A phase III study of belatacept versus cyclosporine in kidney transplants from extended criteria donors (BENEFIT-EXT study)

A potential drug in the armamentarium of post-cardiac transplantation immunosuppression: belatacept

Undeterred by all the advancement in the field of cardiac transplantation, heart transplant rejection remained its mammoth quandary. Management of heart transplant recipients has drastically improved with current regimens of immunosuppressive drugs. The adverse effects of calcineurin inhibitors are lacking with the use of belatacept, which is a costimulation inhibitor that interferes with the interaction between CD28 on T cells and the B7 ligands on antigen-presenting cells. It was originally approved for use in renal transplant recipients but it has shown promising results in heart transplant recipients.

Modulating the wayward T cell: New horizons with immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments in autoimmunity, transplant, and cancer

The T-cell response is regulated by the balance between costimulatory and coinhibitory signals. Immune checkpoints are essential for efficient T-cell activation, but also for maintaining self-tolerance and protecting tissues from damage caused by the immune system, and for providing protective immunity. Modulating immune checkpoints can serve diametric goals, such that blocking a coinhibitory molecule can unleash anti-cancer immunity whereas stimulating the same molecule can reduce an over-reaction in autoimmune disease. The purpose of this review is to examine the regulation of T-cell costimulation and coinhibition, which is central to the processes underpinning autoimmunity, transplant rejection and immune evasion in cancer. We will focus on the immunomodulation agents that regulate these unwanted over- and under-reactions. The use of such agents has led to control of symptoms and slowing of progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, reduced rejection rates in transplant patients, and prolonged survival in patients with cancer. The management of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in certain challenging patient populations, including patients with pre-existing autoimmune conditions or transplant patients who develop cancer, as well as the management of immune-related adverse events in patients receiving antitumor therapy, is examined. Finally, the future of immune checkpoint inhibitors, including examples of emerging targets that are currently in development, as well as recent insights gained using new molecular techniques, is discussed. T-cell costimulation and coinhibition play vital roles in these diverse therapeutic areas. Targeting immune checkpoints continues to be a powerful avenue for the development of agents suitable for treating autoimmune diseases and cancers and for improving transplant outcomes. Enhanced collaboration between therapy area specialists to share learnings across disciplines will improve our understanding of the opposing effects of treatments for autoimmune disease/transplant rejection versus cancer on immune checkpoints, which has the potential to lead to improved patient outcomes.

Conversion to belatacept maintenance immunosuppression in HIV-positive kidney transplant recipients

There are only scattered case reports documenting belatacept use in HIV + kidney transplant recipients. We performed a retrospective review to describe short-term outcomes following conversion to belatacept in a cohort of HIV + patients. Patients were included if they were converted to belatacept between May 2015 and May 2019, had an HIV- donor, and received ≥4 doses of belatacept. All patients were treated with non-depleting induction and triple maintenance immunosuppression. Allograft and HIV-related outcomes were collected from the date of belatacept infusion until May 2020. Ten HIV + kidney transplant recipients were identified, who were converted to belatacept a median of 364 days post-transplant. At last follow-up (median 3.3 years), 8 patients remained on belatacept therapy, and all patients were alive with functioning allografts. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) improved from 31.6 mL/min at baseline to 42.8 mL/min at 1 year (P = .03). Two patients developed acute rejection, with one necessitating conversion back to tacrolimus. All patients maintained undetectable HIV-1 viral loads at last follow-up. One patient each developed pneumocystis pneumonia and Kaposi sarcoma following conversion, which were responsive to standard medical therapy. In our cohort of stable HIV + kidney transplant recipients, conversion to belatacept was associated with excellent early patient and allograft survival and improved eGFR at 1 year.

Memory T cell-mediated rejection is mitigated by FcγRIIB expression on CD8+ T cells

Donor-reactive memory T cells generated via heterologous immunity represent a potent barrier to long-term graft survival following transplantation because of their increased precursor frequency, rapid effector function, altered trafficking patterns, and reduced reliance on costimulation signals for activation. Thus, the identification of pathways that control memory T cell survival and secondary recall potential may provide new opportunities for therapeutic intervention. Here, we discovered that donor-specific effector/memory CD8⁺ T cell populations generated via exposure to acute vs latent vs chronic infections contain differential frequencies of CD8⁺ T cells expressing the inhibitory Fc receptor FcγRIIB. Results indicated that frequencies of FcγRIIB-expressing CD8⁺ donor-reactive memory T cells inversely correlated with allograft rejection. Furthermore, adoptive T cell transfer of Fcgr2b^-/- CD8⁺ T cells resulted in an accumulation of donor-specific CD8⁺ memory T cells and enhanced recall responses, indicating that FcγRIIB functions intrinsically to limit T cell CD8⁺ survival in vivo. Lastly, we show that deletion of FcγRIIB on donor-specific CD8⁺ memory T cells precipitated costimulation blockade-resistant rejection. These data therefore identify a novel cell-intrinsic inhibitory pathway that functions to limit the risk of memory T cell-mediated rejection following transplantation and suggest that therapeutic manipulation of this pathway could improve outcomes in sensitized patients.

Costimulation Blockade in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Costimulation between T cells and antigen-presenting cells is essential for the regulation of an effective alloimmune response and is not targeted with the conventional immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation. Costimulation blockade therapy with biologicals allows precise targeting of the immune response but without non-immune adverse events. Multiple costimulation blockade approaches have been developed that inhibit the alloimmune response in kidney transplant recipients with varying degrees of success. Belatacept, an immunosuppressive drug that selectively targets the CD28-CD80/CD86 pathway, is the only costimulation blockade therapy that is currently approved for kidney transplant recipients. In the last decade, belatacept therapy has been shown to be a promising therapy in subgroups of kidney transplant recipients; however, the widespread use of belatacept has been tempered by an increased risk of acute kidney transplant rejection. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the costimulation blockade therapies that are currently in use or being developed for kidney transplant indications.

Conversion From Calcineurin Inhibitors to Belatacept in HLA-sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients With Low-level Donor-specific Antibodies

BACKGROUND

Belatacept could be the treatment of choice in renal-transplant recipients with renal dysfunction attributed to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity. Few studies have described its use in patients with donor-specific antibody (DSA).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated conversion from CNIs to belatacept in 29 human leukocyte antigen-immunized renal-transplant recipients. Data about acute rejection, DSA, and renal function were collected. These patients were compared with 42 nonimmunized patients treated with belatacept.

RESULTS

Patients were converted from CNIs to belatacept a median of 444 days (interquartile range, 85-1200) after transplantation and were followed up after belatacept conversion, for a median of 308 days (interquartile range, 125-511). At conversion, 16 patients had DSA. Nineteen DSA were observed in these 16 patients, of which 11/19 were <1000 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), 7/19 were between 1000 and 3000 MFI, and one was >3000 MFI. At last follow-up, preexisting DSA had decreased or stabilized. Seven patients still had DSA with a mean MFI of 1298 ± 930 at the last follow-up. No patient developed a de novo DSA in the DSA-positive group. In the nonimmunized group, one patient developed de novo DSA (A24-MFI 970; biopsy for cause did not show biopsy-proven acute rejection or microinflammation score). After belatacept conversion, one antibody-mediated rejection was diagnosed. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate improved from 31.7 ± 14.2 mL/min/1.73 m to 40.7 ± 12.3 mL/min/1.73 m (P < 0.0001) at 12 months after conversion. We did not find any significant difference between groups in terms of renal function, proteinuria, or biopsy-proven acute rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

We report on a safe conversion to belatacept in human leukocyte antigen-immunized patients with low DSA levels.

What have we learned about how to prevent and treat antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation?

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in kidney transplantation is a major cause of late graft loss, and despite all efforts to date the "standard of care" remains plasmapheresis, IVIg, and steroids, which itself is based on low quality evidence. This review focuses on the risk factors leading to memory and de novo donor-specific antibody (DSA)-associated ABMR, the optimal prevention strategies for ABMR, and advances in  adjunctive and emerging therapies for ABMR. Because new agents require regulatory approval via a Phase 3 randomized control trial (RCT), an overview of progress in innovative trial design for ABMR is provided. Finally, based on the insights gained in the biology of ABMR, current knowledge gaps are identified for future research that could significantly affect our understanding of how to optimally treat ABMR.

The role of novel therapeutic approaches for prevention of allosensitization and antibody-mediated rejection

Modification of pathogenic antibodies and their effector functions in autoimmune diseases or use of B cell/plasma cell-directed anticancer therapies have illuminated the biologic relevance of B cells, plasma cells (PCs), and pathogenic antibodies and complement in alloimmunity. They have also rejuvenated interest in how B cells mediate multiple effector functions that include antibody production, antigen presentation to T cells, costimulation, and the production of immune stimulating and immune modulatory cytokines that drive dysfunctional immune responses. Current methods to reduce alloantibodies are only modestly successful. Rituximab is used for desensitization and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) treatment by targeting CD20 found on B-lymphocytes. However, PCs do not express CD20, likely explaining the limited success of this approach. Intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis (PLEX) have limited success due to antibody rebound. Despite attempts to develop tolerable therapeutics for management of AMR, none, to date, have been universally accepted or obtained Food and Drug Administration approval. Lack of approved therapeutics often results in patients having a much shorter graft survival due to AMR. Repurposing drugs from autoimmunity and cancer immunotherapy has rapidly yielded important advancements in the care of AMR patients. Here we discuss emerging therapeutics aimed at prevention and treatment of AMR.

Trajectories of health-related quality of life among renal transplant patients associated with graft failure and symptom distress: Analysis of the BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT trials

Understanding the correlation between transplant symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and graft outcomes is needed to support patient-focused drug development and posttransplant management. A post-hoc analysis of patient-reported outcomes from the Phase III belatacept trials was conducted in order to investigate the interrelationship between trajectories of HRQoL, symptom experience, and allograft outcomes. HRQoL and symptom experience were evaluated using Short-Form 36 Survey (SF-36) and Modified Transplant Symptom Occurrence and Distress Scale (MTSOSD-59R), respectively. HRQoL was captured in 831 eligible renal transplant patients at baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months posttransplant. Following transplantation, patients reported improvements in all SF-36 subscales compared to baseline. Latent class analysis revealed four trajectories in perceived general health, which were associated with graft failure after adjustment. Compared to patients with good perceived health, patients with fair and poor perceived health had 4.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-14.8, P < .01) and 19.8 (95% CI 5.9-66.0, P < .01) times the risk of graft failure, respectively. Using multinomial logistic regression, different sets of symptoms were associated with perceived general health at baseline and 12 months posttransplant. The study supports monitoring HRQoL and symptom experience to capture each patient's health perspective, improve drug development, and optimize posttransplant management.

Targeting Metabolism as a Platform for Inducing Allograft Tolerance in the Absence of Long-Term Immunosuppression

Transplant tolerance in the absence of long-term immunosuppression has been an elusive goal for solid organ transplantation. Recently, it has become clear that metabolic reprogramming plays a critical role in promoting T cell activation, differentiation, and function. Targeting metabolism can preferentially inhibit T cell effector generation while simultaneously promoting the generation of T regulatory cells. We hypothesized that costimulatory blockade with CTLA4Ig in combination with targeting T cell metabolism might provide a novel platform to promote the induction of transplant tolerance.

Insights into CD8 T Cell Activation and Exhaustion from a Mouse Gammaherpesvirus Model

(S.R.S.) I was introduced to viral immunology while working in Peter Doherty's laboratory in the early stages of my research career, inspiring a lifelong interest in this area. During those early years under Peter's mentorship, we studied a mouse gammaherpesvirus model (murine gammaherpesvirus-68 [MHV-68]) that provided a useful small animal model for investigating the immunological control of gammaherpesvirus infection. Interestingly, while CD4 T cells were not required for acute control of MHV-68 in the lung, CD8 T cell-mediated control was progressively lost in the absence of CD4 T cell help, leading to viral recrudescence. This was one of several early studies showing that CD8 T cell control of persistent viral infections was lost in the absence of CD4 T cell help, preceding the concept of CD8 T cell exhaustion. Further studies showed that MHV-68 infection of mice offered a unique model for comparing the mechanisms of acute and long-term control of a persistent viral infection and developing strategies for reversing T cell exhaustion. Here, we provide a brief review of the literature on CD8 T cell activation and exhaustion in this model, focusing on the role of CD40 and B7 family members and including some previously unpublished data.

Belatacept-based immunosuppression with simultaneous calcineurin inhibitor avoidance and early corticosteroid withdrawal: A prospective, randomized multicenter trial

Simultaneous calcineurin inhibitor avoidance (CNIA) and early corticosteroid withdrawal (ESW) have not been achieved primarily due to excessive acute rejection. This trial compared 2 belatacept-based CNIA/ESW regimens with a tacrolimus-based ESW regimen. Kidney transplant recipients were randomized to receive alemtuzumab/belatacept, rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG)/belatacept, or rATG/tacrolimus. The combinatorial primary endpoint consisted of patient death, renal allograft loss, or a Modification of Diet in Renal Disease-calculated eGFR of <45 mL/min/1.73 m² at 12 months. Results are reported by treatment group (alemtuzumab/belatacept, rATG/belatacept, and rATG/tacrolimus). Superiority was not observed at 1 year for the primary endpoint (9/107 [8.4%], 15/104 [14.4%], and 14/105 [13.3%], respectively; P = NS) for either belatacept-based regimen. Differences were not observed for secondary endpoints (death, death-censored graft loss, or estimated glomerular filtration rates < 45 mL/min/1.73 m² ). Differences were observed in biopsy-proved acute cellular rejection (10.3%, 18.3%, and 1.9%, respectively) (P < .001), but not in antibody-mediated rejection, mixed acute rejection, or de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies. Neurologic and electrolyte abnormality adverse events were less frequent under belatacept. Belatacept-based CNIA/ESW regimens did not prove to be superior for the primary or secondary endpoints. Belatacept-treated patients demonstrated an increase in biopsy-proved acute cellular rejection and reduced neurologic and metabolic adverse events. These results demonstrate that simultaneous CNIA/ESW is feasible without excessive acute rejection.

A randomized, phase 1b study of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of bleselumab, a fully human, anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody, in kidney transplantation

This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of various doses of the anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody bleselumab (ASKP1240) in de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving concomitant standard immunosuppression over 90 days posttransplant. Transplant recipients were randomized (1:1:1:1:1) to bleselumab 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, or 500 mg, or placebo, in addition to standard maintenance immunosuppression. The primary pharmacokinetic endpoints were AUC_inf , C_max , and AUC_last . The primary pharmacodynamic endpoint was B cell CD40 receptor occupancy over time. Overall, 50 kidney transplant recipients were randomized; 45 received their randomized treatment (bleselumab [n = 37] or placebo [n = 8]). AUC_inf and AUC_last demonstrated a more than dose-proportional increase in the range of 50-500 mg, and C_max increased linearly with increasing dose. Maximal receptor occupancy for B cell CD40 was reached at all dose levels and was prolonged as dose increased. No kidney transplant recipients experienced cytokine release syndrome or a thromboembolic event. Treatment-emergent anti-bleselumab antibodies were found in one kidney transplant recipient in the bleselumab 50 mg group; these were detected only at Day 7. Overall, bleselumab demonstrated nonlinear pharmacokinetics and dose-dependent prolonged B cell CD40 receptor occupancy and was well tolerated at all doses (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01279538).

Late Conversion From Calcineurin Inhibitors to Belatacept in Kidney-Transplant Recipients Has a Significant Beneficial Impact on Glycemic Parameters

Background.

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and steroids are strongly associated with new-onset diabetes after transplantation, worsening of pre-existing diabetes, and cardiovascular events. We assessed the benefit of conversion from CNI-based to belatacept-based immunosuppression in diabetic kidney-transplant (KT) recipients on glucose control and cardiovascular risk factors.

Methods.

In this retrospective, noncontrolled single-study conducted between May 2016 and October 26, 2018, we recruited KT recipients converted from CNIs to belatacept at least 6 months after KT. The primary endpoint was the evolution of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) between baseline and after 6 months of treatment. Secondary endpoints included modifications to antidiabetic drugs, other cardiovascular risk factors, and renal function.

Results.

One hundred and three KT recipients were included. Of these, 26 (25%) had type 2 diabetes. The patients were either receiving oral antidiabetic drugs (n = 21; 75%) or insulin therapy (n = 14; 54%). Overall HbA1c decreased significantly from 6.2 ± 1 to 5.8 ± 1%, P < 0.001. In diabetic patients, HbA1c decreased from 7.2 ± 1 to 6.5 ± 1%, P = 0.001. HbA1c significantly decreased in the subgroup of patients with new-onset diabetes after transplantation and whether diabetes was controlled at inclusion or not (ie, HA1c ≤7% or >7%). Moreover, no diabetic patient increased the number of oral antidiabetic drugs and the dose of basal insulin was not statistically different from baseline to 6 months (16 international unit at baseline and 16 international unit at 6 mo, P = 1). One patient had to start treatment by insulin pump. During follow-up, the renal function, body mass index, and hemoglobin level of all 103 patients remained stable, 2 patients presented acute cellular rejection, and no patient suffered from graft loss.

Conclusions.

A late switch from CNI to belatacept was a valuable therapeutic option for diabetic kidney recipients and substantially improved glycemic parameters.

Belatacept in kidney transplant patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Objectives

Lupus nephritis (LN) requires renal replacement therapy in 10%-30% of patients. About 30% of these patients receive a kidney transplant. Belatacept is a second-generation, selective, T-cell co-stimulator blocker (inhibits cytotoxic, T-lymphocyte antigen 4, CTLA-4) used as an alternative to calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) for maintenance regimens after kidney transplantation. The pathogenic relevance of CTLA-4 inhibition and the favourable cardiovascular profile of belatacept make it an attractive therapeutic option in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Intravenous administration of belatacept ensures therapeutic adherence.

Methods

This retrospective, single-centre study evaluates the outcomes of LN kidney transplant recipients treated with belatacept for reasons not related to SLE at the Columbia University Lupus and Renal Transplant Cohort.

Results

Belatacept was started in six patients on CNI regimens at 15.5±17.1 months following transplantation for LN. In five patients, creatinine levels stabilised 6 months after belatacept, one returned to haemodialysis due to CNI toxicity and pyelonephritis and one relisted for a kidney transplant following acute cellular rejection and cortical necrosis. Five patients are followed for extrarenal lupus; no extrarenal manifestations were documented in the other two patients. Data on SLE disease activity pre-belatacept and post-belatacept were available and scored in three patients using the SLE Disease Activity Index Glucocorticosteroid Index (SLEDAI-2KG), which accounts for clinical and laboratory manifestations, as well as steroid dose. Mean SLEDAI-2KG decreased from 13 to 7.6.

Conclusion

Belatacept in LN kidney transplant recipients may decrease extrarenal manifestations, attenuate CNI toxicity and stabilise allograft function, providing a better alternative to CNI regimens. Furthermore, these data suggest that belatacept, although initiated for reasons not related to SLE, might have a beneficial effect in SLE.

Costimulation Blockade in Transplantation

T cells play a pivotal role in orchestrating immune responses directed against a foreign (allogeneic) graft. For T cells to become fully activated, the T-cell receptor (TCR) must interact with the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) plus peptide complex on antigen-presenting cells (APCs), followed by a second "positive" costimulatory signal. In the absence of this second signal, T cells become anergic or undergo deletion. By blocking positive costimulatory signaling, T-cell allo-responses can be aborted, thus preventing graft rejection and promoting long-term allograft survival and possibly tolerance (Alegre ML, Najafian N, Curr Mol Med 6:843-857, 2006; Li XC, Rothstein DM, Sayegh MH, Immunol Rev 229:271-293, 2009). In addition, costimulatory molecules can provide negative "coinhibitory" signals that inhibit T-cell activation and terminate immune responses; strategies to promote these pathways can also lead to graft tolerance (Boenisch O, Sayegh MH, Najafian N, Curr Opin Organ Transplant 13:373-378, 2008). However, T-cell costimulation involves an incredibly complex array of interactions that may act simultaneously or at different times in the immune response and whose relative importance varies depending on the different T-cell subsets and activation status. In transplantation, the presence of foreign alloantigen incites not only destructive T effector cells but also protective regulatory T cells, the balance of which ultimately determines the fate of the allograft (Lechler RI, Garden OA, Turka LA, Nat Rev Immunol 3:147-158, 2003). Since the processes of alloantigen-specific rejection and regulation both require activation of T cells, costimulatory interactions may have opposing or synergistic roles depending on the cell being targeted. Such complexities present both challenges and opportunities in targeting T-cell costimulatory pathways for therapeutic purposes. In this chapter, we summarize our current knowledge of the various costimulatory pathways in transplantation and review the current state and challenges of harnessing these pathways to promote graft tolerance (summarized in Table 10.1).

An update on potentials and promises of T cell co-signaling molecules in transplantation

The promising outcomes of immune-checkpoint based immunotherapies in cancer have provided a proportional perspective ahead of exploiting similar approaches in allotransplantation. Belatacept (CTLA-4-Ig) is an example of costimulation blockers successfully exploited in renal transplantation. Due to the wide range of regulatory molecules characterized in the past decades, some of these molecules might be candidates as immunomodulators in the case of tolerance induction in transplantation. Although there are numerous attempts on the apprehension of the effects of co-signaling molecules on immune response, the necessity for a better understanding is evident. By increasing the knowledge on the biology of co-signaling pathways, some pitfalls are recognized and improved approaches are proposed. The blockage of CD80/CD28 axis is an instance of evolution toward more efficacy. It is now evident that anti-CD28 antibodies are more effective than CD80 blockers in animal models of transplantation. Other co-signaling axes such as PD-1/PD-L1, CD40/CD154, 2B4/CD48, and others discussed in the present review are examples of critical immunomodulatory molecules in allogeneic transplantation. We review here the outcomes of recent experiences with co-signaling molecules in preclinical studies of solid organ transplantation.

CYTOMEGALOVIRUS RETINITIS WITH BELATACEPT IMMUNOSUPPRESSION

PURPOSE

To report two cases of cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis in renal transplant patients after conversion to belatacept immunosuppression.

METHODS

Case report.

RESULTS

Case A was a 41-year-old African American man with no ocular history, chronic hepatitis B infection on entecavir, status-post living relative renal transplant for end-stage renal disease secondary to IgA nephropathy presented with a chief complaint of "blurry vision" in his right eye. Fundoscopic examination of the right eye revealed perivascular retinitis of the superior arcade extending temporally and a lesion nasal to the optic disk. The patient was diagnosed with CMV retinitis with macular involvement. Case B was a 52-year-old woman with an ocular history significant for bilateral vein occlusions treated with laser, and a medical history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and end-stage renal disease secondary to hypoplastic kidney status-post deceased donor renal transplant presented with one week of blurred vision in the right eye. Fundoscopic examination of the right eye revealed macular star configuration of exudates, as well as subretinal fibrosis temporal to the macula. Fundoscopic examination of the left eye showed Grade 4 vitreous haze and multiple areas of retinal whitening and hemorrhage, consistent with CMV retinitis infection. The patient was diagnosed with bilateral CMV retinitis, with macular involvement in the right eye.

CONCLUSION

Renal transplant patients converted to belatacept immunosuppression may be at an increased risk for herpes virus infection, and thus herpes virus retinitis. Although the degree of risk remains uncharacterized, patients on belatacept therapy who are at the high risk of CMV infection (i.e., donor-positive/recipient-negative patients) should be counseled on the presenting signs and symptoms of CMV retinitis. In these cases, clinicians should also consider regular monitoring of serum CMV titers or continuation of antiviral prophylaxis.

Efficacy and Safety of Belatacept Treatment in Renal Allograft Recipients at High Cardiovascular Risk-A Single Center Experience

Belatacept is an attractive option for immunosuppression after renal transplantation. Renal allograft function is superior when compared to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) based therapy in “de novo” treated patients and it has also been proposed that individuals at high cardiovascular (CV) risk may benefit most. In this retrospective cohort study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of treating patients at high cardiovascular risk with Belatacept (n = 34, for 1194 observation months) when compared to a matched control group of 150 individuals under CNI immunosuppression (for 7309 months of observation). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increased for patients taking Belatacept but decreased during CNI-based therapy (+2.60 vs. −0.89 mL/min/1.73 m²/year, p = 0.006). In a multivariate Cox regression model, Belatacept remained the only significant factor associated with the improvement of eGFR (HR 4.35, 95%CI 2.39–7.93). Belatacept treatment was not a significant risk factor for renal allograft rejection or graft loss. In terms of safety, the only significant risk factor for de novo cardiovascular events was a pre-existing cerebrovascular disease, but Belatacept was not associated with a significant risk reduction. Belatacept treatment was not associated with an increased risk of severe infections, cytomegalo virus (CMV) or BK-virus reactivation, malignancy or death in the multivariate Cox regression analysis. Belatacept is an efficient and safe option for patients after renal transplantation at high cardiovascular risk.

Secondary lymphoid tissue and costimulation-blockade resistant rejection: A nonhuman primate renal transplant study

Naïve T cell activation requires antigen presentation combined with costimulation through CD28, both of which optimally occur in secondary lymphoid tissues such as lymph nodes and the spleen. Belatacept impairs CD28 costimulation by binding its ligands, CD80 and CD86, and in doing so, impairs de novo alloimmune responses. However, in most patients belatacept is ineffective in preventing allograft rejection when used as a monotherapy, and adjuvant therapy is required for control of costimulation-blockade resistant rejection (CoBRR). In rodent models, impaired access to secondary lymphoid tissues has been demonstrated to reduce alloimmune responses to vascularized allografts. Here we show that surgical maneuvers, lymphatic ligation, and splenectomy, designed to anatomically limit access to secondary lymphoid tissues, control CoBRR and facilitate belatacept monotherapy in a nonhuman primate model of kidney transplantation without adjuvant immunotherapy. We further demonstrate that animals sustained on belatacept monotherapy progressively develop an increasingly naïve T and B cell repertoire, an effect that is accelerated by splenectomy and lost at the time of belatacept withdrawal and rejection. These pilot data inform the role of secondary lymphoid tissues on the development of CoBRR and the use of costimulation molecule-focused therapies.

The past, present, and future of costimulation blockade in organ transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Manipulating costimulatory signals has been shown to alter T cell responses and prolong graft survival in solid organ transplantation. Our understanding of and ability to target various costimulation pathways continues to evolve.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since the approval of belatacept in kidney transplantation, many additional biologics have been developed targeting clinically relevant costimulation signaling axes including CD40-CD40L, inducible costimulator-inducible costimulator ligand (ICOS-ICOSL), and OX40-OX40L. Currently, the effects of costimulation blockade on posttransplant humoral responses, tolerance induction, and xenotransplantation are under active investigation. Here, we will discuss these pathways as well as preclinical and clinical outcomes of biologics targeting these pathways in organ transplantation.

SUMMARY

Targeting costimultion is a promising approach for not only controlling T cell but also B cell responses. Consequently, costimulation blockade shows considerable potential for improving outcomes in antibody-mediated rejection and xenotransplantation.

Targeted Proteomic Analysis Detects Acute T Cell-Mediated Kidney Allograft Rejection in Belatacept-Treated Patients

BACKGROUND

There is an unmet need for reliable minimally invasive diagnostic biomarkers for immunological allograft monitoring and for the detection of acute kidney transplant rejection. Here, targeted proteomic analysis was applied to compare 92 proteins in sera of belatacept-treated patients who had biopsy-proven, acute T-cell-mediated rejection (aTCMR) with patients without aTCMR.

METHODS

Proximity extension immunoassay was used to measure 92 inflammation-related protein concentrations in the prerejection and rejection sera of 11 patients with aTCMR and 9 patients without aTCMR. This assay uses 2 matched oligonucleotide-labeled antibody probes for each protein and polymerase chain reaction to measure normalized protein expression values.

RESULTS

Five proteins (CD5, CD8A, NCR1, TNFRSF4, and TNFRSF9) were expressed significantly higher in samples with aTCMR compared with samples without aTCMR (adjusted P-value < 0.014) and had a good predictive capacity for aTCMR [area under the curve in a receiver-operator curve ranged from 0.83 to 0.91 (P < 0.014)]. These proteins are associated with CD8 cytotoxic T-cell and NK cell functions. Nonhierarchical clustering analysis showed distinct clustering of samples with aTCMR and samples without aTCMR. This clustering was not found in prerejection samples (1 month after transplantation). In prerejection samples, IFN-γ was expressed at a significantly lower level (normalized protein expression value median -0.15, interquartile range: -0.27 to 0.04) than in samples of patients without rejection (median 0.13, interquartile range: -0.07 to 0.15, adjusted P-value = 0.00367).

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted proteomic analysis with proximity extension immunoassay is a promising minimally invasive technique to diagnose aTCMR in kidney transplant recipients.

Corticosteroids and methotrexate as adjuvants to costimulation blockade in non-human primate renal transplantation

Belatacept, the CD28-B7 costimulation pathway inhibitor, has been approved as a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) alternative in kidney transplantation. Although costimulation blockade (CoB) allows for CNI avoidance, it is associated with increased rates of early rejection, prompting a search for agents to pair with belatacept. Methotrexate (MTX) is an antimetabolite that has been found to be complimentary with abatacept, a lower affinity CD28-B7-specific analogue of belatacept, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We examined whether this synergy would extend to prevention of kidney allograft rejection. Rhesus macaques underwent kidney transplantation treated with abatacept maintenance therapy with either a steroid taper, MTX, or both. The combination of abatacept maintenance with steroids prolonged graft survival compared to untreated historical controls and previous reports of abatacept monotherapy. The addition of MTX did not provide additional benefit. These data demonstrate that abatacept with adjuvant therapy may delay the onset of acute rejection, but fail to show synergy between abatacept and MTX beyond that of steroids. These findings indicate that MTX is unlikely to be a suitable adjuvant to CoB in kidney transplantation, but also suggest that with further modification, a CoB regimen used for advanced RA may suffice for RA patients requiring kidney transplantation.

Switching renal transplant recipients to belatacept therapy: results of a real-life gradual conversion protocol

Conversion to belatacept immunosuppression is a therapeutic option for renal-transplant recipients with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) toxicity, but it associates with high risk of acute rejection. Gradual conversion and serial immune monitoring with urinary chemokine CXCL9 may allow increasing safety of this maneuver. We converted kidney transplant recipients with signs of toxicity to CNI or other immunosuppressive drugs to belatacept over a 2-month period. We monitored renal function, metabolic profile, and circulating lymphocyte subsets. We also quantified urinary CXCL9 over a 12-month follow-up period. Between September 2016 and March 2017, 35 patients were successfully switched to belatacept immunosuppression at 3.3 (1.3-7.2) years after transplant. Two patients had a reversible rise in serum creatinine, associated with acute rejection in one case. Urinary CXCL9 increased before serum creatinine. After conversion, blood pressure and HbA1c significantly declined while eGFR and proteinuria remained stable. The percentage of circulating effector T cells and memory B cells significantly declined. Conversion from CNI to belatacept, in this setting, was feasible and safe, provided it was performed over a 2-month time-period. Monitoring urinary CXCL9 may further increase safety through earlier identification of patients at risk for acute rejection. The procedure associates with improved blood pressure, metabolic profile, and reduced circulating effector T and B cells.

Conversion to Belatacept in Maintenance Kidney Transplant Patients: A Retrospective Multicenter European Study

BACKGROUND

The use of belatacept is not yet approved for maintenance in kidney transplant patients. This retrospective multicenter European study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of conversion to belatacept in a large cohort of patients in a real-life setting and to identify the predictive factors for improved kidney function after the switch.

METHODS

Two hundred nineteen maintenance kidney transplant patients from 5 European kidney transplant centers were converted to belatacept at 21.2 months (0.1-337.1 months) posttransplantation, mainly because of impaired kidney function. Thirty-two patients were converted to belatacept within the first 3 months posttransplantation. The mean duration of follow-up was 21.9 ± 20.2 months.

RESULTS

The actuarial rate of patients still on belatacept-based therapy was 77.6%. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate increased from 32 ± 16.4 at baseline to 38 ± 20 mL/min per 1.73 m (P < 0.0001) at last follow-up. Conversion to belatacept before 3 months posttransplantation was the main predictive factor for a significant increase in estimated glomerular filtration rate (of 5 and 10 mL/min per 1.73 m at 3 and 12 months after the switch, respectively). Eighteen patients (8.2%) presented with an acute rejection episode after conversion; 3 developed a donor-specific antibody. Overall efficacy and safety were good, including for the 35 patients that had a donor-specific antibody at conversion.

CONCLUSIONS

The conversion to belatacept was effective, especially when performed early after transplantation.

Alemtuzumab induction and belatacept maintenance in marginal pathology renal allografts

We performed a prospective, 12-month, single-center, nonrandomized, open-label pilot study to investigate the use of belatacept therapy combined with alemtuzumab induction in renal allografts with preexisting pathology, as these kidneys may be more susceptible to additional toxicity when exposed to calcineurin inhibitors posttransplant. Nineteen belatacept recipients were matched retrospectively to a cohort of tacrolimus recipients on the basis of preimplantation pathology. The estimated glomerular filtration rate was not significantly different between belatacept and tacrolimus recipients at either 3 or 12 months posttransplant (59 vs 45, P = 0.1 and 56 vs 48 mL/min/1.72/m² , P = 0.3). Biopsy-proven acute rejection rates at 12 months were 26% in belatacept recipients and 16% in tacrolimus recipients (P = 0.7). Graft survival at 1 year was 89% in both groups. Alemtuzumab induction combined with either calcineurin inhibitor or costimulatory blockade therapies resulted in similar acceptable one-year outcomes in kidneys with preexisting pathologic changes. Longer-term follow-up may be necessary to identify preferential strategies to improve outcomes of kidneys at a higher risk for poor function (ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT01496417).

Belatacept in Solid Organ Transplant: Review of Current Literature Across Transplant Types

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) have been the backbone immunosuppressant for solid organ transplant recipients for decades. Long-term use of CNIs unfortunately is associated with multiple toxicities, with the biggest concern being CNI-induced nephrotoxicity. Belatacept is a novel agent approved for maintenance immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients. In the kidney transplant literature, it has shown promise as being an alternative agent by preserving renal function and having a minimal adverse effect profile. There are emerging studies of its use in other organ groups, particularly liver transplantation, as well as using with other alternative immunosuppressive strategies. The purpose of this review is to analyze the current literature of belatacept use in solid organ transplantation and discuss its use in current practice.

Prolonged-Release vs Immediate-Release Tacrolimus Capsules in Black vs White Kidney Transplant Patients: A Post Hoc Analysis of Phase III Data

BACKGROUND

Black kidney transplant patients experience inferior outcomes compared with other ethnicities. Because scrutiny is required when immunosuppressant drugs are used in such at-risk populations, we report the first large-scale clinical efficacy data assessing prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-T) in black de novo kidney transplant patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We used logistic regression and proportionate hazards to compare a composite outcome measure (biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, mortality, and loss to follow-up) in black and white patients in treatment groups longer than 24 weeks, from 3 large Phase III randomized controlled trials. Secondary endpoints included tacrolimus trough concentration, dose, and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

RESULTS

The study included 2162 patients whose treatments belonged to two categories (immediate-release tacrolimus: 77 black patients, 721 white patients; and PR-T: 87 black patients, 1277 white patients). Despite demographic factors generally predictive of worse outcomes, efficacy failure among black patients who received PR-T was non-inferior to that among white patients who received either therapy. Compared with immediate-release tacrolimus, black patients who received PR-T achieved stable tacrolimus concentrations 2.5 times faster (21 vs 56 days, P = .04), and more achieved stable target concentrations (76.7% vs 69.3%). Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with those reported separately in pivotal trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, black patients who received PR-T achieved non-inferior outcomes compared to white patients, despite higher pretransplant risk among black patients. Moreover, PR-T improved the time to achieve, and the likelihood of reaching, stable therapeutic concentrations among black patients, suggesting that PR-T could improve the consistency of tacrolimus exposure in this patient population.

Immunomics of Renal Allograft Acute T Cell-Mediated Rejection Biopsies of Tacrolimus- and Belatacept-Treated Patients

Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

Background

Belatacept-based therapy in kidney transplant recipient has been shown to increase long-term renal allograft and patient survival compared with calcineurin inhibitor–based therapy, however, with an increased risk of acute T cell-mediated rejection (aTCMR). An improved understanding of costimulation blockade-resistant rejections could lead to a more personalized approach to belatacept therapy. Here, immunomic profiles of aTCMR biopsies of patients treated with either tacrolimus or belatacept were compared.

Methods

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded renal transplant biopsies were used for immunohistochemistry and gene expression analysis using the innovative NanoString technique. To validate NanoString, transcriptomic profiles of patients with and without biopsy-proven aTCMR were compared. Biopsies from 31 patients were studied: 14 tacrolimus-treated patients with aTCMR, 11 belatacept-treated patients with aTCMR, and 6 controls without rejection.

Results

A distinct pattern was seen in biopsies with aTCMR compared to negative controls: 78 genes had a higher expression in the aTCMR group (false discovery rate P value <.05 to 1.42e–05). The most significant were T cell-associated genes (CD3, CD8, and CD4; P < 1.98e-04), γ-interferon-inducible genes (CCL5, CXCL9, CXCL11, CXCL10, TBX21; P < 1.33e-04) plus effector genes (GNLY, GZMB, ITGAX; P < 2.82e-03). Immunophenotypical analysis of the classic immune markers of the innate and adaptive immune system was comparable between patients treated with either tacrolimus or belatacept. In addition, the transcriptome of both groups was not significantly different.

Conclusions

In this small pilot study, no difference was found in immunomics of aTCMR biopsies of tacrolimus- and belatacept-treated patients. This suggests that clinically diagnosed aTCMR reflects a final common pathway of allorecognition which is unaffected by the type of immunosuppressive therapy.

Effect of Conversion to CTLA4Ig on Tacrolimus-Induced Diabetic Rats

BACKGROUND

The effect of conversion to cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 immunoglobulin (CTLA4Ig) treatment on tacrolimus (TAC)-induced renal dysfunction is well known, but its effect on TAC-induced diabetes mellitus (DM) is still undetermined. In the present study, we tested the diabetogenicity of CTLA4Ig and evaluated the effect of conversion to CTLA4Ig treatment on TAC-induced diabetic rats.

METHODS

We tested diabetogenicity of CTLA4Ig by escalating doses (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 mg/kg weekly) for 4 weeks. In the conversion study, we administered TAC (1.5 mg/kg) for 3 weeks and confirmed TAC-induced DM by intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test. Thereafter, TAC administration was continued, withdrawn, or replaced by CTLA4Ig treatment (1 or 2 mg/kg) for additional 3 weeks. The effect of CTLA4Ig on TAC-induced DM in vivo and in vitro was evaluated by assessing pancreatic islet function, histopathology, oxidative stress, apoptosis, and macrophage infiltration.

RESULTS

Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test in the CTLA4Ig groups did not differ from the control group. In addition, plasma insulin level, glucose-induced insulin secretion, and islet viability were not different between the CTLA4Ig and control groups. In the conversion study, TAC withdrawal ameliorated pancreatic islet dysfunction compared with the TAC group, and conversion to CTLA4Ig further improved pancreatic islet function compared with the TAC withdrawal group. TAC-induced oxidative stress, apoptotic cell death, and infiltration of macrophages decreased with TAC withdrawal, and CTLA4Ig conversion further reduced those values. In the in vitro study, CTLA4Ig decreased TAC-induced pancreatic islet cell death and reactive oxygen species production.

CONCLUSIONS

CTLA4Ig was not diabetogenic, and conversion to CTLA4Ig reduced TAC-induced pancreatic islet injury.

Conversion from tacrolimus to belatacept improves renal function in kidney transplant patients with chronic vascular lesions in allograft biopsy

Background

Conversion from tacrolimus to belatacept has been shown to be beneficial for an increasing number of kidney transplant (KT) patients. Predicting factors for favorable outcomes are still unknown. We aimed to investigate whether histological vascular lesions at the time of conversion might correlate with greater improvement in renal function post-conversion.

Methods

The study was conducted on a retrospective cohort of 34 KT patients converted from tacrolimus to belatacept. All patients underwent an allograft biopsy prior to conversion. We analyzed the evolution of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 3 and 12 months after conversion.

Results

Median time to conversion was 6 (2–37.2) months post-transplant. About 52.9% of patients had moderate-to-severe chronic vascular lesions (cv2–3). We observed an increase in eGFR in the whole cohort from 35.4 to 41 mL/min/1.73 m² at 3 months (P = 0.032) and 43.7 at 12 months (P = 0.013). Nine patients experienced acute rejection post-conversion, with one graft loss observed beyond the first year after conversion. Patients with cv2–3 had significant improvement in eGFR at 12 months (+8.6 mL/min/1.73 m²; 31.6 to 40.2 mL/min/1.73 m²; P = 0.047) compared with those without these lesions (+6.8 mL/min/1.73 m²; 40.9 to 47.7 mL/min/1.73 m²; P = 0.148).

Conclusions

Conversion from tacrolimus to belatacept has a beneficial effect in terms of renal function in KT patients. This benefit might be more significant in patients with cv in the biopsy.

Immunosuppressive drugs and the gastrointestinal tract in renal transplant patients

Gastrointestinal (GI) discomfort is common after renal transplantation and can be caused by the use of various immunosuppressive drugs. GI symptoms affect the quality of life, lead to an impaired graft survival and an increased mortality. Moreover, diseases and disturbances of the GI tract also affect the pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressive drugs. This review addresses the interaction between immunosuppressive agents and GI disorders. The GI tract is involved in the metabolism of several immunosuppressive drugs. Calcineurin inhibitors, mTor inhibitors, and corticosteroids are subjected to metabolism by the intestinal cytochrome P450 (CYP3A) and by the drug efflux pump ABCB1. Mycophenolate is partly metabolized in the stomach and intestine and undergoes enterohepatic recirculation. Gastrointestinal disturbances can lead to a modified exposure to immunosuppressive drugs. In the first and second part of this review, we focus on the role of the GI tract in the pharmacokinetics of the immunosuppressive drugs and how to adjust immunosuppressive therapy in patients with vomiting, need for tube feeding, delayed gastric emptying, intestinal resection, and diarrhea. In the third part, we review the GI adverse effects of the various immunosuppressive drugs, with special attention for diarrhea and dyspepsia. Finally, we discuss the effects of drugs used for relief of GI complaints on the exposure to immunosuppressive agents.

Belatacept for maintenance immunosuppression in cardiothoracic transplantation: The potential frontier

Current immunosuppressive regimens with calcineurin inhibitors have improved the management of patients after transplantation. However, their adverse effects are linked to increased morbidity and limit the long-term survival of heart and lung transplant recipients. Belatacept, a costimulation inhibitor interfering with the interaction between CD28 on T cells and the B7 ligands on antigen presenting cells, has shown success and is currently approved for use in renal transplant recipients. Furthermore, it lacks many of the cardiovascular, metabolic, neurologic, and renal adverse of effects of calcineurin inhibitors that have the largest impact on long-term survival in cardiothoracic transplant. Additionally, it requires no therapeutic drug monitoring and is only administered once a month. Limitations to belatacept use have been observed that must be considered when comparing immunosuppression options. Despite this, maintenance immunosuppression with belatacept has the potential to improve outcomes in cardiothoracic transplant recipients, as it has with kidney transplant recipients. However, no large clinical trials investigating belatacept for maintenance immunosuppression in heart and lung transplant recipients exist. There is a large need for focused research of belatacept in cardiothoracic transplantation. Belatacept is a viable treatment option for maintenance immunosuppression, and it is reasonable to pursue more evidence in cardiothoracic transplant recipients.

Comparison of de novo IgM and IgG anti-HLA DSAs between belatacept- and calcineurin-treated patients: An analysis of the BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT trial cohorts

Preventing conversion of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) from an IgM-to-IgG could a way to prevent chronic rejection. We evaluated whether belatacept-treated patients (belatacept less-intensive [LI] or more-intensive [MI] regimens) have a lower rate of conversion than do cyclosporine A (CsA)-treated patients. We included 330 HLA-mismatched patients from 2 phase 3 trials with either (a) complete donor/recipient HLA-A, -B, -DR, and -DQ loci typing or (b) incomplete HLA typing with IgG DSAs detected pretransplant or posttransplant. IgM and IgG DSAs were tested with single antigen beads at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months posttransplant. The overall (preexisting or de novo) rates of IgM- and IgG-positive DSAs were 29% and 34%, respectively. The pretransplant IgM and IgG DSA-positive frequencies were similar between treatment groups. The IgG-positive dnDSA rate was significantly higher in the CsA-treated group (34%) compared with the belatacept-LI (8%) and belatacept-MI (11%) (P < .001) groups. In IgM-positive dnDSA patients, the IgG-positive dnDSA rate of conversion was 2.8 times higher in the CsA group than in the combined belatacept groups (P = .006). However, the observed association between belatacept treatment and more limited conversion of IgM-to-IgG dnDSAs was based on a limited number of patients and requires further validation.

Posttransplant reduction in preexisting donor-specific antibody levels after belatacept- versus cyclosporine-based immunosuppression: Post hoc analyses of BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT

BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT were phase III studies of cytotoxic T-cell crossmatch-negative kidney transplant recipients randomized to belatacept more intense (MI)-based, belatacept less intense (LI)-based, or cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. Following study completion, presence/absence of HLA-specific antibodies was determined centrally via solid-phase flow cytometry screening. Stored sera from anti-HLA-positive patients were further tested with a single-antigen bead assay to determine antibody specificities, presence/absence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), and mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of any DSAs present. The effect of belatacept-based and cyclosporine-based immunosuppression on MFI was explored post hoc in patients with preexisting DSAs enrolled to BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT. In BENEFIT, preexisting DSAs were detected in 4.6%, 4.9%, and 6.3% of belatacept MI-treated, belatacept LI-treated, and cyclosporine-treated patients, respectively. The corresponding values in BENEFIT-EXT were 6.0%, 5.7%, and 9.2%. In both studies, most preexisting DSAs were of class I specificity. Over the first 24 months posttransplant, a greater proportion of preexisting DSAs in belatacept-treated versus cyclosporine-treated patients exhibited decreases or no change in MFI. MFI decline was more apparent with belatacept MI-based versus belatacept LI-based immunosuppression in both studies and more pronounced in BENEFIT-EXT versus BENEFIT. Although derived post hoc, these data suggest that belatacept-based immunosuppression decreases preexisting DSAs more effectively than cyclosporine-based immunosuppression.

De novo donor-specific antibodies in belatacept-treated vs cyclosporine-treated kidney-transplant recipients: Post hoc analyses of the randomized phase III BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT studies

Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are associated with an increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection and graft failure. In BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT, kidney-transplant recipients were randomized to receive belatacept more intense (MI)-based, belatacept less intense (LI)-based, or cyclosporine-based immunosuppression for up to 7 years (84 months). The presence/absence of HLA-specific antibodies was determined at baseline, at months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 84, and at the time of clinically suspected episodes of acute rejection, using solid-phase flow-cytometry screening. Samples from anti-HLA-positive patients were further tested with a single-antigen bead assay to determine antibody specificities, presence/absence of DSAs, and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of any DSAs present. In BENEFIT, de novo DSAs developed in 1.4%, 3.5%, and 12.1% of belatacept MI-treated, belatacept LI-treated, and cyclosporine-treated patients, respectively. The corresponding values in BENEFIT-EXT were 3.8%, 1.1%, and 11.2%. Per Kaplan-Meier analysis, de novo DSA incidence was significantly lower in belatacept-treated vs cyclosporine-treated patients over 7 years in both studies (P < .01). In patients who developed de novo DSAs, belatacept-based immunosuppression was associated with numerically lower MFI vs cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. Although derived post hoc, these data suggest that belatacept-based immunosuppression suppresses de novo DSA development more effectively than cyclosporine-based immunosuppression.

Belatacept/CTLA4Ig: an update and critical appraisal of preclinical and clinical results

INTRODUCTION

The B7/CD28/CTLA4 signaling cascade is the most thoroughly studied costimulatory pathway and blockade with CTLA4Ig (abatacept) or its derivative belatacept has emerged as a valuable option for pharmacologic immune modulation. Several clinical studies have ultimately led to the approval of belatacept for immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients. Areas covered: This review will discuss the immunological background of costimulation blockade and recent preclinical data and clinical results of CTLA4Ig/belatacept. Expert commentary: The development of belatacept is a major advance in clinical transplantation. However, in spite of promising results in preclinical and clinical trials, clinical use remains limited at present, in part due to increased rates of acute rejection. Recent efforts showing encouraging progress in refining such protocols might be a step toward harnessing the full potential of costimulation blockade-based immunosuppression.

Risk factors associated with post-kidney transplant malignancies: an article from the Cancer-Kidney International Network

In kidney transplant recipients, cancer is one of the leading causes of death with a functioning graft beyond the first year of kidney transplantation, and malignancies account for 8-10% of all deaths in the USA (2.6 deaths/1000 patient-years) and exceed 30% of deaths in Australia (5/1000 patient-years) in kidney transplant recipients. Patient-, transplant- and medication-related factors contribute to the increased cancer risk following kidney transplantation. While it is well established that the overall immunosuppressive dose is associated with an increased risk for cancer following transplantation, the contributive effect of different immunosuppressive agents is not well established. In this review we will discuss the different risk factors for malignancies after kidney transplantation.

Successful kidney transplant with eculizumab, thymoglobulin and belatacept therapy in a highly-sensitised patient with atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome due to factor H mutation

Atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome is a disease caused by complement regulation abnormalities that generally progresses to chronic end-stage renal disease with a high rate of recurrence in kidney transplantation and a high risk of graft loss. Anti-complement therapy has improved the prognosis of these patients, achieving disease remission in most cases, increasing the likelihood of a successful kidney transplant and increasing patient and graft survival. Drugs with low risk of induction of thrombotic microangiopathies such as belatacept and mycophenolate have also been used with satisfactory results. We present the case of a young patient at high immunological risk, with atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome due to factor H mutation, who underwent a successful kidney transplantation with eculizumab, thymoglobulin, belatacept, mycophenolate and steroids, to date preserving excellent graft function without disease recurrence.

Early barriers to neonatal porcine islet engraftment in a dual transplant model

Porcine islet xenografts have the potential to provide an inexhaustible source of islets for β cell replacement. Proof-of-concept has been established in nonhuman primates. However, significant barriers to xenoislet transplantation remain, including the poorly understood instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction and a thorough understanding of early xeno-specific immune responses. A paucity of data exist comparing xeno-specific immune responses with alloislet (AI) responses in primates. We recently developed a dual islet transplant model, which enables direct histologic comparison of early engraftment immunobiology. In this study, we investigate early immune responses to neonatal porcine islet (NPI) xenografts compared with rhesus islet allografts at 1 hour, 24 hours, and 7 days. Within the first 24 hours after intraportal infusion, we identified greater apoptosis (caspase 3 activity and TUNEL [terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling])-positive cells) of NPIs compared with AIs. Macrophage infiltration was significantly greater at 24 hours compared with 1 hour in both NPI (wild-type) and AIs. At 7 days, IgM and macrophages were highly specific for NPIs (α1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout) compared with AIs. These findings demonstrate an augmented macrophage and antibody response toward xenografts compared with allografts. These data may inform future immune or genetic manipulations required to improve xenoislet engraftment.

Outcomes at 7 years post-transplant in black vs nonblack kidney transplant recipients administered belatacept or cyclosporine in BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT

Clinical outcomes are generally worse for black vs nonblack renal allograft recipients. In BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT, recipients were randomized to belatacept more intense-based, belatacept less intense-based, or cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. At year 7, belatacept was associated with superior graft survival vs cyclosporine in BENEFIT (recipients of living or standard criteria deceased donor kidneys); belatacept was associated with similar graft survival vs cyclosporine in BENEFIT-EXT (recipients of extended criteria donor kidneys). In both studies, renal function was superior for belatacept-treated vs cyclosporine-treated patients. Seven-year outcomes were examined by race post hoc in each study. The effect of race and treatment on time to death or graft loss was compared using Cox regression. The interaction between treatment and race was also considered. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated from months 1 to 84 using a repeated-measures model. In total, 8.3% (55/666) and 13.1% (71/543) of patients in BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT, respectively, were black. Time to death or graft loss was similar in blacks and nonblacks. For both subgroups, estimated mean GFR increased over 7 years for belatacept, but declined for cyclosporine. Outcomes were similar in belatacept-treated black and nonblack patients. Due to the small number of black patients, these results must be interpreted with caution.

Allograft dendritic cell p40 homodimers activate donor-reactive memory CD8+ T cells

Recipient endogenous memory T cells with donor reactivity pose an important barrier to successful transplantation and costimulatory blockade-induced graft tolerance. Longer ischemic storage times prior to organ transplantation increase early posttransplant inflammation and negatively impact early graft function and long-term graft outcome. Little is known about the mechanisms enhancing endogenous memory T cell activation to mediate tissue injury within the increased inflammatory environment of allografts subjected to prolonged cold ischemic storage (CIS). Endogenous memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cell activation is markedly increased within complete MHC-mismatched cardiac allografts subjected to prolonged versus minimal CIS, and the memory CD8+ T cells directly mediate CTLA-4Ig-resistant allograft rejection. Memory CD8+ T cell activation within allografts subjected to prolonged CIS requires memory CD4+ T cell stimulation of graft DCs to produce p40 homodimers, but not IL-12 p40/p35 heterodimers. Targeting p40 abrogates memory CD8+ T cell proliferation within the allografts and their ability to mediate CTLA-4Ig-resistant allograft rejection. These findings indicate a critical role for memory CD4+ T cell-graft DC interactions to increase the intensity of endogenous memory CD8+ T cell activation needed to mediate rejection of higher-risk allografts subjected to increased CIS.

Immunosuppressive therapy for kidney transplantation in adults: a systematic review and economic model

BACKGROUND

End-stage renal disease is a long-term irreversible decline in kidney function requiring renal replacement therapy: kidney transplantation, haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. The preferred option is kidney transplantation, followed by immunosuppressive therapy (induction and maintenance therapy) to reduce the risk of kidney rejection and prolong graft survival.

OBJECTIVES

To review and update the evidence for the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of basiliximab (BAS) (Simulect(®), Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd) and rabbit anti-human thymocyte immunoglobulin (rATG) (Thymoglobulin(®), Sanofi) as induction therapy, and immediate-release tacrolimus (TAC) (Adoport(®), Sandoz; Capexion(®), Mylan; Modigraf(®), Astellas Pharma; Perixis(®), Accord Healthcare; Prograf(®), Astellas Pharma; Tacni(®), Teva; Vivadex(®), Dexcel Pharma), prolonged-release tacrolimus (Advagraf(®) Astellas Pharma), belatacept (BEL) (Nulojix(®), Bristol-Myers Squibb), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (Arzip(®), Zentiva; CellCept(®), Roche Products; Myfenax(®), Teva), mycophenolate sodium (MPS) (Myfortic(®), Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd), sirolimus (SRL) (Rapamune(®), Pfizer) and everolimus (EVL) (Certican(®), Novartis) as maintenance therapy in adult renal transplantation.

METHODS

Clinical effectiveness searches were conducted until 18 November 2014 in MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (via Wiley Online Library) and Web of Science (via ISI), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and Health Technology Assessment (The Cochrane Library via Wiley Online Library) and Health Management Information Consortium (via Ovid). Cost-effectiveness searches were conducted until 18 November 2014 using a costs or economic literature search filter in MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), NHS Economic Evaluation Database (via Wiley Online Library), Web of Science (via ISI), Health Economic Evaluations Database (via Wiley Online Library) and the American Economic Association's electronic bibliography (via EconLit, EBSCOhost). Included studies were selected according to predefined methods and criteria. A random-effects model was used to analyse clinical effectiveness data (odds ratios for binary data and mean differences for continuous data). Network meta-analyses were undertaken within a Bayesian framework. A new discrete time-state transition economic model (semi-Markov) was developed, with acute rejection, graft function (GRF) and new-onset diabetes mellitus used to extrapolate graft survival. Recipients were assumed to be in one of three health states: functioning graft, graft loss or death.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs), of variable quality, were included. For induction therapy, no treatment appeared more effective than another in reducing graft loss or mortality. Compared with placebo/no induction, rATG and BAS appeared more effective in reducing biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and BAS appeared more effective at improving GRF. For maintenance therapy, no treatment was better for all outcomes and no treatment appeared most effective at reducing graft loss. BEL + MMF appeared more effective than TAC + MMF and SRL + MMF at reducing mortality. MMF + CSA (ciclosporin), TAC + MMF, SRL + TAC, TAC + AZA (azathioprine) and EVL + CSA appeared more effective than CSA + AZA and EVL + MPS at reducing BPAR. SRL + AZA, TAC + AZA, TAC + MMF and BEL + MMF appeared to improve GRF compared with CSA + AZA and MMF + CSA. In the base-case deterministic and probabilistic analyses, BAS, MMF and TAC were predicted to be cost-effective at £20,000 and £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). When comparing all regimens, only BAS + TAC + MMF was cost-effective at £20,000 and £30,000 per QALY.

LIMITATIONS

For included trials, there was substantial methodological heterogeneity, few trials reported follow-up beyond 1 year, and there were insufficient data to perform subgroup analysis. Treatment discontinuation and switching were not modelled.

FUTURE WORK

High-quality, better-reported, longer-term RCTs are needed. Ideally, these would be sufficiently powered for subgroup analysis and include health-related quality of life as an outcome.

CONCLUSION

Only a regimen of BAS induction followed by maintenance with TAC and MMF is likely to be cost-effective at £20,000-30,000 per QALY.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42014013189.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.