene expression in CsA-treated patients is a promising tool to monitor the CsA dosage reduction in long-term renal transplant patients. An increase in residual expression of NFAT-regulated gene expression may result in an acute rejection episode.

Variation in Leukocyte Subset Concentrations Affects Calcineurin Activity Measurement: Implications for Pharmacodynamic Monitoring Strategies

Background: In renal transplantation patients, therapeutic drug monitoring of the calcineurin (CN) inhibitor cyclosporin A (CsA) is mandatory because of the drug’s narrow therapeutic index. Pharmacodynamic monitoring of CN inhibition therapy could provide a tool to define and maintain the therapeutic efficacy of CsA therapy. We investigated the effect of variation in cell counts of leukocyte subsets on leukocyte CN activity measurement in renal transplant recipients.

Methods: We measured leukocyte CN activity, whole blood CsA concentrations, and leukocyte subset cell counts in 25 renal transplant recipients. Blood was collected before graft implantation and CsA therapy, 1 day before transplantation when CsA therapy was already started, and 5 days after transplantation. Monocyte, granulocyte, CD4+ T-cell, CD8+ T-cell, B-cell, and natural killer–cell CN activities and CsA inhibition sensitivities were determined in vitro by a spectrophotometric CN assay.

Results: Leukocyte CN activity was inhibited after drug intake. Inter- and intrapatient variation in leukocyte subset cell counts resulted in variation of sample composition. The mean (SD) CN activity varied among leukocyte cell subsets, ranging from 650 (230) to 166 (26) pmol/min/106 cells for monocytes and CD4+ T cells, respectively. CsA half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values ranged from 15 to 78 μg/L for monocytes and B cells, respectively.

Conclusion: Inter- and intraindividual leukocyte subset cell count variation can affect measured CN activity independent of CsA concentration. Cell-specific activity and drug sensitivity should be considered for sample validation to optimize method specificity when pharmacodynamic monitoring strategies are applied in a clinical setting.

Single time point measurement by C2 or C3 is highly predictive in cyclosporine area under the curve estimation immediately after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

The two h post-dose cyclosporine (CsA) concentration has been advocated as the optimal time point measurement for CsA area under the curve (AUC) estimation after solid organ transplantation. The aim of the study was to investigate whether intensified CsA monitoring is necessary, or if a single time point measurement is accurate to estimate the AUC in the very early period following lung transplantation (LuTX).

METHODS

Within the first two wk following transplantation, daily AUCs were calculated by serial CsA measurements at zero, one, two, three, four, and six h (C0-C6) in 12 consecutive lung transplant recipients. Correlation of single CsA measurements and AUC as well as linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the most predictive single CsA blood level regarding the AUC.

RESULTS

A total of 606 CsA concentration measurements were performed and the 101 corresponding AUCs were calculated for each patient. Mean AUC was 3443 +/- 1451 microg/L. C0: 361 +/- 118 microg/L, C1: 481 +/- 231 microg/L, C2: 682 +/- 314 microg/L, C3: 715 +/- 347 microg/L, C4: 658 +/- 271 microg/L, C6: 571 +/- 260 microg/L. The correlation of CsA serum levels with AUC was the lowest at trough levels (C0) with a correlation coefficient (r = 0.31) and highest at three h (C3: r = 0.89) and two h (C2: r = 0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

Similar to a stable post-transplant period, CsA trough levels turned out to have poor correlation with the corresponding AUC early after LuTX. The highest correlation of C3 with the AUC may be explained by delayed intestinal resorption immediately post-operative, however C2 is a peer parameter. Optimum AUCs and corresponding C2 or C3 levels in the immediate post-operative phase however remain to be determined.

A prospective cross-over study comparing the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine A and its metabolites after oral versus short-time intravenous cyclosporine A administration in pre-heart transplant patients

Sometimes intravenous administration of cyclosporine (CsA) is essential before oral administration is possible. There are only a few reports available on the interindividual variability of CsA metabolism and different metabolite pattern depending on intravenous versus oral administration of CsA in heart transplant (HTx) patients. For effective inhibition of calcineurin we used a short infusion reaching peak concentrations after 2 hours. In a prospective cross-over study we compared the pharmacokinetics of CsA and its metabolites after oral (2.0 mg/kg body weight) versus intravenous (0.7 mg/kg body weight; 2-hour infusion) CsA administration (single test dose) in 7 pre-HTx patients. The pharmacokinetic parameters of CsA and its metabolites were analyzed using high-pressure liquid chromatography. The pharmacokinetic parameter area under the concentration time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) of CsA after intravenous administration was significantly lower (2903 ng*h*mL(-1)) than that after oral administration (4344 ng*h*mL(-1); P=.01). Peak concentrations, time to peak concentration, and terminal elimination half life were not significantly different. Short-time infusion of CsA resulted in a significant decrease in the AUC of the metabolites AM1 (3-fold), AM9 (10-fold), and AM1c (3-fold). A 2-hour infusion of CsA is just as effective as oral administration and the reduced amount of metabolites is advantageous for the patient.

Monitoring of blood cyclosporine concentration in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Cyclosporine has been used for patients with nephrotic syndrome. Because of substantial inter- and intra-patient variability and a narrow therapeutic window, drug monitoring of cyclosporine is mandatory. To confirm the therapeutic effects of a cyclosporine microemulsion (CSAME), the absorption profile of the agent after preprandial administration was determined in steroid-resistant patients with refractory nephrotic syndrome.

METHODS

Fourteen patients were enrolled into the study (mean age, 31.2+/-12; 6 men, 8 women). The patients received 1.5 mg/kg of cyclosporine 30 minutes before breakfast for 6 months. Blood cyclosporine concentration was measured 5 times serially: before administration (C0) and at 1-hour intervals until 4 hours after administration of cyclosporine (C1-C4). In addition, area under the concentration-time curve from 0-4 hours (AUC0-4) was calculated.

RESULTS

After 6 months, CSAME showed marked improvement in proteinuria levels (8.3+/-4.8 g/day vs 0.8+/-0.4 g/day, p<0.001). No changes in serum creatinine and urea nitrogen levels were observed. In 83% of the patients, the CSAME peak concentration appeared within 1 hour after administration (C1). A strong positive correlation was noted between AUC0-4 and C1 (R2=0.90312) and C2 (R2=0.78431). The mean steroid (prednisolone) dose was 40 mg/day when CSAME treatment was started, but a lowering of the dose to 17.5 mg/day (p<0.001) was achieved at 6 months after CSAME therapy.

CONCLUSION

Preprandial administration of CSAME is effective in steroid-resistant patients with refractory nephrotic syndrome. C1 or C2, but not C0, was a good clinical marker for CSAME exposure.

Pharmacodynamic cyclosporine A-monitoring: relation of gene expression in lymphocytes to cyclosporine blood levels in cardiac allograft recipients

Recently, we established a pharmacodynamic assay to monitor immunosuppressive effectiveness of cyclosporine A (CsA) in patients on standard CsA regimen. The aim of the present study was to extend this correlation to reduced CsA regimen and to compare pharmacodynamic and kinetic parameters to allow prediction of rejections and infections. In 53 heart allograft recipients, nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT)-regulated gene expression was quantified at trough (C0) and 2-h post-CsA dose (C2). Gene expression at C2 was calculated relative to C0 (residual gene expression, RGE) or relative to a healthy reference group (absolute gene expression, AGE). RGE correlated with CsA C2-levels in bimodal fashion: above 575 ng/ml correlation was seen with flat regression gradient. Below 575 ng/ml, correlation was excellent with markedly steeper gradient. At C0 in the low-C2 group (<575 ng/ml), AGE remained unchanged, whereas in the high-C2 group (>575 ng/ml) AGE was markedly reduced. In both groups, AGE at C2 was strongly inhibited. In patients contracting infection during follow-up, RGE was lower than in those without infections independent of CsA levels. CsA-monitoring by quantitation of NFAT-regulated gene expression is feasible with standard and reduced CsA regimens. It correlates better with the incidence of infections than measurement of CsA concentrations and might help in avoiding over-immunosuppression.

Pharmacodynamic monitoring of the immunosuppressive therapy in patients after heart transplantation: Whole blood flow cytometric analysis of lymphocyte function

Despite therapeutic monitoring and daily measurements of blood concentrations (pharmacokinetics) of immunosuppressive medications, immunosuppressive therapy remains still a challenge after heart transplantation (HTx) due to drug interactions, toxicities and individual responses to drug effects. We established whole blood flow cytometric assays of lymphocyte function to assess the pharmacodynamics of immunosuppressive therapy and investigated both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic approaches after HTx. Our results showed that pharmacodynamic measurements provide a more direct assessment of the functional activity of immunosuppressants on immune cells compared to drug level monitoring alone. The information from both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic monitoring has the potential to increase the efficacy and safety of individual immunosuppressive therapy after HTx.

Taste-immunosuppression engram: Reinforcement and extinction

Several Pavlovian conditioning paradigms have documented the brain's abilities to sense immune-derived signals or immune status, associate them with concurrently relevant extereoceptive stimuli, and reinstate such immune responses on demand. Specifically, the naturalistic relation of food ingestion with its possible immune consequences facilitates taste-immune associations. Here we demonstrate that the saccharin taste can be associated with the immunosuppressive agent cyclosporine A, and that such taste-immune associative learning is subject to reinforcement. Furthermore, once consolidated, this saccharin-immunosuppression engram is resistant to extinction when avoidance behavior is assessed. More importantly, the more this engram is activated, either at association or extinction phases, the more pronounced is the conditioned immunosuppression.

Limitations of cyclosporine C2 monitoring in pediatric heart transplant recipients

Monitoring CSA levels at two h after dosing (C2) has been shown effective in providing adequate CSA-based immunosuppression in clinical trials in adult transplant recipients, but there is limited data regarding C2 monitoring in pediatric transplant recipients. Given the differences in CSA pharmacokinetics between children and adults, a cohort of stable pediatric transplant recipients was converted from monitoring CSA trough (C0) to C2 levels, to establish the clinical utility and safety of C2 monitoring. After an abbreviated AUC(0-5) to establish baseline exposure, subsequent CSA dosing was adjusted based on C2 levels. Additional evaluation included monitoring for rejection, changes in CSA dose, toxicity, serum chemistries, and infection. Twelve heart transplant recipients were enrolled, with mean age 4.8 yr (range: 0.6-14.0). All patients received microemulsified CSA (Neoral((R)); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ, USA) twice daily. Baseline CSA dose was 5.39 +/- 2.05 mg/kg/day (mean +/- s.d.), with mean C0 = 267 +/- 112, C2 = 1065 +/- 565, and AUC(0-5) = 3817 +/- 1435. Only seven participants showed clear CSA peak levels at two h, with five exhibiting delayed peaks at three to five h post-dose. These seven participants completed 48 wk of study, with mean CSA dose decreasing to 4.55 +/- 3.61 mg/kg/day, maintaining mean C2 599 +/- 211 (vs. target C2 = 800). No significant change in serum creatinine was observed, although GFR increased from 76.9 to 107.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (p = 0.11). Five patients failed to achieve target C2 levels (>800) during the first four wk, despite comparable AUC values, and were maintained on trough monitoring (C0). Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures fell slightly, three minor infections were noted during the study period, and one episode of acute rejection occurred, despite stable CSA dosing. Nearly 50% of stable pediatric transplant recipients failed to achieve adequate peak C2 CSA levels during conversion from C0 to C2 monitoring. Age-dependent differences in CSA absorption and/or clearance pharmacokinetics may explain these findings.

Cyclosporine A (CsA) 2-h concentrations vary between patients without correlation to graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Cyclosporine A (CsA) therapy based on 2-h concentrations (C2) after oral administration has demonstrated low acute rejection rates after solid organ transplantation. We analysed the correlation between C2 and trough (C0) levels of oral CsA therapy in samples obtained twice in consecutive weeks from 58 patients during their first admission for allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Also 8-h concentration curves were obtained from 23 patients. The mean (range) CsA dose was 332 (167-763) and 255 (113-575) mg/day for patients with matched unrelated donor (MUD) and human leukocyte antigen identical sibling donor (Sib), respectively. Median (range) C0 and C2 were 254 (145-332) and 898 (419-1466) ng/ml in MUD patients, and 130 (93-265) and 554 (196-988) ng/ml in Sib patients. In MUD patients with either aGVHD grade < II or > or = II, the median C2 were 915 (419-1466) and 890 (519-1399) ng/ml, respectively. In Sib patients with aGVHD grade < II or grade > or = II, the median C2 were 552 (404-718) and 539 (196-988) ng/ml, respectively. The median C2 levels were comparable in patients with or without severe infections. Interindividual variations in CsA uptake and metabolism may explain the wide variation of C2 levels without prediction for increased risk for severe aGVHD or infectious complication when C0 guided the CsA dosing.

[Individualized dosage regimen of immunosuppressive drugs based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis]

The calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus are widely used to prevent allograft rejection after transplantation. Since these drugs have narrow therapeutic windows and show considerable pharmacokinetic variability, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is essential to avoid adverse effects such as nephrotoxicity while maximizing immunosuppressive efficacy. On the other hand, some patients experience acute rejection episodes or postoperative complications despite achieving therapeutic blood drug levels. Therefore, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors by which to establish individualized dosage adjustment for these drugs should be identified. Recently, it was recognized that pharmacogenomics has the potential to facilitate personalized medicine by translating knowledge of human genome variability into rational therapeutics. In this paper, we review the population pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenomic analysis of tacrolimus, focusing on an efflux transporter P-glycoprotein (multidrug resistance 1 [MDR1/ABCB1]) and drug-metabolizing enzymes cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and 3A5, and describe Bayesian forecasting to individualize the tacrolimus dose in de novo living-donor liver transplant recipients. Furthermore, the pharmacodynamic properties of tacrolimus and cyclosporine, which were evaluated by measuring calcineurin phosphatase activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, are reviewed in relation to an optimal monitoring strategy as well as a rational dosage regimen for these drugs.

The Clinical Benefits of Cyclosporine C2-Level Monitoring: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Monitoring of cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) using 2-hour postdose (C2) levels is alleged to improve clinical outcomes, but the efficacy of this strategy is uncertain.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed for trials directly comparing patients monitored with C2 levels with those monitored by trough (C0) levels. Primary outcomes assessed were renal function and acute rejection.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies met the inclusion criteria. Only 10 of these were randomized controlled trials. Overall quality was poor and this precluded meta-analysis. The most consistent finding in de novo renal, hepatic, and cardiac transplant recipients is a higher mean cyclosporine dose in the early postoperative period in C2 monitored patients. There is no clear evidence that this leads to impaired renal function. In the majority of studies, the monitoring strategy had no significant effect on the rate of acute rejection. In stable transplant recipients, the majority of studies show a reduction in mean cyclosporine dose with adoption of C2 monitoring. No obvious clinical benefit was derived from this reduction in dose.

CONCLUSION

In de novo transplant patients, there is little evidence from prospective studies to support the theoretical benefits of C2 monitoring. Potential dose reductions in stable patients may reduce costs, but no short-term clinical benefit is seen. Quality of studies in this area is poor, and the practical limitations of C2 monitoring mean that further evidence is required before a strategy for the administration of cyclosporine based on C2 levels can be recommended.

Cyclosporine Trough (C0) and 2-Hour Postdose (C2) Levels: Which One Is a Predictor of Graft Loss?

BACKGROUND

Compared with conventionally measured trough level (C0), cyclosporine 2-hour postdose (C2) concentrations show a better correlation with the area under the curve and acute graft rejection.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the relationships of C0 and C2 with long-term graft survival among kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

In a case-control design, we selected 215 adult kidney recipients. Inclusion criteria were more than 18 years of age at transplantation and at least 6 months of follow-up. The case group consisted of patients with graft loss (n=17) and a control group, patients with functioning grafts (n=198). The C0 and C2 levels for the first 6 months posttransplantation, along with demographic and clinical data, were compared between the two groups using univariate analysis. P<.05 was considered to be significant.

RESULTS

The mean age at transplantation was 40.5 +/- 16.5 years. The mean follow-up duration was 18 +/- 14 months. The mean C0 values for the case and control groups were 257.8 +/- 126.5 and 248.5 +/- 104.4 mumol/L, respectively (P>.05). The values for C2 were 712.7 +/- 273.2 and 886.2 +/- 266.9 mumol/L, respectively (P=.01).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed that C2, but not C0, in the first 6 months posttransplantation were a predictor of long-term graft survival. The findings here in supported the results of other studies that have proposed cyclosporine concentration monitoring by C2 rather than C0 measurements.

Blood Concentration Curve of Cyclosporine: Impact of Itraconazole in Lung Transplant Recipients

Although the influence of cytochrome P450 inhibitory drugs on the area under the curve (AUC) of cyclosporine (CsA) has been described, data concerning the impact of these substances on the shape of the blood concentration curve are scarce. By assessment of CsA blood levels before and 1, 2, and 4 hr after oral intake (C0, C1, C2, and C4, respectively) CsA profiling examinations were performed in 20 lung transplant recipients taking 400 mg, 200 mg, and no itraconazole, respectively. The three groups showed comparable results for C0, C2, and AUC(0-12). Greater values were found for Cmax, Cmax-C0, peak-trough fluctuation and rise to Cmax in favor of the non-itraconazole group. Additionally, tmax was shorter in the non-itraconazole group. Comedication with the metabolic inhibitor itraconazole is associated with a flattening of the CsA blood concentration profile in lung transplant recipients. These changes cannot be assessed by isolated C0, C2, or AUC(0-12) values alone.

Renal protective strategies in heart transplant patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic renal failure associated with long-term calcineurin inhibitor immunosuppression is a substantial clinical problem in the heart transplant population, compounded by difficulties in identifying patients likely to develop renal dysfunction. Several approaches, however, have been developed or are being investigated to preserve renal function in heart transplant patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Approaches to identify patients with an increased risk of developing renal dysfunction are being refined, and improved calcineurin inhibitor monitoring strategies are being investigated. Novel immunosuppressive regimens including mycophenolate mofetil and/or rapamycin that lack nephrotoxicity promise new therapeutic strategies with the efficacy of calcineurin inhibitor-based combinations. Temporary ('holiday') or permanent ('retirement') calcineurin inhibitor replacement with interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibodies has the potential to halt progressive renal dysfunction. Finally, emerging data on the renal protection afforded by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers, either singly or in combination, provide another avenue of investigation.

SUMMARY

Several strategies have demonstrated their potential to preserve or improve renal function in heart transplant patients in small studies. Large randomized controlled trials are necessary to determine the optimal strategies to prevent rejection while preserving renal function in the long-term management of heart transplant patients.

Therapeutic monitoring of calcineurin inhibitors for the nephrologist

The calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) cyclosporine and tacrolimus remain the backbone of immunosuppression for most kidney transplant recipients. Despite many years of experience, protocols that optimize efficacy with minimal toxicity remain a subject of debate. Nevertheless, studies of the pharmacokinetic properties of the CNI, particularly cyclosporine, have led to improved dosing strategies. The purpose of this article is to review the current understanding of CNI pharmacokinetics and its relevance to proper dosing and monitoring of these medications. This article also reviews the trials that have helped to define the optimal dosages and discusses the effect of adjunctive immunosuppressive agents on CNI pharmacokinetics and dosing.

Disease, destination, dose and delivery aspects of ciclosporin: the state of the art

Since its discovery in 1971, ciclosporin has revolutionized organ transplantation and the treatment of autoimmune disorders. The wide array of applications resulting from its clinical efficacy warrant unique administration strategies and varying doses, times of exposure and extents of distribution, depending on target tissue. The poor biopharmaceutical characteristics of low solubility and permeability makes this uphill task even more challenging for the drug delivery scientist. Efforts underway have explored various body routes employing approaches like emulsions, microspheres, nanoparticles, liposomes, iontophoresis and penetration enhancers. This review attempts a brief holistic view of the "four Ds" (disease, destination, dose and delivery) surrounding this immunomodulator drug.

Pharmacokinetics of Neoral in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients With Long-Term Diabetes Mellitus

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of Neoral has been studied widely and C2 monitoring has been shown to be superior to C0 monitoring in predicting outcomes. However, data are scarce in diabetic renal transplant recipients who may have gastroparesis. We studied 0 to 8 hour pharmacokinetic profiles (AUC(0-8h)) of Neoral on 3 consecutive days in 18 diabetic adults who had stable renal function for at least 6 months after transplantation and no overt symptoms of diabetic gastroparesis. All patients had diabetes mellitus (DM) for at least 5 years. Intrapatient variability of C2 levels was 28% (range, 6%-68%); it was < or =20% in 9 patients (50%) and >60% in 2 patients. Correlation coefficients between AUC(0-8h) and AUC(0-4h), between C2 and AUC(0-8h), and between C0 and AUC(0-8h) were 0.95, 0.86, and 0.77, respectively. Exposure phase (85% of AUC(0-8h)) was longer than 4 hours in all completed (48/54; 89%) profiles; it was longer than 6 hours in 20 profiles. C4 levels had good correlation with AUC(0-8h) (0.86) and low intrapatient variability (16% +/- 11%; range, 2%-39%). Thirteen of 18 patients (72%) had intrapatient variability of C4 < or = 20%. We conclude that the exposure phase of Neoral is prolonged more than 4 hours in adult renal transplant recipients with long-term diabetes, even in the absence of symptoms of gastroparesis. Because of very high intrapatient variability in this group of patients, C2 levels may not be reliable for TDM of Neoral despite high correlation with AUC(0-8h). C4 level may be a valid alternative for these patients.

Immunosuppression in pediatric solid organ transplantation: opportunities, risks, and management

The pediatric transplant community stands at a time of unprecedented choice of immunosuppressive agents - and with a legacy of morbidity from those agents used in the previous two decades. This review considers the clinical utility and side-effect profiles of immunosuppressants used widely in current practice (e.g., glucocorticoids, azathioprine, ciclosporin, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and sirolimus) and those agents which are in increasing use or in evaluation (e.g., IL-2 receptor antibodies, everolimus, FTY720, LEA29Y, and deoxyspergualin). Further consideration is given to the wider drug interactions likely during the use of new immunosuppressant regimens and to our growing awareness of the influences of genetic heterogeneity on drug efficacy and handling. Finally, we consider the new demands being placed on the use of drug monitoring to regulate dosage of this new repertoire of immunosuppressants.

Cyclosporine short infusion and C2 monitoring in haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

Blood concentrations of cyclosporine A (CsA) >or=800 microg/l measured 2 h post-dosing, the C2 concentration, is necessary to obtain a maximal pharmacological effect and correlates well with transplant-related complications such as transplant rejection and toxicity. In an open crossover study CsA blood levels were measured during 24 h to generate a pharmacokinetic profile on days 1, 8 and 15 after starting CsA infusion in 21 haematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients who were receiving intravenously CsA 3 mg/kg/day either by continuous infusion or by 2 h infusion given every 12 h. C2 levels after the 2 h infusion correlated better than C1 or C3 levels with the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 4 h (r2=0.62). C2 levels >or=800 microg/l were also achieved for 20 out of 24 (83%) of cases after the 2 h infusion of CsA without any increase of CsA-related toxicity but for only three of the 23 patients (13%) after continuous infusion. Therefore, we recommend CsA infusions in 2 h during transplant and perform C2 monitoring to obtain therapeutic C2 levels >or=800 microg/l.

Spectrophotometric assay for calcineurin activity in leukocytes isolated from human blood

The calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporine and tacrolimus, still constitute the cornerstone of immunosuppressive regimen after organ transplantation. An efficient and feasible way to measure calcineurin activity and inhibition by these drugs may improve therapeutic monitoring of these drugs in transplant recipients. Calcineurin activity was measured in leukocyte lysates isolated from human blood using spectrophotometric phosphate quantification. The dephosphorylation of a 19-amino acid peptide substrate of calcineurin was determined using the Malachite green phosphate reagent in the presence of okadaic acid and with and without the calcium chelator EGTA. Sample storage and lysis buffer components were among the variables optimized, and the inhibitory effect of calcineurin inhibitors was investigated. Observed loss of calcineurin activity during sample storage was eliminated by adding ascorbic acid to lysis buffer. The final inter- and intraassay variation coefficients were 10 and 4.5%, respectively, and the detection limit was 15 pmol min(-1)x10(6) WBC(-1), where WBC is white blood cells (leukocytes). In vitro IC50 values were 212 and 34 microg/L for cyclosporine and tacrolimus, respectively. In vivo calcineurin inhibition was observed when calcineurin activity was measured in transplant recipients on maintenance therapy with cyclosporine and tacrolimus.

Pharmacodynamic Monitoring of Cyclosporine A in Renal Allograft Recipients Shows a Quantitative Relationship Between Immunosuppression and the Occurrence of Recurrent Infections and Malignancies

BACKGROUND

At present it is unclear which dose and consecutive blood levels of cyclosporine A (CsA) are optimal with respect to immunosuppressive efficacy and drug specific side effects at the level of individual patients. Several pharmacodynamic measures of CsA effects have been proposed, but have not become clinical routine yet. Besides the lack of practicability, the biological relevance of these assays has not been determined so far.

METHODS

Residual expression of nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFAT)-regulated genes two hours after drug intake was used as molecular pharmacodynamic marker to assess CsA effects on lymphocytes and correlated with the frequency of recurrent infections and malignancies in patients with five or more years of follow-up posttransplantation.

RESULTS

Recurrent infectious complications were observed in 44% and malignancies in 20% of the 133 patients studied. Patients with a strong suppression of NFAT-regulated genes by CsA--as judged by a residual level of transcription of less than 15% after drug intake--develop more frequent infections (53% vs. 29%; P = 0.005) and malignancies (22% vs. 4%; P = 0.002). The lack of correlation between the incidence of these complications and CsA blood concentration might point to the interindividual differences in the sensitivity towards calcineurin inhibition.

CONCLUSION

The data presented here reveal a clear relation between the frequency of infectious and malignant complications and the degree of suppression of NFAT-regulated genes by CsA in transplanted patients. Therefore, pharmacodynamic monitoring of CsA efficacy in transplanted patients might be a useful tool to adjust immunosuppressive therapy in individual patients.

Murine taste-immune associative learning

Taste-immune associative learning can result from contingent pairings of an immune-competent unconditioned stimulus (US) with a gustative conditioned stimulus (CS). Recalling such an association may induce a set of physiological responses affecting behavior, endocrine, and immune functions. We have established a model of behaviorally conditioned immunosuppression employing the immunosuppressant drug cyclosporine A (CsA) as the US and saccharin as the CS in rats and humans. In order to investigate the inter-species generalization of this neuro-immune interaction, we tested the feasibility of this paradigm in mice. In a single-bottle scheme, male BALB/c mice (n=5) were conditioned by conducting three association trials and a single recall trial. Control groups (n=5/group) were designed to assure associative learning, pharmacological effects of the US, and placebo effect. Results show that CsA-conditioned animals displayed significant immunosuppression in the spleen after recall, measured by in vitro T-lymphocyte proliferation, and IL-2 production. However, the same animals did not show evidence of avoidance behavior to the CS. In contrast, evoking the association of saccharin-lithium chloride (inducing gastric malaise) in another set of animals (n=4/group) resulted in significant and pronounced avoidance of the taste (CS). These animals also displayed significant suppression of splenic T-lymphocyte responsiveness after the recall phase. The present results indicate that mice seem to be capable of associating a gustative stimulus with CsA, resulting in behaviorally conditioned immunosuppression without affecting appetitive behavior.

Chronopharmacokinetics of ciclosporin and tacrolimus

The correct use of immunosuppressive drugs has a considerable influence on the prognosis of patients with organ transplants. The appropriate utilisation of the drugs involves the administration of an adequate dosage to reach the blood concentrations that will suppress the alloimmune response, while avoiding secondary toxicities. However, transplanted patients exhibit heterogeneous immunological responses and high inter- and intraindividual pharmacokinetic variabilities. One cause of these variabilities that is rarely considered is circadian rhythms. In vitro and in vivo experiments have clearly demonstrated that all organisms are highly organised according to an internal biological clock that influences various physiological functions. Considering that the absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination of drugs is influenced by the physiological functions of the body, it is not surprising that the pharmacokinetic, and consequently the pharmacodynamic, profiles of drugs can be influenced by circadian rhythms. Ciclosporin, a mainstay immunosuppressive drug used following organ transplantation, displays minimum blood concentration (C(min)), maximum blood concentration (C(max)) and area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) in the morning that are generally higher than the corresponding parameters in the evening. These observations are supported by the ciclosporin total body clearance and elimination half-life in the morning, which are, on average, higher and shorter, respectively, than those in the evening. In addition, the disposition of tacrolimus is determined by the time of administration. The tacrolimus C(max) and AUC after the morning dose are significantly higher than those after the evening dose. Finally, the results reported in this review suggest considering more carefully the chronopharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and ciclosporin in order to obtain better results with fewer adverse effects. Significantly, the morning appears to be the best time for therapeutic monitoring using the C(min), C(max), concentration at 2 hours after dosing and AUC to modify dosages of tacrolimus and ciclosporin. Less certain are any conclusions about whether, in order to obtain better immunosuppressive control, higher doses must be administered when these drugs are given in the evening to compensate for the higher levels of interleukin-2.

The calcineurin activity profiles of cyclosporin and tacrolimus are different in stable renal transplant patients

Cyclosporin and tacrolimus remain the cornerstone immunosuppressive drugs in organ transplantation. Dosing and monitoring these drugs is based on pharmacokinetic protocols, but measuring a pharmacodynamic parameter, calcineurin phosphatase (CaN) activity, could be a valuable supplement in determining optimal doses. Forty stable renal transplant patients were investigated three times in a 6-month period. Blood samples were drawn at 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 h after oral intake of tacrolimus (FK) or cyclosporin at days 1 and 180. At day 90, one blood sample at trough level (FK) or C2 level (cyclosporin A, CsA) was drawn. CaN activity was determined in whole blood as the release of 32P from a phosphorylated peptide. Activity of the 32P was quantitated by liquid scintillation and results converted to Units CaN, utilizing a calibration curve with CaN. We demonstrated that calcineurin activity profiles at days 1 and 180 were the same for both drugs. Furthermore, we found that patients treated with tacrolimus or cyclosporin displayed different calcineurin activity profiles. We found that cyclosporin displayed greater calcineurin inhibition than tacrolimus. We have demonstrated that the two drugs exert significantly different effects on calcineurin activity in renal transplant patients with stable, well-functioning grafts and that tacrolimus-treated patients can maintain good, stable graft function with minimal CaN inhibition.

Is C2 Monitoring or Another Limited Sampling Strategy Superior to C0 Monitoring in Improving Clinical Outcomes in Adult Liver Transplant Recipients?

Cyclosporine (CsA) has had a major impact on the process and success of solid organ transplantation. Early in the use of CsA, therapeutic monitoring using the predose (trough, or C0) concentration became the standard of care. However, there are complications with the use of C0 monitoring that have only partly been mitigated with the advent of the micro-emulsion formulation (CsA-ME). More recently, limited sampling strategies (LSSs) for measuring the area under the CsA concentration-time curve (AUC) have been investigated to improve the monitoring of CsA post-transplantation. Many centres now routinely monitor CsA therapy using the concentration at 2 hours postdose (C2). In this paper the strength of the evidence for C2 (or other LSSs) relative to C0 monitoring of CsA-ME for improving clinically important outcomes in liver transplant patients is critically examined. Additionally, gaps in the literature are identified and recommendations are made for clinical research that could be done to provide more definitive evidence for the use of C2 or other LSSs in monitoring liver transplant patients.

Cyclosporine monitoring in renal transplant recipients with induction therapy: C2 levels in patients monitored on C0

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the cyclosporine C(2) blood levels in renal transplant recipients with induction therapy, monitored on C(0) levels during the early and long-term post-transplantation periods in different French transplantation centres, to the target values recommended by the International Consensus on Neoral and used in the Mo2art study. A retrospective study was conducted by the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) committee of the French Pharmacological Society. Cyclosporine C(0) and C(2) concentrations from 168 renal transplant recipients were collected at different post-transplantation periods by six TDM laboratories of transplantation centres from April 2001 to April 2002. Cyclosporine blood levels were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay (mFPIA, AxSYM, Abbott) or enzyme immunoassay (EMIT, Dade Behring). Most patients had C(0) values in the recommended target ranges, with C(2) levels below the targets used in the Mo2art study or proposed by the International Consensus Conference, both during the early and long-term post-transplantation periods. Sixty-eight per cent of patients had C(2) below 1,500 microg/L +/- 20% in the first 2 months post-transplantation and 55% had C(2) below 800 microg/L +/- 20% in the late post-transplantation period (>1 year). Cyclosporine dose should be increased by 40% on average during the first week post-transplantation period and by 50% during the maintenance period to achieve the C(2) targets. In France, most renal transplant recipients receiving induction agents monitored on C(0) had C(2) levels below the targets recommended by the International Consensus Conference. In clinical practice, the optimal therapeutic windows for CsA monitoring based on C(2) needs to be more precisely defined, both during the early and long-term post-transplantation periods in renal transplant recipients receiving induction agents.

An up-date review on individualized dosage adjustment of calcineurin inhibitors in organ transplant patients

Calcineurin inhibitors, tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporine (ciclosporin A), are the primary immunosuppressive agents used on recipients of organ transplantations. The hepatic metabolism of these drugs by cytochrome P450 IIIA (CYP3A) subfamilies is considered a major eliminating process. The intestinal efflux-pump P-glycoprotein (Pgp) (multidrug resistance 1 [MDR1], ATP-binding cassette B1 [ABCB1]) and CYP3A4 have been demonstrated as important for the bioavailability of drugs, so called "absorptive barriers". Recently, an important role for CYP3A5 in the intestine for the oral clearance of drugs has been identified. Both tacrolimus and cyclosporine are substrates of Pgp, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5, and therefore, these molecules are potential pharmacokinetic factors with which to establish personalized dosage regimens for these drugs. Although the effect of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the MDR1/ABCB1 and CYP3A5 genes on the pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressant has been widely examined, some contradictions have been emerged. In living-donor liver transplant (LDLT) patients, the intestinal mRNA expression level of MDR1 and CYP3A5 genotyping both in the native intestine and in the grafted liver are suggested to be potential pharmacokinetic factors for adjusting initial dosage and predicting post-operative variation in the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus. We review the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of these drugs including the large pharmacokinetic variation and potential individualized dosage adjustments based on the genomic information of transporters and metabolic enzymes as well as classical pharmacokinetic analyses based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).

Optimizing the use of cyclosporin in allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Cyclosporin remains the most widely used immunosuppressive agent in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). The increased awareness of the impact of the intensity of post-transplant immunosuppression on determining outcome after allogeneic SCT has resulted in a re-examination of whether cyclosporin is currently being optimally used in this population of patients. Recent studies in solid organ transplantation have questioned whether the use of trough levels provides the most accurate reflection of the immunosuppressive actions of cyclosporin and alternative strategies to monitor cyclosporin dosage after liver and kidney transplantation are increasingly being used. As a result there is now interest in examining whether there is scope for translating these advances into the arena of haematopoietic transplantation. In this paper, we will review the rationale underlying the current schedules for dosing and monitoring cyclosporin after allogeneic SCT and identify specific areas in which the use of cyclosporin requires re-evaluation. These include evaluation of whether patient outcome would be improved by using peak cyclosporin levels to determine dosing schedules, analysis of optimal cyclosporin dosing schedules in patients undergoing reduced intensity allografts and investigation of surrogate markers of cyclosporin's immunosuppressive activity.

Correlations between Calcineurin Phosphatase Inhibition and Cyclosporine Metabolites Concentrations in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Implications for Immunoassays

Cyclosporine exhibits a wide spectrum of metabolites that vary considerably in the extent to which they interfere with the various parent drug monitoring immunoassays. There is no consensus regarding the clinical significance of metabolites. Cyclosporine exerts its immunosuppressive action by inhibiting the enzyme calcineurin phosphatase. Determination of the enzyme's activity is one of the most promising pharmacodynamic markers. It is unknown how calcineurin phosphatase inhibition correlates with various cyclosporine monitoring assays and what is the potential impact of metabolites in this perspective? The aim of the present study was to determine the concentration of cyclosporine (by means of three different assay methods) and the four most significant metabolites (AM1, AM4N, AM9, and AM1C) in relation to calcineurin phosphatase inhibition. Twelve randomly selected cyclosporine-treated renal transplant patients were included in the study. Blood samples were drawn before, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hr after oral intake of cyclosporine. Parent drug and metabolites were determined by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MSMS). Additionally, cyclosporine concentration was determined by the enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT) and by the polyclonal fluorescence polarization immunoassay (pFPIA). Calcineurin phosphatase activity was measured by its ability to dephosphorylate a previously phosphorylated 19-amino acid peptide. We found that calcineurin phosphatase inhibition correlates strongly with parent cyclosporine metabolites concentrations determined by all three assay methods. Determination methods that took metabolites into consideration exhibit stronger correlations with calcineurin phosphatase inhibition (sum of cyclosporin plus metabolites r=-0.93, LC/MSMS; pFPIA r=-0.94, P<or=0.001), compared with methods that measure exclusively the parent drug (EMIT: -0.84; LC/MS-MS: -0.81, P<or=0.05). Our results indicate that the immunosuppressive role of cyclosporines metabolites should not be considered valueless per se. Further research is required in order to verify the potential clinical importance of our observations.

Single-dose daily infusion of cyclosporine for prevention of Graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from HLA allele-matched, unrelated donors

Peak blood concentration of cyclosporine (CsA) in renal transplantation patients was recently reported to be associated with clinical efficacy. We therefore evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of a regimen of once-daily infusion of CsA plus a short course of methotrexate as prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from an HLA allele-matched, unrelated donor. Nineteen patients with hematologic malignancies received CsA, 3 mg/kg per day, as a 4-hour intravenous (IV) infusion from day -1. After engraftment, patients received CsA orally at twice the IV dose. The CsA dose was adjusted to maintain the blood trough level between 150 and 200 ng/mL. Methotrexate was administered IV at doses of 10 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 7 mg/m(2) on days 3, 6, and 11. Bone marrow engraftment occurred in all patients. Grade 1 and grade 2 GVHD occurred in 6 (31.6%) and 7 (36.8%) of the 19 patients, respectively. No patient had grade 3 or 4 GVHD. Acute nephrotoxicity developed in 1 (5.3%) of the 19 patients, and hypertension developed in 3 (15.8%) of the 19 patients. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of 4-hour CsA infusion in 10 patients. The mean trough concentration, mean peak concentration, mean time to peak concentration, and area under the curve (24 hours) were 161 +/- 43 ng/mL, 1498 +/- 387 ng/mL, 3.2 +/- 1.0 hours, and 10,848 +/- 1,991 ng +/- h/mL, respectively. This regimen was well tolerated and did not enhance the risk of severe GVHD in patients undergoing allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from an HLA allele-matched, unrelated donor.

Cyclosporine exposure and calcineurin phosphatase activity in living-donor liver transplant patients: twice daily vs. once daily dosing

We have compared the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cyclosporine between once- and twice-daily dosing regimens in de novo patients of living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). A total of 14 patients were enrolled in this study, who had received cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) twice a day (BID, n = 5) or once daily in the morning (QD, n = 9) after transplantation. On postoperative day (POD) 6, the QD regimen significantly increased cyclosporine exposure; the blood concentration at 2 hours postdose (C2) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for 4 hours (AUC(0-4)), compared with the BID regimen. Moreover, the area under the calcineurin (CaN) activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells time-curve (AUA) for 12 hours (AUA(0-12)) and 24 hours (AUA(0-24)) were decreased by approximately 42 and 25% with the QD regimen relative to the BID regimen, respectively. The C2 level was significantly correlated with the AUC(0-4) (r2 = 0.95), which was negatively related to the AUA(0-12) with a large interindividual variability (r(2) = 0.59). However, a significant correlation was found between the AUA(0-12) or AUA(0-24) and CaN activity at trough time points. According to a maximum inhibitory effect attributable to the drug (E(max)) model, the mean estimates of E(max) and the C(b) value that gives a half-maximal effect (EC50) for CaN inhibition were not significantly different between the 2 groups, respectively. These findings suggest that a once daily morning administration of cyclosporine may improve oral absorption and help to provide an effective CaN inhibition early after LDLT. Furthermore, CaN activity at trough time points would be a single surrogate predictor for the overall CaN activity throughout dosing intervals following cyclosporine administration.

The area under the concentration-time curve versus trough and peak blood level monitoring in renal transplant recipients on cyclosporine

OBJECTIVE

The area under the concentration-time curve of cyclosporine microemulsion is the best measure of the absorption and beneficial effects in renal transplant recipients. We sought to determine the best method of monitoring cyclosporine levels in these patients.

METHODS

Prospective evaluation of peak cyclosporine blood levels and area under the curve monitoring were performed for 1 year in 65 renal transplant recipients (study group). Cyclosporine trough levels and peak cyclosporine blood levels were correlated with the calculated area under the curve. Cyclosporine trough levels were monitored in equal numbers of matched controls.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the incidence of acute rejection, cyclosporine nephrotoxicity, proteinuria, serum creatinine levels, or graft and patient outcomes between the groups (P = .1). Peak cyclosporine blood levels guided by calculating the area under the curve were found to be 27% to 32% lower than previously reported. The correlation coefficient was <70% for cyclosporine trough levels (P < .02) and >90% for peak cyclosporine blood levels (P < .001) when related to the calculated area under the curve. The calculated area under the curve was approximately 6000 ng/mL/h following transplantation, gradually decreasing to approximately 3000 ng/mL/h at 1 year. Both appeared to the acceptable therapeutic values.

CONCLUSION

Calculating the area under the curve using trough and peak blood levels versus using isolated readings for either of these levels alone is the most effective method of monitoring cyclosporine in recipients undergoing renal transplant.

Is Absorption Profile of Cyclosporine Really Important for Effective Immunosuppression?

The clinical significance of cyclosporine (CsA) concentration 2 h postdose (C(2)) monitoring is widely recognized in organ transplantation, because C(2) value is considered to be a predictable surrogate marker of full area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), and/or a peak concentration value exhibits potent inhibition of calcineurin activity. However, the pharmacological advantage of absorption profile (AP) has not been fully elucidated. In a rat skin allotransplantation model, the authors evaluated the efficacy of AP by different dosage regimens (20, 25 or 30 mg/kg/d, once or twice daily) and routes (p.o. or i.v.), and examined whether high C(2) or AUC(0-4) is intrinsically valuable for effective immunosuppression. Graft survival was CsA dose-dependent and correlated with full AUC(0-24), rather than AP. The difference between the once and twice daily administrations did not influence full AUC(0-24) or immunosuppressive effect. Continuous intravenous infusion with flat pharmacokinetics also produced adequate immunosuppression as was observed in enteral administration at the same level of total exposure. The impact of high peak concentration in AP on immunosuppressive effect could not be found. It was suggested that AP would not have intrinsic pharmacodynamic value. However, absorption profiling was considered to be clinically useful in that C(2) value is a good surrogate marker of total exposure (AUC(0-24)).

Aortic allograft vasculopathy is mediated by CD8(+) T cells in Cyclosporin A immunosuppressed mice

We investigated the role of CD4(+) T cells and CD8(+) T cells in mediating allograft vasculopathy in Cyclosporin A (CyA) immunosuppressed mice. We first established that a dose of 50 mg/kg/d CyA was required to prevent acute rejection in C57BL/6 mice. CyA given at 50 mg/kg/d did not prevent allograft vasculopathy in either cardiac or aortic transplants in these mice. Using CD4(-/-) and CD8(-/-) mice, we established that CyA immunosuppression at this dose was only effective at preventing allograft vasculopathy in mice lacking CD8(+) T cells. This implicates CD8(+) T cells in the development of AV in situations of clinical cardiac transplantation where CyA is still the mainstay of immunosuppressive therapy. We confirmed the important role for CD8(+) T cells in AV in the face of CyA immunosuppression by allopriming mice in the presence of CyA and transferring alloprimed T cells into RAG1(-/-) immunodeficient mice. The RAG1(-/-) mice were also treated with CyA. In this situation (CyA present during the allopriming and in the recipient), only primed CD8(+) T cells could mediate AV, primed CD4(+) T cells could not. Alloprimed CD8(+) T cells raised in the presence of CyA exhibited markedly reduced direct recognition responses (as measured by MLR) and effector responses (as measured by cytotoxic activity). In contrast indirect activation was retained. We interpret these data to suggest that in the face of CyA immunosuppression CD4(+) T cell effector function is ablated while CD8(+) T cell function remains partially intact. The in vitro data suggest that the indirect pathway remains intact in this population of CyA resistant CD8(+) T cells.

Seeking optimal prescription of cyclosporine ME

Optimal use of cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA ME) in transplant recipients is still a matter of debate. Therapeutic drug monitoring of CsA ME is needed because high variability of inter- and intraindividual exposure to this drug has been reported. Thus, consensus guidelines have been recommended, but the ideal method of follow-up has not yet been found. Pharmacokinetic studies have shown that the 2-hour postdose (C2) sample concentration is more closely correlated with the risk of acute rejection and with toxicity in solid organ recipients compared with the trough (C0) concentration within the first 3 months posttransplantation. For some years, this time point has therefore been used to monitor patients treated with CsA ME. However, there are still some technical (accurate dilution) and practical concerns (education of the patient). Moreover, the target levels of C2, in particular after the first year posttransplantation, are less well defined. Pharmacogenetic studies of the MDR-1 gene as well as the CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 gene polymorphisms could not yet demonstrate any clear influence on the interindividual variations on the pharmacokinetic profile of CsA ME.

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of C0- Vs C2-guided Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Cyclosporine in Stable Heart Transplant Patients

BACKGROUND

Cyclosporine monitoring using 2-hour post-dose samples (C2) is thought to be more efficacious than using pre-dose levels (C0) in managing immunosuppression for transplant patients. We evaluated the effect of C2 monitoring on cyclosporine dose and clinical parameters in stable heart transplant patients.

METHODS

125 stable heart transplant patients were randomized to C0 or C2 monitoring of cyclosporine levels for a period of six months. All patients had both C0 and C2 samples taken, and clinicians were blinded to one of the samples depending on randomization. The primary endpoint was the relative change in cyclosporine (Neoral) dose during the study period and secondary endpoints were change in creatine clearance, mortality, infection, and acute rejection.

RESULTS

There was a significant decrease in the cyclosporine dose for the C2 group as compared with the C0 group (-11 mg/day and -26 mg/day respectively, p = 0.0025). No proven rejection episodes occurred in either group and there was no significant difference in the incidence of infection (C0 6, C2 10; p = 0.14), the change in renal function (change in creatine clearance C(0) +0.54 ml/min; C2 -0.16 ml/min; p = 0.61), the number of blood tests or dose adjustments between groups over the study period. Analysis of the blinded samples revealed that the reduction of cyclosporine dose in the C2 group could not be accounted for by reduced immunosuppression .

CONCLUSION

C2 monitoring allows a significant cyclosporine dose reduction without compromising patient outcome in stable heart transplant patients. Further studies are required to ascertain whether this dose reduction can be translated into clinical benefit.

Comparison of Cyclosporine Concentrations 2 Hours Post-Dose Determined Using 3 Different Methods and Trough Level in Pediatric Renal Transplantation

Immunosuppression has been one of the great challenges in pediatric recipients of kidney allografts. Cyclosporine (CsA) has evolved during the past 25 years of transplantation. It requires frequent blood level monitoring because of its narrow therapeutic window and interpatient and intrapatient variability. Neoral (Novartis) is no exception. Ideally, monitoring of blood levels should also include determination of the area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) to better target the therapeutic window, thus avoiding underdosing or overdosing, especially in pediatric patients. A single blood concentration measurement 2 hours after Neoral administration (C2) has been shown to be a more for accurate predictor of drug exposure than trough levels (C0). Therefore, its use may lead to reduction in the incidence and severity of cellular rejection and of CsA toxicity. Some studies have shown that the metabolites/CsA ratio is substantially lower using C2 than C0, however, the between-assay differences for C2 monitoring have not been considered. The purpose of this study was to evaluate CsA C0 and C2 levels, determined using monoclonal fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA)/TDx and enzyme multiplied immunoassay (EMIT). CsA levels were determined using a radioimmunoassay (RIA) in 30 pediatric transplant recipients with stable renal function within 42.7 mean months follow-up. Mean age was 13.4 years; 15 children were girls; 23 patients were recipients of cadaveric kidneys. The mean CsA microemulsion dose was 5.7 mg/kg/d. The 3 methods showed a high correlation between C0 and C2 (r > or = 0.97). A linear regression slope was significantly higher for C0 than C2 (P < .001). The CsA concentrations both at C0 and C2 were significantly higher with FPIA than with RIA (P < .009) but no differences were found for EMITT (P = .2). The mean C0 level for FPIA was 22% and 26% higher than RIA and EMIT, respectively. The mean C2, for FPIA was 7% and 12% higher than RIA and EMIT, respectively. In conclusion, CsA levels determined using RIA or EMIT are better than using FPIA/Tx; also, C2 CsA levels are more accurate than C0 in pediatric transplantation patients.

Limited sampling strategy for cyclosporine (Neoral) area under the curve monitoring in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

Cyclosporine (CSA; Neoral) is one of the most common immunosuppressants used in pediatric renal transplantation. Research in adult renal transplant recipients has shown that 2-h post-dose concentration (C2) monitoring and limited sampling strategies (LSSs) are better at predicting drug exposure and outcome than trough concentrations (C0). While C0 monitoring is the usual practice in pediatric renal transplant patients, area under the curve (AUC) monitoring has been shown to be superior in terms of predictive ability and outcomes. However, AUC monitoring is impractical and inconvenient in a clinic setting because it involves many blood samples. An LSS provides a reliable alternative. The purpose of this study was to prospectively define an LSS (AUC(0-12)) for CSA monitoring and to test its predictive performance. As well, an LSS (AUC(0-4)) for CSA was developed and its predictive performance tested. Blood samples for CSA concentrations were collected in 29 stable pediatric renal transplant patients prior to (t = 0) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h following a steady-state morning CSA dose. AUC was calculated by the trapezoidal method; LSSs for AUC(0-12) and AUC(0-4) were determined using multiple regression analysis in 14 patients; and the LSSs' predictive performance was tested in 15 additional patients. Both LSSs require two blood samples. For the LSS (AUC(0-12)), blood samples are required immediately before the dose and 2 h post-dose: AUC(0-12) = 12.45 C0 + 2.17 C2 + 723.16 (r2 = 0.909). For the LSS (AUC(0-4)), blood samples are required at one and 2 h post-dose, AUC(0-4) = 1.17 C1 + 1.85 C2 - 41.00 (r2 = 0.971). The LSSs demonstrated low bias and high precision for both AUC(0-12) and AUC(0-4). Our two-concentration LSSs are accurate and precise predictors that are more clinically useful for our patient population than other LSSs that have been developed for pediatric renal transplant patients. Our study template provides a guide for other centers to develop accurate and precise LSSs specific to their own patient population.

24-h Monitoring of Calcineurin Phosphatase Activity in Healthy Subjects

The calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus are the cornerstone immunosuppressants used in solid organ transplantation. Studies investigating calcineurin (CaN) activity in renal transplanted patients have been published, but basic properties of the enzyme activity in healthy subjects remain to be described. The aim of this study was to investigate whether CaN displays circadian variation or sex difference is present in healthy subjects. Twenty subjects had blood samples drawn every 4 h for a 24-h period. CaN activity was determined in whole blood as the release of 32P from a phosphorylated peptide. Activity of the 32P was quantitated by liquid scintillation and results converted to units CaN utilizing a calibration curve. We found no circadian variation in CaN activity and no difference between the two sexes. The clinical importance of these findings is that blood samples for calcineurin activity can be drawn without taking the exact time of day into consideration, but only considering the time of drug intake.

Cyclosporine Monitoring With 2-Hour Postdose Levels in Heart Transplant Recipients

Cyclosporine therapeutic drug monitoring based on 2-hour postdose concentration (C2) compared with conventional trough concentration (C0) can improve clinical outcomes for de novo renal and liver transplant patients. However, in heart transplant patients, published studies are limited. To determine the clinical significance of C2 compared with C0 following orthotopic heart transplantation, the authors measured CsA at C0 and C2 and estimated CsA area under the curve (AUC) using Bayesian estimation and 4 sparse sample algorithms in a cross section of 31 adult patients receiving triple-drug immunosuppression with CsA, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisone. CsA was measured using a validated HPLC method. Endomyocardial biopsies were graded based on the ISHLT system. Mean +/- SD values for CsA dose, C0, and C2 were 4.8 +/- 1.4 mg/kg/d, 240 +/- 62 microg/L, and 1319 +/- 469 microg/L, respectively. Correlation with AUC, using different estimation algorithms, was better for C2 (r(2) = 0.79-0.99) than for C0 (r(2)= 0.11-0.52). The mean +/- SD values for C0 (microg/L) and C2 (microg/L) for rejectors (n = 3) were 215 +/- 68 and 949 +/- 204 versus 242 +/- 62 and 1359 +/- 474 for the nonrejectors (P = 0.66 and 0.12, respectively). Fisher exact test P values using the median as threshold value for C0 and C2 (234 microg/L and 1251 microg/L, respectively) were 0.6 and 0.1. Analysis of the data revealed that C0 values in rejectors have wider variability than C2. There were no rejectors among the 16 patients exceeding the C2 median value; for C0, however, there was not an easily identifiable threshold value. There is a trend for a significant relationship between C2 and the incidence of rejection, but the number of rejectors was too small to reach statistical significance. A prospective concentration-control de novo study design is recommended as the most appropriate way to fully evaluate the potential utility of C2 monitoring in heart transplant patients.

Use of Neoral C2 monitoring: a European consensus

Large-scale clinical trials using C(2) monitoring of cyclosporine (CsA) microemulsion (Neoral) in renal transplant recipients have demonstrated low acute rejection rates and good tolerability with a low adverse event profile in a variety of settings: with or without routine induction therapy; in combination with mycophenolate mofetil; with standard-exposure or low-exposure Neoral; and in patients with immediate or delayed graft function. In liver transplantation, C(2) monitoring significantly reduces the severity and incidence of acute rejection compared with C(0) monitoring, without adverse consequences in terms of renal function or tolerability. Different C(2) targets are appropriate depending on adjunctive immune suppression, level of immunologic risk, CsA tolerability, risk of renal toxicity and time since transplantation. CsA absorption may increase substantially in most patients during the first 1-2 weeks post-transplant, and this should be taken into account to avoid overshooting C(2) target range. A patient with a low C(2) value may be either a low or a delayed absorber of CsA, or be a normal absorber who is receiving too low a dose of Neoral. C(2) monitoring alone is insufficient to differentiate between these types of patients, and measurement of additional timepoints is recommended. Adopting C(2) monitoring in maintenance transplant patients identifies those who are overexposed to CsA. In summary, randomized, prospective, multicenter studies and single-center trials have evaluated Neoral C(2) monitoring within a range of regimens in different organ types, providing a robust evidence base for the benefits of this sensitive monitoring technique.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions of morin and cyclosporin

Morin is a flavonoid present in mulberry and herbs. We have reported that morin exerted anti-inflammatory activity on the activated macrophages. Cyclosporin (CsA) is a potent immunosuppressive agent with narrow therapeutic range, which is widely used for the treatments of autoimmune diseases and transplantation rejection. This study aimed to measure the effects of morin on the disposition of CsA in lymphoid and non-lymphoid tissues, and on the functions of immune cells in mice. CsA (Neoral, 10 mg/kg) was orally administered with and without a concomitant dose of morin (0, 50, 100, 200 mg/kg) to mice once daily for 2 weeks. CsA concentrations in blood, liver, kidney, and spleen were determined by a specific monoclonal fluorescence polarization immunoassay. The decreased levels of CsA in tissues were found well correlated to increased doses of morin. The coadministration of 200 mg/kg morin significantly decreased CsA in blood, liver, kidney, and spleen by 33%, 17%, 38%, and 45%, respectively. On the other hand, coadministration of morin decreased dramatically the nitric oxide production by the activated macrophages when compared to CsA treatment alone. Moreover, morin maintained the level of CsA-suppressed T helper 1 (Th1) type cytokine, although the CsA concentration in spleen was markedly reduced. In conclusion, morin coadministration profoundly reduced CsA concentration but did not significantly alter the CsA-suppressed Th1 immune response in mice.